TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Booty_Canoe Archive

View 1 posts and 207 comments by Booty_Canoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Ever thought about thinking twice before you give an online platform all your personal information, including your fetishes?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:03 AM
9

Reverse the genders and try to make the same point again.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 02:06 PM
1

And this right here is one of the reasons feminism is winning - guys who let them win.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 06:59 AM
3

"The child is transgender" - That makes me sick. It's one thing when adults transition, but supporting or encouraging gender change of an underage child is at the same level as diddling kids. Why is diddling kids (even with their consent) forbidden? Because we consider children too immature to consent. So how could a permanent and life changing procedure like sterilization or hormone therapy possibly be legal or moral?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:55 AM
5

THE END OF MEN | WOMEN OF RISE AND THE ...and the what? Please, tell me; I have to know what these poor women from Rise are going through! And they don't even specify if they meant Rise, Norway or Rise, England EDIT: I see what they did there. You're supposed to read "The fall of men" from top to bottom and "and the rise of women" from bottom to top. Nice try for symbolism, but that's not how reading works.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:21 AM
4

This whole thing got my wondering if we don't actually have it backwards and men are supposed to be wearing skirts, for obvious scrotum freedom. The same goes for bysicles. Men should be the ones driving those with the lower horizontal bars instead of the high ball busting bars. And indeed, they made the lower bars for women because... of skirts!
/r/MensRights24/06/17 05:49 AM
0

The right is where it has always been. The center and the left have just tilted so far into extreme leftist regions that anything right of that appears more extreme by contrast. Example: Merkel's party, the CDU, is traditional a conservative right-wing party. Of course the fact that MSM is largely biased towards the left contributes too.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 06:59 PM
2

Shouldn't there come a point where you realize that it's not all women who are at fault, but maybe yourself for not changing your situation for the better? I recognize that experience doesn't just fall out of the sky, but it's really easy to get: Go out and do it. Jump over your shadow. Go to a big mall and ask 10+ people for directions or how late it is. Each day, for an entire week. Repeat that the next week with only women. Then another week with only attractive women. Watch your shyness evap…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:10 PM
1

women do marry nice guys Women marry nice guys because they are easy to keep on a leash. They fuck "assholes" because these guys display attractive behavior, like confidence and dominance. And more often than not, they are not even assholes, they are only perceived as such by the nice guy because they are more confident. A very important lesson is that there is a huge difference between what women say they want in a man and what they actually want.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:47 PM
2

Feminists are absolutely making these distinctions. They keep their nice guys and white knights on a short leash because they are useful to their agenda. Guys they don't like are assholes, if they're actually good guys or not. But that's because radical feminists and man-haters regard everyone who disagrees with them as an enemy/sexist/racist/Hitler etc. And of course every nice guy is fake according to my (pretty sensible) definition. That was literally my distinctive feature between nice guys …
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:22 PM
2

I don't think the term was invented by feminists. Neither was "neckbeard".
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:37 AM
4

The term has nothing to with manners or politeness. A "niceguy" bends over backwards to please women he's interested in, constantly changes his behavior and his opinions to appease and has no problems sacrificing any moral values if he thinks it enhances his chances with a woman. He also hides his sexuality and tries to initiate a sexual relationship backwards through a pseudo platonic friendship. Often to be found in the friend zone. A good guy might be polite and well mannered, but he has no s…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:00 AM
1

That's all?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:07 PM
1

What is that irony? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:54 AM
10

But not because it's porn. Because it's a bad movie. Maybe even dangerous, because it promotes nonconsensual sex and glorifies a psychopath. It gives young women an image of BDSM that's totally false. For an outsider it might seem counter intuitive, but BDSM values consent a lot. That's why there are safewords. It also takes a lot of trust to surrender yourself to be at someone else's will. 50 shades of gray treats all of that with contempt.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:31 AM
5

AFAIK, all roles were written ambiguously, to be cast as either male or female.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:10 AM
9

Do you know what the opposite of toxic masculinity is called? Empowerment.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:02 PM
1

That being said, even (or maybe especially) as a CS student, dates don't have to come expansive, once you let your inner Scotsman grow and look for student discounts. Even taking those away, you still have regular concerts, hiking, picnicking (even antiquing) and cooking diner together (also great activities to sort out spoiled bitches)
/r/askTRP05/06/17 02:55 AM
1

Beauty is common. Character, cleverness, sex appeal and sex performance not so much. You seem to already attract beautiful women, so you're good on that front. Worry about the latter attributes, but don't be intimidated by beauty alone. The fact that a girl this popular wants to go out with you should make your breast (and dick) swell, not shrink. See it as a testament to your attractiveness. Maybe you don't see anything special, but she seems to. Just accept that. And get used to it ;-)
/r/askTRP04/06/17 10:44 PM
2

You should know why these guidelines exist in the first place. I'm going to XY concert this Friday. They play this great mixture of R and Z and the guitarist is a genious. Wanna tag along? / You can meet me there. Statements like this convey the impression that you're not "asking for an opportunity to see her", you just do fun stuff and allow/invite her to tag along. And if she's busy or she doesn't want to, you're gonna do it anyway and have somebody else accompany you. Her loss. And keep in mi…
/r/askTRP04/06/17 10:37 PM
2

The Rule of Two was a Sith philosophy mandating that only two Sith Lords could exist at any given time: a master to embody the power of the dark side of the Force, and an apprentice to crave it. The philosophy of two governed the Lords of the Sith for a millennium, beginning with its founder Darth Bane.
/r/askTRP04/06/17 10:25 PM
5

Oh, it gets better: She publicly stated that going after Trump was too easy so she promised to attack Barron. She was promptly fired from CNN, then publicly blamed the Trump family for bullying her.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:15 PM
2

I believe the most vocal and crazy subgroup of the LGBT community shines a bad light on the majority - well, at least it's my hope that the majority is actually sane. I wouldn't know because I don't consider myself as a part of the community even though I'm bisexual. That actually has a different reason: I don't define my whole personality based on who I fuck; and I don't feel the need to choose my social circle based on their sexuality because that's extremely shallow to me and doesn't mean we …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:01 PM
1

A lot of (if not most) crimes have an emotional motive. You're gonna have a hard time teaching that to machines.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 02:33 PM
5

I posted this here in hope that you guys read it and to fuel a discussion. I also kinda made a bet that this would be discussed more freely here than on /r/TwoXChromosomes. Turns out that I'm now banned from /r/TwoXChromosomes.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 06:22 PM
2

What the fuck? You said yourself they are good guys, so that should answer your question while you ask it. Fuck Alpha or Beta, that should not be your first criteria when meeting new friends. Friends that you need, because you don't have any right now. From a purely strategic position, that also makes you likely to be the leader of the group - so at least know some hipster locations the group likes while there are also cool girls.
/r/askTRP25/05/17 12:56 AM
9

There are multiple possible solutions: Allow women in the military, but only in strictly non-combatant units: supply, base hospitals etc Mandatory community service. When Germany still had a draft, you could opt out and do community service for the same time perios instead, for example in retirement homes, hospitals and schools for disabled children. Now that it's gone, many of these institutions have gone to shit because they are chronically understaffed. Make that mandatory for women.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:57 AM
1

Well, she sure gets more ass than you do, haha. Don't worry about it, it's a job.
/r/askTRP21/05/17 09:13 AM
6

What's manlier than being a manly man? That's right, fucking manly men.
/r/askTRP21/05/17 09:11 AM
1

"Just make sure that sex is off the table. I'll just show up because you magically see through my tricks" Yeah, ignore the need to add a "Kappa". If she has a sense of humour, she'll add it. If not, less work for you.
/r/askTRP20/05/17 10:55 PM
3

This one doesn't even makes sense. makes even less sense. It makes negative sense. Edit3: Women already receive lenient sentences for bullshit reasons (see frontpage of this sub 3-4 days ago, too lazy to find the link) and because of that injustice, they should receive no sentence AT ALL!? This is as if a pharmaceutical or chemical corporation said: Well, our monetary penalties for pollution are so low in comparison to our revenue, you might as well abolish all environmental protection laws. The…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:59 PM
7

Of course. It's even more ridiculous than reparation claims from radical black racists for slavery.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:07 PM
22

To them, the unfair treatment of men in family courts is obviously a reparation payment for centuries of oppression. That's one of the two key arguments that serve as a last resort whenever you present evidence that contradicts the feminist narrative: The patriarchy forced women to make a decision that doesn't benefit them (e.g. choosing a career with a lower wage or choosing to wear uncomfortable shoes that make them feel sexy) Every injustice towards men is justifiable because it's "our turn" …
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:48 PM
11

That's exactly what I expected of Macron. Or rather his wife. She's been grooming him since he was 15, it's obvious he's just a marionette. Men would go to jail for what she did, but a woman becomes First Lady.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:38 AM
2

That's literally the opposite of the principle behind our legal system. FTFYME
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:31 AM
2

None of this is sexual assault. And dafuq is this: For the sake of equality all sexual assault stories are to be considered truth until proven in a court of law. That's literally the opposite of our legal system.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:51 AM
3

The same goes for me. Watching the American MSM go nuts and our usually more neutral German media follow that trend, along with peaceful and innocent Trump supporters being attacked and/or killed by leftist terrorists because they changed their definition of "Nazi" to "somebody who doesn't agree with me" certainly pushed me towards being a sympathizer. I'll be the first to consider and discuss any legitimate Trump criticism. That's because not like them, I actually like civilized debate, I don't…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:39 AM
4

Would you also advocate for black slave owners in our current day and age just because it used to be the other way round? That's a weird way of justice.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:56 AM
7

Wait... so women can rape other women but women can't rape men?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:48 AM
2

Of course "family friendly" is pure bullshit, but I don't see anything wrong with women-only gyms per se. It's probably even a lucrative business model that attracts a lot of lesbians and women too shy to visit a regular gym. And they save money because they don't need gender separated restrooms and locker rooms. However, imagine the outcry if the genders were switched.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 05:46 AM
3

I never said anything about the infantry. Although there's a lot to be said about the women who actually end up in the infantry. Your point before: A man is never given an option regarding a child: The mother by default has the rights to abortion and to custody. (not even hardcore feminists can deny me on that!) And if the father wants to fight that: the right of habituation (i.e. if the child USED to grow up in Church Street 43, they are entitled to live up the rest of their lives in Church Str…
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:10 AM

This is plain stupid. Not from their perspective, but from ours. Women give birth. They possess magic and they already give up at least a year of their lives to do that and that's assuming a career that can afford a daily maid (which assumes they want a career). Which is expensive, because we want to at LEAST pay minimum wage. We want to hire registered American teenagers for the job and follow the rules, pay the taxes. That being said, following that rule is hard, because now we assume that eve…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:42 PM
5

"But women are groomed by the patriarchy to choose these lower paying fields." -Feminists
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:40 AM
1

Then you have a system like in China where university students are on their own and with the other sex for the first time on campus. That's basically the point they hit their puberty and as a result, they get nothing done. I do thing that a boys' club with strong structures that value discipline is very important, but so is the socializing aspect of mixed gender schools.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:38 AM
3

In that case it's the internalised systemic misogyny that made her do it.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:18 AM
7

That's also the gold standard I'd recommend to any new user: Don't issue any special measures, just judge her on the same standards you judge your best friends on. http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/191/368/f91.png
/r/askTRP02/05/17 01:42 AM
1

Sounds to me like you have a problem with merging your "old people" with your new principles. That's a common phenomenon in TRP and Pickup: People in your circle are gonna have a hard time accepting change within your character. They are gonna do their hardest to fit the new You within their picture of your old You", even if it means ridiculing your opinion. The most effective behavior, apart from breaking contact (in my case that was a really toxic, literally alcoholic group too), is just amuse…
/r/askTRP02/05/17 01:16 AM
73

The sudden impulse for monogamy doesn't have to be a bad thing necessarily... As long as you follow the "No Bro" rule that I just invented: If you ever have the retrospect feeling that "No bro would have gotten away with the shit SHE just pulled off", then you've got oneitis." In other words: have standards and moral values. If she does not comply, then sure, next her, but if she does, you're probably gonna have a wonderful time together.
/r/askTRP02/05/17 01:07 AM
32

Hahahahahahahahhahahahahaha. You do realize we'd have to hurt Jew rights, yes? We're Germans, we have inherited guilt, we can't do that. EVER.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 02:48 AM
12

Oh, rape culture is absolutely real. You already mentioned prisons. Then there's the rape culture within illegal immigrants from Latin America. Apparently rape (or rather forced prostitution) is nowadays a broadly accepted form of payment for coyotes. Rape culture is real in the middle east, the mildest form being arranged marriages. But they do "classic" gang rapes too. One of the various culturally enriching goods they brought to Europe - remember Sylvester in Cologne for example.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:42 PM
6

Did she say... All I can do is lie around (...) Because that's actually accurate.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 02:06 AM
5

As a German, I think those first 10 seconds could almost lead me to believe she was honest. With this "You can't be asking me this!" vibe. Then the rest followed. And again, as a bisexual German.... I am deeply worried. I personally know refugees me and my girlfriend helped, but those happened to be Christians. Deep inside my gayest inner SOUL (not sure if that's my throat or butthole), and because I am a statistician by profession.... ...This can't go well. The sad thing is that the ACTUAL far …
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:58 AM
1

Why white knight? I just have principles. The douchebag in question broke them all and, in the end, got what's coming for him. EDIT: If You're in an LTR and plan to fuck other girls: Better make that perfectly clear.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 03:19 PM
0

Or maybe: Don't fuck other girls if you committed to a relationship!
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 02:29 PM
2

If I supported reddit, I'd guild you for this very thoughtful and differenciated post - and I'm not cheap enough for reddit silver, so I decided to write down my appreciation. That being said, I agree with you wholeheartedly. I didn't develop a hatred for women or femininity - I merely see things (feelings, reactions, "shit-tests") as how they are: An inherent quality of women. For example, just as much as I accept that I look at her face and body on first sight (but probably even her ass and ti…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/17 02:27 PM
3

Why is it never a strong, vibrant and opalescent hair color? They always have this washed out style with bleach blonde showing through and natural color coming out in the roots. Because it adds that flavor of hobo grease?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 08:10 AM
10

That's what happens if you value virtue signalling higher than health and sanity. Let me be absolutely clear here: The bar set by Bloomberg was incredibly low. It literally said "Get consent from uneducated parents". De Blasio took that bar and managed to bury it underground.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:12 PM
2

As far as I know, that's what happens to most women in most military units. Non combatant roles. Again, you could argue that it's special treatment. Or just treatment according to biological features (which is why we have gender discrimination in sports).
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:27 PM
1

I guess Germany was a little more progressive on that front. Both military and social was 9 months. And I earned way more than 3.60. I believe I had 350-650€ per month, increasing regularly. I remember there were a few things that irked me. institutions like hospitals and schools for heavily disabled children (where I served) used to rely heavily on "Zivis" (people who do compulsory civilian service). In fact, so much that during the 3 months each year when there are none, business runs barely o…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:01 PM
-9

Also we have a compulsory military service ("Wehrpflicht") which is paused now but if Germany is in danger at some point in the future it will be used again. But only for (or rather against) males. Let me play the devil's advocate here... Women have 9 months of pregnancy, men have 9 months of service (military or civil). Let's face it, as a man, if you don't plan to stay in the military or go into nursing or paramedics, you lose a year, career wise. If a woman gets pregnant, she loses the same a…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:14 PM
3

What she means is courtesy or politeness, not respect. If I do not know you, then I have no reason to respect you. I do, however, respect our social norms of courtesy, so I'm probably polite towards you. You could also do something that makes me lose all respect for you and I will still be polite, should the social setting require it. The problem is that women like this have no idea about either, so they mix it up.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:01 PM
19

If feminism was about equality, it would be called egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:11 PM
0

I'm not in favor of these restrictions. I think they're bullshit. Why?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:58 PM
8

There is also no connection between abortion and jerking off. The vast majority of sperm cells die, whether it's inside or outside of the body. The same goes for unfertilized eggs. Nobody gives you a hard time if you want to get sterilized. In fact, that's a much more moral procedure than an abortion. This is what she has a problem with: Farrar has fought against Texas legislation mandating a 24-hour waiting period between a required consultation and receiving an abortion, and another measure re…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:05 AM
1

"Something dramatic happens to girls in early adolescence." Yeah and it's called puberty.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 08:44 AM
1

Not the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:00 PM
8

Well, go ahead and do it. But don't just ban the male TV personalities. Be complete and thorough. Ban the camera guys, the audio engineers, the editors, the maintenance guys, the IT guys, the electricians and the security guys. Then go ahead and watch TV. And you didn't even ban the guys working in the TV factories.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:55 PM
1

No true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:50 PM
1

Also, if you write an essay about the holocaust, make sure to exclusively use Nazi sources. Do NOT use historian sources.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:50 PM
16

It's worse than war actually, where they have it the worst because they lose their sons and husbands. If the world ends, they lose their sons, husbands, daughters, mothers, fathers and their own lives. Cleary, women are affected the most.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:16 AM
1

What kind of landowner would do such a thing without a contract?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:12 AM
1

On there you have guys who say they've done everything (lifting, looksmaxing, etc.) But they never did, they just think they did and gave up. A smaller scale example is skinny guys who say they lift and eat a lot, but never get bigger, then you ask for their calorie and protein intake and it turns out, they just work out and eat too little. You also have guys saying that men actually have a wall at 29-30 simply because the number of available women goes down. That's kind of reasonable if you pla…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 01:55 AM
9

"I prefer betas to alphas." And she said that, verbatim? [...] or are there actual beta-hunters... and if so, why? Money. Why wouldn't the woman just go with an alpha that gives her better/bigger tingles? Oh, don't worry, she's gonna do that on the side.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/17 01:38 AM
1

Don't know if they are talking about this debate.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:04 PM
26

It's a BDSM thing on the surface. The movie itself (can't talk about the books) has nothing to do with BDSM. It has some (not much) BDSM in it, the most of which is decoration. It might sound strange at first, but BDSM is all about consent, empathy and comfort. The character Christian Grey does not have a grasp of any of that. This is a movie that glorifies an abusive relationship with a stalking psychopath.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:12 PM
1

Most of these things are done by women, specifically feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:31 AM
13

We're not attacking cultures, we attack genital mutilation. US based circumcision is rooted in Christian puritanism, we don't make an exception there either. You can't use freedom of religious expression as a shield to defend barbaric practices. And how dare you to throw us into the same basket as #killallmen! Nice strawman.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:54 AM
10

The best part about that one is that the guy didn't even mean his dick. He said it because he's fat.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:20 PM
23

I don't see a huge problem with this, but I haven't heard an awful lot about the game either. Amazon mythology goes all the way back to the ancient Greeks and beyond and to me, this game looks like a modern take on it. If you're a gamer, I'll advice you to judge the game on its merit: graphics, gameplay, story, character development. Don't judge solely on the fantasy of a matriarchal society, see if there's an actual toxic feminine (ha!) background, like in Marvel comic books lately apparently. …
/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:41 AM
1

Sorry, got confused with my pronouns, because the opposite case happened quite often recently (MtF winning in women's sports) but in the end, it doesn't even matter. Either the transgender... boy....girl whatever, gets fucked over - or everybody else gets fucked over. The transgender person in question will dominate the girls because of hormone treatment, but can't compete with the boys because of bone structure. If the boys let her in anyway, now the boys will have to wrestle a girl.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:22 AM
3

There's literally no objective difference between being an alpha snd a beta. But there certainly is measurable difference. You can show a thousand woman the pictures of Chad Thundercock and a Buzzfeed reporter and ask them to rate their attractiveness. You can also measure their muscle mass, their testosterone, their stress level during social interactions, their willingness to stand up for their opinions, their leadership skills, etc. You can then correlate these factors with their number of re…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/17 10:10 AM
1

He wants to be a girl though. Why would he compete against boys?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:54 AM
22

This statistic might be true, but it's not really valid, because the "1 in 4" statistic that's been parroted by even the POTUS qualifies drunk sex as sexual assault. So in order to compare the two statistics, you should say "1 in 1 men".
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:04 PM
2

But women need razors too because the patriarchy forces them to shave their legs and armpits! I wonder if men could actually get free toilet paper out if this since they tend to have hairier asses, hence consume more TP.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:22 AM
23

Because it is a procedure that is only done to men - legally. Notice how female genital mutilation is heavily condemned and forbidden. Because this is an actual example of real, existing institutionalized sexism - unlike everything else that is promoted as such. Because the procedure itself has no real purpose in western societies, only cosmetical, petty and religious reasons. That's because American women are used to cut dicks and you can't criticize Jewish practices because suddenly You're an …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:40 PM
1

I figured, but I was too lazy to look it up, hence "at least 50%" ;-)
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:07 PM
2

How on Earth does The Australian Council for the Arts justify supporting this? Because it sells and it's in fashion. And it doesn't hurt any minorities. Well, here's a newsflash: If you life in a society that's predominantly white, chances are most assholes are white. Statistics. And for fuck's sake, I dare any of those fucking white hating snowflakes to migrate to a "brown" society. How about Saudi Arabia? See how far you get there, being gay. I mean... I get it. My mother is a lesbian. I heard…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:33 PM
2

Germany forces people to consult with Pro Familia (or similar registered organizations) before they are allowed to have an abortion for reasons other than the mother's health and you can only do it within 3 months. I find that to be a very fair approach.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:12 PM
5

Meanwhile, male talent have been known to do up to six different scenes a day. How do they manage to shoot these gigantic loads in the 6th scene? Edit: Serious question.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:58 PM
18

You know how a feminist reads that? Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among adolescent girls in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Who invented cars? Men. Who built that car? Men. Who taught her to drive? Probably a male driving instructor. Who was in the other car? At least 50% chance it was a man. There you have it. Lead cause of death are men.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:53 PM
1

Sure, I'd probably not be invited to a party again Well, that's exactly my point. It's also not about bashing Muslims. If anything, it's bashing Islam. And wondering how feminists keep making excuses for blatantly misogynistic practices.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:32 PM
2

Then what else, in your opinion?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:41 PM
1

None of these activities are rituals of respect.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:38 PM
3

Of course nobody can legally force you to shake hands with somebody. The issue here is that it's specifically targeted towards women and that the underlying reason is deep seated misogyny. Because unlike in our western societies, such a thing actually exists in Islam. And speaking of rape culture, that doesn't exist in our western societies either. It does however exist in prisons, in the Middle East, during border crossing from Mexico and in refugee camps.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:17 AM
9

Shaking hands is a Western custom. Why should the rest of the world have to follow it? Because they ARE in the west! We don't expect them to do it in the Middle East, we expect them to do it here. If you go to Japan, you don't necessarily shake hands with Japanese people, you bow. If you enter their homes, you take off your shoes. Female tourists in Italy are advised to cover their knees and shoulders when they enter churches (Oh you think that's sexist? Check the dress code for mosques...) We f…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:10 AM
3

Islam is a good partner for that.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:58 AM
12

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Why is the most inhumane and backwards religion in the world excempt from that?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:15 AM
3

I don't see a paradox here. In the contrary, protecting and treasuring while also knowing better sounds like a pretty traditional male role to me ;-) And OP is pretty frugal in her demands too. She just doesn't want a wussy. If you define (untoxic) masculinity as being fit, educated, confident, charismatic, able to lead, socially adept and an animal in bed, then what part of you can't protect/treasure/honor a woman if she deserves it? Of course, that's a difference in attitudes here. Modern femi…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:40 PM
21

Fuck body positivity, she's literally dying. Can't get any less body positive than dying.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:55 PM
5

Yeah, that's what I was about to write as well, except I wanted to use Kiwis. Maybe cause they're hairy. The shaft itself is really not the problem, it's the balls. Everybody knows how painful a kick to the balls is, but even a really careful squish begins to hurt very quickly. Now, that isn't a problem by itself in everyday situations. It just means that we can't sit with crossed or even completely closed legs for a long time. A 15-30 degree spread is usually enough. But there is that ONE GUY i…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:45 PM
3

It's similar in Germany, but only for girls under 20, otherwise they only pay if there's a medical indication. Condoms are not covered by health insurance, but you could probably get some for free at Pro Familia and similar organisations. It gets funny for vasectomies: it's not covered as a method of contraception per se, however: If the pregnancy would be a health risk for the women, then her insurance first covers her sterilization, but if there's a medical reason against that too, the women's…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:07 PM
7

That was an estimated guess. Turns out my estimation was too high actually. Liechtenstein was in 1984 the last western European country to allow women to vote. So female suffrage is one of my measurements of equality. I usually consider the 60s/70s as the turning point of emancipation.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:41 PM
30

Feminism is not an equality movement and it never was. It's a movement that aims to heighten women's standing in society. Now, 40 years ago when women actually had a standing lower than that of men, it was a justified movement. But when that movement keeps going after equality has been achieved, it's naturally an unfair movement. And, by examining the language, you can also see that there are no real issues. Feminists rely on neologisms like manspreading, and mansplaining, microaggressions as we…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:42 PM
21

Then you have grown men in the same room as little children. We can't have that. Duh. On the other side, it's probably a real possibility that a snowflake comes into the room, sees a guy with his dick hanging out (because you know, it's a toilet), and claims sexual assault. I think gendered bathrooms are fine.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:22 PM
27

They have a separate restroom for Lesbians? Or Liberals?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:44 PM
2

That's just projection. Oh, and if there was a pill for men, guys would swallow that shit up. Literally. I'm somehow getting the feeling that these abortion enthusiasts just really like getting creampied by strangers.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:49 PM
1

Feminism, at its core, its definition, it's purpose, is the idea of men and women being treated equally. You got it right, "at it's core, its definition". However, that's not practiced anymore in modern feminism. Modern feminism is not about equality, it's about getting privileges without duties. Feminism has more than reached its goal in western society, we already have equality of opportunity. Feminism is obsolete. It's over. And in fact, feminism has overshot the mark. Why anyone wouldn't wan…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:34 PM
14

Dafuq is this bullshit? Male masturbation is officialy banned. That shit actually happened. It's why we have circumcision in the USA. Because that makes it harder to jerk off! The biggest reason why it was actually instated in the first place. You need to read this before we can perform your vasectomy.... Vasectomy != Abortion. Why are these lunatics so obsessed with killing babies? Bieber Wardrobe malfunction You know who cares about celebrity wardrobes in our society? Women! They eat that shit…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 01:21 PM
3

McGrew said that whereas fraternities deliberately cultivate themselves as social spaces, sororities tend towards intimate associations and do not affect wider social trends at Yale in the same manner." So what he's saying is that sororities suck? Shouldn't be the first logical step then to improve the program of sororities? Or is there an implication that women tend to have trouble forming functioning societies?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:55 AM
1

Oh come on, it's a brotherhood, literally! The term "sorority", sisterhood, was invented solely because brotherhood was deemed inappropriate for a club of ladies.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:46 AM
9

The most successful YouTuber of all time (I believe) with 53+ million subscribers and 14+ billion total views. I don't watch him because I don't like his Youtube persona, but he has a massive audience of teenagers. Needless to say, this MSM stunt will create a massive backlash amongst his audience. Once again, they dig their own grave.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:14 PM
1

like what black people went through Like, getting captured by Arab slave traders? Not quite yet.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:43 AM
2

As opposed to...?
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:12 AM
5

THE HORROR. Apparently she's unaware that these are not even gendered issues. Actually, they are. Men are far more likely to get assaulted on the streets...
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:04 AM
3

Well, I'm very biased here. Obviously there are a lot of factors coming into this. My moms girlfriend was not a good person and my dad was very distanced early on. I was not a planned child and I felt it often. These things don't have any connection with lesbians per se. That can happen in every heterosexual family as well. That being said, lesbian parents just have by default little chance of having a strong male role model because there is no father present.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 11:02 PM
9

I was raised by a lesbian couple. Can confirm. Not a big fan. I don't wanna bash lesbians or anything. The only problem with my mother being homosexual was the bullying and I could as well attribute that to cruelty and homophobia of the bullies. The bigger problem was the lack of a father figure. And probably getting beaten by two women.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:22 PM
2

Because alimony comes from a time when men were the sole earners and women had a hard time surviving by themselves, without a husband. We don't live in these times anymore.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:31 AM
2

I first got a pop-up asking to allow notifications, then another one asking to sign up. I don't know what the third pop-up was because I closed the site. archive.is, people!
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:08 AM
7

The original reason for circumcision in the US is that masturbation (and sexual activity in general) is less enjoyable. Basically, puritans sought a fool proof way to make they boys jerk off less because that's evil and "you're going blind" didn't cut it. Of course now there's more attached to it, for example attractiveness. Americans are used to circumcised dicks, so they are now the norm and look more attractive than uncircumcised dicks.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:00 AM
2

Source for that? Give me a quote from milo
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:17 AM
7

Wouldn't latino students find that incredibly offensive because the poster assumes they are illegal immigrants? You know, the ones the wall will be built against?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:35 PM
3

Jews become white once they are successful.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:31 PM
1

Yes, the rabbi. Fun fact: in traditional jewish circumcision rituals, the circumciser sucks some blood from the fresh wound. And, in some cases, transfers herpes to the baby. While sucking on its dick. To be fair, apparently it's not that widespread anymore.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:20 AM
1

What were her arguments?
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:14 AM
9

Yeah, the phrasing there was a bit wonky. What I meant was something along the lines of "women tend to be physically less powerful than their male counterparts". Can't disagree with me on that. That's why we have gender separation in sports and women ask men to open the pickle jar.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:00 PM
66

Everything you mentioned belongs to the list of factors that have to be accounted for. Men are 8 times more likely to ask for a raise than women, women tend to work less hours and "less hard", women tend to take more days off and during maternity leave, they are pausing their careers while their male counterparts progress (for example by asking for a raise). You don't skew the data, you are a perfect example of the data.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 11:02 AM
2

By the way, it's called jetpacking and it has a few tremendous advatages, such as the option to receive a reacharound or have her cup my balls, which is a formidable sleep aid. And I don't get her hair in my nose.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:08 PM
3

Tell that to a feminist and the their response will always be that the women in those countries are most likely brainwashed... by the patriarchy. This is always the answer when a gender difference results from women's decisions, for example choosing a career in education instead of STEM, thus resulting in lower earnings. Obviously her choice to enter that field was not really her choice, but the one she was forced to make by outside factors. Or the oppression. Of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:38 PM
639

Have you ever considered the possibility that either you are a psychopath or you have psychopathic traits? Case closed.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:26 AM
2

by the president of the USA.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 05:42 AM
4

Of course. You can also do that to obtain censored video games or to practice assisted suicide by the way. I think German laws regarding abortion are the fairest you can get. Considering the loopholes: One of the associations you can consult is called Pro Familia. And Caritas is a catholic society. Okay, AWO are declared socialists...
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:28 AM
7

Dafuq is this shit about Trump making abortions illegal? He cut government funding for it, nothing more. By the way, as a German, I love how you Americans still keep the term "abortion". The political correct term in German translates to "pregnancy cancellation". Speaking of it, this is how it works in Germany: Abortion is essentially illegal Exceptions are health implications for the mother and rape. There are, however, additional loopholes: You can have an abortion after a consultation with re…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:23 PM
7

Good question. There are a few options to progress after we reach 100% of women. Increase the number of perpetrators. "1 out of 1 women has been gang raped" Increase the number of rape incidents. "1 out of 1 women has been raped repeatedly" Increase the political rank of the perpetrators. Increase the number of women, like you suggested. "2 out of 1 women have been raped" Considering the past mental efforts of feminists, I think it'll be a mixture: "2 out of 1 women have been gang raped repeated…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:06 PM
0

I explained ("teacher-splained"?) that sexism is a system that gives males power and undermines women and that is bigger than any one person's actions [...] No darling, that's the Patriarchy! She can't even cuntsplain feminists' own made-up definitions correctly. I'd tell her to look up the word in a dictionary, but a quick search showed that every major online dictionary mentions "especially against women". No, that's misogynism, you fools!
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:52 PM
3

And that's exactly the kind of experience you should strive to offer. Break out of this stiff traditional way of wining and dining and you break out of the traditional way of paying for all her expenses. Granted, for me, the need of doing that was partly because I was broke as hell, so I had to actively look for cheap, but interesting activities to do on a date. And often times these ended up being things I wanted to do anyway, like climbing, bowling, going to museums, festivals, concerts of loc…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:18 AM
1

So... this is an ad by a fashion label trying to make a point that women are forced to spend more on fashion that is made by... that very label?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 12:06 PM
1

This reads more like a parody of an ad.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:53 AM
5

Or as the article says it: "Men and women have such vastly different historical experiences with objectification that equality can’t be achieved by treating everyone equally." So that's the reason for the bigotry...
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:43 AM
49

The first comment hits the nail right on the head: What are feminists afraid of, another opinion?
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:40 AM
1

Oh, for people of interest, there is definitely a lot of use in twitter. And vice versa, you can subscribe to those to get updates on their work in a centralized way - for example youtubers, authors and artists in general. For posting your own private opinion on shit... not so much. a) nobody cares and b) character limit.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/17 05:25 PM
1

Gal Gadot. I like her and apparently she has some military background, but to me she just doesn't cut it as an Amazon warrior. The worst in that regard is Zoe Saldana (Uhura, Gamora) though. Super skinny. And I should add Carrie-Ann Moss to that list.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:03 PM
1

Well, if they did an all female Expendables spin-off, I'd be throwing my money at the screen. You know, a team with accomplished action actors like Lucy Liu, Michelle Yeoh, Uma Thurman, Lucy Lawless, Michelle Rodriguez, Kate Beckinsale, Gina Carano, Judy Dench and Geena Davis. Maybe Linda Hamilton if she's still fit. But definitely not Melissa McCarthy. Incidentally, a movie like this would work much better if the script was written with male actors in mind. Gets rid of the gender agenda.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:02 AM
52

because the laws required penetration to be a victim of rape Wasn't the problem that they required penetration by a penis? Because even without one, there are still enough body parts a women can penetrate a man with.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:56 PM
2

Alright, I'm German and just checked our own laws. Apparently in Germany, it's actually forbidden to serve alcoholic beverages to visibly drunk people. I did not know that. And no bartender has ever denied me a drink, no matter how cross eyed I was. So the story could actually look a lot different than I thought if there's a similar law in her state. Especially if the bartender already denied her and the accused bought her drinks to circumvent that.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:51 PM
43

You could go after the bartender if the girl was below drinking age. This was a (one should assume) grown woman of 24 years who chose to drive after 17 shots and then some. Holding someone else responsible means treating her like a child. And even if the bartender stopped after 10 shots (when she could probably still walk without crashing everywhere), nobody has control over what she does when she leaves the bar. If the argument here is that she was somehow pressured into drinking that much (by …
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:31 AM
3

First off, why would you completely let it go if it bugs you? Your girlfriend might just do it out of habit, completely unaware she's upsetting you. Like leaving the toilet lid or drawers open. People tend to do that stuff subconsciously. Can you give examples for those little things? For example, I used to be bugged by people interrupting me. As it turned out, I just took way too long to make my point, spoke very monotonously and made too much pauses. People just got bored listening to me. And …
/r/TheRedPill08/01/17 02:22 AM
2

Your one friend is a niceguy, that's why he's not getting any action.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 11:58 PM
2

Are you this guy?
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 11:55 PM
1

You should also see scenes from the real world I hate to break it to you, but porn isn't the real world. I mean, I'd love to have three DSLR cams pointed to my dick while I paint my girl's face white, but that shit's expensive - and lighting's a bitch!
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 11:51 PM
4

Then as soon as 25 came around, it all started to change. How? Granted, if most of your friends start getting married and popping out kids, sure, you feel like a loner in that group as a single. you will almost always feel like a misfit compared to most other people of your age Then DO feel like that. Be the misfit If that's the lifestyle you want to live, you shouldn't feel bad for it. And you are the only one who has power over your feelz. Yeah, getting married and popping out kids is still so…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 11:24 PM
11

What if you go into a store and only have money for one guitar. And the guy says to you "you can't try any others because you're so cheap. So you may as well buy this one". Oh but that comes with a contract that literally prohibits me from playing any other guitar again. Fuck that guy. I try a different store. Maybe take what he said to heart and work on not looking so cheap. And you're so desperate to play/have one because everyone else has had one except you. Sounds like a personal problem to …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 06:10 PM
128

I just fail to see the logic in that. I'm a guitar player. When I hang out in my favourite guitar store, I like to play on a bunch of guitars. You know, to find out which one resonates with me the most, find out what feels good in my hands, how they sound and if my style is compatible with that guitar. If I see a very beautiful instrument, I wanna play it. And if I like the guitar, I make sure I visit the shop more often in the following weeks to play that guitar some more. I'm even willing to p…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/17 03:32 PM
1

I don't see anything wrong with that, I'm just questioning their marketing choices and here's why: When I, a man, think about men and makeup, the most extreme, yet still somewhat masculine form of it looks a little like this. Or... hey, Khal Drogo. I think this is a valid and decently sized male market they could aim for. But what kind of target audience identifies themselves with Manny Gutierrez? I think a the largest part of gays don't, because they embrace masculinity. Most straight males als…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 09:45 AM
2

Thanks for mansplaining that.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:35 AM
11

This is the one of the dumbest things I've ever read.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:33 AM
7

[This election] is a warning that feminism, as it has been defined, did not inspire enough people in enough places around the country. So there are two possible ways to handle this: 1: Change the ways of feminism so that it inspires enough people 2: Double down on what you're currently doing. "Inspire harder!" Guess what's gonna happen?
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:07 PM
2

Even if it was Halloween, I'm pretty sure dressing up as a member of a fictional tribe is cultural appropriation.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:32 AM
1

But that's sexist because it's what the patriarchy expects from women!
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:53 AM
1

And I freaking hate it. A lot of the dubbing, especially in TV series, is just atrocious. Every guy sounds like a whimp, every woman sounds like a bitch. There are exceptions though, Gandalf is great in German and the guy used to voice over history documentaries in a similar tone. And by the way, a Texan accent often translates into sounding mentally retarded. Not sure how accurate that is.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 09:42 AM
11

Well, it has some foundations in reality. Example: A study found that on Twitter, misogynistic language is more likely to be used by women than men.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:58 AM
4

Focusing on physical differences usually just opens a transphobic can of worms that will mostly just silence the MRA movement. Can you describe that can of worms? And more importantly, tell me why it's transphobic. And why should it silence the MRA movement? cis male structure What has gender identity to do with this? Sexual dimorphism has nothing to do with what you identify as, only what you are born as. And there are exactly two biological sexes. but focusing on sexual dimorphism, where in ou…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 09:29 AM
1

They don't know Male Tears is a synonym for cum, right? male tears made the best moisturizer bathe in male tears "drink male tears” for breakfast
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:09 AM
10

A man would have been fired.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:44 AM
5

I love how this has so spectacularly BACKFIRED in all the wimminzfolk face. Just like everything else they do. They trivialize the real issues by shouting racism, rape and sexism at everything. It's the boy who shouted wolf. Censoring opposing ideas, prohibting free speech and silencing the crowd by shaming them as sexists isn't too far away from burning books. But while rational people concede when they're wrong, feminists do the complete opposite and double down on their agenda.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 07:24 AM
8

The real issue is that parents don't know how to teach self esteem and respect because they've never learnt it them selves and grow into an adult child, body of an adult yet the resolving abilities of a 5 year old. In that aspect, the worst is yet to come. The present generation of parents-to-be currently dwell in safe spaces, protected by laws against free speech, far away from confrontation and any opportunity to develop and grow their personalities.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:04 PM
6

Exactly what I thought. I could maybe get behind OPs issue if this was for a military position (which I thought it was when I read "uniform"), but a freaking Pizza Hut?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:19 AM
2

I stopped reading at "girlcott". Suprised I even got that far.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 01:26 PM
2

Cause nothing says Freedom of Speech as much as Censorship!
/r/MensRights03/12/16 04:22 AM
2

Wat
/r/MensRights03/12/16 02:29 AM
3

You didn't read anything of the shit I wrote, did you? The idea that men need to become even more peacock dancing monkeys for these dishonest monkey sluts is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the truth, of what needs to happen, and what will fix society. Nope. And quotes like that is why I distance myself from TRP. We're not broken. Wat? I never said that. We have just unlearned our instincts. What we DO learn is picking flowers for women, but be ashamed of our sexuality, to do everything just right for her…
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:48 AM
2

I'd guess it's because society expects men to naturally understand how to acquire and produce value, including social value. [...] counter-productive places like TRP and PUA PUA was what first came to my mind when I read your title. Now... I have seen both sides. I've been an active Pickup Artist, although I never really sided with the movement - for similar reasons I will not side with The Red Pill: They got a lot of things right and make a lot of good points, but there is simply too much hate …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:37 PM
8

Notice how the "sexism" isn't even measured in something like "praise of societey". Instead they choose to go with "child's favorite". Goddammit, children are so sexist! However, a reasonable person might link this perception to the fact that children don't see daddy so often because he's working all day and comes home late while mommy is there all the time, hence they value the limited time with daddy differently.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:09 AM
3

What's an Egg account?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:01 PM
2

So you make wild claims without any backup and then accuse anybody who opposes you of being a troll. Hm, where have I seen that before...
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:25 AM
1

I love how Peterson had to restrain himself in the beginning: You can't have it both ways unless you are completely in... Did he want to say "insane"?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:58 PM
6

Yes, as I said, that's the actual danger. Regarding my room: In some of our psycholinguistic studies, the lab is actually only dimly lighted, so you got that part right, although I don't quite understand your jab there. The fact that these people can't be taken seriously on a scientific level (because their claims are completely void of any foundation) means in no way that their movement isn't harmful. Bill C-16 shows that. The concept of not using these fantasy gender pronouns is legally worse …
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:58 PM
12

Can you imagine being a student in one of his classes and disagreeing with him? No, I can't. I am (or rather, I'm striving to be) a prolific scientist. Gender Studies is not a science and no honest, reasonable human would set foot into that guy's classroom. I also can't imagine an actual debate with this guy. Which is great for SJWs. They love their echo chambers. Now, the actual danger is that people like him are the self proclaimed "experts" who lead (in some areas mandatory) seminars on discr…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 06:41 PM
5

When I watched this a few weeks ago, this very statement instantly devaluated everything this guy was about to say in the whole debate. Yeah, let's make a ridiculous claim and provide ZERO evidence. And this guy teaches? Well, to be fair, the guy probably knew that a real scientist of Peterson's caliber would shred him to pieces in an actual debate, so he just choose to remain silent about his highly questionable evidence.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:52 PM
15

The first sentence is really off. Why would I be proud of being white? I didn't contribute to the fact that I'm white. The same goes for my nationality. I'm born in Germany, but that was out of my control at the time. Am can be happy to be a white male, but not proud of it. I can be proud of my achievements, but not my heritage.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 01:36 AM
2

As in, you show up and do this, or you're benched for a month. So what are they gonna do if nobody shows, bench the whole team?
/r/MensRights28/11/16 12:19 AM
3

Maybe the problem is that this year the Devil was a female one. But that's emancipation...
/r/MensRights27/11/16 10:34 PM
1

That Feeling When / That Face When
/r/MensRights27/11/16 09:25 PM
2

TFW the amputee in your video is the person with the healthiest body.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 08:47 PM
2

Why do most feminists almost always deny the bad parts of being male? Because it doesn't fit into their narrative. Notice that whenever you present a feminist with facts that contradict their agenda, they will not oppose with you with facts, they will: accuse you of being a sexist/MRA/homophobic/racist/shitlord blame the patriarchy call the authorities to prevent you from talking redefine terms so they fit into their narrative Yes, the facts are on our side. Unfortunately, the hype is on theirs.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 08:10 PM
3

It's the same problem Black Lives Matter has. "7000 black people are killed every year, less than 2% are killed by police officers in an unarmed way, so why don't we talk about the 98% (https://youtu.be/7xJ3lV0w7wc?t=637) They wilingly ignore the fact that black people show a significantly higher crime rate than white people and instead focus on a very small subset of problems. One that depicts another ethnic group as the perpetrator. That's the easy thing to do and it's easy to get upset over i…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:20 PM
18

"Choose to CHANGE"? Why would I do that? I'm currently not violent against women and girls, why would I change? Did they just assume my violence? #TRIGGERED
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:04 PM
2

Well, for people who don't exactly follow the agenda, it's a movement that's easy to follow. Take white knights for example. Their agenda is not one that's concerned with equality (or rather, what feminists define as equality), their agenda is to get into those women's pants - by being as slimy and ass kissing as they possibly can. For young women it's also easy. It's easy to get upset over nothing. It's easy to believe dramatic headlines. It's easy to fight for a cause by condemning the "majori…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:51 AM
2

Secret meetings that plotted how to overthrow this alleged patriarchy. Are you secretly a writer for HuffPost?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:25 PM
12

It's the same as the "1 in 4 girls have been sexually assaulted in college" meme, where an actually appropriate summary would read more like this: Approximately 1 in 4 of 19% of a Non-Representative Sample of Women Who Responded to a Non-Representative Survey of 27 Colleges (Out of Roughly 5,000) Reported Experiencing Sexual Assault, Where “Sexual Assault” is Taken to Mean Anything from Being on the Receiving End of an Unsolicited Kiss to Forcible Penetration at Gunpoint, Regardless of the Parti…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 12:34 PM
5

Yes, Team Siren. Baited and Outsmarted. The best example of a business with a feminist agenda that ended up accomplishing nothing. If anything, that debacle made it harder for females to get into professional LoL. Because they were a joke. Their individual ranks were in the Plat/Mid Diamond range, which is respectable, but far from a professional level.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:27 AM
1

Here's how you can get into a professional team in League of Legends: You git gud and climb the Solo Queue (a ranked ladder that pretty much measures only your Elo) to the highest tier and hope to get recognized by a professional team. The best thing is: that shit is anonymous, nobody can tell you're a girl. There is literally only one factor involved: your skill. I imagine it's easier for games like Starcraft where you don't have to be on a team. It's just yourself and your skill, tournaments a…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:19 AM
3

There are two sides to the streaming issue: If you look at streamers like Kaceytron (whose selling points are boobs and being a bitch) and Mia Rose (literally an actual ex porn star), yeah, their chat probably goes crazy. I'm not gonna say they're asking for it, but they don't really get viewers because of their skillful gameplay. If you purposefully lure in viewers with a boobcam, then these are the reactions you provoke. Watch honest female streamers like KayPea, Behkuh, itsHafu, Elspeth and D…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 12:58 AM
1

league of legends has a huge base of over 130 male, female, and non-gendered characters. at this point, every character has multiple counter-champs. guys regularly play at the international pro level without regard for the champ's gender. why can't women? even then, isn't that literally an admission that women are not equal to men? I never said that champion gender could be an issue for competitive players of either gender, just that a lot of research goes into that topic - as opposed to a resea…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 11:03 PM
1

So you're OK with this? Well hello there, I am absolutely okay with this. In fact, it's pretty hot. Can you link the actual blog?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:11 PM
1

Yes. That article caused a lot of mayhem in the e-sports scene.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:00 PM
3

you don't get worse units or abilities for being a female. it's solely about your skill in a video game. This "video game skill" relies on other factors, such as reaction time, spatial recognition and strategic knowledge. Males generally outperform females there, but there seems to be a learning effect that brings the groups closer together. I only did a very superficial research, so I don't wanna quote anything. Additionally, most research seems to focus on connection with fictional characters …
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:56 PM
2

Good catch. That explains why DOTA 2 earnings are so high. I didn't know they were crowd funded. Not that it even matters in this context since the statistics are not about wage, they are about winning. The only thing they could legitimately complain about is that not enough women play and win high prized competitive games - but you can't blame anybody else but women for that. Personally, I'd like to see more honest female gamers in esports - as opposed to "girl gamers" who are basically cam gir…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:19 PM
53

Another equally informative comparison: Highest earning female model: $ 44M Highest earning male model: $1.5M Back to topic: Since they didn't include a source: http://www.esportsearnings.com/ A few things to note: AFAIK this site estimates prize money only. Salary, stream and youtube revenue is not included. That means the money earned as listed on this site ties directly and ONLY to their performance in tournaments. The highest earning player in League of Legends won two World Championships. H…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:49 AM
2

There are several different approaches on how to handle such a situation. By far the worst is to show any kind of mate guarding, for example trying to devalue the guy or showing other clear signs of jealousy. An interesting approach is the exact opposite of that: If she tells you some genuinely good thing about the guy, compliment him: "Sounds like a pretty chill guy, you gotta introduce us next time." - and that's it. The background is that only men of high value can give value (while men of lo…
/r/askTRP19/11/16 01:09 AM
4

My philosophy for text communication with women: Only use it to set up dates. Start with a tongue-in-cheek reference to your common past (maybe a running gag you two have), then propose a time and location. If she agrees I tell her to wear something sexy and that's it. That's not even some special strategy, I just can't be bothered typing on phones. I use it as an alarm, a notification tool for my mails/calender and for browsing reddit on the shitter.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/16 12:01 AM
16

bad body language [...] There's nothing that can be done to fix it So you just identified a very fixable problem, then state that there's no fix. Unless you have some kind of mental disorder that lets you twitch your body uncontrollably, you can improve body language and facial expression. It's just internalized behavior. You can unlearn it. It might take you some time practicing in front of a mirror or recording yourself, you might even want to consult an image adviser or an acting coach. Stop …
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 10:23 AM
2

Because if she puts up at least some kind of pseudo defense, it's easier to justify it afterwards in her mind. "I hesitated in the first place, but then it just kind of... happened"
/r/askTRP16/11/16 10:56 PM
8

Well, by being conditioned into thinking that sex isn't the most important thing, that emotional connection is far more important, that if you truly love her it's worth waiting (or that by waiting you "prove" your love) and that you should feel ashamed for your natural desires. The "staying" part was nailed by the OP. You don't stay in a relationship like that. At least not while keeping your sanity. OP described the process perfectly: He gave into her frame ("I was always doing everything she w…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 06:35 PM
1

When I first heard of the term "mansplaining", I thought it was a joke - and still do, it sounds ridiculous. Like... "microaggression". Can somebody explain mansplaining to me? You can even mansplain it, I won't be offended. This is what I came up with: So from what I understand, if somebody acts like they are stupid or blatantly ignores facts or makes a claim despite having an overwhelming amount of evidence for the contrary or lets their emotion get in the way of an otherwise calm debate, the …
/r/TheRedPill16/11/16 10:24 AM
5

You're right, what we should call traditional marriage is the act of clubbing a fertile female unconscious and then dragging her into ones cave to reproduce, occasionally after defeating the alpha male of the tribe since that practice has been used way longer than the institutional marriage we practice today.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 10:21 PM
1

Well, I hate to break it to you, but she has a point. A badly written, insulting one, but nevertheless: it is the guy's fault. Now, I do not doubt he's a good guy, a loving father and caring husband. And what he wants is absolutely legitimate. He's just using the exact wrong methods to get there: sucking up to her, negotiating attraction and using logic arguments to lead up to sex. By doing all these date nights and romantic gestures, he puts up a sign that reads "Look at how nice I am to you, t…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/16 11:11 AM
5

First off, her statement itself is probably valid. Chances are you are indeed a different person when you're high. Just because your behavior doesn't seem strange to yourself, that doesn't mean that nobody notices you eating that beer with a spoon while enjoying a side dish of confetti. It doesn't have to show this heavily, but hey, you're on drugs. You do behave differently. Secondly, your reaction: A muffled "orly" in conjunction with chickening out to the fridge/phone is just you awkwardly re…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/16 07:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter