TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BoredOfReposts Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by BoredOfReposts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Its a modern version of the n word or slurs people used for gay people. Its a way to dehumanize and oppress, to tell someone you hate them and want them to suffer without specifically using the word hate or directly saying they deserve suffering. Weak bigoted people use those sorts of words to hide behind. Maybe its extreme to compare it that way to those other words with their historical context, but you look at the intent of the people using it, and I don’t really see much of a difference.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 01:50 AM
5

Misandrists gonna misander. Its a thing that happens, weve all seen it.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 05:41 AM
1

I learned what gender bias was in the sixth grade from the women teachers. Same work, lower grades for boys than girls, consistently. That plus the attitude difference when they worked with girls than with the boys. Girls could get away with anything, boys? Instant detention. Letters home. If we had any problems, well it was our fault. It was weird because all the prior grade’s women teachers did not seem biased, or if they were, they sure didn’t show it. Those sixth grade teachers though, its l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 04:07 PM
15

I did not click the article above, and before I saw the link and comments below, I already knew we were talking about grace hopper. The whole thing is super hypocritical. I use it as a litmus test. If a woman acts all excited about it, it means they have that misandrist gender bias, and will almost certainly apply it to the maximum extent they can get away with if they make it into management. If they dgaf, then its a sign they can be professional. In my experience it is always the most underper…
/r/MensRights04/03/26 04:13 PM
2

They banned me too. No warning or anything, just straight up perma banned after i made an obviously unserious comment. I suppose my association here must have tipped it too, or maybe the mods there are idiots who don’t understand what moderation is about. It really didn’t live up to the name anyway, so not missing it tbh
/r/MensRights05/01/26 07:14 AM
1

And who supplies the sperm banks? Men. They cant do it without a dude involved, period. They were dumb flunkies, mindlessly spouting the feminist shit their mothers told them.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 01:00 AM
3

Someone mentioned a colloquialism for ivf after that. Then i think someone mentioned jesus and immaculate conception, and someone else mentioned some pop-science bullshit about self fertilizing eggs, at which point the teacher shut it all down. Couple years later high school rolled around, and those particular girls made it extremely obvious they had a change of heart lol.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 05:03 PM
94

Actual conversation in class in 7th grade: Toxic girl: “id like to see man have a child without a woman, they cant” Everyone with half a brain: “uh, id like to see a woman have a child without a man” Some people are so fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 03:11 PM
15

Its used to mean there was past prejudice which can now be corrected by special favoring for those who were prejudiced. Not that those affected are somehow inferior in some way. When i grew up, we called it affirmative action. Then that was bad, so they had to make a new word.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:52 PM
101

They only want the benefits of equality not the actual equal in everything part. Thats why they started using the word equity instead.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 01:44 PM
7

Didnt learn much in sixth grade except for how sexist the two female teachers could be. None of the previous or subsequent female teachers were sexist, at all really, but boy were those two. They made it so obvious too, and also made a point to make it obvious that there was nothing you could do about it.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 11:51 AM
17

HR departments are often run by mostly women, and they have significant clout when it comes to policy. Factor in a few dudes who for whatever reason agree, and a few feminists in whatever department to make it sound good in meetings. Facts dont matter in corporate settings as long as it sounds good. I’ve literally seen this play out at some so-called progressive companies i had the displeasure of working for. Sat in meetings where it was affirmed and that not only more women must be hired no mat…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:33 PM
21

Be nice if that term was treated the same as other derogatory words, because thats really what it is and does nothing to help the people it was invented to describe. See how something sounds with a different derogatory word: “[here is a podcast] where i spoke to one of the world’s lead researchers on faggots, id be fascinated what you guys think about [show about gay men] and his research on faggots” Pretty offensive right? So why is it ok for “incel”? Im not calling you out OP, I know you have …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 02:24 PM
3

It is impossible for one to understand something if their salary depends on them not understanding it. There, I explained it for you.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 12:25 PM
9

Now normally i would agree, a lot of this stuff is fake. Did you actually read their history, for more than a page though? They literally are asking if tango/salsa dancing is a place to meet people two months back. And on subreddits for dating apps. If this is faked, its pretty darn elaborate, and to what end? https://www.reddit.com/r/ISTJ/comments/173ozj2/istjs_have_you_tried_to_dance_tangosalsa_before/
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:11 PM
21

How? You are making a lot of assumptions, and nowhere do you explain your reasons for name calling.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:36 PM
30

Yes, they would be saying the guy was a pedo and a rapist. And the title would say “raped” and not “had sex with”.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:33 PM
27

Ive heard moderators of menslib are mostly feminist women not actually male rights advocates. Assuming thats true, they don’t really represent the community and have a separate agenda. Obviously whatever you said is not part of that echo chamber. I unsubscribed as soon as I learned about the moderators. Mensrights is a better sub imo, with moderators who are at least not disingenuous like menslib.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/22 01:59 PM
1

I was banned from ahs for pointing this out
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:57 PM
-2

Why are you defending the 1%. Do you expect to be one of them someday?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/21 01:06 PM
8

This
/r/MensRights05/06/21 01:38 PM
18

Already in ahs too.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:16 PM
2

Thank you for your posts. It seems folks are so easily polarized by association, admittedly ive felt the pull myself. You are from a really interesting demographic, able to see what life is like for young men in todays society vicariously. I feel like a lot of the current rhetoric is based on what life may have been like at one time, and is no longer the case. There has been and is a rebounding effect. Hopefully society in this new digital age can, ultimately, settle on values based on merit and…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:18 AM
9

This
/r/MensRights19/04/21 04:06 AM
3

Oh i can assure you it was happening, and in the “early 2000s”, sounds like you simply werent at a sufficiently liberal school to see it. Congrats on getting into cambridge none the less.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:25 PM
5

No. But they love to take credit when stuff happens. They are a terrible company. They make money by reselling your email address amd personal info, and use dark ui patterns to opt you into agreeing with that. Its a complete scam. Source: worked there for a bit, saw it from inside
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter