TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BoringGenericUser Archive

View 0 posts and 233 comments by BoringGenericUser on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Easier than getting the actual "does not equal" symbol, and conveys the same meaning. Your problem?
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:01 PM
10

H e s f i v e
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:49 PM
14

I see things like this and just think "ok but what if I don't wanna do those things what then?"
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:47 PM
1

Not the point of this sub my dude.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 10:28 PM
3

Jesus dude. Did you even read anything beyond "when she's attracted to you"? And no, considering the time frame, that could not have been edited in after you saw it. Also, that last paragraph just makes you seem like more of an incel with the need to point out that you have sex, so...
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:29 PM
30

This is the fucking thing, they complain and berate men for doing this while suggesting women do the exact same thing and acting like it's acceptable.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:23 PM
3

Technically correct, but...dude, no. Just don't.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:19 PM
4

And those who eat apples?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:18 PM
2

Yeah. Sad to see how far it's fallen.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:54 PM
4

r/whoosh
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:52 PM
0

Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh
/r/MensRights11/10/19 09:52 PM
-1

I mean, I won't deny it. I'm still not gay though.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 09:03 PM
1

Wanna try that again? Sound a little less homophobic this time? Or, actually, don't. Show everyone exactly what kind of person you are. Also, I'm not even gay lmao
/r/MensRights11/10/19 08:31 PM
-2

Yeah, obviously... As obvious as it may be, we should not leave room for misunderstanding or intentionally misrepresenting us as condoning such actions. People who make these blame-tilting "observations" are generally the same ones who cheer on female on male violence and anti-male hysteria culture. Oh, honey, as if. Why would I encourage violence against my own gender?
/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:48 PM
91

try to take revenge on the society that abused them their whole life. Important to note, those actions are still not acceptable.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 01:42 PM
8

...what the fuck?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:47 PM
2

Thanks, u/conradfart. In all seriousness, thank you for saying this.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:02 PM
3

Should've stayed in Greece.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:24 PM
4

4 hour flight to UK Don't know why anyone'd want to do that but alright.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:21 PM
2

Uh...wow.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:32 PM
3

I'd say consent was given by informing her they wanted to fuck her. Consent was given under specific conditions, being conscious during the act, for example. Once said conditions are violated, they no longer consented.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 12:33 PM
9

Not the tea, you monster!
/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:13 AM
2

if you're too drunk to say "stop" Does it not occur to this idiot that the rapist can just ignore you?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 04:10 PM
-1

Eh. One's a misogynist, the other's insulting a misogynist.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:22 AM
1

And I thought I was a grammar nazi...
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:12 AM
7

Same thing.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:25 PM
2

but you are because leave won Not why I'm doing it. You are impossible to reason with, so there's no point in me talking to you any longer. Discussion over.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:19 PM
1

So...me not liking the fact I lost is the same subject as you, by your own logic, being biased for not pushing for a second referendum? Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:04 PM
2

Since you're trying to change the subject, I think it's safe to assume that you don't have a way to refute my previous point, and are just trying to distract from that fact.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:59 PM
2

Eh, it's mostly me not understanding it properly. But yeah, seems to be that way.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:57 PM
1

Same to you. If I'm biased for saying I wouldn't push for a second referendum if remain won, you're biased for not pushing for a second referendum because leave won.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:53 PM
2

this is basically a diametrically inverted position. Who are you saying that about? I'm guessing their position?
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:52 PM
1

I said I wouldn't push for one. Not that there would be no need to have one.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:48 PM
5

That is pretty much word for word what you said. Not a strawman.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:40 PM
1

but then claimed there was no need to have one if remain had won. I never claimed that. You're not going to convince me of any of this because you're coming from an extremely disingenuous standpoint to begin with, so fuck off and peddle your bullshit elsewhere please. Good. I was never trying to convince you of anything. But, since we've come to an agreement on this matter, I bid you good day.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:40 PM
1

You apparently think the only reason someone who is biologically male would be trans is because they hate men. Thus transphobia.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:35 PM
1

Yaaaaaaay transphobia!
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:29 PM
1

So I'm supposed to push for a second referendum if the thing I want to win wins? You're very clearly not doing that, so you can't really expect me to do the same. I think you put it best: you also showed that you don't actually give a shit about democracy like you claim, it's all about you and what you want.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:21 PM
1

So you're trying to discredit everything I'm saying because of that? Alright, then everything you've said is wrong.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:39 PM
1

Honestly, no. But leave did win, and I don't see you clamouring for a second vote, so...
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:44 PM
1

Yes, there is. Your key point is that a second referendum would be taking away your vote. I said that you could just vote like in the first referendum. You didn't refute this, so you basically admitted you're wrong on that front. Oh, and also, "having a second referendum is pointless to anybody but an EU fanatic" is wrong. Having a second referendum helps to confirm the continued support for leave, or potentially result in a decision being made that won't absolutely fuck our country.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:39 PM
1

You still haven't refuted anything, just repeated "you can't take that you lost, so you're throwing a tantrum and trying to take away my vote". That's essentially the only thing you've said this entire time.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:18 PM
0

Your example is not remotely the same thing. And no, I'm not "openly conspiring to take away your vote". You can vote the exact same you did before, and if the majority agree, nothing changes. How is it bad to check in with the country and say "hey, is this still what most of you want?". And no, I'm not "being a fucking fascist" either. Your animosity towards me here is unreasonable. Not to mention that you haven't provided any actual argument other than "you're trying to take away my vote" when…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:08 PM
1

You seem to be the only one throwing a tantrum here. I told you my logic behind another referendum being a good thing, politely mind you, and you responded with insults and assumptions.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:59 PM
1

I won and because a bunch of spoiled cunts in London and a few middle class suburbs dotted around the UK can't take that they lost they are in fact potentially illegally taking away my vote and stamping their feet and throwing temper tantrums in the form of London based protests where they claim to 'respect the result' by calling for a second referendum. A second referendum is objectively more democratic. If leave still wins, then that's that, nothing's changed, we know the majority want leave. …
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:54 PM
1

Yeah, you're right.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:21 PM
1

Saying "fuck em" on its own doesn't do too much, you're right on that. But it, like many things, let people know that we do have a problem with the way things are. Lumping a massive amount of people together is shitty though, yeah.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:22 PM
3

You make some good points, but if we do nothing, nothing changes. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:13 PM
2

While spreading awareness is good, it doesn't help to fix anything by itself. There still has to be another group capable of actually helping that is benefiting from the increased awareness.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 08:47 PM
8

You're putting a hell of a lot of words in my mouth there buddy.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:57 PM
-1

I mean, again, you're just saying things. I'm not saying you're lying or wrong, just that I'm choosing to be sceptical of things random internet strangers say. But yeah, if that's true, it's pretty awful. Gets so much funding, and so much of it goes to waste.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:57 PM
17

Oh hey, menslib, the sub that does nothing but parrot feminist's bullshit, and blame everything on men.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:54 PM
8

Stop being homos about that. During pride month? Really?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:52 PM
9

Yes, they can. It is a fact.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:51 PM
11

Usually it does not, and is just performed on a child for cosmetic reasons.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:47 PM
-2

Proof?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:43 PM
3

tumbleweed
/r/MensRights03/06/19 07:38 PM
6

I'm fairly certain that was referring to the second part, as they also said "but want to share it."
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:14 PM
3

Cause women only do bad things when provoked, right?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:13 AM
2

Yeah no. This is abusive as fuck.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:13 AM
1

Have you tried reading? Might do you some good. Oh, and also, calling everyone who disagrees with you a white knight? Really? That's just kinda pathetic, honestly.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 09:59 AM
2

Not THAT extreme, but there is definitely still a stigma about it, and there shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 09:57 AM
1

I did not "change the subject" and you know it. It is very clear I was saying "This (meaning you) is the reason we have a bad reputation". You never posted that. If you are the source, then there is no reason for me to believe you, since there is 0 evidence you are a remotely reliable source.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:49 PM
1

That...is relevant to what currently? I was asking for your proof of women blaming everyone but themselves.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:26 PM
1

Burden of proof is on you here. You're the one who originally made the statement, provide evidence to prove it's true if you expect people to believe it.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:11 PM
0

Not the same point you made just now. What you said before was that women blame everything but themselves. What you said just now is an example of the common belief that all women are innocent angels and only do anything bad when provoked.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:47 PM
0

This is why we have a bad reputation.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:35 PM
1

No, people is correct here.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:17 PM
2

It's literally a fact that it's beneficial. There's been research on the topic.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:53 PM
2

That does not change anything about my point, or refute it in any way. If you are circumcised as an infant, you do not have the option to make that decision as an adult, so the decision is not theirs to make.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:10 PM
2

I just don't get how a person could want something on their body without having experienced it. Then you don't understand how someone could want piercings or tattoos without having had them before?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:22 PM
4

Their decision is theirs to make Except that's the exact problem. With infant circumcision, the decision is NOT theirs to make.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:18 PM
1

The population of Australia, 24 million people, you have, at last count, a 0.015% chance to be raped/sexually assaulted each year Mind giving me a source for that statistic?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:56 PM
1

Shit MY pants? They'll have to catch me first!
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:20 PM
2

Nope. "Leaving, letting go" clearly indicates it's not that.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:01 AM
9

For some people, yes.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 04:54 PM
3

Yeah, then it's just necrophilia!
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:08 PM
1

And here, again, you are saying they are both rape, and acting like one is okay (and that we should not be permitted to complain about it happening) and the other is not.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 09:57 AM
8

You literally say they're both rape, then act like one is okay?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:51 AM
2

And you're an asshole, who believes they are the arbiter of humour, when they are not.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 01:35 PM
0

Mate, I'm a different person.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:43 PM
1

That's the question I pose to you. You, after all, are the one who said this: To think otherwise is to ignore the conditions of the average men in those societies.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:46 PM
2

It doesn't. This person is saying "all-female cast" but the actual post is saying "female only viewings".
/r/MensRights03/03/19 10:40 AM
3

r/nonononoyes
/r/MensRights03/03/19 10:26 AM
3

An all-female cast in a movie doesn't violate egalitarianism in the slightest Yes, but only allowing women to view it does.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:12 PM
1

No, her.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 10:07 AM
1

A more reasonably sized version of this image.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 10:47 PM
5

Good thing there're at least some people who haven't been indoctrinated yet! Also, somewhat off topic, but the fact your 10 year old niece has significantly better handwriting than me makes me more than a little bit disappointed in my writing skills.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 09:20 PM
2

HAHAHAHAHA WHAT Okay I'm sorry, you're just too hilarious.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:35 AM
2

I get teased for liking Prince and taking hair care seriously. To me, this sounds like things that are typically considered feminine.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:39 AM
4

CUM ON YOUR BACK?! OKAY!
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:48 PM
6

...no it fucking doesn't.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 05:00 PM
16

It absolutely is. But two wrongs do not make a right.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 09:06 AM
28

Did you miss the part of this image where it says "can choose to abort and to suggest that she "keep it in her pants" is offensive"? Because that's exactly what you're suggesting men do.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 01:04 PM
4

despite proving otherwise? Hold on, what? When...when did, and when can, anyone irrefutably prove this person is not a feminist?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:22 AM
11

Found her reddit account.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:23 PM
8

There’s no evidence the child isn’t pressured to dress/act like a boy when in the father’s care. There absolutely is. It's not just around his father he acts like a boy, he acts like it around everyone except his mother.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:26 PM
3

...what?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:28 PM
3

Niggardly has 0 relation to the slur, other than sounding somewhat similar.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 05:52 PM
3

If 👏 you 👏 can't 👏 join 👏 em 👏 beat 👏 em 👏
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:09 PM
-1

r/uselessredcircle
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:59 PM
0

There's technically no wrong answer to this.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:11 PM
1

Except I am. If consent isn't being respected, that's a problem, no matter who it's happening to and who's doing it.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 12:02 PM
1

Clearly it fucking is. You're being really stupid right now.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:45 AM
14

I'd say feminists are just an extremely vocal minority really.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:42 AM
4

most of the sexism I and many others have seen from feminists has been the idea that men are incapable of anything especially parenting. The dad has a sigh of relief at the end with a reassuring message from his wife playing on the Alexa. It paints men as incapable of anything related to parenting,
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:57 PM
1

The wage gap is only taking into account the average amount of money earned, not the jobs done to earn that money. Men tend to get into jobs with worse and more dangerous conditions, so of course they'd get higher average earnings than women.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:38 AM
6

Orange man bad am I right
/r/MensRights11/10/18 06:31 AM
8

if a guy did this same thing he should be punished worse and that would be justified. No, it would not be justified. You're a sexist asshole. Good day.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 08:02 PM
6

There are differences between the sexes Sure. There are. But here's a question for you. Why do you think that needs to be taken into account when deciding whether or not it's okay for someone to commit sexual assault? Either everyone's allowed to do it, or no one is. That's the way this works.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 07:33 PM
10

Oh fuck off.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 06:50 PM
3

Well why the fuck does this need to be one?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:02 PM
4

succ Yeah that'd probably do it
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:30 AM
5

Change my mind No.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:08 PM
1

exempt from everything else that affects them negatively. FTFY
/r/MensRights24/09/18 06:51 AM
1

Yeah, I don't get how, for example, saying it's a good idea not to accept food/drinks from someone you don't trust or carrying something to defend yourself is shifting responsibility.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 10:18 AM
1

No, incels are a specific group of people, who can't sleep with women and also hate them.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 07:34 PM
2

No, incels hate women.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:42 PM
1

Pregnancies do have a pretty high risk of imposing permanent physical change So? A castration is guaranteed to impose permanent physical change.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 12:14 PM
2

Yeah no that's creepy.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:38 AM
2

Is...is that legal? Can they do that? Either way, stay strong, and know that I'm here if you need to talk.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:03 AM
1

As you so like to say, nice strawman.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:47 PM
1

It seems your argument is entirely based off a sexist legal definition.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:30 PM
1

provided the context indicates she was in violation of established protocol Wha...when is it not in violation of established protocol to rape your students?!
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:21 PM
2

Demographic : "A particular sector of a population. " Like, say, men and women.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:58 PM
2

There are no downsides Wrong.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:20 PM
1

Oh wait...
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:19 PM
2

Disgusting. Just fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:40 AM
5

It's not hard to use "them" there.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:34 AM
3

And it's locked for "rampant, ridiculous sexism", apparently. Of which, surprise surprise, there is none. Which means the only thing I can really say to that is this.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:34 PM
3

It's telling that you modified part of the statement you copied. Except...they didn't?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:19 PM
8

That's not a source. That's another statistic without a source.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:49 PM
6

Source?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:28 PM
1

I've no clue either.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:27 PM
1

r/twentycharacterlimit
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:30 PM
3

So can you actually disprove it?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:27 PM
1

Thank you for being a good human, and helping a good doggo.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:01 AM
1

There. Are. None.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:00 AM
1

So you're admitting you can't read?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:47 AM
1

That's purely a physical thing.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:23 AM
1

Unconscious people don't have priapism you ninny. Sure. Okay, I guess. What relevance does this have? Oh...oh no. Don't tell me you're going to try to claim unconscious people can be aroused now?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:20 AM
1

Terminal erections. You wanna try to claim corpses can be aroused?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:03 AM
1

A deliberately ambiguous, general statement =/= A hard claim. ...source?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:13 PM
2

You making a statement is not a source for that statement. What is "a person unable to understand their own words" for 500 Alex.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 06:23 PM
7

Your narcissism is astounding. Nobody cares about or remembers what you say. You’re irrelevant. Get over yourself.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:12 PM
1

No, what they said is transphobic. They claimed that being trans is only caused by being brainwashed. You can see why that's bad, yes?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:11 PM
0

Oh, really? Is that so? Well, how about you give me some evidence I've been, as you call it, "brainwashed"? Come on, I'm open to discussion about this, just go ahead and try to prove it.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:10 AM
1

So you're a misandrist. Good job.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:55 PM
2

Yeah no. The fact you think men being trans is caused by women "brainwashing" them tells me all I need to know about the kind of person you are.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:41 PM
1

The 10% of it is male, you mean?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:39 PM
2

Okay, then should the same happen to any females over 12 who complain about "sex" with a man?
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:28 PM
3

I feel like people aren't understanding something here. While it is true that testosterone does tend to cause increased aggression, it doesn't say testosterone, does it? It says "male gender" and that is the problem. It is saying just being male causes increased aggression, which isn't true.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 02:03 PM
1

And I DO oppose those issues. I also oppose this issue. What's wrong with that?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 07:49 PM
0

No. No I don't. I won't lie, I don't think they'll reciprocate. But there is a possibility, and either way, that's not what this is about. Even if they don't fight for equality, why should we stoop to their level?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:50 PM
4

Sure. That's reasonable. Deliberately shifting women's test scores down is not.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:20 PM
6

Does this mean we should condone and allow discrimination? No. No it does not.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:35 PM
3

No. If we don't try to do anything about it, we're no better than those who ignore discrimination men face. But if we do, that could generate some positive attention, and help our cause.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:33 PM
1

No. If we don't try to do anything about it, we're no better than those who ignore discrimination men face. But if we do, that could generate some positive attention, and help our cause. So there's no downside to it.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:32 PM
1

The UK is terrible now. I honestly think if the tech was available to monitor what people are thinking, we would literally have thought crimes.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:58 AM
4

We aren't making fun of that though.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:41 AM
12

And they're going to have to keep facing rejection from people who, ya know, just don't want to fuck them (which is obviously super unreasonable right) until they get that.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:10 AM
3

Presumably to send a message that it's not cool to discriminate with your bathrooms.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:07 AM
1

I want to say it was the ex-wife, but knowing the way the world is right now, it was him. Am I right or am I right?
/r/MensRights06/08/18 11:02 AM
2

Yeah, that's our problem quite a lot of the time.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:56 AM
2

This includes the maiming and killing of her male partner. That is just pure insanity.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:51 AM
2

That's your defence? Really?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:27 PM
1

Then please tell me, oh great one, what is it that is sufficient to be considered an argument in your almighty opinion?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:19 AM
1

Then please tell me, oh great one, what is it that is sufficient to be considered an argument in your almighty opinion?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:17 AM
1

My last comment was an argument. I'm sorry if you can't understand that.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:58 AM
1

Support for that one specific thing they said, not the rest. Sure, I do agree with the rest of what they were saying, but that one comment does not indicate that. It only indicates support of that one statement. You can agree with something someone says without agreeing with everything they say. I'm sorry if you can't understand that.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:55 AM
5

You're claiming that since the kid got hard he must have liked it, yes? Death boners disprove that. Unless you're going to claim the dead person somehow likes being dead?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:52 AM
1

I mean, you're supporting someone who is trying to normalise child rape, so you agree with them that child rape is normal, and at the same time claiming nobody is.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:47 AM
1

You're actually hilarious. When did I claim to even support the position they held? I simply agreed that you're a fucked up person, which seems pretty accurate.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:44 AM
2

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:40 AM
2

Yeah, this person truly is amazing. Quite possibly smarter than Einstein. They've got to have something more important to do with their time than be here and argue with us idiots.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:34 AM
1

I'm not even the same person. Ever tried reading usernames?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:27 AM
7

If you think this isn't a crime, I'd be afraid to let you teach.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:25 AM
6

He wouldn't even get hard if he was forced. Death boners. Your point is invalid.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:23 AM
2

Probably more like a little from column A, and a lot from column B.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:20 AM
4

No, seriously, dude. I think you need help.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:19 AM
2

No, it actually is. Here.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 07:07 PM
9

Be the change you want to see. Be a prostate?
/r/MensRights01/08/18 08:27 AM
1

You, mate.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:46 PM
3

You're attacking a strawman in other words.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:53 PM
2

They have the same definition, because they're both interchangeable.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:16 AM
5

*arse
/r/MensRights09/06/18 10:50 PM
6

Edit: downvoted for absolutely no reason but ignorance and indignant redditors. No, you were downvoted because you're being an arse.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 09:48 PM
2

Wait...what?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 05:49 AM
1

Well I guess I'm a peasant fool then.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:06 PM
7

And a brain.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:45 PM
3

No one's saying they are, but if they were, and they managed to, the reaction would be very bad.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 06:12 PM
1

85% male and 65% female That's not possible.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:26 PM
3

I like how you seem so questioning of it. Just like "I think I'm not trying to troll, but I'm not sure".
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:59 PM
4

Especially if you are trying to make a point You notice how hypocritical you are? You say grammar is important, but neglect to end your sentence properly.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:58 PM
3

So do you expect everyone to get training so they don't get attacked by people?
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:55 PM
5

They're not the OP.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 04:20 PM
1

Consider this. If what you said was true, why are death erections a thing?
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:41 PM
13

Seriously? She divorced him and probably took most of his shit, she doesn't get to be jealous.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:25 PM
5

I've already posted it, and it got down to 0 really fast.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 03:01 PM
9

I want to see if that's actually the case. I'm going to make that thread.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:10 PM
5

It might start the applepocalypse if you insult it too much.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 02:42 PM
9

Did it ever occur to you that what you are saying is sexist? Or do you just not care?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 02:29 PM
4

Deserves every moment of it too. Deserves more, honestly.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:13 PM
8

Sorry, I would, but I'm too busy committing my daily rape. Got to do that, you know? It's a very important part of every man's life!
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:58 PM
2

What are you doing in my swamp?
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:29 PM
-1

Can you not? It's people like you who make this community look bad.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:21 PM
3

9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999! Factorial this.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 04:20 PM
9

Outrage. Feminists/mainstream media (pretty much synonymous at this point) would say the owner of the bar is misogynistic, sexist, etc.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:32 PM
2

You are a genuinely sickening person.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:12 PM
61

Very.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:58 PM
3

magic force field around my dick Super magical dick field activate!
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:21 PM
3

"Uh, why are you telling me to damn myself?" "Oh yeah, good point. I'm still mad though!"
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:19 PM
2

I'm pretty sure they intended to respond to the comment talking about the last paragraph of the link saying not to draw conclusions, and just messed it up. If you read it as someone trying to support their own point it doesn't make sense, but if you read it as responding to that comment it makes sense.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:16 PM
7

And now it's guilty until proven innocent for men and innocent regardless of guilt for women.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 08:42 AM
2

Yeah, but it's not like men need their balls for anything, right? /s
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:55 PM
4

Yeah. I don't give a fuck if it's a part of your culture, there's no excuse to mutilate people.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 08:01 PM
6

How many drugs are you on right now?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:19 PM
23

Because quotes about male genocide are pro-equality!
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:16 PM
2

We don't hate women just feminists. There we go. I told you it. Happy now? Is this what you wanted?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:14 PM
1

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:48 PM
7

AgainstMensRights is full of deranged people like this.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:35 PM
10

Wait, what? Men being unable to do things is misogyny now? How do they come up with this shit?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:30 PM
1

Men don't exist just to ease women's comfort. Apparently quite a few women think they do. And of course women are always right! It's fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:47 PM
1

Plus there's no nasty spray of shit/piss water when you flush the toilet.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:42 PM
1

You might get a negative reaction for advertising it, but I'll certainly be getting in on this.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 09:38 PM
2

Damn it. Why do I always forget to rape?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 06:42 PM
1

I think that you also a word.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:34 PM
1

All I did was google "age gap is a power imbalance" and the front page was filled with exactly what I wanted to find. Gee, I wonder if it could be because you literally googled " age gap is a power imbalance", and google is just showing you what you clearly want to see?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:09 PM
4

This feels like sarcasm, but at the same time it doesn't.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:46 PM
22

No, he saved them from going flying a hill and getting severely hurt.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:27 PM
4

you can't eat your own kids out of fear like Kronos did. Oh, really? I thought you could. Oops.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:44 PM
2

There wasn't man-hating among previous waves (as far as I know) though. It was just what it says on the tin: a movement dedicated to getting equal rights for women.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 12:10 AM
8

And then they'll withdraw consent.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 09:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter