TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Boring_Meat2550 Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by Boring_Meat2550 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

A man who "acts feminist" in front of women without believing in its principles is certainly suspect, yes. Feminism is a political ideology. To real feminist men, it's a deeply rooted belief system that they try and apply it to all aspects of their lives, not just dating/sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:22 PM
–

I mean you're entitled to your opinion but you're wrong lol. I don't need to do anything to "land women". I've already "landed" one for life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:04 PM
–

This looks like bait so I'm not going to bite. Just be specific when you speak about "men". Most men aren't redpill men. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:33 PM
–

I mean this just isn't true. Dunno what else to say. If you or other men you know think like this, y'all need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:22 PM
–

I've already explained why I didn't do that. It would have been a waste of my time and energy since OP would not have understood it. The terms I used to describe the post were not directed at OP but to the post itself. Hence not ad hominem, either "weak" or strong. Do look up these terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:24 AM
–

The terms I used described OP's argument, they weren't "ad hominem". Look up what that means. Also look up "logical fallacy". You seem to like using heavy-sounding words to sound smart except you don't seem to know what they actually mean or what contexts to use them in.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:23 AM
1

I used terms that described OP's post accurately without elaborating on actual gender theory because that wouldn't have been productive given where they're coming from. It was the most rational course of action from my perspective. Not every man's masculinity is as fragile as yours where being called "weak" "effeminate" "lame" etc. threaten it. If you were trying to get under my skin, you'll have to try a lot harder. If you think you're being rational, you might want to look up the dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:45 PM
0

>So, when people say that there really are no truly involuntarily single men, it’s confusing and invalidating But this user never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:37 PM
7

>It is true that I see them as losers but not necessarily because they aren’t good men, but because they’re stuck in a defeatist mindset. A conventionally unattractive man who's single because many women find him physically unattractive doesn't have a "defeatist mindset", many women just find him physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:34 PM
3

If you consider being conventionally unattractive as something wrong with them, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:25 PM
8

I'm not sure if by "loser" OP means a man who's morally bad or someone who's inept and worthy of demeaning. There are quite a few women who think a man who's single is a "loser" in the latter sense, I don't know if there are many who think it's a moral failing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:17 PM
1

You don't have to do all these things. A lot of "average" men will simply find "average" women. Behaving as if you'll be single as a man unless you do all of this is rather wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:06 PM
2

No, modern gender theory is scientific, facts-based and logical. Whatever this guy has written is all of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:54 PM
2

What (who) is WPATH? There's no "according to" when it comes to something being unscientific. There's no scope for personal opinion here. Whatever you've written is factually incorrect and has no relation to reality or history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:06 AM
1

How do you know which is more common?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:04 AM
2

I can't speak to what "most men" are like and neither can you. I can only speak about the men I keep company with and most of them aren't horny/desperate enough to sleep with almost any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:03 AM
1

I never said anything remotely as outlandish as a "guy using a woman for girlfriend energy". I said some women develop feelings for their male friends that go unreciprocated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 08:01 AM
0

That's what I'm saying, the logic doesn't follow for you because it seems you're willing to sleep with almost any type of woman. It follows for a lot of men (including me) who wouldn't. I'd rather stay sexless than sleep with certain types of women, and I believe many men would.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:28 AM
1

Which "stuff" are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:21 AM
2

This is weird. Some women may like "bad boy traits", most don't. This myth that most women want bad boy traits in men is probably because some of the attributes that "bad boys" have are generally desirable like confidence, ambition etc. But y'all assume that women want the whole package of disrespectful, disloyal etc. which most women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:36 AM
0

I mean, you do you, just don't claim to speak for men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:33 AM
2

Uninformed, unscientific, irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:16 AM
1

This is the most twisted reason for not befriending women that I've ever come across. My female friends are amazing people and life wouldn't be the same without them. I know I'll never develop romantic feelings for them, nor will I not befriend a woman because of the possibility that I'll catch feelings for her down the line. If that happens I'll deal with it. It's quite possible the woman carches feelings for you and you don't reciprocate. You don't seem to have even considered the possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:14 AM
1

>they complain all the time about their abusive bfs, and when you ask them why dont you leave, they stay silent or give a bs excuse. Could be because their abusive bfs are more likely to kill them if they leave than if they stay. Also they may need to stay for their kids, be financially dependent on their partner etc. You haven't spent even a second trying to understand what life might be like for women in abusive relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:14 AM
11

That, and the fact that women are shamed for having casual sex and it's also far more risky for them than for men. These factors disincentivise women from having sex too soon with someone they don't know very well. I doubt many women even think of sex as a "bargaining chip" the way men on here believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:50 AM
1

>Who promised you guys that everybody can be a millionaire playboy? Obviously no one did and no sensible man believes this. Absurd statement. I've just mentioned why it's impossible to make even "marginal improvements" in some of the metrics men are judged on most (height, facial attractiveness). It is possible in other areas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:12 PM
–

Speaking of terms of service, you don't sound old enough to participate in adult subreddits. Nothing "personnel" kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:13 AM
3

Your proof that "most men" think like this? How are you such an expert on what "most men" do?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:37 PM
–

Yes I see that, but what were your reasons for posting this? Do you find such behaviour "icky"? Because if that's the case then these are incredibly imaginative situations. Also, the first one is a terrible situation to be in and if you find that an "ick", you're just not a very nice person. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:36 PM
–

Yup, "regarded" is what I am lol. Also, you clearly can't read so maybe go back to school and learn that before trying to debate strangers online.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:29 PM
3

It's not "using" her if it's something she's doing consensually.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:06 PM
6

We men have 2 categories Speak for yourself, you don't represent men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:04 PM
0

I understand the fat/ugly women are going to have a hard time finding a husband or guy that genuinely cares about them It's the other way round - men who get into relationships with such women are more likely to care about them vs. men who date attractive women, who might be in it because they just want a trophy. But for men, to even get A SINGULAR date, it takes a lot of effort lol Wrong. It's usually no more difficult for a man than for a woman to get a date with someone they want to go out wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 04:22 PM
–

Except for many women the "bad cake" vastly outnumbers the "good cake" and might make you horribly sick and even kill you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 03:01 PM
–

>the majority of them don't even find success from taking part in the Red Pill. It's a cult where the goal is to keep you within it, not to find success. If most red pilled men found success they wouldn't have much to complain about and the whole theory would fall apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:05 PM
–

I'd broadly agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:01 PM
–

That's not the meaning of the sentence you wrote. Learn to write clearly and coherently in English or use ChatGPT to translate from your native language.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:26 PM
–

Oral rehydration salts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:58 PM
–

Not being attracted to women and being indifferent to being cheated on or broken up with are two wildly different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:57 PM
–

How can the bar be in hell for these men whom supposedly most women want, if most women supposedly want them? Do you realise how much you're contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:56 PM
–

They do seem so, sadly. A lot of them sound like they're perpetually online and have little life experience. Not sure which post this is though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:55 PM
–

These are your "icks"? I'm trying to see the point of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:53 PM
–

I still don't get where "moral failing" comes into the picture. I'd imagine more people would hold the first category *personally accountable*. But like I said, it isn't a black and white answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:51 PM
–

This hypothetical woman sounds like someone with both low self-esteem and was enabling cheating. Both dealbreakers to me. If it was a long time ago and it's something she regretted and is sure she'd never do again then maybe. If it was her most recent ex then probably a no go for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:46 PM
–

There's no question of morality here as it isn't immoral to be any of these things. While sensible people will hold the fat or slovenly or smelly person accountable as these things are mostly in one's control (lot of nuance when it comes to fat though), the world doesn't actually have a lot of sensible people. Lookism is a major phenomenon, a lot of people project negative traits on to unattractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:42 PM
–

>While older guys always be trying to advocate for age gap relationships Not always, not even close. Plenty of men date within their age group. >It’s other men making it harder for younger guys to date, not women. Quite a few women have a criterion that a man be of same age or older (within a few years) in order to date him. Both men and women are responsible for setting this standard today.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:39 PM
–

It's not a "privilege" to be pursued and hounded and harassed by creepy, potentially dangerous men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:32 PM
4

Not red pill, and definitely don't believe AWALT logic. But generally speaking, when it comes to what makes men desirable, some of the things are extraordinarily difficult while others are downright impossible to achieve. If a man is born into a low-income family and let's say has learning disabilities too, it's extremely challenging for him to become wealthy. It's practically impossible to grow taller than a man's genes allow or change his facial structure to look more attractive in a masculine…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:31 PM
–

Humans can't be explained through "primate behaviour". Most people aren't complete slaves to genetically coded instincts and behave like mindless automatons. There's huge variety in human behaviour that can't be explained through simple generalisations based on primate behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 09:33 AM
1

I... was talking very specifically about dating and traditional gender roles here. My only point was all men don't yearn to be the sole provider or want all the highly-gendered traits in women this guy has listed. That's all. I absolutely didn't try to tell women how they should be viewing men from a safety pov.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 11:16 AM
1

>Most men You mean most redpill men. Don't drag regular men into this. We neither love being the sole provider nor want all the qualities you've listed in a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:28 AM
–

"penis-shaming" can take different forms. I've rarely seen women throw penis-related insults directly at men. Or talk about how small someone's dick is when he isn't present. However comments like "small dick energy" and "limp dick" are used a fair bit by women. It's not directly shaming an individual man's penis, but it's still proagating the notion that smaller penises or ED are things to be ashamed of and worthy of being demeaned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:26 AM
–

>I deliberately left out things like "good", "kind", "dedicated" or "respectful", as those do not cause attractiveness. Confidence, charisma and competence are generally positive qualities. The fact that you didn't include other positive qualities doesn't make these not positive qualities. >I didn't say "desirable qualities". I said attraction. Ok. Gay men would be **attracted** to other men with these qualities. Better? >Please, kindly tell me what's the most sold book of the last decade I assu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:41 PM
–

So now it's "majority" and not "overwhelming majority"? Do you realize how pointless it is to list a bunch of mostly positive qualities and say the majority of women are attracted to these? Gay men would find most of these qualities desirable in other men. So would lesbian women in other women. Also "looks" and "charisma" encompass a wide range of attributes - the overwhelming majority of women are definitely not attracted to the hypermasculine "Chad" you guys think they are. They're also not at…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:18 PM
–

>You haven't understood the argument. This part wasn't addressing your argument, it was pointing out that you're drawing an analogy between two wildly different things that can't be compared. >The overwhelming majority of women are.. Except they aren't any of these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 07:53 PM
–

>there is NO situation where all ANYTHING is like anything. No sane person will say otherwise. >the overwhelming majority of women are like that That's where you're completely wrong. The overwhelming majority of women don't behave anything like how Red Pill claims they do. While gendered conditioning 100% exists, there's huge variation in women's behaviour across their entire population. Warning underage girls to be wary of adult male groomers and "warning" adult men to be wary of adult women in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:24 PM
–

I obviously wouldn't feel good about it. What sort of question is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 04:16 PM
–

Again, the manosphere is still a pretty small minority of men in the world. What they think doesn't coincide with what regular men who aren't part of (and quite likely haven't even heard of) the manosphere think. Belonging to this category myself, I find your "levels" rather hilarious. And yes, for men levels 2 and 3 are mainly based on physical attributes. Again, this isn't "for men", but only for a limited number of men from the manosphere that you've interacted with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 07:06 PM
–

Are there ways in which your feminism carries over into your dating life?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:57 PM
–

I'm.. really not sure what your comment has to do with the topic at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:52 PM
–

I don't see the logical flaw in this stance. I don't hold it myself, but for the men that do, wouldn't the fact that all women supposedly not wanting to sleep with virgins be precisely the reason for them "pissing and moaning" about women not giving virgins a chance? Don't know if I'm missing something here. >How do young men ever become non virgins if almost none of us give them a chance? Both can be virgins I guess? That is fairly common.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:43 PM
–

I'm not sure which men you've been talking to, but this really isn't close to accurate in describing how men view women. The men on this sub are not accurate examples of male behavior in the real world. I'm also curious, is the distinction between your Levels 2 and 3 solely on the basis of physical attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:37 PM
–

So then, according to your logic, on the one hand he's been dealt the "death sentence" of being 2" below average height. But on the other hand, he has some unknown physical quality that makes him so irresistible to women, that it not only compensate for his "death sentence" but also allows him to pull of "being a manic pixie boy or any [blank] boy"? Do you not see the massive contradiction in your arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:32 PM
–

It's disingenuous to dismiss pretty privilege as a "chronically online view about looks and gender". Men absolutely do treat women they find attractive better than those they find unattractive, generally speaking. People generally treat people they think are attractive better than those they think are unattractive. It's a very real, widely acknowledged, and documented phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:17 PM
–

Yeah well this guy seems to be from the US where he's a good 2" below average. So you're logic of "Being a manic pixie boy or any [blank] boy works wonders when you're above average" falls apart no?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:00 PM
–

You've taken generalizations way too far with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 09:46 AM
–

"Above average" in terms of what? He's below average in terms of height at least, which a lot of y'all think is a death sentence when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:37 AM
–

>I never really minded being the more experienced one. Even took a couple “virginities” Good for you. But I'm not sure that's what most women want. >But I am telling you, nobody cares if I cry when I’m sad or tell a deep secret. Would you describe yourself as conventionally attractive? Because there's a big difference between in how people (especially men) react to vulnerability in women they find attractive (which usually conforms with what is conventionally attractive) vs not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 08:34 AM
-1

Testosterone <> libido
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:20 PM
5

Ignoring the tangent you went off on, I'm just stating plain facts - if >95% of penises are between 4-7 inches, saying this range is 'average' makes no sense. There's a huge difference between 4 and 7 inches. If you'd said around 5 inches or something, that would have made a lot more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:17 PM
7

All he said was that's a massive range for 'average'. Which it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 10:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter