TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BornLearningDisabled Archive

View 2 posts and 89 comments by BornLearningDisabled on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

GeneralBornLearningDisabled/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:40 PM
0

discussionBornLearningDisabled/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 04:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Women are far more likely to believe a vegan diet is healthful. A big part of climate change is getting rid of traditional farming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/21 01:30 PM
18

It sounds like the goal of the elite is to give petty power to people who are psychologically unfit, for the express purpose of abusing citizens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/21 01:15 PM
2

Or even poor women. Have you ever heard an intersectionalist university professor use the term "class privilege"? It's certainly not on wikipedia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:32 AM
1

He's certainly not a member of the alt right or free market libertarians. Woke capitalism, spending money on women's issues, is just socialism. Not your socialism maybe, but socialism none the less. There are a million ways to spend money. Only one way to say no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:31 AM
2

It would help if the left didn't cheer every time some multinational corporation fired someone for a facebook comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:29 AM
1

The establishment could offer world peace, and we still ought to oppose them just on principle. It's not theirs to give. If you ever find yourself on the same side as Google or Amazon, you'd better rethink your position, and if you're not in conflict with them already, you'd better find a way to bring yourself into conflict.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:22 AM
1

Political correctness is a tool the connected wield against the unconnected. You're still the enemy no matter how much you criticize MensRights. They don't need you for that. I don't get why people here still believe they will be spared.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:18 AM
1

I would have said absolutely not, before we switched to a mail-in voting system. Kamala is your new mommy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:13 AM
2

Feminists are uniformly perusing a left wing agenda with institutional support. Men are split as evidenced by the existence of this subreddit as a left wing offshoot of mens rights. Women cooperate. Men compete. Usually. Rugged collectivism is a hard sell. I don't think it's a phalanx as much as it's a motte and baily, but I like your example of women intuitively knowing who to stick up for. Women are very practical that way. Men are romantic and ideological. There are a number of female politic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 08:09 AM
5

In America women consume something like 8 times more health care than men. Very good customers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/21 01:14 AM
4

Laser eye surgery is considered cosmetic as well, at least in America which has the same policies with regard to breast implants versus hair transplant. Circumcision is also considered cosmetic depending on the circumstances, kinda like breast implants. When it needs to be, it is. When it needs to not be, it isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/21 01:13 AM
14

King of the Hill reversed the genders and feels much more realistic because of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 10:06 PM
-2

Why don't you want to be "that guy"? You should be proud. I've avoided news for a long time so I didn't know about these attacks, but I assumed as much and appreciate that you took the time to defend the allegedly indefensible. That warms my heart. The wallowing downtrodden attitude has got to go. We need pride in ourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 06:13 PM
-1

I don't know what that is. I know it's a feminist term. I looked it up a long time ago and forgot what it was because I didn't think it was legitimate. Debate comes in all forms. Trolling is a kind of debate, and artful kind. Socrates was a troll. Zeno was a troll. The fact that you put the word debate in quotes shows that you're not comfortable enough in your own views to let your guard down, lest some wise internet denizen trick you into undermining yourself. Hypocrisy is a terrible thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 06:08 PM
0

I hear what you're saying and you could be right. But I tend to think that we are made to feel like being respectable and having public support is the way to change things, in order to keep us in line. We can look at examples like Martin Luther King versus Malcolm X, Booker T Washington verus WEB Dubois, etc... It seems like the reformers fared better historically, but what if that's just an illusion? What if it's only because the reforms were what the establishment wanted anyway? If so, then it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 05:59 PM
0

You can't blame the spark for igniting the fuse. Imagine how easy it would be for the media, if they wanted to, to tar feminism with Lorena Bobbitt. Instead they write books glorifying her. Worse yet, get the CIA to pay some mentally ill homeless person to stab a bunch of Jewish people while screaming "Intactivism!" The bottom line is we can't worry about our image when our image is curated by our enemies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 05:38 PM
2

It's good that you learned that, somehow. I don't see how anyone will, if we stick to echo chambers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 05:31 PM
0

Thanks. My views were actually very well received on r/mensrights aside from the moderators. When I call myself "extreme", I guess I paint a certain picture that I shouldn't have. It was almost my way of rationalizing why I got banned. If I got banned, I must have been extreme. What else could it be? I'm polite. Sadly that never matters. Anyway, you're probably right, but it's nice to test the waters. My feeling is that the commonalities should matter more than the differences. For example, lear…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 05:22 PM
-5

As a considerable person, I've thought about that. But it's not most people. It's just the moderators and the people who hide behind them. A small but empowered minority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 05:13 PM
19

The deadline is 56 years? That's random.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:03 PM
3

The difference between MRA and feminism isn't "popularity". It's institutional support.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:35 AM
2

Nobody will ever pay granny next door $50 a week to watch neighborhood kids after school anymore when they can get "free" child warehousing from the government that costs $5000/month to cover the insurance for the obese illiterates that guard the storage facility and deal the prescription drugs. They want kids out of the home at all costs. Childcare should be illegal and anybody associated with it should be in jail.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:12 AM
2

Test rukkus
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:21 AM
3

White women are the biggest beneficiaries of Affirmative Action. Rich people promote anti-male ideology to take down competition. Men who can't afford lawyers are much more likely to be victimized by fake rape accusations. Men with no financial prospects are much more likely to be victimized by a military draft, not get into college, etc... Naturally, since black men tend to poorer, anti-male policies cause more black men to end up in jail or dead. When we say black lives matter, we're lying. It…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:58 AM
11

Read about what the Google office was like before they got political. They had parties with cocaine and hookers in the office. Now they have implicit bias training. Just like schools, the entire corporate apparatus is designed around making women comfortable at the expense of men. For goodness sake Google fires men for expressing non-feminist opinions.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:15 AM
1

Always attack. Also take note of how women specifically chose a pest as the example. Would they liken Jews to vermin? Only some of them own banks.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:10 AM
1

The government created Lyme disease on Plum Island. It was part of military research to find ways of weaponizing ticks. They were doing all sorts of horrible things to us around this time. It was after the military industrial complex had been ramped up from WWII and they had all this new money and power and nobody knew anything. It's hilarious if you go to the Wikipedia article. Some idiot wrote that it's a discredited conspiracy theory right after it acknowledges that the government was exposed…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:06 AM
1

"Men have 99% of workplace deaths" convinces no one. "My wife left me and took all my money" fires people up. ​ Every comment needs to be angry. No exceptions. Feminism is a hate group. You can't have a society with feminists.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:55 AM
3

The left is supposed to care about the "vulnerable", but they laugh at the "fragile". It's great when feminists say things like this because it's self defeating. It reveals two things: One, that they are motivated by hatred for the less fortunate, not compassion. Two, they recognize themselves as the oppressors and men as the oppressed. Men are not threatening to them. They see men as pathetic. When a woman says you are fragile, what she is saying is that you used to be rich, but because of femi…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:49 AM
3

Where's the incel subreddit?
/r/MensRights14/08/21 04:50 AM
3

Censorship is expensive. You know how many millions of views Alex Jones had?
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:52 AM
6

Women's soccer doesn't exist without sexism, which is in their favor.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:27 AM
1

Get a camera, get her to say things through text messaging, both to you and to her female friends if possible. For example, while you're at your house having fun, you could encourage her to drunk dial her friends, for fun. The more she says, the better.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:36 PM
166

Who's going to resist Reddit censorship? Not women. Who's going to resist STEM labor pool expansion? Not women. Who's going to resist workplace sexual assault? Not women. ​ Reddit mods have a clear political agenda.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 05:17 PM
21

The expensive one.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:24 AM
2

Wasn't "Luna" the name of some TV character the kid liked?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:22 AM
43

Institutional power is always going to be on the side of feminism. As men, we have to fight guerilla style like Jane Fonda and the Vietcong.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:11 AM
6

There's a lot of cognitive dissonance when reddit feminists leverage institutional power to censor us. Never occurs to them that it would be the other way around. Here's how they work that out in their heads: We're the elite, but we're hate mongers and make the elite look bad. They say corporations are only pretending to be woke.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:09 AM
3

America was on the communist side with Uncle Joe Stalin. We lost.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:00 AM
1

Touching a woman on the shoulder isn't a crime. The accuser should go to jail instantly.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 08:08 PM
7

He probably rapes patients when he puts them under before surgery. They won't remember either.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:58 PM
-1

No it's not legal. It's extremely illegal. They just don't enforce it for rich people.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:43 PM
0

Isn't he a circumfetishist?
/r/MensRights10/08/21 07:47 PM
1

Social media has given a voice to us, which is why there's such a rush to lock it down.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:12 PM
1

I watched that video yesterday because it came up in my feed for some reason, already a red flag. There's nothing in it to prevent feminists from thinking it's about us instead of the other way around. It's a terrible video.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:07 PM
14

Some rich guy's wife was in danger of losing out to a man of lesser means.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:03 PM
-1

If he's not getting sex, he's an incel. Labels aren't toxic.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:00 PM
1

I mean that's the view of people who want women in STEM.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 10:59 AM
1

Which Fortune 500 corporation is not aggressively hiring based on gender? The corporate agenda is about cartelizing the free market.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:54 AM
6

Nobody is afraid of us. That's an act. Everybody is doing victory dances around us because we have no power. Other than that I think you're exactly right about how they intellectually justify putting the boot down. Great find.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:45 AM
1

I don't see how you can support rights for men without reflexively being alt-right/anti-corporate/anti-feminism. What is an example of a men's right that is not bad for corporate power?
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:40 AM
3

If opposing circumcision makes you antisemitic, your name better be Adolf Hitler.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:33 AM
8

No it's a huge problem. You just don't understand what feminism really is. More money is spent pushing women into STEM than is spent taking kids away from fathers. You can't oppose part of the agenda of elite corporate ideology.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:27 AM
1

Simple. Wages in STEM are too high and need to be driven down. This goes hand in hand with H1B visas which are being pushed by all the same people. Feminism is a class war. Women don't want to be treated like drones in an office. That's why pushing them into STEM is costing so much money. It's a subsidy for big business.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:25 AM
3

Imagine Hillary Clinton uptalking.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:12 AM
-1

Think of autism as the extreme male brain. Autistic people are obsessed with organizing and categorizing things. They prefer objects to people. It's not under-diagnosed in females. Since when is a psychiatrist reluctant to sell you pharmaceutical drugs? If anything it would be over-diagnosed, in boys as well as girls for the same reason. Do feminists ever claim girls are being denied Ritalin? Not on your life. This is just feminism looking for ways to take even more revenge against the most vuln…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:10 AM
3

You keep saying you're in the middle, yet a mainstream network TV channel is the most extreme thing you can imagine. You're to the left of Trotsky.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:49 PM
1

No that's not it at all. One side has all the power. The other side couldn't be "fanatical" even if they wanted to. Same story here.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:45 PM
2

Discussing men's rights has led to identification of the impediment to those rights, which is feminism, the flattery of female vanity by rich men in the class war. The angry comments are the good comments. The tone police comments, like yours, are the shill comments. No matter how much we try to play by the rules, they're they ones setting the rules, as a means to justify shutting us down. And if they can't, they'll do it anyway. They're fighting the war to end the war as the progressives used t…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:38 PM
2

Imagine you're a feminist and you learn about something called "female genital mutilation type IV" that occurs in some far away land. You want to stop it from happening. Do you: A) Join forces with men who allegedly have all the power and stop all genital mutilation together? B) Dream up justifications for male genital mutilation and bizarrely hope your own oppressors will decide to stop oppressing you while continuing to oppress themselves. She's lying.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:24 PM
16

MRA isn't looking to be officially sanctioned. But feminists know it's persuasive and people can't be permitted to see it. They would love to see us retreat to some internet ghetto devoid of any cross-traffic. The whole purpose of the internet is to force people to look at things they don't want to see. If you look at how any underground movement works, like a trolling organization, they may have their own private forum, but all the action happens in the mainstream. It may come down to MRAs pret…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:14 PM
6

This looks like a list of things feminists say to distinguish female circumcision from male circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:57 PM
2

Feminist subs are filled with "hate". Subs aren't removed for that reason. Don't get confused.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:44 PM
2

While there is certainly some in group out group bias against men across the board, not taking other people's issues seriously is the default. People operate on self interest. Nobody cares about starving Africans or less yet something nobody has even heard of like female circumcision until there is organized money behind it. So the question becomes why is there no money behind men's issues. In the eyes of authority, men aren't as compliant as women. Men don't make good customers. The future is f…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:14 AM
12

Media, corporations, academia, and government all speak with one voice.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:10 AM
31

You just hate poor people.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:08 AM
35

"Patriarchy" doesn't hurt the feminists who fight to keep the rich men in power over the poor men.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:07 AM
2

These are the same scientists who say circumcision prevents AIDS. They're lying. Healthy people with high testosterone levels will be driven to masturbate more, hence the correlation.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:40 PM
3

Walk around naked. Have sex with anybody I want.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:31 PM
3

Yes we know, women make better customers for Big Pharma.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:30 PM
6

The article itself is the most disgusting part. It's written by a Jewish woman who uses buzzwords like "foreskin owner", calls it medical waste to distance herself from it rather than explain how that's a legal loophole, talks about the specialized cells without any reference to why we have have them. There's nothing scientific in the article at all. It's part of the hype machine for corporate products, and she's very pleased with that.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:34 PM
2

Jews are 2% of the country. Muslims are 1%.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 12:56 PM
2

You didn't experience female circumcision. It's a hoax. It's nothing.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:59 PM
1

That's pretty much what it is. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:56 PM
1

Yeah I didn't know what to call it.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:55 PM
-1

Thanks for the suggestion. I want an incel subreddit because I, like everyone else, love a good underdog. I was debating communism in a communism debating reddit, and I got called incel a whole bunch of times. So now I'm curious. I think in a way, every man is "involuntarily celibate" because no man gets as much sex as he wants. I don't know much about it other than that. I read some of the incel wikis a long time ago, and they seemed to talk a lot about animal matting patterns from an evolution…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:51 PM
2

Banned me too. Doesn't take much. Straightforward argument about something specific with no swear words or insults.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:39 PM
3

Didn't Trotsky coin the term racism? Unless you'd rather be white and poor than black and rich, then these isms are examples of the left as the global power structure.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:32 PM
1

Every corporation is feminist.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:28 PM
1

If this sub is more to the left than LWMA by your definition of leftism, then wouldn't this sub be even more far left of MensLib? MensLib hates men.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:25 PM
2

Certainly, but not as much. With the word feminism it tends to be more about degree. Killing all men or just some of them. That's not outrageous. Heck, even the word equality is disputed. People at least have some idea about them though. With leftism, it's all over the place and impossible to pin down. You say leftists don't call out feminists. I say leftists champion feminists. Can we say universal healthcare is a leftist cause? Women use 8 times more healthcare than men so feminism is a great …
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:21 PM
1

I think he's the first president with a low IQ. He's not communist, because he isn't anything. But the woke corporate globalist agenda is communism. Lots of feminist cooperation. No competition allowed.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:58 AM
2

Racism isn't an issue. The people who are racist live in trailers and have no money.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:56 AM
1

A little bit of feminism, huh? Extremists take ideas to logical conclusions. It's all or nothing.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:54 AM
1

How could it possibly not be 2 dimensional? What is a libertarian socialist or a right wing authoritarian? If there is a centralized authority, it's going to have a certain nature unto itself regardless of window dressing.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:53 AM
13

I read a thread on r/AskFeminists where one of the feminists said something about class and got downvoted into oblivion. One of the other feminists became indignant and said, "oh god, you're not one of those leftists who thinks sexism is a distraction from classism are you?" It was clearly being used that way. I read another thread on one of the parenting subreddits where a rich woman was talking about sending her daughter to public school to experience diversity. She said she was doing her part…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 06:51 PM
1

In anthropology, there's a politically correct movement to change the name of hunter-gatherers to gatherer-hunters, in order to emphasize the gathering and de-emphasize the hunting. They want to make modern meat consumption look like an aberration. They do the same thing with sex and equality. They loudly point out that women had tribal leadership roles while quietly admitting that rape was rampant. The point is to make it look like our society is particularly sexist and that sexism isn't natura…
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:43 AM
1

Feminism is a weapon that rich men use against poor men. Bill Cosby getting off on a technicality will be construed as evidence of male privilege, not wealth privilege.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:32 AM
3

Tell them you are female. Tell them you're black. File a lawsuit for racism.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 09:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter