BornRetarded Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	Where can we engage feminists?	Feminism	BornRetarded	/r/MensRights	01/04/21 10:34 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	If you were looking for an excuse to avoid women at all costs this is it. Consent legally withdrawn if a woman thinks you're lying about any one of a thousand things. Yes you are the only person who thinks a woman is allowed to change her mind after the fact. Feminists and the industrial prison complex they represent are just lying. You have no excuse.	/r/MensRights	14/04/21 01:30 AM
2	If you were looking for an excuse to avoid women at all costs this is it. Consent legally withdrawn if a woman thinks you're lying about any one of a thousand things. It's legal to shoot a chicken and eat it, but it's not legal to marry a chicken because a chicken can't consent, even though a chicken doesn't have consent to give. Consent is a noxious term.	/r/MensRights	14/04/21 01:28 AM
2	If you were looking for an excuse to avoid women at all costs this is it. Consent legally withdrawn if a woman thinks you're lying about any one of a thousand things. You're going to have ugly children.	/r/MensRights	14/04/21 01:23 AM
3	What do you think about female privlage. Harmony, not equality. Male and female are biological concepts. I would guess that the no votes are from people who reject the concept of privilege. It's an anti-concept, like the notion of "progress" and many other buzzwords used to market corporate ideology.	/r/MensRights	13/04/21 06:42 PM
1	Thoughts on this perspective? (genuinely asking) It's 100% rhetorical. People who espouse a view like that did not come up with it on their own. They simply like feminism and where it's taking us, so they were looking for a way to be against men's rights, saw this on the internet and adopted it through motivated reasoning. They don't fully believe it, it sort of just fills a gap in their minds, like intellectual laziness. Consider how difficult it must be to believe that feminism is not a dominant corporate ideology. Who's holding up this patr…	/r/MensRights	13/04/21 06:36 PM
4	Only 2% are false accusations? It's more than 50%, but nobody's going to believe your number over academia. Here are some common sense retorts: "Every rape case highlighted by the media turns out to be a hoax. If it's only 2%, why is media's batting average closer to 110?" "More convictions are overturned for rape than for any other crime. See the Exoneration Project." "Fake insurance claims are only 2%, but that's because they'll investigate you and send you to jail for burning down your own house. There's no punishmen…	/r/MensRights	13/04/21 06:17 PM
2	I find it so insanely frustrating to hear women say "That's not real feminism" Have you seen the new Shell Oil commercial making the rounds on youtube? It uses that corporate stick figure art style and is all about Shell's commitment to Net Zero. Big Oil has some big ideas about global warming. Is that "not real environmentalism"? You're a chump if you think you're the one setting the political agenda. Same goes for any feminist who isn't personally in favor of circumcision. Big deal.	/r/MensRights	13/04/21 06:01 PM
4	New book: The future is female: Capitalism and the Masculine Disorder Why is this only now becoming an issue, when society is at its most feminine, its most socialist? Public school shooters aren't pillars of masculinity. They are victims of xenoestrogenic chemical warfare in the most female dominant environment that has ever existed. Such an affront to basic observations, this tome must have 20 volumes.	/r/MensRights	13/04/21 05:54 PM
2	Feminist comes to terms with MRAs on gender pay gap after discord debate. Women aren't going to stop consuming because you made a good argument. You can't compete with the psychological manipulation by ad men and you can't expect them to buck trends when TV is so good at showing them the consequences.	/r/MensRights	12/04/21 01:53 AM
1	I've noticed that the Wikipedia entry about sexism, has been manipulated to be sexist against men Somehow every wikipedia article is wrong is the same way.	/r/MensRights	10/04/21 10:43 PM
1	Sure, maybe there have been occasions where feminism has benefited men accidentally, but that's just not good enough. You can't claim feminism helps men when it actively undermines us and minimizes our issues and seeks to deplatform all of us for simply criticizing them and voicing our concerns. You could have simply given an example of feminism being the rising tide that lifts all boats, but you didn't. Here, I'll do it: Feminism promotes universal childcare. Was that so hard? Yes, because it's so obviously wrong. There will be no money left to pay grandma next door, because she's not a government approved child warehouse.	/r/MensRights	02/04/21 10:26 AM
1	Does anybody know of any study that 'measured' how circumcision reduced sexual pleasure in men? Garbage in, garbage out. Little evidence to support the idea the idea that chopping off your hands has a significant reduction on penmanship.	/r/MensRights	01/04/21 10:11 PM
1	Does anybody know of any study that 'measured' how circumcision reduced sexual pleasure in men? Translation: For circumcision to be bad, thousands of scientists at the CDC would all have to be lying. They are. Scientists are bad people. They know the power that white lab coat gives them. Scientists are not the nerdy old geezers we imagine. They're the sluts you went to college with. Remember them? They fucking love science, and they all took biology cause it was the easy one. The CDC doesn't even know what a circumcision is. They don't even have an anatomical description of a foreskin anyw…	/r/MensRights	01/04/21 10:05 PM