TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BoxSweater Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by BoxSweater on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Personally my interpretation of the movie wasn't that it was intended to be misandrist, but there was a lot of the audience who took it that way. Like when I watched it I was thinking it was about a depraved cult using the tragic event in the main character's life to ensnare her and her friends to rape and kill the men while brainwashing the main character into becoming part of the cult, and I thought the movie did a good job at that. Basically the movie was about how cults can use emotional vul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 09:41 AM
4

I actually have seen this kind of thing done by some right-wingers more recently. Some video of a black man committing a crime comes out and people are commenting "funny how it's always members of a certain demographic" or something like that. I think most feminists would see this as obviously racist (feminists can totally be racist too, but it's usually more subtle), but they would literally support the exact same sentiment but "demographic" in their case would be referring to the gender instea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 11:35 PM
9

What they fail to grasp is, when you omit a quantifier from your statement like "Some" or "Many" or "A lot" etc then the default assumption is that you are actually referring to "All" with your statement. I mean technically I could see it meaning "the overwhelming majority", but you're pretty much totally right. Like you'd never see them apply this standard to another group: "women are whores", "black people are thugs" etc... are all bigoted statements that obviously mean "as a rule, ___ are ___…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 11:30 PM
6

Yeah I haven't specifically looked into that history, but I'm sure it did occur and almost certainly still does sometimes. Giving an easier option to do it, whether it's race or gender discrimination, seems like it'll just harm a lot of people for marginal benefit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 10:42 PM
12

Honestly, regardless of legality I don't think services like Uber should offer that toggle, no matter who can use it. It could still harm men if they're less in demand as drivers/riders, and I can see some predatory men using the toggle to go after women. Like it would seem pretty awful to introduce a race filter, even if anyone can choose any race, and I feel like the same problems could arise here. Having a built in option for discrimination based on immutable characteristics is a bad thing IM…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 07:14 PM
7

This makes a lot of sense. I was also thinking it could be related to people trying to survive after the initial attempt. Like if a man and a woman swim far out into the ocean hoping to drown and as they start drowning they both panic and try to swim back to shore, the man seems significantly more likely to make it back based on average strength. In other methods it seems like once you've made the attempt your physical strength would be only minimally important to your survival.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/25 07:21 PM
29

but they lose their minds if you do the same about any other group of people Yeah the arguments I've seen used to defend it being done to men fall apart if you were using other demographic groups. Like I hear a lot "I said 'men are violent' not 'all men are violent' so really I just meant 'there are men who are violent' and if you perceive that as an attack on all men then you don't understand how English works". With any other group it'd be obvious that when someone says "[demographic group] ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/25 05:27 PM
6

It's so unfortunate to see them taking this route as it just makes me more pessimistic that another republican is going to win next election. Like Trump isn't some master linguist who calculates every word he says carefully in advance to tap into the male subconscious and siphon off Democrat voters, he's an idiot who's good at tapping into base emotions like anger and frustration with the other side. The right-wing media sphere doesn't flourish right now because of how calculated and pre-planned…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 03:28 PM
1

I wouldn't assume there's really anything you could do to pull him out of this, in terms of logical argument at least. If someone's that deep into the Trump worship I do think it's pretty cultish, so logical arguments will just be automatically dismissed because it contradicts the dogma (Trump is amazing, intelligent, loves America, etc...). I think everyone's got to choose when disagreements are so fundamental that they end the friendship, but personally I've had friends start to go down this r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 06:30 PM
66

I got what he was going for, “you didn’t cared about loneliness until it affected men and could be used against women” I think his central idea here is just totally wrong too. Like yeah, there are a lot of men who care when people mention that it's an issue that primarily effects men, but this doesn't mean that they don't care about women being effected. If you have an issue that you know is impacting your demographic, and some people aren't acknowledging that, then it's natural to want it to be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 03:35 PM
3

Bernie was huge in 2016 especially among anti-establishment people, everyone with a passing interest in US politics knew who he was; this seems to prove he supported him back then. But I agree these days he's pro-Trump.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 07:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter