~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | why it is important we must first change irrespective of the outcome is the bias and different treatment of circumcision and similar female procedures and why both genders must be subjected to the same legal standards regardless of what they even are.Laws follow public opinion. Before you can outlaw (or allow) all forms of genital mutilation/cutting you must obtain a public consensus that all cuttings and mutilations, regardless of sex, are the same. ICGI posted about this in 2006 stating that the process must first start with addressing HGM (human genital mutilation). The reason being that you cannot combine FGM and MGM if you continue to use the two terms. Doing so just reinforces the erroneous concept that they are different, not the same… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/25 12:03 PM |
| 1 | big part of me does not want to write this because writing is often hard for me but this is why circumcision is really bad and needs to be something we prioritize preventing from happening to people maybe even more than anything else.It makes sense to him, the author. Think ee cummings. Not everyone processes language the same. And punctuation is a convention, not a rule. You've made your suggestion 3 times. Time to move on. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/25 12:58 PM |
| 3 | imagine a baby girl is born and i know i talk a lot about this topic so i will try to make this the last thing i say about it for a while.Here's another take on that dilemma. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322318472\_Through\_a\_Veil\_Darkly\_A\_Genital\_Cutting\_Thought\_Experiment? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/25 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Research Questions (mods approved)Nicely done! | /r/MensRights | 24/02/25 01:18 PM |
| 1 | To cut or not to cutHere is an entry-level site that both you and your husband will like. http://circumcisiondebate.org | /r/MensRights | 12/02/25 01:24 PM |
| 1 | Baby boys are almost 18 times more likely to die from circumcision than an adult man is from penile cancerYou, and many others, are misrepresenting my data. My 2010 study estimated that 117 boys died FOR THE YEAR I STUDIED. Not every year. The mortality rate I came up with is 0.9/10,000 births. It would be correct to say, "more than 100 per year." As far as I know, my estimate was the last one published on the topic. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240804903_Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_US_Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths | /r/MensRights | 04/12/24 01:43 PM |
| 2 | Whose foreskin has been retracted by force?2 out of 5 boy are still experiencing FFR according to an Intact America survey. https://intactamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2018-FFR-Survey.pdf | /r/MensRights | 25/11/24 01:45 PM |
| 9 | The disadvantages of being male• Living with a de-sensitized and semi-functional genitals. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/24 12:12 PM |
| -10 | Male genital mutilation is a billion-dollar industry when you consider the cost to carry it out and the biotech industry purchases of neonatal foreskinI think Adler, et al. are incorrect. First, the $1,750 amount refers to adult circumcisions; infant circs are closer to $300 and often bundled in maternity costs regardless if the boy is cut or not, or a girl. Second, hospitals don't sell foreskins. Selling human tissue is illegal. Hospitals (and tissue suppliers) can charge to cover processing costs. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/24 04:46 PM |
| 6 | Sex differences between men and women are usually due to biology, not socialization or patriarchy, research shows.Do you have this available as a white paper PDF? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/24 02:13 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision Permanently Alters the BrainYes, many studies regarding PTSD, alexithymia, and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 01:13 PM |
| 14 | Circumcision Permanently Alters the BrainI wish people would stop posting this as if it was some sort of silver bullet. I was in Boulder when he first presented his "study." To me, it is a sham. No data, no peer review, and his pictures of the "team" looked like stock photos. Oh, and only one data point. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Male rape statsMost states define rape as penetration as you say. But they included penetration with a body part (penis, finger, etc.) and any object. So your claim is only partially correct. Also, many states are now rewriting the laws to say "penetration or envelopment", which of course means 'she raped him.' | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 02:42 PM |
| 3 | Police threaten MRM activists with arrest for protesting circumcisionWhat was the outcome? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/23 01:46 PM |
| 2 | US extends funding ban on circumcision in foreign aid.What is your source for this? Got a link? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 10:03 PM |
| 8 | Sharing an essay, with many references, that I wrote on why circumcision is harmful. (Good resource)Not money driven? It's a $5.7 billion industry! https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350709776\_High\_Cost\_of\_Circumcision\_57\_Billion\_Annually | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 03:22 PM |
| 4 | Sharing an essay, with many references, that I wrote on why circumcision is harmful. (Good resource)It's an essay, so he's allowed to express his opinions. You know, free speech, just like in your unsubstantiated rant! | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 03:21 PM |
| 5 | Sharing an essay, with many references, that I wrote on why circumcision is harmful. (Good resource)Well done. It's a bit breathless, but then my first writing was, too. I think most writers try to chew off too much. Next time, focus and develop your thoughts further. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 03:19 PM |
| 2 | Men circumcised, women most affected?The book was written by the O'Haras, a couple. So the husband knows. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/22 09:03 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter