TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Brazuca0 Archive

View 5 posts and 155 comments by Brazuca0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Perhaps. I'm just saying that considering that a marriage didnt fail just because they didnt get divorced isnt much of anything IMO if the couple is unhappy, not having sex or just staying together for the kids. I personally would consider my marriage a failure if i were stuck in such circumstances. And there are plenty of those around. Call me a cynic, but i think plenty of "successful" marriages arent that successful at all imo tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 07:00 PM
-2

Out of those who remain married, how often you think they end up in the dead bedroom situations or just staying together for the kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 06:42 PM
1

Divorce rates are rather complicated because you could slice it even further. You mentioned remarriage. True. Could also mention how rampant divorce is in black community. Or how low it is among asians. Financial problems are one of the main causes of divorce, in fact, lower income people tend to be single more often and divorce more when they do get married. If going by statistics, your chances of divorce could vary from low to almost certain depending on your circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:56 PM
2

I certainly wouldnt want that, but if there is an opt out, there is no real reason to get married in the first place. Is there any positive that you get from marriage that you couldnt get if not married? Because if the answear is no, then i dont see the point in doing it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:41 PM
1

Very few really. Marriage was created for motives that no longer exist. People have this really romanticized idea of marriage, how couples stayed together in the past and stuff, as if it was out of love and not necessity. Marriage worked in the past, in the sense that dispite all problems, it was still functional enough to most people find being married better than not married. That's no longer the case for a large and growing number of people today. You gotta realize that people lived in a worl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:34 PM
1

Date? Probably neither. F--k? THe daughter Disclaimer: this isnt necessarily my personal preference, it's what i think most men would do
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 04:15 AM
1

I am not. Things would only turn around If there were incentives in order to, and i dont see that happening Either that or some kind of authoritarian gov, which i dont want to happen either
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:26 PM
1

What is 4B?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:23 PM
–

As a Man who never struggled with money and currently has a a lot of wealth, and lives in a highly developed country (switzerland) i hate this "omg owning property is hard today brrr"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:06 PM
–

Option B. Plus single mothers are bad for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 03:49 PM
2

Not sure if i agree about the third places always have been bad (could you expand?) But i definitely agree with everything. I, fact, i've said this many times and people get so iffy cause they dont want to admit it: third places are everywhere, PEOPLE now days are just: 1. asocial 2. addicted to technology. So they socialize online (like we're doing right now) instead of irl. Which is terrible if you want a partner, but third places are still around.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 03:17 PM
–

See, your mistake was believing that feminists want equality, when in reality feminists want whatever gives feminists the most benefits. This liberal policy benefits me? Gimme. This specific tradcon treatment benefits me? Gimme too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 03:07 PM
–

Came here to say this. I find It so weird that some people have such a hard time understanding that you can respect someone's choice and still have nothing to do with them. For example, i can respect your worth as a human If you're a coke-head, but you're definitelly not someone who i want as a partner. I think this should be simple to understand to anyone dosent have a negative IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 10:20 PM
2

I feel you. I never understood why most people seem to think that living past expiration date having a terrible quality of life is the goal
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:30 PM
1

Lesbian < straight male < straight woman < gay male So There is a clear evidence that the more women you have to deal with, the less you live
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:24 PM
–

IKR? This study proves nothing. If your prove that someones (dis)likes others is just their words, this proves nothing. The KKK also says they dont hate blacks, they're just "proud to be white" and other stupid shit like that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:38 PM
2

That seems pretty reasonable to me and a nice way to go about things. I recently started seeing this girl, and we're kind of doing the same thing you described. For example, i paid the bill on first date. But second date, she paid for the movie theater tickets. Then i paid for the pizza we ate afterwords. IMO women who expect men to pay for everything every single date are kind of entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:33 PM
2

Well, i'm brazilian fwiw and the dinner part being considered terrible idea... well, i know i've never been to a dinner first date. I think it's probably more common for older people to have dinner dates, but people who are younger than 35 seem to find it common to just have a beer/ coffee date. Personally, if i suggested a coffee date and she was like "that's cheap, take me to dinner", i would just move on to the next girl, as i find the purpose of first date to get to know each other and see i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:16 PM
1

What you mean? I already explained in the comment above. Just because you're fucking someone dosent mean you're BF/ GF. You cant cheat on someone who you're not in a relationship with
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 10:35 PM
1

I never said anything about cheating. Being in a relationship ≠ Casually seeing someone
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:45 PM
1

I think you may have misunderstood my point. Yes, i agree that sugar is a form of prostitution. It's th same thing. What i mean is that legal prostitution is less expensive than a sugar relationship (in my country it's Very cheap to hire a prostitute, it's affordable. But If you're going to be a sugar daddy, it's expensive)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:44 PM
4

Second this. I was the first of 2 of my ex-gf and the whole virginity thing is overhyped. I understand not wanting a total hoe, but the "she has to be a virgin" thing is just silly to me. I prefer women with some experience. Ever been sucked off by a virgin? She dosent even know what she's doing, man. You're lucky with she dosent accidentally teeth you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:58 AM
1

Yeah, but sugar relationshits are alot more expensive than the average hooker Very few men can actually afford to be a sugar daddy, any mf on minimum wage can hire a prostitute (not sure if it works the same in the US, but that's how it is in my country)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:25 AM
3

I think that from a logical POV your logic makes perfect sense and it would work, the problem is that humans are actually a lot less logical than we would like to think we are, and much more emotional. Incels dont want just sex, they want to feel wanted by their partner (genuine attraction, as they call it), you can see that when you start to read the way the describe their (very idealized) idea of a relationship. I think the term itself "incel" is misleading because of that, it makes it seem as…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:14 AM
1

Legal here too and i second this. THere is the false idea of men who hire prostitutes being ugly, fat, incel losers, when in reality men of all walks of life hire them. It1s well known that wealthy businessmen hire prostitutes all the time in here, because 1. they can afford it 2. they dont like to waste time chasing women
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:48 PM
1

My country has legal prostitution and modern dating is a clown show just as much as in the US. I'm for legalizing it in the USA too for many reasons, but it really wont fix the problem
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:40 PM
1

Nah, dawg, i can fix *me*, not other men. I can choose not to simp, i cant enforce others not to. I hold no power over them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 07:31 PM
-1

But they do, dont they? Even before the whole pill BS started, losers in school were always salty about jocks getting all the bitches I mean, there is a whole trope of "revenge of the nerds" in pop culture, where the loser because a badass and the jock is now cleaning toilets or something similar. That's them resenting men who do better than them with women
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 07:24 PM
10

100% I would say be realistic about looks, but values and compatibility are actually important in a healthy relationship. Dont lower your standards about those.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:41 PM
3

No. People do differentiate about preferences such as if you like brunettes over blondes, or pretty boys more than more masculine men, if you're into a speciffic race etc. It's a difference between people of similar level of attractiveness who differ in traits. This is subjective preference, that exists sure. For example, i like girls with dyed bright hair, others may find it a turn off But there is such a thing as objective attractiveness which correlates to facial symmetry. There is no where i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 06:34 PM
5

There is a tone of difference between what people say and what people do tho. What men say (try to project their image to people) is that they would not be with fat women, single moms, OF girls etc What a lot of men do in reality is settle for any woman who gives them the time of the day Same thing applies to women in a different scenario: women who say they would never settling but are settling by being in situationships with men they find attractive. First case they are settling about looks, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:04 PM
6

THat's not the link i read before, but she does talk about how men Vs women see someone who is 80% what they want: http://edition.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/02/24/lori.gottlieb.marry.him/index.html
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 02:54 PM
1

I agree with a lot of what you said, but there is actually plenty evidence that monogamy *isnt* natural to humans. There is evidence that monogamy is *better* for a suitable society, yes, true. But not that it's natural for humans. A lot of evidence seems to indicate that humans are seasonally monogamous, meaning they will choose 1 partner for a period of time and then move on the next partner to do the same thing. Just like penguins, swans, otters among other animals that people usually say the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:32 PM
1

I posted the statistic in another comment asking for the source https://nypost.com/2023/11/17/lifestyle/more-than-half-of-gen-z-want-open-relationships-study/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:29 PM
1

I posted the statistic in another comment asking for the source https://nypost.com/2023/11/17/lifestyle/more-than-half-of-gen-z-want-open-relationships-study/ About the second question, IDK really, i'm more trying to see how people in PPD feel about the whole thing than to actually making an affirmation for either side
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:28 PM
1

23:59 You dont understand what kids do 00:00 You're young Cant write this shit. I'm actually slightly annoyed that in 2 comments in failed to give any meaning feed back at all, just some sort of tongue in cheek dumbass responses. I asked about monogamy, as there is clearly a trend of more single people, less marriages, gen z now openly talking about NM. You missundestand (or willingly misrepresent, as other redditor said) as if i'm asking about polygamy marriage. I try to explain a little better…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:26 PM
3

Makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:22 AM
3

Yeah, i know a few people in NM but i understand i also have some sample bias since the people i hang out with when i'm not in my boring day job are artsy types (who everyone knows tend to be more liberal). But even when i'm talking to "normal" people, i have this feeling that commited LTR are becoming less of a thing and that situationships are becoming the norm, my sister complains about that a lot and ofc it's all over the social media aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:22 AM
5

There is definitely a growing divide between the haves and have nots in relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:10 AM
2

Happy cake day! ​ > It's not really going to die out until people start teaching polyamory in schools When you say this, you mean it would be the best to make poly functional and people understand it or that you fact dont believe such dynamics could change spontaneously, and it could only change if taught in schools?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:07 AM
1

> I’m on team get rid of marriage as it is. Same lol ​ > Make the legal parts separate and allow more people to apply the benefits to non-romantic relationships. My bad, i'm not sure if i get this part. What do you mean by that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:58 AM
3

Hmm that's not what i asked. Nowhere i said i think polygamy will be legalized. And for the record, I dont think it will. Polygamy implies legally marrying more that one person, it involves of the state, legal paperwork shit. You dont have to actually marry them in order to live in a non-monogamous way. For example, i've a few friends friends couples who are open relationship. I was invited to be part of a poly relationship earlier this year also. I know a whole bunch of people who are into the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:45 AM
3

https://nypost.com/2023/11/17/lifestyle/more-than-half-of-gen-z-want-open-relationships-study/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:38 AM
1

I feel this way too
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:30 AM
5

You feel it provides no benefit regardless of her status, for example, if she has kids? Why do you say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:28 AM
0

FR Most of the time i've seen a woman being called a pick me, she was just saying stuff that is common sense. I understand calling some that if she's in fact just pandering, like that Pearl podcaster, but 99% of the times i've seen in, it was a girl simply not being entitled and not being a cunt. Makes you really think most women who use this term are just misandrists
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:27 AM
3

If that's what you want to believe, that's ok, but dont complain about being stuck in situationships later
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:47 PM
10

If the men she considers being in her league arent commiting to her, it's quite likely she's overestimating her own league tho
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:07 AM
2

Depending on whom i'm having sex with and how good are those cake and garlic bread, i could said that same sentence unironically
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:43 AM
1

? I'm not sure if you said this just to be snarky comeback or if you really have terrible comprehension skills in order to misunderstand so badly what i said
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:34 AM
2

The point ----> <---- your head
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 02:04 AM
1

I'll definitely check this one out
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 06:00 PM
1

You may also like Esther Villar's book "The Manipulated man" where she goes in details about why evolution made it necessary for men to view women in such ways
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:22 PM
–

Well, fwiw she was the worst gf i had (hence why it lasted so short). My others exes i can at least save some good memories, even tho it went sour, this one it's just shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:16 PM
2

I completely agree
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:48 AM
1

My life took a very different path than what i imagined, and in a lot of ways, i'm still figuring my shit out. I think i'm blessed in some ways, while in others i think life really fucked me over unfairly. Not to mention, i did in fact done some dumb decisions (and like most dumb decisions, they seemed like good ideas at the time). Not one to complain tho. Relationship wise, i'm pretty certain i wont find a woman who i think it would be a good idea to get married to, but tbh i think most people …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:09 AM
12

> the innocence and purity expected from women is childlike I think a lot of this is also because (and i'll probably get flammed for this, because it's such a controversial topic) there is a lot more ephebophilia to male sexuality than most people would like to admit. I watched this youtube video a few weeks ago, "born sexy yesterday", a common trope in si-fi movies, which is basically sexually mature women with child-like minds. You might find it interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:24 AM
7

Isnt saying that women are infantilized by society the same as saying society expects women to act like children, but in a more socially acceptable way of saying the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 03:04 AM
4

> but equivalent terms exist for women Do they really tho? I dont think i ever hear one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:05 AM
-6

This is because women are not expected grow physically nor intellectually after puberty. joking... but serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:04 AM
8

No, that's terrible advice. A man who leads this way will just be seeing as Mr Nice Guy. To be clear: Yes, men (and women) should be good people and healthy partners, but to lead with just that will get them nowhere
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:56 AM
3

Very based. This is unfortunately the way for the average man these days. Will they do it? OFC not. But it's the best option for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:53 AM
1

My bro out here cracked the code
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:45 AM
2

Well, it really is very uncomfortable in the groin area, to me at least. I also think it would probably cut the blood flow to your penis, if you remained sitted like that for long enough
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 01:43 AM
15

To my understanding, men are generally happier when coupled up, regardless if married or dating. Most men dont seem to take singledom very easily. I also think that it is not that men dont want to get married per se, it's that they dont want to get divorced, and many men see it as almost inevitable these days. Men are happier married, but they are also the ones who feel the blow of divorce the hardest. I remember reading once a lawyer saying that married men are happier than men overall, but div…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 12:33 AM
–

They complain about men not acting "like men" when he isnt doing his traditional male role, like being a provider, and also complain that men are acting "like men" when he's being traditional about stuff they dont like, such as wanting her to cook for him and because he cares about N count. In reality they want a dog who pays for dinner. Just adore them, dont demand anything from them and give the most he can to them. "A boy that's sweet, a boy that's tough, a feminist who likes to pay for stuff…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 05:50 PM
8

> I am once again here to say most women are not feminists, do not engage with feminist works What is a feminist? How do we define what is a feminist? If a woman shares the same core beliefs a feminist has but she dosent claim to be a feminist, is she not a feminist? Likewise, if a share the same core beliefs a racist has, but i dont claim to be racist, am i not racist?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 05:43 PM
1

All 3 of them? Joking but serious, it's so rare that it's hard to even say much about such cases. But funny enough, i did meet (and dated for a short while) a woman like that: she was raised by her father and grandfather and had no relationship with her mother, all i can say is that she was clearly spoiled. Zero doubt she was definitely raised as daddy's little princess, really showed in her entitlement. She also did the same thing you described, seeing her dad as super hero on comparing me to h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:25 AM
1

If they dont, then why they complain so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 03:01 AM
1

By not having kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:57 AM
7

People here pretending women and BP never say stupid shit like "its not about looks, just be confident/ funny"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:51 AM
1

I think you summed it up perfectly
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:25 AM
0

I agree things are changing, but i also know that there are gringos who marry women straight out of favelas (for those who dont know what it is, google images). If anything, i think alot (not all, but many) of these guys go straight up to women who dont really have money, cause it's just makes it easier to seal the deal. You're probably right about them expecting their new wife to work eventually tho, less and less men now days would be fine support 100% financially the wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:23 PM
5

Well, that's what i supposed he meant when i read it anyway, only him could confirm if that's really it what he meant THat's literally what i did. How about you be less combative for no reason or at least read properly before doing so?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:49 PM
2

I loled when i read that too. Like, insecure much?If you think about it, posting thirsty traps and bikini pictures is way more cheating than that, guys liking those pics are showing his direct interest in your body, and i wouldnt even make a big deal out of women who post stuff like that. Porn? It's literally just pixels in my screen, that Jynx Maze dosent even know i exist LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:43 PM
1

NGL i think the "men addicted to porn" is over hyped. I know for a fact way more women are addicted to their smartphones/ social media and people arent making a big deal out of it. I think that there are probably some men who are in deed addicted to porn, and that's bad, but it's way less common than people make it seem to be. Honestly i think it's just talked about alot because 1. some insecure women get icky about their man satisfing himself without her and 2. guys are always after getting som…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:36 PM
2

Got it. To my understanding, FDS would be an example of that, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:05 PM
7

I think he meant that education is dominated by women in the sense that there are more women are in higher education and so they are the recipients of most program, specially when the programs that get such bennefits are degrees with heavy female to male ratio. Well, that's what i supposed he meant when i read it anyway, only him could confirm if that's really it what he meant
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 04:03 PM
3

Real. I not only dont understand how in their mind they're sticking to the men, i also dont understand how getting f-ed in every hole abroad is any different than doing that back home, but better for me lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:53 PM
1

I know that's not the topic at hand but what's pinkpill?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:43 PM
3

Probably a push back from all the overall feminism in laws and culture, would you say?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:39 PM
2

NGL, if that was me, i would imidiately think it's a scam and they're after my organs lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:37 PM
4

Interesting. I've met quite many cases of developed countries guys bringing the 3rd world girl with them. And yes, i agree it's mutual beneffit. But developed country woman and porr country men, i always thought it was a mutual understanding of being just a ONS vaccation thing. Damn, even i hooked up with the gringas before lol I thought the idea of these women bringing guys with them was just a meme. The more you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:35 PM
4

Makes alot of sense, and kind of explain why soooo many women have this "i love travelling" shit, probably it's ingrainted in their evolutionary memory
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:30 PM
11

That's also true LOL every girl who travells solo who i've ever met have a story of hooking up with locals (plural). I guess my misunderstanding of passport sister was because i imagined they had the same goal in mind of marrying a local and bringing them back to their home country, which isnt really a thing. But yeah, girls having a bunch of random ONS abroad is deffinately very common lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:27 PM
7

> Those in charge of decisions about education are still majority male. So? One thing does not exclude the other. Are you saying because those people are men it's impossible for them to make decisions that beneffit women? By that logic, Margaret Tatcher was doing only things beneffiting women. Now tell me: Was she?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 01:24 PM
4

I agree tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:25 AM
2

> The passport sis is more about sex tourism than finding a husband. It's just as predatory, they travel to developing, and undeveloped countries to find men and boys to play out their exotic fetishism. ​ Oooohhh, i thought their plan was to get a husband over sees like the passport bros. So you're saying their plan is basically to just hook-up with guys in other countries without really expecting more out of it? Well, seems silly to me lol but i can see that in this case
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:23 AM
2

> Also discussion there is very limited ​ I got banned from that sub because they were wondering why gen z boys are so anti-feminist, and i said: because they feel feminism is failing men. And i got banned for that. Notice i didnt even say i necessarily agree to that. I didnt say something like "feminism sucks", i said that GEN Z GUYS feel that way. And i got banned for that. They carried on with their amazing possibilities to why that phenomeon of young men hating feminism is growing, which was…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:50 AM
3

Rare blue pill based take. I think the same: i dont really care they exist. I just think it's bullshit how male spaces that match the same level of toxicity are quickly shut down or shadow banned, but the same dosent happen to toxic female spaces. Same rules should apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:36 AM
4

> You believe a survivor of multiple SAs and rape is not justified in hating men? You believe a survivor of being mugged by a black guy is not justified in hating blacks? ​ You shouldnt hate people who havent harmed you because they happen to be the same race/ gender/ whatever of someone who harmed you. I mean, i *understand*, but it isnt really justified, no. If you hate an entire group because of an individual, that's the kind of thing that should be worked in therapy tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:19 AM
2

I dont have a problem with women having a women only spaces, i have a problem with men not having men only spaces.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:01 AM
11

I kinda dont know what they get out of it fr "look at me flauting something you want but cant have haha" It's rather petty.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 11:29 PM
1

> Well I have never met a man in real life like the ones on here, I don’t think the men here are giving a good representation of men ​ Same. Bbbbut a possible counterpoint: most men who post here probably dont sound remotely similar irl. I certainly dont. For many reason, such as i want to keep my job and i like to have sex, most people i know irl have no idea of a whole bunch of "controversial" takes i have. So it's entirely possible that there are way more men in your life who think like guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 10:53 PM
–

I dont want to sound rude, but i dont see how what you said is of any relateability or comfort to these guys. Kinda sound like upper-middle class kids talking about being poor cause they couldnt afford certain luxiries. ​ "Yeah, when i was 12 i thought i would never kiss. But by 18 i probably had a solid hundred make out party seshs. I totally get it what it's like to be a kissless virgin in your late 20s, you're gonna be fine" ... i mean, not really
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 10:38 PM
6

No apps = lonely and single With apps = lonely, single and feeling like sh1t. One of those options is clearly better than the other
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:14 AM
3

I think the term "concern trolling" would apply to them
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:10 AM
2

I suppose there are women who really care about men issues and arent just using the narrative as a means to their ends. that been said, i've never met such women.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:08 AM
2

Yep. I got perma banned from that sh1t a few days ago because OP was asking "why young men are less feminists than millenials?" And i aswear: because young men feel feminism failed them? ANd i got banned for that. Note that i havent even said that i personally think feminism failed men (although i think that, but), what i said is that many young men feel that way and that's why they become anti-feminist. It's not Andrew Tate, it's not Jordan Peterson, it's feminists themselves not wanting to tal…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:06 AM
2

WHat is very funny is that this sub is larger but yet has so much less traction. Dare i say Reddit shadow banning?
/r/MensRights08/01/24 02:01 AM
5

Well, for women maybe you're right and wouldnt change a thing because they rate >80% men as below average. But it would change for those men: they would feel alooooot better. I know i felt so much better after i deleted that sh1t. Dating apps are terrible for men. You get nerfed hard. Like i'm not gonna tute my own horn, but i'm an attractive guy, a get girls IRL when i go out. Pretty girls btw. But on dating apps? Holly f00k, WHEN i got dates i always had to lower my standards significally. And…
/r/MensRights08/01/24 01:43 AM
1

> Young women are starting to turn their backs on the movement in ever increasing numbers ​ Are they really tho? I've seen reports that gen z identifies as feminist less often than millenials, but that only happens when they dont separete by gender, since gen z men tend to pull the stats lower because they're alot more antifeminist than millenials (geeezz i wounder why...) ​ When they account for gen z women only, over 60% of them identify as feminist, which is the highest than any prior generat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/12/23 03:44 AM
–

He himself disagrees with you, but to each their own. He already mentioned that he was bullied alot and that his nickname in school was Fat Cavill That wasnt the point anyway, as i said, i just meant Chad as someone who is a lady killer
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 05:25 PM
–

I meant Chad as someone who does very well with women. ​ But your premisse is wrong either way, plenty of men are weird when young and become good looking adults. Ever seen pictures of Henry Cavill when he was young? He was a weird looking fat kid and he's literally superman now
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 04:32 PM
1

It's how they cope. Women here really expecting a volcel Chad are funny af. They want this fantastic man who's got all the attributes that makes him the perfect match BUT he's not gonna have sex with any of the many women who see that he's high value. ​ How to deal with this cognitive dissonance? You make up this scenario that a guy who has a high N count is raping women behind the alley, instead of the much more likely scenario that the guy she sees as the perfect match for her will simply be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 12:11 AM
1

Yep. ​ There are two types of men who are red-pilled: the guy who got all that knowledge and got bitter because he is not Chad. ​ And the guy that all the knowledge and became Chad. ​ The first usually becomes incel and black-pilled. The second fucks a whole bunch of girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 11:49 PM
2

100% And another thing i would add to the difference is that many men (most maybe?), if they're looking for serious commitment, wouldnt have a problem if she's not sleeping around because she's conservative. Like "she hot, not a hoe and i dont have to listen to her complaining about the patriarchy ™ ? Sign me up!" ​ (most) Women on the other hand would absolutely have a problem if the reason is that he's conservative. So they want a guy who can but is not sleeping around by his own decision, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 02:58 PM
1

So he's been with many women and he's not highly desirable? He's a 5'4, balding, fat, poor, no style, cant dress for shit, dosent groom, bibble-nut, undereducated, dead-end job, butter-face with no social skills and still managed to have many many women insterested in him? As Said before, delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 02:11 PM
2

A volcel Chad who is a male feminist/ progressive. ​ Like, he CAN have any woman he wants BUT he chooses not to, and it is NOT for religious/ conservative reasons. It's just... *cause*. ​ I mean, yeah, good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 03:09 AM
1

They are actually. ​ I mean, there is a big range there, if we lump together middle class and poor, but poor men speciffically tend to be single. ​ https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/ ​ https://www.bbc.com/news/business-40894089 ​ ​ <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 02:36 AM
2

I think so many women in this thread are delusional. A guy who sleeps with plenty of women is obviously a man who has many of the atributes women desire in a man, otherwise he wouldnt be abble to. Are women here really expecting a highly desirable man, with plenty of women insterested in him to just be like: no thanks, i'm holding myself to future wife. You cant be that delusional. A single man who is highly desirable in his mid 20s will obviously been around the block. Only exception to this is…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 01:09 AM
2

I dont see why someone (man or woman) is rotten in heart just because they fuck around, but i guess we have different values
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:46 PM
3

I see your point. I dont think someone who is into casual would be a good partner (probably wouldnt), It is just that someone who has an extensive list of exes is someone who i already know wouldnt. I actually know a guy like that, he has 30+ ex-GF, my sister became insterested in him, i told her: he already has 30 relationships that went south, what makes you think 31 is the lucky number? Needles to say, she didnt listen... It lasted 2 monthes and they broke up. At the end of the day, is It rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:51 PM
0

I personally think a serial monogamist is a worse choice for serious partner than a person who is into causal. Theorically someone who is into causal might be a potential good partner if (s)he decided to but just wasnt looking for marriage when younger. A serious monogamist is seomone who proved repeatedly to be activilly trying and failling, so either is bad partner or terrible at picking
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:17 PM
16

Just curious Where do you, a 45 YO man, keeps meeting hundreds of girls under 25? Do you work at a night club or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:08 PM
1

Mate, If you're not interested in biology and too dumb to understand it, that's fine. Again, everybody else was abble to add something of value, except you... Seems more of a you problem. Which is why your comment is literally the only one removed. And idgaf about upvotes, i made the post because i had a question and was looking for answears, not because i wanted internet strangers' aproval. What are you, 12?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:51 PM
1

I'm insterested in understanding the biological reasons behind things. As you can see, everyone here understood the point, except your low IQ having ass. If you dont have anything interesting to add, there is no reason to reply at all
/r/MensRights14/11/23 05:09 PM
1

That shitty r/ used to pop up to me sometimes when i searched for something, i would read some of their stuff and just find It ulter garbage It was over 2 years ago tho, long time without lurking that Didnt even know they have a podcast
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:50 AM
2

You're insane for browaing that trash can lol That sub angers me alot more than subs who are openly misadrists like FDS (which i find pathetic)
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:28 AM
95

97% of all media is
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:14 AM
2

I know germanic and Nordic countries are heavily manginistic, but i didnt know they have female quotas for parking lol
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:02 AM
2

That's also a very reasonable explantion to me
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:28 PM
3

>I've always heard that men go for bodies and women that just aren't fat and aren't too ugly I seen studies that men usually go for body for short term, and face for long term. Women are like that too, to a leaser degree. >women definitely do prefer better looking men in the face as well This part of the answear will be a bit long and more complex, but here we go: i know women care about that too, but throughout history, most women really couldnt afford to choose a cute boy over a man who provid…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:10 PM
9

Makes sense. Considering some bad genes really show on your face, like down syndrome or mental r3t4rdation
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:53 PM
2

I imagine that to be the case too, since reproduction is the end goal of all living things, but i never really seen anything that indicates having a pretty face with that. I mean, are people with less simitrical faces more prone to diseases or something? IDK
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:49 PM
1

I know alot of what we find attractive in women has to do with neoteny, but i dont see why this preference, unlike being skinny and young
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:45 PM
–

Perhaps. I hope so, tbh. Although quite frankly i'm more pessimistic about it. ​ I have to point out tho, that while divorce rates are dropping, it isnt because people are staying married, it's because more people are not getting married at all. Gen X married less than Boomer, and Millenials are marrying alot less than Gen X. It's very likely that Gen Z will continue the trend and get married even less than millenials... i mean, a whole bunch of them are not even into monogamy at all lmao... but…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 01:43 AM
1

I think this is huge part of the reason why OLD is ulter shit for guys: most men are not phisically attractive. IRL they can compensate with a number of factors that cant be properly shown in a picture-based setting. There is whole bunch of guys that, if met IRL, women would hit off with or at least give a chance, but when they see them online, they are just... meh. ​ And i know women have their set of problems in OLD too, i'm not dismissing that, i just thought it was a somewhat related to the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:38 AM
1

That's something i come to notice is very common among women. They (almost) always find their bf unattractive by the end of their relationship when she's the one doing the breaking up. Sometimes even if she is the dumpee, she starts to find him ugly after a few week after he becomes an ex. Men are not like that... well, most of us anyway. We only think our ex is unattractive if she in fact became unattractive through the years (like put on a lot of weight or let herself go or something like that…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:01 AM
2

Well, i dont think that's the main reason but at least it's still a better reasoning than the claim a woman in this sub gave me in my post that the reason that women initiate most divorces is because "they are more confortable doing paperwork" ​ I swear some people in PPD would rather make the dumbest claims instead of admiting they're wrong sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 11:51 PM
–

They're more likely to get married yes, but they're only more likely to stay married as long as they dont outearn their husband. So her degree isnt the relevant factor to being more likely to stay remain married, because when she has a degree and makes more money, she divorces even more. Which was the initial point. And sure people on this sub can make assumptions "oh, it's because the husband is insecure". I personally think it's alooot more complex than that, but sure, whatever, we can have it…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 11:03 PM
–

Thanks for your input. When you say your husband made half of what he does now, was he still making more or at least equal money than you tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 10:34 PM
1

I wouldnt really considere this prove of the end of hypergamy when they are more likely to divorce Also there are more women who would rather stay single than "marry down". Which fine by me, nobody is obligated to get married, i just dont see it as a prove of the end of hypergamy, more the opposite if anything
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 07:02 PM
1

I lurk here alot, but rarely post, impression i had was that some people here are denying regardles. I could see some people disagreeing if i said somethink like "women only want money", which i didnt, i said money i a huge factor about marital status. Adding to the topic, statiscally, there is a growing divide between upper-class marriage rate and working class: https://americancompass.org/our-conjugal-class-divide/ And as posted in OP, men who make less than wife are more likely to get divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 06:50 PM
1

Well, ofc you can, never said you couldnt. ​ But statiscally, there is a growing divide between upper-class marriage rate and working class: https://americancompass.org/our-conjugal-class-divide/ And as posted in OP, men who make less than wife are more likely to get divorce. Men who make a significally higher amount are less likely Put all this together and you can come to the conclusion that, statistically, you're less likely to get married and more likely to divorce if you're a man of lower i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 06:33 PM
1

I could see that in cases where both want to divorce and agree beforehand. Divorce dosent require both parties to agree for them to be filled tho. Plenty of divorces are filled unilaterally, that's why there a whole trope of "but i dont want a divorce" husbands in romcom... but i digrass
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 11:35 PM
0

Do you have any evidence that suggests that? Because it just sounds like a hell of a stretch... ​ - So, john, you didnt divorce Sue who cheated on you, why? -Oh, i just dont feel very comfortable doing paperwork
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:19 PM
3

> If you're more educated you are unsurprisingly more comfortable with paperwork. ​ Sure. If you think that "they are a more comfortable with paperwork" is a relevant enough reason that explain the gap, ok then i guess. Your train of thought is entirely sophistry tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:07 PM
5

What do you mean by divorce rape? If you mean that men who get divorced get fucked over, well, that happens a lot. If you mean that most women get married *with the intention* of eventually divorcing their husband and take half of his shit, i personally dont believe most women do that. And i think guys who think like that are a little paranoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 08:50 PM
1

"Is this an entire argument to say that women who have high performing careers are bad to marry? Or is it to motivate men to be higher earners?" ​ Neither and both. I merelly dropped that info, guys can do with it as they please. That depends entirely on their goals: they can keep trying to satisfy female hypergamy and earn more, or they can think exactly what you said at first, that marrying a carreer woman is a bad idea because f-k the corporate ladder, or they can just say f-k to finding a wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 08:24 PM
2

How am i the one making assumptions if you're the bringing up a hypothetical cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 07:54 PM
3

How do you know any of that is a result of women's feelings and not men's? Because women are the ones who file for divorce, in most cases. In fact, some data sugests that it is initiated by women 90% of the times when she has a college degree. I would say it's a result of men's feeling if they were the ones initiating most divorces
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 07:48 PM
0

I never heard of that study, so i'll take a read. Everything i always read about it shows that women divorce their husband more often when they ear more, so this is new to me. About ifs, they do cite their refferences and studies in the article ​ Edit: my reply is basically saying "never heard of that so i'll read it, cause i might be wrong" and got downvoted. Really makes apparent that some people here are antagonizing not because the info i posted is wrong, but rather that because they dont wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 07:02 PM
-1

Yeah, i personally dont intend to get married, i just thought those were some interesting data to men who intend to Edit: why tf am i getting downvoted for my personal decision to not get married? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:51 PM
-3

Those are possible explanations to why when a man makes more money than his wife the chances of her filling for divorce are lower, but the fact still remains: When men make more money than his wife, she files for divorce less often. That is supported by data, yes. Everything else is just assumption
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 06:47 PM
5

Interesting, i'm also late 20s and my friend group is also very "fuck It" about women now, as opposed to a few years ago when everyone was hyper-focused on women (be It a relationship or hooking up). I wounder if it's common for late 20s/early 30s men who are single to just stop giving a shit about women and just hang out with their friends (or alone) instead
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 06:42 PM
1

True, female friends are usually high mantaince. I still think the point somewhat stands tho, because It made sense in the past for a man to prioritize a woman, but does It still make sense in the modern world? I dont think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 06:26 PM
1

What's friends group average age?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 06:01 PM
3

I agree with most of what you said, but i do think the last claim has a point If you look at It a different angle: men do tend to drop their friends when they get a girlfriend. Men should stop doing that. Men put women on a pedestal way too much, as If when you get a woman you dont need anything else. Dont drop your friends just cause you got yourself some ass, because chances are that will end eventually and then you will have not a girl nor friends. Keeping your friends is not a total solution…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 05:55 PM
1

LDAR Not american. What does LDAR mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 10:42 PM
3

This dosent apply to most <40 women. Maybe it's true for older generations, but not millenials and genz
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 10:30 PM
6

This is already happening. But fewer divorce rates because people are staying married and fewer divorce rates because they're not getting married in the first place have 2 very different outcomes
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/23 09:58 PM
1

IMO It used to be rare, but it's get more and more common
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 01:38 AM
1

Damn, this guy just keep dropping truth bomb
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/23 01:30 AM
2

Genuine question: is prostitution ilegal in your country ( hence why you're sugar dating) or do you preffer It over prostitution for some whatever reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter