TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Breaker-of-circles Archive

View 21 posts and 217 comments by Breaker-of-circles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1928

False AccusationBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:02 PM
170

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights11/04/22 03:50 AM
166

Edu./Occu.Breaker-of-circles/r/MensRights01/07/24 03:35 AM
72

FeminismBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights22/07/20 01:26 AM
30

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights23/06/20 02:40 AM
30

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights21/11/23 05:37 AM
29

ProgressBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights18/06/20 01:54 AM
28

GeneralBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:43 AM
25

GeneralBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights03/06/21 08:06 AM
20

ProgressBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:23 AM
13

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights05/07/21 03:30 AM
9

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:45 AM
6

Legal RightsBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights20/01/21 07:28 AM
1

ProgressBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights07/05/21 09:27 PM
1

FeminismBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights29/07/21 01:56 AM
1

Social IssuesBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights09/10/20 12:37 AM
1

Edu./Occu.Breaker-of-circles/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:37 AM
1

Edu./Occu.Breaker-of-circles/r/MensRights13/09/22 03:36 AM
1

False AccusationBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights23/11/20 11:54 PM
1

ProgressBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights24/06/21 01:46 AM
0

HumourBreaker-of-circles/r/MensRights23/09/20 02:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

So she's being a huge fucking asshole as an excuse for something everyone is entitled to refuse? Room temperature IQ move right there. And it's in Celsius.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:08 AM
43

In this case specifically, Sabrina's name is literally credited as song writer and producer, though.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:24 AM
31

Adding male gendered words to their buzzword concepts is a targeted and calculated move. For example: Men bad against women = Misogyny Men bad against men = Toxic masculinity Women bad against women = Internalized Misogyny Women good to men = Pick me. Internalized Misogyny. Trad Wife Men good to women = Doesn't happen. Something that should be done. Women bad against men = Yas queen. Putting men in their place. Doesn't happen. Misandry? What's that? Society bad = The Patriarchy Society good = Bu…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:55 AM
17

Oh yeah, "Trad wife", "Pick me", some -phobe.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 05:04 AM
42

Adding male gendered words to their buzzword concepts is a targeted and calculated move. For example: Men bad against women = Misogyny Men bad against men = Toxic masculinity Women bad against women = Internalized Misogyny Women bad against men = Yas queen. Putting men in their place. Doesn't happen. Misandry? What's that? Society bad = The Patriarchy Society good = Built by everyone coming together (even though barely any woman work those blue collar jobs) Now we have "Male Rage". As if rage is…
/r/MensRights21/04/25 03:54 AM
7

There are less male individuals and less instances of male suicide attempts because men are more successful at doing it. Women half ass it or do something that can be medically rescued, like poison or overdosing. Then they get diagnosed and contribute to how there's a higher number of female depression diagnosis, on top of the stigma against men seeking help, then they also try again and contribute to more numbers for female suicide attempts.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 05:24 AM
63

r/WomenWritingMen r/MenWritingWomen r/WomenWritingWomen
/r/MensRights11/03/25 04:24 AM
6

If you know who said the words that followed, you'll immediately know that the username is meant to be fake.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:08 AM
147

The amount of made up issues that goes around in those spheres is ridiculous, it's even getting into the normal spaces. For instance, they are blaming men for women not getting into the olympics. When I said, if you're not olympic level by the time you got your first child, you're never getting into the olympics. Olympians start young, how can their husbands hold them back if they haven't even met yet. LMAO!
/r/MensRights06/08/24 01:51 AM
2

This. I've tried that route before. If what was posted in the screenshot was considered "fancy", I shudder to think what they'd say if they saw a comment written in formal letter.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:36 AM
5

I think they chose that narrative to confuse and gaslight him so they wouldn't have to defend themselves for being called out.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 03:14 AM
19

Not as funny as saying "rogue vagina" though. LMAO!
/r/MensRights03/07/24 03:29 AM
16

Oppressed for centuries? How? Right to vote was only exclusive to men for like 50 years. Before that, and everyone was fucked by the monarchy or some shit. Men are free? HAH! Throughout history, the majority of men have been duty bound to die for some stupid shit since the dawn of mankind. What do you think "The patriarchy" is? A bunch of men who decided to go out to hunt with nothing more than a pointy stick and a skin of water because it's fun? Men brought home the literal bacon and thus had f…
/r/MensRights17/06/24 07:50 AM
6

From my very modest understanding, it's basically programmable extensions you can use in the background of your browser to do some magical shit on websites like reddit.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:10 PM
13

You wouldn't download a car
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:11 AM
13

Read on. They used the results here to try and justify allocating even more resources to educating little girls early on so the "math gender gap" disappears.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:02 PM
6

Yes, but I'm talking about the articles they linked about men getting away with murder using the insanity defense.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:19 AM
10

If any of you read the articles, the guys in them are all either long diagnosed with psychosis or schizophrenia, has prescription medication to combat said mental illness, were committed to a psych ward after trial for a looooong time, or were NOT released with 100 days of community service.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:38 AM
24

>https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/burnaby-man-not-criminally-responsible-for-killing-wife-judge/wcm/14c290b2-2af7-4923-8ac6-217b166cb376/amp/ Christ. This one reads like my essays. Rewording and repeating the same points multiple times. Dude in that one was diagnosed with psychosis years prior, though. https://www.norwichbulletin.com/story/news/local/2022/11/15/norwich-man-who-murdered-pregnant-wife-committed-to-psych-hospital/69645622007/ Dude on this one was committed to a state psych ward …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:53 AM
2

Oh, don't be disingenuous. I'm not talking about stopping all stereotypes. I'm talking about stereotypes formed because of societal norms. Some of them are outdated and wrong.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 10:49 AM
0

Hate to be that guy, but it means equal opportunity and breaking down stereotypes. Men's rights doesn't mean we stop others from getting ehat they worked hard for. Men's rights is about protecting men from inequality.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 02:58 AM
-1

You probably should always read the full sentence instead of nitpicking things out of context.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 01:33 AM
45

Guess what the homeless population in Japan is. According to a national survey conducted in January 2017 by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, there are approximately 5,534 homeless in Japan. Guess the demography? 5,168 being men, and 196 being women. https://izanau.com/article/view/homeless-in-japan I am aware that the video might be talking about kids running away, but it's hilarious that they try to highlight only the "Teenage Females" as they call them in the title.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 05:40 AM
10

They literally said it's a professional video production to depict a real-life scenario, because apparently false groping accusations have been growing rampant in Japan.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 12:50 AM
41

You'll have to understand that cries about sexism has been severely overblown in the western world. You can no longer make the casual stereotyping jokes in many circles like how women go to the restroom together, or how they take too long to fix themselves before going out, lest you be labelled the worst kind of misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:37 AM
5

How the hell can you fuck up grading math? It's probably the most pure objective subject you can teach. If it's just 1+1 = 2, how did Johnny end up getting an A, while Jenny got an A+?
/r/MensRights24/10/23 07:26 AM
57

What? Is this a joke that I'm too Hitler to understand?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 08:46 AM
223

The continued misuse of the word "gaslighting" should be a criminal offense now too. Guess who love to abuse words until they lose all meaninf beyond being some knee jerk reply to when you're losing an argument?
/r/MensRights15/08/23 06:35 AM
1

In gaming or in the real world? Twitch thots don't count.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:00 AM
-5

I wouldn't say completely egalitarian. First of, I have no idea who this woman is or what the issue is. I'm not a hardcore game culture follower and I prefer to game alone or with family. No internet game culture whatsoever. But... Loads of videos on the internet about girl gamers getting harassed or kicked out of a game because they revealed they are girls. I'm saying this as a supporter of Men's rights, you can check, I have a few posts here, but it's undeniable that some assholes are in gamin…
/r/MensRights04/08/23 08:02 AM
66

"Yeah, but let's see men do healthcare jobs." An actual quote from when I posted about this on r/trueunpopularopinion Like, lady, who do you think goes to the field to rescue victims, do all the lifting, and even perform dangerous rescues, while you sit in your airconditioned nursing station waiting for the next rounds of scheduled medication. Oh, you occasionally have to clean up elderly patients? I thought you were at a hospital and not an elderly care facility? Do you want a reward for that?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 03:09 AM
12

As opposed to hiking for days on end with their 10-20 kg equipment only to get shot within the first few seconds after encountering an enemy?
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:00 AM
30

Lady Death? But like everywhere else, women were a small part of the front line or even rear guard. They're mostly in assembly lines, farms, or hospitals, and even those places and equipment were still maintained by men.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 01:19 AM
174

Man, they've been saying that shit for almost a decade now, but everything that makes modern life possible is still staffed by men.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 10:38 AM
2

I said that people should wait a little before waving around their pitch forks, and guess what happened.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 04:35 AM
15

Yes, but the question was, who is going to take responsibility for the kids? Then someone answered, the donor.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:27 AM
7

It was fine until like the last third or something. The mystery and build up all led to that shitty reveal. Then they end it with "It's our turn now" literally admitting that they are going to continue their perceived evils by running the simulation. LMAO
/r/MensRights23/05/23 04:13 AM
2

Yes, but like 20-30 boys short.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 01:47 AM
5

Nobody is here to stop you from being ignorant either.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:37 PM
25

If this was the same post I saw yesterday, then the boy was 17, and the issue was that the consent form was signed after they fucked or something. Who the fuck asks consent AFTER you've already boned? Then she posts about it and says she learned her lesson. She's using this incident for exposure. LMAO!
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:22 AM
11

Google Romeo and Juliet laws. We got those in the Philippines too, even before age of consent was raised to 18 from 14, iirc, across the board, recently. Even back then, there were still a lot of nuanced laws that prevents an adult from diddling anyone below 18 despite the age of consent being 14 or something.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 11:20 AM
7

This wasn't the case with pre-colonial Philippines. Women could hold positions that are often available only to them, and in most cases have as much power as the King/Datu/Raja. They have priestess circles (though men can join if they want but they'd have to wear priestess garbs), healers are almost exclusively women, join warrior castes, rule the land on their own, etc. Expanding onto that, alipins, whose closest western equivalent were slaves, can free themselves either by working off their de…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 01:33 AM
1

Yeah, I don't know about the US, but fucking around over here is never seen as good.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:05 PM
2

Doesn't this just mean that either the same number of women are also celibates or they're fucking the same dudes, which is kinda sad regardless of which.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:55 PM
18

Related: When they tried to lynch GRRM for writing slavery or some shit in the novels as if he was a supporter.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:23 AM
9

I didn't say that. I said the novel was shitty because Ayn Rand's self insert in her own novel is very obviously horny for said super capitalist and I feel like half of the novel can be shaved off if she didn't do that. It also highlights Ayn Rand's hypergamy tendencies.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 01:41 AM
11

Fuck that shitty ass novel though. Don't get me wrong, I read the whole fucking thing because I got nothing better to do, and agree with SOME of its points. But goddamn half of it is Ayn Rand fantasizing about some super capitalist and an entire chapter was dedicated to fucking. It was also like 100+ hrs as an audio book. I forgot exactly how long. Might even have been 160hrs.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:46 AM
6

I agree with what you said mostly, but I disagree lorewise about the scarlet witch. She was born the scarlet witch, literally a myth at some point, and I don't think the power can be passed on unless they butcher the already established lore. If they do that, then it breaks one of the most fundamental rules of story writing: Establish the rules of the world and never break it.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:36 AM
8

They're actually right though. They called back the original cast and cgi the actor that already died, forgot his name, sorry. Spoiler alert but the main plot was passing on the metaphorical torch to new blood, some of which are, spoiler alert again, direct descendants. It's got Paul Rudd in it. I didn't watch the feminist mangled adaptation, but this newest Ghostbuster movie didn't feel like it had much, if any, feminist agenda. The lead characters were literally kids with the original cast jus…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:25 AM
2

Can't find the comments section. What I found though was hilarious. An article link titled "Expert lovers on how to have magnificent sex." I can just imagine their business cards. ASHOK KUMAR, L.D. M.S. EXPERT LOVER
/r/MensRights28/07/22 08:19 AM
8

"What, are you practicing climbing through unsuspecting women's windows?"
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:42 AM
5

Ask them to elaborate. If they can't, tell them no penis no opinion. If they can, tell them stop their womansplaining or stop being cuntdescending.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 01:06 AM
41

I mean camaraderie is one thing, Not openly slandering others is something different entirely.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 12:31 PM
311

They lost me at the camaraderie part. Men definitly have more camaraderie than women, at least in the workplace. There was a company led by a woman and employed only women that went under because the women argued day in and day out about the most stupid shit like dresses and backstabbed each other nonstop. I'm pretty sure it was posted here before.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:58 AM
78

pirate it. no reason to give them money.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 11:35 AM
3

Ah, so she's based then?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:39 AM
2

IMO, if this was treated like traditional comedy, which I am having doubts about because I've lost faith in people, then it will be helpful as it highlights the inequality in law, as all satire should. Needs the whole routine to judge fairly.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:47 AM
4

Sounds like they were doing the woman version of the mansplaining to you.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 05:51 AM
15

I'm an introvert. Being around people drain me regardless of their gender or how attractive they are. Wtf is this creature talking about.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:38 AM
9

Well, duh. The men went hunting. And again, stop trying to use a tribal society as proof that women can build and maintain a modern city.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:26 AM
11

30 years actually. And yes, they exist with the help of men. 50 women, 200 children (created of course with the help of men because they're not the virgin Mary). The men takes care of the livestock, which is the heavy lifting in a tribal society, unless hunting is involved, while the women cook, clean, and take care of children. But again, the village was used as a proof of concept for a woman only village, not about any other issue. Jesus.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:44 AM
8

Bruh, the village was only used as some sort of proof of concept for the main topic which is a women only city and how it could work. Then we find out the village was maintained by men. Don't confuse the issue. And I hope you won't be one of the women who'd maintain that city if it ever comes to fruition. You're too scatter brained to keep on topic, I'd be horrified if you were tasked with something more important.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:34 AM
12

BAHAHAHA! Women want something exclusive for them but they need men to maintain it? The entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:24 AM
1

Really? I already gave one. Lifting stuff. It's totally ridiculous, not to mention impractical bordering on impossible, to get the forklift everytime you need to move a sack of something up a flight of stairs. Yes, I know things like lifts, trolleys, etc. exist, but even those need human muscle, however briefly, to get them to transport stuff. Hospitals still use men for patient handling. Anything that requires strength and dexterity still uses people. What else? Pipe work. It involves a lot of …
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:21 AM
9

uh, yes. That's the point of calling it "women-only". A fully functioning society of only women. Also, where did you think the kids came from? The holy spirit?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:41 AM
1

No, we're not. A city built by only women isn't going to become reality for the simple fact that there are not enough female blue collar workers. Machines aren't going to fill the gap whichever way you try to spin it. There will always be work that require good ole human touch.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:39 AM
12

That was linked below. They still get men to do many of the chores. Also, that's definitely not what western women would call a city they'd want to live in.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:28 AM
1

Bruh, machines don't operate alone and they aren't universal. There will always be things that need the ole human touch. Women + Machines =/= Men + Machines
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:27 AM
2

You are, again, assuming men don't have industrial equipment and ingenuity. Are you somehow assuming that machines will do everything for you, including maintaining themselves? Which, btw, maintenance also involve some heavy lifting. So your big solution is to let men continue maintaining society until humans finally invent robot slaves? Yep, go wait for your slave robots, mate. They're definitly coming, oh in like the next century, maybe. Edit: aaaand I'm talking to someone's alt account. Typic…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:00 AM
4

You literally tried to use machines as some sort of great equalizer as if men don't use them too. And here you are trying to do it again. Unless you're implying cybernetic enhancements, industrial equipment isn't going to make women become as effective blue collar workers as men. Acquiesce that no city is going to be built and/or maintained by an all women workforce.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:41 AM
7

You think men don't use machines in the construction site? You think men use machines for everything in a construction site? Also, please don't distill it down to just lifting stuff. I merely used that as one, singular example of why women are not found in a construction site. It's not the whole argument. At the end of the day, there's just not enough female blue collar workers in the US to even plan the construction of a single high rise condo where the entire workforce are women, much less an …
/r/MensRights01/07/22 06:21 AM
12

Uh, yeah they are. Do you know what's involved in construction? For one, lifting heavy shit. Even if we disregard the fact that women are very likely not going to want to lift things, they are going to be a very ineffective workforce. What else is in construction? A lot more. Either you get men to build the city, or your shit isn't going to get built anyway. So you're still looking at a period of decades of men building shit for women while we pretend it's all women.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:57 AM
27

You think there are enough women to build modern city things like concrete buildings, sewers, plumbing, electricity? Sure, they may have the theoretical down, but the last time I saw a woman in a construction site was when the worker's wives brought them their lunch.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:22 AM
53

Goodluck with that. At the risk of sounding sexist, I doubt there are enough women with actual practical knowledge of making society work, considering that blue collars jobs are mostly populated by men. No one wants to do the dirty jobs except men.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 03:15 AM
1

So it's objectifying men too. LMAO!
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/22 04:15 AM
19

Electric bugaloo
/r/MensRights22/04/22 05:09 AM
30

LMAO! Did you guys see that AMA by the author of "How to be a woman online" or some shit? It was an obvious milking of this made up issue. She can't even provide research data to support her claims. It's all "feeling".
/r/MensRights21/04/22 05:38 AM
66

It's an odd and unexpected outcome, but Will Smith's slapping of Chris Rock on the stage of the Oscar's has led to a lot of analysis of the dynamics of their relationship and possible abuse that goes past the usual "hurr durr toxic masculinity" schtick they throw out, and directed a huge flow of media traffic to how real it is that men are also victims of abuse. This is a clip of a more obvious instance of abuse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ti8bE-_Ci7A
/r/MensRights11/04/22 03:53 AM
19

I mean, just have all men on strike for one day, the world would stop and maybe burn down. No men in power plants? Depending on power plant type, either no power or the reactor cascades. No plumbers? Good luck with your clogged toilet and burst pipes. No Emergency response? Good luck dying of a stroke, housefire, piece of pie that went into the wrong hole. You get the idea.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 04:34 AM
7

If you're talking about India, they have more problems than dowry and arranged marriages, and an Indian person is going to tell you that the stereotype held by some westerners is outdated and racist. Not to mention that modern India is reeling from severe problems of male prosecutiom on top of some of their old problems with male and female sexism. Regardless of that, your comment was irrelevant whataboutism at best.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:38 PM
10

Asia is a HUUUGE place and your generalizarion is both ignorant and offensive. That dark humor joke is from the movie The Dictator starring Sacha Baron Cohen which is, obviously, satire about Dictators.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:14 PM
14

Dude, stop replying all over. You're obviously getting emotional, creating all these branching threads when there's just 2 of us here.. 😂😂
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:35 AM
25

I could argue with you for hours about how I am not being emotional, but I'd just give you a taste of an ad hominem? I know you're a woman, you're a feminist disguising as a concerned individual. Why are you trying to sweep aside issues based on your bigotry?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:29 AM
16

You do realize this is a sub for addressing social injustice against men, right? If you want to sit on your ass and do nothing, then you're free to go, but don't expect others to just brush off shit like this. #killallmen is a toxic, sexist trend that has gone on for too long.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:26 AM
26

Ah, an ad hominem. Got anything more useful than that?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:24 AM
43

A man posting under their own personal social media account wouldn't be able to get away unscathed. Judging from the fact that this woman's face and name needed to be censored to be allowed on this website tells me that that's her own personal account. See the difference? Men can't "troll" like this without being skinned alive.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:21 AM
62

I wish I could post things like this about girls, call it satire, and get fake internet points, using a personal social media account.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:15 AM
6

dafuq?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:36 AM
32

Sadly, that doesn't do shit when it comes to math related courses.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:06 PM
10

Looks like someone bought one of those accounts made by bots.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 06:56 AM
10

Dig up their most embarrassing moments in life that will make them say kill them now, then don't kill them. Then, when the feeling subsides, get their first crush and make them relive their first rejection. Then get their mom to retell all the stupid shit they did when they were little. Finally, let them go. and when they're about to enter their house shoot them in the head.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 06:54 AM
8

She sounds like she's womansplaining men to men. LMAO!
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:11 AM
2

Not when they're lying in bed.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 06:10 AM
1

Yeah. The title is pure clickbait and only until you read the whole thing can you see that these two are fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 11:38 PM
1

Disturbing the hornet's nest. I don't even care about their opinions as I'm not American or in the US, but that move is stupid. I mean, I repeatedly made this point throughout this entire thread.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 08:37 AM
-1

They don't get this point, apparently. The way they treat this incident screams so much like feminazis trying to frame everything as the fault of men. SMH, I thought people here had critical thinking.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:45 AM
-10

I called them idiots for the move, not their opinion, which frankly I don't care about because I'm not in the US. You go stir up a beehive to exercise your freedom and I'm going to call you an idiot. Do you understand now? Or do I need to simplify it more for you? Everything else you pointed out is tangential to that. This incident is mainly not a gender issue and you forcing it into one makes you reminiscent of the bullshit they pull in TwoX
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:37 AM
-2

Hence why I called it stupid. This is most definitely also not a gender issue but a more generally political one. So maybe don't post this here and cry about men's rights being violated. SMH, the uni professors' actions might be progress but the nature of this issue is so wrong. Go ahead and downvote me, I'm not going to associate with this kind of men's rights because it's not even about it.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:14 AM
-18

I support our rights. Evidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kwf3jj/on_new_years_eve_a_flight_attendant_died_alone_in https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/he6de2/mulans_ill_make_a_man_out_of_you_highlights_the But you're not going to win me over by being an idiot. These two willingly ran into the other camp with trigger words taped onto their faces in order to exercise their "free speech"? This goes way beyond gender politics and well into right vs left politics that it's…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:02 AM
-42

She claimed their presence was unsettling because one had a “Police Lives Matter” sticker on his laptop, and the other wore a T-shirt that said, “Didn’t Vote for Biden.” If this is true then those two white dudes are obviously there to get a rise out of everyone. I mean I could have agreed if they were confronted for being white and being men, but then details like this pop up and I'm no longer sure. I agree with protecting men from harassment, but this incident is such a stupid move for the 2 d…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 01:43 AM
6

I remember that time I read a story there about how two adult girls are eating ice cream while and it runs down their chin like some fucking children, and a man came up to them to tell them that he'd do that to them with his nut.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:28 AM
48

We don't even need to go there. These children broke laws, or at least establishment rules, to enter the premises of an establishment that serves alcohol by faking their age. Granted they should've been kicked out or called their parents on them if found out, but them being there is no one else's fault but them. This idiotic game of trying to seduce adults while lying about your age in order to what? prove that they are pedophiles? is a stupid game stupid prizes situation.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:36 AM
46

Come to r/Philippines. Our presidential elections are happening next year and some feminist is trying to insert gender politics, as if the sub's preferred candidate, which is a woman that I happen to support too, wasn't also voted by men in the last election. The sad thing is it's gaining traction. There was also that one time when a transgender tried to use the women's toilet but was stopped by the janitor and got security called on her. The entire Philippines internet went on a sexist rant aga…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 02:44 PM
5

Yeah, would love to link directly to it too next time someone tries to argue with me.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 07:29 AM
1

There are already a lot of that on youtube. Here's one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZTIbHIsIYw
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:45 AM
8

I think they thought getting their cervix pummeled was a good idea.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:42 AM
3

Did he say that in this video though? I don't really know much about what other stuff he said or whether they were said seriously or in a stand-up routine, but I believe using his stance on other issues to discredit his stance on this one is called ad hominem.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 12:20 AM
4

I want to put humour because it's Patrice O'neal but he's saying a lot of facts.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 03:31 AM
0

Totally unrelated but I read 6ft3 as his total volume and was utterly confused for a second.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 02:37 AM
9

Me too. I just don't get how I can be 30% Radical Feminist because I hate the notion that men have oppressed and continue to oppress women. That's bullshit and I know it.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:15 AM
4

My results: 56% Traditional 65% Liberal Feminist 30% Radical Feminist 39% Marxist Feminist 31% Cultural Feminist Traditionalism refers to illiberal strands of philosophy which seek to preserve what they see as the “natural” and “traditional” order of things. In the past, this standpoint was chiefly represented by early 20th century thinkers such as Julius Evola and Rene Guenon. After a hiatus following World War II, Traditionalism has resurfaced as a new type of “conservatism to the right of mai…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 08:08 AM
8

Please realize that most Asian national subs are ran by weebs or whatever the equivalent is. Those places are moderated and populated by foreigners.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:10 PM
57

That came totally out of left field.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 11:56 PM
8

Not really. There was no indication that Roger was bullied. Had to google his name. Every article and character analysis about him is that he was a sadist. Destroys sand castles that were created by the smaller kids, throws rocks at other kids, sees piggy as nothing more that "a lump of fat", his own words, and was challenging Jack, the hunter leader, to be the new leader by the end of the book. The kid had a few screws loose since the beginning.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 12:28 AM
9

The boy that killed Piggy was showing signs of being a psychopath in the earlier parts of the book. He was throwing rocks at, but not hitting, another kid who was fishing or something, and he found it exciting/enjoying.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 12:04 AM
9

Here's one. https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/comments/m6flm1/what_the_fuck_did_you_say/gr6vudv?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 I mentioned how trippy it would be if both genders do the other's job for a month. Triggered a feminist spewing strawman arguments as if I said anything against her concerns.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 05:33 AM
13

So you're solution is prove them right? And no, I'm an MRA. Look at my posting history.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 09:29 AM
15

Eh no. That's how these people got the idea and why feminists are here.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 09:20 AM
14

Not to mention the fact that hazard pay for hazardous work is huge and is mostly received by men because it's mostly men who work in hazardous places.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 07:18 AM
3

Well then fuck off. Like I said, her autopsy reports, CCTV footage, etc. have already been made public. If you can't be bothered to actually check them, like you claim you already did, then I'm not going to indulge someone who's obviously arguing in bad faith. Good bye.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 03:46 AM
3

Presumption of innocence. If you're trying to pull a Russell's teapot here, then do it properly. You're the one supporting the rape narrative, you prove it is true.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:18 AM
2

Man, do your own research. There's already autopsy reports, CCTV footage, testimonies about this case. None of them points to a rape murder.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 01:31 AM
2

Glad you noticed this article by that website has no supporting claims. They're one of those news sources with very obvious biases.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 11:48 PM
41

I did not know that.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 02:03 PM
76

I thought all awards cost Reddit coins?
/r/MensRights13/01/21 01:47 PM
38

Nah, I don't blame her for causing this much grief on her friends. She likely died of her own abuse of her body, but she wasn't the one who pinned it on her friends. It's the stupid Philippine National Police for going public with their assumptions, the biased and agenda pushing woke crowd, and finally her own fucking mom.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 01:44 PM
46

Seriously, just how much leeway are people going to give her? I'm all for supporting victims, but the way this shit show is turning out, the real victims here are her gay friends, the one they are blaming. Are these virtue signalling asshats really unaware of their hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights13/01/21 01:30 PM
527

The victim died after a night of heavy partying, drinks, drugs, you name it. She was also the sole woman amongst a group of 11 of which everyone but her was a gay guy. They broke quarantine rules to party before her death. There's also a room full of guys next door and they are blaming them too. While it's true that victim blaming was happening on social media, the ones that do it are composed in equal parts by both men and women, so how is this the fault of men? As the days passed, each new evi…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:13 PM
1

Sir picking one exception does nothing to discredit my thesis
/r/MensRights03/12/20 01:32 AM
2

You mean this: I'm not saying that. it's just that when you look at European history whenever women were in power their country was also in crisis and it happened more frequently with women than men. Two historians that studied this subject said that the wars started by women were when the economy was booming. You are contradicting science with just your gut feeling and speculations. You are the dense one.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:52 AM
3

More blah blah without substance. Stop speculating and provide proof.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:28 AM
3

Your thesis? There's literally two historians who studied this subject intently and they concluded that when the queen's delegate the economy to their husbands, the resulting surplus of money from the economic growth is spent by queens on bolstering their armies. Read the article. Here’s Dube and Harish with more on that: Female reigns may have had higher capacity to carry out war since queens often put their spouses in charge of official state matters. This division of labor would then have fre…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:26 AM
1

Seriously, there's an entire article behind the link I provided. Read it before going off on your own wild speculations. The conclusion that historians came to was because Queens ruled differently. Basically, while kings had no division of labor, opting to rule everything in his own with little help from advisors, Queens tend to equally divide labor with their husbands managing the economy while they spend the money on bolstering the army.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:16 AM
3

Uh, no. If you read the article, the conclusion that historians came to was because Queens ruled differently. Basically, while kings had no division of labor, opting to rule everything in his own with little help from advisors, Queens tend to equally divide labor with their husbands managing the economy while they spend the money on bolstering the army. Seriously, there's an entire article behind the link I provided.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:14 AM
5

Please don't go with the take away that it doesn't matter that you were wrong as long as you successfully rained on someone's parade.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:03 AM
3

I think you were downvoted because you provided no data to back up those claims. You were expressing an opinion based solely on speculation and implying that Kings were just having it easy by default, like how feminist extremists are painting it today.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 11:51 PM
372

This has been demonstrated throughout European history. Queens are more likely to wage war than Kings. https://www.economist.com/europe/2017/06/01/who-gets-into-more-wars-kings-or-queens
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:02 PM
3

It even touches up on the issue of women's hypergamy.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 02:52 AM
4

So, the world went tits up too hard it became anime titties?
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:21 AM
10

It's bullshit. But what's with that sub's name though? LMAO
/r/MensRights20/10/20 02:14 AM
1

I also found a video of a little girl whose chin was literally covered in ice cream and it just drips onto her shirt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xChQ9EYvJY There's practically real life footage for the best case scenario for this story to happen and it still doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:49 AM
5

I saw something there a while ago and posted it on r/quityourbullshit https://www.reddit.com/r/quityourbullshit/comments/iy340z/making_up_a_physically_impossible_story_for_karma
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:16 AM
1

It's a drop of cold, sticky ice cream. Either they're numb as fuck or this was made up. How the hell can you confuse your chin from your chest?
/r/MensRights23/09/20 03:14 AM
1

walking down the street eating ice cream with a friend, and some melts on her chin, slides down her neck and drips into her cleavage before she can catch it on her fingertip. When I read that, I can't help but laugh. That shit would be impossible in real life. Either you have no chin or the the ice cream would have to go against the flow of gravity in order to travel down your neck and onto your chest. What? You expect it to travel back up from the tip of your chin? Even then, you're first react…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 03:02 AM
13

Not trying to defend her but there are quite literally lesbians in female prisons and some of them can beat my scrawny ass in a fair fight. Just saying.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:00 AM
2

This pope? Nah.
/r/MensRights16/09/20 12:32 AM
11

Yeah, that's how it starts. You give them an inch, they take a mile.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 08:07 AM
5

The people in the Philippine sub don't even see it. In the context of the COVID pandemic, they tell you to stay the fuck away from men, and stick with women instead.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 07:03 AM
18

It's sad that these bullshit ideology is making its way to the Philippines. For one, western values were already forced into our culture by colonists and destroyed our native culture that values both men and women. A little history: Women can hold powerful positions in pre-colonial Philippines, including village elders, exclusive priest orders where men can join by dressing as women, healers, warriors, and equivalents of war generals. Some even held the clan chief's position. Now we are witnessi…
/r/MensRights08/09/20 05:36 AM
1

Quite an old one too. I believe I first saw this on 9gag ages ago.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 03:02 AM
1

Posted it on r/statistics. Hope it sticks. https://www.reddit.com/r/statistics/comments/hwbvxw/d_the_latest_uk_tax_data_are_in/
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:15 AM
1

Probably serious. The Philippines, where this post was made, doesn't allow full blown pornography. This post was apparently an old page by one of our "pornstars" that turned politician. She might have posted that to attract thirsty fb users
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:48 AM
5

"Huli ka balbon" is an expression that literally means "Got you, Hairy!" which probably translates better as "Got you, bitch" or other equivalent.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 01:26 AM
90

No, no. Let them stay. Open attacks like that will show other people who visit this sub but are not pro or anti MRA to see what MRA has to constantly deal with. It'd be an additional point of consideration.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 11:21 AM
1

This show still hasn't ended? Because I swear I've seen this post some months ago. Are they shooting live or something?
/r/MensRights14/07/20 02:20 AM
0

LOL! The government isn't going to meddle in your relationship. It'll just be there to give you tax breaks for using public services. If you don't want to pay taxes, go live in the mountains. I didn't know you're all also paranoid conspiracy theorists.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:29 AM
0

The benefits are there to promote the most effective way to secure a future for the country, ie an intact family unit with two adult role models. I know you've all read those posts about how kids turn out better adults with a father figure involved, it's actually better to have BOTH parents present. Being legally bound together means you all have documentation, which makes it easier to prove who you are, therefore less paperwork, therefore less man hours to process you when you need to avail som…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:24 AM
1

You want me to take all the immensely varying human emotions, manners, culture, upbringing, etc., assign a numerical value to it, use it to calculate the likelihood that a marriage will fail, weigh the risk over benefits, and give you a solid figure? LOL! I've been posting on this sub for quite a while because I support our rights, but saying that marriage is a waste of time and nothing but a trap for the breadwinner, which you think is you because they are often men, because there's women invol…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:16 AM
-2

You don't get it. You get all these AUTOMATICALLY after getting married. Without marriage, you have to prove everything you claim here to qualify for all these things. You can go through all the trouble of proving that instead of just getting married, and that's up to you.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:04 AM
1

Children born from unmarried couples don't automatically qualify for inheritance of anything. You have to go to the trouble of going to court for that. Some countries have laws that give married couples tax breaks for the number of dependents they have. Marital Tax Deduction. Joint Filing of Taxes. There are health insurance benefits that can be availed only if you're married. There's a lot you can't do if you don't marry. Do these outweigh the risks of getting married? I don't know and it's not…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:33 AM
1

Eh, not really. You do get some incentives for doing certain things as a married couple. Like tax breaks, automatic inheritance for your children, etc.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 12:08 AM
9

Women have been flying to other countries for a bit of sex tourism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_sex_tourism https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/minority-report/201909/female-sex-tourism Sex tourism supports human trafficking.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 07:01 AM
3

Aren't onlyfans just plain old simple porn? Is that what "women empowerment" has come down to?
/r/MensRights05/07/20 11:36 PM
1

Insult? You have no data of my intentions, you can't possibly conclude that I'm insulting you without presenting me such data.. You only have data on my actions and I'm giving you genuine advise to go take your minute phallus and shove it up your anus.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 09:25 PM
0

Yes, I'm advising you to put your dick up your butthole.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:01 PM
0

It's clear you're arguing in bad faith. Go fuck yourself. What kind of fucking idiot thinks governments are going to issue official documents for why they are blocking other countries' food sources. What? Are you going to claim you're not arguing in bad faith because I don't have "data"?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:48 AM
0

UK and US prevents India from securing food source. This is a fact. How is that not "data"? Interpret it.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:28 AM
0

Dude, stop pretending to want data. I've done nothing but give you data. You just refuse to read it because according to you it's biased. You're just too pussy and/or ignorant to make a stand, and that's where you'll fall in this discussion and this topic in general. And you'll never ever leave, because you're one of the people benefiting from the WTO's trade policies.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 04:11 AM
0

Countries like India want to secure their own food source for their starving people. Countries like the US and the UK are being enabled by WTO policies to block this because they're greedy. What's so hard to understand there? What's your interpretation of that?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:37 AM
1

There's instances like India being fucked in the ass by the US and the UK for their own food. What bias are you going to accuse them of. What is the intentions of the US and the UK there? And really? You clicked on one article and think it's what everything else contains? Go on. Have a gander at the rest. These aren't even a small portion of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:29 AM
1

While everyone else arrives at the same conclusion, people like you who indulge themselves in the benefits of being in a rich country in the WTO are denying its hypocrisies. Here are reading materials that are not from Dr. Chang or any of his works: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:11 AM
1

No data? Look around you. I'd like to think you're just too pussy to make a stand. But that's giving you too much credit as you're probably just ignorant. The WTO IMPOSES trade rules that where NEVER USED in the past or by the countries who make up the WTO. It's literally in their mandate to meddle with every trade activity on Earth. Poor countries have no choice but to follow these trade policies or be excluded from everyone. You're the one who's biased. EDIT: While everyone else arrives at the…
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:54 AM
0

Wow. All your posturing amounts to this.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:50 AM
0

Is his conclusion right or wrong? Answer that because that's the only thing that matters.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:47 AM
0

Confirmation bias? LOL! You're the only one who says that his research is bull. You can't even offer a different interpretation of the historical facts. So why did the developed world extensively used protectionist trade policies, huh? And why are they not using it now? Go right the fuck ahead and explain that.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:34 AM
0

What is the bias? Biased against what? You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means. And what mover evidence do you need? it's in the history books, trade history, constitutional changes, etc. You're the only one who denies it without giving an alternative interpretation of the present data because you're too pussy to stand by anything and would just like to keep repeating BIAS as if you even know what it means. So yeah, you're a useless man to talk to that is too bli…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:29 PM
1

If the fact that developed countries have historically used protectionist policies and are now pushing for unfair trade policies isn't proof for you, then nothing is. You're a blind fool that refuse to listen and is nothing but a waste of time. Goodbye, little man.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:59 AM
0

The intentions of the developed nations is to impose trade policies that they never used until now. It's been pretty obvious that that was the observation talked about in the book from the summary I posted since the beginning. Again, YOU DO NOT READ.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 02:47 AM
0

Point out facts is playing the victim card? Another attempt at diverting from the actual discussion... Uh-huh. Crying croc tears for apparently being "attacked" is stupid as fuck and is nothing more than a diversion. You keep trying to push all these bullshit and branching out to more pointless arguments when it is a fact that you can't even explain what the bias is. Again. What is the bias here? What is Dr. Chang being biased about? ​ Oh perfect. Then you can support the assertion with informat…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:28 AM
0

Can't defend the bias so you attack me? Here comes the victim card. If you can't recognize bias because it fits with your own bias, then your education was woefully inadequate. Don't play the victim card when you're the first one to attack, boy. Really? Trying to divert away from the discussion... pretty pathetic at this point. What discussion am I diverting from? Go on. You can't even explain how the book is biased beyond the fact that YOU ALONE think it is. That does not mean the book has been…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:17 AM
1

Not the books you're reading, no. IF you even read. Do you even know what "Kicking Away the Ladder" is? This book is the winner of the 2003 Myrdal Prize, European Association of Evolutionary Political Economy. What is the Myrdal Prize? https://eaepe.org/?page=awards&side=eaepemyrdal_prize&sub=rules
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:09 AM
1

Well researched, Peer reviewed, accepted by many experts, highly acclaimed book. And according to some random idiot on the internet, it's biased. HAHAHAHAHA!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 01:01 AM
1

Again, that's not bias. You're the only fool that calls that book and Dr. Chang biased. If all the developed countries in the world used protectionist policies, including imposing tariffs, product bans, etc., to get rich in the last millennium, then why are they trying to force developing nations to use open trade policies that exposes their natural resources and products to corporations and countries that could easily buy them out. If you can't understand that, "then your education was woefully…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:19 AM
0

That's not bias. That's the conclusion after extensive research, you fool.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:48 PM
1

Oh... that makes it impossible to have bias does it? Unless you can provide something to prove he is wrong, I'm not going to agree with you. Especially since his works are peer reviewed. Are you going to accuse all who agree with his works with the same bias? And yet, his conclusions on the motivations of first world nations... isn't about economics, it's entirely about bias... What bias are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:14 AM
1

Dr. Chang is an alumni of the University of Cambridge. I'm not going to agree with a random stranger on the internet who claims to know more than a doctor whose works agree with many economists. If free trade was so great, then why did UK leave it behind along with the EU? Because they and many rich nations got rich through protectionist policies, not free trade. Trade agreement? Like agree to do menial, low paying, environmentally dangerous work to keep prices low, or continue to be a poor coun…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:54 AM
2

And how does that happen? Does the WTO trade policies seem fair? Maybe at first glance. But a Doctor of Economics, Dr. Ha-Joon Chang, did a study and made a book about it and it isn't fair to poor countries.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:37 AM
2

What can be what?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:34 AM
2

People might not have any personal control over the system but they are still benefiting from it, and imo they cannot fully wash their hands from it especially if they happily partake in its benefits.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:32 AM
2

I asked you first.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:29 AM
2

Answer this: Do you think trade deals are "taking advantage of each other"?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:16 AM
1

It's not really something we can argue on. HAHAHAHA! Are you serious? You believe this shit without any basis?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:15 AM
2

You accuse EVERY COUNTRY of taking advantage of others when it's abundantly clear that many poor ones get the short end of the stick in trade deals.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:12 AM
2

Ah yes, that bullshit again. "If we don't do it, somebody else will." How did the rich countries really become rich? In this provocative study, Ha-Joon Chang examines the great pressure on developing countries from the developed world to adopt certain 'good policies' and 'good institutions', seen today as necessary for economic development. Adopting a historical approach, Dr Chang finds that the economic evolution of now-developed countries differed dramatically from the procedures that they now…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:09 AM
1

Rich nations, who were coincidentally also ran by a white government up until last century, still continue to take advantage of other countries though.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:55 AM
7

most of the wars are started by men. Yeah, but women are more likely to wage wars than men. https://www.thecut.com/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/ https://www.economist.com/europe/2017/06/01/who-gets-into-more-wars-kings-or-queens https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:43 AM
3

Mulan is already a celebrated piece for women empowerment. Completely glossing over the fact that it's an attempt to put a woman in a man's world and how difficult it would be. It's actually a piece discussing gender roles, but whatever scene that tries to highlight the price men have to pay to keep society intact is being appropriated by women. Like this particular song. This post doesn't mention anything about the sacrifice she made? Throwaway dude, read my first comment, as I have mentioned h…
/r/MensRights23/06/20 04:01 AM
6

I actually think that Mulan highlights societal issues and pressures of traditional gender roles, but youtube comments have begun dismissing one gender over the other and even inserting LGBT into this by making comments like: L - Let's G - Get Down T - To B - Business
/r/MensRights23/06/20 02:42 AM
3

Yes, it is, as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Faction#/media/File:Red_Faction_Series_logo.png I meant "as well" because it's apparently similar to the USSR fist and many other things.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:13 AM
0

That Red Faction Logo he uses though.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 03:16 AM
12

Then go through with the case, win it, and the persisting story would be the truth.
/r/MensRights20/05/20 07:45 AM
6

Let's not make the same mistake they're doing.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 02:04 AM
2

I'm just going to point out that The Dictator is a satire.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 02:21 PM
99

Am I just too nice and innocent to think that she's just parodying Borat? EDIT: I just realized that I confused the movies Borat and The Dictator.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 06:32 AM
3

Low hanging nuts, this ain't. Sorry, had to.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:40 AM
2

Looks edited, tbh. There's a bigass space between the question and the female option.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 10:48 AM
0

Fuck this current breed of feminists, and I can back that statement up with previous statements, but are you all really blaming the women like how the current feminists are blaming men? I think people here are conflating the definition of the old feminists with the new. From the word itself, "Feminism" is for women. They didn't do men wrong by forgetting them back then. They are doing the world wrong now by blaming men. Don't do the same.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 01:12 AM
1

LOL! I got accused of being a feminist for disagreeing. How fucking ironic. Here I am not being a feminist, among many other instances of participating on this sub and supporting men's rights all over reddit. But sure. Wait, so you also think all those other civil rights movements were evil because they also killed people. LOL! Women fighting for the right to vote, even after using violence, was justified. What women are doing now, demonizing the male gender, isn't. I guess I'm just not full of …
/r/MensRights15/04/20 11:38 AM
2

I thought this sub wasn't an echo chamber and actually gives credit where it's due. But ok. You telling me that women had the right to vote before any of these? Come the fuck on.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 10:38 AM
0

The first waves did get women the right to vote and many other things.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 09:05 AM
47

The first two waves had a goal. This 3rd wave had one that I think was about the female identity, but then it devolved into illogically hating all men and anyone that doesn't agree with them.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 03:48 PM
8

Read their rules. It's not a place to "debate" against feminism. So it's basically an echo chamber promoting hate and should be shut down, but I know reddit ain't gonna do that because they'll be labelled as anti-feminist and they don't want to deal with that.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:46 AM
11

I get the feeling that it's another girl who's astrosurfing. Dickballs as a username gives me the "fellow kids" vibe.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:39 AM
2

Shimoneta flash backs.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:21 AM
1

Ok, I've been there too. For me, it's when too many people are trying to bury my argument that I see arguments anywhere I look even when there is none. Maybe take a break?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:01 AM
5

This may be perpetuating gender stereotypes but "Single with 50 cats" is a pretty obvious diss at women.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:57 AM
9

Well, nothing legally written is hindering the setting up of any Male centered foundation, but may I remind you that when a MRA tried to hold a meeting, a bunch of militant feminists attacked the building they were in, cut off the power, harassed the MRA group when they left the now dead building, and tried to shift the focus to women's issues. You could probably find this exact incident on youtube because there's a famous militant feminist called Big Red that was caught on cam being a total ass…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter