TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Breer Archive

View 1 post and 31 comments by Breer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yes, I can't see anything at fault with what you said
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:27 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that prenups have been overturned in the past.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:13 AM
10

What? No, it's not rape. But I would still classify it as a sexual offense. But rape? That's ridiculous, of course it isn't rape.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:32 AM
42

Yes, I would consider so.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:18 PM
49

The theft of seminal fluid for the purpose of unlawful insemination, by use of deception and coercion. Yes, I'd say that's a sex offense.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:55 PM
24

What a psychopath.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:46 PM
2

It's a good thing that people should be self sufficient, but telling people to "man up" is part of the reason why man can't get help in many areas. Oh, you were raped by a woman? Thats impossible, man up you pussy!
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:43 PM
85

Compensation???? She should be put on the sex offenders register for life. And the IVF facility/sperm bank that facilitated this despicable act should be shut down and the people responsible tried for gross criminal negligence and misconduct, and forced to pay this man compensation as well as cover the entirety of his child support costs. Now that, would be actual compensation.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:39 PM
1

but there has still been a disparity that isn't erased by averaging out the general levels of oppression through time. I categorically disagree. I think that the idea of male disposability that has seen men thrown by the wayside for thousands of years (including the recent past and to this very day), is just as bad as the notion of husbands owning their wives, if not worse. I honestly don't see how you can say that women have been subjected to more oppression, even if you're just focusing on the…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:25 PM
2

Where do you get this impression that I said that sexism doesn't exist?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:18 PM
1

women were not seen as fully human in the same way as men. Women have been property, women's bodies have been property. And so were men. Men were property of the government/monarchy/emperor for thousands of years, and were forced to risk life and limb for their country Even the most cursory look at history will show you that this female victim narrative is complete and utter horseshit, and is nowhere near the entire story. Painting ancient society as this otherwise peaceful place, and then simpl…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:36 PM
2

But what about if the man is drunk and the woman is sober? Surely by their own definition that is rape?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:30 PM
23

I feel sorry for all of these circumcised guys trying to euphemise it and play it down. If they're fine with their dicks, then that's cool, really it is. But they don't seem to understand that OTHER PEOPLE AREN'T. Why can't they just get this through their head? It's like because they are fine with it, they don't think anyone should have a say, at all. They're fine with it, so everyone should just man up and stop making a big deal about it. What's even more sickening is the women that are for ci…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:35 PM
26

In the end it doesn't make a difference. This woman in the article will eventually divorce him due to long, deep seated resent, and then she'll get half of his money anyway.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:30 PM
10

I'm not even sure if you're kidding or what. Judging on how I was just banned from /r/rape because I replied to the claim that "it is impossible to give consent whilst drunk", with "I was drunk and had sex with a sober lady 3 days ago, was I raped?" - you may possibly be right. If so, that really is just a new level of insanity.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:11 AM
4

Can you please show me one "egalitarian feminist" organisation that has done anything, ever, for the plight of men and boys? Because those that do, are vanishingly few. I think you would be better off to class yourself (or at least so called egalitarian feminists) as part of a very very small minority of people who really do see our side of the coin. But they are by no means the majority, or ANYWHERE NEAR IT. The feminist organisations with the most power and the individuals with the most legisl…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:01 AM
3

This belongs in /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:25 AM
7

This is just a linguistic trick. It's an attempt to dominate gender politics by redefining feminism as equality for everyone, regardless of what it actually is. Feminism, at its BEST, is about doing things for women. At its worst, is about doing things for women that actively harm men, or doing things just for the sake of harming men (thereby creating, in their eyes at least, a level playing field). All this talk of "feminism actually means equality, and is therefore good for men", is nothing mo…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:23 AM
3

That's because feminism isn't based in any actual serious desire for legislative change. (although it still does a lot of damage) It's an ideological movement. Don't expect them to be coming out with any realistic demands because they don't have any. They talk about lofty concepts such as "rape culture" and "patriarchy". Have you ever wondered why these ideas are so vague and nebulous? It's so they can always be applied. Any situation, these labels can be applied, and from some angle, they'll ma…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:16 AM
17

Precisely right. We're desensitised to it. Oh, circumcision, who cares about that! Stop making a big deal out of it will you! Fuck that. It is the mutilation of the genitals of an infant child. It is one of the most abhorrent practices that goes on in our culture. The fact that it is as prevalent as it is is testament to the insanity of certain elements of our culture. If someone wants to get circumcised for religious reasons, let them make that choice when they are 18. But mutilating the genita…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:09 AM
13

This is because you've been infected by the cultural normalcy of it. It's a fucking sickening act. Look, I want you to watch an actual circumcision. Watch this VICE documentary on it. It's a sickening act. And the only reason you don't take it seriously, is because it is prevalent. But think about what it actually is. You take an infant boy. You take a sharp blade, and cut off a part of his genitalia, often without anaesthetic, for absolutely no reason. If no-one had ever done it, and there was …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:07 AM
3

Jesus Christ. This is absolutely sickening. I feel physically ill after watching this. How anyone can do this to an innocent child is just... I'm at a loss. The people that support this and attempt to euphemise it by pretending that it prevents AIDS or some other such nonsense, are psychopaths. Really, after seeing a live baby in agony having his genitals mutilated, and then actively trying to promote this so it is an even more widespread practice - what can we call such evil? It's an absolute d…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:48 PM
18

I know man, I'm getting real tired of this line of reasoning too. This masochistic, pseudo-intellectual line of reasoning. The patriarchy is a junk concept, nothing more. It's barely even intelligible if you actually try to get your head inside it and find out what it REALLY is (which I assure you, feminists do NOT do). They'd much rather leave it as an automatic-win buzzword. Say patriarchy, get a clap. There's no such fucking thing as patriarchy. The traditionalist roles came about through NEC…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:26 PM
1

Yes you're possibly right
/r/MensRights29/04/13 03:30 PM
3

Ok let's do it
/r/MensRights29/04/13 01:50 PM
1

Yes that's fair enough.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:37 PM
11

Yes they do, by the droves
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:31 PM
190

It would be interesting actually, create a fake magazine called "The Chauvinist" and literally just invert the gender in every single Cosmo story and have that as the entirety of the magazine Wait until the opposition reaches fever pitch and then reveal that it is literally a copied, mirrored version of cosmo but with the genders changed, and then see how they react to that.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:29 PM
30

It's because they are walking on egg shells. If you don't hedge what you're saying, with the constant feminist coronary, they'll bring it up and chastise you for not mentioning it, or accuse you of actually euphemising it. Basically, everyone is so scared of being called a woman hater or wife beater apologist that they have to constantly hedge their bets to acquit themselves of such a charge. It's what happens when junk, nebulous concepts such as patriarchy and rape culture become the academic n…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:47 PM
2

Well, the evidence is overwhelming yes. But we still have to be impartial here. Let's not forget that one of the main things we want is a restoration of the innocent until proven guilty maxim. We would be dishonest if we didn't apply it across the board.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:37 PM
316

Some classic lines from the article When a woman cheats, even just once, there's usually a problem in her relationship. "Women often stray if their sex lives are stagnant or they're feeling neglected," Yes, of course. And we all know that if a man cheats its because he is a sex maniac, and woman abuser, right down to the very fabric of his DNA. "Ask yourself why you did it," advises Weiner. "Then let your boyfriend know what you need from him." But still, do not confess. Take the least amount of…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter