~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Evidence for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Unhealthy, poorly nourished and low-status mothers are more likely to give birth to daughters because female offspring has a more reliable reproductive success (Song, 2012)Obviously. The nutritional factor of the mother wouldn’t hold any bearing on if the child receives the X sex chromosome from her. The sperm will determine if the offspring receives the second chromosome to become either a female or a male. Female does not have bearing on gender. This study is biased towards incels who will believe whatever leans into their bias | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/07/19 09:57 PM |
| 3 | Evidence for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Unhealthy, poorly nourished and low-status mothers are more likely to give birth to daughters because female offspring has a more reliable reproductive success (Song, 2012)The fucking ovum without genetic mutations is always an X chromosome. The sperm can be X or Y. If the offspring is XX, then without mutation the baby will be a girl. If the offspring is XY, then without mutation it will be a boy. Poorly nourished mother has no say end of story. The mother always contributes an X chromosome. That is without genetic mutation. If this study went the route of poorly nourished are more susceptible to chromosomal mutation in their ovum then sure. But this is 2019 and … | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/07/19 01:51 PM |
| 1 | Evidence for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Unhealthy, poorly nourished and low-status mothers are more likely to give birth to daughters because female offspring has a more reliable reproductive success (Song, 2012)The fucking ovum without genetic mutations is always an X chromosome. The sperm can be X or Y. If the offspring is XX, then without mutation the baby will be a girl. If the offspring is XY, then without mutation it will be a boy. Poorly nourished mother has no say end of story. The mother always contributes an X chromosome. That is without genetic mutation. If this study went the route of poorly nourished are more susceptible to chromosomal mutation in their ovum then sure. But this is 2019 and … | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/07/19 01:50 PM |
| 1 | Evidence for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Unhealthy, poorly nourished and low-status mothers are more likely to give birth to daughters because female offspring has a more reliable reproductive success (Song, 2012)The fucking ovum without genetic mutations is always an X chromosome. The sperm can be X or Y. If the offspring is XX, then without mutation the baby will be a girl. If the offspring is XY, then without mutation it will be a boy. Poorly nourished mother has no say end of story. The mother always contributes an X chromosome. That is without genetic mutation. If this study went the route of poorly nourished are more susceptible to chromosomal mutation in their ovum then sure. But this is 2019 and … | /r/BlackPillScience | 17/07/19 01:48 PM |
| -5 | Girls holidays 🥴🥴🤡🤡The only thing that’s naive here is thinking that after getting hurt one to two times is to sit on your ass and make excuses instead of finding the person who does truly love you. Most relationships will fail end of story, you’ll fail over and over until you don’t. End of story. So this sub pisses me off because you place blame on anyone but yourself. And it’s ignorant to blame anyone in these scenarios, rather than growing the fuck up and going back out there to find that person for you | /r/MGTOW | 16/07/19 12:49 AM |
| 0 | Girls holidays 🥴🥴🤡🤡5 of each is literally among the most undergraduate of studies and no matter which way the results swayed would largely be considered not significant data in terms of the alpha score end of story. If you want real data, conduct it. Don’t sit here and arm chair your way into thinking you have this massive breakthrough, when you really don’t have a foot to stand on in terms of data. It’s called confirmation bias, and no matter what answer you’ll get you’ll maneuver your way into thinking it fits y… | /r/MGTOW | 15/07/19 09:17 PM |
| -1 | Girls holidays 🥴🥴🤡🤡Alright your whole argument is they build their argument out of emotions. What are we going to say about every argument between two men that escalated to a point of a physical altercation? Which wouldn’t happen unless they were reacting based on emotion, and the overwhelming majority of physical altercations, are because men reacted this way. How about gangs? Those people see opposing gang members and react with shootouts, or physically based upon an emotion and not rationale. Those are admitted… | /r/MGTOW | 15/07/19 08:40 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter