TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BridgeBurner22 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,032 comments by BridgeBurner22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,032 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh yeah, sure, because defending your own daughter is the same as risking your life for any unknown woman who might be in trouble. Very fair comparison. I'll make it short, so your limited attention span can handle it. You seem to think that women deserve to get protection from men? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 04:37 PM
2

critiqued me frequently Really? That's surprising to me. Most men I know are happy to have sex and aren't going to critique their partners unless those partners aren't even doing the bare minimum. It doesn't take much to make a man come.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 04:11 PM
2

You are talking like you never seen a man or don't understand anything about male anatomy. Men aren't crushing their balls in-between their legs when they are driving. That's BS. You have a hole there. Men have a dick and a nutsack there. Of course men aren't going to keep their legs as close together as women do. If men would start complaining about all the "breastspreading" that women do, we would be doing the exact same ridiculous thing you are doing now. Imagine a man complaining about being…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:21 PM
1

Not having sex in the first few dates ≠ giving that man the impression that you’ve never had sex. Men will try to have sex. Women will stop them and when they do, they usually give a reason. Because if they don't explain why they don't want sex with someone they are seeing, then that person might start to think the woman isn't attracted to them and see no point in trying to keep on dating. Making a man wait almost always is accompanied by some form of "I need more comfort", "I'm not that kind of…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:12 PM
1

so why are they acting surprised if we adjust our behavior depending on what we're looking for?? Straight from the horse's mouth. So guys, expect to get deceived based on what she's looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 03:02 PM
1

Is you not wanting to pay for a date with one woman but paying for a date with another one lying? No. It is when you give women the impression that you never pay for dates. Women who make some men wait aren't exactly telling them "I just make you wait, not all guys". They give those men the impression that all men have to wait, when they say "I'm not that kind of girl." Or "I need to have a connection before I have sex", etc. You know how this goes. Why do you even pretend like there is no disho…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 02:56 PM
2

For women in particular, our partners just need to be willing to listen and try our preferences. For men in particular, our partners just need to be willing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 02:28 PM
1

It is only an attempt, if you actually try to succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 02:04 PM
1

I asked them whether they would intervene if they saw a man attacking a woman in terms of rape, and they refused to answer. So men have to risk their lives to save women they don't even know? Why? Plenty of men get killed because they were chivalrous and tried to save another person. And it isn't like modern women are appreciative for men being chivalrous either. Nowadays you risk being called a male chauvinist pig, if you dare holding a door open for a woman. But when a woman is in real trouble…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 02:01 PM
1

men in the driving seat never do it Today I learned that some people are so braindead, they actually believe that a man's body autonomy magically changes when that man is driving a car.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/23 01:39 PM
12

Most women even have a backup guy(s) when they are already in a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 03:18 PM
1

I never said that getting cheated on is the same thing as rape. I said that people who ignore red flags don't have my sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 01:59 PM
3

You aren't telling me anything new nor anything I don't agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/23 01:55 PM
8

Some men are obviously players or just plain old assholes. If you decide to date them and you are getting played, than that's on you. If you are a regular girl and you decide to date a guy way out of your league (which is very common since women are driven by their hypergamy), of course you are going to get pumped and dumped. That's also on you. If you date at your level and there are no obvious red flags, then you have my full sympathy when the guy you were dating turns out to be an asshole. Ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:58 PM
13

But all men are assholes because she decides only to date assholes. Women truly are more child than adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:36 PM
3

Women have such lack of self awareness and then they still get mad when redpill says that 'women are the most responsible teenagers of the house'. Act like an adult, be self aware and take responsibility for your actions. Untill they learn to do this, they are definitely more child than adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:33 PM
1

Why don't you understand what logic is? It isn't that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:16 PM
1

I have no problem with you pointing out that I was trolling, but please be fair and apply the same rules to the person I was talking to. They just wrote a whole post just to troll. You say nothing to them. I respond with a troll myself, and I get a moderated? Moderating should be applying the rules of a subreddit, not strategically applying to rules of a subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:15 PM
2

Men are fine dating a woman that they find attractive, even when there are women out there that are even more attractive. Men are ok with "good enough".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 05:01 PM
1

You are so incredibly naive. It's endearing and worrysome at the same time. I don't know if I want to slap that naivety out of you or protect you from all the bad things that inadvertently happen to naive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:35 AM
3

Women are hypergamous, they aren't into "good enough", they only care for "the best they can get". Rich and tall is still better than rich and small.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 07:25 AM
0

‘I don’t want a girl whose been run through by other guys,and has baggage’ thing doesn’t make sense. Doesn't make sense to you. Which is perfectly normal, you aren't a man so you can't be the victim of paternity fraud, so your gender never developed an ingrained aversion to promiscuous behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 06:24 AM
-1

If you are happier in a relationship, then by definition you are not completely happy being single. Because you know you would be even more happy in a relationship. That's just basic logic. Basically you took a long way to undermine your own premise. Women aren't happy being single. Because women don't do "good enough". They are hypergamous, that means that they want the best they can get, not just "good enough". And since you admitted they are happier when dating, this means that they aren't go…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 07:33 PM
3

Biology isn't your strong suit. Go and get some evidence about what you claim here, missy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 07:22 PM
4

And it’s certainly not a signal of any personality trait. Right, that's why extraverts are more likely to color their hair and shy people are less likely to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 07:12 PM
3

That’s a lot of words for “alt women won’t fuck me”. I treat women with brightly colored hair, like I would treat any brightly colored animal that can be found in nature. I stay far away. They are both probably poisonous.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 07:11 PM
2

I don't know why you wrote all that about men that never take initiative, when we were talking about men who only pass on women who they know aren't interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 07:03 PM
7

You do realize that coloring your hair, just because you like the colors, will get you the same extra attention that coloring your hair, because you are an attention whore, will get? Or in other words, regardless of what your intentions are, that hairstyle will come with extra attention. And everybody knows this. You might tell people that you have brightly colored hair because you like the colors, but if you didn't like the attention too, you wouldn't have got the colors done. That's why shy pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 06:56 PM
3

Just a thought: If it's better than being single, than apparently those women weren't really happy being single.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 06:42 PM
1

You aren't strong at reading comprehension, are you? I ask you why women, who are apparently happy being single, would bother with men at all. Why not stay single, if they are happy being single? Your answer: They’re happy to wait until they find a high value male, because they would rather have no one at all than someone low value. I wasn't asking why they are waiting. I was asking why would these women still bother dating men, if being single is making them happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 06:07 PM
1

You sound like you are on your period. Don't worry won't hold it against you. All the best and see you at a less hormonal and more stable time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 05:59 PM
8

That's a difference between men and women. Men actually have to face rejection, because they are expected to take the initiative. After a while you get a pretty good idea for what is definitely out of your league and won't give you a chance. Not approaching those girls has nothing to do with intimidation, it's about being efficient with your time. Feeling intimidated can be a factor when you might have a chance (because you fear the possibility of rejection). It isn't when you know there isn't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 05:47 PM
3

It’s not indicative of anything. Colouring your hair in bright unnatural colors is definitely attention seeking behavior. You know you are going to stand out and be looked at, if you walk around with bright blue hair. I never saw an actual beautiful woman with bright, unnatural colored hair. It's always girls who are trying to divert attention away from the fact that they are 50 kilograms overweight or the common girl next door type who is tired of not getting noticed or lesbians. Anytime I see …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 05:32 PM
9

Not approaching someone because you know they are probably going to beat you up when you do = being intimidated. Not approaching someone because you know they aren't interested and it's a waist of time anyway =/= being intimidated. Intimidation requires an element of fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 04:56 PM
8

many are happy to stay single until they can get one. Ah, of course, that's why they get 5 cats and a wine addiction, because they are "happy" being single. And why would they stay single "until they can get one?" If the single life would make them happy, why still bother with men at all? Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself that single women are this radiating beacon of happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 04:38 PM
1

Are you asking me if oral, also known as licking pussy, cunnilingus and oral sex, is sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 02:26 PM
0

Looking briefly through your post history, where you do nothing but be judgmental and insulting in mostly short one sentence posts, you definitely don't sound like you are a balanced grown-up. And it's not even being insulting at the end of a lengthy discussion or anything, no, you seem to join discussions others are having, to make a short negative remark. Very mature behavior, mate, I am in awe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 02:12 PM
0

I expect more than just "being clean" from a partner. Typical PPD, anytime a man has some standards, he is "insecure". Wonder how long it will take before you realize that shaming tactics only work on people who respect you. I don't know you, so why would you think that shaming me is going to do anything? It's pathetic. Since when is "I have sucked 37 other men and none of them is still around" a sign of quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 02:03 PM
1

Because I wonder what is wrong with someone who couldn't make any of the 37 other men stick around? You are funny. I'll leave it to you then to wife up all the basket cases, since you seem to think that playing captain save-a-hoe is a sign of security.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 01:53 PM
2

Good point. Sex to me means genitals are involved. I don't come from just a make out session. So to me making out isn't sex. But if that would give me an orgasm, than my genitals would be involved and then it would be not just a make out session but indeed sex. Your point of view made me realize that even the same thing (heavy make out session) can be sex to me and can be not sex to me. This is more complicated than I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:55 PM
2

If you take the same amount of married and unmarried women. And you compare their age-adjusted death rates, than having a higher death rate does in fact mean that they are dying sooner than the women in the other group. And that's exactly what this study has done.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:30 PM
8

That's why people don't agree in this thread. We apparently all have a personal definition of sexual activity. To me, when genitals are involved, it is sex. Kissing isn't sex to me. Having genitals in your mouth is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:17 PM
-1

I know that wasn't her point. Doesn't change the fact she was very indignant when a man told a woman she needed to pay for a date. Even calling it "massive disrespect". Meanwhile men are expected to suffer the same disrespect as a standard practice. Where is her outrage about men being expected to pay? Isn't that just as disrespectful as a man telling a woman that she needs to pay? Or is something only disrespectful when it is done to a woman? Get out of here with that double standard. Equality …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 06:12 PM
3

You are reading a different thread than I do. Most men here are definitely making jokes about women not including all the blowjobs and handjobs in their n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:09 PM
3

I don't need therapy for women lying about their sexual history. And I don't think a person is a sexual deviant because they aren't honest about their n-count. Most men also lie about their actual number.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:06 PM
1

That's not really giving me an answer to the question I asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:03 PM
3

I think most women aren't exactly honest about their sexual history and lower their numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 05:02 PM
6

I personally know several women who had threesomes and gangbangs. I know two who have an n-count way up in the triple digits. I know this because they told me themselves and I actually believe them because everyone I know has had sex with them, including myself. One of my friends once made the joke that when he dies, he wants to be buried in one of their pussies, because at least then he is sure that all his friends will come visite him after he's gone. I'm from Western Europe. Porn got nothing …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:46 PM
2

I personally don't know any men my age who are still a virgin. And yes, after a certain age, if you haven't had sex as a man, I will think there are some issues with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:36 PM
2

Imagine a woman who has given 60 guys a handjob, has given 40 guys a blowjob and has rimmed at least another 20 guys, but never actually had PiV sex with any of them. If that woman tells you her n-count is zero, do you think she is telling the truth? And if your answer is yes of course she is telling the truth, wouldn't you feel somewhat cheated, when you find out about all the guys she tucked, sucked and tossed a salad for?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:32 PM
5

Depends on the definition of virgin you use. Are you talking about a woman who's hymen is still intact? Or are you talking about a woman who never had PiV sex? Or is a virgin to you a person who's never done anything sexual at all ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:25 PM
2

Then at least she wasn't an awful kisser.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:24 PM
3

It's not insecure to wonder why the person you are currently seeing wasn't in a relationship when you met, although there were plenty of other men who have had sex with her. A woman is going to be just as hesitant to date a man, if that man had been in 40 previous relationships but none of them ever worked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:57 PM
5

Naked touching genitals = genitals are involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:46 PM
3

Words have meanings That's funny coming from someone who goes against the definition of what sex is, to be able to exclude blowjobs and handjobs from it. N count is the number of people you had sex with. And the definition of sex is: sex :noun (chiefly with reference to people) sexual activity, including specifically sexual intercourse. So if words have meaning than sex is any sexual activity and not just PiV.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:44 PM
8

A person who has sucked 37 dicks is not somehow tainted. It definitely won't feel very special to be number 38. And it will make you wonder why none of the 37 guys before you ever bothered to stick around. Unless number 37 did stay and she is now cheating on him with you, of course. But that's a whole other can of worms.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:35 PM
11

If genitals are involved, it is sex. Having genitals in your mouth is a sex act and should add to your count.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:20 PM
2

Married women had a death rate of 569 per 100,000, two-and-a-half times lower than the 1,482 rate for widows. The death rate was 1,096 for divorcees and 1,166 for never-married women. https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/news/20191010/marriage-tied-to-longer-life-span-new-data-shows#:~:text=Married%20women%20had%20a%20death,1%2C166%20for%20never%2Dmarried%20women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:10 PM
3

I have never spoken to anyone in real life who classes a blow job as sex. That's really weird, since the definition of what sex is, clearly isn't limited to only PiV. This could be an age thing Words already have meaning. And that meaning doesn't change because of a person's age.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:01 PM
6

I don't want to argue about which gender pays. I want you to realize you are being a hypocrite, when you only call it disrespectful when a man asks a woman to pay. The fact that women in general expect men to pay, is just as disrespectful. Women are liberated, women can work, women have their own money. There's no reason for this silly tradition that men have to pay anymore. But they are still expected to do so. And that's not disrespectful according to you. Only when a woman is expected to pay,…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:55 PM
24

The mental gymnastics in this thread are incredible. There is a clear definition for what sex is. sex :noun (chiefly with reference to people) sexual activity, including specifically sexual intercourse. Sex is any sexual activity, including sexual intercourse. So, it includes PiV, but also any other sexual activity. Women who aren't counting all the blowjobs, handjobs,... are inventing their own definition of what sex actually is, to present themselves as less sexual experienced than they are. "…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:46 PM
5

You can't just invent your own definitions of what words mean. That's what children do. And it will lead to a breakdown in communication with others. There is a clear definition for what sex is: sex :noun (chiefly with reference to people) sexual activity, including specifically sexual intercourse. As you can tell from the definition, sex is any sexual activity, including PiV. You made up your own meaning of sex, only PiV and nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:36 PM
0

Best point you made in those whole thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:27 PM
2

A bj doesn't mean you had sex with the guy eventually. Sex is more than only a penis in a vagina. Anytime genitals are involved it is sex. And since a blowjob means that a dick is involved and a dick is part of a male's genitals...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:26 PM
1

So you only count PiV as sex? And this while sex is so much more than just PiV. A blowjob is a sex act, a rimjob is a sex act, a handjob is a sex act,... If genitals are involved it is sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:22 PM
11

he told her he would go out with her if she pays for both of them. That’s the disrespect that chasing men gets you. You mean the same disrespect that is a standard for men, since men are still expected to pay for the first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:14 PM
2

A blowjob and a handjob are both sexual acts. Sex is more than inserting a penis in a vagina. Why wouldn't you count blowjobs and handjobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:04 PM
3

N-count is the number of people you had sex with. A blowjob is a sex act. Blowjobs should definitely add to an n count, if you have any intention of being honest about that number.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:02 PM
2

A blowjob is a sex act.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:00 PM
2

a blowjob is a sex act.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 01:59 PM
14

Ignoring non-PiV acts Ignoring anything that happens in Vegas, because it stays in Vegas. Ignoring all the drunk hookups, because that was alcohol's fault, not hers. Counting that time those 5 guys from the football team run a train on her as one, because they were all on the same team, so it was "just one football team". Ignoring all the lesbian hookups, because there was no dick involved. Ignoring at least ten other hookups because "I didn't came, so it wasn't real sex". Ignoring all the cheat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 01:53 PM
0

You are aimlessly blabbering. Get your emotions under control and make your point, if there is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 12:48 PM
1

If you're one of those people that uses things to replace their lack of human companionship, by all means go live your life with a bunch of vibrators and some cats. If that makes you happy, good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 06:48 PM
0

Who are they? Youth and beauty isn't coming from anyone else, but from a young and beautiful woman herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 05:15 PM
2

Honey, I could slap you in the face with all the proof in the world and you would still deny it's existence. It's not my first time on PPD. Try wasting your own time for a change.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 05:00 PM
3

Actually 30%-40% of women out earn their partners so I would not call them an anomaly. That more women are starting to outperform their partners financially, doesn't change the fact that women would rather date men who are doing better than themselves. These women were forced to settle, because there were no financially stronger candidates or they weren't willing to date those women. Not surprising since the education system is favoring women above men and the pay gap has been proved to be a myt…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:58 PM
0

The real wall for me wasn’t my looks, it was my wisdom. If you think that "growing wisdom" is your wall, wait untill your looks have catched up with your age. You are just lucky with your genetics and haven't reached that point of no return yet. You are still attracting young and old men alike and are still getting carded, it's obvious you haven't reached your wall yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:52 PM
-4

Confident and happy people don’t take pleasure in loudly telling everyone else how they don’t measure up. Tell that to all the older women who are telling men that are dating young women that "women his own age don't want him".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:43 PM
2

Women really could benefit from realizing the world is only catering to them because of their youth and beauty. And youth and beauty are very temporary. It's men's reaction to being faced with female entitlement and trying to bring that entitlement a few pegs down, by reminding women of the temporary nature of their source of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:40 PM
5

marry a woman who makes the same or more money than they do. Oh wait they are too insecure for that Men would love to marry a woman who doesn't use him as her personal ATM, but it's women who are hypergamous and will not give a man of equal or lesser financial standing the time of day. Once again another example how femnazi's turn everything into a man's fault. I out earn every man I have been with ever. You are a statistical anomaly. Women nowadays even put their financial cutoff in their datin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:24 PM
2

Oh, it's not just the monkey branching that is the reason. That's part of it. It's also their hypergamous nature that makes women trade in their partner more often. And a system that gives women half of a man's stuff ,whenever she decides that she is ready to upgrade, isn't helping the numbers either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:10 PM
2

Get a life. I don't recall asking you anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:01 PM
4

At least you're admitting the existence of financial divorce rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 04:01 PM
3

doesn't mean their monkey branching. Women are hypergamous and can't stand being alone. Of course they are monkey branching.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 03:56 PM
9

Is that your opinion or are you going to prove what your suggesting with some actual evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 08:13 PM
2

It's one of the reasons why women initiate divorce, just like wanting to be with a better woman is one of the reasons for men to initiate divorce. So, it's relevant in a discussion about monkey branching.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 07:05 PM
33

If men monkey branched as much as women do, women wouldn't be the ones initiating divorces at such high rates. Those rates would be a lot closer to 50/50 instead of the 70/30 to 80/20 we see now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 06:30 PM
10

But they don’t go outside, they just stay in, swipe, wank and cry. Sound a lot like what you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 06:22 PM
1

Having sex with women, is clearly a different activity from having sex with men. You are only using half the words to make it sound like it is one and the same thing. We aren't talking about sex in general. We are talking about why there is a difference in judgement on men having sex with women and women having sex with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:21 PM
1

She looks very rollable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:09 PM
1

If you are a heterosexual man who sleeps around, you are sleeping with women. If you are a heterosexual woman you are sleeping with men. People who complain about the "double standard" when it comes to promiscuity, are saying that sleeping with men is the same thing as sleeping with women. It clearly isn't. You refusing to address any of the points I made and responding with sad attempts at insult says enough...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:58 PM
7

Women his own age don't want anything to do with this kind of guy; they've gained enough experience to recognize that he's a loser Like why would that guy care about this? Why would any guy care about an older woman not wanting him, when he is dating younger ones? You seem to think that men like dating older women and that when older women don't want them, they have to go through the horrible experiences of dating younger ones. But it's the other way around, men prefer younger women and will onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:40 PM
1

Nah, I don’t have a slutty side. and I literally block some out in my head like they never happened. I like being innocent so I’m pretty good at coming off like that. Blocking out past experiences in order to be able to appear more innocent, is pretty pointless if you don't have a slutty side. You are contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 06:07 PM
8

Men who can get younger women, aren't going to care if more experienced and wiser older women aren't giving them the time of day. Men are attracted to youth and beauty. Experience, wisdom and whatever else you can think of, isn't going to beat a nice pair of tits that hasn't been wrecked by gravity yet. Why would a man care about an older woman not wanting him, when he is dating a younger one? Nobody who's driving a Ferrari is going to be sad when they can't drive a Toyota. Let's face it, it's o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 05:45 PM
1

Then making one more when asked won't be a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:52 PM
1

I'm pro equality. No man has a problem with being called a male and no woman has a problem with calling a man a male. Therefore women who have a problem with being called a female, can sit their hypocritical ass back down and deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:44 PM
1

I'm 100% sure the majority of what you write would be so much more legible, if you learned how to use some punctuation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:40 PM
3

Good, because men who can date younger women, aren't waiting around to date women their own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:04 PM
1

constant care and support Guys, go ask your woman to make you a sandwich and see how much of that mythical "constant care and support" you will receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:52 PM
1

Good strategy for past indiscretions, but won't work on what your slutty side does in the present or the future. Your best bet is dating an inexperienced man who still believes in romance. They are easily deceived. Any man worth his salt will have a working slut radar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:22 PM
1

We’ll just wait and see who dies first. My money is on him, he’s already 7 years older than me. Ah, true love, hoping your man kicks the bucket before you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:08 PM
2

Female logic: if it doesn't make any sense, but it sounds good, it is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:02 PM
1

Hopefully those simps have more experienced friends then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:53 PM
3

The woman herself may not like or appreciate the attention from this so-called backup man Then he obviously isn't isn't her backup man. A backup man is exactly that, a backup for her current man. Somebody she sees herself dating, if her current relationship goes down the drain. You are talking about her simps or her admirers. Those ain't no backup men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:45 PM
1

Lizzo is wider than she is tall, she is definitely obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:12 PM
3

It ain't that easy. A slut can lie about her past, but she can't stop herself from being what she is and will slip up in the present or in the future. Sluts are gonna slut. Sooner or later the facade comes down, hopefully before rings are involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:09 PM
3

It's not a double standard. You need the same activity being judged differently, in order for it to be a double standard. And sleeping around with the opposite gender is a different activity based on what your own gender is. A heterosexual man who is sleeping around, isn't doing the same thing as a heterosexual woman who is sleeping around. Since they are doing different things (sleeping with women for the man, sleeping with men for the woman) you cannot call the difference in judgement a double…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:04 PM
8

But don’t try to shame women who are just like you. When a woman and a man are both sleeping around, the only thing that is the same for both of them is the way we label their activities. It's called sleeping around for both genders. But what a man and a woman are doing to be able to sleep around have nothing in common with each other and couldn't be further apart. There isn't any "just like you" when you compare a promiscuous man to a promiscuous woman. Every step of the process of sleeping aro…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:51 PM
2

"Social" media is the cancer the is killing the social aspect of society.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:10 PM
0

Sad, very sad. You didn't even bother to read. So what are you doing here? Stroking your ego and masturbating to your own words?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:44 PM
0

Oh yeah, your "evidence". You think providing a link that says that sexist ideologies attract people who exhibit dark triad traits, proves that the red pill is full of dark triad guys. But you forget that you first have to prove that the red pill is a sexist ideology, if you want to make that connection. Something you didn't do. And something you won't be able to do. Because red pill isn't about women. And it isn't a cult nor an ideology. It's about men. All that redpill is, is effective advice …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:41 PM
3

Love flows from men to women, from women to children and from children to their pets. Men love their women in the same way that women love their children and children love their pets. Nobody loves men. It shouldn't surprise you that you are willing to sacrifice more for your woman than she is for you. Her love and willingness to sacrifice is meant to go to her children.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:05 PM
1

would you say those experiences are inherently different just because of your brain type? No, probably not. Let's use some logic here. Humans experience everything through their brain. If there's no brain, there's no human to experience anything. Since men's and women's brains are very different, it is more reasonable to expect that our experiences are going to be different than the same. Because every human experience is tied to their specific brain. I don't know about food, but pain for instan…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:10 PM
3

Again, you are being a racist who when confronted with his racist behavior, accepts no accountability, but instead starts to explain why he does racist things. You act as if men being repulsed by promiscuous behaviors is the problem. And women lying about their promiscuous past, is the solution. Men can't turn off their instincts. And women won't have to lie if they never were sleeping around with randoms in the first place. Take some damn accountability. You have to lie, because there are thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:53 PM
1

The prerequisites are the same: That's why any non hideous woman has an easy time at sleeping around, while a man needs to reach famous athlete/movie star levels to have the same amount of succes. Because the prerequisites are the "same". You are being wilfully obtuse. There's nothing the same about the whole experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:27 PM
1

I think you know that men and women have different bodies and different brains. That's a biological fact. And it's through those brains and bodies that we experience life. Also a fact. How is it not obvious to you when you look at these two facts that men and women will experience things differently?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:16 PM
2

One is an instinct, ingrained in male DNA as a response to the fact that women are the only mammals, who hide the moment they are ready to conceive and to the possibility of paternity fraud that comes from this. The only protection men had against paternity fraud was selecting for non-promiscuity. The other is a conscious decision to lie, manipulate and deceive. And to use these deceiving techniques as a basis for a serious relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 02:08 PM
1

So, you start a conversation with me today, just so you can throw in my face that you weren't happy with our conversation from yesterday, without having the intention to actually have a conversation with me today. Next time, don't pretend. Just tell me that you weren't happy with our conversation from yesterday if that's all you want to do anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:55 PM
2

It's not the easy sex I was referring to. It's the not being manipulated and lied to part, that I was referring to. You aren't going to lie about being a chaste woman to a one night stand. But you are to a potential long term mate. Since you are lying to the long term partner and not to the human dildo of the evening, you are treating only one of them with respect. And it isn't the one who is willing to be there for you until death do us part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:46 PM
2

Our bodies and our minds is what we use when we have sex. They determine our experience. Both a man's body and his mind are completely different from a woman's body and mind. It's pretty obvious that we will have completely different experiences. I really feel like you want me to explain to obvious here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:36 PM
3

The basics are the same Basics for a man are putting his penis somewhere were it feels good. Pretty sure that a woman's basics are going to be different. The only thing that is the same is the label. It doesn't matter if it's a man or a woman who is doing it, we label it "having sex" for both genders. But everything else is different. The prerequisites required are different, the roles each gender plays are different, the body parts involved are different, the hormones that are released are diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:26 PM
2

What do you expect a racist to do, when you manage to make him see that his behavior is shitty? Show some accountability perhaps? Make an effort to change? Stop with doing those shitty things? What you definitely don't need is for the racist to just shrug it off and for him to explain why he is being shitty. Because the why doesn't matter, it matters that they not only see that their behavior is shitty, but also try to change. You are doing like this racist. You are explaining shitty behavior. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:11 PM
3

You are saying that men would treat women just as shitty, as women are treating men, if that would benefit their results. And that maybe true. But we aren't dealing with a hypothetical, we are dealing with reality. And the reality of the actual situation is that a man will give his best to a potential long term partner, while a woman gives her potential long term partner manipulation and lies. There's no incentive for a man to ever want to date a woman seriously when she treats her one night sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:44 PM
2

We already established that both genders can be shitty. The difference is men are treating their one night stands shittier than their potential long term partners. While women treat their potential long term partners shittier than their one night stands. Female logic -> if you are a one night stand you get the honest version of me, if you are the potential father of my kids I will manipulate and lie to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:33 PM
1

Why is it a completely different experience in your view? Are you really asking why sex is a completely different experience for two people who have a different gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:14 PM
2

you’re literally all saying how u don’t want them to lie, but you still want them to sleep with you straight away? but if they sleep with you straight away, they’re a slut and you don’t want them. Women on here should stop with putting words in our mouths that we never put in there ourselves. We want women to be consistent. If you are the kind of woman who sleeps with randoms you met 5 minutes ago. Be that kind of woman. But don't pretend you are not that kind of woman to manipulate a man into g…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:11 PM
5

Men treat the people they actually want a relationship with better than the people they want to just fuck. Which isn't nice, but it makes sense. You value someone you see an actual future with more, so you treat them better. Women treat the people they actually want a relationship with worse than the people they just want to fuck. Think about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:04 PM
-1

Having sex is the same as having sex. Really? A man having sex is doing the same thing as a woman having sex? When both genders use body parts during the activity that the other gender doesn't even have, it's pretty clear that having sex isn't the same thing for both genders. When a man does it, we call it "having sex" and when a woman does it we also call it "having sex" but that's where the similarities end. Everything about the experience is different for each gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 12:00 PM
2

Its not a ‘woman’ thing at all. It is in the sense that men will lie and try to manipulate women they do not want a relationship with (lie about commitment to get sex). While women will try to manipulate the men they do want a relationship with (make him wait, make him believe you are not the kind of girl who sleeps around to get more commitment). Do you see how fucked up that is? Women treat their one night stands with more honesty than they do their potential life long partners. are you gonna …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:49 AM
2

Of course, the "double standard" excuse. There's only a double standard when people are doing the same thing and they get judged differently for it. That's what a double standard is. A woman sleeping around isn't doing the same thing as a man sleeping around. There are almost no similarities. They even use different body parts the other gender doesn't even have to be able to do it. How could they be doing the same thing? The requirements to be able to sleep around are completely different for bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:37 AM
3

I would argue that they arent ‘treating’ the men (human dildos as you put it), better than the men they want to be in a LTR with. the only thing them men would be getting is easier sex. Human dildos get: no silly games. Sex. the real you, you don't care about him anyway, so no need to pretend. Potential long term partner: make him wait for sex. make him believe you aren't the kind of girl who sleeps around with randoms, when you are that kind of girl, only never with people you see a future with…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:12 AM
0

we should treat men and women who do it the same No, we shouldn't, because sex is a completely different experience for women as it is for men. Why would anyone want to treat experiences that are vastly different, as being the same thing? It doesn't even make sense from a logical point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 11:02 AM
3

so if she ‘valued’ his opinion, shes more likely to choose to wait! (& lie about her past There you have it. Straight from the horse's mouth. If a woman values your opinion, she's more likely to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 10:32 AM
5

News flash, men do it to women they don't want to build a relationship with. Women do it to the men they do want to build a relationship with. You have no problem building a relationship on pretenses and treat the men, who you use as a human dildos, better than the men who you see an actual future with. Do you realize how fuck up that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 10:27 AM
0

it's a pretty well documented fact that sexist ideologies So men giving other men advice is a sexist ideology? God forbid men start thinking for themselves and stop being obedient little worker bees and providers. You have no idea what red pill is and are just throwing around some buzz words to try and discredit something you never even bothered to have an actual look at.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 10:17 AM
1

You are definitely not here to have an actual discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 10:08 AM
1

Tinfoil hat levels are extremely high here
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 10:05 AM
4

I do, just trying to see if you can come to the obvious conclusion by asking you an easy question. What do you think is the solution, when lies and manipulation are the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:21 PM
1

I sent you some links (few posts earlier in this thread).Just take a look at them, 90-95% from the men who were asked what happened when they opened up to a partner, have a horror story to tell. Those numbers clearly indicate that the vast majority of female partners will respond negatively to her male partner opening up. No denying how big the discrepancy between positive and negative experiences is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:15 PM
5

When lies and manipulation are the issue, what do you think would be a solution? I hope you are not going to suggest that I don't date women anymore and should just use their bodies for sex, like the last feminist here suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:11 PM
1

Did you even read my last post? I said explicitly that I don't agree with you saying that those women were awful women, because accepting that would mean that the big majority of women are awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:03 PM
9

You are missing the point completely. Men don't care about a woman being a slut. And men don't care about a woman being a prude. What men do care about is a slut, who pretends to be a prude, to manipulate a man into giving her more commitment than he would be giving her otherwise. The manipulation and the lies, that's what annoying. And it is even made worse by the fact that a woman will be honest to a man she see as just a fuckboi, but will try to lie and manipulate a man she actually wants to …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 07:33 PM
1

When such big majority of men experience a negative reaction when they open up, it's more reasonable to assume women are turned off by males being vulnerable, than it is to assume that all those men had bad luck and were dating awful women. Because this would mean the majority of women are awful. Because we aren't talking about a small number of exceptions here. The majority of men who open up, will never again open up to a partner in the future. You can find thousand of stories from men who sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 07:24 PM
1

Nothing? Thought so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 06:57 PM
23

So, your solution to a man's problem that women are more likely to lie and manipulate a man who they really want to date than one they don't want to date, is to tell that man he should stop dating and only have sex? Of course women don't need to do anything. When women lie and manipulate men into commitment, the solution is for men to no longer date. Not for women to stop with their manipulation. That would be crazy, right, expecting some form of accountability from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 06:08 PM
16

The big difference between men and women not being a straight shooter with their partners, is that women do it with the men they want commitment from and men do it to women they don't want a relationship with. You have a higher chance of being manipulated and lied to by a woman who wants to seriously date you, than one who thinks you are just a fuckboi. And that is fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 05:34 PM
1

What I know for sure is that someone (you) is making unsubstantiated claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 05:17 PM
2

My point is that a man will not be expected to provide in those cases. You didn't get the nemo, did you? Female gender roles are abolished. Men's aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 05:03 PM
1

You have no clue what red pill is about (which is very obvious from you assuming it's almost synonymous with psychopathy and machiavellianism) and yet you are handing out advice and expect to be taken serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 05:01 PM
1

It's me who can't make you understand that saying that most men can't do something, is completely pointless when most men aren't trying to do that something in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:55 PM
1

Oh? I must have found a unicorn for a wife Your personal anecdotal evidence of one, means nothing when the vast majority men have a different experience. Just some examples to show that more men have a bad experience with opening up than a good one. And why your advice to be emotional open to your partner, is advice that's going to backfire on most men: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/pg0m2h/was_your_experience_with_showing?sort=top https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/1smtg7/what_a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:53 PM
-2

Luckily for them there are people like you, who think they are better than others and in a position to judge others, not based on knowledge but based an assumptions and prejudice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:39 PM
1

You saying this: Most men will not attain the type of wealth needed to have a 22 year old girlfriend when they are 40. when you know almost no men think this way, is equivalent to me saying this: Most women will not be able to grow a full fletched beard. Why would I point out that "most women" can't achieve something, that most women don't even want to achieve in the first place? It's completely pointless to make this statement. You were being nonsensical (pointing out that most men can't achiev…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:27 PM
0

What your comment achieves is that you prove that you think that men's attraction works in the same way as a woman's attraction. Well, it doesn't. None of what you say here is applicable to how a man sees a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:11 PM
1

And you really don't get it? Are you for real? Just go to the askmen subreddit and search for "opening up" or "being emotional" or something along those lines. You can read thousand of post from men who express what happens when a man opens up to his partner. All men open up to their partners sooner or later, most men will only do this once in their life.That's all you need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:06 PM
0

Women have shown men that showing weakness is an attraction killer. Most men will open up to at least one woman in their life. And most men get such a horrible response, that they will never make that same mistake again. Not even a slither of accountability. "These redpill men have been made to believe". When it is women who show men that they can't open up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:00 PM
0

You can't negotiate attraction. The more words you throw at a lack of attraction, the worse it becomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 03:53 PM
1

I never said that most men want that or claim that they'll be able to. I'm sorry but yes, you did. This comment from you doesn't make any sense at all, unless you think most men believe that life works this way: Most men will not attain the type of wealth needed to have a 22 year old girlfriend when they are 40. Why would you bring up that most men won't be able to achieve certain things, if you know that most men don't even want to achieve those things or don't believe that they will achieve th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 03:40 PM
3

A lot of men care about sharing their lives and love with a partner who is autonomous, accomplished and interesting for the same reason women do. What point is it to a man to have an accomplished woman, if he is still expected to uphold traditional gender roles and provide for his partner? A woman who doesn't have an accomplished partner is missing out on provisioning. A man who doesn't have an accomplished partner isn't missing out on anything, because having an accomplished partner doesn't cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 03:26 PM
1

If you know they are a minority there's no point in you making statements like this: Most men will not attain the type of wealth needed to have a 22 year old girlfriend when they are 40. Because most men don't believe nor claim that they will. Only that minority does. So, you were making a pointless statement or you were putting us all in the same box. If you want to know where the defensive reaction comes from, this is it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 03:18 PM
1

I don't assume that the majority of men to think that way either. If you don't assume that the majority of men think that way, why did you make the following statement that only makes sense if you do think that most men think that way? Most men will not attain the type of wealth needed to have a 22 year old girlfriend when they are 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:56 PM
1

You can find idiots saying things with both genders. What I don't do when a woman says something incredible unrealistic or stupid, is assume that all women think that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:39 PM
1

Most men don't think they will get a 22 year old girlfriend when they are 40. That you think they do, is the only fallacy here. They will however increase their options with becoming more accomplished. And that's all they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:26 PM
1

Like I said, what you see is an exaggerated version of what is said. Men aren't claiming they will reach unreachable heights, they are claiming they will improve. There's no fallacy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:17 PM
1

Which one do you have a problem with?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:04 PM
1

You exaggerate the options postulated so that you can ridicule the whole thing. The only thing postulated is that men will make improvements when they age. I said it isn't complicated because you keep holding on to the ridiculous notion that men all think they will become billionaires in their forties. While the real explanation is more simple, men know they will improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 02:03 PM
1

I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:54 PM
1

If you sleep with one person straight away and make another guy wait, are you going to tell the second guy that he is waiting were others weren't? We both know the answer. If you tell him the truth he will feel invalidated and leave your ass. So you won't tell him the truth. Therefore women who sleep with one person straight away and make other guys wait, are almost always people who pretend they don't engage in casual sex. They are manipulative by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:52 PM
1

Wasn't talking about myself and you know it. Men aren't the ones having unrealistic standards for their partners. Men rate women on a bell curve, women rate 80% of men as below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:39 PM
1

Become gay. Women are hypergamous, if you don't want to respond to their hypergamous instincts, they will have a hard time being interested in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:33 PM
2

Sure, dark pigment will give some extra protection from the sun, but skin color doesn't protect against gravity. Even black breasts will go saggy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:29 PM
1

Or eventually all standards get lowered...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:28 PM
4

But simply not having sex with them when they want is not bad or manipulative. You are stating that water is wet here. And nobody even claimed it wasn't in the first place. What we were talking about is women who sleep around with some men and then turn around and manipulate other men into believing they are not the kind of woman who would have casual sex with a random. If you want to be a hoe, be one and stay true to yourself. Don't pretend you are something different to get a raise out of a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:26 PM
1

They still will have more than when they were younger. Nobody's saying we all will be millionaires. But we almost all will improve and that improvement gives more options. It's isn't complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:19 PM
1

She listed the first life skill that popped up in her mind when she thought about being older, wiser and more experienced. It happened to be deepthroating dicks. Nobody's reaching for anything here, we don't even have to, she already did all the work for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:16 PM
1

They go well with shapeless, deflated tits and cellulite. So it's still a match.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:06 PM
3

Any man will probably be doing better financially in his thirties than he was doing when he was twenty. Nobody is claiming we are all going to be fucking millionaires. But since women are hypergamous, even that increase between our twenties and our thirties is enough to get better results.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:03 PM
2

Why would a woman prime only be related to her looks and fertility... women around 30 are usually also much more accomplished people than women at 20. And men don't care about a woman being accomplished, because men will be expected to provide just the same. Women care about a man being accomplished, because woman benefit from a men being accomplished. Men don't benefit from a woman being accomplished, so men don't give a fuck about your career. Looks, fertility and personality is what men care …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:56 PM
3

Around 30 is that age that skin elasticity starts losing it's fight against gravity. The age were perfect, firm and round turns into deflated, saggy and shapeless. Of course you'll lose some points when that happens. Men are visual creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:49 PM
6

If you sleep with some men fast and you make others wait, it isn't about self control now, is it? Because if it was about self control, you would make all men wait. The problem is the deception and the inconsistency. If you fuck after meeting someone 5 minutes ago, don't pretend to be a chaste person who first needs an emotional connection to other men. They will feel deceived, because deceiving them is exactly what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 12:37 PM
1

You are one of those people with brain rot, the only thing that's the same about a man and a woman sleeping around is the label "sleeping around". They fill different gender roles while sleeping around, they use body parts the other gender doesn't even have while sleeping around, they face different risks while sleeping around, etc ... Literally nothing about their experience of sleeping around is the same. Yep, definitely brain rot, no similarities but still claiming they are doing the same thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 11:18 AM
1

Ok, smartass explain me this: how can a man and a woman be doing the same thing when they are sleeping around, when both are using body parts during the activity of sleeping around that the other gender doesn't even have?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 05:29 PM
1

Slow clap. I'm impressed by how original your insulting is. This must be the first time ever a man is called an incel just because he has a different opinion than someone else. Truly remarkable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 05:22 PM
1

You aren't willing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 04:50 PM
1

I bet you also think that a man having sex and a woman having sex are doing the exact same thing, just like you think they are both doing the same thing when they are sleeping around. While yes, both men and women are having sex, but only one of them is using their dick to do it and only one of them can get pregnant from it. The label "having sex" is used for both genders, but one gender is penetrating, the other is getting penetrated. Having sex clearly is not the same activity for men and wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 04:37 PM
1

I asked you a very simple question, one you choose to ignore because you can't answer it. Tell me, if a man sleeping around is doing the same thing as a woman sleeping around why do those activities share more differences than things that are the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 03:03 PM
1

Sleeping around, promiscuity, etc... are just labels we put on an activity. If you look at the actual implementation of the activity for each gender, it's pretty clear that they share almost no similarities. But here you are claiming there's a double standard, which requires the same thing being judged differently. A man sleeping around isn't doing the same things a woman sleeping around is doing. In short, you call an activity that shares a label, but almost nothing else between two genders, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:35 PM
2

technically it is a double standard by definition. It’s two people doing the exact same thing but being judged differently for it. No, it's clearly not. Racking up a high n-count is super easy for women (don't have obvious birth defects and not say no is all it takes). Racking up a high n-count is hard for men (You need to be rich, famous, have game, take initiative, be witty or have exceptional genetics or a combination of all the above). Since it's super easy for a woman to rack up a high n-co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 01:17 PM
3

Women rate 80% of men as below average. If you think your boyfriend is average, that means in reality he's a top 20% man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:46 PM
1

I don't feel obligated to spend money on any woman at all. I'm for equality. In this day and age, where both men and women can work and earn money, any woman that expects to receive money just because she is a woman, is just a golddigging leech. And should be treated as one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 03:19 PM
0

Keep projecting, not my bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 12:45 PM
1

I didn't do "more" because I had sex earlier. It isn't a prize to hand out, it's a relationship. It's intimacy. I didn't give one guy a gold star and one guy a bronze star. It is indeed intimacy. Something you freely and readily handed out to other men, but not to your future husband. Look, you can use as many of these " , as you want, but having sex with one guy and not with the next, means literally that you did more with the first. Doing is literally more than the absence of doing. You did do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 12:35 PM
0

Man or a reworked woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 12:23 PM
1

... to you. Which isn't that surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 04:23 PM
2

But, by Man Logic, a man doesn’t want a washed up slut, right? He wants a girl that values herself and doesn’t put out. Too late for that. You were already putting out for other men. By the way, this doesn't make you washed up or a slut (Unless you were really racking up those numbers). Everyone has sex. It's natural. What the problem is here, is not that you had sex with men. But the discrepancy. You had sex with some men, but the man you liked the best and decided to marry, that man had to wai…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 03:25 PM
1

I didn't "do more" for other men. In fact, I valued myself less with those men You are judging this situation from your perspective. You even add the "In fact, I valued myself less with those men" to prove that you didn't do more for those other men. While you should look at this from your partner's perspective. They are they ones who are on the receiving end of your actions. Not you. You had sex with those other men. You didn't make them wait. You made you future husband wait. It's pretty obvio…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 02:53 PM
3

Good for you. I'll never understand how a man can be happy with a partner that did more for other men, than she is willing to do for him. You must really think you are actually less than other men, if you are fine with being treated that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 02:25 PM
1

And he still married you? You really picked a winner, didn't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 02:07 PM
6

I'm doing a lot more than coping, but keep telling what you need to hear to feel normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:02 AM
1

You wouldn't be happy with a partner that did a lot more for his previous partners than he is doing for you. Because no matter how you turn it, this shows he is less invested into his current relationship than he was in his previous relationships. Same goes for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:01 AM
1

True, but you rather have your man stay with you then leave you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 10:58 AM
6

You are proving the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 10:55 AM
1

I answered this question in my previous comment. You just need to be willing to read between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 10:55 AM
1

So, if you find out your current boyfriend used to really pamper his girlfriends. Treating them to lavish holidays, expensive shopping sprees, etc.. The works. But with you he barely manages to give you a birthday card and some cheap flowers once a year. Would you be fine with his explanation that people's outlooks change, and being very generous in the past doesn't mean you've signed a contract to always be generous? Remember now, you don't want to sound like a child having a temper tantrum bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 10:52 AM
8

And I'm just as likely to call out a woman as I would a man. Your comment history proves this is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 10:38 AM
2

If I only would attract bad women, I would assume the fault is mine. Because I know not all women are bad, yet all the women I attract are. So it must be a me problem. And I think men are just as diverse as women...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 06:04 PM
2

I put myself through college working behind bars in a college town. I used to joke that being a bartender is 10 percent serving drinks and 90 percent being a therapist. You would be surprised what people talk about if you think them mentioning a one night stand is "being open".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:07 PM
2

Or to do some therapy to find out why you are attracting that type of person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:58 PM
2

You are exaggerating what I said to make what I said sound unbelievable. I never said that I know the exact sexual history of anyone. You don't need an exact history, you only need to know that someone had a one night stand and that they are dating someone else without them having had sex with that person yet. We aren't talking about deep dark personal secrets here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:56 PM
2

We don't care. It's the inconsistency and the dishonesty that's the problem. Want to be a hoe? Great, but stay that way and don't pretend you are something else, to trick a man into taking you more seriously than he would otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:44 PM
2

Oh great, another one thinking fake laughing is a power move.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:40 PM
0

You don't have to try and dumb anything down, honey, you are already good without trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:30 PM
2

I'm sorry but what kind of BS is this? We are confusing the women we know for other women? That's your explanation? I have been made to wait (by women who I know had one night stands with other men) and I have had one night stands with women (who I know made other men wait). There's no confusion here. It's pretty common for women to act this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:28 PM
3

A man feels more validated when you sleep with him than when you are more careful in building a relationship with him. To you it may seem that the second one is getting the best deal, but from a male point of view this is definitely not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:16 PM
3

Not the contradiction you think it is. Worthless sluts are still fine for sex, but they disqualify for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:14 PM
3

Good luck with your love life, "smart one", don't get to used.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:11 PM
2

If you are a hoe who sleeps around with men you met 5 minutes ago, don't make other men wait in an attempt to trick them into believing they found a woman who's worth commiting to. Honesty has to come from both sides. Funny how you assume it's a man being dishonest about his intentions that is the issue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 04:07 PM
6

Definitely not a weird thing to say. Apparently your exes are all cheats and assholes. The only common factor between all your exes is you. So you might look into why you always attract those kind of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 02:14 PM
6

She told it was because of infection That infection was not the reason she made her partner wait: but I would have waited anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 01:38 PM
0

And while the man she makes wait gets her most "valuable and import" part, namely her time, consideration and attention, poor old Chad, who doesn't need to wait, gets her body and some uninhibited sex. I'm sure Chad is really feeling like he's getting the short end of the stick. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 01:21 PM
1

Different kinds of women does not explain why one woman makes some men wait and has sex instantly with other men. Difference in attraction levels does.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 01:11 PM
7

Female logic: I don't have feelings for this guy, let's fuck him soon. I do like this guy, let's make him wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 12:55 PM
7

That's not what was asked. Does your partner know he had to wait for several months, while there are men you had hookups with?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 12:46 PM
1

You aren't making any sense. I never made "praise the women" comments. You completely misread what I was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 01:40 PM
1

"praise the women" and "how dare you" responses I'm a man, who constantly gets downvoted by feminists and special snowflakes. What are you on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 01:20 PM
2

Your only argument at this point is repeating that "he is missing the mark". You're not even trying to argue the actual points he made.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 12:06 PM
-1

There's no patriarchy. If this was a society "made by men and for men", why are men the only ones who are slaughtered in wars? Why do men get longer sentences for the same crimes as women do? Why are family courts in favor of women? Why are there more support networks for women than for men? Why does the education system favor women? This society reflects that women are precious and men are expendable. This ain't no patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:56 AM
1

You can't get the state to give you half of someone else's stuff, if you aren't married to them beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:49 AM
1

First mistake you make: you equal a task to a job, like tasks and jobs are automatically the same thing. They are not. I can give myself the task to clean up my room. In this case this task is unpaid labor that I do for myself and therefore isn't a job. Second mistake you make: something that carries a load on a person or ruins bodies, isn't automatically a job. Playing a sport recreationally carries a load and can ruin your body. Playing a sport recreationally isn't a job. So just because a pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 04:17 PM
1

paternity fraud isn’t a thing. You literally file a paternity case, get tested, and confirm whether you’re the father. Source - I’m a lawyer. You maybe a lawyer, but if you believe paternity fraud isn't a thing, you aren't a smart one. Women who have a steady partner, who cheat on their partner and get pregnant in doing so and who fail to inform their partner that the child isn't his, are definitely commiting paternity fraud. Paternity test aren't standard, most men trust the women they are with…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:53 PM
1

What is the point you are trying to make here?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:22 PM
16

Low-cut top, short skirt. Looking up through eyelashes. Placing herself in the vicinity of a man she is attracted to. Maybe play with her hair a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:14 PM
-2

retroactive jealousy It's not retroactive jealousy. It's your subconscious telling you that a promiscuous woman is a serious threat to your survival (survive = passing on your genes in this case). Women are the only mammals who don't display any outwards visible signs of being ready to conceive. So, selecting for non-promiscuity is how men tried to reduce the risks of paternity fraud. The "yuck" you talk about is just your fight or flight response telling you to get the f away from someone who i…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 03:09 PM
1

It’s a movement It's not a movement. It's not a cult. It's not an organized group. Red pill is men giving advice to other men. That's all it is. A practical and effective alternative to all the BS society tells men. Men like to fight problems with solutions. Red pill is giving them the solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 06:46 AM
1

It's really remarkable that no other mod here ever had an issue with anything I said. No one but you, "completely by accident" of course, are stumbling on "inappropriate" comment after comment. You are hiding behind your moderator status and are singling out accounts you don't agree with. Harassing them and blocking them untill you purged this subreddit of voices you don't agree with. You also engage in those accounts with your moderator handle turned off, so you can entrap them and next use you…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 07:27 PM
1

And how about you make your point already? This is the internet, people have a short attention span.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:52 PM
1

I didn't call anybody delusional. I called one specific behavior (being insulting and thinking it's your honesty that's causing the downvotes) delusional. Do you understand the difference between calling somebody a shitty person and pointing out that somebody did a shitty thing? One is an attack on a person and one is addressing a specific thing a person did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:47 PM
1

The global sales of condoms would plummet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:39 PM
1

I'm asking you, the person who "stumbled by accident" on my comment and who decided that it was an uncivil comment, why you think it is uncivil. I don't see how an appeal to other mods will give me an answer. They didn't decide that a comment without any insulting words, is uncivil. You did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:34 PM
1

Just saying A and then saying B does mean there is any logical connection between the two. If you want to make a point, you'll have to do more than just put unrelated words into the same sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:28 PM
1

I understand perfectly. It's you who doesn't understand that the world is way to complex for your simple black and white reduction of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:19 PM
1

Don't know what you consider uncivil about my comment. If I say insulting stuff and then claim I'm getting downvoted for my honesty, people will point that out. And rightfully so, because it's delusional behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 06:15 PM
1

And even when women are BRUTALLY HONEST (such as myself on this sub) i get downvoted You thinking you are getting downvoted for you honesty, is just as delusional as Hitler thinking he isn't a popular figure in humankind's history because he spoke German.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:52 PM
0

Women who expect to be "wined and dined" for the pleasure of their company, are the ones turning themselves into hookers. If you expect me to pay you for your time, you may just as well act like the professional that you are and tell the going rate upfront.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:40 PM
1

I just don’t care, nor do I want to know, how my lover got to be so good in bed You are a woman. Paternity fraud isn't an issue your gender has to deal with. Paternity fraud is an issue for men. Therefore men aren't keen on promiscuous partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 02:29 PM
1

Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/22 01:59 PM
1

So is it your experience that women don't bond with their children through their pregnancy or are you saying that some women don't bond with their children through their pregnancy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 02:26 PM
2

You are denying biological reality here. Biological parents bond naturally with their children. Non biological parents learn to bond with their non biological children through shared experiences. They are not the same process.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 02:03 PM
5

"paying for a surrogate is probably the most exploitative thing you could do as a woman" - direct quote. Not a direct quote from me. I am not the person you reacted to. I am a passerby who sees you claiming that giving birth is "work". And that getting paid for "work" can't be exploitation. When giving birth is clearly not the same as "work" and therefore your whole argument is based on a lose foundation. And even if it was work, you can get paid for work and still get exploited. Just go ask the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:58 PM
-1

So because men don’t carry their children then they don’t bond with them? What is this insanity You need to learn how to read. I said the bonding between mother and child already starts in the womb. This doesn't say anything about the bonding between men and their children. You are the one coming to a conclusion (that I never stated) and are now attacking me for what you (wrongfully) concluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:39 PM
10

You are funny in the way you twist the meaning of words in order to try to make a point. Giving birth isn't "work". It's no job. It's the most profound and the longest lasting thing a human can do. And here you are putting it at the same level as filling racks in a supermarket in exchange for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:29 PM
1

Funny that it's always women who say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:15 PM
2

Literally everyone bases everything in their lives on emotions. That's your solipsism talking. You are governed by emotions and because you are solipsistic, you think everyone else is the same. We are not. That's why women need empathy when they have a problem and men want to hear a solution and couldn't give two cents about your empathy, when they have a problem. Why add the "your welcome"? The only point you actually made here, is to demonstrate your solipsistic nature. That hardly deserves a …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:12 PM
-1

They aren't misconceptions. And even if they were, you only need to work through things if they impact your life in a negative way, not if they are beneficial to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:03 PM
6

Why would anyone choose you as their life partner and the mother of their children, when you aren't willing to give birth to their children? Children don't magically appear when they are born. They already form a bond with their mother in the womb. Something you aren't willing to do. Making humans is too much of a responsibility and an adventure, to embark on it with someone who isn't willing to go the distance and you aren't willing...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 01:01 PM
10

Get to do life on easy mode with all cheat codes enabled? And use some crocodile tears to provoke protective instincts, if it still is too hard? Fucking my way to the top if I don't feel like putting in the work? Letting others do all the hard work, the unhealthy work and the dying on the battlefields? Having the education system, the judicial system and the family courts favor my gender? Having sex on tap and getting away with living life without accountability or consequences for my actions? B…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 12:51 PM
0

Another one who speaks in absolutes and doesn't realize absolutes don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 12:17 PM
0

You said in many cases the sex is also veiled manipulation. You implied women use sex’s a a manipulation tactic and don’t have sex because they enjoy it. The only thing he said, was that women use sex as a manipulation tactic. You are the one implying that this means they don't have sex for pleasure. You can use sex as a manipulation tactic and enjoy the physical aspect of sex at the same time. One doesn't exclude the other. You are in the wrong here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 12:10 PM
2

Seeing you are the only one reacting with anger, this whole comment feels like projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/22 11:40 AM
1

Yes, the real world is simple and black & white like that. Bad people online, good people in real world. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 02:04 PM
1

Everybody knows that body count doesn’t matter You can keep on repeating BS untill you are blue in the face, it won't change the fact that a woman's body count is a major factor in how a male partner will view that woman and their relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 12:50 PM
1

What do you mean pretending to be someone she wasnt? I think he means she claimed she wasn't a garden tool, when in fact she was.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/22 01:52 AM
3

UK women aren't exactly known to be among the prettiest in Europe. To each their own, but pretty and fat are contradictory to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 03:08 PM
-2

But to go back to the original message, for a man to outright say that he doesn't want any woman with a mental illness, despite being part of the red pill, spouting such derogatory comments towards the very beings of his desire (women) is a mental illness is it not? No, it's not. Because you aren't mentally ill if you agree with red pill ideas. I agree with not being a doormat. I agree with trying to improve yourself and having standards for the partners you choose. These are all red pill ideas.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 02:49 PM
0

The whole issue with the red pill is that it's a cult. If you want to prove that you have no clue what you are talking about, you just succeeded. Red pill is no cult. No organisation. No group. It's men giving advice to other men about all aspects of life. And like any advice, the people who receive the advice can pick the parts that are beneficial and ignore the parts that aren't beneficial to themselves. If red pill was a cult, there would be no friendly advice and no choice to reject those pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 01:36 PM
-3

Yeah, we get it. You think that red pill men are mentally ill. Yet, here you are, spending time on a discussion forum, having discussions with the crazies. Tell me again, what is the point of engaging in discussions with people who are mentally ill? Surely, trying to convince or even engage in a rational discussion with people who's brains don't function correctly, is pointless and completely futile. If red pill men are mentally ill, there is definitely something wrong with you too. Because you …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 01:28 PM
-2

Seems you are picking all the bad boys, have a horrible time dating them and then cry that all men are scum. Maybe take a good look in the mirror. That person staring back at you is the one picking all your partners. Get some self awareness in stead of blaming half of the population for your bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:58 PM
2

All girls face are scribbled over so you can't see them. If you judge the bodies of these people (the only thing that can be compared from these photos) it's pretty clear that the guys are all much fitter than the hambeasts they are hanging out with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:34 PM
4

Maybe they are "hardly fat" in America, but over here in Europe these women are definitely seen as overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:27 PM
6

The women in the first/last look like they're in that acceptable "thicc" range. "Thicc" is meant for fit people who have curves. Not for unhealthy fat people who are obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:21 PM
1

no circlejerking
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:41 PM
1

Another melting snowflake...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 01:20 PM
1

Nice, exposing the hypocrisy and using her own words against her to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 12:57 PM
2

women here offer sincere advice and encouragement. Gaslighting at it's finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 09:36 AM
0

If you are lucky as a man, you will meet one woman who will truly love you. One woman who loves you for being a human being. And that woman is your mom. If you are lucky... All other female love is based on what you can provide as a man and is purely transactional. Men love women. Women love children. Children love pets.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 01:04 PM
1

Pedantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 11:32 AM
1

Once again proving you never bothered to actually look at what red pill actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:58 AM
1

Yes, of course, why do you pretend as if having different ideas to the feminist movement and being right wing are the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 10:55 AM
0

You cared enough to write a reply
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 05:28 PM
-1

a rather large proportion of men who identify as redpill are also right wing Could you provide proof for your accusation? This whole sub is people who present their own ideas or just a hunch they have, as universal truths. It's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 05:20 PM
1

It's more their ability to be offended by anything. No one has a problem with a person being offended for good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:33 PM
1

It does when it comes out of a feminist's mouth.They have no sense of chill or nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:11 PM
1

Believe it or not, we're not children Women are highly emotional to the point that they make decisions based on emotions not reason and are incapable of taking accountability for their own actions. Does that sound like adult behavior to you? Start acting like adults, get treated like adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 03:02 PM
1

If she's into tasting new flavors, she is just as well disqualified as a candidate for a healthy monogamous relationship. If your taste buds need variety, they for sure ain't going to like eating spaghetti everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 01:26 PM
1

If a high body count just means a woman wants/enjoys sex You start from the wrong premise. A high body count doesn't mean a woman enjoys sex. You can have lots of sex with one partner. A high body count means she needs attention from lots of men. Which disqualifies her as a candidate for a successful monogamous relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 12:53 PM
1

"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". Ain't no going back to friendship after the rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 09:48 AM
1

What's strange is that you think you know what "pretty much anyone thinks". You are not a God. You don't know what others think.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:05 PM
3

sexual desire is based off of controllable emotions which can be re-trained via therapy. Says the woman, who thinks she knows what male sexual desire feels like, when she has 1/20 amount of testosterone a man has. Testosterone, you know, the hormone that regulates your sex drive. You are just reaffirming that you don't know what you are talking about. Your "controllable emotions" are not even 1/20 of the emotions a man has.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 12:01 PM
1

If it works, it must exist. Because nothing that doesn't exist can work. Hoe radar for the win.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 01:50 PM
1

The same hat your non existing arguments where pulled from, when you said "it's just not true".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 01:40 PM
1

Are you really this stupid? You are not being treated the same as usual. Usual any visitor pays the same price. Here you are paying double as other visitors, just because you happen to be born with a dick.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:36 PM
1

I think over 80% of them are actually 5 or 4. Another one proving that women see 80% of men as below average, even when this is a mathematical impossibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/22 12:48 PM
1

People with a specific gender pay LESS, the rest pays THE SAME AS USUAL. If you only give a discount to one gender, you are still discriminating the other gender. You can call it a promotion. But that's just word play. Because a selective promotion based on gender is still a discriminating act to the other gender, who doesn't receive that promotion.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 11:16 AM
12

Giving you a discount based on your gender isn't discrimination Men you need to pay double what women pay. What did you say? A discrimination against men? No, of course not, we would never discriminate. It's just a promotion for women... Just in case you didn't get the sarcasm, this is 100% discrimination based on gender. People with the wrong gender are forced to pay double what people with the right gender need to pay. Discrimination doesn't get more clearcut than this.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:11 PM
1

make zero sense. Like I said in my previous message, even self-explanatory things are still to difficult to understand. Sorry, not going to dumb it down any further, you'll just have to level up to catch up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 01:57 PM
1

Thanks for sending me a bunch of links, I guess. Not sure what you expect me to do with those or what you think these links prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 01:51 PM
1

This is simply not true. That's it boys. Time to pack it up and go home. How can we even argue with this? Let's just bow our heads to the sheer brilliance of this woman's debating powers. The argument to top all other arguments. Truly irrefutable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 01:38 PM
2

By not listening to what halve the people on this subreddit say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 01:15 PM
3

If you ever need proof that women can't handle accountability, this thread is an absolute goldmine. Most of them can't even just say it. I cheated becomes -> "technically" I cheated, I didn't really cheat but... (and then they tell how they did cheat),etc. And then the excuses. A woman can never admit to something just being her decision. Even when she cheats it's her boyfriend's fault. He was abusive, he wasn't giving me enough attention, we were fighting all the time (so I cheated). Girl, thos…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 11:30 AM
6

You analyze the world and everything in it through a blue pill lense and you bump into anomalies constantly. Things that just don't make sense and go directly against what blue pill told you to believe. Then you try to analyze the world through a red pill lense and suddenly there are no more inconsistencies. Everything makes sense. Results become predictable. You don't get lucky no more, you get repeatable results.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 10:56 AM
1

You need to learn how to count if you think that's one word.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 05:11 PM
1

It's so tiring to have discussions with women on this sub. You say something pretty self-explanatory and then you still have to explain what you mean, because apparently you were saying something to complicated for them to understand. If you don't understand how it is better to make no claims then to make unsubstantiated claims, you have no business being in a discussion with other adults. Find yourself a toddler to talk to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 05:09 PM
1

Goth cultures, divorce market, rich college kids... These are not cultures. And even within the categories you mentioned, what you say isn't a standard behavior. Nor did you provide any evidence it is a behavior at all. Goth kids are still humans, with a normal human programming. A goth kid isn't suddenly going to like his girlfriend flirting with other men, because he is dressed in black. That's very unscientific even for this subreddit. Rich college kids are suddenly fine with a partner that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 05:04 PM
8

No, it isn't. Women are hypergamous. Not made up. Since women are hypergamous, they will chase after the best they can get. In real life, the best they could get were men at their own level. On dating apps, if Chad has a slow Tuesday night and he is sure nobody will see him with an ugly duckling, the best they can get is this Chad. Since Chad never wanted anything but any easy hole, the "relationship" leads to nothing and the woman in question will think men are assholes and the problem. Tell me…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 04:36 PM
1

You are not making any sense. You didn't provide any actual examples of cultures where the men aren't repulsed by promiscuous behaviors. Do exceptions exist? Yes of course, anything human has exceptions. Therefore there also are men who aren't repulsed by signs of promiscuity. But they are the exceptions that solidify the rule. There are people who like to nail their genitals to a table. Doesn't change the fact that humans as a species are pain avoidant. Since only exceptions exist and the defac…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 04:10 PM
15

It is representative of their experience, but their inflated egos make them not realize that they are chasing men out of their league. If Chad is willing to use you as a fuck toy on a slow Tuesday night, that must mean he isn't out of your league, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:49 PM
2

Goth kids are a culture where men aren't repulsed by female promiscuous behaviors? And you are not joking? Goth kids are not a culture. They are just kids from different cultures who like a certain kid of depressing music and like to wear the color black. You got Goths in the VS. But also Goths in the middle east. What would lead you to believe that someone who's into that style (because it's more a fashion choice and a love for a certain music type than anything else) would not be repulsed by h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:32 PM
2

UMC rich white kids, goth/rocker/punk kids, divorced market... You are joking, right. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:21 PM
1

Okay but there are other cultures and upbringings and situations where men really don't give a fuck so... Which cultures exist where men have no problem with their partner displaying promiscuous behaviors? If they exist and you seem to know they do, it won't be a problem naming them. Chimps too... What are you talking about? Female chimps signal their fertility by having very visible swelling and sometimes red coloration of their genital region. And that's also how male chimpanzee know when to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 03:04 PM
2

If it wasn't inbuilt, it would be impossible for men all over the world (different cultures, different social upbringing) to have the same reaction when confronted with the same situation. Further, it is really weird that you think that a quality that doesn't exist in any other mammal except female humans (fertility being hidden) would not have a evolutionary counter reaction from the male of the species.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 02:24 PM
1

The fact that all men have an inbuilt repulsion to signs of promiscuous behavior, clearly demonstrates that this is not a detail to overlook. If it wasn't important to evolution, evolution would not have given men that reaction. An alcoholic has a better change at recovery, than a promiscuous woman has at becoming a reliable, stable partner in a monogamous relationship. The vetting tactics you advise men to follow, would lead men to having a healthy, non-alcoholic partner, who cheats on him, tur…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 02:07 PM
-5

We men will answer your questions regarding prostitute visits as honestly as you women are answering our questions regarding n-count... And that's a promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 01:34 PM
3

Because your n count could be triple digits, but if you behave like a normal non-psycho, most guys would never even question it. Show me a triple digit woman, who doesn't have some kind of ingrained behavior from her promiscuous days. People who need that much attention that they rack up triple digits, don't just become well adjusted homebodies at the flick of a switch. All you need is to be a little vigilant and to not believe in Disney romances and a hoe like that will stand out like a tree wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 01:28 PM
1

I know it seems impossible, but here you are, proving that it can be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:56 PM
1

The marvel is at it again. How cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:52 PM
1

Can't stop a "hoe radar". It is ingrained in males to be repulsed by promiscuous behaviors. It's a subconscious reaction. It's how men learned to defend themselves against the fact that humans are the only mammals who don't display signs of fertility and against the paternity fraud that is made possible by this peculiar human characteristic. Why would I try to stop something that has shown me time and time again that it works and is beneficial to me and other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:52 PM
1

Doing nothing is better than making unsubstantiated claims. Just like not saying anything is better than lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:45 PM
1

You are a scientific marvel. You manage to write with one braincell. That has to be a world record.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:37 PM
1

Lol, lol, lol, I am not a brainless feminist, why am I answering in fake laughing? lol, lol, lol damn, I must got infected lol, lol, lol. Hope there is a cure for lol, lol, this...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:30 PM
1

I don't have to dream. Time erases everything. You are delusional if you think men can make everlasting things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:39 PM
1

Read the posts by men on this subreddit. It’s not made up. Men are the #1 complainers. I see just as much, if not more, complaining from women in this sub. What you do here is called observer bias. But you need self reflection to be able to understand that. So, I guess you are shit out of luck. And they’re not going to admit to feeling emotional about it because of the complaining about toxic masculinity. Men showing their emotions would be the opposite of what society calls toxic masculinity. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:37 PM
0

And all those things in time will be forgotten.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:11 PM
1

Life is inherently meaningless. We are all just dust in the wind. Doesn't mean we can't give our own life meaning to ourselves. But in the grand scheme of things our lives are completely insignificant. As long as there are descendants of you around, your own life had meaning. They are the living proof you existed. All other things you could do with your life will sooner or later be forgotten.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:50 PM
-1

Basically, you are claiming that men are more emotional than women are. Which we all know is definitely not true. Most men can't even recall the last time they cried. Go ask a woman when the last time she cried was... Hey, you can say anything you want, but don't expect to be taken seriously when you say made up shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 01:31 PM
2

I was just trying to explain how you "own yourself" by not having children. If you don't have children, you voluntary lose at the game of survival. A game you can only play, because in the very long line made up by your ancestors, there were only winners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:51 PM
1

You are trying to have a logical discussion with an emotional creature. It won't work. She will reject your arguments, no matter how logical sound they are, because her feelings don't agree with them. And you will bash your head against a wall wondering why she doesn't understand logic. Women are capable of logical thinking, but their emotional comes first. You are waisting your time here. It's just like when a woman complains about a problem and the man listening suggests a way to solve her pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:45 PM
-2

Lol, that's feminists logic for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:24 PM
-3

It's not women here. It's women. Receptionist: How do you write women so well? Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:19 PM
-2

I think life is inherently meaningless. But if there's a meaning to life, it has to be to reproduce. It's the only thing you can do that's guaranteed to make an impression that will last beyond your own lifetime. By not reproducing,you are "owning yourself" in the sense that you aren't doing the one thing, that could give you being born, meaning. Or you could look at it this way. All your ancestors, all the way from way back when we were still covered in fur and spoke only in grunts, did success…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:14 PM
2

but it's not hugely distinct from these original methods of similar types of communication in romantic relationships. It's completely different. Up until we had social media and smartphones, people's dating was bound by locality. You were only exposed to people near you. Which limited the number of candidates. Today, everybody all over the whole world is withing reach through their phone. The consequences of this are killing dating as we know it. There always seems to be a better candidate to da…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:54 AM
0

You don't know the difference between correlation and causation, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:43 AM
1

On top of this, many times the other person is often somewhat unaware of how lucky they've gotten When she settles for your money and your assets but isn't attracted to you and therefore resents you <-> be thankful you have gotten lucky. Remember gentlemen, women nowadays are so delusional they think you should be thankful for getting resentment from Chad's sloppy seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:36 AM
1

That's all you did, you claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:11 AM
1

You never ask a woman her body count. You won't get the truth that way. If she volunteers that number, multiply by at least 3 to come close to the actual number.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:10 AM
1

Because you will be having a discussion with yourself, if you don't
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 11:06 AM
0

Not gonna argue on men being bigger risk takers. More testosterone = more risky behavior. It's just that if you have slept with enough women to form yourself an idea of women in general and not one of them asked for protection (and some even opposed it), that it is hard to believe women are the prudent ones. You would expect the majority of them to ask about protection, or at least some of them. But none? I even started carrying condoms with me, because it's no fun to repeatly end up at someone'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 04:36 PM
0

Would you say someone, who believes protected sex is the way to go but raw dogs in the heat of the moment, is a sexually prudent person because of their believes?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:56 PM
2

Please believe the majority of women move like that. I would love to. Unfortunately, my real life experiences all point in a different direction. And if I have to choose between my actual real life experiences and the word of a stranger on Reddit, my experiences are going to win every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:52 PM
0

Beliefs are meaningless. Actions are what matters. You can believe that it is a bad idea to have unprotected sex and still raw dog like there's no tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:49 PM
1

I guess we’re both even. You are the only one claiming they "proved" something.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:46 PM
0

Your first study isn't about actual condom use, but about "beliefs about condom use". The participants were asked what they believe, not what they actually do or have experienced. I would expect women to be more careful than men. Women have the added risk of getting pregnant. So, if you would ask me who I believe is the more careful gender, I would say women. They have more to lose, so it would make sense to give this answer. If you would ask me to think about my actual experiences, my answer wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:43 PM
1

You should look up what can count as actual proof. You told me about a friend of yours. That's a sampling size of 1. There are close to 4 billion women on this planet. A sampling size of one proves nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:23 PM
1

You didn't prove anything, my dear. You told me a story about a reformed slut friend of yours. If that counted as actual proof of anything, we all would be winning Nobel prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:07 PM
1

So you’re the kind of guy that creates high body counts! What happened to accountability? I'm not forcing a high body count on a promiscuous person. That's something their own behavior does to them. And even if I wouldn't date them, that won't stop them from sleeping around with others and still get a high body count. You really have to be some kind of special snowflake, to blame anybody else but a promiscuous person themselves , for creating their high body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 03:03 PM
0

I'm not saying that promiscuous people are bad people. I date them. But then again I'm not interested in serious relationships. But I would not date them if I wanted a serious monogamous relationship. For those relationships, you have a better chance at success if you date non-promiscuous people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:47 PM
2

I proved my point Lol, where? You overestimate how much what people do is conscious and underestimate how much what people do is unconscious. If you are a person who has a past of engaging in promiscuous behaviors, that isn't something that will never resurface again. I've never been wrong, my "hoe radar" has been going strong for more than 40 years. So, you can keep on telling me how "you will never know the truth". I once told one of my friends, that his older brother's wife was trouble, after…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:41 PM
1

Any prove for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:20 PM
1

This is exactly my experience to. Never had a woman bring up protection. And some of them even act annoyed when I use protection. If you don't want me to use protection, I'm definitely going to need protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:17 PM
0

Usually the men are the ones against condoms not the woman Not even once had a woman bring up condoms to me. Just like most things in dating, it is up to the man to take the initiative. This is the reason why I'm adamant about using them all the time. It blew me away how careless women are with their own health and as a consequence the health of their male partners. If they don't mention condoms to me, they aren't mentioning it to the next guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:14 PM
2

You don't have to like it, but people behave like they are. They can try to hide it, but you can't hide away who you really are for long. I'm pretty sure any man dating your "hoe turned religious" friend, can piece together her past quite easily. She will forget her religious facade and mention something from her past that doesn't fit into her newly created personality. Or she won't be able to answer questions about her past without contradicting herself. She will let herself be herself on a nig…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 02:08 PM
0

Nothing to do with insecurity. Promiscuous women are a bad choice as a partner for a stable monogamous relationship, compared to non promiscuous women. It's about maximizing your rate of succes when trying to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 01:24 PM
2

People who have a high body count, get to that high count by behaving in a certain way. You are not going to accidently rack up a high body count. Unless they completely change their personality (which is impossible unless there is trauma involved, so not something you can just force on yourself) they will still exhibit behavioral cues that signal their past. For example: if you are used to flirting with every man that gives you attention. Do you really think you can completely turn off your fli…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 01:18 PM
1

People lie about their body count all the time it’s the dumbest thing you could ask someone. That's why men in the known, never bother asking the woman directly. People who have a high body count, get to that high count by behaving in a certain way. You are not going to accidently rack up a high body count. Unless they completely change their personality (which is impossible unless there is trauma involved, so not something you can just force on yourself) they will still exhibit behavioral cues …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 01:05 PM
1

People who have a high body count, get to that high count by behaving in a certain way. You are not going to accidently rack up a high body count. Unless they completely change their personality (which is impossible unless there is trauma involved, so not something you can just force on yourself) they will still exhibit behavioral cues that signal their past. For example: if you are used to flirting with every man that gives you attention. Do you really think you can completely turn off your fli…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 12:51 PM
1

Look my man, you think I don't understand what you mean. But I do understand what you mean. Even before this last post from you, I already did. Your point is that you can make objective statements, about something subjective. An idea I agree with. But the problem was that you used examples that expressed subjectivity, to try and prove objectivity. Your examples where contradicting the idea you were trying to explain to me. It's hard to convince someone that something is objective, when the words…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 03:42 PM
1

If using a fancy vocabulary would turn dumb ideas into good ones, we all would sound just like you. But, unfortunately it doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 03:06 PM
-4

You sound like generalizing men and saying misandristic things isn't something you only do on rare occasions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 02:50 PM
1

In your second post to me, you already claimed that the number of people who find someone attractive, is objective. Which is obviously not a correct statement, because every group of people you ask, will have a different number of people that will find someone attractive. You probably meant to say the number of people from one group that find someone attractive, is objective. But you didn't say that. I was supposed to read your mind and know that you were only talking about people that all belon…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 01:46 PM
2

Men here are often hostile as fuck. Unprovoked? I bet you were only saying sweet nothings to them before they became hostile. I'm just like ah yes me, the man hater, with my beloved partner, excellent friendships with men and great relationships with my father, brother, shit I even hang out with my male cousins. You can have excellent relationships with men in real life and still spew your disdain and hate for men all over reddit. Out of touch people. If you never say anything negative about men…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 12:50 PM
1

Your whole point was incorrect because of your words choice. You were talking nonsense. Why engage in a discussion, if you don't care about what's being said in that discussion. Did you hit your head recently? Like really hard? Because there's something just not working right up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:55 AM
1

If you still think that the statement "a group" is a specific statement, there's no hope for you. Good luck to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:36 AM
1

Not this again. I gave you a link to a page that gives examples of specific and general statements. I spent 5 days trying to get you to understand these concepts. And you still don't get it? "A fool and his money are soon parted" is a general statement about foolS (FOOLS PLURAL). Because you are not defining which specific fool you are talking about. Therefore a person who uses this saying, means that it's easy to scam fools (FOOLS PLURAL). Not one specific fool. Fools in general are easy to sca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:25 PM
1

Implied -> again, nobody can read your mind. The vast majority of people follow the accepted meaning and use of words. When you make a statement about a non determined group, those people will understand that you are talking about groups in general. If you ment to make a statement about a specific group, you didn't provide enough information for them to know what group you were even talking about and your statement would be nonsensical. If that is your point, you should have said that at the sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:28 PM
17

Much harder. You won't be motivated enough to deal with all the entitlement and the crazy coming out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 04:07 PM
2

For sex, no. Sluts are fun in bed. For anything serious, hell yeah. Sluts are useless in monogamous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 03:57 PM
1

She played a critical and irreplaceable role in the early success of the business. Are there really people, who believe that Jeff Bezos would not have built the same company, if his wife was a different woman back in the early days? Did MacKenzie help Jeff? Yes, she did and she received overcompensation for her troubles. Was she critical and irreplaceable? Nope, any other supporting wife could have done what she did.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 03:55 PM
1

You don't have to name a group to express a specific statement. You could indeed have said "a specific group providing a person with an average attractiveness score is objective" and that would have been a correct statement. But you said "a group providing a person with an average attractiveness score is objective". Which is a general statement about groups. And an incorrect one at that, because in that case it's subjective, not objective. What you meant is obvious to you. But again, people can'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 02:45 PM
1

“A band doesn’t make money from selling CD’s” is talking about a specific band. No, it's not talking about a specific band. You are talking about "a band". A non determined, non specified band. The person who hears you say those words, has no way of knowing which band you are talking about. Your remark that "a band doesn't make money from selling cd's", is applicable to all bands. Not just one. Because you don't bother to be specific. "That band", would be specific. "The biggest band in the worl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 11:55 AM
1

A group is still a singular non determined group. It could be this group, that group or any other group. Therefore you are not making a specific statement but a general statement when talking about "a group". And when you are talking about groups in general you cannot say that them giving an attractiveness rating is objective. I'm sure that in your mind, you were talking about one group. But I can't read your mind. Only your words. And they did not express that you where making a specific statem…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 06:09 PM
1

You are projecting. Women like men with careers and achievements. Therefore you think that your career and achievements will also be attractive to men. It isn't. Men don't benefit from a woman's achievements. So, why would a woman's career mean anything to a man? It just means you will have less time to spent on your relationship. Men want someone who is attractive (to them) and nice to be around. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 05:05 PM
1

When you talk about "a" group giving an attractiveness score to a person, you are making a general statement. You are not talking about one specific group, but about "a" group. It could be this group here or it could be that group there. Therefore the statement: "a group assigning an attractiveness score to a person", isn't objective. You are making a general statement about groups. It could be replaced by any other group. And since that score would also change, when you change the group, this i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 04:16 PM
4

What red pill is, is different for every man. Red pill is just a toolbox. Every man just picks the tools he needs to fix the issues he has. That quarantined sub offers some tools. Blogs offer some tools. Old men giving advice offer some tools. Before red pill, men were told "work hard and be yourself" and everything will be fine. Which is clearly BS, as any man who followed that advice has found out. Red pill is actionable advice that works to help men get better results in all areas of their li…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 03:37 PM
2

You are talking about content creators, who are selling whatever will bring them a repeat audience and the most money. They package their content as red pill (because it sells) and you believe that the BS they are selling is actual red pill. Actual red pill is about self improvement for men. But self improvement doesn't sell, because an audience doesn't want to work hard and fix their lives, they want to blame others for their shitty lives so they don't have to do anything. That's what these con…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 02:42 PM
2

That says more about what content creators do to get a repeat audience, than that it says something about the actual red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 02:04 PM
6

It's pretty obvious you are just repeating some rumors you heard about red pill and never even bothered to actually look at what red pill actually is. Because red pill has nothing to do with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 12:56 PM
1

but any studies/calculations based on this data can be objective. I never disagreed with that. Of course you can calculate an objective average from the subjective attractiveness scored handed out by the members of a group that was rating attractiveness. If your point was, that an average calculated from the same numbers, is objective, than you should say just that. But that's so obvious, it's like saying that water is wet. And it doesn't change the fact that you cannot say that the amount of pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 12:27 PM
0

Just what I thought. Silence from your side. Next time, don't speak about things you don't know anything about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 11:42 AM
1

We were talking about a specific example. Rating someone's attractiveness. If you think that a group, that is rating the attractiveness of a person", is doing an objective thing than you are just not understanding the concept of what objective is. And you don't want to or just can't comprehend it when I try to explain it to you. THERE'S NO SCALE OF REFERENCE FOR ATTRACTIVENESS, SO YOU NEVER CAN MEASURE IT IN AN OBJECTIVE WAY. YOU ARE ALWAYS RATING ATTRACTIVENESS BY YOUR OWN INTERNAL SCALE. THERE…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 11:40 AM
1

You should pick better men to hang around with then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:58 PM
1

See, you did it again and it feels like you are projecting again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:40 PM
2

I'm not asking to prove or disprove what the red pill claims. I'm asking you to prove what you claimed. You said that red pill only works on women that are on the lower range of the intelligence scale. I ask you for your evidence for that claim. shouldn't be difficult to provide some evidence, if you didn't make the whole thing up. The fact that you were attributing PUA techniques to the red pill, demonstrates that you don't know what red pill is actually about. Basically, you made a made up cla…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:38 PM
9

Hypergamy was always there. Women always tried to find the best deal. But in the past there were limits on it. Because there were limits on women. Now that women are no longer kept in check, the real fun starts. What we have today is unbridled hypergamy. Everybody is reachable through cellphones, social media. Therefore no matter how much you offer a woman, it seems there's always a better option within reach to her. And it's just a matter of time before her hypergamy drives her to be dissatisfi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:24 PM
8

"Bleach Enema", good name for a death metal band!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 03:05 PM
1

Agreed to all these examples. But you also said this, which I don't agree with: I have said that the amount of people who find someone attractive or the average rating they would receive from a group of people is objective. The amount of people who find someone attractive fluctuates from group to group. Therefore the amount of people who find someone attractive is not an objective number. It is subject to change depending on the group you ask for that number. The average rating from a group of p…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 02:59 PM
3

I'm not the one making the claims. You made an unfunded claim. I ask you to provide proof for that claim. Your response is to demand research for claims I didn't make? In what kind of world is that a logic reaction? Don't make BS claims and no one will ask you to provide evidence that it's more than a BS claim. And of course you are ignoring the fact that you are trying to blame red pill for things coming from PUA. You might as well admit that you don't really know what red pill is all about. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 02:36 PM
1

Guess that means you have no research to back up your claim. Which isn't surprising. For your information: negging and slimy salesman tactics belong to the realm of pick-up artists and are not things recommended by red pill. I'm sure that if you would actually research red pill, you would find legitimate things that you could criticize. But that's something you didn't bother to do or you wouldn't be blaming red pill for tricks coming from the PUA scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 02:10 PM
1

Good for you. But the same is true for most men. They aren't going to date a woman they are not attracted to and treat her like shit. Therefore it's weird that you made the claim they do. Which leads to other people wondering why you would make such a claim. And since projection could explain your behavior...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:51 PM
1

This is a conversation from 3 weeks ago. I moved on, maybe you should to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 12:35 PM
1

there is the minor problem that red pill primarily works on women at the lower 50% of the intelligence bell curve. Lol, that's a good one and something you just pulled out of your ass. Care to share your sources for this bold claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 11:59 AM
0

Or just was projecting? Questions, questions....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 11:37 AM
0

So that we won't just stare at your tits?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 11:19 AM
1

Female, stop telling other humans what words they can or can't use. Thanks in advance, a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:58 AM
0

Nice people don't. I guess she isn't nice and is projecting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:56 AM
2

Age and gravity, the big equalizers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:51 AM
1

You are a female human being, just like I'm a male human being. Stop telling other people what words they can't use. Male/female are not swear words or insulting words. You are oversensitive and decided that these words are bad (of course only when they are used to address a woman, not when they are used to address a man). That's your problem. You should work on your oversensitivity and stop trying to police other people's vocabulary.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:42 AM
1

Either way, you can still measure subjective data and make conclusions from it. True. But measuring subjective data and calculating an average with the data you collected doesn't turn that subjective data into objective data.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:30 AM
1

Classy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 10:27 AM
0

If you think that a joke made by a man equals to that man calling you a slut and calling for your rape, then you've definitely spent too much time on this forum. All the best to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 06:49 PM
2

Even women who produce more testosterone than the average woman aren't coming close the the levels a man has. Male: 300 to 1,000 nanograms per deciliter (ng/dL) or 10 to 35 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) Female: 15 to 70 ng/dL or 0.5 to 2.4 nmol/L.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:17 PM
1

Scoring a person's attractiveness is subjective. If it's done by an individual -> still subjective. If it's done by a group -> still subjective. If it's done by a group, but then you calculate an average from it -> still subjective. You can't rate someone's attractiveness in an objective manner. It's really weird that you think that when a group rates someone's attractiveness, that calculating an average of the group's scores will turn rating someone's attractiveness from a subjective thing into…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:14 PM
2

You'll be surprised how big the difference is between just missing sex on those few days you are horny each month vs missing sex all the time because you are always horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 05:03 PM
-1

Said the person who doesn't even have 1/10 the amount of testosterone a man does and therefore doesn't have the same biological drive for sex a man does. Basically, the only thing you said here, it that you don't understand how men can suffer from not getting sex, because you yourself don't suffer when you aren't getting it (or maybe you never even went without). Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 04:36 PM
1

Look it's not about averages, it's not about a group who is measuring/judging vs an individual doing the same. It's about the thing being measured. You can't measure something objectively, that has no objective scale to measure it with. You claimed that a group giving an average attractiveness score is objective. Since attractiveness cannot be measured in an objective way, it doesn't really matter if a group gives a score or an individual. And it doesn't really matter if you calculate an average…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 04:19 PM
1

And men not having a problem with the word "male" is irrelevant. The problem is that it sounds odd. It sounds odd to you. Which is irrelevant to all people who are not you. Seems like other people using the words male or female is a "you problem". Maybe you should just learn how to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:54 PM
1

I know that an average is objective. Because based on the same input numbers, you always will get the same average. But this is not what we are in disagreement on. You claimed that a group, rating someone's attractiveness, is objective. Which it obviously isn't, because it will change with every different group. How you calculate the number given to you by that group isn't really relevant. If you calculate it by adding all the scores from the individual members of the group or if you decide to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 03:36 PM
1

yawn
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:48 PM
1

I have said that the amount of people who find someone attractive or the average rating they would receive from a group of people is objective. The average rating received by a group of people is a subjective number. Why? because it will change depending on the group of people you ask to give you a score. The fact that calculating the score of one group is always the same, regardless of who is adding the scores from all the individual members of that group, doesn't change this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:28 PM
1

Be graceful in defeat and stop projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:09 PM
1

I have said that the amount of people who find someone attractive or the average rating they would receive from a group of people is objective. And it isn't, because those things are subjective. Your first example: the amount of people who find someone attractive. The number of people who find you attractive, will change depending on what group of people you ask to judge you. It is a different number for every different group. Therefore the amount of people who find someone attractive is a subje…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 02:06 PM
1

You are funnier when you try to be serious, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 01:29 PM
1

If we both calculated the average attractiveness rating the same group of people gives to the same individual person, we would find the exact same average. Just adding numbers together has nothing to do with objective and subjective. You don't understand these concepts, like this example you gave, proves. If that group of people would all rate the attractiveness of that person and came to the same conclusion, attractiveness would be an objective quality. If they all would say that person is a se…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 12:47 PM
8

It also makes it easy to spot the oversensitive snowflakes and the woke crowd. Just curious how long the list of "regular words who are now deemed bad words" will get, before the infantilization of our society stops. It reminds me of Orwell's 1984 and things like "double speak" and "thought police".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:55 AM
0

He was not talking about the kind of substance you can swallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:45 AM
11

No man has a problem with the word "male". It's women who have a problem with the word "female" and who've decided that men, who use the world "female", are misogynistic pigs. So, now men just shrug their shoulders and put the word "female" on an ever growing list of words that apparently are wrong and are making the snowflakes melt.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:40 AM
0

You know that situation when someone tries to be funny and fails miserably, so all you feel is vicarious shame, but just to be polite you pretend to laugh? This is like that, but without me pretending to laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 07:28 AM
0

I know. Don't really understand why you feel the need to do this "water is wet routine". Must be an ego thing. But did you know there's a world where women actually solve their daddy issues instead of letting them grow and fester all over the internet? With some hard work, you could live in that world too. I promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 04:09 AM
1

You must be very proud that the vast majority of people keep you informed on what their reality is like and choose you as their spokesperson.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:42 AM
1

If you and I calculate the average life expectancy of the same group of people, we will find the exact same average. Average life expectancy can be determined objectively. That's what objectively means, it's not changing based on the person who is calculating or judging it. If you and I have to judge the attractiveness of the same person, there's a good chance that we will rate the attractiveness of that person differently. Because that's a matter of taste and can therefore variate. Attractivene…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 02:34 AM
1

When people use "being attractive", they are referring to the figurative meaning of it and not the literal meaning. What do you think most people will answer when you ask them if Jeff Bezos is attractive? Do you think they will answer yes, because he attracts a lot of attention and therefore is an attractive man in the literal sense? Or will they say no, because they think he isn't a visually pleasing man and apply the common figurative meaning of the concept? If I tell you that I have weed that…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 04:38 PM
1

garnering more attention does = being more attractive Look, Jeff Bezos will garner more attention than 99% of men out there. Because he is famous and one of the most wealthy people in the world. But you can't claim in good conscience that the man is an attractive man. He is bald and short. Same goes for people with an obvious disability. They will garner more attention than regular people (getting stared at, people offering them help, etc...), but their disability will make them not attractive t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 03:54 PM
0

The only thing that is the same and is shit, is your response. Age doesn't automatically bring responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 02:18 PM
0

No, it isn't. The oldest kid isn't automatically the most responsible. If you want to quote something, at least try to quote what was actually said. There's already enough BS on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:40 PM
2

Red pill is definitely not created by incels. People who can't cook, do not write cook books.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:36 PM
1

TRP says women are the oldest teenager in the house. Nope. It says women are the most responsible teenager in the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:32 PM
0

She doesn't care. You are waisting your time. She's here to hate on men, not to have an actual discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 01:29 PM
1

Even if whether an individual is attractive is subjective, the number of people who would describe them as attractive is objective. Since being attractive is a subjective quality and depends on the personal taste of the person who is doing the judging, the number of people who will find you attractive will change depending on the group of people who you ask to do the judging. So that number is definitely not objective. Show a picture of a white person to 100 people in a Western country and ask h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 12:00 PM
1

You are mixing up "attracting attention" and "being attractive". They are two different concepts and don't have the same meaning. Being attractive means being beautiful and is completely subjective. Attracting attention is objective and can be measured. Do women attract more attention from men than vice versa? Yes, of course because men have a higher drive for sex. Does this also mean that women are more beautiful than men? No, it doesn't. Garnering more attention =/= being more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 11:41 AM
1

All your examples are relative examples and therefore will change if you change the context. "X% of people find being tall unattractive" for example. That percentage will change depending on the group of people who you ask this question. How could you even try to prove that women are more attractive than men? It's like comparing apples to oranges. And not even on objective measurable criteria like their size or their pH level, but you are trying to determine who of those fruits tastes better. Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 03:46 PM
1

Again, completely non scientific mumbojumbo. You can't prove that men with a lower sex drive would be just as willing to fuck a higher percentage of women, than women are with men. And in fact I believe this to not be true at all. Men's standards are lower, specifically because men are more driven to sex by their higher levels of testosterone. Lower their sex drive and they are no longer willing to fuck that ugly fatty they where willing to fuck when they were going crazy from being so horny all…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 03:34 PM
0

the outcome is oberwhelmingly indicative of females being more attractive You are very wrong. The outcome is only indicative of men having a higher sex drive. Something that's caused by a higher level of testosterone. Which is something that we can prove scientifically. You are confusing a gender having a higher sex drive with another gender being more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 02:52 PM
0

What evidence would indicate women being the more attractive gender? I' guess I'll have to repeat myself, because you are not understanding. You can't get evidence for subjective stuff. Being attractive is not objectively measurable. So you can't prove that one gender is more attractive than the other. This is kindergarten basic level science. Evidence needs to be objective. If it is subjective, it leaves room for doubt and therefore isn't evidence at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 02:35 PM
-1

women don't care if men decide they don't want women Delusional. Just go to any dating subreddit and read what women are saying. There's plenty of women not being happy with the current state of the dating world. Plenty of women complaining about being without a man. But you won't find those women on FDS. If you only hang around in your sad men hating circles, of course you're going to think all women prefer cats to men. aren't going around getting angry and murdering men as a result. Again delu…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 02:24 PM
1

This is dumb. Strength is objective and can be scientifically measured. Therefore, a claim that men, on average, are stronger than women, can be made. Being attractive is subjective and depends on the person who is judging the attractiveness. There's no objective measurement of attractiveness and no universal claims about attractiveness can be made. Just like we can't claim that the color green is the most attractive color, we can't claim that woman are the most attractive gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 01:36 PM
0

women have been universally deciding to desert men in droves. Delusional. Yes, there's a clear divide between the sexes, but it's coming from both sides. Both men and women are reluctant to date the other gender, because the benefits that were associated with being in a relationship in the past, today don't hold up anymore. Something that's true for BOTH genders. But here you are, delusionally claiming it's women doing the deserting and men being passive and getting salty about it. It just fits …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 01:27 PM
0

You should follow your own advice. You sound extremely delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 12:30 PM
-1

Oh yes it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 04:33 AM
-1

This is the correction of centuries of men getting what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 03:57 AM
2

You really believe your revenge fantasies are reality, don't you? This sub doesn't need mods, it needs psychologists.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:05 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 05:10 AM
3

Made me chuckle.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/22 04:46 AM
1

Oh honey, try again. Your aren't even putting a dent in me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 10:03 PM
0

probably assume that the less modestly she dresses the more attention she'll get. They don't just assume. A woman who has her tits almost hanging out of her dress, will definitely get more attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 10:01 PM
0

Good one. Epitome of eloquence.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 09:55 PM
1

Everytime a woman says "a real man", she is trying to shame a man, by attacking his manliness, into doing something that is to her benefit. Often against the man's best interest. A real woman would never stoop so low.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 09:54 PM
0

You said that the young women who are dating Leo DiCaprio are the ones who are dating down. I'm advising you to try that "dating down" out in real life and see where your delusion gets you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 09:41 PM
1

You take things, that aren't meant to be taken literally, literally. Maybe it's an intelligence problem or maybe you pretend to be dumb to be able to discredit what I say. Anyway, it's annoying. OBVIOUSLY (can't believe I actually have to explain this to you), nobody is using blowtorches on these guys or pulling their fingernails. There are plenty of guys who end it, after they find out their kids aren't their kids for instance. They had someone take away their whole life (that's the torture in …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 09:34 PM
0

Ever heard of the Duluth model? It's the standard procedure for law enforcement when it comes to handling domestic violence. It doesn't acknowledge that men can be victims, nor does it acknowledge that women can be the abusers. If a woman abuses a man and he call the cops, he is the one getting arrested, not his abuser. If you want to talk about why there are more female victims, let's talk about how the standard procure doesn't even recognize men can be victims at all. Whatever the statistics a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:46 PM
2

Suicide is a choice If I torture you untill you can't take the pain no more and kill yourself, you didn't really choose to kill yourself, you choose to stop someone else from hurting you. And nobody chooses to be getting hurt by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:31 PM
0

Maybe you should use whatever's left of your youth and beauty to make a world famous millionaire date up and sweep you off your feet. Lol, don't forget to remind that man that he's the one dating up and you're the one dating down. See how that goes, you delusional sad woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:21 PM
1

If I torture you untill you can't take the pain no more and kill yourself, you didn't really choose to kill yourself, you choose to stop someone else from hurting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:17 PM
23

female entitlement is annoying at most. Oh another, "women can do no evil", great.Tell that to the men who are killing themselves after an entitled woman destroyed their lives. False rape accusations are more than annoying. Paternity fraud is more than annoying. Financial divorce rape is more than annoying. Domestic abuse is more than annoying (there's at least just as much female to male domestic violence as the other way around),...... If you think that female entitlement cannot be more than a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 01:14 PM
1

Yep, spoiler alert, it's anorexic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 10:58 AM
2

So true, my last discussion with a woman on here ended, when she claimed Leonardo DiCaprio is the one dating up, when he is dating one of is young girlfriends. Admitting that these young women are dating Leo for his fame, money, status, connections and are therefore the ones who date up, would have meant admitting to being wrong. She couldn't handle being wrong, so reality had to be changed. I don't know why this subreddit has debate in it's title. Nothing ever gets debated on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 10:56 AM
1

Ok, we're off to lalaland, I see. Good luck, special snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 10:46 AM
1

the dating culture there and personal testimony from icelandic people Now you got me. That's really really overwhelming evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/22 10:45 AM
2

What kind of evidence do you have that Icelandic men are not repulsed by female promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:44 PM
1

No, it's not a solution. What you presented as a solution was a path that will lead even more men to a place of frustration. The only thing you said that might help any men, is that they could visit a professional. It's more damaging to present a non-solution as a solution, then to offer nothing at all. Some men might actually believe you and believe that ignoring their own needs is going to help them in any way. I'm not in a competition with you to deliver the best advice. I'm here to stop othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:43 PM
3

I made several points why this is an instinct. You focus on one of them, but conveniently ignore all the others. And again, you have the arrogance to tell a man that you know better than he knows himself, what his instincts are. All these discussion about slut shaming and double standards on this subreddit are completely pointless. You cannot convince people to go against their instincts. Their instincts will win every time. Even if you would be able to convince men on an intellectual level "tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 05:33 PM
3

You are forgetting that I am a man myself. How ridiculous would it be for me to walk up to a woman and to try and tell her, her mother instinct isn't real, but just a cultural thing. I think she knows her mother instinct is an actual instinct, just by how strong that feeling is. By how difficult it is to go against it. It definitely is an instinct. That's why so many men can't explain why they don't want to date a promiscuous woman. They are not making a conscious decision, they just have this f…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 03:46 PM
1

I don't have the answers, but neither am I presenting my lack of solutions as a solution. That's what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:52 PM
2

If your comment that "men should be more like in romance novels" was not an attempt at trolling, you deserve to be mocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:35 PM
1

If you think not having sex, will decrease your desire for sex, you not only don't understand men, but also don't understand how nature and desire works. Not having sex, will not shrink your "sex stomach". Telling men to just go find a prostitute, is the most actionable advice you gave. All the rest was pretty useless and ignorant advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:09 PM
1

So you think Leonardo DiCaprio is the one who's dating up, when he's dating one of his twenty something girlfriends? Lol, yeah, right, you don't understand the concept you are trying to discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 02:04 PM
1

Women who don't get any male attention at all, are very rare. Just make a fake Tinder profile for a very unattractive woman and see how much attention that still gets. It's a lot. So, any man who isn't the bottom of the barrel himself, is aiming to low if he's aiming for a woman who can't get any orbiters. And the bottom of the barrel (for both men and women) are outliers. So, no it's not awfully presumptuous, because the majority of men are not the bottom of the barrel either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:57 PM
1

What does this have to do with your advice, that men should just date up like women do? Make a point already.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:07 PM
4

Imagine, if it took you years, how difficult it will be for men who have this repulsion ingrained into their DNA. Men have an evolutionary reason to be repulsed by promiscuous behaviors in their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:05 PM
1

No, not automatically hypergamy. Aiming high is only hypergamy if you are aiming for higher than what you are yourself. You can aim for higher than the lowest of the low (women other men aren't even willing to compete for), without it being hypergamy. hypergamy: the action of marrying or forming a sexual relationship with a person of a superior sociological or educational background.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 12:02 PM
1

It’s not right to lie to men and have them wish upon a star for a sexy, high sex drive woman to fall out of the sky and start sucking their dick. I agree, but don't know why you are telling me this. I wasn't telling these lies. You told men, "just go do something else". You really don't understand how useless that advice is. Since you don't have the testosterone levels a man has, I can't explain it in that fashion. But you do get hungry. Which is comparable in the sense that hunger will also per…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 11:56 AM
1

And you should be accountable for yours. Women know damn well that their orbiters are not real friends, but they accept the friendly favors these orbiters do for them anyway. Yes these orbiters lack self-respect. But that doesn't justify taking advantage of them. And don't try to pretend to be naive. Women are far better at reading people and picking up social cues. You know these guys are not real friends and would go for a relationship when given the chance. I know a woman, who had a guy who w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 11:39 AM
1

Do you even understand what hypergamy means? hypergamy: the action of marrying or forming a sexual relationship with a person of a superior sociological or educational background. Youth and fertility have nothing to do with hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 11:21 AM
1

Here: If you're not in competition as a man then you're aiming low. If other men are not competing for the woman you are going for, then you are going for a very undesirable woman. Even fatties have multiple orbiters. Therefore no competition means you are aiming for the bottom of the barrel.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:43 PM
2

You are a woman, no? Women never developed being repulsed by promiscuous behaviors, like men did. Because there was not the same need. Women know a child is theirs. Men don't. So, it's easy for you to dismiss being repulsed by promiscuous behavior as something that's just cultural. Your instincts are not screaming at you , that you are making a big mistake, when you ignore signs of promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:40 PM
1

Yes, I do. But again, what's the relevance of you mentioning this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:39 PM
1

It’s best to give advice that an individual can do rather than forcing or praying someone else will give you what you want. I agree, but you didn't provide any useful advice for men who struggle with dating or women. You just told them they should focus on other things. Which is pretty useless advice if you know how strong the male sex drive is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:34 PM
1

You were saying that men could just date up, like women do. Is it too hard for you to understand that both partners cannot date up? If one dates up the other, per definition, has to date down. So, your advice was just dumb. What does the random stuff you said in your last two comments has to do with anything you said or with what I said? It really feels like today is "say random stuff" day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:55 PM
1

When he was talking about there being no competition, he was talking about the bottom of the barrel. Aiming higher than the bottom women, is not being hypergamous, like you were insinuating. Aiming higher is only hypergamous, if you aim for someone who's at a higher level than you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:49 PM
1

Is it "let's say random shit" day?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:30 PM
1

You can aim high and still be the one who's dating down.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 02:13 PM
2

You're welcome, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:45 PM
1

Having friends and hobbies is very healthy. Not disagreeing with that. But you suggesting friends and hobbies, as some kind of a solution to a man's desire for women and sex, is comical. You might as well have suggested that people who are hungry should just invest in friends and hobbies to make their hunger go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:44 PM
18

Men learned not to like female promiscuous behaviors, because humans are the only mammals who don't display outwards signs of fertility. To counter this extraordinary human characteristic, men have learned to select partners who don't display promiscuous behaviors. It's one of the only options men had to ameliorate their chances at reproduction. Or in other words, men who didn't wife up the town bicycle, were more successful in reproducing than men who did (not shocking, pretty common sense). An…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:23 PM
1

If men and women both want to date up, nobody is going to be dating. Because if someone wants to date up, someone else needs to date down for it to be able to happen. Since women are the ones already doing it, thanks to their hypergamous nature, men cannot do the same, not if they want to date at all. Maybe think next time before you decide to write something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:34 AM
1

Ah, I see, setting up the long con. You go, girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:18 AM
1

Alright, pussy, pussy, pussy! Come on in Pussy lovers! Here at the Titty Twister we’re slashing pussy in half! Give us an offer on our vast selection of pussy, this is a pussy blow out! Alright, we got white pussy, black pussy, Spanish pussy, yellow pussy. We got hot pussy, cold pussy. We got wet pussy. We got smelly pussy. We got hairy pussy, bloody pussy. We got snapping pussy. We got silk pussy, velvet pussy, naugahyde pussy. We even got horse pussy, dog pussy, chicken pussy. C'mon, you want …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:09 AM
3

Oh, please chill with all the feigned indignation over things only existing in your head... Something tells me You could go to therapy and that something would stop telling you bad things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:00 AM
0

So the onus is on the women to cut the friendship Friendship? That's a good one. You all know when a guy would jump at a chance of dating you. So, you know that there is no real friendship. Just a woman hiding behind "friendship" while using and abusing a man, who's into her, for favors. And a simp with not enough self-respect hiding behind "friendship" in the hope to get some pussy. Two human beings, both deplorable in their own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 09:53 AM
3

Tell me you don't understand one thing about men, without saying you don't understand one thing about men...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 09:37 AM
2

Lol, no we are good.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 09:28 AM
1

lol, I don't think you know the meaning of the word contradicting then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 03:51 PM
1

You went from claiming this: That was option one which I agreed was the best option To this: So no, I didn't mention option one because It's irrelevant. But I'm the one who's thick?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 03:41 PM
2

Women can get sex, just from the fact they have a vagina. This makes sex less self-affirming to women, because men will fuck anything with a vagina. Men will sleep with ugly women and even women they hate, just because they have a nice feeling hole. Women get the same kind of self-affirmation, that men get from sex, when a man doesn't just want to sleep with them, but also wants to date the actual person behind the vagina. For men it is different, they don't get access to sex just because they a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 01:12 PM
1

Reread our conversation. You didn't express to me you preferred option one. Our discussion started when I explained why option 3 was worse than option 2. And kept on revolving on those options. Now that I point out your hypocrisy in chosing the benefit of the child above the father's benefit, but not above the mother's benefit, you suddenly claim that you preferred option one all the time. Could be, but I can't read your mind and you didn't express that to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 12:25 PM
0

You are funny. Sex for a man is the same activity as sex for a woman? The fact that they have completely different sexual organs isn't a big enough difference for you? And then your simplistic example. Of course there is no difference between a man and a woman who are welding. You just need to hold a blowtorch, which requires hands. Both men and women have hands. But do women also have a dick they use to penetrate men? Can men also have 5 orgasms in a row or cum from having their clitoris being …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:27 PM
1

It's not what this discussion was about, but at least we agree on something natural not being good and not being bad either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:40 PM
1

At least we agree on one thing: the other not saying anything valuable or meaningful. Good day to you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:38 PM
1

Then it's not about the child. Because we could deny both men and women the possibility to opt out. And always have a favorable outcome for the child. You chose one bad law, not the other, but justify that choice as being about the child. Seems like it's about the mother and not the child (and definitely not the father).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:22 PM
1

Humans are the only mammals who don't display outward signs of fertility. Not made up, but fact. It would be really weird if the males of our species would not have developed ways to deal with this extraordinary human characteristic. I can understand you don't like what I'm saying, but it doesn't make what I'm saying made up. Men who chooses partners who displayed non promiscuous behaviors, had a better chance of reproduction. It was bred into us to not like promiscuous behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 04:15 PM
1

it was about not making the child suffer So, men can't opt out, because we don't want the child to suffer. But women can opt out, because abortions don't make a child suffer? If not making the child suffer is the reason why men can't opt out, why do women get to opt out?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:49 PM
1

Having a sex drive is uncivilized behavior? Still seems like you are just arguing against nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:45 PM
1

I definitely made I valid counter argument, when I pointed out that every argument you use to justify men not being able to opt out, is an argument that can also be used to deny women the right to opt out (having to face the consequences of their own behavior, being fair to the child). Something you choose not to respond to. But you made it clear. It's about making men suffer, because nature made women suffer. We don't need to discuss what is the most fair option, when the goal isn't being fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:37 PM
1

I don't even want children. But I still have a drive in me to want to have sex. Nature doesn't care what we think.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 03:12 PM
1

I don't believe there is an inherent meaning to life. Life just is. But since every living organism has a drive to reproduce, if there's anything that comes close to "the meaning of life", reproduction would be it. Men's most effective way of achieving reproduction, has always been promiscuity. So, I don't support your notion that promiscuity is bad. Unless you think nature is something that's bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:58 PM
-1

Of course you didn't. They are angels, all of them. They don't shit and if they do it doesn't stink, they never have garlic breath and they definitely never ever make fun of a man unprovoked.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:38 PM
1

Yes you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:27 PM
1

Oh, so it's basically about punishing men for the fact that nature decided women should be the ones doing the birthing. Now I get it, I should have figured this out way sooner. It's about getting even, not about being fair. Women suffer through childbirth, so let's make men suffer in return. That kind of thing. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 02:21 PM
1

Was there a point or were you just venting?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:54 PM
1

When men can't opt out financially, but women can opt out by way of plan b or an abortion, it's pretty obvious that only one gender has to "face the consequences of their own actions". Both had sex, only one gender can't escape the consequences of having had sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:53 PM
0

the premise is that promiscuity is bad. I don't agree with this premise at all. And here is why: If there is a meaning to life, it is making sure your genes survive. The most effective way for a man to achieve this, is to just be promiscuous. Which is not the same for a woman, who has a better chance of her genes surviving if she selects a partner who is willing to stick around and help with the child the she took 9 months to create. You are claiming that promiscuity is bad, while it is men's mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 12:50 PM
0

they made the choice to do the same bad thing It's not the same bad thing, though. The only thing that is the same, when a man and a woman are being promiscuous, is the label we give that activity. We call it promiscuity in both cases. If we would investigate what promiscuity actually means for a woman (how does she do it?, what prerequisites are needed?, what preparation if any?, is it hard work?,...) and we would do the same for a man, we would find more differences than things that are compar…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:28 AM
1

It would only by hypocrisy if men and women were both doing the same thing, but received a different judgement for doing it. Since promiscuity is something that easy to do for women and very hard to do for men, it's clearly a different thing to women as it is to men. And therefore it's not hypocritical to judge those different activities differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 06:05 AM
0

made the same choices as them But they aren't the same choices. It would only by "rules for thee, but not for me" if both genders were doing the same thing and were judged differently. But since promiscuity is something that's easy to do for women and very hard to do for men, it's pretty clear that promiscuity is not the same thing for both genders. A man and a woman who are both being promiscuous, are not doing the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:52 AM
0

Women only need to lack obvious birth defects and not say no to be promiscuous. Men need money, fame, status, height, big d, social aptitude,... to be able to reach a similar level of promiscuity. Sleeping around for women is easy, for men it's hard. Men and women are not doing to same thing when they are both being promiscuous and for that reason the different judgement is not hypocritical. It would only by "rules for thee, but not for me" if both genders were doing the same thing and were judg…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/22 05:46 AM
1

So how should we decide? cos your only idea so far is one option being "more fair" with no reasoning behind it. There is a very clear reasoning behind it: Equal treatment of both genders. There is no equality when one gender gets to decide for both genders. A pregnant women can decide a child is born or not. And therefore has more power to decide what will happen with a man's life (the biological dad) over the next 18 years, than the man himself. Because he isn't allowed to opt out. Baby trappin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 05:44 PM
1

Trying to be edgy? Always a pathetic look. You can do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 02:50 PM
2

You'll have to find another dancing partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 02:41 PM
1

Humans are the only mammals who have no outward visible signs of fertility. Human males have therefore learned to favor non-promiscuous partners as a means to have a bigger chance of procreating themselves. It's not even a preference, it's an ingrained instinct (thank evolution for that) because men who preferred partners that where non-promiscuous had a better chance at spreading their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 01:02 PM
1

He chose to take the risk. That is having a say. He was using protection. He chose sex, not parenthood. If you say he chose the risk, you should also not allow women to have abortions. Because when woman can opt out of pregnancy while they also chose to take the risk of having sex, telling men that they have to become fathers because they "took the risk" is hypocritical. This discussion wasn't about who is suffering the most. That's you moving the goalposts. If I was interested in a discussion a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 12:23 PM
1

The father has a say in whether or not to have a child. No, he doesn't. He has a say in whether or not to have sex. But once a woman is pregnant, he has no deciding power. Only the mother does (her body, her choice). If a man has unprotected sex, I agree with you that he has made a choice and should be held responsible. But when a man and a woman have protected sex and she gets pregnant anyway, he did not have any choice at all. And therefore should not be made responsible for someone else's cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 11:53 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 11:51 AM
2

Are you really saying that forcing half of the population to fight and die for the whole of the population is ok, because people who are not forced to fight die too? A woman who dies from pregnancy complications has bad luck. A child who dies from a disease also has bad luck. A man who was made to fight and die, didn't have bad luck. Other people decided that he should fight and die for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 11:13 AM
2

Oh, we don't need to die on the battlefield? We have a choice? Cool, then everything is ok. I will choose to live then. Can you inform all bullets to not hit me? And if we choose not to die on the battlefield, we also get to rape? In that case, where can my friends and I sign up? This sounds like a blast! /s Only one half of the population gets forced to die for the whole of the population. Explaining that the half that gets to sacrifice their lives is physically stronger, doesn't change the fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 10:39 AM
1

I think that if only one person gets to take all the decisions, only one person should face the consequences of those decisions. If the mother wants the child, but doesn't have the financial means to take care of it, it is irresponsible of her to bring it into this world. Punishing the father for her irresponsible decision, to have the child anyway knowing she can't take care of it, is not a fair solution. I'm talking about cases where protection was being used, so both people agreed to sex, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 10:20 AM
1

Too much ignorance to bother with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 09:53 AM
2

I did read what you wrote Then you didn't understand it. The possibility of the kind of violence you're talking about is present for everyone, everywhere. That's just called crime. And here is proof you didn't understand it. The kind of violence I talk about, is men will physically correct other men who deliberately cross borders. And because men know this is how it works between them, they will avoid crossing those borders and be more civil. It's not crime, because crime is usually unprovoked. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 04:33 PM
-6

If the patriarchy was real, men wouldn't be the ones dying on the battlefield, women would. Since society only sacrifices men's lives, it is ridiculous to even claim we live in a society build by and for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 04:12 PM
1

That's what we all want. We just don't agree on it being option 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 03:19 PM
1

You can't want equality for women and in the same breath deny men equal rights. That just reaffirms that feminism is about supremacy and not equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 02:46 PM
1

So, you think improving childrens situation from possibly getting aborted or financial abandoned (example 2) to just possibly getting aborted (example 3), justifies denying equal rights to one gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 02:22 PM
1

No wonder y’all are so anti body positivity We are not against body positivity, we just fail to see what is positive about turning your body into a lump of fat and giving yourself diabetes and an early grave. Do you see us applauding smokers for what they do to their bodies? Why not? What's the difference between killing yourself with cigarettes and killing yourself with too much food or unhealthy food?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 02:00 PM
2

When someone is against segregation based on gender, offering them even more segregation isn't the solution you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:48 PM
1

I don't understand why people are even entertaining this as a good idea. Because it puts an end to inequality when it comes to parenthood. If a woman becomes pregnant, she and she alone gets to decide what happens with the child. She decides that the child will live or die. Which is good, because her body her choice. But an unjust consequence is, that we now have a situation where one person and one person only gets to decide if two people will become parents or not. If only one person has the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:33 PM
1

There are 3 involved parties, namely children, women and men. First example: Best option for children and equal treatment of both genders. Second example: Not a good option for children, still equal treatment of both genders. Third example: Not a good option for children and unequal treatment of both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 12:22 PM
1

Lizzo herself often speaks out about the ridicule and animosity she receives for simply celebrating who she is. She receives ridicule because she is denying reality. It's a case of "the emperor's new clothes". No matter how many times Lizzo is saying that "big is beautiful", people are not attracted to morbidly obesitas. Everybody should strive to love themselves and I applaud Lizzo for that. But trying to convince others that something is beautiful, is never going to work. You can't reason with…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 11:40 AM
1

We have evolved to be attracted to signs of strength, health and fertility in our partners. Therefore being morbidly obese isn't attractive to anyone who doesn't have a fat fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 11:32 AM
1

Here take my upvote, you glorious bastard.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 11:19 AM
1

I am wondering why you would need to resort to violence in the first place. Because you aren't capable of reading (or are misrepresenting on purpose) I'll copy/paste the part of my comment that you missed (twice now): The idea that you misbehaving can lead to violence, is what keeps everything civil. Men therefore almost never cross borders, when they are interacting with each other. And therefore don't need to resort to violence. the possibility of violence =/= actual violence. Ever heard of a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 10:20 AM
3

You are the third person who didn't bother to read what I wrote. So, I'll copy/paste what I responded to the other two: You didn't read what I wrote. Or you didn't understand it. I compared the possibility of violence to nuclear weapons, because they are both THE OPTION THAT'S NEVER USED. The option, that because it exists keeps everything balanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 10:14 AM
1

So what if they did not exhibit any outward signs of fertility? That has no bearing towards promiscuity. Putting two and two together is still too hard for you apparently. Since there are no outward signs of fertility, the only two measures a man can take to make sure he is the father of his partner's child is to: a) never leave her out of his sight for even a second. b) select partners who do not display promiscuous behaviors. The only practical solution is option b.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 10:11 AM
8

You are misinterpreting others people's comments on purpose to start a fight. The idea that you misbehaving can lead to violence, is what keeps everything civil. Men therefore almost never cross borders, when they are interacting with each other. And therefore don't need to resort to violence. If a woman comes along, the normal rules don't apply to her, because "you just don't hit a woman". Women do cross borders other men would never dare to cross and turn the social interaction into a shit sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 01:03 PM
7

You didn't read what I wrote. Or you didn't understand it. I compared the possibility of violence to nuclear weapons, because they are both THE OPTION THAT'S NEVER USED. The option, that because it exists keeps everything balanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 12:23 PM
10

Violence isn't cool, no matter the gender. You didn't read what I wrote. Or you didn't understand it. I compared the possibility of violence to nuclear weapons, because they are both THE OPTION THAT'S NEVER USED. The option, that because it exists keeps everything balanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 12:01 PM
1

Your clarification wasn't clearing up any confusion, but added to it even more. That's why I responded with the moving the goalpost comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:54 AM
1

The elites like women more than they like men then, because women aren't being sacrificed on the battlefield.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:49 AM
2

It's discrimination based on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:29 AM
21

Men know there are rules and boundaries, that if crossed could lead to physical altercations. It keeps everything in balance. Sort of like nuclear weapons. They are the option that's never used, but because they exist, all involved parties behave more civil. For women no such rules exist. A woman can be the biggest cunt and you can't lift a finger to correct her shitty attitude, because she's a woman and you just don't hit a woman. It breaks the balance and leads to a more volatile group dynamic…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 11:26 AM
1

If you respond with "that's not true" to someone's comment, you can't blame me for assuming it's more than just the first two sentences you don't agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:30 PM
1

This is what the person you responded to wrote: Women are the ones who spread it around their communities. I've seen much more public slut shaming coming from women than from men. This was your response: Come on. That’s definitely not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:40 PM
2

Do you need help moving that goalpost?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:23 PM
1

Women share specifics, but men gossip more? Makes no sense whatsoever. Yes, a man will admit to his friends when he had sex with a woman, but that's where the conversation ends. Men will not share the intimate details. Meanwhile all her friends will know your dick size, what foreplay you guys did, if you are good at oral, etc. Women gossip more and it isn't even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:13 PM
0

You are funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 03:00 PM
17

What patriarchy? This society, that kills only men on the battlefield, is supposed to be a society made by and for men? Wouldn't women be the ones supposed to do the dying if we lived in a patriarchy? Patriarchy doesn't exist. It's just a term used to facilitate misandry.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:31 PM
10

Society: Oh no, one out of five homeless people is a woman! We need to do something about this! Me: What are you on about? That still means four out of five homeless people are male. So, male homelessness is a bigger problem. Society: Yeah, but did you know that one out of five homeless people is a woman! The injustice! We need to do something about this!
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:23 PM
2

Women have no problems listing their requirements on dating apps. In fact, most women's profiles on dating apps is just that, a list of demands, with no information whatsoever about themselves. So, this is some first class nonsense. Woman list income and height, but almost never the man's promiscuity as a requirement, because they don't care about the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:21 PM
1

You waiving me out, like you won at a discussion you weren't even willing to participate in, was to much arrogance to not respond to, miss "millions" of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 03:11 PM
1

Millions of reasons! Millions!.... ......Fails to even provide one. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:51 PM
1

All you are doing here, is again say how wrong something is, without explaining why it is wrong. So, no, YOU are wrong in a million ways, but since I have some prejudices about you, I won't share with you why you are wrong. See, how childish this is? Somebody is definitely wasting their time here, but it ain't you. Bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:37 PM
1

I trust any person to be a person. And even good people can be tempted. That's why she won't be my girlfriend, if she places herself in situations where temptation is expected. What do you think will happen if your girlfriend bumps into her celebrity crush while having that girl's holiday to miami? What if that guy thinks she's attractive and approaches her? Women are hypergamous by nature. It's easy to predict how this will end. You won't stand a chance when being compared with her celebrity cr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:29 PM
2

I'm listing, but you are not willing to share even one of your millions of reasons why the other comment was wrong. It's such a childish way of conducting a discussion. What you are doing is: You are wrong and I have a millions arguments to prove you are wrong. But I'm not going to share any of them. I'm going to stick with what I know. I agree with the other comment and apart from you claiming that that comment was wrong, you brought nothing to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:08 PM
1

The difference between men going on such trips and women, is that most men won't get approached. Which means that nothing will happen, if they don't take the initiative and make something happen themselves. While women get approached and can get themselves into tempting situations, without them taking any initiative. In short, men have to work to be able to cheat, women have to work not to cheat (turn down advances, refuse that drink being offered, etc.). It's a whole different dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:03 PM
2

You are willing to waste your time giving excuses for why you won't give a reason though, but actual reasons (and apparently there are millions of those) why what he said is wrong, you won't give. Very logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:56 PM
1

The mere existence of your body and my body is proof alone for God's existence. And the fact that children with cancer exist, is proof alone that God doesn't exist and if he does he is incredibly cruel and not worth worshipping anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:48 PM
2

That's why all those women's profiles on Tinder speak about wanting a man with a modest sexual history and that's why they never mention 6feet high or a 6 figure income as requirements. You must be so right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:52 PM
3

I bet you can't even give 3 reasons why what he said is supposed to be wrong. I sure would like to see you try.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:40 PM
3

What do you think happens on a "girls trip to Miami"? Some light shopping, thee and biscuits at four and in bed by 9, in order to be ready to go on that morning run?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:07 PM
3

It's more than a handful. Women like sex just as bad as men do. But it's available to them all the time. Most men have absolutely no idea how much sex women are actually having. Only a handful of women won't have a hard time finding a worthwhile man for a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 11:52 AM
1

Are you really suggesting that the only reason why you won't prove God's existence, is because I might not believe you? Good one, I won't prove the existence of Santa Claus then. Not because I can't prove the existence of imaginary men, because that would only be a practical detail, but because I fear you won't believe me when I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 02:04 PM
3

Somebody got murdered with their own gun. Beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 08:44 AM
1

there is God for example Cool, care to prove that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 08:31 AM
5

You must have big boobs. For big boobs men will overlook even radical feminist tendencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 08:24 AM
3

Yeah, but you couldn't use sliding into their DM's as an effective way to slide into their bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 06:04 PM
1

that's why promiscuous people pair up - they understand each other better. Not agreeing with this part. A man can only be promiscuous, if he is high value (has money, career, social standing, outgoing, 6 feet high,6 pack,...). A woman just needs to lack obvious birth defects and not say no. A woman has no idea what it takes for a man to be promiscuous. Men don't go stand somewhere and get approached all night. I had my promiscuous fase too. Stil won't date a promiscuous woman. I spent 3 years in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:54 PM
1

Stop defending people who didn't ask for it. This is not condescending. Because it is what you were actually doing. And it's a bad idea. Why did you even feel the need to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:24 PM
1

Not only were you white knighting, but now you are giving advice while you come across as very young. Shouldn't you wait until you have more life experience, before you start handing out advice? The fact that you feel the need to save people who didn't need saving, nor asked for it, tells me you have a lot to learn. Advice from an older man to a younger one: When they are not your monkees, it's not your circus.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:02 PM
1

Really? You can't see that telling someone that they lack basic education, is placing yourself above them, because obviously you do have that required knowledge. And you really don't see that adding the word "basic" in front of "education", means that they are missing something trival, something that most other people (yourself included) do not lack? If you tell someone they lack basic knowledge, you are not far away from calling them intellectually challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:30 PM
1

Not even sure what you are trying to say by that. Are 31 words to much for you to handle?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:07 PM
1

If you had some actual arguments to disprove that your comment was condescending, I guess you would have used them. You may want to consider some basic education on what condescension is and what treating adults like children looks like. Still don't know if your profession is being a teacher.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:55 PM
1

Check out the profile of the person you defended without that person even asking you for your help. What forum do you think you are on? Jeezus, man. You jump on a person reacting (me) and you don't even wonder why they react or what they are reacting to? Keep your nose out of business you know nothing about. What was your goal in defending that femnazi? Why did you start defending a person who didn't need any help, while you clearly didn't educate yourself on the discussion and had no idea what …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:41 PM
1

I have a hard time taking any adult serious who uses words like "shocked pikachu face". Maybe just say it in English and leave the emoji speak to the young kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:30 PM
1

Yep, another feminist faking laughing. Got a joke for you. How do you know a radical feminist replies to something you post on reddit? The first thing they write is "lol".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:28 PM
1

You are speaking on behalf of a femnazi, who didn't need any defending in the first place, because she was doing just fine being hateful on her own. What kind of man volunteers to go around reddit defending femnazi's? A white knight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:25 PM
1

Why ask for examples, if you are going to ignore them anyway and are going to dismiss the issue that is being exposed by them? You are on a debate subreddit, only to insult and to listen to your own voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:17 PM
3

Your advice, although it is well intended, shows that you don't really understand what men face when they show vulnerability. It is a gender issue. If women would get the same treatment for opening up, they would also stop opening up. But they don't, so they don't face the same issue. It's not young kids doing this that hurts This mostly hurts when it comes from you mom or the woman who is your partner and has uttered "I love you" to your face. You should educate yourself more on how men experie…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:11 PM
5

being emotionally illiterate Men are not emotionally illiterate. What you are doing here is calling someone who doesn't want to speak, a mute. Men do understand their emotions, men do have to ability to listen to others and to empathize and are capable of expressing their emotions. But whenever men show this side of them, they get punished for it. So they stop showing this side. We are oppressed, not incapable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 02:01 PM
5

If everytime you open up backfires, it's the only response.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 01:47 PM
5

Plenty of examples for ya. Just go to the askmen subreddit. Search for "opening up", "vulnerability", "showing vulnerability", etc. You can read thousands of examples where men share their own personal experience with showing vulnerability. It being used in future confrontations, it being dismissed all together, it being shared with other people (breach of trust) and loss of attraction and respect are the most common experiences. To get you started: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/pg0m2…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 01:44 PM
1

I'm definitely not your, bro. White knights are the lowest of the low. And what you are doing here, is a damn fine example of being a white knight. A feminist can hide behind the fact that men are different and therefore still has an excuse, namely the fear of the unknown. You are a man, you don't have that excuse. Check yourself, you are defending a person who thinks you are less of a human being, because you are born with a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 01:31 PM
1

This is one of those cases that any further discussion would be futile. In the western world, all the men who have real choosing power, are dating younger women. You completely avoid this fact, by saying "over here famous people are tacky". Just look at this simple fack: men who can choose any woman they want, choose younger women. Women between the ages of 20-25, are the most desirable women in the world. But don't believe me, just read some studies on the matter. Here's one article: https://ww…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 12:26 PM
1

Ok, so there was no point. Noted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 12:07 PM
1

You have no idea what fair looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 11:58 AM
2

People who are in need of dick, to feel good and secure in their own skin, will resort back to looking for dick, anytime their relationship isn't providing them with the feel good vibes they need. And any relationship will have stale moments. This is what they mean when they say that you can't make a hoe a housewife. People don't change. People can hide their true self, but it always comes out in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 11:57 AM
1

You may want to consider some basic education on how to interpret data and what reliable and unreliable sources look like. This is a prime example of a condescending tone. You are insinuating that he is lacking basic education. Not some high level education, no sir, he (according) to you, is even lacking the basic stuff. At the same time you are declaring yourself to be some kind of expert on these matters. Because you can't know what he is lacking, unless you don't lack those things. So, here y…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 11:52 AM
3

Really? Why don't you enlighten me and tell me how they handled determining fatherhood in the past? And how they handled humans being the only mammals who display no outward visible signs of fertility? You damn biology deniers should learn that you can't make up shit when it's contradicting nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 11:16 AM
1

Good on you, special snowflake. Don't melt while falling out of the sky.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 05:19 PM
0

A short man struggles with short man complex. Which he compensates with feeling better by dating a younger woman or buying a bigger car. That short men date younger women (if this is even true, you provided no evidence) can just as well be explained by them trying to overcompensate and show the taller men that short men can get the more desirable younger women. Why do the most desirable men in the world, all date women years or decades younger? (Famous people, rock starts, movie stars, millionai…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 05:18 PM
6

The only focus of redpill is to provide men with the knowledge to have better, more successful lives. Since we can't do anything about the collapse of society their advice on this one issue (the decline of society) is to not worry about it. That's all. Their advice on one small issue, is not their mission statement, nor is it what they stand for.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 05:00 PM
-1

I could have said anything or nothing. I would not have been able to make a dent in your shield of delusion. Why are you even on a debating forum, when you only want to listen to yourself? Seems counterproductive. Hope all is well in lalaland, enjoy the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:54 PM
6

If you just look at those threads on r/askmen. If thousands of individual men claim that they had this experience with every woman they ever opened up to, you start to realize it's women. And not just shitty women. But you also don't blame women for this, because they are just acting according to their biology. It's in a woman's nature to be turned off by a man who shows her vulnerability. This doesn't make her a bad person. Just a person you don't open up to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:45 PM
-1

For you to touch a nerve, would require for me to care about you. I don't know you and therefore it would be impossible for me to care about you. Why would I get worked up about you? I just don't subscribe to that line of thinking. It's weird to me. Do you get worked up when I point out your fake laughing? I hope not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:40 PM
4

I'm not playing semantics. When someone says: Dunno what you expect from a group whose mission statement is “Embrace the Decline” They are wrong twice in one sentence. First, redpill is no movement and therefore has no mission statement. And secondly, if you were to pretend that redpill is a movement and would make up a mission statement for that movement: "Embrace the decline" would definitely not be it. Redpill are not anarchists.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:33 PM
3

Female promiscuous behaviors have always been an issue, because humans always had the problem that you couldn't tell fertility from the outside. N count is just another way of calling out promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:27 PM
0

First things first. Fake laughing doesn't make what you say any more true or better. It's just immature and cringe af. Every immature person on reddit tries to get the upper hand by throwing some "lol" around. Grow up, it's a bad look. Secondly, you know what cures men of that magical power that female beauty has over them? Actually dating a woman. Sex stays a motivator. Dating not so much. Unless you want children, there's no reason to actually date a woman. So, no, I won't be simping for a dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 04:24 PM
0

He admitted to having picked something not very scientific. No need to go overboard with the demands and the condescending tone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:51 PM
1

Yeah, tell men again how being pressured to be masculine works. I'm sure, you as a woman, are the expert on this matter. Ignorant af indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:46 PM
3

Just like what you said was anecdotal. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:41 PM
7

there is no human time of female promiscuity to have evolved an n count aversion in. Humans are the only mammals with no outward signs of fertility. This makes it nearly impossible for the human male to be sure about his fatherhood. One of the only defense mechanism a male had, was to not select partners who displayed signs of promiscuity. Because it's kind of obvious that a partner who likes to fuck with different men, brings even more uncertainty in determining your own fatherhood if she's you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:33 PM
0

You have that all wrong my dear. We wouldn't turn down sex with her. But dating her is a completely different proposition. Like the wise dr Dre once said: "You can't make a hoe a housewife" (doesn't mean you can't have sex with her).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 03:13 PM
1

Good, than we don't have to bring up that women get shorter sentences for the same crimes as men do. That there are 1,3 women in college for every man in college, but still only programs to get more women into college exist. That men are the only ones who are expected to die on the battlefield. That the standard procedure for handling domestic violence, the Duluth model, doesn't even recognize men can be victims nor that women can be perpetrators of domestic violence. That women are the only gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:59 PM
4

A mission statement is what defines a movement. Redpill is not a movement and if it was the mission statement would definitely not be "enjoy the decline". So, what you said here, shows that you don't really know what you are talking about: Dunno what you expect from a group whose mission statement is “Embrace the Decline”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:40 PM
0

Point is that a man that goes for a younger woman failed to get women earlier. Which would only have a chance at being true, if men didn't prefer younger women. Why would they first try with women who are not their preference and only turn to the younger women they prefer when their first attempts don't succeed? You are not making any sense. It's the other way around. If a man goes for a woman his age, he failed to get a younger woman earlier. Men are mostly attracted to youth and beauty. A woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:27 PM
5

No, I'm not saying redpill is trying to equip men so they can enjoy the decline. Because the decline of society has nothing to do with providing men with the tools to be successful in life. To be successful in their lives they should not worry about things they can't change. Therefore they are advice to handle the decline of our society with amusement. Grab some popcorn and enjoy the decline. It's better advice than fight a decline you have no chance of stopping. But it's no mission statement at…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:04 PM
8

When is around your male friends. When is never around your woman, no matter how many times she says she wants you to open up. She will lose attraction, she will share your vulnerabilities with her friends and it will be used against you everytime the relationship has a dip or when you two are in a fight. Too many men have experienced this exact situation. Learn from their mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:58 PM
9

A mission statement is like a goal. Enjoying the decline is no goal of redpill. It's just what they advice men to do when faced with a society in decline. You might as well try to enjoy it, because you can't change it anyway. That idea. A mission statement for redpill would be more along the lines of: providing men with the tools necessary to navigate their lives successfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:38 PM
0

With a truly non promiscuous women there's no need to. It will be obvious by the way she interacts with you. You only do this when you already have a suspicion that she might be promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:31 PM
4

the only "sign" that a woman used to be promiscuous - her own honest admittance You think a promiscuous person can just stop all her promiscuous tendencies because she has a desire to settle down? People hardly ever change, just look at her behavior and you will be able to tell. You can't keep on hiding your true self.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:29 PM
0

Mock a promiscuous woman and if your woman is smart, she will hide her promiscuous past from you. Do the opposite and give her the idea that you are open and into kinky people and "wild adventures" and you have a better chance at getting to the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:14 PM
2

they have no way of knowing if a woman is low or high n count other than her own words. A man listening to just a woman's words, will get fooled more times than he can handle. A promiscuous person doesn't become not promiscuous, because she's lying about it. She will slip up and show her true colours by her actions. People are easy to get to know, if you ignore the sounds they make and pay attention to their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:09 PM
12

He would have lost his girlfriend just the same and would have beat himself up for thinking women actually know what they want, if he allowed himself to do what she asked and show his vulnerable site. Women say they want men to open up, but as a man you learn that when you do you'll get punished for it. There are plenty of threads on the askmen subreddit, that show this is a universal experience for the men who were stupid enough to believe they could open up. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/com…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:58 PM
20

If you think that's redpill's mission statement, you have no clue what redpill is about. Accepting things you can't change, is just common sense. Even if the thing you can't change is the decline of our society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:40 PM
1

You probably don't have the mathematical chops to comprehend, but 80% of something can never be below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:31 PM
1

unless you know they've acted in bad faith Come on, now, it's stunning-potato we are talking about here, there's no doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:27 PM
9

I guess I haven't figured out how to look for it You can't find non-existent information.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:07 PM
2

She can't provide evidence that doesn't exist. You will get nothing but excuses as to why she won't give you that non-existent evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:06 PM
-2

Part of men having younger partners is failure in dating Yes, another "women his own age don't want him, so he has to date younger women." What you and everyone else, that uses the "women his own age don't want him" reasoning, fail to realize is that men have a natural tendency to prefer younger women. It's not like we try women our own age and if it doesn't work out, we reluctantly turn to younger ones. It's the other way around. We prefer younger, but if those are not available we will try wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:04 PM
5

Feminist math. It's the same math they use when they say 80% of men are below average, while this is a mathematical impossibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 11:53 AM
1

If you are talking about laws of physics, like gravity for instance, you are right. Everything on earth is subjected to gravity. If you are talking about biology, you are wrong. There are no universal truths in biology. There are exceptions to almost everything. People are usually born with pigment, still albinos also are born. Humans usually have 46 chromosomes, still humans exist with 47 chromosomes. People and animals usually have the same eye color in both their eyes, still some people/anima…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 10:47 AM
1

What you are saying is that an exception to a rule, disqualifies that rule. Which is not the case, every rule has exceptions. Most men are repulsed by promiscuous behavior. Some men are not repulsed by this. And some men are even attracted to this, we call those men cuckolds. Doesn't change the fact that this general present revulsion is not a conscious choice. It is also not learned behavior, it is inborn. And therefore a biological explanation is the only possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:41 AM
2

Tell it to the person who's comparing people to toilets. I just called her out on her behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:23 AM
1

Everybody knows we have an inborn repulsion for things that can be dangerous. It's how we survived. You can call it lame, but doesn't change the fact even you have them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 09:21 AM
1

The fear of spiders is far more universal than the preference of a low n count women. I didn't talk about a preference for low n count women. I talked about being repulsed by female promiscuous behavior. They are not the exact same thing. Men are almost all universally repulsed by female promiscuous behavior. Doesn't mean they can't date a woman who stopped being promiscuous but has a high n count from her promiscuous period. One is a preference and the other is an ingrained evolutionary defense…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 02:41 PM
1

I am not saying that there isn’t a majority of men who prefer low n count women - but I really want to emphasize that this is a personal preference and not a male quality in general. You don't understand evolution, if you really believe this. Evolution has made us grossed out by certain things because they represent a possible threat to our survival. Hairy spider > possibly lethal bite > evolution made sure we are grossed out so we don't go near. Slithering noodle on the floor > possibly lethal …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:55 PM
2

It's gross. It's not attractive. It's like a revulsion in the pit of your stomach. You are so close, but still not there. Evolution has made us grossed out by certain things because they represent negative experiences or outright danger. Hairy spider > possibly lethal bite > evolution made sure we are grossed out so we don't go near. Slithering noodle on the floor > possibly lethal bite from snake > grossed out so we don't go near. Female promiscuous behavior > big chance of getting cucked and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:39 PM
3

To that femnazi we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 01:28 PM
1

It's what she calls life and it's just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:28 AM
5

The kind of man who doesn't know that Rich stole all his ideas from Rollo Tomasi.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:17 AM
1

they have equal access to education You are right when you say women don't have equal access to education. Because they have better and more access to education than men. In most western countries, more women finish school, more women finish highschool, more women finish university compared to their male counterparts. Since 1980, the female-to-male ratio in two-year college enrollment continued to increase until it hit about 1.4 in 1995, stabilizing at that point. The relative female-to-male rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:49 PM
1

Marriage numbers have been dropping for a long time now. And I don't see this trend stopping.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:28 PM
4

Fake laughing doesn't make anything you say better or more true. It's just cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 04:26 PM
2

I love how all the aggressiveness of your first two sentences, gets followed by wishing me a good weekend in the last. So refreshing to get a dash of passive-aggressiveness on the PPD forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:51 PM
1

Thanks for letting me know, I will stop holding my breath then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:31 PM
1

Damn, girl, take it easy. A rant like that can't be good for your blood pressure. I didn't mean to attack you. I'm fine with being used as a dick and I'm honest when a woman is just a vagina to me. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of the women on this forum, who won't leave a chance alone to call out men who engage in objectifying behaviors. Yet, here you, a woman, clearly objectifying men and all I hear is crickets and the soft blowing of the wind.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:26 PM
2

Yes it did. Tilt your head at an angle, squint your eyes a little bit and try to read it again. Maybe that will improve your reading ability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:19 PM
1

Get a life. You are just looking for something to attack him with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:10 PM
1

Where are all the people claiming you are a nasty person for objectifying another human being? I forgot, you can do anything to a man. And objectifying is only wrong if it happens to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:07 PM
1

there may have been a slight decline in number of men having sex in recent years That's the understatement of the day. Since 2008, the share of men younger than 30 reporting no sex has nearly tripled, to 28 percent. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 01:59 PM
2

What's my logic according to you, that makes you say that I might as wel claim all women are golddiggers?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 01:28 PM
1

Women are hypergamous, they are programmed to go after the best they can get. It's a feature that guarantees our species keeps improving. We can't blame women for this behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 10:49 AM
9

Sounds good advice if you like attracting golddiggers. Which nobody does.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 10:40 AM
1

Hope your girlfriend is happy with your lack of sex drive, sub 300 testosterone "man".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/22 02:25 AM
1

Am not sure if women find purpose easier than men do, but throughout history most men indeed have achieved things because they had a sexual drive that kept them motivated. If you take that drive away, you get depressed, unmotivated men. Men only want to be the best, strongest, richest because that's what gets them the most sexual access. We are programmed to want to sleep with women, to the point we feel bad if we don't exceed in doing so. Maybe women don't have that same drive, but you girls mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:55 PM
1

Oh, I thought you were gonna say that you were the baby they deprived of oxygen. I would have believed you. But lets get serious for a moment. You not having a need for sex, means your testosterone is probably lower than 300 nanograms per deciliter. Which means that you are basically a woman from a hormonal point of view. Which in turn explains why we are having a discussion on something no man would dispute in the first place. By the way: fake laughing is cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:11 PM
1

Yep, you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:57 PM
1

Shame, could have saved us both some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:57 PM
1

Don't forget Jezus was a man! Which makes him, in your very delusion view on the world, probably a rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 04:56 PM
1

You will have to if you want to find a positive comment. But don't bother for the hate, you will be tripping over that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:44 PM
1

I'm sorry this reality upsets you Your personal delusion is not upsetting me, because I don't confuse it with reality. You do. By the way, Jesus doesn't exist either. That's another delusion you carry around.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:41 PM
1

You are in no position to allow anybody anything. You are just some human holding a phone or a keyboard. And apparently one with an inflated ego. On top of that you are wrong again: Maslow's hierarchy places sex in the needs category (above) along with food and breathing. Get your ass to go and see your medical physician. You are short of testosterone if you don't think sex is a need. That might as well explain why you are such a pathetic white knight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:40 PM
1

You should look at your own comments and try to find one that isn't talking negatively about men. But I have to warn you, you will have to wade through a lot of comments that are downright negative to the point of becoming nasty, in order to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:33 PM
1

Realistically? I don't think we can turn the situation around anymore. Just try to enjoy what is left, untill it all inevitable crumbles into the abyss. I truly think social media is killing society and we would be better of without it. But I don't think humans will do what is best for them in this regard. Life and specially relationships where better, more balanced before we had social media. Dating apps that are giving everyone constant FOMO and the illusion that better is just a click away, h…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:26 PM
0

and this is how men treat women. Literally ask any woman and they will tell you the same, we have all been assaulted multiple times by men just going about our daily lives. No they don't. I'm a man and I don't treat women that way. My father, friends, men in my family don't treat women that way. You are talking about a small minority. I have a mother, a sister, a partner and female friends. Some experienced assault. Some didn't. But none of them see the world like you do. The world isn't one big…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 12:36 PM
1

If you are pointing your finger at all the simping going on and are saying this isn't right, yeah I agree with you. It's uncomfortable to get pedestallized and not attractive behavior. I lose respect for a man when I see him simping. It's just another sign that men completely lost their place in society and don't know how to act anymore with all the contradicting signals they receive from women and society as a whole. A sign that men are lonely and so desperate to get away from the solitude that…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 12:10 PM
1

People on reddit do two things: they agree with opinions they agree with and they don't agree with opinions they don't agree with. You basically are saying that all reddit users need professional help.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:45 AM
1

What threat did I make? None. I just pointed out that you hating on men is there for all to see in your post history. So, you shouldn't claim you are not hating on men. It makes you a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:40 AM
0

It's definitely a need. And it's not just me who says this. Ever heard of Maslow's hierarchy of needs? That a man can even make the claim that sex isn't a need, really leads me to think you should get your hormone levels checked. We wouldn't be having this discussion if you were healthy, because you would undeniably feel that need.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:34 AM
1

You have such a negative view of men and the world as a hole and it's not based on reality. I was planning on refuting all the false claims you made, but I realize this is pointless and beyond my pay grade. I really think you could benefit from some professional help. It must be scary living in a world like you describe it. And what's really sad is that what you describe is a product of your own imagination. You are living your life in a prison of fear. And you are the one who put yourself in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:29 AM
1

I agree. But having a desire for sex or women isn't a personal failure nor "poor impulse control". Sex is a need and we are programmed to have that need by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:14 AM
1

it's straight up poor impulse control. This is like me complaining about the mood swings of a pregnant woman and calling those "poor impulse control". Learn about biology and hormones. You are a man. If sex isn't a need to you, you might need to check your hormone levels. If yours are below 300 nanograms/deciliter you are going to experience a reduced sex drive. Which might explain the nonsense you write here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 11:01 AM
2

Your whole post just proves one thing: you don't understand the power of testosterone. What you call simping, is men reacting according to the way nature has programmed us. This desire for women and sex is what made the species survive. It's not a defect, it's a feature. And you will never understand unless you get regular testosterone injections to get your levels to those of a man. You are complaining about nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:47 AM
2

You should learn to make a point and learn to make it in a concise manner. I read through your ramblings, where you jumped from one thing to the next without reaching any clear conclusions. It was only when I arrived at your last paragraph, that I found the purpose behind your post. Next time just write the insult you wrote in your last paragraph and leave out the extra fluff. You still achieve the same goal and don't need to make such an effort to come across as intellectual.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:20 AM
2

this isn't the majority of men but it must be a good chunk of them. Imagine a man saying the following: "women are not all gold digging whores, but it must be a good chunk of them". Does this feel like misogyny to you? It sure does to me. Just like when you claim that not the majority, but a good chunk of men are rapists. The reality is that 1 out of 3 young men, didn't have sex the past year. Which for a man means they probably didn't have any intimacy at all. No cuddling, no physical contact e…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:06 AM
1

I don’t hate on men at all You are or delusional and need professional help or you are a hypocrite. Your post history is there for everyone to see. Or did you forget? Hard to claim you didn't do something, when there is so much written evidence of the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 09:13 AM
1

Clearly I did. You are funny, telling me I didn't read your comments, when you are the one accusing someone of attacking feminism, who didn't even mention feminism at all. You seem to confuse reality and fantasy with each other, it might be time to get some professional help.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 08:51 AM
1

Just because you meet a toxic man or women, you shouldn’t group the entire gender from it. Aren't you just a sweetheart, listen to your own advice. Hating on men and then handing out advice like this, makes you seem like a big fucking hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 04:00 PM
1

There was no debate. You were just looking for a fight. Which was pretty obvious from the fact you managed to accuse him twice of attacking feminism. The second time, even after he already explained to you that he didn't even mentioned feminism at all. A discussion requires the will to listen to the other side, something you are not capable of doing/willing to do, like you clearly demonstrated here. Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 03:55 PM
2

but the taken thing confuses us guys. Guy here and not confused by this. Taken = you have been vetted and approved by a woman. And since women have a hivemind, this automatically means other women will assume you will also pass their bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:40 PM
6

Replacing actual eyebrows with ones who are drawn on, comes to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:23 PM
1

Why is a white dude who's successful with women called "Chad"? Why not Peter, John, james or whatever? Someone started calling him Chad. Others starting doing the same. It got accepted by enough other people to become sort of the defacto name. Same with Tyrone. We are not talking about scientifically accepted labels here. This is all urban dictionary territory. I don't know what you are trying to achieve with your last two questions. OP wasn't being racist. The last thing a white racist would do…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 10:49 AM
1

Yep, Chad. Those labels are about racial diversity, not about hairstyles.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:39 AM
1

Any man who has used porn is out. Congrats, you just reduced your dating pool to a very small group of asexual men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:22 PM
1

Believe me we know. That's why we multiply every answer by 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 03:15 PM
1

Well yeah, often enough that they started using different names for when Chad wasn't a blond, white dude. That's the whole point. You are trying so hard to be woke, you are crying racism when people are acknowledging diversity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 09:36 AM
1

Chad doesn’t have a racial connotation to it. You are funny. Chad is white. So obviously Chad comes with a racial connotation. From the Wikipedia page about Chad: "a Chad is further tagged with an explicit last name and is often depicted as a muscular blond man and with very pronounced masculine features". To acknowledge there are more than just white people in the world, they started using different names for a Chad. What you call racism, is in fact the opposite, namely recognition of diversity…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 09:03 AM
1

Ohhhh, so eloquent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/22 08:48 AM
1

Tyrone is used as the black version of Chad. Nothing racist about that, unless you are going to argue that a person of color who calls some white guy Chad, is being racist for doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 12:03 PM
1

I would hope your position is not that being cheated on doesn't cause psychological damage and having a built in fear of disloyalty is normal or healthy. I hope your position is not that all men get cheated on by their female partners. I know some women can be cunts, be lets not generalize here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 08:32 AM
1

Redpill is just a bunch of tips for men to improve their lives. All men, not just white men. Redpill has nothing to do with racism. You're wrong again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 08:25 AM
-1

It's literally a name. Just like Sarah, James, Kareem, ... are names. Trying to attach racism to a simple name, is just ridiculous. What are you going to do next? Are you going to cry racism when a person of color uses a typical white name, like Sarah for instance? Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 08:06 AM
0

You are trying to turn something innocent into an act of racism. That says more about your state of mind then OP's. Truth has nothing to do with it. Delusion does.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 07:30 AM
1

Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 07:20 AM
1

No point in dispelling baseless claims. You're the one claiming men are damaged by being cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 05:12 PM
1

We appreciate loyalty both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 04:26 PM
1

We appreciate loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 02:27 PM
1

Probably not. Dogs are loyal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 10:57 AM
2

Sorry, you can't admit to being wrong. Good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 12:48 PM
2

It does matter because you said men are more eager than women to get into relationships. If you were only talking about men that have no other option than to get into a relationship to get their sexual needs met, you should have specified. And this also means that sex is their main motivation for getting into that relationship (while for woman the relationship part of the relationship is what drives them). So, they are not more eager to get into relationships than women. They are just more despe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 12:40 PM
2

men are still more eager to get into relationships than women so This is what you said and what I responded to. Since men can get a relationship from every woman that is interested in them (but not no strings attached sex) and women can get sex from every man that interested in them (but not a relationship), women are the ones who are more eager to get into relationships. You are looking at it from the point of view of a man who has no options. Of course such a man will be eager to get into a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 12:01 PM
1

average woman has it way easier to get into a ltr than the average man so idk what ur talking about What you don't grasp is this: That average woman can get sex from almost all men that are interested in her. Only some of the men that are interested in her are willing to also date her and make her their girlfriend. An average man can get a relationship from every woman that is interested in him, but not all women that are interested in him are willing to give him no strings attached sex. Therefo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:21 AM
8

Hypergamy, no. If anything hypergamy is less of a thing than it even has been before. Female hypergamy never sleeps and social media continuously presents the illusion of "something better is available". So, no it's actually the opposite, hypergamy is now more prevalent than ever before.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 11:03 AM
1

That doesn't change the fact that women can get sex easily and have a harder time to get a relationship than get just sex. Therefore for a woman a relationship is more valuable. And men (specially those that can't pump and dump) can get a relationship more easily than they can get no strings attached sex. Men wil agree to a relationship just to secure sex, that's true. But if they can get sex without the relationship they would rather do that. While for woman it's the opposite. They will offer s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:37 AM
1

men are still more eager to get into relationships than women so No, they are not. Women decide on sexual access, men decide on relationship access.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 10:18 AM
2

CDC: 41.7% of Americans are obese Reddit: Losing weight is easy! These two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 12:04 PM
1

He wants young, naive women to look at him as a champ -because he knows he does not make the cut for women with experience Oh yes, another "women of his own age don't want him". You do realize men prefer younger women, do you? It's not like we are pining for women our own age and see younger women as a less preferred second choice. It's the other way around. If younger women don't want us anymore, we will go for anything that's left. Even women our own age. Because what you think is "experience"…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 11:26 AM
5

Saying that women are less whining and hating on men, in a post that does nothing but whining and hating on men....
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 11:07 AM
1

Pair bonding is mainly caused by oxytocin in your body. The level of oxytocin in a body is raised by activities like hugging or climaxing. It's not a conscious choice and it's completely comparable, because the release of oxytocin is also a physical response. I'm not willing to be a dancing monkey for you. I'm not going to look for a study just because you are on a power trip. Humans do pair bond. If you never experienced pair bonding yourself and need a scientific study to accept that humans do…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 05:19 PM
1

What you are doing is comparable to asking someone to prove humans get hungry by providing a peer reviewed scientific study. Why would someone need to give you a peer reviewed study to prove humans get hungry? I am human and get hungry. I have seen other humans get hungry. And you are a human yourself so you obviously also experienced getting hungry. Same goes for pair bonding. I experienced it myself. I have seen it happen to other people around me. And I assume you are a normal person yourself…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 02:57 PM
1

Lol. Nice try.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 02:41 PM
1

Why don't you answer the simple question I asked. Did you never bonded with any of your partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 12:55 PM
1

You backed up your statement with a paper describing lemurs. Not exactly a very confidence-inspiring source. No I did not. You are the one mentioning a study involving lemurs. I didn't even know about the existence of such a study until you mentioned it. And now you claim I'm the one who brought up that study? What is this. You do something and then say I did what you did? This is some weird stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 12:53 PM
0

I don't. I responded to your bitterness spoiling over onto reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 12:22 PM
1

I didn't even look. First of all, you are doubting something that is generally accepted without bringing any arguments why it should be doubted in the first place. Second, you demand other people to perform for you. Find me a scientific peer reviewed study! Right now! lol. How about you bring some scientific evidence that proves human pair bonding doesn't exist? You providing a study that proves it exists in lemurs, isn't any reason to start doubting it exist in humans. Anyone who's not a sociop…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 12:14 PM
1

Why doubt something you have experienced yourself (if you're not a sociopath and if you had partners).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 11:33 AM
1

Da
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 10:41 AM
0

Did that make you feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 10:35 AM
1

Stay funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 09:22 AM
4

Are you seriously doubting that pair bonding is a thing for humans?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 03:20 PM
1

Women can be just as desperate and low value too. I know that’s probably a shocking revelation for you. Not at all. That women can be low value and desperate is obvious. That this would overrule their hypergamous nature, is not. What you say may happen in very small communities, when even the best men are still losers and no other options are available. But in this day and age with smartphones and dating apps, those small communities are virtual non-existent. You didn't bring any other arguments…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 03:18 PM
1

The fact that you even mentioned the prom queen proves my point. Don't get on your high horse just yet.... It's just a quote from the movie "The Rock". Where Sean Connery tells Nicholas Cage that "winners go home and fuck the prom queen". You missed a reference to popular culture and are now reading way too much into that. The only thing me referencing that quote from mr. Connery proves, is that I saw at least part of that movie. Popular culture even acknowledges that losers aren't getting any. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 02:14 PM
5

That's not an unrealistic expectation, that's a personal preference. Expecting the average for men to be 6 inch plus, is the unrealistic expectation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 02:00 PM
1

Let's not blame others for what we are doing ourselves,ok? You know damn wel losers don't fuck the prom queen. They don't fuck anything. For you to even suggest that losers can be man sluts, is a complete denial of reality. According to you these men are broke, unfit, not famous. What are those women you claim to know, who are fucking those losers, getting out of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 12:30 PM
2

What happened to women have standards? Apparently suddenly women are happy to fuck with losers. Did they find a cure for hypergamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 12:20 PM
3

Nothing you said here changes the fact that you have very unrealistic ideas of what average is for a man. You just used an excuse to blame men for your unrealistic expectations ("The men that aren’t very well endowed probably aren’t get laid as often as the well endowed men so that shifts the average that women actually see"). Even if you are the one with the unrealistic expectations, it's still men's fault. No accountability, no surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 12:18 PM
4

I consider that average. When they say that women see 80% as men as below average, they weren't lying, lol. 6 inch and up is only 19% of the male population. You consider someone, who's in the top 19% of men when it comes to penis size, as average.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:25 AM
1

Twisting your words? He is literally quoting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:21 AM
7

Pair bonding is a behavioral and physiological bond between two mated individuals, and is rare among non-human primates. First thing that pops up if you do a web search.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:13 AM
0

What are you going to do differently after you find out? Probably nothing.. Still sleep with her, but won't date her. Different to sleeping with her and also being open to date her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 09:08 AM
2

unless she's punching waaaay up Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:56 AM
5

She's cute in America and fat in Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:49 AM
1

Lmao no you do not…I know quite a few low value male sluts that are not rich, nor are they fit or famous. So, you are saying that lots of women are willing to fuck broke, unfit dudes who are not rich nor famous? Enough for the men in question to be considered to be a male slut? Lol, yeah right, this whole subreddit wouldn't even exists if that was the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:42 AM
1

Throw them in jail and men will even fuck other men. So yes it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:28 AM
7

Oh, let her have her fun. She likes the feeling of emasculating men on reddit, by telling them what her big bad husband will do to them. Telling men, what another man will do to them, makes her feel powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:28 AM
10

At most, there's a slightly larger minority of losers. 30% of men under the age of 30 did not have sex the past year. Almost one out of three young men isn't a small minority. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:23 AM
0

You think the 30% of men that didn't have sex the past year, didn't have sex because their standards didn't let them? You are funny. After only a few weeks without sex, most men would fuck anything that has a heartbeat (some won't even care about the heartbeat).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 03:34 PM
2

If having low standard was all it takes for a man to be promiscuous, all men would be promiscuous. Because men aren't exactly picky or being difficult when it comes to sex. Hell, a nice pair of tits is enough in most cases to make the cut. And since 30% of young men are reported to not had sex in the past year, it's pretty obvious that having low standards is not enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 12:54 PM
1

these men are promiscuous themselves Men need a lot of objective qualities to be able to be promiscuous at all. Women need to lack obvious birth defects and just don't say no. The sleeping around part doesn't make a man high quality, but the objective qualities needed to be able to do so, does (money, career, social aptitude, fame, fitness,...). A promiscuous man might be a douche, but at least he is one that possesses a lot of traits society views as high quality. A promiscuous women is a perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 12:48 PM
1

men (or women) who were promiscuous and seeking a low n-count partner are hypocrites. Would be true, if being promiscuous would be the same thing for both genders. But it isn't. Men need to have a lot of high quality traits, according to society's standards, to be able to be promiscuous (money, fame, game, social aptitude, fit, good career,...) No male loser has the ability to be promiscuous. Women just need to lack obvious birth defects and don't say no, to do the same. Therefore women being pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 12:39 PM
-1

How does a man having sex with many women benefit society in any way? To be able to be promiscuous as a man, you need to be a high value male according to society's standards. That means fit, rich, famous, socially adapt, having game, good career... If you're a man and you are a loser according to society's standards, you won't be able to be promiscuous at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 11:48 AM
1

Yeah it's all just memes, bro. Not based in reality at all, bro. https://www.boredpanda.com/social-experiment-guy-created-fake-tinder-profile-hot-model-pictures-germanlifter/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic Here an example where they created a profile of a person who was convicted of child abuse and who was abusive to his ex-girlfriend. Pretty inappropriate guy, no? Well apparently inappropriate doesn't exist when you are Chad. https://www.distractify.com/trending/2018/…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 10:17 AM
1

Nope, there have been many experiments on this. You can try it yourself. Make two Tinder accounts. Use pictures of a male model for one. Use pictures of a regular guy for the other. Use inappropriate language or be a creep and see who gets away with it and who doesn't. I have seen this experiment play out, where in the bio they told that the male model was a former convict and let him use: "Wanne fuck?" as his opener when starting conversations. And he got away with it. It's not just memes, thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 10:02 AM
-1

Make me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 11:19 PM
1

The only thing that is demonized is being inappropriate And the difference between being inappropriate and not being inappropriate, is if she likes you. If Chad makes a comment, she is attracted to Chad = appropriate comment. Neckbeard makes the exact same comment, she is not attracted to Neckbeard = inappropriate comment. Funny how that works, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 02:13 PM
0

I never saw a monogamous relationship succeed when the woman was into casual sex. Men are constantly offering sex to women and if your partner is into casual sex, there will be a point in the relationship that she won't say no. Maybe it's different if you date men. They still have to do the work themselves, because women don't constantly offer men sex. So maybe it's easier for them to withstand those urges. But dating an attractive woman who likes casual sex is not a smart move. You are expectin…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 01:42 PM
5

Partying and dating aren’t mutually exclusive. My experience with dating people who were into casual sex and partying, is that they make lousy partners. There's a reason why some people like casual sex. And that reason doesn't disappear when they are dating someone. I don't judge people for having casual sex. Nobody is a bad person for being into casual sex. I just won't date them anymore. Casual sex people are for casual sex only. That's what they are good at. They usually suck at monogamous da…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 12:08 PM
2

You misunderstood. Dating advice is not necessary when you are not into dating someone. I didn't say people who are into partying/casual sex don't need guidance. What I meant is that they need hook-up advice, not dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 11:51 AM
2

It's just a shaming tactic. Whenever you experience a shaming tactic in the wild, just realize a woman is trying to get you to do something that's against your best interest and in her best interest. Man up, are you a real man? A real man wouldn't, etc... see these things for what they are. They are signals that someone wants to take advantage of you.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 10:04 AM
2

Women are not the ones putting themselves out there and making the first move, you genius. They aren't facing rejection at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 08:51 AM
6

Then he doesn't need dating advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 08:39 AM
1

If OLD was as beneficial for women as you say, then more women would be using it. I didn't say that OLD was beneficial for women. I said they can get sex from OLD. But they don't even need OLD to get sex. And most women prefer relationships to casual sex. So I have no idea why you think that I said OLD is beneficial for women. This is the second time you put words in my mouth, that I didn't put in my mouth myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 02:52 PM
0

Smallness of soul is far worse than shortness of height. True, but your shortness of height will make it so that your smallness of soul won't be a woman's problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 01:50 PM
1

You are trying to get privilege and are selling that as equality. And when men don't fall for your scam you turn on the shaming tactics. Men don't die just for women. True, but they are still dying for women as well. Women aren't dying for anybody, but they are willing to be anyone's CEO, right? Stick your privilege in a sun sheltered spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:59 PM
2

Men here absolutely do that when they claim to know what women want or the intentions behind their behavior. I see that all the time. So what, I'm all men? You said you could say the same about me, when I told you you were using your female experience to deny men's reality. And now you justification is that men here do that. Unless you can prove that I'm exactly like all men here, don't think that you can claim things about me because "other men". You had no basis to claim you could say the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:49 PM
2

Ok. Gibberish.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:16 PM
2

I'm not the one looking through my male eyes at the female experience and then claiming that what women say is their reality, is actually not their reality, because my experience as a man is so different I cannot comprehend. You are the one doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:43 PM
1

If you look at the most extreme ends of violence that’s technically true (statistically). No, if you look at ALL cases of domestic violence, this is still true. Not just technically or statistically. And not just the most extreme ends of violence. But all around true. Because the Duluth model is the STANDARD for almost all law enforcement in the VS. And this model doesn't even recognize that men can be victims, nor does it recognize that women can be perpetrators. When you claimed this: When a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:28 PM
2

I refuse to believe Like I said, you cannot comprehend how the other half of the world lives. Just keep on denying other people's reality and keep giving them advice. I'm sure it will be very helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:13 PM
2

When a woman is suspected to be violent sometimes even if she's the victim she is blamed as often abusers are more powerful. This is pertinently not true in the VS. Because in the VS the Duluth model is used for cases of domestic violence (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model). This model doesn't recognize the existence of female perpetrators of abuse nor does it recognize that males can be victims of abuse. In other words when a man gets physically abused by a woman and he calls the cop…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:08 PM
2

I also don’t buy that there are huge amounts of men with truly zero options. 1/3 of young men didn't have sex in the last year (https://news.iu.edu/stories/2020/06/iub/releases/15-sexual-inactivity-young-men-united-states-no-sex-debby-herbenick.html#:~:text=BLOOMINGTON%2C%20Ind.,activity%20in%20the%20past%20year.) We are talking about millions of healthy young males. Do you think a healthy young man, who's horny all the time, would go without sex for a whole year if he had options? You truly don…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:54 PM
1

Just cause a dude is a coal miner that doesnt automatically make other dude entitled by default to be a CEO. We weren't talking about individual men or women. We were talking about men as a group and women as a group. If men (as a group) are doing all the worst jobs (coal miner,etc.), why is there a problem with more men doing the nice jobs? You women don't want to die on the battlefield and men will step up and die in your place. That's something women are perfectly fine with. But more men bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:21 PM
3

TIL that racism is a social movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 11:43 AM
2

The irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 11:40 AM
2

She's a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 11:40 AM
1

when the majority of ‘nice’ jobs are mainly for males, that is the problem. The majority of very awful jobs are also for males. Anything that's dangerous or demands such hard work that it puts serious strain on the human body will be a job that's automatically "for men". Just because men are physically stronger than women. Men build the high rises. Men are laying roofs on hot summer days. Men inhale coal dust in mines. Men die on the battlefield. Sure, being a nurse (mostly women) is also a hard…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 05:37 PM
1

Are you really this dense or are you pretending to be dense to make some kind of point? There are jobs where men are overrepresented. Some of those jobs are "nice" jobs, some of those jobs are "awful" jobs. If you only want to change the overrepresentation of men in "nice" jobs, you shouldn't claim to want that change out of an equality principle. Because there's nothing equal about wanting the benefits, not the burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 04:45 PM
1

My point is that feminism isn't about equality. Something I demonstrated by pointing out that feminists only campaign for more women in desirable jobs (where men are overrepresented) and not for more women in undesirable jobs (where men are also overrepresented). Both CEO's and garbage disposal workers are mainly male. How does the fact that there are women who do mundane jobs change anything about feminists being hypocrites when they only campaign for more female CEO's? If feminist want job equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 04:14 PM
1

You’re acting like a female working in a clothing factory wants to be a CEO or on a boardroom. That's your interpretation of my words. Not my actual words. I just pointed out that feminists use equality as an excuse to only campaign for more women in desirable positions, not for equal representation of men and women in all positions. And in doing so, they showed that they don't care about equality, but only care about more and better for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 03:29 PM
1

Cherry picking in this case means feminist campaigning for more women in the boardroom or in well paying positions. But not campaigning for more women in the unwanted positions that also are mostly occupied by men. If you want job equality, you can't pick for which jobs you want job equality and for which jobs you don't want equality. You can't chose for only more female CEO's. If you want that equality, then more female CEO's also means more female garbage disposal workers or more women doing h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 02:41 PM
1

So the problem is that a movement started by women to gain similar acces as men to opportunities has the ‘fem’’ in it? No, the problem is a movement started by women to gain similar access as men to opportunities, without also accepting a similar amount of burden as men. If you want job equality, you can't cherry pick which jobs you want equality for. Equality to a feminist means they want equality in those areas where men are at an advantage, but refuse equality in those areas where men are at …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:55 PM
2

You've got a point there. The most toxic ones are also the loudest. Where I live they are so loud, I doubt anybody else even exists, because you never hear a rational feminist or one that actually cares about true equality over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:35 PM
1

One example of feminism actually acting in accordance to the real meaning of equality, doesn't counter the vast majority of instances where equality is used as thinly veiled excuse to benefit women only.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:23 PM
1

At the moment, for every man who is in college, there are almost two women in college. But a feminist' focus will be on the fact that there are less women in STEM. The difference between men and women globally in college is not a problem to a feminist. One area where men are not underrepresented is though. Completely ridiculous. Using the word "equality" to push an agenda that is exclusively pro women. An agenda that at best doesn't care about men and at worst is anti-men. Feminism isn't about e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:10 PM
1

a lot of people, both men and women, have shitty jobs. True, therefore feminist talking about "job equality" but only campaigning for more women in nice well paying jobs, is pure hypocrisy. It is intellectually dishonest to argue that women don't want to do dirty work, when they actually already do it. I already responded to you on this. You are repeating yourself. So I will do the same: You should learn how to read. I didn't claim women don't do hard labor. I claimed feminists only campaign for…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 12:39 PM
1

I saw plenty of feminists talking about men being abused for example. Or their poor overall mental health because society places a lot of expectations on them. Good for you. I never had that same pleasure. I only saw feminist talking about more for women. What do feminists do when women outnumber men in higher education? They campaign for more women in STEM, because one area (STEM) where women are still less represented than men, is a bigger issue to them than women outnumbering men in almost al…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 11:41 AM
1

It's a huge misconception that women don't have to do hard labor. You should learn how to read. I didn't claim women don't do hard labor. I claimed feminists only campaign for equal rights not equal obligations. I pointed out that they complain about the lack of women at the top of society (well paid jobs, CEO's,...), but don't complain about the inequality at the bottom, where hard labor jobs and getting killed on the battlefield are almost exclusively done by men. It's one very clear example t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 11:22 AM
2

you make some point but you start from the wrong assumption that women should fight for men’s problems. No, that’s just plain wrong. If men have problems, I expect them to talk about those problems and organise themselves. Feminism claims to be about equality. If it really was about equality, it would fight for both men and women. It would make sure both genders get equal right and obligations. You just proved my point that feminism isn't about equality. It is about "more for women" and men be d…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 11:06 AM
5

Feminism is about equal rights No, it isn't about equality or equal rights. If it was, the following wouldn't be happening: • No feminist ever demanded for more women dying on the battlefield, working hard labor jobs or working for the garbage department. Seems those are jobs where feminists don't consider equality to be important. They do campaign for more women in high paying roles in society though. • No feminist is fighting divorce courts where women get custody 65% of the time. • No feminis…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 10:41 AM
1

In drugs we trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 02:27 PM
1

Nobody is attracted to a whole gender, this is an incredibly foolish notion. I completely agree. Therefore it's really strange that you are the one bringing this up, because nobody else claimed that anyone is attracted to a whole gender. This is just you taking a normal statement ("You are choosing not to have sex with the gender you are attracted to") and turning it into something exaggerated to be able to argue. The statement I made means you are attracted to men. Or in other words: that you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 02:22 PM
1

To most men not being fat means fuckable. Maybe fuckable after ten beers or fuckable when she's wearing a bag over her head, but still fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 12:50 PM
2

You weren't talking about horny, you were talking about sleeping with people you are not attracted to. Weed makes me horny, but not blind. You need beer goggles to fuck people you are not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 12:20 PM
1

You say they are in the same situation as you, because they could have had sex from gay men but didn't? That's funny. You are choosing not to have sex with the gender you are attracted to, but you could have. You are making the choice. These men are choosing to have sex with the gender they are attracted to, but can't. Someone else made made the choice for them and choose the opposite of what these men would chose themselves. They are completely not the same thing and no, the fact you could have…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 12:11 PM
1

You wrote "I'd rather have periods" in stead of "I rather have periods", so people are going to assume you are a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:49 AM
1

You choose not to have sex, but could have. Those men choose to have sex, but couldn't. Big difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:31 AM
1

Nothing makes sense to people who are unwilling to comprehend.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:22 AM
3

It's called alcohol.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:15 AM
1

But you are fuckable when not fat and fuckable is what men mean when they say that 80% of women are pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 11:15 AM
1

You are confusing "open to sex" with "disregarding personal health", when you tell me to get tested.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 10:48 AM
1

slightly fat is like a little bit dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 10:38 AM
0

I thought everyone has double digits. I even know some triple digit people...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 10:03 AM
1

Yeah, alright, impedance isn't something you want as sauce on your cauliflower.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 05:41 PM
1

So any convo that involves “what are you looking for” is a list Then op asking “what do you bring to the table” is asking for a list. What are you on about? A list is just a number of connected items. A convo that involves "what are you looking for", is a convo where someone asks a question. And OP asking "what do you bring to the table", is OP returning the favor when he was faced with her entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:59 PM
1

I wouldn't tell him but: you play stupid games, you win stupid prices. A kid is a decision that will affect at least 18 years of your life. People will be cautious with other decision that have a serious impact, but when it comes to children they choose to be careless. I'm not going to invest at least 18 years of my live into a child unless I know it's mine. To all women who feel insulted by men who want a paternity test: There is no maternity fraud. You wouldn't like living with the uncertainty…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:11 PM
1

which isn’t a list You are being semantic again. A list is no more than a number of connected items. If she has several requirements, she has a list of requirements. But we weren't discussing what a list is or is not. We were discussing if bringing up that list, ten minutes into a first date is entitled or not. He knows what she expects from a boyfriend, before he even got to know her well enough to know if he even wants to be her boyfriend. I believe that dumping your checklist of prerequisites…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 01:23 PM
1

If your "description of what your looking for", consists of 20 different items, it pretty much sounds like "your description if what your looking" for is an actual list of requirements that you slapped a different name on. I wasn't there, but you weren't either, so if anything I claim isn't valid because "I wasn't there", anything you say is invalid for the same reason. We both weren't there. Asking if I was there is pointless and adds nothing to our discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 11:19 AM
1

She did not “list out” standards. It’s a convo. It’s an answer to “what are you looking for in a relationship” - which is very common question. She did "list out" standards. OP literally said: "who about ten minutes in described her standards (a list of about twenty things, a huge mix of alpha/beta traits)"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 05:24 PM
1

Don't need to, OP described what happened: She started giving her list of demands while they had barely met (they where 10 minutes into their date). And it was one-sided because she was perfectly fine making sure he knew what he had to bring to the table, but refused to answer what she would bring herself. Even told him it was misogynistic to ask her that. So, him asking her what she brings to the table is apparently misogynistic, but her telling him what he should bring to the table is fine? If…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:36 PM
1

A one sided convo, where she is telling him all her requirements, is just as entitled as slapping down an actual list of demands on the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 11:59 AM
1

It very common to talk about what you are looking for in a partner. Two people talking to each other and sharing some things they hope to find in their new partner, is fine. One person, slapping their list of twenty demands onto the table and expecting the conversation to be a one way street, is pure entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 10:13 AM
1

She didn't say men should die in a fire, but she presents her irrational fears as being reality (I quote: "This is no mental illness, this is the reality for women.") And in that reality she presents men as sex crazed killing machines. (I quote: "At your house you’re not safe. No house lock is unbreakable. Any time a man can decided he wants you dead because you refused his advances and you’re dead (also most cases of women killed by men happens by the boyfriend/husband or ex boyfriend/ex husban…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 05:00 PM
0

She should definitely acknowledge her fear. I didn't say ignore the fear. I told her to find therapy. Therapy is the opposite of ignoring. It's working through the fear. What she shouldn't do, is come on a public forum and let her fear make sexist remarks about half the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 04:12 PM
0

People have no control over the feelings and thoughts that occur to them, particularly when it comes to fear. That's why I said she should get help, look for therapy. Find professional help to learn how to deal with those thoughts. You're right, you can control which thoughts pop up in your head, but you can damn sure learn to control how you react to them. She was saying that she is in constant danger of being killed by men. I am a man. I'm never looking for opportunities to harm women. I know …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 03:57 PM
1

You still don't get it. Even if her list has only reasonable things in it, the fact that she presented somebody who she should be trying to get to know, with a list of requirements, is in itself already entitled. Dating is about getting to know each other, to see if you BOTH ARE COMPATIBLE. Not about assuming that you yourself are automatically good enough, so the only thing that's left to figure out is if HE IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU. Presenting one party with a list they should qualify for, is li…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 03:19 PM
1

literally saying “i’m looking for a compatible decent being to be my spouse, who happens to be tall” That's not what it was literally saying, because that's a list of 3 requirements (compatible, decent, tall). She had a list 20 requirements + some mumbojumbo about her "worth", like she is the price and he is not important, so he should try to qualify for that price. You do understand that not only the requirements can be entitled, but also the number of requirements? Imagine that you go on a dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 12:46 PM
1

It's not hypocritical. If men and women would be doing the same thing and only one of them would get judged for it, then indeed it would be hypocritical. But when a man and a woman are both sleeping around, they are not doing the same thing. And I'll prove to you why. • A man needs a lot of qualities to be able to be promiscuous (height, game, money, career, social standing, initiative taker, physical fit, big d, ....). A woman needs to have an absence of obvious birth defects and not say no. So…
/r/seduction18/08/22 09:26 AM
0

if they had asked me that, i’d be so over it You really are not good at social interaction. He only asked what she brings to the table, because she was being a demanding and entitled b*tch with her list of 20 demands. If she acted less entitled, nobody would have turned the situation around and asked her that question. The only reason why OP asked that question was because he was over her entitled ass and wanted to return the favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 09:14 AM
0

I know I'm not a woman. But I have a partner, mother, sister, nieces, aunts and friends. All women. Unless you live in a very dangerous neighborhood or an active warzone, this isn't an actual treat you face daily neither. You act as though men, all men, are constantly looking for an opportunity to attack you. And you don't realize there is something wrong with your mental state? Look, I was mugged by 3 men. They also used violence. I felt threatened for weeks after that. Everytime I saw men who …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 06:57 PM
6

Finally, the miserable pricks are more picky about women than women are picky about men I agree with everything you said except this. Men will never, not even black pill men, see 80% of women as below average like women do with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 06:10 PM
1

Lol, you just summarized 90% of the discussions on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 05:03 PM
0

But you don’t ASK “what do you bring to the table”. That’s so classless and tasteless. When somebody with an entitlement problem, hits you with her non negotiable list of 20 items , it's completely justified to turn it around on her and ask her what she brings to the table. She just gave you her one-sided list of demands, you make her understand that relationships are a two way street, by asking what she brings to the table. That question was clearly a reaction to the entitlement she displayed. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 05:00 PM
0

You know the difference between healthy expectations and entitlement? Expecting someone to have their life in order is not entitled, expecting someone to be rich is. If you have a list of 20 items, that are non-negotiable minimum requirements, you are no longer talking about expectations. You have ventured deep into entitlement teratory. When you have such a list and don't bring anything to the table yourself, you are completely lost in entitlement teratory. If you are poor, don't demand being r…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 01:42 PM
3

Working hard for those brownie points.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 01:19 PM
1

What part was disgusting? The entitled part. Where she had a list of demands that were her minimum requirements to be able to be considered a potential partner for her. While she herself doesn't bring much to the table and couldn't even respond to the question of what she brings to the table. Like, you have a list of 20 items as your minimum requirements, but you can't name one thing you bring to the relationship yourself? You see this entitlement on OLD all the time. Where broke, chubby single …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 01:04 PM
1

You make the same mistake a lot of people make. YOU are a woman and YOU don't, this doesn't automatically mean all women think/behave like you. I know a woman who gets a lot of validation from the fact she fucked 3 different guys in one day (don't understand her on this, men would fuck anything that's easy, so why the validation?). There are definitely women out there who get their validation from the number of people they sleep with and who use racking up numbers as a way of self-affirmation. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 12:38 PM
1

A man brings up sex and you equal it to sexual assault? Why don't you just cut the bullshit and say directly that you think all men are rapists, you sad misandristic excuse of a human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 12:20 PM
0

You are paranoid and assume all other women are paranoid too. It's not normal to be afraid all the time. Your gender has nothing to do with being anxious all the time, that's just you and something you should get therapy for.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 12:05 PM
1

Replying two days straight to a discussion without even mentioning one argument, is what is pathetic. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 03:48 PM
1

Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 03:31 PM
1

Again you discuss like a child. An adult would use arguments to show me the "stupidity" of my arguments. You didn't manage to do that and present me with only a half assed attempt at an insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 01:05 PM
1

I wouldn't even be able to tell you if your arguments are really really fucking stupid or not, because you still didn't make any. I therefore conclude that you are full of shit and you just keep on responding because you lost face when you couldn't bring any arguments to counter my arguments. Explain to me why a man and a woman who both are being promiscuous are doing the exact same thing, when the difficulties they face, the qualities they need and the possible consequences of their behavior is…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:59 PM
0

And I'm pretty sure intelligence really doesn't matter when it comes to who you have sex with. It sure as hell doesn't matter for the people who are into or they wouldn't be having sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:42 PM
1

Hey, it's you, the person who refuses to bring any arguments to the table, but still keeps on responding in a discussion on a subreddit with the word "debate" in it's name. Your behavior makes as much sense as the arguments you didn't bring.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:38 PM
0

Ok, let me rephrase that for you: You have just proven that whoever is willing to have sex with you, doesn't need intelligence in a bed partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:29 PM
2

it’s hypocritical to say men can do it, but women can’t. Which I would agree. It would only be hypocritical if men and women were doing the exact same thing and one of them would get judged for it and the other wouldn't get judged. But when men and women are both being promiscuous, they are not doing the same thing. I make a claim: Men and women sleeping around, are not doing the same thing. Therefore there's no double standard, no hypocrisy. I prove my claim with logic: Sleeping around is somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:21 PM
0

Lol, you just proved that men don't consider intelligence, when they are looking for something to fuck...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 11:40 AM
0

Lol, you should be. I expect to find your name on a Darwin award candidates list, somewhere in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 11:26 AM
1

Option 3 it is. As predicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:57 AM
1

It's because society views women as sluts and men as studs for doing the exact same thing How can you be so close and still not make the connection? Why is society doing this? Does society just hate women? Or could it be there are objective differences between male and female promiscuity that could explain the difference in judgement? Two reasons: 1) Promiscuous women can lead to paternity fraud. All life has a drive to reproduce. And it's the only thing all livings being share, so we could even…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:56 AM
2

I make a claim: men and women sleeping around, are not doing the same thing. Therefore there's no double standard. Like you claimed there was. I prove my claim with logic: sleeping around is something that's hard to do for men and easy to do for women. If they were doing the exact same thing, they would experience the same difficulties. They do not. So therefore they are not doing the same thing. I reach the conclusion: A double standard requires the same activity to be judged differently based …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:42 PM
4

That's because men will often categorize women into 2 boxes, fuckable or marriage material. The two boxes are fuckable and non-fuckable. If she is fuckable and has also other qualities she may become marriage material. If you are a man, I hope for your sake, that any woman you see as marriage material also fits into the fuckable category.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 05:04 PM
1

Ignore and carry on like you were.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:53 PM
1

If I walk up my local hill. Nobody will be impressed by that. If I climb Mount Everest, a lot of people will respect me for achieving that. It's the same thing, climbing a hill, but one gets respected because it's hard and not everybody could do it. The other won't even get noticed because it's easy. The ease is very relevant to any human activity. People don't respect things they could easily do themselves. They only respect hard to achieve things. This is exactly why women sleeping around is n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:49 PM
2

Maybe that's your internet. But I don't need your welcome. You can keep your version of the internet. I like to have an actual discussion based on arguments. I don't do screaming into the void. That's more your thing, as you demonstrated clearly, when you gave me 4 different reasons why you won't give me one real argument. A sane person would rather give one argument to prove their point, before they would ever give 4 different reasons why they don't want to give that argument. It would be faste…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 04:39 PM
2

Four reasons now, for not giving me an actual argument. Still zero arguments. Normal people win discussions by trying to counter the arguments the opposition makes, with their own arguments. You think you can achieve something by giving reasons why you don't give any arguments. We both know you can't counter my argument and therefore started to refuse to engage in the discussion all together. Again, this is how a child handles discussions. You have some growing up to do or maybe I'm just discuss…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:58 PM
1

I clearly demonstrated that sleeping around is not the same thing for a man and a woman and therefore the remark you made when you said "rules for thee, not for me" is completely bogus. You now give me a fourth excuse why you won't counter my argument. If men and women are doing the same thing when they are sleeping around, explain to me how that exact same thing is very hard to do for only one of the two genders. This is a clear argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:28 PM
1

You shouldn't. Only if he's vetted and you really like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 03:20 PM
2

You are wrong again. There would be no point in any discussion whatsoever, if we started out agreeing. I, at least, gave some arguments to disprove your premise that it's hypocritical to judge men and women, who sleep around, differently. You did nothing to counter my arguments, only stopped discussing because you can't counter them. First you tried to avoid responding to my arguments by saying "you said the same thing as the other guy, so I'm not responding". Then you claimed that I brought in …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:55 PM
5

When people have no arguments, they usually resort to insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:46 PM
1

When anyone says "men", they are always generalizing. Because men is a big group of very different individuals. You assuming that anyone who uses the word "men" is talking about all men, no exceptions, is the weird thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:42 PM
1

I don't believe it's true for a whole gender. That's you making assumptions. I know there are men who have it easy and women who find it hard. When talking about men and women, we always generalize. Otherwise a conversation can't be had, because you can't always include all the exceptions. You are pointing out the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:27 PM
2

We are specifically talking about a specific double standard. You choose to ignore that and bring in irrelevant scenarios. As I said to the other person: if you would like to discuss those feel free to make another thread where people who care to engage with you can. I'm talking about the exact same thing as you: SLEEPING AROUND. What irrelevant scenarios did I bring in? Mentioning that SLEEPING AROUND is easy to do for a woman and hard to do for a man, is still talking about the same scenario: …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:23 PM
3

The central question was that the same thing (sleeping around) is judged differently based on the gender of the person doing that thing. And that doing so is hypocritical. If it is hard for a man to do and easy for a woman to do, it is clearly not the same thing to them. Because it is not the same thing for both genders (for which the discrepancy in difficulty is the clear evidence) it's not a double standard to judge it differently and therefore not hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:15 PM
1

You claim rules for thee, but not for me. But when someone proves that the hypocrisy you talk about isn't happening, because they are different situations with different rules, you don't have a single argument to prove your claim. So instead of disproving what I said (which you can't) you just pretend to be above a discussion you started yourself. You argue like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 02:03 PM
6

Yeah, but dwelling on the anger phase is something that redpill warns against. So these complaints are not complaints against what redpill is. But only what people assume it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:59 PM
2

I didn't say anything that even resembles "but women". Here's what I said: You realize men and women are not the same, do you? The fact that sleeping around is easy to do for a woman and hard to do for a man, should make you realize that sleeping around is two different things based on the gender of the person who's doing the sleeping around. If sleeping around is the same thing and men are being hypocrites for giving women a hard time for being promiscuous, explain why that same thing is hard f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:56 PM
3

Maybe modern redpill is what you say it is. I don't visit the redpill anymore, because I took all I can learn from it already. But when I used to visit the redpill community in my younger days, they talked about self improvement, career advice, health, money, grooming. Women were an afterthought. One of the core lessons was that in order to fix all your problems with women, you fix yourself. Women were seen as a byproduct of improving yourself. And they specifically said not to focus on women be…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:49 PM
1

Thanks, for informing me about a question you posted to another person. Don't understand why you felt the need to do so, except maybe to satisfy your need to get a word in without needing to actually respond to what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:43 PM
4

Those are the ones we try not to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:39 PM
2

You realize men and women are not the same, do you? The fact that sleeping around is easy to do for a woman and hard to do for a man, should make you realize that sleeping around is two different things based on the gender of the person who's doing the sleeping around.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:29 PM
1

Men and women only really need each other for procrastination. The safest years for both mother and child are when she is between the ages of 20-25. You are arguing against biology and in the same breath are insinuating that men are pedophiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 01:17 PM
14

You are missing the point. If a man is looking for sex, all he cares for is some kind of attraction. Men will fuck women they would never date seriously. No man wants to settle down with the town bicycle and make her the mother of his children.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:58 PM
13

Redpill isn't telling men to resent women. Redpill is just a box of tools for men to become better at life. Resenting women would be counterproductive to becoming better at life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:48 PM
8

Of course we probably all had sex. But there's a clear difference between knowing your partner had sex in the past and finding out she had sex with all your friends and even fucked your dad while she was looking for a sugar daddy. We don't need a woman to be a virgin, we need her to not be a garden tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:37 PM
0

It's not hypocrisy when a different situation is judged differently. It's only hypocrisy when the same situation gets different judgment. A man and a woman doing a thing, can make it a different situation because their different genders make it a different situation. Sleeping around is something that's hard to achieve for a man. Sleeping around is something that's easy to achieve for a woman. Sleeping around is not the same thing for a man and a woman. So there is no hypocrisy when sleeping arou…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:22 PM
1

If you have a problem with what I've said well I guess truth hurts. You are so delusional and arrogant that you actually believe that words coming from you equate truth. No wonder you can't see that your a hypocrite, when you blame men for doing the same things you are doing yourself. People, like you who see themselves as the source of truth, believe they are the center of the world and are the most insufferable people ever. Work on your God-complex, it's disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 12:12 PM
1

Be easy for a guy you really like and vetted. Don't be a walk-in clinic for every willing sperm donor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:54 AM
1

Men just need attraction to date a woman. Her salary is not important at that point. I thought we were talking about requirements to date. You are talking about requirements to be a life long partner. Yeah, sure most men don't need a 6- figure salary from their partner, but a wife who does her part and contributes financially is nice. Women already need that high income to be willing to give a guy a chance at dating. Men will date with only being attractive as requirement. And men almost never n…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:56 PM
8

How many dating profiles have you seen where a man says that he needs a woman to have a six figure salary? And compare that to women's dating profiles where it's almost a standard requirement. Men see attraction as a base requirement and see a nice salary as a bonus, not a requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:33 PM
2

If you consider a dad bod to be an average body for a father, then plenty of people considered his body to be average, because they think he had a dad bod. He even was body shamed on social media: https://www.today.com/series/love-your-body/aquaman-star-jason-momoa-shamed-social-media-his-dad-bod-t158183
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 02:05 PM
13

True, a man's love is also conditional. But men don't have a list of conditions. Be attractive is basically it. And what is attractive? To some men a nice pair of tits is already enough to qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 01:47 PM
2

The only area, where men and women actually depend on each other to achieve succes/actually need one another, is reproduction. The worst person to rely upon to achieve reproduction for a man, is a promiscuous woman. Before you know it, you are raising another man's child and are not reproducing yourself. Which is evolutionary suicide. That's where all the aversion and name calling comes from. When it comes to settling down and reproducing, a promiscuous partner is the worst choice a man can make…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 01:39 PM
40

The only woman who will love you just for you, is your mother. And this is if you are lucky and have a good mom. Apart from that one relationship with your mom, men are liked for what they bring to a relationship. It's always transactional and never "just for us".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 01:11 PM
1

What you're criticizing in men, is exactly what you are doing yourself (just need to reverse genders to make it clear and obvious). You justify your own man hating by pointing your finger at the men you put down and say "it's all them". Like you are incapable of taking responsibility for your own actions. And when those men are putting women down, they are woman haters. You do it -> it's all them. They do it -> they are woman haters. You lack the basic self awareness that is needed, to be able t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 01:01 PM
2

But again: it's just them. & Toxicity is never taking accountability for your own failings and blaming them on literally anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 04:12 PM
2

I have a lovely partner, great friends, high paying job, and generally I love my life. So why all the men hate and all around negativity? If you go through your own post history you'll have to admit that anger, lashing out, hating on men and all around negativity are prevalent. It's hard to match your reddit activity with the person you claim to be in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:30 PM
2

If you swap around the genders in your response, then your response is an accurate description of the way you yourself come across online. It's actually scary how accurate it is. For example your post history is also deeply pretentious, dismissive to a t and devout of anything positive or uplifting. And you do seem to blame men for everything that goes wrong in the world. Maybe you should not hand out advice untill you are more happy yourself, so that your advice may actually do some good. Now, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:05 PM
2

She's a toxic know-it-all who likes to vent her frustrations and gets off on putting men down.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:29 PM
1

Married people also have dead bedrooms, while unmarried people just brake up when there is no more intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:21 PM
1

I'm married with kids and have sex anytime I want it. Without knowing how long you are married and if you are a man or a woman, this information is not very informative.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:12 PM
1

Exposure effect can push someone, who isn't sure about you at the start, over the line and make them see you as an option. Exposure effect won't change someone who thinks you are unattractive, into someone who is attracted to you. In that sense attraction is non negotiable. People who aren't sure, can be persuaded. People who have their attraction figured out, can't be persuaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:02 AM
1

That women don't understand how rejected a man feels (subconsciously) when they are made to wait for sex, while other men received it without waiting, is not a big problem for men. Men do have some problems, but this isn't really one of them. Men who've got options will decline such a relationship and find a partner who doesn't make them feel devaluated.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 02:28 PM
1

One doesn't exclude the other. You can be more logically inclined than another person, this doesn't mean that everything you do is logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 02:10 PM
2

If you know this, you shouldn't be asking if I know that sex doesn't = love. Because I clearly stated that the male subconscious is what makes us feel so validated from sex. And realizing that sex doesn't = love is a rational thought process and not an instinctive one made by the subconscious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 01:53 PM
2

You know there is a difference between your logical thoughts (that you control) and your instincts, subconscious (that you can't control), don't you? And that both have influence on how you feel and behave?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:58 PM
2

earliest forms of birth control I'm talking about reliable forms of birth control. We always could pull out. So, if you want to be pedantic (like you are being), we could claim birth control existed as long as humans existed. It's widely accepted that reliable birth control started in the sixties with the wide spread usage of the pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:52 PM
2

It's not, if you don't care about the guy or don't care about dating the guy. It might be your problem if you do care about him, because nobody wants to be with someone who makes them feel like second choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:40 PM
2

You don't understand men. We don't have a self worth problem when we feel less validated when other men received sex faster or more easily. And therefore no therapy is needed. You can't therapy away the way your subconscious functions. You can't therapy away evolution. We have these feelings because people for most of their existence, had to pick their sexual partners carefully. Sex could lead to children. So, choosing your sexual partners was a big deal. For most of human existence casual sex d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:35 PM
1

If casual sex given prior but not to him because someone values him as a potential partner vs a means to an end then that’s on him to decide that he doesn’t value that person back And he can walk away. Trying to tell women tht all men will feel the way he does is pointless because most of us have our own Worldy experience that tells us otherwise Our subconscious doesn't understand birth control. When you have sex with a man, he feels very validated in his existence. His subconscious tells him th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 12:28 PM
2

Because if you don't care about a guy it's not the most intimate thing. It's just sex. It means nothing. One of the most validating things a woman can do for a man, is have sex with him. It doesn't matter that she had an itch and used him to scratch that itch and that it meant nothing to her. To him it is pure validation. To all other men, knowing that she had sex with a certain guy, also means that she validates that guy. Our subconscious doesn't understand birth control. A woman having sex wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:58 AM
9

Ok, apparently you are the golden standard and that's why every other woman does exactly the same thing you do. And apparently I am the golden standard for all other men, because my personal experiences is suddenly "another male idea". Like all men have the exact same ideas. You do realize the difference between one person's idea/experience and an universal truth, no? And that you can't claim that my idea about women is wrong, because your personal experience as a woman is different. My experien…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 04:08 PM
4

Any woman who's been on dating apps long enough, will be setting. Because they all will have had sex with men out of their league. And they all assume that because that guy was willing to sleep with them, they can also date a guy of the same level. When this doesn't happen and it won't happen by definition (that's why they call it "out of her league"), they will either become a person with lots of "fur babies" or they will settle with a man who isn't as rich, charismatic, famous, well hung as th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:43 PM
5

Maybe modern redpill is what you say it is. I don't visit the redpill anymore, because I took all I can learn from it already. But when I used to visit the redpill community in my younger days, they talked about self improvement, career advice, health, money, grooming. Women were an afterthought. One of the core lessons was that in order to fix all your problems with women, you fix yourself. Women were seen as a byproduct of improving yourself. And they specifically said not to focus on women. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:29 PM
9

but if guys out there will fuck her their is bound to be one who will date her. Not necessarily and not necessarily the same guys. You can't automatically see a man willing to fuck you, as a man willing to date you. There always will be guys willing to fuck her. If she is really ugly, it might be only when they are drunk, but any woman can get sex. This doesn't mean that they are willing to date her. The only validation a woman can subtract from a man willing to fuck her, is this: at this exact …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:14 PM
23

You treat sex and a relationship as interchangeable when you say if you can get sex/relationships then your standards are not unrealistic. In reality a lot of the men who are willing to use a certain woman for sex, won't be caught dead somewhere in public with that same woman. If the men who have sex with you are also willing to date you, then your standards are realistic. If they don't, then you are just being used as a Fleshlight and your standards are completely unrealistic. Because no woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:54 PM
1

Nice tip, big woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:24 PM
1

Why intrude on a conversation between others on reddit, are you like this irl?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 06:15 PM
1

Women rate 80% of men as below average, even when this is statistically impossible. You sound like you could do wel in real life. Drop de apps and present yourself to women in the real world. Your results should be way better than chubby single mothers or tattoo covered party girls that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 05:54 PM
1

It means you look at their actions and learn to ignore their words. The day I learned to look at people's actions, is the day all confusion stopped. Words are completely meaningless if they are contradicted by actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 05:46 PM
1

Leave to a jackass to police grammar on reddit Leave it to a jackass to police... You forgot a word. Which makes your sentence nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 05:38 PM
2

I was and then women showed me just how bad of an idea it would be to actually go through with it. To paraphrase the great philosopher S. Dogg: "I treat marriage like 7-up, I never have, I never will".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 05:06 PM
1

Do you have to pay for your commas?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 04:51 PM
1

Plenty of other men will be thrilled to have an argumentless discussion with you. No worries, you will be fine. Godspeed, and may the gods of dysmenorrhea look down favorably on you...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 01:15 AM
3

Take both your earlobes between your thumb and your index finger. Now softly rub them and say "whoosaaaa".
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/22 01:02 AM
1

Damn, aren't you boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 12:51 AM
0

Men are simple and are attracted to youth and beauty. Women are a lot more complex in regards to who they are attracted to. A beautiful man, who has no game, no job, no social proof by having a big social network, no money, isn't 6 feet, can forget about being promiscuous. He will get lucky once in a while because he has a beautiful face/body but will still be seen as a loser because he is lacking in those other areas. A man who can be as promiscuous as the average woman can be has to bring a lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:30 PM
1

You are not debating, because you would need actual arguments to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:21 PM
2

Non of the things you mention here are me ascribing personality traits to a human sex. Which was the basis for you telling me that I was wrong. So I'm still waiting for you to show me were I did what you say I did. I've got a feeling that waiting will be in vain. “Because men and women are different” is not an explanation, it’s a deflection. Saying that men and women are different, is stating a biological fact. It explains perfectly why the same action (promiscuity), will get a different respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:59 PM
-3

The reason you are waiting, is because you don't want to get into a relationship He doesn't want to get into a relationship.... ..... with a woman who might be sexually incompatible with him. Since sex is an important part of a relationship, it is common sense to see if your future girlfriend is at least compatible with you in that area, before you take the relationship to the next level. She is the one stopping him from taking this any further, because she refuses to find out if they are sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:06 PM
1

I don’t know how to explain that ascribing specific personality traits to a human sex is incorrect, I never asked you to prove that this is incorrect. I asked you to show me where I did this. Show me where I ascribed specific personality traits to a human sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:38 PM
0

Your example is literally how our bodies have evolved to have sex with promiscus women. Our bodies never evolved to have sex with promiscuous women. That was never the goal of evolution. Because sex with promiscuous women leads to a lower chance of procreation, than sex with a non promiscuous woman. It would be a non productive strategy for survival. Our bodies evolved to have the best chance of survival for our genes. The result might be the same (dick that can shovel), but you are confusing wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:33 PM
1

Instead of saying that my premisse is faulty and therefore everything I said is faulty, tell me why I'm wrong. Use arguments to stake your claims, show me the errors of my ways. Because what we have now is me saying: A is true, here are my arguments. And you go: A is not true, so you are wrong. This leads to a non discussion where I don't know any of your arguments and can only respond to your accusation of me being wrong, with saying that you are wrong. Which will lead absolutely nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 12:54 PM
1

I see constructive criticism or using arguments to prove a point were to intellectually demanding for you, so you chose the completely useless thing to do and just wrote something insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:47 AM
1

If anyone can have a bite, we can probably assume that this particular banana is not monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 08:29 AM
2

Ok, let's settle this then, are bananas monogamous?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:10 AM
3

Why is this so hard to believe? Why do you think men have a penis with a big ridge below the head? It is so men can scoop out the DNA that was left by a previous partner. Our dicks have evolved to give our own DNA a better chance to reproduce, by shoveling out the sperm left by another man. But our brains evolving to give ourselves a better chance of reproduction is something unimaginable? Humans are the only mammals who have no visible outward signs of fertility. This means men cannot know if a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:58 AM
2

Why is this so hard to believe? Why do you think men have a penis with a big ridge below the head? It is so men can scoop out the DNA that was left by a previous partner. Our dicks have evolved to give our own DNA a better chance to reproduce, by shoveling out the sperm left by another man. But our brains evolving to give ourselves a better chance of reproduction is something unimaginable? Humans are the only mammals who have no visible outward signs of fertility. This means men cannot know if a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:57 AM
1

You can sleep with someone the first night but check her off your list for potential partner, why? You don't seem to understand men and women are different. And because they are different sleeping around means different things for them. Because it's easy for a woman (don't say no and lack obvious birth defects and you're good to go) and very hard for a man (you need game, money, above average looks, decent career, social aptitude, social status,...). People don't get praised when they excell at …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:39 AM
6

What does dyeing your hair and having piercings have to do with having lots of sex? It's attention seeking behavior. Loud colored hair and a bunch of tattoos or piercings will make you stand out more from the crowd. You can say: I coloured my hair bright purple just for me. But it will still have the side effect that people will notice you more. People who crave attention to feel good in their own skin are usually more inclined to flirt and put themselves out there. People who put themselves out…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:34 AM
2

You do a lot of laughing, not so good with actual arguments...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:56 AM
1

No need for apologies, you didn't hurt my feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:18 AM
1

I think you never saw "As good as it gets" (movie with Jack Nicholson), or you would have known the reference. Chill, not everything in live is serious and not everybody is out to get you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:10 AM
1

You didn't say one thing to counter the arguments I presented (except trying to derail the discussion by bringing up a difference between "social and biological hardships", whatever that's supposed to mean). Of course we are not going to agree, when you have no arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:02 AM
1

We were not talking about the difference between social hardships or biological hardships (not even sure what your definition of those terms is), we were talking about actions. Something you see as a thing in itself and apparently completely independent from the person performing the action. Because that's what you are saying, when you say that a man sleeping around is doing the same thing as a woman sleeping around. Men get longer sentences than women for doing the exact same crime. This shows …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 12:13 AM
1

It's the same action, but an action is always coupled with the person who performs the action. If tomorrow a man would give birth to a baby, the whole world would hear about it. It would be news and in al the papers. Yet, women give birth all the time and nobody seems to think that's newsworthy. Why not, when it is the same action ? Your reasoning is faulty. Actions are performed by people. And the people who perform the action have influence on how that action will be seen by others. Or why do …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 11:02 PM
0

You don't seem to understand men and women are different. And because they are different sleeping around means different things for them. Because it's easy for a woman (don't say no and lack obvious birth defects and you're good to go) and very hard for a man (you need game, money, above average looks, decent career, social aptitude, social status,...). People don't get praised when they excell at doing something easy. People only get praised when they do something hard. When a woman and a man a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:29 PM
1

If by knowing you mean knowing by name, then yes, everybody has heard of guys like Mick Jagger and Hugh Hefner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:10 PM
1

You lobotimize that part of your brain that is responsible for reason and accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:05 PM
3

I'm starting to realize you chose your username because of your dating life and not your calmness of mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/22 11:59 AM
2

What can I say, you inspired me
/r/seduction30/07/22 01:40 PM
1

You shouldn't if you don't like promiscuous men. Most women do the opposite and go for men all other women like to sleep with and ignore the modest guys. I still sleep with promiscuous women, I just don't date them.
/r/seduction30/07/22 01:37 PM
1

Some girls who are easy to sleep with don't do it for the sex, but for the validation and the novelty. You wife them up and still have a once a month relationship because by then you are not novelty anymore. You can't generalize like you do here.
/r/seduction30/07/22 01:35 PM
0

Yeaaahaaaa, little piggy.
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:44 PM
-1

Believing that you are so special that she is doing something with you, that she won't do with the next guy, is a bit delusional. It is possible and I personally give them the benefit of the doubt. But I haven't met a woman yet, that was easy for me to sleep with, who didn't show me pretty quickly that she is just easy to sleep with. And that it had nothing to do with me personally. I still give the next one the benefit of the doubt though. And I don't judge. They are not bad persons for sleepin…
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:43 PM
0

Look, everyone is allowed to do what they want. I'm not judging. Just trying to explain why sleeping around is viewed differently when it's done by a man or a woman. Men are more visual and are therefore attracted to beauty and youth. Therefore any woman who is not born hideous, can easily sleep around. Women are (luckily) more complex when it comes to their attraction. Men don't have to rely solely on their looks. Things like social aptitude, social standing, career, financial succes,... all he…
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:33 PM
0

If it's valid, than it isn't a double standard.
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:14 PM
2

I agree with you, but don't really understand why you are saying this. I never claimed that someone is bad or good for doing those things.
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:13 PM
-7

You’d rather date a girl who makes you work 4 dates to have sex than a girl who’s a straight shooter and is willing to hookup early on? Doesn’t make sense. I'm not so arrogant that I think I'm better than any other guy. If she sleeps with me on the first date, she'll sleep with anybody on the first date. In other words she's easy to sleep with. Why would I invest into a someone who's easy to sleep with? It makes it even harder to make the relationship succeed and relationships are already hard e…
/r/seduction29/07/22 07:11 PM
15

You’re judging these girls for hooking up with you whilst you’re hooking up with them. Doesn’t make sense. He had to work hard on himself to be able to have hookups. He leveled himself up to a level that seducing women became possible. He achieved something. Women who are not born completely ugly, have the ability to hookup just because they are born as a woman. There is no achievement. When a man and a woman both are being promiscuous, only one of them is doing something that's hard to do for t…
/r/seduction29/07/22 05:30 PM
1

Even active attempts often don't. If they actively trying to seduce men and are ok with casual, then there is something you are not seeing or are not telling me. If they are as cute as you say and they are ok with casual dating and they are actively putting themselves out there, then no way they aren't having any succes. Or they are only trying with men way out of their league or they are not as cute as you say. Men are not known for passing on easy sex, they are known to do the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:53 AM
1

being attractive is not enough to be considered an attractive man" lmfao yes it is. You're doing some mental gymnastics now. I said being good looking is not enough to be considered an attractive man. I never said being attractive is not enough to be considered an attractive man. Don't twist my words. Everybody knows attractiveness of a man consists of a lot of different factors, his physical appearance is just one small part of it. Or do you think Elon Musk with his weird body and plain face co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 11:42 AM
1

You need to define attractiveness. To a man attractiveness is mainly the visual. Men mainly respond to youth and beauty. Women are more complex and respond to more than the visual. Many women will consider a man to be attractive if he has a successful career, financial succes, outgoing personality but just average looks. Therefore good looks in themselves help, but good looks alone won't be enough to seduce most women. Plenty of shy good looking guys, or broke good looking guys are sitting alone…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 04:30 AM
2

Okay so you agree that men will have an easier time getting sex simply by being born attractive. Then it's fair to say that those men didn't do anything but being born, to be able to sleep around, and why would people respect that? You jump to an conclusion that isn't justified. Attractive men have an easier time than unattractive men. True. That doesn't mean that an attractive man can sleep around by just being born. Even Chris Hemswort with his good genes and nice eyes couldn't do what any dec…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 03:25 AM
1

Now you are just playing dumb and also changing the subject. Of course a better looking man will have an easier time to get sex than an ugly man. But we were not comparing men. We were talking about why promiscuous women get looked down on and promiscuous men get respect. You already proved my point by bringing up Chris Hemsworth. You tried to use a man who worked his ass of in the gym for years, who also managed to become world famous and who is filthy rich thanks to his successful movie career…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 02:48 AM
3

There’s plenty of unambitious dudes with low salaries and questionable personalities who are promiscuous .. So, you are saying that women are fucking unambitious, broke assholes who are sleeping around on them. If that is the case, then those men are the exceptions. Having no drive, no money, a bad personality and a tendency to sleep around are not a common way to a woman's heart, wouldn't you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 02:02 AM
1

A gift and a curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 01:53 AM
1

You think Chris Hemsworth was born with those muscles, his multimillion film career and fame? Do you think it would be as easy for him to get sex if he had that same face but wasn't jacked, rich and famous? He worked his ass off to get to a level that getting sex is easy. He achieved that. Damn, you are dense if you think Chris Hemsworth was born into this level of desirability. The level that mr. Hemsworth achieved, is the same level any good looking woman has by virtue of being born as a good …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 01:50 AM
1

Maybe they should try the "two glances and a hair flip" trick. It usually does get my friends approached, and they really are plain Janes. If they were actually hot, I wouldn't have doubted them when they told me they can get sex at any time. But my friends don't expect any commitment either. Just some fun. If your friends want an actual relationship, I can understand that's a lot harder. But any non hideous woman wanting to have some fun, should have no problem. Seeing is believing and I witnes…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:58 PM
1

a lot of perfectly normal-looking women Somehow I doubt the "a lot" and/or the "perfectly normal-looking". I have some very promiscuous female friends, who are just plain Janes and no models. They assured me that they can get sex anytime they leave their house. Didn't believe them at first, but have seen them do it to enough times to believe. A few looks and maybe a little hair flip and the boy usually comes running. Opened my eyes to just how easy it is for a woman. Felt like watching them stuf…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 09:25 PM
2

If people actively have to suppress their gag reflex when they see her, then she will need to wait untill some guys are drunk. But she will still be fine. Men will fuck repulsive women, women they hate, women they absolutely don't want to be seen in public with. Men are horndogs and women getting sex is no achievement. Really don't understand how women get any validation from having guys want to have sex with them. Show me the number of guys that actually wants to date you. If that number is any…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:51 PM
2

She might need to wait a little longer for a man to approach her and not say no when that happens. Unless you think waiting to get approached is an activity, there's nothing for her to do "harder".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:36 PM
1

In a thread full of condescending remarks, you managed to stand out with your condescension. I'm repulsed and impressed at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:26 PM
2

People don't get praised for doing something easy, they get praised when they do something hard. When both a man and a woman are being promiscuous, only one of them is doing something that's hard to do. So it's only natural that only one of them gets praised.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 08:08 PM
3

I achieved the ability to sleep around through building a career, working out in the gym, overcoming my introverted nature. It was hard work. My promiscuity is proof of my dedication to self improvement. A promiscuous woman only needs to lack obvious birth defects to be able to sleep around. Her promiscuity is proof of her self indulgence and lack of impulse control. It's easy for her to rack up numbers. I'm not a hypocrite for not wanting to date a promiscuous woman as a promiscuous man. Men an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:58 PM
2

Women get sex by default without improvement...if they're already hot. All a woman needs to do to get sex is not have any obvious birth defects and not say no. "Already hot" is not a requirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:41 PM
0

Oh, so you were doing the guy you don't agree with a favor. Nice of you...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:34 PM
0

Prime example of not taking responsibility of your own actions. You did something but I should ask someone else for their reasons? Ok, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:21 PM
0

The weather today is fine 😂... No, tried it myself, it's definitely weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:16 PM
0

Really? You did something weird because the guy you don't agree with also did it? Maybe you two have more in common than you both realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:09 PM
0

Never understood why people who don't say anything funny, end their message with a laughing emoji.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 07:02 PM
1

You made me smile, so I think you are funny too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:54 PM
1

Women are the ones deciding romantic interaction, men are the ones deciding relationships. This explains everything about your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:41 PM
9

Skip everything but that last sentence. Same results with less words.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:21 PM
3

Men die in wars protecting women and children because they want to stroke their own ego? Lol, I don't know how to have a discussion with a batshit crazy person. Best of luck to you and everybody that has to engage with you in real life, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 06:12 PM
4

That's why millions of men died in wars throughout history and sacrificed themselves defending women and children not fighting in those wars. Because "masculinity is concerned with the self over others".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/22 05:47 PM
0

You still talking? Lol, you do realize I don't take you serious and you're just a joke to me? And this is me being friendly and spelling it out to save your crazy ass some time.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 10:37 AM
1

Lot of words confirming exactly what I said.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/22 08:48 AM
2

My abuse of power? Of course, to you all men are abusers. Sorry, you can't tell the difference between logic and abuse of power. You're nuts.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 04:40 PM
1

And that doesn't even touch on how many of the men who give these reasons will use this as a double standard and think it's totally fine if the man has had 58 sexual partners. You don't seem to understand men and women are different. And because they are different sleeping around means different things for them. Because it's easy for a woman (don't say no and lack obvious birth defects and you're good to go) and very hard for a man (you need game, money, above average looks, decent career, socia…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 01:23 PM
6

You don't seem to understand that men and women are different. A man who's able to sleep around, is a man who displays a lot of qualities society regards as valuable. Low value men can't sleep around. Sleeping around for men is hard. A woman doesn't need to be a high value woman to be able to sleep around. She just needs to not say no and don't have obvious birth defects. Sleeping around for a woman is comparable to stuffing yourself untill you have an indigestion at a free banquet. It's easy. S…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 01:11 PM
1

You overestimate our advancement. People whos natural smell is pleasing to you, are more compatible with you on a genetic level than those you think smell bad. You won't date people, if you think they stink. You will think that you made the conscious choice not to date them, but it was your nose telling you that their DNA is not compatible with your DNA. (https://www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2019/11/19/key-study-the-sweaty-t-shirt-study-wedekind-et-al-1995/). We are a lot less advanced th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 11:04 AM
1

The four sixes: at least six feet high, a 6-pack, 6 figure income, 6inch D.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 10:53 AM
1

If she is taken then SHE should behave as such. You are not a part of the relationship between her and her boyfriend and have no responsibility to that relationship. I would never date a girl who cheats on her boyfriend. But if she is pretty and up for some casual fun, her boyfriend is her problem to deal with and I will treat her like she behaves. If she acts single, I'll treat her as such.
/r/seduction23/07/22 01:01 PM
1

No, I based my understanding of women on all women I have met in my life. Those 3 women are outliers, like I already acknowledged in my previous response to you. So, it's a bit dissapointing that you suggest that I base my understanding of all women on those 3. I already acknowledged that I realize they are outliers. But with outliers the differences are more obvious, because they are even bigger. Those 3 women showed my how different sex is/can be for women. Sex to them is something that's alwa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 06:23 PM
2

You are on r/purplepilldebate. All women here call all men here red pill. And all men here call all women here feminist or FemaleDatingStrategy members. And no real debate happens...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 05:44 PM
2

They are outliers. And those daddy issues are not something they chose (one of them turned this way because of sexual assault). But they really opened my eyes on how different sex is for a woman and a man. I saw something on YouTube where they asked women what they bring to the table in a relationship. They all said a lot of things, but most of them mentioned "loyalty" as one of the first things they bring to a relationship. This surprised me, because to me as a man loyalty is a given and theref…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:32 PM
1

Your comment about women who have sex really disgusted me. Which one? That it is as easy for a woman to be promiscuous as it is to eat untill you have an indigestion at a free banquet? I'm not making stuff up. I have 3 female friends who are attractive and have daddy issues. They are open about their sex lives to me. They are way up in the triple digits. One told me how she had sex with 3 different men in 24 hours. If you are an attractive woman and you like sex, you can go to any bar and walk o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:43 PM
2

You don't seem to understand that men and women are different. A man who's able to sleep around, is a man who displays a lot of qualities society regards as valuable. Low value men can't sleep around. A woman doesn't need to be a high value woman to be able to sleep around. She just needs to not say no and don't have obvious birth defects. Sleeping around for a woman is comparable to stuffing yourself untill you have an indigestion at a free banquet. If I tell you that a certain man sleeps with …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:40 PM
1

because you keep claiming it’s impossible for women to think 80% of men are below average. I am saying it’s perfectly possible since it’s not the same as statistical averages we’re talking about subjective attraction You say that I'm claiming it's impossible for women to think 80% of men are below average. I'm going to quote myself from my previous answer to you, because I literally said : "A woman CAN think that 80% of men are below average (because it's just her opinion and indeed subjective),…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 06:13 PM
0

Yeah, facts and logic don't really work on women, I agree with that one...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:26 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:11 PM
1

You are still repeating exactly what I said, but act like we are saying different things. A woman can think that 80% of men are below average (because it's just her opinion and indeed subjective), but statistically that's not something that's possible. 50% of men will be better looking than the average man and 50% will be uglier. Because that's exactly the definition of what average is. It also points to the ridiculous standards women have for men. If men would be as demanding as women and would…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:06 PM
3

Many women's standards are high. They have high standards for men. They don't have those standards when it comes to what they themselves bring to a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:07 PM
1

You are repeating exactly what I said. Women rate 80% of men as below average. What point are you trying to make?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:03 PM
4

I never said it is impossible to not be attracted to 80% of men. You guys need to learn how to read before you start attacking someone on what they wrote. I wrote that it's impossible for 80% of men to be below average. Because all men together determine what an average man is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 01:11 PM
9

No, that's complete BS. You can't make up your own definition of what average is and except to have a meaningful discussion. To come to a "standard of looks" like you call it, you still have to consider all men. You can't only look at the good looking ones and define their looks as the standard. When most of men neglect their looks like you say they do, the standard of what a beautiful man is gets lowered. Because you have to consider all men when you want to reach a standard or an average. So, …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 12:51 PM
14

It's not statistically possible for 80% of men to be below average. Can't believe I even have to explain this. Statistically 50% of men should be above average and 50% should be below average, because that's what average means.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 12:10 PM
20

You are a woman, women rate 80% of men as below average, even when this is a statistical impossibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 11:20 AM
2

Refreshing to meet a woman in todays age with a realistic, down to earth view on what she desires in a partner. I'm sure it will work out for you, most of your competition is taking themselves of the market with unrealistic demands. All the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:51 AM
1

Oh yes, the old myth again that doing chores will make her jump your bones. Guys, if a woman isn't having sex with you, the amount if chores you did or didn't do, never is the real reason. Go ask any man who believed this crap, how helping more in the household has influenced his sex life. He will tell you that it didn't. Story always goes like this. Dead bedroom situation blamed on lack of helping out in the household. Man starts doing chores. Man gets one or two pity fucks in the beginning bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:13 AM
3

After reading this whole thread, your height is not the problem, it's your insufferable personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 10:11 AM
1

What i wanted to convey is that qualifying in the 4 sixes doesn't make a man dating material to women of substance who aren't shallow. He still needs to be attractive in other more substantial ways. Now you make it sound like the 4 sixes are not enough in themselves, but are still a requirement. Is being attractive in other more substantial ways in itself enough for you? Or do you need the substance and a little bit of the four sixes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 05:06 PM
2

My apologies. I read your comment and deducted that since you were dating a rich, good-looking guy with a big d who still wasn't good enough because of his values, that being rich and good-looking with a big d were also requirements of yours. If your actual requirements are that his personality has to be compatible with yours, you have very realistic requirements and I directed this comment incorrectly at you. Let's be honest, it's no secret that women usually date upwards. They even make jokes …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 04:33 PM
-1

So basically you want a man with high status, six figures, big dick, good looking and who also shares your goals, values, communication style,.... Requirement six figures If we only look for six figures earners, we are already excluding 84% of all men. We are left with 16% of all men that qualify for you dating pool. Requirement good looking If we only look at your good looking requirement you are excluding 90% of all men (80% of men are seen as below average by women according to research, so l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 03:51 PM
1

Check the dating statistics. 80% of the casual fucking is done by 10% of the men. Most average men do their fucking in relationships. Because they need to give something in order to get some.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:58 PM
1

Dating is one of those areas of life where the female and the male experience is so vastly different that neither should try to advice the other. You might luck out and give some advice that is actually helpful to the other gender, but that's what it is, just luck. You want actual advice, talk to someone who knows what they are talking about. Don't talk to someone who tries to imagine what could work for a man based on their experiences as a woman or vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:51 PM
3

I used to visit the red pill community in my younger days. They talked about self improvement, career advice, health, money, grooming. Women were an afterthought. Women were seen as a byproduct of improving yourself. Don't know if they got soft and decided to sit around and be whining losers, but that community used to be about men helping other men be better, not about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:40 PM
1

Really? Interesting, would you like to be so kind to back up your invented statistic with some actual proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:20 PM
13

You should learn to not take all words literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:17 PM
4

Because women don't cheat based on n count. I got a whole comment full of scientific papers that say that n-count and infidelity in women are highly related. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/konfzd/z/ghuvlbj
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:14 PM
10

Even a broken clock is sometimes right. Dating is one of those areas of life where the female and the male experience is so vastly different that neither should try to advice the other. You might luck out and give some advice that is actually helpful to the other gender, but that's what it is, just luck. A lot of women want to give dating advice because dating is easy for them, so they feel like experts and qualified to do so. While they are only qualified to actually help other women who are of…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:05 PM
6

OLD is a time sink and a self image destroyer for all men but the top 10%. That means telling 90% of men to do OLD is giving them bad advise (and that top 10% doesn't need advice). They will waist time, get nothing in return but some bar/restaurant bills and will come out the other end still alone but significantly less confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 01:48 PM
5

Oh yes we do...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 11:01 AM
1

It’s wild how many men find this offensive It's not offensive that women have a right to feel attracted or not.... What is wild is that you can't understand that if the exact same behavior can be classified as 'flirting' and as 'sexual harassment' based on the attraction of the person who is the receiver of the behavior, the person doing the behavior cannot know himself if he is sexual harassing or innocently flirting. Imagine a world where women have to take the initiative to find a partner. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:57 PM
2

most promiscuous women are childless Lol. Making up facts now? Good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 10:27 AM
1

Yeah, nowadays "screening" means sending 10 messages on a dating app before hooking up. Not risky behavior at all. Somehow it doesn't surprise me you only look at this from a woman's point of view. You don't mention paternity fraud. You don't mention getting tricked into not reproducing. Somehow shaming women for behavior that causes paternity fraud and evolutionary suicide is the problem. When there are estimates that say that 1 in 10 children is not the biological child of the man in the relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 12:04 PM
1

Stop telling me to get of Reddit. Your god complex is showing again. You think you are in a position to tell others what to do. Stop worrying about others. There is more than enough work on yourself. Begin with modesty. Come back when you learned that concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:22 AM
2

Humans are the only mammals where the female of the species doesn't display any outward signs of fertility. This gives women an advantage where they can use one man for his seed and another man to raise the offspring. The males of our species have in turn learned that promiscuous women come with a risk of paternity fraud and even evolutionary extinction (not spreading your genes because you think you are a father while in reality you are raising some other male's child). A promiscuous woman disp…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:16 AM
1

You are mistaken. I'm not a feminist. I'm not for equality only when it benefits me. I'm for real equality between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:18 AM
1

Judging people you don't know, like you are an all knowing god, means you are full of yourself. Funny you don't even realize how arrogant you come across.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:11 AM
3

You do understand that men and women are not the same, right? There are biological differences, differences in the way they think, etc... Men need to have a lot of qualities society deems to be desirable, to be able to be promiscuous (fame, money, athletic body, social savoir faire, good talker, not shy, daring, initiative taker,...). Women on the other hand just need to lack obvious birth defects and not say no, to do the same. So it's only logical that a promiscuous woman is not praised for he…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:58 PM
1

Ah, stop being so full of yourself. You are not the centre of the world. Nobody made you the authority on anything, especially not on people you don't know. How you got it into in that thick head of yours that you are in a position to judge, I'll never understand. It makes you look arrogant and insufferable. Judge yourself, there is plenty to judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:25 PM
1

Projecting much?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:42 AM
1

Man, you are full of yourself. I feel dirty thinking a conversation with you could go somewhere. The way you make assumptions about people you don't know, like you are some all knowing being. Do you masturbate while watching yourself in a mirror? You sound like the kind of person who does...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 11:09 AM
0

But most men do prefer their partners to be their age Not correct. If men could choose without being judged negatively for the choices they make, they would be dating 20 year olds until the day they are to old to get it up. We only get female energy, intimacy and fertility from our partners. It makes no sense to look for older partners when all a partner offers us is better at a younger age. Just take a look at the men who can attract any woman they want.The guys with enough money, power or fame…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter