TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Brief_Mongoose_7291 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,727 comments by Brief_Mongoose_7291 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,727 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

You'd be surprised to learn how many men still belive it's about looks It is. Always was, always will be. Unless I get totally disfigured in some freak accident, I will have endless attention with 0 effort. Granted, I'm an outlier in this regard, but it's not much different for men slightly below my attractiveness level.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 08:23 AM
–

The question is more about public sympathy. That crazy homeless guy gets 0 sympathy from regular folks; they would all want him to be behind bars or in an institution.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/26 08:04 AM
–

Where the fuck do you see that? Btw, there is a degree of difference between "My wife doesn't want to have sex with me" And "My wife doesn't want to eat feces directly from my bumhole" Everyone would agree that you are really pushing it with the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 09:45 PM
0

A belonging in a certain social class has nothing to do with a person being classy. You are using the right word but the wrong noun.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:38 PM
–

But why would they be concerned about something with a 0% probability of happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:35 PM
–

There is nothing to understand in your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:33 PM
–

where dudes assume their POV is the default and anything else is an aberration The irony is that you are saying that while replying in a thread where a woman is telling you (yeah, you specifically, because you somehow are unable to understand it) how women ENJOY reading about romance and generally good things happening to them, and then expecting that in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:31 PM
–

He's gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:25 PM
–

Kinda not the same. There would be a lot of bitching if those same men went to strip club :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:24 PM
–

I think most people are going to hold more concern for a person who is dangerous to half the population How exactly does that danger manifest? There are probably 100s of times more deaths of kids by their ppd mothers than deaths of women by incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 08:15 PM
–

Because 1 person made this topic and 1 person responded to you, that means men haven't moved on. Yeah, tracks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 06:12 PM
–

There is no evidence he had a psychotic break Because a normal person writes his screed and does the things he did.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 06:03 PM
–

because of their extreme callousness and entitlement Which stems from their mental health issues. Why are you disregarding that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 06:02 PM
–

It's not comparable. Why? Idk why y'all are comparing mental health diseases anyway. Why not? PPD is severe depression specific to post partum. Can a severe depression exist without it being originated from post partum? Idk. There's men doing push ups for that blouse wearing choad Tate. Women just laughed at them and moved on. And killed their kids :/ Idk why y'all can't do the same and move on. Most men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 05:59 PM
1

You have 4 degrees, how is that working out for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 06:41 AM
–

When trying to ragebait, at least give some seemingly credible reasoning and make it seem at least somewhat believable instead of just: "Single women should be exempt, even if they are childfree by choice."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 05:30 AM
1

I just like to be the last one to reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 09:51 PM
0

10% is very rare? What isn't very rare by your estimate, then? What % would put something above very rare?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 05:18 PM
1

I don't care much what you want. If you don't want a reply, don't comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 05:16 PM
0

Is there a reason it should be otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 01:21 PM
1

And Adam is not "ONLY" attracted to people who look like Sally. What does that have to do with Sally being straight? Straight isn't being attracted to specifically straight people, it's just being attracted to the opposite gender. I mean, Sally can be (and probably is) attracted only to straight men, but that's not Sally being straight, that's Sally being attracted to only straight men. So because couples spend time and talk, Sally isn't really interested in being with someone who at some point …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 01:18 PM
1

Oh, so you are against trans ideology as well. My mistake, I assumed otherwise. Almost all non-red people here are all on trans this and that, so I pegged you the same (no pun intended).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 01:12 PM
1

Not a thing. Never was, never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/26 10:58 AM
1

Yes, exactly: only to people of the opposite gender That's exactly what Adam is. He is people of the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 11:36 PM
1

Yeah, but can we not be judged on that please!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 12:20 PM
1

You are simply a gift that keeps on giving.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 12:18 PM
0

And it is a straight line to that from what you are arguing. A straight line to what exactly? What will be codified into law if we continue on this path?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 12:14 PM
1

You can be not attacted to bi people then lose attraction when you find out theyre bi This is literally the scenario from the post from the OP before she started making these validation posts on different subreddits. See how wrong you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 12:02 PM
1

It again comes down to proability, what's the chance a girl with aids would willingly spread it? Almost zero I would say. Again, irrelevant to the point I'm making and to the argument you are making. Your whole argument is that you ask about things that matter to you so you aren't blindsided. And that others should do the same. And my point was that you are biased. You ask about things that you consider highly probable that also matter to you. But, in doing that, you are missing tons of potentia…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 10:37 AM
1

Why? You aren't really consistent in your beliefs if you don't adhere to that logic. If you are all in on "EVERY TRANS WOMAN IS ACTUALLY A FULL-ON WOMAN!" but then you don't want to date them, it begs the question: why? If they are actually women like any other woman, what could be your reason for not wanting to date specifically them, but you are A-OK dating biological women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 08:23 AM
1

So should Sally be forced to date a lesbian woman? Who is claiming that? Sally is straight; she wants to date men. Adam is a man who wants to date Sally. Where do you see the disconnect here that led you to the leap of "logic" in the statement above? Because by your logic she'd be homophobic if she refuses. Then you don't understand my logic or logic at all, for that matter. Oh, that's right. Sally is a straight woman, attracted to straight men. Didn't "straight" mean attracted to the opposite g…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 08:16 AM
0

You don't need to complicate things so much with completely pointless and useless analogies. It's like you are physically unable to make an apt analogy in this case. I wonder why. You could just illustrate things as they are: Sally likes men who only like women. Adam likes women and men. Sally isn't interested. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 08:06 AM
1

Because she loses attraction. x2 But why? I'm not saying that she shouldn't lose attraction for any imaginable reason. I'm just asking what the reason is in this case. x2 The fact that they are not only attracted to women like herself. x3 Expand on this? What does that actually mean in practice? Are you EVER attracted to a person only like themselves? I don't understand your reasoning here at all. x3 They are advocating shaming her for having that preference, implying that shaming should be used…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 08:01 AM
1

False. True. Free speech is not unlimited. Threats are not protected speech. Doxxing is not protected speech. Yelling FIRE in a crowded theater is not protected free speech. Depends on the context. All of it. The problem people like you seem to have with rights is that you don't understand that you do not have the right to do whatever you want. You have the right to do whatever you want so long as it does not encroach on the right of another to do what they want. Oh, I understand that completely…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:54 AM
1

Ok, then we have no disagreements.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 07:27 AM
1

You are just proving his point. You are equating criticism to harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:26 PM
1

feminist logic Let's oxymoron the shit out of this oxymoron!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:24 PM
0

Erroneously labeling someone as "racist" "sexist" "homophobic" etc. which carries severe repercussions in the workforce and to their personal safety in the era of doxxing is ABSOLUTELY dangerous over what is, at the end of the day, personal preference. Suddenly, "you" people have issues with that :D Funny how the turns have tabled. Free speech does not include things that in modern life severely impact people's lives. It's not free speech to yell FIRE in a movie theater and it's not free speech …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:18 PM
1

But you (I mean women) have no qualms about using the "insecure" argument condescendingly towards men when they express any kind of apprehension with regards to women and their options.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:15 PM
1

Holy shit, dude...because she isn't into him when she finds that out. Why? It's no different than if she found out he likes anime and she doesn't want to date a dude who likes anime. Ok, so in this case, she doesn't like dudes who like anime. What does she not like in dudes who are bi? Or if he's into red pill content, and she doesn't want to date a guy who likes red pill content regardless of how he treats her. Great. So she doesn't like dudes who are into redpill. What does she not like in dud…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:09 PM
1

She is only attracted to men. So you don't consider bi men as men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:04 PM
1

Which insanity is it then? Who is pushing this agenda?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:03 PM
1

I can't say I've seen that in real life. Oh, but of course you can't :D I don't consider online reddit comments where I can't verify the person to be an example. Oh, but of course you don't :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 02:01 PM
-1

You dont only have to be worried about girls now. You have to be worried about men too. Oh, so you're just insecure. And you also have to worry that you can NEVER give him what a man can. Oh, more insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 01:50 PM
1

Her having Aids harms me and her dude. That's a different ballpark. That's completely irrelevant to the argument you are making. Your argument is "I ask about the things that mattered to me". So I was testing your argument with this. Her having AIDS seems pretty relevant, so why didn't you ask about that? You were probably expecting her to divulge such a thing, because it was a normal expectation to have, right? That's my entire point. You have a bias. You have certain things that you consider "…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 01:27 PM
1

Hmm, never knew most women eat shit but cool. I was referring to the things that you are inquiring about. My point was that those are the things that, for some reason, you have identified as important for you to know about. Some people would consider other things as such, such as your man being bi or not. It had nothing to do with my exaggerated example. It's always an educated assumption that the other person is telling the truth. You can never know 100%, everyone already does that. So my quest…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 12:58 PM
1

If an 18 year old woman refuses to date a crusty old man, is that age discrimination? Age is, after all, a federally protected characteristic too. Get a better analogy. In this case, there are about 100 completely valid (that almost everyone would consider such) reasons that she can list for her to refuse such an arrangement. But in the case we are discussing here, if Sally is extremely attracted to Adam and everything about him, but is like "EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW" towards the very same Ad…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 12:36 PM
1

It's not contradictory. The things that matter to me are in decent range on possibility for the average person. Those are the things that you identify as such. Nothing more, nothing less. And, btw, of course it's contradictory. Let me ask you something: why ask anything at all? Why don't you make an educated assumption about everything? Your scenario is very farfetched, but if her mouth is clean now then why does it matter, if she hides this then it shouldn't matter to me. So I would definitely …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 12:08 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 11:59 AM
1

That implies prior knowledge of things. How can you ask about something you have no information about? Like my example with eating shit that I used in my other reply to you, how in god's name would you think about asking that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 11:54 AM
1

The things that matter to me I have made sure to know them. But that's completely contradictory to: I really would not want to know. When you say that you have inquired about the things that matter to you, that's completely misguided. You have asked about 1% (completely arbitrary number) of potential dealbreakers while fooling yourself into thinking that's all you care about. You (we all do, I'm not singling you out here) care about A LOT more, but the thing is, you just make a strategic assumpt…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 11:52 AM
1

Do you extend the same courtesy to her? You wouldn't mind not knowing that she "had" a penchant for eating feces, for example?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 11:00 AM
1

Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:52 AM
2

Not trying to pass a test does not improve your academic record. Repeating nonsensical things for the argument at hand does not suddenly make it sensible and relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:35 AM
1

How do you build a strawman and lose to it? You tell me :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:34 AM
1

It's funny how many of these conversations are started by straight men. Why would this happen? Can you explain the reasoning? It's also ironic that you are saying that in a topic started by a woman. These straight men seem to think that women will responded to being shamed and will change their minds. So straight men are clamoring to shame women into having sex with bi men? And everyone wonders why the stereotype "woman vs logic" exists. Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:22 AM
1

Not trying to pass a test does not improve your academic record. Trying to get your professor to like you instead of learning the subject does not improve you academic record. Not trying to impress an employer does not help you get a job. Trying to get your interviewer to like you while having a shit CV does not improve your odds of getting a job. Not trying to complete a task does not help you keep a job. Trying to get your superior to like you instead of doing your job does not he.. Actually, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 08:18 AM
9

No, it isn't. It's only hypocrisy if you are acting like you don't have flaws to be "called out".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 07:22 AM
2

You seem to have a very specific scenario in mind What is so specific about that? If they are a good friend, you WILL meet all of their partners, and you WILL be the first person they go to if they are discontent in their relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 07:20 AM
0

You shooting your shot with Ashley on Tuesday might get you a different response than shooting your shot of Thursday. Yeah, but the response I get from Ashley while being fat as fuck on Tuesday will be the same as being fat as fuck on Thursday. The point of generalized advice is to remove as many things that always eliminate you from potential options.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 12:49 PM
0

Completely irrelevant. I'm not asking you to define it or describe it; neither is anyone asking for advice on how to attract someone. You are still aware of what affects it, generally, and that's what we're discussing here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 12:35 PM
0

But how would they know it's actually reality? Is everything you agree with reality, and the things you don't agree with fiction? If they apply the same reasoning, what makes them any more wrong or right compared to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 08:34 AM
0

You literally described your comment history :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 08:28 AM
0

There's a reason why the right wing works so diligently to keep people uninformed and uneducated. I think you should update your bias a bit. Long gone are the times when blue = educated/knowledgable. I would posit that the opposite is the case now. You should really check literacy rates per state currently. If you gobble up propaganda with no educational base to keep you grounded in reality, you're going to be an incredibly reliable voter who can be manipulated by fear and lies. You are literall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 08:27 AM
0

But no advice is going to be universal. Correct. Working out will make some women find you more attractive. Also correct. Some women will find you less attractive. Not correct at all. Like, I know 0 (ZERO) women (and I know a lot of women) who would prefer the guy in the before pic (mind you, I'm not talking about men with body and mental issues who are already fit but keep insisting on going to the gym until they become pure muscle mass). Some women it won’t move the needle. For most, it will, …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 08:19 AM
7

but that’s not the case How conclusive is that stance of yours? I posit that what I'm about to say is true for the overwhelming majority of women: If you tell a woman that some guy struggles with women, without any additional context, regardless of whether she utters it or not, her initial thought will be "It's probably because he's a misogynistic or simply a shitty person."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 07:55 AM
10

Did the guy just say "Im lonely" and then was blamed Are you acting like this isn't something that happens often? Whenever the guy says he is lonely (without any additional "context" that you like to add to that), he will be met with a barrage of "Women don't owe you sex/relationship!!!!!" and "Why do you feel entitled to sex/relationship?!??!"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 07:37 AM
6

But if the latter happens more than the former, how can the former be the norm or normal, and the latter isn't normal in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/26 07:35 AM
1

Men don’t like that women have financial expectations. Do women like that men have sexual expectations?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 10:05 PM
–

I just repeated what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 12:51 PM
3

You are what we call a "useless outlier". An outlier that is a result of an error or a mistake in noting the data. Essentially not a data point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:55 AM
1

Even if he doesn't do literally anything else after that, you got a free drink, and you both went your own way at the end of the night, you never even exchanged a word with each other. Is that approaching?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:35 AM
1

You didn't do anything beforehand; he just bought drinks for you. Is that approaching?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:12 AM
1

Ah you’d like women to do everything while the guy does nothing? Haha nice try. Would you consider a guy buying drinks for you and your company as him approaching you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 11:00 AM
2

Actually, great reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:57 AM
1

Coincidentally, there is a whole movement of men right outside my door protesting that their wives won't have sex with them after calling their post-childbirth bodies blobs of goo with a fuckhole. Who exactly is excusing and advocating for men who insult their wives after childbirth? Why are you using such moronic arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:35 AM
1

And an awful lot of guys do not want to address that. And an awful lot of women do not want to address that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:31 AM
1

Would you mind if your husband/partner doesn't show any signs of affection towards you, doesn't kiss you, doesn't hug you, doesn't say he loves you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:29 AM
1

Only in cases where the mom allows it and doesn't fight it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:22 AM
1

Neither is doing housework and taking care of the kids. What even is in the marriage contract?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:21 AM
3

Then why marry and have vows if they mean nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:19 AM
2

No one is entitled to intimacy in marrige, but they are entitled to a healthy relationship Why? Why are you entitled to one and not the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 10:18 AM
1

How ironic :)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 08:37 AM
–

You said that Hitler was your favorite painter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 08:17 AM
1

It never fails to eventually become a point of contention when a woman is outearning her man to such a degree. I hope you are the outlier to that ironclad rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 08:11 AM
0

Your words: a lot of guys on this forum are claiming that most men are either toiling away on oil rigs or making millions as entrepreneurs Where? If it's a lot, it shouldn't be a problem to find a few examples of what you are claiming here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 07:59 AM
1

This is absurd. What exactly is absurd about it? You can’t speak for most people. Neither can you. But I can speak for myself, exactly like I have been doing. I have incredible friends who are brimming with You’re simply refusing to acknowledge it while insisting on understanding the OP’s perspective.-confidence and possess a strong sense of self-worth. Their identity or sense of value doesn’t depend on male validation or envy of others. I'm so happy for you. Even being married I receive more at…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 07:57 AM
1

You could use literally the same line of argumentation to intimacy in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/26 06:02 AM
3

a lot of guys on this forum are claiming that most men are either toiling away on oil rigs or making millions as entrepreneurs Who's claiming that? Where are all those "a lot of" guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/26 10:59 AM
4

Great. Do you also say, "We need to be friends first before we get into a relationship"?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:50 PM
0

You’re being purposefully dense. Hm, it seems like you are doing this. Do you not talk about contraception or STDs prior to having sex? If you don’t discuss what will happen if an accidental pregnancy happens (ESPECIALLY if you don’t wear a condom), you deserve anything that happens after 🤷‍♀️ A conversation takes 5 minutes You are deflecting. None of that was the topic of this discussion. The discussion was specifically about parental testing, where the guy was saying that you could never ever …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:48 PM
4

But that same man isn't saying that "We need to be friends first" while also saying "There is nothing worse than someone I thought was my friend suddenly becomes romantically interested in me!"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:43 PM
2

I don’t need his comment explained to me. Judging by the way you interpreted it, yeah, you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:23 PM
12

We only dread it when we have zero romantic interest in said guy friend. Do you not see the issue with this statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:04 PM
1

You also committed sexual violence!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:33 AM
7

It’s so interesting you all think ugly men are altruistic and nicer. Lol. It's interesting that you interpreted his simple sentence the way you did. He simply meant that she would have a better chance that way. The ironic thing is that you would give the same advice to an ugly guy, yet this is how you react to this :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:31 AM
21

OP: "I don't know why anyone would be in this very situation I'm willingly in." Me: "I don't know, maybe you can tell us?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:17 AM
0

So you talk about DNA testing before sex with every partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:13 AM
1

Again, you don't understand. It's not that it's harder for men because they are expected to approach; it's that it's 10x harder. You fundamentally don't seem to understand the difference in the amount of interest women receive vs men, and that shows in your example with your gorgeous friend. You didn't suddenly stop existing for those men; they just reserve some of their interest for her as well, even though they were talking to you. You still have plenty left. But with women's interest in men, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:11 AM
1

I reckon we have ourselves here a dirty lier. That we do...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 04:45 PM
2

However, if being around successful friends causes you to feel insecurity instead of confelicity, that will follow you into all of your relationships. You and the rest of the people here are missing the point completely. I have a couple of friends who are VERY successful, to say the least. I'm extremely happy for their success because I know how they got there, and each and every one of them has worked their ass off for every bit of that success that they enjoy now. I'm quite successful myself a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:36 PM
1

You are still missing the point. This is the guy that you would be at dinner with and be happy because he paid for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:25 PM
1

He was lying about it. And how was he lying? He was lying BY PAYING FOR DATES AND NOT GOING 50:50! How can you not understand that?! And you are vetting for that; you are vetting for liars to lie to you so they can use you and abuse you when you are in a relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:44 PM
1

Don’t hide behind fears, talk to other people and be yourself stay calm, you can only develop through action. I just vomited a bit. You are a walking soundboard of platitudes :D
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:40 PM
5

Why are you making it sound like you only have this “friend” in the hopes that their successes will rub off on you, like you’re doing LinkedIn networking or something? He didn't make it sound like that. In a weird kinda a way, he is literally saying the opposite of that. I don't understand how you managed to interpret it the way you did, completely opposite of what was said. Do you not have other things in common with this friend that keep you emotionally close? Why does that matter in this case…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:37 PM
1

It's not about what he was saying; it's about what he was doing. He was paying for all the dates. He wasn't going 50:50 on dates, HE WAS PAYING FOR THEM. You avoiding a "split the bill" guy will, ironically enough, land you the abuser that you think you are avoiding by avoiding the "split the bill" guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 01:15 PM
2

Doesn't work for me either; I'm just trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 12:43 PM
1

TRY HARDER
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 12:22 PM
2

More than 50% of people aged 18 to 25 in the US are overweight or obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:34 AM
3

Look, being sexually crazy about your bf is not some rare occurence but the baseline for healthy persons being in a relationship. I think that's a very rare occurrence. Most happy couples are "okish" sex wise. It's just one of the things that are part of a relationship, nothing more. A pure, unbridled lust for your partner is probably rare. At least judging by my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:32 AM
1

If you aren't fat and of average height, you aren't average.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 11:04 AM
2

I think they are relatively rare. You don't think so? Are most of your female friends in happy relationships? But we are getting off track here. We were specifically discussing happy relationships where the guy isn't a chad and the woman still reveals her crazy sexual/horny/desperate side to her partner. Those are very rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 10:57 AM
3

You are missing the point. I'm objecting to your argument. The guy you replied to said: ... that most men will never get to experience To which you replied with a scenario that is very rare in reality. But that only confirms his initial premise; you didn't counter it with anything substantial.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 10:16 AM
4

Are you the one calling Pedro Pascal mid But she can still like him if his personality is stellar. So it's not all lost for our boy Pedro Pascal! He just has to try more in the personality department!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 10:10 AM
11

Yes, women and men are both shallow but men are excused for their shallowness, whereas women are chastised and told to focus on personality, much more than men are. I have no idea what reality you are living in, but it's not the one the rest of us populate. How are men excused for their shallowness? They are constantly branded as shallow and nothing more, like they don't care about the basic of someone's personality. How are women chastised for their shallowness? Who ever tells them to focus mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 10:05 AM
8

I'm sure that you are deep diving into every word of every profile you run into :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 09:58 AM
3

just because it's rare it doesn't mean it's unachievable? No, it doesn't mean that it's unreachable, it just means that your point is moot in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 09:57 AM
2

TRY NOW
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 09:34 AM
1

This is actually hilarious. Here: A link to you being wrong So, now that we have established that you are completely wrong (a surprise to literally no one), this begs the question of how women like you are actually vetting men. There is literally no basis to conclude what you did based upon the guy splitting the bill, and yet here we are. You are unable to recognize and identify basic psychological patterns of behavior, and you are assigning completely wrong meaning to the things that you think …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 07:25 AM
1

I understand perfectly what she meant, but that's completely irrelevant to our discussion. What does that have to do with him being 50:50 and resenting her for earning more in her main vocation? Can you explain the reasoning?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:05 PM
1

He isn't a 50:50 man. A 50:50 man has no reason to be angry about his wife earning more. Why would he be angry at that? Do you know who would be angry about his wife earning more? A man who thinks he is supposed to be a provider :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:29 PM
1

Why would he resent it if he was 50:50 man? There is no reason to resent it in that case. But if he was pretending to be a provider and she is earning more, of course he is going to resent her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:28 PM
1

Why would he resent the fact that she is earning more if he is a 50:50 man? That doesn't make any sense. The only reason to resent her in this case is if you are cosplaying a provider and you can't cut it. He is a "Don't touch the bill!!!!" man. It's so obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:16 PM
2

And I clearly said that he is "The bill is MINE!" man. It's obvious. You would have to be oblivious not to notice it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:15 PM
1

It's a full-on patriarchal "I'm gonna take this bill!!!" man. That's what you get when you marry such a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:07 PM
1

No it’s clear to me that he was the type that demanded to split the bill. I see that as quite the opposite. He seems like someone who was paying for every dinner, trying to wow her. He seems patriarchal like that. He wasn’t a provider. She provided too, but he resented that he made more money. He earns more. She earns more from her main career, but he works more and brings in more. You need to learn how to read with understanding. It can help you with all aspects of your daily life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 01:06 PM
1

Good thing then that I'm not using your reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:45 PM
1

You’ve done nothing but prove me correct. How? I'm sure that he paid for every dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 12:43 PM
1

I'm just messing with ya! But please tell him the child isn't his when the time comes. Enjoy your wedding.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 11:36 AM
1

Have you told him that it wasn't his? :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 11:01 AM
0

You have a discussion on what their views are. Do you not try and get to know your partner on a deeper level? Asking what their views on abortion or paternity testing isn’t absurd. Have you discussed this before sex with any of your partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 10:59 AM
6

Or just lazy :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 10:38 AM
0

He literally answered your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 10:01 AM
2

I don’t think emotional immaturity is limited to any gender. You will find a lot of dissent from your "kind" on this very topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 09:57 AM
2

“When I go out on the town” does not mean I wear makeup every day. It means that you wear makeup 100% of the time you are going out. Going on a date is going out. You would wear makeup by default. Wtf are you even going on about if you agree that the work I put into my looks is effort? Again, you are missing a point. Take me for example. I am extremely good-looking and have a physique that takes a lot of effort to maintain. To make a parallel, you saying that you are putting in effort by doing y…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 09:41 AM
–

I disagree with the guy usually being uglier. I see fit men with fat women far more often than the reverse. The same exact experience. I have no idea what the guy was looking at but this is what I often see, especially in my gym circle. Uber-fit guys with pudgy girlfriends are so common that it became a sort of joke between us. Whenever a guy gets a good-looking fit girlfriend, everyone is like "you couldn't do better than that? all the good ones were taken?" I also disagree with height being ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 08:17 AM
2

I have never said I am “always wearing makeup.” In fact, I only wear makeup for the most part for dates, going out. and important work things. I sweat too much at the gym and swim almost daily so it doesn’t make sense to wear makeup every day. You literally said that. I am 49 years old. I know who I am and how I like to be. When I go out on the town, I wear makeup 100% of the time. It’s not a mask, it’s part of my outfit because I love fashion and want the whole outfit to be a statement. This is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:53 AM
2

By that reasoning, I would conclude that most women are whores because men are supposed to pay for their time and affection :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:32 AM
4

I didn’t say splitting the bill is domestic abuse. Of course you did. You linked a post about an abusive husband and said that those are the men that you are trying to avoid by not seeing men who are splitting the bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:31 AM
2

Why does it matter why a woman wears makeup? It doesn't. That's the point. You were trying to make it seem like an effort women specifically do for dates, but in the very next breath you say that you are always wearing makeup regardless. So is it one or the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:26 AM
0

I am 49 years old. I know who I am and how I like to be. When I go out on the town, I wear makeup 100% of the time. It’s not a mask, it’s part of my outfit because I love fashion and want the whole outfit to be a statement. This is part of who I am. I’m a dancer and looking a certain way is part of that. So you going on a date has nothing to do with you wearing makeup, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:22 PM
5

So women always wear makeup for themselves, except when going on a date, then they wear it for the date even though they would wear it for themselves anyway? Am I doing this right?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:18 PM
3

It should be 100/100. How does this look when the bill comes?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:16 PM
4

Holy Leap to the Sun and back again, Batman! I don't even know why I actually expected an example of financial abuse (not that it would be any more logical, but still). No, just straight-up abuse. Guy wants to split a bill = domestic abuser :D
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 10:16 PM
8

A gay man. Very important distinction. His dating experience will be much closer to that of a hetero woman than a hetero man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:54 PM
2

"I'm not asking how women think" Yes? Anything wrong with that statement? You've already stated that you're not interested in listening. How did I state that? I didn't say "I don't give a fuck how women think!". I didn't even imply that. I just clarified that I want specifically your opinion on this; I was asking you. Then I don't have to answer. Of course you don't. Nobody is forcing you to. But I think everyone who is reading this exchange knows your answer to my question even if you refuse to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 09:49 PM
2

No, it doesn't. It's a simple and concise question that you are refusing to answer. It's not even a highly hypothetical question, I've seen this exact scenario happen with my friends, and I'm guessing that it happens fairly often when bi men try to hide their proclivities (you can't hide something like that for long).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 08:48 AM
3

Then we better start actually looking into options to make motherhood more appealing. I guarantee you that if we had a way to assist parents so there was no risk of sleep deprivation or them losing freedom and their life prior to having children (having spare time and being able to have dates/trips together with their partner), more women would have kids Literally does nothing. The countries with the best childcare benefits have low birth rates (not the lowest, but low).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:41 PM
3

I'm not asking how women think; I'm asking you a simple question. Why are you unable to answer it? Would anything change in your case?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:45 AM
3

I don't understand you. If you find a guy to be the sexiest guy alive without knowing he is bi, are you telling me that nothing would change in the way you feel about him if you find out that he is bi with actual experience (in practice, meaning he has experience with man/men)?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:16 AM
2

It's not biphobia if you are disgusted by only one aspect of that concept while the other is perfectly fine. You are not phobic of the entirety of bi, just the gay part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:59 AM
1

Maybe you are correct; phobia could be the wrong term for this. What is the term that encompasses disgust? This is more like that. You see, the issue here is if you look at the guy and you want to fuck his brains out and he wants to do the same to you, you are so incredibly attracted to him. But then you find out that he had a dick up his arse, or in his mouth, or he had his own dick on some other man's orifice, even just once, and you are immediately disgusted and all the attraction vanishes in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:54 AM
18

The life that you think no longer exists, does exist… in China. You.. haven't been to China :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:59 AM
8

Most of the people around me could afford children and would probably be good parents, but it just gets in the way of doing fun things. That's something I've been constantly telling people whenever someone mentions the cost of raising kids and whatnot. No one gives a fuck about that; people who want kids will have them regardless, and people who don't want kids will not have them even if they were to get tremendous childcare benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:57 AM
4

It's not my argument It is. You mentioned exactly this and variations of this as a retort to people asking what the issue is with asking more than once. and no good faith interpretation of it could have possibly led you to that conclusion. I don't need good faith interpretation. Literal interpretation is enough. If this is your answer to someone asking what the issue is with asking more than once, then you logically have the same issue in asking even once. If someone says, "But what's the issue …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:48 AM
1

I don't have an issue with them. You just don't give a fuck about them. Other women are like that as well. So what argument do you have for them to be as popular, as appreciated, to earn as much as men when you, and other women, don't give a fuck about those sports? You don't watch them, you don't attend the matches, you know nothing about any of the clubs or players, but you are always ready to use them in an argument about the equality of pay and whatnot. Great. That's you guys who refuse to w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:32 AM
1

I would have specific things to say. You don't. No, you wouldn't. You would say that it's shit. You would expand on that if pressed further, as I did, but your initial reaction would be "It's shit". Why spend any more time than necessary on something that is shit? They have to introduce these characters somewhere. That wasn't an introduction. Iron Man is an introduction of a character. Captain America: The First Avenger is an introduction of a character. Spider-Man: Homecoming is an introduction…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:24 AM
1

Translation: "because I said so." As I said, it would be the same if someone asked you about the movie you consider shit. You would also say the same exact thing. You say you saw the movie and yet you say that? What's wrong with me saying that? Is the plot of the movie irrelevant? Is pacing irrelevant? Is bombarding the audience with characters you know nothing about, expecting them to know full history, irrelevant? The last part actually annoyed me the most. I was waiting for you to drag that o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:09 PM
8

But this is your argument. You stated this. Do you not stand by the things that you state or?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:20 PM
9

By saying that "Women can tell you when they want sex". That implies that you don't ever need to ask for sex; you will be informed when a woman wants sex. Anything beyond waiting for them to tell you when they want that sex is pestering, even asking once. That's your stance.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:17 PM
1

"It was utter shit because, uh, well, uh, REASONS!!!" Because it was shit. You also have movies that you consider shit, and when someone asks you about that movie, you tell them it's shit. I mean, I can elaborate why I consider it shit, because I, unfortunately, against my better judgment, went to see the movie. The plot is shit, the pacing is shit, the sudden introduction of tons of new characters that we are somehow supposed to all know about because we are supposed to be watching 10 other dif…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:14 PM
–

That you don't even understand what irony is, let alone hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:16 PM
2

How many women do you think are acting the same as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:16 PM
1

How about changing yours to manstericalfit? I don't tolerate your insolent backtalk, this conversation is over. Sorry, it was just a stupid quip! Can't help it when you have such a pretentious handle. Men or women? That part's untrue. Yeah, literally everyone. Women are half the population. If they wanted something to be popular, it would be popular. You are seriously overestimating the "power" of "manbabies". Or are you considering almost all men as "manbabies"? That could also be an explanatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:15 PM
–

I was also going for the absurd end of the argument just as you did. I was focused more on the socialist/communist angle since that's what those modern progressives are going for currently. That aims to flatten society completely as a socialist/communist utopia descends upon us. But then those same women advocating for that kind of society don't see the "flattened" men as their peers or potential partners; they are aiming for the ones that are above the system that they themselves are advocating…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:03 PM
–

The irony of having that as your handle and completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:56 AM
2

I think your lots is everyone's problem!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:39 AM
5

Ok, you don't have to ask for sex at all. By your own argument, you shouldn't. Otherwise, it's coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:38 AM
–

I don't think the fact that most volunteers at an animal shelter wouldn't date a stray dog makes them somehow "fake animal shelter volunteers". This is your argument. This isn't at all analogous to what OP is saying. If we wanted to make your example analogous to what OP is saying, it would be: Progressive men and women are fighting tooth and nail for a society where all women are homeless prostitutes, because that's what they consider an ideal society. Women being chaste and family-oriented is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:01 AM
–

Opposition control primarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:02 AM
–

communism and socialism are about goods, property and resources. Never was, never will be. women and sex aren't any of the things mentioned above bruh. Always were and always will be part of every equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 09:32 AM
3

What effort do you employ on your part?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:25 AM
4

The equivalent of this title is "If you are extremely attractive, you will get laid a lot. Women being attracted to you is a huge advantage."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:21 AM
1

I could have lots of answers, but I don't know how much that is. I was hoping you could help me with that because you seem to be aware how much lots is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:16 AM
9

But, by your own reasoning, "Women can tell you when they want sex", so what gives you the idea that you are allowed even one "No"? Again, what's the difference between one "No" and 2x"No" if "Women can tell you when they want sex"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:15 AM
1

And what is my number for lots?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:12 PM
20

No, he isn't trying to say that. He is asking you who you are to decide what is acceptable for another human, considering the fact that another human's own subjective mental state is the final arbiter of what is or what isn't an acceptable state for him/her to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:31 PM
21

This is a quote from you: Women can tell you when they want sex. If that's your reasoning, then asking even once is coercion. What's the difference between not asking, asking once, and asking twice if women can tell you when they want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:29 PM
4

Lots How many is lots? We can keep playing these games all day. Yup yup.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:20 PM
8

With the title of this post, you are replying in?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 04:06 PM
1

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Marvels, which got panned by the manbabies. Nothing wrong with Marvels other than it being utter shit. Kill Bill wouldn't do so well anymore Funny you should mention that. You obviously have no idea that there was a recent screening (end of last year) of Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair, a cut of the movie that seamlessly combined both Volume 1 and Volume 2. EVERYBODY WAS RAVING ABOUT IT, ALL THE MANBABIES AND EVERYONE ELSE LOVED IT! And you obviousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 02:18 PM
–

That's because angry man-babies boycott any show with women in any kind of prominent role. Or maybe they are shit? In general, if something is flopping at the box office, it means that no one (men or women) likes it. The Alien series would be shitcanned today because of Ripley, where she used to be quite popular with male viewers. So you are claiming that almost 50 years ago (and onward) people were more open to strong female characters than they are today? Maybe you should change your handle to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:58 PM
1

Can YOU differentiate? What is an extreme event? Can different people consider different things as extreme events, or do they need to contact you for your stance on something being or not being an extreme event?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:16 PM
-1

Wait till those same men find out how their partners react to them expressing emotions. It's gonna be so fun!!!! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:14 PM
2

Being selective pays off: Men who swipe right on less than 4% of profiles get 11.85% match rate. Swiping on everyone gets you 2.19%. That's a 3x difference. This is all I needed to figure out the quality of the article; they can't even copy the numbers from the table properly. Swiping on everyone gets you 3.95%. Being picky demonstrates that the user has value, and that they aren't mindlessly spamming their profile to everyone because they aren't desperate. No one wants a date who is desperate. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:49 PM
2

I said you haven’t shown they’re representative of society. Let me quote you as an answer to this: You’re still making the same unsupported leap. Because your first sentence is exactly that: an unsupported leap. Why are you acting like an arbiter of what's representative of broader society? Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok aren’t random samples of the population. They more or less are. But specifically of the younger population because they are the ones using those platforms the most. People choose…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 11:45 AM
5

My point still stands. But your point is, for lack of a better term, stupid. If someone gets 5 coffees off of 200 swipes, how would him being pickier improve his success? If we go by your reasoning and he actually reads all the profiles and out of those 200 women and then he narrows down his choice to 10, or even 20, statistically he probably filtered out each and every one of those 5 women that otherwise he would go to coffee with. So now he has 0 coffee dates. In what universe could that be co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:23 AM
3

You’re confusing “a lot of Redditors agree” with “this is what society believes.” You are also confusing "what society believes" with "I'm going to go with "society" argument even though I literally have no idea what broader society thinks about this thing". You are completely correct that he is conflating these things, but your argument can't be "society doesn't think that" based on literally nothing. Reddit is a self selected group with its own culture, biases, and echo chambers. But you see, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:41 AM
4

They were in the past, dude. Women having choice over pregnancy is a relatively novel idea caused by science more than some actual change in our biology. Good thing then that you are living in the present and that we are talking about the present and our current reality. I don't understand people like you. You say it's a novel idea, but for you it's your entire life, your entire existence; it was like that from the moment you were born. There is nothing "novel" for you regarding that. So why are…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 02:10 PM
7

War and child birth are those weird areas where you can't really shake the fact each gender is significantly the correct answer to the problem. Yeah, those weird areas where one group is FORCED without any choice on their part to go and die in a war, and the other group has full freedom of choice if they want to do "their part". So, could you stop using that comparison because it will never be appropriate unless women from Ukraine are suddenly FORCED without any choice on their part to become ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:49 AM
2

Because biologically there are higher costs to women of reproduction with the wrong man. So, logically, from that it follows that women should be the ones choosing and approaching the man. If the choice of the man is so important to get right, shouldn't they take a more active approach? Because socially, men are less selective with female partners than women are with male partners. Therefore, willingness to make a move is seen as distinguishing a man who is interested from one who isn't really b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 08:06 AM
4

So women are very rarely best partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 07:53 AM
0

but considering there's a reason incels are considered an international threat International threat :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 01:51 PM
3

Just don't call it a study.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 01:38 PM
0

It does. BB is being taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 12:06 PM
2

He defined it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 12:05 PM
1

So you guys want women to conclude that dating as the guy is hard after a woman was being a fucking idiot while she was posing as a guy? That’s really what you guys want us to take away from that? No. We want women to conclude that, even though they think they know everything (like you), they actually have no fucking idea what it's like to date as a man (again, like you), that's what we want. And that's what that video perfectly presented, and you are unable to comprehend that. You keep calling …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 12:00 PM
2

Why didn't you utilize your resources to work a higher-paying job that isn't in customer service?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:55 AM
1

What do you think your job should entail?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:41 AM
1

Talk to her? Communicate? You guys are so lazy, it shocks me. No wonder you guys suck at dating. THE ENTIRE POINT WAS NOT TO DO THAT. THE ENTIRE POINT WAS FOR HER TO DO EVERYTHING ON HER OWN BY ACTING AS A MAN, TO USE HER OWN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT WOMEN TO HER ADVANTAGE. Why is it so hard for you to realize that? Unlike her, I dont have a guy who can verify the dating account Why? Why don't you have anyone in your life who would do that for you? but you guys are men, you could verify the dating accoun…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 04:26 PM
1

Where is the praise for her in that comment? And I love it how even when the guy isn't the problem, a guy is the problem. How is he supposed to correct her during the experiment where he is supposed to have no effect on her actions (by design)? That was the point of the experiment. And after that, what would be the point of him correcting her? Will she cosplay a man again so she needs pointers? The entire point of the experiment was to see her point of view. No, we love people who aren't up in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:50 PM
–

I work in a commercial gym And judging by the rest of the post, you are actually at the tippy top of your career.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:29 PM
1

That tells me a lot about how you guys feel about accountability. She did so much shit wrong during that experiment and you guys are praising her. Who exactly is praising her for doing shit wrong? If she is praised, she is so because she was at least willing to try and experience it herself, as opposed to people like you who are certain of everything based on nothing. Show me a news article about this. I'm saying that's what they want. Just like your claim that men wanna be bimbos.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:22 PM
2

So by that logic, nobody should answer questions or share opinions about any group of people, because any observation about a group is a generalisation. This entire sub would barely function, it’s built on people discussing their thoughts. What is the definition of generalization? In your opinion, don't google it, just tell me what you think generalization is. Also, I did say why I felt women are less attractive too but hey you didn’t seem to have an issue with that generalisation huh. Yes, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:18 PM
1

See, you guys wish you could function like bimbos. It’s not that it’s impossible for a guy to get matches or be successful on dating apps. You guys just want to function like you’re bimbos. So women just want to become CEOs on demand. It's not impossible for a woman to become a CEO any more than it is for a man. They are just lazy and unmotivated compared to men. That's all there is to it. Then why are you guys showing women dating experiments like these? Because you asked for that. This was you…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:11 PM
1

She didnt boost, she didnt verify, she doesnt show her profile, which seemed to have been generic from what she said, and she only posted two pictures when it seems Tinder allows up to 9 pictures. She thought his looks and being a psychologist was going to carry him. As I said, this is how women think, how easy it is to be a man. The perfect example of the delusion. She’s an idiot and anyone who agrees with her is an idiot too. She's thinking like any random woman on Tinder. It’s always fascinat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 02:49 PM
2

This was when specifically asked if I (NOTE THAT MY PERSONAL OPINION was asked) think men are now less attractive hello. To which you can say that you don't want to generalize. You chose to generalize. After that, you say that you would never generalize. Also, it’s barely a generalization If I say: Women have become less attractive You don't think that almost every woman would say that I'm generalizing about women? I FEEL That doesn't make it less of a generalization. You feel, therefore, you ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 02:14 PM
2

For someone not generalizing, this is pretty generalizing: Yes I do think men (somehow feel the need to disclaim I don’t mean alll men) have become less attractive. Not necessarily physically, but in terms of outlook and behavior. Decades ago, black/red/whatever pill, incel rhetoric, endless 50/50 discourse weren’t nearly as mainstream. Now, a noticeable number of men have adopted those worldviews, build entire identities around them, reinforce one another and become increasingly radicalised. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:52 PM
1

I don't think she's pretending.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:50 PM
1

So five out of the seven days, she decided to get picky. 3 out of 5 or 2 out of 5, depending on when on day 3 she started being picky. Judging by the video, she wasn't doing anything after day 5 other than wallowing in "self-pity". And again, if you swipe on 100+ people the first 2 days, it's completely irrelevant that she got picky after that. Those initial likes still remain. The issue was that neither was producing tangible results. So she spent the majority of the time going after women she …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 01:50 PM
2

Let me ask you something, you are claiming that men in my life don’t ask for much except to be doted on and supported by their woman instead of having more problems piled on. Why don't you generalize that same thing to the rest of the male population?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 11:56 AM
5

Based on my experiences, men in my life don’t ask for much except to be doted on and supported by their woman instead of having more problems piled on. This is one of my favorite things. Somehow, magically, all the men in some random woman's life are great, but all the other men are shitty, and each woman thinks like this :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 11:48 AM
1

5:30 proves you wrong. Yes, right after saying that she was swiping on everything like a maniac, she decided that it might be better if she was more selective by matching with attractive women, even though not even less attractive ones were matching with her (can anyone wrap their mind around that "logic"?). You are acting like, suddenly becoming more selective for just 1 day, the previous swipes where she was matching with literally everyone were somehow erased? What the fuck :D Again, she fell…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 11:41 AM
2

And how right are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:49 AM
3

How right do you need to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:44 AM
1

And if there was no fat shaming, they would still be fat but not hateful and broken, right? And "many people"? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:42 AM
2

In your valuation, have women become less attractive in the last 20 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:41 AM
1

We could tell that to each and every woman who has trouble climbing the corporate ladder while her male peers zoom right past her. If she wants to be lazy and do nothing, that's on her!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:32 AM
3

She immediately said she started getting picky She literally said the opposite of that. She said that she started swiping on literally everything, on women who she didn't consider attractive, because no one was replying in any meaningful way. It's funny how she became depressed by the experience in like 5 days, and it wasn't even her :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:29 AM
3

but to also reveal their personalities You don't care about that if the pics don't match :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:19 AM
5

That you guys intentionally ignore multiple factors. You are literally describing each and every one of your posts/comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:16 AM
2

Love how you assume you know me better than me. You sure? You don’t even know me much less did any research lol. On the contrary, I don’t care what anyone’s standards are. I don't assume that I know you better than you know yourself. What I assume is that you are lying if you are claiming that you don't care about standards at all. I'm claiming you don't care RIGHT NOW because you find them acceptable and you interpret that as not caring about standards. Why do you bother so much about what peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 09:49 AM
1

Which ones haven't?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:58 AM
2

hey are attracted to other things instead. Like what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:50 AM
6

Granted I don’t do statistical research, but the rest of it are just my opinions and I don’t see how it isn’t in good faith. That's the definition of bad faith arguing. You don't research things that are really easy to check, and then you base your opinions on literally nothing at all, and then hide behind it with an argument, "but that's just my opinion". It's like claiming that you aren't arguing in bad faith if you keep claiming the sky is pink and the other guy is saying no, it's fucking blu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:41 AM
0

Just acknowledge you were wrong bro. He isn't wrong. He is literally reading the definition you provided. Being corrected isn't a big deal. You seem to be trying really hard for someone claiming that :) Refusing to learn, digging in your heels, insisting you are correct when you aren't is a waste of time. Hmmmmmmmmmm............. Irony anyone? Do you really want to be as smart today as you are ever going to get? If not, be open to learning new things. Doubly whammy of irony, anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:11 AM
0

They would be completely useless as a movement without support from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 01:20 PM
2

Lack of draft limits state's ability to do dumb shit. No, it doesn't. Because your country can institute a draft at any point in time if they deem it necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 01:19 PM
4

What's traditional feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 01:33 PM
0

Yeah, I skipped it instantly and just wrote my comment. I will do the same next time as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 07:59 PM
1

You mischaracterized my argument with a massive straw man claiming that I said that the only way to work hard is with a college degree. I didn't. I asked you if that's your own opinion. It was a question. I asked it 2 times. It's a fair question when someone frames something as "this group of people does something super positive, and this group of people does this shitty negative thing," while ignoring 99% of things in between. I see that logic wasn’t one of the courses that you pursued in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:55 PM
0

Maybe your issue is functional literacy? Maybe it's yours if you need a machine to string simple sentences for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:43 PM
1

Shall we evaluate how we got here? First there was this: Having confidence and work ethic is not acting like a conservative, jfc. To which you wholeheartedly agreed (btw I agree with this as well), but in a way that you equalized confidence and work ethic, specifically with college, by saying: Seriously. Liberal men are more likely to have college degrees and conservatives are more likely to have dropped out of high school And then I challenged that with: The only work is the one you do with a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:40 PM
0

So much for no AI here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:52 PM
2

If you found college easy, you didn’t go to a good college. One of the best European STEM colleges. Scholarship is supposed to get more difficult the farther you get into it. Yes, but it still isn't hard if you have any proclivities for it. I found high school much more tedious because I had to learn about things I cared very little about. With college, I could focus specifically on the things that I actually like learning and doing. Most trades in the USA require a high school degree and probab…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:49 PM
1

Dollar General Is that the only alternative to college? Trades don't exist? 2/3rd of the jobs done in the US are the ones where you don't need a college degree. Are those irrelevant? Btw, college is the easiest shit I've ever done in my entire life. High school was harder than college. And I was at the hardest STEM college in my country. I'm of the opinion that you are partially retarded if you find college hard. I teach high school I feel sorry for those children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 02:17 PM
1

I can pull up a dozen in the last year. You? Feel free. Lmao, exactly. Which is my point. Exactly. It was going to increase regardless due to those two factors alone. So the "ban" actually did nothing at all, just made things a bit more complicated. Technology, eh? "Ban", eh? I love how when you ban a product or a service, you can't use it anymore. But when you "ban" abortion, it's used even more than before :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:51 PM
2

I just don't believe it's happening on any large scale. Neither does the case you linked. You're just confused. It is increasing in the states that did not ban it, because women from other states are now having to travel for the procedure. No, you are confused. It's increasing in totality, on the level of the entire country. Again, when something is banned, you don't see more of it. Yes, they made it more complicated for women living in certain states, but they aren't preventing those women from…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:40 PM
1

There was just a 14 year old girl in Indiana who had to fight for the ability to abort her rapists baby. And there are teen boys who are raped and forced to pay child support for the baby their rapist decided to keep. They don't have an out. Each gender has fucked up things that happen to them. Again, the number of abortions increased after the repeal of Roe v Wade. And it keeps on increasing year after year. Kinda weird for something that's BANNED. Or we have a completely different understandin…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:29 PM
1

Because half of the US now has total abortion bans as 'revenge'. Whether it is revenge towards the left or women themselves is irrelevant. It is still hurting women, and only women. Is Plan B banned anywhere? Btw, the number of abortions increased after the "ban". And it keeps on increasing year over year. So much for the "ban".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:10 PM
1

Oh wow. So you have to fill out a piece of paper. The horror. Ok, so you fill it as well if it's so inconsequential. Women get stuck carrying some rapists seed around for 9 months. Why was she stuck carrying some rapists seed around for 9 months? Did it slip her mind what got her pregnant? I'll choose signing up for something that isn't real, please. Yet, women (feminists) are ardently against selective service registration for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:03 PM
1

It's literally that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:00 PM
0

The only work is the one you do with a college degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 05:42 AM
0

You male by chance Just sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:57 AM
1

Of course, we will be dismissive; why wouldn't we be? When women see the term AWALT, and, mind you, that's a term that is used in a far more tame context than what we are talking about here, they fly off the handle instantly (and rightfully so). And yet that same side feels that it's perfectly fine to generalize all men based on the most violent shit a few men are doing. Holy cognitive dissonance, Batman!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:53 AM
1

So you lack skill, will, and grit. Noted :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:47 AM
-1

Another case of linking data as an argument for your case without understanding the context at all. Do you understand what that graph represents? It illustrates the % of people in each generation who consider themselves feminist. It's a static measure at the point in time when the survey was conducted. This graph doesn't disprove the statement of the person you replied to (nor does it prove it) because his claim was that fewer and fewer people associate themselves with the label feminist. That c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:41 AM
1

Obamacare happened This being something good is debatable to say the least. Biden pulled out of Afghanistan (messily but at least he fuckin did it) after 20 years of failure Trump set up the framework for that withdrawal before he left office. And Biden fumbled it completely. I can't believe that you are using this as a positive. he passed the IRA The benefits of that were? CHIPS Very, very debatable. It led to literally funneling money to Intel, NVIDIA, and several other tech companies with pra…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 09:49 AM
–

And above and beyond anything? I want environmentalism, universal healthcare, paid time off, billionaires taxed into humility, 91% top tax rates like we had prior to Reagan, strong labor unions, monopolies broken up, I see America as more racist/homophobic/sexist than you likely do, want Christianity and religion further away from politics, want to cut defense spending in half and give that money back to the citizenry in whatever form, and don't want migrants treated with the kind of cruelty tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:21 PM
–

That's my point entirely. But you missed my point. It was always like that, from the literal beginnings of democracy. I don't understand why you are so convinced that this is a new state of things. You were always voting for morally bankrupt, unscrupulous, and primarily selfish people. But you were giving them a pass, and you were always looking at them through rose-tinted glasses because they were on your side of the aisle. Graham Platner is the perfect personification and example of that. They…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:46 PM
1

to be realistic one have to be morally gray the majority of time No. To be realistic, you just need to be objective. Actually, if you add morality to the mix, you essentially lose the ability to be objective and realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:30 PM
–

But then the left gets pestered constantly over purity tests and a big tent. And that's completely their fault because they are pestering everyone all the time. Only a moron would be surprised when the people you keep pestering react by pestering you. A tattoo, mind you not of the SS sign nor the swastika, from 25 years ago does not equal Nazi today. So, because he doesn't have nazi swastika in the middle of his forehead, it's all fine? You didn't stop to think that he got the Totenkompf exactly…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:20 PM
–

App companies really don't need to engage in any shady and legally risky hidden "match throttling", because the incentives to pay for visibility are right out there in the open. Being less visible unless you pay IS match throttling, what are you talking about? You are perfectly describing what match throttling is and how it works while pretending you don't know what match throttling is or how it works :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:11 PM
–

you seem smart but a bit morally gray. He isn't morally gray, just realistic. If everyone were like you (asexual), we would die out. I'm not mean to you by saying this; I'm realistic. You may not like me saying that, but you cannot deny the truthfulness of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:25 AM
2

0 people would get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:11 AM
-1

I'm asking again. Do feminist femdoms respect each and every male sub as a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:10 AM
3

And I should take advice from a guy with a virgin flair why? Because you have probably 1 million mental issues that you need to work through, and even the Virgin boy here can offer some insight that could help you out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:09 AM
-2

Basically, you can’t expect women to do this very intensive thing for you if you don’t respect her as a person. Why not? It's just an act. Why do I have to respect her as a person? Do they respect each sub as a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:07 AM
–

0 people are in agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:04 AM
–

I mean, you can pretend that there is no difference that you are aware of between the free and paid versions of any dating app; that's a choice. But let me ask you a purely hypothetical question. How would you encourage people to pay a subscription for your dating app, given how dating apps work currently? What would you do to give them a push from the free tier to the paid tier? And even more so to pay for the "uber best premium version" at that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 07:44 AM
–

And Donald Trump's a Christian? Did I claim that? Even his most ardent supporters will admit that he isn't really acting based on Christian values. But the issue here is that the left will always call him out for that while adding an occasional "Nazi" (based on literally nothing) adjective in the mix, while at the same time platforming a literal Nazi. Don't you see anything wrong with that duplicity? If anything, politicians protect their weakest flank from their own voters. Which is a moronic m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 07:30 AM
0

I have no idea which guy you're talking about I'm talking about the same guy you are talking about. If they want to date an abusive nazi they are trash. What guy are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 12:13 PM
1

I would say it's more moral to vote for the asshole that does good in office than the one that does bad. What makes you think he would do good things while in the office? Because he claims so? He also claimed he had no idea he actually had a nazi tattoo. A complete fraud through and through. Yeah, let's believe him. Had he stayed, you should happily vote for Platner if you care about women's rights and feminism because that's practicality. The same practicality as saying Harvey Weinstein cares a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 12:01 PM
0

Is his wife a piece of trash? I mean, she should be the biggest piece of trash ever because he actually married the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:06 AM
1

He will have at the very least attracted women who don’t take politics that seriously. "I don't mind you being a nazi, I'm not into politics" :D
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:04 AM
2

The question on here is usually: "Why is this guy getting action while I am not?" That's often a misinterpretation of the actual question, which is: "Why is that guy getting action?" That's the actual question. You are claiming that some things that badly disqualify others don't necessarily always disqualify someone else, but we aren't talking about someone having a huge nose. We are talking about things that should disqualify everyone every damn time (excluding extremes like a woman nazi lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:58 AM
1

but would like to see some evidence What kind of evidence would you deem credible?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:32 AM
3

Where aren't you wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:51 AM
4

why would someone talk about that on a first date Because that's what you do when you are emotionally intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:50 AM
0

If women just want sex No one said that. I said that the women I was with and the women I know don't date for a relationship only. The alternative to a relationship only isn't sex only. It's also relationship AND sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:22 AM
7

As long as he is not dating them (and it seems like he isn't), he is actively "choosing better" each and every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:21 PM
0

Women date for relationships only I would hazard to say that I know more women than you do. But I have certainly been intimate with more women than you have. They disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:18 PM
10

And "choose better" He did exactly that..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:14 PM
2

There is a huge spectrum between someone clearly not happy with you being there and someone being utterly and completely enthusiastic about saying yes to your approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 03:11 PM
0

Again. If you explain to this guy: Then when you describe coercion: "well that's just normal dating". What he did is actually SA, is he like "oh wow, didn't know at all, I'll just stop doing that now!" or is he deflecting? If it's the former, as unbelievable as it may seem, he might just not understand consent. If it's the latter, he understands perfectly what consent is. Which of the two is by an order of magnitude more probable?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:58 PM
1

They keep saying that keep saying they can't even talk to a woman anymore without being accused of SA. False accusation. False is the keyword here. You conveniently forgot that word. That also indicates that they understand the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:35 PM
1

If they don't know the difference between hello and grabbing a crotch then there is obviously an issue. But you are the only one making that false equivalence; no one else is doing that. Again, who do you think isn't aware of the difference between those two actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:02 PM
5

This is what you’re supposed to do!!!!!! If she isn’t enthusiastic about being with you, it’s a no!!!! If she is saying no, it’s a no!!!! We are talking about approaching. Who is utterly and completely enthusiastic about someone at first? Are you insane? If she is saying no, don’t assume it’s banter!!!!!! That’s a one way ticket to assault!!!!! SHE ISN'T SAYING NO!!!!!!!! Can't you fucking read? I'm saying even when it's not a no, and she isn't saying it's a no, it will be interpreted as a no by…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 02:00 PM
-1

Yeah, actually, when the beauty standard was literally called “heroin chic” and you’re expected to look like a literal starving drug addict, I think women had a LOT to complain about. The fuck are you talking about? Literally no one expected or wanted women to look like the skeleton Kate Moss (other than other stupid women). She (and poor girls who looked like her) appealed to no man. No man gave a fuck about Kate Moss and similar runway models, especially compared to Pamela Anderson and other s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:51 PM
1

They are confused about the details. You can see that in a lot of studies and polls. Everytime a poll uses the words rape or sexual assault, men are deeply offended and pearl clutch just to say they aren't that type of guy. As soon as you don't use the words but rather just describe the actions that are happening they go "oh yeah, I do that". So you think that men who would go straight for the crotch of their date without her consent were actually one explanation away from not engaging in that k…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:31 PM
0

You are usually quite good at playing daft, but sometimes you are so on point it's uncanny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:13 PM
–

I can't be curious why other dudes can't seem to manage friendship with a woman? Yes, you can. And that's the reason he asked you why you wouldn't show the same curiosity about some woman not having male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:04 PM
1

I am more likely to come across someone thats doesn't understand boundaries or proper consent But that's not what you were previously saying. You said the following: Once you actually go into details, suddenly its "well, thats just part of dating! Thats normal!". The amount of excuses people use to justify their own bad behaviour and to normalise disrespecting other peoples choices is wild. If they are excusing said behavior, that's not them not knowing what consent and boundaries are. It's them…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:55 AM
1

Clavy Aww that's so cute. You so close!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:40 AM
0

I explained it clearly. What you clearly explained is what an ultimatum is. The distortion of the mind causes you to equate that to a threat. Considering women are your target audience and you want to learn to communicate with us, perhaps hear what we say. Or stay single and whine. I should just listen to any insane person and their "explanation" of things just because they are a woman? You don't need to worry about me, I very well listen and respect women who are worth being listened to and res…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:12 AM
2

Keep having it. It's working wonders. I'm sure you are running into millions upon millions of men who are running around doing stuff willy-nilly because they have 0 concept of what consent is, and then you swoop in to explain it to them and lead them to light. Could also help if you could teach murderers not to murder, assaulters not to assault others, and rapist not to rape. But hey, priorities are there for a reason. First, you need to ensure that people who know what consent is and are respec…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:07 AM
1

What he did was threaten. Imagine how distorted your mind must be to consider that a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:01 AM
1

Like women were bitching for decades about "unrealistic standards men have for women boddies"? Is it any different from what's happening now, other than a gender swap situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 10:52 AM
2

If men dont understand consent then its better if they dont approach. Who is the target demographic of this sentence? Who are you trying to "educate" with this? Men who understand consent are already not approaching for fear of causing even a minor inconvenience. Men who don't give a fuck about consent also don't give a fuck about your opinion that they shouldn't approach. So who exactly is that sentence aimed at? Is there some mythical group of men who, for some reason, don't understand what co…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 10:42 AM
7

You don't understand. You are creating a framework for behavior where a guy who actually completely respects your NO will interpret any behavior that isn't complete and utter enthusiasm as a NO (even when it's not a NO at all, because you are bantering and whatnot), but the behavior of the dude that doesn't give a fuck about your NO doesn't change at all, he still doesn't give a fuck about your NO. You (as in women) are creating a lose - lose scenario out of every potential positive outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 09:32 AM
2

Wearing X clothes is signaling nothing One of the most naive or the most "I reject your reality and substitute it with my own" things I've ever read.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 09:19 AM
1

You were given a whole explanation Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 01:50 PM
1

Complaining is complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:38 PM
1

Yes there are people in here that have hateful attitudes against the other gender to the point of malice. That's vastly different from those people wanting you dead, don't you think? I am sharp because prior experiences (dealing with antisemitism) have had this unfortunate side effect in other debates. Why are you projecting that onto PPD?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:36 PM
0

Not here, but yes absolutely they tell me so themselves. What the fuck are you talking about? You yourself literally said: And some people in here are like that. Not most but Ive seen a few. Then you need to be sharp. The people I end up “debating” most of the time want me dead. How did antisemitism creep into this conversation? This is mostly for lurkers not the people one is arguing with. So why are you referring to the people here? Can you decide what you think before you put it into a commen…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:25 PM
–

and again in my culture, a lot of girls already gotta learn how to take care of the house chores when they're like 7, while boys aren't given any responsibility outside of school, i don't think they got more responsibilities at all. That's the issue with your primitive culture. Don't generalize based on your backwards culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:17 PM
3

Depends on how you view partiarchy. If it is in the "men are superior to women" it is still alive. Why would I (or anyone else, for that matter) interpret patriarchy in that way? There are men who are constantly worried about their masculinity and are afraid of anything feminine. Correct. But that isn't because they feel like being a woman is lesser, but that being less of a man is lesser because being a man is their identity, and if they are losing that, they are losing their identity. While a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:10 PM
9

a man saying he chooses to stay single while constantly complaining about women and being bitter is another Literally the same thing women are doing. I know exactly 2 women who are single and at peace. The rest complain about men non-stop endlessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:01 PM
–

You just perfectly described how most of us feel when reading your posts/comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:57 AM
1

The people I end up “debating” most of the time want me dead. You actually honestly think that people you are debating want you dead? That's your starting point here when debating people on PPD most of the time? And you are pushing for a good-faith debating format? Use that mirror you are pointing at everyone else and look at yourself in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:57 AM
1

Hyperbole? Really? Something like the OP saying that the people she debates here most of the time want her dead? Something like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:55 AM
–

what unites men is hate for women Really? That's the only thing men band on? What unites women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:52 AM
1

Your future husband is a lucky guy. I hope he continues being appreciative of your efforts, and I hope you continue being appreciative of him. I wish you a bright future!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:49 AM
3

I’d be like 10x further in my career if I had another person dedicated to domesticity. Really? And what prevents you currently from progressing in your career?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:41 AM
2

Like women who indulge too much in romantic slop, the same thing, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:36 PM
–

What's a good source to use, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:08 PM
2

She’s innocent fir a start. So was Elliot Roger. She was made the scrap goat of a lot of other problems but that’s fir another days What a coincidence, so was Elliot Roger. When you use mental illness as a reason why someone did unspeakable acts you are excuses them No, I don't. They are still to blame for their actions. By your reasoning, pedophiles are excused for the rape and abuse of children.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:01 PM
2

You (a random person): "Why are you such a bitch that you are listening to the opinions of random people?!?!" You (the same random person): "You don't want to listen to me, and I'm trying to explain everything to you!"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:53 PM
1

If they have the main characters spattered all over the front cover, the spoil the book snd the ending fir readers, They also make reading these kind’s of books awkward in public. You are acting like romance slop is the equivalent of an Agatha Christie "whodunit" novel. Like, we don't know from the get-go who the main male romantic interest is. Are you serious right now? Most erotic doesn’t have any pictures Romantic <> Erotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:48 PM
1

"Oh yes yes, totally forgot about that! Silly me! They were so fucking fat and old, they could barely move!" So totally believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:40 PM
2

You claimed that when you said “mental illness” No, I didn't. You can translate "excuse" to reason in the context of that sentence, that was my point. Mental illness was the reason he did what he did. I don't understand how you could think otherwise. Was Lucy Letby insane?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:39 PM
4

Yeah, completely correct. What people forget when they nonchalantly use that saying is that beautiful people share commonalities that make them beautiful for the vast majority of people. Which is clearly presented in romance slop. It's like a carbon copy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:34 PM
1

Most people that have mental health problems don’t use that as an excuse to murder children No one claimed that. Even those mentally deranged lunatics who do those reprehensible things don't use mental illness to excuse their actions because they don't find themselves to be insane. The word excuse was quoted for a reason. I can explain if you don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:29 PM
3

They are all different Differently muscular :D Differently tall :D Differently attractive :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:23 PM
1

Mental illness is a pretty good "excuse" for doing something insane. You don't think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:16 PM
2

Just like your gender isn’t collectively porn sick. Oh, not collectively. That's great! But how many do you think are porn sick :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:15 PM
3

"No, I don't" what exactly? What is the default look of a male romantic interest in those books?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:07 PM
-4

Probably by asking her not to be a piece of shit towards him. He wanted to feel special, i.e., not a piece of shit like she made others feel. Probably. I don't know. I'm guessing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:02 PM
0

He was also handed a mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:49 AM
5

Well a guy on Purplepilldebate debate for a start. The irony is palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:48 AM
2

Like someone already mentioned. For every Loki on a cover of a romance slop aimed at women, you will get 10 Thors. So much for female gaze :/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:44 AM
3

But your gender regularly harps on porn as something that makes men porn-sick and is something that completely twists men's standards and expectations of women in real life. Do you disagree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:36 AM
2

same as porn So, porn doesn't influence men at all, is what you are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:31 AM
6

Cool story bro. I absolutely believe every word of it. You can make a choice to trust me, the same way I need to make a choice to trust women when they try to convince me of their proclivities, even though they are fucking a dude who is a complete antithesis to that. You don't understand, I'm not denying that women prefer Loki over Thor, but that's a pointless distinction was my point. What does it prove that most women prefer one tall, attractive dude vs another tall, attractive dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:28 AM
9

They never realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:25 AM
2

And they were also fat and old? You conveniently forgot that part.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:23 AM
15

yet most women admit they prefer loki Oh, they admit! Well, that certainly ends all discussions. It was admitted! Funny thing is, you actually think you made a point by saying "look, women actually prefer this very attractive tall man as opposed to that very attractive tall man with a bit of a different physique". But I actually find it fascinating how you (as in women) literally can't help but virtue signal in any and all situations. I've had women who were telling me (in the break between our …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:16 AM
4

who try to get muscles do so to try and compete with other men. The same way that every woman who uses expensive makeup spends a ton on hair and clothes, does so to try and compete with other women primarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:52 AM
1

I already select for overweight older men with moustaches who dress in smart clothes and are into classical literature. No, you don't :D It's like me saying that I select for obese women with moustaches who like pogo jumping and can do pogo front flips and backflips. But if I don't manage to find women to satisfy this niche, I'll keep on being attracted to and dating tall and slim women with beautiful faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:48 AM
1

the desire to put down another man who's explaining it to you But why should he value the opinion of a random "man"? That's your own argument :) Your opinion is completely worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:20 AM
8

You ask: BY WHO??? He answers: Women in my life? You retort with: Do you always listen to random people though? PPD is such a funny place with people like you :D Tell me, what was the right answer to your question? Is there a right answer? Would he be able to say anything that wouldn't prompt such an idiotic response, like calling his female friends and family random people? Who aren't random people by your valuation?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:15 AM
–

It is sexist. Why is it sexist? Is he not free to choose who he associates with and in which manner he does that? And he isn't refusing to associate with women at all; he just lays a clear rule that a chaperone must be present. Would you have the same "energy" to condemn a married female CEO refusing to associate with her young protege alone at a dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:03 AM
1

The fuck are you talking about? Nothing is funnier than a tall, fat dude. Who do you think they are attracting :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:35 AM
5

I don’t feel comfortable standing up to them because I feel like it makes me look like a right wing psycho to speak up on behalf of men. Such a bitch attitude. If you defer to your female friends in this way, then what kind of friendship is that if you can't express your views freely? You don't have to be obnoxious about it, or "put them in their place", but if you are keeping mum when they are talking shit you don't agree with, you are a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 07:31 AM
2

No, it isn't. I still have no idea what you are talking about. Geneva Convention has nothing to do with espousing things like "healthcare is a basic human right". Where are you getting your info from? The only purpose of the Geneva Convention is to "ensure" humane treatment of people during wartime.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:27 AM
–

healthcare is a basic human right according to the geneva convention No, it isn't. What are you talking about? Maybe you are too certain about the things you don't know much about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:48 AM
1

Women were simple, ameroua creatures leading men into sin. And you think that is proof positive that women are as horny as men? It literally shows the opposite; it illustrates that men would throw away their whole lives for some action. The fact that you don't have a gender-reversed scenario tells you all you need to know about the difference in levels of horniness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:28 PM
0

Ancient Greeks thought so. I don't think you want to go there. The idea of men being the more libidinous gender is fairly recent Really? So only from the time when we can objectively report and record things?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:25 PM
–

What are you talking about :D
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:09 PM
–

Right! No guy has ever gotten a junior position without prior work experience. Totally makes sense!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:01 AM
–

And no guy has ever gotten a junior position without previous work experience. Do you understand how analogies work?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 07:53 AM
1

or at least the high school report cards You can't be fucking serious. Literally retarded people who are unable to read graduate from high school. What are you even on about? You are so wrapped up in your "credentialism" that you refuse to honestly engage with someone holding an obvious interest in something and providing you with the resources they themselves used to form their opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:25 AM
2

No I just think it’s funny that “I study X in my free time” was used to establish credibility What is funny about that exactly? I would put way more emphasis on the opinion of a person actually reading about something with interest, fervor, and understanding than on the person who graduated in a certain field but is never educating themselves further. And the latter is the vast majority of people. You would probably value their opinion more because of the silly title they hold. In persuasive wri…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:20 AM
2

You actually think that's comparable?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:18 AM
1

Guess you aren't making a positive impact today :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 02:30 PM
0

It seems instead of a unified sidebar like it used to have, RP is just “whatever anyone wants it to be.” That's how you interpret it because it suits your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 10:17 AM
2

Well, because we aren't accusing every man of being dangerous. By that same logic, we could say that AWALT isn't accusing all women of being like that; it's just a precaution.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 08:05 AM
2

How is AWALT different from treating every man as a potential danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 02:26 PM
1

Identical to what happens to people today when they are branded as incels. Is there any difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 01:12 PM
1

I'm asking you what that looks like, being rejected by society at large, being ostracized. Can you illustrate it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 11:55 AM
1

And what does it look like when society rejects them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 11:51 AM
0

Being a fascist is a miserable way to live I find it more miserable to live a life where you automatically designate everyone 2 paces to the right of you a fascist :) That term used to mean something until people like you started throwing it around willy-nilly towards everyone and anyone. As for Mamdani and NYC, I honestly hope you (and everyone else who supports him) get literally everything he promised that he would do. I sincerely do. He's doing a fantastic job up till now, and I just hope he…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 08:31 AM
7

I'll add one more thing. The eternal catch-22 of getting a starter job - they require experience for junior positions. The equivalent of being a male virgin on the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 07:48 AM
1

Again, you are completely missing the point. Society already rejected them. They aren't surprised. And they want to dismantle that society that doesn't accept them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 07:43 AM
2

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:41 PM
2

We (as a society) aren't able to solve FAR LESSER problems, and you think we will solve this easily. "Let's be real" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:24 PM
1

Society actually doesn't function if everyone is selfish. And these radicalized young men are in for a rude awakening if they don't realize that. You are missing the point. They are aware of that. They strive for a failed society. And the ones who are in for a rude awakening are people like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:22 PM
2

And most women did through rape by conquering nations.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:05 PM
1

This is ahistorical. He didn't say EVER. The most qualifying thing he said was "in the past". And with the context of the rest of the post, you can safely deduce he meant "recent past". But you chose FOREVER AND EVER and focused on that. But why are you doing that in the first place? If something terrible starts happening to women and you would like a discussion about it, and you say, "We were much safer in the past!" obviously referring to the recent past before those terrible things started ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:58 PM
1

Society isn't calling women that. Whoever says that gets socially ostracized right away, like instantly. Imagine saying that somewhere in public in a mixed crowd of people? You can't because it doesn't happen. While virgin and incel are used willy-nilly in every possible occasion for every possible situation where you want to put some man down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:37 PM
0

And they keep learning and doing it better They definitely learned how to abuse antidepressants and are doing it better than any generation before theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:32 PM
1

It’s poetic isn’t it You will find it especially poetic when slapped with a mandatory "work till 80 years old" bill because there is no one left to prop up the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:29 PM
0

Extremists lost all throughout Europe Really? Who exactly? Who is an extremist in EU politics? AfD? The single highest polling political party in Germany. A few years ago, you would be considered a lunatic thinking they could go above 5%. That doesn't seem like losing. Marine Le Pen? If they don't ban her, she will win the next French presidential election. Victor Orban? Only naive people don't see that Peter Magyar is literally the other side of the same coin. Are the extremist those wanting th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 03:12 PM
–

At a population statistics level men’s horniness has led to men fucking animals, dead people, children, people in comas, to the spread of all sorts of disease the preponderance of AIDS I can go on and on. You have to be out of your fucking mind to think something like this. That's not men's horniness, that's mental illness. Almost every man is horny, but almost no men will fuck an animal. Almost every man is horny, but almost no men will fuck a corpse. Almost every man is horny, but almost no me…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:11 PM
1

Wow, really? How do you figure that? What's getting better?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:14 PM
2

Women don’t have to deal with aggressive misogynist red-pill types anymore and they don’t, that’s where you see most of the single guys. You actually honestly think that most single guys are aggressive misogynist red-pill types? You people literally are despicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:13 PM
8

There is a clear statistical correlation and ignoring that would be foolish and dangerous. If you are calling it a correlation, then you are implying and saying exactly what I said. Or you have no idea what correlation means. Of course it doesn’t mean that most suicidal men are going to do that🤦‍♀️. By saying correlation, you are implying that. It does mean that monitoring for the murder / suicide possibility in suicidal men with a history of domestic violence is a reasonable thing to do. It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:43 AM
2

secure, sensitive and empathetic men You now have an order of magnitude more men who fit that description than ever before in history. And currently, we have most single men (% wise) than ever before in history. Because, regardless of your larping, you don't want those men. You never did, you never will.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:38 AM
2

but hopefully we’ll be back on track soon enough. It is getting better. You are living in a parallel reality. Or we have vastly different interpretations of things getting better :D
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:32 AM
5

So what was the point of the literally first sentence of your comment that is supposed to counter the OP? Enlighten me, please, what was the point of that statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:10 AM
–

I'm glad for you. And for every one of you, there are probably 10 couples where sex dried up soon after they got married, even though they were fucking like crazy beforehand. They also thought that what they have at the moment will continue in marriage as well. They were wrong. You are an outlier. And you are extremely lucky. But don't fool yourself into thinking that you somehow "figured it out" and that's why everything worked out. Each and every one of those couples that aren't having sex als…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:37 AM
8

60% to 80% of family annihilators are suicidal men I hate this shit so much. Especially if you are doing it on purpose. It's like saying 100% of family annihilators are men who breathe. How fucking moronic can someone be to think that 60% to 80% of family annihilators being suicidal men = 60% to 80% of suicidal men are family annihilators.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:31 AM
–

It’s a bit pathological their need for bone’ing. Why are you designating men's need for sex as something pathological? Can I say the same for women's need for affection? That said, I also think men should be more upfront about just how horny they are. Be explicit about how much sex you desire. So no one’s blindsided or caught off guard. I think that's always fairly obvious. How much more upfront can we actually be?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:19 AM
–

that can be certainly be sustained through the long haul You literally have no idea what you are talking about. There are so many examples of sex drought after marriage vows, when the pair was sexing it up like animals beforehand. You can't judge how someone will act while married based on their behaviour before marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:12 AM
4

Most people didn't even know who she was before the trial. The fuck are you talking about? She was a well-known actress. Not the most famous actress ever, but well-known nonetheless. The people who took her side was Hollywood, especially Warner Bros. The people who took her side were all the women on planet earth who heard about her and her case at the beginning of it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 04:16 PM
5

Amber Heard? The worst example ever. You are literally adding to her argument. Amber Heard was believed by everybody before the damning evidence came out showing her as an abuser.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:55 PM
1

How are you possibly getting butthurt about that? I'm not. I'm just noting that you are contradictory or possibly hypocritical. First, you say that "No one cares more about dick size than a straight guy with a small dick" and then when making an ideal man, you give him an above-average dick. Seems like in addition to straight guys with small dicks, you also care as well :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:41 PM
–

You couldn't be more up your own arse if you wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 11:33 AM
-1

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:50 PM
6

after being banned for life from a bar for approaching a woman What? Really? That happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:57 PM
1

I don't think that's a great comparison since that's not inherently an attraction related thing. Why does it have to be an attraction thing? Some things make some people happy, nothing more to it. If you like big dick and enjoy it sexually you are a size queen. Again, you are missing what I'm saying. They were happy witnessing it, you can ask them why that is. But they didn't all enjoy it. There were a few times when there was literally no way to proceed with sex because I would actually hurt he…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:40 PM
1

You are an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:36 PM
1

No, I'm not noticing. How exactly am I doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:35 PM
1

No brother, everyone doesnt talk about dicks. Youre preoccupied and projecting your own thoughts onto other people. The fact that you dont know of any conversations around men saying something along the lines of "hotdogs down the hallway" "blown out" and "used up" is just further indicators of your preoccupation. So, isn't that a positive thing? We are talking about dicks, and we don't talk about pussy at all, especially not in "the most degrading, horrible ways". That's supposed to be a positiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:35 PM
1

And women do focus on the guys actually suffering in silence And how exactly does that happen when you yourself are showing the opposite here? You talk about this and that here in your comment, but each and every post/comment you make is a post about the "aura farming guys" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:46 PM
1

I don't understand. Do you not talk about sex at all, or do you not talk about your personal sexual experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:43 PM
1

Is every woman who is happy being taken to a fancy restaurant actually a high-maintenance / gold-digger? Is there no option where she is just a normal woman, just being happy that she was taken to a nice restaurant? Maybe they were all curious and were happy they got the opportunity to try?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:40 PM
3

and you should see all the horror stories from women who "gave the 'nice guy' a chance." I would like to see those. Where can I see them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:19 AM
2

Men who aura farm do real damage because they make themselves louder than the men who are genuinely suffering in silence. Hence, they’re making men’s issues look like a joke. Or you yourself are focusing on those men more, making them out to be more than they actually are, propping up their already loud voices even though they are a tiny minority, and further silencing actual victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:13 AM
7

Kinda better than "Men kill, men rape, men abuse, men manipulate and deceive, men are dangerous, treat every man as a potential rapist/killer" and similar :)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:05 AM
1

You have no idea :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:38 PM
2

I meant, why don't you hear women saying that they prefer smaller dicks? Why don't they brag about their latest fling having the perfect smaller dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:35 PM
1

I am again speaking about practicality and ease of use So if that's all you are concerned about, then 3" dick is perfect because it will never hit the cervix.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:21 PM
1

Though you'll probably hear women saying this less at a bar or such. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:18 PM
1

No one cares more about dick size than k straight guy with a small dick. And then builds an ideal guy with an above-average dick :D If I was building a guy he would probably get a ~6in dick
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:17 PM
1

Many women don’t care about height. And many do. What's funny about grouping people in "I don't care about height" and "I care about height" camps is that women who casually say "I don't care about height, as long as he is taller than me" are placed in a "I don't care about height " camp. But why is that? She obviously cares about height and has a strict cutoff. That cutoff may include many men, but will also exclude many men if she is a woman who is taller than average. I think men are more lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:03 PM
2

You missed my point. I didn't claim that each woman is a size queen or something similar to that. I didn't even claim that even one of the women I was with was a size queen (three of them were). I just wanted to illustrate the fact that every woman was happy (some disturbingly so) with the fact that I had a big dick. They wouldn't be happy if they didn't care; they would be indifferent, it would just be another dick like every other dick. That was my entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:52 PM
-1

Yeah that was the point of the comment, MEN talk about dick. Who's dick was bigger, if yours is enough, how sad you are about it. Everybody talks about dick. Even if it's in passing. There are dick jokes that you can witness in your favorite sitcom, there are dick insults thrown all around (you've probably done a fair share of that yourself as well, one way or the other), and people (not just men) are talking about dick size constantly. Also, men talk about pussy in the most degrading horrible w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:43 PM
2

No, it doesn't. The depth of a vagina is 4-8" when aroused. So the lower end of that is close to the penis average, and then you have another 3" buffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:17 PM
0

Your preference for the size of penis you have sex with is very much about your sex life No, it isn't. Maybe you prefer a big dick, but you've never had it. It has nothing to do with your sex life because you are talking in hypotheticals. Maybe you could say that you would never have sex with someone with a big dick, it still doesn't have anything to do with your sex life; it's just a matter of expressing your preference. And are you honestly trying to convince me that you never ever have conver…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:07 PM
-1

is your own specific experience/bubble, not a general case. No, it isn't. What are you talking about? There are dick jokes, dick insults, dick names, dick this dick that, and this is something that goes on in the public sphere, completely acceptable talking points. Do we have something similar to that with pussy? No, we don't. It's practically a taboo term.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:02 PM
1

Same dude. It baffles the mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:44 PM
-5

Hey dude, the equavilent to dick is pussy. No, it isn't. No one talks about pussy at all, and the dick is always talked about in any possible context. So there is no equivalence there. Dick isnt visible the majority of the time, unlike tits and ass, and I dont kiss and tell. Tits and ass aren't visible either. What are you talking about? Idgaf if you believe me. Men on this sub come here to explain women to themselves, why would i expect different from you? But the most ironic thing is that you …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:37 PM
2

Of course all the women you have been with have told you what you want to hear, because obviously your ego couldn’t handle it if they were to tell you otherwise. Maybe you're right, maybe my ego really couldn't handle it (whatever it is), but I didn't get the chance to experience that test. It’s basically the duty of women to stroke men’s ego. So if a guy has a big penis you tell him you love the size of his dick. If he has a medium penis you tell him you love the size of his dick. And if he has…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:26 PM
-2

It doesn't ever have to be about your sex life at all. It's just a question of preference that can be part of any normal conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:50 AM
2

However women do not care about this Oh, they so do. Literally every woman I was with adored the fact that I was in the massive category (by the categorization from the OP). And I was with a lot of women, from all walks of life. Many of them "didn't care" until they met me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:36 AM
1

Look, average is average for a reason. It tends to be the best all-arounder Something being average doesn't indicate the quality of the thing, just the incidence of the thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:39 AM
-1

Ive never had a conversation with someone IRL about dick size. As believable as a man saying "I've never had a conversation with someone IRL about boobs or ass. We just don't get into those subjects."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:36 AM
1

Yes, that's me, not agreeable. But the ironic thing here is that both you and OP are trying to signal that being agreeable is something women look for in a man, but it's the complete opposite of that. If you are actually honest in that you really like your man to be agreeable, then you are in a tiny minority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:36 PM
1

And you seem not to know what you are talking about. None of the men mentioned is agreeable. Do you understand what agreeable means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:30 PM
2

And this also isn't a rational argument because the first date is about him demonstrating provision. And you think that's rational? You think one singular event, which is actually an expected behavior on a date, demonstrates anything other than a person following a social script? Or do you actually think that a man paying for the first date in a restaurant demonstrates his ability and willingness to financially provide for you in the future? This is a perfect example of why women often get brand…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:20 PM
5

Why be retarded once when you could be retarded twice? So there is no confusion, I'm referring to your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:59 PM
5

If she doesn't have $25-$35 to pay for her own meal, she a broke bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:54 PM
5

Only when they want to have children. If you don't plan on having children, your point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:50 PM
4

a lot Very few would be my estimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:49 PM
6

If you are evaluating for "end game" on the very first date, then please also give a lot of sex afterwards, because that would be an expectation in the upcoming marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:48 PM
2

There is no man who is risking losing out on a girl they really fancy over the 50-75 bucks it would cost for a standard date at mid tier restaurant. Then I guess I don't fancy her very much if that's the case. When it comes to dating you put in the effort that you think is worth it do if you won’t pay you don’t think she is worth it Can't I say the same for her? If she isn't willing to pay her half, she doesn't find me worth it? Secondly men paying for dates is generally the social expectation I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:44 PM
1

Humanity would do WHAT exactly? Go extinct. But that includes you as well :/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 09:52 AM
1

There’s 3 men in my house and they all bring jars for me to open Either that's something cute between you, and they just go at it because they are poking fun, or they are all retarded. Because you don't even need strength to open the jar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 09:51 AM
2

He wasn't emasculated; he was just using that as an excuse for his insecurity (and I'm wary about using insecurity in general, considering how it's used here, but this is pure unadulterated insecurity). It would be emasculating if you were the one emphasizing the height difference, even as a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:14 PM
1

Currently, yes. But he can also stop being married if you decide so, that's the point. I mean, in your case, it's a bit of an overreaction to your silly term of affection, but imagine if he was calling you "his favorite fleshlight!" You probably wouldn't be too appreciative of that, even though he would mean it in the best way possible 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:31 PM
0

SHE DIES OF AIDS AS A TORTURED PERENNIALLY SEXUALLY VIOLATED NOBODY. WHICH WAS THE RESULT OF HER OWN CHOICES! ALL OF IT! LITERALLY EACH AND EVERY THING THAT HAPPENED TO HER COULD ALSO NOT HAVE HAPPENED TO HER IF SHE CHOSE OTHERWISE. Meanwhile, over his lifetime, Forrest became an All-American college football player, earned the Medal of Honor in Vietnam, won a world table-tennis championship, and built the highly lucrative Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. You are making it out to be like it all fell from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:15 PM
2

Swiping right on a profile is a literal antithesis to chasing. What are you even on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:35 AM
3

Fox News Wow, really. Fox News, you say. Interesting how that works, because if anyone mentioned Fox News in the context of them being a trusted news channel, you would probably gag. Yet you find it ok to use them as an argument in this context. How bout some news channels that your ilk always pushes, like CNN or MSNBC? basically all current political policies at the federal level And which one are those? Name some, you don't have to name all. Why do you think they want to pretend its possible t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:30 AM
–

only slightly below average You don't seem to understand statistics 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:56 AM
–

You should look into studies about what women actually get aroused by. What are those studies based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:50 AM
–

And that it is the woman's responsibility to dress modestly enough and keep herself at enough of a distance so that he doesn't latch on to her with sexual interest. And you are comparing dressing modestly to being completely covered from head to toe, specifically for the reason that the other men can't see any part of your wife? Are you seriously making that comparison? But then, neither would that be the case in a moderate islamic country. What is a moderate islamic country?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 07:17 AM
6

They fail at it a lot so I'd say not. But if men fail a lot at trying to get a relationship, or just a date, then they haven't tried hard enough, or they haven't mastered attraction, or whatever else your argument is? Why are you excusing women but not men? Why are women unable to properly judge men's character? Are you implying they are unintelligent, emotionally stunted or just unable to learn things? Are you actually a misogynist?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:40 PM
1

Once you have attraction mastered How do you do that? Couldn't women master not being duped by basic psychological tricks, and could they also stop making those basic psychological tricks they fell for the 175th time in a row as some master manipulation that men perform on them, rather than them being intentionally oblivious (for whatever reason)?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:32 PM
1

I didn't say the number. Not many can still be millions. Millions? You think there are millions of men who are such master manipulator sociopaths that women aren't able to identify properly in time and end up getting duped by? Ok, if we take that at face value, what is that compared to the rest of the men? How many % do you think that is? And considering women have such strong feelings about manipulative men it could be higher than I think I don't understand what you mean by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:29 PM
1

So what? If 1000 master manipulator men cast wide nets, are a million women at risk of being duped? Isn't this an argument that women actually aren't at risk of those master manipulator men because there are so few of them. So they just need to use basic discretion to not get into a relationship with shitty men that they could actually identify without issue? So, there is no argument to say that women have it harder in dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:19 PM
10

I wasn't talking about myself. If I get terribly maimed in some freak accident, I could have trouble attracting women, but I find it ridiculous to say, "Even fat slobs that don't shower have a girlfriend." It's completely untrue. Who would date a fat slob who doesn't shower? Other than those 2 women with mental issues. Or are you making a veiled comment about the character (or something else) of the men who aren't able to get a girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:16 PM
4

And how many men are like that? What % of men are the men women should be careful of? I guess my question is, what % of men are such master manipulators that willingly trick women to that degree that women are unable to recognize their manipulative tactics?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:06 PM
7

And you think that is easier than women being more discerning about who they pick out of the lot of men chasing after them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:52 PM
4

Really? Like what? And can women also do some stuff to not have it harder in dating, as you suggest? Or are they unable to do "stuff"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:48 PM
13

Once you accomplish that Can we discuss how hard this step is without glossing over it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:44 PM
8

Once a man becomes attractive You are making it sound like it's something you grow into, you just have to wait a bit, and it somehow magically happens, like getting out of puberty 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:42 PM
1

By your reasoning, if we use her example of 669 women dying during childbirth in 2023, couldn't we call that a human error as well? If they weren't pregnant, they wouldn't die during childbirth :/ That's how silly your argument sounds. No, logging can't be done without workplace fatalities. That's the nature of that job. And most of the deaths are due to human error, which is correct. But human error is part of our every endeavour. The difference is that in your random cushy office job, human er…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:29 PM
1

You are completely detached from reality, or we are all, except you, living under a rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 11:01 AM
1

Really? If a man helps a woman, then the evangelical man will interpret that as the man wanting to insert his penis into the woman he helped?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:15 AM
1

they are usually talking about one that is successful and well known No, they aren't. They are talking about women they could potentially be dating, doing OF.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:44 AM
1

If you don't date someone due to their gender is it sexist? What a stupid argument. It's the equivalent of saying, "if you don't want to have sex with animals, you hate animals!" There is sexual orientation and preferences within that sexual orientation. You were clearly discussing preferences. Why the need to derail the conversation? And yes, some preferences can be rooted in bigotry, hypocrisy, and racism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:37 AM
1

How can a blacked-out person initiate sex? Would that be a valid defence for anyone claiming the same when having sex with a blacked-out person?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:15 AM
1

That's not a figure of speech. But here we are ig.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:13 AM
2

"My argument is so good that I don't need a counterargument. It's not that I have it, I just don't need it!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:11 AM
1

Shallow is such an overused term that barely means anything these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:41 PM
0

If we go by the standard of "having sex with someone unable to consent because they are blackout drunk" then how would you call his case? I mean, you literally made the same argument yourself in the other comment: Right if someone isn't conscious they can't consent. Whether they're drunk or not isn't even really relevant in that situation. Like if they're unconscious for any reason they can't consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:28 PM
2

There is no argument that you are making.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:15 PM
1

You gave me 0 of the things I asked for. There is no victory in discussion with you, only a bitter realisation that I have wasted time again thinking you are actually a human with a working brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:59 PM
5

You gave me 0 of the things I asked for. And it's not that I don't like that. It's just that you are so disappointing every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:27 PM
6

Find me a public announcement of that if it's so easy. Please do. Or you have brainwave issues. It's not an issue finding one specific person saying something stupid. I specifically asked for a public announcement akin to the poster in the pic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:18 PM
6

But you are. What, in your opinion, was that article supposed to prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:12 PM
9

I thought I was supposed to provide proof for my argument, and you for yours. Why are you providing proof for my argument? Who is going to provide proof for yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:05 PM
3

They don't give a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:01 PM
1

like you just know dude is absolute trash in bed and miserable to live with Like, you literally have no idea. You can assume and presume, but you literally have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:56 PM
3

But some attractive people say or do something that ruin their shot like being rude to the waiter/waitress during the date. When you pass a certain threshold of attractiveness, no one gives a fuck about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:54 PM
1

What do you think would happen to Ukraine if they stopped fighting? What would Russia do? They would be annexed. Not the first, not the last country in history that happened to. Some annexations were violent and tyrannical, some were relatively peaceful. The issue here is when you say, "if they stopped fighting" you are specifically applying that to men. Why don't you use the same reasoning for women in Ukraine? Why do they have the option to just leave the country and not fight at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 11:26 AM
1

I don't have a conscious height requirement for either, but I seem to prefer people who are close to my height/not significantly taller or shorter than me. I don't particularly like towering over or being towered over. So you don't mind men being potentially shorter than you? Yes What does this yes for income represent? Do you expect them to be financially independent? To own a home? What is that specifically? yes What does this yes for confidence represent? How do you imagine a confident man? D…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 11:05 AM
–

He already explained it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 09:34 AM
–

That is the question you seem to be asking. No, he isn't asking that. So much for the: It treats listening as secondary to teaching. You just refuse to listen and honestly engage any points of view that contradict your own worldview. But you are oh so ready to teach us your worldview. This is why redpill exists, because of people like you and the blatant hypocrisy that you think you can always get away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 09:32 AM
1

I think you have provided enough evidence to substantiate the claim that you actually don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:45 AM
8

I can easily find people saying being drunk doesn't matter for consent. Does that make it the case? Find me a public announcement of that if it's so easy. Please do. This is a single poster made for a single university almost 20 years ago and red pillers are STILL using it lol Not a red piller, but why shouldn't I use this? Feel free to use an example of the opposite of this from 20 years ago, I don't mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:45 AM
2

What's the equivalent of the height requirement for men that you apply to women? Are your income expectations for women equal to those you have for men? Confidence? Amount of fitness? Are there some standards that you apply to women that you don't specifically apply to men (something that can actually be applied to both genders)?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:43 AM
2

near as wide a range of women they can approach That's irrelevant when talking about per capita in this case because you assess only the approaches that you make towards other lesbians; you aren't assessing trying to approach a random woman who will, by 95% chance, be hetero as a rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:39 AM
-1

So.. You're a rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:32 AM
10

It's not <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:29 AM
6

Which women here are saying that’s ok? Each woman who didn't say anything against it but would have "choice" words for a man who does the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:27 AM
3

The. Sentence. Said. "SMH". Or did you mean some other sentence? You didn't specify. Can you quote me the sentence that I need to read, and I will try to find it somewhere to read it. And then I can body shame, everyone! Can't wait!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 08:00 PM
3

I just did. Is it now ok to body shame, or do I need to read more? When can I start body shaming as you do? What do I need to accomplish to get to that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:47 PM
3

SMH?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:40 PM
2

Did it say this: "It's ok to body shame someone I don't like."?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:37 PM
2

But I don't understand. When is it ok to body shame someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:33 PM
2

So it's ok to body shame in some instances?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:31 PM
0

What is a baddie concept based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:28 PM
3

Are you saying that if you don't have anything to say about someone, it's ok to body shame them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:23 PM
1

By your logic, all dates in itself are a test then. Right? Because it’s not a question, it’s a gesture. And what happens during the date results in an outcome. Date is not a gesture. It's conversation, getting to know each other, banter, flirting, and much more. Or none of that, depending on the quality of the date. But you could call it a test because it definitely is a sort of prolonged test if the other person is worth getting into a relationship with. It’s baffling to me how people fail to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:20 PM
3

We see what’s really happening. We do? What's really happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:07 PM
3

Why are people looking for things to talk about when hes brought up instead of talking about nothing when people bring him up?! But why body shame him? Is that worth mentioning? Is that something? Is it worse for someone in his position to be without accomplishments or to be short?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:35 PM
3

Or they could talk about how he has no accomplishments. Why the need to body shame?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:16 PM
1

It's not the same. This isn't a question; she didn't ask him, "What do you think about going dutch on a date?" If she did, I would have no issues with that. That's conversation, that's getting to know each other, that's establishing compatibility (or lack thereof). But PRETENDING that you actually want to go dutch and gauging her date's reaction is a test by any definition of a test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:07 AM
–

I'm what most people would consider an extremely attractive man, and I also don't go around assuming that every woman wants to be with me. BUT, literally without exception, every fucking time I was friendly and complementary towards women who aren't part of my close friends group, they would misinterpret things. EVERY TIME.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:02 AM
5

It’s not really a test. Of course it is, it's a literal definition of a test. She poses "the offer" and decides what happens next based on the outcome. Offering is good manners It isn't if you tie an expectation of him not accepting the offer to the offer itself. It's just performative good manners. It's like a person claiming they are progressive, because that's the default expectation in their friend group, but actually being an adamant Trump voter. To be upfront may lead to more pretense on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:29 AM
1

It's a standard shit test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:17 AM
–

What's weird about it? Ask any very attractive woman what happens when she gives a compliment to a less attractive man. The same happens to a very attractive man giving compliments to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:12 AM
–

I thought an incel is just someone who can't get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:09 AM
2

If he had accomplishments people could talk about them. But if he doesn't, people could talk about him not having accomplishments, even more so if you want to insult him. Why go for body shaming? You- but why?! What don't you understand here? Bruh you couldn’t list a single thing! I wasn't claiming there is a single thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:08 AM
2

Once again- read the entire sentence that was written. I did. I see no reason to height shame him. If it's ok to height shame him for not being accomplished, I can call a woman fat and ugly for not being accomplished, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:05 PM
2

So if some woman isn't accomplished, it's perfectly fine to call her fat and ugly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:43 PM
–

Mansplaining time!! Do you know what an incel is?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:47 PM
–

Who is this advice for then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:41 PM
2

But why would I list his accomplishments? Did I claim he has any? My question was, why are you shaming him for his height?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:36 PM
1

But that makes it transactional then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:33 PM
0

Do you mean this sentence? If he had more accomplishments other than “disgraced angry little man” then people would describe him differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:38 PM
1

there aren’t clothes that alter men’s behavior Of course there are. Go to the office in a low-cut shirt and a mini skirt, and men who usually wouldn't look at you will do so. That is clothes altering behavior. Not for the better, but still 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:37 PM
1

But why would I list his accomplishments? What would that accomplish?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:33 PM
-1

Most relationships are reciprocal. Not transactional. Yeah, that's how it's supposed to be, not keeping score but just caring about your partner's well-being. And yet, somehow, there is always a score in the background. There is always "unpaid labor" score, "emotional labor" score and many more "I'm doing way more of this than he is" scores. How is that in any way reciprocal?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:31 PM
1

I still don't understand. If you want to shame him, you would shame him for that exact reason (him not having accomplishments). Why mention that he is small?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:21 PM
0

Can I call them whores and tricks?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:19 PM
1

So you can't shame him because he doesn't have any accomplishments? If he had accomplishments, you would shame him for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:18 PM
1

So you are shaming him for height?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:12 PM
1

But what issue? You haven't said anything concrete.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:08 PM
1

If he had more accomplishments other than “disgraced angry little man” then people would describe him differently. This better?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:05 PM
1

“disgraced angry little man” Did I do it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:03 PM
1

It’s obvious. But it isn't. We started talking about height, then you say look at you asking about height.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:59 PM
-1

Don't call women bitches and zeros! That's totally disrespectful!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:56 PM
1

I did, and I didn't prove your point. What is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:54 PM
3

How did I prove your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:48 PM
5

Was his height mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:39 PM
2

I'm just messing with ya 😃 I have a completely opposite problem with giving compliments. My issue is as if I were an attractive woman giving a compliment to a nerd. I can't give compliments because they would be interpreted as something more because they want it to be more, and I don't. So I never give compliments unless I actually want to have sex with that person, because in that case, the person I'm giving a compliment to will almost certainly want to have sex with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:37 PM
1

Would you give compliments to anyone if every time you give a compliment to someone, they completely ignore you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:32 PM
0

I don't care about that. Men are not fishermen! Some are, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:31 PM
3

So you did the easy and lazy part only?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:30 PM
2

So why do that then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:26 PM
1

Saying thank you doesn't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:24 PM
1

Men aren't fishermen! Some are, but not all! Don't use such comparisons that reduce men to a mere hobby!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:23 PM
1

So is it ok to compliment your style and then expect sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:21 PM
1

Why comment at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:16 PM
3

Do the same for Gregory Bovino :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:15 PM
1

Oh my god, what the fuck is that monstrosity??!??!? The best example for r/dataisugly. I can't believe that graph. I feel actual physical pain when looking at that. Area graph with identical color and shade for each category!?!!??!?! Our civilization should burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 12:44 PM
8

No one brings up Tom Cruises height The fuck 😃 Reddit is like an interdimensional forum where people from different dimensions are all conversing in the same place. You are from a dimension where people don't mention Tom's height.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:01 AM
1

Unfortunately the majority of them do actually do the negative thing in question. What negative thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:38 AM
2

Holding them accountable for using rape as a throwaway argument in a random online discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:29 AM
1

Do you really think if she wasn't wearing that she would get raped. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 09:00 AM
1

I hear this a lot, but in my experience men are actually attracted to women’s bodies - NOT clothing. As a woman I have attracted attention to my physical appearance by existing. Unless I were to wear a burka or something, they can see me and what I look like! Do you have any evidence that it is actually the clothing that attracts men? Can you give me an example of an outfit an attractive woman could wear that would NOT attract male attention? But that's exactly what he's saying in that very quot…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:56 AM
1

without sexualizing them How would you know they aren't sexualizing them? Their not acting on their impulses doesn't mean they aren't sexualizing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:46 AM
1

Something you would be ok wearing in a professional environment (job).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:43 AM
2

there will always be exceptions Can I use the same argument for every man who does something bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:19 AM
2

The same way it's nobody's fault that men orgasm easier :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:53 PM
–

This might be the most entitled and the least self-aware comment I've ever read 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:50 PM
3

How do you not understand that that is a YOU issue, it's not women's issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:48 PM
3

Oh my god!!!!!! Why are you such a transgender exclusive biggot?!?!?!?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:46 PM
2

No it's just observational data. As is when you notice that women are heavily filtering for height.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:14 PM
2

Interesting nowhere did that say “Thats all that was needed” so clearly that’s what you thought. Did I say that anywhere? Why are you paraphrasing while removing all context? Would you burst into flames if you were to respond to something in good faith? This is what I said: If that were all it takes, there would be 0 (zero) issues with the height of a man. As a reply to this quoted part of your comment: Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. If you had the ability to under…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:10 PM
3

You brought it up yourself. You said: Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. Insinuating that height isn't an issue at all because of that. I just replied to that sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:10 PM
1

I also have an ungodly amount of men who are eternally triggered by my tone and who can't help but make replies that do nothing more than let me know just how much they don't like how I said things. Isn't that funny? No, not funny, it's normal. You seem generally annoying. But see, I find you annoying as a person, not as a woman. It definitely says to me that there are absolutely gendered differences here wrt what kind of communication men tolerate based on sex, and an entitlement to being perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:08 PM
2

I just saw another study Can I see it as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:37 AM
4

Are we discussing that? I thought we were discussing something that completely removes you from receiving any pussy 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:29 AM
0

If you cannot grasp the very simple concepts I'm explaining because you want to cling to some near autistic level of expounding on a simple point that both I and the previous poster agreed with long ago, then you can continue to do so in an echo chamber. You agree with exactly one person (whose mental faculties I'm not very sure about) while everyone else on this chain is in opposition to you two, and I'm in an echo chamber? So much for grasping simple concepts. Three simple facts remain: Oooo c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:26 AM
2

men would rather die out than treat women with respect 🤷🏼‍♀️ Can we please stop with this stupid notion? It literally has nothing to do with this, and it never did, so please stop repeating it. I could treat women like utter trash (I don't btw) and that would have 0 negative impact on my romantic and sexual success with women. I have a friend who is actually a piece of shit towards them, and that fact has 0 negative impact (it may even be positive in some sense) on his romantic and sexual succes…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:56 AM
2

if she was trying to keep him When isn't she?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:42 AM
2

If you have a nice face, you're all set as a guy. You are saying like it's a decision that some guy forgot to make (he simply forgot that he has to have a nice face), and when he remembers, he will be a ok 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:39 AM
4

Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. If that were all it takes, there would be 0 (zero) issues with the height of a man. But women ain't searching for a man taller than them, they want a tall man, as in taller than other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:38 AM
1

You are arguing for a 1:1 causation/correlation. That's simply not the case. Where? In what way? And at this point you're just repeating yourself, not adding any new points. Because you are unable to grasp simple concepts that were explained to you several comments ago. The only solution is for me to keep repeating, hoping that you will finally somehow manage to understand. What you are presenting is a very black and white understanding of things that fails to consider the complexity of human be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:41 PM
-1

Also have you watched the video? What is the tl;dr of her arguments? Such a lazy reply. Why don't you watch the fucking video yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:24 PM
1

You have addressed exactly 0 points that I've made, but probably 10 points made by the ghosts in your head. Abuse doesn't make you stronger and more resilient. Abuse doesn't build character. If you are strong and resilient by default, you will persevere through abuse because that was your character already. There are no positives to abuse. Having abusive parents is a complete negative. Having good and supportive parents is always a positive. It doesn't guarantee how a person will turn out, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:54 PM
0

I stand up for my friends. I also would stand up for myself It's not about that. Almost everyone would stand up for their friends. It's about standing up for random people completely unrelated to you. Would you do that? If you would, you are in a tiny, tiny minority of women because whenever some shit goes down, a man is the one reacting to it to save others. Why that is, I don't know. We can all just guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:43 PM
1

So the fact that you don't get 100% success rate means that men don't want women to approach them :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:22 PM
1

Hence "good parents" instead of good parents. But I wasn't talking about "good parents", I was talking about good parents. And I wasn't talking about "bad parents", I was talking about actually bad parents, the ones who abuse their children. Or will you tell me there is nuance in abuse? The point is that bad parents are not deterministic, as posters here routinely claim. Bad parents are just bad parents. And if an adult is 30 or 35 and has had over a decade out of home, and is still blaming thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 11:06 AM
0

Women don’t approach because that usually doesnt go over well I have no idea in which reality you are living in, but it ain't the reality that the rest of us live in. What does it even mean, "doesn't go over well"? What exactly does that look like? Do you mean you can, god forbid, get rejected? I'm an extremely attractive guy, and the majority of my relationships started with the woman initiating. They are always given a chance (granted if I'm not already in a relationship), regardless of their …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:30 AM
1

This is the only relevant thing in your comment, so I'll address just that: "Good parents" don't guarantee someone won't be weak. "Bad parents" don't guarantee someone will be helpless. It's almost as if people are individuals and life is what you make of it. That was my entire point. This debate started because a dude said that he wouldn't change his circumstances in which he was abused as a child and a teenager because that helped him grow into the man that he is today. And my point was the bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:18 AM
1

You are replying to imaginary comments. What you wrote here has nothing to do with my comment. Did I lament personal agency anywhere in my comment? So why are you writing about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:49 PM
1

Actually the people who do that are far more likely to grow from it and succeed in spite of their upbringing, which is kind of the point here in preaching "not being a victim of circumstances you can't control and allowing them to hold power over you for your entire life." Or they won't grow at all and will be broken humans for the rest of their lives. Happens far more often than otherwise in this case. The ones who "fail" are often the ones complaining on the internet about how everything is so…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:58 PM
–

And yet here you are going back and forth with him :D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:54 PM
–

His job is far more jeopardized if he is a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:06 PM
–

Im just saying acting like sexless men don’t have their issues is crazy. They can also be picky like i said and often shoot out their league. But no one is acting like they don't have issues. Of course, they do; they are sexless because of those issues. But they aren't (at least not by default as you paint them to be) bad and evil and pricks and awful. They just have issues. You obviously have a plethora of issues. The only difference is that your issues don't lead to you being sexless, and thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:03 PM
–

I imagined what it would be like in a room full of you. And this quote of yours perfectly sums it up: Horrible group of people a majority of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:58 AM
–

If he were a bitch and stayed, he is a bitch and will always be a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:47 AM
0

Common sense. Debatable. What you define as common sense today may have nothing to do with common sense 20 years ago. 18 years of schooling. Debatable as well. There are young people coming out of high school functionally illiterate today. Information is everywhere. Yes, it is. But so is misinformation. Are you certain that you can easily differentiate between the two? Information isn’t the problem. It’s critical thinking and reading skills that are lacking in all of RP. That's a problem for eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:43 AM
3

I'm still baffled he would ask a question like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:01 AM
2

All (not most, but literally all of them) of my friends and acquaintances who had a fucked up childhood ended fucked up themselves later on. Not one of them has something resembling a functioning decent life. I don't understand how you don't understand that you are a complete outlier. 99% of people living through shit you lived through (assuming you are truthful about it) will be completely fucked up later on. You are romanticizing abuse, thinking that you need it to build character, but you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:48 AM
2

Abusive parents can either produce really self-reliant kids with scars, or hapless failed adults. That's completely reductive. It's like saying "A person jumping from the airplane without a parachute can either survive the fall or die.". Yeah, those are the 2 options, but one of them is so much more likely to happen that it makes it ridiculous to present it as an actual 2 options when the reality is that there is only one actual outcome. Abusive parents can produce self-reliant kids that grow up…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:31 AM
1

Oppression isn't altruism. Isn't feminism all about female empowerment and choice? They aren't forced to do anything; it's a choice. Why do you want to deprive them of that choice? Passport bro-ing isn't something I would EVER engage in, but from a purely utilitarian perspective, you are wrong on every level. What annoys me the most is that the same people (like you) would, in the same breath, fully support women selling their bodies for money (prostitution) for whatever reason, but would be aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:00 AM
3

I'm allowed to think about you, whatever I wish to, regardless of what you have lived through. But thank you for allowing me to do something that is allowed by default. Whatever makes you feel more important. I'll allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:36 PM
7

If you wouldn't change that for a much less eventful childhood, then there is something fundamentally wrong with you. I was growing up in a war and everything that entails (death, destruction, famine, poverty, being a refugee for a couple of years), and I would replace that for a happier childhood in a heartbeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:20 PM
3

True Glad we agree. Because they have to for survival. And men don't? But we know that women prefer cooperative systems instead of hierarchies. We know? And how do we know that? Is it like "Sky is blue and women prefer cooperative systems instead of hierarchies." or some other "know"? Men prefer hierarchies and because our whole system is build around male preferences we all have to participate in it. Or maybe this is the most sustainable system there was?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:55 PM
2

Did your parents abuse you physically and mentally?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:31 PM
8

Aw man, you are so shit at bullying. You couldn't even help a bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:28 PM
2

Men just keep it alive in the hope they will get on top of the hierarchy. Literally the same thing can be said for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:24 PM
5

What a fucking stupid question 😃 What do you guess his answer will be?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:16 PM
8

You should have bullied him to make him more resilient and stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:15 PM
1

No. And no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:07 AM
1

Here in the UK, individuals don't press charges, the government does. We know. But I don't think he has anything to be afraid of because he didn't write bad words on Facebook.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:06 AM
5

They don't put in jail people who could be innocent. I love it when people are confidently completely wrong. They literally do exactly that (at least in the US). Jail is a short-term incarceration while, for example, waiting for trial, and it goes on during the duration of the trial. So you could be completely innocent, and you would still be in jail while waiting for the verdict. Btw, I don't give a fuck about Tate, but he is still not found guilty, and he is currently not incarcerated. Just fy…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:40 AM
3

So a better outcome is world peace, people living in harmony, everybody being happy and content, simply utopia. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:01 AM
-1

Highest divorce rate is actually among lower income women. The data refutes your premise. Do you know how the divorce rate is calculated? If you knew, you would know how stupid that statement is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:59 AM
1

So the better outcome is just to leave them in their squalor?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:28 AM
3

the folks who want nuance and romance Yet, ironically enough, these are the ones that perpetuate this selection bias presented by the OP. who want to date by statistics and minmax strategy like a video game Yet, ironically enough, these are the ones that have a firmer grasp on the fact that it will be hard to find someone exactly because of what OP is saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:26 AM
0

Of course, I'm safe. You are waving the red flag the size of moon.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:58 PM
2

Yes, that's what I said. He said he wouldn't want to date them; he didn't say why. What don't you understand here?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:16 PM
1

They just think it’s rude and inconsiderate to not keep them to yourself. He kept them to himself. He just refused to date them. What's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:05 PM
1

midget It's little person!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:56 PM
2

What's wrong with that? Don't be a prude!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:53 PM
2

I can't wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:39 PM
2

They wouldn't date you even if you weren't married.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:31 PM
1

In what universe does your reply have anything at all to do with his comment, let alone the part of the comment you quoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:51 AM
1

has at some point or another Very important distinction. That's the point. At a certain point, you want a husband. But not before that certain point when it's about fun and craziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:43 AM
–

false accusations are not that common How common are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:45 AM
–

The judge doesn't prosecute. you can’t really say it’s something “women” are all opposed to tho, right Good thing he didn't say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:43 AM
2

actually believe that by hiding their posts and comments in their reddit profiles means (to them) that they are free to be raging hypocrites So, something like this: https://preview.redd.it/m6dt33u3i93h1.png?width=1037&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd70ad0dc81c2ba03d609d5b4c0e7508e0f0017a
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:38 AM
0

Women aren't covert about showing those tendencies because they think it's acceptable (and it is) for them to be that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:34 AM
2

Men like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:24 AM
-4

Ironically enough, what you are flexing here is an actual red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:21 AM
–

but I don't really see it as cheating by itself I wasn't talking about cheating at all, nor did I consider it cheating. I was just trying to illustrate why a man has every right to be apprehensive about his girlfriend/wife dressing sexy and going to the club, and it has nothing to do with insecurity. And way more so in this case than in the hiking case, because the club is teeming with sexual energy, and you are playing directly into that by dressing sexy and going there. Should you be playing i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:58 AM
7

You are missing the point. He wasn't talking about people asking specific dating advice for their own singular situation. It's the discussion about the current dating environment in general. And the people who have been partnered for the last 15 years feel like they can contribute with their own experience, which is completely removed from how things currently are. Their experience is almost completely inapplicable to the current issues that plague people trying to date. They might even be the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 10:44 AM
1

You completely missed my point. In no way did I try to minimize the risk part of the risk-benefit analysis. The risk of the first date that you described exists for each and every first date, no question about that. What I had an issue with was the benefit part because you said the following: Benefit - get to meet a nice guy! Maybe it goes somewhere but we have a good time. But ask yourself how great every first date was, Igor. Many are eh... or down right uncomfortable. So some benefit, but not…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 07:56 AM
2

You are comparing a completely different set of circumstances. A woman dressing up sexy to go to a club is in no way comparable to a man dressing up sexy and going to the club. An attractive woman dressed sexy in a club will receive a tremendous amount of attention just by existing; she doesn't have to do anything, her being there invites that attention. You can argue that it's not fair to put that on her because she may not want any of that attention, and I agree with that, but the fact still r…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:31 PM
1

Good for you man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 11:43 AM
1

women are attracted to the same small percentage of men. Exactly. What's confusing to you about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 09:32 AM
1

Not examples, evidence. Yes, you provided examples, that's correct. But is the person who's dealing with big data gonna tell me that 2 examples are evidence of something on a population-wide scale? I sincerely hope you won't. Therefore, you also provided 0 evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 02:32 PM
1

My one fascination with risk assessment by men (especially young men) is that they only ever look at chance - they ask themselves how likely is X to happen -and entirely forget the question of how bad will the result be. They flunk cost-benefit analysis. This is one of the reasons that men sadly suffer so much violence. You're completely wrong about this. Young men don't do risk assessment AT ALL. They simply do shit just for the sake of doing shit. There is zero reason or risk assessment involv…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 02:26 PM
1

Are you for real 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:35 AM
2

Communism is equal OUTCOMES.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:31 AM
1

With all due respect, dating is hard for everyone. You don't think nuance matters here? You wouldn't find it weird if your very attractive friend is complaining to your (and hers) very ugly friend, who never dated anyone in her life (and never will), about how dating is hard for her? Or do you think it's equally hard for both of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:19 AM
1

Because it's not that popular. How do you define popular?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:15 AM
2

Nothing 😂🤷🏽‍♀️ maybe a warning. And I (an extremely attractive guy) will get a fine, so your example is completely opposite of what you think you are presenting. Again, this occurrence is not gender specific, you just have tunnel vision. It's extremely gender specific in the case that OP is presenting because 90% of the time, the man is the one doing the approaching and initiating and he is the one judged based on him having/not having pretty privelage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:56 AM
3

however, if either partner enjoys going to the club for the experience itself, then they do not necessarily have to change their behavior. Why are you separating "experience itself" from dancing and flirting? That is exactly what experience itself is like. What do you consider "experience itself" if not that? If they met in the club, that means that they are dancing with people other than their friends, and that is obviously something they (as in both of them) like to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:37 AM
1

If all men had no capacity for social skills, society would just accept that men suck at social skills and people probably wouldn’t rely on men for social shit. You didn't answer the question; you just expanded a bit on the OP's hypothetical. The question was "What would women do?" What would the world look like, how would we interact with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:31 AM
1

What are you talking about? They are femcels exactly because they are socially inept right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:29 AM
2

Either it's ok for everyone or no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:02 PM
4

So he provided an equal amount of "evidence" OP did. Which is none.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:00 PM
2

And I said be specific about your RQs. And I said that's irrelevant because the data is randomly biased to a tiny sample regardless of what you query. We are going in circles here. Ultimately, Reddit Answers is a consumer-facing engine with its own protocols. So, ultimately, it isn't something you should recommend doing stuff you claim is doing. The better approach is to export historical data from Reddit (or wherever people talk online) and analyze it using third party tools and algorithms. Yes…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:36 PM
1

The goal is get an unbiased understanding of what people say and why they say it. Unbiased. Ok. You didn't answer his question about how you are categorizing misogyny and misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:20 PM
12

I don't think objectively means what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:16 PM
4

I'd guess the type of men who use dating apps are probably already less attractive on average. And what would you have guessed about the type of women who use dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:15 PM
1

And I replied that I don't bias the data; the tool does that by default. What are you finding issues with here?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:03 PM
3

That online dating is the primary or preferred way to meet people. He said that people are moving everything online, and the trend of meeting people online is growing. He is completely correct about that, you can't really deny it. The fact that some women have dating apps they rarely use, or tried it once and didn't like it, doesn't negate that. Nor does it speak for your case either. You have no idea how big that "some" is, and you have no idea how big a chunk of that "some" are the ones that j…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:01 PM
2

You literally said: No. Don’t bias the data. Ask it why socratically. As a direct reply to: So I can get even more completely biased answers based on the completely random set of posts that are probably just 0.0000001% of the totality of potentially relevant reddit data? Any more great suggestions? How does that equal "I don't bias the data." I never accused you of that because we weren't even talking about that. What exactly are you countering?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:33 PM
2

No. Don’t bias the data. I'm not biasing the data; the tool is doing that by default. And worst of all, the bias is completely randomized. Ask it why socratically. Yeah, let's use socratic method on the "AI" that's drawing insights from an absolutely limited and completely random dataset. I think you never actually used Reddit Answers. Why are you being intentionally dense with each reply? Why don't you use socratic method to find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:16 PM
2

Either way it’s a consumer-facing tool. With limitations. And the limitation here is a handful of randomly selected posts that may or may not be heavily correlated to the question at hand. So, given that, why would someone dealing with big data suggest such a flawed tool to anyone? Now be more specific about the questions, and the motivations, the whys. Your research questions and methodology is shoddy and incomplete. So I can get even more completely biased answers based on the completely rando…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:45 AM
2

You should tell me 10 more times how you are getting paid to do this research.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:38 AM
3

I get paid to do this research. I have no idea how much you are paid for doing that, but trust me, you aren't paid nearly enough. I know they do. Great. You provided no evidence of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:37 AM
3

It’s not “cherry picked.” It’s data. It's data only when it suits your agenda. It will be "just an irrelevant twitter/instagram post" the moment it goes against your agenda. I work in this space (ethnographic largescale data) And yet you think posting links to 2 twitter/instagram posts is relevant? We analyze millions of online opinions on a regular basis. And yet you think posting links to 2 twitter/instagram posts is relevant? There are clear trends. Yes, there are. They are in the article you…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:27 AM
5

If you want to be pedantic it’s actually more than two examples. At least count the replies in the screenshots. The screenshots include more than two comments. You guys can’t even do “gotcha” math well smh. Or maybe you should look at the screenshots yourself to see the gender of people replying. Or maybe you should assume that if you have an "edgy" comment that has replies, the vast majority of those replies are condemning the edgy comment. Or maybe don't assume at all, and verify it yourself (…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:15 AM
4

They were from Instagram. Ohhhh, so much better and a much more valid source. Are you going to dismiss Instagram as a cesspool? Rhetorical question? Is massive amount of verbatim data on the internet not reliable? It’s data. Massive? Yet you provide 2 twitter posts with barely any replies. At some point you guys can’t keep hand waving as “that’s just edgelords…” Can we say that for the casual #killallmen crowd? It’s male opinions across the internet. Not just convenient sites you think don’t cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:44 AM
8

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS DISCUSSION. That fucking ambiguity is the reason this topic exists for your silly comment to exist on it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:36 AM
2

in my opinion, this is a bit hypocritical. if you get into a relationship with a woman who wears revealing clothes, loves going to the club, and is active on social media, why would you expect her to change her entire lifestyle just because she's dating you? Would you expect a man whom she got in a relationship with by meeting him in a club where he likes to dress up to flirt with women and dance with them throughout the night to change his behavior when they get together?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:31 AM
6

This really isn't true. What isn't really true? You haven't specified. Is his entire comment not true, or some of it? Online dating apps have always been a niche market and have always been designed to appeal more to men than to women, which is why way more men are on it than women. Somewhere between 30-50% of new couples formed are formed on OLD. And you consider that niche market? Appeals more to men than women? Yeah, that's true. While at the same time talking about how you can meet women pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:25 AM
1

Yes. By default.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 08:33 AM
5

And at that time, there was STILL tremendous social pressure on women to pair up with men. If we didn't we were considered losers. Literally something that ALWAYS happened to men, and is still so. Can you think of anything comparable that women do systemically? I don't think you understand what systemically means. None of your examples are of something men do systemically.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:44 AM
–

Do you consider those answers reasonable? To the question "Can you be considered an activist against racism if you hate black people?" he got the answer "Yeah, I hate black people, but I still want them to receive equal treatment!". That's what you consider reasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:31 AM
–

And why do women always have their dms off…. Because they are weak and paranoid?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:26 AM
1

What changed is that less people are dying and police are able to focus on more severe crimes As I said, drug use should never have been a criminal offence. Any law enforcement resource going towards that is a waste. It was all the scandinavian countries. Back in the 60s and 70s they had a reform which included reducing long-term and indefinite sentences. Then in the 90s they began to focus on rehabilitation over punishment. I have no idea where you are getting your information from. At least fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 09:16 AM
2

Thank you for that video of not only 2 but all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:48 AM
1

Scandinavia Which scandinavian country? Do you know what happened and what changed in their law and what consequences it had? Or are you just mentioning Scandinavia by default whenever there is some discussion about "country good"? And portugal's decriminalization of drugs led to a huge reduction in drug-related deaths and hiv. Using drugs should never have been a crime to begin with; it's something you do to yourself. If drug possession and usage are crimes, alcohol usage and possession should …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:43 AM
1

It’s not always feasible, but we should do our best with what we have and with what the survivors request. I have no idea what happened to you, but I'm fairly certain most "survivors" would request appropriate/harsh punishments for the violence perpetrated on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:31 AM
2

El salvador is a one of a kind story. Youre the one cherry picking here. El salvador is the only kind of story. Anytime a nation goes soft on crime, it downs in crime rather than flourishes. Can you give me an example of a country that went from strict and stringent punishments to soft punishments for crimes and was better for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:21 AM
1

Can you explain the reasoning for that statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:18 AM
0

They don't prefer them. They prefer the status that comes with men doing those kinds of jobs. Isn't it kinda moronic to say "Women don't prefer doctors and lawyers" when each and every doctor and lawyer is either married or can get a relationship with any issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:04 AM
3

What is FeministsTM, how do you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:35 AM
–

When you ask chatgpt to think for you, ask it to do that in a much shorter form, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:27 AM
1

And men’s and women’s are different How so? What are men's desires? What are women's desires?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:19 AM
1

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about the person I initially replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:40 PM
1

I am surrounded by married couples with kids, including being part of a married couple with a kid That's how I know it's bullshit. How is this not you invalidating her experience and validating yours? No, you're not, but it's ok because it's revealing you don't actually know how to disagree with women without calling them liars. While you think telling someone, I will paraphrase a bit, "What you said is total bullshit, and I know better." is you respecting them and their opinion 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 02:12 PM
1

None of those invalidated her experience. They invalidated her claim that her experience represented the broad trend of all heterosexual marriages, which is also not mansplaining. And your experience is more valid because what exactly? It's kinda funny to see red pill dudes on this sub try and 'gotcha' people by parroting feminist talking points only to reveal they don't actually understand them at all. There is no gotcha here, I'm showing genuine curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 02:02 PM
0

No that's just bullshit. There's nothing to back up that claim. That's how I know it's bullshit. Doesn't seem like a language validating someone's experience. Or are you claiming that this is how you validate someone's experience, by calling it bullshit and telling them they have nothing to back up their claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:55 PM
1

Is your heterosexual experience and heterosexual experience of your friends more important and valid than her experience and the experience of her friends? If yes, is it because she is a woman or is it something else that makes her opinion less valid compared to yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:31 PM
2

It literally has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:28 PM
0

Of his partner's past that he is avoiding hearing?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:27 PM
1

How would you define a man explaining to a woman that her gendered experience is completely wrong and that you as a man know way more about her female experience? This usually went under the umbrella of "mansplaining". Is something different now?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:27 PM
5

Men do this to women ALL the time too. "Sorry, I just don't have that vibe with you anymore". In this case, it would be a completely valid complaint from women as well. There was even a post here recently regarding men "pumping and dumping" explaining that it isn't always intentional. Sometimes after sex men just realize the vibe is off and they don't actually want her like they thought. Oh well. Move on. Such is life. That has nothing to do with what we were discussing. It's a perfectly normal …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 12:37 PM
1

Again, you are saying hate. And I'm saying not liking =/= hating something. I'm not talking about hating something. I'm talking about being indifferent towards something at worst. Like, I don't care much for that thing; it's 134 on my list of things I could be doing now, but that isn't hating something.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:33 AM
1

But I meant in general (you started with general, I continued it). Not specifically sex. When someone says that they don't really like hiking, that doesn't mean that they will die if they go hiking. It means that they have 20 other things that they would like to do more than hiking. I'm applying the same principle to doing certain acts in sex. Not liking something =/= vehemently hating something, not nearly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:16 AM
1

If my partner said “I know you don’t like X during sex, but I want to do X to you anyway” I would break up with them. Sex should be about both people enjoying the experience. I didn't ask that. Tell me honestly, dude… would you even be able to enjoy doing a sex act to someone you KNOW doesn’t like it? Could you keep going feeling them tense and gritted as they endure it? No, I wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:02 AM
6

You seem to be racist against brown people :/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:09 AM
2

There is a big difference between 1 and 2 times a week. One option is twice as much as the other. Is it 1 or 2?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:05 AM
3

It's a you issue more than you even realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:04 AM
1

Is a female nurse the archetype of an average woman? No other kinds of women exist? Have you talked to all of those 150 female nurses to get their opinion on this matter? Was no nurse left behind?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:03 AM
0

I'm noticing you're engaging in mansplaining a lot. Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:01 AM
1

If no man ever managed to fulfill your requirements, it's a you issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:58 AM
1

Are you the spokeswoman for all average women ever in the entire world?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:57 AM
0

But no man has ever fulfilled my needs to that point. Than I think this is a "you" issue rather than "most working women in adult relationships" issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:53 AM
-1

If you need affection and love why aren't your needs being met by cuddles, kisses and hugs? Would you protest if you weren't getting these? If yes, why? Why do you feel entitled to cuddles, kisses, and hugs?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:50 AM
1

Then why engage in that kind of sex at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:37 AM
4

If I said the first thing to a guy it would mean I wasn't into him. That's the point everyone is always making, but every damn time, "people" are being intentionally obtuse and pretending that you are talking about the 2nd option (when no one is) and replying to that instead of the 1st option. Thank you for bringing some nuance to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:35 AM
1

Your comment implied that you don't want to know because you would feel jealous, and it would sour your relationship IF YOU KNEW. Therefore, you choose to remain wilfully ignorant. I just applied that to cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:14 AM
0

Not caring about what someone did sexually before they met you isn't the same as not caring about being cheated on. But this isn't "not caring". He doesn't want to know exactly because he would care if he knew, and that is the reason that he doesn't want to know. Because he would be unable to face the truth. And that's why I made an analogy with cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:08 AM
1

But would you do it for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:05 AM
–

How is it not? You are asking about someone's previous relationship(s). You won't find out about that info by asking “where did you grow up, what was your childhood like”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:32 PM
1

Yep, sometimes I have to do things I don’t like. But, by definition, I don’t like having to. And I don’t love people who pressure me and claim I don’t love them if I don’t. But the point is that you would do those things for your partner even though they would never force or pressure you to do them because you are aware that those things would make them happy, and if it's not torture for you, why not do them? Your partner is probably doing the same for you. So in that constellation of things, if…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:27 PM
–

You wouldn't care if your potential partner cheated in his previous relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:59 PM
–

It was so simple, and yet you failed. The point is NOT TO MAKE IT MORE SPECIFIC.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:55 PM
–

Sorry, this comment was supposed to go to the person above you because I completely agree with you 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:42 PM
–

But using that kind of logic, you would be ok with your partner cheating on you just as long as you never find out, and just as long as it doesn't affect your relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:14 PM
1

If I was body dead I would be dead lol. That was... my point... Which would make the body more important than the brain, because you can't be "body dead" without actually being dead. Basically, if you go into a coma your woman won't want you anymore. She'll leave immediately (like men more often do) because now your body is useless and there's nothing else you offer. Almost no one leaves their significant other in a coma. Partially because you can't really "leave" someone in that state. Either y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:42 AM
2

And if you were "body dead" would it be any different than being brain dead as to you writing comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:25 AM
0

Just gotta train em well. You are so right about this. I keep saying this to all my guy friends who don't have issues getting a woman, but always run into issues later on in their relationship. You gotta train 'em well!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:03 AM
2

for children, both men and women have a major responsibility to contain their anger for that same reason So, one could say that it's a FAR WORSE offence to do something like that to an infant or a small child just based on the power difference, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:33 AM
2

This is what you said that initially caused me to reply: I've seen plenty of tall, conventionally attractive friends fail because they lack social skills. And you are basing that "plenty" on exactly one socially retarded (or maybe generally retarded, judging by your comment) friend that is so socially retarded that it's not troublesome at all for you to write an essay (I'm a fucking morong for having read all of that) about how socially retarded he is. And he is also 2" taller than you, and you …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 03:11 PM
1

I've seen plenty of tall, conventionally attractive friends fail because they lack social skills. At least try to make it somewhat believable. I would really like to know where you live to be surrounded by so many tall, attractive, socially retarded men who somehow fail regardless of how they look :/ On the other hand, I have friends who are the best people I have ever known, as funny and as interesting as it is humanly possible. And yet, because they aren't as conveniently attractive (they aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 08:43 AM
2

I really wish you guys would understand there are people who dont live in your bubble. Said by the person in a bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 07:26 AM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about. Can you imagine then how I feel? Half the time I myself have no idea what I'm talking about, so why would you know what I'm talking about. I consider myself above average and have never had problems attracting women. So your "advice" is completely useless for men who are average and below average. "Like a foot" - how old are you? Is that some kind of Boomer slang? Are you trying to ask me how tall I am? You know what a foot is? Can you imagine what you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 03:13 PM
1

I said being able to interact socially with women has nothing to do with looks. I have no idea why people are peddling this kind of reductive opinion. You can disagree to what extent looks matter in this case, but saying it has nothing to do with it is ridiculous. It's like saying height has nothing to do with someone being in the NBA. If you are a good-looking guy, everything is so much easier when interacting with women socially. You are in a constant positive feedback loop; the mistakes that …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 03:08 PM
0

How "like a foot" do you look from 0 to foot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:27 PM
-1

I presume you look like a foot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:20 AM
–

What? I provided a screenshot. Of what? Of it not being used how you said it's used? Yeah, you definitely provided a screenshot of that. I also linked an example of that in another reply from last week of a guy here using the phrase to explain how women should expect men to be polygamous. Yes, you did. I could also provide a screenshot of people enjoying taxidermy. Either of those is equally relevant to your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:06 AM
–

Wrong. Yeah, I was wrong, I admit. It's actually NEVER EVER. It’s related but I know you guys like to play dumb. Somehow, only in your mind (but I guess that's all that matters anyway). Everyone else is pointing out how there is literally no connection. But I guess you are right, and everyone else is playing dumb. There is a name for that kind of condition, I think it starts with n, and ends with arcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:02 AM
1

Furthermore, if you do your own queries across the internet you’ll find men using that phrase to talk about how women should “duh expect men not to be faithful” commonly enough. They are used so commonly enough that you are unable to provide a single example? We seem to have differing opinions on what common means.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:40 AM
1

Again, don't project your experience onto others, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:36 PM
1

Don't project your experience onto others, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:47 PM
–

I'm not trolling. You either don't understand what harm is, or you consider viewpoints to be harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:18 PM
3

It’s not an uncommon phrase. Men use it often. And never in the context you described. And what you linked has nothing to do with the context in your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:27 PM
–

fun fact women that gain weight in the relationship is usually because of the man :/ Fun fact, your fun fact is stupid and has no basis whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:40 AM
–

What a silly notion. "Single" dads only do better because they have a higher likelihood of having a live in girlfriend or wife that takes care of the kids while nothing in his life ever has to adjust. So, is he to blame for realizing that the best outcome for a child is to have a father AND a mother figure and doing what he can to provide that for his child/children? Shouldn't he be praised for this instead of criticized? It isn't even that they're better parents. They just have more money. More…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:21 AM
1

You would also have to ask her male fans what they like about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:09 AM
–

Correct, and also completely irrelevant. OP said that he wanted to demonize step-fatherhood so that men don't engage in it because they have a noble cause (to be a stepfather and take care of children that are missing a father figure), but, in the end, it is detrimental for them (them being men who become stepfathers). So, quite the opposite, he's not demonizing stepfathers, he just thinks that they are hurting themselves by choosing to be stepfathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:02 AM
–

No, he didn't. He proposed the demonisation of step-fatherhood, not step fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:36 AM
1

Women.. Am I right.. 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:12 AM
1

If only people would read the actual studies they link nonchalantly. And imagine if they understood the data. Oh, how much better the world would be. But who's got time for that when you are barely 126765 deep in making your daily diet of 100000000000 stupid comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:51 AM
1

Fuck no.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:48 AM
1

How do you decide what fits in: within reason and limited
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:41 AM
–

You never saw a man smile? I don't understand. Your own point is that men are "externalizing" their feelings. If not in the way you mentioned, how are they then doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:37 AM
–

Isn't that externalized behaviour? And don't men also cry, smile, laugh, frown?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:26 AM
1

So a self-reported survey that asks “how much rage did you have prior to redpill and after redpill?” As opposed to you deciding, by yourself, that: They were ALREADY filled with rage, TRP just allowed them to express it more. based on literally nothing. Hm.............................
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:07 AM
–

The activities of young men were of great interest long before 21st century Internet forums. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:56 AM
–

And how do women display emotions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:48 AM
–

I hope you aren't a lawyer because you have issues with reading and understanding. He said: even though even the wikipedia page could assign no specific harm Unless you think being anti-feminist and misogynistic is a harm. But then we enter the sphere of thought crime, and I'm not sure we would like to go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:46 AM
2

But I did, and you didn't want to answer. You are still not answering. How are they different? Do they feel different inside you, and how?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:34 AM
1

They were literally using their incredibly unusual experience to pivot from the original conversation How exactly? You asked: What are men supposedly scared of about women then? Do they think women will hurt them in some way? And he gave you a concrete example of his own experience as an answer to that very question. Where exactly was the pivot? You were the one pivoting after his answer. I still can't understand why you are so focused on the circumstances surrounding him being almost stabbed in…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:08 AM
1

I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:12 PM
4

AND HOW ARE THEY DIFFERENT?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:35 PM
3

Because you don't want to answer a simple question! What most do you like inside you, a big labia, a penis length or forsking length and how are they different?!?!?!?!? What's the issue with simply answering a simple question?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:34 PM
1

You would be correct if we were living in an alternate universe where you are correct. But there are no such universes. I didn't reply to your initial comment about men who have issues with women's labia being addicted to porn, because I actually somewhat agree with that. I replied to a comment where you say that women are influenced by things other than porn (they are influenced by porn as well btw). To which I just questioned why that influence would be any more or less valid than being influe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:32 PM
3

I don't know, you seem to know but don't want to tell me. Why don't you want to tell me?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:23 PM
3

But how do they compare to labia size and what do you prefer more inside you, a penis length or forsking length?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:16 PM
2

You did what exactly and why am I here lol ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:14 PM
5

But they aren't two different things. They are the same thing in this context - preference. Do you, yourself, prefer bigger dick in you or more forskin in you? It's a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:13 PM
4

You are trying too hard to make everything about porn. If you want to talk about porn, make your own post about it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:51 PM
6

What does that have to do with him likening the size of the labia to either of those?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:50 PM
4

So that makes their influence more valid, or?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:48 AM
1

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:47 AM
3

I don't understand what I'm supposed to explain to you that I haven't already explained. Are you denying that saying "um, that's an interesting experience" about something serious, while at the same time pivoting to another issue, is reducing and trivializing that issue? Are you denying that saying "um, that's an interesting experience" to a woman who was talking about being almost raped is reducing and trivializing her trauma (regardless of how weird you may find the circumstances of that poten…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:15 AM
0

You are reducing way too many factors that led to Trump's first term to "misoginy". How many women voted for trump? Why did they vote for trump? I mean I can guess your answer - "internalized misogyny". A convenient way to explain away everything without engaging in the conversation at all. What does redpill have to do with those female voters? Ah, I can guess that as well, their husbands/partners made them vote that way :/ . But redpill men weren't supposed to have wives/partners......... Why i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 07:30 AM
3

Do you know anyone who was almost raped by their partner's ex?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 07:15 AM
3

Why are you so laser-focused on that instead of the fact that he was almost stabbed? Am I weird for not finding jealous, violent outbursts strange and unusual? Or do you find it weird because the woman was a perpetrator? There was a case not long ago in my country where a man shot and killed his ex-wife, her then husband, her mother, and an unfortunate neighbour who happened to be there at the time. Does that warrant um, interesting reaction, or is it completely understandable because a deranged…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 07:09 AM
0

It doesn't have to say "Red Pill" specifically for it to be true. Please be for real. Articles that are supposed to prove that "gamergate led to redpill being mainstream" (verbatim your statement) don't have to mention redpill at all? So how did they make redpill mainstream by not mentioning redpill at all not even once? Red pill=manosphere=misogynistic=aggrieved men. Aaaahhhh, that way. So the point was that you arbitrarily cojoin terms so whenever either of the terms is mentioned, all the othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:29 PM
1

Can you link some articles that say that it's all the same, and them not mentioning either of the "Red pill=manosphere=misogynistic=aggrieved men" terms?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:22 PM
0

Thank you for proving my exact point. Btw, you linked a wired article that didn't mention red pill once. A medium (with 3 claps mind you, literally 0 people read it) that didn't mention red pill once. And wiki article about gamergate that didn't mention red pill once. And these are supposed to be proof that gamergate led to red pill being mainstream?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 03:02 PM
7

What's to explain? I'm supposed to believe that you find it, oh so unusual that someone was almost stabbed? What exactly is unusual about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:56 PM
0

I definitely learned something today. I learned that regardless of how insane or illogical some belief might be, you can always find someone who thinks that exact way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:52 PM
7

I guess that's where we diverge in our opinions. You think that I think that you are telling the truth, and I, on the other hand, know that you are lying. I guess we are at an impasse here. Oh well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:50 PM
1

Gamergate led to redpill being mainstream. I can't wrap my mind around you thinking this is a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:47 PM
2

If you were honestly asking for an explanation and clarification, you would have gotten it. Saying "This post is barely coherent." is not it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:42 PM
1

I don't know. You placed gamergate next to RvW being repealed, so I guess it means that much (if not more) to you. I just wondered why.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:40 PM
5

Would what you have written be written, and would we be having this discussion if he had been almost stabbed by his ex's ex, who was actually her boyfriend rather than girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:37 PM
2

Same here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:05 PM
1

They've already repealed RvW and only what...6 years after gamergate? This doesn't imply that gamergate is somehow a significant event that, not even 6 years after it happened, RvW was repealed? You are acting like you said "They've already repealed RvW and only what...6 years after I first had Eggs Benedict!"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:00 PM
7

It's, um, interesting when someone is almost stabbed? Is it, um, interesting when someone is almost raped?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:56 PM
3

Or you could also ignore this post that you replied to in the way you did?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:55 PM
1

You are only roleplaying a male feminist. Nothing more, nothing less. If you are as attractive as you claim to be, you could roleplay a piece of shit boyfriend, a misogynistic bastard, a feminized in touch with your feelings male ally, a brooding emo, or whatever else comes to mind. You would still have interest from women. The interest you receive has nothing to do with you being a feminist or whatever other role you are playing at the time. I should know because it's the same with me. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:52 PM
2

I could literally copy and paste this reply verbatim to each and every one of your topics, and it would fit perfectly each and every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:42 PM
2

So the increase in these views also correlates with less dating. Why do you assume that there was an increase in those views?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:39 PM
0

I didn't realize gamergate was such a historic event that you measure time as time before gamergate and time after gamergate 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:37 PM
15

Well that's an, um, interesting experience. I don't think you minimized it or trivialized it enough. I think you can do it much better than this lame attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:25 PM
–

There is always a "because".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 12:02 PM
4

I read your flair. What do I do next?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:08 PM
1

Don't wanna!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:26 PM
1

Many such examples and the latest one is from more than 2 years ago 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:21 PM
1

Many such examples? Really? I was curious, so I went there. Went through at least 50 topics (couldn't stop myself from reading on). Everything there is fucking horrible. But I saw exactly 0 such examples. I guess they magically pop up when you look at that sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:06 PM
0

WAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYY TOO MANY, and then you keep repeating the same story of one man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:46 AM
1

And he somehow managed to cheat in the meantime?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:43 AM
2

How is it enforced right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:52 AM
3

Objectively our closest genetic relations still practice Polygamy. And where the fuck are our closest genetic relatives right now? Why should we as a species in any way consider the social structure of animals that lick their shit? What the fuck is wrong with people?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:43 AM
2

And that's different from how things were forever in what way exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:34 AM
2

after we let natural selection take its course again What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:27 AM
1

Realizing that doesn't help them suddenly get into a relationship. You are confusing cause and effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:26 AM
–

Now read about dogs, wolves and the differences in their reactions to men and women. Or you can actually read the OP a bit further than the title if you are going to make a reply. What does this have to do with your perceived gender war Nothing. And that was the point of his post. If you actually bothered to read it before commenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:33 AM
4

😃
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:24 AM
1

So nothing that doesn't concern you directly can have value?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:19 AM
1

You are like a kid "It's not that I can't, I JUST DON'T WANNA!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:18 AM
0

This should tell us everything we need to know about your ability to think critically. Read that sentence slowly my dude. Read it again, and everything seems fine. I don't understand what you are having issues with. A guy in China will know who Klay is. A guy from anywhere in Europe will know who Klay is. A guy from the Philippines, Australia, or Brazil will know who Klay is. None of them will know who Megan is. A global star who gets her shows cancelled because of low ticket sales. You don't se…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:15 AM
1

I mean, you said yourself that you are unable to read, I'm just saying that I'm feeling sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:29 AM
1

That's an article from 2022 referencing a top list made at the start of the season, in which GSW (Golden State Warriors - NBA team that Klay played basketball in at the time) won their 4th ring in the era of Steph/Klay/Dray. He would probably be on that list if it was made a year later. He's usually in the top 100 players ever. Can you even grasp what that means? The NBA is a league that funnels all the best players from the entire world to play in it. Meaning that if you are in the top 100 ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:26 AM
0

I'm sorry that you are unable to read. I hope your situation improves with time. I pray for your recovery.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:19 AM
-2

meghan Yeah, she's so well known that you people don't even know her name. I'm fairly certain that 95% of women here don't even listen to her songs at all, and yet are so adamant about discussing her fame. & she’s at the beginning of her career She is going to be talked about for 5 more years, tops, and will be forgotten completely afterwards. klay is at the end of his and was never a lebron to begin with. Yup, he isn't as famous as lebron, none of them are. But he is still extremely famous. It'…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:12 AM
3

But in this case, it literally is her fault for not vetting properly. She isn't to blame for being cheated on; she is to blame for being in that situation at all because she gave a chance to a known cheater.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:07 AM
0

Holding him accountable would be not getting with him at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:03 AM
2

Lets say you trust me and then I con you and take you for all you have. But why would I trust you if you are a known conman? You are reframing things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:03 AM
0

Wrong. Just because you like Klay Thompson more doesn't change the fact that Megan is more famous globally. Wrong. Just because you like Megan more doesn't change the fact that Klay is more famous globally. Megan Thee Stallion is a major pop culture figure. In the US. Klay is known globally. Grammy-winning rapper with hit songs and crossover into film, TV, and brand deals. Now imagine if it were 100x harder to get a single Grammy. That would be the equivalent of winning the NBA Championship. He …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:00 AM
0

Are you yanking our chain or something? I don't know, am I? looked it up. He doesn't even make the top 50 here. I got tired of scrolling. I don't see him on ESPNs page either for this season See, that's the difference here. Klay is at the end of his career, and he's not stuffing the stat sheet this or the previous season. But because of his legacy, he will be known for a long time. Megan will be forgotten the moment she drops off the charts. I'll be generous and give her another 5 years tops. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:51 PM
3

If you told me, "I have conned 10 people just before I met you, but I would never con you, never ever!" and I let you con me, OF COURSE I WOULD BLAME MYSELF.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:28 PM
1

And you continued on being with him till he cheated on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:13 PM
1

If a person runs full speed headfirst into a concrete wall, knowing full well what the outcome would be because there were 10 other people who ran into that wall the same way just before him, does that make the wall an asshole? Or might that person be partially retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:12 PM
2

I'm sorry that you are unable to read more than one sentence replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:06 PM
0

You don't have to believe it. Doesn't change the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:05 PM
1

Why were you in a relationship with a socially awkward retard of a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:04 PM
0

Y'all really refuse to hold men accountable for cheating because you'd rather admire them. The post is literally holding him accountable. Megan didn't hold him accountable. Guess she should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:02 PM
1

You never see this when men get cheated on by women, nobody's whining "but he picked her, it's his fault"! If you are completely blind, yeah, then you don't see that. Otherwise, that's the only thing you see in that situation. Especially coming from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:00 PM
1

I've seen at least a dozen reels and Reddit posts of men saying 'shes ugly and if I was her BF I'd cheat too and he's rich and famous and she's a nobody' with thousands of comments supporting. No way, dozen you say! Can you link to at least one of those Reddit threads with thousands of comments supporting his cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:52 PM
0

You don't have to read any of it. Just be aware that it's all true and you are completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:43 PM
1

Do you apply the same standard to Megan, who is outing their relationship dirty laundry for the whole world to see?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:42 PM
2

no you definitely don’t if you think that personal values don’t impact sexual & relationship value. I just illustrated my own experience that proves otherwise. I might be an outlier in that, but I can only comment on what has happened to me personally. being adored by (& manipulating) insecure women really proves nothing Why do women here always do this? You just can't stop yourself from infantilizing each and every woman whose choice of a relationship has a potentially negative outcome. No, reg…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:40 PM
1

lol meg is a globally popular music star No. Taylor Swift is globally popular. She could stack 10 concerts, one after the other, in any European town that you pick in the biggest venue that you can find, and each of them would be sold out. That's global popularity. Megan can't fill an arena and had several concerts that were canceled in the EU part of her 2025 tour. That's literally the opposite of global popularity. basketbal does not nearly have as much widespread appeal, even in the US where …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:06 PM
3

I do. Quite more than you might think. Speaking from personal experience, because of the way I look, my personal values were irrelevant. I was a piece of shit for quite some time, and I was adored by each and every woman I was with at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:55 PM
0

I have no idea what this means I meant that it's an extremely expected comment, that's why it's a comment one could expect here. I don't understand what's not clear about that. It's still a weak point for the reason I explained. It's not. I mean, you could have that silly argument about the fame of a person who isn't a singer and isn't supposed to fill an arena solo, but when a person that is a singer can't sell tickets, that tells you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:50 PM
2

It's geniunely hilarious. The men these dudes look up to the most are literal nobodies to the vast majority of women. Yeah, it is. I literally can't stop laughing. You actually think that the man Megan Thee Stallion (who is, for some reason, considered globally popular goddess of rap and beauty here on PPD) was in a relationship with is a nobody because you yourself haven't heard about him. I can't even fathom the sheer amount of cognitive dissonance needed to be employed for someone to reach th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:45 PM
0

All of the guys I know know who Klay Thompson is (I'm not from the US). One girl (out of many) I know knew who Megan is. He is obviously more famous because a whole ass world outside of the US actually exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:34 PM
0

So why are we discussing value if it's a completely subjective assessment?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:30 PM
-1

Exactly the comment one could expect here 😄 Btw, it's a knock against her "GLOBAL POP STAR" case. Because she isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:27 PM
1

constantly being thirsted on by men How exactly would you know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:18 PM
1

It's not even that. It's the fact that everyone is calling Megan a global pop star while at the same time, probably 90+% of them aren't even listening to her, and she is almost a complete unknown outside of the US. And when they say "basketball is an american sport" AAAAAAAAAARGGGGGHHHH. The entire fucking world is watching NBA. No one knows who the fuck Megan Thee Stallion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:15 PM
3

Your personal values =/= your sexual/relationship marketplace value
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:11 PM
1

Are you shaming men for being emotional?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:08 PM
1

So, when did women start having standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:06 PM
1

As unique as any other woman here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:04 PM
0

You’re saying this from the perspective of a dude-centered mainstream outlook. While you, on the other hand, will give an objective assessment, right? You are completely wrong. It's literally the opposite of what you are thinking. Their fame is incomparable. He is one of the best NBA players who has ever played the game, and the NBA is popular in the entire fucking world. While she is primarily an american rap star. Not global, AMERICAN almost exclusively. She could barely fill an arena in her E…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:38 PM
1

How would you define value?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:14 PM
0

But nearly all the men here are defending his cheating. I feel sorry for people like you. My wish is for you to live in the world that you perceive it to be. My wish is for you to always be correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:06 PM
1

The direct parent comment chain above it never included you. Neither did they include you. And yet here we are. I replied to HighlightDowntown966. Who had two back-and-forths with ThatBitchA. HighlightDowntown966 originally replied to anomalocarus. The chain was about Meg not needing a provider, and the thread I was a part of was about who Meg's "equal" would even be. HighlightDowntown966 said: Megan is in"no Man's Land". Where men in her tax bracket don't want to take her seriously. And then yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:04 PM
1

And anyone you don't know is irrelevant for the other 8billion people? Megan knew who he was. Is the opinion of the global rap superstar (like some here deem her to be) less relevant than your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:58 PM
1

RP picks and chooses when to apply their theories and they ignore the real life examples that disprove their narrative. Saying that while picking and choosing the outlier of outlier cases (for each of those cases, there are probably 1000 cases to the contrary) is peak irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:54 PM
1

No, "we" aren't discussing anything, you are butting into a conversation you're not a part of. I'm sorry for my non-consensual reply to your comment. I will think about what I just did and will try to do better in the future. Or who gives a fuck. Anyway, what do you mean by "butting into the conversation"? Do you mean the same way you are butting into a conversation when you made your first comment on this chain? Why is my butting into the conversation any different from your butting into the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:42 PM
1

We are currently discussing how committed he was to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:52 PM
1

Again, that's cool. So many men are defending a cheater. Really, and how many is that? Did you make a count? This thread is full of men like you defending a cheater. Keep putting more straw in that strawman that you are making, make it as big as your husband's moral compass and the goodness of his soul, the biggest strawman ever. It's really enlightening discourse. Every comment exchanged with you is enlightening in more ways than you can imagine. Honestly, makes me grateful I found a man who al…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 04:26 PM
1

I do know something about this man from what you're telling me. No, you don't. You are just assuming things about him. You know that girls are attracted to him and that he doesn't react to that. You also know that the girls who are attracted to him don't pursue things further. In that "arc of a story", you know exactly as much about him as you know about the girl/s.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 04:07 PM
1

I define cheating men (and women) as losers. I don't. I define them as pieces of shit. Loser is something completely different to me. I attach that to the lack of success, and in no way can I attach that to Klay Thompson. I guess we differ on the interpretation of the word. Even my husband who is aware of his ball game thinks he's a loser now. 🤷 I really don't give a fuck what your husband thinks of anything, really. It's actually weird, in this same comment chain, another user was also telling …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:55 PM
2

You are so funny 😃 "Nature doesn't select shit, but if it did, I know exactly what nature would select for!" And you are saying that he "bleats on" about things he knows nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:36 PM
4

I'm not mad at you; I feel completely indifferent towards you. Can you tell me why you would be surprised that someone is calling you out for asking for proof about the stance that they may hold, while you don't feel the need to prove anything about your own stance that they are criticizing? We are supposed to take your stance as is, while everything you don't agree with is under question and needs to be proven? You really see no issues there?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:15 PM
4

How so? By calling out your hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:48 PM
1

Lol. He's a loser. Depends on how you define a loser. The ones who know him as a player and know his career, he will be one of the best ever. To people like you who evaluate him because of the fact that he cheated on Megan, he will be a loser. It's all a matter of perspective. The entire world now knows he's a cheater. I don't think anyone in the world cares whatsoever. Most (like me) probably have no idea about that. Keep defending him. It's doing great things for y'all. I'm not aware of the gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:46 PM
3

You also can't just exclude women who are on OLD like they don't represent women "in real life" (whatever the fuck that is). How stupid must you be to not realize that the person you are talking to and "vibing" at some get-together is probably also on some dating app. All of you are acting like women on OLD are somehow invisible in real life, like they exist only virtually, that every woman you actually see in real life has nothing to do with OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:55 PM
2

Nothing more grating than people thinking they understand statistics without actually understanding statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:52 PM
3

Women are significantly more agreeable than men, and yet 44% of them voted for trump. Could it be that you could be both agreeable and vote for trump?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:46 PM
1

But you are acting like wanting doesn't change. It just is from the beginning of time onwards. But it isn't like that. Can you honestly say that the standards women have for men have not increased significantly in the meantime? And if you concur that they did, then your entire point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:38 PM
1

Fine you are not. Truth it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:30 PM
1

Are you one of the people who thinks looksmaxxing causes insecurity? Yes. I am a black piller in this case, either you have it, or you don't. I don't think you can "work around" not being attractive. If you aren't, you aren't. Unfortunately, I'm a black piller because of my own experiences, but not in the way you might imagine. I'm extremely attractive, and that really soured my opinion on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:43 PM
1

So stop doing it!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:14 PM
2

As opposed to your doctor's dissertation, rife with research and citations?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:11 PM
–

Blaming women will not help neither understand the issue And blaming men (like you are always doing) will?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:07 PM
1

All that and no one knows who he is LOL. Embarrassing. You can keep saying that as much as you want. Delusional. Basketball is an American sport. The entire world is watching NBA. He is absolutely not world renowned like Megan is. No matter what she does in the future, she will never have a 10% of his world renown. Literally no one other than Americans has ever heard of her. The entire world LOL. Yeah, no. Being that rap music is absolutely listened to world wide. Completely correct. But not her…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:03 PM
1

She's a rapper with more awards and more global reach. Hahaha global reach. No one other than US knows about her existence, that's how "global" she is. The entire world knows who Klay Thompson is. He's an aging basketball player in America with rapidly declining stats. 11 points last season? He had a horrible season, she stood by him, and he still cheated. Totally irrelevant to his status. He is at the end of his career. She stood by the generational player who gets his bag regardless of his per…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:50 AM
3

he's mostly known for dating Meagan LOL The fuck are you talking about 😃 One of the best NBA players of all time, a soon-to-be Hall of Fame player, is "mostly" known for dating Megan? The entire world knows one of the Big 3 of the golden generation of the Golden State Warriors. Who the fuck knows who Megan Thee Stallion is? You can't even spell her name properly (that's how famous she is), and you talk about delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:43 AM
3

If you can't show any proof, then why even start a discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:29 AM
1

Yes. It does matter. If he doesn't have feelings for the girls, he's not obligated to do anything. It doesn't matter. Even if he did have feelings for the girls, he's still not obligated to do anything. I'm not going to psychoanalyze a woman I know nothing about. Why don't you mind doing that to a man you know nothing about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:01 AM
0

Does it matter? I ask again, why doesn't the girl invite him out if she likes him?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:10 AM
–

How would you know something is an "actual truth bomb"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:02 AM
1

Does he want to date them? He should ask them out. Does he not want to date them? He should keep doing what he's doing. But if he is unable to read the cues, how can he act on them? Why doesn't the girl invite him out if she likes him? (if we assume that he really is liked like that)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:46 AM
–

Exactly. So don't assume and we are all fine and dandy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:36 AM
1

We, as men, should bully each other in elementary school into hyper-focusing on our appearance to the point that we don't feel comfortable going outside without makeup?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:46 AM
3

More like Lilith 0.2
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:34 PM
-1

Have you asked the people you know on a personal level why you could be struggling to find a partner? Has she? It is hard to gauge from a post or two online why some men are having a harder time than others so generic advice like, “workout, try to be less hostile in conversation, develop a sense of humor, change your grooming habits” is given. Tell that to a person saying this: But that would be lying, it is because of their shitty personalities and incel outlooks
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:31 PM
2

And what is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:29 PM
3

And how do you think you would be treated as an obese man :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:01 PM
2

I was laughing so hard at this :D The only way a fat guy can be attractive is if he was skinny :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:56 AM
2

Completely correct. And sometimes those discussions have merit. But this isn't that at all. This is a classic "Sky is blue." situation. It's obvious to everyone (including you) that the sky is blue. There is nothing I can do to convince you of that if you are adamant in claiming that it's actually pink.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:50 AM
2

Once again, you have already conceded his "point" here that no one wants and (almost) no one engages in polygamy Yes, I agreed with his assessment. Men have never in the history of this planet been "forced into" polygamy, it has always been something they wanted. They create entire religions and dozens of cults so they can allow themselves to have multiple wives. But these, again, are an extremely rare outlier and in the western world it's practically non-existent. Do you know what polygamy mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:43 AM
1

It's by a huge margin, otherwise we wouldn't be having these kinds of discussions on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:03 AM
2

Let's cut the fucking shit. Yeah, let's. Since you insist he didn't mean "polygamy," and since you are also presuming to speak for him as such, then you tell me point blank what he meant instead by "polygamy." I really can't understand you. Why would you think that? I'm not insisting that, quite the opposite, I'm insisting that he literally means polygamy and not your interpretation of polygamy (casual sex). From the first comment, my point was to take his comment literally instead of adding you…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:18 AM
3

Why does it matter if people say what they mean? Is that a real question? Yes, for people like you, we need to ask questions like these. When I say that he clearly didn't mean it like that, it was a response to your interpretation of his words because he didn't write that at all. I just wanted to clarify that the fact that he didn't write that obviously wasn't enough for you to comprehend, he also didn't mean what you interpreted. This is incoherent. You are incoherent. If he "clearly meant" "wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:18 AM
1

But that's not "just existing", it's the literal opposite of that :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:02 AM
6

Because that's invariably what men on this sub mean when they refer to "polygamy." Women having casual sex. Why does that matter in this case? He clearly didn't mean it like that. The actual definition of polygamy is having more than one spouse. Virtually no one does that in the western world and almost no women want that. And that is exactly his point; I don't know why you are unable to grasp that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:57 AM
1

You are wildin', bruv.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:52 AM
3

That seems like something men should work on, not women. What exactly should men do to provide value just by existing as normal women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:40 AM
8

Where did he mention hookups or non-committed relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:38 AM
4

You are the person she is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:34 PM
8

None of the women in here should feel bad about anything other women do. There is no point in saying that because they never do anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:27 PM
2

A person can be retarded regardless of age, why are we limiting ourselves to under 20?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:52 PM
1

Holy projection, Batman!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:47 PM
–

You also seem to have issues communicating with people :D A prevalent issue on PPD so it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:11 PM
0

So there's your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:08 PM
2

What do you do if you’re hungry? Do you eat? What a silly question :/ Do you need someone to watch you eat to eat?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:48 AM
-1

Why don't you assume that he is also talking about "some people" and you could both be correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:32 AM
0

How do you know they feel off?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:30 AM
–

You seem to have issues communicating with people :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:18 AM
–

I think the purpose is to present the fact that he is collecting degrees and qualifications at an insane rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:17 AM
3

A stack of hot takes :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 01:26 PM
1

I am not acting like my view is sacred truth. But you are. Is there any other way to interpret this: There is more to being human than the reductive framework you are describing. I do not really expect you to see that though, because it is not entirely your fault you were taught to think about people in such narrow terms. other than "It's not your fault and I'm so sorry you are so backwards and aren't enlightened as I am :(" I am saying his view is way too reductive. Yours is as well. There are …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 09:09 AM
0

Yeah, and like I said, you are from a different generation, so I think your view of our species is skewed. Yeah, but the issue here is that you are treating his view as something completely wrong while your view is completely correct. Why? There is more to being human than the reductive framework you are describing. I do not really expect you to see that though, because it is not entirely your fault you were taught to think about people in such narrow terms. There are only a few things more anno…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 08:33 AM
2

But that suggestion is like saying "Hey, if that doesn't work, maybe you should try shooting yourself in the foot."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:29 AM
1

Yeah, he should leave all the rotting of the brain to you and me!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:22 AM
0

Make-a-child fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:51 PM
1

I’d go for avg And what do you consider average?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:24 PM
1

If you had an option to magically do so, would you change your quite above average dick for a quite below average dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:21 PM
–

We are at an impasse here. You are claiming that those jobs are something that any average joe can do, and I somewhat agree and somewhat disagree with that statement. But I actually disagree with that general framing. My argument is that the fact that they are doing those jobs and are visible as they are, they stop being average joes. So my point is, you can't use the fact that any average joe can attract women while using 0.something % of the population as a template as to how to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:16 PM
1

People talk about their values directly and indirectly before committing to being boyfriend/girlfriend. It sounds like you are talking about “hookups” which I don’t consider to be dating. I am talking about dating specifically. You won't be given a chance for the dating part is my point. So how are you supposed to figure out anything about their values? Sure, I believe that you were a stud just swimming in pussy. 😉 Very believable. You act as if no women has ever stopped dating to focus on schoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:10 PM
1

Not the same thing, but women face a similar issue with boob size. Not comparable at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:39 PM
1

Everybody can see what you're doing. I can't. What is he doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:39 PM
1

Morality. And moral taxidermy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:30 PM
2

Of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:23 PM
1

I would not date someone who used to be red pill, but that's only because I am not dating anymore But would you mind if you were still dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:10 PM
1

And, equally importantly, what kind of "advice" do these weak/insecure men think they are uniquely qualified to give their bullied kids when (not if) they come home from school having been picked on? And what "advice" would a progressive, enlightened man, such as yourself, give to his child in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:06 PM
–

Because they are rare? I don't know how many security guards you know, but the ones I know personally and the ones I've seen working are all huge, bulky guys. That's as far from average as you are going to get. Yeah, everyone can be a bartender, but the issue I had with his post is that he is trying to paint a picture of an average joe in the club setting as one of 10 people visible to everyone (which carries a certain status) and not one of the 300 men who are attending said club. Those specifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:50 AM
1

To me it read as if these guys were not trying to date others if they are sitting and waiting to be chosen. I think that's just a figure of speech. Don't take it literally. You are assuming that women are only rejecting men because they find these guys unattractive but not because of other issues like incompatible values, having limited availability to date because of work/school, etc… Oh come on now, be serious for a second. Of course, it's primarily because they find them unattractive (btw, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:42 AM
1

Then you're all good in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:53 AM
0

Just you saying that they are exceptions doesn't make it so. The same way that you say that they aren't exceptions doesn't make it so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:50 AM
2

Those guys should go out and try to date others instead of waiting around 10+ years to hope those girls will finally choose them. Why do you assume that they haven't tried? The crux of the issue is that they have and are constantly trying and failing at it; that's the problem. And yes I would date someone that formally rejected me. My husband turned me down twice when I wanted a relationship when we were friends. Eventually he did develop feelings for me, asked me to be his girlfriend, and we’ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:47 AM
2

As long as you do not expect men to police the behavior of other men, we are cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:43 AM
1

Is it ok to compare men to bears?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:36 AM
1

More than 1/3 support the potential implementation of Sharia law in the US. Or at least the implementation of the Sharia courts. What about LGBT rights? What are moderate muslim stances on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:35 AM
1

I posit that not understanding simple analogies is a serious character flaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:01 AM
1

Why do you want to date women who you won't be compatible with? And how do you find out you are or aren't compatible with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:00 AM
0

If they could identify who likes them we wouldn't be having this stupid conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:56 AM
3

It will forever be a bad idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:56 AM
1

Yup, they are. I can vouch for that as well. And when he says constantly, he means constantly because it happens with almost every hookup. I don't even understand how you can deny that guys who are able to get hookups can get relationships MUCH EASIER than guys who struggle getting relationships :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:48 AM
1

They're not idiots. But "they" seem to have trouble understanding what "they" are reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:42 AM
–

What a silly post. First you claim that being around women is all that it takes, and then when you get to explaining, you are specifying that you actually meant being around women while at the same time being either a security guard, DJ, club promoter, barmen, owner of some kind of establishment where women frequent, a doctor, or a photographer. While at the same time saying that you are talking about average joe :D You are a hoot, man! I love your post!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:28 AM
1

Do they support the implementation of Sharia law?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:21 AM
1

you switched it to families No, I didn't. The guy you replied to initially was talking about families specifically! Check the conversation again Maybe you should take your own advice. any woman of any age, that comes from a culture where she's not respected, is going to assimilate with better conditions If they come as a family unit, no, she won't. If you say "All Pakistani wives become feminist when immigrating to UK!" and I say "No Pakistani wives become feminist when immigrating to UK!" one o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:04 AM
2

Please stop. If this was true, there would be no short men. You are aware that there are 2 sides to that equation? One of the sides that is always on the short side :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:36 PM
1

What's wrong with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:59 PM
1

they do, and passport bros know better than you. It also makes logical sense. They know nothing about this. They are completely irrelevant in this discussion. Going to a country to buy a wife and bringing her back home DOES NOT IN ANY IMAGINABLE WAY EQUAL having a family in some country and that entire family moving to some other country. Why are you so adamant about being wrong? First generation maybe they don't integrate but they integrate on second and third generations. It's been like this s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:57 PM
1

Migrant families have women in them no? Yes, they do, and as I said, they NEVER become feminists. Don't compare that to a passport bro going to the Philippines and bringing home a freshly bought wife. The wives in those two situations are completely incomparable. We are talking about how even if migrant families have kids, that doesn't mean they are going to be conservative. One of the main issues literally every developed country currently has with regard to its migrant population is that they …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:46 PM
–

sending her a life changing amount of money because he was horny Does free will even exist anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:23 PM
1

That's not a muslim at all. You are breaking one of the core tenets of Islam.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:01 PM
3

People won’t think about you negatively, they just won’t think about you at all. Yeah, but that's all BEFORE. I'm talking AFTER! After you decide you want to beat your social anxiety, you start interacting with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:00 PM
2

No more or less unrelated than the comment I replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:58 PM
3

That’s not true, women always initiate, just because some men can’t pick up the cues doesn’t mean they don’t. I had to let it simmer a bit. After it simmered a bit, yup, it's still exactly as ridiculous as I initially thought :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:06 PM
1

It also doesn't mean that they like taxidermy!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:50 AM
2

Do chads who talk about chads have poor social skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:48 AM
6

Actually, excellent comment. But the issue here (that often gets swept under the rug) is how differently society treats men with social anxiety compared to women with social anxiety. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to downplay your effort, I commend you for it, but the thing is, you don't have the same starting point as a man in a similar situation. Your starting point is "quirky", "shy", "withdrawn", or whatever other adjective you would like that sounds like someone cool but is unable to ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:44 AM
0

“shy girls” are often in the same boat as said men No? Not at all. Even though you are correct in the way they signal their interest and can't recognize interest on the other side, it doesn't matter much for girls because they aren't expected to initiate. It's much more different for the side (men) that initiates, because now they are doing that based on limited and bad (because they are bad at interpreting it correctly) info.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:26 AM
1

because the same structure held back all of us that weren’t affluent white men Are there any other men who aren't affluent white men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:13 AM
1

The most non-answer of all non-answers in the history of non-answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:33 AM
1

I completely agree. Whenever I read something about sex and attraction from women on PPD (in an overwhelming majority of cases), it's like I'm living in a parallel reality where everything is upside down compared to what they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:07 AM
1

moderate Muslim What does that look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:48 AM
1

Passport bros know better than others about third world women behavior. But they aren't relevant to this. The guy specifically mentioned "families" that come from those countries, meaning both the man and the woman are from the country of origin. Those women NEVER become feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:10 AM
1

He specifically mentioned countries that don't give a fuck about women's rights. Can you guess which countries those are? And why are you mentioning passport bros at all? They literally have nothing to do with this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 06:47 PM
1

Of what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 06:43 PM
–

Interestingly (ironically) enough, the entirety of PPD is women punching down on men they feel are below them :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:39 PM
–

An outlier. Not worthy of mention. How would you describe someone who loves taxidermy and can't gain weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:27 PM
–

You just need to keep repeating that until it becomes true.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:14 PM
–

Because they are eating less. There is no magic formula for this. It's just caloric intake - caloric expenditure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:12 PM
–

You are living in an alternate reality to the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:11 PM
–

And who is saying that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:11 PM
–

You can't be serious :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:05 PM
1

You're reciting a formula but you evidently don't understand it because it undermines your own point. Let's break it out: Yeah, let's. (Consumption): Private consumption expenditures or consumer spending by households (e.g., food, rent, haircuts). Population growth has the most obvious impact on consumption growth. Can you tell me another factor that would increase consumption in a similar fashion to population growth? (Investment): Business investments in equipment, construction, and inventory,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:02 PM
4

And that is going to help how exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:30 AM
0

You literally have no idea what you are talking about. You think people in Africa who live in abject poverty and misery just didn't fight enough for their rights? If they did, they would also have a comfortable modern life? What is there to fight for if you aren't a modern, developed country? What are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:20 AM
1

The general female population is having less kids around the world, not just feminists Not the general, but very specific. Liberal women are having far fewer children compared to before. The "issue" is that there are more liberal women than conservative women, and what you take their average, the number, expectedly, goes down.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:04 AM
2

Do they really :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:01 AM
1

not one single person has more than 2 kids out of the 50 or so closest people I know. You Americans are so fucked :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:00 AM
–

also pretend patriartchy doesn't exist But isn't the fact that he can only talk about it facetiously, without it even being considered an option, the proof that patriarchy doesn't exist? You can't claim patriarchy exists while somehow being immune to everything patriarchal. Then it doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:51 AM
–

if they cared about population they'd be adopting orphans from africa I could say the same to every woman who actually wants to have children. I could tell her that she is an evil, selfish person for bringing up new humans into the world, while we have starving African orphans that she could take care of. It's a stupid argument. And btw, however heartless this might be, adopting children does nothing for population growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:37 AM
–

based on real events btw Just like "Martian", I know!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:19 AM
6

Meanwhile men are still committing suicide rather than seeking even recognising even a bit of weakness. And when this is mentioned in some other context to signify male suffering, you will jump in to point out that women ACTUALLY have many more attempts at suicide. Disgusting behaviour, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:22 AM
9

Did you just actually link to an article from a private mental health care provider that's lamenting that they aren't getting enough male customers as an argument for your stance? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:20 AM
7

Technically it's still random You could also say that technically, now it isn't random anymore if you improve significantly. You are right, that nothing guarantees success, but improving can guarantee that you don't automatically fail right from the get-go. That's extremely valuable in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:17 AM
–

Increased automation, delayed retirement, restructuring of tax and economic policy Do you even realize what this presents for your future? I always find it baffling how nonchalant people are about suggestions and potential solutions for current issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:43 AM
1

Is the "ick" against "insecurity" in men so fucking strong that you are willing to go as far as to pathologize them completely and literally invent the entire framework of behavior that makes them out to be extremely dangerous, just so you are justified in shitting on them for no reason whatsoever, while in the real world the actual damage is being done by men who are a literal opposite of that what you consider dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:24 AM
–

These people just don't want kids (and that's fine) I'm trying to explain this to people all the time (I just wrote a reply before spotting your comment). But you are treated as some kind of pariah when you suggest that. What is the exact issue in suggesting that people obviously DON'T WANT children?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:10 AM
–

We're below it now because times are economically hard for most people already and we won't get above it til it's better. Why do people keep perpetuating this like it's the be-all end-all of this discussion, but in reality, the poorest countries have the highest fertility rates, and the richest countries have the lowest fertility rates. Can you explain this to me? Are you claiming that having kids is way too expensive, even for the most wealthy countries in the world? Don't get me wrong, it defi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:05 AM
1

Awww, that's so nice of him. Australian dudes really are the best!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 10:32 AM
1

Citation needed. Not being completely oblivious to things happening around you needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:44 AM
1

They oppose the draft for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:43 AM
1

Did. Or had. Left.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:19 AM
–

What's the danger there? You can just leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 07:44 PM
1

I'm fairly sure that ~90% of PPD have some kind of brain injury that prevents them from understanding very simple analogies. I didn't say those two are the same. I didn't even compare them. I just compared THE ADVICE. In my opinion, advising men to wear makeup to improve their attractiveness to the opposite gender is the equivalent (EQIVALENT BEING THE ADVICE, NOT THE MEANS) of telling women to grow nice beards to attract men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 02:09 PM
1

That's like suggesting facially unattractive women who want to attract men to groom nice beards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 10:24 AM
–

It could be that they slept with 2 people per year for 25 years. Do you think that would make them a good LTR material, if they are changing partners on average every half a year? We are talking about LTR, right? But you don’t get to make up a story about their character just based on a number. You would probably make up a story about a character of a man if he had a n of 0 at age 40. Again, someone’s body count does not give you enough information to know their current intent. You are completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 08:22 AM
1

while having consensual sex is not a character issue A high n may not be a character issue (it often is), but it's a character trait nonetheless. There is always a reason a person gets to 50+ partners. Having more consensual sexual partners than you might prefer does not equal a person who cheats. Does it equal to a person who wants to have many sexual partners and not really being a monogamous person? I would rather remain rooted in reality and what I have personally observed. You don't conside…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:32 AM
1

Are you trying to infer that someone’s dating or consensual sexual history is synonymous with criminal activity? Nope, not claiming that. I'm just challenging your supposition that we should just leave the past behind based on how people act in the present. If those hypothetical men are good to you, and you like them, and they have already "paid" for their PAST crimes, what's the issue in dating them? I mean, it's your own stance that the past shouldn't matter much, so what's the issue here? Do …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:24 AM
1

Would you ever date a man that you liked but later find out that he is a convicted rapist? Would you ever date a man that you liked but later find out that he was convicted of DV? If not, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:36 AM
1

Ok, so you wouldn't. So don't expect me to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:14 AM
1

Would you read the study and argue against or for the data and research they provide if it were a study where they were referring to high n women as whores?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:12 AM
2

For me, it's less about the number, and more about the person's lifestyle and values. It's less about the number, yet when the number starts increasing, you have an increasing number of questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:36 AM
1

You see what you want to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:06 AM
2

Webster and Oxford both recognize it as a word. "Whore" is also a word recognized by Webster and Oxford dictionaries. Do you see it in many studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:01 AM
0

Is your link a blog post?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:58 PM
1

Who else had a breakfast rich in protein and healthy fats? I did. I ate her all up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:20 PM
2

You go, girl!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:15 PM
1

Just the normal ones, not the exaggerated ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:13 PM
1

I just thought of an idea for an app when I saw your idea for an app. My app would be called "pornai" (porn + sexai). It would be an app that streams all the sex encounters where people use sexai. There would be so much joy and laughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:10 PM
1

So why don't you want to help a gay man?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 01:00 PM
1

I decided to stop cocaine forever though We hope that you also decide to stop with the delusions as well :/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:57 PM
1

So who is gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:54 PM
1

I always smile when I read your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:49 PM
1

Maybe you can cry together about your ex, that could help.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:46 PM
1

Because he's gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:44 PM
1

That's a very progressive non-Western woman you have there!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:43 PM
3

So if your garden house has a set of hoes, and you identify as a garden house, does that mean you identify as a hoe?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:40 PM
4

Really? Can you explain the reasoning?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:26 PM
1

So thst is true. No, it isn't. You aren't selecting a good or bad partner. You aren't selecting, period. Thanks for confirming. I confirmed you have difficulty with simple concepts a while ago, and it's been confirmed again. So thank you! And thanks for also confirming it doesn't strictly mean "many" partners. I'll give you that. It means "many partners" in only 99.9% of cases. So you are completely correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:10 AM
1

I have no idea what you are asking here. What pressure are you referring to? What kind of pressure causes the "ick" a bi woman feels towards potentially dating a bi man?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:06 AM
1

Being indiscriminate, sexually, also means you're not selecting good partners. No, it doesn't. You could be indiscriminate and manage to choose good partners every time. Being indiscriminate just means that you don't care either way; anyone will do, regardless of whether they are good or bad partners. The word explains itself; you are not discriminating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 02:02 PM
1

How exactly? By quoting some random site that literally states that promiscuous means "having numerous, casual sexual partners" or by quoting wiki where it says that promiscuity is "engaging in sexual activity frequently with different partners or being indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners" (which directly implies you have a lot of partners because you literally don't give a fuck about of who you have sex with, you just keep on having sex with different people)?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 01:16 PM
1

You aren't wrong about something. You are wrong about the entire thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:41 PM
1

You're growing 👍 You, on the other hand ...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:36 PM
2

Men blaming women is just going to turn them into whiny victims. So.. Women? And do you know who women dont want to date? Should we base all of our worldview on that specific thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:34 PM
0

How exactly is: You using numbers that a random guy on the internet Different from: but the best comes from a Hinge engineer and was published on Hinge’s official blog Weren't the OKCupid finding salso published on their official blog? And they actually backed it up with an actual graphical representation of data. Here, we get just 2 numbers devoid of any context. And JUNIOR GROWTH ENGINEER, really? This person is the paragon of truth and proper information? He explains that half of all likes go…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:24 PM
1

Can I see that retraction? Do you have a link to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:07 PM
1

English language.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:55 AM
1

That refers to the usage of the term in a very sexual context :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:40 AM
1

The part after "or" refers to the use of the term in a non-sexual context. We are using it in a sexual context.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 11:40 AM
1

I don't understand. You are literally proving me right. Do you not understand what's written there?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:51 AM
1

Does that differ from "having many sexual partners"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:50 AM
1

Where will I see a definition of promiscuous that differs from "having many sexual partners"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:20 AM
1

What a perfect reason not to try anything ever :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:55 AM
1

It's much cheaper to do nothing. Incidentally, that's something that's true for literally every problem. So are we always not supposed to do anything because it's much cheaper?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:53 AM
1

Should we base our views on studies from India specifically because they now make up 20% of the world population?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:49 AM
2

orientation stigma Is it really? How does that come into play if bi woman doesn't want a bi man as a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:46 AM
1

Promiscuous doesn't have to mean "many sexual partners". It means EXACTLY that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 06:58 AM
1

But because you think you are paying into your pension plan and it's a magic pot that holds your money until you get old, and then you use that money, right? It's baffling how little people know about the monetary system and pensions in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 01:39 PM
1

304: "hoe/ho. Slang for a promiscuous woman". Which the dude initially said how it's actually used. Now tell me what I was wrong about. Oh, nothing. And how did you say the term was used?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 01:10 PM
1

It's really something, isn't it? A mother says she was called a ho because of her children Which is completely wrong, and it's a shitty thing done by a shitty person. You were offended by that, but it doesn't mean that you are right about it being the way the term is used. If someone said that you are a dad to your children, that doesn't mean that you can use the term "dad" in that way, it just means that the person using it is doing it wrong. and your intuition is to argue with her to make her …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 12:10 PM
1

Dude, you care way too much about this. I think you thought you were just going to say something shitty to a woman and that be that. Oh, you were expecting just a standard run-of-the-mill misogynist, and I disappointed you :( And now you're literally arguing the definition of "304". It's sad. Weren't you doing the exact same thing? And that's not what "generalize" means 🤦‍♀️ If I were generalizing the term, I wouldn't be saying it can be used in more than one way. That's exactly what generalizin…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 10:05 AM
1

You’re mad that current young people aren’t supporting your retirement. Who do you think will support your retirement?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:45 AM
5

No I’m tired of this subreddit, the snarky replies and lack of reasonableness Oh the irony :D You want a relationship, maintaining a relationship require 100x more effort than the beginning stages of dating, for men and for women For women yes, because they are putting in 0 effort in the beginning. So anything more than 0 is incomprehensible effort for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:36 AM
2

So if dating is already too much work... The irony :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:30 AM
1

I didn't forget my comment. And it's not about that, and it wasn't about that. I made my comment in the context of your reply to the guy who simply said a correct statement, Doesn’t 304 refer to a high body count? Not having sex too early? to which you replied I don't think it has to specifically refer to one thing. I've been called a "hoe" just because I have kids by different fathers. (First husband died. I moved on with life 🤷‍♀️) You are trying to generalize the usage of the term for differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:11 AM
5

Why was she giving them the opportunity?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 07:23 AM
2

The issue isn't about letting go of a rude remark. The issue is that you are generalizing based on a very rare occurrence of something happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:48 PM
7

Why was one specific person burned one too many times by fuckboys? Why did she meet so many fuckboys to get burned by them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:45 PM
0

That probably happened exactly once, and you weren't able to let it go and will never be able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:50 PM
6

Why were they burned one too many times by fuckboys?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:47 PM
1

So, you think one party gets satisfaction out of denying the other sex? Where did I claim that? I have no idea how you got to that conclusion. That the act of denying is what they want? It's not about denying sex. It's nothing malicious or spiteful towards their partner (I mean, it could be exactly that, but generally we don't discuss those cases when talking about dead beadrooms). It's just not wanting sex, for whatever reason. But the fact remains that the person not wanting sex is getting wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:38 PM
8

See how I wrote "well functioning relationship" on the initial post? But in that "well-functioning relationship" you also didn't even notice you had issues with intimacy with your partner until their frustration surfaced. So, are you sure you are describing a well-functioning relationship? That was my entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:45 PM
10

If my partner feels repeatedly rejected and brings up discontent, I'd say "sorry, X has been happening with me. for now, please don't initiate any more" with the understanding that the ball is now "in my court" in regards to initiating: it's my responsibility, i have not forgotten about their needs, and i will do it if i can. You may not be aware of it, but you have just described the beginning of every dead bedroom scenario I've seen there (at least as long as the high libido partner is reasona…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:36 PM
2

Both parties. Both parties are sexually unsatisfied. But it isn't like that at all. One party, for whatever reason, doesn't want to have sex. And they don't. So that party is getting exactly what they, for whatever reason, want and doesn't engage in something that they don't want to do. How you can even compare the two is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:55 PM
13

Sexual exclusivity is an implied term in marriage contracts Is sex also not an implied term in marriage contracts?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:40 PM
1

Neither would I.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:07 PM
1

Of course they are. When someone is using an anecdote as an argument in their comment, the story is ALWAYS edited and filtered so as to better suit and strengthen their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter