TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Brief_Mongoose_7291 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,118 comments by Brief_Mongoose_7291 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,118 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Then we better start actually looking into options to make motherhood more appealing. I guarantee you that if we had a way to assist parents so there was no risk of sleep deprivation or them losing freedom and their life prior to having children (having spare time and being able to have dates/trips together with their partner), more women would have kids Literally does nothing. The countries with the best childcare benefits have low birth rates (not the lowest, but low).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:41 PM
–

I'm not asking how women think; I'm asking you a simple question. Why are you unable to answer it? Would anything change in your case?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:45 AM
–

I don't understand you. If you find a guy to be the sexiest guy alive without knowing he is bi, are you telling me that nothing would change in the way you feel about him if you find out that he is bi with actual experience (in practice, meaning he has experience with man/men)?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 10:16 AM
–

It's not biphobia if you are disgusted by only one aspect of that concept while the other is perfectly fine. You are not phobic of the entirety of bi, just the gay part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:59 AM
–

Maybe you are correct; phobia could be the wrong term for this. What is the term that encompasses disgust? This is more like that. You see, the issue here is if you look at the guy and you want to fuck his brains out and he wants to do the same to you, you are so incredibly attracted to him. But then you find out that he had a dick up his arse, or in his mouth, or he had his own dick on some other man's orifice, even just once, and you are immediately disgusted and all the attraction vanishes in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:54 AM
–

The life that you think no longer exists, does exist… in China. You.. haven't been to China :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:59 AM
–

Most of the people around me could afford children and would probably be good parents, but it just gets in the way of doing fun things. That's something I've been constantly telling people whenever someone mentions the cost of raising kids and whatnot. No one gives a fuck about that; people who want kids will have them regardless, and people who don't want kids will not have them even if they were to get tremendous childcare benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:57 AM
–

Translation: "because I said so." As I said, it would be the same if someone asked you about the movie you consider shit. You would also say the same exact thing. You say you saw the movie and yet you say that? What's wrong with me saying that? Is the plot of the movie irrelevant? Is pacing irrelevant? Is bombarding the audience with characters you know nothing about, expecting them to know full history, irrelevant? The last part actually annoyed me the most. I was waiting for you to drag that o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 02:09 PM
–

"It was utter shit because, uh, well, uh, REASONS!!!" Because it was shit. You also have movies that you consider shit, and when someone asks you about that movie, you tell them it's shit. I mean, I can elaborate why I consider it shit, because I, unfortunately, against my better judgment, went to see the movie. The plot is shit, the pacing is shit, the sudden introduction of tons of new characters that we are somehow supposed to all know about because we are supposed to be watching 10 other dif…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 01:14 PM
–

That you don't even understand what irony is, let alone hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:16 PM
–

How many women do you think are acting the same as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:16 PM
–

How about changing yours to manstericalfit? I don't tolerate your insolent backtalk, this conversation is over. Sorry, it was just a stupid quip! Can't help it when you have such a pretentious handle. Men or women? That part's untrue. Yeah, literally everyone. Women are half the population. If they wanted something to be popular, it would be popular. You are seriously overestimating the "power" of "manbabies". Or are you considering almost all men as "manbabies"? That could also be an explanatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:15 PM
–

I was also going for the absurd end of the argument just as you did. I was focused more on the socialist/communist angle since that's what those modern progressives are going for currently. That aims to flatten society completely as a socialist/communist utopia descends upon us. But then those same women advocating for that kind of society don't see the "flattened" men as their peers or potential partners; they are aiming for the ones that are above the system that they themselves are advocating…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:03 PM
–

Ok, you don't have to ask for sex at all. By your own argument, you shouldn't. Otherwise, it's coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:38 AM
–

I don't think the fact that most volunteers at an animal shelter wouldn't date a stray dog makes them somehow "fake animal shelter volunteers". This is your argument. This isn't at all analogous to what OP is saying. If we wanted to make your example analogous to what OP is saying, it would be: Progressive men and women are fighting tooth and nail for a society where all women are homeless prostitutes, because that's what they consider an ideal society. Women being chaste and family-oriented is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:01 AM
–

What effort do you employ on your part?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:25 AM
–

The equivalent of this title is "If you are extremely attractive, you will get laid a lot. Women being attracted to you is a huge advantage."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:21 AM
–

But, by your own reasoning, "Women can tell you when they want sex", so what gives you the idea that you are allowed even one "No"? Again, what's the difference between one "No" and 2x"No" if "Women can tell you when they want sex"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 07:15 AM
–

And what is my number for lots?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:12 PM
–

No, he isn't trying to say that. He is asking you who you are to decide what is acceptable for another human, considering the fact that another human's own subjective mental state is the final arbiter of what is or what isn't an acceptable state for him/her to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:31 PM
–

This is a quote from you: Women can tell you when they want sex. If that's your reasoning, then asking even once is coercion. What's the difference between not asking, asking once, and asking twice if women can tell you when they want sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:29 PM
–

Lots How many is lots? We can keep playing these games all day. Yup yup.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:20 PM
6

With the title of this post, you are replying in?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 04:06 PM
1

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the Marvels, which got panned by the manbabies. Nothing wrong with Marvels other than it being utter shit. Kill Bill wouldn't do so well anymore Funny you should mention that. You obviously have no idea that there was a recent screening (end of last year) of Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair, a cut of the movie that seamlessly combined both Volume 1 and Volume 2. EVERYBODY WAS RAVING ABOUT IT, ALL THE MANBABIES AND EVERYONE ELSE LOVED IT! And you obviousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 02:18 PM
–

That's because angry man-babies boycott any show with women in any kind of prominent role. Or maybe they are shit? In general, if something is flopping at the box office, it means that no one (men or women) likes it. The Alien series would be shitcanned today because of Ripley, where she used to be quite popular with male viewers. So you are claiming that almost 50 years ago (and onward) people were more open to strong female characters than they are today? Maybe you should change your handle to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:58 PM
1

Can YOU differentiate? What is an extreme event? Can different people consider different things as extreme events, or do they need to contact you for your stance on something being or not being an extreme event?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:16 PM
-1

Wait till those same men find out how their partners react to them expressing emotions. It's gonna be so fun!!!! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 01:14 PM
4

Being selective pays off: Men who swipe right on less than 4% of profiles get 11.85% match rate. Swiping on everyone gets you 2.19%. That's a 3x difference. This is all I needed to figure out the quality of the article; they can't even copy the numbers from the table properly. Swiping on everyone gets you 3.95%. Being picky demonstrates that the user has value, and that they aren't mindlessly spamming their profile to everyone because they aren't desperate. No one wants a date who is desperate. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 12:49 PM
2

I said you haven’t shown they’re representative of society. Let me quote you as an answer to this: You’re still making the same unsupported leap. Because your first sentence is exactly that: an unsupported leap. Why are you acting like an arbiter of what's representative of broader society? Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok aren’t random samples of the population. They more or less are. But specifically of the younger population because they are the ones using those platforms the most. People choose…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 11:45 AM
5

My point still stands. But your point is, for lack of a better term, stupid. If someone gets 5 coffees off of 200 swipes, how would him being pickier improve his success? If we go by your reasoning and he actually reads all the profiles and out of those 200 women and then he narrows down his choice to 10, or even 20, statistically he probably filtered out each and every one of those 5 women that otherwise he would go to coffee with. So now he has 0 coffee dates. In what universe could that be co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:23 AM
2

You’re confusing “a lot of Redditors agree” with “this is what society believes.” You are also confusing "what society believes" with "I'm going to go with "society" argument even though I literally have no idea what broader society thinks about this thing". You are completely correct that he is conflating these things, but your argument can't be "society doesn't think that" based on literally nothing. Reddit is a self selected group with its own culture, biases, and echo chambers. But you see, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:41 AM
5

They were in the past, dude. Women having choice over pregnancy is a relatively novel idea caused by science more than some actual change in our biology. Good thing then that you are living in the present and that we are talking about the present and our current reality. I don't understand people like you. You say it's a novel idea, but for you it's your entire life, your entire existence; it was like that from the moment you were born. There is nothing "novel" for you regarding that. So why are…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 02:10 PM
6

War and child birth are those weird areas where you can't really shake the fact each gender is significantly the correct answer to the problem. Yeah, those weird areas where one group is FORCED without any choice on their part to go and die in a war, and the other group has full freedom of choice if they want to do "their part". So, could you stop using that comparison because it will never be appropriate unless women from Ukraine are suddenly FORCED without any choice on their part to become ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 07:49 AM
2

Because biologically there are higher costs to women of reproduction with the wrong man. So, logically, from that it follows that women should be the ones choosing and approaching the man. If the choice of the man is so important to get right, shouldn't they take a more active approach? Because socially, men are less selective with female partners than women are with male partners. Therefore, willingness to make a move is seen as distinguishing a man who is interested from one who isn't really b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 08:06 AM
4

So women are very rarely best partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 07:53 AM
3

Just don't call it a study.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 01:38 PM
0

It does. BB is being taken advantage of.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 12:06 PM
1

Why didn't you utilize your resources to work a higher-paying job that isn't in customer service?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:55 AM
1

What do you think your job should entail?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:41 AM
–

I work in a commercial gym And judging by the rest of the post, you are actually at the tippy top of your career.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:29 PM
2

In your valuation, have women become less attractive in the last 20 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:41 AM
1

We could tell that to each and every woman who has trouble climbing the corporate ladder while her male peers zoom right past her. If she wants to be lazy and do nothing, that's on her!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:32 AM
3

She immediately said she started getting picky She literally said the opposite of that. She said that she started swiping on literally everything, on women who she didn't consider attractive, because no one was replying in any meaningful way. It's funny how she became depressed by the experience in like 5 days, and it wasn't even her :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:29 AM
3

but to also reveal their personalities You don't care about that if the pics don't match :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:19 AM
5

That you guys intentionally ignore multiple factors. You are literally describing each and every one of your posts/comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 10:16 AM
2

Love how you assume you know me better than me. You sure? You don’t even know me much less did any research lol. On the contrary, I don’t care what anyone’s standards are. I don't assume that I know you better than you know yourself. What I assume is that you are lying if you are claiming that you don't care about standards at all. I'm claiming you don't care RIGHT NOW because you find them acceptable and you interpret that as not caring about standards. Why do you bother so much about what peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 09:49 AM
6

Granted I don’t do statistical research, but the rest of it are just my opinions and I don’t see how it isn’t in good faith. That's the definition of bad faith arguing. You don't research things that are really easy to check, and then you base your opinions on literally nothing at all, and then hide behind it with an argument, "but that's just my opinion". It's like claiming that you aren't arguing in bad faith if you keep claiming the sky is pink and the other guy is saying no, it's fucking blu…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:41 AM
0

Just acknowledge you were wrong bro. He isn't wrong. He is literally reading the definition you provided. Being corrected isn't a big deal. You seem to be trying really hard for someone claiming that :) Refusing to learn, digging in your heels, insisting you are correct when you aren't is a waste of time. Hmmmmmmmmmm............. Irony anyone? Do you really want to be as smart today as you are ever going to get? If not, be open to learning new things. Doubly whammy of irony, anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 07:11 AM
-3

They would be completely useless as a movement without support from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 01:20 PM
2

Lack of draft limits state's ability to do dumb shit. No, it doesn't. Because your country can institute a draft at any point in time if they deem it necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 01:19 PM
4

What's traditional feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 01:33 PM
0

Yeah, I skipped it instantly and just wrote my comment. I will do the same next time as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 07:59 PM
0

Maybe your issue is functional literacy? Maybe it's yours if you need a machine to string simple sentences for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:43 PM
0

So much for no AI here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:52 PM
2

If you found college easy, you didn’t go to a good college. One of the best European STEM colleges. Scholarship is supposed to get more difficult the farther you get into it. Yes, but it still isn't hard if you have any proclivities for it. I found high school much more tedious because I had to learn about things I cared very little about. With college, I could focus specifically on the things that I actually like learning and doing. Most trades in the USA require a high school degree and probab…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 04:49 PM
1

Dollar General Is that the only alternative to college? Trades don't exist? 2/3rd of the jobs done in the US are the ones where you don't need a college degree. Are those irrelevant? Btw, college is the easiest shit I've ever done in my entire life. High school was harder than college. And I was at the hardest STEM college in my country. I'm of the opinion that you are partially retarded if you find college hard. I teach high school I feel sorry for those children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 02:17 PM
1

Oh wow. So you have to fill out a piece of paper. The horror. Ok, so you fill it as well if it's so inconsequential. Women get stuck carrying some rapists seed around for 9 months. Why was she stuck carrying some rapists seed around for 9 months? Did it slip her mind what got her pregnant? I'll choose signing up for something that isn't real, please. Yet, women (feminists) are ardently against selective service registration for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 12:03 PM
0

The only work is the one you do with a college degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 05:42 AM
1

So you lack skill, will, and grit. Noted :D
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:47 AM
-1

Another case of linking data as an argument for your case without understanding the context at all. Do you understand what that graph represents? It illustrates the % of people in each generation who consider themselves feminist. It's a static measure at the point in time when the survey was conducted. This graph doesn't disprove the statement of the person you replied to (nor does it prove it) because his claim was that fewer and fewer people associate themselves with the label feminist. That c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 10:41 AM
–

And above and beyond anything? I want environmentalism, universal healthcare, paid time off, billionaires taxed into humility, 91% top tax rates like we had prior to Reagan, strong labor unions, monopolies broken up, I see America as more racist/homophobic/sexist than you likely do, want Christianity and religion further away from politics, want to cut defense spending in half and give that money back to the citizenry in whatever form, and don't want migrants treated with the kind of cruelty tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:21 PM
–

That's my point entirely. But you missed my point. It was always like that, from the literal beginnings of democracy. I don't understand why you are so convinced that this is a new state of things. You were always voting for morally bankrupt, unscrupulous, and primarily selfish people. But you were giving them a pass, and you were always looking at them through rose-tinted glasses because they were on your side of the aisle. Graham Platner is the perfect personification and example of that. They…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:46 PM
–

But then the left gets pestered constantly over purity tests and a big tent. And that's completely their fault because they are pestering everyone all the time. Only a moron would be surprised when the people you keep pestering react by pestering you. A tattoo, mind you not of the SS sign nor the swastika, from 25 years ago does not equal Nazi today. So, because he doesn't have nazi swastika in the middle of his forehead, it's all fine? You didn't stop to think that he got the Totenkompf exactly…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:20 PM
–

App companies really don't need to engage in any shady and legally risky hidden "match throttling", because the incentives to pay for visibility are right out there in the open. Being less visible unless you pay IS match throttling, what are you talking about? You are perfectly describing what match throttling is and how it works while pretending you don't know what match throttling is or how it works :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:11 PM
–

you seem smart but a bit morally gray. He isn't morally gray, just realistic. If everyone were like you (asexual), we would die out. I'm not mean to you by saying this; I'm realistic. You may not like me saying that, but you cannot deny the truthfulness of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:25 AM
-1

I'm asking again. Do feminist femdoms respect each and every male sub as a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:10 AM
3

And I should take advice from a guy with a virgin flair why? Because you have probably 1 million mental issues that you need to work through, and even the Virgin boy here can offer some insight that could help you out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:09 AM
-2

Basically, you can’t expect women to do this very intensive thing for you if you don’t respect her as a person. Why not? It's just an act. Why do I have to respect her as a person? Do they respect each sub as a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:07 AM
–

0 people are in agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 09:04 AM
–

I mean, you can pretend that there is no difference that you are aware of between the free and paid versions of any dating app; that's a choice. But let me ask you a purely hypothetical question. How would you encourage people to pay a subscription for your dating app, given how dating apps work currently? What would you do to give them a push from the free tier to the paid tier? And even more so to pay for the "uber best premium version" at that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 07:44 AM
–

And Donald Trump's a Christian? Did I claim that? Even his most ardent supporters will admit that he isn't really acting based on Christian values. But the issue here is that the left will always call him out for that while adding an occasional "Nazi" (based on literally nothing) adjective in the mix, while at the same time platforming a literal Nazi. Don't you see anything wrong with that duplicity? If anything, politicians protect their weakest flank from their own voters. Which is a moronic m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 07:30 AM
0

I have no idea which guy you're talking about I'm talking about the same guy you are talking about. If they want to date an abusive nazi they are trash. What guy are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 12:13 PM
1

I would say it's more moral to vote for the asshole that does good in office than the one that does bad. What makes you think he would do good things while in the office? Because he claims so? He also claimed he had no idea he actually had a nazi tattoo. A complete fraud through and through. Yeah, let's believe him. Had he stayed, you should happily vote for Platner if you care about women's rights and feminism because that's practicality. The same practicality as saying Harvey Weinstein cares a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 12:01 PM
0

Is his wife a piece of trash? I mean, she should be the biggest piece of trash ever because he actually married the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:06 AM
1

He will have at the very least attracted women who don’t take politics that seriously. "I don't mind you being a nazi, I'm not into politics" :D
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 11:04 AM
2

The question on here is usually: "Why is this guy getting action while I am not?" That's often a misinterpretation of the actual question, which is: "Why is that guy getting action?" That's the actual question. You are claiming that some things that badly disqualify others don't necessarily always disqualify someone else, but we aren't talking about someone having a huge nose. We are talking about things that should disqualify everyone every damn time (excluding extremes like a woman nazi lookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:58 AM
1

but would like to see some evidence What kind of evidence would you deem credible?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 10:32 AM
3

Where aren't you wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:51 AM
4

why would someone talk about that on a first date Because that's what you do when you are emotionally intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 09:50 AM
0

If women just want sex No one said that. I said that the women I was with and the women I know don't date for a relationship only. The alternative to a relationship only isn't sex only. It's also relationship AND sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 07:22 AM
7

As long as he is not dating them (and it seems like he isn't), he is actively "choosing better" each and every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:21 PM
0

Women date for relationships only I would hazard to say that I know more women than you do. But I have certainly been intimate with more women than you have. They disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:18 PM
10

And "choose better" He did exactly that..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:14 PM
-1

Yeah, actually, when the beauty standard was literally called “heroin chic” and you’re expected to look like a literal starving drug addict, I think women had a LOT to complain about. The fuck are you talking about? Literally no one expected or wanted women to look like the skeleton Kate Moss (other than other stupid women). She (and poor girls who looked like her) appealed to no man. No man gave a fuck about Kate Moss and similar runway models, especially compared to Pamela Anderson and other s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:51 PM
–

You are usually quite good at playing daft, but sometimes you are so on point it's uncanny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:13 PM
–

I can't be curious why other dudes can't seem to manage friendship with a woman? Yes, you can. And that's the reason he asked you why you wouldn't show the same curiosity about some woman not having male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 12:04 PM
1

Clavy Aww that's so cute. You so close!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:40 AM
0

I explained it clearly. What you clearly explained is what an ultimatum is. The distortion of the mind causes you to equate that to a threat. Considering women are your target audience and you want to learn to communicate with us, perhaps hear what we say. Or stay single and whine. I should just listen to any insane person and their "explanation" of things just because they are a woman? You don't need to worry about me, I very well listen and respect women who are worth being listened to and res…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:12 AM
2

What he did was threaten. Imagine how distorted your mind must be to consider that a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 11:01 AM
1

Like women were bitching for decades about "unrealistic standards men have for women boddies"? Is it any different from what's happening now, other than a gender swap situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 10:52 AM
1

You were given a whole explanation Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 01:50 PM
1

Complaining is complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:38 PM
–

and again in my culture, a lot of girls already gotta learn how to take care of the house chores when they're like 7, while boys aren't given any responsibility outside of school, i don't think they got more responsibilities at all. That's the issue with your primitive culture. Don't generalize based on your backwards culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:17 PM
3

Depends on how you view partiarchy. If it is in the "men are superior to women" it is still alive. Why would I (or anyone else, for that matter) interpret patriarchy in that way? There are men who are constantly worried about their masculinity and are afraid of anything feminine. Correct. But that isn't because they feel like being a woman is lesser, but that being less of a man is lesser because being a man is their identity, and if they are losing that, they are losing their identity. While a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:10 PM
9

a man saying he chooses to stay single while constantly complaining about women and being bitter is another Literally the same thing women are doing. I know exactly 2 women who are single and at peace. The rest complain about men non-stop endlessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:01 PM
–

You just perfectly described how most of us feel when reading your posts/comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 10:57 AM
1

The people I end up “debating” most of the time want me dead. You actually honestly think that people you are debating want you dead? That's your starting point here when debating people on PPD most of the time? And you are pushing for a good-faith debating format? Use that mirror you are pointing at everyone else and look at yourself in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:57 AM
1

Hyperbole? Really? Something like the OP saying that the people she debates here most of the time want her dead? Something like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:55 AM
–

what unites men is hate for women Really? That's the only thing men band on? What unites women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:52 AM
2

I’d be like 10x further in my career if I had another person dedicated to domesticity. Really? And what prevents you currently from progressing in your career?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 07:41 AM
2

Like women who indulge too much in romantic slop, the same thing, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:36 PM
–

What's a good source to use, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:08 PM
1

"Oh yes yes, totally forgot about that! Silly me! They were so fucking fat and old, they could barely move!" So totally believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:40 PM
2

Just like your gender isn’t collectively porn sick. Oh, not collectively. That's great! But how many do you think are porn sick :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:15 PM
3

"No, I don't" what exactly? What is the default look of a male romantic interest in those books?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:07 PM
-4

Probably by asking her not to be a piece of shit towards him. He wanted to feel special, i.e., not a piece of shit like she made others feel. Probably. I don't know. I'm guessing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:02 PM
2

Like someone already mentioned. For every Loki on a cover of a romance slop aimed at women, you will get 10 Thors. So much for female gaze :/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:44 AM
3

But your gender regularly harps on porn as something that makes men porn-sick and is something that completely twists men's standards and expectations of women in real life. Do you disagree with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:36 AM
2

same as porn So, porn doesn't influence men at all, is what you are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:31 AM
6

Cool story bro. I absolutely believe every word of it. You can make a choice to trust me, the same way I need to make a choice to trust women when they try to convince me of their proclivities, even though they are fucking a dude who is a complete antithesis to that. You don't understand, I'm not denying that women prefer Loki over Thor, but that's a pointless distinction was my point. What does it prove that most women prefer one tall, attractive dude vs another tall, attractive dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:28 AM
9

They never realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:25 AM
2

And they were also fat and old? You conveniently forgot that part.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:23 AM
15

yet most women admit they prefer loki Oh, they admit! Well, that certainly ends all discussions. It was admitted! Funny thing is, you actually think you made a point by saying "look, women actually prefer this very attractive tall man as opposed to that very attractive tall man with a bit of a different physique". But I actually find it fascinating how you (as in women) literally can't help but virtue signal in any and all situations. I've had women who were telling me (in the break between our …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 11:16 AM
4

who try to get muscles do so to try and compete with other men. The same way that every woman who uses expensive makeup spends a ton on hair and clothes, does so to try and compete with other women primarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:52 AM
1

I already select for overweight older men with moustaches who dress in smart clothes and are into classical literature. No, you don't :D It's like me saying that I select for obese women with moustaches who like pogo jumping and can do pogo front flips and backflips. But if I don't manage to find women to satisfy this niche, I'll keep on being attracted to and dating tall and slim women with beautiful faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:48 AM
8

You ask: BY WHO??? He answers: Women in my life? You retort with: Do you always listen to random people though? PPD is such a funny place with people like you :D Tell me, what was the right answer to your question? Is there a right answer? Would he be able to say anything that wouldn't prompt such an idiotic response, like calling his female friends and family random people? Who aren't random people by your valuation?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 10:15 AM
–

It is sexist. Why is it sexist? Is he not free to choose who he associates with and in which manner he does that? And he isn't refusing to associate with women at all; he just lays a clear rule that a chaperone must be present. Would you have the same "energy" to condemn a married female CEO refusing to associate with her young protege alone at a dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 08:03 AM
–

healthcare is a basic human right according to the geneva convention No, it isn't. What are you talking about? Maybe you are too certain about the things you don't know much about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:48 AM
1

Women were simple, ameroua creatures leading men into sin. And you think that is proof positive that women are as horny as men? It literally shows the opposite; it illustrates that men would throw away their whole lives for some action. The fact that you don't have a gender-reversed scenario tells you all you need to know about the difference in levels of horniness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:28 PM
0

Ancient Greeks thought so. I don't think you want to go there. The idea of men being the more libidinous gender is fairly recent Really? So only from the time when we can objectively report and record things?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:25 PM
–

What are you talking about :D
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:09 PM
–

Right! No guy has ever gotten a junior position without prior work experience. Totally makes sense!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:01 AM
–

And no guy has ever gotten a junior position without previous work experience. Do you understand how analogies work?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 07:53 AM
1

or at least the high school report cards You can't be fucking serious. Literally retarded people who are unable to read graduate from high school. What are you even on about? You are so wrapped up in your "credentialism" that you refuse to honestly engage with someone holding an obvious interest in something and providing you with the resources they themselves used to form their opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:25 AM
2

No I just think it’s funny that “I study X in my free time” was used to establish credibility What is funny about that exactly? I would put way more emphasis on the opinion of a person actually reading about something with interest, fervor, and understanding than on the person who graduated in a certain field but is never educating themselves further. And the latter is the vast majority of people. You would probably value their opinion more because of the silly title they hold. In persuasive wri…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:20 AM
2

You actually think that's comparable?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 10:18 AM
1

Guess you aren't making a positive impact today :D
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 02:30 PM
2

Well, because we aren't accusing every man of being dangerous. By that same logic, we could say that AWALT isn't accusing all women of being like that; it's just a precaution.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 08:05 AM
2

How is AWALT different from treating every man as a potential danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 02:26 PM
7

I'll add one more thing. The eternal catch-22 of getting a starter job - they require experience for junior positions. The equivalent of being a male virgin on the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 07:48 AM
–

At a population statistics level men’s horniness has led to men fucking animals, dead people, children, people in comas, to the spread of all sorts of disease the preponderance of AIDS I can go on and on. You have to be out of your fucking mind to think something like this. That's not men's horniness, that's mental illness. Almost every man is horny, but almost no men will fuck an animal. Almost every man is horny, but almost no men will fuck a corpse. Almost every man is horny, but almost no me…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 02:11 PM
8

There is a clear statistical correlation and ignoring that would be foolish and dangerous. If you are calling it a correlation, then you are implying and saying exactly what I said. Or you have no idea what correlation means. Of course it doesn’t mean that most suicidal men are going to do that🤦‍♀️. By saying correlation, you are implying that. It does mean that monitoring for the murder / suicide possibility in suicidal men with a history of domestic violence is a reasonable thing to do. It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:43 AM
5

So what was the point of the literally first sentence of your comment that is supposed to counter the OP? Enlighten me, please, what was the point of that statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:10 AM
–

I'm glad for you. And for every one of you, there are probably 10 couples where sex dried up soon after they got married, even though they were fucking like crazy beforehand. They also thought that what they have at the moment will continue in marriage as well. They were wrong. You are an outlier. And you are extremely lucky. But don't fool yourself into thinking that you somehow "figured it out" and that's why everything worked out. Each and every one of those couples that aren't having sex als…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:37 AM
8

60% to 80% of family annihilators are suicidal men I hate this shit so much. Especially if you are doing it on purpose. It's like saying 100% of family annihilators are men who breathe. How fucking moronic can someone be to think that 60% to 80% of family annihilators being suicidal men = 60% to 80% of suicidal men are family annihilators.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:31 AM
–

It’s a bit pathological their need for bone’ing. Why are you designating men's need for sex as something pathological? Can I say the same for women's need for affection? That said, I also think men should be more upfront about just how horny they are. Be explicit about how much sex you desire. So no one’s blindsided or caught off guard. I think that's always fairly obvious. How much more upfront can we actually be?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:19 AM
–

that can be certainly be sustained through the long haul You literally have no idea what you are talking about. There are so many examples of sex drought after marriage vows, when the pair was sexing it up like animals beforehand. You can't judge how someone will act while married based on their behaviour before marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 09:12 AM
4

Most people didn't even know who she was before the trial. The fuck are you talking about? She was a well-known actress. Not the most famous actress ever, but well-known nonetheless. The people who took her side was Hollywood, especially Warner Bros. The people who took her side were all the women on planet earth who heard about her and her case at the beginning of it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 04:16 PM
5

Amber Heard? The worst example ever. You are literally adding to her argument. Amber Heard was believed by everybody before the damning evidence came out showing her as an abuser.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:55 PM
1

How are you possibly getting butthurt about that? I'm not. I'm just noting that you are contradictory or possibly hypocritical. First, you say that "No one cares more about dick size than a straight guy with a small dick" and then when making an ideal man, you give him an above-average dick. Seems like in addition to straight guys with small dicks, you also care as well :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:41 PM
–

You couldn't be more up your own arse if you wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 11:33 AM
-1

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:50 PM
6

after being banned for life from a bar for approaching a woman What? Really? That happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:57 PM
1

I don't think that's a great comparison since that's not inherently an attraction related thing. Why does it have to be an attraction thing? Some things make some people happy, nothing more to it. If you like big dick and enjoy it sexually you are a size queen. Again, you are missing what I'm saying. They were happy witnessing it, you can ask them why that is. But they didn't all enjoy it. There were a few times when there was literally no way to proceed with sex because I would actually hurt he…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:40 PM
1

No, I'm not noticing. How exactly am I doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:35 PM
1

No brother, everyone doesnt talk about dicks. Youre preoccupied and projecting your own thoughts onto other people. The fact that you dont know of any conversations around men saying something along the lines of "hotdogs down the hallway" "blown out" and "used up" is just further indicators of your preoccupation. So, isn't that a positive thing? We are talking about dicks, and we don't talk about pussy at all, especially not in "the most degrading, horrible ways". That's supposed to be a positiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 01:35 PM
1

And women do focus on the guys actually suffering in silence And how exactly does that happen when you yourself are showing the opposite here? You talk about this and that here in your comment, but each and every post/comment you make is a post about the "aura farming guys" (whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:46 PM
1

I don't understand. Do you not talk about sex at all, or do you not talk about your personal sexual experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:43 PM
1

Is every woman who is happy being taken to a fancy restaurant actually a high-maintenance / gold-digger? Is there no option where she is just a normal woman, just being happy that she was taken to a nice restaurant? Maybe they were all curious and were happy they got the opportunity to try?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:40 PM
3

and you should see all the horror stories from women who "gave the 'nice guy' a chance." I would like to see those. Where can I see them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:19 AM
2

Men who aura farm do real damage because they make themselves louder than the men who are genuinely suffering in silence. Hence, they’re making men’s issues look like a joke. Or you yourself are focusing on those men more, making them out to be more than they actually are, propping up their already loud voices even though they are a tiny minority, and further silencing actual victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:13 AM
7

Kinda better than "Men kill, men rape, men abuse, men manipulate and deceive, men are dangerous, treat every man as a potential rapist/killer" and similar :)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 12:05 AM
1

You have no idea :D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:38 PM
2

I meant, why don't you hear women saying that they prefer smaller dicks? Why don't they brag about their latest fling having the perfect smaller dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:35 PM
1

I am again speaking about practicality and ease of use So if that's all you are concerned about, then 3" dick is perfect because it will never hit the cervix.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:21 PM
1

Though you'll probably hear women saying this less at a bar or such. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:18 PM
1

No one cares more about dick size than k straight guy with a small dick. And then builds an ideal guy with an above-average dick :D If I was building a guy he would probably get a ~6in dick
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:17 PM
1

Many women don’t care about height. And many do. What's funny about grouping people in "I don't care about height" and "I care about height" camps is that women who casually say "I don't care about height, as long as he is taller than me" are placed in a "I don't care about height " camp. But why is that? She obviously cares about height and has a strict cutoff. That cutoff may include many men, but will also exclude many men if she is a woman who is taller than average. I think men are more lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:03 PM
2

You missed my point. I didn't claim that each woman is a size queen or something similar to that. I didn't even claim that even one of the women I was with was a size queen (three of them were). I just wanted to illustrate the fact that every woman was happy (some disturbingly so) with the fact that I had a big dick. They wouldn't be happy if they didn't care; they would be indifferent, it would just be another dick like every other dick. That was my entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:52 PM
-1

Yeah that was the point of the comment, MEN talk about dick. Who's dick was bigger, if yours is enough, how sad you are about it. Everybody talks about dick. Even if it's in passing. There are dick jokes that you can witness in your favorite sitcom, there are dick insults thrown all around (you've probably done a fair share of that yourself as well, one way or the other), and people (not just men) are talking about dick size constantly. Also, men talk about pussy in the most degrading horrible w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:43 PM
2

No, it doesn't. The depth of a vagina is 4-8" when aroused. So the lower end of that is close to the penis average, and then you have another 3" buffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:17 PM
0

Your preference for the size of penis you have sex with is very much about your sex life No, it isn't. Maybe you prefer a big dick, but you've never had it. It has nothing to do with your sex life because you are talking in hypotheticals. Maybe you could say that you would never have sex with someone with a big dick, it still doesn't have anything to do with your sex life; it's just a matter of expressing your preference. And are you honestly trying to convince me that you never ever have conver…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:07 PM
-1

is your own specific experience/bubble, not a general case. No, it isn't. What are you talking about? There are dick jokes, dick insults, dick names, dick this dick that, and this is something that goes on in the public sphere, completely acceptable talking points. Do we have something similar to that with pussy? No, we don't. It's practically a taboo term.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:02 PM
1

Same dude. It baffles the mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:44 PM
-5

Hey dude, the equavilent to dick is pussy. No, it isn't. No one talks about pussy at all, and the dick is always talked about in any possible context. So there is no equivalence there. Dick isnt visible the majority of the time, unlike tits and ass, and I dont kiss and tell. Tits and ass aren't visible either. What are you talking about? Idgaf if you believe me. Men on this sub come here to explain women to themselves, why would i expect different from you? But the most ironic thing is that you …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:37 PM
2

Of course all the women you have been with have told you what you want to hear, because obviously your ego couldn’t handle it if they were to tell you otherwise. Maybe you're right, maybe my ego really couldn't handle it (whatever it is), but I didn't get the chance to experience that test. It’s basically the duty of women to stroke men’s ego. So if a guy has a big penis you tell him you love the size of his dick. If he has a medium penis you tell him you love the size of his dick. And if he has…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 12:26 PM
-2

It doesn't ever have to be about your sex life at all. It's just a question of preference that can be part of any normal conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:50 AM
2

However women do not care about this Oh, they so do. Literally every woman I was with adored the fact that I was in the massive category (by the categorization from the OP). And I was with a lot of women, from all walks of life. Many of them "didn't care" until they met me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:36 AM
1

Look, average is average for a reason. It tends to be the best all-arounder Something being average doesn't indicate the quality of the thing, just the incidence of the thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:39 AM
-1

Ive never had a conversation with someone IRL about dick size. As believable as a man saying "I've never had a conversation with someone IRL about boobs or ass. We just don't get into those subjects."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:36 AM
1

And you seem not to know what you are talking about. None of the men mentioned is agreeable. Do you understand what agreeable means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:30 PM
2

And this also isn't a rational argument because the first date is about him demonstrating provision. And you think that's rational? You think one singular event, which is actually an expected behavior on a date, demonstrates anything other than a person following a social script? Or do you actually think that a man paying for the first date in a restaurant demonstrates his ability and willingness to financially provide for you in the future? This is a perfect example of why women often get brand…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 03:20 PM
5

Why be retarded once when you could be retarded twice? So there is no confusion, I'm referring to your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:59 PM
5

If she doesn't have $25-$35 to pay for her own meal, she a broke bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:54 PM
5

Only when they want to have children. If you don't plan on having children, your point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:50 PM
4

a lot Very few would be my estimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:49 PM
6

If you are evaluating for "end game" on the very first date, then please also give a lot of sex afterwards, because that would be an expectation in the upcoming marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:48 PM
2

There is no man who is risking losing out on a girl they really fancy over the 50-75 bucks it would cost for a standard date at mid tier restaurant. Then I guess I don't fancy her very much if that's the case. When it comes to dating you put in the effort that you think is worth it do if you won’t pay you don’t think she is worth it Can't I say the same for her? If she isn't willing to pay her half, she doesn't find me worth it? Secondly men paying for dates is generally the social expectation I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 02:44 PM
1

There’s 3 men in my house and they all bring jars for me to open Either that's something cute between you, and they just go at it because they are poking fun, or they are all retarded. Because you don't even need strength to open the jar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 09:51 AM
2

He wasn't emasculated; he was just using that as an excuse for his insecurity (and I'm wary about using insecurity in general, considering how it's used here, but this is pure unadulterated insecurity). It would be emasculating if you were the one emphasizing the height difference, even as a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 09:14 PM
1

Currently, yes. But he can also stop being married if you decide so, that's the point. I mean, in your case, it's a bit of an overreaction to your silly term of affection, but imagine if he was calling you "his favorite fleshlight!" You probably wouldn't be too appreciative of that, even though he would mean it in the best way possible 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 08:31 PM
2

Swiping right on a profile is a literal antithesis to chasing. What are you even on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:35 AM
3

Fox News Wow, really. Fox News, you say. Interesting how that works, because if anyone mentioned Fox News in the context of them being a trusted news channel, you would probably gag. Yet you find it ok to use them as an argument in this context. How bout some news channels that your ilk always pushes, like CNN or MSNBC? basically all current political policies at the federal level And which one are those? Name some, you don't have to name all. Why do you think they want to pretend its possible t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:30 AM
–

only slightly below average You don't seem to understand statistics 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:56 AM
–

You should look into studies about what women actually get aroused by. What are those studies based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:50 AM
–

And that it is the woman's responsibility to dress modestly enough and keep herself at enough of a distance so that he doesn't latch on to her with sexual interest. And you are comparing dressing modestly to being completely covered from head to toe, specifically for the reason that the other men can't see any part of your wife? Are you seriously making that comparison? But then, neither would that be the case in a moderate islamic country. What is a moderate islamic country?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 07:17 AM
6

They fail at it a lot so I'd say not. But if men fail a lot at trying to get a relationship, or just a date, then they haven't tried hard enough, or they haven't mastered attraction, or whatever else your argument is? Why are you excusing women but not men? Why are women unable to properly judge men's character? Are you implying they are unintelligent, emotionally stunted or just unable to learn things? Are you actually a misogynist?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:40 PM
1

Once you have attraction mastered How do you do that? Couldn't women master not being duped by basic psychological tricks, and could they also stop making those basic psychological tricks they fell for the 175th time in a row as some master manipulation that men perform on them, rather than them being intentionally oblivious (for whatever reason)?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:32 PM
10

I wasn't talking about myself. If I get terribly maimed in some freak accident, I could have trouble attracting women, but I find it ridiculous to say, "Even fat slobs that don't shower have a girlfriend." It's completely untrue. Who would date a fat slob who doesn't shower? Other than those 2 women with mental issues. Or are you making a veiled comment about the character (or something else) of the men who aren't able to get a girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:16 PM
4

And how many men are like that? What % of men are the men women should be careful of? I guess my question is, what % of men are such master manipulators that willingly trick women to that degree that women are unable to recognize their manipulative tactics?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:06 PM
7

And you think that is easier than women being more discerning about who they pick out of the lot of men chasing after them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:52 PM
4

Really? Like what? And can women also do some stuff to not have it harder in dating, as you suggest? Or are they unable to do "stuff"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:48 PM
13

Once you accomplish that Can we discuss how hard this step is without glossing over it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:44 PM
8

Once a man becomes attractive You are making it sound like it's something you grow into, you just have to wait a bit, and it somehow magically happens, like getting out of puberty 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:42 PM
1

By your reasoning, if we use her example of 669 women dying during childbirth in 2023, couldn't we call that a human error as well? If they weren't pregnant, they wouldn't die during childbirth :/ That's how silly your argument sounds. No, logging can't be done without workplace fatalities. That's the nature of that job. And most of the deaths are due to human error, which is correct. But human error is part of our every endeavour. The difference is that in your random cushy office job, human er…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 12:29 PM
1

You are completely detached from reality, or we are all, except you, living under a rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 11:01 AM
1

Really? If a man helps a woman, then the evangelical man will interpret that as the man wanting to insert his penis into the woman he helped?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:15 AM
1

they are usually talking about one that is successful and well known No, they aren't. They are talking about women they could potentially be dating, doing OF.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:44 AM
1

If you don't date someone due to their gender is it sexist? What a stupid argument. It's the equivalent of saying, "if you don't want to have sex with animals, you hate animals!" There is sexual orientation and preferences within that sexual orientation. You were clearly discussing preferences. Why the need to derail the conversation? And yes, some preferences can be rooted in bigotry, hypocrisy, and racism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:37 AM
1

How can a blacked-out person initiate sex? Would that be a valid defence for anyone claiming the same when having sex with a blacked-out person?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:15 AM
1

That's not a figure of speech. But here we are ig.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:13 AM
2

"My argument is so good that I don't need a counterargument. It's not that I have it, I just don't need it!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:11 AM
1

Shallow is such an overused term that barely means anything these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:41 PM
0

If we go by the standard of "having sex with someone unable to consent because they are blackout drunk" then how would you call his case? I mean, you literally made the same argument yourself in the other comment: Right if someone isn't conscious they can't consent. Whether they're drunk or not isn't even really relevant in that situation. Like if they're unconscious for any reason they can't consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:28 PM
6

But you are. What, in your opinion, was that article supposed to prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:12 PM
9

I thought I was supposed to provide proof for my argument, and you for yours. Why are you providing proof for my argument? Who is going to provide proof for yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:05 PM
3

They don't give a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:01 PM
1

like you just know dude is absolute trash in bed and miserable to live with Like, you literally have no idea. You can assume and presume, but you literally have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:56 PM
3

But some attractive people say or do something that ruin their shot like being rude to the waiter/waitress during the date. When you pass a certain threshold of attractiveness, no one gives a fuck about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:54 PM
1

I don't have a conscious height requirement for either, but I seem to prefer people who are close to my height/not significantly taller or shorter than me. I don't particularly like towering over or being towered over. So you don't mind men being potentially shorter than you? Yes What does this yes for income represent? Do you expect them to be financially independent? To own a home? What is that specifically? yes What does this yes for confidence represent? How do you imagine a confident man? D…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 11:05 AM
–

He already explained it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 09:34 AM
–

That is the question you seem to be asking. No, he isn't asking that. So much for the: It treats listening as secondary to teaching. You just refuse to listen and honestly engage any points of view that contradict your own worldview. But you are oh so ready to teach us your worldview. This is why redpill exists, because of people like you and the blatant hypocrisy that you think you can always get away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 09:32 AM
8

I can easily find people saying being drunk doesn't matter for consent. Does that make it the case? Find me a public announcement of that if it's so easy. Please do. This is a single poster made for a single university almost 20 years ago and red pillers are STILL using it lol Not a red piller, but why shouldn't I use this? Feel free to use an example of the opposite of this from 20 years ago, I don't mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:45 AM
2

What's the equivalent of the height requirement for men that you apply to women? Are your income expectations for women equal to those you have for men? Confidence? Amount of fitness? Are there some standards that you apply to women that you don't specifically apply to men (something that can actually be applied to both genders)?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:43 AM
-1

So.. You're a rapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:32 AM
10

It's not <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:29 AM
6

Which women here are saying that’s ok? Each woman who didn't say anything against it but would have "choice" words for a man who does the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:27 AM
0

What is a baddie concept based on?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 07:28 PM
–

I'm what most people would consider an extremely attractive man, and I also don't go around assuming that every woman wants to be with me. BUT, literally without exception, every fucking time I was friendly and complementary towards women who aren't part of my close friends group, they would misinterpret things. EVERY TIME.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:02 AM
5

It’s not really a test. Of course it is, it's a literal definition of a test. She poses "the offer" and decides what happens next based on the outcome. Offering is good manners It isn't if you tie an expectation of him not accepting the offer to the offer itself. It's just performative good manners. It's like a person claiming they are progressive, because that's the default expectation in their friend group, but actually being an adamant Trump voter. To be upfront may lead to more pretense on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:29 AM
1

It's a standard shit test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:17 AM
–

What's weird about it? Ask any very attractive woman what happens when she gives a compliment to a less attractive man. The same happens to a very attractive man giving compliments to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:12 AM
–

I thought an incel is just someone who can't get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:09 AM
–

Mansplaining time!! Do you know what an incel is?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:47 PM
–

Who is this advice for then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:41 PM
1

But that makes it transactional then.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:33 PM
1

there aren’t clothes that alter men’s behavior Of course there are. Go to the office in a low-cut shirt and a mini skirt, and men who usually wouldn't look at you will do so. That is clothes altering behavior. Not for the better, but still 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:37 PM
-1

Most relationships are reciprocal. Not transactional. Yeah, that's how it's supposed to be, not keeping score but just caring about your partner's well-being. And yet, somehow, there is always a score in the background. There is always "unpaid labor" score, "emotional labor" score and many more "I'm doing way more of this than he is" scores. How is that in any way reciprocal?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:31 PM
0

Can I call them whores and tricks?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:19 PM
1

But what issue? You haven't said anything concrete.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 02:08 PM
-1

Don't call women bitches and zeros! That's totally disrespectful!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:56 PM
3

How did I prove your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:48 PM
5

Was his height mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:39 PM
2

I'm just messing with ya 😃 I have a completely opposite problem with giving compliments. My issue is as if I were an attractive woman giving a compliment to a nerd. I can't give compliments because they would be interpreted as something more because they want it to be more, and I don't. So I never give compliments unless I actually want to have sex with that person, because in that case, the person I'm giving a compliment to will almost certainly want to have sex with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:37 PM
1

Would you give compliments to anyone if every time you give a compliment to someone, they completely ignore you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:32 PM
0

I don't care about that. Men are not fishermen! Some are, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:31 PM
3

So you did the easy and lazy part only?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:30 PM
2

So why do that then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:26 PM
1

Saying thank you doesn't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:24 PM
1

Men aren't fishermen! Some are, but not all! Don't use such comparisons that reduce men to a mere hobby!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:23 PM
1

So is it ok to compliment your style and then expect sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:21 PM
1

Why comment at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:16 PM
3

Do the same for Gregory Bovino :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:15 PM
1

Oh my god, what the fuck is that monstrosity??!??!? The best example for r/dataisugly. I can't believe that graph. I feel actual physical pain when looking at that. Area graph with identical color and shade for each category!?!!??!?! Our civilization should burn.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 12:44 PM
8

No one brings up Tom Cruises height The fuck 😃 Reddit is like an interdimensional forum where people from different dimensions are all conversing in the same place. You are from a dimension where people don't mention Tom's height.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:01 AM
1

Unfortunately the majority of them do actually do the negative thing in question. What negative thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 10:38 AM
1

Do you really think if she wasn't wearing that she would get raped. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 09:00 AM
1

I hear this a lot, but in my experience men are actually attracted to women’s bodies - NOT clothing. As a woman I have attracted attention to my physical appearance by existing. Unless I were to wear a burka or something, they can see me and what I look like! Do you have any evidence that it is actually the clothing that attracts men? Can you give me an example of an outfit an attractive woman could wear that would NOT attract male attention? But that's exactly what he's saying in that very quot…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:56 AM
1

without sexualizing them How would you know they aren't sexualizing them? Their not acting on their impulses doesn't mean they aren't sexualizing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:46 AM
1

Something you would be ok wearing in a professional environment (job).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:43 AM
2

there will always be exceptions Can I use the same argument for every man who does something bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:19 AM
2

The same way it's nobody's fault that men orgasm easier :/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:53 PM
–

This might be the most entitled and the least self-aware comment I've ever read 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:50 PM
3

How do you not understand that that is a YOU issue, it's not women's issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:48 PM
2

No it's just observational data. As is when you notice that women are heavily filtering for height.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:14 PM
2

Interesting nowhere did that say “Thats all that was needed” so clearly that’s what you thought. Did I say that anywhere? Why are you paraphrasing while removing all context? Would you burst into flames if you were to respond to something in good faith? This is what I said: If that were all it takes, there would be 0 (zero) issues with the height of a man. As a reply to this quoted part of your comment: Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. If you had the ability to under…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 01:10 PM
3

You brought it up yourself. You said: Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. Insinuating that height isn't an issue at all because of that. I just replied to that sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:10 PM
2

I just saw another study Can I see it as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:37 AM
4

Are we discussing that? I thought we were discussing something that completely removes you from receiving any pussy 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:29 AM
2

men would rather die out than treat women with respect 🤷🏼‍♀️ Can we please stop with this stupid notion? It literally has nothing to do with this, and it never did, so please stop repeating it. I could treat women like utter trash (I don't btw) and that would have 0 negative impact on my romantic and sexual success with women. I have a friend who is actually a piece of shit towards them, and that fact has 0 negative impact (it may even be positive in some sense) on his romantic and sexual succes…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:56 AM
2

if she was trying to keep him When isn't she?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:42 AM
2

If you have a nice face, you're all set as a guy. You are saying like it's a decision that some guy forgot to make (he simply forgot that he has to have a nice face), and when he remembers, he will be a ok 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:39 AM
4

Because the majority of short men are taller than most women. If that were all it takes, there would be 0 (zero) issues with the height of a man. But women ain't searching for a man taller than them, they want a tall man, as in taller than other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 10:38 AM
-1

Also have you watched the video? What is the tl;dr of her arguments? Such a lazy reply. Why don't you watch the fucking video yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:24 PM
0

I stand up for my friends. I also would stand up for myself It's not about that. Almost everyone would stand up for their friends. It's about standing up for random people completely unrelated to you. Would you do that? If you would, you are in a tiny, tiny minority of women because whenever some shit goes down, a man is the one reacting to it to save others. Why that is, I don't know. We can all just guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:43 PM
1

So the fact that you don't get 100% success rate means that men don't want women to approach them :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 01:22 PM
0

Women don’t approach because that usually doesnt go over well I have no idea in which reality you are living in, but it ain't the reality that the rest of us live in. What does it even mean, "doesn't go over well"? What exactly does that look like? Do you mean you can, god forbid, get rejected? I'm an extremely attractive guy, and the majority of my relationships started with the woman initiating. They are always given a chance (granted if I'm not already in a relationship), regardless of their …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:30 AM
–

And yet here you are going back and forth with him :D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:54 PM
–

His job is far more jeopardized if he is a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:06 PM
–

Im just saying acting like sexless men don’t have their issues is crazy. They can also be picky like i said and often shoot out their league. But no one is acting like they don't have issues. Of course, they do; they are sexless because of those issues. But they aren't (at least not by default as you paint them to be) bad and evil and pricks and awful. They just have issues. You obviously have a plethora of issues. The only difference is that your issues don't lead to you being sexless, and thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 12:03 PM
–

I imagined what it would be like in a room full of you. And this quote of yours perfectly sums it up: Horrible group of people a majority of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:58 AM
–

If he were a bitch and stayed, he is a bitch and will always be a bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:47 AM
0

Common sense. Debatable. What you define as common sense today may have nothing to do with common sense 20 years ago. 18 years of schooling. Debatable as well. There are young people coming out of high school functionally illiterate today. Information is everywhere. Yes, it is. But so is misinformation. Are you certain that you can easily differentiate between the two? Information isn’t the problem. It’s critical thinking and reading skills that are lacking in all of RP. That's a problem for eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:43 AM
3

I'm still baffled he would ask a question like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:01 AM
2

All (not most, but literally all of them) of my friends and acquaintances who had a fucked up childhood ended fucked up themselves later on. Not one of them has something resembling a functioning decent life. I don't understand how you don't understand that you are a complete outlier. 99% of people living through shit you lived through (assuming you are truthful about it) will be completely fucked up later on. You are romanticizing abuse, thinking that you need it to build character, but you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:48 AM
1

Oppression isn't altruism. Isn't feminism all about female empowerment and choice? They aren't forced to do anything; it's a choice. Why do you want to deprive them of that choice? Passport bro-ing isn't something I would EVER engage in, but from a purely utilitarian perspective, you are wrong on every level. What annoys me the most is that the same people (like you) would, in the same breath, fully support women selling their bodies for money (prostitution) for whatever reason, but would be aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:00 AM
7

If you wouldn't change that for a much less eventful childhood, then there is something fundamentally wrong with you. I was growing up in a war and everything that entails (death, destruction, famine, poverty, being a refugee for a couple of years), and I would replace that for a happier childhood in a heartbeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:20 PM
2

Did your parents abuse you physically and mentally?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:31 PM
8

Aw man, you are so shit at bullying. You couldn't even help a bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:28 PM
2

Men just keep it alive in the hope they will get on top of the hierarchy. Literally the same thing can be said for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:24 PM
5

What a fucking stupid question 😃 What do you guess his answer will be?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:16 PM
8

You should have bullied him to make him more resilient and stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:15 PM
1

No. And no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:07 AM
1

Here in the UK, individuals don't press charges, the government does. We know. But I don't think he has anything to be afraid of because he didn't write bad words on Facebook.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:06 AM
5

They don't put in jail people who could be innocent. I love it when people are confidently completely wrong. They literally do exactly that (at least in the US). Jail is a short-term incarceration while, for example, waiting for trial, and it goes on during the duration of the trial. So you could be completely innocent, and you would still be in jail while waiting for the verdict. Btw, I don't give a fuck about Tate, but he is still not found guilty, and he is currently not incarcerated. Just fy…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:40 AM
3

So a better outcome is world peace, people living in harmony, everybody being happy and content, simply utopia. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:01 AM
-1

Highest divorce rate is actually among lower income women. The data refutes your premise. Do you know how the divorce rate is calculated? If you knew, you would know how stupid that statement is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:59 AM
1

So the better outcome is just to leave them in their squalor?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:28 AM
3

the folks who want nuance and romance Yet, ironically enough, these are the ones that perpetuate this selection bias presented by the OP. who want to date by statistics and minmax strategy like a video game Yet, ironically enough, these are the ones that have a firmer grasp on the fact that it will be hard to find someone exactly because of what OP is saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:26 AM
2

Yes, that's what I said. He said he wouldn't want to date them; he didn't say why. What don't you understand here?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:16 PM
1

They just think it’s rude and inconsiderate to not keep them to yourself. He kept them to himself. He just refused to date them. What's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 01:05 PM
1

midget It's little person!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:56 PM
2

What's wrong with that? Don't be a prude!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:53 PM
2

They wouldn't date you even if you weren't married.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 12:31 PM
1

In what universe does your reply have anything at all to do with his comment, let alone the part of the comment you quoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:51 AM
1

has at some point or another Very important distinction. That's the point. At a certain point, you want a husband. But not before that certain point when it's about fun and craziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:43 AM
–

false accusations are not that common How common are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:45 AM
–

The judge doesn't prosecute. you can’t really say it’s something “women” are all opposed to tho, right Good thing he didn't say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:43 AM
0

Women aren't covert about showing those tendencies because they think it's acceptable (and it is) for them to be that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:34 AM
2

Men like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:24 AM
-4

Ironically enough, what you are flexing here is an actual red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:21 AM
–

but I don't really see it as cheating by itself I wasn't talking about cheating at all, nor did I consider it cheating. I was just trying to illustrate why a man has every right to be apprehensive about his girlfriend/wife dressing sexy and going to the club, and it has nothing to do with insecurity. And way more so in this case than in the hiking case, because the club is teeming with sexual energy, and you are playing directly into that by dressing sexy and going there. Should you be playing i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:58 AM
7

You are missing the point. He wasn't talking about people asking specific dating advice for their own singular situation. It's the discussion about the current dating environment in general. And the people who have been partnered for the last 15 years feel like they can contribute with their own experience, which is completely removed from how things currently are. Their experience is almost completely inapplicable to the current issues that plague people trying to date. They might even be the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 10:44 AM
2

You are comparing a completely different set of circumstances. A woman dressing up sexy to go to a club is in no way comparable to a man dressing up sexy and going to the club. An attractive woman dressed sexy in a club will receive a tremendous amount of attention just by existing; she doesn't have to do anything, her being there invites that attention. You can argue that it's not fair to put that on her because she may not want any of that attention, and I agree with that, but the fact still r…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 12:31 PM
1

women are attracted to the same small percentage of men. Exactly. What's confusing to you about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/26 09:32 AM
1

Not examples, evidence. Yes, you provided examples, that's correct. But is the person who's dealing with big data gonna tell me that 2 examples are evidence of something on a population-wide scale? I sincerely hope you won't. Therefore, you also provided 0 evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 02:32 PM
1

Are you for real 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:35 AM
2

Communism is equal OUTCOMES.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:31 AM
1

Because it's not that popular. How do you define popular?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 09:15 AM
2

Nothing 😂🤷🏽‍♀️ maybe a warning. And I (an extremely attractive guy) will get a fine, so your example is completely opposite of what you think you are presenting. Again, this occurrence is not gender specific, you just have tunnel vision. It's extremely gender specific in the case that OP is presenting because 90% of the time, the man is the one doing the approaching and initiating and he is the one judged based on him having/not having pretty privelage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:56 AM
3

however, if either partner enjoys going to the club for the experience itself, then they do not necessarily have to change their behavior. Why are you separating "experience itself" from dancing and flirting? That is exactly what experience itself is like. What do you consider "experience itself" if not that? If they met in the club, that means that they are dancing with people other than their friends, and that is obviously something they (as in both of them) like to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:37 AM
1

If all men had no capacity for social skills, society would just accept that men suck at social skills and people probably wouldn’t rely on men for social shit. You didn't answer the question; you just expanded a bit on the OP's hypothetical. The question was "What would women do?" What would the world look like, how would we interact with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:31 AM
1

What are you talking about? They are femcels exactly because they are socially inept right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/26 08:29 AM
2

Either it's ok for everyone or no one.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:02 PM
4

So he provided an equal amount of "evidence" OP did. Which is none.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 02:00 PM
1

The goal is get an unbiased understanding of what people say and why they say it. Unbiased. Ok. You didn't answer his question about how you are categorizing misogyny and misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:20 PM
12

I don't think objectively means what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:16 PM
4

I'd guess the type of men who use dating apps are probably already less attractive on average. And what would you have guessed about the type of women who use dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:15 PM
3

That online dating is the primary or preferred way to meet people. He said that people are moving everything online, and the trend of meeting people online is growing. He is completely correct about that, you can't really deny it. The fact that some women have dating apps they rarely use, or tried it once and didn't like it, doesn't negate that. Nor does it speak for your case either. You have no idea how big that "some" is, and you have no idea how big a chunk of that "some" are the ones that j…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:01 PM
2

Either way it’s a consumer-facing tool. With limitations. And the limitation here is a handful of randomly selected posts that may or may not be heavily correlated to the question at hand. So, given that, why would someone dealing with big data suggest such a flawed tool to anyone? Now be more specific about the questions, and the motivations, the whys. Your research questions and methodology is shoddy and incomplete. So I can get even more completely biased answers based on the completely rando…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:45 AM
2

You should tell me 10 more times how you are getting paid to do this research.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:38 AM
3

I get paid to do this research. I have no idea how much you are paid for doing that, but trust me, you aren't paid nearly enough. I know they do. Great. You provided no evidence of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:37 AM
3

It’s not “cherry picked.” It’s data. It's data only when it suits your agenda. It will be "just an irrelevant twitter/instagram post" the moment it goes against your agenda. I work in this space (ethnographic largescale data) And yet you think posting links to 2 twitter/instagram posts is relevant? We analyze millions of online opinions on a regular basis. And yet you think posting links to 2 twitter/instagram posts is relevant? There are clear trends. Yes, there are. They are in the article you…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:27 AM
5

If you want to be pedantic it’s actually more than two examples. At least count the replies in the screenshots. The screenshots include more than two comments. You guys can’t even do “gotcha” math well smh. Or maybe you should look at the screenshots yourself to see the gender of people replying. Or maybe you should assume that if you have an "edgy" comment that has replies, the vast majority of those replies are condemning the edgy comment. Or maybe don't assume at all, and verify it yourself (…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:15 AM
4

They were from Instagram. Ohhhh, so much better and a much more valid source. Are you going to dismiss Instagram as a cesspool? Rhetorical question? Is massive amount of verbatim data on the internet not reliable? It’s data. Massive? Yet you provide 2 twitter posts with barely any replies. At some point you guys can’t keep hand waving as “that’s just edgelords…” Can we say that for the casual #killallmen crowd? It’s male opinions across the internet. Not just convenient sites you think don’t cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:44 AM
8

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS DISCUSSION. That fucking ambiguity is the reason this topic exists for your silly comment to exist on it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:36 AM
2

in my opinion, this is a bit hypocritical. if you get into a relationship with a woman who wears revealing clothes, loves going to the club, and is active on social media, why would you expect her to change her entire lifestyle just because she's dating you? Would you expect a man whom she got in a relationship with by meeting him in a club where he likes to dress up to flirt with women and dance with them throughout the night to change his behavior when they get together?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:31 AM
6

This really isn't true. What isn't really true? You haven't specified. Is his entire comment not true, or some of it? Online dating apps have always been a niche market and have always been designed to appeal more to men than to women, which is why way more men are on it than women. Somewhere between 30-50% of new couples formed are formed on OLD. And you consider that niche market? Appeals more to men than women? Yeah, that's true. While at the same time talking about how you can meet women pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:25 AM
5

And at that time, there was STILL tremendous social pressure on women to pair up with men. If we didn't we were considered losers. Literally something that ALWAYS happened to men, and is still so. Can you think of anything comparable that women do systemically? I don't think you understand what systemically means. None of your examples are of something men do systemically.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:44 AM
–

Do you consider those answers reasonable? To the question "Can you be considered an activist against racism if you hate black people?" he got the answer "Yeah, I hate black people, but I still want them to receive equal treatment!". That's what you consider reasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:31 AM
–

And why do women always have their dms off…. Because they are weak and paranoid?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 10:26 AM
2

Thank you for that video of not only 2 but all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:48 AM
1

It’s not always feasible, but we should do our best with what we have and with what the survivors request. I have no idea what happened to you, but I'm fairly certain most "survivors" would request appropriate/harsh punishments for the violence perpetrated on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:31 AM
1

Can you explain the reasoning for that statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:18 AM
0

They don't prefer them. They prefer the status that comes with men doing those kinds of jobs. Isn't it kinda moronic to say "Women don't prefer doctors and lawyers" when each and every doctor and lawyer is either married or can get a relationship with any issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 08:04 AM
3

What is FeministsTM, how do you define it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:35 AM
–

When you ask chatgpt to think for you, ask it to do that in a much shorter form, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:27 AM
1

And men’s and women’s are different How so? What are men's desires? What are women's desires?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:19 AM
1

How would you define a man explaining to a woman that her gendered experience is completely wrong and that you as a man know way more about her female experience? This usually went under the umbrella of "mansplaining". Is something different now?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 01:27 PM
6

You seem to be racist against brown people :/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:09 AM
0

I'm noticing you're engaging in mansplaining a lot. Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:01 AM
1

If no man ever managed to fulfill your requirements, it's a you issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:58 AM
0

But no man has ever fulfilled my needs to that point. Than I think this is a "you" issue rather than "most working women in adult relationships" issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:53 AM
-1

If you need affection and love why aren't your needs being met by cuddles, kisses and hugs? Would you protest if you weren't getting these? If yes, why? Why do you feel entitled to cuddles, kisses, and hugs?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:50 AM
–

Then why engage in that kind of sex at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:37 AM
–

If I said the first thing to a guy it would mean I wasn't into him. That's the point everyone is always making, but every damn time, "people" are being intentionally obtuse and pretending that you are talking about the 2nd option (when no one is) and replying to that instead of the 1st option. Thank you for bringing some nuance to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 07:35 AM
–

How is it not? You are asking about someone's previous relationship(s). You won't find out about that info by asking “where did you grow up, what was your childhood like”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:32 PM
–

You wouldn't care if your potential partner cheated in his previous relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:59 PM
–

It was so simple, and yet you failed. The point is NOT TO MAKE IT MORE SPECIFIC.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:55 PM
–

Sorry, this comment was supposed to go to the person above you because I completely agree with you 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:42 PM
–

But using that kind of logic, you would be ok with your partner cheating on you just as long as you never find out, and just as long as it doesn't affect your relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:14 PM
1

If I was body dead I would be dead lol. That was... my point... Which would make the body more important than the brain, because you can't be "body dead" without actually being dead. Basically, if you go into a coma your woman won't want you anymore. She'll leave immediately (like men more often do) because now your body is useless and there's nothing else you offer. Almost no one leaves their significant other in a coma. Partially because you can't really "leave" someone in that state. Either y…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:42 AM
2

And if you were "body dead" would it be any different than being brain dead as to you writing comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 11:25 AM
0

Just gotta train em well. You are so right about this. I keep saying this to all my guy friends who don't have issues getting a woman, but always run into issues later on in their relationship. You gotta train 'em well!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:03 AM
2

for children, both men and women have a major responsibility to contain their anger for that same reason So, one could say that it's a FAR WORSE offence to do something like that to an infant or a small child just based on the power difference, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 08:33 AM
1

I've seen plenty of tall, conventionally attractive friends fail because they lack social skills. At least try to make it somewhat believable. I would really like to know where you live to be surrounded by so many tall, attractive, socially retarded men who somehow fail regardless of how they look :/ On the other hand, I have friends who are the best people I have ever known, as funny and as interesting as it is humanly possible. And yet, because they aren't as conveniently attractive (they aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 08:43 AM
2

I really wish you guys would understand there are people who dont live in your bubble. Said by the person in a bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 07:26 AM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about. Can you imagine then how I feel? Half the time I myself have no idea what I'm talking about, so why would you know what I'm talking about. I consider myself above average and have never had problems attracting women. So your "advice" is completely useless for men who are average and below average. "Like a foot" - how old are you? Is that some kind of Boomer slang? Are you trying to ask me how tall I am? You know what a foot is? Can you imagine what you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 03:13 PM
1

I said being able to interact socially with women has nothing to do with looks. I have no idea why people are peddling this kind of reductive opinion. You can disagree to what extent looks matter in this case, but saying it has nothing to do with it is ridiculous. It's like saying height has nothing to do with someone being in the NBA. If you are a good-looking guy, everything is so much easier when interacting with women socially. You are in a constant positive feedback loop; the mistakes that …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 03:08 PM
0

How "like a foot" do you look from 0 to foot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:27 PM
-1

I presume you look like a foot?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:20 AM
–

What? I provided a screenshot. Of what? Of it not being used how you said it's used? Yeah, you definitely provided a screenshot of that. I also linked an example of that in another reply from last week of a guy here using the phrase to explain how women should expect men to be polygamous. Yes, you did. I could also provide a screenshot of people enjoying taxidermy. Either of those is equally relevant to your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:06 AM
–

Wrong. Yeah, I was wrong, I admit. It's actually NEVER EVER. It’s related but I know you guys like to play dumb. Somehow, only in your mind (but I guess that's all that matters anyway). Everyone else is pointing out how there is literally no connection. But I guess you are right, and everyone else is playing dumb. There is a name for that kind of condition, I think it starts with n, and ends with arcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 07:02 AM
1

Furthermore, if you do your own queries across the internet you’ll find men using that phrase to talk about how women should “duh expect men not to be faithful” commonly enough. They are used so commonly enough that you are unable to provide a single example? We seem to have differing opinions on what common means.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:40 AM
1

Again, don't project your experience onto others, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:36 PM
1

Don't project your experience onto others, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:47 PM
–

I'm not trolling. You either don't understand what harm is, or you consider viewpoints to be harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:18 PM
3

It’s not an uncommon phrase. Men use it often. And never in the context you described. And what you linked has nothing to do with the context in your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 12:27 PM
–

fun fact women that gain weight in the relationship is usually because of the man :/ Fun fact, your fun fact is stupid and has no basis whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:40 AM
–

What a silly notion. "Single" dads only do better because they have a higher likelihood of having a live in girlfriend or wife that takes care of the kids while nothing in his life ever has to adjust. So, is he to blame for realizing that the best outcome for a child is to have a father AND a mother figure and doing what he can to provide that for his child/children? Shouldn't he be praised for this instead of criticized? It isn't even that they're better parents. They just have more money. More…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:21 AM
–

Correct, and also completely irrelevant. OP said that he wanted to demonize step-fatherhood so that men don't engage in it because they have a noble cause (to be a stepfather and take care of children that are missing a father figure), but, in the end, it is detrimental for them (them being men who become stepfathers). So, quite the opposite, he's not demonizing stepfathers, he just thinks that they are hurting themselves by choosing to be stepfathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:02 AM
–

No, he didn't. He proposed the demonisation of step-fatherhood, not step fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:36 AM
1

Women.. Am I right.. 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:12 AM
1

If only people would read the actual studies they link nonchalantly. And imagine if they understood the data. Oh, how much better the world would be. But who's got time for that when you are barely 126765 deep in making your daily diet of 100000000000 stupid comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:51 AM
1

Fuck no.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:48 AM
1

How do you decide what fits in: within reason and limited
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:41 AM
–

You never saw a man smile? I don't understand. Your own point is that men are "externalizing" their feelings. If not in the way you mentioned, how are they then doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:37 AM
–

Isn't that externalized behaviour? And don't men also cry, smile, laugh, frown?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:26 AM
–

The activities of young men were of great interest long before 21st century Internet forums. How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:56 AM
–

And how do women display emotions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:48 AM
–

I hope you aren't a lawyer because you have issues with reading and understanding. He said: even though even the wikipedia page could assign no specific harm Unless you think being anti-feminist and misogynistic is a harm. But then we enter the sphere of thought crime, and I'm not sure we would like to go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:46 AM
5

But they aren't two different things. They are the same thing in this context - preference. Do you, yourself, prefer bigger dick in you or more forskin in you? It's a simple question.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 01:13 PM
4

You are trying too hard to make everything about porn. If you want to talk about porn, make your own post about it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:51 PM
6

What does that have to do with him likening the size of the labia to either of those?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:50 PM
4

So that makes their influence more valid, or?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:48 AM
1

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:47 AM
2

If you were honestly asking for an explanation and clarification, you would have gotten it. Saying "This post is barely coherent." is not it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:42 PM
2

Same here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 02:05 PM
7

It's, um, interesting when someone is almost stabbed? Is it, um, interesting when someone is almost raped?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:56 PM
3

Or you could also ignore this post that you replied to in the way you did?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:55 PM
1

You are only roleplaying a male feminist. Nothing more, nothing less. If you are as attractive as you claim to be, you could roleplay a piece of shit boyfriend, a misogynistic bastard, a feminized in touch with your feelings male ally, a brooding emo, or whatever else comes to mind. You would still have interest from women. The interest you receive has nothing to do with you being a feminist or whatever other role you are playing at the time. I should know because it's the same with me. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:52 PM
2

I could literally copy and paste this reply verbatim to each and every one of your topics, and it would fit perfectly each and every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:42 PM
2

So the increase in these views also correlates with less dating. Why do you assume that there was an increase in those views?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:39 PM
15

Well that's an, um, interesting experience. I don't think you minimized it or trivialized it enough. I think you can do it much better than this lame attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:25 PM
4

I read your flair. What do I do next?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:08 PM
1

Many such examples and the latest one is from more than 2 years ago 😃
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:21 PM
1

Many such examples? Really? I was curious, so I went there. Went through at least 50 topics (couldn't stop myself from reading on). Everything there is fucking horrible. But I saw exactly 0 such examples. I guess they magically pop up when you look at that sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:06 PM
0

WAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYY TOO MANY, and then you keep repeating the same story of one man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:46 AM
2

How is it enforced right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:52 AM
3

Objectively our closest genetic relations still practice Polygamy. And where the fuck are our closest genetic relatives right now? Why should we as a species in any way consider the social structure of animals that lick their shit? What the fuck is wrong with people?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:43 AM
2

And that's different from how things were forever in what way exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:34 AM
2

after we let natural selection take its course again What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:27 AM
1

Realizing that doesn't help them suddenly get into a relationship. You are confusing cause and effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:26 AM
–

Now read about dogs, wolves and the differences in their reactions to men and women. Or you can actually read the OP a bit further than the title if you are going to make a reply. What does this have to do with your perceived gender war Nothing. And that was the point of his post. If you actually bothered to read it before commenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:33 AM
3

😃
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:24 AM
0

This should tell us everything we need to know about your ability to think critically. Read that sentence slowly my dude. Read it again, and everything seems fine. I don't understand what you are having issues with. A guy in China will know who Klay is. A guy from anywhere in Europe will know who Klay is. A guy from the Philippines, Australia, or Brazil will know who Klay is. None of them will know who Megan is. A global star who gets her shows cancelled because of low ticket sales. You don't se…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:15 AM
1

That's an article from 2022 referencing a top list made at the start of the season, in which GSW (Golden State Warriors - NBA team that Klay played basketball in at the time) won their 4th ring in the era of Steph/Klay/Dray. He would probably be on that list if it was made a year later. He's usually in the top 100 players ever. Can you even grasp what that means? The NBA is a league that funnels all the best players from the entire world to play in it. Meaning that if you are in the top 100 ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:26 AM
3

But in this case, it literally is her fault for not vetting properly. She isn't to blame for being cheated on; she is to blame for being in that situation at all because she gave a chance to a known cheater.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:07 AM
0

Holding him accountable would be not getting with him at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:03 AM
2

Lets say you trust me and then I con you and take you for all you have. But why would I trust you if you are a known conman? You are reframing things.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:03 AM
0

Wrong. Just because you like Klay Thompson more doesn't change the fact that Megan is more famous globally. Wrong. Just because you like Megan more doesn't change the fact that Klay is more famous globally. Megan Thee Stallion is a major pop culture figure. In the US. Klay is known globally. Grammy-winning rapper with hit songs and crossover into film, TV, and brand deals. Now imagine if it were 100x harder to get a single Grammy. That would be the equivalent of winning the NBA Championship. He …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:00 AM
0

Are you yanking our chain or something? I don't know, am I? looked it up. He doesn't even make the top 50 here. I got tired of scrolling. I don't see him on ESPNs page either for this season See, that's the difference here. Klay is at the end of his career, and he's not stuffing the stat sheet this or the previous season. But because of his legacy, he will be known for a long time. Megan will be forgotten the moment she drops off the charts. I'll be generous and give her another 5 years tops. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:51 PM
3

If you told me, "I have conned 10 people just before I met you, but I would never con you, never ever!" and I let you con me, OF COURSE I WOULD BLAME MYSELF.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:28 PM
1

And you continued on being with him till he cheated on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:13 PM
1

If a person runs full speed headfirst into a concrete wall, knowing full well what the outcome would be because there were 10 other people who ran into that wall the same way just before him, does that make the wall an asshole? Or might that person be partially retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:12 PM
2

I'm sorry that you are unable to read more than one sentence replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:06 PM
1

Why were you in a relationship with a socially awkward retard of a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:04 PM
0

Y'all really refuse to hold men accountable for cheating because you'd rather admire them. The post is literally holding him accountable. Megan didn't hold him accountable. Guess she should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:02 PM
1

You never see this when men get cheated on by women, nobody's whining "but he picked her, it's his fault"! If you are completely blind, yeah, then you don't see that. Otherwise, that's the only thing you see in that situation. Especially coming from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:00 PM
1

I've seen at least a dozen reels and Reddit posts of men saying 'shes ugly and if I was her BF I'd cheat too and he's rich and famous and she's a nobody' with thousands of comments supporting. No way, dozen you say! Can you link to at least one of those Reddit threads with thousands of comments supporting his cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:52 PM
0

You don't have to read any of it. Just be aware that it's all true and you are completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:43 PM
1

Do you apply the same standard to Megan, who is outing their relationship dirty laundry for the whole world to see?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:42 PM
2

no you definitely don’t if you think that personal values don’t impact sexual & relationship value. I just illustrated my own experience that proves otherwise. I might be an outlier in that, but I can only comment on what has happened to me personally. being adored by (& manipulating) insecure women really proves nothing Why do women here always do this? You just can't stop yourself from infantilizing each and every woman whose choice of a relationship has a potentially negative outcome. No, reg…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:40 PM
1

lol meg is a globally popular music star No. Taylor Swift is globally popular. She could stack 10 concerts, one after the other, in any European town that you pick in the biggest venue that you can find, and each of them would be sold out. That's global popularity. Megan can't fill an arena and had several concerts that were canceled in the EU part of her 2025 tour. That's literally the opposite of global popularity. basketbal does not nearly have as much widespread appeal, even in the US where …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:06 PM
3

I do. Quite more than you might think. Speaking from personal experience, because of the way I look, my personal values were irrelevant. I was a piece of shit for quite some time, and I was adored by each and every woman I was with at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:55 PM
0

I have no idea what this means I meant that it's an extremely expected comment, that's why it's a comment one could expect here. I don't understand what's not clear about that. It's still a weak point for the reason I explained. It's not. I mean, you could have that silly argument about the fame of a person who isn't a singer and isn't supposed to fill an arena solo, but when a person that is a singer can't sell tickets, that tells you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:50 PM
2

It's geniunely hilarious. The men these dudes look up to the most are literal nobodies to the vast majority of women. Yeah, it is. I literally can't stop laughing. You actually think that the man Megan Thee Stallion (who is, for some reason, considered globally popular goddess of rap and beauty here on PPD) was in a relationship with is a nobody because you yourself haven't heard about him. I can't even fathom the sheer amount of cognitive dissonance needed to be employed for someone to reach th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:45 PM
0

All of the guys I know know who Klay Thompson is (I'm not from the US). One girl (out of many) I know knew who Megan is. He is obviously more famous because a whole ass world outside of the US actually exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:34 PM
-1

Exactly the comment one could expect here 😄 Btw, it's a knock against her "GLOBAL POP STAR" case. Because she isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:27 PM
1

constantly being thirsted on by men How exactly would you know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:18 PM
1

It's not even that. It's the fact that everyone is calling Megan a global pop star while at the same time, probably 90+% of them aren't even listening to her, and she is almost a complete unknown outside of the US. And when they say "basketball is an american sport" AAAAAAAAAARGGGGGHHHH. The entire fucking world is watching NBA. No one knows who the fuck Megan Thee Stallion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:15 PM
3

Your personal values =/= your sexual/relationship marketplace value
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:11 PM
1

Are you shaming men for being emotional?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:08 PM
1

As unique as any other woman here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:04 PM
0

You’re saying this from the perspective of a dude-centered mainstream outlook. While you, on the other hand, will give an objective assessment, right? You are completely wrong. It's literally the opposite of what you are thinking. Their fame is incomparable. He is one of the best NBA players who has ever played the game, and the NBA is popular in the entire fucking world. While she is primarily an american rap star. Not global, AMERICAN almost exclusively. She could barely fill an arena in her E…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:38 PM
1

And anyone you don't know is irrelevant for the other 8billion people? Megan knew who he was. Is the opinion of the global rap superstar (like some here deem her to be) less relevant than your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:58 PM
1

RP picks and chooses when to apply their theories and they ignore the real life examples that disprove their narrative. Saying that while picking and choosing the outlier of outlier cases (for each of those cases, there are probably 1000 cases to the contrary) is peak irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:54 PM
1

No, "we" aren't discussing anything, you are butting into a conversation you're not a part of. I'm sorry for my non-consensual reply to your comment. I will think about what I just did and will try to do better in the future. Or who gives a fuck. Anyway, what do you mean by "butting into the conversation"? Do you mean the same way you are butting into a conversation when you made your first comment on this chain? Why is my butting into the conversation any different from your butting into the co…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:42 PM
1

We are currently discussing how committed he was to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:52 PM
1

I do know something about this man from what you're telling me. No, you don't. You are just assuming things about him. You know that girls are attracted to him and that he doesn't react to that. You also know that the girls who are attracted to him don't pursue things further. In that "arc of a story", you know exactly as much about him as you know about the girl/s.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 04:07 PM
2

You are so funny 😃 "Nature doesn't select shit, but if it did, I know exactly what nature would select for!" And you are saying that he "bleats on" about things he knows nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:36 PM
4

I'm not mad at you; I feel completely indifferent towards you. Can you tell me why you would be surprised that someone is calling you out for asking for proof about the stance that they may hold, while you don't feel the need to prove anything about your own stance that they are criticizing? We are supposed to take your stance as is, while everything you don't agree with is under question and needs to be proven? You really see no issues there?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:15 PM
4

How so? By calling out your hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:48 PM
3

Women are significantly more agreeable than men, and yet 44% of them voted for trump. Could it be that you could be both agreeable and vote for trump?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:46 PM
1

But you are acting like wanting doesn't change. It just is from the beginning of time onwards. But it isn't like that. Can you honestly say that the standards women have for men have not increased significantly in the meantime? And if you concur that they did, then your entire point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:38 PM
1

Fine you are not. Truth it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 01:30 PM
1

Are you one of the people who thinks looksmaxxing causes insecurity? Yes. I am a black piller in this case, either you have it, or you don't. I don't think you can "work around" not being attractive. If you aren't, you aren't. Unfortunately, I'm a black piller because of my own experiences, but not in the way you might imagine. I'm extremely attractive, and that really soured my opinion on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:43 PM
–

Blaming women will not help neither understand the issue And blaming men (like you are always doing) will?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 12:07 PM
1

She's a rapper with more awards and more global reach. Hahaha global reach. No one other than US knows about her existence, that's how "global" she is. The entire world knows who Klay Thompson is. He's an aging basketball player in America with rapidly declining stats. 11 points last season? He had a horrible season, she stood by him, and he still cheated. Totally irrelevant to his status. He is at the end of his career. She stood by the generational player who gets his bag regardless of his per…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:50 AM
3

he's mostly known for dating Meagan LOL The fuck are you talking about 😃 One of the best NBA players of all time, a soon-to-be Hall of Fame player, is "mostly" known for dating Megan? The entire world knows one of the Big 3 of the golden generation of the Golden State Warriors. Who the fuck knows who Megan Thee Stallion is? You can't even spell her name properly (that's how famous she is), and you talk about delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:43 AM
3

If you can't show any proof, then why even start a discussion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:29 AM
1

Yes. It does matter. If he doesn't have feelings for the girls, he's not obligated to do anything. It doesn't matter. Even if he did have feelings for the girls, he's still not obligated to do anything. I'm not going to psychoanalyze a woman I know nothing about. Why don't you mind doing that to a man you know nothing about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:01 AM
0

Does it matter? I ask again, why doesn't the girl invite him out if she likes him?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:10 AM
–

How would you know something is an "actual truth bomb"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 08:02 AM
1

Does he want to date them? He should ask them out. Does he not want to date them? He should keep doing what he's doing. But if he is unable to read the cues, how can he act on them? Why doesn't the girl invite him out if she likes him? (if we assume that he really is liked like that)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:46 AM
–

Exactly. So don't assume and we are all fine and dandy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 07:36 AM
1

We, as men, should bully each other in elementary school into hyper-focusing on our appearance to the point that we don't feel comfortable going outside without makeup?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 06:46 AM
3

More like Lilith 0.2
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:34 PM
-1

Have you asked the people you know on a personal level why you could be struggling to find a partner? Has she? It is hard to gauge from a post or two online why some men are having a harder time than others so generic advice like, “workout, try to be less hostile in conversation, develop a sense of humor, change your grooming habits” is given. Tell that to a person saying this: But that would be lying, it is because of their shitty personalities and incel outlooks
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:31 PM
2

And what is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:29 PM
3

And how do you think you would be treated as an obese man :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:01 PM
2

I was laughing so hard at this :D The only way a fat guy can be attractive is if he was skinny :D
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:56 AM
2

Completely correct. And sometimes those discussions have merit. But this isn't that at all. This is a classic "Sky is blue." situation. It's obvious to everyone (including you) that the sky is blue. There is nothing I can do to convince you of that if you are adamant in claiming that it's actually pink.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:50 AM
1

It's by a huge margin, otherwise we wouldn't be having these kinds of discussions on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 11:03 AM
3

Why does it matter if people say what they mean? Is that a real question? Yes, for people like you, we need to ask questions like these. When I say that he clearly didn't mean it like that, it was a response to your interpretation of his words because he didn't write that at all. I just wanted to clarify that the fact that he didn't write that obviously wasn't enough for you to comprehend, he also didn't mean what you interpreted. This is incoherent. You are incoherent. If he "clearly meant" "wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:18 AM
1

But that's not "just existing", it's the literal opposite of that :/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:02 AM
6

Because that's invariably what men on this sub mean when they refer to "polygamy." Women having casual sex. Why does that matter in this case? He clearly didn't mean it like that. The actual definition of polygamy is having more than one spouse. Virtually no one does that in the western world and almost no women want that. And that is exactly his point; I don't know why you are unable to grasp that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:57 AM
1

You are wildin', bruv.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:52 AM
3

That seems like something men should work on, not women. What exactly should men do to provide value just by existing as normal women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:40 AM
8

Where did he mention hookups or non-committed relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:38 AM
4

You are the person she is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:34 PM
8

None of the women in here should feel bad about anything other women do. There is no point in saying that because they never do anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:27 PM
2

A person can be retarded regardless of age, why are we limiting ourselves to under 20?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:52 PM
1

Holy projection, Batman!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 01:47 PM
–

You also seem to have issues communicating with people :D A prevalent issue on PPD so it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:11 PM
0

So there's your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:08 PM
2

What do you do if you’re hungry? Do you eat? What a silly question :/ Do you need someone to watch you eat to eat?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:48 AM
-1

Why don't you assume that he is also talking about "some people" and you could both be correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:32 AM
0

How do you know they feel off?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:30 AM
–

You seem to have issues communicating with people :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:18 AM
–

I think the purpose is to present the fact that he is collecting degrees and qualifications at an insane rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:17 AM
3

A stack of hot takes :D
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 01:26 PM
1

I am not acting like my view is sacred truth. But you are. Is there any other way to interpret this: There is more to being human than the reductive framework you are describing. I do not really expect you to see that though, because it is not entirely your fault you were taught to think about people in such narrow terms. other than "It's not your fault and I'm so sorry you are so backwards and aren't enlightened as I am :(" I am saying his view is way too reductive. Yours is as well. There are …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 09:09 AM
0

Yeah, and like I said, you are from a different generation, so I think your view of our species is skewed. Yeah, but the issue here is that you are treating his view as something completely wrong while your view is completely correct. Why? There is more to being human than the reductive framework you are describing. I do not really expect you to see that though, because it is not entirely your fault you were taught to think about people in such narrow terms. There are only a few things more anno…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 08:33 AM
2

But that suggestion is like saying "Hey, if that doesn't work, maybe you should try shooting yourself in the foot."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:29 AM
0

Make-a-child fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:51 PM
–

We are at an impasse here. You are claiming that those jobs are something that any average joe can do, and I somewhat agree and somewhat disagree with that statement. But I actually disagree with that general framing. My argument is that the fact that they are doing those jobs and are visible as they are, they stop being average joes. So my point is, you can't use the fact that any average joe can attract women while using 0.something % of the population as a template as to how to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:16 PM
1

People talk about their values directly and indirectly before committing to being boyfriend/girlfriend. It sounds like you are talking about “hookups” which I don’t consider to be dating. I am talking about dating specifically. You won't be given a chance for the dating part is my point. So how are you supposed to figure out anything about their values? Sure, I believe that you were a stud just swimming in pussy. 😉 Very believable. You act as if no women has ever stopped dating to focus on schoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 01:10 PM
1

Not the same thing, but women face a similar issue with boob size. Not comparable at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:39 PM
1

Everybody can see what you're doing. I can't. What is he doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:39 PM
2

Of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:23 PM
1

I would not date someone who used to be red pill, but that's only because I am not dating anymore But would you mind if you were still dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:10 PM
1

And, equally importantly, what kind of "advice" do these weak/insecure men think they are uniquely qualified to give their bullied kids when (not if) they come home from school having been picked on? And what "advice" would a progressive, enlightened man, such as yourself, give to his child in that case?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 12:06 PM
–

Because they are rare? I don't know how many security guards you know, but the ones I know personally and the ones I've seen working are all huge, bulky guys. That's as far from average as you are going to get. Yeah, everyone can be a bartender, but the issue I had with his post is that he is trying to paint a picture of an average joe in the club setting as one of 10 people visible to everyone (which carries a certain status) and not one of the 300 men who are attending said club. Those specifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:50 AM
1

To me it read as if these guys were not trying to date others if they are sitting and waiting to be chosen. I think that's just a figure of speech. Don't take it literally. You are assuming that women are only rejecting men because they find these guys unattractive but not because of other issues like incompatible values, having limited availability to date because of work/school, etc… Oh come on now, be serious for a second. Of course, it's primarily because they find them unattractive (btw, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 11:42 AM
1

Then you're all good in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:53 AM
0

Just you saying that they are exceptions doesn't make it so. The same way that you say that they aren't exceptions doesn't make it so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:50 AM
2

Those guys should go out and try to date others instead of waiting around 10+ years to hope those girls will finally choose them. Why do you assume that they haven't tried? The crux of the issue is that they have and are constantly trying and failing at it; that's the problem. And yes I would date someone that formally rejected me. My husband turned me down twice when I wanted a relationship when we were friends. Eventually he did develop feelings for me, asked me to be his girlfriend, and we’ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:47 AM
2

As long as you do not expect men to police the behavior of other men, we are cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:43 AM
1

More than 1/3 support the potential implementation of Sharia law in the US. Or at least the implementation of the Sharia courts. What about LGBT rights? What are moderate muslim stances on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 10:35 AM
1

Why do you want to date women who you won't be compatible with? And how do you find out you are or aren't compatible with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 09:00 AM
0

If they could identify who likes them we wouldn't be having this stupid conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:56 AM
3

It will forever be a bad idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:56 AM
1

Yup, they are. I can vouch for that as well. And when he says constantly, he means constantly because it happens with almost every hookup. I don't even understand how you can deny that guys who are able to get hookups can get relationships MUCH EASIER than guys who struggle getting relationships :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:48 AM
1

They're not idiots. But "they" seem to have trouble understanding what "they" are reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:42 AM
–

What a silly post. First you claim that being around women is all that it takes, and then when you get to explaining, you are specifying that you actually meant being around women while at the same time being either a security guard, DJ, club promoter, barmen, owner of some kind of establishment where women frequent, a doctor, or a photographer. While at the same time saying that you are talking about average joe :D You are a hoot, man! I love your post!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:28 AM
1

Do they support the implementation of Sharia law?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:21 AM
2

Please stop. If this was true, there would be no short men. You are aware that there are 2 sides to that equation? One of the sides that is always on the short side :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:36 PM
1

What's wrong with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:59 PM
–

sending her a life changing amount of money because he was horny Does free will even exist anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:23 PM
1

That's not a muslim at all. You are breaking one of the core tenets of Islam.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:01 PM
3

People won’t think about you negatively, they just won’t think about you at all. Yeah, but that's all BEFORE. I'm talking AFTER! After you decide you want to beat your social anxiety, you start interacting with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:00 PM
2

No more or less unrelated than the comment I replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:58 PM
3

That’s not true, women always initiate, just because some men can’t pick up the cues doesn’t mean they don’t. I had to let it simmer a bit. After it simmered a bit, yup, it's still exactly as ridiculous as I initially thought :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:06 PM
1

It also doesn't mean that they like taxidermy!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:50 AM
2

Do chads who talk about chads have poor social skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:48 AM
6

Actually, excellent comment. But the issue here (that often gets swept under the rug) is how differently society treats men with social anxiety compared to women with social anxiety. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to downplay your effort, I commend you for it, but the thing is, you don't have the same starting point as a man in a similar situation. Your starting point is "quirky", "shy", "withdrawn", or whatever other adjective you would like that sounds like someone cool but is unable to ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:44 AM
0

“shy girls” are often in the same boat as said men No? Not at all. Even though you are correct in the way they signal their interest and can't recognize interest on the other side, it doesn't matter much for girls because they aren't expected to initiate. It's much more different for the side (men) that initiates, because now they are doing that based on limited and bad (because they are bad at interpreting it correctly) info.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:26 AM
1

because the same structure held back all of us that weren’t affluent white men Are there any other men who aren't affluent white men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 11:13 AM
1

The most non-answer of all non-answers in the history of non-answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:33 AM
1

I completely agree. Whenever I read something about sex and attraction from women on PPD (in an overwhelming majority of cases), it's like I'm living in a parallel reality where everything is upside down compared to what they are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:07 AM
1

moderate Muslim What does that look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:48 AM
–

Interestingly (ironically) enough, the entirety of PPD is women punching down on men they feel are below them :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:39 PM
–

An outlier. Not worthy of mention. How would you describe someone who loves taxidermy and can't gain weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:27 PM
–

You just need to keep repeating that until it becomes true.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:14 PM
–

Because they are eating less. There is no magic formula for this. It's just caloric intake - caloric expenditure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:12 PM
–

You are living in an alternate reality to the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:11 PM
–

And who is saying that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:11 PM
–

You can't be serious :D
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:05 PM
–

also pretend patriartchy doesn't exist But isn't the fact that he can only talk about it facetiously, without it even being considered an option, the proof that patriarchy doesn't exist? You can't claim patriarchy exists while somehow being immune to everything patriarchal. Then it doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:51 AM
–

if they cared about population they'd be adopting orphans from africa I could say the same to every woman who actually wants to have children. I could tell her that she is an evil, selfish person for bringing up new humans into the world, while we have starving African orphans that she could take care of. It's a stupid argument. And btw, however heartless this might be, adopting children does nothing for population growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:37 AM
–

based on real events btw Just like "Martian", I know!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 10:19 AM
–

Meanwhile men are still committing suicide rather than seeking even recognising even a bit of weakness. And when this is mentioned in some other context to signify male suffering, you will jump in to point out that women ACTUALLY have many more attempts at suicide. Disgusting behaviour, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:22 AM
–

Did you just actually link to an article from a private mental health care provider that's lamenting that they aren't getting enough male customers as an argument for your stance? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:20 AM
–

Technically it's still random You could also say that technically, now it isn't random anymore if you improve significantly. You are right, that nothing guarantees success, but improving can guarantee that you don't automatically fail right from the get-go. That's extremely valuable in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 08:17 AM
–

Increased automation, delayed retirement, restructuring of tax and economic policy Do you even realize what this presents for your future? I always find it baffling how nonchalant people are about suggestions and potential solutions for current issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:43 AM
–

These people just don't want kids (and that's fine) I'm trying to explain this to people all the time (I just wrote a reply before spotting your comment). But you are treated as some kind of pariah when you suggest that. What is the exact issue in suggesting that people obviously DON'T WANT children?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:10 AM
–

We're below it now because times are economically hard for most people already and we won't get above it til it's better. Why do people keep perpetuating this like it's the be-all end-all of this discussion, but in reality, the poorest countries have the highest fertility rates, and the richest countries have the lowest fertility rates. Can you explain this to me? Are you claiming that having kids is way too expensive, even for the most wealthy countries in the world? Don't get me wrong, it defi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:05 AM
1

Awww, that's so nice of him. Australian dudes really are the best!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 10:32 AM
1

Citation needed. Not being completely oblivious to things happening around you needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:44 AM
1

They oppose the draft for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:43 AM
–

What's the danger there? You can just leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 07:44 PM
–

It could be that they slept with 2 people per year for 25 years. Do you think that would make them a good LTR material, if they are changing partners on average every half a year? We are talking about LTR, right? But you don’t get to make up a story about their character just based on a number. You would probably make up a story about a character of a man if he had a n of 0 at age 40. Again, someone’s body count does not give you enough information to know their current intent. You are completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 08:22 AM
1

while having consensual sex is not a character issue A high n may not be a character issue (it often is), but it's a character trait nonetheless. There is always a reason a person gets to 50+ partners. Having more consensual sexual partners than you might prefer does not equal a person who cheats. Does it equal to a person who wants to have many sexual partners and not really being a monogamous person? I would rather remain rooted in reality and what I have personally observed. You don't conside…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 07:32 AM
1

Are you trying to infer that someone’s dating or consensual sexual history is synonymous with criminal activity? Nope, not claiming that. I'm just challenging your supposition that we should just leave the past behind based on how people act in the present. If those hypothetical men are good to you, and you like them, and they have already "paid" for their PAST crimes, what's the issue in dating them? I mean, it's your own stance that the past shouldn't matter much, so what's the issue here? Do …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 06:24 AM
1

Would you ever date a man that you liked but later find out that he is a convicted rapist? Would you ever date a man that you liked but later find out that he was convicted of DV? If not, why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:36 AM
1

Would you read the study and argue against or for the data and research they provide if it were a study where they were referring to high n women as whores?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:12 AM
2

For me, it's less about the number, and more about the person's lifestyle and values. It's less about the number, yet when the number starts increasing, you have an increasing number of questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:36 AM
1

You see what you want to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:06 AM
2

Webster and Oxford both recognize it as a word. "Whore" is also a word recognized by Webster and Oxford dictionaries. Do you see it in many studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:01 AM
0

Is your link a blog post?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 11:58 PM
4

Really? Can you explain the reasoning?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:26 PM
1

I have no idea what you are asking here. What pressure are you referring to? What kind of pressure causes the "ick" a bi woman feels towards potentially dating a bi man?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:06 AM
1

What a perfect reason not to try anything ever :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:55 AM
1

It's much cheaper to do nothing. Incidentally, that's something that's true for literally every problem. So are we always not supposed to do anything because it's much cheaper?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:53 AM
1

Should we base our views on studies from India specifically because they now make up 20% of the world population?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:49 AM
2

orientation stigma Is it really? How does that come into play if bi woman doesn't want a bi man as a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:46 AM
2

So if dating is already too much work... The irony :D
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 09:30 AM
–

The issue isn't about letting go of a rude remark. The issue is that you are generalizing based on a very rare occurrence of something happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:48 PM
–

Why was one specific person burned one too many times by fuckboys? Why did she meet so many fuckboys to get burned by them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:45 PM
–

That probably happened exactly once, and you weren't able to let it go and will never be able to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:50 PM
–

Why were they burned one too many times by fuckboys?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:47 PM
1

So, you think one party gets satisfaction out of denying the other sex? Where did I claim that? I have no idea how you got to that conclusion. That the act of denying is what they want? It's not about denying sex. It's nothing malicious or spiteful towards their partner (I mean, it could be exactly that, but generally we don't discuss those cases when talking about dead beadrooms). It's just not wanting sex, for whatever reason. But the fact remains that the person not wanting sex is getting wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:38 PM
8

See how I wrote "well functioning relationship" on the initial post? But in that "well-functioning relationship" you also didn't even notice you had issues with intimacy with your partner until their frustration surfaced. So, are you sure you are describing a well-functioning relationship? That was my entire point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:45 PM
10

If my partner feels repeatedly rejected and brings up discontent, I'd say "sorry, X has been happening with me. for now, please don't initiate any more" with the understanding that the ball is now "in my court" in regards to initiating: it's my responsibility, i have not forgotten about their needs, and i will do it if i can. You may not be aware of it, but you have just described the beginning of every dead bedroom scenario I've seen there (at least as long as the high libido partner is reasona…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:36 PM
2

Both parties. Both parties are sexually unsatisfied. But it isn't like that at all. One party, for whatever reason, doesn't want to have sex. And they don't. So that party is getting exactly what they, for whatever reason, want and doesn't engage in something that they don't want to do. How you can even compare the two is beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:55 PM
13

Sexual exclusivity is an implied term in marriage contracts Is sex also not an implied term in marriage contracts?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:40 PM
1

Neither would I.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:07 PM
1

Of course they are. When someone is using an anecdote as an argument in their comment, the story is ALWAYS edited and filtered so as to better suit and strengthen their argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:33 PM
2

The most annoying is when they write things. I get annoyed instantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:14 PM
0

A thought experiment. Try to imagine you are beautiful (a hard sell for any woman), but you suddenly find yourself in a weird alternate reality where you aren't considered beautiful at all. You find that out the hard way by having 0 interest from any man out there. But you want a relationship, and you are willing to work on yourself and change yourself to be more attractive in that weird reality. How would you figure out what you need to change about yourself to be more attractive to men in that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 12:02 PM
1

To blame a poor person for receiving free money is stupid instead of blaming the person giving them free money no? But your analogy doesn't really fit here. It's more like 3 poor people got their free money, and now ALL the poor people expect free money. They don't want to earn it, because they deserve that free money! Why would I blame 3 random dudes with an excess of cash for completely misplaced expectations that the entirety of the poor population now suddenly have?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:50 AM
1

He literally said "most".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 10:05 AM
1

It is cultivated, written and edited. And an anecdote from a random "person" on Reddit that you don't know and will never know isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 09:10 AM
1

My claiming that something is a personality trait doesn't make it synonymous with all personality traits. I don't know how you got to that conclusion. Shy and insecure are personality traits, yet they aren't synonymous with either seductive or attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 09:41 AM
6

Are women responsible for what they are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:28 PM
4

I’ve had hookups, fwbs and relationships when I was below average. Are you sure you understand what the term "below average" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:23 PM
2

No, it isn't. It's an amalgamation of things. It's like saying being attractive is a personality trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:21 PM
8

You are still a fighter and an inspiration (lose the quotations!!!)! I wish you all the best man!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:23 AM
1

im specifically saying for dating it doesnt, if you look at it long term. You don't seem to understand. I will be given so much leeway on literally everything in a relationship compared to a not-so-attractive man. A not-so-attractive man will have to work exponentially harder to maintain a relationship. Now imagine me not being a complete piece of shit but actually a good relationship material dude (which I am), there is literally no comparison. The thing is, you seem to observe everything as if…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 09:15 AM
1

Or just.. Uninterested?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 08:10 PM
1

How exactly does this: My husband didn't indicate any interest before I asked him out. have anything to do with this but not everyone requires that their partner is that confident and comfortable right off the bat
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 04:58 PM
1

it doesnt trump other traits For dating, it does. For a lot of things in life, it does. Even if I wasn't an expert in my field, I could coast based on looks alone. Actually, looks trump almost everything by the virtue of ALWAYS being frontloaded. People form opinions about you the very first moment they see you, and I don't mean people who know something about you from other people, even when they have never heard about you. They just fill in the blanks. And when you are very attractive, those b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:42 PM
2

Actually, I agree. The most trad thing is to be a hypocrite and act trad while you are doing anything and everything that isn't trad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:19 PM
3

I don't understand why you people always make it out to be one or the other when, in reality, it's usually both and all. And being extremely attractive while also being intelligent, hardworking, and driven is a force multiplier you wouldn't believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:22 AM
2

Not really. "Attractive" is subjective, as is "Average". But when you get to the extremes (either way), it becomes way less subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:18 AM
2

Yes, very much so. You are definitely a woman through and through if you are asking what you did in your initial comment, no buts or ors about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:15 AM
1

but not everyone requires that their partner is that confident and comfortable right off the bat Kinda hypocritical coming from a woman, don't you think, since not being exactly that eliminates the man from the get-go, maybe even faster than his looks would eliminate him as an option.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:13 AM
3

I dunno But you should know, since you are the one making the claim. What are you basing your claim on if you don't know? the biggest heartthrob for my generation was Colin Firth as Mr Darcy. Hardly the muscle mary you see in comic book movies. Oh, didn't know we were discussing things from half a life ago. My mistake. I didn't realize we were in a history class.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:11 AM
-2

I like how "Trad woman" can now be: Try selling sex for years Doesn't work for whatever reason Ok, I guess I'm a "Trad woman" now
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 08:25 AM
3

Yes, exactly. The fact that you asked that question was a perfect example of how little women know about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:43 PM
2

Can you name some, just for example's sake, to hammer in your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:41 PM
1

Good luck out there! Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:40 PM
3

The sort of men who are cast as romantic leads in women’s pictures are very different. Are they really now :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:34 PM
–

You aren't well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:24 PM
5

This is a perfect example of how little women know about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:19 PM
2

Do you think you are doing a good job?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:16 PM
2

"Instant carnal desire" isn't real. I'm sorry you feel that way. I hope there is a point in your life you are going to feel some other way sometime in your future. Sex isn't some paint by numbers step by step process that is repeated the exact same person to person. Sex isn't a video game. No matter how y'all try and view it that way. Where did I claim that? Better? I don't even understand why "better" is even being used in this question. What other word would you like more?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:04 PM
1

No. They disagree with you because you are claiming that the first number 2 is a koala and the second number 2 is a panda, and when you add a panda and a koala, you always get a 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:51 PM
1

Your ability to articulate the point that you yourself are missing is astounding. You should be studied.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:40 PM
–

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:35 PM
15

But I'm debating you. If you expect proof for a claim that another commenter makes, provide proof for your initial claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:32 PM
16

Have you presented any proof for your debate points? Either of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:09 PM
4

And my advice is (and always will be) to steer clear of those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 12:34 PM
3

Anticipation is hot. Do you know what else is hot? Instant carnal desire. Building tension and chemistry as you get to know someone is hot. This is stupid on so many levels. You don't think you can do that WHILE HAVING SEX with someone? If you are building tension and chemistry towards sex, what happens after you finally have sex? Is the quest done? Is the mystique gone? What do we do now? Fucking someone immediately isn't always actually the most satisfying option. Only agree if the person in q…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 12:32 PM
4

I believe that’s true for a lot of women No, it isn't. I have no idea where you're getting this from. Literally all of my relationships started with sex instantly. I'm on the very extreme end of good-looking. But so were all the women I was with, so it wasn't a situation where they felt that they had to "provide sex" to try to keep me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 12:19 PM
-1

There are also people who like taxidermy. But they are not the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 12:10 PM
1

What a reductive point of view. Could I not care about both?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:58 AM
1

I checked - it's like 108 men versus 100 women in the 30s-40s age. That's a huge difference. What a weird cutoff range. Why didn't you include 20s? It would be even more of a difference. And you find that huge. There is probably 2 to 3x that of men getting left behind in the West currently. But that's somehow a non-issue while this is huge. Weird how that is. Do you think attractiveness is only gauged by weight? It isn't. Do you know how fat they were or their girlfriends were when they met? Peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:35 AM
–

The U.S. has a huge military and we haven’t needed to use the draft since the 70s. I think we will be fine. How would you interpret this other than that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:10 AM
5

What's the problem in someone shittin in your mouth?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:50 AM
2

I’m fully in favor of women being eligible for the draft. I don't care much for that discussion. I'm just annoyed by the "Last draft was 50 years ago, so that means that draft won't happen ever again!!!!!!!!!!" arguments that are often used here. The most annoying thing is that you pretend like 50 years ago is like EONS ago. On the other hand, if we are talking about women getting the right to vote (which happened more than a 100 years ago), you are all acting as if it happened just now, ok ok, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 05:16 PM
2

Since something hasn't happened in 50 years, that means it will never happen again EVER. I can name a few countries currently at war where that isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:58 PM
1

Do we really? Highly doubt that because you seem to see that somewhere in our exchange, while I don't. So our definitions of that must differ at least a little bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:52 PM
1

We seem to have a vastly different definition of "discussion".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:26 PM
1

I don't know about red pillers, but the guy you initially replied to didn't imply that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:55 PM
1

Yeah, I'm surprised as well. I don't mind writing novels when I'm invested in the discussion. I guess I subconsciously found it completely worthless to exchange anything with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:50 PM
2

It would be really hard to find anyone against what you suggested.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:41 PM
0

It's like they have nothing to do with each other :/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:38 PM
1

The U.S. has a huge military and we haven’t needed to use the draft since the 70s. I think we will be fine. People like you are ridiculous. You are acting like 70s were thousands of years ago :D
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:15 PM
1

Let’s be for real for a second though. The birth rate is in the shitter. No government will ever send prime age women to war because it will not matter if they win the war if their population is wiped out and they can’t replenish after the war. Women are more valuable to a country’s survival point blank period. War is how society eliminates defective men from the gene pool and society to avoid them causing trouble. Let's be for real for a second though. The birth rate will remain in the shitter …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:56 PM
1

Do you understand how reading works? How bout you read that comment again and try to figure out exactly which sentence the "bad joke" refers to. It's really simple, it's exactly one sentence, and it has a bad joke in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:46 PM
2

I mean, it's tongue in cheek. But yes, not having empathy makes one a crappy person on most accounts. I disagree. Not having empathy about something while having empathy about something else is a common state of things. There are no people (other than psychopaths and sociopaths) who have no empathy in general towards anything or anyone. Again, disagree. It's all in the presentation. If it's presented as an attack it won't be received well. If it's presented as something women need to "do" someth…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:43 PM
0

Women aren't monsters. I didn't claim that. Even reacting as I said to that normal complaint wouldn't make you a monster. It wouldn't even make you evil or someone with bad intentions. At worst, I could call you unempathetic. If you are making a connection between being unempathetic and being a monster, then that's something you should sort out with yourself. We would absolutely be more empathetic if every complaint didn't end with something along the lines of, "and women are bitches It's all th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:51 AM
1

I've seen this happen maybe 3 times in my life. You've probably seen it MANY MANY more times without realising it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:12 AM
2

No, it's "I am lonely and thus women must lower their standards"= You aren't owed a relationship. No, it isn't. That's the thing. You just arbitrarily add on things so you have a justification to say, "You aren't owed a relationship." That sentence is uttered regardless of what it is supposed to be a response to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:08 AM
1

You rarely see anyone making that kind of scene in public. You are imagining something completely different from what OP is trying to present. You are imagining a crashout of epic proportions, but it's not that. It's not a "scene" at all. It's a jab. Trying to be funny at his expense. Just a random word or phrase thrown out here and there, aimed directly at him. It has nothing to do with it being a "scene". It's just a normal conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:24 AM
-2

She is telling the complete and utter truth, while he is letting his imagination run wild? How does that work exactly, why do you believe her and not him? Any specific reason other than gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:15 AM
4

“I am lonely, I would like to have a relationship” = I’m sorry you are feeling that way, that sucks. So very rarely do we see that. Most often it's: “I am lonely, I would like to have a relationship” = You aren't owed a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:12 AM
0

I don't know any definition of nice that includes confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:35 AM
2

If you want something realistically achievable. Don't hyperbole, I am sure you get the point. But why are you the arbiter of what's realistically achievable?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:59 PM
–

But they absolutely make it clear that acting like a red pill asshole is more than sufficient to turn women off. I'll need some data to make something absolutely clear. Do you have some to provide to support your claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:36 PM
5

You are missing the point. Trump is the symptom, a symbol, nothing more, nothing less. Look at the whole picture and the general shift in world politics. Germany is the best example of that. AfD is currently polling similarly to CDU/CSU, they are neck in neck. A far-right party flirting with neo-nazism. In a country laden with generational guilt because of WW2. If you asked any German citizen 20 years ago if they foresaw something like this coming to fruition, they would call you insane, even th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:29 PM
2

If women look like men, yeah, why not? Lots of things can be "gay", but that's really kinda gay, isn't it? You have many flavors of women, but if you always pick ones that look closest to what a man looks like, kinda gay!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:19 PM
5

I think that the rise of the right wing is kind of a blip Something that is happening around the entire planet at the same time is a blip? We have vastly different definitions of what a blip is. For me, this is a blip: I think that women are starting to take enough political power
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:17 PM
–

If we want to go by “strictly evolution”, what’s stopping men from physically dominating women to get what they want? Is something that each and every person using "evolution" arguments so casually, like the OP does, should ask themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:09 PM
–

How are your abortion rights in one of the free-est countries in the world? Yeah, I would say some things are going back.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:04 PM
1

Rather, I come here to provide an education to men who were too lazy or unintelligent to obtain the education on their own. Funny, literally exactly the same reasoning that men use to mansplain to women :D
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:59 PM
1

lol you really think affordability has nothing to do with women not having children?? That's what they are telling themselves. They are still stuck on the old software version, where they need to invent a reason not to have children, because it would be preposterous to just say that you don't want children. If they were updated to the latest version, they would feel free to just say "I simply don't want kids." I jest a bit! But the fact is that it's kinda silly to use "affordability" as an excus…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:48 PM
4

What a silly notion. How bout you want to play in the NBA, but want it REAL HARD :D
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:37 AM
1

That’s like saying “it’s pointless to go to work because you might get fired.” Not nearly the same. Your initial point is that you marry for emotional or financial stability. And the dude replied that marriage doesn't guarantee that, so what's the point? I reiterated that, and my point is also that you can have both without getting married. So it would be something like you going to work, and every time you clock in, you write "I love my company!" in a company-loving book. You are doing that bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:33 AM
8

Low V line? The fuck are you talking about? She was in a tank top that covers more skin than any tanktop I have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:22 AM
5

Do plenty of heterosexual men find her attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:19 AM
5

It all goes to testicular and prostate cancer research, men’s mental health, and suicide prevention. The least amount of funding goes to testicular and prostate cancer research. Most of the funding goes to mental health programs and suicide prevention programs. Notice how I specifically didn't say MEN'S mental health. Because it isn't men's, it's just mental health. Almost all the programs are mixed-gender, or women have indirect benefits. There are a lot of women that work for Movember, which w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:18 AM
8

If you are gay, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:34 AM
8

He said attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 11:05 PM
1

We can do better. I'm baffled someone could seriously think this in the world we're living in today.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:57 PM
2

Are you arguing for his case or against, because the way you worded it here is for his case. If nothing is guaranteed, then getting married for emotional or financial stability is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:55 PM
–

You are always taking things to banal extremes; that's not really conducive to a productive debate. This is never a question of that. It always was and is a question of how much you are willing to compromise. If you are not a fan of hiking (you don't hate it, it's just not something you would ever remember to do on your own), but you always went on hikes with your previous partner because you know they would like that, you now deciding to never go hiking with your current partner even though you…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:44 PM
2

What example would you like more?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:14 PM
1

It did? Didn't you invite an attack? I presented you with an example of an attack that won't end up with jail time and affects women immensely. You didn't want that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:10 PM
2

Was that not an attack on women? Do you not care about women's bodily autonomy?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:41 PM
0

Did you ever think that there would come a time when abortion would be banned in any of the US states? Correct me if I'm wrong, but no one went to jail for that to happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:31 PM
9

But the sexes should be working together in the end rather than being at odds with each other under some form of -archy. But if that isn't happening (and it isn't), meaning that there seems to be no way to cooperate towards a common goal, what's next?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:19 PM
4

You would be A-OK for your partner to say to you, "You are the 4th most beautiful woman I've been with!"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:58 AM
–

I love it how they are literally proving exactly what you said here with their every response. You literally told them, "You will do this because you are hypocritical!" and they were "NONONONONO we aren't hypocritical!" and then they go on and do exactly that. Lovely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:46 AM
1

But with most things when it comes to guys' preferences, people wouldnt care if guys weren't assholes about it. That was almost never the case; they were almost never assholes about it. But what regularly happened (and what you are doing here as well) is them being branded as such just by expressing things exactly the way the dude here expressed. Just a stated preference and reasoning behind it. It's fine that a man doesn't want kids. However, it's absolutely evil for a man to want kids and then…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:23 AM
–

And why would they release him after 8 days? It takes 8 days to stop being a danger to yourself and others?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:00 AM
4

Oh come on, don't be disingenuous. If you had a "research" that had the topic "Do women want their partners to see them as the most beautiful woman in the world?", you would deem that research ridiculous (rightly so).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:59 AM
5

What proof would you be satisfied with? What kind of proof that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:26 PM
1

But you didn't answer my question tho He literally told you that he's not sure what you are asking. And then you made 0 effort to clarify and asked him again to answer. Isn't that kinda weird?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:25 PM
1

Women shouldn't be offended if they are deemed to be non-relationship ONS material.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:54 PM
0

So which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:53 PM
5

No, just a staunch observer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:52 PM
0

I will never have an inkling of an idea what you are talking about, and I will be so much richer each day for that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:48 PM
9

That would be far more correct. But then you wouldn't have anything to write about because it's a normal, non-inflammatory statement. So there was 0% chance that you would think about this a bit more deeply until you reach this conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:46 PM
2

Did your mom not teach you that you shouldn't open argument with "you're stupid"? Seems like his mom taught him well because he didn't do that. The point of the post to show men's behavior and how they contradict themselves. You are doing a piss-poor job at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:42 PM
2

So men have to actually see that logical error. Nothing to do with you personally. You don't seem to notice the logical error in your thinking. You (as in women) are saying that women get conned because of some mythical master manipulator, while we (as in men) are saying that you got scammed by a literal mouth-breather, and you (as in women) weren't able to notice it even though it was completely obvious to literally anyone with slightly above room temperature IQ. It's just an ego thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:38 PM
0

I've never seen a point to refute in her posts. What is the point to refute in here? I don't understand. Can you help me understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:34 PM
2

we have completely different view on that Yeah. You will have fantasies, while the other person will have data.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:27 PM
1

So, which is what?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:26 PM
5

You are the weird one. There are many women here who also refer to their husbands/partners as Mr. and their reddit handle. I really can't understand how something like this can rile you up so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:52 AM
6

Lots of things are sad. It's even more sad if it's sad AND true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:49 AM
3

Even the women who "don't know what they want" are rarely actively lying. Semantics. If neither of us looked up in our entire lives, and I tell you that the sky is green, am I lying to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:45 AM
1

You can see plenty of men on twox as well. Plenty of anything is meaningless in the discussion of ratios.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 09:59 AM
2

So is being pregnant. It's at least two steps removed from any issues with bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:43 PM
3

So is putting someone in jail.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:42 PM
2

Is going to jail not being physically forced?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:00 PM
0

This is going to blow your mind. The sun is dying. Its energy isn't infinite.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:56 AM
1

But the child's claim to life isn't stronger than a woman's claim to being able to fuck anything that moves with zero responsibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:28 AM
-1

Those are important considerations, they're just not actually about bodily autonomy. Bodily autonomy isn't really about what things you might do (by moving your body around in and interacting with the world) -- it's about things happening to and inside your body parts nonconsensually, either autonomously or due to someone else's direct actions onto you. What a weird concept that somehow perfectly fits your own definition of the term. How bout this: I tie you up, and keep you tied up. I will give…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:16 AM
2

So mass AI extincion event = "Several US teenagers, including 16 year old Adam Raine and 14 year old Sewell Seltzer III, are known to have died by suicide after conversations with AI chatbots." And "In another recent instance 56 year old Stein-Erik Soelberg allegedly killed his mother and then himself after a paranoid spiral fuelled by conversations with AI chatbots." The 2 of us have different understandings of words. For example, I understand them correctly, while you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:09 PM
2

I think you misunderstood me. I honestly think that you are OH SO WORRIED. I really do. Nothing about what you said would indicate otherwise. You are mega worried.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:05 PM
4

But you're missing the point. When you are a broke college kid, everyone is a broke college kid. So money is of no consequence in that kind of setup.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 03:47 PM
1

I didn't convey the tone of my question properly enough. The first sentence was a rhetorical question. Because you keep saying how harmful the lack of community and real human connection could be, but that ship has sailed already. That harm has been ongoing for quite some time now. You are talking in hypotheticals about something that's right here, right now. This AI companion shit is a direct response to that. The question is, is AI making things worse for those people or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 03:32 PM
3

We aren't talking about one specific match but a general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 03:22 PM
5

By trying to differentiate how a partner leaving you would be different from a corporation withdrawing its services with no notice, and yet the way you described the corporation is almost exactly how a disgruntled partner would react and conduct themselves. That's irony. And for some reason, you keep writing cooperation instead of corporation. That's not irony, just something I noticed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 03:22 PM
1

But once I got out, I psychologically started to hate men less. Judging by your comments here, you have a long road ahead of you still.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:54 PM
1

William Munny: "Deserve's got nothin' to do with it."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:50 PM
1

It's more complicated than that, your experience is not universal And what was it in your case?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:46 PM
1

Thank you for your service!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:52 PM
0

Don't mind me, I'll just be in that corner over there, being flabbergasted by the sheer amount of sacrifice you are willing to endure for peoplekind.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:37 PM
1

PPD is literally devoid of any critical thinking skills. It's about the rationalization and plausible deniability that you engage in when you say "they aren't interested", and I presented the analogous example of that. Isn't it ridiculous to say that they aren't interested when they themselves downloaded the app, made the profile, made tons of photos, made the selection, and uploaded "the best ones", wrote out a detailed bio to signal their availability to everyone on that app? And they did all …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 12:35 PM
7

I mean it's great that the trash is taking itself out, but I'm also very worried for your mental health. You definitely seem worried :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 10:10 AM
7

Exactly. So what are the rest of them that don't have those features supposed to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 10:05 AM
1

There is proof that isolation, a lack of community and attempting to replace human connection does cause harm. And what do you think is happening right now to those people? And do you think anything is being done (societally) to make things better?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 10:02 AM
1

Unhealthy but each to their own Is it more or less unhealthy than not having any of your emotional needs satisfied?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:58 AM
8

Yeah but you have more chance of actual having a reason :D rather than just being cut off without a chance to ever speak to the again :D and it's all in control of a cooperation, nothing you actions and words can do. Oh lord. The irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:57 AM
4

I’ll take being approached in public Wow, such a sacrifice for the betterment of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:55 AM
1

As opposed to watching it fester.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:52 AM
1

It's labeled as unhealthy because people keep dying lol They do? Did I miss some mass AI extinction event?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:50 AM
7

The easiest time ever for meeting women was when I was a broke college kid. Here is a hint. It had nothing to do with you being broke :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:48 AM
2

When I have a girlfriend or I am courting a woman, I am way way more motivated to work hard and be a nice person. When I am single, I feel irritated and don't feel like I owe society a thing, and just want to extract resources and be greedy instead of provide value, since the social contract is not being fulfilled imo. My response to this is your own first sentence in this comment: I won't lie it seems a little sad and pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:47 AM
1

I’d say 1:5. Really? There are a lot of things I'm willing to give grace to my gender, but this definitely isn't one of them. That's actually pathetic. My advice for everyone (men or women) is to break up with people who aren't willing (while not having a VERY VERY good excuse why they can't) to enthusiastically go down on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:16 AM
4

I think it proves that women are less interested, which should not be surprising. How convenient. The equivalent of "I didn't even like you anyway!" when you get rejected. If someone is deliberating about starting their gym journey and they never do it, which one would you find more plausible: - "I don't even care about my body looking good and being healthy" the reasoning of said person. or - They are just lazy and unwilling/unable to put in the effort to change themselves. ? This is the same t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 08:35 AM
–

It's ironic that this is actually the best argument you ever made to any discussion to any comment :D
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 01:54 PM
1

But the woman who feels love for you will be much less likely to leave as love is more rare and hard to find and build than lust And what is that "love" that we are building?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:11 AM
2

But this is based on some comments and replies of men expressing they want to be listed after primarily rather than being "husband" material or being seen as someone to want a relationship with versus just sex. You are banalising that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:06 AM
1

You care very little for anything you post here because you are constantly regurgitating the same "thoughts" with different packaging.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:31 AM
2

That answers literally 0 questions I've asked. Although I find it really ironic and telling that (by your own admission) whenever you were the "picker", you picked wrong. It's funny when you think about it, by your own admission, you don't/can't vet properly. But even more funnier than that is the overall point that is probably completely lost on you. Whenever a man raises a complaint how a woman used/abused him, he is met with "well pick better" while at the same time those people saying that h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:26 AM
2

i'll ask people who also apply for the job and only them I'll ask people who are easily changing jobs how they are acting on their job interviews. Is that not reasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:45 PM
3

Do you understand the concept of "scale" of things?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:40 PM
3

I used to be a man But were you actually? I don't mean this as something insulting; it's just something I'm trying to understand. You're a trans woman, and I presume that you always "felt" like a woman even though you were presenting as a man. So my question is, how can you present an honest male perspective if you yourself have never felt like you actually are a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:37 PM
2

Non-sequiter It's fucking non-sequitur, and will you (and everyone else, for that matter) stop using fucking terms that you don't understand or don't know how to use properly. PLEASE!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:45 PM
–

Keep in mind, the consequences of one’s actions because he thinks with his dick all the time does not make him a victim. You are hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:40 PM
2

Physically yes. Emotionally, I don’t know It's easy physically? As in you open your mouth and say things, so it's easy? By that reasoning, everything is easy; you just do it, what's stopping you? I have also asked and been rejected How many times did that happen? emotionally stressful but not physically Did anyone claim it was physically stressful? Is it being mentally stressful not enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 11:14 AM
3

They have asked you, and they have been rejected, and that leads you to the conclusion that asking and being rejected is easy?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:43 PM
4

What have men done to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:39 PM
1

Imagine me telling you, "You're dumb!" And then you go: "Why did you call me dumb?!?!?!?!" And I say: "No, I didn't. I use that interchangeably with smart. Just re-read my comment, but imagine I said smart instead of dumb!" I'm being facetious now :D Sorry. But you are missing my point. The OP is asking what a woman needs to do to "prove" that she actually loves you instead of being with you because you are convenient in some way. To which you reply: In none of the relationships I’ve ever been w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:38 PM
2

I just want to know how she formed the opinion that "Asking isn't difficult, nor is being rejected." People usually have some kind of basis for their opinion, I just want to know what her's is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:42 PM
1

How can you interchangeably use love and "I don't dislike him."?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:41 PM
1

I'm just trying to ascertain what you consider a "reasonable level of fitness", nothing more nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:12 AM
5

You said "vast majority". Later clarified it somewhere in the comments as 95%. That's closer to ALL than most.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:11 AM
2

Yes, there is. I was just asking why you are omitting some information when talking about what you, subjectively, find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:09 AM
1

There is a big gap between being super fit and just barely being able to climb the stairs at the baseball stadium. Btw, in case you didn't notice, all over downtown (wherever you live) and all over the stadiums, it's full of FAT AND OBESE people. Does that mean that all of those people have a "reasonable level of fitness"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:07 AM
11

But your OP is a blank absolute statement on ALL MEN, and I'm fairly sure you know a lot of men who are all the points you mentioned, yet unsuccessful dating-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:01 AM
1

I didn't ask about what to do; I specifically asked what that looks like aesthetically because you mentioned "reasonable level of fitness" when it comes to looks. I don't need the program.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:59 AM
2

Yeah, but why don't you say "Smart, interesting, and attractive was always a draw for me." Why are you omitting attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:55 AM
-1

Saying things like “Well I guess if you are fine with microwave dinners every night, then marrying a “boss babe” is fine.” So, do we have a name for the opposite trend when the boss babe is looking down and insulting women who approach things traditionally? How do we call her when she is acting like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:23 AM
0

B: you can very easily tell if people don’t like you. You are ok with her just not not liking you? She doesn't have to like like you, just not not liking you is enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:20 AM
5

it's full of men calling women liars for saying what they want. What do you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:11 AM
3

As I posted previously: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:06 AM
5

Asking isn’t difficult, nor is being rejected And you know that because you are constantly asking and constantly being rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:05 AM
3

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:03 AM
5

I'm taking a wild guess here, but it probably had nothing to do with any of the points you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:41 AM
1

If not millions :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:35 AM
2

Is your husband an ugly MFer?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:24 AM
1

reasonable level of fitness What does this look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:20 AM
3

just bad at pretending to be dumb Or really good at being that :D
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:18 AM
14

You completely defeat your own argument when you resort to basic anecdotes, and that specifically about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 08:02 AM
2

So someone first needs to be a piece of shit to learn how not to be a piece of shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 04:24 PM
5

The Duluth method that advocates for a nuanced, compassionate, inclusive approach to ending domestic violence. Are you not being sarcastic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:53 PM
1

Does it matter either way? What is it with the victimhood based on ancestry when you yourself haven't felt any of those struggles?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:50 PM
0

That is an answer to which question exactly? Not the one I posited. But thank you for your answer nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:09 PM
2

Y'all have made that abundantly clear. Yes, they did. So abundantly clear. It doesn't exist. What doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:49 PM
5

Yes, women tend to acknowledge the serious issues and problems in relationships and are far more willing to choose to end those relationships when those serious issues and problems become chronic and cannot be resolved, even if that means that other parts of their lives will become more difficult. But now we have to ask the question, why are there so many relationships with serious issues and problems that become chronic and cannot be resolved when 2 women are involved? Men tend to ignore those …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:38 PM
6

So don't engage in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:30 PM
6

What if lesbians have several happy monogamous relationships in a row? Yeah, first thing that comes to mind when someone is switching partners often, "Look how happy they were in each of their relationships!". I'm sure that's the first thing that comes to your mind when you find out that someone is a serial monogamist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:22 PM
1

So why are you pretending it doesn't exist if it actually doesn't exist? Shouldn't it just not exist then? Why do you need to pretend?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:08 PM
-1

No, I didn’t say anything about women’s tolerance or lack thereof… some women are more tolerant, some not really… But how else am I supposed to interpret your reasoning that there are more breakups with lesbian couples because of hormonal fluctuations and mood swings that come with menstrual cycles? I mean you yourself referred to that as a reason. I understand if men don’t want to deal with these mood swings But they do deal with it and seem to be more tolerant. Which is ironic considering that…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:04 PM
2

Which "narrative" would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:01 PM
–

You are completely missing the point. Is this a black and white thinking thing? Do you think if a relationship ends that means one or both of the people have to be "bad"? I was specifically referring to EXACTLY ONE reason that is often mentioned: In lesbian relationships, women aren't afraid to leave a bad relationship and are doing so much sooner compared to women in hetero relationships." And everything I said in my comment is in the context of this. And at no point did I mention men or women …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:56 PM
1

Okay. Let’s say we systematically overestimate our own contribution. Yeah, that was the initial statement. Objectively there are numerous individuals who are in similar or worse of positions, but are still performing. Furthermore, over-performing. Yes, there are numerous individuals who are in a similar or worse position. That's always the case. The issue here is the prevalence. How many of them are there compared to the "overestimators"? And what does "performing" mean in this case? You can per…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:47 PM
2

I don't understand how that ties in with what you quoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:32 PM
2

You tell us. What is the narrative that you pretend doesn't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:03 PM
0

Most of the red pills on here have no life experience But you do, and we should all believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:01 PM
4

People change all the time. People who work on themselves are often more pleasant to be around than people who either lack introspection to even see their flaws or just don’t want to do the work to change. What happens to the people they hurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:56 AM
3

“why did you learn from your last relationship about yourself and how you approach relationships.” So what did he learn from being a piece of shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:55 AM
3

Sure. It gave him experience. Everything gives us experience. The more we interact with people the more confident we usually are. You seem to be confusing getting experience with being a piece of shit. Are you advising men to be pieces of shit in their 20s so they can have experience for later life?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:53 AM
-1

So your point is that women are far less tolerant of their partner's hormonal shifts and mood swings than men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:47 AM
3

You think those are "Beauty standards are off the charts"? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:44 AM
4

Big fat hairy guy = masculine? And that's something you consider a "Beauty standards are off the charts"? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:32 AM
–

I'm not denying that they break up more, I'm denying that that's automatically bad. Of course it's bad. If your goal is a successful relationship, then breaking up is a negative outcome, always, regardless of reason. It means you failed in your goal that is securing a successful relationship. We can discuss the reasons, but that doesn't change the fact that the outcome is failure. And however you try to justify that, it never puts women in a good light. One of the reasons that is almost always u…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:29 AM
3

big fat hairy guy hypermasculine ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:33 AM
8

Beauty standards are off the charts amongst gay men. I have no idea where you get this from. Completely untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:32 AM
–

What is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:22 PM
–

Who is equating that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 03:43 PM
0

Sure but your post being about communication in a subreddit that discusses gendered experiences should allow for these type of responses? Especially when you flair it “debate”? Whataboutism is allowed, so is bad faith debating. She can engage in that as much as she wants. I’m not sure if a lot of women in the comment section here claimed women are such great communicators at all times. I don’t think they are, a lot of other women don’t seem to think they are. We merely want to point out nobody i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 02:06 PM
1

Your comment seems like an emotional response to a logical argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:53 PM
1

No one being good at something (a something essential for our entire society to function properly) doesn't mean that it's irrelevant that some are way worse at it compared to others. I think that's an important distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:47 PM
4

I just reject the whole idea of leagues. No, you don't. You are only rejecting the conventional wording defining leagues. And then you go on and reinvent leagues in your own wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:39 PM
0

So better a lie that has some rules about it, than truth that's messy? You are inverting everything. Your own position is a lie that has some rules about it. His is the truth that is messy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:32 PM
–

It's incredible, isn't it? I just love her posts :D They never disappoint. Funny thing is that she always wants to give the impression of something being really thought out, but the final product can (each and every time) be summed up to a contradiction wrapped in shiny platitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:26 PM
–

I love how we pretend that people don't eat other people. Some of you have never been to a deep Amazon jungle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:22 PM
–

Au contraire, your comments right here proves your personality IS the issue. You are far more grating than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:20 PM
–

but they're broke themselves Did you ask for their bank balance?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:17 PM
–

No one ignored it because everyone acknowledges that if you are hot dating is going to be easy. No one is talking about that; that's common knowledge denied by no one. I specifically meant ignored here, as in PPD. Because any mention of looks is systematically suppressed. And perfectly on cue: [ Removed by moderator ] Hot guys with shit personalities might not be relationship material but yes they will get hookups because personalities don’t count for hookups beyond surface level interactions an…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:13 PM
–

People don’t fit into nice objective boxes unfortunately. People don't, but truth does.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:58 AM
–

We all know looks matter. So why are discussions about it banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:55 AM
–

What a stupid question :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:54 AM
–

I honestly think that everyone should be completely filled with righteous indignation that will prevent them from reading any of your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:52 AM
–

This is beautiful. The lack of self-awareness is astounding :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:50 AM
–

It comes so naturally to them that they forget the mantra :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:43 AM
–

No one is ignoring it. You are (I mean, they are). How can you say it's not being ignored when every thread with even a hint of pointing in that direction is instantly closed? Well, you could get technical about it and claim that they are actually doing the opposite of ignoring because they are actively hunting for it and suppressing it wherever it pops up. It’s just not as big of a deal as most blackpill want to make it It's one of the most important things dating wise and it's only exacerbated…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:37 AM
–

one persons truth is not another persons truth I really hate this part of the current zeitgeist (other than all the other parts). Truth used to signify something factually and objectively correct, regardless of the person espousing it. It wasn't a hostage to perception, feelings, and it was never something you could even attach a possesive pronount to. Still, to this day, I find that so grating.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:18 AM
–

because it doesnt look nice Oooof :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:06 AM
16

Casually outing your boyfriend as an emotional manipulator :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:58 AM
5

Did I claim otherwise? These are your words btw: Choice feminism is a cancer to feminism So, by your reasoning, feminism equals being limited to the choices approved by the feminist hivemind machine? But the ability to choose literally whatever isn't feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:48 AM
–

Yah
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:27 AM
–

Take a guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:24 AM
–

If he knew 1000s of them, you would ask for millions, if he knew millions, you would ask for a billion; if he said billion, you would say that there are 4 billion women on planet earth, how can he have any conclusive evidence by observing only a quarter of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:55 AM
–

Sometimes being single is better than being in a terrible abusive relationship. How bout you try ALWAYS.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:44 AM
3

Even though there would be an order of magnitude more of the former (enough so to justify actually thinking that) compared to the latter (such a TINY minority of men thinking like that, a total outlier).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:29 AM
–

But literally zero reasonable people expect their significant other to look 20 when they are 50+, or your SO having a model body right after birth. It's not about that. It's about you making excuses for overweight / obese people by default. Yeah, the state of their body could be because of a certain condition, illness, or some medications, but you are deluding yourself if you think that's the norm when those are actually outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:41 AM
1

But that's the point. Liberals were always droning on about freedom of speech and how republicans are stifling it, but now we are at the point where your argument is "Hey, look at these republicans, they are kinda doing the same!" when it comes to censorship. Fascinating really.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:43 PM
4

Just because a woman chooses something doesn’t make it “feminist” What a stupid notion. That's the literal point of freedom of choice: you can choose whatever you want, even if it would potentially be detrimental to you. It's not about the option being feminist or not; it's about having the option at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:40 PM
-1

Do you need other things?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:20 PM
0

Again, you are still missing the point. The guys that those women with unrealistic standards want don't need to improve. They are already fucking/dating/are married to way better women. Do you really not see the conundrum here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:18 PM
1

Again, you are missing the point. I kept my standards high and met the love of my life. Completely reasonable if you have a counteroffer for those high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:57 PM
0

I think you are kinda missing the point here. No one is talking about like and like getting together; that's to be expected, and almost zero reasonable people would mind that. The issue here is that people have arbitrary generalized standards that exclude 99% of the population, while not being anything close to that "like". If you have a friend who is "mid/average" in all regards, and her standards are literally David Corenswet and no one else, you would laugh your ass off thinking she was jokin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:45 PM
7

Why do people always engage in this whataboutism when it comes to weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:14 PM
1

I really don't understand anything about that situation. Why would he care about what his grandma thinks? Is Grandma his guardian? Is he still young? Does he have to live with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:45 AM
1

Then "grandma pill"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:43 AM
1

They are acting just like women, aren't they? Disgusting really.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:30 PM
3

What is the "looks level" of a fit 25-year-old guy with an average face?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:29 PM
5

No, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:21 PM
3

Most of us have to put the work in; some of us do, others don't. The idea that it is "too much effort", just shows they are not really willing to put in the work to get a partner. If someone says that it's "too much effort", you equate that to no effort at all? Why? Maybe sometimes it is just that, too much effort. Is that so hard to fathom? The fact that you are putting in effort and somewhat succeeding doesn't mean that someone not succeeding isn't putting in effort. Maybe they're putting 10x …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:16 PM
4

The point is to get to know the other person, no? The activity doesn’t need to be expensive for that to happen. Perfect. Now you need to realize that you are an ever-decreasing minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:05 PM
–

She is not more likely to believe it, just more likely to act on it. Ding ding. This is where the magic accountability comes into play.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 11:49 AM
–

Have you watched how stupid men are around a pretty girl? And everyone laughs (men and women included) if they say they were "manipulated" by her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 11:48 AM
1

What a(n emotionally healthy) woman has is: friends, enjoyable pursuits, peace. That's what men are competing against. Yes, I know that's exactly what she's telling herself while slowly getting older and more jaded by the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 03:00 PM
2

You might not now how numbers work.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:45 PM
2

I'm going to ask you again. Are you going to argue that an abuser abusing his victim = the entirety of men in a society being socialized?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:26 PM
2

I don't understand you people. Do you have a basic understanding of what qualifiers like "many" even mean anymore? Can you even imagine the world in which just 5% of men (which is a teeny tiny minority, the opposite side of the spectrum from "many") react with physical violence when they get angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:22 PM
2

Are you going to argue that an abuser abusing his victim = men being socialized?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:13 PM
3

So the fact that you have an abusive father means that men (as in all men) are socialized to express their emotions the way your father is "teaching" your brother? This is a new low, even for PPD standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:01 PM
3

No, it isn't, what are you talking about? Where are we socialized to express emotions in such a manner? It's like me saying that underhandedness, pettiness, passive-aggressive behavior, and gaslighting are how a lot of women are socialized to express all emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:46 PM
3

Anger =/= physical aggression. Could you stop strawmanning?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:43 PM
2

Yes, so? I'm asking you why you are equating that with physical aggression?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:42 PM
6

When you say that something is a problem in male psychology, you are implying that there is an issue on a basic level of how men function, that it's an innate issue. When you say something like: Everything else aside, I thought we were all in agreement that feeling unable to express emotions is a negative element of male psychology. No, we aren't all in agreement at all. Feeling unable to express emotions is not a negative element of male psychology because that would imply that it's something i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:35 PM
5

but in actuality all scientific research requires steps which are effectively the researcher making decisions about what to include and exclude. This is unavoidable. And all researchers have internal beliefs, motivations, and biases that inform their decisions. This is also unavoidable. Do you understand that all research would be completely useless if we just "accept" the points you are making? I mean, you are correct in thinking all of what you mentioned here, because all of that is happening.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 09:45 AM
4

I don't think this is something women should need to adapt to. Nor did the OP claim you should. Why the need to strawman constantly?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 09:11 AM
6

You also ignored what you yourself have written and ascribed it all to "male psychology" but if the opposite was the issue, ie. women having the same issues (issues that are caused by outside factors), it would be the fault of patriarchy, society, and their environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:50 AM
–

People also tend to have a hard time accepting warped, insane perceptions of unwell individuals when they clash with reality. And I don't know about you, but I don't particularly consider that a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 03:14 PM
–

I used it as i did and explained it. And I'm saying that you are using it wrong. Why make a comparison to something while completely invalidating how that something is used?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:22 PM
–

Yes, as a comparison to "women are wonderful". And I'm telling you that your comparison is wrong because "women are wonderful" isn't used the way you described it for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:18 PM
2

I wasn't referring to that. You are probably completely correct about that, but I don't understand your reasoning in saying It's just that third world country women are more desperate for a better life. As a response to: In my example where the Pinay I knew intentionally get impregnated by that Canadian guy, there was absolutely no exchange of money or resources of any kind. And I asked, how would now having a child without a father and support improve her life?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 02:13 PM
–

That literally has nothing to do with how "women are wonderful" is being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 01:56 PM
2

How would their life get better if they got a child with no support? I could think of many ways it would be worse, but 0 that would make it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 10:50 AM
2

i do like the fact that i have free therapy Why aren't you using it then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 09:18 AM
1

white supremacy that harms black male populations Yeah, nothing hurts gangbangers more than white supremacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 09:15 AM
2

They should reply on you to stop relying with silly comments on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 09:13 AM
3

Do you understand the concept of "Window shopping"? You don't actually buy anything. The analogy in this case is just browsing around and getting free attention points.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 09:10 AM
0

Do you approach every relationship as "This is the one I'll marry!"? If not, then your point is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 03:18 PM
12

You only care what misandrist women are talking about. Hence, they constantly appear in your algo. Or, as some would call it, bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:35 AM
5

And there is an organized political movement that is actively trying to remove rights that women have fought for. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:34 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 12:45 AM
1

Why would you think I know what I meant?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:53 PM
1

You tell me!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 10:20 AM
0

And then he left :D
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:59 PM
1

Do I?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:53 PM
-1

If he had those, you would reject them outright as anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:50 PM
2

Most Red Pillers do not read the study. Is that relevant? You didn't read it either, but your first impulse is to shame and deny. If Some Guy uses arguments that are validly supported by the study, there is nothing wrong with citing him as a reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:46 PM
5

Men provide For whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 11:32 AM
5

Mora akin to something like this:
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 09:15 AM
0

You simpliflied the dialogue huehue, I'll walk myself out. But, for real, why do you insist on lying when the entire comment chain is like 5 tiny comments? - men actually care to be desired and not about the speed they get sex (Correctly interpreted.) - then why do they get angry if you don't fuck them fast enough? (This is the reality part I was talking about. She said "They yell and call you a whore and tease and ugly." and you take that for granted like it's some normal reaction to someone no…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 08:57 AM
1

Oh, so what she says is reality? Are we allowed to question her "reality" or just accept it by default as factual and true?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:25 PM
–

But you fucked there, in that kind of environment, specifically because you considered yourself protected there. Would you have fucked there without physical security present? If not, you fucked for that protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:00 PM
–

Oh, lol. Protestors demanding ICE identify themselves. ? They are demanding that everyone identify themselves. They are "trying to identify ICE agents", but they are doing so by asking for ID from everyone they deem "suspicious". Oh, lol. I forgot who I'm replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 11:53 AM
1

That's fair, I wasn't addressing their point directly (men suffering emotional pain from not feeling desired), but more an implicit question I added myself I'm sorry, but I find this so funny. People usually go defensive when called out, but you went "So, yeah, I just invented another question that I would like to answer, and I answered it quite nicely if I may say so." But I'll still refer to your answer :) Anyway, this part of your statement is completely ridiculous: with relatively little eff…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 11:00 AM
10

I seriously doubt this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:33 AM
2

Literally nothing that you said here ties in, in any way, to the comment you replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:30 AM
1

I still don't understand your point. I mean, I completely understand what you are saying here, but how does that tie in with your initial point: I guess the only solution is for men to become more picky when using dating apps. Because I really don't see how what you said here is in any way connected to that. I specifically wanted to know how men being more picky would help them on OLD, but you completely digressed from that. Also, your "advice" is kinda funny. Here we have a serious issue that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:17 PM
–

What's the difference between a close friendship and a relationship with someone if intimacy is not involved?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:05 AM
2

The mechanics of self awareness & differentiation? Expand on that. I have no idea what you mean by this. How is this supposed to help men when using dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:40 PM
1

You are missing my point. She is responsible for not refusing sex without a condom. But should we absolve the man 100% too If abortion exists as a way for a woman to absolve herself (and himself, regardless of whether he wants that child or not) 100% than, yeah, we should absolve the man 100% too if he decides to opt out. If abortion isn't a legal option, they are both on the hook to raise the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 01:42 PM
1

In the context of an accidental pregnancy im guessing? Yes. Do those happen a lot? You serious? Cause most of the time dudes insist to skip the condom At what point do we ascribe at least some agency to the woman in that equation? in that case you need to bear some responsibility Why? If the woman doesn't want to bear the responsibility, she can abort the child. What avenues of avoiding responsibility does a man have in this case?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 01:25 PM
1

No, it means "Women should not be allowed to force a man to pay for child custody of a child he doesn't want to have".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:26 AM
2

Can you explain the mechanics by which that decision would actually help men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:42 AM
–

and fwiw i’m not on a high horse here Oh yes, you are, because you think this i definitely tilt desperate at times lol is remotely comparable between men and women :/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:36 AM
0

No, I don’t think she meant that, and that’s not what I was arguing either. She and I both meant that young thin healthy women who also meet all your other requirements (single, “nice”, childless, etc) are actually a fairly modest minority of women. You just don’t consider most women to be “women” or something if you think they’re the majority. Young thin healthy men who also meet all your other requirements (single, "nice", chilldless, etc) are actually a fairly modest minority of men. You just…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:57 AM
3

they called me by my first name and we developed our own relationships and I got close to a couple of them because they are their own people and not just a possession that is "yours" or "not yours". And where are they now? Where are you in their lives? Now imagine if you have been with them long enough for you to consider them your own children in the way you love and care for them, and they consider you their dad. And then you break up. What then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:13 AM
2

Do you know how flairs work?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 02:08 AM
7

almost no drama This is a hard sell, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:52 AM
2

Do you look like a goblin? If not, then everything you have written here is irrelevant. Nobody is negating "right place right time" mantra. That's a default expectation. The discussion we were having was because the person I was arguing with was claiming that she would take literally any man, regardless of his attractiveness, if he was there when she got the horny. And I believe her, I have no reason to doubt that, but the issue was that she was ascribing that kind of behavior to all women who g…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:38 AM
1

Extraversion heavily correlates with attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:36 AM
3

And where is that? Can you show me some of those places they share that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 11:34 AM
–

That's like a sanitized version of the least controversial fantasy take in the history of forever. I just don't believe it. It's like when you ask someone to tell you the juiciest swear word/phrase they know, and, as a response, you get "Jiminy Cricket!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:35 AM
0

That you make an ass out of u and mption?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:25 AM
0

Who decides what's moral?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:09 AM
–

You aren't being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 12:03 AM
–

Granny lover!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 11:59 PM
7

and they report of having sex simply because a man was available at the right time and place, and if there was another it would be fine too. Where exactly do they "report" that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 11:53 PM
–

This is not up for debate btw I completely agree with that. People who believe that are utterly insane; it's really not up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 11:26 PM
3

the natural response is to give them advice how to increase their chances of being successful in dating. And advice would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:57 PM
8

Do you then try convincing them that all women think as you do, or do you do that before convincing them of everything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:54 PM
1

Only an insane person would believe something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:14 PM
1

Why not here?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:10 PM
1

I’m still a bit suspicious that OP is that dysfunctional, dismissive partner in his extremely vague account of therapy misuse. While we are on subject :)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:09 PM
1

I feel like you'd be better off sending this comment of yours directly into your anal opening right now instead of posting it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:57 PM
1

So, without anyone saying anything, you saw an "emotionally expressive man" being mentioned, and you went straight to "trauma dumping"? In your mind, that's the same thing? Can a man not show emotions without it being a trauma dump?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:50 PM
2

There is a difference between being a little selfish and being a selfish cunt (not a gendered term).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 07:40 PM
1

Do you think men and women feel love the same way, or that they should feel love the same way?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 05:12 PM
0

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 04:40 PM
1

You are saying what ISN'T loving someone. I asked WHAT IS. I don't know how I can make this simpler for you to understand :/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 03:03 PM
-2

Completely irrelevant info that I have no interest in. You need to sort that out with the other person, not me. I asked a specific question completely unrelated to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 02:57 PM
1

no, we're afraid of men because of how violent they are. This is the starting point of our discussion. From that point on, I'm refering to women in general because you are refering to women in general. Also lets assume women did that, how long it was until humanity in vulnerable position? What kind of vulnerable position would that be? Vulnerable to what exactly? Humans are Earth's ultimate apex predators, not because of their physical traits but because of something else. Can you figure out wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 02:49 PM
1

Are you all women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:35 PM
1

you guys gonna reveal your hand? how much money did the evil Medusas steal from you? Don't ask me. Money is of no consequence for my dating life. I am craved for by women for the conventional traits (face, body, dick).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:29 PM
2

So what should i do? Date less big, less strong, less threatening men? I find it hilarious how something like this isn't even an option for you :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:25 PM
-1

and shows you don’t love them as a person What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:22 PM
1

exchanging love for sex What exactly are you exchanging for sex in this case? What's love?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:19 PM
1

if you even have any lol Extra funny considering your own example lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:16 PM
5

no, we're afraid of men because of how violent they are. No, you are afraid of men because they are physically big and strong, AND could also be violent. Would you be afraid of a violent gerbil? On one hand, OP completely missed the point with this example. There is nothing hypocritical in wanting a big and strong man who isn't violent because violence is not inherent to those traits. On the other hand, OP is completely correct with this example because it really is hypocritical to say that wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:08 PM
1

What's the relevance of that statement as it pertains to what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 12:56 PM
1

What if he said, "Publicly, of course, I do. Privately, GOD NO! FUCK THEM ALL!" Does that fall under your umbrella, "it's ok and not hypocrisy"?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 10:36 AM
1

What's not clear about that? Most American women do identify as progressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 10:25 AM
–

I have value beyond my looks. You don't see the irony of that statement, considering what you are talking about? That statement is also ego, my friend. What if someone told you that you are 4/10 and that you also have no other redeeming qualities to compensate for the lack of looks? Judging by what you have said here, I assume that you would probably act defensively because you obviously disagree with this take. So, then, is there any difference between your "pride" in things beyond looks and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:58 AM
–

I don't think the reason she was said to be confused was gendered. Really? You think people would make the same excuses for him if he cheated? "Oh, he was just confused!" I'm kinda sceptical about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:56 PM
–

Why do you equate disagreeability with toxicity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:51 PM
–

Bro's playing Crusader kings IRL Fuck you man!!!! I almost choked when I read that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 12:54 PM
–

and free health care I really don't understand when people say this. But it's not free, is it? You pay for it through taxes. I'm always arguing with people about this because it's the same in my country. "Free healthcare!!!!!" only costs 20% of my gross pay. Insane when you think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 12:43 PM
–

Women have had a D in their A, yet they refuse to date men who had a D in their A.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 12:32 PM
–

Do they really, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 12:09 PM
–

Is it allowed to say "Fuck you!" as a reply to your comment? Or "Fuck your mooma too!"? Or can I say neither that nor "Choke on my biggus cockus!"?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 12:06 PM
–

I'm happy to toss out words if they don't do the job. That's what I mean by not concerned. Do you honestly not see the fallacy in what you are doing? You are missing the forest for the trees. You are using one specific situation (I'm not saying there aren't countless more, but here I'm referring to the one you mentioned) where body language, gesticulations, and gestures are more appropriate to covey what you wanted to convey while ignoring the other 99.99% of situations. If that person you hugge…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:43 PM
–

There is no consensus. If there wasn't a consensus, languages wouldn't exist. The ironic thing about that sentence is that you are claiming there is no consensus is a consensus in itself between everyone who understands english language. Funny that. Words change meaning often. No, they don't. They almost never do. Some words, sometimes (very rarely), also get a new additional meaning. But very, very rarely does a word completely change its meaning. Language isn't static. Almost the entirety of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:43 PM
7

I was talking about my friends. Most of them have issues with dating apps, and I would consider all of them at least (slight bias perhaps) average. One of them hasn't gotten anything for a few weeks already. But others, even if they get a match or 2 in a week, are immediately ghosted. Only one is currently talking with a girl. But the dynamic of that conversation is so uncanny! He is just a normal guy, slightly bit below avg height (for our country at least, he would probably be above average in…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:25 PM
–

Since they are symbols they are not a perfect representation of the object or concept the speaker intends for them them to represent. Exactly! And precisely because of that, there needs to be a consensus (and there always is) on the meaning of each symbol and what it represents and also rules and limitations on how to use them to able to form a language. So since language is inherently imperfect way to communicate And yet, it's the most perfect way to communicate that currently exists. A miracle…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:09 PM
7

You are a perfect example (and I don't mean anything bad by this, but just literally what I'm saying) of how disconnected women are from the average male experience. You literally can't even comprehend it, even when it's explicitly stated what it's like. I feel like I should start believing in god again because I feel an immense need to thank something or someone for being attractive as I am. I am practically in awe at how some of my "average" friends are managing. I would be fucking depressed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:56 AM
1

Here is an upvote from me as well, even though I neither upvote nor downvote anyone. Bitches be crazy :D
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:47 AM
0

do you believe them In your case, I wouldn't. Not saying that you would say something like that, but I would still think that you are exactly as you portray yourself here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:45 AM
2

She didn't try hard enough. She should try harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:23 AM
5

You don't think there are levels and context to "same problems"? Like a homeless person saying, "I don't know what I'm gonna do about food today..." and a trust fund kid saying, "I don't know what I'm gonna do about food today..."?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:11 AM
10

So why bother answering at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:05 AM
–

You’re acting like language is a fixed concept and not something that changes by context, culture, speaker. It is a fixed concept 99.999% of the time. That's the point of language, to be understandable to everyone regardless of context, culture and speaker. The fact that ambiguities and specific non-standard uses of words and phrases exist doesn't negate the fixed structure of language. It is notoriously subjective and fluid. No, it isn't. It's notoriously fixed and rigid. Does sick mean awesome…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 09:02 AM
–

And how do you define men's peak?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:13 AM
–

Based off what she said So now we don't believe all women if they are conservative :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:08 PM
–

If only you knew....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:02 PM
–

No, you don't. It's enough to see someone playing to understand that idiom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:01 PM
0

Is he also working as a bald indian janitor on his off-time?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:56 PM
–

Ah, so it isn't rape when it's done to a conservative woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:53 PM
–

And you would be completely wrong about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:51 PM
–

I think he is honestly concerned about your well-being.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:50 PM
–

Nothing else. The height of 5'4 is a cutoff for casual sex. If you are below that, no casual for you. If you are above it, it's casual sex galore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:43 PM
–

Better than being gay!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:38 PM
–

Air is also more importan then sex. You need air every day!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:34 PM
–

Tell her it's hard. Should be a good opener.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:23 PM
–

Even your “leftist” “Bernie Bro” boyfriend secretly wants you barefoot, pregnant, and submissive in the kitchen lol. I'm sorry, I don't understand what is supposed to be wrong with that? Isn't that, like, normal?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:20 PM
–

Those things never die. Just "lose" it somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:16 PM
–

D. Other And that other would be me letting her pray and not disturbing her at all. She would receive so much oral and dicking at the soonest convenience possible because nothing gets me going like seeing my date randomly praying for invalid children. I'm so horny right now just thinking about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:15 PM
2

Is that fat friend of yours busy because he is a bald indian janitor?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 02:57 PM
-1

We're not discussing that. You are now implying that he said that the 30-something has 0 value. He didn't say that. He said that a man with options will not value that "option" (it being that 30-something woman from an app) as a younger, more attractive option. If you are asking all of this with the assumption that the commenter you originally replied to (or me, for that matter) implied no value at all for the average woman from the dating app, then we aren't discussing the same thing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 02:38 PM
-2

But you are the one who implied that a random average 30-something from the dating app should also be valued as a, presumably, pretty younger woman that a man with options has easy access to. So, I'm asking you, what about her is he supposed to value?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 02:20 PM
–

Mandatory?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:54 PM
0

And what about her should he value, as opposed to an alternative (a much younger, prettier woman)?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:53 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:30 PM
–

The fact that you immediately jump to mental illness, and as a response to someon you don’t even know, is very telling of you. Best way to judge is to be judgmental :D
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:25 PM
–

No more cringe than your image.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 01:18 PM
–

You are confusing quality with quantity. Being Top 1% Commenter on PPD is a sign of some kind of mental illness and also a sign that you are commenting a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:37 PM
–

Can you please go back to putting images of completely unrelated quotes of completely unknown people in your comments rather than trying to "invent" your own analogies? Please!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:28 PM
–

But I kinda find his question valid. Yeah, your statement is correct. But shouldn't you be able to identify what makes sex with the same person "better" with time? I mean, in every other facet of life, when something improves compared to a past state, you will, most certainly, be able to verbalize the factors that contributed to it being improved. Why would sex be any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:26 PM
–

There were many "from the river to the sea" protests all around the US. Does your hand hurt from all that punching?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 12:15 PM
–

yes japanese people liked Nope, nobody really liked it. It was a lukewarm adaptation and received a lukewarm reception. Live-action anime adaptations are, generally, bad. GiTS fits in the bad category.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 11:12 AM
–

women shouldn't have to suffer being in a relationship with an average man. No one should suffer through your comments, yet here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 11:07 AM
–

I'm speaking from experience. Even worse is discussing trends with people who think their singular experience is trend-defining.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:56 AM
–

But also, many men (and women) are most definitely not “100% straight” so they may as well tap in. Which also means that they aren't 100% gay. So we can cure them! YAY!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:55 AM
–

i thought japanese people didn't mind some liberations taken like when they didn't get angry at scarlet johanson casting for ghost on the shell but i guess when it comes to anime and hardcore fans it's different. Ghost on the Shell :D The issue is that GiTS movie was an adaptation of an anime, and people are aware that there will be some artistic and creative liberties taken with the making of the movie. It's an entirely separate thing from the anime, and you evaluate it as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:48 AM
–

10s of millions of women voted for Trump. I guess women don't give a fuck about abortion rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:36 AM
–

He wants to put his corn into your cornhole.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 09:30 AM
–

So you want to "euthanize" everyone over age 65?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 08:14 AM
–

The point is that they are always saying that there are way too many people on earth right now, and there is an immediate solution that could help alleviate that problem instantly, but none of them want to engage in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 08:08 AM
-2

So, I am asking what the cock carousel has to do with men no longer finding women attractive past a certain age Again, you are missing the point. The comment you initially replied to didn't say that you will be unattractive past a certain age because of CC (although that's somewhat true as well), but that the time wasted on CC could have been used in pairing up sooner and because you are on CC you are also, by default, excluding big swaths of potential men that would be serious with you early on…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 02:32 PM
-7

You are "aging out" of men's preferences because you aren't paired up. That's the point. It's a whole other ruleset if you are already married. Wife goggles? Have you heard of that term?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:16 PM
1

I'm way more amazed by the picture above, where the woman isn't in the kitchen. It's insane!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:08 PM
0

The issue is there’s too many people on the planet period. It is a fact A fact? Really? Where can I read about and check out that fact? We need to slow down our numbers as a species Because?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:06 PM
1

AI is really crazy these days!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:03 PM
8

Oppressor group :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:01 PM
1

Both what?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:00 PM
2

Or she could not have dated him at all? 99.9999% of the male population would also be "don't date that dude, what the fuck is wrong with you". Almost every fucking time it's self-inflicted and men as a gender get blamed for the stupid decisions women make.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:46 PM
2

The best!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:43 PM
1

Because that's something for a man, you see a man in the picture. A woman can't use that. It's for a man. You can get something like this: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:42 PM
1

It's getting blown so out of proportion when it's not Trump and Trump only?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:35 PM
3

Enjoy whatever life bestows upon you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:33 PM
2

and female women "voted" for this or supported it from a humanitarian pov. Typical NIMBY (not in my back yard) thinking and virtue signaling. It's easy to be humanitarian when you don't feel any consequences for it. But are you then really humanitarian? Nothing changes for you, you just feel fulfilled by voting for a party that will flood the country with people they won't be able to house or support, but who gives a fuck about that? The most important thing is that I feel so good and "giving" r…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:31 PM
13

Those are not straight men. They are just public-facing straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:17 PM
0

I love how people are so nonchalant in saying how there are too many people on this planet, and we need fewer of them, but they never consider themselves to be the issue. It's always too many of those other people that aren't them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:33 AM
3

Lower birth rates in Japan and Korea didn't make the economy collapse. That's one of those things that you look at with hindsight when you are already in a colapse and trying to figure out how everything came to pass. There are other countries who went through this first Really? Which ones would those be? and they are trying their hardest to come up with solutions to support their aging populations and continue to do things with less people And they will come up with nothing. The current system,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:29 AM
5

Is he wrong :D
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:24 AM
1

This woman is literally looking into your perspective and understanding it, she just happens to be disgusted by it. She isn't understanding anything, that's the issue. She is acting like she is looking into "our" perspective while applying totaly random value judgements and then generalizing them to all men like it's some kind of "eureka" moment for her, like she suddenly completely understands how men think.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:17 AM
5

This doesnt make child abuse okay even if a young boy is involved. Only you are making that conflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 09:15 AM
–

It literally has everything to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 02:58 PM
5

It's not drama. It's a dread game or some shit. It's literally the opposite of drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 02:21 PM
5

They are just pragmatic. There is a difference. They are doing it because it works. If it didn't work, they wouldn't be doing that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 01:33 PM
5

FEETMAN!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 12:49 PM
2

I was stupid for actually expecting something at least somewhat cogent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:03 AM
–

I find it hilarious how women aren't even able to comprehend the point of your post :)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:30 AM
3

As you should! Never settle for anything less than perfect that you deserve!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:27 AM
3

Yet, on the other hand, you offer no backing for your own hypothesis. Why is it less shameful now to admit that you are struggling with dating? And even if it is, why would men admit that?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:21 AM
0

That's not me. Incompatibility. I have no issue dating someone who makes less than me. As long as we vibe in other ways 🤷‍♀️ And everyone knows you can only vibe in the same socioeconomic status 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:20 AM
0

Among other isms they lean into that I don’t love. Like them not loving classism that you obviously do :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 01:32 PM
1

But you somehow magically gravitate towards content where men are insulting women's bodies. Curious that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 12:05 AM
2

I guess I participate in very different spaces on the internet. Different from everyone :D
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:18 PM
7

Anonymous folks on the internet always gonna go for generalized insecurities - that’s why men go for “you’re a slut/whore” or “you must be a dog/fat” or various other insulting things in the direction of women’s appearances. Your examples of common anonymous insults against men aren’t any different than that. Yeah, not different at all. Other than a tiny teeny weeny detail that one is completely socially unacceptable and shunned, while the other is A-OK, and even encouraged. Bit of a difference …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:17 PM
8

simply because I have genuinely seen men almost exclusively insult women's bodies, and women almost exclusively insult men's behaviors and character. To me, this sentence sounds like sci-fi.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:12 PM
10

Do you consider calling a woman a whore an insult?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:09 PM
6

Imagine there is a woman sitting next to him, espousing the same rhetoric as Fuentes. How would you insult her?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:07 PM
-1

You don't think there is a distinction in behavior when you are single and in a committed relationship? Or you don't think there should be?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 06:01 PM
0

Being hypocrites. How so? Playing games How so? Expecting participation trophies How so? Setting up rules What kind of rules?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:59 PM
1

What do your female friends specifically mean when saying cruel rejection? For a woman, a simple "no" can be cruel enough because she isn't used to it. The same situation could be interpreted completely differently depending on the gender of the person doing / recieving the rejection. For the record, I've never had a cruel rejection happen to me, but I've had women crashing out when rejected happen to me, my friends, and I have witnessed that happening to men I didn't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:57 PM
0

And how much time does it need to pass for a person to feel love?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:19 PM
1

and a lot of our data uses biomarkers to verify self-reporting on taboo behaviors Clarify this for me. What exactly constitutes taboo behavior in this case? The level of agreement is shockingly high for people who don't work in my field, who don't believe people would report honestly. I first need to know what kind of behaviors you are observing here so I can properly respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:11 PM
10

So? Are you implying he is gay as an insult?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 05:04 PM
1

After one week or 2 of dating it's not love what you are feeling, it's limerence. Who exactly are you to get to decide that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:57 PM
0

What's quality data on n-counts? Self-reporting and quality data don't go hand in hand, especially self-reporting on sexual things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:55 PM
1

If you really know what a prude means, how can you say that a woman being a prude is "one of the greenest flags out there for most men"? It isn't, for any man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 04:51 PM
12

How is it even possible to miss the point so much?! It's not about the fact that he is getting shitted on; the issue is how people are going about doing so. If a black person is, as you say, shitting on people and you don't agree with him, is it acceptable to barrage him with n-word insults? Of course it isn't, because you aren't just insulting him with that, you are insulting every black person. What if an obese woman is shitting on people, and you don't like what she's saying, is it acceptable…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:03 PM
1

In short, you think you are better than you are, and you want others to acknowledge your delusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 01:41 PM
–

Was there any analysis and/or introspection as to the reason for that kind of discrepancy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 12:23 PM
–

You miss 100% shots you don't take!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 12:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter