TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BrilliantDoubting Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by BrilliantDoubting on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's not the topic we both speaking about, no? You said, many women don't realise, that men only want to have sex with them. And i agreed and said, that many men are good at hiding their intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:25 PM
2

then you don't have values So you have no clue what "values" even mean. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:22 PM
1

I'm avoiding radical and polemical statements, which are on top not as smart as you think they are. But the true degeneracy here is, you thinking that monogamy should be the norm and the opposite gender you seem to dislike above all, should comply to your own worldview. With this attitude no guy will marry you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:10 PM
2

I'm saying, that women don't have the ability to entertain a man for a long time. Give a man a girlfriend for a year, and he will most likely start masturbating to porn. Ah the blue pill. Traditional family values. In this framework a woman should be quite. But somehow they are spending their entire time on the internet being angry about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:00 PM
2

Because men want sex. A lot. With a vast amount of women. I have never seen a man, who had disagreed with this statement. So men who have casual sex are not radicalised. They are just men. Maybe men are just not for you?!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 08:04 PM
2

You should slow down a bit. Based on your history, i would say, that you have been radicalised on the internet. All i'm saying is, that no one really cares if you think, that men who have casual sex are bad. But your attitude to communicate that is a bit annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 07:50 PM
1

To be fair: Men go great length to hide their true intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 07:46 PM
2

Fair enough No one forces you to pick a guy who has casual sex. Why are you so insistent on calling them bad people? Heartbroken by one of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 07:43 PM
-3

Third world country
/r/MensRights15/11/24 05:26 AM
1

Men like the sexy kind of modest.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 06:12 PM
1

I like the show, but the depiction of him is more of a successful simp, rather than a womaniser.
/r/seduction22/10/24 07:44 AM
2

What the f? I certainly didn't say any of this. You are just confusing my statements with some you have read a long time ago. I don't talk about chads and stuff like that. Just admit it. You are angry and you put me in a box with everyone else you disagree with. That's it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 02:49 PM
3

I didn't say any this. Nice try though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 08:13 PM
4

No need to be condescending. Just avoid those women. But don't judge them for their lives. It's theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 06:27 PM
2

No one tries to control others. Where did you get that from? Every woman has issues. Regarding sex workers at least you know what kind of issue that is. It's manageable. You pay and you leave. Of course many men can have sex with a lot of women without paying for it. But those woman come with a lot of trouble and no man wants to handle that. And those women are usually not the ones that are on the top of their game either, lookswise. The best looking woman are usually the most selective ones wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 06:24 PM
4

All you questions arise from your misunderstanding, that the world is fair, just and equal. But it is not. Women usually don't care if a man has paid for sex. When she is attracted to him, she doesn't care about his "history". But women are relentlessly selective. They need to be, because their biology drives them to be. Or do you think women should unite, held a conference and distribute themselves equally to all men?! Men do care about womens sexual past, because that's how they protect themse…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:56 PM

Men typically can tell without asking. Not the exact number, but an approximation is always written on her forehead.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:29 PM
30

It's more complex oftentimes. She also asking herself where this will lead. She might be genuinely attracted to you and STILL flake you, leave you in read and so on.
/r/seduction08/10/24 03:54 PM
6

Funny how half the comments here "disagree" with what you've said, only to paraphrase exactly what you have said.
/r/seduction07/10/24 09:12 PM
2

All of this makes up stronger and more attractive. Stay strong
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:47 PM
2

You don't need to be among the best pro-athletes in the world. All you need is to be a somewhat pro in your particular sport. Then you can enjoy the game the most.
/r/seduction16/06/24 04:17 PM
2

I mean... in principle, yeah why not. But i'm not an expert by any means. :D In Germany abortion is allowed in the first trimester. After that it's a criminal offense. We have no nationwide public debate about abortions like the US has. I think the same period could be a reasonable timespan for a man to decide, wether he want's to be a father or not. Paper abortions are absolutely necessary. Some people say paper abortions are good, because unwilling men were not incentivised anymore to talk wom…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 02:06 PM
2

I swear i have no clue why someone would downvote you for asking questions. What do you want to know about Germany?^
/r/MensRights26/05/24 04:21 AM
41

On top, she is looking if you would try to qualify yourself, which would make you low value. Make her qualify herself. "Depends on if you are worthy of a gentleman. What differentiates you from all the rest here?"
/r/seduction25/05/24 04:43 PM
6

It plays a big role, since the US Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in Germany.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:08 PM
5

Not even an American, but are you sure, you had this opinion on paper abortions BEFORE roe vs. wade was overturned?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:00 PM
0

Partners The dynamic you are describing usually involves a obese woman and two bi-sexual 'feminine' men. Not bitching on any of them, but this is exactly how it goes. Those women will try to exercise their 'abundance', while the men involved try get anything. It's not a deliberate or consciously established arrangement, but one that is a practical option inside their limited field of possibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 11:24 AM
2

It's true but non of it is proof for your original statement. Just because women don't fuck, even if they can, doesn't make them less horny. Maybe womens horniness just simply differs from mens, like the different kind of orgasms we have. There is really no point in trying to trump women in this regard. The actual question you should ask, and that's also the actual topic hidden in this thread, is how do you get the sex in quantity and quality you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 08:34 PM
4

Novelty is the cause. It's exiting, fresh, new, different.
/r/seduction19/05/24 02:17 PM
10

Love it. Will telling a woman, that wants commitment from me, that i'm in my hoe-phase be repulsive to her?
/r/seduction19/05/24 12:53 PM
54

Being a guy, most likely
/r/seduction18/05/24 08:44 PM
1

Trying to get into "the perfect relationship" as is just another kind of suffering. You are setting yourself up for a great disappointment. If you are aware of this and still want it, go for it, because then it is something you have to experience. I would recommend to read into spirituality. I feel you might be ready for it.
/r/seduction12/05/24 08:50 AM
-2

You are probably thinking about news anchors, singers and actors, right? That might be true on the surface. These are outliers really. Check out your local newspapers, underground musicians, painters, photographers, scientists and engineers, philosophers, cardinals, priests, monks... Those who collect and transmit knowledge are 80% men.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:46 AM
-7

Depends of which side of public life you are measuring: Politics, economy and the "knowledge-sector" (media, arts, science, religion...) is run predominantly by men. This is what usually called "the patriarchy". At least in this day and age. But simultaneously the matriarchy exists too. It's just a different kind of power: Sexuality, might be the biggest one here.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 12:19 AM
1

They are both poor. The one who want's nothing is king.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 02:07 PM
1

The second paragraph is not entirely true. What women biologically want is a guy for "good" offspring's and a guy as provider. It doesn't have to be the same guy necessarily, even if this would be her preferred choice. That's the entire point. Guys like this are rare, and therefore desired. Those guys have abundance, at least temporarily and put those women in the f***-buddy zone, thus they become "sluts". Are all women like that? Of course not. Some women genuinely want to have sex with a lot o…
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:57 PM
0

What? I'm talking about unfulfilled desires. Those are equally present in both men and women. Sure, women can have sex all day long and every day. But that's usually not what they want. Longing fur pussy, or longing for committed relationship, and still end up wanking or answering bootycalls is equally bad.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:49 AM
-22

Most sluts become sluts, because of their hypergamic nature. Having sex with "higher value males" will put them in the f***zone. It's not voluntary.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:18 PM
-36

female counterpart The functional equivalent of a male incel is a female slut. Both have it equally hard in society.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:00 PM
1

It's the Internet. We are connected through our smartphones and computers now. Most of our communication is online. The necessity to talk to esch other diminished. And most women find most men they don't know, unattractive. Hence: The modern incel was born.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 08:22 AM
7

All of this is true, but to be fair: That's exactly how all the other western social media companies are run too. Echochambers produce angry users. Angry users log-in more often. More log-ins equals in more ad-revenue. Therefore i think the chinese version of TikTok is an exception to the rule, the west has established.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 12:03 PM
1

Women are children. When your 2 year old wins against you at a game, you must pretend, that this kid is a genius. When you win on the other hand, you are a bad parent.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 05:28 PM
0

I get what you are saying. Ancient greek democracies had no problem with having slaves and ruling out women from elections as well. So i agree, that there is no clear demarcation line from which a society can be deemed democratic or not. But you have mentioned involuntary labour of prisoners, and you have expressed, that there is some kind of flaw in this understanding of a democratic principles. And i agree. Locking up millions of (mostly) black people in a private prison-system and forcing the…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:40 PM
0

The modern understanding of "democracy" is, that it contains three elements: 1. Government of the people (mostly representative or direct) 2. Separation of power (usually 3 branches) and both of these to secure Fundamental rights of the individual (evolved, defined and refined over the centuries) The united states are widely considered a flawed democracy for those reasons you've mentioned.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:14 PM
-1

Which conditions? Slavery was abolished because it was deemed undemocratic.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:56 PM
4

The government owns your children, not you. Yes or no? No. In a democracy nobody owns anyone. It's called fundamental rights.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:15 PM
12

Germany is a very progressive country. Men who exhibit those traits might appear feminine. For conservative women, like Ukrainians this is by default a huge turn off. They understandably want a protector and provider. At the same time, women who want a conservative man, usually don't live a conservative life themselves, which makes them unattractive for conservative men.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:06 PM
6

But equality is not possible. It's will always be a benefit for one person/gender at the detriment of the other. AI will most likely recognise that and tell as to f*** off.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 12:20 AM
28

My advice is, don't be so triggered by feminists. It's true, a lot of them are annoying as hell. But fighting them doesn't make men confident and self-assured. Recognise they do exist. When they derail a conversation, treat them like the childs they are. Teach other men how to handle those situations. And go on with you own daily business without thinking about them anymore. It doesn't matter really if they are masquerading as feminists, if they are genuinely convinced they are right, or just pr…
/r/MensRights26/03/24 10:43 AM
4

He should find out how OLD he is first. He seems to be 24, 25, 27 and 60 years old. It's hard to get laid, when you are not sure about that one.
/r/seduction24/03/24 01:21 AM
1

Too much game is having no game at all.
/r/seduction19/03/24 01:59 AM
20

Bra... you are just good-looking... :D
/r/seduction03/03/24 03:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter