TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Brinnstar Archive

View 1 post and 186 comments by Brinnstar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

educationBrinnstar/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 09:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

ew.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:41 PM
0

I'm kind of upset that I have a retard asking me stupid questions.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:36 PM
1

No, it just makes you kind of a well-intentioned dolt.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:21 PM
0

This is such a weird thing to get upset about.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:20 PM
-3

Momentary fear is not "a state of excessive alert".
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:13 PM
0

how about... NOOO!! How about YOU manage your emotions and control your unfounded fears Kinda sounds like you're the one who need to manage your emotions, buddy. You seem a little triggered.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 07:10 PM
-11

Yes, it is fear. Momentary fear, not living in fear. someone approaching you from behind is not really "sneaking" or do you want men to treat women like a doe in a forest? Just cycle past her. This isn't complicated.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 06:33 PM
-18

She's not living in fear. She was startled because somebody sneaked up behind her. It happens.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 06:20 PM
-16

Or we could just not sneak up behind people while thy're out jogging.
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 05:10 PM
1

What's called sarcasm? If who didn't bother to think about what?
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 02:18 PM
1

what?
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 08:23 AM
2

Ahh, okay. Sorry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 11:18 PM
2

Which is why it's a silly argument. Most if not all feminists believe in a patriarchy. By your reasoning, all feminists are extremists, so why add the qualifier? It's redundant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 11:10 PM
1

Not a quote, but a video.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 11:02 PM
2

Then stop calling extremist feminists "radical feminists", when by your own admission they're not the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 11:00 PM
2

Radical feminists can be deranged, but most of the feminists you're fighting with aren't aren't radical feminists, they're intersectional feminists. It just makes you sound ignorant when you call any extremist feminist a "radical feminist".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 10:58 PM
3

I'm not saying radical feminists can't be extremists. I'm saying "radical feminism" is not a synonym for "extremist feminism", and most of the people on this board clearly think that it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 10:29 PM
1

I believe the best actor should play the role so I don't really care if there's a black Batman, but that means the reverse is also true: we should be able to have a white Blade or something. I mean I feel like those two things aren't really equivalent. The vast majority of heroes are white, so it doesn't really affect me to lose a white superhero. On the other hand black people have to make do with much less representation, so turning one of their superheroes white feels like a significant loss …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 10:01 PM
-5

You're using the word "society" when in fact you mean "a subsection of society". Is there a side of the cultural dialogue that unfairly criticizes men for pursuing meaningless sex? Sure. There's also a side that unfairly criticizes those frigid bitches for making men jump through endless hoops to get a little action. You're being very insular in your thinking here. Or, an example from this sub: Women report that they receive constant harassment and so it must be all or most men that perpetrate t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 09:41 PM
0

The roots of patriarchy mythology can indeed be found in the Declaration of Sentiments of the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention, yes. But this understanding wasn't universal across schools of thought or even across countries. And even today it isn't, as in equity feminism, which I already mentioned. Okay, so you agree that patriarchy theory comes from first wave feminism, not from radical feminism? Why are you arguing with me then? Nah, they were wrong. A "patriarchy" is a social order wherein men ho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 08:27 PM
-1

I don't claim to be an expert on schools of feminism, but what I'm seeing is that radical feminism popularized patriarchy mythology and the power dynamic of men as oppressors and women as oppressed. Radical feminists might have coined the term "patriarchy" (or rather, appropriated it) but patriarchy theory has always been a fundamental tenet of feminism. First wave feminists understood that they were battling a universal order of male dominance, and they were right. That understanding was contin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 01:33 AM
2

Radical feminism is very focused on sex. Mainstream feminism today is fourth wave feminism, which is much more focused on gender. In practice this leads to fiery disagreements between second wave and fourth wave feminists about trans people and men. Radical feminists think you are the sex you were born with, fourth wave feminists think you are the sex you identify with. Radical feminists also tend to take a dimmer view of men. There are lots of other differences too but that's the main thrust of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 12:56 AM
0

100% of the people I've heard complain about "black ghetto culture" have been extremely obviously closeted racists, and I'm working from a large sample size. It's not necessarily a 1:1 correspondence but it's a workable rule of thumb. Also, frankly, black ghetto culture is no different to any other culture. It has good parts and bad parts. If you can only see the bad parts, that's probably because you're a racist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 12:50 AM
0

That's not the implication.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 12:37 AM
0

Radical feminism is not a synonym for extreme feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:14 PM
0

for the craic
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 02:43 PM
1

I agree but mainstream feminism is dominated by 3rd and 4th wave radical ("patriarchy") feminism Uh, radical feminism is second wave feminism. And fourth wave feminists generally do not like radical feminists. Also, all feminism is "patriarchy" feminism. Patriarchy is kind of a central tenet of feminism. Can't really have feminism without patriarchy. especially the non-radical branches that people like Farrell and Summers are part of Okay, I'll bite. Which branch of feminism do Farrell and Summe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 02:06 PM
1

All the more reason to get started on prison reform as soon as possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 02:00 PM
1

Contra is nothing like Hoff Summers. She's an extremely influential modern-day feminist thinker. Nobody that I'm aware of is calling her an anti-feminist, that would be a really dumb thing to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:47 PM
2

That has nothing to do with what I just said. My point is that "self reported" statistics are far more friendly to your position than courtroom statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:37 PM
0

I think you should re-read the comment you just replied to, friend. I never said they weren't IP banned or using TOR. I agree that they probably are.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 12:16 PM
1

It was "Men".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 11:08 AM
-12

They are feminists pretending to be men. yes, that's the most likely explanation...
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 11:03 AM
-13

Yeah dude, they've been IP banned because they're racist, misogynistic antifeminists.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 11:00 AM
-14

The feminists are using Tor to create endless 5-minute-old troll accounts pretending to be men, posting extremely misogynistic/homophobic/racist stuffs here, trying to make us look bad Yes, surely this is the simplest explanation.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 10:52 AM
–

But it IS generalization since she didn't even put the word "some" in the post's title. This is such a retarded argument. So you're angry that you didn't catch the very obvious implication that this post only refers to a subsection of the male population? Obviously she's only talking about some men.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 10:44 AM
–

The "some" is implied.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 10:42 AM
1

No, definitely not just in the US. Very, very few countries on earth can boast a humane prison system. I think good sex ed, which should include discussions on grey areas of consent, etc., should get priority because it affects everyone. This is insane to me. The rate of sexual abuse is sky high in prison, both men's and women's. A huge percentage of male rape victims are raped in prison. This issue is absolutely urgent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 10:32 AM
1

I meant that people do not seem to properly link it to misandristic stereotypes Contra and Vaush explicitly did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 10:11 AM
1

You mean the one where she talks about black men and white women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 09:49 AM
3

Many statistics feminists show are self reported (no court or police involved) I mean, you should support these kinds of studies really, since the best self-reported statistics show that men and women are raped at roughly equal rates. If we judge by conviction rates, then men are far less likely to be raped.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 09:34 AM
3

1) I believe it shows that men and women are raped at roughly equal rates. Men I think are more likely than women to be rapists though. 2) impossible to say. 3) the first and most pressing solution by far is prison reform. A very, very secondary solution is to teach consent to children during state-sponsored sex ed, making the rules explicit to both genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 09:31 AM
–

ok creep
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 08:41 AM
–

Please do.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 07:46 AM
–

Where did I say women didn't perpetrate street harassment?
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 07:46 AM
1

I wouldn't say that gender has nothing to do with it. Gender is part of human socialization. Girls and boys can definitely be socialized into different patterns of toxicity, and those patterns become very obvious at the more dominant ends of society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 07:05 AM
-1

I think generally speaking we do address toxic femininity. We don't necessarily always call it by that name, but the concept is very firmly lodged in our collective consciousness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 07:00 AM
1

That's like saying "Any movie that addresses British colonialism also has to address French colonialism, or it's unfair." It's perfectly fine just to tell a story about British colonialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:56 AM
0

So any film that addresses toxic masculinity also has to address toxic femininity?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:49 AM
1

What makes it misandrist rather than insightful social commentary? Can horror movies not explore toxic masculinity without being misandrist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:46 AM
–

Yes, I'm sure this is a very serious and widespread problem.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 06:42 AM
1

lol right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:25 AM
2

It's another casualty of the algorithm, I'm afraid. The easiest way to make a successful movie is to get people talking about it; and the easiest way to do that is to turn your movie into a hamfisted social justice soapbox. Some people will love it, some people will hate it; but either way, they'll be talking about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:13 AM
2

shirts with violent slogans like "Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" and there being no outrage or controversy over these when if the genders were reversed there absolutely would've been. I genuinely cannot imagine getting even remotely upset by a shirt that said "girls are stupid, throw rocks at them". It's playground humor, like "girls have cooties" or "boys are stinky". and then you've got movies that are just outright hateful propaganda garbage like the 2019 Black Christmas remake. Just l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 06:09 AM
2

Yeah, I agree. Nothing wrong with focusing on race or gender, but it's certainly not something that every action movie needs to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 05:51 AM
3

Famously, 'Alien' was written with a gender-blind script. Ripley's gender isn't addressed in the movie because she wasn't written as a woman. There are arguably some problems with gender-blind and race-blind casting, but personally I enjoy it and would like to see a lot more of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 05:47 AM
–

The issue is that there isn't a widespread universal pattern of female servers lashing out at people. There is absolutely a widespread universal pattern of men committing street harassment.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 05:33 AM
-1

Isn't contrapoints one of those "feminists" who mainstream feminists refer to as anti-feminist? Kind of like Christiana Hoff Sommers and people like that. Definitely not. She has some detractors, but: A) mainstream feminists generally don't feel any particular way about her, and B) the charges against her mostly relate to her positions on trans politics, not feminism. I am very much aware of that brand of feminism (from the second wave) but it's definitely not mainstream. I don't know what you'r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 04:39 AM
1

Your own comment is a stark example of gynocentrism Expressing empathy for bereaved husbands and fathers is an example of gynocentrism? and the hypocrisy here is literally what we're all talking about in the OP and in the comments. Yes, I understand that. I'm arguing that it isn't hypocrisy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 04:35 AM
-1

If generalizing women is wrong, then should any people in these communities That's ridiculous. These are communities that explicitly organize around their misogyny, bitterness, and contempt for broader society. This is no different than calling all conservatives white supremacists or liberals BLM supporters It's more like saying "all white supremacists hate black people". Not precisely true, but true enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:45 AM
0

That's not unreasonable in my opinion. That charge actually seems to be more for the father's benefit than the mother's. If a man's pregnant wife is murdered, I think it's fair to acknowledge that he has lost not only a partner, but also a child. Forcibly terminating a wanted pregnancy is a crime against the parents and it should be treated as such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:37 AM
-1

A lot of them do, yeah. Contrapoints has some great videos about this, including one where she specifically breaks down the black male/white female social dynamic. Vaush has too many videos for me to sift through, but I've definitely heard him address the subject explicitly. I do agree that this is an under-discussed topic on the left in general though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:28 AM
7

Presumably because the groups who make these complaints the loudest tend to be incel, redpill, blackpill, mgtow, dark enlightenment types who really do say some very objectionable things about both men and women, even if some of their observations are valid. This creates a really unfortunate association in the broader social consciousness between "complaining about the male experience of modern dating" and "being a toxic, regressive lunatic". If you want to have a productive conversation about t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:33 AM
1

It's a nice concept and would be great if it were applied properly, but to them eg. "the intersection of gender and racism" basically just means "the intersection of misogyny and racism", despite the fact the definite existence of racialised misandry, especially with black and Asian men. There's definitely feminists that do this, but all of the feminists I follow acknowledge the specific oppressions faced by black men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:10 AM
-1

/r/inceltear showcases posts like this. Incel communities in general are toxic, shallow, ugly, bitter, misanthropic, misogynistic shitholes that deserve every drop of shame and ridicule they attract. Virgins don't deserve to be ridiculed, awkward people don't deserve to be ridiculed, men don't deserve to be ridiculed, but toxic incels absolutely do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 11:42 AM
0

Yes, you can. Making jokes about men is not misandric.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 08:31 AM
2

As a joke.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 05:12 AM
1

I don’t believe he was being hostile. If he respectfully said no, he was being neutral. He was being hostile. Declining a polite request is hostility. It violates the social contract. Rude, sure. Hostile? We would’ve had to been there to tell. Rudeness is hostility. When you are rude to somebody, you make it clear that their feelings are of no importance to you. That's hostility. I am not arguing that you shouldn’t feel anything at all. I am arguing against the entitlement, or maybe more naivety…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 05:12 AM
0

It's confusing because it's off-topic. We're talking about a particular woman right now, not the entire breadth and depth of feminine cruelty and deceit. Yes, some women lie about paternity, but not the woman we are discussing here and now. Try to stay on subject.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 04:07 AM
0

So he's a cuck who's letting his girlfriend get fucked by someone else, but his girlfriend is also imaginary. I see.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 04:01 AM
1

stealing the semen from a condom? Yes, stealing semen. That is the behavior we're discussing here. It's extremely weird. Very few women behave this way. how about lying about the father of the baby? I don't know what this has to do with anything or why you're talking about it.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 04:00 AM
1

Personally, I don't think you should feel entitled to people's kindness because you will be very disappointed at even a simple "no". Well I'm sorry, but that just isn't how human feelings work. If you are needlessly hostile to a stranger, nine times out of ten, that stranger is going to feel hurt or offended. Maybe they shouldn't feel that way, but they will. It's not a sign of entitlement or hypersensitivity or feminine deviousness. It is how most people react to social transgressions. Maybe yo…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 03:58 AM
1

You said she was “disrespected” and “brutally” rejected by the guy (even after having a plethora of reasons why he didn’t) She was disrespected and brutally rejected. She was. It doesn't matter why he did it. He may have had very good reasons. He might be undergoing extreme stress. He might be mentally ill. He might be in a hurry. He might be a very nice person most of the time. But his behavior was, indisputably, aggressively antisocial. He disrespected her, and it made her feel bad. That's usu…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 02:37 AM
1

Yeah, and that's rude. Refusing a small and polite request from a stranger is rude. It's not how well-mannered adults behave.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:46 AM
1

It is of course his choice, but there are certain standards of politeness that people tend to observe while in public, and performing small favors for other people is part of that standard. "Could you hold that elevator for me?" "Could you move your bag for me?" "Could you tell me where you got that great watch?" You don't have to do any of these things, but it is polite. You don't have to move aside so my buddy's wheelchair can get through; it's your body, your choice. But you are absolutely op…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:44 AM
1

It is rare for a woman to steal semen. Most women who get knocked up by a rich guy do it consensually.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:28 AM
1

She probably felt embarrassed because she asked somebody for help and had her polite request brutally rejected. It's normal to feel humiliated when you're openly disrespected by a stranger. They’re probably saying he’s a misogynist loser in her comments First, Bush invades my home turf, then he takes my pals, then he makes fun of the way I talk... probably.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:26 AM
1

I'm not saying she doesn't feel humiliated. I'm saying we have no idea why she was humiliated. You're assuming it has something to do with feminism, but you have no objective reason to believe that.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:10 AM
1

Possibly, but there's the slight problem that we have no idea why this man refused to help this woman. Maybe he was a politically-motivated MGTOW, maybe he was afraid of offending her, or maybe he was just a selfish jerk. Maybe he was experiencing paranoid psychosis and thought she was an alien sent to steal his adrenochrome. Maybe he was a germophobe and doesn't like touching people. You can't just assume he's afraid of being perceived as sexist when he gave to clue as to his motivation.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:08 AM
1

Right, but unless this woman brags all day about not needing a man, she's not being a hypocrite.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:54 AM
2

https://medlineplus.gov/menshealth.html
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:48 AM
0

https://medlineplus.gov/menshealth.html
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:48 AM
1

Also, ambition and drive are absolutely personality strengths.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:33 AM
0

Utility is anything that provides value to your life. It can be mutual. When one monkey grooms another and eats the lice, those monkeys are providing each other with mutual utility. Sex, emotional support, good parenting, these are all things that provide utility. Everybody wants utility from their relationships, both sexual and platonic.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:31 AM
1

LMFAO don't worry, medical science improves every year :)
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:13 AM
2

That's interesting. It sounds like you have fairly good judgment then. That's a wonderful quality that will save you a lot of pain and heartache in the long run. Getting your affairs in order before you start looking for love is an eminently sensible idea, and I wish more people took this approach. When you've increased your confidence and better understand your place in the world, you'll probably find that predatory men start to find you less interesting, and decent, stable men will start to fi…
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:10 AM
1

Yeah, that's rough. I've had friends in your position. If you keep getting into bad relationships it's definitely worth it to stay single for a while just so you can figure out what the problem is. You might also check out /r/BPDlovedones in the meantime. Just a hunch, but it sounds like you might have dated a couple NPDs or borderlines.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:03 AM
-5

Deal <3
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 12:00 AM
-9

Marry me.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:58 PM
1

Because there should be no such thing as a sacred cow. Either everything's fair game, or nothing is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 11:54 PM
-1

No, I agree that it exists. All types of weirdos and losers and assholes exist. I'm saying that's not a sensible reason to cut off all contact with your preferred gender when you can keep yourself reasonably safe just by taking sensible precautions. And because of it most good guys want nothing to do with women I mean, this just isn't true. All the guys in my extended social circle are good guys. At least half of them are married or in long-term relationships. The others are single for various r…
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:47 PM
0

Women who intentionally steal rich men's seed definitely exist, but they're pretty damn rare. Not really common enough to warrant forswearing all contact with the opposite sex, imo. If you're that worried about being targeted for spermjacking, just live a humble lifestyle and these kinds of women won't even see you.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:37 PM
1

lol the person in the OP is a troll, genius.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:30 PM
-1

Yeah, this poor fool who's nailing two hot women at once.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:07 PM
0

It's not cheating if you have permission.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 11:04 PM
0

Making a child not by your consent is the same concern. No, it isn't. The fact that you're genuinely trying to argue that impregnating someone and being impregnated are an identical experience demonstrates your intellectual dishonesty. You know your argument is ridiculous, but you need to pretend that it isn't because you're married to this ideology. If rape is a gendered problem, then the feminists have a valid point. And the feminists simply cannot have a valid point. That doesn't make an aver…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 06:50 PM
1

For instance, women who are raped have greater fear of unwanted pregnancies and STDs. Men have these same fears. It's just inverted for the pregnancy So not the same fear then. A fear of impregnating someone, not of being impregnated. A gendered fear. And no actually, men and women do not have the same fear of contracting STDs. As an educated, mature adult, I'm sure you're aware that during sex, the receiving partner is more vulnerable to infection than the giving partner, due to the thinness of…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 06:40 PM
0

"False allegations don't exist" —aaaakoko
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:14 PM
0

Of course I accept it. Your source was every bit as good as mine. No arguing with youtube.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:12 PM
1

I'm glad we agree: false allegations don't exist.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:09 PM
0

Nothing's wrong?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:05 PM
0

My source was posted by lawyers as well. And police commissioners. And Stephen Hawking. And the Pope. And they all say there's no such thing as false allegations.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:01 PM
0

Also, men are statistically more selfish than women. Source: youtube
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:47 PM
1

So you agree that there's no such thing as false allegations?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:43 PM
1

In that case: 100% of rape allegations made by women against men are valid. Source: Google.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:37 PM
1

"Youtube" is not a source.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:35 PM
-1

You haven't posted any sources.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:20 PM
-1

I don't know how to explain this. The criticisms you're making of the BBC are similar to criticisms you could make of any news source. All news sources have serious problems. You seem not to understand how the news works.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:15 PM
-2

I'm not disputing your data. I'm disputing your conclusions.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:11 PM
-3

It could be considered if it's something against a country or some sort of race, religion. And when they are against a race or religion or gender. Then such news articles should not be carried as a source of info Okay, then there are no valid news sources. Because they all discriminate against somebody.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:07 PM
0

There's no need to "raise awareness" about oppression of women in the Middle East. Everyone is already 100% aware of that issue.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:06 PM
1

I mean, not really. Seems like you're just using the Fallacy of Relative Privation to dress up a point that fundamentally isn't valid.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:43 PM
0

Yes, the BBC has an editorial slant that many people don't care for. That's true for literally every news outlet in the world. That doesn't make it unreliable as a source of raw information. It's extremely reliable as a source of hard facts. The BBC does not just make shit up, they report the news accurately but within the confines of their own philosophical lens. Calling the BBC "unreliable" as though it just invents the news makes you all look extremely ignorant. It's almost like you don't und…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:20 PM
-6

Yes, the BBC has an editorial slant that many people don't care for. That's true for literally every news outlet in the world. That doesn't make it unreliable as a source of raw information. It's extremely reliable as a source of hard facts. The BBC does not just make shit up, they report the news accurately but within the confines of their own philosophical lens. Calling the BBC "unreliable" as though it just invents the news makes you all look extremely ignorant. It's almost like you don't und…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:20 PM
1

I neither have to support it nor agree with it... you decide what you want and others get to do the same. Oh okay, so you actually kind of dislike this hypothetical woman. Funny, I thought only feminists judged women for their choices? Or is it only being judgmental when it's me disliking a Pick Me? Only you get to dislike women, is that it? The difference here is that you want me to see those women as strong women No, I don't. None of the behaviors I described are inherently "strong". You're pr…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:18 PM
1

Show me exactly where I said you're abusing me, exactly, where is said those exact words. You accused me of DARVO. DARVO is an abuse tactic. By accusing me of DARVO, you are accusing me of abuse. You've not actually answered a single question posed Which question have I refused to answer? Really, tell me. I mean it. I genuinely want to know, what question do you feel like I'm avoiding? Explain. WHAT QUESTION AM I AVOIDING, AKIHONJ? FUCKING TELL ME. I WANT TO ANSWER IT. so let's go back why do yo…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:05 PM
1

It can be if you chose to see the world through a particular lense. No, it's explicitly an abuse tactic. That's what DARVO is. A way for abusers to disempower their victims. If you're not accusing me of abuse, then use a different term. Still not answering the questions I answered literally every one of your questions, in meticulous detail. Ok so I'm a rampant mysoginist, trump supporting racist, kavanagh loving rape apologist. Funny that you keep accusing me of DARVO and "reframing" when you ar…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 12:46 PM
1

DARVO is an abuse tactic. By accusing me of DARVO, you are accusing me of abuse.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 12:37 PM
1

Deny attack victim reverse offender. Yes, I know what DARVO means. That's why I was poking fun at you. For accusing me of abuse for replying to you on the internet. It's amusing. Yes you're doing exactly that, derailing the conversation Derailing a conversation is not abuse. trying to bring it back onto your terms Trying to bring a conversation back to my terms is not abuse. playing the victim because nobody accepts you're in a relationship Arguing with you about my relationship status us not ab…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 12:35 PM
1

There is no attack other than to say you try to convince me too much how happy you are, if you're actually that happy pointing out the pick me women you clearly hate on so much wouldn't even feature on your radar. That's ridiculous. Yes, people in the first flush of romance have no time for politics or social media nonsense, but that's not me. I'm in an established relationship. We've been together for years. Life goes on as usual. I'm doing all the same things I did before the relationship, I j…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 11:54 AM
0

The idea that the result, the issue, is gendered because of the assumption that women and men rape for different reasons No, that very definitely isn't the assumption. The assumption is that men and women experience these problems in different ways. For instance, women who are raped have greater fear of unwanted pregnancies and STDs. Men who are raped have greater fear of being forced to pay child support. This is the same essential problem, but it manifests in gendered ways. It is a gendered pr…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 10:43 AM
0

Re-read the comment you just replied to.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 10:26 AM
0

A person reports a crime to the police. The police search for evidence. If they find a lot of evidence that feels pretty solid, they take the case to court. The court hears evidence from the prosecution and from the defense. If the prosecution makes a case that seems utterly airtight, the court will convict. If the defense manages to introduce even a whiff of reasonable doubt, then the court will acquit. The vast majority of criminal cases do not end in a conviction. This does not mean that all …
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 10:20 AM
1

Okay, cool.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 10:09 AM
1

So you are saying that Court will acquit a person when they have a REASONABLE DOUBT / EVIDENCE that CRIME HAS NOT HAPPENED. No. You don't need evidence that a crime hasn't happened in order to acquit. That is not how the legal system works.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 10:09 AM
1

Okay, but do you understand the difference between these two statements: There are multiple cases of Indian courts convicting men of rape without good evidence and Indian courts do not require evidence to convict men of rape You get that these are two very different statements, right?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:55 AM
1

Sure you are, I believe you believe you are. Yes, I am. We've been living together for two years. We're planning to get married. It's the best relationship of my life, by far. I had no idea love could feel this good. I'm sorry my happiness is upsetting to you. I'll just leave it at that, nobody as bitter and angry at women who enjoy and like being with men is in a happy relationship. I'm not bitter and angry at women who like being with men. Seeing happy couples is my favorite thing in the world…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:32 AM
0

And are you starting to understand why that's a ridiculous reason to believe that Indian courts have dispensed with evidence completely?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:14 AM
1

Especially the one where you thought I was homophobic For the last goddamn time, I didn't think you were homophobic. But you lost all credibility the minute you admitted to believing I was homophobic. Oh my God.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:13 AM
-1

It's embarrassing that you need to have this explained to you.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:11 AM
1

As to whether or not a CRIME HAS TAKEN PLACE, you complete and utter retard.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 09:10 AM
0

The way it works is that it requires a preponderance of evidence to convict somebody. If there exists reasonable doubt, you acquit. I can't believe I need to explain this to you.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:58 AM
-1

No, I didn't, because if you need to have that explained to you, you aren't smart enough to understand the answer.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:57 AM
-1

The BBC is a credible source. You don't have to like their editorial slant, but calling them not credible as a news source just makes it clear you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:56 AM
1

Okay sweetheart. Let me break this down for you. Rejecting someone as a sexual partner is not slut shaming. You can reject anyone, for any reason. It isn't slut shaming to reject a man. It isn't slut shaming to reject a woman. It also isn't slut shaming to shame people for engaging in inappropriate sex, like sex with children, or sex with unconsenting people. When you made your OP, it wasn't clear whether or not you were doing this, because you were intentionally vague with your language. What I…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:54 AM
1

You are literally too dumb to have a conversation with. There's no way to explain anything to you, because you'll just forget everything that's been said the second the conversation progresses. I'm in awe at the shallowness of your memory.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:42 AM
-1

Yes, I did. It talked about cases being dismissed because of a lack of evidence. Maybe you should read the whole article and not just the first three or four paragraphs.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:33 AM
1

You are a moron.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:24 AM
-2

Tell you the difference between a person who hasn't committed a crime, and a person who hasn't been convicted of a crime? Are you serious? You genuinely don't understand the difference between those two things??
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:24 AM
0

You have expressed no judgement with me having an elimination criteria for men who go against my definition of a virtuous man. Correct, you are allowed to eliminate anyone from your pool of suitors for any reason. Yet you keep expressing how it's wrong for men to reject women that go against their definition of a virtuous woman. Oh really? Where did I do that?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:22 AM
-2

Is... is that a serious question? Do you genuinely not understand how the judicial process works?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:21 AM
1

Gay sex ? How does a man become a slut for having gay sex unless he isn't cheating on his wife or girlfriend? Stop being homophobic... I'M not being homophobic. I was saying that for all I knew, YOU were being homophobic. Jesus Christ, you're slow. Sex with kids? Animals? Bruh that's not even slutty at this point. That's just crossing the lines of basic humanity. Oh my God. Why are you so bad at following conversations. My values for the type of man I want aren't that he shouldn't have had pre-m…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:20 AM
-5

The official government data shows conviction rates, not false allegations rates. It's embarrassing that you don't understand the difference between these two things.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:17 AM
-1

Funny how you yourself believe that you're slut shaming men, and yet you've somehow managed to convince yourself I'm the asshole here. Hey honey, if you think you've been slut shaming men, how about you stop doing that?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:03 AM
1

Because you spoke about men in only the vaguest terms. You spoke about "certain preferences" and sex that you "don't approve of". That could mean fucking anything. Gay sex, premarital sex, sex with children, sex with animals, sex with dead people. Some sexual acts are absolutely fine to discriminate against.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:02 AM
-3

The evidence is literally in the comment she's replying to.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 08:00 AM
-3

All those guys has been jailed & went into court as rapists. Yes, that's what happens when you are accused of a crime. You go to court. Would you rather do away with that system? Just lead people straight to the gallows when they're accused of a crime? Is that what you're advocating for here? Ruturned to their home as victims of false allegations.. No, they weren't. You don't seem to understand the difference between "falsely accused" and "not convicted". I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that …
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:59 AM
0

Yes, and that definition of "virtue" explicitly shames women who engage in premarital sex. That's what you're doing right now. Shaming women who have sex. The thing you said was bad to do.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:54 AM
1

I will disregard everything you've said, simply because you think you have the skills and education to dictate when something is pathological, like throwing the word abuse or narcissistic about lol, are you genuinely unfamiliar with the concept of colloquial speech? Did you think I was using the word "pathological" in a clinical sense? Do you think everybody who uses the word "narcissistic" is referring to an actual medical diagnosis? You understand that words can have different meanings in diff…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:53 AM
-13

It's "official data" that doesn't say anything about the prevalence of false rape allegations. I'd make fun of you for providing a twitter post containing a photo of a letter as though it were compelling evidence, but it's obviously real. If you were going to fabricate evidence, you'd probably fabricate evidence that actually supported your case.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:37 AM
0

Well yes. All that is necessary to disprove your claim that Indian courts have dispensed with due process is to provide one case of an Indian court respecting due process. That's how logic works. Okay, I'm gonna find more evidence when I've time. No, don't do that, you'll just open yourself up to confirmation bias. No matter how many cases you find of Indian courts ignoring due process, those cases still only amount to anecdotal evidence. They don't tell us anything meaningful about the general …
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:33 AM
1

But you are shitting over a woman's choice. Yes, I am shitting over a woman's choice. Just like how I'll shit over a woman's choice to go stop washing her hair, or blow her nose at the dinner table, or wear velvet tracksuits. Some women make choices that deserve to be shit on. In order for a woman to be wife and mother if that's what she craves then naturally she's going to crave the attention of men All women enjoy receiving positive attention from men. That isn't something that merits criticis…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:22 AM
1

A single miscarriage of justice is not evidence that Indian courts have completely thrown out due process when it comes to rape cases. By that logic, no court anywhere in the world requires evidence to convict anybody of anything.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 07:14 AM
-1

Unless you aren't shaming women that don't do this, why aren't you allowed to have your own preference? Because they usually are shaming the women who don't do this. Look at this thread. Most of the men here are calling sexually active women sluts. You yourself shamed those women in this very post, by equating virginity with virtue.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 06:32 AM
0

I mean, I'm not sure where to start. I've provided sources debunking your claims, and they just kind of seem to bounce off you. I've shown that Indian courts do in fact require evidence in rape cases, and that the rate of false allegations in India is well below 70%. You seem to have no good sources for anything you believe, and yet you refuse to believe claims that are well sourced. I'm not sure how someone like you can be convinced, to be honest.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 06:09 AM
-2

You are embarrassingly ignorant.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:29 AM
-6

That's data on conviction rates, not false allegations.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:16 AM
-24

Twitter as evidence 😂😂😂
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:16 AM
-1

[citation needed]
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:58 AM
-1

"Officer, this powerful man raped me."
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:55 AM
-26

False rape cases 80%. No, they aren't.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:51 AM
0

The false accuser (or any accuser) has always more power than the accused (because she is a woman and can get sympathy from judges and society). This is an incredibly simplistic understanding of power dynamics. "Sympathy" is one of many axes of power, and not even one that's common to all women or to all courtrooms. No one would accuse someone with more power or connections. This is just flatly untrue and reveals your extreme ignorance on the subject of false allegations. It's becoming increasin…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:48 AM
0

If the man pressurises them into withdrawing the case they can just destroy his life by suing him for pressurising. If a man is powerful enough to pressure you into withdrawing a valid criminal allegation, then pursuing him in civil court is a very stupid idea. Also in a false claim the power is in the hands of the woman so she can decide wheather she wants to withdraw it or not. This an utterly bizarre thing to say. Why is a false accuser any more powerful than an honest accuser? When somebody …
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:31 AM
0

You very clearly have terrible trolldar.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 04:26 AM
1

Dude, you just edited to add the reasons. No, I didn't. If I'd edited the comment it would have an asterisk next to the time code, like this comment does. Also I read that but they can sue the man for presusurising to withdraw claims and everyone knows if the man's family has power to pressurise they also have power to destroy their lives once the cases are withdrawn I have literally no idea what this sentence is supposed to mean.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:49 AM
1

...are you serious? I literally just listed two reasons why somebody might drop a valid case. Did you not read the comment you replied to?
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:42 AM
-6

That very clearly isn't true: The evidence from the Commission for Women is in fact far from conclusive. It classes as "false" all reports of rape that were dropped before they reached court, without analysing the reasons why. So it doesn't distinguish between cases dropped because it was clear the woman was lying and those where a woman was put under pressure to withdraw her claim - or where there was simply insufficient evidence to build a strong case. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-3879645…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:36 AM
-6

56% of the rape cases have known to be fault That's not true: But when a body called the Delhi Commission for Women published a report in 2014 describing 53% of rapes reported in the city the previous year as "false" this was seized upon by men's rights activists as evidence that the legal changes and noisy public debate had ended up making victims out of men. [...] The evidence from the Commission for Women is in fact far from conclusive. It classes as "false" all reports of rape that were drop…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:34 AM
-15

Rape laws never require the victim to provide evidence. That isn't how the judicial system works.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:29 AM
-4

That isn't true.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:28 AM
0

I know you didn't say it. It's the logical conclusion of the thing you did say. If something that can happen to anyone isn't a gendered issue, then there are no gendered social issues. Homelessness, workplace accidents, and prison rape can happen to anyone, so I guess they're not men's issues.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:24 AM
1

women don't need evidence to accuse a man of rape Nobody needs evidence to accuse anyone of rape in any country. Compiling evidence is the job of the prosecutor, not the plaintiff.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:22 AM
-26

And the #marriagestrike campaign started when martial rape was made illegal So the feminists in the OP are right to call these men rapists then. Thanks for the context.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 03:19 AM
5

Happens to the best of us.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 02:18 AM
0

By that logic there are no gendered social issues.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 02:10 AM
3

"Modern feminism" is a meaningless term. "Modern feminism" isn't one thing, it's dozens of competing branches of ideology with opposing dogma that generally all kind of despise each other.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 02:03 AM
-1

Being raped, assaulted, and body shamed is not a gendered issue at all Yes, it is. It's a problem that manifests in different ways and to different extents for men and women. That makes it a gendered problem. When a man is abused by his girlfriend, he’s screwed because not many domestic abuse shelter accept men and the moment he defends himself, HE becomes the perpetrator Right, and this makes it a gendered problem.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:58 AM
3

The gender dynamics in the Middle East isn't something ordinary Westerners can just "help out" with. It's an incredibly delicate, multifaceted, complex problem that requires extremely precise solutions from governments, community leaders, and institutions. When ordinary Westerners try to "help out" with things like this, they usually just make them worse.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:55 AM
-10

It's a troll. I can't believe I need to explain this.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:21 AM
1

The fact that this even needs to be stated is embarrassing.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:19 AM
-8

wow, it's almost like it's an obvious troll...
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:17 AM
1

This is a (much) less funny version of a Noel Coward joke.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 01:13 AM
1

Ok so you're saying that a woman who wants to be a wife and mother and does what she has to in order to become a wife and mother is insecure. No? That's not what a pick me is. A pick me is someone who craves male approval, not someone who craves any particular lifestyle. You seem very confused by some pretty basic terminology. Wow, way to shit all over the choices of other women, I think it very telling about feminism when the claim is that's its about choice 1) I didn't shit over anyone's choic…
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 10:44 PM
0

A pick-me is someone who wants to be picked, not someone who gets to be picked. It means insecure and needy.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 01:04 AM
1

80% of short men are angry and insecure. Obviously it would lead to less desirability. That and the other stereotypes going around.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 05:05 PM
1

And no mercy either for BW, they made themselves undesirable. If dark-skinned women made themselves undesirable, so did short men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 05:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter