TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BritishHobo Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by BritishHobo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

Spammed a resource for rape victims with false accusations... to prevent it from bein g spammed with false accusations. Essentially they fucked up an outlet that could have massively helped male rape victims, to pursue a vendetta against some feminists they'd completely made up. Sillymod is now pretending that everyone involved was just a troll from outside the subreddit. This is unprovable, which is handy, because he has none. It's a made-up defence presented as a legitimate one. Pathetically s…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:27 AM
3

Awfully convenient that you can claim that nobody in your sub had any responsibility for a front-page post. Based on hearsay and assumptions, it was probably definitely absolutely the work of some totally unspecified and unknown trolls, and neither you nor your users have to face up to any responsibility for a horrible witch hunt that got hundreds of upvotes, along with comments from regular users. Fucking shameless. You're a coward for passing the buck here and making up a defence for your user…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:55 AM
2

It's ironic, given that that video is very balanced in allowing different viewpoints towards Reddit, and yet the comments are just people whining and crying that a viewpoint they don't like was included. Balance isn't support, it's just not being totally, idiotically one-sided.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:55 PM
9

"Three videos in a year" is and continues to be a dishonest way to present the circumstances. The funding began a year ago. Add the length of the fundraiser, the fact that creation of the product doesn't begin until the money comes through and isn't instantaneous, and the start date for release of her project is far closer than a year ago. Also your criticism 'apparently Sarkeesian needs OVER AN HOUR to decide that the Damsel in Distress trope "needs changing"' shows a fundamental misunderstandi…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:24 PM
1

Why is it that you credit an unexplained /r/bestof ban to "liberal/progressive behaviour" and use it to explain your move away from that group?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 06:25 PM
1

So wait, when someone calls you out for suggesting harming innocent people as revenge for innocent people being harmed, your defence is 'Well a movement that I am against entirely does this sort of thing*, so it's fine for me to do it."? Are you... are you serious? *they don't
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:34 AM
1

To be fair, do you not see the irony in, in response to a couple of internet stories about some women stereotyping men, slowly becoming terrified of all women because you think it's very likely that they will lie about rape or get you arrested for paedophilia? What's the difference between you and them? You're both making snap judgements about people of the opposite gender based on fear-mongering and emotive anecdotes.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:32 AM
-1

Hating somebody for calmly presenting an argument you disagree is one of the fucking stupidest excuses I've ever heard. You don't hate somebody just for that, unless you have severe problems with anger.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:46 PM
4

That doesn't change the rest of my point. Apparently shaming men for not living up to the macho stud stereotype is totally fine when they're on the other side of the debate to you. You shameless hypocrites.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:18 PM
1

I love that this post accuses SRS of doing nothing but ad hominem, and yet here you guys are pulling the 'fat nerds who can't get laid!' card. You know, for a sub concerned with Men's Rights, you sure are surprisingly fine with shaming men for not being sexually active, simply because you disagree with them. Interesting that, isn't it?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:36 PM
2

I love that this post accuses SRS of doing nothing but ad hominem, and yet here you guys are pulling the 'fat nerds who can't get laid!' card. You know, for a sub concerned with Men's Rights, you sure are surprisingly fine with shaming men for not being sexually active, simply because you disagree with them. Interesting that, isn't it?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:36 PM
-2

Proof is at the top of the original post itself. edit - Oh noz, people think I'm not BAD_SEXUAL_COMMENT from [1] /r/GameofTrolls Yes, yes it is true, it is me. Going to bury my brother.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:47 PM
-4

Your article doesn't offer one shred of proof that SRS was involved. Your (impossibly thin) argument goes like this 'SRS campaigned against creepshots > a tumblr is set up to dox Redditors > SRS set up this blog, despite my article containing no proof whatsoever of even a link between users - but I will pass this off as fact anyway, because my readers will accept the baseless speculation > Chen doxxed Gawker > IT'S ALL SRS' FAULT!!' Your article doesn't support your claim, at all. Not in any way…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:02 PM
-2

The truth?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:46 PM
0

Lots of paranoid conspiracy theories based on nothing.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:11 PM
1

In other words, even when SRS didnt do it, because Chen did, SRS still did it.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:00 PM
-5

That wasn't even in any way SRS. This entire comment thread is just a string of inaccurate bullshit. Two users taunted the guy, Game of Trolls pretended to be his sister. You're all just passing off made up shit as fact to continue using SRS as a boogeyman.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:57 PM
4

Ironically r/beatingwomen is run by.. SRS. Proof?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:12 PM
13

Wow, I'm baffled. So you support Men's Rights, but you would mock and bully weak men as pathetic?
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:17 AM
1

Wow. ITT: People who have never been in such terrifying danger questioning and accusing people who have, from the safety of their own keyboard.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:20 PM
4

But I don't even understand what's supposed to have happened. People still highly upvoted the 'SRS owns beatingwomen' comment despite its total lack of evidence for the claim it touted as complete fact, and downvoted the comment that offered proof to the contrary. Are you trying to ascribe all of that to GoT?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:07 PM
7

Ohh, this is so convoluted. Which comments were the troll ones? I might have to actually commend GoT on a job well done for once, even though they still went ahead and boasted about it being fake.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:01 PM
20

Critical thinking 3/10. Aw, come on. The original comment, with absolutely no proof to back up its assertions, is heavily upvoted, and a comment that actually offers some evidence to the contrary (SRS didn't even become the community it was until a long time after /r/ShitRedditSays was created) is in the negatives. Seems massively rich to complain about critical thinking, given the open bias going on right there. I don't begrudge anyone a hatred of SRS, and I see their reasoning, but when someth…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:18 PM
-1

Well. Based on the experience of what kinds of comments a subreddit upvotes, they get angry at a specific subreddit. And even in that comment they clarify 'some of you', not 'all of you'.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:54 PM
3

By the way that linked article is one where Paul Elam smears another subreddit with absolutely no proof for his accusations at all. Given the topic he's writing about (people smearing /r/MR with absolutely no proof for their accusations at all), it's laughably hypocritical. I'm not criticizing the Men's Rights movement, but I am saying you should consider not supporting people like that.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 12:23 AM
-2

To be fair, it has made SubredditDrama create a bot in response that makes them look a bit thin-skinned and defensive. Why would they do that if they thought the first bot was having no effect?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 12:18 AM
29

There is a group of feminists who have set up a pro-violence subreddit and modeled it to appear to be MRA owned and operated. r/beatingwomen was set up by some of the same people that brought us r/SRS, an openly anti human rights group of feminists who have attempted to attack the MRM for some time. So is there any proof for this claim? I like articles where the things that are written down are backed up by things like fact and hard evidence. This is a genuine question by the way. Since you wrot…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 01:04 PM
81

There is a group of feminists who have set up a pro-violence subreddit and modeled it to appear to be MRA owned and operated. r/beatingwomen was set up by some of the same people that brought us r/SRS, an openly anti human rights group of feminists who have attempted to attack the MRM for some time. So is there any proof for this claim? I like articles where the things that are written down are backed up by things like fact and hard evidence. This is a genuine question by the way. Since you wrot…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:48 PM
5

No, you just didn't bother to write anything that someone in primary school couldn't smear in shit on a bathroom wall.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:08 PM
23

If you're arguing against SRS because you think they're stupid, why don't you at least make an attempt to try and be intelligent in your comments instead of settling for childish, sub-4chan insults? 'Pussies and white knights'? Really?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:29 AM
18

Gah this guy's views make me feel physically sick
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:34 PM
69

When people say this, it's not about whether or not they're equal in terms of history or intent or meaning, but that it's wrong in general. Hitting someone is less wrong than stabbing someone, but it's still not a nice thing to do.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:55 AM
3

It was a quick figure of speech aimed at the overly histrionic manginas that come to r/mensrights from SRS. Certainly nothing worth having a fit over. Who's having a fit? Just after reading so many /r/MR posts, I was interested to see how people thought their angry sexist insults might be taken when they consider themselves the fair and balanced ones. I'm not from SRS. Again, you ignored my question and ranted about how shitty you find r/SRS. What is it about this question that you're quite fail…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:41 AM
4

Oh okay, so it's fine to use a negative female stereotype because some of the people you're using to insult it are male, okay. So, uh, I could use the n-word if a group of people, some of whom are white, are being shitty, and I want to insult them? That wouldn't be offensive? Again, you never answered my question, you're still avoiding it.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:30 PM
5

So?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:21 PM
7

Again, all you're doing is saying 'well SRS is worse!'. I'm asking why you think saying things like 'perhaps you're all just group menstruating' is going to do anything other than make you look like a group of furious sexists?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 08:18 PM
8

That doesn't answer my question. I'm not asking about r/SRS or feminists, all you're doing is avoiding the question and say 'THEY STARTED IT!'. Besides, that only strengthens my points. If you think feminists are so batshit crazy, why don't people take the opportunity to be sane and reasonable in the face of that, instead of making clearly sexist insults?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:36 PM
14

Speaking calmly for a second, do you people really think it helps your case, do you really think it makes you look fair and balanced, and only concerned with having men's rights be equal, do you really think you're not being misogynistic, when you say things like 'perhaps you guys are all group menstruating'?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:16 PM
13

Hmm, now why do people think MRAs are a group of batshit misogynistic wankers? I mean, you all make such intelligent, constructive arguments, so it can't be that.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:13 PM
24

To be fair, the bots linking you to the SRS threads are from r/MR or other users who hate SRS.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 08:18 PM
2

Yeah, they're almost definitely not.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 04:10 AM
3

Looking like something =/= actually being something. 'Oh man, the first time I met you I thought you looked like a serial killer.' 'HEY FUCK YOU THAT'S A REALLY SERIOUS ACCUSATION'
/r/MensRights06/11/11 01:21 AM
1

But Pretty Woman is the only movie about women!
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:12 PM
1

Yeah, it came out of nowhere. Suddenly I'm picturing a terminally ill man with an abusive wife whose daughter hates him, and the story gets unecessarily depressing.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:46 PM
8

Your comment wasn't just about this case, you were talking about most abused women. So most abused women are... actually the abusers themselves? Yeah, that's not a fucking crazy viewpoint at all.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:58 PM
10

Feminist bullshit, just like Battered Woman Syndrome. You're an expert on the psychology of abusive relationships, then? All those women could happily just up sticks and leave, they just don't because... feminist... bullshit? What a fucking idiotic comment.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:52 PM
6

aww did my post get to you? Nah. Free country though bro S'why I replied.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:10 PM
6

I barely paid attention to the thread I didn't pay the thread much attention either Gawd, why aren't these well-informed opinions being upvoted straight to the top? I just can't put my finger on it...
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:27 PM
9

Well yeah, we all know there's a 'telling people' quota, and if you post on Reddit you physically can't tell the police. It's not as if she said in her fucking post that she called the police right after it happened or anything.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:26 PM
11

The political message being 'rape is bad'? Controversial.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 03:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter