TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Broke_stupid_lonely Archive

View 0 posts and 136 comments by Broke_stupid_lonely on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

No, but it's not about changing their mind. It's about changing the public's mind, and if you play into their narrative you do yourself no favors.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:15 AM
28

Because they're already attacking masculinity as violent. You don't change people's minds about that by using violence or aggression.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:46 AM
48

... Because they wouldn't spin a man tearing informational material up to be a negative thing...
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:04 AM
2

It's not surprising, just important because there's so much "Women have so many impossible beauty standards men just don't understand" going around.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:43 AM
3

That's the joke.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:21 AM
3

Just FYI, you might want to delete this and repost it with your name covered as well. Just because it's your information doesn't mean you want anyone on reddit to be able to get a hold of it.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 08:32 PM
1

Yeah get butthurt about a sexist joke. No one ever makes offensive jokes about anyone except men.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:32 PM
6

It would still be funny.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:30 PM
1

I think the joke was a reference to the this is thin privilege blog.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:22 PM
1

As well as it's effects on people's learning. Hell I don't even know what whole language teaching is right now.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:02 AM
13

I think /u/grantmoore3d could have been using the rhetorical device known as sarcasm. I am not sure thought.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:54 AM
1

No, we don't. The random people on the internet absolutely do not need to see their faces, or anything else for that matter. Would it be helpful to a jury? Yes but it's not the internet's business.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:49 PM
-2

I'm going to be the guy that says smiling != enjoying it. Just because something feels good does not mean it's not rape. Plenty of men and women experience orgasm during rape so don't read too much from a smile. Privacy of both parties is more important in my opinion.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:45 AM
4

Not women, just the way the court system works. Don't be an ass about it.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:12 AM
1

I have trouble calling a situation where you didn't want to but said yes anyways rape. Otherwise I agree with you.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:05 AM
1

At that point boys are going to be better athletes naturally, assuming all other factors are equal. So it's really not a big deal.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:32 AM
1

The men's world record for a mile is 3:43.13 and the women's is 4:12.56. Why is this so? In general boys are going to be better equipped for physical tasks than girls (we can get into the who develops faster argument later). You'd need to tell me what age these times are applied to but it was probably derived from finding the average for a ton of kids of that age for each gender, and rounding to make it pretty. I would hazard a guess that you shouldn't get worked up over this because roughly the…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:58 PM
4

I had the exact same thoughts about the PMS ones as a man. I thought they seemed more offensive towards women (PMS makes you a terrible witch).
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:31 PM
5

"Goddammit I raped another one. I don't mean to, I just can't stop!"
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:13 PM
1

Curious kids experiment with who they're exposed to. As far as we know it was a one time thing where the girl didn't even understand what was wrong. Kids aren't born with the knowledge of right and wrong, and I maintain that until you prove otherwise the kid gets that benefit of a doubt. You're right I have no information of the crime but neither do you so you can't jump to that conclusion either. And as far as I'm concerned even if she did do it maliciously she sure didn't fully comprehend how …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:51 PM
1

I also fail to see how that's legal. A 10 year old probably doesn't understand her rights and needs an adult there to ask for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:30 PM
6

Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. This is a non-issue being blown to insane proportions. There was no malicious intent and a 10 year old who has only done this once probably doesn't even know what their doing. Kids get curious, that's what happens.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:59 AM
2

That clearly was my opinion as to the meaning of the original comment.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:32 PM
0

Feelings of guild != poor decisions were made. A lot of shaming does happen and many women feel guilt and regret when they are actually raped. I have a friend who was molested as a child and often feels like it was her fault for going along with it. You can't say "you regret it so it wasn't rape because you wouldn't regret it if you didn't make the decisions." That's simply not true.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 05:12 PM
9

They are, I feel like grurul's comment was pointing out how the "everything is rape" mentality detracts from the meaning of the word and how awful the crime is.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:58 PM
1

I think rape is rape, and the more violent ones will get other charges. Well I guess that's what I meant in my head. I just think violent rape should have a greater charge than rape + assault. It seems worse to me. And that leads me to another question. Rape affects people differently. Should the overall harmfulness of the incident be taken into account? I (for religious, and personal reasons) am firmly in camp "wait till marriage" so being raped would likely bother me more than someone who hasn…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:55 AM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong but what your saying is it comes down to intent? That seems like the best criteria to me, person x slept with person y when they were both intoxicated, can't say either one meant to take advantage of the other. Person x was out looking for drunk people and picked up person y, person x was trying to find a vulnerable person so they would be guilty. For the situation you gave I would call it rape but it's not violent/agressive rape and certainly shouldn't be punished the sa…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:55 AM
5

The problem is that legally we don't really afford for gray area. What's legal and illegal needs to be clearly defined and I don't think we'll ever come up with a reasonable compromise that makes sense to a majority of the people.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:05 AM
7

This is why a designated driver is a must. They should be keeping you out of all situations that you shouldn't be in in your (drunken) state. I hate the extreme "you're victim blaming" that comes along. I think if a person chose to consume that much alcohol and made decisions in a drunken state without taking precautions (friends they trust, ect) then if they said yes it was consensual. This assumes a few things, one being that the other person has had a few drinks themselves (because I think ho…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:42 PM
3

I think you missed the point, superman is the male power fantasy (I read plenty of comics and part of it is because they do awesome shit I can't as far as I understand it that's male power fantasy) to the left, is the exact same pose in a book targeted at women, suggesting that men and women both generally like similar things. The argument being made is that it's silly to think of it as "wrong" when men do it but "right" when women do it.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:39 AM
5

You get an upvote for the picture of old school nightwing (pre-52 at least). Hell as a straight man I find him sexy.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:35 AM
-5

I think the point of that is that porn changes the perspective men have of women and makes society as a whole degrade women in general, not just the ones in porn. I recently joined nofap (I had a serious addiction and needed help, I'm not in camp superpowers) and can say that just in these past two weeks a lot of my thoughts have changed so I can see where this idea stems from.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:42 AM
-4

It does not matter how feminist see us. Like you said they will always find fault, what matters is how the rest of the population sees us and they will have the same knee jerk reaction as one would expect at gross generalizations via demeaning terms. It's not about gaining credit to feminist, because we likely never will. It's about gaining credit with the rest of the world, which as much as no one wants to admit we need their support if we want anything to change, and we won't get it by alienat…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:40 AM
26

Women are not the opposition, and if you take that approach you're going to meet a lot of unnecessary resistance and make yourself look silly. The reason MRAs are given that label is exactly because there are enough members of the MRM who do act that way (to be clear, enough can be 1 in 100 because that sort of behavior stands out and is what people will remember, but continuing to engage in such activities will most definitely not improve how we are seen.) I fully understand what /u/MaxJohnson1…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:15 AM
–

I know you're frustrated but can you please refer to them as women? Calling women vaginas is not going to improve the MRM in the eyes of the rest of the population.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:30 PM
1

The point is that whenever people come here asking for advice they are told by hoards of users to "lawyer up" and people just say that and don't give other practical advise/support. I agree that it's often a good idea but on this sub it's repeated so often it's lost some of the meaning if that makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:04 PM
3

Lawyer up is the go to response here when people have problems.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:06 AM
2

vaginaless? huh.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:41 PM
–

I like you. I don't want people to say "sorry these women make us look bad." Rational people can differentiate between a group of people and outliers and I don't think anyone here assumes all women are that jaded. And your analogy was perfect. I was about to reply with the same one and saw you had already done it.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:43 AM
4

Yeah I'm gonna need a source...
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:37 AM
6

skinny has not always been what is attractive. That is a societal issue mostly. Also, what the fuck does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:37 AM
90

Friend of mine got charged with manslaughter when he was in a wreck that killed his passenger. He got 18 months. Same county as this story actually.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:08 AM
2

Only a sith deals in absolutes.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:53 PM
1

Noisy minority is what I like to think of.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:52 PM
6

No, his rights should be waived because he's a rapist.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:57 PM
18

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:54 AM
-1

That's what I was saying, it seems like every time I see workplace deaths brought up in this sub though it's "Men have it so bad, look what society is doing to us" which is what I have a problem with. I also have a problem with the "Women make less, look how bad we have it" argument. And I do think it's stupid that these roles are still around, but they aren't law and people are free to make their choices.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:32 PM
12

You hit the nail on the head. Why is it that when women make less and complain it's because they made the choice to go into a lower paying field, but when men die at work it's the world against us? The fact that more men die at work because men generally choose to work in more dangerous fields because they have greater rewards is no more sexist than women being paid less because they tend to choose safer jobs.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:34 PM
2

Edit: Haven't you seen kids holding signs that say "I skipped school and this is my punishment" and all that stuff? Is that really that bad of a punishment? All it is is shaming them for what they've done and perfectly acceptable. It's not like they didn't deserve punishment. Come on now.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:54 PM
-2

Also, whenever parents punish their kids by making them hold signs by busy intersections saying "I'm such a terrible kid ect. ect." It's considered decent parenting (by most people in my area at least, I can't speak for elsewhere.) So maybe shaming is the right word, after all he is deliberately bringing attention to something shameful the woman has done.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:01 AM
1

By that logic people who go to jail after making tons of money should be in penthouse prisons.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:51 PM
1

chael is talking about when it comes to the court. Facts are the only thing that belong there.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:01 PM
1

The problem with that is then the public thinks more along the lines of OJ and less along the lines of turns out they were innocent.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:12 PM
1

Wow, I have never thought about police using it as a way to detain almost anyone. That is marginally terrifying actually.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 11:50 AM
1

Yes I honestly think we should be allowed to, because I think what will be found is that it comes down to individuals. The studies would have to be unbiased and repeated across a broad range to ensure accuracy but if that can be achieved I see no reason why all these factors couldn't be considered. And naturally if an individual demonstrates that they are an exception to the group they fall in their rates would then need to be adjusted accordingly, all this research would go for starting costs o…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:54 PM
1

Compensation should be the accuser's responsibility. Also, why not full anonymity for all people until they have been convicted?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:24 PM
3

I would agree that if you could control for all other variables that if the finding was that a certain race was worse then it would be perfectly justifiable to charge more for that.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:05 PM
3

I didn't say it makes sense or is right, but that is the practice in many cases. Either way, statutory rape can be applied in cases where it is silly to as well.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:54 PM
4

I would think that the suspension would be kind of necessary, I would want some time off after that, I can imagine it to be quite stressful.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:50 PM
8

It's partially true though. Who in their right mind would call an 18 year old who had sex with their 17 year old girlfriend a child molester? Yet this is how prosecution see's it all the time. She's a minor, minor=child, he's an "adult" therefore child molester.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:41 PM
7

A 17 year old girl in most cases is considered the same as a 10 year old girl. FTFY
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:40 PM
24

This is a massive problem. It's statutory rape because even if they say yes they were coerced by the older person because the younger doesn't fully understand what is going on. Unless it's a boy of course, since they are all sex craved monsters they would always say yes so they can't be raped.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:38 PM
1

Same reply I gave to another. The above comment was loaded with sarcasm.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:28 PM
3

That post reeked with sarcasm. Sorry, thought it was obvious.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:24 PM
2

But economic stimulus bill for women would help them get better jobs and finally be equal to men.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:19 AM
2

Having separate places for male and female victims of domestic violence does make sense. Those people could be unstable after their abuse and that could potentially cause problems.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 02:12 AM
1

But what other weapons do we have?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 11:48 PM
4

I think telling them that you think it's better that an innocent woman go to jail than someone like Casey Anthony go free would be the best counter argument. All of a sudden when they are the ones facing jail for something they didn't do it's a different story.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:11 PM
4

Regarding the police not having enough evidence ect.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:05 AM
-22

Before we go blaming the police for their inaction...
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:40 AM
117

Saw this on justiceporn, was about to do a x-post. I sure hope he does successfully sue them for something for the attempted libel. Hopefully being videotaped and showing how easily some women can ruin a man's life will help gain traction for anti-false rape actions.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:33 AM
1

There were none that I could find. The article was written 5 years ago, which is like a billion in internet years. This is a matter of "I hear about this crap all the time, but don't have any actual evidence right now."
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:21 AM
2

Are there sources for when these things actually happened? I'm sure it's mostly true, but I would like to see documented evidence ya know?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:42 AM
6

And that's where normal people would say "this is ridiculous." Seems like the consensus here is that the school discipline system is jacked up.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:52 PM
1

I think in this case though it was the only way to stop the problem. Unfortunately this mentality has been over done and lead to extreme reactions in many other ways.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:08 PM
31

This is exactly what would happen.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:44 PM
7

This makes so much sense, why can't everyone think rationally.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:43 PM
9

That's the policy at my school, because they had way too many people abuse the right in the past. I don't really see it as a problem. Some of this zero tolerance is bullshit though. A friend of mine was expelled for having a paintball gun in his car on school property. Had to go to a private school for the remainder of his junior year and had a hell of a time getting in as well.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:39 PM
1

When I worked at sonic, I made the highest tips out of anyone there, by quite a bit actually. I was the only one at the time to skate, and I think that made the difference for me. Other than that the girls made more than they other guys.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:18 AM
0

It should be.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:12 AM
2

Bingo, businesses are free to do as they please, and they should be. If they practice something you find immoral don't purchase from them.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:06 AM
1

This right here. It's a private business and they do have the right to hire whoever they want or don't want for whatever reasons. It may suck sometimes but I don't think the law should step in here.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:05 AM
5

When it is just one person's word against another it would have to be thrown out. Can't be making judgement on hearsay. Have to have witnesses if the genetic material isn't there, or else we have no evidence in either case. As far as proving false accusations, finding motive, any of the text that say "if you don't do this I'm claiming rape", or confessions from the people close to the accuser could hold water.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:58 PM
2

Seeing as I think the punishment for false accusations should be as severe as the punishment the accused could have received, I think it should be difficult to prove that the accusations were false, as much as the original defendant has the right to "Innocent until proven guilty."
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:01 PM
1

The first time she accused someone she was 13, probably not malicious at that point, just ridiculously unstable. Not to mention can you really give a 13 year old jail time for that?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:19 PM
8

Where I stand, there should have to be as much evidence proving that the accusations were deliberately false to convict the accuser that there should be to prove that the man was the rapist. That way not everyone can cry "false accusations, burn her in hell!" when there was either not enough evidence against the man, or she actually was raped and had for any reason identified the wrong person. I believe that will not discourage actual rape victims from coming forward, and if we make all trials c…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:14 PM
22

Yeah, it's like "Hold on with your real problems, I have some fake ones to cry about."
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:09 PM
1

Notice I never said that it is correct, but that is the view society has. Are you really going to argue that women are stronger than men? Take a look at every track record, or weight lifting record, or pretty much any athletic record ever and you will find that men have done better in nearly everything. This is biology, men are naturally stronger. There can be women who are stronger than some men but in general it doesn't happen. Also, you have not explained how a women is more capable of fendin…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:51 AM
2

Explain to me how a woman is better able to fend off attacks. I am aware that a man is more likely to be targeted, but the potential damage for a woman who is attacked by a man than a man who is attacked by another man is much greater, given that all other things are equal, simply because a man is more likely to be physically stronger than a woman.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:38 AM
3

Sticker price is the same, but there are automatic, non-competitive scholarships worth a total of about 2 thousand dollars for all females pursuing an engineering degree.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:07 AM
4

Agreed, he really isn't doing anything to help the MRM with these arguments. Merely fueling the fire of hate and misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:38 PM
2

This is my girlfriend exactly. Her parents are paying 100% of her college, just so she kills time while I go to college. Honestly we were both raised fairly traditionalist so this doesn't bother me that much but it is odd that her brother was pushed to the military so he could start working immediately yet she is having everything covered to get a degree that she openly admits to not planning on using (her parents accept that.)
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:22 PM
1

So make every application anonymous, and then the bias goes away. If they picked essay number 6 as the best one, then if essay number 6's writer was a hispanic, black or other minority be they male or female then they are the most qualified, and if that person happens to be a white male then they got in on their own merit not for being a white male.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:04 PM
10

This right here, how is it anonymously if they are given their names? For a scholarship I applied (engineering school) for you were assigned a number and that was all you put on anything, that way to process was as fair as possible and based on merit alone.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:57 PM
1

I think it's fine, but has a woman who recently gave birth tried it to confirm that this machine is anything similar? Honestly I would love be able to do it and at least know what women are talking about.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:57 PM
5

This actually kind of makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:29 PM
0

I didn't say that everyone should cut their kids off at 18, just that it shouldn't be so unacceptable to do so. As someone else said, my parents are letting me stay at their house rent free, let me use the washing machine, eat free, and electricity/internet access, so it's not like I'm completely on my own anyway.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:48 AM
58

I noticed dad was not mentioned anywhere...
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:00 PM
5

I have heard this as the explanation for homophobia. "How dare a man act like a woman, women are awful and why would he act like that? We can't have men acting womanly, it will weaken our power!" /sarcasm
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:00 PM
14

I was wondering this as well, does he ever get the chance to try and do "boy things?" I played with dolls as a kid and did get made fun of for it but I was a kid and shrugged it off, but I also had my construction set and toy guns.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:59 PM
3

My parents have the means to pay for my college (although things would be mighty tight if they did) but are leaving that for me to pay. Honestly I don't see it as their responsibility. I don't think the parents should be held to pay for their kids college, after all they are an adult now right?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:46 PM
5

But it's a priority that he gets out so he can start working to pay back that debt.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:38 PM
-3

This may be true but is not their intent, and like I said, the real problem here is what they identify themselves as. Personally I like "equalitarians" because there's no sex based bias there.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:39 AM
-5

No, I meant that feminism is defined as a group as the hate filled misandrist. Meaning the "good feminist" are not aligned with feminism at all, and should be called something else. I'm not sure how else to say anything, to me it seems like we are saying the same thing and I'm just making it sound weird.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:22 AM
-6

I believe that's what i just said, in a much shorter version. Individuals =/= group, and their individual ideology is fine but they are not practicing what feminism as an institution is defined as. So these as I called "good feminist" earlier are actually just people pushing for equal rights.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:03 AM
-16

What I got from this is that because in general feminism is crazy that people with actual goals should not call themselves feminists? I can go for that.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:26 AM
-25

Not all feminists are that way. It's just the radical ones stand out more. Kind of like not all males are rapist but because there are some rapist they stand out and make everyone look bad. It sucks but that's how it is.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:41 AM
1

Good ol' magic.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:34 AM
2

A girl who graduated from my high school set the record for the most push ups in a minute at the police department where she went to work, beating her brother's previous record by five. Of course she was an Olympic gymnast it's still pretty damn impressive if you ask me.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:36 PM
3

Yes definitely joking, the crazy ones think anyone not as radical as them aren't "real" feminists.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:09 PM
1

two tits good, vagina better.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:39 AM
4

Yes but the ones receiving the death threats aren't real feminists anyway...
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:39 AM
1

I received it recently in the us, my doctor said HPV had been linked to testicular cancer or something like that. Ask your doctor about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:38 PM
3

I'm not sure you understand the goal here.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:26 PM
1

This can clearly be seen when you compare mine and my girlfriends finances. Take a guess at whose are in order...
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:24 PM
2

Unfortunately women can say the same about us. =/
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:22 PM
2

All the shaming that is constantly going on, because I have the same body parts as that dude that kidnapped and raped those people I am a potential rapist as well and should not be trusted. Simply ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:20 PM
-2

So glad I read this comment, as someone who has been in a relationship for almost 3 years and plans on getting married once we're financially stable (still in college, got a few years.) this article made me cringe. Your comment is a small thing but it was encouraging to hear "Yes bad things can happen but it doesn't have to be that way."
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:27 PM
2

Male in college and I carry pepper spray with me because my school (a community college in a big city) has a lot of crime reports. Given that I have night classes I prefer to have something with me just in case. the difference is I am not immediately suspicious of every person standing around outside. Doesn't hurt to be cautious.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:09 PM
1

It could be criminal damage of his own property anyway. If he put any sort of money into that car.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 01:06 PM
2

Yeah, if the men's rights movement had a picture of this in reverse... Oh the hell we would catch.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:02 AM
3

Well I guess when I said "feminist" I actually meant "anti-male" but couldn't think of any other way to put it.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:57 AM
1

Ok I might be naive but is there a way to have the fetus implanted into a surrogate mother or does that only work with artificial insemination?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:39 PM
1

It is half his child.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:36 PM
2

I can just imagine how this would go down. Me: "Typical woman, no job and makes her husband work long hours so she can buy shoes. Can't even get the freaking dishes done." Her: "How dare you! You need to learn some respect and stop being so bigoted!" shudder I don't know if I want to stoop to that level.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:04 PM
3

What is two party consent?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:42 PM
2

Correct, at this point my dad's decided it's easier to just ignore most stuff.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:41 PM
15

Well it's not normal exactly, but it obviously wasn't intended for sexual reasons. Neither party knew what they were really doing.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:06 PM
13

18, final year of high school.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:47 AM
4

That's what I thought at first too.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:08 PM
1

Gotcha, I misread your comment apparently.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:15 PM
11

That's what infuriates me. All men are made out to be monsters because of the one guy who did hit his partner.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:38 AM
6

I believe that's what this thread is about. Women get drunk and have consensual sex in their drunken state and can call it rape the next morning, but a man can't. How was I not clear in what I was saying?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:06 PM
5

Bingo, did not give them the right to steal the car, but did make it easier and harder to resist.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:47 PM
3

In what way? They made the decision to drink, they then made the decision to drive, leading to a wreck. A woman chooses to go to a bar, and chooses to drink alcohol, and then regrets the decisions SHE made while intoxicated. The only difference is she became the victim of her decisions rather than an innocent motorist, and all of a sudden none of the blame is hers. In the event that she's roofied or whatever all bets are off, but everyone is aware that alcohol affects judgement, and should be pr…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:43 PM
14

Then don't get trashed. By that logic we shouldn't hold drunk drivers responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter