TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BryceHoerenberg Archive

View 1 post and 49 comments by BryceHoerenberg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Social IssuesBryceHoerenberg/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Cool, so we agree that there are double standards for men that hurt men. Cool. I’ll count that as a win for both of us :-). Wanting to control others is a larger philosophical problem with humanity. I think where a lot of people go wrong is joining on to a larger mob to achieve that goal. In this case, it’s feminism, but it could also be joining a political party or any other group. People sometimes feel powerless in their situation. They want things to be different. But because they don’t know …
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:12 PM
2

I’m not all-or-nothing — either with her or against her. I have to agree with other things that somebody says. I’m not being mind tricked. Godwin’s law applies.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:38 PM
-9

This article in particular is not doing that. The author addresses what she perceives as a rigid gender role for men. I agree, she’s right. Men are judged under different standards than women are. It’s unfair and harmful. Can you think of a situation where “a woman complained“ resulted in problems for the person being complained against because of gender roles? Where the person who complained of a problem was a petite, innocent-looking woman and the accused a large man? Imagine a woman going to …
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:23 PM
1

My question “How do you feel about mothers who become aroused during breast feeding?“ is not delusional. It contains a scientifically evidenced, established fact. You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not entitled to your own facts.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/09/19 02:02 AM
1

… And a large number of mothers get sexually aroused breast feeding. That’s not just “feeling good“, it’s sexual arousal. Search, everyone: breastfeeding sexual arousal Some mothers may feel shame resulting from this pleasure. I’m not passing judgment; just asking how other people feel about it.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/09/19 01:44 AM
-2

That does not address the question.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/09/19 05:07 AM
-4

How do you feel about mothers who become sexually aroused by their children breastfeeding, a biological phenomenon that creates a bond between mother and a child?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen03/09/19 04:14 AM
1

From Time :— “The average male specialist’s salary is now $372,000, compared to $280,000 for female specialists.” The time article omitted an important piece of information. Fortunately, they did provide a link to the referenced report, which states: With the exception of ob/gyn, women often choose to practice one of the lower-paying specialties. (Which one of the lower-paying specialties did women choose? The report does not state. I suspect that what was written in that report — one specialty …
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/08/19 05:40 PM
2

There are more female doctors than male doctors. Male doctors earn substantially more, on average. r/UnpopularFacts
/r/FeminismStopsWhen30/08/19 05:26 AM
1

Yes, that really does help. Roofies, Viagra, prostate stimulation, turkey baster — sounds totally batshit crazy. My concept of rape is generally that it’s about sexual gratification. What you’re describing is above and beyond, with premeditated intent and forced parenthood. It’s hard to imagine such evil.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:37 PM
-1

I think rape implies penetration. I can understand how a man could be forcibly anally penetrated. But how can a man be forced to penetrate someone else and cum? I feel like I need an example because I just don’t get it.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:42 AM
1

I’m probably ignorant and insensitive but how does a woman rape a man? And especially to ejaculation?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:22 AM
1

The post was not about a relationship issue. It was about an issue the double standard regarding what women expect from men. You could say it is an “issue the disproportionately affects men“.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:20 AM
4

I vote no on loose mothers
/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:54 AM
1

In Arizona, you can kill someone, get convicted for second-degree murder, and be out in 10 years. If the person lives, you only get five years has attempted murder, even though you did the same thing.) But have sex with someone as this woman did, they put you away for minimal 20 years.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 11:50 PM
1

The American criminal justice is highly focused on retribution. But how valuable is that, really? My understanding is that crime deterrence is the primary social benefit of corrections. Corrections does a few other questionable things, rehabilitation and social protection. Is society safer when dangerous criminals are locked up? How about when those “rehabilitated” individuals are later set free?
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:48 PM
0

❌ WRONG. Burden of proof is on you. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that sex among minors is generally harmful to them. Nor is there evidence that Romeo and Juliet laws result in psychological trauma, either. You have no evidence to show that voluntary sex generally harms minors, otherwise you would have presented it by now. Instead, you type emotional insults, always promising to stop but never stopping. N.B. — it’s not up to me to prove that voluntary sex among minors isn’t harmful,…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:23 PM
0

You won’t agree with the common definition of consent; can’t provide your own. (Your government info sheet is not a definition.) Still no evidence from you; only emotion.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 07:22 PM
0

consent n. permission for something to happen or agreement to do something. Where is the evidence showing voluntary, consensual sex is harmful?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:59 PM
0

❌ WRONG “Common sense” is not a valid argument. It’s a bad attempt at the appeal to popularity fallacy. Still no evidence from you. Absolutely nothing useful; just endless low-quality posts.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:34 PM
0

I understand that you’re very angry and that you would like to have me locked up. Your emotional outburst does not constitute a valid argument for anything. You learned nothing. You lost, now get lost. 😄
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:54 PM
0

Dude, face it, nobody wants it to be legal to be a pedo, and you're some kind of sociopath. Acting like I'm being unreasonable doesn't change that. "Being a pedo" is not illegal, dumbass. Nor should it be. You're way off in the weeds on tangential bullshit. ​ If someone rapes a minor (it is rape, since a minor cannot give informed consent) ❌WRONG. consent. n. permission for something to happen or agreement to do something. Informed consent is the ability to make the decision with the relevant in…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 05:23 PM
-1

❌ WRONG. You spent how long reading my posts? Five minutes? You’re going to have to spend a lot more time on it than that. You’re continuing to make accusations which have no basis in reality. This does not work well among people who actually know how to think. You seem to be too invested in your emotional reaction. Take some deep breaths and count to 10.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:30 PM
0

Hi, James Walker 43. I’m typically friendly, too. I generally meet respect with respect. I also don’t take any crap and when I am disrespected. People are generally less friendly when you come at them with baseless accusations, as that other user did in his low-quality responses. I am no different in this regard. I don’t take any crap. Additionally, I take offense to threats of violence undue use of force. Likewise, threatening to use the state (police, prosecution, etc), to limit the natural ri…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:20 PM
-1

❌ WRONG. Non sequitur. Wanting to end persecution for some thing and wanting to do that thing are distinctly different concepts. To spell it out for you… Some people like to campaign for the rights of homosexuals. These people are not necessarily homosexual. It’s the difference between “I want to do something“ and “I want people not to be persecuted for doing such things“. None of this affects when I’ve written. Again, my arguments stand on their own. Let’s just hope you don’t register to vote o…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:06 PM
-1

❌ WRONG There is no evidence to suggest that I want to fuck kids. It might be something that I want to do. Or it might not be. Either way, my arguments stand on their own. Why don’t you try doing something smart for a change, loser?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:53 PM
0

Your anecdotal evidence about your immature brother doesn’t trump the rights of free people to bodily autonomy. I would like to suggest to you: — Why don’t you try to educate your little brother? — but your demonstrated ability at thinking leads me to believe that you would be a very poor influence on him. That you would prefer to murder someone rather than to educate your little bro showcases your ability to think rationally, make good decisions, and act in a civilized manner. 13-year-old shoul…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:48 PM
-1

How did you get that the media is promoting pedophilia? The relationship and sex were evidently mutually wanted and mutually enjoyed. Why did you call it rape?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:34 PM
-1

How many cases of this do we need to showcase the fact that statutory rape laws need to end? Along with Christianity and its repressive, puritanical age of consent. The boy’s stepmother installed spyware on to his phone. He was from a broken home. His father is an angry, controlling man who has his son to call him “sir“. It is another case of failed authoritarian parenting. Perhaps the father’s control issues ruined his first marriage which probably ended in divorce. Divorce has long-term negati…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:23 PM
2

Thanks for the clarification. Funny how you get two positive karma and I get two negative karma. “We can’t explain ourselves but we’re gonna keep hating.”
/r/MensRights16/08/19 03:07 PM
-1

The female cow is lead into the cage, restrained, and anally fisted by the human. A long metal tool is inserted into her vagina to inseminate her. This is done so that the female cow can produce milk, which she will do for her baby calf. But the baby calf is not the desired result and so they are either killed or sold for veal, The mother is milked and the process is repeated constantly until the mother can no longer produce milk sufficiently, At which point she has killed. In some cases, the us…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 05:17 AM
1

You have no evidence that minors are harmed by sex. Voluntary acts are by definition non-coercive. Coercion implies the use of force or authority. Voluntary means done on one’s own free will. It is important to distinguish between abuse and willfully chosen acts. I have never argued that molestation of anyone, minor or otherwise, is a moral good. I am not using weasel words. It might help you to look up “weasel words”
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:55 PM
1

Do you have any cases of consensual, non-coercive sex being harmful to minors? I want to take a look at some cases. Do you have any evidence that we can look at?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 06:31 AM
1

Who is the one to determine who is capable and qualified to do something? Who determines who owns their own body versus whose bodily autonomy is controlled by the state? You, a random shit posting loser of Reddit? You’re the decider of when people can have sex? So far, you have not defended your position as to why it is morally wrong for 13-year-olds to voluntarily engage in sexual activity. You did not support the claim that it is impossible for them to do so. Everyone owns their own body. It i…
/r/MensRights15/08/19 05:02 AM
-1

This low-quality post does nothing but demonstrate your inability to think. kick rocks, loser.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 06:47 PM
1

Why is any person capable of consent only with people of a similar age? Is sex harmful to minors?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:55 PM
-1

Age of consent laws were not determined by us. Thus, we have not deemed that 13-year-olds cannot consent. Somebody else did that. Lawmakers, initially influenced by Christian ideology, determined age of consent as marriageable age for girls, 12. Feminist reform raised the age in the 70s. In the 90s, age of consent laws were raised to prevent teenage pregnancy (fail). In 2015, the laws were reformed to be gender-agnostic. So now, what was initially protecting chaste of girls, is applied to preven…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:50 PM
-2

❌ WRONG We have not deemed that 13-year-olds to not have mental capacity to consent. You’ve made a false assertion. Age of consent laws are arbitrary, various, and mostly ignored by minors. They do not protect minors against real abuse and coercion. They punish after the fact those who have engaged voluntarily and those who have used force or other illegitimate means.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:34 PM
0

I definitely agree with equality under the law. The disagreement is the law itself. Laws the criminalize voluntary, consensual behavior are unethical. Also, how consent is obtained matters as well. Permission that is obtained through coercion, manipulation, or deceit is not valid consent. Use of implied force creates a dilemma where it is not clear if it is OK to refuse consent to someone who might impose real or false authority. Police do it, too, and you may have seen that in few First Amendme…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:08 PM
-4

Reread sentence number two: What is consent? https://www.etymonline.com/word/consent 13-year-olds can and do consent. It is not impossible to consent to sexual activity. Only the law determines the 13-year-olds cannot consent and that is for customary sociological and political reasons.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:31 PM
-8

Consensual sex should not be illegal. Consent is determined not by age but by will.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 07:14 AM
0

Privilege is misspelled. I couldn’t read the rest of it because it was too small, but that jumped out at me.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:23 AM
3

The dialogue and delivery seems sincere
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:15 AM
7

Men having to wear a suit is just bad for everybody. It means that the office is going to be too cold and that means the women are not going to like it because they’re going to be too cold.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:00 AM
2

I really don’t know the details of the story because I wasn’t there. I’m just reading it like everyone else here. But I am acutely aware of the extreme paranoia regarding adult males and children. It is sometimes referred to as #PedoParanoia. Another way to look at it as a form of discrimination against males. A possible form of retaliation would be to assert that you’re a female. “Yes, Miss stewardess, you asked for a female to sit next to the child. I am a female. Please don’t discriminate aga…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:09 AM
2

I’ve always been intrigued by claims “we need more women in tech“. The first thing I want to ask is “we who?”. The next question I want to ask is“What are you doing?“. Often, they get confused by that question so I might have to be more explicit as “can you tell me more about your project?“. And finally, if we’ve made it this far, I ask “Why is it important that the person that you need to do the job have a vagina?“. It’s funny that the person who is claiming to need a woman in tech usually does…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 02:17 PM
1

Why would they move that man?
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:40 PM
3

The airline doesn’t have to create a social demographics map of their airline and re-organize its passengers to suit their social constructs. And they don’t have to gender match anybody – what the hell would that accomplish? Would it satisfy their paranoid fantasies and ideologies or what they go on and assume that the man will rape the young boys mid-flight or, concomitantly, the women, the young girls? Not only do they not have to do that, doing that would only get them in a legally compromise…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:15 PM
2

Pedoparanoia and sexism. They can’t tolerate that such people could be sitting together because then they might talk to each other and grown men should not talk to young children, isn’t that the social rule? The people harmed most by these paranoid fantasies are the children. Because children learn that they’re not to trust adults, not to talk to adults, and not capable of interacting with adults. Children are forced into schools, organized by age and rank, and taught compliance and helplessness…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter