TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Btuyvesant Archive

View 20 posts and 140 comments by Btuyvesant on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
266

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:26 AM
184

DiscriminationBtuyvesant/r/MensRights21/06/19 04:25 AM
158

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:29 PM
158

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:25 PM
82

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:41 AM
81

FeminismBtuyvesant/r/MensRights20/06/19 06:26 PM
57

FeminismBtuyvesant/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:20 PM
42

Btuyvesant/r/MensRights29/05/19 02:25 PM
40

False AccusationBtuyvesant/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:32 PM
40

Anti-MRMBtuyvesant/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:10 AM
28

Marriage/ChildrenBtuyvesant/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:25 PM
25

False AccusationBtuyvesant/r/MensRights04/06/19 05:13 PM
22

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:28 PM
15

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:28 AM
4

FeminismBtuyvesant/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:42 PM
4

Legal RightsBtuyvesant/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:46 AM
3

IntactivismBtuyvesant/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:42 AM
1

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:57 AM
0

Social IssuesBtuyvesant/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:23 AM
0

Btuyvesant/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/19 10:57 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

We're in the US. Arbitration, legally, is very similar to being in court. The result, with both, is "final." But, it isn't really for either of them. You can sue someone as many times as you want for civil offensives (whether they were found innocent or guilty the first time). Someone not happy with Judge Judy can do two things: Dispute the original arrangement by showing that it wasn't fair or they didn't have enough information about what it would entail to agree with it. These arguments are t…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/20 07:54 PM
0

The only part about it that's binding is, as the other commenter mentioned, the contract that you signed. You can always challenge the contract, and if new information came to light like in the example given, most courts would probably overturn the contract. That being said, he probably wouldn't feel the need to because of the benefits from going on the show in the first place.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/20 06:57 PM
2

Any of the involved parties in the examples you gave could file lawsuits, and in a court they would absolutely be thrown out. However, title 9 gives schools/universities the ability to handle these cases as they see fit: conducting their own investigations and giving their own punishments. That's why students might be expelled from school due to rape accusations for which they were found innocent or the charges were dropped. So you would never go to jail for going into the wrong restroom (unless…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:21 AM
7

Title 9 has a lot of different parts to it, your quote was just a tiny fragment of it (albeit the most commonly known one). In this context, it would be used as a sexual harassment claim, which has been successfully done in the US against boys in schools who walked in the girls bathroom while it was being used (I think it was in a state that started with an M). The point is, title 9 protects rights to privacy related to sex/gender, which would include bathrooms. Granted, this is "supposed to" be…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 10:00 AM
3

You ever been to any of the feminist or X chromosome subs? There's far more bullshit there than here. When there aren't that many allies to your cause, the few that there are get noticed more.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 11:02 PM
6

I agree that we need a link, but not because I doubt the story. Today I gave my girlfriend a hug in public and she got aggressively asked by a random guy walking by if she was okay with me touching her. This world is fucked.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:34 PM
8

Why would they offer any though, they could just call the bluff? While it's standard practice to settle for large corporations, a lawsuit of that nature would be on a local level.
/r/PussyPass21/09/19 11:50 PM
8

If this is the US (should be with dollar general) , good luck getting a court to rule in your favor.
/r/PussyPass21/09/19 11:33 PM
0

Hmm okay pc is weird.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:15 AM
23

He's referring to the fact that many self proclaimed feminists encourage misandrism and things of the like, but nobody is allowed to tell them "men aren't inherently that way" or "both boys and girls can be toxic." On the other hand, here you are commenting that on a post which exemplifies how they can make these sort of generalizations but there's an outcry from people like you when men do the same.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:33 AM
19

I fully agree with the second part of your post, the rest is BS. First, r/all doesn't get linked to this sub, especially not in a post with less than 500 upvotes (at this time). Secondly, I don't like the generalization made simply because we do have to be better than them to get others to listen, but nobody here is "upset" or "spewing vitriol." This form is solely used for discussing and pointing things like this out calmly. Edit: So apparently if you scroll really far down on PC there's a pote…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:31 AM
3

I included a note thing mentioning exactly that: a dress shirt and slacks are perfectly formal attire. Regardless I was accentuating the comments more than the post itself, the comments specified that the man is immature and pathetic for not owning and wearing a suit in particular (one with a lot of upvotes said you're not a real man if you don't own at least one dress suit, or something along those lines). I interpreted his attitude as willing to wear the slacks and shirt, but I could've been m…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:25 PM
3

But if it was blind then the mother wouldn't be able to burst into tears, get unfair sympathy from the judge, and beg to have her children. That's not a good solution at all! (/s)
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:41 AM
22

Because they are treated as such in most/many cases, that's kinda why this sub exists.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/19 03:46 AM
9

It's not criticizing the father or the mother, he's just pointing out the mentality. I didn't think twice about it when I read it and seeing this made me realize the depth of it, but I still agree with the sentiment in a way.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 03:36 AM
2

No you
/r/MensRights23/08/19 08:34 PM
4

That's not relevant, the rule is why you were banned.
/r/PussyPass23/08/19 02:54 AM
2

There absolutely is a lot, his point is saying it's not nearly as much as from r/GenderCritical. I've been in both and banned for the latter (for saying the fathers should have equal rights over children as mothers). In GenderCritical every single post is an attack on some group, MGTOW is frequented by misogynists but that's not the only thing in the sub, whilst GenderCritical is the extreme end of radical misandrism. All of these subreddits tend to be skewed and have a lot of idiots, but MGTOW …
/r/PussyPass23/08/19 01:18 AM
3

That actually goes against one of the sub rules...
/r/PussyPass23/08/19 01:13 AM
5

She was no longer a potential date as soon as she asked him what his height was.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:22 AM
10

A boy under 16 is a kid, that's pedophilia no matter how you spin it. Regardless he can't consent at that age, it's rape. Add the fact that she's a school nurse, she's around tons of kids, and has raped this one 8 times. And then she tried to pay him, bribe a minor to keep quiet about the fact that a person of authority raped him. In the other article it seems to be a drug dealer who offered her drugs in exchange for sex (which she could not consent to). One of these seems a lot worse to me, yet…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:03 AM
13

Why don't the women upvoting women show more support to the men? Neither group does, that's what the post is trying to illustrate. From your previous comment about posting in this sub, it's clear that you already have some preconceptions about what it is, but to be frank there are definitely fewer misogynists here than misandrists in r/feminism. This wasn't a "fuck women for getting more attention" post, this was "we should give men more attention" post.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:18 AM
145

It's all kind of backwards: they can be held responsible for child support if it's not their child (as long as they were in a relationship with the mother) but can be denied interactions with the child. It's stuff like that that makes me lose faith in our system.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 11:19 PM
5

Last time I checked the comments of something like that I was sad and annoyed for the rest of the week, I'm just gonna keep scrolling.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:17 AM
14

Enough is said in the title.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:52 AM
2

I just up voted because I've seen like 50 reposts of her story and didn't realize it was fake. I get that it's in the wrong subreddit, but I feel like this being exposed kinda supercedes that since this was able to reachch r/all (kinda salty as well because I believed it).
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/19 08:21 AM
1

Again case by case, 26 of the 27th deadliest ones come from a home that was fatherless at some point (with many of them being quite flexible in that). That's a nice thing to know but it's not x% of mass shooters are raised by single mothers, which is what I was hoping for. Thanks though!
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:59 PM
7

But using logic and reasoning doesn't work on many people who'd disagree with that correlation. As for the statistic, a Google search on this specifically didn't have a yield, otherwise I wouldn't have asked.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:42 AM
23

Any chance you have a statistic on that? (for future use)
/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:50 AM
2

The issue is that the USSF isn't really responsible for the bonuses, Fifa is. Asking USSF, who's already paying them more, to also pay them what Fifa is responsible for paying the men (which is more for obvious reasons), is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 09:35 PM
14

This is what you're thinking of: https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/29/u-s-soccer-federation-president-womens-national-team-losses/ The president gave those numbers and the wnt spokesperson called them a liar, nothing was verified in the article itself.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:13 AM
1

The practice at least, not the theory. Feminism is supposed to be equality for the sexes, but it's just used as an excuse for misandrist ideals. Whenever anyone tries to call that though, they're called uneducated and sexist because the definition of feminism is still equality.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:43 AM
2

I'm confused by what you mean. I'm assuming you support men's rights, hence you being on this sub. The comment to it basically says that all those who do are basically idiots, unaware of things as basic as the content of the dispensaries in women's bathrooms. Feminists are capable of humor, so they can find the scene (that the screenshot was taken of) funny, I do too. I don't view the derogatory comment targeting everyone (or at least most of the people) on this sub, in addition to many not on i…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:34 AM
2

I'm not complaining about the screenshot, I'm complaining about the comment on it.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 04:21 AM
10

The thing about the candy in itself is funny, not the comment made on it.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:20 AM
4

Dude invest in autocorrect, lol.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:50 AM
22

Some guys' punches don't hurt that much (I'm not bragging or tryna say I'm tough). If a weak dude picks a fight with me then that was his choice. He chose to assault someone clearly stronger than him. If a woman makes that choice I'ma honor it.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:40 AM
2

That was his account, which she actually confirmed. I read it in the first one that I saw linked.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:02 AM
2

I'm glad to see some people are starting to get it
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:09 AM
40

She didn't stop, she kept advancing. He even threatened to hit her and she kept going, then he ran into the car and locked himself in it to escape. Then she called the police and said he threatened to hit her.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 07:28 PM
13

Idk, if a man was making the same "advances" in this type of context I think people would be perfectly happy calling it attempted rape.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 07:27 PM
117

Of course, that's basically a natural disaster!
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:49 AM
3

-is more experienced and knows what you're talking about -your job is to tell the person what you know -you tell the person what you know -"he's MANSPLAINING!!!"
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:30 PM
5

They're meant to be tough physically, emotionally is completely different. That mindset is the issue we're facing.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 10:08 AM
6

And having resources available to you is also huge, it's harder to cope with it if everyone just tells you to "man up", "grow some balls", or "deal with it".
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:35 AM
3

It goes both ways like this: the key to every good relationship is communication in all aspects, including sexual. It is each spouse's, regardless of gender, responsibility to ensure that the other knows/does what they want/like.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:29 AM
3

That's assuming the male does do the efforts to achieve both though. In that case I would agree with you, but if the female does the effort to give the male an orgasm then it's fair and decent for him to return the favor, no? (again this is only in the case when the effort is equal)
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:27 AM
16

Also automatic water faucets in bathrooms that don't turn off and on randomly when I'm trying to wash my hands.
/r/PussyPass18/07/19 05:09 AM
1

They definitely could've handled it better, if they calmly said they paid for those seats and they're not moving from them they would've been able to keep them.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:17 PM
1

What about her?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:54 AM
1

She asked, they said no politely at first, then she called over the FA to force them to move. Not very reasonable in my opinion.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:53 AM
5

She wanted to sit somewhere that wasn't her seat, then called FAs to try to get them to make them move (which they legally can't unless they're causing a disturbance). I think he treated her rather nice tbh.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:17 AM
7

r/whoosh
/r/MensRights13/07/19 12:28 AM
1

When possible, people try to avoid committing the elderly. As far as illnesses/disabilities go, dementia isn't the most severe, and she is capable of living on her own in that state. Also, she still is an old woman, not that much of a threat to people's safety.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:04 PM
3

The memory loss from dementia is accompanied with judgement issues, I'm assuming the latter was used to say she doesn't deserve that much of a punishment (and I kind of agree).
/r/MensRights11/07/19 05:53 PM
1

So, the men make all their money by playing in games (with games being more profitable for men than women, simply because there is usually more interest and money spent on/in those games) whilst the women actually have a salary with bonuses. That makes this whole debacle even further against them, does it not? There is simply more money in men's games than women's games, with them winning/losing just deciding how much of it they get (and if the gold cup this year being anything to talk about, th…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:43 AM
1

The revenue share plan wouldn't, never said it would. I said that paying them the same as what the mens team were paid would result in it. Currently the cap on what a member of the US male team can make is 800k, there's a reason why contracts are agreed upon before the season begins. With every sport that I know of (football (American and normal), baseball, basketball, hockey, etc) performance does not negatively impact the amount you have already agreed to be paid. Under this plan, it would. Th…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:19 PM
1

So, they would earn a percentage of the amount that the team makes without salaries being deducted? Then the league wouldn't have any surplus.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:46 PM
1

Well that would depend on the specifics of that revenue sharing plan? My assumption without having heard it is that it doesn't actually account for the differences between men/women that we have such a hard time acknowledging. The men's league is quite literally far out of the women's league, men across the board (at varying levels) are paid amounts that reflect the level of competitiveness, skill, and players at that level. If the men would make more money playing for an organization that ackno…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:22 PM
2

The actual net profit of each team in 2015 and 2016 is in that article, 2017 and 2018 can be found on the USSF website in their financial section. The difference in the profit of the women's and men's teams is less than the difference in the total amount of USSF money set aside for salaries.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 08:04 PM
2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/08/are-us-womens-soccer-players-really-earning-less-than-men/ If the women's team was paid as much as their counterparts on the men's team, they would have a net loss every year instead of a net profit (with years that they win the Cup being brought down to almost no profit or under depending on how much it is that year). That's not really a sustainable model.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:39 PM
116

The judge is now facing investigation and the sentence may be reconsidered: https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/judge-who-said-drunk-driver-16122788
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:59 AM
61

But I'm pretty sure it's not rape, no matter how you try to swing it...
/r/PussyPass07/07/19 09:32 AM
3

The only way we're going to back them into a corner where they acknowledge their errors is if we confront them with how things are for us by their standards, otherwise they can justify treating us with the same disdain as we generally regard them with.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:16 AM
4

It's not complete garbage, it's just liberties being taken with the definitions and research (just like the wage gap). I'd say it was probably more like 1 in 20 for women and 1 in 40 or 50 for men off the top of my head, I forget what it actually was. Regardless of that, the point the spreading of that statistic is that by the feminist movements' own standards, men should be given the same attention.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:08 AM
3

Yeah it's the same source, that's the point.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:50 AM
0

Stand your ground is self defense, the opposite isn't true. Let's take NY and Texas: NY has self defense laws, Texas has laws that include stand your ground. In Texas if you think someone is gonna shoot you, you can shoot them. In NY, you have to be able to prove that you were in the process of being attacked.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 07:12 PM
1

If the heel hit the seat it would keep moving forward, because the heel isn't in motion down, it's in motion forward. When you get hit in the balls you USUALLY DONT REACT IMMEDIATELY. Do I need to start citing physics and anatomy papers? Not a single one of his blows was a punch, they were all open hand. The dude slapped them, which was well deserved. If he punched them that many times with the intent to harm they would probably be knocked out, he seems to be a big dude. If you insist on deludin…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 07:06 AM
2

I re-watched it again. Look around 0:02, she lashes out in between his legs with a kick. Her leg is moving quickly, then suddenly stops. HOWEVER, her leg is not fully straight, the knee is still bent a little. That means she made contact with something, and she was not able to move the other thing (given that he was sitting down fully up against the back of the seat) so her motion stopped. The foot is straight up, exactly between his legs, and stopped exactly where his balls would be. I am not r…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:56 AM
2

What are you even doing in this subreddit if you don't think men should be able to respond LESS THAN EQUALLY to women assaulting them? Also, it connected, should I screenshot that part of the video and put an overlay to show where the location of her heel had to be when her leg was fully extended? He also slid back away and attempted to close his legs after getting hit, men don't actually die after getting hit in the balls. I'm wondering if you're a male at this point, or if you've ever been hit…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:47 AM
1

No dude, you're wrong. Watch the video. Her first kick 100% connected with his groin, the others I can't say with complete certainty but they seem to have. After being kicked there, he just pulls her up and starts to walk away. She gets up and smacks him, and then he smacks her and starts to walk away again. The other woman moves forward and hits him, then he smacks her. etc etc Re-watch the video and pay attention this time.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:30 AM
7

This is the classic response that is somehow acceptable: man gets hit multiple times in a sensitive place by a woman intending to hurt him as much as possible. man retaliates lightly, clearly making sure to do no serious harm. "HE HAD NO RIGHT TO HIT HER OMG"
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:20 AM
4

The entire thing was self defense, she kept yelling at him and you can see her advancing at him right up until the end.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:17 AM
1

Stand your ground (which is a law in most southern states in the US) is different than self defense laws, which are present almost anywhere. With stand your ground, if you perceive a (lethal) danger to yourself you can respond in kind (that's more restrictive). Self defense is far more open, which is intentional so you can be judged in court. In most states in the US, the law is vaguely "if you are attacked, you may reciprocate." The limits of how far you can go in self defense are USUALLY NOT s…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:14 AM
4

That guy was clearly strong, he took several solid shots to the balls and was obviously pretty big otherwise. He open handed them far more gently than I ever would; if someone hit me there even once they would get socked. The only excessive force here is from the woman assaulting him, that should be obvious.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:05 AM
1

Umm, pretty sure they started it regardless, or at least did the worst of it. From his body language in the beginning, My guess is: he was probably stretching out or spreading his legs normally (before the video began) then they told him to get out of their space. He prob said something along the lines of "fuck off", but they kept going so he slid down a bit to cross the halfway point because they were harassing him (with the idea of displaying that he wasn't in their space, and if he was he wou…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:03 AM
8

They were touching his groin... If you don't view that as molestation, thing about if a guy touched a woman's breasts.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 05:56 AM
167

When underage males have sex with adult females (no matter whether or not the adult is aware) the adults generally aren't charged with statutory or found responsible in any way. On the other hand, when it is underage women, even if they are seeking out and lying to the adult and appear underage, the adult is found responsible. Having an 'easier' time because you're a woman is quite literally the definition of pussypass.
/r/PussyPass04/07/19 01:25 PM
9

Justice isn't blind, while there are women who are sometimes treated fairly, there are cases exactly like this one (see some other commentors in this thread) where the court just selectively ignored the evidence.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:14 PM
1

I mean, using correct flairs might help. Social issues are a legitimate issue, and the more common/everyday aspect for most people. Whilst most of it is just an echo chamber, there's always a few dissenters and a discussion happening in those types of posts. That being said, the tweet ones you mentioned are obnoxious. Conclusion: use flairs, they're our friend.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 04:06 AM
1

If he wasn't willing to reproduce and never said he was, I don't see how it's necessary to share any biological factor.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:14 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:33 AM
1

What if she told you up front she was never going to have children and would not change her mind? Would her actual ability to do so matter in that situation?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:24 AM
2

He mentioned in some comment that he had told each one when getting into the relationships that he was never going to have kids, with that statement his fertility isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:21 AM
1

I'm pretty sure I saw that once 😬
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:20 AM
1

They weren't trying to get pregnant though, his fertility was never relevant to their relationship.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:19 AM
2

The OP told the girlfriend when they were getting into the relationship he was never going to have kids with her or anyone (that was from either the original, an edit, or a comment, I forget where I read it).
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:18 AM
3

I remember one where the court ordered child support on a kid his wife had in an affair and he was called an asshole for leaving the country to avoid paying (I'd be on the fringe with that one but yeah).
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:15 AM
1

I think it's just misinformation (most media outlets try to portray vasectomies as easy and reversible - in keeping with the wave of women advocating for men getting them instead of them taking birth control). He tried to defend himself too much for it to be fake.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:14 AM
1

The problem with that sub is that it's incredibly subjective (what's posted is popular among people in the sub but unpopular with most people). It is useful for getting feedback, though I've seen a few great posts be taken down because they're voted popular.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:12 AM
1

I couldn't find the India one on Google, do you have an article or something so I can look into it?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:09 AM
1

ESH is also a judgement (everyone sucks here), I feel like in this context it'd be worth it to use. The vasectomy itself wouldn't have been a problem (reversible) if they ever decided to have children, but in a comment the OP specified that they went into the relationship with her knowing he didn't want children. In that frame, I don't think he is the asshole for not openly telling her about a specific and private medical procedure he had done long before their relationship began.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:04 AM
1

Seems about right
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:57 AM
1

It has in the past (well, a guy has been called an asshole for getting upset about his girlfriend doing exactly).
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:56 AM
5

cough cough Boy Scouts cough cough Girl Scouts
/r/PussyPass26/06/19 02:15 AM
12

That was painful to read.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 10:47 PM
4

Yeah we agree with that part, but the entire idea of toxic masculinity should also be shot down, which is what this post is trying to say. The phrase toxic masculinity in itself states that being male/masculine is toxic, the person in this post was using that to refer to a 4 year old who'd just been exposed to something new for them. I don't think anyone in this thread disagrees that everyone can polish their nails.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:23 PM
7

Commentor was referring to the "toxic masculinity" bit.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 01:14 PM
2

I believe some of the testimonies/reports included descriptions of her having sex with them / when they woke up it was clear that someone had.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:26 PM
3

"this isn't acknowledgement because that's not related to it" - It's related to it because it is an instance of abuse of a male by a female being addressed for once "anything that's man vs women is seen as a problem" - it's a problem exactly in the way and cases I've just described "90% of this sub has..."- the reason why this sub is titled men's rights is because we're advocates for men's rights, that means in relation/contrast to women's rights. The modern day feminist movement (at least in fi…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:23 AM
5

She's been indicted with crimes that had males as the victims, it's exactly it.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:12 AM
23

She said drugging + 'having sex', since you can't consent when high it'd be rape. I'm not sure if she directly admitted to that in the video but I know she said it at some point.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:41 AM
1

I meant negative in any way, MGM is a pointless procedure insofar as there are no health risks to not being circumcised (source: everywhere but US + human anatomy) whilst having the procedure serves only to reduce potential pleasure for males and make it more "aesthetic." It's performed regularly on unconsenting newborns, often without asking the parents permission. I mean that they should treat this as a violation of men's rights (right to choose to undergo an unnecessary, detrimental medical p…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 03:21 AM
58

Yeah it's all good, the response is just hostile because a lot of people don't think women can be rapists and from your comment it seemed like you were one of them (hence downvotes).
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:38 AM
91

She admitted to drugging and then having sex with (that's rape because no consent) multiple men, before robbing them, when she worked as a stripper. She stated that on live TV a couple years ago but it kind of got swept under the rug.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:35 AM
8

She admitted on live TV several years ago to drugging, raping, and robbing men. Nothing happened to her until now, and even now nothing sexual was listed in the charges. This is progress towards acknowledgment that males can be victims of females, which isn't something that has been believed for much of history (and still isn't in a lot of places).
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:34 AM
7

Rape (or anything else that's sexual) wasn't one of the charges listed, but this is progress at least.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:31 AM
1

r/madlads
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:31 PM
8

Well it's good to know that regardless of what companies and people living within the Netherlands think, it's legally prohibited. To be fair though, I presume that works in a similar way to the US: illegal but can't be challenged (e.g. Girls Who Code).
/r/MensRights21/06/19 05:23 AM
8

Your brother sounds like a boss
/r/MensRights20/06/19 06:28 PM
1

Oh, yikes. Sorry, I didn't realize!
/r/MensRights19/06/19 04:22 AM
1

Social issues are included, hence the tag to this post. Her targeting of men in her post is what I'm trying to highlight.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:50 AM
1

I just got on man 😢
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/19 12:18 AM
1

I- oof
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/19 12:18 AM
1

Yeah, I wanted to show the edited version.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 06:56 AM
1

This is an edited version: it was originally directed to men in particular, and those who spread it generally say something along the lines of "men need to learn to behave like decent human beings with common sense."
/r/MensRights08/06/19 12:12 AM
1

Well I was saying (or trying to, I'm not sure if it cam across right) originally if men in countries such as the US organized and protested in a similar way we might be able to accomplish the same things they did. First wave feminism, I'm not celebrating it, but it did get them more rights legally and put us where we are today in places such as the US (completely screwed as men). If we did the same but stopped at true equality, the end of what is considered the first wave (legal equality), that …
/r/MensRights07/06/19 10:54 PM
3

The US is the same, due process just doesn't exist in these cases.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:30 AM
1

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180510-somalia-woman-with-11-husbands-to-be-stoned-to-death-by-al-shabaab/ - separate/diffetent but 'equal' is most certainly not equal. That article is the best sum up of the middle east, in which many countries force women to cover their hair, most of their face, and their body because of "national religion," which quite a few of the women don't follow. They also are STILL unable to leave their homes without their husbands with them, are considered to legall…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:18 AM
1

Any woman close to our side is beneficial, we're not gonna make any progress unless all men work together (not gonna happen) or we get a bunch of women too.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 02:55 AM
1

Here's your one, remember this from my world history class: https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2013/jun/01/suffragette-emily-davison-knocked-down-kings-horse-video -today's society in FIRST WORLD COUNTRIES is, much of the world is not, and it wasn't in the past. If you need evidence for that as well then just Google women + any middle east country -theres effectively just as many men as women in the world, if we rally as effectively as the feminists do, we can easily affect change.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:33 AM
0

To compare it to something else: first wave feminism. When women are actually oppressed without basic human rights or rights equal to men. Many of them did lose everything, but they made that choice and sacrifice. That's something not everyone is able to do that, hopefully enough are. "the only way for injustice to remain is if good men sit back and do nothing" (amended quote)
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:23 AM
0

That's what's gotten us to this point, just sitting back and doing nothing. Nobody else is going to help us, we have to organize and do that ourselves (at the risk of being labeled neo nazi, misogynistic, white supremacists).
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:02 AM
5

Lack of (a correct and complete) education is never a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:58 AM
8

Along the lines of indoctrination, it's definitely not near the level that was implemented in Germany, but it most certainly is. Most teachers and figures in children's lives are women, which is bad enough, but when they spread propaganda and ignore men's issues, going as far as saying that men are lesser, that's HORRIBLE for young boys. Not only does it result in many believing these things, it destroys their self confidence: there's a reason male suicide rates start to increase once they reach…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:49 AM
1

Oof
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:15 PM
20

It stated men, this attitude is reflected unto men of all races, they just were specific in this one.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:58 PM
1

The American legal system disagrees with your last point.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:48 AM
1

The American legal system disagrees with your last point.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:48 AM
1

The American legal system disagrees with your last point.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:48 AM
1

The American legal system disagrees with your last point.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:48 AM
1

The American legal system disagrees with you
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:47 AM
5

"It" in this case is a very misleading statistic, I don't view reporting it to be a good thing. Fox does the exact same thing (to a greater extent) with their information. I mentioned CNN because their article is the first thing that comes up when you Google it, and I'd hoped they'd be reliable.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:58 AM
12

Because undermining due process is their intent in this case, ever heard of "believe all women?" Many people, including my high school English teacher, my mother, sister, and a few female friends blindly accept that statistic and use it on anyone who attempts to complain about the issue. Due process for males accused of anything sexual sadly just doesn't exist in first world countries today, and these news outlets can't report on that without alienating a large portion of their base supporters, …
/r/MensRights14/05/19 10:17 PM
72

CNN and most other mainstream liberal media outlets love to cite that only x% of rape accusations end in it being revealed to be false so its not a big deal: this is a VERY misleading claim. Most of the false accusations never make it to court, they're thrown out of lack of evidenced or rescinded; however those accused still have their lives ruined completely. The commenter here was pointing out how this one didn't reach court either, so isn't included in the aforementioned statistics.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:55 PM
11

The thing is, that last statement seems like common sense: the old saying "don't fight fire with fire," yet so many people disagree with it when shown that it applies to their ideology: justifying themselves by blankly insisting its "not the same."
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:19 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it's real, the OP has a post history with past screenshots and I think some advice posts relating to it.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 06:31 PM
17

The issue isn't legal per se, it's that the accusations themselves destroy lives, regardless of whether or not they have any basis whatsoever. The person would win in court, but after being fired from their job, crucified across social media, spending a shit ton on legal fees, and maybe even spending some time in prison pending the trial.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:34 PM
12

Wait, what is this? I want to see this for myself (not doubting you, just want to see the official story)
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:57 AM
1

I tried to phrase it in a very open way, and didn't even get that many down votes. Ig the wrong mod / a mod saw it.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter