TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bubbly_Equivalent490 Archive

View 0 posts and 195 comments by Bubbly_Equivalent490 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I don’t talk to liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:25 PM
0

Not for men, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:22 PM
1

I don’t care about you or your legs. Find a different man to try to impress.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:22 PM
2

You don’t know a thing about the men I’ve dated You’re not special, and neither are the men you’ve fucked. You’re all as predictable as any other human.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:20 PM
1

You’re a moderator here, and a redditor. That goes without saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:19 PM
2

So my original thought on the analogy stands, then. This is only a good saying if you’re someone who sees yourself as a predator wanting to trick someone into dating you. So to you this is a good saying. The exact same analogy works if you swap fish and fishermen for customers and salesmen. You’re just choosing to be uniquely offended at being compared to a fish. I only like men who actually want mutual attraction and don’t have to resort to baiting and luring women to trick them, so for me anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 06:02 PM
0

Because women were also a thing in the 7th century. And the 21st century remark had nothing to do with flirting. Read better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:56 PM
2

What I’m pointing out is that in the fisherman/fish dynamic, the fisherman is wanting to catch a fish who doesn’t want to be caught. No, that’s not what the analogy means. You don’t understand the analogy. The analogy means that fish don’t know how fishing works because they’re fucking fish. They can’t explain what a good tackle to use for smallmouth vs largemouth bass is, or the best time of day drop a line. The best they can tell you is “give us worms, worms taste good.” While a fisherman can …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:55 PM
1

Because men have to live with women, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:50 PM
1

A failure to understand analogies is indicative of a low IQ. If an abused woman finally left a man after one too many outbursts, and described it as “the straw that broke the camel’s back,” your response would not be “bUt wOmEn aReN’t cAmELs.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:48 PM
5

Not all of us were born in the 21st century.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:44 PM
-3

Most women sleep with about 10 men before graduating college. If describing women as they are insults women, then perhaps the problem is women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:43 PM
1

Normal people commit 3 felonies a day, litter, drive after drinking, smoke marijuana, buy Chevrolet Silverados they don’t need, and have a diet consisting mostly of birds. “Normal” means very little.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:38 PM
-2

“Flirting” is repellant, feminine behavior that women enjoy because it reflects their love of plausible deniability, as evidenced by their tendency to practice passive aggression rather than to insult their enemies directly. Light-hearted jokes with thinly-veiled double meanings are the domain of women and children: the kinds of people that play games, laugh, smile, and treat life like some exploratory journey rather than the character test it is. Men are raised to be direct and to say what they…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:35 PM
2

Women that don’t engage in good faith don’t deserve to be responded to in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:26 PM
–

MtF
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:17 PM
0

This is the privileged opinion of someone who’s used to being showered with positive attention every day of their life. Some of us had to earn our way.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:16 PM
-6

this is a complete contradiction - do you want us to talk about it or not? It’s not a contradiction at all. It’s called accountability for one’s actions, something women aren’t used to. In either case, nothing I said should offend you. Men get to not date sluts, and sluts get to not date men that don’t like sluts. It’s a win-win.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:15 PM
-1

That it’s cringy as fuck. I had a female acquaintance insist on dragging me to her softball games and her bowling leagues. The people there were lonely, attention-starved losers dressing and acting like little boys and girls. I don’t care if random women do lame shit in their spare time. I just want nothing to do with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:21 PM
0

Are you asking me what a coed adult sports league is?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:12 PM
2

I don’t talk to liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:06 PM
-3

How about we take away your right to have a decent job, a bank account, or a bank loan You’re regurgitating propaganda. Women have been able to have bank accounts for well over a century. Which means one of two things: you’re an easily manipulated sheep, or a liar. Which is it? Trump will absolutely destroy the right wing rural power base in four years. Just like he was going to from 2016-2020? I’m sure it’s really going to happen this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:56 PM
–

I don’t talk to liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:54 PM
-1

I take it as a concession. Putting on a performance is vain, feminine behavior. A man should opt to die alone if that’s his only alternative. Being performative is the behavior of a little boy who cares deeply what others think of him. Not a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:39 PM
1

Being a smooth talker rarely correlates with intelligence. Most smooth talkers follow a script if you watch them in action often enough. They may be uniquely good at “reading the room,” but again, that’s not a function of intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:36 PM
0

No man has slept with a woman he found unattractive because she was nice or made him laugh. Woman moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:34 PM
2

I said what I mean. “Behavior” is performative in the context you’re using it. Women want noisy attention whores and dancing monkeys. They don’t care about those men’s actions, only whether they’re willing to conform to pre-selected social graces and trade sincerity for embellishment. Your actions are what you actually do, not how well you do tricks for someone who isn’t fit to judge your worth in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:28 PM
-2

And your advice was still terrible, as per usual. I dismantled your post with barely any effort. It’s as terrible for a 5/6 as it is for a 9/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:22 PM
0

Behavior isn’t an action. Building things is an action. When your only frame of reference is talking to people and sitting at computers for a living, you forget what actual achievements are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:20 PM
10

Remember: after you did all that expensive preening and killed your soul and self-respect in the process, you’ll get the privilege of dating a woman whose idea of fun is playing children’s games in recreational sports leagues and daytime drinking at botanical gardens. Oh, and she’ll be a feminist with disgusting political opinions. Enjoy your spoils.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:17 PM
-2

I didn’t know caring about how you look, smell, and act was this big burden. It’s a baseline standard for many other people. For women and boys. Not men. Men define themselves by their actions, not their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:14 PM
3

No. Women’s attraction is largely rooted in immutable characteristics, and vanity in men is repugnant both viscerally and morally. Vanity is the domain of women, and men should never do anything that makes them more like women. A woman will decide, from the moment she’s met you, whether you’re attractive enough for her, based on your facial features, shoulder width, hairline, height, and voice. You are genetically destined to be unattractive to certain women no matter what you do, just as you’re…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:04 PM
–

You forgot that he’s a man, and men have character, unlike women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:44 PM
1

People did oral back then, you really think women didn't suck dick in 1950? 1930? Oral sex was very unpopular back then, with both men and women. It wasn’t a “shameful but fun kink” like anal is now. It was genuinely hated. Obviously, things have changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:43 PM
-8

Women weren’t “settling.” They just weren’t spoiled for choice like they are now. Being “stable but boring” wasn’t the death sentence for men that it is now, because women understood that there’s more to men than dancing monkeys. Now, women have been pampered and privileged to unprecedented heights, and they believe that they’re entitled to a monkey that never stops dancing. Then they become bitter, sexless femcels on PPD when the mask slips and women realize that women’s expectations require th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:41 PM
-9

Excellent post. Though it’s worth noting that every man today knows that the average woman has a double digit body count by the time she’s done with college, and is fooling himself if he thinks otherwise. Women have access to free, low stakes sex at the snap of a finger, and screech and wail when anything happens to force consequences on their actions (such as delegating abortion’s legalization to the states). All women really have to do is not talk about their past partners, and be honest about…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:36 PM
1

Nothing you just described is a right. Between this and your mistaken belief that hate speech is illegal, we’ve established that you’re fairly ignorant and emotionally motivated. Do you think ignorance drove you to feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:25 PM
–

Sounds like you’re just a coward afraid to own how shallow you are. Men don’t respect cowards, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:24 PM
0

Graduated college yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:22 PM
–

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:21 PM
-1

Funny to see a grand total of 2 PPD women tell you that you were a victim. Men, keep this in mind next time a PPD woman tells you that she “always calls out bad behavior” from other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:56 PM
1

the rights of the majority List these rights that conservatives have “eroded.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:52 PM
–

I didn’t project you lying repeatedly about the legality of hate speech, or the assertion that men on MGTOW were radicalized to violence. I don’t need to care what a liar thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:44 PM
2

“Human rights” is a motte. The Bailey is usually funneling money from taxpayers to pet projects funded by NGOs or providing legal aid to leftists fighting conservative interests. No one is fooled.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:42 PM
–

Not in public, baby girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:40 PM
1

I’m not interested in going on a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:33 PM
2

“I don’t want to debate people. I want them to blindly validate my feelings.” Filtered as intended.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:31 PM
1

“Capitalism is bad” is the opinion of someone ignorant to the privileges capitalism has given them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:30 PM
–

You don’t understand it because as a woman, you’re sexually attracted to much fewer people than your husband. And as a woman, you’re hypergamous, which men are not. Your husband is attracted to women he sees that aren’t you every day. He doesn’t need to care about those women to want to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:26 PM
0

Porn was how I learned about sex. I learned that sex was violent and loveless. I learned that the women’s pleasure didn’t matter and that we were objects. As usual, you’re telling on yourself here. Violent, “loveless” sex is much more popular as pornography with women than with men. It’s women that get off on being tossed around violently in the bedroom. Men indulge them out of necessity. Men prefer porn where the woman is clearly enjoying herself and showing love to her man. Women project this …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:20 PM
1

For me, from an ethical POV the difference is that one is a complete brain fantasy while the other one includes actual humans where you never REALLY know if there was dubious consent, revenge porn in amateur porn, health consequences, etc. Who cares? I don’t ask the women I know for permission to masturbate to them, let alone women I don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:17 PM
1

You have zero knowledge of how porn works if you think the women in porn are being “abused.” Most of them are making bank and love being whores. They have sex on-set with each other even when the cameras aren’t rolling. They’re hedonistic perverts, not trafficking victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:09 PM
1

Alcohol is terrible for you whether you’re an alcoholic or not. If porn is equivalent to alcohol, then men would indeed be better off without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:01 PM
2

Connections are nothing special. Men have them. They just don’t care. When my friend of 15 years calls me his brother and his wife calls me family, my emotional response is indifference. When a woman at work told me she admired how cool I am under pressure, my emotional response was indifference. When a woman hugs me and tells me she loves me (as a friend), my emotional response is indifference. Because unlike women, I don’t care what other people think of me. Their approval is neither desired n…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:49 AM
1

Dick is cheap, and tall pretty boys with a 6th grade reading level are a dime a dozen. Which isn’t to say women don’t want to fuck these guys, but they’re naturally inclined not to appreciate or particularly savor something they can easily get: a tall, fit himbo is just meat for her to fuck if there’s nothing going on behind his blue eyes. So women hamster this lack of appreciation as the “average” man being very unattractive, since they can get something above average or better with minimal eff…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:39 AM
1

Sluts are pretty easy to game this way if you understand how their insecurities work. If you meet a woman who’s good looking and knows it, there’s a mutual attraction, and the first thing you compliment is her “energy” or “unapologetic confidence” or some other innocuous intangible bullshit, it will immediately distinguish you in her mind from all the other guys trying to fuck her. Usually that combined with love bombing is enough to make her swoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:34 AM
1

Women in this subreddit: “being sexually attractive is your only ticket to ride.” Also women in this subreddit: “we’re banning men from sharing the same sentiment because the black pill makes women’s feelings hurt.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:31 AM
1

Redditors unironically bleating about “the oligarchy” is like women bleating about “the patriarchy.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:25 AM
3

Men have no issues admitting that they’re shallow and like a woman with a thick, supple ass. Women will bend over backwards lying to pretend that what they’re attracted to is personality traits and not a guy’s body. Because one of the sexes is straightforward and honest, and the other is rank with duplicitous, disingenuous liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:24 AM
4

policing and shaming women’s sexuality Are we not going to pretend that women clutch pearls and shriek like banshees when Leonardo DiCaprio dates an 18-year-old? I’m not going to bother listing off all the ways that women shame men’s sexuality, because women on this subreddit are too pedantic and bad at arguing to engage with my general point if I do. So I’ll simply say this: if men weren’t shamed for their sexuality, then straight relationships would look much more like the gay community. With …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:20 AM
1

Looks like the NPC is repeating itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:10 AM
1

Pretending that feminists in general tell non-feminist men that “it’s okay to not be a feminist, god speed, bro!” is peak delusion or shameless duplicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:09 AM
–

There is nothing “unreasonable” about calling out tactics commonly employed by very partisan groups to pretend that they’re non-partisan. The ACLU is infamous for doing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:02 AM
–

No, they weren’t. You’re lying through your teeth.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:00 AM
–

Not for any organic reasons. Being proud of your race is a social privilege only granted to minorities, just as being proud of your sex is a social privilege only granted to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 10:53 AM
1

The difference being that those men would be rounded up and banned in short order, with plenty of the other men here cheering it on. The odds of a woman on this subreddit ever reporting one of the women that insults my virility or the quality of my penis is less than 0%. Women’s in-group bias is too strong for that to ever happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 10:45 AM
–

I already played the “Trump said” game with Redditors for 4 years straight. The moral of the boy who cried wolf is that no one cared when bad things actually happened to the boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:48 AM
–

I do not vote out of principle, so no. If I didn’t have principled objections to voting, then that would be the easiest first and last vote of my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:44 AM
–

Boring pearl clutching from a liberal techie who probably has no kids, doesn’t own his own home, and is more concerned about access to porn than access to guns. Am I 3 for 3? I’ll say it again: no one cares. The jig is up, and the cultural degradation started by the Bolsheviks has just about run its course. The people who keep the lights on are done capitulating to squirrelly over-educated multiculturalists who are embarrassed of being white, wealthy, and American. You aren’t in charge anymore. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:16 AM
–

They objectively and factually did. Unless you think Ethiopia and Liberia are a testament to how idyllic African life could’ve been without European colonization.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:05 AM
–

If I should lose the privilege to vote, so be it. My principles are not as shaky as you seem to think, and I’m not motivated solely by naked self interest as it’s apparent all of the women here are. I am happier with a principled approach to suffrage that excludes me than the brainless universal suffrage democratic shitshow we have now that includes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:56 AM
–

Yes, I’ve heard it a million times. Some two-bit crackhead begging for money and shitting under an overpass has just as much “right” to vote as the people actually keeping society afloat in the social democratic bug world Redditors want. Because saying otherwise is mean. Don’t care. Those of us who keep the world turning are getting fed up. Trump is just the beginning. Say goodbye to the Marxist bullshit of the past century. The adults are going to talk now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:41 AM
–

The relationship term you’re looking for is symbiotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:35 AM
–

Of course we can. You can also argue for your right to slit my throat and rape my corpse. Because unlike you, I don’t need to ban wrongthink to win my arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:31 AM
–

It wasn’t a bill. It was a few words added to the annual defense authorization bill to keep the bill from passing the Senate for partisan reasons. Educate yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:30 AM
–

Anyone calling the America of 2025 a “proto fascist state” is not a serious person. And you apparently missed that OP isn’t white. Unlike you, many people’s principles aren’t “I’m a greedy, lazy monkey that wants my gibs.”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:25 AM
–

The privilege to murder your children because they’re inconvenient to you is a privilege exclusively given to women. Not having that privilege just makes you equal to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:24 AM
–

So you agree that disenfranchisement is, on its own, not a bad principle? Or are you just mad? Edit: he blocked me. He was just really mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:19 AM
1

Being retirement age without your own land is incredibly irresponsible. Those people absolutely have no business voting. If you don’t own a piece of the United States of America, then you have no investment in the country that you couldn’t walk away from in 2-3 business days. You don’t get to decide how it’s run.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:17 AM
–

1 house. But if you’re trying to measure dicks, I don’t vote out of principle.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:14 AM
1

Still stuck in a loop. NPCs sure are something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:12 AM
1

Did I break your NPC script? You seem to be stuck in a loop. Let’s try this: the Wu Flu was a lab leak, and Fauci’s emails reveal he lied about it. Is that a “conspiracy” too?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:09 AM
1

Okay. So what did you do today for “the society”?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:06 AM
–

I have a friend with benefits (though she calls herself my “girlfriend”). I hate all women, including my relatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:01 AM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_care https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:59 PM
1

No more or less of a woman than anything else born female. That flaw in her design still doesn’t constitute an “issue” I have with her in particular.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:57 PM
1

Trump crushing NGOs that funnel money to immigrant smuggling operations and ceasing UN funding, along with protectionist foreign policy, are very much actions that constitute “destroying” neoliberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:55 PM
1

Neoliberalism and globalism are conspiracies? Are wheat bread and 24-hour laundromats also conspiracies?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:49 PM
1

The same ideas? No. But they have commonality in that their moral development mostly stops short of principled-based thinking. Your own morals probably don’t extend beyond a heal/harm paradigm, and whether or not people are helped or hurt by some action. That is the foundation of feminist frustration with men, and it triggered women so bad that they developed their own morality system called the “ethics of care” to discredit justice-based ethics. Which is a long way of saying… with women, it’s m…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:47 PM
–

Voting is not a right, it’s a privilege. You’re born with rights. You aren’t born able to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:44 PM
–

It was pretty obvious I was more happy about the destruction of the globalist neoliberal eradication of borders and civic nationalism. Hence the seething.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:43 PM
–

Don’t pretend that women care about evidence when they still believe bullshit like the wage gap and that women couldn’t have bank accounts until the 1970s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:39 PM
–

I am smart enough and hot enough not to do physical labor. A smart person doesn’t have the grammar of a sixth grader. And “being hot” means nothing, since you have no character. I bring enough to the society What did you do today for “the society”?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:38 PM
–

The man that’s dismantling the Department of Education and making neoliberals seethe at the loss of their New World Order? Yes, why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:34 PM
–

I know that as a woman, sex is the only unit of value you understand, but this conversation wasn’t about sex. Try not to let your emotions carry you away.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:32 PM
–

MtF
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:28 PM
–

Conservatives just elected a man who’s dismantling NGOs funded to aid illegals immigrants with taxpayer dollars and the Department of Education. They are still very much against “big government.” Defense spending is lower than it’s been in decades, too, by percentages.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:27 PM
–

The point he made is that you can’t argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:24 PM
–

Because contrary to the propaganda you were raised on, voting has never been a right. Not even in America. It’s only become a “right” in our modern lexicon because it’s popular with social democrats. I suspect, for instance, that the average American would struggle to explain why it’s more dangerous for a 17-year-old to vote than a convicted felon.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:19 PM
–

The 19th amendment has mostly damaged the country by creating demand for social democracy in a country that was founded on principles very much opposed to social democracy. The Founding Fathers didn’t want random men deciding on who is elected president, let alone random women. They were deeply distrusting of democracy as a concept of government, and for good reason. That said, repealing the amendment now would send women into their usual histrionic fits of rage over their supposed “rights” bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:17 PM
–

This is duplicitous bullshit. The democrats only proposed mandatory female registration as a bargaining chip in the annual defense authorization bill. They somehow forgot that they care about women being drafted any other time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:16 PM
–

It is, actually. Because it’s symptomatic of a more mature, philosophical outlook on life than “I’m a greedy, lazy, selfish monkey that wants to maximize my gibs.” Women can’t understand, as they only know how to be the monkey.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:13 PM
–

You’re incapable of defending your opinions logically, either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:12 PM
–

No, voting should be restricted based on whether you own land. That’s it. Then you at least have to suffer the consequences of whatever ruinous policies you vote for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:12 PM
–

I work in the second most dangerous industry in the country, and I have the scars and burns to prove it. You don’t get to play that card with me. What did you do today, other than talk to people or sit at a desk and type?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:10 PM
–

Unlike women, men are capable of voting on principle and not solely for things that grant them personal power and privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:09 PM
–

“Achievements” matter less than having a stake in the country’s welfare. That’s why voting should be restricted to landowners. Even if someone is a worthless waste of skin, the fact that they own a home means they at least own a small piece of America, and as such, have skin in the game. Too many “renters” in the country currently who are happy to vote for ruinous policies that destroy communities because they can just pick up and move without a second thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:08 PM
–

Voting is not a right. You are not born able to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:05 PM
–

“Everyone should be able to vote, except for these few arbitrary exceptions.” Your weak assertions suggest that your beliefs are mostly a product of cultural osmosis rather than any deeply held convictions. Even women didn’t believe that women should vote, once upon a time. I’m happy to be proven wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:46 PM
–

Women voted for Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:43 PM
–

Nope. He already said that as a racial minority, he’s open to hearing white nationalists argue for why he shouldn’t vote. Sounds like he’s better than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:42 PM
–

And just like that, you took away her only ammo: emotional turmoil. Women cannot be rational or objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:40 PM
1

Irrelevant. I’ve never told a woman here that she has daddy issues, that her vagina looks like roast beef, or that she’s sexually undesirable. Which means that I hold myself to a higher standard than the women here hold themselves to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 09:01 PM
2

I was completely right about what you believed, as you continue to demonstrate. You do not want men to go their own way if they do so in a way you disapprove of. Because you think your approval matters when it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:57 PM
3

Yes, I’m aware of the official claims about MGTOW. Which is why I pointed out that those claims are bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:54 PM
3

Deflecting and pretending the question is irrelevant. Heh. I care because I want to live in a society that isn't plagued by hateful bigots. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_signalling https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slacktivism Even after it became clear that mgtow was a sham, the response from normal people wasn't anger, it was ridicule. Ridicule is rooted in contempt. And MGTOW didn’t qualify as a “sham” at all. You’re describing the 4b movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:53 PM
3

I don't have to post on a subreddit to read it's contents. You never did either. Because hate should be opposed. It is morally wrong to be a bystander when evil flourishes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slacktivism We all know what men want to do most with girls. Unironically repeating the “men only want one thing and it’s fucking disgusting” meme is a bit on the nose in 2025.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:44 PM
3

“It’s gentle ribbing when I do it.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:36 PM
1

“Inciting hate” is not illegal. “Inciting violence” is, but nothing MGTOW ever did qualifies. And merely having “Woman Hater” in my flair gets me contemptuous insults about my virility, my relationship with my mother, and the quality of my penis from women here. There is no basis for your claim that women wouldn’t find a reason to be mad at anyone that doesn’t like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:35 PM
1

It is not weakness to point out when your opponent erected a straw man to misrepresent your argument because they weren’t intelligent enough to grapple with what you actually claimed. Refrain from quoting Game of Thrones in the future. It adds to the embarrassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:31 PM
2

They became both, because that's what hate does. Now I’m going to ask you how many men were radicalized to violence by /r/MGTOW, and you’re going to dodge the question or pretend it’s irrelevant. Their own movement claimed that was the point. You should ask them why they lied. No, that is not what we’re discussing. I’ll repeat: why do you care? And if you want to pretend a “threat” existed, refer to my above question. the collective reaction was "k bye hope you find the best" they went right bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:28 PM
3

At no point did I say that MGTOW is a hate group. I rejected your entire world view, and you failed spectacularly to defend it on logically consistent grounds. If it helps you protect your ego, you may pretend that you weren’t dismantled publicly. But I cannot pretend that you won an argument when you clearly didn’t. And /r/MensLib is tolerated because it regularly genuflects at the altar of progressive shibboleths held sacred by neo-Marxists and feminists. There was zero difference between the …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:24 PM
2

I accept your concession. And on the subject of men’s personal sovereignty, I believe there’s a saying women are fond of. My body, my choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:19 PM
6

So I was right. You never posted there, and are parroting the opinion you were told to have of the subreddit. I accept your concession. I read enough to be sickened to the misogyny and the whining by spoiled man-children who absolutely refused do make the slightest effort improve their lives. Those men deserves shame and humiliation. Some of them deserved to be on the watchlists of multiple law enforcement agencies. Your feelings don’t matter. Why would I bother to post on a site devoted to men …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:16 PM
2

“It’s only hate when it’s people I don’t like doing it.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:08 PM
3

Hate speech is explicitly illegal in america. No, it is explicitly not illegal. The Supreme Court has consistently rejected any argument that hate speech is not protected. Being a “protected class” does not make it illegal for people to hate you. You are legally illiterate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:07 PM
4

Nothing I said was a “shrill nonargument.” If you are incapable of holding your own in a debate, then you’re free to go to one of the many subreddits that will not challenge you and simply validate your feelings as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:05 PM
3

What they “require” is none of your business. You aren’t a part of their life. What you think they should be doing means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:02 PM
3

Not really. They only do it to virtue signal or as a token gesture of being “ideologically consistent.” Feminists very much operate on the who, whom model of tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:01 PM
2

And women shouldn’t drink alcohol, eat fast food, or skip exercising any day of the week. But what they should do and what they can do are not the same. You don’t get to tell someone they can’t do something because they “shouldn’t,” especially when you already told those men to go socialize with each other and leave you alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:00 PM
2

Not in America. “Hate groups” and their right to exist are protected by the Constitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:57 PM
2

And now for the armor piercing question: so what? Why do you feel entitled to be liked by people that were rejected by you? Why do you care whether a random group of men can “move on” or not? Women refuse to be the solution to lonely men’s problems. You aren’t a part of their life. You don’t get to tell them what to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:54 PM
3

Sports fans bond over how much they hate the rival team’s fans. Political party A bonds over their mutual hatred of political party B. Blue pillers bond over their hatred of red pillers. Again, you only care when it’s a group you consider above criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:50 PM
2

I’m guessing the “plenty” you read was comments and posts shared elsewhere on Reddit to shame and humiliate those men. If you actually posted there, which you didn’t, you would know that one of the most upvoted threads was a man with a picture of him and his dog saying, “she’s the only girl I need.” So hateful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:48 PM
1

This claim is ridiculous. If you’re so emotionally compromised being exposed as ignorant on a debate subreddit, then don’t go on debate subreddits. /r/aww is full of puppies getting tummy kisses if that’s more your emotional frequency.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:39 PM
5

They didn’t. And there’s a 1000% chance you never spent a single, solitary moment on /r/MGTOW, so you don’t get to claim otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:36 PM
3

And you’d lose the bet. /r/everydaymisandry
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:35 PM
1

People are allowed to bond with others over things they dislike. Have you not seen sports fans bitch about their team’s coach? Or parents bitch about the principal of their children’s school? Negativity is a normal part of being human. Let’s not obfuscate the truth. The only reason it’s an issue when men do it is because women don’t like being complained about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:34 PM
2

This comment is word salad. What does fraternity “in bad faith” mean to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:30 PM
1

To be clear, I had no desire to “shock” you. Your feelings aren’t important to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:09 PM
-1

just ask "are humans social creatures?" in your preferred browser and embarass yourself Google’s AI fallaciously claims that women couldn’t have bank accounts until the 1970s. “Google it” is not a refutation. And men, unlike women, are not entirely dependent on others to live. It is a meme among women that men make a few friends in school and then decide that “that’s enough socializing for one life.” Because men are independent, and women are not. lol We both know you’re not laughing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:07 PM
-1

Perhaps if resenting women wasn't the goal if these groups in the first place, they would be able to more harmoniously coexist with the rest of the world 🙏 They aren’t trying to coexist with you. You told them to stop making their loneliness a problem for women to solve, and they did what you told them to. They made friends with other men who actually empathized with them instead of insulting them like women do. You don’t get to dictate the social life of someone that you reject.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:56 PM
–

Irrelevant to what I said. If you can’t refute me, then graciously accept the loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:53 PM
0

Don’t project your issues with your own parents onto me. I have no issues with my mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:53 PM
0

I see no such arguments, and I almost certainly spend more time in male-only spaces than you. What I do frequently see are men who claim being falsely accused is worse than being raped. And they’re right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:52 PM
1

Yes, I predicted the “men are only hermits because they’re mentally ill” argument. Now I can embarrass you. In the United States, the prevalence of mental illness in the past year is more common among females than males and more common among the young than the old. As of 2022, some 26.4 percent of females reported some type of mental illness in the past year, compared to 19.7 percent of males. But let’s go deeper on why your argument is idiotic. It is well acknowledged by men and women alike tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:50 PM
4

They discuss those topics no more than femcels discuss their desire to rape/kill/enslave men. Yet femcels are conspicuously allowed to be hateful toward men on Reddit with impunity. Hmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:43 PM
6

Lying is harshly punished. Perjury and other forms of lying to federal employers is a felony, which can ruin your life. Women that lie are committing crimes, and they aren’t punished for them at all. Whether they need to be punished as much as a rapist is ancillary to the fact that they need to be punished more than they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:16 PM
–

“I did some summer jobs because of nepotism and hated working” isn’t the flex you think it is. You’re not a man, and you never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:14 PM
1

Not every man is a hermit. But nearly every hermit is a man. Because unlike women, men can actually be strong and independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:14 PM
1

“It’s different when you do it.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:13 PM
1

If you aren’t going to read anything I link to you, then you can stop replying to me and concede the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:13 PM
2

So men are only allowed to socialize with other men if they do it in a way that women approve of. Fascinating. I wonder if that kind of bullshit might make men resent women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:12 PM
-1

That a lot of women nagged a man so badly that he decided “he’ll sleep well in a prison cell knowing she’s in hell.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:11 PM
8

And that was a sham. MGTOW was no more hateful than TwoX.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 06:10 PM
3

Yet men are constantly told that their opinions of it are invalid because women learned the word algorithm sometime in the past 8 years and suddenly thought they had discovered Plato’s allegory of the cave. The content you consume is no more meticulously crafted for your consumption than TikTok. A point that women are loathe to concede.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:45 PM
4

If your position is that sexual assault as a whole needs to be punished more harshly, then that is a personal judgment. And it would make sense for you to target the most under-punished sexual criminals first: female teachers in the public school system. If your position is that sexual assault wasn’t punished harshly enough in a handful of cherry picked cases, then that proves that those are the exceptions to the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:43 PM
4

They can also form online groups run for and by men. Until women step in and get them banned for wrongthink, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:37 PM
2

In fairness, I rarely see men say that they can’t make friends. I see women making the absolutely stupid argument that male friendship is an adequate substitute for romance, and men getting rightly annoyed by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:36 PM
4

“Female shooting sprees aren’t real if I move my goalpost.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:34 PM
2

No. Domestic violence rates are pretty much gender neutral. The Duluth model championed by feminists which treats men as natural predators, and is why cops default to arresting the man in any domestic dispute, is the only reason anyone thinks otherwise. Men are certainly more dangerous to other men, but women get off very lightly by comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:34 PM
1

Funny how scorned women and frustrated boys resort to homophobia the moment they receive pushback on their adolescent worldviews, isn’t it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:32 PM
–

You aren’t a man. You use words like “dude” and “bro” excessively despite being a father. You were raised soft. You’ve never worked with your hands for a living or gone to war. You cannot speak for real men, so don’t play pretend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:31 PM
-5

like, no, we are extremely social creatures to the point where humans die if they are isolated. Skill issue for women, and a reflection of their weakness. Men routinely walk into the woods to be isolated from the world. Because men, unlike women, actually are strong and independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:29 PM
1

My favorite way to summarize homosocial bonding: Men pretend to hate each other while secretly loving each other. Women pretend to love each other while secretly hating each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:25 PM
4

No you aren’t. Women cry bloody murder when sad, lonely men build communities exclusively for sad, lonely men. Women absolutely refuse to let men be free of their tone policing bullshit. Look at the fate of innocuous, toothless Reddit groups like MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:24 PM
–

“TikTok isn’t real when it makes women look bad.” - the position of 100 IQ women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:23 PM
1

There’s a marked difference in that men and women alike condone rape and sexual assault as crimes (and if they didn’t, then the criminal justice system run primarily by men would not incarcerate sexual criminals), while absolutely no one from Team Women is condoning false accusations, with most refusing to even accept that it’s a real problem, citing hilariously bad data like the “only 2% of accusations are false” statistic to back up their entirely emotional and gynocentric position.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:22 PM
1

Oh, and since you’ve decided on an isolated demand for rigor that makes feminists infallible as a “group,” here are many more prominent feminists espousing hatred of men and receiving zero pushback from you or other women over it. https://np.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1h8vdmj/some_examples_of_highprofile_feminist_journalists/ I accept your weak attempts at damage control as a concession.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:15 PM
1

Posting comments from individuals is not proof that feminists groups celebrate violence against men Then comments from individuals is not proof that incel groups celebrate violence against women. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Yet only one of the two sexes (the less privileged one) is punished as a group for the individual wrongthink. Hmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:10 PM
1

Every man alive knows that women can’t help but police how men behave. I’m sure the men you’ve sucked cocks for can attest to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:14 PM
2

Police your own behavior and stop telling people how to enjoy their personal social media accounts. So women will stop trying to police incels on social media, gotcha. Looking forward to this massive change in how women behave.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:08 PM
0

So you also can’t find anything? Your willful ignorance is not my problem, and I accept that you’ve conceded the argument by refusing to acknowledge the reality I presented you with. Here are a few choice selections that I found in 5 minutes. I have now shoved your head in the river. It’s up to the camel to take a drink. We both know you won’t. A woman gleefully joking about violence against men: https://np.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1bfy2ul/violence_against_men_is_okay_on_reddit/ A …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:43 PM
4

Women just don’t like when men complain about their problems, because it disrupts their Marxist/feminist conflict theory of oppressor/oppressed gender relations. Women are also notoriously bad at being empathetic toward men they aren’t related or attracted to, which is an extension of women’s immense social and sexual privilege. They don’t care about lonely men…until it’s their brother, son, or lover experiencing loneliness. Then those complaints about loneliness are valid and the man deserves t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:04 PM
0

there’s never been a case when a women has actively hurt a man and been celebrated for it by other women This claim doesn’t dignify a response. Go look at what the femcels on Reddit talk about. It makes MGTOW look like a women’s rights conference. There’s been notorious subs here that had to be shut down because they celebrated every time something horrible happened to a women. Even entertaining the idea that this is an unbiased reporting of the truth: so what? Women have made it abundantly clea…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:31 AM
3

Circular logic. “You have no options because you have no standards.” “Why do I have no standards?” “Because you have no options.” Having standards is a privilege of attractive people, women, and people that don’t mind dying alone. It doesn’t reflect one’s character unless they make the hard decision to be alone in the world rather than compromise on what they value in a relationship. And 99% of people compromise in relationships, which means those people are hypocrites if they attack anyone else…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:20 AM
1

If you don’t understand that misandrist, ignorant propaganda from feminists and privileged western women does well on social media because (1) women like it, and (2) hatred targeting men is condoned by the deafening silence of women who aren’t nearly as casual about the social media algorithm when it targets them, then you aren’t worth the calories expended acknowledging your existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:17 AM
-1

“When my side does it, it’s a few crazies. When your side does it, it’s endemic of a larger problem and needs to be discussed.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:34 AM
1

Distinction without a difference. Redditors spend every day having barely contained orgasms when random republicans get hurt or killed. The power mods and administrators don’t give two shits because they don’t like republicans. Furthermore, femcel subs that celebrate men being hurt and murdered exist, and Reddit does nothing about them. The only reason incel subs are policed as hard as they are is because they offend women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:32 AM
5

“Bad opinions don’t exist because I don’t see them, and if you do see them, those opinions are your fault, anyway” is textbook female solipsism and why men will never take women seriously as rational actors.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:28 AM
5

I made no claim as to whether standards are a good or bad thing. Merely that it is embarrassing to offer the rebuttal that having low standards is “why men are single.” It’s empty virtue signaling and incel shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:26 AM
3

Obviously, this is correct. Every time I read the opinion of some simp dunking on the red pill for good boy points, and inevitably get to the part of how red pillers were “brainwashed” by podcasters, I roll my eyes. It reeks of the opinion of someone who gets their own opinions from podcasts and projects that herd mentality onto others. We see how mercenary and ruthless women are when it comes to sex and attraction because we spend our lives being attracted to them in return. There is no conspir…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 12:24 AM
12

“Your low standards are why you’re single” will always be the stupidest thing that women genuinely spin their hamster wheels trying to argue into reality. Anyone that can convince themselves that “if you’re having trouble meeting someone, then you need to be more exclusionary” is very unintelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:19 PM
1

The only people that get offended by “jerks” in a bar are noisy women that think a man should be grateful for their attention. What noisy women need to understand is that they are not entitled to a man’s attention by virtue of being nice to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 06:46 PM
1

I went to bars constantly for most of my 20s. They’re a waste of money and an easy ticket to a DUI. No one was “brainwashed” into hating bars.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 06:14 PM
3

Women want to be entertained by a dancing monkey. This is why they prioritize men with “humor.” They don’t take life seriously, and they prefer men that are similarly frivolous and privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:57 PM
7

a certain type of women The average woman. Seems more like you’re basing a whole worldview on your own dating experiences. Yes, you are describing the process by which men develop wisdom. Specifically the ones where you played a role you admit you didn’t like. The alternative to “playing a role I don’t like” is being an incel, and women have made it clear that they consider being an incel worse than being a child molester.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:46 PM
9

Yes, women have “picked me,” for shallow and superficial reasons. In fact, I became much more popular with women when I stopped conducting myself with honor and integrity and began acting like a narcissistic, noisy attention whore who’s full of himself. Because the traits that women find attractive in men are not generally orthogonal with the behaviors that virtuous, heroic men cultivate. As every man who’s had to dabble with the more privileged sex will tell you. Hence, my original claim to wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 04:11 PM
21

The “certain type of person” you’re describing is an average woman. There is nothing exceptional or unique about the kinds of women attracted to Chris Brown. Women are not attracted to moral righteousness or heroism. They are shallow and superficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 03:25 PM
1

I’m confident female teachers are molesting more children than the Catholic Church could ever dream of. But it goes criminally underreported for obvious reasons. Feminists don’t want a social problem that implicates women as pedophiles, and the government doesn’t want a social problem that implicates the public school system as a feasting ground for child predators. Someone did a poll on YouTube recently asking people what “the incident” at their high school was, and over half the responses were…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/04/25 12:13 PM
25

I’ve had multiple women (including strangers) tell me I should smile in my life. I always scoff when women try to make this a gendered issue. People like to see other people be happy, especially if it’s someone they think is cute. More news at 11.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 03:20 PM
24

If men are so privileged, why do they all look so miserable? This question has the energy of a noble asking why the peasants are never happy to see him.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 03:17 PM
25

Also, since they’re stronger than us, I’m terrified of them. Behold, the indoctrination of young women to fear and hate men, despite men being one of the least dangerous parts of their lives. As a woman, you’re much more likely to be laid out or killed by some undercooked food or rush hour traffic than a man. Yet women never do a “safety check-in” with their gal pals in the middle of a drive home from work. Only when meeting some guy. Because women are irrational. They operate on feelings, and t…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 01:05 PM
2

Men do all the yard work (which inexplicably gets ignored when discussing the distribution of household chores) and repairs. Men vastly outearn their wives despite women outperforming men academically (what’s the deal, ladies?). And unlike women, a man can never be 100% sure a child is his. Which is why men have less incentive to be faithful than women, even though cheating remains a largely gender neutral pastime.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 02:14 AM
3

How fucking pampered and sheltered do you have to be to think that men would be put off by the taxing, thankless work of…checks notes…washing dishes? Fucking really? Men would be elated to have an opportunity to be a stay-at-home husband. To keep the home clean and well maintained while devoting all their time to personal projects. Women spent decades whining about how hard this work is, and every man who’s lived alone after leaving home knows it’s piss easy. Let this woman spend her entire 20s …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter