TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bubbly_Succotash6014 Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by Bubbly_Succotash6014 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

If you never get what you want, then your standards are warped? And it can also make society dysfunctional. When it comes to money, some people are fixated on themselves being rich and refusing to accept that they're not. Is that a good mentality? We all know that only 2% of people can/will ever be rich. And these people who refuse to accept that they're not rich, quickly go down some destructive path. Same thing with women refusing to date anyone but Mr Darcy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 06:56 AM
–

Obviously it doesn't. And when you open up that discussion it's impossible to rank different attributes as being more or less "valid" in terms of a relationship. It doesn't matter why someone is with you, as long as they want to be with you. And you can't even know, you become like a woman who will nag your parter constantly about "but WHY do you like me!? is it because of my body???" etc. The two single advantages that men have: 1. age 2. money are of course the ones who are determined to be mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 06:54 AM
0

"men should just stop having a sex drive" ok how exactly, should they be castrated? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 04:21 PM
–

Indulging in neuroticism is not healthy
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:21 PM
6

Yeah university made me so angry, the girls were cheating and flirting to get higher grades, and also had off-campus boyfriends who supported them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:16 PM
7

Yeah but this only makes sense in traditional gender roles. If we now have women who are being able to climb as high as men, while still avoiding the penalties or falling to the bottom, where does that leave us?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:13 PM
–

Because children have to be made somehow, and age gap relationships are fruitful. The alternative that feminists suggest of everyone just being childless is simply worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:00 PM
–

And the women who are the most into therapy are also the ones with the worst mental health.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:57 PM
–

It's because women know by instinct that they will become pregnant and therefor limited in their physical ability, and after this will be saddled with an infant that they have to care for. For this simple reason, they need to have a support group. Men don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:55 PM
3

Yeah of course they prefer that, but the problem is that they can't find it, because poor countries don't have a lot of upper middle class "good families".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:27 PM
1

And western women don't treat men like product when they compare their height and income on dating apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:16 PM
5

What is a "real" relationship then, and who decides that? This quickly becomes quite pretentious and judgmental. Pretty obvious this is bullshit to try to manipulate men into disregarding their own interest. And when western women are so open about wanting men with high incomes, what's the difference? If all women want my money, why shouldn't I just get the most value for my money then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:15 PM
-2

Ok I can answer your question: it's better to observe practical facts about how people actually ACT than to listen to what women say, because it's been shown over and over again that they constantly lie
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:01 PM
0

These are not emotions, these are practical facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 01:58 PM
7

When you can't just take your privilege and shut up, you have to demand people's respect as well, LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 01:46 PM
3

I had a female friend who's boyfriend was earning really good money and she didn't have to work, and could do sports and hobbies all day. She was *constantly* ranting about how "money doesn't matter" and over and over asserted that it had nothing to do with why she was with her boyfriend. Like, what's the point? No man, who has a woman with big tits, would ever preach about how breast size doesn't matter. It's just such an obvious lie, and it's also belittling your own partner by trying to deval…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 10:08 AM
13

The only reason men do this is because women can't be honest, so you have to try to figure them out by observation. Men are just honest, so there's no need. If you ask a man what kind of woman he wants, he will just say "one with big tits" and that's it. A woman will give you a whole bullshit speech about kindness and emotions and shit, when she actually just wants a man with muscle (or money/status). Why do women always have to campaign for themselves like a politician? Why are they constantly …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:44 AM
-2

That's simply not true. Just look at countries like Thailand, there are many many old men in their 60s and 70s that have children with young Thai women. What's your "argument against" that simple fact? And for women it's literally impossible to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:26 PM
0

Stay on the topic or stay quiet
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:25 PM
0

Objection, irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 01:24 PM
1

Is reproduction the goal of desirability?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 12:16 PM
0

Your personal experience is irrelevant, this is debate on sociology and is regarding men in general, in society. It doesn't matter that you have 10 gay friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 12:04 PM
0

So you are just fully denying that women socialize more than men in general? Ok whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 11:49 AM
1

Oh yea, so why don't they do it then unless there's a woman around?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 11:25 AM
-4

You can go and plant seeds in the desert where nothing grows, and you will be just like Don Quijote fighting windmills. It's a useless endeavor. Or you can plant seeds in fertile ground where things actually grow. I could see how one of these would be made fun of, and the other not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:17 AM
1

Because those guys maybe are not on the apps? I can personally get solid mid girls in social situations, bars, parties etc. But on dating apps I get overweight weirdos and single moms. So I just quit the app, what's the point
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:48 AM
-3

Just keep pretending to be a man, good luck, it seems to be working out, actually not so good... hmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:47 AM
4

Old seed are better than no eggs, deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:44 AM
-3

Yeah but men don't like talking dates, going to birthday parties, meeting your friends, going to brunch, caring for babies, or any of the other million things that women demand of their men, fully knowing how miserable it makes them. Bottom line is, if women and men are to live together in peace, there needs to be compromises on both sides. Nobody can just insist that they never do a single thing that they are not intrinsically extremely aroused to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:33 AM
-1

Yes, men are simply (in general) not attracted to masculine behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:29 AM
-8

Because men and women don't age the same with regards to reproduction? How is this so hard to accept. A 50 year old women hitting on a young guy is to be made fun of, because it's fruitless. A 50 year old man hitting on a young woman, cannot be made fun of, because it's fruitful. Sexual relationships that bear fruit and produce offspring will be higher regarded, than those that don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:15 AM
2

No, only for the below average guy will the ROI with online dating be greater. For anyone above average (in personality/social skills) it's obviously better to use a situation where those skills are on display.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 07:05 AM
1

Yeah western women are so open about looks, money, status, and then turn around and accuse western men of being "shallow" and "transactional" it's ridiculous. Western women can be stone cold and filter men on height and income, but western men have to take the worst women possible because "only with a western woman can it really be true love". LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:41 AM
3

Ok good luck being crazy, I choose to stay sane.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:12 AM
5

Men are not that dumb. You have to come up with something a little better to make people throw their lives away at your service.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:06 AM
1

But I will never know true love, how can I go on!! I feel so insecure and in need of random women's approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 09:00 AM
3

Ohh the elusive "real" relationship that only women can know. How I suffer not receiving this blessing!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:55 AM
2

But my answer, yeah, to all that "use me" stuff I want to spread the news That if it feels this good getting used Oh, you just keep on using me Until you use me up
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 08:48 AM
0

It's nice to know that if I ever became desperate, even as a 70 year old, I could still snap my fingers and get a hot young foreign wife to have children with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 03:38 PM
1

Yeah some marriages are pseudo intellectual high school debate teams, who consider themselves superior over the simpletons who just feed and fuck each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:27 AM
1

You are mocking caring for someone like a parent, while that's actually what love is, and the whole point of the relationship. And the whole point of marriage. What exactly is your point here, other than just being smug?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 11:11 AM
1

Yeah exactly, it's literally the whole point of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:41 AM
1

Yeah because that's what a relationship/marriage is? You think you have a scoop here but you're just stating what's obvious to everyone and the very definition of marriage, you're supposed to care for each other, same as a parent to a child. "LOL humans are just big children" yeah obviously? Humans are humans. You think you have evolved to some higher being because you have some education, that's what the real LOL is here how insanely pretentious educated people can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:40 AM
1

Yeah people want to be practical and enjoy the simple things in life, and not be neurotic and pretentious for no reason other than add unnecessary stress to their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 09:37 AM
2

Yeah this "war" has just made me realize what a big advantage I have as a man, how I can play my cards best, and what an endless supply there is of hot young woman willing to have sex and children with just a modicum of material standard. Feminist women are for me just like incel men, there is no reason to engage, because they have zero leverage. The least attractive partners who offer the least, and are demanding the most. They just get sorted to the bottom of the list and ignored, because you …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:20 AM
1

Yeah BUT they already have a boyfriend at home, that's the problem. I can't find any single women in single's spaces anymore, it's only women who are already taken. It's the girls who are not single, that are active in flirting and mingling, and they just abuse lonely men to entertain them because they're bored with their relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 05:39 AM
1

Yeah it's not about being "wanted" it's about gaining access to sex, and having the means to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 05:38 PM
1

Yeah, it's unrealistic and it's something that has emerged only in the last generation of men raised on feminism and gender equality. Feeling the need for someone to "want them" is traditionally 100% a female characteristic, and men would never be in need of that kind of validation. A man would be busy with his own projects and success and base his confidence on that, not on "being wanted" by the opposite sex. That's literally in line with the traditional woman's role when you need marriage and …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 03:33 PM
1

100% wrong, but I understand now that you are not actually engaging, but only describing your own fantasy world. I hope it makes you happy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:33 AM
1

You think men and women are the same, and you "disagree" that there's any difference between the sexes. You're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 04:33 AM
1

Any woman can always get pumped and dumped, so what? You're not getting any commitment from any of those men. You had way better options for actual relationships when you were younger. And all of those men would also have fucked you when you were younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:22 AM
1

That's completely backwards. The age gaps become wider with age, not smaller. And do you seriously think that a middle aged woman can just be "cool and fun" and be equally attractive, and have the same options as a 20 year old woman? LOOL
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:12 PM
1

Ignoring that a woman's biggest asset is youth. Waiting is not a way for a woman to get a better man, she gets older and her selection becomes worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:28 PM
1

Decentering is dramatically different for men vs women because of fertility windows. And MGTOW is doing just fine, it's just that you don't hear from those men anymore, they disappeared from social media and dating apps, and women are now trying to hit on them in the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:25 PM
9

That's completely wrong. Just go to the trans community and ask women who raise their testosterone to a male level, what happens with their need for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:28 PM
1

Transactional relationships are the best, they are clear and logical and reliable. It's this bullshit about unconditional love that becomes a complicated mess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:27 PM
-1

It's because childlessness for men is always only temporary, but for women it becomes permanent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:06 PM
3

Forget about "commitment" there's no men randomly entering loyalty pacts with other strong independent equal adults, for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 01:50 PM
1

You're not a celebrity. Nobody is going to want to just bask in your presence. Normal average people don't get groupies to follow them around.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:58 PM
2

"I demand to be more important than life itself!" Ok Queen of Hearts, good luck with that. Men have more time and can just move on to other younger women. You are the one who will be alone succumbing to your delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:39 PM
1

That's just the way it is. You want to keep a man? Then you have to fuck him and feed him. Why get tangled up in this mental gymnastics when it's really so simple. No man is going to stay with a useless woman just because of her "personality". You're not so special that you can compete with sex and procreation. Your company can't outshine the miracle of human life and the urge of furthering the species.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:55 PM
–

Then monogamy should also be required each time sex with another person is engaged. Why do women not need to have sex anymore but men still have to be faithful? And consent has been removed from marriage only in SOME western countries since the 1970s-1990s, in the vast majority of the world it's still the case. And marriage has been around for 5 thousand years. It literally solves a problem by forcing men and women to split the difference and meet in the middle. And if you change that deal, to n…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:36 PM
–

Yeah and consent to sex is exactly what the marriage contract have always been. That's the whole point, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 04:57 PM
–

Yeah and this is why it was always the man's legal right to have sex with his own wife. That's the benefit the woman offers in return for his monogamy. It makes sense doesn't it, the man limits his sex life to only one woman, and in return for that he gets a sex guarantee. But after this was changed by feminism in the later part of the 20th century, now men still have the legal risk of being accused of rape also in the marriage. So there's now a legal way to literally corner a man into a sexless…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 10:46 AM
1

You're just trolling now, I'll take that as a win. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 12:07 PM
-2

I think it's perfectly reasonable to pay for sex on the first date, and then see if it develops into something more. Why not? It would obviously solve the initial dilemma.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:11 AM
-2

Nobody cares about paying for a date, the question is when all these "50/50"-women are going to actually start paying half of the bills in the household. And as long as they don't do that, obviously they should make less money than men, and they should do more of the housework.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 11:08 AM
2

I agree, but being "alone forever" is not really the same kind of looming threat for men, as it is for women, since men are always fertile. Men can change their minds at any point, and just opt in to family life again. For that simple reason, it also makes a lot of sense for men to be alone and work on other things. If you think about it, why would a man center his life, and most productive years around "romance"? That makes perfect sense for a woman, but doesn't really for a man does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:04 AM
1

That's what I always did personally, I always went for the average face with the hot body. That's the best deal for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:44 AM
1

Because I know how it works. Have you ever walked around in public with a super hot girl who is a 10/10? You don't get any "admiration" from other men, you get death threats. The experience ranges from annoying to downright dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 09:42 AM
2

I will absolutely deny that fact, I have never met any man that have ever cared about any "social currency", this is 100% a woman's thing. And every time some rich guy is flaunting his wealth, there's a woman besides him who actually want to do that bragging. If a man is single and rich, he only brings out his money when he has met the right girl, and does NOT want to show it to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:52 AM
1

Because men will attack you with physical violence, in an attempt to steal you girl, yes. And you don't want to take that risk, when there is seemingly no possible gain to be had from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:48 AM
1

"I don't want to have sex with this woman, but I'm doing it anyway so I can brag to the guys and get their approval" Yeah, that doesn't happen. Men don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:44 AM
0

What do you mean "in that way". I value sex for sex. Only women have this double-think where they do things, not because they like to do it, but as part of a scheme to manipulate people. Men don't think that way, if men do something, it's because they like it, period. Men will never do something THEY don't like, but only because other people think it's something that should be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:41 AM
1

The whole idea behind "arm candy" is 100% a woman's thing. It's the woman showing off what a high status man she could get. A man that has a pretty girl wants to keep her to himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:29 AM
1

I have a lot of sex with many women, and I don't give a shit about what other men think about this, in fact I deliberately hide it and never tell anyone. It's like having a lot of money, you just don't tell other people about it, because you know it just turns ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:24 AM
1

As a man, it's only a bad idea to show off your hot girl to other men. Why on earth would you want to do that. You're just making yourself a target.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:12 AM
0

Men value only sex, period. Men don't really care much about "social approval", that's a typical female thing to worry about what other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 08:07 AM
–

In dating markets where men have the upper hand, it's always sex first, and then (maybe) dates. This is what men prefer. So the "compromise" of women sending nudes to a man before a date, is actually pretty reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 07:40 AM
1

This is exactly how it is in buddhist/(former)communist countries. Even western countries were liberated like this in the 1960s with free love. It has just gone backwards in western countries because capitalism is based on robbing people of their natural healthy sex lives, so it can force them to work hard, and then selling sex back to them at a loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 07:25 AM
–

Yeah imagine having other stronger people grovel to you, and kiss your feet, for no reason. Of course it's nice for you to have that privilege. But it's a bluff, and it's fake. It's just performative theatre like a trained pet doing useless tricks. Men don't like any of this shit, and why would they? Do you seriously think you can continue to fool men with this simple doublespeak? It's like a manager trying to get you to work harder "imagine never having the pleasure of seeing your hard work com…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 04:59 AM
1

A small percentage of college educated feminist women in the western world, like to play these perverse games pretending to be men. It's like a man would be obsessed with having his nipples suckled. It's literally useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:57 PM
1

Women have sex either to become pregnant, or to make the man stay with them. The reason they want a man to stay with them is either: child care, or money.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:48 PM
1

You are assuming that women don't want to have children. Women value sex to get pregnant, men value it for the orgasm. If a man wants to keep a woman, he has to give her a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:18 PM
1

You have sex because you want to have sex? Why would you seek out a horny person of the opposite sex, if you want to talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 04:45 PM
2

From what I can see, the man stays because the woman provides housework for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 04:41 PM
10

Yeah young women and old men have an obvious advantage: combining the advantages both of youth and age, and at the same time be fertile. I find it funny how basically all of society is based around this principle of pairing up older and younger people so they can learn from each other. In school, at work, families, literally everywhere. But when it comes to private relationships, suddenly this becomes evil and must always be a form of abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:19 AM
6

Which country is this? Asking for a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:14 AM
-2

So what, why can't the man have a little status then? Women are so moralizing and dismissive now in dating. Everything is wrong. Sex is wrong, money is wrong, looks, status, all wrong and "immoral". There's like a list of reasons/benefits with relationships, and 99 of those things are wrong and immoral, and the one single approved reason is a secret. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 09:40 AM
4

Yes. But also because it's provides stability and peace in general. I just want to point out, that beta bucks don't choose monogamy because they enjoy childcare as this post suggests, they choose it because they want access to sex. I find it annoying how widespread the idea today is that men have a desire for children in the same way that women do. I don't believe it, I think all men desire just sex, and monogamy is simply just the best way for a lot of guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:35 AM
1

So if anyone dares to pose the age old question of "can men and women really be just friends?" that makes them a misandrist? Men and women are not the same. This is just basic simple facts, the onus is on you to show some kind of at least plausible reasoning for why friendships between same sex, and different sex, suddenly now are equal? Just overnight women start to pretend that men enjoy long deep talks about feeling over brunch, and start insulting anyone who dares to disagree, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:14 AM
4

They engage in exclusive commitment because it's their best/only way to access sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 08:08 AM
1

Because you simply get everything you need, and it just works. You get sex and intimacy and romance from your man/woman, and friendship from your same sex friends. How is that depressing to have a functional life where needs are met and practical matters get done? I find it way more depressing that people should be alone and never find sex and intimacy, because women demand this androgynous superhuman jester who can transform basic practical things into fun and exciting adventures.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:36 AM
1

You are not "reduced", you still have FEMALE friends who appreciate you for as a friend, and want to talk about feelings. You just don't get that part from a man. Why would you try to force men to behave like women, when you can just talk to your female friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:31 AM
1

Looking for a partner to do the adulting so you can be a teenager all your life. Make a choice, be a child and be treated like one, or grow up and get the respect of an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 07:27 AM
2

It would not make me feel anything at all. Men and women are different, and they find the other's activities and interest boring and annoying. That's just a normal fact of life, so what? I don't have any problems with that. I don't need my woman to be my friend, I have guy friends for that. Living together and raising children is a whole other practical matter, and the person needs to be more like reliable co-worker, and not someone you need to be personal friends with. Friendship and hanging ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 05:23 PM
1

Haha. I think men shouldn't date women unless they are prepared to have children, otherwise they should just pay for sex. Dating apps should be either for paid sex, or for parenthood. Anything else is just confusing unclear expectations. Men get sex, women get either money or a child. Makes perfect sense. Why would women have "relationships" where they are not trying to have children? I find that disrespectful towards the woman since she has limited time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 05:09 PM
2

Suits me just fine, the men get exactly what they want then, it's the women who will be unsatisfied and not get what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 04:27 PM
1

Ok so what if men only like women for sex, what is actually so terrible about that? It's still liking somebody, for something. It doesn't mean you hate the person, does it? Why are people so afraid of admitting that sexual relationships are about sex. Why constantly trying to turn it into something else? Is it shameful, is it religion? Is it "primitive" and you want to be sophisticated? Seriously, what is it. It's not a friendship. Nobody knows what the hell a "deep emotional connection" means a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 04:12 PM
3

Yeah it's like a job interview where you can't say that you take the job for the money, you have to come up with some other bullshit. And in the date you can't say that you take the woman for the sex, you have to also come up with some bullshit. But everyone knows the truth so what's the point of it, and why turn your private love life also to some corporate bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 03:40 PM
5

Men care more about looks, dating apps optimize for looks, why are people surprised when there are more men than women there? "hey we made this nice fish tank where women can parade themselves in front of random strangers, why aren't they showing up?" You could make a dating app with only voice messages, and I can guarantee that there will be a majority of women on that app.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 03:18 PM
-1

And there's also a huge rise in age related fertility issues and IVF treatments. Women are told that they can do anything a man can, and believe that, only to discover that it's not true. "gender is just a social construct" until it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 08:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter