TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bullylandlordhelp Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by Bullylandlordhelp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

My point was that no one has seen the evidence. Here's a follow up tik tok with an attorney saying that anyone who says they have seen the footage is very likely a liar. While there are charges, and she was arrested and processed, there is not a conviction. And that means that the police have recommended her for prosecution. What has not happened yet is a determination on whether there is enough evidence to prosecute her, or whether that prosecution will succeed. While not true for social media,…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:31 PM

It's not pointless. I'm pointing out all the assumptions and this subs inability to read the word "allegedly", all the stuff I said could also be true "allegedly" because that means it hasn't been substantiated. You are acting like you know what happened, and all anyone knows is that these two people are saying very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:18 PM
-4

Video in fact does lie. Have you not been paying attention to sora or AI lately??
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:56 PM
-5

Because EXHIBISTIONISTS and flashers often use the "it was an accident, I was asleep/distracted/didn't know my fly was undone" constantly. And flashers love delivery people because they are allowed to be naked in their home and the delivery people have to walk up to do their job. Theres literally a whole porn trope about pizza delivery guys, and this whole sub is like "since he was 'allegedly' asleep automatically innocent! Burn the witch!" Because who the fuck falls asleep with their pants down…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:53 PM
5

We are social creatures. There are always social consequences to criminal action and it is the primary driving force between the right of a jury trial. I agree evidence cannot be made public without influencing the jury, but the first amendment RELIES on the court of public opinion hearing all ideas and determining the best one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 01:46 PM
2

I would strongly disagree that western culture is feminist. West coast maybe. But a good 75% of America supports equal rights, not what you are using the term "feminist" to define which is some kind of gender reparations. And this too will pass, whether good or bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:24 PM
2

No one gets offered dating opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:25 PM
4

"no resistance from women is relevant" kind of betrays your point and sorely underestimates women. Women have never been 100% subjugated. And even in societies we don't understand, they are not powerless. Good thing there is no time in history that your scenario has ever occurred species wide. And that's because #notallmen, ironically enough. You will never get any amount of men to agree en masse to behave the way you describe. Purely because there are personalities who detest authority in gener…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:23 PM
1

I am. Next?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:28 PM
1

I am a cis woman from the Midwest. But I love anthropology. Native Americans were actually matriarchal, and despite nudity among the tribes, maintained order and ran the long house. Quote: source "Thus, women’s role in production afforded them – women elders in particular – considerable political power within society as a whole. Morgan’s and others’ data on the Iroquois stand alone in proving that women’s oppression has not existed in all human societies. But it is worth noting that more recent …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 12:18 PM
5

You're illustrating the point the commenter was making. It's because to be appealing to women, you can't just use "easy visual" mass-appeal by displaying men's bodies. That's because women are not a montilith in what attracts them. And arguably men have been culturally trained to find it appealing. Fixating on sex and women's bodies is not just a foregone conclusion. Just imagine if slave Leia actually repulsed men because they had empathy for slaves?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 01:44 PM
-5

I disagree. Among millennial women the strong-man look is a turn off, and as a thirties woman with many single friends, none of them expect to be pampered. If you choose to be in a relationship with women who consistently have their hair and nails done or signs of other pampered activity, then you should expect to have to fund, either directly or indirectly, that habit. As you would have to do with any other habit for any other partner. As a woman that plans to "SAHP" my partner someday, I have …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:27 PM
-1

Blue pill* uses feminism to.... FTFY. That is not what feminism means.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 01:38 PM
0

You know that feminism is a word with a definition right? It literally means equality between the sexes. It does not raise women above men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 01:37 PM
1

You said "nobody". And I sourced a notable somebody, with a large following of other somebodies that are expressing agreement. I comprehended what you said just fine. It appears you needed another comment to qualify what you meant. But apparently you need to feel superior in some way, so you pretended I made an argument I didn't in order to posture as if you are above me in some way. This is an unimpressive strawman logical fallacy AND and ad hominem redirect. But makes no sense. I THINK your co…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 12:41 PM
2

Lmao as a video is going viral of a Christian nationalist podcaster Joshua Haymes on saying "slavery was not inherently evil" and "if you believe in the Bible you should be able to defend it"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 08:49 PM
0

This sub is filled with WAY too many red pill and moderators don't do enough to tamp that shit down. So many assumptions and "hot takes"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 11:46 AM
3

It's not insulting, because there are whole sections of the population that don't evaluate their partners using sex, frequency, type or history. That understand that people's hormones change. And that their value as a partner doesn't involve genitals. People who also don't categorize or fixate on people's past. But rather look at what that person offers to their future.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter