Burntholesinmyhoodie Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. I always think our conversation has ended since days go by in between responses lol. All good tho Alright sorry if I called the whole sub toxic earlier, that's not what I meant so if that's how i worded it, my bad. I do believe both groups deserve empathy Im not saying this post results in more divide, not at all. Im saying your original comment on feminism does. Cross promotional marketing? Dude, you are the one who brought up feminism, I only replied to it. If you can't see how harsh claims ab…	/r/MensRights	04/12/18 06:27 PM
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. I was saying that your questions made assumptions within them, similar to that of court - not that it was necessarily intentional or that I think we should be doing that (which if it was a competition like setting, id see otherwise and would be utilizing myself). I think malicious and assault are pretty harsh terms. I said that your comment A) is incorrectly generalizing feminists and B) results in more divide between this sub and feminists, which C) in effect is counter active to getting more a…	/r/MensRights	30/11/18 12:21 AM
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. Questions can have implications within them. It's a court technique. We're not competing lol. That's a weird way to see discussion Anytime any group that isn't inherently malicious is generalized like your original comment does, then it's fair to offer empathy and say something. That doesn't mean the entire group absolutely needs it. If you're asking me to define whataboutism, it's the dismissal of one injustice because another (or plural others) exist. Now, the reason i say your original commen…	/r/MensRights	22/11/18 04:43 PM
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. Oh and I'll answer your questions even tho I don't feel they relate for nor against my original claim. Why do think feminist need you to defend them, assumption you're creating is that I think they "need" that. You can defend a group without feeling they need it. I do consider myself a feminist if we go by dictionary definition. I brought up my initial claim because of multiple reasons. Empathy for the group, hopes that you will see where Im coming from, and that maybe itll be an interesting dis…	/r/MensRights	21/11/18 07:17 PM
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. Smashing =/= whataboutism. You're right, I didn't make the connection about the thing about ancestors. Fair enough Although the whole "all or none" thing is whataboutism (that's not mental gymnastics, fallacies exist.) But, im saying that you going against feminists by saying they are all a certain way, is counter productive to your goals of spreading empathy towards men. Your bringing up of all these other elements doesn't detract from that claim But i agree some feminists are a problem	/r/MensRights	21/11/18 07:03 PM
2	International Men's Day is Nov 19. I'm not making commentary on your quote on men's ancestors, so you're bringing up other things is whataboutism. I never claimed that sexism doesn't exist against males, Im not sure why you're alluding to it. Oh feminist don't need statics on their fliers This is a generalization, it imposes that all those who call themselves feminists are completely fine with leaving out sources or stats. That's not true, if we're truly judging feminists as individuals. Which is what you do by using the word "fe…	/r/MensRights	21/11/18 03:01 AM
2	International Men's Day is Nov 19. Smashing in that you're making a grand assumption about feminism. Im not claiming that double standards dont exist - im saying that the character assassination brings more divide than it does unity	/r/MensRights	20/11/18 10:56 PM
1	International Men's Day is Nov 19. The phrase isn't "the future is only female"	/r/MensRights	20/11/18 09:54 PM
3	International Men's Day is Nov 19. And this is why people view this sub as toxic, it's not just about empathy for males - but also about smashing on feminists when you can be a feminist and still support lots of the goals you're advocating for	/r/MensRights	20/11/18 09:52 PM
0	Because women logic. Sure, I don't necessarily disagree! With that said, one thing thats bad doesn't negate something else that's bad and this post is sexist irregardless	/r/MGTOW	26/05/18 01:10 AM
-1	Because women logic. Tbh I personally haven't but it's possible my experiences aren't a good indicator for that quote to arise, perhaps you have witnessed it lots. Regardless making broad generalizations is hurtful to exceptions Saying this is 'woman logic' is sexist because it assumes this applies to women as a whole, which would be more fair if it were based on a conclusive study, and not out of mockery.	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 09:08 PM
-3	You are probably doing better than you think. It's equally wrong when a female does it about males. Whataboutism doesn't dismiss the negative impacts of an action	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 08:57 PM
-5	You are probably doing better than you think. Lots of the posts here are making female-wide generalizations and are basically impossible to verify	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 08:47 PM
-14	You are probably doing better than you think. Not all females turn your children against you Not all females wish to live on their partners salary	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 04:28 PM
-2	Because women logic. This is the logic that applies to all females? That is genuinely sexist	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 04:27 PM
13	Common sense is "Hate speech" It means that there are 2 yes, but not only 2. Meaning you are attracted to male and female sexes, not intersex or trans people. The term you're confusing it with is Pan (pansexual), and doesn't serve as a term to replace Bi but allow more specifics	/r/MGTOW	25/05/18 04:25 PM
1	Banned from r/Feminism just because I think in recent times the me too movement has had some good influences	/r/AntiFeminists	18/12/17 05:37 AM
1	Every modern feminist ever We're just less vocal lol	/r/AntiFeminists	18/12/17 05:33 AM
1	Banned from r/Feminism just because I can understand that. I tend to define ideolgies by their purpose/ creational intention as opposed to influence (albeit i do use influence to guide my actions surrounding ideologies). With that said Im not sure feminism as a whole has had more negative than positive influence Also, I wouldn't be surprised if lots considered themselves to be feminists but didn't do anything that really is feminist focused, making r/feminism a loud minority	/r/AntiFeminists	17/12/17 07:43 PM
1	Banned from r/Feminism just because r/Feminism doesn't represent all feminists	/r/AntiFeminists	17/12/17 07:30 PM
3	Feminists trying to understand memes... As a feminist i agree that those comments are sexist towards men and are wrong because they are counter productive to equality	/r/AntiFeminists	16/12/17 10:02 PM
1	Every modern feminist ever Lol	/r/AntiFeminists	15/12/17 07:40 PM
5	Every modern feminist ever Modern feminist here, not like this. Funny comic tho nonetheless	/r/AntiFeminists	15/12/17 07:31 AM
0	"Step In Inequality" xpost /r/mensrights You can brush off circumstances or situations as nothing more than excuses, but that doesn't mean they're not a problem and should be changed. The question really comes down to how much of us and our actions are a result of environment and how much is biological. I honestly don't have the answer but it's worth considering both sides for sure	/r/PussyPassDenied	05/07/17 06:38 AM
1	Another Perspective on the Wage Gap You're assuming most women leave their jobs to take care of kids and that men don't do this as well. But in regards to your other points, if true (not saying they even are), Is it not possible that females don't get hired for those jobs? Maybe due to sexism. Maybe due to that last assumption you made about families Id like some sources for your points tho. A cartoon doesn't really cut it What's ridiculous is that you're assuming these things though. Women do take dangerous jobs if hired, etc. Ma…	/r/PussyPassDenied	13/04/17 06:37 AM