TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Business-Ad-5344 Archive

View 0 posts and 265 comments by Business-Ad-5344 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The reason why having a son is important for survival is because of warring tribes. If men in a village has daughters 90% of the time, the next generation is 90% female. If another village has 90% men, the next generation is 90% men. When the two village war, then there is equilibrium in the generation after the two villages merge after fighting. it isn't directly about reproduction, but the village's survival which will determine the next generation's traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/23 07:06 AM
1

he has the crazy artist look going on and it kind of works.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 07:38 PM
1

5
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 07:30 PM
1

buying a home is nice, but really meaningless in the end. that's why everyone is saying get a hobby. you have to find joy in the little things.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 07:21 PM
2

it's too general of a theory. lots of people are competent at stealing money, such as bankers, and doing it legally too. lots of politicians are good at being the guy that you want to have a beer with, but bad at legislature and making the world better. lot of idiots are procreating and lot of smart people aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/23 04:36 PM
1

the problem is you invest tons of time and effort, then meet and find out there's zero chemistry.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 04:57 PM
3

money and materialism aren't exactly the same. Make money, But don't spend. Don't buy useless shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 04:54 PM
1

just compare to the "average joe" pictures that people showed. you're making the same mistake that people make when they say emma stone is a 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 04:45 PM
1

read the second definition: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blackpill blue pill is very, very wrong. like The Matrix movie, bluepill is the "illusion" which society constructed for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 04:20 PM
1

rating is hard. joseph gordon levitt was the 5 here for a long time. i think people eventually convinced others that he was closer to 7.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 04:09 PM
1

agree he closed the gap. but you said the people who said he needs to win one more to catch up "are wrong." so that's what's confusing. i do get it. he's damn good, especially career totals.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 05:17 PM
1

there's a reason why people score insane amounts of points these days. they call the fouls differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 04:47 PM
1

any of these top guys like curry, kobe, durant, can put up 40 in one season if they hog the ball and risk injury by overplaying. any of these guys like curry kobe durant, would have a couple more championships if they played with d. wade or shaq, etc. we just witnessed durant going to golden state and picking up some championships. that's how easy it is to switch to a strong team and put them over the top: you can beat lebron like that. Imagine if jordan just went to Houston and played with Olaj…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 04:43 PM
1

There are straight men that would date Leo for the career boost and connections.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 08:38 AM
1

there are times when people ask me something and i'm completely zoned out and like 5 minutes later, my brain processes it and thinks: "Oh, someone asked me something."
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/23 07:25 AM
1

my thought: if a partner did that for me, we'd be there to the end. we'd make some other arrangement for sex. but we'd party hard and enjoy the fuck out of what we can. coke and video games aren't all that bad TBH.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 07:39 AM
1

young 5'10" mike would decapitate tyson fury, in about maybe 20 or 30 seconds.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 04:48 AM
1

depends on ethnicity, location, age, birth county, etc. it is above average. 5'10" might be above average. depending on the precise average that you go with, 6'0" can be in the "middle fifty."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 03:58 AM
0

it's hard to pick one photo and rate accurately. there's a tiktok where people rate themselves and then take a photo and someone else rates them. it happens all the time (for both men and women) that the photo is bad and they get rated much worse than they are. it happens the other way too, you can totally fraud and give yourself extra points.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 02:01 AM
2

even 6'0" is a normal average range height even though you can still consider it on the tall side. Yet it's also IDEAL PERFECT height for many women. even 5'10" is ideal height for a lot of women. if you're thin or athletic build, that really does put you in like the top 30% of all men around your age. or even higher. people were calling joseph gordon levitt average here for a long time. when just being skinny and average height puts him way above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/23 01:56 AM
1

due to famines, average male in north korea might be 5'5. maybe lower for younger people who grew up during the worst famines and covid supply chain problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/23 10:51 AM
4

it IS natural selection at work: Nervousness and Anxiety are increasing! The reason we have nervousness and anxiety is because those are the traits that got passed down and survived!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! people without any of that got selected out of the gene pool!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 10:04 PM
1

i said that wrong. yes, it's not people who just find an LTR who get off. people who fail will go off and on. dating in general, there's a lot of failures in general. so yeah, the number of CURRENT users isn't interesting. the number of people who HAVE used dating apps though, is interesting in one sense: that it is "normal". Whether it is useless, i could agree with it, i'll have to google more about it. for a good number of my friends, anecdotally, they found a spouse on a dating app. I think …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 06:48 AM
5

it's the adults that probably evolve to find the babies cute, so they protect them and pass on their genes more successfully. when the babies evolve they evolve so they can survive on their own. or gain advantages, like they kill their baby siblings (like eagles).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 05:38 AM
0

not an interesting number though. because most people get into an LTR and get off the apps. when you're talking about younger people: About half of those under 30 (53%) report having ever used a dating site or app when you include people 50+, yeah, many didn't use an app to meet their spouse. some 50+ were married before ever using the internet. dating apps aren't insignificant for younger people. apps are normal. but what's very interesting in this chart: https://goat.com.au/relationships/this-…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 05:22 AM
0

even if you're just talking about apps, your stats are wrong. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/02/key-findings-about-online-dating-in-the-u-s/ it's 30% who have used a dating app before. but that's including people over 60.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 05:02 AM
3

39% of couples met online. and 27% "met at a bar". but a lot of the ones that "met at a bar" you can see that in the graphs, it increases the same as meeting online increases. In other words, people are lying about meeting at a bar, when they actually met online.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 04:41 AM
2

being honest means understanding that some 5'4" men are much better looking than other 5'4" men, but that overall, (like one woman admitted today) being 5'4" does make it harder for you. it's almost common sense. just ask short men if it's a disadvantage. then ask your female friends how important height is for them. let's actually be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:39 AM
2

Of course it does. Your entire argument is predicated around the idea that plenty of men put a ton of effort into dating and sex. And yet compared to women, they don't. that's not my argument at all. my argument is that someone with zero success can claim some general understanding of "What Women Want." of course you need to attempt to try to figure it out on your own, you can't put zero effort, fail, and then claim to understand what women want. so i'm ruling out men who put in zero effort. It'…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:33 AM
2

Same with one of my friends. Again, nobody is saying that short men can't find success. those are two very different arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:13 AM
2

Women put significantly more effort into finding partners on average than men do. Saying this as a man, because it doesn't take much research to find out how blatantly true it is. has absolutely nothing to do with the discussion. Rare that any man gets laid with no effort. plenty of guys aren't doing anything but date women and have long term relationships. for example, i have friends with no taste, no sense of fashion, not the most stable employment, etc. and some have girlfriends, some don't. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 03:10 AM
3

are you in the US? then you do see 5'4" men. which is the 3.6 Percentile. if you go to a mall and walk by 100 adult men you'll see 4 on average. even if you barely go out and live in a rural area, i doubt you can seriously claim "never." a 5'4" man is more common than a 5'9" woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:55 AM
1

not convinced. i can get that some vibe might have been off. when the vibe was off, they thought he was just gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:43 AM
3

that's a different argument. even 1% of 1 million population is 10,000 people. 5'4" for a man is a height i encounter every single day. even 5'0" is not extreme in the sense that it is normal for a person to be that height. if a man is 4'7" then yes, i assume that there was nutritional deficiency or medical conditions involved. I don't often see a 4'7" man walking down the street. but i see a 5'4" or shorter man basically every time I'm out walking like at a mall. discussing it and complaining a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:33 AM
1

again, saying that height is important is not the same thing as saying that no short men can find success. you're conflating the two for some reason. i ALSO have short male friends that are not unsuccessful in dating, even at 5'0". and one that is wildly successful at 5'5". those things have nothing to do with our discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:10 AM
5

Goliath was 6'9.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:07 AM
3

ok, just ask your friends then. but of course you'll say "my friends don't care." I've talked to female friends, coworkers, roommates, etc. about this. I've looked at marriage statistics that are based on height. i've looked at videos like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbG05ePWRQE I know some people say "short men are fucked forever." But when someone says "Height is important" they do NOT mean that short men are fucked forever. they just mean that height gives you a noticeable advantage…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:04 AM
3

serious question: what was average height back then?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:57 AM
2

ok, then just google it in 2 seconds: https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/qrr6pd/i_f25_broke_up_with_my_boyfriend_m27_because_he/ this is like how you claimed all booth babes had "elite" faces. and it literally took me 20 seconds to find one picture of 3 booth babes where I asked and everyone agreed that they were not elite: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/15zu7kz/daily_community_chat_megathread/jxna28n/?context=3 Just google it and agree with us in 10 second…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:54 AM
2

women also say height is important. just watch dating reality shows on netflix. it comes up very, very often. i gave an example: Indian Matchmaking on Netflix. Height is trait that comes up all the time. ignore what the men say about height. just go with what women say on those shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:39 AM
2

others: He has high standards. He's extremely short but decent looking. He's smart but autistic. i agree generally, but there are more categories than you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:24 AM
5

because you know what women don't want. you can deduce what women want. for example, say you're 5'4", like one of the guys on Indian Matchmaking, who has passion, stable job, intelligence, not bad looking... he can probably deduce from his experience that height is fairly important. in fact, the woman meets her friends and discusses his height. compare that to a 5'9" guy who has had some, but not a lot, of success. He won't know how important height is. he might think being tall is advantageous,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:22 AM
7

i mean, if you can't get laid but put in a huge amount of effort, it kinda makes you an expert on what women want. compare that to a guy that put in zero effort and gets laid infrequently, but enough that they never need to question or observe anything. There are two types of experts: the ones that put in a huge amount of effort and never get laid but always constantly learn and ask and observe. and the ones that get laid so much that they start asking questions, like "Why is this happening?" no…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 12:12 AM
1

it doesn't just affect men. both men and women hold crazy ass beliefs about relationships, bodies, and everything in general. that's why a book called The Secret exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 11:25 PM
1

yes, this only affects men. there are no women who hold bat shit crazy beliefs about certain things, like climate change or when souls enter fetuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 11:05 PM
1

my take is "Many women AND men don't find their partners very attractive and that's NOT a huge problem." i think more people should be settling for companionship, hobbies, and "best friends."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 10:59 PM
1

i think this is part of the comedic element of very elaborate memes. part of the funniness is how much effort someone can put into the most trivial thing. you definitely think "I'm the biggest nerd" when you take things that far.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 09:36 AM
2

when you start, you'll see 30+ year olds in your classes. and maybe some 50+. maybe seniors who get discounts for courses too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 12:06 AM
1

pattern i've seen on dating shows. a man will continue asking question after question and the woman answers everything and never asks anything back. Then the woman later says she enjoyed it and asks about the second date.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 11:44 PM
1

although not the case at a beach. men with huge boobs don't need to cover it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 04:17 PM
1

they joked about that when the sub was around.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 04:16 PM
1

how much better is it than doing a ton of speed dating events while just being yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 04:11 PM
1

i mean, we can just as easily conclude most women are hypocrites or douchebags too lol. just look at how many women are voting for trump. nice guys are just very nice and kind. that's all it is really.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 03:52 PM
1

we can agree they are hypocrites, yet acknowledge that the difference is that female sexuality is more hidden by society, so this hits them all at once at some point. if guys aspire to be bad boys, then either they succeed or their core is too kind and they fail. are the ones that fail really so terrible compared to the felons out there?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 03:30 PM
1

i mean, if you have a preference why avoid bad people who say they're good? if you like "bad boys" then go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 02:53 PM
1

real nice guys might just be nice, might go to church, have church friends, always polite, never been arrested, have safe hobbies, risk averse, stable job, etc. etc. etc. about #2: these guys are mad when they are just discovering this. men's desires were always transparent. even the typical sayings "Men would fuck anything" which is a total exaggeration (there are many 8's who won't fuck 4's). We all knew what men wanted. No surprise. there's nothing really terrible about nice guys except for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 02:44 PM
1

most people here including women lean blackpill. same with those other popular dating forums, dating_advice, etc. if you have a minimum height requirement that is higher than the medical definition of a genetic condition, you're blackpilled no matter what you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 01:42 PM
1

neither does the female pics if you carefully look at them. it's hard to rate quicky. you have to take more time and think about things. you have to be more objective. women here claimed joseph gordon levitt was the typical "5" guy and then some time later people started using the average guy pic. HUGE difference between those two guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 01:36 PM
1

choice music of too many republican congressmen who claim they are fighting the machine that is holding them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 01:10 PM
2

there were a few shorter guys (under 5'8") on love is blind. one was rejected, height was mentioned, but the "reason" was religion. other shorter guy on that show is still together with the girl. one of the few couples still together. she is a ballet dancer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 05:49 AM
1

it depends on the specific thing. some things are more fact than opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 05:41 AM
-1

if you love her, why not let her experience pleasure. most men take their opportunity: porn. now we have VR porn which is even more realistic. What about the next level after that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 02:58 AM
1

between above average and well above average. i think the ratings are pretty accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/23 02:47 AM
–

women also shame promiscuous women, sometimes bully them and they commit suicide. that shows you who is the worst among slut shamers: you can argue men and women are equally bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/23 10:08 AM
1

read the second definition: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blackpill nothing nihilistic about it. looks are important. that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 08:03 AM
1

almost everyone frauds to some degree. some people lie 1 inch, others lie 5+ inches. there are horror stories about this. However, what i gain from these stories is this: Lying actually works. Girls post stories about the guy said he was 5'8" but looked more like 5'4" and they're now in a relationship because she doesn't want to be shallow. girls wear make up and get laid by hotter guys. unfortunately (or maybe fortunately for some), all these tricks work sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 06:08 AM
1

they don't enjoy it when it's for settling to get into a relationship. that problem you describe is huge. women ask for advice all the time. the question "settle vs. never settle" is like "Coke Vs. Pepsi."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 03:32 AM
1

we're talking about friends, not casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 02:46 AM
1

it's all psychological. if you have ANYONE saying some shit like "Yo, I seriously have like 300 quadrillion dollars. I just can't show it to anyone. I'm dead serious." "I have a black belt in 300 martial arts too." We all know people who say this shit, and some people who believe those people. Trump is one example of that type of person. All those examples prove that saying stupid shit actually works on some people. even some people claim he lies about being a billionaire. if you think he maxed …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/23 02:46 AM
1

work. school. church. classes/clubs (like art classes or book clubs or some choir or orchestra group, etc.) the reason is that new people are risky. These places allow more time for people to get familiar with each other without committing. this is why the MRS degree sound so cringey, yet the more you think about it, the more it makes sense. you simply need to be around people and have a reason to be around people so that two people can reach a level of familiarity. it's why religion is so impor…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 04:22 PM
1

"strong" "self image" "respectable presence"... just as embarrassing imo. it's not embarrassing if you shift your perspective: almost everyone has these desires, even subconsciously, even when people claim they don't. It's like if a practical genie existed, where wishes had to be somewhat realistic, and the genie listed every wish made. nearly every human out there is wishing for shit like "I want to be hotter." "Put 100 million in my checking account." "i wish to fuck more." from another perspe…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 03:59 PM
1

blue, red, and black are all real. red pill works for guys like Trump. people who have Narcissistic Personality Disorder, have no empathy, and they can't hear how stupid they sound, so Trump can go around lying about shit and getting laid. like "I was a marine and killed like 1 billion guys in one day." He can say that without being ironic and be dead serious and SOME women will like that and believe it. If you don't believe it, watch Bad Vegan on Netflix.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 05:47 AM
–

learn on your own. do coursera and edx specializations or micro masters. build a portfolio. then go for the entry level jobs in your area. it could take 2+ years. learning on your own is hard, so try to find a friend, or ask a lot of questions on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 10:15 AM
1

video games are just a medium. saying that video games are a waste is the same as saying "books are a waste" or "movies are a waste" or "art is a waste" or "sports are a waste" or "dancing is a waste." Reading novels was considered the same degenerative hobby when they first started coming out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 09:57 AM
–

from matrix: bluepill=illusion, redill=reality/truth. how does society create an illusion? by certain behaviors. Example: slut-shaming. because of slut-shaming, women don't discuss sexuality. especially christian societies. masturbation is a sin. These types of beliefs all shaped our society. It "hid" female sexuality. It made sex bad and abnormal by default. They became "sins." Another example: The idea of soul mates. If soul mates exist, it would be abnormal to get a divorce. Yet this is preci…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 08:05 AM
–

if bluepill is looks matter less than personality, then blackpill is looks matter more than personality. That's all. How extreme you take it, or any other beliefs, or how you deal with that, are all independent of the pills. most people are part blue and black pill. according to the matrix reference, black pill should be called red pill. red pill is some other stuff that is partly influenced by selling products and services for profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 07:46 AM
1

those lawsuits are dismissed. the reason of course, is that it's basically all legal. Most well known charities have guys at the top making like $400k per year. That salary comes from guys who make $50k and donate to those charities. And not all of it is helping a cause. Non-profits buy lunches and TV's for their lounges. The biggest non profits have private jets and caviar. Smaller non profits might hire their friend's kids and pay them bloated salaries and give them important experience. this …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 06:22 AM
–

Booth babes. Rate, facially: https://www.reddit.com/r/boothbabes/comments/1r4n6k/dlink_babes/ also, if you rate below 8, how many seconds does it take for you to conclude that they are not "elite" faces?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 03:10 AM
–

i mean, you really think facially all these girls are elite? Just google images and convince yourself that's not the case in about 1 second.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 03:02 AM
–

it's hard to tell even when you have a group of those girls. take runway models, for example. not famous ones, but your average show on youtube. there's no one level, where all the girls are facially way above average. it's all over the place, some are way above average, some are slightly above average, and then a couple will be below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 02:56 AM
1

nyc isn't mostly white. venturing into Jersey, you have the suburbs with the highest population of indians out of any suburb in the country. indians are the largest group in some of these towns.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 02:28 AM
1

sounds like the entire world with fires and weird hurricanes and record breaking temps. the end times is what's going on. it's biblical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 05:25 AM
1

risk-averse, career or education focused, high self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/23 01:38 AM
–

he's already found that information: There exist women who are shut ins looking for relationships. People who basically never go out. i've lived next to many: women who won't go out except for groceries and maybe when old friends visit. you can find them in rural areas, but they do exist in cities too. People CHOOSE to live in those rural areas. like the town in alaska where everyone lives in one building. they can leave any time they want. They're out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 10:30 AM
–

above median height, above median income, better than median weight. simplified to make the math easier: 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 12.5%
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 03:27 AM
–

i think 100% of my female roommates over the last 10 years have had casual sex. and maybe half regularly. the sluttiest brought back at least 10 guys per year, which doesn't include the times when she went to the guy's place. one of them had a fiance over and we were discussing dating and sex. she looked at me right in the eye and i understood what it meant: I'll fucking kill you if you say anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 01:00 AM
–

the argument exists because they misinterpret the stats. https://vpfw.com/blog/getting-pregnant-at-40-faqs-and-tips-for-optimizing-your-fertility-health/#:~:text=By%20age%2035%2C%20the%20chance,it%20will%20likely%20take%20longer. it is probably mostly innocent. they think it is like only 5% of women who wish to get pregnant can get pregnant after 40, or something like that. people do that here for all kinds of stats. like even today, 80/20 is misunderstood. people don't bother to go read the 80/…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 12:48 AM
1

i like the second definition here: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 02:46 AM
–

i'm left wing blackpill. it looks like this: when you grew up with slut shaming, you think sluts are abnormal, deviant behavior. when you're blackpilled, you accept female sexuality as much more normal. that makes me a feminist, it makes me accept that women have desires without having to shame them for it. it makes women equal to men. the illusion was hiding women's sexuality. to go with matrix: blue pill was illusion. red pill was Reality. Reality is simply reality. it doesn't automatically ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 01:58 AM
1

yes, but they are both real phenomena. there's a real pattern there. i think that's what the argument usually is. what they are responding to is women saying "Young women don't like older men." There's enough that do, it's not a rare thing. men understand the argument for women: Even if they hit a wall there are plenty of men still willing to date and marry them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 11:14 PM
1

if you can't find the right conclusion, then it's not so scary.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 11:03 PM
1

the older men here who claim they look good also often claim that younger women throw themselves at them. this may depend on geography. it may simply happen more in the more rural suburban areas, where 1) there are less good looking men in general and ambitious young men leave. and 2) younger women may want to be "rescued" from their shitty suburban job and lifestyle. a man who looks older usually will be wealthier than younger men. women might be looking at a guy's car and clothes, at least sub…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 11:01 PM
1

there's so much more to research for the person who wants a solid conclusion. you have to consider a few things like geography, and new user boost on certain apps, you have to consider things like actually meeting irl, bots, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:56 PM
1

i don't know the original specific thing you're reacting to. i just know biology is real. if women generally prefer taller men or broader shoulders or muscular build, it all makes sense. you know eagle babies kill other eagle babies in the nest. selfish strategy. It's very scary to think about evolution and what it says about our species.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:52 PM
1

maybe. we might actually be onto something, like a neuroscience discovery or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:47 PM
1

the reason that's not valid are the pros and cons. like you say, it's morally reprehensible. but what if we take morals out of it? killing is biologically beneficial: you go to war and you have more resources if you win. but on a higher level, it's bad. one village can pillage another village and gain something. yet if there is a greater threat, it is better if the villages cooperate and work together. different strategies: selfishness vs cooperation. Both are biologically beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:34 PM
1

it's possible. but it could also be subconscious desire. it could be the lizard brain we're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:08 PM
1

no, it's not a dire situation, therefore my lizard brain doesn't kick in if i saw a girl at a mall. But my lizard brain doesn't even kick in if i see 25 year olds or 35 year olds at the mall. it may be low libido or it may be rational self control, but i don't turn my head when i see a woman in tight yoga pants and a nice butt. But i see men and women turn their heads and stare often.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 09:57 PM
1

even in war, in certain situations, would you commit genocide? The answer is Yes for almost everyone, statistically. Tons of people will participate and tons of people will support. you may say you don't, and you might be one of the special ones that does not participate, like Bonhoeffer. but it would still be extremely rare. things change. most people aren't thinking about genocide on a daily basis. but that doesn't mean they reject genocide once it becomes legal. even lizard brain takes over w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 09:38 PM
1

my answer is no, but it's meaningless. just like your answer. because many say no, but we all know what happens in a nazi-type situation. Almost nobody says no. lizard brain takes over. in certain times, it's not even lizard brain, but rational brain that decides that killing is the best decision: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietrich_Bonhoeffer
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 09:27 PM
0

would people kill if it was legal? such as in a time of war? The answer is yes for almost everyone. everyone is a product of rape and child marriage here. we have hundreds of generations of ancestors and that's in our DNA. we all have a layer of lizard brain. it takes intelligence and education and learning and rational thinking to conquer it and hopefully many of us are strong, but the majority probably aren't and society can possibly revert. just look at germans today: they are descendants of …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 09:12 PM
2

paradox: if he's straight he won't know the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 08:48 PM
1

netflix: indian matchmaker. confirming a lot of what people talk about here. the pressure to get married is insane. even little things like getting married first if you're the older sister. advice from older women keeps popping up over and over again: don't be too picky. a 38 year old woman, regretfully: "i missed out on some good guys."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 10:56 AM
1

this comes up in some forums: bi people that choose exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 05:28 AM
1

these "marry me if we're both single at age 40" arrangements are extremely beneficial for women and not men. it's considered so often that mainstream newspapers write about it: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/fashion/weddings/if-were-40-and-single-lets-get-married-deal.html
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 02:41 AM
1

It's the "woman's average": if there are 100 men in a room, pick the 5 best looking men. Those are average men. Anyone worse looking in the world is below average, and everyone better looking is roughly average. sounds like a joke, but women here actually suggest this when trying to define what average means and create a way to find it. While men here define average face in a room of 100 women as some statistical average rating if all the women were rated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 12:21 AM
1

it's also clearly a joke when you exaggerate, like "i'm only 6'11 not 7 footer. i'm screwed." but the joke is more subtle when you use heights around 6'5".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 12:12 AM
1

to a certain extent. low iq as in 110 vs high iq 150? maybe certain topics. 80 vs 120? probably not too much. you have to realize, newton and leibniz discovered calculus. Very few people understood it. Today, there are thousands of high schoolers every single year getting a 5 on calculus exam. so they average gifted student in high school can understand much of the math that newton was using. education and learning is extremely important in the "creation" of a "smart" person. same with things li…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 11:26 PM
1

some notes on an interesting show on netflix: Indian Matchmaking. the older women advise younger women: don't be too picky. some women are very picky. a mom says "No men under 5'3". they really get how it is. a very reasonable standard. a female matchmaker says basically "physicality is just as important for women" and a client says he didn't think that was the case according to female friends. 6'7" dude i assume is having trouble dating because he is using the matchmaking services. lots of dude…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 08:53 AM
1

family guy is also a great show. and i love guys like quagmire. But he's a rapist. this is all entertainment. these are fictional characters that we like. if this is real, you take a segment of that population of king of the hill, and they're all voting Trump. If they had complete control, this is what happens: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/fate-of-another-royal-found-guilty-of-adultery-1753012.html if this was real, a guy like Hank Hill would pack up and move to Boston su…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 11:27 PM
1

all you really need is masculine marketing. Name your gym "Mr. Lazer's Bad Azz Gym" or something. There really are gyms like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 10:13 AM
1

it's the same reason some women strangely get angry when you discuss hypothetical future tech sex robots. Same as when men dating younger women is discussed. it's just competition. in a weird way, subconsciously, many of these women want to fuck up the competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 10:01 AM
1

don't forget that women also advise other women to settle. https://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/marriage/dont-judge-a-book-by-its-cover-the-truth-about-marry-him-the-case-for-settling-for-mr-good-enough-by-lori-gottlieb and in their argument, it can lead to a happy outcome. i mean, how bad really is it to marry someone such as your best friend with whom you have much in common? so really the advice is a good outcome for the woman. it's not men begging women to be with them necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 09:58 AM
1

not a problem if two people are attracted to each other and find each other extremely hot. which is probably, what, almost all married couples?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/23 12:23 AM
1

thousands of years ago, those things could have been different. sexual dimorphism increase means that women can birth smaller females but larger males. some species, females are bigger. even with bad nutrition, men could have easily been 7 feet on average. just like nutrition might have been bad at times, with droughts, etc. in many places, yet elephants still exist and they are huge. animals can have a plant diet and have the build of a silverback gorilla.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 10:35 PM
1

because it's about ignorance. blue pill = ignorance. society is ignorant to the sexuality and desires of women. and due to that, slut shaming is normalized, and supports the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 08:28 AM
1

i believe you. it still is enforcement of blue pill ideas, though. part of red pill is a new understanding that these blue pill ideas aren't always matching reality. when you slut shame, which both men and women do, it makes being a slut far more abnormal. whereas if you accept women's sexuality, then slut shaming loses its effectiveness and power. because we made being a slut abnormal or deviant, then punishing sluts becoming normal. So we have capital punishment for adultery in many societies …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:31 AM
1

if you believe in soul mates, adultery seems abnormal. when you don't believe women have sexual desires, then when a woman with sexual desire comes along, it must be abnormal. adultery is punished by Death in saudi arabia. in many ways, it's the blue pill person's wet dream. blue pill is enforced by laws. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mishaal_bint_Fahd_Al_Saud
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:13 AM
1

i think most men here believe there are two perspectives. the other perspective being: The women use his dick for pleasure and have an awesome time. The 1990's perspective though, is definitely: the women are victims and he's using them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 06:00 AM
1

i live near a gym and see people with similar physiques on the street regularly. there are also offices nearby. people come out and walk around in tight shirts and go to the cafes and stuff... most of the time, they're basically invisible. in fact, i see men checking out men and women checking out women more. like this one time some girl who was kind of pretty but had yoga pants on and a really nice butt. an older woman just couldn't take her eyes off it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 01:35 AM
2

men practice too much. women go shopping. an 8th grade hooper will be on the courts every single day since like 2nd grade. judit polgar practiced too much. she got to the top.
/r/AllPillDebate16/08/23 10:39 PM
1

btw, it's ok if you think a person with a condition is fucked in relationships. we can give you that and that doesn't have to make you blackpilled via any definition. we're talking about extremes at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:35 AM
1

is it really though? it depends how we interpret your words in the context of the link that i shared with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:31 AM
1

you said in one of the comments: Yea and I don't think they are in their right mind
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:22 AM
1

yes, attraction is like that... you are attracted to and love people with completely shit personalities, and this is common. yes, i agree that men are like that too. in the study though, more women got the surgery than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:21 AM
1

If you're not a conventionally good looking man and aren't wealthy/powerful then you're inherently fucked." which is very weird, because you yourself claimed there's something wrong with the women in some of these odd couplings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JjTeycc7_Q in other words, you're kind of saying this guy is fucked, since he ended up with a mentally ill person! so even you would agree there is some looks threshold below which someone is fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:16 AM
1

Some people are fucking mental, it's unfortunately a thing. the better looking killers get more letters. and sure you can make the case this is mental, others make the case that there is enough of this happening that it says something about women in general, at the primitive level of the brain. You know how abusive relationships work, right? Staying with someone after being assaulted is unfortunately common across all social classes. and much of the time, it's because she still loves him. For so…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:11 AM
1

Yea and I don't think they are in their right mind, or they're being needlessly contrarian. The overwhelming mantra amongst society still remains that "looks matter". They're not the be all end all, but they do matter. we'll just have to disagree. society's mantra for women choosing men is "personality matters the most." "Just be nice" is a common mantra: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNBumpu_kZg blackpill, which is opposing bluepill simply by default has the mantra of "Looks matters the most.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 11:06 AM
1

gastric bypass discussion guy who is blackpilled in 2008. https://killthefatman.livejournal.com/32994.html he also dealt with the bluepillers: Some of you are going to say "that's not true!' ​ this is a super blackpilled stat. it alone would have blackpilled me: The simple fact remains that the divorce rate following bariatric surgery is high. However, if the person was overweight or obese when the relationship or marriage began, the chances of that relationship or marriage ending within two yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 10:59 AM
2

only the most obtuse of self identified blackpillers would claim that looks is the only thing that matters. although i'm sure some would make a good case, and bring in things like how serial killers get married. that small percent of women who write to serial killers is still an interesting pattern. even psychologists find it noteworthy. so a small percentage of women, it won't matter if you're a dumb ass killer. They'll still write you based on your looks. If you're in the NFL and you beat a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 10:56 AM
1

No one in their right mind thinks that physical attraction is an irrelevancy. but some do think that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JjTeycc7_Q some women say height doesn't matter AT ALL. and i believe them. some men don't want to have sex. i believe them. they are neither straight nor gay. ​ read the second definition's "misconception" section: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Blackpill ​ yet look at how simple these Truths are: Two "ugly" people get married. One becomes "hot.…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 10:48 AM
1

i consider myself blackpilled but I believe that almost everyone can find partners, get married, have kids, etc. including obese people, and it's clear that they do find partners. but here's what happens to obese marriages if one gets gastric bypass surgery: https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1wuk6e/til_that_85_of_married_obese_people_who_have/ you just need a few studies like this to get blackpilled. It's basically an experiment of what happens when you have an ugly couple, and one…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 09:56 AM
1

so looks are important for enough people that you'll notice the disparity? that essentially is blackpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 09:37 AM
1

but you're the one dismissively saying "nah" with one anecdote? blackpill isn't a single anecdote of someone going to a mall and seeing 3 average looking girls with above average looking men. and proof that blackpill is bullshit isn't a single anecdote either. blackpill is statistical Truth. to say it applies to 100% of all people is bullshit. it is also bullshit when a guy comes in here and he's a 5/10 and every woman 5/10 and below is obviously invisible to him. but generally statistics aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 09:35 AM
1

women date and marry men they feel little to no attraction to. that's also part of all the blackpill stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 09:01 AM
1

that's not a sample size of 2. the sample size is all of your friends. like, if i said I know 2 people close to me who had breast cancer, that's not a sample size of 2. the sample size would be like 50+. https://datepsychology.com/no-the-sample-size-is-not-too-small/ even anecdotally though, without statistics, that's where the patterns begin to interest people. you see 3 of your friends laid off. You see 3 banks close in your city. All of that anecdotal shit is meaningful. it tells you SOME thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 06:43 AM
–

it's literally statistical truth. it's the same way you poll 1000 random people and you get extremely accurate answers on the entire group of 100 million or more people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 05:10 AM
–

two examples in the small sample size of women that you know or women you dated, is a possible trend. what we don't know yet is it a pattern of 5% of women, or 65% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 01:51 AM
3

her face and body are both above average. but she's not so stunning in regular candids with normal clothes. the look is attainable to a lot of girls out there. they choose not to do that. part of that is like career ambition and being in the entertainment industry, things like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:44 PM
3

they ARE ordinary average cute women who looksmax, photo and makeup fraud and get surgery: https://www.asiaone.com/entertainment/mspuiyi-reveals-why-new-boyfriend-didnt-impress-her-initially-his-boys-talk-pulau-amelia-henderson-joey-leong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:17 PM
4

https://www.asiaone.com/entertainment/mspuiyi-reveals-why-new-boyfriend-didnt-impress-her-initially-his-boys-talk-pulau-amelia-henderson-joey-leong she doesn't look super glamorous or super beautiful. she looks like your average cute asian girl. nothing that's head turning at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:54 PM
1

height is a gross fetish. no difference, tbh. why isn't height preference gross?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 01:45 AM
1

we don't know the context. love is blind is one example, tons of women say shit like that. yeah, depending on the context it's weird and inappropriately, but not uncommon. my point is that these examples are like "Wow, men are weird. look at men!" when the reality is that there are a lot of people both men and women that are like this. i approached a girl and she dressed well and looked professional. her job was buying stuff on offerup and reselling it on ebay. another girl i approached at an ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 01:30 AM
1

not really. girls do it all the time. just watch Love is Blind. girls say stuff like "He's not my type. I usually go for 6'5" guys."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 12:24 AM
1

none of that is weird: 10 years older: not that weird. has a child: not that weird. unemployed: not that weird. usually more into asian women: not that weird, he was open about this. it's not that different than someone saying "I'm usually into taller men." It's just a preference. the weirdness depends on the conversation and how it was said. if you're a smart person, you are meeting classmates and coworkers who all have certain levels of ambition and intelligence. When you get out into the "rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 11:38 PM
1

what exactly is "average." It has actually come up in various forums several times. i separate a group of guys into good looking and bad looking. Then the good looking group becomes "average." i rate every guy, and use this rating system to calculate the average score. people close to the average score are roughly what is "average".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:25 PM
1

of course it's not all people who become super successful. and yes, socialization helps, such as becoming a salesman. but it's not super important. the weirdest guy i worked with stuck to his retail job while we all quit, and he manages it now. he's a bizarre dude. he's basically like the stapler guy in Office Space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHHZBmF8mk4 And the best looking most sociable charming people are not doing too good in terms of career. 6'3 white guys who are sociable claim they …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:11 PM
1

so the female equivalent of the male idea of voting for the guy they'd like to have a beer with?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:05 PM
1

young people here come up with a reasonable view: such as that childhood socialization is important for things outside of dating, like making money and being generally successful in life. when you're older, you realize that these people find a way to become successful despite being socially very awkward. when you're older you'll have had some weird bosses, know some weird rich people, etc. these weird dudes find a way. they run a comic book shop or something. they have their niches where they ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:01 PM
1

unibrows aren't that rare, because people pluck them and you never see them. in high school we had a conversation about guys' unibrows. The next day, the people we were talking about had plucked them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:49 PM
1

there's a lot of pro-sex worker stuff in woke environments like twitter. this has leaked into general society. we're in the middle of it now, kind of like how some liberal politicians remained anti gay marriage longer than other liberal politicians.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:48 PM
1

they're not. it's just that too much hair is gross for both men and women. and people shame people for it. a group of girls will point and laugh at a man with too much back hair at a beach. which will cause sadness in the man with too much back hair, and he may shave it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:45 PM
1

it's incredibly un-PC to insult sex workers who are putting food on the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:04 AM
1

i've seen nonstop unibrow talk on twitter. just totally fucking a guy up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:15 AM
1

classical literature and movies. people, in general, should do mini reviews after watching or reading them. i know some people already do this every once in a while, when people mention red pill movies. if you have netflix, i'd watch something like Lady Chatterly's Lover. if that is too old style for your taste, watch some more recent red pill style movies, such as In the Company of Men. A good relationship show that people watch here is actually Seinfeld. It gets into some relationship issues. …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 09:01 AM
1

there are male celebs that feel ENORMOUS pressure to shave the unibrow. It takes ENORMOUS courage to be a male with a unibrow. The women WILL body shame the FUCK out of you for your unibrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:49 AM
1

deflection technique: They're not allowed to find sex workers disgusting, so they must find the clients disgusting. one becomes code for the other. To say that they find the clients disgusting is the same as saying "Fuck the women who were poor and decided to get into this work to feed their children."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 08:47 AM
1

"Bob, if horoscopes are bullshit, then why are they in EVERY RESPECTABLE NEWSPAPER IN THE WORLD."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:49 PM
1

sounds fake as fuck. living with multiple housemates who all could be doing crazy shit, and hearing a loud sound, then shooting the guy? i've lived with dudes in one house. loud sounds were regular. one of the louder ones was a dude backed out of the garage with the door down, crashed through, got angry, and just left.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 11:40 PM
1

this sub is blackpilling everyone, men and women, whether they admit it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:31 PM
1

i've done similar, and when i was done i declared "NEVER AGAIN!"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:30 PM
1

when we're all 23 and you're moving, yeah, i'll help you out and we'll have adventures in a uhaul. when you're older just hire movers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:16 PM
2

that just means the gay porn revenue is too low for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:43 AM
2

would you do it for 35 trillion USD?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:42 AM
2

I think people are talking about like 1 trillion, where you're able to feed the world's poor and save a million lives. as a man, my own price is 500 million.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 09:41 AM
1

at the same time, if these centrists were extremists, the extremists would simply have more power. a centrist isn't always negotiating, a centrist actually believes in centrist economic ideas. if centrists are most powerful, then they don't even have to compromise with anyone. they can, and often do, bully others and force their agenda. the problem is that they can't dodge bullets from far away. it's like the Titanic. if you didn't turn in the past, it's too late. that's why the smartest centris…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 11:04 PM
1

we still have climate change if we're all centrists. i'm a centrist. the difference between centrism vs extreme left environmentalism is that the species might end due to centrism, and the species might be saved due to extremists. it's totally possible that's the reality 10,000 years from now. in one path of the universe, there are no humans ever again for the rest of the universe. Another species claims the top spot. In the other path, humans flourish and colonize trillions of planets.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:41 PM
1

0.01% -> 0.1% chance is statistically huge. you're rolling those dice every year. if you actually could see a million of the same people show up every year rolling those odds, you'll see more and more drop dead. it will be damn noticeable. the click bait usually go with some thing like "Don't eat bacon 3 times a day for 40 years: 16% INCREASE of disease!!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:26 PM
1

men have the same limited perspective. that's why men are shocked when they realize how easy it is for women to get casual sex with hot men. mothers are shocked that their son can't go approach those cheerleaders in the mall and hook up with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 10:09 PM
1

most people that say "i'm above average" overrate significantly. one example is a woman here who i think was from europe, had pictures and claimed she was 8+. and most of the men said 4-6 while also saying they were being generous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:59 PM
1

if 40%+ of all first marriages end in divorce, it can give us a rough picture of what effect a small annual relative frequency has after decades. it leaves a huge crater of divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:51 PM
1

fake your death. make a few thousand bucks on your monetized youtube. pay mortgage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:35 PM
1

no need to shame anyone's preferences, like if a woman only wants to date men who are 5'0"+ or if two men want to date each other. As long as both people are 18+, no need for us to sit here shaming them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:16 PM
1

there's a few things that bluepillers keep arguing over and over, i notice. One is "nobody ever talks about x in real life. Not a single person ever." Where x is "settling in love" or "rating people 1-10" or "discussing things like height and weight in attraction" or some other topic that comes up here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 07:43 PM
1

what same example? There are literally thousands of posts about it! people asking it all the time. magazines write articles about it, and have been doing that for decades! https://www.glamour.com/story/should-you-settle-25-of-new-yo the way they write about it, it's an age old question "SHOULD YOU SETTLE?" it's like "COKE VS PEPSI" that's how much this is discussed. people instantly understand the question. the enormous pressures that single women face to settle down and have kids before it's to…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 04:21 AM
1

women would talk about it all the damn time. even though it is difficult to talk about, women do talk about it all the time. it's difficult to admit that the person you will marry is not attractive in some way or has some flaw that you find unattractive, including personality flaws. yet i've listened to women talk about this with each other in real life. and it also is pretty popular as a topic on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/datingoverthirty/comments/fqcf3j/dae_wish_theyd_settled_earlier/ t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 04:10 AM
1

just change the name then, call it: very attractive men attract more women and have more options so they can dump them more knowing that they have other women waiting/lots of women when they get old want to settle down, get married, and have children, and they have a biological clock but a lot of hot guys who are the same age don't have the same pressure so this creates imbalances and they need to settle with guys that aren't as hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 03:53 AM
1

weird theory: he looks like her before surgery. He's the male version of her unlooksmaxed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 03:49 AM
1

that wasn't a direct response to the meme you posted. anyway, you responded with this: Women already are what? Having sex with men they're not attracted to? If they are, they should stop that. and i responded directly with this: no other options if you want marriage and kids with someone with a decent career, and you're 35. It seems clear from your comment that you already assumed we're talking about SOME women. you're not confused at all about it when you wrote that first response to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 03:12 AM
1

of course that would be absurd if i actually said it. but i never said that. we're talking about SOME women. when i say "Women are already doing that." That doesn't mean ALL women! not sure how you would interpret it like that. our starting point is women who aren't attracted to their partners, yet sleeping with them. i don't even suggest that it's the MAJORITY of women!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 02:54 AM
1

because 30-something women give themselves that goal. it's not a totally arbitrary cut off, it's related to fertility. of course many women will still be able to have kids after 40, and many women won't even want kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:11 AM
1

so tons of women aren't in that situation? https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomenOver30/comments/qq5138/never_dreamed_id_still_be_single_at_35does_anyone/ https://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/marriage/dont-judge-a-book-by-its-cover-the-truth-about-marry-him-the-case-for-settling-for-mr-good-enough-by-lori-gottlieb you really don't think this is some obvious shit? you ever get drunk with a single female 40+ friend and talk about this shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:08 AM
1

no other options if you want marriage and kids with someone with a decent career, and you're 35. if you are single and you give yourself a goal, you have 5 years? what happens if you date a guy, but he breaks up with you after 2 years? Then you suddenly only have 3 years to reach your goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:03 AM
1

women already are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 11:54 PM
1

to be fair, there are a lot of comments that are like "my last 3 boyfriends were actually quite tall, all over 6'5" but I honestly don't care about height at all. In fact, I highly prefer short men, because I don't have to strain my neck to kiss."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:53 PM
1

she's taping her skin taut.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:43 PM
1

at the end, it shows you how she does it. by using tape. morally, if you were to trick someone into a short relationship, and they never see you without the makeup.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:43 PM
1

is this even that bad, like morally? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jcHp3-Ds9U
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 10:29 PM
1

it's definitely weird for women on dating/sex. maybe if we're talking about the opioid crisis, we can get equal amounts of empathy from both genders. but when it comes to dating discussions, one person here summed up the reason for the problems: Women often have know idea what they want and are confused themselves. so it makes it hard to talk about things, such as all these statistics and anecdotes and stuff. all of this makes sense though, dating is more complex for women. they're dealing with …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:54 PM
1

some women are becoming conservative too. become conservative and ban all video games in order to fuck the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 08:45 PM
1

those are averaged facial features, not average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:23 AM
1

the blackpill stats are mostly from academia or industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 12:20 AM
1

it is definitely problematic, but if it's real, then it's real. people use all kinds of information for their own agenda. but apart from those things, everyone is bisexual has been claimed by researchers. https://nypost.com/2018/03/14/new-research-finds-were-all-bisexual/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:47 PM
1

some comments got me thinking and i had this weird brief thought that 100% of guys could be attractive, in some weird sense. for a split second, it actually kind of made sense. it would explain relationships like the shane and hannah couple on youtube that people have linked here before. it would explain serial killers getting married. it would explain why people go on Love Is Blind and they really believe in it. on a super primitive lizard brain level, any two people can pair up and have a succ…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:26 PM
1

thanks for being honest
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:21 PM
1

like LTR possibility
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:19 PM
1

all 4 traits would be less than half of all dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:18 PM
1

every man is attractive to society, because the weak men are still way stronger than almost all women. And we all should be attracted to that, biologically?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:06 PM
1

maybe because the weakest men are still above average strength in the general population including women. but i'm speaking platonically as a man, while walking around a walmart and looking at minimum wage employees. if they are male, they seem attractive and high value, something i respect and i believe everyone should respect and feel attracted by them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 10:03 PM
1

women, would you consider nearly 100% of men attractive? Not attractive to you, but just attractive "in general." such as society considers them attractive and High Value.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:55 PM
1

no, not most, basically 100% of all men are high value and attractive. the problem with that statement isn't this sub. Just go out into the real world and ask a handful of women: Are 100% of men attractive and high value? The most common answers you get will be under 10% of men are attractive. Nobody defines it the way you do. If you define it like that, that's not a problem, it just definitely isn't a definition shared by most women out there in the real world, let alone this sub. and you won't…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:43 PM
1

i mean, if a few women finding you attractive makes them attractive in a discussion, then really nearly all men, close to 100% are high value and attractive. by definition all men are high value and attractive, no need to discuss things further.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:34 PM
1

i mean, we're talking about average man here. the discussion is about average man, then we need to be talking about averages. we don't even need to talk about majority. it just has to be a significant portion of women. it's a pretty normal way to define attractiveness: a lot of people find you attractive rather than saying you're unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:22 PM
1

let's say an average man is attractive high value man. but most women aren't attracted to this attractive high value man, maybe most women consider him low value man. Then I would claim that that average man isn't an attractive high value man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:17 PM
1

because you called average man high value and attractive. maybe i interpreted that wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:13 PM
1

if average guy is a high value attractive man, then i assume you believe that women will find these attractive men attractive to them, rather than find them unattractive or low quality or ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:08 PM
1

because about 50% of all men are average or above.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 09:01 PM
1

if average is high quality, will most women find about 50% of men attractive, if you ask them in other forums?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:55 PM
1

I'm waiting for the obligatory hit and run comment: "I don't know a single woman who ever complained about where the good men are. It's never happened in history."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:43 PM
1

disney is ultra blackpilled. Shrek is bluepilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:23 PM
1

bluepillers are right about a few things, but the effect is miniscule. example: bluepillers are right about Types, and how some women may not find a model attractive. This is true for men too. Some men do not find any Kardashian attractive. there is a lot of subjectivity for everyone, and bluepillers are right about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:22 PM
1

here, not all women would admit to that. because it would make them at least partially blackpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 08:12 PM
1

if most incels are average looking, then what about the bottom 25% attractiveness guys? it's exponentially harder for those people. just like being 5'2" is significantly more difficult than 5'7"-5'11" (What you might call an average Range.)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 07:54 PM
–

for undergrad? if you look at math, one of the hardest subjects for most people, you have your calculus sequence, plus 8 requirements could get you a degree at many schools out there. there is one big caveat to that statement, and that's half the world has below average IQ. but for a person that is reasonably intelligent, it's true for at least Undergraduate level mastery of a subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 07:02 AM
–

i agree it's what you make of it. but my point is that i have a degree and someone out there doesn't. yet they may know more than me. The degree itself doesn't tell you that much. stats guys I talk to tell me that a lot of phd stem people don't really know much about stats and often use them wrong. so it goes all the way through to the top: there are people who coast all the way, and end up with a PhD. stats may be outside of their specialization, but it's necessary for their research and they s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:54 AM
–

based on the youtube MIT stuff, I assume it's pretty similar there. Huge lectures, very little access to top experts. I'm not sure about Harvey Mudd. smaller schools might be the way to go. though the education might not be vastly superior to the library, of course the prestige is there even for state schools and I assume you're paying a good amount less for state schools.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 06:46 AM
–

also, tuition stories from older folks are so wild. kids just decide to walk to their local college, pay like $85, fill out a little form the size of a postcard, and start taking courses. 2.5 years later, they hold an engineering degree. there's a lot of gatekeeping these days, with testing and letters of recommendations, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 05:41 AM
–

even before internet, if you had a good library, you could pretty much master undergraduate level of any subject. it seems odd to always have been focused on degrees. back in the day it was more common to become a lawyer by self-teaching and passing the bar. weird shit like that, you basically never hear about it anymore. people who do that all know their shit. whereas people like me, with a bachelor's, yet i don't think i ever finished reading a single textbook in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 05:37 AM
–

the wall isn't comparing smv of women vs smv of men. the wall is comparing women vs other women. and also, no, go to a mall and look at all the women roughly 60+. or just google 60 year old women stock photos.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 02:43 AM
–

women themselves talk about the wall, and some women independently discover the wall and describe it in posts. i've read posts where women are like "Where have all the men gone after I hit 30?" it isn't a single number for everyone. it's just something that happens enough that it becomes a shared experience of many women out there. maybe youth is the female equivalent of height.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 02:32 AM
1

notice that not every guy that is arguing is complaining. there are attractive guys here. The top guys here are top 1% in attractiveness. just like if you look at 10,000 female minimum wage employees at walmart, some of them are going to look like models. many guys (and girls) here are simply observing. the interest is in sociology, evolution, psychology, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 02:21 AM
–

they do move on. and yeah, i agree with that. but on this forum it's just a discussion. it's interesting from a strategy perspective. it's also women who give this advice to other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 09:30 PM
1

there are different facts here. most women consider a very small percentage of men physically attractive. that's one fact. you can debate this, but we hear it from women in their forums, many of them agree with this. many women aren't physically attracted to their husbands. this is a consequence of the first fact. Just because I link ONE woman, as an example, doesn't mean there aren't more examples on the internet. Obviously, we all can find thousands of more examples pretty quickly. this may NO…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 09:13 PM
1

it's clearly news because people get shocked and argue against it! for example, you get people, both men and women claiming things like "No woman would ever marry a person that they didn't find physically attractive." and then you show them some link https://www.refinedprose.com/not-attracted-husband/ this is simply a consequence of most women finding few men attractive. Yet when these things get shared every month, it CLEARLY is news to many people out there. what's interesting is that the info…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 09:00 PM
–

the filtering itself is a mistake. rejecting 5'11" is probably a mistake. being obsessed with height so badly that you date a guy who claims he's 6'0" and you don't notice that he's 5'9", you marry him. you rejected a 5'11" guy but in real life, you meet him with your 5'9" husband and the other guy is actually 5'11.5" and you visibly scowl. it is a mistake to take all of these things too seriously and obsess about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:48 PM
1

https://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/marriage/dont-judge-a-book-by-its-cover-the-truth-about-marry-him-the-case-for-settling-for-mr-good-enough-by-lori-gottlieb the consequence is that you lose out on the one. it could be the greatest relationship consequence in many lives. I hear about it from women. I see it in the marriages of my friends and coworkers. i read women's posts about it in different forums. people, both men and women, talk about the imbalance, the problems with too many choices, etc.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:17 PM
1

people have done that to me, i'm not that big, and i completely understand their reaction. i may be wearing a hoodie and look poor generally. the poorer you look, the higher the chances that you're homeless. if you're homeless, in some cities, there's a bigger chance that you might randomly assault someone. i've done that to people. but they were obviously homeless dudes muttering shit. me and my friends refused to go down a street with a 4'10" homeless guy because he was so fucking scary. at ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 08:00 PM
1

that's not uncommon advice from older women to younger women. those women are at the other side, and they claim the consequences are insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 07:43 PM
1

success for everyone would mean a high quality experience for everyone, which is impossible. algorithms can't do that. they're limited by real life behaviors. what i mean by independent of tinder, is that all other apps have the same problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 05:35 AM
1

lol. i'll give you that. that's pretty mockable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 04:48 AM
1

if Tinder could, they would want everyone to have success when it comes to casual sex. every damn person in the world would be in the app if they could find success and happiness with casual relationships that they got from the app. this is why 80/20 is independent of tinder. it's so strong that no cultural, corporate cognitive habit-changing methods will change it within a few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:35 AM
1

does anyone really disagree with 80/20 for casual sex, when you have real life anecdotes, you talk to your coworkers, etc.? even just asking women on forums, you basically get the 80/20 rule. or worse. a 95/5.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:31 AM
1

clients don't like tats. even on arms, etc. especially midwest, lots of christian people. this was back 15+ years ago though. a lot has changed. if society in general was against tats at some point, it just means having a preference isn't that mockable. it's important for some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:15 AM
1

any tat preference is fine: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/body-modification-fan-covers-himself-27900133 no guy is going to base the decision on a single little butterfly tattoo. but it is perfectly reasonable to think that the more area that is covered, the more it might matter to an individual. when you look at extremes, it should be obvious. it's exactly why men understand why 5'0" men are in general less preferred than 5'8" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:08 AM
1

there are employers who wouldn't hire me because of a tat. you can mock it, but it's default views of society. It is definitely changing though and becoming far more acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 02:02 AM
1

all preferences should be ok. some people have a strict height preference. if someone has a strict tattoo preference, how is that any different? personally, in dating, I believe any preferences are valid, including gender, race, height, weight, religion, tattoos, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 01:50 AM
–

some men get pregnant and become single fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:21 AM
–

there are good tattoos out there, but most tattoos are just some red pill bro's doodles.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:12 AM
–

i disagree that i need a lot of reading. i think former pros and sports commentators and fans on forums are mostly right, or at least they make very good points. the training and body size difference still plays out. this is anecdotal, i see way more boys playing hoops in the driveway, than girls. probably like 99 to 1. i do see random non-hall of fame boys in youtube clips, they're like 6'7" in 8th grade. so the size difference is real. i agree that almost all boys lose to men's pro teams even …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:01 AM
–

i would agree. people also talk about advertising revenue and ticket sales. some women's sports i assume are doing very, very well in terms of revenue. others simply are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 11:19 PM
–

i have zero understanding of sports. all these points are made by other people, some are made by sports commentators, this was very popular in forums around when serena vs average college male player was a popular topic to discuss. guys were saying Federer at age 15 could probably beat many of the top pros. i wasn't saying that, sports fans in forums were saying that. people went into detail about even weight differences and heights in various sports. people in various forums suggest top 8th gra…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 11:07 PM
–

so you're just suggesting a non starbucks date. that's perfectly fine. it's the women here who totally reject for those types of reasons that are handicapping themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:51 PM
–

people in many forums talked about this multiple times. the top 15 year old boys play daily since age 5. some since the age of 3. whereas most high school girls don't play daily, they're at the mall shopping. the top 15 year old boys are better than some pro men in top leagues. those top 15 year old boys, some of them turn pro at age 16-18, and a pro gets cut from the team to make room for them. Just look at guys like Lebron and his points per game first year in the league. There are tons of NBA…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:42 PM
–

no starbucks is arbitrary. the whole point of a meeting is to quickly assess major red flags. for online dating, that means they're not catfishing you, they're real, they're photos and height claims are close to accurate. not too much major frauding. and for dating in general, just find out a little bit about a person. but a lot of women have these weird arbitrary things. "he wore shorts and sandals so i rejected him. he's perfect otherwise though. I wore shorts and sandals too but I'm a woman a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 10:30 PM
1

to be fair, we know serial killers have bad personalities, and yet they're getting married and fucking during visitation hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 06:59 PM
–

most americans live paycheck to paycheck. we now live in an era where sons encourage moms to do onlyfans, because that's real money and they understand that. go to any walmart and you'll find girls there. if they make a couple hundred extra per month for little effort, it's a big deal to many of them. i've googled my neighbors and their usernames on different accounts. a few of them have camgirl pages that show up. it's going to tempt many people. maybe not 25%, but a high enough number that tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 04:55 AM
–

more than you think. any girl doing doordash has to stop and think about that stuff some of the time. there's an opportunity for a better life out there. a few of my neighbors have done stuff like that. they look like ordinary people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/23 02:29 AM
1

many guys here say they are. they say that once they hit around 30, the 19 year olds are very attracted. it's the same anecdote as girls who hit puberty and notice tons of men checking them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:13 PM
1

it's just one more example added to the pile. other examples include makeup, fashion, implants, fillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 05:59 PM
1

the biological mechanism would probably be related to increased libido, but that need can be met without having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 10:07 PM
1

you ever see those hoarder shows?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 09:51 PM
1

society had a preferred illusion or myth for their children. Soulmates is part of that. religion is part of that. that alone has huge consequences, such as a woman getting a divorce and then becoming an outcast. why would you divorce the soulmate that God has chosen for you? this is all 100% a coherent ideology that is shared by many people, even today. purity, no premarital sex, this was all very popular. if purity is what society considers the norm, then being slutty is, by default, abnormal. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 06:53 PM
1

to talk to people here and get a rough idea of the scenario that you want to share. or to ask a question, and that number is relevant to the question. obviously this is imperfect, but we do it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:11 PM
1

i mean people can't tell by looking in the mirror. so they'll never really know from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 05:09 PM
1

you can find x% of people who find you attractive. if that number is 78%, we can interpret that you are more attractive than a person whose number is 7% using this methodology. obviously this is still flawed, but it's just a rough estimate and really can't be done to people here unless they share multiple good photos. we do this to celebs all the time. even when some celebs vary a lot, like adam driver.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:39 PM
1

you should know if you're a great singer or horrible by just listening to a tape of yourself. but watch american idol and you'll quickly realize that this is not the case for probably millions upon millions of people. and not all of them are idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:32 PM
–

and very few of them are actual liberals. Go anywhere with money, such as execs of a breast cancer charity, at the top, even if you find mostly women, they all vote Republican.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 04:39 AM
–

that's the plot of Undercover Boss. And, yes, it's a recurring theme for those CEO's to say "Damn, this is harder than I thought."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:49 PM
–

i'll say this: any idiot can be president of a company, or even a country, and come out without having done too much damage. or do good by somewhat lucky decisions such as reagan and GPS. and the opposite is true too: Smart people can really fuck up a company so bad, that it goes bankrupt within several years, or reputation is permanently damaged, with huge long term consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:41 PM
–

i think it's that anyone can run a company as good as some of these CEO's. it really is one decision sometimes, such as the decision to not buy Netflix for Blockbuster. I do believe some random neckbeards at minimum wage walmart jobs would have purchased Netflix if they were in that position. The CEO of blockbuster had to approve of this: "No more late fees ever, no matter what! Instead, we charge your for purchasing the DVD if you keep it too long, and if you want to return it, then we charge y…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 09:39 PM
8

this is a weird bluepill perspective, to only consider that men use women for sex. the reality is that women use men for sex too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:44 PM
1

based on roommates and neighbors, i'd estimate promiscuity much higher than stats claim. multiple of my neighbors and roommates bring home random dudes regularly. one neighbor is inviting people into her home without ever meeting them before. so, i'm assuming off an app. they literally introduce themselves at her door.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 07:38 PM
1

this applies to everything. like personal finance. "Just stop buying stuff bro" Meanwhile, there are people who spend 50 years of their life trying to figure out how to get you to buy more stuff. They literally go to school for that, and get a PhD in psychology or cognitive science. On top of that, they have armies of financial lawyers for their fine print and fees, nickel and diming you. even senators are flabbergasted by these loopholes they come up with to charge you fees. On top of all of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 06:32 PM
1

if average woman wants to fuck hotter guys, then those don't fail with online dating. they get what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:57 PM
1

when you talk about passport bros or even if you talk about future hypothetical sex robots, you often find women getting mad in the comments. it's because pussy is all the power that they have. you're taking away some of that power.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/23 03:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter