TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ButterflyTattoo Archive

View 0 posts and 135 comments by ButterflyTattoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We are infinitely malleable. It just takes time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 06:59 PM
1

Scientists broadly consider evo psych to be pseudoscience. Its also a favorite of the altright to justify their bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 09:30 PM
1

Lol thats okay!!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 09:28 PM
1

Cool explanation. It's too bad evo psych is widely considered to be pseudoscience
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 09:32 PM
1

Whether you like it or not, the fact remains that most men aren’t interested in marrying a promiscuous woman. Thats nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 08:16 AM
2

I said in that post I only dated one rich guy 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 08:16 AM
1

Who says I want commitment from every single guy im with????
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 01:55 AM
2

Oh no of course not. Ive only ever dated (not sugared) one rich guy and I'm still with him. Dated many others.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/21 01:54 AM
2

Try using commas and full stops, its hard to follow what you are saying. Lots of SDs are horrible people and the reason they go for 18 or younger is that its easy to take advantage of their innocence. And also because 3,000 a month seems like a good amount of money for dumb girls that age, when in reality I can make that much in a few days now through numerous other avenues. But thats why I think sugaring is not great anymore. The men on there aren't particularly RICH, they are doctors, managers…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:59 AM
0

Getting your heart broken is part of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:55 AM
1

Men use women for sex, thats seeing the opposite gender as tools. I actually have relationships with these men and am open and honest with them. Thats hardly using them as tools.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 10:55 AM
1

Oh it was alright! I started too early (16) and was taken advantage a bit. But once I got some experience and found some nice men it was fun and I got my tuition paid, lots of gifts, traveling, and never had to worry about money. Some of my SDs barely wanted sex they just wanted to spoil me so that was fun. But by now I think sugaring is for girls who dont know how to find the real prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 10:58 PM
1

Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 09:26 PM
2

Definitely, definitely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 09:25 PM
1

Nope. Sugaring is like when you are 18-21. I would just find a rich man to date now 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 08:41 PM
1

Omg they are allowed to do whatever they want and think whatever they want. I'm allowed to tell that that their assumptions about 'sex workers' are bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 08:40 PM
1

Thats alright if thats what you think. I enjoy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 08:35 PM
1

??? I can and have experienced both. Who the hell said that you can ONLY have either sex with love or casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 08:35 PM
-7

im not
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 11:13 PM
-2

I just think sex is/should be something sacred between two people Love is something sacred between two people. Sex really, really doesn't have to be. You can have sex with or without love, and the latter is amazing fun too. And liking the latter doesnt mean someone wont like the former... Just kind of weird to think this way... 😕
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 11:09 PM
-2

That seems to betray some level of insecurity on your part huh. Cause I was a sugar baby until a year ago and sure the sex was transactional but it isnt with my actual partners and never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 10:58 PM
0

I used to be a sugar baby until like a year ago and I don't think like that. I just needed the money lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 10:57 PM
-15

no history of extracting money from men in sexual situations Lol whats the problem with stripping or sugaring
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 10:08 PM
1

I dont fit in this at all but practice open relationships always. But I guess thats more 'nonmono' than poly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 09:24 PM
1

Its not funny at all. Some places in India reached 55 degrees this year in urban places. Thats uninhabitable. A town in Canada burned down after it reached 51 degrees. In CANADA. Its not funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 08:29 PM
1

This year you had record temperatures in Canada where a town literally burned down. 50+ degrees in British Columbia, 45 in Seattle. Unprecedented, and it will go as yet another year that is one of the hottest year on record, including the hottest Summer on record. But yeah keep believing your republican lies. I dont have to be a scientist to read the temperature.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:49 PM
1

Okay then say you are a nuclear physicist, not a scientist. Also not sure how nuclear physics makes you an expert in climate change. It sounds like quite a big effort to convince 95% of scientists to say a certain thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:58 PM
0

how is that 'hamstering'. And the link between monogamy and 'civilization' is so moronic. We're moving that way and we are doing fine. In fact open relationships would solve a lot of our current problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:56 PM
1

Maybe. But pregnancy is also rarer, less complicated, less dangerous, and not necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:45 PM
1

'scientist' No scientist ever said that. Scientists dont say they are 'scientists', they specifically list their particular job and field. No one works as a 'scientist'.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:44 PM
1

I dont think anyone should be forced to be poly or to not have children or something. But people are becoming more poly, and the birth rate in many countries is 1-1.5 children per couple. Thats about perfect imo. Wouldn’t it be more effective There are multiple directions to take to target environmental issues. I say.. why not all of them?!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:28 PM
1

Blah blah blah. Republican anti-science nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:26 PM
1

Its not about land. Its about climate change and conservation efforts. Every new person means an even bigger carbon footprint whereas we need to drastically reduce it. Meanwhile, while people live in congested areas the food they eat is grown across a wide swathe of land. This causes deforestation and damage to ecosystems. This is especially bad in places like Asia, Africa, Middle East and latin america where there is very high population growth but low land space. Those people then need to immi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:43 PM
0

People can reproduce in open marriages. But also, having children is less important in a world suffering from overpopulation and the problems that come from it A lot of people get married for the event and tradition of it. I think thats fine but we should remove the monogamy aspect of it already. Its outdated. Ive only ever been poly and cant think of being monogamous now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:26 PM
-1

I think marriage never made much sense. I think its primary benefit was for unattractive men who could lock in women by restricting our sexual choices and then utilizing money to lure women (while also restricting our independent means of earning.) And marriage was also often open on one side, unofficially. Because often women could not leave a marriage due to our lack of financial independence. In the modern world monogamous marriages dont make any sense. I think open relationships in general s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:41 PM
7

I DOUBT that TRP works. It just packages a bunch of other good advice like working out, being confident and dressing well (advice that actually works) with a boatload of unnecessary misogyny and toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:38 PM
1

Not really!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:30 PM
1

Nope. A lot of it transactional and a lot casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:30 PM
6

21F - 24
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:03 PM
0

Not unreported numbers. I mean the number of reported rapes have increased. But the number of arrests have decreased or remained the same. As a result the number of closed cases for rape cases has halved in the last few decades. The increasing number of cases and reduced closed cases is part of why there is an increase in rape culture. I didn't say college is useless. I'm saying that it's far less useful than it was before. It doesn't guarantee you anything other than debt. Some people do well a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:43 AM
-1

There are different kinds of crime. Homicide, theft and most of the crimes that largely effect men have definitely decreased. But rape has increased significantly, and the numbers of men arrested for rape has decreased. These are all stats you can look them up. Crimes overall have decreased. Rape has increased. Rape culture has never been more prevalent. College is far from useless. The reason unmarried women earn more in our 20s is because we only enter the labor force with a college degree. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 08:13 PM
-3

Oh okay. So part of the decline is men just being pathetic and not able to live in a world where women are empowered. Got it. Also I'd rather loser men watch porn than go out and commit rapes and murders, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 08:01 PM
16

Learn to use paragraphs lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:21 AM
6

More crime. Overfilling jails. Crime is decreasing Kids who are lost, alone, with no ambition, no drive. More people have college degrees than ever. Women are able to do work with far fewer barriers and somewhat more even pay (though not nearly the same yet.) Nihilism, Incels, Black Pill. How are incels a product of more open sexuality? They are a product of porn and toxic internet communities I would continue but your entire post is nonsense and is typical 'back in the good old days' logical fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:20 AM
6

Because they are usually old/incels
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 06:17 AM
1

Omg L.O.L. As if 'moral character' can be decided just because she likes casual sex with hotter guys? Get over yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 03:35 AM
0

I think the part about this that is gross is the bitterness that goes with it. Realistically nothing about having multiple sex partners before marriage is negative if you practiced safe sex and are STD free. The fear men have of these women is 100% misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 04:15 AM
2

Its 'inefficient' in that its restrictive for men and very oppressive towards women. The reason it exists is obvious. To oppress women and promote the interests of some men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 06:42 AM
4

'pseudoscience mega-thread'
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 11:07 PM
1

Yeah I guess I'm not a sexist red piller
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 06:13 PM
1

Your 'example' is not the norm. The modern framework simply doesnt confine women to a role they may not want to do. Only loser men have a problem with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/21 06:01 PM
2

Okay fair
/r/askTRP19/05/21 03:29 AM
1

I dont get why you are telling me this. My question is why is onlyfans immoral but having casual sex is not.
/r/askTRP19/05/21 03:15 AM
1

Well I have an onlyfans. And I don't understand how it is 'morally unacceptable' but you having casual sex with girls is morally acceptable. At least have consistent standards!
/r/askTRP19/05/21 02:51 AM
1

We're attracted to attractive men. Attractive men cheat more often because they can. Unattractive men want to cheat but cant. That doesnt make them better, it just makes them losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/21 02:50 AM
3

Haha I mean that word tends to be used with negative connotations these days. I'm an activist for social justice issues. So yes I guess I'm 'woke.'
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 05:07 PM
6

Hahahaha. Naa no thanks. And I don't follow the logic anyhow. Makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 06:51 AM
0

On top of that, they aren't even good looking a lot of the time They usually are. And then the bad boy persona is obviously very attractive because these men are more confident and interesting. Its not that women are attracted to abusive cheaters. Imo all men would cheat if they were attractive. So I don't really buy that whol angle. 'Oh women are cheating this cheating bad boy over a nice good guy who will treat her right!' That does not happen. The nice good guy just has less opportunities to …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 06:48 AM
1

Yeah honestly I think both sides tend to overreact here. 5 year advantage seems about right. I think guys around 24 are probably the most attractive to me (20). And yes, men my age are insanely immature and always have been.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 04:56 AM
3

I think it increases as you age. But I'm 20, and 25 is the highest I'd be willing to go for a relationship. If he's rich I'd go higher, but it wouldn't be for long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 02:22 AM
15

I think men here tend to exaggerate how little age gap matters to women and women tend to exaggerate how much it matters. So there are always arguments. For me, 5 years older is not a big deal even though some girls here say it is a big deal. And as a SB, I slept with men much older than that and often it was enjoyable. But when it comes to marriage, I think the women here are closer to being right because it actually matters a lot to us about the actual chemistry between us and our spouse as we…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 02:37 AM
-1

Lol its funny how men talk like this but then cry when I say I only date men over 6 feet. You treat us like objects so why should I not do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/21 01:07 AM
1

Non negotiable: Be well off and successful. Be fun and have hobbies, I don't want his entire world to revolve around me. He should have his own stuff and I should have fun with him when we spend time together. Be older but of reasonably close age to me so we are at similar stages in our lives. Be attractive and tall. For things I'd like... Definitely health and fitness. Educated. Well dressed. Want children.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 06:57 PM
1

Yes its real and it hurts men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 06:52 PM
1

Hookup culture doesn't dehumanize women. We choose to engage in hookup culture because its ideal to you know date around, sleep with different people before settling down. He doesn't oppose hookup culture because it 'dehumanizes women' (as if we weren't dehumanized before hookup culture? lol), but because he's a reactionary who doesn't like these changes in our culture. Also lol Ben Shapiro.. further proving my point that JP panders to alt right and alt right adjacent people. Jordan Peterson is …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 07:01 PM
3

The discussion wasn't about whether misandry was okay, but whether there is a large scale attack on boys and men to a degree that people like Jordan Peterson are actually being reasonable in 'fighting' against these movements, rather than simply fearmongering and contributing to a false narrative. If all you can point at is a few mean people on twitter I think that proves my point. And you know, after the centuries of abuse and being treated as an inferior gender, a few mean twitter words is act…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 11:35 PM
2

Omg preach! 👏💯
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 05:35 PM
1

Whatever they say about men, its about 100 times more tame than what incels, TRP, and other misogynists say about women. So you know... Men need to grow up. I really don't understand how white men in particular have the audacity to consider themselves victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 10:09 AM
3

Because he's enabling the alt right, white supremacists, sexists, racists and a whole host of other bad characters/groups. Whether he's doing it for money or because he actually believes the things he says, I have no idea. But he's definitely scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 10:06 AM
2

Men are privileged but no one ever says the other two things you said. This so called attack on boys/men doesn't exist. Its just men angry that the traditional gender dynamic is being changed, and JP is a proponent of their reactionary mindset. Though idk if he actually believes it or if he's just a grifter, but either way he's a scumbag.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 07:18 PM
0

I mean... JP doesn't have anything coherent to say on anything that isn't his field. He's just a grifter who is making money pandering to alt right talking points while pretending to be a centrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/21 10:55 AM
1

Ohhh yeah I can totally see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 09:21 PM
1

Yep. I started at 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 09:13 PM
1

No, if I was to date a 25 year old for instance at 20 it would start getting weird. late 20s and my friends would be like wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 08:34 PM
2

realized my window is more like 2 years max. I think that is an exaggeration. Even as a college student I see 4 year age gaps all the time. Master students or recent grads with undergrads. Current bf is 3.5 years older than me. No one thinks its weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 08:29 PM
1

Omg what??? I was saying you are an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 08:10 PM
1

Also, I'm turning 21 this year
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:53 PM
6

Considering you are an incel, what anecdotes do you have exactly 😂😂 Also none of those 'studies' you posted said anything about attraction lol. As I said I dated older men for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:51 PM
6

Thats not evidence. 25% of women are in a relationship with 5 or more years age gap. The majority of those age gap relationships are probably 5 or 6 years. How many women date men 10 years older than them. And why would they? How are you, as a man, telling women who and what we find attractive? You said older women on this subreddit are in denial about younger women being attracted to older men. As a younger woman I'm telling you I'm not, despite having been with many of them. And I can't think …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:45 PM
4

Lol I used to be a sugar baby for a few years so I've been with many older men. I think this is just what men say when they are getting older and young women are no longer super interested in them. Its like ohh of course, as a 20 year old I dream of nothing more than a 35 year old man with less hair, more body fat and lower fitness. Come on.. I can say that some aspects of the sex is better and yes the fact they can actually afford a lot more stuff for you is amazing, but I'm not going to fall i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:33 PM
1

Honestly it shows bad character that someone left him. If he left her or it was mutual separation then maybe its something to consider and its not that big of a deal, but then again if he has like three divorces its a red flag even if he initiated them or it was mutual .
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/21 07:27 PM
7

Is this really a 'neutral' community. Most people I see are 'red pill.'
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 10:59 PM
3

Neither method is successful. Morality is not really a factor for casual sex at all. If anything it kind of leans towards men who are more moral getting more, imo. But ultimately, the guys who project how nice and kind they are, are just using that as their only means of getting laid. So its kind of pathetic, and thats what turns women off. Not doing that, or doing the opposite, might show nonchalance, which is certainly more attractive than servility and desperation. But that doesn't mean women…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:20 PM
5

Do they agree when they have a daughter? Most men never seem to realize this and accept the truth, regardless if they have a daughter or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:13 PM
5

No I just think this whole being an asshole will get you more girls thing is a myth that is perpetuated because people who do that successfully brag about it to everyone but the majority who fail don't say anything. Also the guys who look for strategies in how to get girls tend to be bitter and misogynistic in the first place, so they want to see women in the worst possible light and accept these myths because thats exactly what it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:11 PM
3

'Players' are more likely to be attractive in terms of looks and personality. As in they are more confident, more cool, more funny, taller, more fit, generally more fun to be around etc. Thats the traits women select for, it has nothing to do with being good or bad. Morality is just what men who have none of those things project to women because that is their only game plan to getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 01:49 PM
3

No there is no statement like that. There is a basis given for which divorce is allowed in Christianity. Marital unfaithfulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:38 PM
3

The second only applies to church, not elsewhere. Basically means priests and pastors should be men. I don't entirely agree with that but it seems like what Paul was saying. The first and last are not a thing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:28 PM
2

Where does it say that particularly. I mean particularly with Jesus, almost nothing he said remotely supports what you are saying. and what exactly from '1960s male expectations' is bothering you? Opening the door for ladies?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:28 PM
3

Lol where is that in the Bible? Where are you from by the way
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:24 PM
6

Yeah well, women were oppressed in 1950s and none of that had any basis in the Bible. We made progress in women's rights, and you are just having a hard time buying it because you are bitter towards women or something. Protestant Churches are about having a proper relationship with Christ in order to find salvation, not about oppressing women on the basis of misogynist traditional ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:16 PM
8

There are almost no single people at my church. They do get matched up. And there are some young women. Anyway, I'm not sure if you understand what Christianity is about at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:10 PM
2

I think thats just rationalizing because you feel insecure that she's been with other men than you. Men like to feel that their penis is special or something. In reality, having casual sex doesn't really mean anything. Casual sex is different than intimate sex in a relationship. And really.. you think everyone who has casual sex a bit becomes addicted to sex? What a strange thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 08:00 PM
9

No, I mean, its none of his business. If it bothers him, he can leave. Good riddance.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 01:24 PM
10

Lol no. Why would I care if some toxic incel who cares about how many men I've slept with wants to date me or not? The men who are actually worth being with don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/20 01:18 PM
36

I don't think it should be encouraged to go into sex work if you have many other options, but a lot of women don't HAVE many other options. I remember reading about this girl who contacted her old client to start sleeping with him again because she needed to pay for her mother's medical treatment. When women make far less in the workplace, endure discrimination in school, college, the workplace etc. and rarely get promoted, they run out of options.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/04/20 01:09 PM
3

He is so repulsive I can't even. It almost seems like satire.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/04/20 01:06 PM
1

Wow, very mature and level headed! Good to see :)
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:09 PM
0

I don't know if what you are telling me is the truth, or if is lies propagated by the patriarchy. But I guess I'll read up more about sexism boys might face in school. I am fair. I dont want anyone to be dsicriminated against. What I suppose might be happening is that the teachers try to help the girls overcome the cultural barriers that we place on girls in education, but are neglecting doing the same for certain boys. But idk. Anyway this conversation has gone a long time and I dont think we a…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:54 AM
1

Our colleges can be private or public yes. Mine is private, but afaik the sociology and gender studies faculty is very well funded. Could it just be that girls work harder than boys? I think that was generally the case in my school... But like, idk I guess I have to read the papers more. It does say here though that " On the other hand, girls who benefit from gender bias in math are more likely to select a science track in high school. " So it might be just that some teachers want to encourage g…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:52 PM
1

Oh you are Swedish. I don't understand how you can be against feminism then. Sweden was rated the third best place to live in the world. Norway was first. If men had it that bad there then this would not be true. Anyway, who concluded that it is unscientific? lol. They havent been defunded in the US. No doubt that is part of my privilege! Imagine being African American and struggling through school where racist teachers give you lower marks and then not being able to go to college! Thats horribl…
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:45 AM
1

All the things I am saying are regularly discussed in academic circles. White fragility is a term in sociology and intersectionality studies. So is male fragility. Female fragility is not. Everything I am saying is supported by stats and by academics. No one in university takes MRA people seriously because its all based on WHITE MALE FRAGILITY. Didn't you state in an earlier reply to me that the majority of your feminist college group were white? Yes, but the majority of my college is white. And…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:44 PM
1

Yes you do. By exhibiting white male fragility. Which means you overreact to criticism and try to obfuscate from realizing your own privilege by bringing up irrelevant things (mostly lies, too.) Compared to white men, white women don't have many privileges. Sure we don't go to jail as often but we don't commit as many crimes. We don't die in wars but we don't start the wars. Some affirmative action helps us but I don't think you realize what the hell affirmative action is. Its not a privilege, i…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:18 PM
1

pon marriage, a woman's legal rights and obligations were subsumed by those of her husband, in accordance with the wife's legal status of feme covert
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:07 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:43 PM
1

Well you seem to exhibit a lot of white male privilege. But idk. Well we recognize that our position on the social ladder is much lower than white male but significantly higher than other women of color. And so we do our best to promote the betterment of women of color. I mean, we could do this much better but we at least make an attempt. We support affirmative action. We support the inclusion of more trans, more gay, more minority people in politics. Like, even in my college, our feminist group…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:50 AM
0

I've taken history classes. I noticed that you left out the colonization of America and Africa and Australia out of there. White Europeans at one point had colonized 80%! of the world. No other group of people comes even close. White women at the time period you are talking about - victorian - could not vote. In fact, by law they belonged to their husbands. By law their husbands could beat them up. They could not work. Wow, so much privilege!!! Fuck you
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:24 AM
0

It says a few of the tribes practiced slavery. Like Aztecs. Not all of them. A lot of civilizations oppressed their own people, sure. But only white people conquered all over the world and oppressed multiple groups of people. Anyway, what you are exhibiting right now is just white male fragility. My point was that white men are by far the most privileged group, and almost every other group in America can be considered oppressed relative to white male social status. You are just bringing up other…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 11:27 PM
0

No I'm in college. Western Europeans enslaved a lot of people. Oh but they ended it eventually! Such great people. Again, the civil war was white men fighting against slavery against white men fighting for it. Many parts of the world had no slavery in the first place! Like many native american tribes, (who white men slaughtered and enslaved, btw.) Anyway, if YOU actually read about these things you will know that a big reason that abolitionists succeeded was because with the rise of capitalism, …
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:55 PM
0

Aww let me go and thank all the white men for standing up for me. Thank you all so much for fighting in wars that YOU START. White men sacrifice themselves in war to continue propping up a system that helps them and oppresses others. And they sacrifice themselves to kill innocent people in third world countries. They dont sacrifice themselves for other groups.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:19 PM
1

Thanks for proving your racism to me.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:55 PM
1

Preferably by that point it would be possible to remove the fetus without terminating it and put it up for adoption. But if the mothers health is at risk regardless then yes abortion should be possible.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:46 PM
1

89th?? Whenever. Its the woman's decision.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:06 AM
0

No we aren't. There isn't a more privileged group than white males like yourself. No doubt white women have their own privileged status. But at least many of us recognize that and try to change that. White men reject that privilege entirely and try to obstruct equality movements. It makes sense I guess. Every one has something to gain from equality except white males. Thats just how big the gap is between them and everyone else. As for your counters to my point. Utter nonsense. 95% of rape victi…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:38 AM
0

We realize that they are poor, but what we focus on is how we have arrived at these state of affairs - how the history of oppression of african americans have lead to their situation. Of course there is a racial wealth gap, but its not their fault at all. The system we have in place is constructed to keep them poor. Mens rights positions are that white men have it really bad wah wah. All other movements are just anti-white male, particularly feminism, which is the main enemy.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:25 AM
-2

Why does your mom take a sick day instead of your dad? Why this societal expectation? Its not an exception. It follows that if we want to avoid greater problems and therefore provide free birth control (Im glad you support this) we should also provide free abortion - not to mention getting rid of limitations like gestational limit, opening more clinics, and stopping the obligatory doctors meeting guilt trip before the abortion. And I'm not going to click it. Its probably just more islamophobic a…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:25 AM
1

Intersectional feminism doesn't 'represent' African American people as poor, we evaluate their history in American society and see how earlier forms of oppression (by white people) have resulted in the complex problems in African American communities today, which overall lead them to perform worse in a system that we have created which makes it hard for them to thrive in. Feminism won't save them from this system, we'll all work together to destroy it, as the same system also represses women. I'…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:58 AM
-2

Women in the professional workplace don't have as many opportunities because they have families to take care of. Why do we expect women to take care of families and not men? There is still a moral argument. Because pills don't always work, and people can make mistakes. You would rather pay to take care of the child? Or not pay at all and have societal issues as a result? I'm not going to discuss your islamophobic remarks.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:22 AM
-9

How are women equal now? Can we go out late night without fear of rape? Can we go out and get a few drinks without fearing that a man will take advantage of us? Can we dress however we want without being harassed, whistled at and blamed for provocation? Can we get get high level positions as easily? Can we get paid the same for the same work? Do we have easy and free access to abortion without any limitations or shaming? Thats just a few things. There are plenty of ways women are NOT equal. To s…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:31 PM
-1

No, I had been saying that I find that the reason the Gillette ad triggers so many old white male snowflakes is that it portrays black men in a more positive light than they traditionally are portrayed in, and then I came across this post on 'mens rights' where men are whining about it. It was like.. confirmation of what I was saying, which is pretty funny. But yes its blatantly racist, not to white women but to black men. Like saying that the only reason we date black men is to use them as dild…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:05 PM
0

Plenty of comments here are downright offensive to black men. and the black guys seem to want a white ATM Seems to portray black men as poor... Black men are emasculated by feminists And the entire topic itself is racist.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:52 PM
-4

As a white girl currently dating an African American guy, I strongly disagree. I have never been with an African American man for that reason, but because I find them attractive
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:42 PM
-2

I can't believe so many men make such a big deal about such a minor thing. Like seriously wtf lol. FGM can lead to lower life expectancy - meaning it leads to various health issues that lead to earlier death. What is a better measure of the danger of a practice than that? Circumcision is entirely different.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:26 PM
0

There are no practical benefits for us. And it can cause a lot more harm than a little foreskin lol
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:03 PM
-5

When a male is born he can have his genitals mutilated. Hundreds of baby boys die from this procedure every year. Lol its not mutilation. Its a mild cosmetic procedure, and I guess it has some practical benefits too though idrk. Boys only clubs (eg the Boy Scouts) are being eliminated while girl only clubs remain. Nonsense. Next it's off to University, where there are a range of female-specific scholarships and programs even though women make up the majority of college students and young women a…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:30 PM
-12

Have you seen much of muslims? Muslim Americans can be supportive of both, and there are muslim girls I know who support feminism. Malcolm X fought for equality, fair treatment, and standing up for the oppressed. Thats what feminism does too.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:23 PM
-20

It really doesn't. Malcolm X fought for the rights of African Americans and he would have been pro-feminism and LGBT rights too.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:07 PM
-12

This is blatantly racist. More evidence that 'men's rights' is really just angry old racist white men.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:06 PM
1

I'm sure the people who post on r/feminism also post on other subreddits and argue with people with different opinions. But sometimes you just want a place where you feel comfortable and talk with people who share your opinions. That's what a safe space is. And its not about what I found offensive. Numerous people reported you. We have r/feminism and r/askfeminists for a reason. You know, I'm not getting banned here, but I did get banned from the red pill. So its not like we're oversensitive, so…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 02:14 PM
1

r/Feminism is a safe space. We banned you because people were reporting you, which means they probably felt offended at things you were saying - and certain things you were saying could be seen as offensive imo. Its a safe space and members should not feel uncomfortable. Anyway, you can go to r/askfeminists for a more open atmosphere. I am inexperienced and dont know many things from before. Of course, those things are not relevant anymore but whatever. Thats just the way of things. Nothing agei…
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:55 AM
2

But I'm not trying to be demeaning. If you actually want to learn I can link you books, or videos about feminism, gender identity, and intersectionality. I myself didn't really understand these things until a year ago.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:25 PM
2

I'm not a member of this horrible place. I just saw you complaining about your ban so I thought I'd explain. There is no biological definition of gender. Gender is a social term. There is a biological definition of sex. Sex is distinct from gender. When we talk about trans identity we are speaking entirely about gender. It has nothing to do with biology. See I'm not being ageist (not that I care about 'offending' old white men), I'm just saying that old people wouldn't know these things. We've e…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:19 PM
2

They don't fit my definition of 'women'. They may, however, fit yours. In which case we disagree on the definition of the word 'woman'. This is an issue which is arbitrary and therefore cannot be resolved. So, I suggest we leave it at that. You don't get to have your own definition. I mean, you can, but its transphobic. Male to Female transexuals are women. They are recognized as women by law. Anyway... whatever, anyone who posts on mens rights should be banned on r/feminism, imo. They are at od…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:11 PM
2

Are you seriously suggesting that black guys are better than white guys? I assume that you think that the vice versa case is true. At least that's what it sounded like. Trans in a few of your posts you said you don't consider trans women, women. Which means you don't respect what they identify as. I think most people will agree that this is backwards and transphobic. As for misogyny... you post on mens rights. And in a lot of your posts about feminism you made 'what about' arguments. I think wha…
/r/MensRights23/01/19 08:16 PM
1

Oh please, just going through a few of your posts I have found racism, misogyny, transphobia... That's not dialogue that is hate.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 04:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter