TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ButtsoupBarnes Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by ButtsoupBarnes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I'm so tolerant I'm actually going to have a temper tantrum when I don't get my way
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:05 PM
20

It was started in support of prostate cancer research.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:27 AM
2

Traditionally, a billion meant 1,000,000,000,000 in the UK. Although that is becoming archaic, they could just be trying to avoid confusion.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:07 AM
5

Women have always been the primary victims of male suicide.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:05 AM
5

Being asked for evidence is now an attack. Wonderful.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 08:54 AM
1

And in my personal experience, of the many hundreds of people who have threatened legal action against me and the company I work for, there have been less than 10 times we have ever received any kind of notice of proceedings on the back of it. Most of the time you never even hear from the aggrieved party's lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:46 PM
211

The new campus climate is as damaging to women as it is to men—more so, in fact. I can see some limited merit in the argument that it is more insulting to women, but to argue that it is more damaging is pure nonsense. Women may be being infantilised, but they are not being pseudo-criminalised and drummed out of their education.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:07 PM
14

Oh, unspecified and unsourced "threats" against her didn't do the trick for getting sympathy and discrediting her critics, so now it's her kids that everybody is apparently threatening? The damage control is real.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:18 AM
5

It's always worth raising a complaint when something is not right (it's my job to analyse customer complaints and drive potential new business strategies from them , so believe me when I say it is worth it). I would just encourage everybody to be polite when doing so. You are not personally angry with the person on the other end of the phone, after all.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:13 AM
2

Another article which somehow managed to make Ellen Pao's baseless lawsuit which was laughed out of court sound like something which actually mattered. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 07:31 AM
2

The men should earn higher prize money based on several factors. I agree with chocoboat, however, that the length of the match is irrelevant. The greater interest in the men's game and the greater revenues it generates are what matter. If the same number of people cared about women's sports as men's, and they were therefore pulling in the same audiences and the same money from sponsors etc, then they would deserve equal pay. It wouldn't matter one bit if they played for five sets or five minutes…
/r/MensRights30/06/15 11:40 AM
27

It's just amazing to me that so many people seem so willing to accept that proof is unnecessary. It's genuinely frightening how quickly we've fallen to this point.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:47 AM
0

I don't think it's sufficient either, but they did include an apology to the fraternity at least, which seems to shoot holes in the idea that they are avoiding doing so in order to limit liability.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:51 PM
15

I keep seeing this argument, which ignores the fact that Rolling Stone has already expressly apologised to the fraternity in print. We would like to apologize to our readers and to all of those who were damaged by our story and the ensuing fallout, including members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity and UVA administrators and students.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:10 PM
2

If it isn't exactly like this, I will be completely amazed. There is no way they will do anything other than push the exact same narrative and argue that individual cases don't matter.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:15 AM
4

Of course, this is blocked by Symantec in my office.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:03 PM
3

It seems like you do understand it.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:53 PM
16

'I believe her, but now it's becoming obvious that there is no justification for that position, I hope you will all just stop checking facts and take the lessons on board.'
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:10 PM
3

They represent victims of sexual assault. Naturally they are professionally interested in making it as easy as possible to level accusations of sexual assault. I understand the point they are making - that lawsuits like this are likely to make universities gunshy about prosecuting in these cases - but that's just the wrong point to be making. Universities should be nervous about kicking people out for allegations like this, because they are not capable of investigating them properly. The point i…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:53 AM
6

From the NY Times article: Ms. Sulkowicz did not press criminal charges, a lengthy process that she said would be too draining You've literally carried a heavy weight around endlessly to demonstrate the burden you have to bear, but actually putting your story up for inspection before the law is just too much of a hassle?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:25 PM
51

She said while the campaign was directed towards young men, anti-sexual violence messages should be spread across all male demographics. Because it's simply implausible that any of the scenarios depicted could be perpetrated by people who don't have a dick.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:29 PM
7

The case is...a warning to women that their credibility will always be a key target of the defence, Prof. Sheehy said. Stupid patriarchy, insisting on only credible testimony in criminal trials.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 01:24 PM
2

Rape hysteria really is becoming absurd. It's an opinion about a high profile case which was being debated on national television, but expressing an opinion on one side of that debate is unacceptable. If you can't even say that you disagree with a jury's decision based on the evidence that you have seen, what can you say about it? He was hardly being inflammatory in my opinion.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 05:59 PM
3

You're absolutely correct, and I will edit my post to reflect that. While it is still possible that an imbalance of the type I mentioned exists, the data provided is not enough to draw that conclusion.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:37 AM
218

The charity estimates that one in ten rough sleepers in London is a woman. Statistics from the Department for Communities and Local Government show that half of adults in temporary accommodation are women. These two sentences really do follow on from one another. Men account for 90% of homelessness, but only get half the available shelter. Wow. Edit: As per the post by fia_bui below, I have to acknowledge that my conclusion here is not reliable. I conflated "rough sleeper" with "homeless" in my …
/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter