TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

C0pe_Dealer Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by C0pe_Dealer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

How can you reconcile your claim with the presented evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 01:34 PM
0

implying what?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:53 AM
1

It seems you have some misconceptions re: evolution. It's a common mistake to employ a post-civilization framework as a means of speculating on past selective pressures. Understand that whether we start from habilis or erectus, the fundamental forces behind homo phylogenies scarcely involve concepts like "wealth", "charisma", "leadership", "wars", etc. The time period you are considering has had relatively little evolutionary influence on our morphology. To say that "the only thing women might s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/21 12:57 PM
1

What exactly is your argument? Your conclusion is that the differences in IQ distribution are the result of socialization. What parts of your post are meant to premise that conclusion other than the advice of your mother? Further, does attributing observed IQ distribution differences to socialization infer that they are "BS"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 04:33 PM
1

You originally argued that you were acting with agency when you intuited social settings. In the gunman thought experiment, you defined "agency" as when you have a choice of responses. But then claimed you lose agency when on drugs because you are "incapacitated". But when incapacitated, you still have a choice of responses. Your argument revolves around your definition of "agency", which is not cogent (as stated), and therefore neither is your argument. But that misunderstanding may be unimport…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:29 AM
1

When you are on those drugs, are you not acting on the basis of intuition? What is dictating your actions in that state?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 03:26 AM
1

Do you also have agency if you are on a large number of different psychedelic drugs and you are hallucinating?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 02:08 AM
1

Then someone being sexually assaulted at gunpoint has agency?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:58 AM
1

Not at all. In fact, in my original comment, I described that as the "default assumption." Almost all life on Earth perceives dynamics in real-time because they are incapable of consciously establishing ethical principles and ideals that can inform their choices such that they act in a consistent and subjectively virtuous manner. If someone put a gun to your head and told you to do 10 pushups, you would do them because you intuited that as the best decision. Is this acting with agency?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:53 AM
1

And when you are using those concepts to analyze your motivations, is this occurring before or after the social settings?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:40 AM
1

When you intuit social settings, how do you derive the reasoning on which you based your choices?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:27 AM
1

You may be right. If I am wrong and you are in fact acting with purposeful awareness, what general principles, ideals, or theories are you following in the scenarios outlined in your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:22 AM
1

I don't have one in the context of this conversation because I never used the term "agency" in any of my premises. You interpreted my initial comment as revolving around the idea of agency and I asked you if believe that your post did not indicate a lack of agency. Now I am asking for your definition so I can understand your arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:07 AM
2

What is your definition of agency?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 12:58 AM
0

"I'm not walking around my life bursting to the seams with "lust." And so, if I happen to indulge in an impulsive lust-filled moment, 9/10 my environment dictated it." Do you believe that your post did not indicate a lack of agency? Was it a misinterpretation on my part?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 12:40 AM
-1

Do you believe that your post did not indicate a lack of agency? Was it a misinterpretation on my part? My claim was not that you are incapable of retroactively analyzing your behavior and identifying patterns. But rather, the fact that you need to understand your life in reverse indicates that you act without conscious purpose or in accordance with consistent ideals. Which would explain the inconsistency criticized in the referenced post. Was that unclear in my original comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 12:33 AM
0

Is it not strange to have to look back on your life and try to deduce the independent variables common to specific actions -- because you don't even know the reasons you do things? Your post opens with you hypothesizing about your own thoughts. . . Who is in control of your body, if it is acting unconsciously, without your awareness? Even more strange is that you felt the need to explain to us that you act without forethought on the basis of animal instinct as if that wasn't the default assumpti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 10:32 PM
2

'You can’t make universal claims from induction, and science even acknowledges this." The scientific method is the process of making universal claims based on an inductive process. Science acknowledges this in the sense that gravity is a theory. It's true what Hume concluded about not ever being able to directly observe causation, even with laws like gravity. This is more of a matter of metaphysical philosophy than it is of science, and it's generally not helpful to conflate the two. Regardless,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 09:00 PM
4

How is it inherently fallacious? The majority of scientific knowledge is built on inductive reasoning and it is the basis for the scientific method.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 01:53 AM
2

From the study: "When you were drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent, how many people ever had vaginal sex with you? By vaginal sex, we mean that {if female: a man or boy put his penis in your vagina} {if male: a woman or girl made you put your penis in her vagina}?"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/21 12:10 AM
13

Every time you read a headline about your local school losing funding or an increase in local homelessness or an increase in male suicide rates do you feel the need to start doing something differently? Then, by your definition, do you not think those things are problems? Wouldn't the only way to maintain one's morality then be to never look at the news?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:43 PM
13

Every time you read a headline about a civil war in Africa or a refugee crisis in the Middle East or an oil spill in the Pacific do you feel the need to start doing something differently? Then, by your definition, do you not think those things are problems? Wouldn't the only way to maintain one's morality then be to never look at the news?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:33 PM
1

https://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85239/1/9789241564625_eng.pdf Page 6 contains the definition of terms
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:21 PM
11

I'm asking for you to define your terms, not being rhetorical. "being a problem" could mean that it's just inherently negative or it could mean that it is an issue we should be heavily prioritizing with tax dollars. How can I know what you mean? Seems the contention in my original comment is lost on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:17 PM
16

You made a post claiming people don't believe you about statistics, then asked if we trust this data. I was commenting on the credibility of the research. You're asking whether I "think these things are a problem"? What is your definition of something being a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 11:08 PM
36

The CDC found the same results. In their methodology they defined sexual violence as including: asking for sex repeatedly to wear you down making you feel unsafe in public having sex while intoxicated such that you couldn't consent a sexual partner calling you names like ugly, fat, crazy, or stupid Page 106: (tucked away at the very end of the paper) https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf Then they parade around the "1 in 3 experience sexual violence" statistic, knowin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/21 10:48 PM
-1

spandex frauding. arm fat doesnt lie. you were trying to prove the wall doesnt exist lol? still mog me as a boomer tho :/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 09:57 PM
7

Things that can skew self-report studies (like the social desirability bias that you are referring to) become less and less relevant as the body of supporting research expands and diversifies across various modalities. Do you honestly think you are the only one smart enough to come up with these potential biases? . . . Researchers think of these things too and they design studies that control for them. For example, to try to account for socially desirable responding, researchers could study how …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 03:00 AM
2

So we've established that the situation is the result of our biology. Men and women's instincts are equally responsible. So the question then becomes: Who is obligated to change? Well, men who are hypersexual receive mostly advantages from that behavior. Women who are hypergamous, on the other hand, more often receive disadvantages for that behavior. The male tendency for hypersexuality confers fulfillment/contentedness through sex. And the highly-prioritized pursuit of women conditions men into…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 10:51 PM
7

You used a lot of words to make the claims that sex/relationships won't enduringly help incels' mental health issues and that there is "absolutely" some "real" mental health issues that need to be addressed. What is your evidence? What are your premises? You've just made claims without articulating any evidence or reasoning to support them. In logic, an argument consists of a conclusion and a premise--your post is a non-argument. The fact that you took a whole paragraph tryning to create an argu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 10:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter