TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

C7_the_Epic Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by C7_the_Epic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Lol are you aware of irony? I was giving you several other reasons why she could've looked away other than the one you've decided she has to show that your idea isn't the only option or even a likely one and that you're making shit up. You also don't actually know what Irony means. Yep if two kids are fighting and one turns away, they're going to get a kicking for it, as we all know. I mean, clearly she didn't, so you can't make that claim. The fact the girl in the vid did turn away like she did…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 05:15 PM
-2

She wasn't expecting him to retaliate and so looked away because she's a girl, no guy would turn away from another guy after assaulting him... Again, this is you pretending you knew her motivations, and again, she's in a confined space, didn't want to trip over desks or run into anyone, and could very well just suck at fighting. It would not be hard to find videos of two kids fighting of any gender and see one turn away and get decked for it. You've obviously never been in such a scuffle nor had…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 04:08 PM
-1

The girl obviously didn't think the boy was going to defend himself after assaulting him (due to her gender and size) Or she just sucks at fighting, and since you can't possibly be in her head and know her reasoning, saying it's because of her gender and size is your imagination. Far more likely? She wasn't expecting him to do a jump kick in a fist fight right after taking his shirt off because she looked away. Maybe it was because she thought he wouldn't fight back? Maybe it's because they're i…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 03:48 PM
-5

Literally nothing to do with gender here, just two kids fighting in school
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 01:37 PM
-6

"hey, can you do basic thing most other people do instictually after you're finished" - most people "WHY WOULD I DO THAT, IT ONLY TAKES LITERALLY NO EFFORT TO DO LOL, FUCK YOU OPPRESSIVE SCUM" -ppd/mensrights redditor "shithshitshit-oh goddammit" - roommate who had an emergency and expected the toilet seat to be down before he fell into the toilet bowl seriously tho, of all the things to be starting any sort of argument over, spending the half second to flick the lid down is absolutely nothing. …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/19 05:57 AM
1

Right. So we agree there was no reason for the employees to get triggered, but they did anyway, because they're stupid Actually the opposite of what I said, and now you're flat out insulting people rather than reading and understanding positions, so you're clearly too far into making something that doesn't have anything to do with the agenda your trying to push into a frontline issue to actually think about what you're saying
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:25 PM
1

I used the word correctly; stereotypes can be based in facts, that's not why it's a bad thing to use them. And we're actually agreeing what it means here. And yes; I actually read the document. Are you reading my responses? My original point that it still literally doesn't matter how factually accurate his points were, Google was still well within their rights to do that and it has nothing to do with men's rights or free speech. Now we agree that his statement applies to general populations and …
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:44 PM
1

Read my edit on stereotypes ( on mobile, didn't see you replied before I started). And again: it doesn't matter how scientifically accurate his as stereotype was; it created a worse workplace for people to work in and Google needed to fix it. Not a free speech issue. Again.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:10 PM
-1

Except it's a company, not a free forum on the internet. It employs the people it's allowing to post on that forum, and actually cares about what people say and feel about what was said on said forum. No, it wasn't meant to be a place where you could post absolutely anything, and you know that. Again: he sent out (posted if you insist) that women are worse in stressful jobs than men. An ideologically driven memo. His co-workers read it, maybe hoping to read up a real discussion that was occurrin…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 12:52 PM
-2

If how I worded sent out to coworkers is your only problem with my post, then all I have to do is ask what the difference was since his all his coworkers could still read it, and how that in anyway changes the fact that he got fired for the exact reason I explained.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:46 AM
-3

If I sent out an ideologically driven memo to all my coworkers, I would expect to be fired. It creates a hostile work environment and in what I'm assuming is an agile workplace that is a very bad thing. No, it doesn't matter if what he said was 100% true. He sent out a memo that said women don't handle stressful jobs as well as men. It made women, who didn't fit that fact because they were handling the stress of the job fine (hence why they're still working there), feel like they couldn't feel c…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter