TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CHICOandtheMAN Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by CHICOandtheMAN on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This is a well-established fact.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 06:43 AM
0

Are you drunk? Referring to a raw dataset is not useful. Data needs proper interpretation and anlysis to be useful. You cite no sources for analysis, so can I assume that you did the analysis? If so, what qualifications do you possess that make you suitable for doing so, otherwise what analysis are you citing? Truth is not a function of the qualifications of the analyst. A true statement remains true if it is discovered or uttered by a perfectly qualified person or if it is discovered or uttered…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 02:46 PM
0

The subject of this discussion is, "higher graduation rates for women are not translating into higher employment rates for women in high paying jobs." Your data does not bear on this question because it is for 2009 only. Rather than relying on Wikipedia, you might to to the original dataset, in this case the CPS. In it you will find that while women in the workforce, on average, earn about 77% of what men earn, they work about 75% as many hours. Controlling for no other factors, women earn 2% mo…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:07 PM
0

Your data is for only one year, and thus does not show whether or not incomes are influenced by increasing graduation rates. To even attempt the argument you assert, you need the same data for several years, not only 2009. Whether or not omen are underrepresented in the highest income strata is not relevant to the question of whether or not increasing graduation rates coincide with increased proportion in the upper income strata. If the data tells us, "As women graduate in higher numbers, they h…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:59 PM
0

Your data does not show graduation rates over time, and led you to an incorrect conclusion. It is the case throughout the workforce. Look at the CPS, Educational attainment of women in the labor force, 1970–2010 and compare it to any of the material datasets. Look at this, and the corresponding historical data: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils55.pdf. And compare unemployment rates.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 04:12 PM
0

It is the case throughout the workforce. Look at the CPS, Educational attainment of women in the labor force, 1970–2010 and compare it to any of the material datasets. Look at this, and the corresponding historical data: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils55.pdf. And compare unemployment rates.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 04:11 PM
-1

I am asserting that increased graduation rates for women are translating into increased employment rates for women in high paying jobs. Look at the CPS, Educational attainment of women in the labor force, 1970–2010 and compare it to any of the material datasets. Look at this, and the corresponding historical data: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils55.pdf. And compare unemployment rates.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 04:10 PM
1

So if women formerly had no jobs available to them, and did not need any education, and men had some blue collar and some white collar jobs available to them, and some of them needed degrees, this is responsible for men earning fewer degrees now? Your logic today is consistent with your post history.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:05 AM
2

You are factually incorrect again. As usual. It is not only true that women are 50% more likely to earn a university degree, but they are also more likely to have their applications to university accepted, and get funding. Men have demonstrated a desire to go to university, but it is well established that men have barriers that women don't have. Your tendency to blame the victims must be emotionally gratifying to you, but it is based on a foundation of fictions that reside in your imagination.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 08:03 AM
1

Nobody said anything about more important. Wages are a matter of supply and demand. If women are willing to do only the indoor work with no sweating, and men are willing to do the UPS work OR the air-con work, there is twice as much demand for the ass-wiping jobs and the wage goes down. There is half as much demand for the UPS job, and wages go up. Women are paid less to wipe asses because of their unwillingness to sweat.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:59 AM
2

I do wonder if a lower male graduation rate was at least partially due to the fact that men formerly didn't need college degrees as much to find decent jobs. No, it is due to systematic discrimination against men, from affirmative action to hundreds of millions of dollars in scholarship money devoted to women only. The discrimination is present in high schools with policies that disfavor boys and result in lower SAT scores. The bias is revealed in the higher demands on young men to earn money at…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:57 AM
1

Also, at least currently, the higher graduation rates for women are not translating into higher employment rates for women in high paying jobs. Yes, they are.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:52 AM
2

When the current rules no longer favor women, feminists will INITIATE alimony reform. They will reform it to a new set of rules that favor them under the emerging circumstances.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:48 AM
0

Lowered academic performance of men will come to be seen as a inherent weakness of men, and one that implicates the morality of men (i.e. "If men were not irresponsible, they would perform better in school so that they can b adequate providers. They are so selfish that they do menial work and neglect to provide necessities for their children, like health insurance and a university education.) When circumstances demand that the current customs around alimony favor men, the laws will change. Femal…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:47 AM
4

Exactly. If maturity is measured in being quiet, compliant, sedate, congenial, and so on (all wonderful things to be), then girls win. But if maturity is revealed in courage, loyalty, sacrifice, willingness to take risks, et cetera, then boys win. Seems to me boys and girls, left to their own, will find equality like water levels itself. But when we tell boys that loyalty, risk taking, independence, and courage are pathological, punish them, degrade them, medicate them for exhibiting these natur…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 03:07 PM
3

In my business it works rather well to refuse to hire women. I avoid distractions and tension from office romances, real or imagined claims of sexual harassment and the corresponding costs (I have insurance specifically to cover this, which I wouldn't buy if there were no women), and a thousand other headaches. If I refused to hire women, I would be a reprehensible sexist, even if I do it to make money and it works.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 04:24 PM
19

I have known more than one of my female friends to have alimony parties, "You just got the house, the mutual fund, and a support order for $5000 per month. Whooo hoooo, girlfriend, we're going out and you are buying us all margaritas!" I have never known of a man who was less popular among other men because he got a big alimony award. Of course, I have never known a man to get alimony even when his wife had a higher income. I have never even known of a man who asked for alimony, and that's the w…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:23 PM
1

You are being reasonable, but if he is not, please don't get into a pissing contest over this. You will regret suing him more than you will regret the loss of the money. And it will almost certainly harm your daughter. He may come around on his own if you treat him with kindness, next month, next year, sometime. If he doesn't, then just pretend your expenses are babysitter $120, gas $20, and pretend that he pays his share and you are paying half!
/r/MensRights21/03/12 02:58 PM
14

Those men who choose to be safe drivers cannot choose lower insurance premiums.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:22 PM
4

But it should be recognized that auto insurance companies do not pay out more money to or on behalf of male drivers, and the disparity in premiums can is not supported by actuarial analysis. This is discrimination to the same extend as nightclubs with dual pricing, women free, men pay cover charge, and beauty salons who charge men less to cut their hair than women with similar hairstyles.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:21 PM
3

When confronting violence, man obliged to defend or rescue woman. Laywoman never risks her life for adult man. Has effect of making men more vulnerable as a result of the actions of women.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:40 PM
1

Nobody compared vasectomy to abortion. Men to not have zero reproductive rights. They have the right to a vasectomy, among others. It is true that women and men don't have it the same, and with respect to reproductive rights, men are second class under the law. But we want to achieve equality by securing more rights for men, not fewer for women. And we want women to have more, also. In this case, a bill is introduced in the legislature not for the purpose of making law, but for the rhetorical pu…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:49 PM
1

Santorum...froth...Ha!
/r/MensRights22/02/12 10:12 AM
5

They did not equate abortion with birth control, they equated men's reproductive rights with women's reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are genuine controversies, no quotation marks necessary -- public funding, insurance company mandates, parental notification, and scores of other topics attract people who take one position with respect to women, and another with respect to men. The bill that is the topic of this discussion, in spite of the title of this post taking it ridiculously serious…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:47 AM
7

Don't be such a dipshit. Nobody is trying to ban vasectomies. Nobody dislikes men having birth control. Satire is being used to call attention to attempts to limit women's reproductive rights. It's clever theatrics, and I hope it contributes to awareness and support of women's access to contraception and abortion.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:19 AM
4

STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM THIS GIRL.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:33 AM
2

Show what you wrote here to your circle of friends. I have solved your problem and you may pay tribute now.
/r/seduction03/02/12 05:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter