TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CK_America Archive

View 1 post and 124 comments by CK_America on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

CK_America/r/MGTOW07/07/18 11:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

It works on both genders. Manipulation gets a bad rep, but really it's a tool, and not demonized for the ways people like that tool. Like, flirting is a form of manipulation, hell the entertainment industry is a form of manipulation. Most people like being manipulated for their own benefit, the trick is knowing what that is, and that others/individuals are the arbiters of what that is, period. Like, I like people dressing up, and pretending to be people they're not, to express interesting and us…
/r/ExRedPill06/06/22 07:34 PM
2

Lol, in short it's that women try to marry the best man that they can, which is founded on the very biological market place I described, and I mentioned that choosing selection in my initial description.
/r/RedPillWomen24/05/22 04:22 AM
1

I completely disagree, and have a stated root advantage that's more core than behavior. Where's the alternative advantage come from?
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/22 11:11 PM
0

You have an entirely different marketplace then men do. There's more men born than women, so the supply and demand is way off. It levels out after about 35+ because Men die off faster. Hence why there are more women in the population, but all the focus on dating is predominantly under 35, so these market dynamics are a good thing to keep in mind. Effects all kinds of stuff, it's why catcalling is more towards women, porn more towards men. Drives me nuts that no one talks about this, but it's a c…
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/22 10:43 PM
2

Lose* not loose, as in "a loose knot". Great advice though, just trying to help.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:29 PM
1

Take a look at China. Male disposability was way off there under one child policy, it's obviously an effect. Globally there's a bias because the ratio is naturally offset, so it's an issue everywhere, but in countries that have it closer, the issues are more leveled out. Is it the sole issue, no, but it's an ignored issue at the very root of our species. That's what makes it a big deal. It's like fish not knowing they're in water, but getting upset about the effects of water, or it being pollute…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 09:31 AM
7

Good luck dealing with any human ever then. The whole batch is obviously spoiled for you.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 09:00 AM
0

We're talking about infanticide, so the birth rate was kind of inherent, but whatever. Secondly, I can see you're offended, and I ask that you throw that out entirely. It's not a dig on you, I'm just laying out a retort to the point itself. Third, I ask that you try to conceptualize my point again, because I don't think you're seeing how deeply it is a men's rights issue. Like, you seem like someone who is annoyed about women having special privileges, and men being dismissed or used up. I'm tel…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:53 AM
9

Kill all men only really refered to men who had done stuff like rape, harass, kill, discriminate because of gender. No it clearly says "all men", unless you're saying that women don't mean what they say. Kinda muddles the no means no thing. Or, maybe you misstepped on this one, women and people in general do mean what they say, no means no should be believed as it is stated, and kill all men is ethically wrong because of how it's stated. just like someone can have a fear of all spiders That's li…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:01 AM
-6

No, there is a hard line, and the survival of the country isn't really that flimsy. Like, invasion is a pretty hard line, which is what Ukraine is going through. The laws that give them rights are going to be erased, so they have to temporarily abstain from them logistically, to fight, to maintain them for the future. A runaway global power that threatens the future of the nation, like WWII, is an example of stretching that hard line to it's limit, which I would also say is justified, because it…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:42 AM
1

That's not how it works, you have to break it into age demographics because the birth rate is predominantly 1.06m/1f globally. In India it's 1.10m/1f, which is way off, and leads to a lot of the issues we talk about here. The reason the population is more balanced out (the numbers you used) is because men die off more. Much of that is because of how men are (testosterone and risk taking), but also issues we list here, like how we're more likely to have violence committed against us, riskier jobs…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:16 AM
3

This one is true though, specifically in India where OP is posting from. It's also why the gender ratio there is so out of wack. Far more than most other countries. Fixing this also works in serving men, because the relationship marketplace gets easier when the ratio is closer, and men are treated less disposable when there isn't such an abundance of them. This isn't propaganda, this is an accurate portrayal of a serious issue, that effects everyone in negative ways. Both from a humanist positio…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:50 PM
3

Glad I could help, I edited my previous reply with more of an answer.
/r/RedPillWomen15/10/21 09:47 AM
8

Yes. I think it's strange to ask this. Does a guys appearance not effect you? Or a person in general even? Edit: update for the added information. Yes, it'll effect a lot of interpretations. Not only how others treat you, but how you treat others because of being more comfortable. Frankly I think you should give it a go. It's a fun experiment to see the changes both you and others go through. It's already cut, and it's gonna take time to grow back out anyways. Enjoy the exploration. See what are…
/r/RedPillWomen15/10/21 09:36 AM
2

You have to think about what you're about. Like, I'm not designed for fun, I didn't make myself that way. That doesn't mean I can't go out to fun places, or hang out with friends, but meeting women in those places has been a mistake for what I'm compatible with. Figure out what you're about, and then figure out what you're looking for would be about, then it gets easier to figure out where to hunt.
/r/seduction06/05/21 06:49 AM
3

The birth rate for Men to Women is like 1.02 to 1. You're seeing the market now for what it is.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 09:16 PM
1

Fundamentally is worthless if it doesn't have any relevance to what they actually support. It's litterally your belief of what the party is supposed to be vs. reality. Like trying to say that National Security is a concern for the right, when the White House has unsecured servers, and is highly compromised by foreign influence. It's a joke, a delusion attempting to validate the opposite of what's happening. Fundamentally the right is for securing itself from China, in reality, they have no probl…
/r/MGTOW22/12/19 01:05 AM
0

Is that why the right are trying to lower military spending, go to war less, reduce spying, and stand against police? Oh wait, that's the left, they're the only ones that are actually standing against a runaway authoritarian government. While the right simultaneously likes to say small government, while inflating spending on military and spying. Just like China.
/r/MGTOW22/12/19 12:21 AM
3

How do you differentiate not proven from innocent?
/r/MGTOW22/02/19 04:13 AM
1

How is sharing a concept through quotes much different then a sprawl of text saying the same thing? And if it fits, I like to do that. Sometimes their my own though. When you get a concept well packaged, hang on to those.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:20 PM
1

Not if you're posting rational arguments. Something you should keep in mind: "Optimism is a political act. Those who benefit from the status quo are perfectly happy for us to think that nothing is going to get any better. In fact, these days, cynicism is obedience." - Alex Steffen
/r/MensRights11/01/19 11:33 AM
2

Posting an article like that is in no way pushing it in their face. Regardless their standard is to never hear any other perspective, that's why they block people for the most inane reasons. Why not at least present rationality when available, since the window for discussion is so small that it leaves nothing but silence, and you're definitely not going to change any minds with silence.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 11:04 AM
12

It's directly related to it. The main narratives that feminism, specifically r/feminism, has propagated for years can clearly be seen in the response people had to this father. Those people saw something going on, came to the aid of the woman, regardless of the circumstances, and that's exactly the type of behavior feminism promotes. The language it uses specifically asks for that. Don't question, just believe women. Of course they don't want to account for the negatives of that behavior, so the…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 02:45 AM
1

No, because it doesn't come up for them. Men start at a deficit, because there's more men then women for the first 40 years. We have to be aware of it. That's why there's a "wall" for Women, and they slam into it, because the fact that they have depreciating value doesn't hit till like 35-40.
/r/MGTOW220/07/18 07:30 PM
1

That's some intense blue you got there. Wow.
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 02:08 PM
3

What's your career?
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 04:13 PM
1

You get it.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 05:54 AM
2

Interesting. Thanks, I learned from you.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 05:52 AM
1

If a random woman approached you today and claimed you hit her, and you claimed you didn't, who would the police detain? Why? Litterally had an experience relevant to this happen today. I work at ACE Hardware, and there was a lady who came in trying to return a AC unit. The sticker facing her on it said it was non returnable, yet she flipped out when we pointed that out, claimed harassment and amplified what we supposedly did with every sentence. Threatened calling cops and congressman. I had no…
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 05:50 AM
1

This is why I think a slight reminder was in order. I see this space as more developed. Where as most of the comments are about how we're just now emerging. This is a push towards that more developed MGTOW, where the things we know to talk about is beyond just women, and our issues with them.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 04:50 AM
1

It drives me crazy. It's a part of this place for sure, but it's crazy to be even more then 50% of this place.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 04:46 AM
1

Yeah it's pretty clear.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:35 AM
1

Better then someone like you.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:25 AM
2

You're a favorite in these replys here. Listen, I'm not for the hate, but I'm not trying to stop it either. I'm trying to round it out a little. The AWALT reminders are great, but what has happened to MGTOW when women are sole focus of this page? It's a page neither for men, nor them going their own way, and the page needs a kick in that direction now and again. The same way RedPill needs a kick in being Red now and again.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:24 AM
1

Hot damn! Thanks brother.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:20 AM
2

There's nothing wrong with even high doeses of that, but it's been all consuming of this page lately. I hear more about women here then anywhere else, and it's apparent that it's a bad sign for maintaining a space for men.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:05 AM
1

Uh, Redpill rage sounds like it has its place on Redpill, how about creating a space for men going their own way, instead of enabling the victim mindset completely focused on what we're trying to go away from. A good kick in that direction isn't a bad thing for this place.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 02:02 AM
4

Who! It was awesome, it was an inspiration to see. People cheered it on while it was occuring. It was actually MGTOW. This sub needs that.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 01:56 AM
-1

You're not MGTOW, you're a victim.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 01:54 AM
3

I dug the culture when I added it. I noticed it goes through a lot of different tones and flavors, but there was a week where people were posting their cars and different things they were working on, I remember ideology being brought up more. This place was healthy, and I just don't see that lately.
/r/MGTOW08/07/18 01:52 AM
1

I'm doing great, but I'm also not married.
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 05:30 PM
2

Try this: http://ckamerica.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-state-of-nation_7.html?m=1 Corresponding video list: The State of the Nation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_Eutci7ack&list=PLq_hGs3PD6GMZRslT_XLNEfWw3piZAGfp
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 03:07 PM
2

The post was shallow crap focused entirely on women. You're right about liberal egalitarian, good call, but I value MGTOW, and childish demonizations don't help this place grow and be independent.
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 09:03 PM
14

How is this dumb whiny shit on here. It's neither MGTOW, nor comprehensive enough to have any depth, or basis in reality. Just weak venting and demonizations.
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 05:44 AM
1

I think you might be interested in an analysis I developed: http://ckamerica.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-state-of-nation_7.html?m=1
/r/MGTOW17/07/17 04:19 AM
3

Thank you for articulating this. As a man you helped me understand something I always knew I wanted.
/r/RedPillWomen10/03/17 06:12 PM
11

I've been saying it for years. Canada is on the same path as America, just 10 years back. Broadly speaking mind you.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 06:41 AM
1

Yeah. Just like Feminism. And this is a mens rights forum. Not r/egalitarian. Like I am egalitarian, and agree that this message is almost toxic, but it belongs here, and it carries an important message. One that shows how toxic and unequal feminists actions already are, which is really what you should be offended about. That's the images point. To express that dynamic, and not actually an avocation for those laws to be passed for achieving equality.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:35 AM
1

There's been 35+ out there for sure. I'm not even playing and i've ran into a few.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/16 02:49 PM
11

Wow man. You are precise, articulate, and relevant to what I know as well. Thanks for laying it out like that.
/r/MGTOW24/05/16 12:11 AM
2

This is the summery I was waiting/looking for. Thank you. I clearly resonate with this.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 02:44 AM
2

Honestly this is going to be the best answer, they're pretty solid over there. You'll get good insights, articulation, and examples from a woman's perspective. They're just closer to the question then we are.
/r/askTRP03/01/16 04:28 PM
1

I use the frog pot analogy too. http://ckamerica.blogspot.com/2015_08_01_archive.html?m=1
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 06:35 AM
1

Yay! Subtle commentary for egalitarianism/equality! My spirits are honestly lifted. Or am I assuming to much?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:27 AM
0

I honestly feel like you should focus on working out. Just moving a lot at any activity will get you to a place where it will be easier to determine your next step, because of the mindset change you'll have.
/r/seduction30/11/15 08:16 PM
5

??? What's the story about Duluth?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:54 AM
1

It is an immoral frame because it adds negativity to the pool, but that's all a relative spectrum anyways. Some would argue that it's moral. I'm not, I would not say it's illogical though. In fact the opposite. It's the result of viewing things as they are with a clear mind, and I'm being enraged by what I'm seeing. Women are not egalitarian by any measure, a pocket of them say they are, and a pocket of those actually put in the effort to be egalitarian. It's a surprisingly difficult thing to ac…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:30 AM
3

I would say you nailed it. Thank you for articulating this. Funny, I spend my time fighting oligarchy, not this paradigm we're talking about. It's just been catching my attention the past few years. Yet I never made the correlation between the attitudes/behaviors I've seen from the rich and women. Seems obvious now. I agree that it would be a very similar if the roles were reversed, but that's still a tough call for me. The details would be different. How do you think men should progress forward…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:03 PM
3

You're describing a framing issue. One extreme being that because of some metric like race, gender, etc, people are a certain way. Both everyday stereotypes and statistical/scientifically verifiable traits are found here. The other end being that these precursor traits don't effect people and we're all individuals. It's just choices that happen to stem from specific groups. So therefore it's unfair to treat groups certain ways or hold certain perspectives against them because of the actions of a…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:30 PM
7

This made me feel better. Because I've been aware that it's not until 40 (in America) that the gender balance flips back in favor of men. At the same time, I've turned into a cynic, believing that most women are useless scum. They aren't going to be there for men, they just work against them to take things. Nor have any useful/attractive traits because they've never really had to compete or try. Those garbage frames tend to sick around too. Male disposability, solipsism, active avoidance of obje…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:16 PM
1

I have no idea how so many people failed to see what was going on here. There're quote brackets and everything. Good lookin' out friend.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:17 AM
1

I appreciate the reminder. It's easy not to be diligent about this.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 06:10 AM
1

Oh snap that's wild. Yet another reason to check that place out. The only others I found were spots in Russia and the Cayman islands. Russia having a high death rate for men, and the Cayman islands being a wealth center, thus the uniqueness being social in both cases, imho. I wonder why New Zealand has more women? Do you know? If not what are your assumptions and thoughts? How has it effected things in your opinion? Frankly I could throw down another dozen questions at this point.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:00 AM
3

Actually there are more men then women up until about 40 years old. Then it flips. It tends to be like that in most societies. The better the quality of life for that society the later that age flip tends to get. This video does a great job of explaining some of the biological mechanics that creates this result.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:51 AM
8

That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:28 AM
14

I'm in CNC machining at a community college right now. 0 women. None this year or the previous year. There's been a 100% job placement for the students who pass this class for years. Mind you, the classes are small because there's hardly any men either, but the lack of women even showing a shred of interest in STEM careers in a very pro-women school. Kinda let's me know that they simply don't give a fuck about learning or working, but will use the gap in arguments regardless. Typical behavior. T…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:46 AM
1

I like it. It's interesting. I'm quite free, but definately in the beta realm for my desire to be loved/validated, so idk how to relate to this yet. I'll probably reapproach it later to get another perspective.
/r/askTRP28/09/15 12:19 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/askTRP26/09/15 10:45 PM
6

Yeah. I would like to hear you speak about this in more depth as well. Simple articulations usually come from comprehensive understandings of the subject, and that line feels incredibly applicable to others and my own life.
/r/askTRP26/09/15 03:06 PM
3

Show yours!
/r/askTRP19/09/15 01:50 PM
0

They perceive they are the inverse of the blissful escapist. The ones who delude themselves, and just try to be happy, instead of perceiving and accepting problems/negativity. The problem is that some pessimists also delude themselves, but with misery, and stay in that state of being. Creating the negativity with a self fulfilling prophesy. So they're a mixed bag. Some have accurate perceptions of reality. Some do not. But this is why they believe they do, in my opinion.
/r/askTRP10/09/15 02:57 AM
1

You mean people, my fellow man. I move a lot, switch careers a lot. People come and go in that sense. I treat most people like neighbors. Because to me they all are. My main tribe is quality of character, but I keep in mind we're all in this weird experience together, and we really don't know what we are doing. So yeah I give a shit about strangers/others. It's no different then a stranger in my relevalt community.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/15 09:19 AM
1

Dude, you sound like an inspiration and you're ahead of the game. The next decade is probably going to be great. Mixing up the environment is my only suggestion, like a work environment that's around women, but not working with a whole bunch of women. Mixing it up is inevitable at 16 though, seek out some fun in that process, try to be and have fun. You sound like you're a lot like me, I focus on saving the world and helping others, it's to achieve a goal mind you, so balancing things is incredi…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/15 02:39 PM
2

TLDR: Being completely focused on yourself or others is toxic for the inverse, be nuanced. I've been exploring this concept for the past year but my conclusion has been that you only have this life, and that you should strive for the fullest enjoyment of it. Why just enjoyment, there's so much more then that. I collect unique experiences, firsts as they say. Focusing only on enjoyment is often limiting. It makes you avoid challenges, scary experiences, learning new things, a purposeless life in …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 09:52 PM
1

I'm holding out here for a few more years to try to implement changes, but my exit strategies into a list of countries is coming together quickly. There's really no place to go to though, when it's all about the future of things.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 05:47 PM
1

Of course it's a cyclical issue and the blame go to both, the people and their leaders: when people are educated more is expected from their leaders and they (the people) are not easily tricked by populism and scarcity of ideas. That's precisely the problem I described with democracies growing too big, you get representative democracies. Managing everyone's opinion to decide what to do consumes time and resources. I think that with new technologies this could be solved (think of employing more e…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 05:41 PM
1

Don't be sorry, it was great, clear and concise, to the point as well. I like your list, I didn't think about taking advantage of a crisis, I'll explore that further. I've seen the government do that, and the banks do that. It's an interesting thought, but I'm generally against it because of the whole becoming your enemy dynamic. That and I'm trying to prevent those crisis. Probably necessary though. I'm well aware of the sabotage element from my experiences with the campaigns and protests. That…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 03:32 PM
2

That was a wonderful articulation. Clear, concise, you have a comprehensive understanding of the playing field. I appreciate it really. It was all positive too, I was expecting you to demean blue pillers, but you went straight for the flaw in their logic. I feel like this should be saved.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 04:51 AM
2

What's the point of your life? Do you follow one, or do you just float in the water? Or is it all just personal enjoyment emotional behavior? No purpose, no contribution, is that the motto?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 03:58 AM
1

I'm behind this train of thought, and I'm interested in that concept.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 10:42 PM
2

Thank you. I was beginning to feel like I was the only one who looked at it that way. That the individual good and collective good are completely at odds with each other, because so many people follow selfish short term roads. By the way, would you mind taking a look at a problem I've been working on. It's a predicament, but solvable in my mind.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 10:24 PM
3

Sounds like concern trolling a little. I don't understand. Can you elaborate? A real man doesn't care about others feelings or legacy. If you live your life with purpose people can't help but admire you. "A real man". Funny line, it's a misnomer. And purpose and legacy are often intertwined, so the basis of your argument feels a bit disjointed. Your worry about being "like them" is unnecessary as we really don't give a shit. It's a matter of hypocrisy and I give a shit. Because to me it's weak t…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 07:16 PM
2

In a perfect world, this would be true, but there will always be power hungry individuals who will take advantage. Hence me saying there's merit in his post, and be nuanced. If every man in the world was a 'nice guy', eventually one of them would find out that getting ripped and acting like a jerk is a more effective strategy to get girls. In turn, more men would start acting like a jerk and the 'nice guys' who refuse to change because of their morals will get left behind. Hence balanced, framed…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 06:58 PM
3

I'm totally behind you on this ideology. Validate and organize your investments in people. Sounds great, possibly necessary to keep moving things forward. Sometimes the net negative people are that way because they haven't been invested in though. They never had a chance, then became ingrained in that lifestyle. A lot of betas are like that, they never knew, then some subreddit invested knowledge in them. It's not like anyone really has a great idea of what they're doing and what's going on in t…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 06:31 PM
1

Yeah, I don't give a fuck about PC. That shit's destructive to articulations of thought. I'm pretty favoring of being egalitarian and just, so "fairness" is more of a matter of avoiding hypocrisy. Do unto others as they say. But when it comes to relationships, workplace interactions, and general human interaction. Fairness is not the end all be all. Someone always comes out ahead, and people like to be positively manipulated to feel good (Flirting, compliments). So you can't always apply it. Som…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 06:21 PM
3

It's a matter of hypocrisy in terms of the individual, and in terms of the collective (because none of us are technically alone in this.) it's necessary because being 100% self absorbed is short sighted and destructive. It's not beta, it's the harder route to go. It's too easy to label things you don't agree with as beta and just dismiss it without thinking about it. I suggest exploring the thought a little bit more.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 06:03 PM
59

There's value in what you said, for sure. Especially with the perception of how people delude themselves that things just happen, but you also sound like how we say a feminist acts. Self absorbed, without morals or honor. It's too easy to behave like them, it's also too fucked up. Even if you're dead at the end, you don't value the legacy you leave? You don't believe in looking out for others? It's short sighted and it's a problem. I'd say a balance is required. Both action for others and yourse…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 12:31 PM
1

Here's multiple things about the election process for you.
/r/askTRP17/08/15 10:25 PM
2

Ha, use the thing that hinders me the most, I'll have to get creative. This narrative isn't exactly simple and placed easily, but it's better then what I've tried. Thanks buddy.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/15 05:55 PM
2

The question is what to do about it, how can the Republic become accountable to the American people again. I've been all over this issue for about 4 years now and I'm running out of ideas. Mostly because of the people, and their lack of interest in the electoral process. It's like living in a suicidal cult. People look at you crazy when you explain how the punch got poisoned and what that means. Any thoughts?
/r/TheRedPill17/08/15 05:22 PM
2

I would hope that you would be interested in this.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/15 01:08 AM
1

Works for prisoners. Some of those dudes run lives with that tactic. I wonder if there's an alpha way of writing letters, like what it would look like. Some women obsess over them, I've been asked to write letters for years, even beta guy friends want letters, I've never understood the desire for them. Inefficient, costly, time consuming, and require meaningless drivel to fill enough space to seem worth it.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 12:44 PM
2

I've never resented getting bells palsy more then this moment. For those that don't know it paralysis one side of your face. It's left me physically two faced/asymmetric for years.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 12:33 PM
6

Extreme wealth is above politician. Aside from that. Nailed it.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 11:46 AM
1

Replied after your post, just didn't want to double up. Cheers. :)
/r/askTRP16/07/15 10:50 PM
1

I'm generally pretty approachable and welcoming. Though I haven't enjoyed manipulating my facial expressions outside of my actual feelings, so I really don't tap into it. Not nearly as interested. At the same time I'm working on trying to smile more in general, because of how it effects my feelings. So there's this bizarre game/battle between what I feel I am, and who I choose to be, at least when it comes to facial expressions. I'm thinking about how location is a big aspect of it too. Like, I …
/r/askTRP16/07/15 10:48 PM
1

But robot consciousness is so fascinating! What if we're wrong and it's super baller having hyper intelligent robots. We would be rollin like it's Star Trek in no time.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 10:02 PM
2

It is. I refer to my response to u/invalidity to explain the details, because he said the same thing.
/r/askTRP16/07/15 02:24 PM
1

Oh it's 100% societal conditioning from the beginning, it's also a matter of operating how I want to in the society I live in, because I care about how my actions effect the society around me, and the future of that society. Caring about how you effect people around you is self societal conditioning, or being neighborly/civilized. It's inevitable unless you're trying to be 100% selfish and self focused 100% the time. Even then you're in an environment raised around others. The very thoughts you …
/r/askTRP16/07/15 02:21 PM
2

It's a cost benefit analysis, some people run it through short term thinking, others long term. It's a personal evaluation on how much life/living is worth, an Alpha could see it as pointless to go on, or have conscious reasoning to this path, but human instinct generally kicks in preventing any action. Also it's difficult to be rooting for your own death. So it's not likely to happen in Alpha traits, Alphas tend to be more proactive at problem solving, self improvement, and making investments i…
/r/askTRP16/07/15 04:24 AM
5

Hahahahaha I forsaw the same thing, currently getting into robotics. :)
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 03:55 AM
1

Part fear mongering, part higher risk assessment, part broken society. Depends on the perspective. It hasn't phased me emotionally at all. I've adjusted, adapted, and acquired new experiences/perceptions because of it. It's kinda fun to me, to be so aware of it, and see what different reactions I can get with the different voices. It effects men too, it's not just women. Which is helping me categorize different types of men. The trial of it itself and the contrast I learned here a few months ago…
/r/askTRP16/07/15 03:18 AM
2

First of all. I agree, but I do as I wish consciously with my own agendas. So don't misunderstand the situation. Second of all, there is an insane, but somewhat valid, narrative going on in this nation about fearing dangers because they "might" happen. Robberies, rape, murder, etc. Which causes people to withdraw more, and that just makes things worse. Isolated people often make poor objective decisions. For women there's more threat, therefore a higher risk assessment. On top of the naturally h…
/r/askTRP16/07/15 02:56 AM
2

Yes, well, I've been told that for the first time a few months ago, but for the first 25 years of my life I've heard otherwise from men and women alike. I've now started to play with a deep, yet still quiet voice when I go out to public areas, to see if it changes attention levels, but I've found nothing so far. Though, I would still agree with that theory, and try to keep it in mind when I see a girl I like.
/r/askTRP15/07/15 10:35 PM
19

Meh... as a 26 yo this feels like a weak argument. Though true for some. I would say it's because I (along with many other men) am constantly playing down being threatening to others around me, specifically women. On top of being told all your life not to rape women or appear like a rapist by being subtly threatening to them, this is also promoted at service industry jobs. It's more welcoming and comforting to soft customers, and is seen as the way to market yourself and the store. Even at the h…
/r/askTRP15/07/15 09:39 PM
2

Funny, I've been going through the top posts, and I just avoided that post because I could smell the bias through the title. Then ran into yours. Overall I think this sub holds it together pretty well. Comments are more emotional then upvotes, so that's the discrepancy I think you're seeing, but I'm glad to see there's someone here to remind us to check ourselves. The same way we expect feminists to check themselves. I feel like both groups are beginning to focus on improving themselves and qual…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:10 PM
5

But you didn't, instead you dismissed the people who need to hear the message, saying instead that they deserve what they get. You talked about how obvious it is when it isn't, and used that to validate belittling someone trapped in a social norm.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 04:03 PM
7

How should everyone know it's a trap? Have you seen the swaths of positive advertising about marriage in every aspect of life? Seriously how are people supposed to inherently know this? I was at a wedding last fall and it was FILLED with positive reinforcement. Everyone saw it as a good thing. TV, Movies, My family, couples coming out of churches. All portray marriage as the joining of two people in love. So explain to me how it's so obvious that it's rigged without being informed by others (spe…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 02:52 PM
0

Just a note, I'm always comparing myself to others, but I cheer on their success as well. I make a lot of investments into people's lives. This is the first time I've wondered if I'm egotistical because of comparing myself, maybe, It's a new thought. I know I'm not particularly confident as a person yet... but I also feel like I don't fit your example. So I just wanted to point out that there may be another type of person that fits outside of the paradigm you laid out. Even something as simple a…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 02:37 PM
1

I liked what you said, but you were incorrect about the playing field being equal, and women having it as hard. Globally there are more men then women. In America there are more single men then women until you hit 40, then it flips. The younger you are, the more competitive it is for men. Dramatically so for you early-mid 20's. These are facts, that's how it is. Both Alphas and Betas are in denial about it, but betas seem to have a sense of it because they're hurt by it. This makes equality impo…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 05:24 PM
1

Sounds like you need to spend a couple months on r/nofap. That'll show you the other side of your behavior. Then you can latch on to a comfortable middle ground.
/r/seduction17/05/15 04:04 PM
2

So in America, between the ages of 18- 40, there are about 1200 single men for every 1000 single women. The younger the age the more extreme the competition for men. Then at 40 it flips and starts being competitive for women. You add in the testosterone factor, financial elements, older men going after younger women, and even a safety factor, it's no surprise that women aren't approaching. It's why on OK Cupid women are commonly listed as "doesn't reply often" where men have the green light and …
/r/seduction04/05/15 04:59 PM
-2

This is one of those deep shortcuts that people look for all the time.
/r/seduction30/03/15 01:37 AM
7

To point it out. Duh.
/r/seduction05/01/15 08:38 AM
15

That was so lame it was boring. Why did you even bother?
/r/seduction05/01/15 06:41 AM
1

Ice.
/r/seduction07/12/14 03:08 PM
1

You should learn sign language/lip reading, dancing, how to articulate yourself and your emotions through text. I think if you spent some time building those skills, your life will get better.
/r/seduction22/11/14 02:17 PM
1

Appreciate that. Specifically the body language/posture. I'm going to correct that. Thank you.
/r/seduction03/04/14 10:51 AM
1

Excellent advise. One thing I'm wondering. I'm tired of approaching women. I'm honestly sick of it, what do you think would help a guy get approached by women, or what types of guys are more approachable then others?
/r/seduction03/04/14 01:07 AM
1

What is fun though? What is a fun guy like?
/r/seduction06/03/14 03:13 PM
1

The inverse of this is what bothers me, I always have to be the one to talk to girls. No girls want to talk to me though, I never get approached. What can one do about that?
/r/seduction22/01/14 05:40 PM
2

Oh snap! And what a name to go with it!
/r/seduction23/12/13 06:24 AM
6

Wow, I think you just helped me. Thanks.
/r/seduction23/12/13 06:21 AM
1

Bingo, Thank you. Got to excited for my date, then I started to panic. Needed that articulation.
/r/seduction27/10/13 10:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter