TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CZ-7000 Archive

View 4 posts and 184 comments by CZ-7000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Yeah, I don't know—I think this website is a mess. Many of their references are just news articles that don't cite primary sources. They also rely on studies that haven't been peer-reviewed and often draw conclusions that simply aren't supported by the evidence. For example, under "Rape and Sexual Assault of Men", in the section "Reporting by Men Is Limited", they state: "Male victims suffer 'recall bias' that makes them more likely to minimise or dismiss their own victimhood as time goes on." T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 11:22 AM
72

So, for everyone who is still wondering about the remaining violence perpetration gap between boys and girls, consider the following. Every single relevant study on adverse childhood experiences and corporal punishment by parents, teachers, or family members shows that boys report significantly more severe and frequent victimization. And because such prior experiences heavily correlate with future perpetration, it is expected that those numbers for boys are higher. So no, it is not because boys …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 06:02 PM
21

Another issue that is not inherent to feminist academia (as it affects all of science, though some fields more than others) is publication bias. For example, the Precarious Manhood Theory states that masculinity is a fragile state that needs to be constantly reaffirmed through masculine behavior such as dominance, violence, homophobia, etc., and it is often used to explain things like why most school shooters are boys. This theory, when tested in practice, finds moderate to very small effect siz…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 12:30 AM
-1

Yes it is except if you think you are entilted to the Body of your Partner.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 08:33 PM
-2

Yes Verbal Coercion is Sexual Violence whats your Point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 08:05 PM
43

This is a Sub about Men and Boys with an explicit LeftWing Bias that doesnt mean we have to discuss other Leftist Topics unrelated to Men and Boys. The title is just a positioning against Racism, homophobia, Transphobia, Gender Role Essentialism and Classism. If you want to discuss how for example Homelessness disproportionally affects Men than great, if you just want to talk about homelessness in general great but its not really relevant to the Sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 07:42 PM
-1

No i disagree most relevant Sexual Violence Research i read uses clear Questionnaire that use clear Coercive acts and not catcalling or staring. For example this Multi national study which found about 25 % Sexual Coercion Victimazation of Women and 23 % for Men. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6474011_Predictors_of_Sexual_Coercion_Against_Women_and_Men_A_Multilevel_Multinational_Study_of_University_Students
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 07:37 PM
-27

No the 25% Number is not Bullshit. You just have a certain view of Sexual Violence that involves draging someone in the bush and the use of heavy Violence. Most Sexual Violence occurs in a Relationship and doesnt involve Severe Violence. And most importantly also about 25% of College Men will experience Sexual Violence
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 09:37 PM
-1

Okay i agree that The Narrativ of the constant Threat and occurances of Male Violence against Women is categorically false and that Women in general are quite safe and that in large Part their day to day Actions shows as much, but your dismissal of Self Report Data when it comes to Domestic/intimate Partner and Sexual Violence is simply wrong. One of the strongest Arguments against Feminist Rhetorik and Theory is the Fact that in Large Self Report Data Men report similar or more Violence experie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 09:32 PM
13

Yeah but it is the single biggest Predicter and outcome of Patriarchy Theory and it is categorically false. And despite the enormous amount of Evidenz it keeps being ignored or denied by Feminist Academics and Activist alike. So what the fuck are we doing here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:10 PM
23

The Evil of Feminism and Feminist Theory is pretty apparent the Moment you start to learn about Male Victimazation of Intimate and Sexual Violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:25 PM
1

Yes that is what every Speed Dating study shows but again i talked only about the Body below the Neck. the 3 most important Factors in Dating are 1. Facial Attractivness 2.Bodily Attractivness 3.Height 4. Everthing else (Status, Job, Personality)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 03:25 PM
17

I think there has been a tipping point in male disadvantage that was reached in the late 2000s and early 2010s, which started to impact men's lives hard enough relative to women's that Red Pill/manosphere ideology began to gain traction. For example, this meta-analysis on gender discrimination in hiring found that, from the year 2009 onward, there has been no more hiring bias against women in male-dominated, neutral, and female-dominated fields. In fact, there is now a slight bias against men in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 10:06 PM
1

By bodily attractivness i mean everything below the neck. Leanness and muscularity >> height.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 06:38 PM
26

I have looked into quite a few studies about male victimization, and one thing stands out to me. They simply do not get cited. Most "feminist-leaning" papers are almost always cited in the 50–100 range at the very least, but papers that lean in the other direction barely reach 10. I mean, just look at this paper about female sexual violence perpetration. It examines 32 studies and has 7 citations: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371250869_An_Examination_of_Sexual_Coercion_Perpetrated_by…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 03:52 PM
-5

No i am sorry but you are fully emerged in Internet Rhetorik. The minimal Height requirement is dependent on the women height itself and is basically always "he has to be taller than me" So lets say for a Women of the Height of 170 cm the minimum Height requirement is somewhere around 172-174 cm. So Men of a height of 172 cm or above have a 32% chance of getting a 2nd Date with this women and Men under 170 cm a chance of 25% There was further Penalty tho as soon as the Men is 8 Inches shorter as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 09:55 PM
-1

sure this Point is absolutly Valid but i wasnt made here. Tho i have to say i might misinterpreted the Post mainly because of the Title of the Graph which puts the responsibility on Women alone and kinda infers blame on Women which i feel comes across as sexual entiltetment. But the post can also be viewed in the sense. "hey here is useful information in case you need it in an argument"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 09:00 PM
-22

alright but than make that specific point about the double standard and not as a standalone point about supposed Female Preferences. For the record i think critisising Dating Preferences is absolutly silly for both Genders. I dont give a fuck if women prefer tall men or men prefer huge Butts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:51 PM
-20

ok but body shaming short Men and Sexual preferences in Dating Partners is not the same thing and you have only Posted about the latter than the prior. Again i think you Post good Stuff generally but this one is a miss for me and screams Resentments to Women for having Preferences. Also the title in the Graph is quite disingenious as it is framed that Women are the ones responsible for this discrepency but this cannot be concluded by this Data alone as Men could be equally the reason for this by…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:37 PM
-3

Bro you are conflating different Topic with one another to Hate on Women dating choices that you are not entiltet to
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:28 PM
-29

What is the point of this post? That women have superficial preferences just like men? That it sucks for shorter guys, but that women are somehow obligated to date someone they aren't attracted to? I understand it if you're using this as a rebuttal to people who argue that only men discriminate based on superficial traits. But as a standalone point, it comes across as quite sexually entitled. Besides, the speed dating data is actually pretty clear on this topic. Height is a factor that increases…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:24 PM
25

we should consider Demographic factors that could explain the discrepency. We know that the higher the Education the more likely People are to lean Liberal and as there is a massive discrepency especially on highest Education (60/40 to 2/1 split depending on the university/college) it isnt that surprising. Also we have quite good evidence now that young Women outearn young Men in many places (which is obv directly linked to education) which also predicts more left leaning attitudes. ironically w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 08:29 PM
39

Oh buddy you have a lot of education to do on Mens Issue and the role Feminism plays in it. Unfortunatly if you actual do the research i doubt your relationship would survive as the phrase "i hate Men" will be the least of your concerns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 11:11 AM
8

So you realise how disingenious this whole comparrison is by this simple fact. Male Pattern Baldness is not the scientific term. The Term is androgenetic alopcia which is a genetic Sensitivity of the Hairfollicles to DHT. And here is the kicker: up to 80% of Men and 50% of Women are affected by the age of 70. So it isnt a sole Male Concern and the benefits of the Funding go to Men and Women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 04:34 PM
17

So, the funny thing about parental alienation is that, just like domestic violence, it is not a gendered phenomenon. This recent study by Denise Hines and Alexandra Lysova found that parental alienation is common and that fathers and mothers engage in it at roughly equal rates. One particularly interesting finding, however, is that boys were much more likely to experience parental alienation. In other words, while mothers and fathers appear to engage in parental alienating behaviors equally ofte…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:37 PM
2

I would like to see Past 12 Months rates on this Topic as like in every other aspect of Abuse Women report higher Lifetime Victimazation while the differences always disappear or even reverse in 12 Months rates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/26 08:31 PM
15

Your personal warped view is worth nothing if we are talking about Violence in the Context of an Initimate Relationship. Your assertion is straight up false. In western Countries 4 Decades of Empirical Evidence has quite clearly demonstrated that Women are more often Violent in Relationship. Th newest Meta Analysis of Alexandra Lysova shows this https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388675702_Rates_of_Male_and_Female_Physical_Victimization_and_Perpetration_in_Intimate_Relationships_A_Comprehe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:58 PM
91

In light of these statistics, it is fucking mad that the feminist rebuttal to the often-cited slogan "Not all men" is "Not all men, but always a man," despite the fact that at least one-third of intimate partner homicide victims are men killed by women. Not even the most extreme racists would dream of claiming that all murder is done by POC, because they and everyone else know how ludicrous that statement would be. But when it comes to men, everyone just accepts it and regards it as true. What t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 12:08 PM
28

Dude… Circumsision is consensual because the Parent consent to it? Fuck these people and everything they stand for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 07:02 AM
23

yea but thats my Point, how could you even come to any other Conclusion than Misandry? Usually you can make some Mental Gymnastic about socialisation and turn around to claim how its actually Misogyny but how do you even do that with 2 year old boys?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 11:12 PM
43

I think the most effective rebuttal to the denial of systemic misandry is the gender breakdown in child homicides in the years 2010–2019, as this concerns a demographic of "men" that can't effectively be blamed in any way, and most of the perpetrators are women, so the "by other men" argument doesn't work either. So just use this in the future as an argument, and especially point to the discrepancy from ages 0–8. <image>
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 10:51 PM
6

Studies that looked into differences in externalising and internalising behaviours of Children which experienced Adverse Childhood Experiences dont find a consistent and significant Differences betweem Boys and Girls. What they do find tho is that Boys experiences significantly more ACEs and especially Violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 04:42 PM
5

So did these women use tactics from the study above to convince you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 03:21 PM
1

Question would you have had sex in the Beginning with these Women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:04 PM
9

I wouldn’t say this is exclusively female behavior. We are still in a pretty sexually restrictive society, and men also don’t clearly communicate their desires.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:02 PM
42

Also the the whole premise of this Paper works only if they asume that consent cant be changed. Just because a Women wouldnt have sex right away in the beginning of the Interaction doesnt mean she cant change her Mind troughtout the interaction. Im pretty sure that almos noone neither Men or Women would be down for Sex if you just go up to them andtell them „Wanna fuck?“ Its
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 08:47 AM
9

Technical breakdown of this studies flaws: https://x.com/josef_jhs/status/2043600934178279622?s=46
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 07:31 AM
4

So, in most Western countries, women and men have extremely unequal parental rights. Here in Germany, being legally recognized as a father is entirely dependent on the mother or on a court procedure that can take years. And that is only about legal recognition, not even custodial rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 03:05 PM
24

For example, to answer the claim of widespread and one-directional sexual violence victimization of college women, you could show the 2007 multinational analysis by Denise Hines that showed equal rates of forced sex and sexual coercion in men and women, thus discrediting the whole argument, as the fundamental principle doesn’t hold up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 12:32 PM
12

I have watched now a few of his Reels and i have ts say im not really impressed. Some are good like the Rape academy video but the answer to the claims of Professor Neil are pretty weak. The fundamental Problem is that he doesnt use actual evidence that disbunked the whole notion of gendered Domestic and Sexual Violence which is the single biggest factor most anti man rhetorik is based on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 12:29 PM
38

I think these types of arguments are stupid because at the very base they validate the notion that Men are much more dangerous than Women. If a racist person says that Black People are dangerous and you need to avoid them and deport them the pushback is not „yes they are much more dangerous but not all tho“ it has to be „fuck you you cunt they are not“.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 11:02 AM
8

Alright tell me how many sexual violence victims are Men and how many Perpetrators are Women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 09:24 AM
23

It’s an experiment where participants are asked questions about their sexual behaviors and experiences in three different settings: In front of peers (friends, classmates, etc.) In private, in front of a single researcher Hooked up to a fake lie detector We see that most gender differences in sexual behavior pretty much disappear in the Lie Detector Group yet remain in the other 2 (sexual partner history, masturbation frequency, porn consumption, etc.). So the point is that women underreport pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/26 12:56 AM
111

It’s always the same shit narrative. Biased sexual violence stats, denying evidence of gender symmetry in IPV, and just ignoring ACEs and violence victimization differences in the childhood of boys and girls, which almost entirely explain the gender crime gap. Also, in the comments, there is this weird sentiment that only men cheat, while completely ignoring that, based on self-report data, women comprise about 40% of cheaters. If we take into account the bogus pipeline experiment in sexual beha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 08:34 AM
12

You posted Police Data on Homicides and Rape which doesnt tell shit about Actual prevelance Rates of Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence. Im not interested in educating you in those domain so im giving you a few Sources and if you are actual curious you can learn about on your own. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388675702_Rates_of_Male_and_Female_Physical_Victimization_and_Perpetration_in_Intimate_Relationships_A_Comprehensive_Review https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374715014…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:42 PM
13

Well as per usual you are another Person that is not educated on the Topic of Male Vicitmazation and Female Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence which makes your whole World View Crumble. The whole narrativ doesnt work when Women make up atleast 40% of Perpetrators of Sexual Coercion and Rape and above 50% of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:28 PM
4

Denise Hines and Alexandra Lysova just released a Study on Parental Alienation from both Father and Mothers and the Impact on the Children. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/404124251_Parental_Alienating_Behaviors_in_Canada_Prevalence_Demographics_and_Associations_with_Legal_Administrative_Abuse
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:12 PM
1

No, your perception is clouded by red- and black-pill talking points. As Sakura demonstrated, both men and women prefer moderate body counts of around 3–9 and tend to judge both low body counts (0–2) and high body counts (12+) more negativly, although high body counts are viewed as much less attractive by both genders than low ones. By the way, the only relevant predictor of a man’s relationship status is neither his attractiveness, height, nor body count—it is his adherence to traditional male …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 03:26 PM
79

I mean, over the past decade, we’ve seen the term “fuckboy” used extensively as a form of slut-shaming directed at men. So it doesn’t really surprise me that there are no significant differences in how men and women are judged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 02:21 PM
8

Also, isn’t postmodernism inherently skeptical and generally opposed to grand narratives like Marxism or patriarchy theory? I’m sorry, but I simply don’t understand the practical application of this philosophy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:12 PM
9

Honest question—I’m not an expert, but isn’t a basic critique of feminist epistemology that it adopts a postmodern view, where nothing is truly apolitical and everything depends on perspective and power structures? And to deal with the paradox this creates, the response is that it can’t really be resolved—so instead, researchers acknowledge their biases and work with them rather than trying to eliminate them. If that’s the case, wouldn’t it be fair to simply disagree on the grounds that their ap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:08 PM
17

Domestic violence yes but it seems that the perpetration rate of Sexual Violence of Gay Men is very comparable with straight Men and Queer Women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 11:38 PM
1

What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 11:33 AM
9

Why is your gender and your abuse history relevant to the argument? And why are you equating feminism and feminists with women? It’s an ideology that both men and women can adhere to. I’m angry at their philosophical viewpoint that harms millions of abused men. To end this conversation on a positive note, I strongly recommend that you read the research of Denise Hines, Alexandra Lysova, and Nicola Graham-Kevan to get a better understanding of male victims of abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 09:04 PM
9

You are just doing the classic Thing. Men suffer under Patriarchy but only in their freedom of Emotional Expression and their Toxic Masculinity. You have literally atributed the emotional Surpression of Boys only to Men despite the Evidenz suggesting that Mother are enacting a higher Bias when it comes to the Boys emotional Expression and that Chil abuser are more often Mothers. But the worst of it all is your complete Lack of Knowledge of Male Victims of Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 07:56 PM
15

I’m not knowledgeable enough to talk about the philosophical framework, but you’re saying that there is extensive empirical evidence revealing sex-based biases. But in those industrial nations (I mainly mean developed Western nations), we have quite a lot of evidence that shows immense biases in favour of women and at the expense of men, and some of those are literally upheld by feminism. Biases against boys and men in school and university which causes huge Gaps Denial of gender symmetry in dom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 04:57 PM
36

Well, one of the few real empirically testable predictions was the extreme male dominance of intimate partner violence, and that turned out to be completely false—to the point that women report being more violent in every Western country compared to men in relationships. It was also found that in conflict situations, men decrease their aggression when arguing with a woman, while women increase their aggression when arguing with a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 01:17 PM
3

Domestic and sexual violence victimization of men, and the feminist effort to obfuscate the findings of symmetry when it comes to perpetration, is the single most important point. Just read Denise Hines’ work (in my opinion, the most important researcher in the field). Especially her studies about help-seeking experiences of abused men, as those show that domestic victim help services, which are almost entirely feminist, revictimize and constantly victim-blame them. Also, her research shows that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 07:58 PM
2

So this isn’t something the researchers can control in most cases, as they usually send out invites to a proportionate amount of people, but not all of those who receive the invites participate in the survey, and very often men are less likely to participate or even complete such surveys. Thats why i added the Part about the sampling so People can keep in Mind that the disproportionat sample could be a Factors that skews Results but we dont really know in which way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 12:13 AM
3

Yea thats true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 04:07 PM
5

I agree with you completely; there is a huge double standard when it comes to touching a person between men and women. I also think that men just don’t perceive inappropriate touching nearly as threatening as women do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 04:06 PM
3

Yeah, you’re right, as we know that men consume greater amounts of alcohol and suffer more often from substance abuse, that might be a relevant factor here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:58 PM
5

Yea that is just fucked up, i hope you will get the treatment you deserve in the Future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:30 PM
3

Guys, I think you are a little unfair here. Yes, all the reporting bias might be real, but this study was conducted by Denise Hines, who dedicated her life to studying men’s victimization and to pushing back against the feminist viewpoint. If there is anyone who would be sensitive to men in such studies, it’s her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:27 PM
2

Alright, I’m gonna push back slightly here. Even though, yes, touching of the arm could also be a part of these reported numbers, I’m pretty sure it’s more about inappropriate touching of body parts like the lower back, ass,chest and kissing. But yes, in general, it is to be expected that the active part might make more unwanted actions by mistake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:24 PM
13

I kinda agree with you that many men don’t contextualize lower-severity sexual assault as such, but I don’t think it can completely explain the discrepancy in this study. What do you think about the explanation that it might simply come from gender role differences in dating? The man is expected to be the more active part in flirting and approaching, and this comes with a certain risk that the man might do stuff that is unwanted by the woman, especially when drugs are involved, which cloud judgm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 02:31 PM
21

You dont even know the Rates for IPV, Sexual Abuse and Domestic Related Death of Men to hold a proper Conversation about it. You literally based your Worldview on Factual Misinformation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 12:49 AM
2

OK, what’s your point? The whole point of the paper is to show that female perpetration is high and that there is a disconnect between men’s victimization and female perpetration—that sexual coercion is not really a gendered issue and that male perpetration is only moderately higher.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:39 PM
4

Idk you would have to check every single Study of the 60 that Dimarco analysed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:37 PM
1

That means it’s a questionnaire that is created from scratch for the specific study and is not used further in different studies, so it is not standardized. So, in theory, these surveys are most susceptible to the bias of the researcher conducting the surveys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:39 PM
2

This might be the case, but if we look at this study, SES surveys reported lower rates on average than other surveys. The funny thing is, the studies that showed the highest amount of sexual coercion among men are studies that use self-developed questionnaires.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:20 PM
3

Wait, which study is trash? Dimarco’s? It’s just a review of 60 studies that investigated sexual coercion perpetration and victimization, and only about 40% of the reviewed studies used the SES by Mary Koss. This study by Dimarco is the most important to date about male victimization and female perpetration to make sexual violence against men visible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:13 PM
4

What do you mean? The definition used accounts for such things, as it includes pressure, which can be through emotional violence (for example, threatening to leave the partner or physical pressure). Might there still be underreporting or elements that are not captured? Yes, but it’s the best thing we’ve got.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:09 PM
8

No, I have to disagree with you here. In this study, we are only talking about coercion to achieve any form of vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse, and not other forms of sexual assault such as forced kissing or touching. I agree with you, though, that the SES survey by Koss is definitely a questionable one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:05 PM
1

What do you mean by hesitancy to coerce?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 03:10 PM
2

Alright, fair, that could be an explanation for the somewhat lower rates of Women , but I don’t agree that you necessarily need to be stronger, as a substantial amount of women’s use of coercion also entails physical force.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 03:09 PM
8

You could interpret it that way, but then the question is why we don’t see that pattern in intimate partner violence, where we see a higher perpetration rate among women compared to men. In this review by Alexandra Lysova, we see the following numbers for victimization in the past year: Victimization: Men 11.3%, Women 10.3% Perpetration: Men 11.1%, Women 18.3% https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388675702_Rates_of_Male_and_Female_Physical_Victimization_and_Perpetration_in_Intimate_Relations…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 02:44 PM
24

Btw, I’m very skeptical of any questionnaire developed by Mary Koss, like the SES, because originally her questionnaire only asked about forced penetration and not being made to penetrate, so keep that in mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 01:43 PM
19

They use the following definition of sexual coercion: “the act of using pressure, alcohol or drugs, or force to have sexual contact with someone against his or her will.” They identified 4 different standardized survey questionnaires that have been used in the 60 studies: Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SES) (Koss et al., 2007) Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2) (Straus et al., 1996) Sexual Aggression and Victimization Scale (SAV-S) (Krahé & Berger, 2013) Postrefusal Sexual Persistence Sca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 01:41 PM
1

As this is journalism and they usually want to present the highest numbers in these cases to generate the most amount of traffic, I would say, based on their wording, that all of those videos combined have a total view count of “hundreds of thousands.” I’m pretty sure that if those videos had tens of millions of views, they would present it as such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 06:56 PM
1

No the 2010 numbers for Men are still at 4,8 % lifetime and 1,1 % past year. In the newest edition they were not reported.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 12:54 AM
10

Simply Question that will Reveal your knowledge on this Topic. What are Problems Men Face? Preferably tell us the Most Important Ones
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 06:49 PM
3

Ok, I don’t quite get your first point, because there are plenty of video games with violence in which said violence is not punished at all—for example, competitive shooters like Counter-Strike—and yet they also don’t create violent behavior. Your 2nd point is already happening in bigger porn production, but most porn about this theme is amateur porn being uploaded to niche websites, which very often operate outside of jurisdictions. So it isn’t really enforceable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 06:43 PM
4

I used 3 sources that showed why it is plausible that a big minority or even a small majority could be women, and your rebuttal is “No, I don’t feel that is true.” Then most of the videos on this platform are most certainly not real and are consensual and staged. Stop pretending that women are these pure creatures. Ffs, there are literally surveys that show that 60% of women have rape fantasies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:31 AM
4

Ok, but why is it problematic to stage a consensual rape scene and to watch a consensual rape scene? I never get this one; it’s just the “violent video games create mass shooters” argument repacked in a sexual context. There is 0 causal evidence that any type of porn creates the depicted sexual desire and behavior. It’s just fearmongering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 09:20 PM
4

Thank you very much for this answer. I’m quite speechless at how little understanding of male sexual violence victimization a sexual violence researcher can have to write such a misleading and poorly argued critique. Fucking hell, that’s grim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 01:33 AM
12

By the way, people who say that citing mainly the yearly rate is cherry-picking can never resolve the following problem. Men’s lifetime numbers, in almost all categories, are inconsistent when we compare them to the 12-month rates. For example, in the NISVS 2012: To reach a 19.3% lifetime rape rate for women at a 1.6% annual rate, it would take about 12 years to reach that level. To reach a 6.7% lifetime “made to penetrate” (MTP) rate for men at a 1.7% annual rate, it would take about 4 years to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 07:01 PM
15

Here are my responses to the points in this paper: I don’t know why we don’t simply define rape as forced physical interaction with the perpetrator’s genitals. That would cover vaginal, oral, and anal sex, as well as handjobs, Footjobs, fingering and Petting. Debating the definition of rape is just rape apologia. Differentiating “made to penetrate” from rape is just more rape apologia and female supremacy nonsense. This might be the only vaguely relevant point, but even then it’s highly question…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:45 PM
14

do you know if there is a response by DiMarco to this commentary?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:26 PM
10

No stats, no substance, and nothing intelligent to add. Maybe just stew in your hatred and fuck off. By any measurable metric we have on IPV and sexual violence, female perpetrators are disproportionately not being held accountable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:29 PM
25

How did they evaluate positive and negative views? Did they simply ask, “Do you see the other gender positively or negatively?”, or were there specific questions about particular attitudes?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 07:15 PM
10

Wait, wouldn’t the feminist logic be that men in groups would catcall even more, as a form of patriarchal status enforcement to signal to other men that they are “real men”? That’s a point where I kind of feel sorry for a lot of women who are raised with this constant narrative of fear that doesn’t seem to reflect actual reality. For example, my mother, who is a wonderful person, constantly tells me how afraid she is of going out alone at night. But she also says she has never had anything bad h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 12:55 PM
15

no worries just wanted to give a more detailed breakdown. Yes of course there are quite a few twitter post of absolut nutjobs which wrongly claim that theres a rape academy of 62 million Men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 11:57 AM
110

You’re making a mistake here with the numbers. Motherless got 62 million views in one month, with no known gender breakdown. We know from websites like Pornhub that women make up around 35–40% of users on large porn sites and tend to watch proportionally rougher content. So there is a good chance that a significant portion of those 62 million views comes from women. When it comes to the “sleeping porn” category, the report mentions 20,000 videos uploaded but only gives a total view count of “hun…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:46 AM
7

The disconnect is so weird. I’ve thought about it, and the only catcalling I can recall was in high school during swimming lessons, when the big, attractive guy came out of the lockers in his Speedos and all of the girls started whistling. But other than that, I haven’t witnessed any, and that matches your 35 years of experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:18 AM
33

Okay, sometimes I feel like I live in a parallel universe. I’m in my mid-twenties, go to the gym three times a week, go out at least once a month to a bar or club, and I’m quite active in my day-to-day life. I have not once witnessed any sexual harassment of women in the gym, whether mild or severe, and I have never witnessed any catcalling in normal day-to-day life. Even in nightlife, I have never witnessed it (though it’s often loud and dark, so it’s harder to notice). And yet, if you go on so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 12:41 AM
12

No, they don’t give a direct example, but my example would be attributed to the overall 95% as a false positive, which is why it is completely meaningless. And yes, you are right, this isn’t gender-exclusive, but they only asked men and would probably find very similar numbers reported by women. For example, this study of college women found that overall 32.7% used sexually coercive strategies, with about 15% of women using sexually abusive strategies. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 01:47 PM
16

No, the way this study was advertised and conducted means that the group of men with the lowest offending rates was completely excluded, and promiscuous and sexually aggressive men were more likely to participate in the study. So it isn’t representative of the male population. This means that even if the methodology afterward was legitimate (which it is not), you can’t extrapolate from this study to the whole population. So this study has a biased sample pool of men and questionable methodology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 01:38 PM
29

The biggest problem is also that they use non-consent as a fixed variable that can’t be changed, and every attempt at changing a prior unwillingness into a willingness as coercion or force. So basically, every single dating interaction, as pretty much no one—men or women—would consent to sex with someone they don’t know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 12:46 PM
22

No, you don’t understand this data. They get to the 95% number by framing non-coercive and aggressive behaviours as aggressive and coercive behaviours. They treat non-consent as a fixed variable, and every attempt at changing non-consent into consent as force. For example, a man talks to a woman. She doesn’t seem to the man like she would have sex with him in that very moment, then he uses the item "used your money, status, age to convince her." So he tells her his age, that he works as a doctor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 12:42 PM
30

Ok, the study is garbage, but your portrayal is not accurate. The study has several selection factors of men who would be more likely to be overrepresented in sexual aggression. First, only men aged 18–34 who had sex in the preceding 2 years were allowed in this survey, and as 15–25% of men aged 18–34 didn’t have sex in the past 2 years, a big chunk of men who are the least likely to offend are missing. Second, the study was not advertised as a neutral study. Usually, such studies are advertised…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 12:33 PM
11

Here is a Post that breaks it down on a more technical Level for the People that are interested and can understand that stuff: https://x.com/Josef_JHS/status/2043600934178279622
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 08:20 PM
16

Just a little reminder that Physical Partner Aggression and Sexual Partner Aggression in the Youth Endowment Fund Study of 2024 showed the following: <image> 25% of boys aged 13–17 experienced forced sexual activity (also known as rape or sexual assault), and 15% of girls aged 13–17 experienced forced sexual activity. But sure, let’s teach boys not to rape. This whole Topic is fucking Mental with the available Data we have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 10:13 PM
28

That’s the irony: women are equally or even more violent in the context of relationships, so by implementing a general curfew for men, you would trap many million men with their abuser at in their Home.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 02:44 PM
30

So you know what is funny? Until the 1990s Women were voting more Right Wing and Men were voting more Left Wing in the West. This is also the time Left wing/ socialist Movement were the Strongest when they focused on Workers. As soon as „The Left“ was taken over by Feminism and Identity Politics the shift started.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 12:02 PM
34

What the fuck is this dystopian quote? I haven't read her books, but how can you even write something like this as an academic who should be aware of research showing fairly high levels of sexual victimization of men by women—even if you don't think it's on the same level as women's victimization?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 11:35 PM
2

Yeah, but even then we have just decided to segregate based on heterosexual attraction. So the fundamental principle for segregation doesn’t even work for same-sex attraction. There is no difference for me if a straight woman or a gay man sees me naked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 09:22 PM
6

What are those needs you are referring to? By the way, I agree that having only one gender-exclusive space is detrimental to the gender-neutral space as well, because women have the option to switch while men don’t. However, I still don’t want any segregation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 12:47 PM
23

I know this is a controversial take, but I don’t think gender segregation should be a thing. I think it breeds distrust, hostility, and hate, just like any other form of segregation. And yes, I think that even segregated toilets and changing rooms shouldn’t be a thing. If we didn’t teach children from a young age that boys and girls are different and need to be separated, I think we would have less gender hostility later on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 11:48 AM
48

Fucking hell, can people just read the actual source? “Both widowed men and women became more socially active after the death of their spouse, but only men experienced a reduction in social support, suggesting that socializing didn’t always translate into the emotional support and connection they needed during their grieving period.” So basically, compared to women, men often don’t receive the support they need even when they reach out. But sure, let’s blame the men—even though the article doesn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 02:08 AM
5

Yea thats exactly what i was expecting. No actual Response to the Point i made. instead a vague Statement to move the goalpost. Great
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 05:31 PM
8

Essentially, you are relying on a standpoint that has been refuted by empirical evidence for over 40 years. Research on intimate partner violence, including a comprehensive review of 1,700 studies known as the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project, has found that approximately 50% of IPV is bidirectional and matched in level of severity. Around 35% is unilaterally perpetrated by women against men, while about 15% is unilaterally perpetrated by men against women. Therefore, one of the core ass…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 10:13 AM
2

Alright, a simple question about feminism. Pretty much every feminist author or theorist describes the world as a patriarchy in which violence against women (“patriarchal violence”) is both a symptom of patriarchy and something that enforces and upholds it. Thus, the disproportionate amount of violence against women becomes the single most important factor in their analysis. Do you agree with this view, and do you think it accurately reflects the world?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/26 11:33 PM
25

Yes, if we dismantle the patriarchy, this will result in proper support and recognition of male victims of partner abuse and sexual abuse. Because Patriarchy is why feminist theory denies and distorts equal or similar victimization and perpetration rates, and therefore directly discriminates against male victims, leaving them in their misery and leading to their deaths. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 11:46 AM
37

This is more of a rant than a well-thought-out argument, but please, can we stop using these vague talking points? Boys perform worse in school and academia because they are structurally disadvantaged and discriminated against. They receive worse treatment from staff, peers, and parents. They are graded worse for the same quality of work. They are punished more for the same behavior. They are neglected more and receive less support from the system. AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, BOYS EXPERIENCE MORE ADVE…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/26 04:57 PM
3

There is actually a substantial amount of research that examines partner abuse from a gender-neutral standpoint. I’m not sure if you’re familiar with the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge (PASK), which is a summary of over 1,700 studies: https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ The consistent findings suggest that approximately 50% of cases are bidirectional, with comparable levels of severity (although some research indicates that women use more Severe Forms ). Around 35% involve female-to-male abu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 05:10 PM
12

One of the most important Topics is Intimate Partner Violence. Here are a few Videos/Presentation of some Important Researcher: Dr Don Dutton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5v1QgtFfo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmwyGFAgXBo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsgeDrlRQWc Dr Nicola Graham Kevan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiVgUJOkAJo&t=3359s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9JfXs5QSfo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-1SN4vWLlw Dr Murray Straus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0eSqoXVwjI…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 01:34 PM
1

Yes, of course — but if you continuously reduce them, where do you think you will end up? And even in European countries like Germany, one of the biggest predictors of future financial and academic success is the socioeconomic status of your parents. There is no way to eliminate that within a capitalist society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 12:41 PM
1

you cant eliminate unequal opportunities in a capitalist system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 09:44 PM
9

I have a question because I find this interesting. Isn't one of the strongest arguments for abortion based on self-defense? Pregnancy poses a relevant health risk and even a risk of death, so shouldn’t every woman have the right to terminate the pregnancy out of self-preservation? For example, if a mentally ill person who has no control over themselves comes at me with a knife, I have the right to protect myself with lethal force if that is necessary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 02:09 PM
3

Yes, the reason is probably that when there is no interview with an actual human being who can explain and sensitize men to sexual violence — especially made-to-penetrate — the reported rates for men drop massively.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 11:33 PM
7

Or, you know, don’t shame people for things that don’t concern you. Maybe try this thing called minding your own damn business.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 06:56 PM
1

Yea its insane how we are basically ignoring half of all abusers
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 12:06 PM
2

There are two points I simply do not understand. First, you have been on this sub for quite a while now, and you are still firmly standing by the claim that in developed/Western countries women face significantly more abuse than men (especially in the context of domestic violence), despite the mountain of evidence presented here to the contrary. Second, can you People please stop pretending that feminist patriarchy theory is a scientific, empirical fact? It is not, nor can it be, even within its…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/26 11:55 AM
21

I agree that the actual gap between men and women in crime—especially violent crime—is likely much smaller than commonly assumed. However, there are probably more male offenders because boys experience higher levels of adverse childhood experiences, which are strongly associated with poorer health outcomes and higher rates of criminal behavior. The following study reported the following rates for boys and girls: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332063876_Measuring_Adverse_Child_Experienc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 01:25 AM
2

Yea absolutly fair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/25 07:32 PM
15

I dont disagree with your post, but there is one thing I would like to correct: Women are not more at risk of intimate partner violence. In fact, men are more at risk, and every gender-neutral study that uses proper sampling shows this. When it comes to sexual violence, women may face a slightly higher risk, but even then there are studies showing gender parity in some areas, or even higher rates of male victimization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/25 07:17 PM
2

Yes in theory that might be true but humans have limitation and it is not a given that we can entirely avoid socially constructed gender categories.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/25 09:22 AM
5

To be fair, it is not really certain whether we as humans can get rid of gender categories, since there are still different biological sexes. We can obviously change or redefine them in whatever way we want, but I am doubtful whether we can truly live in a globalised society without genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 10:45 PM
105

The sentence "2 in 5 victims of violence against women and girls are adult men" alone is enough to convince me that I’m living in a simulation and its creators are trolling me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 07:18 PM
69

Yea im pretty sure thats not true and Women cheat as often as Men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 07:15 PM
4

No, it doesn’t. People who already have a specific fetish gravitate toward specific types of porn. Porn itself does not create fetishes or sexual violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 09:01 PM
29

So we have argued, fought, and provided evidence for over a decade and a half that the narrative claiming violent video games and films/series create violent behavior — up to and including murder and school shootings — is false, only to do a complete 180 when it comes to porn and suddenly argue that it creates and increases violent sexual behavior, despite the evidence not even showing a basic correlation. The porn hysteria is absolutely mental.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 01:49 PM
14

Yes, it’s hard to know whether this is really deliberate, because, for instance, I couldn’t find the actual updated questionnaire that was used in the 2025 YEF survey.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 10:43 PM
15

Yes, there is a major change in methodology, and it seems to follow a pattern seen in many of these studies: the initial ones often show near gender parity, while later ones increasingly skew toward female victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 06:59 PM
33

I looked at the NISVS 2024 briefly, and the main difference is that the survey changed from random digit dialing with live interviews to largely self-administered modes. One possible explanation is that this led to higher nonresponse rates among men—especially younger men, who are the most affected male demographic—because men are more likely to disengage, abandon, or not even start the survey. With live interviews, there was a mechanism to keep respondents engaged throughout the survey. Additio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 06:56 PM
1

Well, it depends on the time period we are talking about. Before modern medicine, the reproductive rate per woman needed to maintain a population was between six and eight children. Combined with the much lower average lifespan, this meant that women were essentially pregnant for most of their adult lives, which made them less productive in traditionally paid labor. Once these physical limitations decreased—due to lower child mortality, increased lifespan, and the availability of birth control—w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/25 11:36 PM
20

Yeah the Division of Labour (Men going to Work and Women getting and raising Kids) is not because of a hatred of Women or Men. It is simply the best way to extract the most possible Value out of the working Class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/25 08:38 PM
2

I have to disagree with your first sentence. As a leftist, there is no “either conscription for both genders or for none” position. The position must be: no forced conscription for anyone, period. You wouldn’t say “either genital mutilation for both genders or for none,” so why do we entertain the idea of forced conscription for both?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 05:44 PM
10

When it comes to Patriarchy there a 2 Definition. The Anthropological and the Feminist. The Anthropological defines itself by Objective Measurement without a Value Judgment. So most Societies in the Past were Patriarchal because for example, Family Lines ran through Men, from Father to Son. From an Anthropological viewpoint the West is not Patriarchal anymore (in some instances some western Countries can be described as Post-Patriarchal). A mere Majority of Men in Politics (2/3 to 1/3 in most we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:51 PM
23

I think this questionnaire is complete horseshit, mainly because most hostile sexism questions and some benevolent sexism are not asked in relation to your opinion to men but as an absolute statement. For example on the question „most women are to easily offended“ i gave it a score of 4 which gets me a high hostile sexism score, but if you would asked me „most men are to easily offended“ i would also give it a 4. So to measure sexism the question should be „women are much more easily offended th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 09:00 AM
4

Ok im doing now an exagerated example to prove my point. Lets imagine a working husband and a stay at home wife, the husband is fully supporting his wife and they share everything he earns 50/50. the husband works 14 hours at work everyday and does nothing coming home while the wife works 4 hours of homework and nothing else. Following your logic the 14 hours of work is irrelevant and only the housework countd so the women in this case has more mental load. How in the fuck is this model in any w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 02:15 PM
5

That is not evidence for the fact that Women have more mental load. While women work more at home men work more at work and in the ende women and men work the same hours. Or is your argument that „Homework“ is more mentally demanding than external work? If so again show me evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 01:56 PM
7

You surely have some compelling evidence for such statements and not just some anecdotal storys from women complaining on Twitter. Because i can also form a narrativ on which Men are bearing more „mental load“ based on anecdotes and stuff Men tell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 01:52 PM
1

Well from what i can see the Questionnaire in this Study was pretty solid. What im wondering is that in this study you get a 2.6 % perpetration rate of Men for Forced Sexual Intercourse but only a 1.1% Rate of Women in the Past 12 Months. This is quite different from Victim Surveys which are closer to Gender Parity. I wonder why exactly that is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/25 05:52 PM
45

I have not looked at these studies but when it comes to Sexual Violence Studies you have to be careful and look at the Methodology because it is not uncommon that a Survey Questionnaire is used which excludes Male Victims, especially in more severe Forms of Sexual Violence. One of the biggest Red Flags in Studies is when a Survey Questionnaire from Mary P Koss is used. For example in this Study: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224499.2024.2397496 they used the following Questionna…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/25 09:56 PM
2

OK let me refine my Argument. Human being are Biological determined in the sense that we all share a certain Framework we can be expressed (we can't grow to a height of 10 meters, and we can't have an IQ of 10000) but every alleged Difference on a Population LVL there is between Gender or Race which is based in evolutionary/genetic differences of the Brain is just not backed by the evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 07:09 PM
1

You do know that the impact of testosterone is actually counted in die Environmental aspects of this Argument. Is it proven that Testosterone doesn't cause a Specific Behaviour, rather it can act as a potentiater of Behaviour/Emotion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 07:03 PM
2

There is not a single Study made that was able to establish a Casual Link between “Genetic” Differences which lead to Differences in Behaviour between the Genders. The evidence that we do have can't be separated from Social/Environmental Factors, is insignificant or can easily be nullified. Even the Toy Studies of Infants are run with Children from the age of 8 Months at which children already show learned Behaviour.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 07:00 PM
12

What is this post. Biological Determinism mixed with severe Defeatism is the worst combination. Get out of this Mindset. Society is not like this because or our Genes. Almost every evo psych argument about gender differences is unsustained. Your friend could have been saved, his life could have been better. This is achievable and its worth fighting for. Biology and „genes“ do not determin Society and Behavior!!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 10:28 AM
2

Hey I don't disagree that the Main Problem is the exploitation of Workers, but the Demographic Change is one of the biggest Threat to Developed Nation. Look at South Korea, it is basically a dead Nation which faces Societal Collapse in the next 60 Years if there isn't Mass Immigration or vast Technological Developments (which could happen).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 08:55 AM
6

Oh boy you are a piece of work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 02:57 PM
9

Alright i don't use this word that often, but this is just misogynie. Stop making such broad negative statement about an entire group of people as if these are characteristics that come with being a woman. They are not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 10:04 AM
14

What? The Feminist View of IPV in a Patriarchy is that Men use it to a disproportionate Amount to control Women and keep them in their designated Role and by that uphold the Patriarchy, while Violence by Women is solely a defensive act. The Fact that we have roughly Gender Parity in IPV is a direct Contradiction to that Framework especially considering that Women commit 70% of Unilateral Intimate Partner Violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 08:10 PM
28

Yeah, except that "Patriarchy" doesn't lead to Intimate Partner Violence in any way. We have Gender Parity (actually with more Women than Men perpetrating IPV) in Domestic Violence and even when you look at Sexual Abuse it is much closer to Parity than propagated. Here is a Presentation of Dr. Don Dutton (IPV Researcher): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5v1QgtFfo&t=1808s Here is a thread about Sexual Violence done to Men: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ocq8r9/some_sour…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 10:19 AM
9

This video is a Presentation of Dr. Donald Dutton a Psychologist which has worked for 40 Years in the Domestic Violence Field. You can find the cited Studies in the Presentation. There are many more Presentations of Dr. Don Dutton on the topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5v1QgtFfo&t=387s When it comes to Sexual Violence I always refer to the following Post which has been made by a User in this Sub a few Years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ocq8r9/some_sources…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 07:49 AM
10

It's pretty simple: Domestic Violence and Sexual Violence being portrayed by Feminism as mostly Unidirectional Violence mostly committed by Men onto Women which serves a Societal Function which upholds Patriarchal Power. This is simply put, blatantly false in all Western Nation. In the Domestic Violence Case (IPV) Women are more aggressive and more Violent than Men are. 50 % of IPV is Bilateral matched for Severity (with a tilt towards Women being the more violent Part) 35% is Unilateral perpetr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 07:24 AM
19

Atleast know the Facts before you start lecturing People here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/25 09:18 AM
2

Alright so what do mean then by the following quote? "I'm ready to believe that men, on average, express sexist biases more often, or more violently then women, who may be more often or more severely affected. But these are statistical differences."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 10:36 PM
5

I'm curious by which Metric do you conclude that misogynic is more damaging than Misandry in the Western World?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 04:05 PM
23

I am heavily anti segregation even in cases like Domestic Violences Shelter because these are Women and Men who have been abused by a Men or a Women and need to rebuild trust with the opposite Gender and that doesnt work if you isolate them. The more Segregation exist in a Society between 2 Groups of People the more Animosity there will be between those 2 groups. And yes Men only spaces right now would be a beneficial thing, but not because Segregation in General is good, no because right now we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 08:43 AM
2

Hey Genuine Question because i see that a lot but never actually see any feasible solution/actions, what has to be done to "fix" dating for Men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 09:15 PM
27

I have looked at the Blue Sky comments and im honestly losing my Mind. The Notion "Men should just treat Women like Human Being" implies that Men treat Women worse than Women treat Men. By which measurable Metric can this in any way be True? Women are more Violent Than Men in Relationships. Women are equally Sexually abusive in Relationships. Men and Women work roughly the same hours per Week while they amount of Housework Men do grows faster than the amount of Paid Work Women do, which results …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 11:33 AM
67

Wait so this author uses quotes like: "Now consider how little warmth, humor and human authenticity it would take to stand out among these men." implying most men are subhuman without a shred of Empathy (little exaggerated, but you get the point) and gets accused of misogynie instead of misandry? Yea that sounds like our Society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/25 10:52 AM
2

Yeah thats fair. I just found these differences had a more probable biological explanation while all the biological „evidence“ for almost all other difference seem dubios to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 09:39 AM
1

I understand your logic but as far as i have seen the observed differences are pretty big in this aspect. For example there is a study where they test genital arousal based in sexual footage and men show very clear arousal based on prefered sex. so straight men get aroused depiction of straight/lesbian sex and get no arousal by gay sex. While straight women get aroused similary by straight,lesbian and gay sex. Funnily lesbian women get mainly aroused by lesbian sex but also they get substantiall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 02:46 AM
1

Genuine Question: Which psychological Differences exist between Men and Women that can undoubtedly traced back to Biological Reason? So far I have found 1 that is pretty reliably caused by Biology, and that is the difference in Sexual Arousal. Men arousal being more driven by Visual Stimulation and Women's being more contextual. Edit: Higher Variability in men (for example the IQ distribution, More Men Idiots and more Men Geniuses) could also be one (although I'm not sure) but that doesn't impac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 09:20 PM
9

This is really good. Many people don't understand that your Physical attributes (height, strength, weight) are part of the environmental Circumstances which can then influence your psychologie and Behavior. So by being Physical dimorphic Species we exhibit Psychological difference without there necessarily being actual fundamental cognitive differences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 02:40 PM
5

Well, I was very skeptical, but the Scientific Evidence doesn't really back up the claim that behavioral Differences between Man and Women are mainly driven by Biological Differences. I wish Male Advocate would stop using Biological Determinist Arguments to explain Social Differences, which very often hurt Men tremendously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 12:13 PM
6

Alright first. Yes, on a statistical LVL today Men and Women are different and show differences in Personality Traits and some cognitive Ability (mathematical/linguistic ability, Spacial Rotation and Toy Preferences) but those can't reliably be trace back to Biological differences. The Brain is highly Plastic, and even differences on a surface LVL don't mean differences in Cognitive ability. In your cited Stanford Paper the Author says that those differences MAY influence Behavior, but there is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 11:40 AM
11

I have actually looked into that a lot the last couple of days and the only things that show clear scientific dimorphism are of physical nature. So men are stronger, faster, bigger, have a different vastly different reproductive system and probably have better fine motor control skills (although this one is little smaller than the others). When it comes to cognitive ability or personality traits there are basically no differences and even for those few which can be detected there is evidence tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 10:16 AM
5

Oh yeah don't get me Wrong, fuck every single one of those Misandrists, but only because those People think it is good to discriminate against Men we shouldn't advocate for Discrimination of Women based on some Form of Retaliation or some Sense of "Fairness".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 10:25 PM
15

Guys what's with this Sentiment that as Longa as Men get to discriminate against Women too this would be just fine? We should never be in favor of Discriminatory practices on the Basis of some elusive preferences because those Preferences can and are very often shaped by Racist or Sexiest Believes. Anti Discrimination Laws, when it comes to Workplaces and Services, are a Thing for a very good Reason. You wouldn't be fine if a Supermarket owned by a White Guy could deny selling stuff to a Black G…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 06:34 PM
1

Alright the first part is true i confused the definition of the cdc with another one. The thing is in my original claim i have never even mentioned unwanted sexual contact i have only mentioned rape and made to penetrate and there you can clearly see a big difference in lifetim stats and annual stats. And yes there could be more randomness due to the low percentafe of reports, on the other hand lifetime stats are extremely inaccurate because the memory degrades vastly over time and past events g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/25 05:03 PM
3

Lifetime difference shows a victimization rate for women of 204% of those of men. Past 12 month the victimaztion goes down to 176% for alle unwanted sexual contact. When it comes to rape/made to penetrate on lifetime the victimization rate is 260% compared to 176% in the past 12 months. So that already is a significant difference. Then in the years of 2011 and 2012 the rate was higher for men. And im sorry unwanted sexual contact includes shit like catcalling and shouldnt be mixed with rape and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/25 04:22 PM
7

Pretty amazing Article. On the Topic of Sexual Abuse you used the Lifetime Stats of the 2017 CDC Survey where there is a bigger difference between Man and Women. However, when you look at the annual Report the gap is much smaller. One thing I noticed in the more recent CDC Surveys is that the Gap between Rape and Made to Penetrate is getting larger. In 2010, it was 1.1 % for Women being raped and 1.1% for Men being Made to Penetrate in 2011 it was 1.6 % for Women being raped and 1.7% for Men bei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/25 11:58 AM
1

Sure here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ocq8r9/some_sources_on_sexual_abuse_of_men_and_boys_part/ I'm sure you're going to read it all and then asses your opinion and come back to discuss it with intellectual integrity.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 10:13 PM
1

Its not even based on a statistical significant difference. When you consider made to penetrate, the numbers of men Raping Women and Women raping Men are pretty similar on a annual basis.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 04:03 PM
2

First I don't deny that Women are more fearful than Men but Subjective Fear or the absence of Fear does not reflect societal Reality and the real Consequences. Intimate Partner Violence is in 50% of Cases Bilateral matched for severity, 35 % Unilateral by Women and 15 % unilateral Perpetrated by Men as presented in this Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f5v1QgtFfo&t=387s if you don't like Men talking then here is a woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtOsEkY_UHc&t=14s The CDC Survey on …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:57 AM
1

Im sorry but im sick of this universally accepted „truth“ that it is dangerous for women to date men. The rape/made to penetrate stats for men and women are pretty similar. The intimate partner violence stats show more violent women. The only factor women face greater risk is being a victim of a sadistic killer/serial killer and those instances are so incredibly small that it is a totally irrational fear. It is enormously more likely to die in a car accident on the way to the date then at the da…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:09 PM
17

It would be a great first step if you would not base your whole worldview on some anecdotal evidence and tiktok nonsense and try to build your world view of facts and data. For exemple the % at which men get harassad (often by women) is shockingly high but men simply dont talk about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 06:15 PM
1

As I said I really enjoyed the show because it portrayed a legit strong and good female Lead and not some annoying Girlboss. But like a lot of Media, Sexual Violence against Men is treated as Funny and often the fault is given to the Victim and unfortunately so does Buffy.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 08:30 PM
2

Listen i love Buffy but the way Buffy portrays Female Sexual Violence is very disturbing and puts the Blame often on the Male Victim (faiths assault of Xander, faiths assault on Riley). When you compare the Rape attempt of Faith on Xander vs the Rape attempt of Spike on Buffy, one is treated like no big deal and the group judges Xander but for Buffy its a major Plot point which is taken extremely seriously (rightfully so).
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:18 PM
10

Brother, you simply have no idea what you're talking about, and I don't blame you. We have been told a lie our whole life. Domestic Violence (intimate Partner Violence) is a Gender Neutral Problem with more Female Perpetrators (70% of Unilateral IPV is Perpetrated by Women). Just watch this video it will blow your fucking mind. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsgeDrlRQWc Even Sexual Violence is a pretty much Equal Problem for Men and Women. Just read this Post. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingM…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 10:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter