TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cadmus_A Archive

View 1 posts and 120 comments by Cadmus_A on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Cadmus_A/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 12:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Sorry when I say "do you think ..." The implicit question is "why?" I don't know if you're unable to read but I am literally trying bozo. I think people see the word depression and fixate on it- my question was literally about wanting things separately from depression itself and only a handful of people actually addressed that. Does the word trigger you? It sure sounds like there's a litany of associations that you pulled out of your ass (i.e. me not wanting to improve and just wanting to wallow…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 03:55 PM
4

This is a great anti depression regimen! I appreciate it, though I feel that my lacking wanting things is a little apart from depression, or at least it's a new manifestation of it that hasn't happened before.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 02:43 PM
0

Who the fuck told you I took shrooms to reframe? I sure didn't. This is literally you making things up hotshot I literally said I wanted to reframe my thoughts, just the constant interrupted and reframes are hard to do (which is a VERY common issue brought up in CBT) and asked if they had tips to make it easier. I also literally said IN THE SAME COMMENT that I understand if it's just something you practice at AND approached the problem with a solution (skill transfer from mindfulness meditation)…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 02:35 PM
1

LMAO it's not that deep bro, I was actually pretty into the idea of the reframing things that way- I genuinely don't know if you haven't read my entire reply to he original comment or you have a preconceived notion of how I'm supposed to feel and you just rolled with it, but I think going about things in good faith is probably a better way to approach things. That being said, I'm still appreciative that you took the time out to reply
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 11:23 AM
1

I appreciate the advice! I was going to do it regardless, which I literally say in my comment - are you just mad because I said constantly policing your thoughts is exhausting? Once again, if you read my post it's been like this outside of my "pondering" my brain has been wired this way for a good while- "the interplay of hormones and neurotransmitters" you refer to are likely a decent chunk of what's screwing with me. Been tested on the thyroid end but I'll def look into adrenal exhaustion, any…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 09:32 AM
1

You're a little silly goofy for this- I don't know if you read anything I wrote but I've been depressed since around puberty, that Google search literally has no bearing on the question I asked
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 09:27 AM
1

I'm still chubby but my academics have been hit pretty hard- I'm not even close to the track I was on and I've recently kicked a super hardcore weed addiction but before that I was completely useless. It's hard to want to get my life together or keep going to the gym though. I think that is a really hard truth to swallow, but I'm facing the larger issue of why people caring about me matters. I don't really want anything at all and it's a bit rough rn. Thank you for your advice
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 06:53 AM
3

I also have been diagnosed with ADHD. I just don't know if it's relevant to my issue of not wanting things yk. I'll keep you posted if anything changes for the better, I think I need to find a solid method to track my mental so I can figure out what methods work- probably journaling
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:59 AM
2

I'll keep you posted if anything improves chief 🫡
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:58 AM
1

This is actually super interesting, do you just have to constantly consciously reframe the thought? That sounds pretty exhausting, so if there are techniques to make the process more efficient I'd love to hear about them! If it's a practice makes perfect scenario, I get that too - probably should look into mindfulness meditation for transferable skills to this CBT type tool
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:56 AM
2

This is such a sad and pathetic statement. If you can't help don't say anything, but one of the pillars of the redpill is mutual support between like minded men who urge people to do better. If you ever need any help, let me know!
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:54 AM
1

I don't think there was really any large life change. I broke up with a partner of 2 years (we were long distance so my day to day didn't change but it was psychologically hurtful I'm sure). I took shrooms at one point and had a horrid trip where I kept dealing with this idea of nothing mattering- I'm worried this subconsciously changed me but it's not a conscious thing I grapple with. The intent of this post, wanting things again, seems to be a fix for the nothing matters problem. I became very…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:53 AM
0

I'd be very interested in your resources. Would taking steps to better my life while also taking psychiatric medication not be a good idea? If I work out and meditate and set up beneficial systems for myself, why not hop on an SSRI with something like bromantane to help with some of the negative side effects?
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:45 AM
4

This isn't why I'm depressed (I'm like 90% sure) I think going to the gym is really great advice and I'll be doing that, but I struggled with depression when I was a kid and when I was fit and fucking. Things are only bad now because I both don't actually want anything, and I'm also depressed.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:41 AM
5

This is a good take. I was manic for about a year and I genuinely felt like i couldn't stop succeeding at things, but it's entirely possible I burned out.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:39 AM
3

Sorry, to clarify, I'm no longer obese. I take L Planatrum to increase the amount of serotonin manufactured in the gut, but there seems to be a misconception on what that serotonin is doing. Serotonin made in the gut doesn't pass the blood brain barrier, so it won't give you all those fuzzy feel good feelings to the extent that you think- it will smack some sense into your vagus nerve and up brain serotonin levels (a little) that way iirc
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:35 AM
5

I appreciate this take, I have been working on it but my insurance is dragging its feet. I guess this was just another route to run through so I can cover my bases
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:33 AM
3

Sorry to clarify I'm no longer obese, I'm still depressed. People call me handsome occasionally but it's people I know somewhat and at less regularity. Do you think a short stay in latam would somehow fix me? I'm open to it and have money saved up but I don't see the vision you do
/r/TheRedPill27/11/23 05:31 AM
5

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733152/ We're looking at 4% when people test for non paternal discrepancy reasons (1 out of 25 men WTF) I'd wager it's higher because mothers that agree to genetic testing when they're unsure whether the children are their betabux are a lil silly goofy
/r/TheRedPill26/11/23 11:53 PM
5

Can tell you're in the other man. This is about women
/r/TheRedPill29/07/22 09:19 AM
0

How is your reading comprehension so completely braindead that you misinterpreted what he said
/r/TheRedPill29/07/22 09:17 AM
1

Look who's salty when they genuinely don't understand probability, or how to parse sentences. 🤡 I'm sorry sweety, but all this posturing just shows how deeply you can't understand my points, you really are making a fool of yourself. Regardless, I think the best thing to do is let idiots be idiots. If only you'd been able to actually tell what I was saying. Maybe read the entire sentence you cite in your comment, I said that violence that led to murders, because you initially cited that. Furtherm…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 11:28 PM
0

If I backed my statements, I'd be saying the exact same things I did before. No use trying to reason with simpletons, I guess. I would like to thank you for showing me just how much smarter I am than most people though. Cheers :))
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 10:32 PM
0

Lmfao this whole post just reeks of your inability to comprehend both probability and my sentences. Please read it again lol. I'll see you when you gain a few braincells.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 09:35 PM
3

Absolute clownery. You realize that you're the one claiming they have an estrus, while I'm claiming that it hasn't been established in women so the scientific consensus is that they don't? You can't prove a negative sweety, maybe take a few college courses.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:46 PM
0

First of all, you haven't read the entire sentence have you? You talked about the rate of rejection murders, and I said that the tendency towards violence that leads to higher murder rates. Learn to read sweety. You keep creating less plausible scenarios to justify it huh. Dy think before you hit someone you think "they're bigger and stronger than me, but maybe they won't hit back. Also I should fumble through my bag for pepper spray or a taser so I can attack this person for rejecting me" like …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:43 PM
2

Also still a proposition you goof 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:37 PM
-1

Have you read that article ???? Still doesn't say anything about it being scientifically accepted. Please learn to read
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:28 PM
1

Wait you're unhinged- you talked about rejection murders and moved goalposts to violent acts. Also physical violence against people larger than you is quite hard. I think you're being super silly and selective with your reasoning. Also this absolutely untrue. Deterrents against violent people exist, nobody wants to punch somebody 6 times bigger than them if they think they'll hit back. The difficulty does absolutely change due to physical gender differences. You're genuinely a moron, or super in…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:24 PM
3

The estrus article is a proposition that still hasn't been accepted. Let's take scientific standards, please. Don't be silly. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(19)30189-5/fulltext Meta analysis, which trump's your two old links. Just because you can look for an article and pretend it supports you doesn't mean you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:14 PM
1

Sure, so you realize the barrier is much lower for men, so it's easier to commit these crimes of passion. It's very silly for you to assume these are one to one without considering extenuating circumstances like the difficult of the task, which is a solid deterrent. Please, read a book, take a class on logic, at least don't put your gotchas on the internet without thinking it through. The general outrage they exhibit, the back pedaling, and the "sour grapes" that most women display when they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:06 PM
2

A) humans don't get estrus, please read a book. B) testosterone is a large component of the sex drive in both men and women. Men have considerably more. C) If you're offered loads of top 5% people because men are horny, then yes you get to fuck every other day while also not being very horny to the point where you would fuck an "average" person. D) the argument isn't even that you are, but that you CAN. Also, women absolutely fuck without necessarily being physically horny, a lot of it is a conv…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:57 PM
3

He literally is not??? Learn to read??? He's saying that then using individual experiences to refute his claims is dishonest which it is..
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:51 PM
1

What a shitty intellectually dishonest take. Not ALL sure, but his point still stands. Obviously he meant not all, he's dealing with population averages you clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:50 PM
0

Women don't have the strength or the tendency towards violence men do to commit murders? Dy think that's a solid metric to estimate responses to rejection?? Please read a book or smth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 07:48 PM
0

The idea that you're never gonna lower your expectations because you want the perfect person is laughable if you don't have anything at that level to give. Grow up lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 04:51 PM
8

The first sentence is absolutely untrue have you seen how women freak out at rejections from men? The rest of your paragraph is equally nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 05:26 AM

Agreed! But it definitely can go the other way too, associations develop over time that make it harder for them to bond.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 02:16 AM

I think the ncount pair bonding thing is completely different from a sexually inexperienced woman enjoying sex with an unappealing man. I agree fully that the latter is untrue, but the former I believe is valid. If you're fucking loads of dudes, you definitely have emotional problems that don't let you properlybond with people romantically. Same goes to men tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 01:42 AM
1

Wait he's tried that with white woman and it didn't work, right? Feel like your advice is redundant
/r/seduction07/07/22 03:59 PM
1

I think approach number matters more than content, the pleasantness of the experience is separate from the fact that you have multiple experiences in regards to your views of abundance, no? I agree that being harassed is awful I have no idea why people think it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 05:33 PM
1

That's right, depending on the conflict. Net total in all conflicts men are disproportionately affected. You're nitpicking edge cases for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 03:12 PM
1

Death in war is kinder than something you may live through? Ofc. Stop being silly. You don't really have any quantative backing to lay on anymore, you're just replying for the sake of replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 03:10 PM
2

Idt that's necessarily relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 03:04 PM
1

I agree it's not mostly away from civilians. However, men are disproportionately affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:25 PM
3

Agreed, but think about the numbers here. Men are disproportionately affected once again.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:25 PM
2

Men have fled conflicts, but it's much more likely for women to survive. I feel like all your replies are based off you not being able to quantitatively reason
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:13 PM
2

Ah, but you wouldn't always be in that scenario in a war, while men in war would be in very real danger the whole time. Very silly to not understand this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:10 PM
4

You're right, they have different struggles. They're unequal. And let's be honest here, fighting on the front lines is far more traumatic than raising children and having the possibility of defending them. No way you just mentioned a/any struggle as if it actually makes a coherent point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 01:44 PM
8

Me when idk how therapy works 😩
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 11:18 AM
1

Me when I don't understand how to extrapolate from data
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 06:23 PM
1

Do you really think that in a relationship if you told your partner honestly that you didn't find them attractive, but you don't care about it that much. There's definitely not anything wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 04:09 PM
0

Ah yes, that's definitely what I was referring to. You're quite smart with that one
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:58 PM
0

Don't hate women, we're just aware of how society let's you get away with shitty ingrained behaviors so we're seeking to even the sexual field
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:08 AM
1

It absolutely is possible, it's just insane
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 03:32 AM
2

Ofc you're so clever!! What did I originally say that you disagreed with you imbecile
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:43 AM
0

Please stop being silly. If you want to debate my ideas rather than have a discussion on who read what better, go ahead and reply. I still stand by the fact that you're misinterpreting the fact that they message people they don't consider physically attractive decently and that they don't message every physically attractive person to mean that they aren't shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:35 AM
1

I'm fairly sure that not the motivation for most people, but I'll think about it more and get back to you. I think you deserve a partner who makes you feel attractive, I promise you there's someone out there for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:26 AM
1

Exactly what I'm saying, shes going to keep bringing up perceptually similar values and pretend she slam dunks on you when you say "oh yeah maybe not 6ft exactly"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:24 AM
1

Like I said, she's deranged bro
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Trust me bro this person is seriously delusional. I don't think they understand how averages work or how perception is inexact. They'll gotcha if you say 6' is the threshold on average by bringing up 5'11.99999" not making the cut
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:16 AM
1

Imo, I've seen people hop on dating apps just because they don't go out often. I feel like it doesn't make sense for less desired people to have higher standards than the average person anyways. I don't quite understand why you disagree, dy think people you date wouldn't be blindsided if you told them you didn't think they were attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 02:12 AM
0

Indeed I did, you're misconstruing data to you hearts content
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:57 AM
1

Dy think the majority of women on dating apps simply go on them due to the fact that they cannot at all find men in real life? I suppose we simply disagree on facts if that's the case, our conversation will probably be a dead end. If I went into a relationship with somebody, I'd do it under the impression they found me attractive unless explicitly told otherwise. This is common for almost everybody in a relationship. It's manipulative to be aware of that assumption and not disclosing that you do…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:57 AM
1

I literally explained that that's not my view and then you pretended it's my view so you can get mad about it. Dy see how delusional you are right now? I literally explained that you can't quantify an x amount for attractiveness exactly as we're talking about perception, which is often times subjective, and also averages, which are generalizations by nature. You realize that you're arguing against the points you made up in your head for me right
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:46 AM
1

That's actually really stupid. You need to prove why that difference matters, if that makes sense. It's like saying blondes don't have periods because they're different than brunettes. Any difference doesn't imply the study doesn't apply, you need to state why that difference would mean it applies. I agree, I think it's fucked that men like to women to get sex. If my kid did that I'd sign him up for therapy and do my best to discipline him. I don't let my friends get away with it, and I've burne…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:37 AM
0

Ah, you understood it but failed to respond to it properly. Seems like you feel it's wrong but can't disprove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:33 AM
1

That's a little insane, and not quite how the real world works. Think of it as a bunch of different values that have different weights, and then you need to have the sum of all those values above a threshold. This threshold is different between men and women. You need to consider averages for these samples, they're objectively important and shared as a group, not objective in the sense that they're highly quantified and ingrained into every single woman. I truly think you're approaching this in …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:33 AM
1

When you asked "what are the objective criteria" he replied, his reply talking about height and facial symmetry, reread (though I'm not sure you can, given your subsequent comments) their original reply please
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:24 AM
0

You realize you can't just say they're not representative when in my original reply I asked why they're not right. Also men tend to find the person they're with attractive, there's no misleading going on. On the other hand, if women were to tell their partners they don't find them particularly attractive, I'm sure they'd love it!!! There's a deliberate manipulation going on when you omit the fact that you don't find your partner attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:22 AM
1

Ofc he was talking about mean? How is that not immediately obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:13 AM
0

You clearly don't have any understanding on sample sizes, what differentiates women on and off dating apps so dramatically that they have differences in what they consider attractive?? Also, the fact that they're dating somebody they're not attracted to is awful I couldn't imagine taking advantage of somebody like that. The fact that you don't see a problem is gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:12 AM
1

What school did you go to that they taught logic at and how can I shut it down because goddamn you didn't learn a single thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:09 AM
2

He literally gave you an objective criteria? Reread it a few times to understand. The whole point is you need people on the upper echelons of those criteria, then within those upper echelons there's a lot of variance based on individual variance. I think you should be thanking your lucky stars if you think men are shallow, because I don't know who's go for a brain like yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:08 AM
1

You're taking the L he's saying on average if his other traits were average or a little above average but he was shorter. Please learn to understand hypotheticals
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:05 AM
1

Delusional mmt. The whole point is what are deal breakers. What matters to the point where you need to have it, not preferences you quite like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 01:04 AM
0

How did you not understand their point at all?? Maybe read it again. They're saying that the threshold is so high that there's an eventual point that the deal breaker becomes highly individualized, at lower thresholds this wouldn't happen. Also imagine saying that your partner doesn't find you physically attractive at all, but sure, you have other stuff going for you. You don't really mind they're plain looking Vs saying oh yeah looks definitely matter to me, but you're quite attractive. Yeah, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:59 AM
0

You're delusional. the most it means is that women are likely to settle or be with people they don't find attractive for some other reason, making relationships even more of a shifty ordeal with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 12:52 AM
3

Oops, replied to the wrong comment
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 07:45 AM
6

Lmfao you got a Spidey sense an unattractive guy was looking at you incredible
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 07:05 AM
1

Bozo look at my other replies to this.
/r/seduction17/05/22 08:09 PM
1

No way you used anecdotes rn. Please pick up a book
/r/seduction17/05/22 06:27 PM
2

I provided links, do you have any
/r/seduction17/05/22 05:20 AM
2

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408 https://archive.ph/7wOAo L+bozo
/r/seduction17/05/22 05:19 AM
6

Yeah it's not attractive
/r/seduction17/05/22 02:00 AM
16

Promiscuity in women is correlated to cheating in a relationship. If you actually care enough about this to want to learn more lmk and I'll source you the articles, but a simple Google search should help too.
/r/seduction17/05/22 01:59 AM
4

Are you sure? Explain how it makes sense and maybe define it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 05:31 AM
5

You're actually gaslighty just implicitly gaslighty.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 05:04 AM
4

Lmfao your partner should be entitled to your past if that was a prerequisite for the relationship. Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 05:03 AM
8

It's more not really having everything to give. It's how easy women look at their half shaped lives and go "this is enough"," thrusting it towards the world like some grand artwork while spitting at statues not made out of gold or smth
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:17 PM
1

You don't think it's illness to have these urges, that a psychologist who intervened earlier wouldn't be able to cure them of it? I think you're probably the sick one here
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:17 AM
1

Imo that's a super reductive take, I feel like these are symptoms of mental illnesses
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 03:59 AM
1

What other reasons can you imagine it to be
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:35 AM
1

So my point is you're probably not observant enough to know for sure, because that's the general trend we observe. Like you can say you're different all you want, but I'm sure all those women could say that too. You need to prove a deviation yk.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:34 AM
3

Idk why do women behave more like men and men more like women in speed dating scenarios where they're the ones moving around? Psychology tends to go deeper than you think. Lowk if you're criticizing gender roles as in your flair, you can probably understand the the concept of how social context influences your decisions in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 05:57 AM
2

I'm like very much sure unless you're quite strong and he's never done a pushup before, that your ex let you win...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 03:54 AM
-1

Okay hunny, should've just said you didn't understand statistics sooner :) Bye-bye now, good luck with whatever you're doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:45 PM
0

So you realize I can say anything you say isn't valid either right? I simply won't provide reasoning to why it isn't?? Idk, one would expect somebody who talks about how women are intelligent to yk, back up their words lolz.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:36 PM
0

So if you think about it, due to the measurements being tested, the country doesn't matter. No study is expected to sample people from every different country to be useful, the notion is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:34 PM
1

Wait you're actually an idiot, I didn't realize. You realize your argument isn't coherent right. You said that obviously less intelligent women than intelligent men exist due to murders, but then pivoted when I said there's more women than men. You're a clown. Furthermore, this experiment used blind testing and measures that were independent of the people conducting the experiment. How would the patriarchy confound these variables exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:30 PM
1

Lmao I literally addressed the points you're making in my first comment- learn to read before you start yapping. IQ is largely genetic, EQ has no actual scientific validity. Address the claims I make rather than whatever makes you feel good about yourself. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886913003036 Also your murder thing makes 0 sense, men tend to kill men at larger rates than women are killed, and with wars men tend to be outnumbered by women, reflected statistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 11:17 PM
2

My point for using the rape of animals statistic I'd that it's not useful to use fringe cases or mental illnesses to make generalizations of a population Somehow, that went over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 10:47 PM
1

First off: i'm not comparing all of abusive relationships to being unhappy in a marriage- brush up on your reading comprehension. I'm illustrating that if people cannot leave abusive relationships, then maybe there are situations in which people cannot leave relationships where they are unhappy but it isn't abusive. Also, i don't know if you know what abuse is, you called it coercive. Abuse is not inherently coercive but practically is usually accompanied by coercion. it's important you keep tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:15 AM
1

wait this is so stupid what if it didnt start like this?? stop trivializing problems people face because you cant wrap your head around it lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 01:13 AM
1

No shot idk why do people not leave abusive relationships? i'm not gonna tell them just love yourself!! i'm giving useful advice you clown
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 12:48 AM
5

Slow down bozo it's not as explicit irl but the dynamic can play out in some ways
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 08:28 PM
5

Maybe he wasn't comfortable taking it further?? Are you pressuring him to either straight up fuck or do nothing?
/r/seduction10/02/22 08:01 PM
1

Yeah I just saw a lot of bullet points so I had to ask, but reading it again those criteria are pretty easy to meet where they aren't subjective
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 06:25 PM
2

Have these standards been consistently met by your romantic partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 06:14 PM
12

Lmao what communication is absolutely important this is a little ridiculous. Are you emotionally drained by an issue you haven't tried to solve??
/r/seduction29/08/21 05:11 PM
2

I mean ig that's fair but like if you're paying money for that regardless I think it's not gonna be worth the return on investment. I've never looked into it, but I assume escorts aren't cheap.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/20 02:16 AM
8

Yikes you'd pay a sex worker not to have sex?
/r/TheRedPill17/10/20 02:03 AM
1

I'm ngl I didn't read the first paragraph, we already agree on the second so the reply didn't really have a point lol.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/20 04:01 AM
1

Yeah then look at point b. My whole point was using evolution is tenuous at best, so I think you kinda misconstrued what I was tryna say.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/20 02:10 AM
1

??? A) on the premise that I can't use evolution: neither can you??? B) if I can use it and you think that war created more specificity: War was far less common than finding multiple places and knowing how to share all those locations, I would assume that genetically one would be a constant factor. Also also, wars, for a real long while, were fairly small scale and fairly primitive, I'm not entirely sure about the prescision required.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/20 02:41 PM
0

I mean foragers tended to be women, they need specificity in both what's edible and where things are. I don't think that really holds.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/20 07:22 AM
56

I mean if we look at your statements, doesn't their brain being geared towards communication imply that the first part of your premise about them being bad at communicating is false? These are fairly contradictory. Unless you say that they simply don't want to communicate, which if you're using a sort of evolutionary basis for, makes no sense. Those who didn't use it probably didn't do so well evolutionarily. I think that when people say AWALT, it's more they mean APALT. Shit tests are universal…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/20 02:55 AM
11

You're supposed to be unrealistically confident when it furthers an agenda you have. Why would you be unrealistically confident now? He's not trying to stick his dick up us lmaoo
/r/TheRedPill07/05/20 07:16 PM
1

Oh thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 05:20 PM
1

What does pnd mean
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/20 12:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter