TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Calfurious Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by Calfurious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

How do you even know if they would be fired? Somebody go and try it out instead of complaining about hypothetical situations.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 05:44 AM
1

Wasn't really talking about the documentary, but more so the movement itself. I don't know jack shit about the documentary. Thanks for the info though. I might check it out.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:45 AM
-1

Red Pill ideology is toxic and it's harmful to both men and women. Red Pill ideology is what leads to people like pick-up artists, Elliot Rodgers, and other Incels. Not to mention Red Pill has deep ties to Alt-Right ideology and therefore tends to promote racism and other such prejudice. It's one thing to be angry because of legitimate grievances. But overall conclusions and methods of Red Pill ideology is wrong. The problem that people have is that they confuse legitimate grievances with legiti…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:19 AM
0

That is not even remotely true. Unless your definition of an SJW is basically anybody who is socially liberal.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:08 AM
-2

Wait are you saying you don't believe there is a patriarchy? What...? Part of toxic masculinity is that the patriarchy restricts the roles of both men and women. The constant pressure on men to aspire to do socially accepted, but highly stressful roles (men have to be in charge, have to make money, have to have a lot of sex, and if they don't, there just a bunch of broke, worthless, virgins). Also feminists wouldn't even consider you guys enemies if you didn't consider feminists to be enemies. F…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:58 PM
-15

That's not true, and the fact that you and most other Men's Rights Activist think this is true is the reason your movement lacks any real progress or power. Feminists could have been your natural allies, instead you've turned them into enemies. Hell, I'd bet if you actually talked to a feminist you'd realize that you probably agree on more issues than you think. Maybe instead of criticizing Feminism you should learn more about it's movement and how it became established. A key element of feminis…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 12:59 PM
-6

It's 10% gender equality, 90% complaining about feminists. It's similiar to those socialists sub-reddits that mostly bash Capitalism instead of talking about the realistic benefits that socialism would have. People are more attracted to anger and outrage than trying form a coherent ideology and have a polite discussion on issues. This is especially true on social media platforms like Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:23 AM
5

Come on guys. This is so obviously a troll.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 08:12 PM
2

How about the one that says "White Rights", "The Red Pill" and LITERALLY /r/altright (which has been banned by the Admins for doxxing.) "Uncensored News" always is notorious for having all of it's moderators being literally White Supremacists and Neo-Nazis (who are also notorious for ban dissenters and left-leaning people). I'm also feeling a bit generous, so I'm going to go ahead and add "The Donald" as well to the mix. Albeit that sub-reddit is Poes Law in community form and is more like half …
/r/PussyPass22/02/17 08:35 PM
21

The side bar has plenty of options for you to choose from.
/r/PussyPass22/02/17 06:18 AM
374

Nothing happened to it. /r/PussyPass and /r/pussypassdenied have always been alt-right shit holes. The moderators have just gotten rid of the thin veil they once used to trick gullible people into believing that they weren't Nazis.
/r/PussyPass22/02/17 06:12 AM
5

You'll fine that a sub-reddit dedicated to bashing women will just get worse. Not really that surprising.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:20 PM
4

Should we be doing hormone replacement therapy on gradeschoolers? I don't know anybody who actually advocates that. Even among the Transgender community. The youngest I've seen people say is that it should be done before puberty. Not when they're still under the age of 10.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/17 04:19 PM
1

Well depending on the FGM, there actual health risks to the woman and they can't enjoy sex. Circumcised people can still enjoy sex. They're both forced surgery on the genitals of a baby. But the reason it's done and the actual effect they have on the person widely differ.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 07:29 AM
2

Upvoted, but this will probably be buried because of the usual circle jerk nature of this sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 03:43 AM
2

Zoe had sex with video game journalists, who in turn wrote favourably about her and her projects. Evidence? Proof? When she was called out on it, she cried Misogyny. She is a fraud, and has done a great deal to make life more difficult for women in the games development industry. How in oblivion does what Zoe Quinn do make life difficult for women in the games development industry? She's her own person. Only idiots like you would conflate what Zoe Quinn does or say to be somehow a representaiton…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:26 PM
5

There wasn't any evidence of Zoe Quinn sleeping for good reviews. Espicially since the timeline when she dated those men and the timeline in which they made ARTICLES (not reviews) about her game completely differed. None of the people who reviewed her game slept with her. Depression quest is a free indie game. She gains no money directly from it. I'm sorry that instead of gobbling up the first conspiracy theory I see as truth, I prefer to look into it and judge people and arguments based on fact…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:35 AM
0

We have differing opinions, the truth could lie in between or it could be that one of us simply right. Lets not forget about the Golden Mean Fallacy. Just because there are two disagreements doesn't mean that the truth is most likely the one in between.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 06:17 AM
-5

Thank you, seriously I would love somebody to actually respond to what I'm saying. I mean seriously, the OP himself just said that prominent anti-feminists and MRA sympathizers gained prominence thanks to GamerGate. You can't at the same time say that GamerGate was completely about ethics in game journalism and at the same time admit that anti-feminists who who have very little to do with gaming ran to prominence thanks to GamerGate. You can say that GamerGate was mostly about ethics in game jou…
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:21 AM
1

So many assumptions are being made about me. First and foremost, I'm one of the first people who will say that male abuse is downplayed. Second, what exactly are my "political opinions"? I'm a liberal, and I would say that a video about BLM belongs in political videos section as well. I mean shit, it's not as if that video disappears from Reddit, it's literally just posted in a different, more appopriate, sub-reddit. I don't think it's bullshit. If it was bullshit, I wouldn't bother making that …
/r/MensRights13/08/16 04:59 AM
0

On what exactly? Because I made an alternate and well reasoned explanation that isn't your typical, alternate-right, conspiratorial "Reddit hates White Males and they're censoring us" rhetoric? I'm sorry, for having a different perspective and opinion then you guys. Please forgive my insolence. /s
/r/MensRights13/08/16 01:03 AM
2

Wait? Is that a thing? Isn't Mens Rights just Mens rights? BLM is more about Black people. Then again, the people who are shot by police tend to overwhelmingly be male....eh no. No. In my person opinion Mens Rights should focus on the male gender as a whole. If you start including different identities into it, you'll just end up like Atheism+.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:50 AM
3

I agree with /u/Crate_Crusher , just try and have a polite discussion with her about it. It also wouldn't hurt if you criticize her viewpoint a bit. Often time people hold views they believe are "obvious" because they just haven't had to argue their beliefs to other people before. It could just be a phase as well. Although if she got this attitude shortly after entering college. I'm betting she's likely mirroring the beliefs of the friends and associates she made at college.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:49 AM
-3

why were videos dealing with domestic violence against women initially allowed Evidence? Source? If what you're saying is true Also it's likely that the moderators probably just never really noticed/examined how political domestic violence against women was until somebody brought it up. It's not uncommon for people to have a set of standards, they generally adhere too, only for people to point out that they don't apply said standards to a particular matter.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:42 AM
-9

Not even a feminist. I said GamerGate had a sexist element to it. I don't think anybody, including GG would dispute that. The only topic of debate is how prevalent that element is and how much did it dominate GamerGate's rhetoric. Personally I think GamerGate is far more anti-feminist and anti-SJW than actually being anti-women. Of course that doesn't mean it wasn't a toxic movement anyways. I didn't say she wasn't qualified to reply. Only that she wasn't qualified to discuss the topic of GAMERg…
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:37 AM
-9

the majority of vocal redditors agree You're a long term subscriber to Men's Rights. Of course you'd perceive as the majority of Reddit disapproves of this. Not to say that perhaps that is true, but lets face it, you don't really consume a politically balanced amount of media on Reddit. The term, vocal minority, exists for a reason. I'd much rather directly hear from the moderators why they removed it, instead of what a bunch of politically charged and easily triggered Reddit users believe. Most…
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:01 AM
4

I know this isn't my AMA but for the last one I think that's a very interesting discussion to be had. First and foremost, nobody truly believes in absolute free speech. If they did, then they would also say that harassment, threats, and calls to commit violence, are all acceptable because they're just people exercising their free speech. Freedom of Speech, like everything else in life, needs to have reasonable limitations. Libel, Slander, harassment, threats, and speech that endangers the physic…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:57 PM
3

Shoe, I have a few questions for you. How bad do you think PC culture is? What's your thoughts on right wing political correctness and left wing political correctness? How often do you think people often use "I'm just not being politically correct" as an excuse to say stupid shit? Do you think there is a serious issue of police violence and discrimination against Black people in the US? If you do, how serious do you think it is? What's your thoughts on Donald Trump? By the way I really enjoy you…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:51 PM
-21

Shoe, you aren't even a gamer. You really aren't qualified to talk about this topic. Then again, a good chunk of the people who talk about GamerGate (on both sides) aren't really gamers so I suppose that's fairly typical. GamerGate was a shit show from the beginning. People in GG like to be play dumb, but we all know that there was a massive anti-SJW and anti-feminist element to it from the beginning. I mean for god's sake the person who coined the term GG was Alec Baldwin, a notorious right-win…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:47 PM
-10

Ugh, okay I'm going to clear up why it was removed. Ignore the conspiracy theorist nutjobs. Certain..."types" of people always complain about Reddit censoring them. Typically the RWNJs. It's not true of course. Reddit didn't remove your video. They put it in their political sub-reddit? Why? Because while you don't think abuse is political, and it really shouldn't, it DOES have political leanings. Reddit would do the same thing for a video that focused on women being abused, or on homosexuals, or…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 11:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter