TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CallingOutYourBS Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by CallingOutYourBS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Google water almonds California, done
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/19 10:30 PM
24

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5nipai/can_someone_in_the_comments_explain_how_this_works/ There's one from the top of all time. It's posted fucking constantly. Here's one if you search for josie, top result for that name. And here's one if you search for jake You have to go all the way to the second post in the results to see that one though.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:13 PM
-2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5nipai/can_someone_in_the_comments_explain_how_this_works/ It's top 50 of all time. If you're posting something that's obviously the fuckin epitome of a sub's complaints, check the top of all time. Or search for any uniqueish terms in your post. Here's one if you search for josie, top result for that name. And here's one if you search for jake.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:13 PM
-1

Having beer near other drinks isn't the same thing as having your dick out. It's seriously not that fucking hard to control your bladder. This is something you are LITERALLY expected to know by the time you go to school. If you still need help with that past that point, it's something you should work on, not wave off as "eh, I can't hold my piss because I'm literally less trained than a 3 year old, so it's okay to have my dick out."
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 10:30 AM
1

Yea-no. If you can't hold your piss long enough to not whip your dick out by a child's soccer game, you need to keep your incontinent ass in the house.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 08:50 AM
1

I am not questioning the stat itself. I am not questioning the stat itself. I am not questioning the stat itself. I am not questioning the stat itself. I am not questioning the stat itself. I am not questioning the stat itself. What part of that sentence is confusing you? It's irrelevant bro, I'm not questioning the statistic. Can you not read? And again, NOTE: I am not saying your claim is false. I am saying what you provided as a citation does not back up the claim you were asked to back up. "…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:55 AM
2

Your reading comprehension is so fucking bad, read the thread, it's explained several times.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:32 AM
1

The point is the other guy is excluding buttrape from other men as rape, you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:21 PM
1

because I am not questioning the stat itself. I said it multiple times. I bolded it. How can you STILL not know it? Simple, you obviously aren't actually reading what's said. Try again bro. I'm not wrong. You're responding to something I never said. Not only are you responding to something I didn't say. You're responding to something I DIDN'T FUCKING SAY so hard that I even made sure to explicitly, in bold, point out that's not what I'm saying. So most rapes of men are perpetrated by women is ac…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:18 PM
2

This proves that statistics that exclude female perpetration of rape against men significantly undercount male victimization. WHICH IS NOT THE CLAIM YOU WERE QUESTIONED ON YOU FUCKING DISHONEST JACKASS. "Sky is blue" "Prove it" "Grass is green" "That's not what you were asked about." "Yea well, sky is blue and I proved grass is green, I'm right, lalalalalalalalalalalalalalALALALALALALA can't hear you!" Original goalpost: "It assumes that most male rape is perpetuated by women." New goalpost: Thi…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:37 AM
1

You were asked about all rape. You replied with some. Either answer what was asked, or don't pretend you did. Don't reply with a stat that doesn't actually source what you were asked to source. It's not that confusing. Beat this into your head. You were asked about ALL rape to men, you only replied about "made to penetrate." You were asked about ALL rape to men, you only replied about "made to penetrate." You were asked about ALL rape to men, you only replied about "made to penetrate." You were …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:31 AM
2

Re-read the exchange. I strongly suggest you do that. I've quoted it. You think I didn't reread it when I've quoted it multiple times? You were asked about ALL RAPE, you replied about SOME. End story bro. You DID NOT provide enough to back up the claim you were asked to, period. Objective fucking fact. If you can't deal with that, sorry about your ego preventing personal growth.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 02:26 AM
3

And adding NEW information doesn't change that you didn't provide it in the first place, and is irrelevant to what I'm saying, because I am not questioning the stat itself. Which I feel I can't really be any clearer on, but suspect will be what you reply about anyway. And what'd you reply with? I know these statistics like the back of my hand. Called it. Shut the fuck up for 20 seconds. Put your ego away. READ WHAT I ACTUALLY WROTE. Then reply. Fuck man. I repeat: Can you acknowledge that your o…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:58 AM
1

Yes, you did. This is an objective fact, that can be quoted and linked. NIPSVS: 80% of men who were "made to penetrate" (aka rape, they just didn't want to call it such) were forced by women. Link. You were asked about ALL rape to men, you only replied about "made to penetrate." sorry dude, this is an objective fact, and apparently you're too in denial and incapable of admitting you could've made ANY sort of slip up to accept LITERAL OBJECTIVE REALITY.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:56 AM
3

Super, your ignorant bullshit has nothing to do with what I said anyway though.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:42 AM
3

So, you do not think that being unwillingly buttfucked by another man should count as you being raped? That's interesting. I'd agree with cdk_aegir, and say it's NARROW to only include "forced to penetrate" and not "forcible penetration" as male rape. I'd consider it rape if another man forcibly fucked my ass, but I guess that's just me, and not a narrow definition of male rape to exclude that to you.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:29 AM
2

So, yes you do. Interesting, since you can literally hit parent and re-read it. I didn't say you misquoted or misrepresented NIPSVS's stats. I said the source you used is not making the same claim as the one you were asked to source. That's not stating EITHER claim is false. It's pointing out you shifted the goalpost, which is dishonest and detrimental to honest discussion. Not to mention unnecessary considering we're already in mens rights, you don't have to convince us men get fucked over thro…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:22 AM
7

And note: I did not say your stat is wrong. I said your stat doesn't support your claim. Do you need me to quote what the claim was that a source was requested for vs the source you provided? I feel like I was very clear about what I was pointing out to you, and you completely ignored it.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:49 AM
46

NIPSVS: 80% of men who were "made to penetrate" (aka rape, they just didn't want to call it such) were forced by women. Okay, but that's not the same thing as "most male rape is perpetuated by women". If a man assfucks another man as rape, it's not in that statistic. He';s not being "made to penetrate". He's being penetrated. You're basically doing the inverse of their fallacy bullshit. They pretend a woman forcing a man to penetrate her isn't rape. You're basically saying forcing penetration is…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:02 AM
21

You made one statement. That everyone contributes. It's false. It's a poor generalization used so lazy people that DO reinforce it can feel better about not doing anything. YOU 100% definitely have a hand in creating the fear society, that's what your generalization just helped reinforce. Everyone sure as fucking hell doesn't. To be clear, that's NOT a generalization. It's a direct statement that you, personally, are part of the problem, because you do things like reinforce the idea it's inevita…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:11 PM
27

No, "everyone" doesn't. Plenty of people work to correct the misconceptions. Being unable to rewrite society on our own doesn't mean were are in ANY way supporting that fearmongering.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:27 PM
2

Because it was an actual unpopular opinion meme, and people got tired of hearing them. Lol, and by that you mean "was the popular opinion puffin" that was constantly used for circlejerking? Popular opinion puffin was garbage, and I can't imagine how anyone could claim it being removed was bad without not only firmly having their hand on the dick to their left, but with an entire rig so you could hold and jack more dicks at once for the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 10:35 PM
1

However, this has enough votes and comments to leave it up in order to encourage the discussion. Remember, as long as you can make your manipulation POPULAR, manipulation is okay! Sorry man, but that's a fucking terrible decision. Anchoring is powerful, lying to someone about the situation first thing is really fucking manipulative. Lying shouldn't get a pass just because he told a popular lie. It hurts the credibility of the whole damn movement.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 05:52 PM
0

Read it again buddy, both mine and theirs. That is one of the things it said. One I addressed very explicitly. Two 15 year olds banging is two teens having sex and isn't statutory rape in lots of states, and would contribute to that 50% without contributing to the statutory rape counts. Still want to argue from the premise I didn't read the 50%? The thing I explicitly called out and gave an example of when it's treating it as statutory rape but it isn't? The first sentence conflates consensual t…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:34 PM
3

Yes, it would be two adults having sex, because adult is 18+. It would also be 2 teenagers having sex, because teens are 13-19. You know, the ones that end in TEEN. 18 and 19 year olds having sex are adult, teenagers, having sex. Adult and teenager aren't mutually exclusive. Obviously it's legal. That's the point, it's trying to conflate adults having consensual sex with statutory rape by conflating statutory rape with teens having sex. They aren't the same thing. I don't like intellectual disho…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:59 AM
2

Yeaaaa... trust me, I'm well aware of how it can come off every time I explain any of this (or how it'd look if IT saw me searching for Age of Consent.) It started with being told I was wrong about something and looking it up to prove I was right. Then correcting that misinformation when I saw it again. Then more misinformation I'd learned was misinformation in the first cases... Well I guess originally it started with looking up to see what, if any, laws me (underage at the time) and my gf (sam…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:59 PM
3

Based on? That's your opinion, and one I agree with, but it's still an opinion. It's not accurate when it comes to the facts, such as the law. In the US many states of marriage exemptions to their AoC laws, meaning a 13 year old could get married (with parents permission) and then bang legally, not considered rape. Ending with "period" seems awfully strong considering it's not an accurate statement about the law, and is only a statement of your opinion, so far as I can tell. Aside from that, tha…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:52 PM
1

Misleading, if not outright false. Every part of japan has stricter laws than that. It's like claiming the US doesn't have any AoC law, because only the states themselves have them, but every state does. Plus, even THAT is misleading, because Japan does have a law that bans fornication with minors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia#Japan
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:44 PM
0

I don't like the first 2 sentences there, because a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT of consensual teenage sex is not statutory rape. A 19 year old banging a 19 year old is two teenagers having sexual intercourse, and that's not illegal in even the strictest of states. Two 15 year olds banging is two teens having sex and isn't statutory rape in lots of states, and would contribute to that 50% without contributing to the statutory rape counts. It's conflating separate things.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:41 PM
1

They vary. Not every place has them. For example, California doesn't have a close in age exemption (R&J clause). The age of consent is 18. Two 17.99 year olds fucking are raping each other. It's only a misdemeanor instead of a felony if they're close in age, but it's still illegal.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:39 PM
32

Yea, working great... clearly it removed this danger to society from society long enough to be rehabilitated. Just check out that guys face. A testament to someone who should've been let back into society. Twice.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 05:51 PM
3

This is a "set back" in the same way stopping an assassination is a 'set back' for the terrorists' ideals. Sure, it is one, but not from the point of view that actually fuckin matters. Yea, I addressed that. And they shouldn't be treating that point of view as though it's valid. Just like civil rights "set back" the KKK's goals, it's not a perspective that should be given any validity whatsoever. No one's going to be like "yea, the country hit a real setback when people were given rights" and be…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 02:18 AM
21

I’ve never seen such a string of legal setbacks for universities, both public and private, in student conduct cases. It's not a fucking setback to force them to follow basic steps of justice. That's a step FORWARD. Just because some institution wasn't allowed to pull the bigoted bullshit it wanted to doesn't mean it's automatically a set back. It's great that things are swinging back towards due process, but I wish it wasn't one of those topics people have polarized so much that big steps forwar…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/16 09:28 PM
2

and then having to decide how to proceed from there Eh, I'm of the opinion that if you wait until after she's pregnant to have that discussion, you're a bit on the line. what is ABSOLUTE bullshit and indefensible is that 2 people can decide BEFORE having sex how they'd handle it. They can agree they don't want the kid. She can say "I do not want to get pregnant. If I did get pregnant, I would abort. If I did change my mind on that, I would not hold you to it." and that means nothing. Suddenly he…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:00 PM
0

Except you're not. Not a signle person called me out on what I said. A lot of people "called me out" on shit I never actualyl said, but they wanted to circlejerk against. Like you, they're blinded by their bias. On behalf of actual mens rights advocates. FUCK YOU. YOU A DETRIMENT TO THE CAUSE. Self centered fuckwit
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:05 PM
-8

There's something so fucking backwards about "MRA is something I feel really strongly about. We're getting the shaft. For that reason I fucking hate /r/mensrights." It's so disappointing to see so many people that got so invested or so bitter that they've resorted to a detrimental circlejerk over actual progress. I know it's in part a reaction to invasions from trolls and SJWs and shit, the more extremes always get louder, but it's still so frustrating to watch something I care about, and these …
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:48 AM
5

Stop looking around for anecdotes. That's the point. Seriously dude, you're obscenely blind to your confirmation bias. Stop trying to argue off of examples instead of data. There's data to argue the point from. There's no reason to be making such bullshit arguments. There's no reason to be making it look like that's the weak ass shit we have to prove our points. STOP FUCKING UP MRA CREDIBILITY BECAUSE YOU'RE TOO LAZY TO ARGUE HONESTLY. Great, you want to support mens rights. You don't do that by…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:45 AM
53

You're totally not biased. Right. That's why you refer to a 26 year old as a "kid." Did you even read the article or just see "dad" and jump to outrage?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:39 AM
-42

Congrats, the NOT ANECDOTAL THING you linked that I DIDN'T CALL ANECDOTAL isn't anecdotal. WOW! AMAZING! I didn't say there's no bias. Don't pretend I did. Don't be that guy that drags it into a fight over some strawman. I said HIS arguments were anecdotal, because HIS arguments were. You're showing your bias again. You like the conclusion, so you ignore it when the logic used to support it is bad. Here you've completely switched out the evidence to try to change my response to apply to somethin…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:32 AM
4

Yea, "100%", totally. No one has EVER gotten a light punishment except on account of their genitals. Not how good the lawyers are, not the judges leanings otherwise, just genitals. Newsflash, things as simple as HOW CLOSE TO LUNCH you are affect sentencing heavily. To pretend the ONLY possible factor is genitals is fucking stupid, and shows you only see what you want to. That's confirmation bias. Look it up.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:22 AM
2

Sure, for someone trying to evade the question because they know they can't answer it without proving their only evidence is confirmation bias. Is it a possible reason? Yea, absolutely. Is it the only possible reason? No. People shouldn't act like it is.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:14 AM
0

There's nothing "redacted" in that post, and are you so retarded you don't understand that just because you realized you were wrong on this doesn't mean the bias that brought you to the stupid conclusion in the first place is gone? Homeboy, if you weren't biased, you wouldn't have gone that way to begin with. No, I don't think you've overcome your bias, and your defensive reaction shows you're probably just going to go into denial and lie to yourself about your biases. edit: Oh, I see your "reda…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:11 AM
7

A gun they were both dicking around with. Do you not understand what analogies are at all?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:09 AM
-63

Yep, because that's confirmation bias. You literally went and looked for evidence for your point, and surprise surprise, you can find it. Above someone showed you can also find evidence of people not being sentenced. It's a fucking massive system. There are tons of people being sentenced at any given time. Some get harsh ones. Some get lenient ones. In both those categories some are men and some are women. You guys are basically playing a game of "who can texas sharpshooter and cherry pick the b…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:07 AM
2

So you have a convenient reason to dismiss them all, even when they're more shocking cases. You also called the victim here a "child" despite that he sure as hell wasn't. You might want to consider the possibility you're letting your biases affect your judgment.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:02 AM
41

That's not what the question was.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:01 AM
0

lol, k.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:19 PM
0

Got schooled so hard you had to edit down to k? Daaaaaaaaaaamn son.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:18 PM
-1

lol, no, it's not. I can't believe how many people have been brainwashed by wanting to feel like they know better than the medical community into believing shit like that.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:18 PM
-1

Read again bro. I don't think you even realize what I said you were objectively wrong on. Listen, you can rant to me all day. You're not going to change my mind. I've actually done research on this. As far as I'm concerned, you're a flat earther. You're wrong, and if you were remotely capable of understanding it, you wouldn't have been so very wrong in the first place. I've discussed it with actual doctors, not whiny tools that based all their responses on their misdiagnoses and lack of actual r…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:29 AM
-1

Yea, I slept through my diagnoses. He was going to go with narcolepsy, but flipped a coin to make sure his diagnoses was unbiased. You should read more if you think you aren't objectively wrong in that claim. It's pretty funny, in the "wow, look at this sad little man convinced his bitter resentment and ignorance is knowledge" kind of way.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:57 AM
-1

ADD / ADHD only exists as a subjective diagnosis by a medical professional. lol. No, it doesn't. You are objectively wrong, and it seems like pretty likely you're just so biased by your experience that you're unable to see past it. Now I'm just waiting for you to spout the old lie that the "creator" of ADD "admitted on his deathbed it was fake". Complete bullshit on multiple levels, but a common thing to see said along with the ignorant stuff you just did.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:32 AM
-8

I could keep cancer or missing head off my chart until I died if I wanted to too. He said you only have it if you were tested for it. That is not true. You have FURTHER STRENGTHENED THAT POINT. You can be tested "positive" and not have it. You can be tested and negative and have it. You can be not tested and have it. You can be not tested and not have it. Testing it is not the factor for whether or not you have it. Yes, it's over-diagnosed. That's a known issue. Don't let that trick you into thi…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:17 AM
2

I'll start by saying I'm a purple elephant, since it seems to be about as true. "never without the father's consent" is ridiculous. No, I should not have any right to force someone else to undergo a pregnancy because I previously put my dick in her. It's reasonable to expect men to have an option of agreeing before hand about what would happen, and not hold him responsible if she changes her mind, but that you can force someone to carry the child is fucking ridiculous. It's fucking stupid and bl…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 10:01 PM
-12

Uhh, no. You only have diagnosed ADD if you've been tested, but you still had the disorder before that. I had ADD before I went to the doctor. It's WHY I went to the doctor. I didn't go get diagnosed for something I didn't have then suddenly start exhibiting all the symptoms.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:27 PM
7

that the claim was knowingly false and malicious. I don't like the idea of having to prove a false rape accusation is malicious. If it was knowingly false, that should count as malice either way.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/15 01:45 AM
2

A bit. Although it's more about disliking dishonesty than liking calling it out.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 05:27 PM
1

He cheats, says you can't be moral without religion, but does things his religion would condemn as immoral. This is a pattern in his behavior elsewhere as well, ignorance, rationalizing him being shitty, blaming others for his fuck ups, and assuming everyone is as shitty as he is.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 05:11 PM
16

In case people don't want to have to view the link. He's a bigot. He's a cheater. He's a hypocrite. He's arrogant. He's cheated on all the women he's married, blames them for it because they let him be near other women, and still thought he was informed enough to write a book on relationships. He thinks because he's too shitty of a person to not cheat, that it must be a trait of all men to not be able keep it in their pants. So obviously he's a bastion of morality and self control, and on that n…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/15 12:23 AM
0

Ohhhh, you're in the "super dedicated to being an internet tough guy because no one takes me serious in real life" phase? Or is it just "I'm going to do 'manly' things and say fag a lot to hide that I'm in the closet. If I say fag in a bad way, they'll never think I love cock as much as I do!"
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/15 06:17 PM
-6

So edgy. Nah, it's not about which words you can use, it's about which words you think are necessary to use. You still feel the need to feel special and smarter because you use words others don't see the need to. I can't remember is this before or after your hot topic phase?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/15 01:34 AM
3

Nope. There's definitely different levels of discussion, and you, I, and inanimate objects all know there's plenty of non-constructive debate on reddit. Aside from how constructive the discussion is, I think the context it's being discussed in matters. Different communities are going to have different perspectives on it. Here, it's going to center on the mens rights side of it, and how this situation and the reaction there AND here compare to how the community reacts to similar situations. I thi…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:54 AM
4

huh, I see it as a sign this sub didn't sink as bad as I thought. I'm GLAD people are both willing and able to question the conclusion the title is working so hard to draw you to. I'm GLAD there are people saying "this is the same shit you call out, it's hypocritical to accept it now." There's actual discussion going on, and you see that as a bad thing? Go to circlejerk if that's what you need. There's some good discussion going on here, and that's not a bad thing. Not being a circle jerk is a G…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:22 PM
3

So, what? you're willing to suddenly accept people can't drink and still consent when it's convenient for your narrative? Aren't we meant to be condemning that? He made his own choices. If they were forcing him to drink, that's another thing, but it's bullshit to try to claim that his choice to drink makes them responsible. I don't get to go get shitfaced, make bad decisions, and then say "oh it's not my fault." You can't just pound a bottle whenever you want to give up personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:19 PM
6

What should happen if my buddies and I find a drunk woman, get her drunker, give her cocaine, This is where I start to take issue with your description. The "give her cocaine" "get her drunk." No. He (or she in the gender reversal) chose those things. That's not the women getting him drunk, it's him getting drunk with the women, it's him choosing to do drugs with them. You didn't just shift the genders, you also stripped him of his personal agency in his decision making.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:17 PM
8

We need to start instilling into these kids (not just girls) that if you hit someone, you will get hit back. You may get hit back. Don't want them thinking just cause they get away with it once the next guy won't put a dent in their skull
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/15 12:08 AM
0

So? Again, just because a woman was involved and it was bad does not make it a pussy pass denied. It's only pussy pass denied if she invoked her gender as an attempt to get out of shit which she didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/15 12:35 AM
1

Only when it's convenient for whatever story they want to tell themselves to feel superior.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 11:21 PM
0

Not a novelty account. Just named after something I enjoy doing. go look through the history. Yep, I call out a lot of people on bullshit, but if you go in without confirmation bias of "he corrected me, so he MUST be wrong on this other stuff" and look at it, you'd see I'm right too. I doubt you'll be able to get past your confirmation bias though. e.g. me calling someone out on them changing their stance when it's convenient. The thing you claimed was there are not treatments other than SRS. Th…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 08:44 PM
-5

Yea, because "concern trolls" toooootally wasn't a value judgment on anyone pointing out it's bullshit. No, the sub wouldn't be empty. It'd just be less full of bullshit, and actually usable for finding pussypassdenied content, instead of "lol a woman was bad" content. Eat a dick hypocrite.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 08:10 PM
4

That's the second time today someone has said I was right, admitted a mistake, and not gotten defensive. Thanks! But... I'm having a stroke right? Am I still on reddit? It feels so wrong...
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 06:28 PM
-2

Yep, because no one ever does something that most people don't do unless they're explicitly doing it because they're a WOMAN! You never answered the question. How do you know it's not because she's white? Where's your proof, dumbass?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 06:08 PM
-3

And? He's making an assumption too. If she had said that, okay, but she didn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:36 PM
-1

What evidence do you have of that? I have exactly as much evidence that she expected to get away with it because she's white as you do that it was because she was a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:35 PM
-2

And how do you know she didn't think she'd get away with it because she's white? How do you know she didn't think she'd get away with it because she thinks her community would feel the same racist way? Let me answer that for you, you don't. You ignore those and assume it was due to gender because that's what's convenient. You're only seeing what you want, it's confirmation bias, and it's not something you should be proud of. Learn to recognize when you're just seeing the parts you want to see, i…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:30 PM
2

ONLY POST IF A WOMAN ATTEMPTS TO USE HER GENDER TO GAIN ADVANTAGE/AVOID REPERCUSSION, AND IS DENIED THAT ADVANTAGE. That emphasis isn't mine. She didn't attempt to use her gender. It is only for when they try to use their gender to get out of it. She didn't. Maybe she thought she could get away with it because of her pussy, but maybe she thought she could get away with it because she's white, or because she thought her community would also be racist enough to get away with her. There are lots of…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:25 PM
3

that's a great point, this could be "whitey denied" if all we're going on is "well it COULD be seen that way."
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:23 PM
7

Welcome to reddit, where whiny shitheads like you will ignore the rules and try to shoehorn in any content even if it doesn't fit and has places it better fits, because you're desperate to see it as "OMG PUSSY PASS DENIED LOLOLOL" or whatever other stupid shit you're projecting onto it. This sub is shit thanks to retards like you that think if it's a woman doing something stupid it's automatically pussy pass denied. Now it's just "sexist assholes claim any time a woman does something bad, she on…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:23 PM
2

ONLY POST IF A WOMAN ATTEMPTS TO USE HER GENDER TO GAIN ADVANTAGE/AVOID REPERCUSSION, AND IS DENIED THAT ADVANTAGE. That emphasis isn't mine. She didn't attempt to use her gender. Most women know that spitting is a no no that can get you punched too. Most people don't do that, stupid bitch in op obviously isn't most people. She's an idiot, but you have no evidence that her idiocy stems from thinking her pussy gives her special rights to be a cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:21 PM
4

But he already dragged his cross so far, you're going to stop him from getting on it now? Rude.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:24 PM
1

newly coined terms like "hatefuck" yet. Sorry, I feel like I'm missing something here. Hatefuck has been around for years, probably decades. How is it newly coined? Is it being used in a new context or just regaining popularity? I'm just a bit confused hearing something I would've described as "dated" being referred to as "newly coined." I mean, hatefucking isn't a new concept, and it's not unique to either sex (or gender or whatever.) It's really weird to be seeing it used in a misandry/misogyn…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 10:13 PM
3

Well, you refer to it as "golden" based on a response rate. That's what I'm commenting on.
/r/seduction26/03/13 12:01 AM
4

So your only measure of if it's any good is "I got a response"? Okay, new plan, message "you are an ugly cunt" to all of them, lets see if you get any responses!
/r/seduction25/03/13 11:42 PM
4

Mm hmm, magic sky fairies. I'm with ya. Totally sound logic you've got goin on.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:46 PM
4

Whether or not the conclusion is true doesn't change your logic being retarded. If someone says "The sky is blue, because magic sky fairies drop fairy dust in the atmosphere" and I say "No, it isn't, you fucking retard." I'm not wrong. The sky being blue doesn't make him right. I'm attacking the logic, not the conclusion. Your logic is fucking retarded. That's what I pointed out. That's all I've ever said. You are a moron. Go enjoy your sky fairy logic, and "omg, you won't look at a bunch of irr…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:42 PM
5

Nice counterpoint. That's what I thought. You're full of shit. Your (probably imagined) case is not representative of the whole. No one with half a brain would think it could be extrapolated to the point you made. Enjoy being smug about being an ignorant fool. Lemme know how it works out for ya.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:33 PM
8

Oh, gee, that's TOTALLY reasonable then. So you think "I had the best law firm in the area, and made sure she couldn't get any of the good lawfirms, and had significantly more money than her" is representative of the general case? Boy, you might be legally retarded. That statement is so stupid I can't believe you actually believe it and that your story is true. Either you're full of shit, or you just are so far in denial you can't own up to making a stupid general statement based on an edge case…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:26 PM
13

Do you honestly believe that "I had the top 10 law firms in 2 counties and "access to greater resources than she did* and mine wasn't overturned" can be extrapolated to a general case "they aren't overturned"? Because that's just plain stupid.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:15 PM
1

You mean your EX girlfriend... right? Please?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:40 AM
1

The sperm that die every time a guy jacks off are alive too. So... masturbation is murder?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:01 AM
1

Do you think what makes something right or wrong is decided by its consequences? Your argument is "sink to their level!" Right and wrong are not determined by if you're punished.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:40 PM
1

Where is the evidence of this? I don't see anything on their frontpages or when I searched.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:36 PM
1

Where are the bans for /r/gaming /r/games posted? I do not see them on their front pages or see anything when I search for gawker on those subs. Where does this statement come from? Thanks for the downvote whoever. "Hey, that guy wants actual evidence and asks for it, better downvote him." Making claims like that without any support is bad. If it is supported, throw in the link. Don't just downvote because someone dared to question you. It reflects poorly on the sub.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter