| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | Found this on Huff. Post. 26 Lessons your son's future spouse will thank you for teaching him. #1. What the actual F?All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/16 09:39 AM |
| 92 | This was posted in /r/funny. It's getting plenty of upvotes but a few comments that support the MRM.It's common in the US, but not in most other parts of the western world. In Europe it's practically unheard of, with the exception of Jews and Muslims. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/15 09:25 PM |
| 2 | Saw this on Facebook today. Surely this is illegal?Affirmative action is just a fancy word for discrimination, though. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/14 07:27 AM |
| 2 | Man sterilized as it's 'in his best interests'.I fail to see what the big deal is. We make lots of decisions for mentally disabled people because they can't make them on their own. This is not a men's rights issue. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/13 05:42 PM |
| 3 | Man arrested for having big musclesYeah, that is pretty much complete bullshit. The government has absolutely no say in what you study. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 09:51 PM |
| 1 | Man arrested for having big musclesIt probably isn't, but we don't know for sure what went down that evening. Just because the test turned out to be negative doesn't mean the police officer necessarily did something wrong. I'm pretty sure the police can demand test without a warrant when the suspect someone to be under the influence of alcohol or narcotics. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Man arrested for having big musclesWell, in the article you linked to, they didn't really arrest people based on body-type. According to the article, those who gave suspicious or evasive answers to their questions were tested. AS for your question, I tried to look it up on-line unsuccessfully. It appears most articles deal with the legality of possession. I'm not even sure that testing positive on a drug test is illegal in itself in Sweden, but that it can warrant further investigation. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 08:30 PM |
| -2 | Man arrested for having big musclesWe we're talking about a man getting arrested on the street for being muscular and appearing to be on steroids. A police raid is quite different from that. Sweden is hardly the only country to arrest people for drug consumption. I don't really see how this is different from arresting people for similar charges but other drugs. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Man arrested for having big musclesI'm neither a cop nor a lawyer but I'm pretty sure police can order a drug test based only on suspicious behaviour. As long as they have proper cause they can administer pretty much any test they want. Whether or not having big muscles constitute proper cause I can't say, but to me it's no different from demanding a drug test after meeting someone who appears to be on drugs. It's not exactly uncommon for police to administer drug tests that turn out to be negative. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 07:58 PM |
| 1 | Man arrested for having big musclesYes, because cops in other countries never harass it's citizens on bogus charges. If this was a common thing I would say something had to be done, but it seems like an isolated incident and we should untwist our collective knickers. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/13 07:48 PM |
| 1 | Progressive feminists seek common ground and rational discussion with a Catholic priestI disagree. Can you shine some light on these religions? In my view, a religion always has some ideas about the afterlife, the supernatural or the origin of life that always have to be believed in without evidence. That is faith to me. I know that, for instance, some versions of Buddhism does not include deities and could therefore be considered atheistic by using a loose definition of the word, but they still teach ideas such as reincarnation, karma and souls, for which they have no evidence. T… | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 03:25 PM |
| -1 | Progressive feminists seek common ground and rational discussion with a Catholic priestI have never claimed to know everything. I'm just saying that no one can really present a rational reason to adhere to a religion. Religion is based on the concept of faith, as in believing something without any evidence. I respect the fact that people have a right to believe whatever they want but also that they should be called on the bullshit they're spouting. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 01:55 PM |
| -2 | Progressive feminists seek common ground and rational discussion with a Catholic priestReligion is irrational bullshit and quite honestly isn't something that merits respect. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 01:03 PM |
| 18 | Sweden, where women are already the dominant gender, MRA is defined as 'Men who hate women'When a married couple divorces in Sweden, they are not considered responsible for each others economy. Only in extremely rare cases does alimony exist, and when it does it is always for a limited time. Child support does exist, but only when one parent has full custody. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/13 01:58 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter