TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CanadianMastermind Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by CanadianMastermind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

The point is: you can't have it both ways - either it is a social construct or it is biological. The issue is that it's likely a very complicated mix of both. Gender roles have changed substantially over time, but there are underlying elements (eg, aggressiveness in males) that seem to persist in various ways and likely have biological roots. The problem is that we've yet to be able to clearly understand what is directly due to biology and what isn't. Second, let's assume that gender is a social…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 12:39 AM
1

No, transgenders are different ... they are actively trying to redefine gender as a fluid construct. You are not born a man or woman, it depends on how you feel. In other words, biology does not exist. You're misrepresenting the argument though. No one is denying that their is a biological component to a person's sex. What is debated is the biological component of gender--all the behaviors, tendencies, mannerisms, modes of dress, etc--that tend to be associated to sex. History proves that societ…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 08:07 PM
6

And, guys, this is not just a number thrown out there: women rate 80% of guys as worse looking than average, while the curve for men is incredibly symmetric. Speaking as a gay guy, I think a large part of it has to do with the culture around physical appearances. A much higher percentage of women, at least in my experience, give a shit about their appearance. There's many things that average-looking people can do to make themselves more attractive, and this applies to both men and women. It's ju…
/r/TheRedPill12/08/15 08:26 PM
1

And none of those factors apply to chess. Uh, what? Culture is highly influential on the activities your participate in. There are countries in the world that actually teach chess in school, for example. I believe it's even a required course in Armenia. Compare that to your average North American school, for example, where it's not. I'm simply pointing out that "More of X people participate in Y activity, therefore that is due to genetics" is not a logical statement. Genetics very well could be …
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:45 PM
2

This difference is extremely easy to notice when it comes to the game of chess where only one woman has ever qualified for the world championships and none have ever won the tournament. There are indeed differences between men and women, but this kind of rationale is not how you'd pinpoint them. Using the same logic, a person in the 80s could have argued that black people are naturally bad at tennis given how few of them had achieved anything in the sport up until that point. Participation in an…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 02:35 AM
4

Agreed. As a gay guy myself, just about all of my gay friends (even one in LTRs) will refer to watching porn. Porn is just an outlet that's not necessarily tied to your satisfaction in the bedroom. Just like how someone can enjoy watching baseball and playing baseball. Playing lots of baseball doesn't mean that you won't want to watch it.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 08:22 PM
1

All these qualities—calm docility, playing together without competition, sitting still for hours in a classroom—are all qualities of girls. To be fair, these aren't qualities of girls either. They're qualities of a lax culture with widespread obestity.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 10:18 PM
2

I'm not a legal expert by any means, and I know it varies from region to region, but most places in North America there's very little difference between 1) being married, and 2) being common law. In my province, for example, you will be declared common law after living together for 24 months and satisfying a few other criteria (sharing expenses, clearly displaying to others that you're a "couple" and not just roommates, etc). After that, you're eligible for 50/50 split of resources upon separati…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 04:12 PM
1

As a straight guy I would agree to the extent that guys are generally ugly: I can't understand why women want to have sex with ugly creatures like us. Well, I think that more relates to how most guys present themselves. When a guy puts even some attention into his appearance (working out, eating right, etc), it can make a huge difference. Men can be draw-droppingly attractive too if the conditions are right. I think clothing plays a big part too, and honestly I would say that's the biggest overa…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 01:18 PM
1

Speaking as a gay guy myself, I will say that I do find that there are more attractive women out there than attractive men. I think this has two main causes: 1) Women can get a somewhat decent figure just through diet restriction. Men, on the other hand, don't have this luxury. Dieting helps, but you need to work out to get a "masculine figure". 2) Many guys out there convince themselves that they don't need to worry about their appearance and can instead rely on things like money, carts, etc, t…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 09:42 PM
1

How exactly is the perceived ease of doing something related to its moral standing? My point was that sex is enjoyable/fun, which is exactly why most people seek it out. Your age/gender/wealth/etc can often make it easier or harder to obtain, but I don't see how that is relevant.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 12:27 AM
0

The point of this post was the fact the reddit seems to be celebrating what would traditionally be something to be frowned upon, and something that many of us still do frown upon. The people who frequent this sub generally aren't against having lots of sex. Heck, a sizeable percentage of of the posts in this sub at any one point in time are are about game, "spinning plates", etc. So to admonish women for engaging in the same behavior that most of the people around here seem to want to engage in,…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 11:51 PM
2

Those two statements don't logically relate, though. Even if we assume for a moment that your average woman has less of a sex drive, that doesn't mean that don't get horny and desire sex and might possibly want to bang on the first date. The usual rational for justifying wanting to call them the "gatekeepers", is that women have more to lose--ie, getting pregnant--and thus "should" be more picky about whom they sleep with. That may have been true in our caveman days, but these days men have a lo…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 12:18 AM
4

Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I think a girl worth LTRing wouldn't bang Brad Pitt or anyone else on the first date. As a gay guy, I find that this whole discussion/dilemma doesn't really arise in the gay community. Having sex on the first date isn't really something people shun each other over. If two guys have sex on the first date it just means that...they were into each other and wanted to bang. That's it. But if a woman's up for it, it suddenly becomes this huge psychological puzzle. It's alw…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 11:01 PM
6

The other factor is that a woman who admits sleeping around with other women isn't immediately discounted as a prospect by straight men. However, if a guy admits fooling around with other guys? Most straight women will be turned off.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 11:57 PM
2

Insofar as it applies to hetero males, it is a biotruth. You my friend are a statistical outlier, the thin part of the bell curve. What applies to you won't often fit the majority, and vice versa. This isn't a personal attack, nor a claim of superiority, but a clarification that you are part of a minority group. But that isn't relevant to my point. My point was that much of the gender theory gets promoted as being objective. ie, that women are objectively more attractive than men and thus get mo…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 02:13 PM
1

Yeah, as a gay guy who mostly just lurks this subreddit out of, uh, curiosity, I thought I would reply and say that I agree with most of your post. Most of the gender theory posted on this subreddit is very much skewed toward a straight male's perspective. This is understandable to some degree (given the nature of the audience), but all too often these perspectives get passed off as "biotruths". Women aren't "objectively" more sexually attractive, for example. The sexual attraction a person feel…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 10:36 PM
1

Regardless of gender, it's a pretty bad idea to try to find romance at the workplace. It works out in rare cases, but more often than not it will result in drama. If she were a male CEO, it still wouldn't be a good idea to try to sleep around with coworkers. Even if they did show interest.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 05:24 PM
2

I realize that. I'm just trying to get a sense of what you believe would have been an acceptable sequence of events. Transgendered people aren't going to wear t-shirts or signs that identify them. So given that, at what point should it be brought up in conversation?
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 08:39 PM
1

Someone explain to me how misrepresenting your gender to someone in order to get them to be physically intimate with you isn't attempting to get sex without real consent? Just for the record, what would have been the ideal sequence of events in your mind? ie, when should she have told him? Just prior to kissing him?
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 08:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter