CanadianRomantic94 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Need help to exit this Endless redpill cycle What you describe as nuance and complexity is really just contextual dependencies. But I will agree to the statement. However, this is fundamentally why there has been a decline in marriage. Historically, men had more economic power than women, this lead to the expectation of an economically successful man as a long-term partner as a norm in marriage. Women have been outperforming men in academia and parts of the workforce, and as a result, the composition of men who make significantly more than…	/r/ExRedPill	16/10/25 06:25 PM
0	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? I do agree that it is both. However, where I typically do disagree with social constructionists is new social constructs can be developed with 0 biological input. For example, I would argue that physical attraction is more of a biological response than a social response. The only argument social constructivists have is that what people consider physically attractive can become culturally dependent. I do not agree. There are very few cultures where morbid obesity is considered arousing. I think w…	/r/ExRedPill	16/10/25 06:10 PM
1	Need help to exit this Endless redpill cycle Would you ever tell women to take men of lower socioeconomic status seriously for long-term relationships?	/r/ExRedPill	16/10/25 02:36 PM
0	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? Is socioeconomic status socially constructed or is it quantifiable based upon income?	/r/ExRedPill	16/10/25 02:30 PM
0	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? Ovulatory shift has been studied Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do Women’s Mate Preferences Change Across the Ovulatory Cycle? A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–12 For men's lack of preferences on income, I'd guide you to. Scheller, M., de Sousa, A. A., Brotto, L. A., & Little, A. C. (2024). The Role of Sexual and Romantic Attraction in Human Mate Preferences. The Journal of Sex Research, 61(2), 299–312. For the importance of parental investm…	/r/ExRedPill	16/10/25 01:36 AM
-1	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? Here's the thing, for most men, they generally do not care about the socioeconomic status of their future partner. It is not a true statement for women. Contextual dependencies. Sure, you can find other paths to the same conclusions that exist in almost every social science. What evolutionary psychology offers is how such conclusions were a benefit to the species. But the major objections to evolutionary psychology come from fields that want to suggest almost every element of human life is socia…	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 09:23 PM
-1	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? It is related to Evo psych because evolutionary psychology provides the why to its truth value. Earning potential matters more in long-term relationships because there are greater chances of long-term relationships leading to children, which means thoughts of parental investment are more considered. Historically, parental investment for women was an important consideration for both short-term and long-term relationships. There were stronger cultural reinforcements for women being more selective …	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 10:53 AM
-1	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? Here's a falsifiable claim put forth by evolutionary psychologists. "In short-term relationships, women are more likely to consider physical attraction as more valuable than earning potential."	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 02:52 AM
0	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? How exactly is evolutionary psychology widely discredited? Most meta-analysis within the literature support many of the claims (not the claims of the OP, those aren't evolutionary psychology claims). You could argue that most of the studies conducted are of students and self-report data, but that's because the type of research needed to further support the theories (dual-mating strategy, ovulatory shift, mate choice copying) would be considered unethical by most institutions. So, it is ontologic…	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 01:28 AM
0	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? False.	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 01:21 AM
1	Why do they always bring " evolutionary reasons " into everything about a women? Personally, I would want some specifics for who is saying these, I won't deny that there are many creators who do misunderstand evolutionary psychology and attempt to present themselves as subject matter experts when they are just echoing another creator. So I will take each of the comments, one by one and say if it fits with concepts within evo psych or not. PREFACE 1 - The biggest of all these comments is making absolutist predictions. Legitimate evolutionary psychologists do not make causal p…	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 01:21 AM
5	Need help to exit this Endless redpill cycle I will be the most sympathetic to the red pill poster here. Here's my analysis. Feel free to agree or disagree. The red pill communities are men in the anger phase of discovery of knowledge pertaining to evolutionary psychology. There are those who challenge the validity of evolutionary psychology as they do not want to underestimate the power culture has in what people want. But the original evolutionary psychologists - David Buss, Martie Haselton, Gad Saad. They weren't ever underestimating cu…	/r/ExRedPill	15/10/25 01:09 AM