~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.My point is that people who rank higher socially are also more likely to rise or improve their condition socially. That means that if you don't control for socioeconomic background you'll end up with spurrious correlations. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.I took a closer look at the study. They are aware of the problem I was alluding to as they write: Prosperous economic conditions likely allow individuals to improve and maintain their physical attractiveness by investing in relevant services (e.g., quality hairdresser, gym membership, and plastic surgery) and goods (e.g., fashionable clothes and effective cosmetics). [...] One way to mitigate the problem of reverse causality is to utilize individuals’ attractiveness assessed before their social … | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 05:07 PM |
| 1 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.Then the study's flawed. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Physical attractiveness more strongly affects social mobility (education, occupation, and income) for males than females.Did they factor in those that were considered attractive at Wave I, but weren't anymore in subsequent stages? Being successful will help you stay healthy, well-groomed, and consequently attractive. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 06:49 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter