TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CanonMKIII5D Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by CanonMKIII5D on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It can be dangerous, but in my opinion it's no more dangerous and often way less dangerous to the "victim" than it is the "accused". I've seen domestic violence cases where it's murder waiting to happen, (one case the perp fired a gun into the ceiling issuing death threats but if the battered victim doesn't want to come forward, the police can't really charge them), cases where the same person roofied different people and different occasions but didn't get convicted because nobody was willing to…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:26 PM
-6

The evidence disagrees with you. Rape Shield laws mean that victims are more likely to come forward, for one.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:57 AM
0

Yeah. Like if someone was say, accused of a serious arson, which is generally a felony in the same class.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:47 AM
-2

Removing anonymity is super dangerous the person bringing that type of charge to the police. If that persons identity is exposed it often means getting death threats, it could mean you get socially ostracized, it could mean someone else assaulting you.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:58 AM
2

If you are bringing up Soul Caliber V, Note Namco's Japanese Advertisement for it. Soul Caliber is a terrible example of trying to claim a false equivalence fallacy regarding male/female sexualization in video games. It's not just how much skin is shown off, but how characters are portrayed. Ivy is a Dominatrix. Tira uses a Hula Hoop. Taki is sexualized far more than any of the male characters, and Hilde wasn't around for the first three games. Some games that (for the most part) actually portra…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:08 AM
3

It's simply a reflection of culture. Probably one of the least successful ways to pick up women, period, is to be on the side of the street and shout "hey baby wanna fuck?" Because that's generally considered by the recipient to be creepy and a poor way to introduce oneself. For guys, it's different culturally. If a fairly attractive woman walks up and says "hey, wanna fuck?" then it's more unusual, but a lot less likely to be refused. Seeing as culture has raised either sex to be different, no …
/r/MensRights30/07/13 10:29 AM
1

The initial subject was sales, not advertising. That is a completely different subject. Talking about womens magazines and car advertisements for having attractive women on the cover are two completely different things. In womens magazines, the person on the cover is in the position of role model. Typically how to look/feel good with attitude/diet/sex/workout routine, because they advertise those things. See Cosmo, Women's Health, etc. As for having good looking women selling cars? That REALLY d…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:09 PM
1

And I know women in car sales that don't. Women buy cars too, and somehow I don't think that "tits" is enough to sell a car in those cases. A reality of sales is that customers have different things they find important in the product they are looking for and their experience purchasing a product. Sometimes part of that experience is comfort and trust, and some people find that in speaking to someone of the same gender. The feedback for that may manifest itself through the internal customer feedb…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:57 AM
-1

This post is sickening.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:04 AM
1

Perhaps I misunderstand, but surely if there are significant, legitimate issues facing men (of which you yourself acknowledge three), then is this not reason enough to justify the existence of a movement directed toward addressing these issues? It is. Engaging in activism about those issues is what accomplishes things. That tends to not be what I see though. (Referring not to just reddit, but other MRM websites as well. I see people being fans of Thomas Ball and his terrorist manifesto. I see pe…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:34 AM
-9

A very succinct summation. This'll be something of a rant, I do apologize in advance. Are there a few Men's Rights issues that I could get behind? Absolutely. Intactivism is cool. Prison rape is a huge problem. Males have the higher suicide rate. Would I ever care to be a part of the Mens Rights Movement? No, for the following reasons. There are certain Extremist Positions, massive tone/public relations issues, and the issue of being spending more energy being against feminism than for mens righ…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:31 AM
1

Yep. There's some fucked up people out there.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:47 AM
0

I in fact addressed Crimson's answer.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:16 AM
-1

Calling it failure in comprehension is Ad Hominem. You're not engaging in logical debate right now. You're making implications. Spell out what you are implying and how you propose to solve the issue of rape as we've been discussing in this thread and I'll be glad to shoot down your argument as I haven't really seen you propose anything that works in this thread yet.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:04 AM
-1

If all the men you refer to never got their bad behaviour validated, would that somehow be a key step in rape never happening again, as Chuckeedee says?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:52 AM
-3

So the reason rapists exist is because women choose to date bad boys who may or may not be rapists. Am I picking up what you're laying down?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:40 AM
2

A) Not really, the poster talking about how criminal behaviour is more or less a product of socio-economic conditions addressed that far better than I did, but more importantly... B) The Philosophy of Mens Rights, when it comes to marketing it to people, is no different than any retail product. You're selling an idea. And this is a failure of a sales pitch. I've worked in sales or had to sell my work to clients all my life. You know how many companies and successful business function primarily b…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:36 AM
3

By fitting the definition? From here: 2 a : lacking positive qualities; especially : disagreeable b : marked by features of hostility, withdrawal, or pessimism that hinder or oppose constructive treatment or development <a negative outlook> <negative criticism> c : promoting a person or cause by criticizing or attacking the competition <ran a negative campaign> <negative advertising>
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:32 AM
0

This post makes zero sense and I doubt it is in fact backed by any sort of scientific data.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:25 AM
1

That's self-victimizing and false. There have been many instances of the bystander effect. See here. The bystander effect occurs in a variety of circumstances with either gender as the victim. Really, unless you can prove that somehow the bystander effect applies in all the other situations except for this one, you're out of luck.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:16 AM
3

Could you expound on this some more?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:15 AM
4

This is what's referred to as the mob mentality. If nobody else in the crowd is doing anything, it's a lot more likely that nobody will do anything. The fact that it's the perpetrator was one gender and the victim was another isn't really an important fact, as that's not why people just stood in watched.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:13 AM
1

It's very possible that someone could simply misinterpret or ignore such signals, and think they are obtaining consent, when in fact, they are not.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:02 AM
0

Look up Rumble Roses XX on Youtube, then look up any WWE game on youtube. That's why.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:58 AM
1

To understand, say, the womans point of view on this, try to imagine the same kind of anxiety except instead of asking someone out you're getting something stuck inside of you.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:34 AM
0

When I see a successful franchise that features a beach volleyball game featuring exclusively male characters where you can buy skimpier and skimpier clothing for the characters, complete with photoshoot mode and next generation junk-bouncing physics technology, I will believe that males are sexually objectified in the same way in video games. That's Dead or Alive, Xtreme 2. When I see a game that was successful enough to warrant a next gen console sequel, with a sequel, that is an equivalent to…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:24 AM
1

Agreed, that's definitely something that should be taught. But in the same vein, you just can't assume that every person is going to say no, especially if they feel threatened. I would imagine that it's easier to ask permission, than it is to say no.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:53 AM
1

Why should it be incumbent on one person to say no, instead of it being incumbent on the person wanting more to ask permission to proceed?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 07:29 AM
2

Holy fucking shit. A) She's underage. That's statutory rape. B) Unless he acquired consent to have sex, which as far as we know, he did not, that's rape. The points people are bringing up about body language are not relevant at all. If the woman was instead gogo-dancer pornstar high priced escort stripteasing rubbing his junk, it still wouldn't matter. If she says she just wants to make out, and he doesn't obtain for sex, and he proceeds anyways, that's rape.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:09 AM
1

The Yahoo CEO is doing this to cut down people who've used "working at home" to mean "Not do anything and get paid." Attempting to manufacture an "issue" for a movement by trying to frame a female feminist CEO in a negative light doesn't accomplish anything and I don't think it helps anything.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:07 PM
1

It sounds absurd and was posted on April 1st. Regardless of whether it was true or not, it looked like a thread with some poor results.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:28 AM
1

The majority of the comments ignored or justified the assault he committed. If that's some peoples idea of giving good advice, then that's a pretty poor standard.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:25 AM
2

If that's your definition of trolling, then that time that one guy posted on April Fools Day and got a bunch of responses from MRA's about how it was more or less justified that he punched his girlfriend in the stomach when she tried to take the used condom from the garbage was failed trolling as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:03 AM
-2

I'm not on some kind of downvote brigade. :) My point is this. Rape in prisons is the biggest instance of rape out there. Femninists are against rape. Including prison rape, as they consider that part of rape culture. How does it help the Men's Right's Movement to make an enemy of Feminism when they are against that same thing, when you could instead utilize a far bigger lobbying power to solve a problem that both factions are against?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:00 PM
1

Feminists care about Reproductive Rights. Abortion. Child Support. Domestic Abuse. Victims of Rape. What I've never heard feminists ever talk about as a serious agenda item is killing all male babies.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:09 AM
1

I'm not moving the goalposts, and I'm addressing points as you bring them up you haven't just brought up one. If you are claiming that feminists are distorting data, then offer some proof. Peer reviewed studies or something of the like is nice.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:02 AM
1

That particular study I'm thinking about wasn't hospital data. How about Police-Reported data?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:25 AM
1

When was the last time you actually talked to a group of feminists in real life?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:19 AM
1

Again, you're arguing against a studyy that you haven't so much as seen the results or origin on and you're blaming feminists for distorting it. How can you make that claim without actually seeing what it is you're supposed to be criticizing?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:17 AM
-2

What's more important, being against Feminism, or helping victims of abuse?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 06:18 AM
-4

Yep. Advocating for/attempting to change prison conditions so that prison rape is lessened? Great idea. Feminists actually agree with that completely, more or less. MRA's would have help if they could actually figure that out. Keeping foreskins? Great idea. Making sure all victims of abuse are recognized? Great idea. Feminists are fans of that as well. MRA's could have help with that if they could figure that part out. That shit would be amazing.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 05:13 AM
3

The Young Turks on Youtube called her crazy for having that done and they definitely aren't MRA's. The self victimizing tone in the title makes it seem as though people outside of the MRA reddit here somehow don't think it's crazy for someone to get a full face tat in under 24 hours.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 05:03 AM
1

Essential point here. Why is the SCUM Manifesto studied or talked about? (Keeping in mind, many Feminists dislike it.) Because Feminists are actually trying to teach all Feminists to murder all male babies. Because it pulls a satirical analysis of gender stereotypes through a reversal of language (replacing "penis envy" with "pussy envy", for example) Because the conclusion of the SCUM Manifesto, if taken seriously, is offensive and a good example of something not to do. I'll give you a hint, it…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:31 AM
1

So when a phone survey is done reaching 24,000 abuse victims in Canada, and women were more likely to go to the hospital, that's not relevant at all, just feminist lies, considering you haven't seen the survey whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:26 AM
-3

If Mens Rights as a movement wants to be successful, it needs to be able to stand on it's own without trying to pull feminism down with it. Not feminism sucks, but Mens Rights are good.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:24 AM
1

A standing ovation for this man.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:06 AM
-2

The problem with statistics like that, is while domestic violence is bi-directional, it is by no means equal. Women are twice as likely to be physically injured by their partners, six times more like to receive medical attention, and five times more likely to be hospitalized due to injuries. It's not just how many instances of violence, but what degree of violence is faced.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 12:50 AM
1

Oh, you're referring to the SCUM Manifesto? A book that Valerie Solaris publicly stated was intended to be taken as non-literal and is obviously a work of satire? Yes, I'm familiar with that. You may as well be arguing that Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" actually advocates that poor Irish women should be paid to make babies so rich people could eat them as a new luxury meat. If you think that's wrong somehow, then walk into your local place of higher education and ask a women's studies Pro…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:27 PM
1

I'm going to hazard a guess that I've read more feminist literature than you've picked up and held in your hands and probably talked with more feminists about their philosophy in meetings than you've argued with on the internet. Pointing to a website and a wing (read: a few nutjobs) in a movement that is far broader than that is disingenuous at best. By all means, if you'd like to compare a Movement like the KKK and it's supporters (who mostly believe in Genocide) to Feminism (Where a few nutjob…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 01:40 AM
1

Not a remotely reasonable comparison. Almost all KKK members believe that all non-whites and jews should be either tried for treason, executed, segregated from society, or banished out of North America... Something of that nature. There is no reasonable parallel to feminism for that in the slightest. It would be equally unreasonable to say that an MRA shares the same views as Vox Day, who believes, for example, that once you marry someone they've given consent for the entire duration of the marr…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:28 PM
1

That reeealllly depends on what you consider a large proportion. Using Alberta in Canada as an example, there was a survey done out of 1,000 men for their opinions on domestic violence. The results are probably more than you'd think, and less than you'd hope. Alberta is a pretty bad province for that kind of thing. In answers to when a behaviour is considered domestic violence, "Forcing your partner to have sex" was considered by 5% to never be considered domestic violence, 13% saying sometimes,…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 10:31 AM
1

I'm assuming that there would be some kind of fix to that problem via legislation, restructuring of policing policy, something like that. Do you think there is a solution to solve the issue of false accusations of domestic abuse, that would simultaneously not impact the safety, or conviction rates in cases of actual domestic abuse victims?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:41 AM
1

The police may ask the victim whether they want to lay charges, but it is not up to them, certainly. That's not the only thing going on though. If a fight is "mutually agreed upon" (whether that's true or not) and nobody gets hurt, it's likely no charges will be laid. Whether the police decide to press charges, is another matter. Whether those charges proceed in court is another matter. In the instance of a "no-contact" condition or restraining order (which it is a criminal offense to violate, u…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:27 AM
1

I've interviewed defense lawyers and people working for counseling centers, abuse centers in the past and I really wish I could say it was as simple as police having enough evidence, catching a bad guy, and putting them in the bad guy box with the rest of the bad guys. The reality is a lot of domestic violence doesn't end up making it as a report to the police, a lot of those don't end up in an arrest, and a lot of those cases don't end up being successful.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:56 AM
0

And if the victim doesn't co-operate with the police for them to press charges, what happens then?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:10 AM
0

My post is not bullshit, and Canada. The police can take that person and toss them in jail for a day, but they pretty much can't really do anything more than that unless the victim presses charges, which isn't always as simple as packing up your things and moving out like some idealistic movie character. If the victim does not press charges, the suspect is out in less than 24 hours. The police can toss them in jail for a day, but they can't exactly press charges unless the victim consents to it.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:08 AM
0

A LOT of domestic abuse cases in my area where there DEFINITELY has been domestic abuse simply aren't prosecuted. The police may just scare the shit out of someone with threats of prison, or if they're feeling especially uncharitable that evening, knock the perpetrator around rather than go through all the legal stuff. In serious cases they likely WILL go through all the serious legal stuff, but even then, it can be VERY difficult to proceed with a case, as it requires the victim to press charge…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:14 AM
1

This thread has several explanations as to why it's not that simple.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:00 PM
6

There's certainly benefits to testosterone, and I've heard such from male and female friends. That being said, too much testosterone can be a bad thing just like too much Seratonin can. It isn't an issue that is as simple as "testosterone is awful" VS "testosterone is awesome". It's a lot more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:49 AM
1

Do you have statistics from a study about that? That certainly wasn't what happened to a few of my friends, female and male.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:41 AM
1

That's not really how rape works. Rape usually goes a bit more like this. Maybe you turned away for a 3 seconds while at a bar with a friend and someone slipped a roofie into your drink. Maybe you can't remember the whole week where it happened due to traumatic memory repression. Maybe you were a guy and got roofied when you went to a gay bar with a friend. Maybe you were too drunk with an involuntary erection and couldn't move, but were still conscious, and got raped. Maybe your mom prostituted…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:11 AM
1

Sounds like the reasonable thing to me.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:45 AM
1

"Fuck you, you soulless garbage" is not a valid form of argument. The subject is "easily defended MRA policy goals". If you ever wanted any of those goals to actually happen, that would require them becoming law. You'd either have to convince a large enough body of lawmakers, or be part of a large enough body of lawmakers to amend... Say, the US Criminal Code, to make a false accusation of rape punishable the same being raped. Which is one step down from first or second degree murder, and treaso…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:31 AM
0

Yes, I agree, that's terrible. But that doesn't answer any of the questions I presented. Specifically, that a false accusation of rape should be punished just the same as raping someone. If you want to propose a policy that has an end goal of getting accepted by lawmakers, you have to be able to propose something that makes sense within the current legal system, and can therefore be implemented without some kind of court challenge that will knock it down. There's the whole felony classification …
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:13 AM
0

So that's why someone making a false accusation of rape should be punished worse than a drug dealer, someone who commits robbery, or manslaughter?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:25 AM
0

Is there not already penalties for bringing false allegations of any crime? Would this be something that you would therefore apply to all laws, or just in cases of what you mentioned, false rape/abuse allegations? It seems to me that the law punishes the severity of the crime. Beating and/or raping someone doesn't seem to be as serious as being accused of rape.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:16 AM
-1

Why should false allegations of beating/raping ones spouse abuse receive the same penalty as beating/raping ones spouse?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:06 PM
1

I never implied that. My only implication was that your comments are a hindrance to a movement that is supposed to promote equality between men and women.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:42 AM
3

And this contributes to the discussion and promotes equality how?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:24 AM
1

If someone is too drunk to say yes, they are not able to resist, and they have sex forced on them as described in the story, that's rape. Yes, he really did rape a girl.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:33 AM
1

I've heard of stories where Journalists in Warzones would use Olympus point and shoots because they were stellar, and using something big would get them killed. The OM-D Olympus put out along with the lens selection it has is so good that I'm going to have to get one of those as well.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:23 AM
2

Ha, no worries. I think the best macro photo I ever took with with a kit lens and some tubes. The first question I usually get regarding any of my photos half the time is what kind of camera I used, people think expensive tools do better so it makes the prices on prints look more reasonable.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:15 AM
4

When did I say I took nude photos? I didn't. That's simply the legal background to that. I know other photographers who do pretty much just that. The real money is in family portraits, and "art" photos of birds, flowers, landscapes, prints of that stuff.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:58 AM
3

Except for the fact that a lot of creepshot photos are also taken off facebook. And a lot of creepshot photos are hijacked from albums set to be private on photobucket and the like. Sets of nude photos from someones cellphone where they had a "reasonable expectation of privacy". It also does not matter in the slightest regarding creepshots if they are pulled off a public facebook. If someone pulls a sexual photo off facebook and uploads it to a creepshots website, they're engaging in some defama…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:12 AM
6

I take photos for a living and I'm going to have to say no. If I take nudes of a guy or gal with a few thousand dollars worth of gear, work with it in photoshop, produce prints and sell an actual artistic creation back to that person in exchange for the fee that I would charge for that, that's fine. I have their explicit consent along with a signed contract. I don't post it, nor do I show it to anyone else without their explicit permission. If I go into public and take photos of either gender wi…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:40 AM
1

I think that there are a lot of things important in a relationship/marriage. Having good finances so that two people can build a home together. Getting along well and having common interests. Loving each other. The type of major relationship ending problems I see are typically more along the lines of "our long term goals in life do not match up whatsoever" or "finances are such a problem that owning a home and having a life together is a long-shot" or "I encounter consistent emotional and/or phy…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter