TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Capable_Camp2464 Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by Capable_Camp2464 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Oh good, it's the standard "when the system impacts women the system must change, when the system impacts men, something something bootstraps". "if you have friends, or a bunch of acquaintances that like to spend time with you, its not hard to start your own thing." Sure, I'll go meet them...oh, yep. There's nowhere to meet them unless I'm into sport which is the only acceptable gender segregation left for men, and quite frankly, at my age, I don't really want to get body slammed playing footy w…
/r/MensRights06/09/25 10:25 AM
6

There are endless complaints about women not being permitted if there's anything "men only". They all have provisos now about women being welcome or "however you identify". The ones remaining open are only open to men who are both wealthy and by connected, I mean within wealthy society. They're all worth hundreds of millions to billions and know each other through politics, boards etc... You have to be nominated by one of them to join typically and approved through reviews of your net worth, con…
/r/MensRights05/09/25 01:06 AM
11

"we have male only clubs and activities where I live," The only ones we have where I am are exclusive for very wealthy, connected men. Everything else gets shut down.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 10:43 AM
2

I had this argument previously. There are some in here who sit within an echo chamber and will argue until they're blue in the face that the loneliness epidemic has nothing to do with male friendships, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary. This plays nicely into the argument that men only care about getting laid etc...that get trotted out.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:58 AM
10

That's just saying men are the problem with an extra step or two.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 01:41 AM
2

The word "inevitable" is key there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 01:30 AM
1

Keep going mate. You're showering yourself in glory defending harassing people who just want to go about their day. I get the feeling you're probably someone who throws bottles of shit out of a moving car at pedestrians because it amuses you.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 04:48 AM
2

There are already piles of exemptions to free speech in your country.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 03:02 AM
2

Are people regularly complaining about feeling threatened and harassed by singing and whistling? No. This isn't rocket science and the fact that you think it's all good to just randomly scream offensive shit at people just trying to go about their day says a lot. You're not the main character. Try and be a vaguely decent person.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 03:00 AM
2

Not really, hence the whole "community outreach" etc...that they do. Maybe people will slowly realise they need to stop acting like chimps and behave, and we won't need to add yet another law.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:22 AM
2

Sounds like an excellent case to make it illegal if people are going to continue to be dicks despite warnings then.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:09 AM
2

Yeah, we're able to build a civilised society that doesn't involve doing whatever our monkey brains spit out at us. But hey, good luck screaming obscenities at random women and wondering why you're still single.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:08 AM
-3

Police do this sort of thing all the time in terms of community outreach etc...their role isn't limited simply to addressing illegal actions.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:36 AM
-1

Catcalling isn't approaching...and if you think it is, you might want to, I don't know, go back to the very basics of human interaction.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 07:35 AM
121

Naturally. It's like watching a video of a woman hitting a guy over and over until he pushes her away, and THEN everyone runs in to stop him.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 04:38 AM
1

So why do you hate her?
/r/MensRights13/08/25 01:58 AM
26

I've been tempted to scrape the internet and pull articles from various news sites etc...and run them through some parsing to identify negative language relating to men to start demonstrating the ongoing societal bludgeoning of guys in various forms of media. To imagine that for boys growing up and only ever reading about men being <insert problem here> has no impact is unrealistic. That's before they get to the really negative stuff.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 10:45 AM
6

Objectively false. Women face a higher chance of sexual assault. Men face a higher rate of assault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 09:49 AM
16

So basically we should just ban men from being around other people, full stop. Isolation from any other people given they are responsible for the most assaults etc... Or do we put collars on all men at all times and they must be accompanied by two women minimum who can push a shock through the collar if he does something they don't like?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 01:50 AM
1

If you were involved in the lifestyle, you'd understand perfectly well why that rule exists. I've been to a few where it hasn't and almost ended up in fights every time because of the complete lack of respect.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:55 AM
3

Unless it has been edited, it looks fine to me. Very clear.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 10:55 PM
0

From an international perspective he was fine. There was stability and predictability which, honestly, is about as much as the rest of the world cares about what's going on in the US unless we're planning a holiday there.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:46 AM
1

Honestly, no one I know of was thinking that externally. We were happy you were a relatively stable country and economy. Now it's a chaotic shit show and myself and a lot of others are busy moving investments around to avoid the US. In my experience, no one with any strength worries about being perceived as weak. That's what the previous admin looked like from the outside.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 12:44 AM
1

As someone outside of the US, most of the rest of the world is looking on in pity at the calibre of people currently in the US government.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 11:58 PM
1

The other poster is right, it just makes you look like a child who resorts to name calling.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 11:42 PM
1

Well in lieu of Putin the coward actually coming forward, yes, wars are going to be fought by populations. But hey, if your solution is "roll over and die" you're welcome to do that.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 11:37 PM
2

I love that they're downvoting what we've actually experienced as well.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 08:39 AM
3

That's like saying someone who shoots someone breaking into their house with the intent to murder and rape the household is just as bad as the person breaking in. Fuck off with you bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:00 AM
1

"is that the vast majority of the globe believe in religion / God." And? Do you think that means anything useful? If everyone believes the moon is made out of cheese, does it mean it is actually made out of cheese or just that everyone is wrong?
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:19 AM
3

"I don't know what crazy YouTube videos you're watching but this is positively batshit conspiracy stuff." Was still going on when I got dragged into church as a kid back in the 80s. From what I hear, still plenty of churches running with it too.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:17 AM
1

I bet every other religion that people have fought and murdered for is though....
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:10 AM
1

Don't know what to tell you dude, I don't see it. I'm guessing you're buried deep in some subreddits where that's all they care about.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 02:16 AM
1

How can you say "all speech about the loneliness epidemic" when I've shown you articles etc...that are talking about it from a completely non-romantic side of things? This isn't a competition. In the spheres I'm in, it's almost nothing to do with women and everything to do with friendships between men. The only ones I ever see saying it's about the romantic side of things is from feminists trying to make it all about women.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:51 AM
1

And that's not what I or anyone else I've spoken to has been talking about in terms of a loneliness epidemic. As I said at the beginning, it may just be the different circles we're discussing it in, but in all of the conversations I've had, it's not that at all. It's coming from married men who don't have anyone around them except their wives as their friends have died, moved, changed life circumstances etc....and it's difficult for them to find a way to make friends once they're out of universi…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 01:08 AM
0

Yeah, how about no. You're trying to make it something almost no one else is commonly talking about. I've provided articles showing that's what it is being discussed as and could bring up hundreds more. I'm participating in real life groups to address it with men who are talking about it being an issue for them. If it was purely a romantic loneliness epidemic that's what it would be called, but it's not. No idea what your particular barrow is you're trying to push but saying the only reason men …
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:56 AM
6

I never wanted them to be honest, and I've made sure it can't happen. I'm of the opinion that if you don't genuinely want kids, you shouldn't have them.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:49 AM
107

Glad I decided to never have kids. Campaigns like this showing that playing with your kids means you probably want to abuse them would be depressing. This is why guys see a kid crying in shopping centres and stay away. It's definitely leaning into the "men should be treated as a threat and kept as unemotional, distant things, and if they show any humanity, it's because they're predators".
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:48 AM
3

Not sure where you're based, but, this might be of interest: https://www.toughguybookclub.com/ Not a solution, but might be part of it.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 08:26 AM
1

What we're seeing though is an increasing number of men who report having no close friends. Things like: "Only 48% of men reported feeling satisfied with friendships, according to a May 2021 survey by the Survey Center on American Life, as previously reported by CNN. And 1 in 5 men said they had gotten emotional support from a friend in the past week, compared with 4 in 10 women." Then articles like this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/middle-aged-men-experiencing-high-level-loneliness/1…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:59 AM
9

Guy sounds like he needs a hobby and about 20 years of maturity.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 06:04 AM
1

"Men have very close friends, often closer than female/female friendships, but generally fewer." The articles I've read have largely focused on the reduction of 3rd places, reduction in male only spaces etc...with an emphasis on a loss of people men can rely on. Could largely be the areas we're spending time in though (as in, you're seeing one side, I'm seeing another based on our interests and reading).
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:13 AM
4

"The male lonliness epidemic is specifically a romantic lonliness epidemic." Is it? A lot of what I've read is that that is a part of it, but the lack of close friends is a critical component.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:23 AM
1

Yep, basically looking to justify dehumanising so they can comfortably sit back and say that there should be no tolerance for the intolerant.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:27 AM
1

Don't talk to you....yeah....seems balanced... Ah, blocked. Thanks mate, you've just improved my reddit experience.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:54 PM
5

They both sound insufferable. Talk to your partner like and adult and agree on expectations. Not hard.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:53 AM
1

It absolutely is handwaving it away. It provides no guidance, no bounds, no structure. Just a flippant "read our minds, morons".
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:23 AM
2

For one, there's no "article" to read. It's a condescending, aggressive piece of trash that seems to think the only reason a guy might be motivated is to get sex. What an utterly disgusting piece of sexist trash and you wonder why people are pissed off about it. Imagine strawmanning a woman in an article with her going "and if I do this, I'll get even ore of his money?" And if you're referring to this: "Don’t say: “This is exactly why I don’t open up to women.”" how is that a discussion? It's an…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:44 AM
1

Tough Guy Book Club probably have a chapter or two down there as well.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:36 AM
6

And how do they get to read the mind of their partner in knowing exactly what and how much is too much? You know what most guys are going to do? Shut down and think to themselves "I don't want to cross that line and the only way to make sure I don't is to say nothing". Which is exactly what we're seeing.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:23 AM
5

No, it's exactly what they're demanding. Playing stupid is pretending it isn't. A decent relationship has absolutely nothing to do with the man hating bullshit that is this "article" (and I use that term loosely given it seems to have been written by a 12 year old with a short attention span).
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:05 AM
0

"But never be vulnerable to women" Meh, that's an absolute. My wife of 15 years has no issues with it. These kind of blanket statements are no better than the bollocks the idiots in TwoX post.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 12:00 AM
16

Too much time at work, men hanging out demonised for the last 30 years, increased responsibility to be both a full time worker while undertaking 50% of indoor housework plus all the outdoor housework. Any men's groups have pretty much all been shut down and the ones that haven't end up being shared spaces. Meanwhile women's groups continue to be perfectly socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:57 PM
8

Exactly. Just go make sure you've gone to a therapist, discussed it with your friends and then if there's anything left over, that's probably an acceptable amount to share. Preferably when it's all fixed, apparently.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:55 PM
1

If your definition of "in the article" involves everyone here only being able to literally copy and paste what's in the article instead of engaging with it with basic comprehension, sure. But then we don't really need to talk about it, do we.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:07 AM
1

Yeah...that's how interpreting an article and its possible outcome works. Do you also think a Nigerian prince has millions of dollars just for you or do you view what they're saying through a lens of critical thinking based on previous actions and culture?
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:44 AM
2

Yes it does. I read it. Here's the thing. People can extrapolate outcomes from writings and then discuss them. If we're all here to simply copy and paste an article word for word, that's a bit pointless I'd say.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 10:10 AM
1

You're saying people would feel better if they could go out and beat the shit out of someone different to themselves?
/r/MensRights12/06/25 04:06 AM
2

Yes it does, you just don't want to admit it does.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 03:09 AM
5

The article says you're going to have to be very careful about what you say around your GP unless you want to be dragged off by the cops. i.e: Patient: "My wife and I had an argument last night and she left the house" Dr: "Well, sounds like she felt uncomfortable, which is domestic violence, expect a knock on the door. Oh, and here's a pamphlet" This just says "Go in, say nothing except the very specific problem at hand, treat them as a potential but necessary threat and get out ASAP."
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:51 PM
1

What does caloric intake have to do with it? We were talking about a plant based diet being "easily" as protein rich as a meat based one. Look at the amount of protein in plant based foods vs red meat. You need to eat physically more of it because the ratio of protein per 100 grams is so much lower. In 250g of steak I'll get 60g of protein. In 250g of tofu, I'll get 20g of protein. In 250g of broccoli, I'll get 7g of protein. Hemp seeds would give me 30g, but, who is going to eat half a kg of he…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:36 PM
0

There's no projection. The church has zero positive aspects and the more sensible parts of the world realise that. The sooner it fades into the irrelevance such a ridiculous concept deserves the better. That's before we even get to the institutionalised protection of child rapists in your "very great" organisation.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:57 AM
0

IDGAF. What makes the church "very great"? Nothing. It's a pitiful institution full of nothing but deception and hatred.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:43 AM
2

"which can easily be as protein rich as red meat centered ones." LOL.....yeah, if you want to consume absolutely massive quantities of food, I guess you could eventually get close.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 09:29 AM
0

Not entirely true, you just have to be very wealthy and well connected.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 11:30 PM
3

Well I guess that makes the Church "very great" then...
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:09 AM
-2

Given the institution actively protected the offenders and continues to fight against compensation, no.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:54 AM
4

We're in a society where men even gathering together is considered a threat unless women are involved to chaperone them. Hard to fix systemic problems when you're legally prevented from gathering without a representative to make sure you're not getting out of line.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 09:49 AM
17

The same thing is going on in another thread about a grandmother in Australia who killed her two grandsons. Nothing but wall to wall "I feel so sorry for her, she must have been suffering terribly".
/r/MensRights10/05/25 09:45 AM
330

"Women are making more money in urban centres under the age of 30 than men. And by the way, I think that's a wonderful thing. I think that's a sign of victory and [there's] also more women-owned single homes than men. I don't think we should do anything to get in the way of that." Is there even any point reading past here? Inequality against men is something to be celebrated in his opinion. No qualifiers about how much worse it could get before he'd consider it a problem, just: "If women succeed…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:56 PM
1

Lay off the internet. Go talk to people, get involved in groups and above all, view women and men as just people trying to get by.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 12:50 AM
0

How did I get it "reversed". I had 37% vs 45% US to Australia. I wrote 37% first, and US first. Then I wrote 45% second and Australia second. I have no idea what you're even trying to say with the first sentence.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 04:28 AM
-2

"we have super duper high taxes becuase we Pay For our healthcare" 37% vs 45% US to Australia. Not that much different. I'll take our healthcare system over the abomination that is the US any day.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 03:49 AM
6

Apex Fallacy.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 12:16 AM
14

I also love the implication that all the men are busy forcing their wives to become SAHMs and the women meekly go along with it. Aside from one couple I know, all of the women have decided if they want to stay at home or head back to work and the guys are like "I don't mind, I'll happily spend time with my kids"...and the woman (sensibly in my opinion, most people don't find their work fulfilling) chooses to stay at home if financially feasible which means the guy has to go back to work and (bac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 05:18 AM
6

Money isn't an issue for me, it's he fact that my job stability and personal reputation would be entirely in the hands of literal children with nothing to lose through false accusations.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 10:15 PM
1

It absolutely is "men inherently bad".
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:07 AM
1

Their opinion isn't dictating public policy. They're just on the receiving end of being blamed for everything again.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:06 AM
5

Who doesn't want their job security to rely on people without fully formed brains and a reduced ability to manage their emotions in an environment where the worst is already expected of men?
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:38 AM
1

They're required to be admitted.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:28 AM
1

Same generation as you. Same experiences. I've just mentally separated myself from the friendships, more or less. I'll still hang out, talk, send memes etc...but mentally I have put up a bunch of walls. They'll never be close friends in my mind, regardless of what they consider us to be. I've tried to explain it and just get the same responses you've already described.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 09:12 AM
3

"Maybe it setup a social club, or space to talk shit or teach each other skills." That'd be shut down so fast or mandated to have women in it.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 02:34 AM
1

"No one wants men’s diagnoses to take longer" Given the number of claims calling for men to be killed or to die, or to commit suicide at higher rates, I'd say that's at the lower end of what some people would be happy with.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 01:43 AM
23

Victoria. https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/statement-premier-126
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:13 AM
54

Don't forget that in a state in Australia, there's now a department for Men's Behaviour Change.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:07 AM
1

I'm fine in the future if my body is donated and someone decides to do this. I'm dead, I don't need my decaying meat suit to be given any respect. Preferably not waste it though.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:35 AM
1

"They are meant to simply expand the interview pool and to look for unconscious bias within hiring decisions." "Unconscious bias" being code for "never consider hiring a white guy if any other option is available".
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter