Capital_Support_2661 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
61	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it.	Social Issues	Capital_Support_2661	/r/MensRights	19/03/26 06:30 AM
39	Are the rates of men abusing men and women abusing men same? Or I am misunderstanding something?	Marriage/Children	Capital_Support_2661	/r/MensRights	31/12/25 05:34 AM
36	Compiled proof from all available source: VAWG is an useless movement.	Feminism	Capital_Support_2661	/r/MensRights	18/03/26 12:39 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	There's a trend now to sexually harass men, and somehow women are justifying this. It's good actually, these women can throw themselves out of gene pool, once and for all. I hope you all do this more.... Judging by the fact that PASK the largest dv report in world, women abuse more be it men or women.	/r/MensRights	06/04/26 07:41 AM
2	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. So no extra payment arises? Literally my point. That's what I am saying, the wife is not contributing money to buy stuff, which husband is paying and is doing the labour instead which husband shouldn't do. Did you even read what I said? And those minor details are like matchstick supporting a castle they are major flaws. You don't get paid professional like unless your work is as strict as one with liability. Nice back and forth.	/r/MensRights	21/03/26 09:34 AM
1	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. So there's no extra payment? The man is already earning everything and the wife is doing all the chores. Literally my point?	/r/MensRights	21/03/26 09:28 AM
2	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. Your symmetry setup has a hidden assumption you never address. In scenario one both partners split the 5k but that also means both are splitting rent, electricity, gas, groceries, toiletries and every other household cost equally. Each person is funding their own existence plus half the shared costs. The moment one person stays home they stop contributing to any of that. The earning spouse now covers 100% of every bill, every grocery run, every utility, every household expense alone. So in your …	/r/MensRights	21/03/26 04:56 AM
3	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. Tax and pay cuts are not something that person is getting so it's not the labour that is getting paid, learn to understand the post. That 100$ contains many other things like rent, food, groceries, fuel, cosmetics, and other stuff that is already being paid by the husband. Let us deduct that then, we may even get a negative value lol. Correlating two different things(one without flexibility and standard and without tax and most life cost to be already covered) to be same is a gross deformation. …	/r/MensRights	20/03/26 08:17 AM
1	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. I am not talking about divorce in this post, I am taking about the contribution in an ongoing marriage. Where people often feel men are just free and women are contributing disproportionately.	/r/MensRights	20/03/26 05:18 AM
3	The argument that housework is unpaid labor, equivalent to professional services sounds clever on paper but falls apart pretty quickly once you actually sit down and look at it. This doesn't really playout. This implies certain stuff like dinner and say laundry to be again split out. So if the working spouse does have early breaks or the sah spouse does chores late, which means the earning spouse will have to contribute to about 40% of chores while paying 100%. That is not fair. To elaborate, the sah spouse in that window can say only make breakfast and clean, that's it, that will be unreasonable and intentional pushing of responsibility. This setup then demands that we…	/r/MensRights	20/03/26 02:42 AM
1	Bidirectional and Unidirectional Intimate Partner Violence: A Comprehensive Review You’re shifting the discussion from who initiates and intends harm to who ends up more injured, and that’s a category error. Abuse is defined by behavior and intent, not by the physical resilience of the victim. If one group initiates unidirectional domestic violence at twice the rate, that fact doesn’t disappear because the other group is statistically more likely to be injured. By that logic, attempted harm only counts if it succeeds, which is absurd. If someone swings a rod at me with the int…	/r/MensRights	10/01/26 08:10 AM