TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CapnDancyPants Archive

View 9 posts and 266 comments by CapnDancyPants on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's why they do both. AF/BB
/r/TheRedPill14/03/16 06:19 AM
0

Every state has common law marriage. Only a few have their statutory marriage attached to it
/r/TheRedPill14/03/16 02:33 AM
1

Those are not common-law. They are recent statutes....(and no, that doesn't mean anything to do with pedophilia...)
/r/TheRedPill14/03/16 02:31 AM
1

OP Reply: Apparently I'm a zero on that Kinsey (?) spectrum so...this is boner-based only. Yes things like nerdiness and outdoorsiness and honor also turn me on, but this is physical, assuming for the sake of comparison that all else is equal: It's hard for any female who does not exhibit dwarfism, to be too short for me. My current bottom plate is within the tall range of dwarfish potential, but not actually a dwarf. (I'm not even going to try to second-guess offensive potential here. As an ave…
/r/askTRP30/04/15 01:14 AM
1

So apparently I used to write well or something. I don't even remember how that works. Well I'm going to put her up for a bit, I've made my mind up about that. I guess looking for tips for how to cover my ass ultimately.
/r/askTRP27/04/15 02:34 AM
1

Right? This is gonna be a good test for sure. Ever heard of a Jack Mormon? They drink coffee. Jack Baptists play cards, dance, and go to the theater. A Jack Muslim lady likes her sun dresses and her red wine. I know 30 is freaking old. Problem is 95% of chicks age badly. This one will age at least as well as Nichelle Nichols (and we're talking worst case here by all indications) and she does have real wifey skills for sure. So, best course seems crash here and look for a place, if it gets bad sh…
/r/askTRP27/04/15 02:32 AM
1

This 4'10" superhot Colombian coug does not have the physical features of "dwarfism" (is there a "nice" medical term? I want "dwarf" reserved for like "Homo Nanus" or something really). She is far more Sapiens-proportional than Nanus. It's all big hair, big eyes, big thighs/hips. Her waist is even relatively small despite a surgery-only-compromised belly, like myself. It's understood there's no future...the sex is just great for us both. And I've even had a couple virgins. Mother-vagina-muscles …
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 01:00 AM
1

Right? Another forum yeilded this gold: It's like telling someone to stand in a bucket and pull up on the handle
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 12:54 AM
1

Psychological pair-bonding is one. Genetic material deposited in ovaries (may be a thing) is another.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 12:40 AM
1

Oh c'mon, folks can't appreciate a good troll / black-knighting these days. That was fucking gold if I say so myself.
/r/PussyPass24/04/15 11:32 PM
1

OIC. By "from" he meant "lives in" as opposed to born or raised. I've been seeing that usage of "from" a lot and it's weirding me out lately.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 11:31 PM
2

My female coworker one early morning there was nobody else in, and a weird noise near the entrance: "But what if it IS someone?" Me: "It better not be!"
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 06:51 PM
1

Half the sexual positions that PUAs enjoy would be banned under a rightist regime. I really don't get why TRP needs a love affair for either mainstream party here.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/15 05:29 PM
2

Honestly the more partners I get and the more frequently they come and the sooner they enter the continual orgasm stage...the more I care about low count for LTRs. I used to take your perspective, but with more experience I can totally see that the sluttier she has been, the sluttier she is.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/15 08:21 PM
0

So much hate. No explanation. I do know enough not born lesbians who hate men's guts (you can still fuck these almost surely if you do it right), and even a few who don't. Actual born lesbians are rare as hell and every femme look with a dike attitude is trying to pretend this.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 12:06 AM
0

I would like to be financially wealthy and powerful one day along with sleeping with many women. Jaysus! All I want is to own a home, raise my own family (good wife and our kids), travel regularly, and retire. If I can make the world a better place somehow, even better, but "powerful", fuck it. The only reason I want to sleep with many women is so my future wife doesn't feel "cheated" (heh) Anyway I dunno if I count as "many" yet, haven't been in much of a hurry for that. Honestly my main reason…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:53 PM
-4

Thing is my 9s and 10s are pop culture's 7s and 8s, and vice-versa for me...not so much now as in the '90s but still mostly. Thigh gaps turn me off. A WRH of 6 is not freakish to me. The thing on a lady's body that turns me on the most is if her thigh flares out wider below her hip than right at her hip. Big boobs are meh, I'd rather have smallish (but there) to medium and nicely-shaped. Big hair is better than smooth hair. 4'10" is not too short, but 4'8" is getting there. 5'5" is getting tall …
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:42 PM
9

Catch? Don't you mean the kind of catch that is good? Like the fish kind?
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:32 PM
0

Yeah. I had actually finished it before I even registered the indignation. I was just being a dick about "stopped there". It was pretty good. It's just that bootstraps shit has got to be the most annoying and irritating thing in the entire world. It's like "let them eat cake" kind of bullshit. What, do rich folks have magic bootstraps that make them float when they tug up on them against their feet? Like what the fuck? That's like saying "go stick your head up your ass". Oh, I'm supposed to take…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:27 PM
0

As a man, I have always differentiated "I love you" from "I am in love with you" and I make this clear to ladies from the start. Still probably want to Also, I hate "I love you too," especially the first time you hear it from the other! I prefer something like "I know", "sweeet", "right?" etc. then I'll bust it out to her when I'm good and ready. By then she's usually in on the whole game so it makes it all more fun, too!
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:25 PM
-3

Soldiers are not good men. The people who shoot at them are. Soldiers are invaders. They love to tell me how they loathe civilians and would not defend us if we were invaded. Honestly I never expected them to. I expect them to impose martial law door to door like in boston and nola.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 06:03 PM
1

Lesbians call a chick a "gold star" if she has never been with a man. It's like their top catch.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 12:15 AM
1

Translation: If you are not more narcissistic than most women, then you must not be a real man.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 01:42 AM
0

God I fucking hate "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" . Seriously fuck off. Most condescending shit ever. Stopped reading there.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 02:05 PM
13

The confidence of my voice is a product of how little I care whether they believe me, times how believable I think they will find it.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 05:03 PM
19

It's certainly more fun to BE confident, but I loathe confident people just because most folks are wrong about most shit most of the time, and any idiot can observe this.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 04:59 PM
-12

I don't know many born lesbians that hate men. Of course most lesbians aren't born so there ya go
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 04:55 PM
1

One of my favorite bumper stickers is "my girlfriend's husband fights for your freedom"
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 07:04 AM
1

You must be thinking North American Hispanic or something bro...
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 01:31 AM
1

Can I get a cheer for a lower-mid-20s BMI or what?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 01:28 AM
1

Have you seen a hot fat woman before? I mean this is the kind that would be unreal if she were in shape, but in any case, she still has a waist and a pretty face. Know what I'm talking about? Definitely not ugly nor a hambeast, except the obesity is a health concern and a turnoff for that reason. Maybe the distinction of morbid obesity is the point at which the maintenance of a figure and the obviousness of a pretty face would become unapparent?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 01:26 AM
1

Or if you just like their genes. But wait. No. Yeah long term isn't good so you totally shouldn't fuck nor even approach long-term beauties. Just...leave 'em to me.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 01:24 AM
1

Minister? Royal? Sure you don't mean province, not state? Also trp needs to be a secret as long as possible or else it'd just be these three killing each other for each others wives in mating duels
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 09:51 PM
2

ry the reverse, i.e. answer shit-tests in ways that won't encourage her to keep bombarding you with more. Can you please be more specific? Most folks equate this with a butthurt outcome dependence, on these fora, if you mean what it sounds like you mean.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 09:23 PM
10

Female salesmen are horrible...they use emotional words to try to sell me a fucking computer and when I ask the numbers they don't even KNOW
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 06:32 PM
2

What if betas aren't real people and never were? Except briefly considered so between slavery abolition and feminism? And what if that was erroneous?
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 05:00 PM
27

It's just noise they make. All this makes you wonder what isn't.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 04:04 AM
2

How is it that foreign women are not horrible? I never really thought of USA women as horrible but we never clicked in relationships; they were always foreign. Here I thought it was just me!
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 04:03 AM
2

Re: Atypical SMV I like my girls shorter, darker and plumper (except tits are unimportant to me, long as not male-verging tiny, hanging all over ginormous, nor crazy deformed) than the styles 15 years ago but now...everyone's all up in my taste. Not sure if my personal 10 would still be called an 8 or even a 7 like 15 years ago!
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 03:56 AM
-3

Nothing is more alpha than calling yourself alpha...
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 03:51 AM
5

If she's attracted, skip dinner and take her straight to your place. Hunger can present a practical problem for both of you. Probably wise to eat before dates for a few reasons, then.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 03:48 AM
0

Just because I am a woman does it give me the power to ruin a family and a man? Yes. Yes it does. He is not a real man, cannot be a father and does not deserve to be a husband, if he can't be the one always giving his wife tingles to the exclusion of all other men. Beta must perish. Edit: Weak and inadequate males must perish from the gene pool, but extract all the labor you can from them first! At least, this is how I understand the motives of feminism. And frankly commoner men have always been…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 03:25 AM
-2

Feminists and MRAs are angry people, because they have this expectation of "equality" (as either movement defines it) being a universal standard you can hold everyone to, or else.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:49 AM
0

but for the sake of self preservation and all these rape accusations you have some girls capable of pulling off I didn't think I was 'drunk' enough to take advantage of this. Not wise to reject a drunk chick either for the exact same reason.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 11:29 PM
2

You don't discover a real social development disorder and call it ass burgers....that's just cruel.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 09:58 PM
1

Not even Saudis belueve their laws are based on hate. Misogyny is an accusation against someone's motives, not their acts.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:59 PM
-6

Unclarified acronym = downvote. And fuck you.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:41 PM
-2

The bootstraps analogy is really condescending.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:08 PM
2

Girls have curves confused with rolls, both ways...
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:00 PM
4

He's probably talking about that special kind of oneitis that's worse than fucking a lumpy hambeast.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 01:36 AM
1

or heart Heart, heart! Don't let me start! It's every critter's most scrumptious part! So next time you cut one apart, don't forget to have a heart!
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 01:33 AM
1

Women lack the capacity to be amical or inimical.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 12:25 AM
3

God I fucking hate unclarified acronyms. Downvote.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 12:20 AM
1

Boys and men deserve what they get. Fact is we are pussies who put up with the feminization of society. When the white knights come and cage us at gunpoint we deserve it for not taking them for the sake of liberty or death.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 12:15 AM
0

Where is it okay to hit a woman back who is not yours (wife, daughter, etc.)?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 09:43 PM
22

It's not about your actions. It's about her feelings.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 08:38 PM
7

Buying a meal for a fwb or ltr has always gone well for me...but before regular sex it always broke the deal! You can have sex before dinner or not at all, apparently.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 12:16 AM
1

Yeah. Most men are low value. Therefore rape. You don't define rules by their exceptions. That's why we live by AWALT
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 12:11 AM
-2

Women are not accountable beings. This is the entire reason for patriarchy. Nobody will defend ray rice, especially not feminists.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 09:50 PM
28

It's code to mean he is fuckable and her peers will not blame her.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 09:00 PM
0

But stating your intentions initially is rape according to modern western women.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 08:58 PM
1

Females went for feminism to free up this kind of monster. I say fuck em. Let women fend for themselves. I probably would have called her a slut and left her and told her to fuck the big amog.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 08:24 PM
1

That's all female frienfs are to one another is tools so...yeah.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:36 PM
1

Of course they're terrified. It might equalize their hypergamy prospects.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 06:54 AM
1

Yeah, gun violence is a problem in the USA where the things are banned, not so much where allowed.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 06:53 AM
1

Lots of things are wrong to point a gun at someone for...but just having his own? The enforcement of a gun ban would be less hypocritical if enforced with blades and bows...still violent though.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 06:48 AM
1

Wasn't fair to arrest her. She's just a woman. They are like kids is all.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 08:04 PM
1

And whoever slapped their wrists is a woman beater. Females have no agency, patriarchs and feminists agree. Expecting agency of a woman is as fair as expecting breast milk from a man.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:59 PM
1

If a lady stabs a man he deserves to die because she wanted him to and the female hivemind rejects permanently. Letting an unfuckable male live is cruel. We used to have mating duels for this reason.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:56 PM
1

And they have proven themselves correct. Women have no agency. They are just women. It's life. Get over it and man up.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:49 PM
1

Yes she was a victim. She is just a woman. Women have no accountability. I thought third wave feminism had settled this after coming full circle.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:48 PM
1

Yes it is fine for women to hit men. Yes it is fine for children to hit men. No it is not right to hit either back. They are JUST women! They are JUST children!
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:46 PM
1

Because women and men ARE NOT EQUAL and feminists agree in practice.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:39 PM
1

Yeah I expect her to do the constant cleaning and I am happy to do the heavy and hard chores.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:37 PM
3

Women are not accountable beings as we men understand the concept. If they accuse you of rape they are just letting other women know you are unfuckable. It's a status thing. Also all your past consensual sex becomes rape because your status collapses and your past partners' consent was based on their thinking your status was higher.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:32 PM
-1

Only men are accountable beings. You bet this is his fault for not controlling the women in his care. Is he man of the house or not? If he is too weak tocontrol her without being arrested he deserves a quick weak mans death...caging is cruel.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:26 PM
-9

Any man who is hit by a woman deserves to die for being a worthless beta pussy.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:23 PM
1

Frankly anyone dumb enough to invade a foreign country deserves shot dead. I would shoot at invaders and I assume the military would side against the people, and with the invaders.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:21 PM
4

Wtf is a licorn?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 05:38 PM
1

But is it even fair to women, to impose self accountability onto them? Do they really have a reasomable expectation of agency? It's not even okay to slap a woman over things you could kill a man for. Sure say it should be, but in practice nobody defends a guy in such an actual situation.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 05:18 PM
1

Oh god go watch a romcom already
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 11:09 PM
2

Females have no accountability amd feminists agree that it's wrong to hold them accountable.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 10:51 PM
2

Females have no accountability amd feminists agree that it's wrong to hold them accountable.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 10:51 PM
4

Males are all expected to be breadwinners. Here it is taboo to say so but you will be raising your wife's boss's kids.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 08:33 PM
1

Towards otger males is fine. Just not towards females you want to bed.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 08:29 PM
2

Women are not accountable to their violent acts. It's not just to use violence against women. This is something feminists agree on. So equality is not feasible, and something has to give.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 08:09 PM
1

That's the whole point. I'm sick of pickup. I don't want to date anyone I'm not already into at this point in my life. Not sure that's possible though.
/r/seduction30/07/14 02:22 PM
1

The context is the difference between being in love and loving. It's the sentence right before. Context is immediate, not light-years away.
/r/seduction30/07/14 02:21 PM
2

That ellipsis is like ten miles long, bro. It's like if you say, "I loathe people who say that Reddit is stupid!" and I quote you as saying "Reddit is stupid".
/r/seduction29/07/14 11:11 PM
1

I've never fallen in love with anyone I've successfully seduced, though. It's like I have to block that part of me, not from her, but from myself. And once it's blocked, it's off for good. It's like meditating through that initial urge to ejaculate prematurely, then it's impossible to later when you want to. I just don't see the point in making the effort to seduce someone I'm not already really into at this point. I've gotten more than my share of hot wet pussy and it was great but, it's enough…
/r/seduction29/07/14 11:08 PM
1

Let's say the above situation has happened to me before (I forgot to mention my crush on her was not a secret), and it was a useful example to answer the mod's question. However, this one is thoroughly alienated and anything I learn will not be applicable to her. That's not the first time something similar has happened to me, but it was the first time in many years -- I'd thought I'd gone immune to it. In any case, it was not the first time, but I would like it to be the last.
/r/seduction29/07/14 11:05 PM
1

I've been having way more sex at 30 than 20. Still a moron if I really want to be with someone for who she is, but great at getting laid meaninglessly.
/r/seduction29/07/14 02:03 PM
1

That's what I gather; that seduction and love are mutually exclusive. I see no point to either, then.
/r/seduction29/07/14 02:02 PM
0

Eeeeeew you're gross.
/r/seduction29/07/14 02:02 PM
2

This is not about one woman, but let's say hypothetically she's my college crush since 8 years ago and we've been close friends over a distance and she's soon moving near me.
/r/seduction29/07/14 02:01 PM
0

That would be a different type from mine...
/r/seduction29/05/14 12:44 AM
-1

I don't have to myself, just seems like they deserve better than to have no idea.
/r/seduction29/05/14 12:43 AM
-5

I never said anything about bringing it up. And my question was not how NOT to convey. I've been doing that just fine for decades, and chicks are missing out.
/r/seduction28/05/14 08:13 PM
-4

I never said anything about bringing it up. And my question was not how NOT to convey. I've been doing that just fine for decades, and chicks are missing out. She'll never be surprised if she is convinced of the opposite. She just won't bother
/r/seduction28/05/14 08:12 PM
-3

I never said anything about bringing it up. And my question was not how NOT to convey. I've been doing that just fine for decades, and chicks are missing out.
/r/seduction28/05/14 08:12 PM
-4

I never said anything about bringing it up. And my question was not how NOT to convey. I've been doing that just fine for decades, and chicks are missing out.
/r/seduction28/05/14 08:11 PM
-4

Downvote to everyone who didn't read my paragraph. For two reasons. I never said anything about bringing it up, and was specific about saying nothing about it until it came up. Also, my question was how TO convey this. Not "how NOT to convey", which is what I've been doing for thirty years. Y'all are like the chick who tells me to "be myself" and wait for her to come to me. This is serious. All the pinprick hung premature ejaculating guys are always compensating for it and getting all these chic…
/r/seduction28/05/14 08:09 PM
1

He still thinks blatant shit tests are earnest, for example. He doesn't know when to disregard the substance of what a woman says, and focus instead on why s he might be saying it. He takes it literally and lets it fluster him and fails her screening method. He thinks their minds work like ours, basically.
/r/seduction07/03/14 01:12 AM
2

I have found zero reason to believe that feminism is anything but a shit test. That is, a lie designed to snare those weak enough to buy it, and to select those strong enough to disregard it.
/r/MGTOW14/02/14 05:50 AM
-6

This is why I don't think women can have equal status under the law. UNLESS they will concede that they have agency and accountability, and that their emotions are not the responsibility of the men around them. But I've never gotten one to concede that in a particular situation. Only in general, and that doesn't count.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:41 AM
-3

No, he said "no punishment for the girl", so he's obviously a troll.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 03:02 AM
0

Why would they want us to be guilty? The nearest I can figure is, it's a shit test. Consciously or not, they are taking a course of action that is most likely to cause the guilty guys to voluntarily remove themselves from the gene pool, and make babies only with the bolder and rapier men. Which turns from a ridiculable fringe hypothesis originated in geeky guys trying to learn how to get laid, to a very scary possibility, when the capacity for shit-testing enters the realm of law...
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:03 AM
1

Here's more copypasta I wrote to someone here, but I just want to see what you think about it in general: I don't think [most women and/or feminists] understand the degree to which most normal boys get educated about rape. We literally get taught that being a rapist is the worst thing in the world. Worse than being a mass-murderer. Worse than being dead. It is within that frame of reference that this casual throwing-around of the word "rapist" to range from guys who didn't stop every fifteen sec…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:00 AM
1

I don't think you understand the degree to which most normal boys get educated about rape. We literally get taught that being a rapist is the worst thing in the world. Worse than being a mass-murderer. Worse than being dead. It is within that frame of reference that this casual throwing-around of the word "rapist" to range from guys who didn't stop every fifteen seconds during sex to ask if she was comfortable, to just anyone with a penis, really affects us. As does any general complaint about r…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:57 AM
0

want to make a bet on how quickly my post gets banned from /r/askfeminists ? I don't think most feminists understand how grave most boys get taught about rape. We literally learn that being a rapist is the worst thing to be. Worse than being dead. Then we get told we are rapists because we don't stop every fifteen seconds during sex and ask, "Are you comfortable?" at best, or just because we have a penis at worst. It's like feminists are literally telling non-rapey guys to go die. And you'll say…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:46 AM
-1

Because I feel like a rapist when I'm told over and over again that I am one, and the only thing I can do to resist it and keep my sanity is be logical about it and not emotional. Because if I drop logic and embrace emotion, I'm already a rapist. There is no absence of teaching men to "not rape". Most men grow up thinking a rapist is the worst thing one can be. Worse than being dead. And that's how I feel. I know I'm not one, but I feel like one, because emotion is not logical. And I'm also awar…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:37 AM
0

Yeah I pretty much don't talk to women, since asking one out to dinner is technically harassment if she says "no" after the fact... (I was getting a lot of sexual attention at one point by being a complete dick, but it made me die a little inside, also the crazy bitches are crazy for sure and they will say anything at all to try and see a fight go down...)
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:33 AM
1

Because it's automatically a man's fault when someone gets raped. Even if it was a woman tying a man up against his will and sodomizing him with a broomhandle; near as I can tell it was still culturally and often legally the man's fault.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:32 AM
-1

Sounds pretty common sense, but sometimes the "don't let" can border on abduction, and you have to let drunk people go that want to go.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:29 AM
0

Even if they weren't your ancestors. Just some white-looking folks is all it takes.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:29 AM
-1

I suspect they are trying to imply that, yes.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:28 AM
0

I used to be the kind of guy where a strange woman could tell me a strange man raped her and I'd want to kill him without knowing anything else about either one.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:28 AM
-1

she's also welcome to hypothesize about other women in general, but...I want to know what you want me to do. and what she does. and what she does. and until I get a good answer, I'm going to assume the one that people will hate me for, because so far it makes the most sense.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:25 AM
-1

It's also why I said "seem to tend". I mean I wasn't going to pause the whole thought for an hour just to word it perfectly for every possible interpretation that wants to feel offended. I thought I'd throw in a few qualifiers to make room for exceptions just for those who didn't want to feel offended ;)
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:24 AM
-1

I'm not asking what women want. I'm asking each woman what she wants. That is the only thing she could ever be expected to answer, right?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:20 AM
2

The original piece was written to a lady who had been operating under the apparent assumption (by context) that only men raped and only women got raped. That's why I mentioned male rapists at all.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:18 AM
0

More copypasta from same debate elsewhere, toward the end. The lady was actually getting me. Respect! But for rape, in general, I'd like to see it treated like any other crime, which it's largely not, going both ways: those raped often get not taken seriously, and people get sentenced for rape based on bullshit ranging from nitpickiness to utter fraud. I want to see due process on both ends is all, and I want to be able to give my advice as I would to prevent any other crime! If you won't let me…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:47 AM
1

Yeah, I can see how "like this" could go anywhere, but yeah, Celda has the tendency. I'm not trying to attack you personally, but I feel ya there, because I do kinda feel the same as a male just in general as per my post. Thanks for the reference, I'll check it out tomorrow!
/r/MensRights22/10/13 05:45 AM
1

Admissions of guilt don't go far with me in this system. In a more ideal one they would be useful, but confessions are coerced so often that it's not even worth trying to pretend they mean anything at all.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:50 AM
1

Then there would be no barrier between the government and the people. That is, after all, what a jury is supposed to accomplish.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:48 PM
1

Spend the next three generations writing our Congressmen. Maybe the third generation of them will care. (Couldn't resist the passive voice there)
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:47 PM
1

and they eliminate all critical thinkers. It would be better to have universal random lotteries. (I'm pretty sure I've never gotten a jury notice because of my political perspectives!)
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:46 PM
1

Just remember to take him with a grain of salt: remember who signs his paycheck!
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:45 PM
-1

Presume guilt much? I know feminists do all the time, but are we just going to be anti-bizarro-feminists or what?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:37 PM
1

I get the feeling that, because you're smart too, you don't want to go into it for the exact same reasons I once also didn't: because it's late, and you can't explain why. So I'm replying for when you come back awake, and likewise unable, just as I was. Now, I'm really distinguishing classes here. If you have a citizen's arrest that anyone can carry out under the same circumstances, and there just happens to be demand for someone to work full-time keeping an eye out for situations that warrant s…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:28 AM
1

I miss the time when citizen's arrest was the ONLY arrest.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:54 AM
1

I didn't really mean the eyes of the law, but yeah, good answer. I didn't mean any need for the rapist to be underage, but that's a good comparison too. If there were no police to report to, and you knew where he lived, would you do something about it?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:42 PM
1

A revolver is actually very easy to tell when not cocked, but I don't get your reply. The two paragraphs seem at odds with one another.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:34 PM
1

So then, what if, instead, the girls had been overage, but these people whom you knew, had forced them to have sex? Thanks for the compliments; have upvotes =P
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:56 AM
1

Right, but, for example, as far as I understand Montana statutes at least, and what I also understand to be common in most states, is that guns are legally considered lethal to the point where unlawfully carrying or brandishing a loaded gun is legally equal to unlawfully carrying or brandishing an unloaded gun.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:43 AM
1

I was always taught to respect people's right to an opinion, but that cultural maxim fails to recognize that once cast as a vote, it ceases to be an opinion and becomes an act. Therefore, if I vote to send masked gunmen into gay people's bedrooms at 3am to drag them off to a cage, it's no different than if I'd hired a hitman to do the same: I'm just as guilty as the hitman, except much more cowardly. So, if the age-limit rule isn't your business, how is it a cop's business, or a judge's business…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:00 PM
1

Where in the United States is a gun EVER considered nonlethal force? Even when used non-lethally? Even when not fired? Even when not aimed? Hell, I'm not even sure you can lift your shirt and show the handle without that being equivalent to killing someone with it.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:58 PM
1

Where are you that the law favors non-lethal use of a gun more than lethal use?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:56 AM
3

Someone or another gets struck by lightning all the time, too, but that doesn't mean it's likely to happen to anyone in particular. I've really come to the conclusion that anyone who advocates a political viewpoint as merely a wishful projection of one's ideal protocol onto the rest of the universe, and not as a willingness to personally initiate violence against someone, is even more of a spoiled, idiotic coward than myself. (Whatever may be my own levels in those categories.) That said: I see …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:53 PM
3

Or is it "teenage man has sex with teenage girl, it is rape because she's female"? Or "married couple gets drunk and has sex together, which means he raped her"?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:47 AM
2

This is true regardless of gender. If you define a relationship based on what you don't do with other people, then you need to do it with each other, or there's no difference. Monogamy is never celibacy!
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:35 PM
1

It's not nearly as socially acceptable, but I'd rather see both sexes equally left alone for this kind of thing than equally punished. Once every murder, forcible rape, robbery, pre-pubescent pederasty, and all other unquestionably nasty crimes are solved and eliminated, THEN we can get nitpicky about personal taste, like banning violent video games and psychedelic drugs and sex with biological adults whose age isn't yet a certain number. Also, 16 is the age of consent in my state. Myself, I'm s…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:27 AM
-5

It's this kind of comment that equates all men with rapists. If we're all rapists, why should we even bother trying not to be?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:42 AM
1

Misandry: hatred of men. Nobody has a right not to be hated. Only to be treated equally before the law.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:30 PM
-17

This is not an infringement of any man's rights. Next.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:43 AM
-1

I was an exception to this, and women thought I was a sissy for it and fucked all the promiscuous guys. No need to downvote this guy for presenting biology. Of course there are exceptions. Still is a tendency though.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:42 AM
2

Obviously, if you want a relationship, you must not be a real man.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:39 AM
6

Never apologize for your gender. That's kind of the central point of this sub's entire message. But I'm glad you realized the truth about feminism.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:43 PM
0

Cops often use tasers as a compliance tool rather than as the originally-intended alternative to lethal force. But, again, that's just a side note. My main point remains that their job involves initiating threats, violence and fraud against people who have not initiated threat, violence or fraud against anyone else, but who may (or may not even) have simply engaged in some harmless act contradicted by legislative paper. I mean, hell, that job often involves breaking into the houses of such peopl…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:33 PM
0

crossed the line antagonize them start to question It's this elitist mentality that's part of the problem. Crossing some arbitrary line, calling someone names, or my very favorite, "questioning" them, are not examples of things that any sane, non-sociopathic human being would consider grounds for physical retaliation. But cops will electrocute you over even less. I'm sure there are people who have done far more aggressive things to cops, and I'm sure there are some cops who try to do everything …
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:08 PM
1

Because all the nitpicky bullshit cops live to threaten people over amounts to picking a fight with them. Got it.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:05 AM
6

that's before dealing with all the criminal activity that they need to deal with You said it. Their priorities are seriously fucked up if they're threatening anyone for simply owning anything while a single murder, rape, or theft goes unsolved. And by this point, everyone who joins the police force knows full well that this is what they're getting into, so absolutely no excuses.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:54 AM
1

So, Hollywood. Seeing how the Wild West archetype is entirely a pop culture legend. Seriously: do you think you were more likely to be shot in Tombstone, Arizona in 1883, or Baltimore, Maryland in 1998? I distrust LEOs as a rule (with the exception of proven individuals and park rangers in general) because they make a living picking fights with peaceful people. Pointing guns at folks and dragging them off to the rape cage because of an unpopular plant or machine in their pocket. Upvote for admit…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:55 AM
1

understandable =)
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:49 AM
1

Also thank you for being SO helpful, jvardrake.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:25 PM
1

Well, my master's is in general linguistics, and my experience is diverse but sporadic given my trouble in finding work in general...
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:25 PM
1

Half of $5,400 = $2,700
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:18 PM
2

Holy shit, I'd be ecstatic to make half that for full time work, with a master's degree, three fluent languages, and really diverse technology and leadership experience.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:10 AM
0

There are actual LAWS discriminating against men, and we're bitching about THIS? At least feminists bitch about this kind of thing because they don't have anything else to bitch about, but seriously.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:01 PM
0

Wouldn't be the first time.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:12 AM
0

Hell, she might finger you as her rapist because you got involved. It wouldn't be the first time.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:12 AM
2

Not sure if Poe...[insert squinting Fry face]
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:18 PM
-2

A woman obviously can't rape a man. Rape is a man-on-woman crime. Duh! A man can be penetrated or made to penetrate without consent. But it's nowhere near as heinous as rape. Which is any sex a woman regrets. Or even non-sex, if the accusation is convenient for her for any other reason.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:05 PM
4

It's about plausible deniability. Women have to be able to pretend they were never interested in you, should they change their mind at any point.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:43 PM
3

Not sure if Poe...
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:40 PM
3

This is exactly what a feminist is. While I'm aware the people who identify with it comprise a wide spectrum of views, there is absolutely nothing about the term "feminism" to suggest anything short of a female supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:05 AM
1

no reasonable person supports this Are you kidding? Everyone who supports the idea of prison supports this, because it does happen, but even more, because they expect it to happen. "Pound-me-in-the-ass prison" is already a cliche phrase. Why? Because when a woman fabricates an accusation of rape in order to cover her social status, her word is sacred -- but when a man gets raped in prison, for ten thousand consecutive nights, it's hilarious.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:13 AM
2

All you stop by presuming guilt upon accusation is the less outgoing males from asking women out and trying to make moves. The ones unscrupulous enough to rape will be unaffected. You don't stop a rapist after the fact, you can only punish him...or stop him before the fact, for which I recommend going somehow armed (after getting trained appropriately), as I'd recommend to anyone worried about becoming a victim of any other crime.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:07 AM
2

And if it were enough, then it would be far better that way, where anyone could accuse with complete impunity, and on a word send anyone to a cage where they can expect to be raped nightly throughout their years-long stay.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:10 AM
1

And you should get some damages to cover your legal fees, losses, etc. while you search for another job. And documentation of your wrongful termination so you can find one. I have to say you have balls, though. I'm afraid to even talk to children in this pedophilia-hysterical period of history.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:52 PM
2

Limp size doesn't mean a lot, apparently...but right about the body hair. Guess they predicted the current depilatory fad? (Creepy as hell when you consider the current pedophilia hysteria though) But apparently there's enough information there to show our average size, what our solar system looks like, and what planet we come from. So that's about like a phone number. Anyway, what I meant was I generally prefer the medical-textbook physique to the pop culture model/magazine physique.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:20 AM
1

Latin is fun and useful!
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:16 AM
1

Dude, looking at a woman is rape if she feels creeped out by it. You realize that means she'd just as soon be held down and forced into sex as looked at? What kind of a sick fuck thinks like that? Seriously to hell with all of them!
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:15 AM
2

Hehehe I'm more into the geeky girl who doesn't know she's gorgeous by my taste (my ideal body type can be found on the Pioneer Plaque: both for myself and for my mate).
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:34 AM
2

Oh yeah, remember that Advice Mallard about not understanding women? Yeah. Too late. Now I don't hit on them anymore as a rule (sometimes spontaneously as an exception) because, basically, fuck them.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:27 AM
1

I used to expect women to be like your girlfriend. As I get older, I consider the woman who exhibits agency to be a rarity and a gem.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:19 AM
8

Yes, we do. That's my back eye last weekend. Women attacked a guy for who knows what "reason", my experience with them suggests it was just to get their boyfriends to attack him so they could get off about it later that night. Anyway they end up brawling on my car, I freak out since it's my only car, tell them to leave, they don't, I push the most active brawlers off it, most of them leave because i"m telling them to go fight elsewhere. Insane woman gets in my face and refuses to leave, leans on…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:15 PM
16

OP: Some example passages for those of us who don't read romance novels, please? Now for the rant: They want any of the 80% of unfit-to-reproduce males to be executed by Big Daddy Alpha Government the second they feel creeped out because he looked at her. Then they want to be swept off their feet and ravished by the remaining 20% of alpha males. Except they don't want to share him. So when one of the other four-to-one ladies gets on her alpha, she wants to divorce him and keep all his assets and…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:10 PM
4

Like he wants his job back in that environment...
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:51 PM
0

Such varieties are only understood internally. When you hear "Christian", do you envision your friendly local bake sale, or WBC and Catholic pedophilia? Thought so.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:20 PM
0

THANK you. JFC, who do I have to objectify to get a fucking link around here?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:13 PM
1

Any poorly-presented argument with which I happen to agree, makes me suspect trolls.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:10 PM
2

Getting up to saying "we should break up" is the bare minimum we demand of women in abusive relationships. If we're going to tell them GTFO NOW, we have to be able to do the same ourselves. I'm glad you finally did, as it's better than the alternative, but really. How frustrated do you think any of the good sympathetic women on this sub feel to see you take that for months and months?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:01 PM
2

Any of the comments here are by folks who could write a petition better than the one linked to here. I'm not going to sign a petition I agree with if it looks like it was composed by a sixth-grader.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:58 PM
1

Damn you, you cracked me up =D
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:17 PM
1

thank you!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:49 PM
1

apple-orange it in flobbityfloop? =\
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:48 PM
1

Have you been to the one on /r/India? I can't find it...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:16 PM
1

Where's the post on /r/India? My search queries haven't found it.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:16 PM
1

I can't find the India post. Link?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:15 PM
1

I disagree. Crazy doesn't have any setting between off and high, in bed. If you like to start slow and work up steadily, you need "genius", which is the best combination of sanity and craziness =)
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:50 PM
2

Instinctively they tell you what they don't want* in completely unreasonable terms (e.g. "buy me a drink", "let's take this shortcut", "are we really watching this movie?" [after having planned it with another friend for the past 6 hours], "These brand new curtains I picked out aren't right, buy me new ones", "asking me out is oppressive", "all sex is rape"), all the while hoping deep down that you won't give in to it. It's not always about violence or rape. Those are just the very worst ones. *…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:47 PM
3

Ha, love it! But seriously, what's so hard to understand about a biological propensity toward manipulative testing of the more aggressive sex's strength? Fuck a wimp, a strong guy comes and kills him, your kids die, you're less fertile by then...I mean, we've only had respectable Equalizer technology for a century or so.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:15 PM
3

It's just a mechanism to test the strength of your will. How can she trust you to protect her if you can't even stand up to her?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:22 AM
-4

It certainly does serve to rationalize the output of shit-tests a code of conduct that is ever changing into a focused beam of hate
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:04 AM
2

I'm sure there are elements of hate and shit-test combined in the movement. But one is conscious, the other is subconscious.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:59 AM
4

Greetings, fellow Reddit Captain! =D No, shit tests are widely believed to be completely subconscious mechanisms, for the most part. No strategy required.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:57 AM
3

When I was 8, I thought insemination was carried out by urinating inside a woman's anus (ISYN). Because pee and butts were all I knew at that age. My point is only that when your brain is viscerally attracted to something with boobs and thighs and hips, you're not a pedophile just because of some number that is completely unknown to you.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:55 AM
-11

I don't know if it's anti-male/hate. It's just an embodiment of the ancient reality that men are worthless until they prove themselves stronger than 80% of other men. I'd call it more of a shit-test than a hate movement. They're trying to weed out the weak men who will stop initiating sex, and therefore stop passing on their genes, because they are afraid of being called rapists.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:09 AM
8

I thought that before, too. I've concluded that feminism is a shit-test: it makes the sensitive and accommodating (read: weak) males afraid to initiate sex, so that only the strong and dominating males will pass on their genes. I mean, if all men are rapists, then it follows that if you're not a rapist, you must not be a real man, right? It's too bad that my genes won't be getting passed on, as this discovery has led me to be viscerally repelled by my understanding of female sexual psychology.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:06 AM
1

The Non-Aggression Principle is incompatible with socialism (and every non-libertarian belief system, as libertarianism is defined by the NAP). Deciding who can (supposedly) justly initiate violence against whom, requires some degree of active prejudicial discrimination, i.e. bigotry. Of course, most people's thought systems are not internally consistent, so they will have some libertarian viewpoints, and some socialist viewpoints. Hell, that's why we have this bullshit right/left paradigm in th…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:02 AM
1

The reciprocal of "masculinist" would be "femininist"...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:57 AM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:44 AM
2

True, they might lack any number of mental faculties, but the fact that they are no longer a biological child remains. And there is no shortage of adults who lack mental faculties necessary to make good decisions, either. My main intent was to point out how ridiculous it is to equate adolescents to young children. It's at least natural to feel sexually attracted to a sexually mature member of your species (if perhaps unwise to start a sexual relationship with someone stupid/crazy/immature, which…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:17 AM
6

^ Citation Needed. Seriously, I know some feminists I want to quiz on this one.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:10 AM
0

the line has to be drawn somewhere to prevent people with authority and seniority from taking advantage of the younger and naive. biological adolescence is hard to fake. Once you can produce a baby you're no longer a "child". At the very least, the term "pedophile" is far too frequently misapplied to an 18-year-old dating a 17-year-old. Edit: also the "authority and seniority taking advantage" bit happens far too often under this absurd statutory framework. I know a man who spent 3 years in pris…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:00 AM
2

This is part of why I love foreign women...
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:22 AM
1

Yeah, though we're slowly headed the other way, apparently...
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:54 AM
1

Luckily, prosecutors aren't the ones who need convincing anyway. Even if I had hit them back, which I did not (mainly because the guy was hiding behind his girlfriend, I confess -- but I didn't), this is not a duty-to-retreat state. People don't have the right to assault other people here, like the de-facto right they have in New Jersey (at least until the cops arrive if they do). People have to be willing to face consequences for assaulting others here. That includes getting hit back, getting m…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:26 AM
1

I'd be willing to freak out about this when there are no other cases far more clearcut than this. I'd certainly prefer that it were consistent between the genders, though.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:21 AM
1

I don't believe telling someone to get away and leave you alone is "consent".
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:50 AM
1

Oh, that kind of "attack". Not the kind of attack that invokes the right to self defense.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:55 PM
1

I thought the big deal here was about laughing and snapping a picture of an unfortunate coincidence.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:53 PM
0

And "harsh words"? What country do you live in? "Fighting words" statutes don't hold in any court here unless they involve a clear threat, and that is, of course, a threat. Calling someone an asshole isn't a threat.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:20 PM
1

If you can prove the animal was trained to do that, that would change everything. I'm not convinced, but that's not what's important. The important thing is that the doubt is reasonable.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:19 PM
0

I don't think you know what "attack" means. Some people actually have to deal with real threats to their safety, and to suggest that this commercial shows an attack is more than a little demeaning to them.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:57 PM
1

They were rolling around on my car punching and kicking each other, it's a wonder it's not all dented up with broken glass all over.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:56 PM
1

Attacking me for attempting to remove them from my car, yes. You don't have to sit around and let people destroy your property here, either.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:54 PM
1

I happen to live in a region where defense against a clear and immediate threat is not considered a crime. Most of the time, it's a great incentive against the behavior of this couple.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:37 PM
1

I want to find them so I can calmly and clearly tell them exactly why they are among the very few people on this planet who need to get their heads examined.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:50 PM
0

Either way, what's good/bad for the goose is good/bad for the gander...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 08:08 AM
0

Sure, but dogs aren't exactly rational as we are...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:53 AM
-5

UPVOTE ALL THE RIGHTSBOTS!!!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:42 AM
1

True, but I'm looking for more sting... xD Edit: also...(shiner might be gone tomorrow, not as bad as I'd feared. I'm sure he sympathized with me to a degree but was pussywhipped enough to have to be able to say he threw a punch. Shorter than me but about 100 lbs heavier...and I haven't being doing my Dance Central 3 on hard difficulty with ankle/wrist weights lately or I could have gotten him under me still...gotta get back on that. Still part of me regrets not shooting them. Not because I'd ex…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:35 AM
1

Our present statist-monopoly brand of police make their living on initiation of threat/force (my initial beef with the perps at all) over capricious minutiae: I can't imagine many situations not worsened by statist-monopoly police presence. I hate talking to them, I hate interacting with them, and given the force of law that feminism exerts over western culture, I can't imagine how you'd advocate that. Still, thanks for contributing =D
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:33 AM
-1

I'm not particularly attached to the MRM myself (more into MGTOW: I'm done even hitting on women at all, because doing it makes me a rapist, and not doing it makes me "not a real man"), but it does seem to have many legal grievances which the feminist movement, at least in the USA, does not have. Since, as an advocate of the Non-Aggression Principle, the force of law is kind of a big deal to me, I'm inclined to sympathize with the MRM in feminized nations, if with feminists to a greater extent i…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:29 AM
8

If both sexes were eligible for a gender challenge award with an initial handicap to compensate for hip structure, it would be reasonable. If only women were eligible for a gender challenge award to compensate for hip structure, having started all at the same time, it would also be reasonable. If there were no handicap or award, it would also be reasonable. In any case, any gender challenge award that's twice the regular prize is certainly unreasonable.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:27 AM
-1

I guess it depends on your definition of sexual harassment. I'd call this situation pretty coincidental and lighthearted for either gender. If you define any expression of sexual attraction as harassment, then this would fall under that category. I wouldn't call this an act of aggression so much as pointing a gun at someone and locking him/her in the rape cage (what we call "arresting" and "imprisoning") in response to this act. Now if there were no doubt that they actually trained this dog to t…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:07 AM
-1

Even if 90% of self-called "feminists" are gender egalitarians, or 90% of self-called "Christians" are chilled-out live-and-let-live types, or 90% of self-called "Capitalists" are all for free markets and equal opportunity and accountability, the reality is that the mainstream apices of those viewpoints are the supremacist, zealot, fascist manifestations of them, militantly imposing their systems onto the rest by force. So by using that term, the common majority is constantly endorsing the radic…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:44 AM
0

Perhaps, but seems like a real long shot to me. It's like how in Hollywood any idiot with a snubnosed pocket pistol can hit a running man 100 yards away, when in reality a 20 yard shot with a tiny pistol is iffy as hell...
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:39 AM
-1

Also glad you're internally consistent one way or the other. That's huge. I wouldn't call you a "feminist" myself, as you don't appear to be a female gender supremacist. And yes, the term "feminist" is a useless buzzword because it means so many different things to so many different people. Like "Christian": hippie agorist communists like Yeshu'a ben Yosef, zealots like Saul of Tarsus or the WBC? Or "Capitalism": free market or megafirm welfare state? List goes on...anyone to be taken seriously …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:55 AM
0

People ripping off my clothes? I mean laughing at someone who has a towel ripped off by a dog, and snapping a picture at the opportune moment. Yeah, I'd prefer if that were chill both ways. But I'm kind of a Non-Aggression Principle buff, so...ya know.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:45 AM
-1

1 = equal freedom 2 = equal non-freedom 3 = some freedom, albeit unequal Wish we had more opinions, thanks for piping up!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:34 AM
5

We have three viable choices here: 1) It's OK for men to do this to women and women to do this to men, and the sexes are equal under the law. 2) It's not OK for men to do this to women or women to do this to men, and the sexes are equal under the law. 3) It's OK for women to do this to men, but not for men to do this to women, and women enjoy fewer freedoms and have fewer responsibilities under the law. I'm hoping I won't have to elaborate on why anything else is unviable, but I am curious about…
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:32 AM
4

Because, you know, we're supposed to initiate sex or we're not real men. Ergo, if you're not a rapist, you're not a real man. That's why all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:25 AM
0

I'm not the one assuming any conspiracies. I'm attempting to debunk the idea that they are impossible. Read usernames. They can be different.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:12 AM
1

So you're saying that nobody in the history of humanity has ever secretly planned an ethically dubious advantage for himself. Got it.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:53 PM
-2

Straight guy here. Only been sexually assaulted by a gay man, myself. Never by a straight man.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:16 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/7lkYGuN.jpg
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:15 PM
1

Not saying that's what you said, but now that you mention it, every legal punishment does carry the ultimate threat of death behind it. However, when someone threatens you or is violent against you, it doesn't matter what means they use. You have no way to know at what point they will stop, if at all. Even if "real men use their fists", it's never your duty to allow yourself to be beaten to deformity, disability or death. And it's certainly not your duty to wait around and see just how far they'…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:44 PM
1

That's pretty specific compared to this. No explanation. May not be intended as such, but as its comments note, with no further info it does look trollish. This has examples and is definitely intended in earnest.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:10 AM
1

dupe...poor cnex? i was on boondocks DSL all last week so I get it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:07 AM
18

Considering the threats a guy immediately gets when he does this, I pretty much fucking hate all humanity after seeing this video. I'm willing to bet copper to gold that drugging someone's dog would go over worse than drugging a man.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:15 AM
2

The only female witness in the experiment was explicitly targeted and chatted up to a degree exceeding all other witnesses. I want to see a mixed-gender witness pool with no excessive attention-grabbing. I see it as a function of exposure.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:14 AM
-5

Seriously. Next time someone hits you, shoot him in the face (unless you're from a sissy bitch country where self defense is illegal).
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:41 AM
1

If it were socially acceptable, I would hug this lady.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:15 AM
0

Agreed: I do think you should have left the first time -- if you two have a future together, it will be after demonstrating your willingness to walk -- but never stoop to a woman's level and bring up old shit. The fight is over now. So just be sure you leave her next time she does it. Because she will.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:55 AM
6

That is not at all what I meant.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:58 AM
-1

There is a movement to allow corporations to vote in elections.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:59 AM
1

My bad. Quebec isn't landlocked. But Switzerland is, and it's smaller than either of the other two. It does just fine.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:31 AM
1

naw I just totally had pictured it wrong and commented without checking is all
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:17 AM
1

so it isn't! I stand corrected. could've sworn it was much smaller and surrounded by other provinces. I guess brown makes things look smaller on a map. My most significant manifestation of quebec in my consciousness has been its system of jurisprudence, brown on the wikipedia map means combination of code and common law.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:17 AM
3

Quebec is landlocked.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:17 PM
1

Really?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:41 PM
5

You people are probably right, but my point is there's a ton we don't know. I'm getting tired of this subreddit presuming male innocence and female guilt all the time. I'm for presuming all innocence. In the case of a reciprocal fight, one must presume the innocence of both and seek further evidence.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:00 PM
3

I would. I'd record for evidence and laugh at the pathetic mugger who tried to threaten me in front of my friends.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:59 PM
0

Who says it was lost? The big deal about mugging is the threat, not the theft. That's why it's legal to shoot a mugger but not a stealth thief.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:58 PM
0

this man didn't do anything to the woman except supposedly "look" at her the wrong way Source? I don't see any video covering what was supposed to have provoked this, so no way to tell whether or not it was just. I've tried scrolling down the comments, hit "show more" at least 20 times, and just see the same comments duplicated. Besides, I don't really consider a comment on a video to be evidence of anything unless the commenter was actually in the video.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:31 AM
1

She needs to be reprimanded for something we disagree with because....our arguments can't stand up to hers in open debate? I mean, why else go over her head?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:22 AM
-43

Do we know why? What if he just got done mugging her for her wallet? She may have been right. Just because women are currently unjustly allowed to hit men doesn't mean they're always wrong for it. I mean, are we after equality or not, here? It would have been smarter to stab or shoot someone bigger than yourself who mugged you, but it doesn't make it unethical to claim your right either. (Though with the info given it does look bad for her)
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:09 PM
2

If we make fear and other emotions a valid criterion for rape, then we have to extend the same to women. I'm not willing to do that. They have a duty to say "NO" and so do we.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:04 PM
4

To be fair, we call them cunts all the time. Many of them deserve it. Many of us do. The meaning of the name of the movement is basically all you can go on largely.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:02 PM
-2

My head hurts. You must go to the Dagobah system, and learn the art of the enter key.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:45 PM
57

It's not even that if a man had done it to a woman, or a woman to a woman, or a man to a man, that it would no longer be seen as funny. It's that if she had done this to a dog, Brazil would be outraged.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:43 PM
-5

I'm not saying it's accurate, but there is kind of a stereotype about women not being capable of comprehending the innate untenability of internal contradiction. This doesn't help debunk it at all.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:33 PM
0

Snow pussies are also oppressive to women because they objectify female sexual organs into something as undignified as a snow sculpture. Representation of the genitals of either sex == oppression of women by men. Duh! </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter