TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CaptainCirriculum Archive

View 0 posts and 335 comments by CaptainCirriculum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I was being sarcastic, but men also have their ethical flaws that directly conflict current societal constructs, such as spreading the seed!, as some hippie named Jesus once eloquently stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:59 PM
8

Sexist bastard! How dare you. NAWALT. She's being completely transparent anecdotally. She doesn't speak on behalf of 2 billion people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:39 PM
–

It's gotta be intrinsic, which the vast majority of men don't have. It's weird, because some males who possess some attractive dark triad/machiavellianism characteristics aren't actually all that physically alluring to women. What's between the ears is severely underrated when it comes to women, especially considering how female aren't predominantly visually stimulated unlike males. You know what I'm saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 09:08 PM
–

Ahhh, but how can one do this genuinely, without it being perceived as purely performative and transactional? I know some dudes who get bitches quite effortlessly, and they admittedly possess the necessary charming aptitude that you're describing here. However, you also have to have at least a moderate level of dauntlessness. A man's largest self-inflictive downfall is being intelligent, cognizant, and an introverted socially anxious neek. You feel me, big dawg?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 08:09 PM
–

Give us an example of "game", and what this term entails.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 03:21 AM
1

Males are biologically wired to find a suitor, whether or not said suitor is satisfied with their presence and company.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:20 AM
1

That's correct, in simple terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:19 AM
3

Physically aggressive men tend to also possess psychologically harmful characteristics as well, they tend to coincide. Maybe women should settle for stupid, meek, dainty fellas? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:52 AM
1

Oh yeah, for real eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:49 AM
1

Why do they have more options? EDIT: To all the simpletons who genuinely believed someone on a subreddit such as this would be this naive and blissfully ignorant, I already know every single viable solution to this multivariable equation. I just wanted to see who was closest to the correct answers, for curiosity's sake and utter boredom. Have at it!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:22 AM
4

This is the way! Many men are simply revolted at this revolutionary seclusionary phenomenon amongst younger generations because their entitlement that's been inherited and ingrained in their minds via environmental stimulus regarding the elders in their lives. They've been consistently fed the ole' nuclear household with a caring, endearing, enriching, supportive, domestically-oriented, submissive, nurturing wife and as many offspring as their balls could possibly squeeze out. It's very interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:23 AM
2

You're right, everyone will have their own personalized sexual/romantic suitors via AI humanoids eventually. Men and women can then at last live peacefully and harmoniously apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 10:28 PM
1

But, I live in fiction!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 08:33 PM
1

Indeed, yes indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 12:47 PM
3

What if one simply glanced at them being 7'4", a full head of luxurious dark hair, and a 12 pack? How does the RP conceive differences in initial attraction and ronance between the genders? Who pulls the majority of the weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:28 AM
17

Only correct answer. Humans' can't make too many compromises and be nonformative with their biology. That's just the way it is, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 04:08 AM
–

Damn, for realz?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:01 AM
6

Send me the study, I'll dismantle it without breaking a sweat. Though, I've probably already seen it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 03:17 AM
6

Says the Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 10:17 PM
–

Wow, that's sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 02:50 AM
–

Women don't gossip, they tend to be very analytical and invested in their beloved friends' lives, which is a crucial aspect of friendship. Don't be sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 12:58 AM
1

Yeah, I saw a leak on MySpace a couple decades ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:21 PM
1

Okay, but you definitely don't have Efron's long shlong, do you? Pause though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:26 AM
1

But... Only teenaged girls would like Troy. What are you on about lad?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:18 AM
1

Zack Efron is literally 5'nothing on some very mild cycles. He isn't the gold standard or benchmark people perceive him to be. Of course, pause, no homo.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 05:11 AM
-1

I lost mine at 67, damn. What if I've been consentualy routinely mind-fucking people since the ripe age of 12?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 05:54 AM
–

Of course we can. You see, rationally, females of all mammalian species retain the majority of their value until they're physiologically unable to bear offspring. In most other neighbouring primate families, they tend to lean predominantly patriarchal in social structure (aside from bonobos, which are tremendously out-populated by chimpanzees by roughly 3-fold). What's the point you're trying to make here?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 07:09 PM
–

Absolutely! What's the matter with you? Smarten up. Ordinary males, from a biological perspective, are congenitally disposable. If a man is unable to propagate some higher quality genes, what else could he possibly provide? Goods and services, baby!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:31 PM
–

This is where you've got it all wrong, young compadre. Women innately shouldn't be the ones doing all the labour, irregardless of if it's domestic or not. Women bear the children. That's enough involuntary reproductive labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:19 PM
2

Yeah, generally speaking. There's a few factors to consider though. Logically, a disease-ridden, incapable, human would know they serve virtually zero beneficial purpose in the tribe. I reference the term 'tribe', as that's how the homo species have lived for millennia prior to the agricultural revolution diversion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 10:10 PM
1

No, that's not the state of mind I was referring to. Their semi-suicidal impulses are purely heroic and sacrificial. That's different, and actually very commendable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:39 PM
1

This is very true, biologically speaking. Similar to male drones (in social colonies to boot), the concept can be very indistinguishable for some males. With that being said, it wouldn't be an outcome one would consciously choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:28 PM
2

I see. Good post nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:05 PM
2

Resources. Biologically speaking, it's perfectly intuitive and feasible that, due to the polarity in reproductive roles and ROI from procreation, that males would be the one to invest more tangible, accumulated, acquired resources in order to fulfill the transaction. Women bear and birth offspring, for crying out loud! Normal relationships fundamentally aren't egalitarian. Far from it. The most successful relationships and happiest everlasting couples have designated roles, and polarizing mascul…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:25 PM
1

Society will largely consist of androids in this particular scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 11:18 PM
3

Most people these days are longing for companionship. Everybody's got a hungry heart, observationally speaking. Predominantly men, as well as some women, will surely indulge in the influx of AI sexbots in the bear future, as they're likely to be completely customizable and personalized down to the last hair follicle. I mean, most people (males) aren't really long-term husband procreation material. Let's be for real. Y'all feel me, dog?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 11:17 PM
11

Man, this is atrocious. How dare you defy the fairer sex! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:59 AM
-12

This is sexist. To assume women are lying about their preferences to seamlessly fit your own biased, victimized perspective is ludicrously immature and irrationally projective.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:47 AM
6

This. Everyone knows men and women are growing further and further apart. It's inevitable. AI is such an incredibly underrated and underdiscussed phenomenon, it's blasphemous. Male and female sexual/romantic suitors will be substituted, and then ultimately replaced by personalized AI sex dolls. Society will thrive, but the homosapien race will surely reach its eventual demise.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:42 AM
-3

This is plain sexist!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:39 AM
4

Why did you have to be so savage?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 04:39 AM
1

Damn my guy, you woke woke.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:36 AM
-1

That's horsedungwilly piss. Women like masculine men, who are solely capable of fulfilling their role of the man in said relationship dynamic. The reason women don't want bisexual men is because it's innately undesirable for men to be romantically and sexually intertwined with their own intrasexual competition. Moreover, it effectively demonstrates that these men potentially have a feminine side that most women simply don't want to partake in. It's basic biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:46 PM
–

I do sincerely apologize for the inadvertent prejudice. Now back to the primary talking point. You see, women generally have preconceived notions about men who dabble with dicks. That's something that's environmentally instilled (and there may be a biological component as well). You're correct in that not every gay or bisexual man likes to explore the anal cavity, however, that kink is one of a few sexual activities that women often naively misconstrue for playing a man playing a feminine role. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:44 PM
–

Tainted? As in, their masculinity is tainted? Or their phallus is tainted with a slightly darker brown hue?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 01:01 PM
0

First of all, black men are more physiologically masculine (on average), so it's perfectly intuitive for women to be magnetized towards genes that are highlg polarizing to their own. Don't even think about going that route. Secondly, your reasoning here is fallacious. Humans can't choose what they're attracted to. Animals can't choose what they're attracted to. It's hardwired - ingrained into our hindbrains. It's purely congenital.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:58 PM
0

False.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:52 PM
–

I'm calling BS. Women are much more ethical than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 12:52 PM
-7

Uh, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:41 AM
2

Men aren't supposed to be hypergamous. You're an anamoly.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:08 AM
-7

Why is that a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:03 AM
-4

Damn, man. Seriously? Is this a universal general observation? Or would you chalk it up to a highly individualistic, improbable sample size?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 03:01 AM
1

I don't think women look for that, they don't idealize and romanticize being inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:39 AM
1

I believe your entire premise is confused, and not very conclusive. It's simply speculation, but we do understand your insinuations. Women, akin to some men overwhelmingly prefer relationship dynamics with highly distinguishable sexual dimorphism present. It's virtually biologically ingrained into humans' hindbrains.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 05:37 PM
-7

Deal with it, brah. Just hit the gym, and become the best version of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 08:00 PM
-3

No, men just suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 01:58 AM
2

Stereotypically, the societally reached consensus of a bad man (NOT badman, which is something completely distinguishable. Albiet, most women do love a real badman) still possesses some inherently masculine traits that women do indeed find sexually attractive and alluring. Prime examples of these characteristics include, but aren't limited to; bravery, confidence, bluntless, ambition, superficial charm, grandiose, and several other Machiavellian, dark-triad, nefariously benevolent character trai…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 09:18 PM
1

This is objectively correct, as revised by myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 12:31 AM
0

I guess CEO's in the previous context was a analogous placeholder for a man that's very successful, socioeconomically. Yes, CEO's often have a relatively pretentious, blunt, Machiavellian personality. Higher on the ASPD spectrum in comparison with the general population. After all, that's what it takes to be a good dictator, and delegator. But I was always under the presumption that women, by and large, would much rather live life with a man who is more than capable of providing her with the fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:27 AM
0

This is an interesting outlook, why do you posit that women would rather live the single life as opposed to being swooped up by a Fortune 500 CEO? Not that I necessarily oppose this take, just curious to hear your perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:23 AM
2

It depends on what kind of relation that's mutually intended. Being "nice" and "good" are rather ambiguous terms, so we'd presume the definition of these terms to be moderately to highly empathetic (cognitively and affectively) given the context clues. Women, from a biological standpoint, aren't predominantly attracted to kindness in sexually influenced environments and settings, especially when selecting viable, virile, genetically compatible mates for procreation. Essentially, when the act of …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:20 AM
5

This is the correct answer (if specifically regarding cis-het men and women with their own biological children in their future aspirations).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:44 AM
0

Notwithstanding, extroversion is still a more valuable social temperament from a socioeconomic standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 12:20 AM
-1

Categorically false. Most gifted people on the far end of the bell curve tend to be a toss up between introverts or extroverts. Furthermore, it's entirely plausible that most of those within the gifted subreddits as well as other digital social spaces tend to be introverted because they'd rather spend their free time discussing anonymously, rather than IRL. But as I previously alluded to, extroverts can be perceived as more 'artificially' intelligent, due to them being markedly more disposed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 08:53 PM
0

Extroverts also tend to be more knowledgeable, and have more wisdom and experience under their belts. So they may seem more intrinsically intelligent, which is an indubitably attractive trait in the eyes of the female gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 07:56 PM
2

This is an interesting phenomenon. It's often philosophied that alcohol removes the shackles of our inner inhibitions and apprehension. Maybe your inner conscience is more of an outgoing partyholic than you initially presumed? I find this to be the case with many introverts. Extroversion is innately masculine (barring several conditions are met).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 07:54 PM
2

My eyes are proactively burning due to the pepper spray you'll justifiably receive. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 02:14 AM
7

You'll be single eternally. Take it from I.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 01:48 AM
–

Look man, there's a method to the madness. Everything - and I mean every single aspect of life - is quantifiable. There are always objective, numerical, arithmetical inputs and outputs. But as humans, the irrational and emotionally paradoxical species, we aren't actually supposed to highlight this irrationality. Humans intrinsically know of the regulatory standards of mother nature, but being a highly social species, there must be a sense of comradery and unity to thrive against what were more d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 01:24 PM
1

Categorically beautiful babies, or insinuating that all babies are beautiful beings?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:56 AM
2

The shape of the human males' cream-composers essentially demonstrates previous eras' inclination towards polyamorous copulation patterns. It's mainly conjecture currently, but one could plausibly speculate that ovulating females used to willingly, consecutively mate with a multitude of males in order to establish and secure potential paternal provision from more than one male. This was incredly efficient, and probably a much more favourable, habitable, and harmonious environment for offspring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:51 AM
4

OP, you're largely and broadly correct in your premise. Men are also shallow creatures when relationships are involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:29 AM
2

These societally labelled "bad men" tend to generally possess more congenitally attractive, practical, elusive, and magnetizing characteristics than men within the empath - neurotypical parameter on the personality spectrum. To be a swift decision maker, dauntless, bold, brave, extroverted, outgoing, adventurous, commanding, and most prominently, secure man are probably the utmost desired personality traits a man can personify. One can potentially learn to adopt such demeanors, but it's quite te…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:27 AM
0

These traits are positive masculine traits, so it's feasible why they're often magnified in these seemingly toxic (not a real thing) men and the negative, dark triad, Machiavellian characteristics are often overlooked. Relationships are often about trade-offs and compromises, as it's relatively rare for someone to actually bag the whole package (aesthetic plus mentality).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 04:12 AM
1

Damn. I never knew this was actually a preference in the available options list for women. That's astounding!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:18 PM
1

Oh, if you're bi then that's understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:22 PM
2

Yeah, my guy. Women in your life will begin to discretely resent you for it - the lack of masculine frame and personification. Truss me, it's occured with myself and countless others as well. For some fellas, building, and retaining muscle mass (along with a multitude of other secondary sex traits) proves to be a little bit more of a tedious process compared to their peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:24 PM
0

Most feminists practice what they preach. Most feminists merely preach and uphold rigidly substantiated philosophies such as having the freedom and agency to to whatever the hell they want [(applicable to either gender(s)]. Furthermore, women get called out all the time. It's becoming increasingly more customary to specifically expose women for their interrelational and domestic wrongdoings as opposed to men, albiet men still do face social consequences, such as being exiled and outcasted from v…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:21 AM
-1

Links don't hold measurable weight, and can just be respectfully placed in the conjecture bin. These interrelational phenomenons are conceived differently based on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:12 AM
0

Albiet a pizza and a hotdog are largely indistinguishable in terms of cuisine preparation and overall rating (unless of course this pizza was served at a Michelin star-studded restaurant owned by Pierre Gagnaire), your sentiment is feasible. Applicable to the majority of humans, they must acknowledge the most forseeable possibility of them settling as well as being settled for simeltaneously. In adult relationships, there must be mutual compromises and sacrifices established and cemented in orde…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:05 AM
0

Gain some damn muscle. What are you doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 03:41 AM
2

Your response holds little to no weight. They brought the factz, and you brought the guesstimates.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:42 AM
-1

She's right and you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:39 AM
–

Don't oppose the above statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:03 AM
1

That's alot of overtly pessimistic, broad, sweeping generalizations about 50% if the world's population. Women, by and large, aren't hypocritical when it comes to embodying traditionally, culturally-coded male characteristics and mannerisms. These are grown adults we're observing here. I'm sure they acknowledge the advantages and disadvantages of the arbitrarily constructed male or female archetype, and carry themselves with dignity and consideration with respect to embodying such traits. Most h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:01 AM
2

Don't be sexist. Women have zero reason and obligation to act like men. Stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 09:01 PM
4

Maybe, maybe not. Lots of couples come to a mutual agreement going forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:15 PM
9

She may prefer chocolate to sex because the sex she's accustomed to having with men is sub-par.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:54 PM
1

Most radical, 28th wave feminists won't make such mindless remarks in response to the OP. Most people with an ounce of self-reflection are well aware of the paradoxical behaviour that men and women display nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 02:45 AM
-3

Don't be sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 02:45 AM
-7

Introverts are less intelligent and a general rule of thumb, as well. In general, males who are introverted will not be as successful economically, and romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 11:31 AM
3

To your first paragraph, that's precisely correct. Women would eventually face the inevitable feeling of mild resentment, regret, and unhappiness when settling. Settling (in the perception of anyone's eyes) would ultimately be to ones detriment, even if the partner they settled with encompassed a multitude of mandatory traits that an adult partner should have in accordance with the default settings. To your second paragraph, I've actually witnessed this happen on numerous seperate occasions with…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:34 PM
2

I can this was typed rather abruptly, and with a little bit of grammatical and punctual negligence. Which is a good thing, because these thoughts must've been itching to escape the mind. All in all, I'd be more inclined to agree with your premise, rather than to disagree. Men, historically (at least, throughout the recorded time parameter of human history) have always been entitled to exercise their procreative rights, and autonomy significantly moreso than women. Evidently, there are still remn…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:44 PM
1

In your post title, you stated the term "bad man". Bad man has a highly distinguishable definition compared with bad men (in the plural, more formal sense). Elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:01 PM
–

Albeit being an objectively, conventionally masculine man gets you into the tournament, it's not nearly enough to get one onto the podium. Women are attracted to men with supremely unwavering levels of confidence. They're attracted to men who are passively dominant, and emanate charismatic leadership capabilities. They're attracted to fearlessness, and dauntlessness, with little to no susceptibility for stress, anxiety, and depression (neuroticism). These men, although tend to inherently possess…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 06:43 PM
9

This!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 07:24 PM
1

So what? Humans select for dimorphism, it's what facilitates that initial spark when searching for a mating partner. The more genetically diverse a sexual couple is, the more robust the offspring will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 04:20 AM
1

Why does this matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 04:06 AM
0

Tallness and notable stature in women is often perceived as elegant, glamorous, and personable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:20 AM
0

Yes, women tend to subconsciously reinforce sexual dimorphism within relationship dynamics (sexual or romantic) a little bit more than men do, on average. If course, one's judgement could be flawed in the face of an actual conducted study (that has yet to be published).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:57 AM
8

This. People seem to naively underestimate how sexually dimorphic humans actually are. In terms of LBM, and primary/secondary sex characteristics the differences are highly distinguishable and vast.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:46 AM
1

Outliers don't disprove the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 04:47 AM
1

Height is indirectly correlated with overall musculoskeletal prowess, presumably. There has to be a primitive, biological reason as to why women inherently find height so alluring. Moreover, towering over others probably subconsciously signifies leadership, thus granting higher rankings in social (now socioeconomic) hierarchies. It's plausible that women with abnormally high levels of introspection and internal-reflective competence would be able to elaborate more in depth. Shorter guys should f…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 02:54 AM
-1

More snowflakes than Alaska nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:41 AM
1

Well, yeah. But he would fare better than your average Joe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 01:41 AM
0

Why was I downvoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:35 AM
-1

Obviously there'd be more men in general willing to date women than vice versa. We greatly appreciate you clarifying the obvious. Of course it isn't heroic, dating isn't meant to be a virtuous, self-righteous and heroic act to partake in. It's a game. And you deal with the cards you were dealt. Autistic men are at a marked disadvantage, and that's perfectly fine. It isn't like low-functioning autists are capable of conceptualizing the nuances behind romantic relationships the way neurotypicals a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 12:34 AM
-2

Funny how you mentioned autism, as if men would happily marry an autistic woman on their own volition. As unfortunate as reality can be, autistic people are fundamentally impaired. Women refusing to date, or invest any element of romantic energy towards autistic men isn't unethical or amoral by any means. Men select for youth, and incompetence. Women select for strength, and resilience. Men bad, women good. Now shut up and go draw a picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 09:57 PM
-11

It's really quite obvious. Males have a tendency to select for youth. Of course, preferences too far on the spectrum is completely abhorrent and illegal. Women just select for traits that men should have, as functioning and capable adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 08:45 PM
-6

Essentially, the OP is being a pussy, and needs to man up. Desperately, and abruptly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:45 PM
1

Was his business directly or indirectly involved with the construction of the Burj Khalifa?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 07:41 PM
1

What would've likely happened to Bin Laden and my boy Al?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:47 PM
-11

Their preferences are more moral and ethical, though. Easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:34 PM
-3

Have you considered the possibility of women being able to be subconsciously selective of these tall men based on their potential to have a more physically imposing musculoskeletal system and overall stature? A tall man who is capable of filling out via pumping a bit of iron could be what women are truly after - the underlying justification for wanting taller men. Which is completely justifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:19 PM
1

Yes, men would. No disagreement here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:45 AM
0

Based on your response to my initial question, I doubt I'm the one that lacks reading comprehension, imbecile. But then again, that's entirely subjective, and based on a fundamental perceptual difference. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:42 AM
1

So when you said that was a lie, are you referring to the generalities of feminine behavioural acts expressed in women? Your response was in direct disagreement with theirs, based on your first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:17 AM
1

The average woman gets anywhere remotely close to thousands of likes on a dating app?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:55 AM
2

It's entirely possible that should a woman choose to move on as soon as possible after a breakup, she'll be able to have access to a larger abundance of men at her disposal as opposed to the gender-mirrored scenario. So, generally, they'll have more potential rebounds in play. However, I'd posit that it would be more appropriate to claim that women are able to regain their emotional agency, self-confidence, overall happiness quicker than men, due to having more social outlets that permit deeply …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:42 AM
-1

How would your perception of action differ from the above commenter when it comes to displaying traditionally feminine acts?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:31 AM
4

This isn't necessarily true for all relationship failures, but indeed some share some sort of resemblance with your speculation here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:30 AM
–

That's fantastic! That's all I was implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:06 AM
–

Is that what you thought I was insinuating? I was implying that, although it's highly unlikely that their both within the top percentile like they're claiming, their self-conviction and sense of security for their partnership is respectable. That's something that, although isn't exactly ethically justifiable, aids in the maintenance of a long-term partnership. There has to be some extent of measurable egoism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:05 AM
–

From anyone, seemingly?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:01 AM
–

No. But your self-assurance and emotional security is commendable. No need for exterior words of affirmation, eh? Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 02:43 AM
1

This form of thinking is absolutely, indubitably constructive for (I'd presume) the vast majority of those currently in stock within the dating market. Everything - every single aspect of life is scientifically quantifiable. Your post reeks of blissful ignorance, and overtly optimistic naïveté, if you will. Men and women expect those treatments (respectably) due to biological factors that should be taken into consideration when making such a conclusive, holier-than-thou post about over complicat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 09:31 PM
1

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 09:22 PM
5

This. Humans tend to congenitally pedastalize those who are dauntlessly outgoing with a more lenient filter than the vast majority of people. You must possess the ability to personify an extrovert to neatly fit this desirable mental archetype, though. To your point, they don't necessarily have to be a morally upstanding individual, as that's not a requisite in most people's eyes. From a sex-appeal standpoint, I'd imagine this to be true with men and women equally, but expressed in very different…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 09:21 PM
2

That's a little too far on the low-inhibition ASPD spectrum , chap! Assuredly, undoubtedly, women aren't innately attracted to irresponsible convict-worthy social outcasts. That's a terrible biological investment, as these trouble-making males are likely to place all parties' lives in serious jeapordy. Straying away from the primary discussion, how did you know I embody all those characteristics in your last sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 03:42 AM
1

There are so many other factors to consider, though. Such men won't have nearly the same swoon-inducing effect on women who regularly ingest oral contraceptives/hormonal birth control, as we know it alters their hormonal pattern and menstrual cycle to significantly dampen ovulation. This invention indirectly protects women from falling victim to the morally nefarious behaviour of these men with more "dark" masculine behavioural characteristics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:44 AM
2

Good, I just wanted to see your response. Yes, the most successful men tend to possess greater amounts of dark triad tendencies and mannerisms. Mild Machiavellianism, if you will. Which is precisely why I suspect even serial monogamy isn't a structure most compatible for humans. We're predominantly polyamorous, IMHO.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:33 AM
2

No, that's not what empathizing means, or insinuates. They are aware of the issues of involuntary celibacy that many, if not most men, will inevitably face. They are also likely aware of the reasons why this phenomenon will continue to be prevalent universally, as women continue to gain socioeconomic autonomy. But why should they forceably alter what they're inherently attracted to? If I was a woman, I certainly wouldn't settle for anything less than the top 10th percentile of the male dating po…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:07 AM
3

So the real winners are men with antisocial personality disorder?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 01:04 AM
1

Quite a few, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:37 PM
1

Social ties? You didn't genuinely think that was a valid rebuttal, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:20 PM
1

You're right. I'm objectively the most attractive male specimen to ever grace the entire Milky Way galaxy. I absolutely melt and liquefy everything I'm within a close proximity of due to my unfathomable hotness. I'm also 6'8", with a Gulfstream parked on my 12 acre driveway. I also have a third leg that makes most thoroughbreds jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:18 PM
5

Exactly! It's not about equality, it's about equitability. And equitability doesn't guarantee equivalent results.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:02 PM
-1

Reproduction isn't a biologically ingrained necessity for the survival of an individual human being. People are just too soft like Charmin.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:00 PM
3

If they empathized with women, and placed themselves in their heels, they'd be able to comprehend why it's so mandatory for women exercise these rights. Moreover, males in general place far too much value on sex. Men should know, instinctively, that not all of them are worthy to procreate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:04 PM
0

But why aren't men capable of understanding why this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:56 PM
3

Wtf is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:26 AM
0

Logically speaking, it's always been more plausible for the age gap to sway towards men being markedly older due to these very apparent factors that would otherwise hinder the dynamic between two similarly aged individuals. The 'ideal' dynamic could be considered to be a 25-year-old woman with a 30-35 year old man, as he's much more likely to have accumulated enough economic capital, resources, liquidated assets, and various other mental characteristics (such as emotional maturity and a little w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 03:08 AM
1

Very intriguing. I wonder why so many people tend to deliberately deviate away from these biological norms, only to end up inevitably feeling resentment due to the lack of attraction and compatibility. Animals can't really beat their hardwiring, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 10:42 PM
1

I see. That makes sense. There has to be some sort of dichotomy, or masculine-feminine dynamic for heterosexual couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 11:59 AM
1

How would these mannerisms differ for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 11:46 AM
7

This. Women generally won't look down on a man with less wealth, though. At least, from a platonic standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:18 PM
10

Categorically false. Women generally prefer more pronounced amounts of sexual dimorphism in relationships compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 01:28 PM
7

So women choose to exclusively invest in men who are actually worth potentially having children with?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:12 AM
5

This. It's in humans' evolutionary hardwiring.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 09:27 PM
2

But I'm saying that the fundamental, tangible differences that inherently desirable men experience compared to undesirable financially literate men is so immensely vast that it just isn't simply a "fake" version. It's a completely different relationship dynamic, with differentiating core principles and values. EDIT: IMHO, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:59 AM
1

I wouldn't consider that a "fake version" of what innately valuable males experience. No matter how much money, accumulated resources, and economical capital one may acquire and bestow upon sugar babies, one key facet that will always be missing (if the payer doesn't possess the necessary characteristics) is sexual desirability.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:37 PM
-1

That's just wrong man, don't be sexist!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:37 PM
0

The answer will always remain the same. Size does matter. Nobody in their right mind with more than one brain cell required for synapses thinks that sizen consideration is even close to being negligible. It's literally the most basic of physics. Men are obsessed with desperately latching onto various trivial justifications for their short comings. If it isn't the hysterical excuses they've binded to, they then resort to the internalized victimization. "It's just not fair!". Akin to any other phy…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:14 PM
1

It means shorter fellas wouldn't be perceived as attractive as taller fellas.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 07:50 PM
2

I was asking her, I know that these are important factors for women (generally). Instinctively, men are well aware that they can possibly, potentially get burned after the initial couple years into marriage. Financially, it may not be in many (not all) men's best interest, due to factor such as alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 12:40 PM
3

That's understandable. I'd be inclined to agree, in the sense that the man should indeed compensate for the inherent imbalances and disproportionately greater load women face during reproduction. I'd render marriage as one way to solidify a man's investment towards his wife and the childrearing process. The fact that's it's a legal, binding contract emphasizes a man's commitment and devotion to a woman. Marriage is economically beneficial moreso than it is disadvantageous, especially if a man an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 02:42 AM
11

What about marriage do you value so highly over being in a consentual, reciprocal adult relationship with a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:57 AM
2

Biology would explain most of it, generally speaking. But you're correct in saying that it's also largely dependant on region, and the norms in their demographic. But most straight people are inherently attracted to dimorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:48 AM
1

Responses akin to this one generally stems from a place of ignorance and inexperience. Statistically, well endowment isn't exactly ubiquitous (approximately 10% of the male population possesses a size that would be considered physiologically ideal), so it isn't surprising to hear such sentiments that undermine the significance of size echoed continually.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 06:58 PM
1

Yeah, it really is an interesting subject for sure, with plenty of nuances to be considered. Similarly, I'm also not a historian, so I'm unable to cite even a synopsis of what occured during that era without sounding like an amateur revisionist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 03:04 PM
1

Indeed. I'd hypothesize that, intuitively, females back then knew that larger penises signalled a rather unexplainable and intangible element of virility that couldn't be disregarded. However, I do believe the the overall environmental conditioning and region-wide constructs pertaining to perceiving endowment with disdain and contempt was able to override the women's inherent preferences. But this is purely speculative, and rather baseless. Furthermore, wasn't this universal notion only prevalen…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:01 AM
1

It's indeed an indisputable visual medium, and I posit that it's partially correlated to our reproductive biology (unintentionally feeding the whole biological determinism spiel) working in tandem with the universal uprise of serially monogamous relations. I do believe that the visually psychosocial aspect of a large phallus pertains to the potentially superior physiological compatibility with most women under the ideal circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 02:07 PM
1

I'd urge you to check out the BDP subreddit, it's tremendously insightful and open to absolutely anyone. There isn't any dickscrimination there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 01:01 PM
0

Your post didn't really clarify anything to any measurable extent. The whole "symmetry" theory isn't really applicable, because a congenital biological preference for full breasts and a vuluptuously sized gluteus isn't quantitatively analogous to a preference for endowment in the Joe Boxer's. And, it shouldn't be. One is specifically visual stimuli, and the other has a multitude of pragmatic aspects to consider. If a woman is sexually experienced, it's highly unlikely that her outlook is going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:38 PM
1

This post comes across as a little politically correct. Phallus size is generally underrated as an attribute to completely disregard the specs and stats if one when writing up the scouting report for a partner. Primarily because there's not only a visual component, but an extremely significant practical component to the phallus itself as well. PiV is paramount in almost everybody's relationship checklist in terms of importance, so intuitively this isn't a surprise. All factors being equal, a lar…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:02 PM
2

Yeah, men are a trip. Deviating so drastically from cultural norms and legal constructs benefiting them disproportionately compared to women (from a economic and domestic standpoint) is currently taking its toll. It hit males like a freight train, and left them discombobulated. Grasping at straws (such as the overturning of Roe v. Wade), and trying to preserve whatever little bit of 'authorization' they had over women and their bodies is their last resort before the finalization of the progressi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:24 PM
10

This. This entire post could be mirrored by the sexes, and it's still largely applicable and verifiable. Men are just as, if not even more entitled than women are during phases of courtship and preliminaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:23 AM
2

I guess the above commenter isn't the best at conveying their opinions. I guess what they meant to say was that women tend to favour receiving validation and public stamps of approval from other women, just to reiterate that they did in fact select a valuable male.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 10:12 PM
4

Women don't hate the monogamous men, and certainly don't hate the concept and idea of monogamy in and of itself, however the above commenter makes some valid points.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 10:08 PM
1

Which is another key aspect of femininity, pleasant (as in, not unbearable) odour.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 04:29 PM
3

Polyamorous. I thought I already insinuated that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:03 PM
2

Seed package, though that's irrelevant and redundant. I'm not in stock within the market currently, supply chain issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:12 PM
3

These concepts were only primarily observed throughout recorded human history, which only covers a measly 10-20,000 years at maximum. Polygamy absolutely IS NOT our natural procreative inclination. The shape of the human phallus glands is proof of that. One thing for sure is, empirically, humans aren't meant to be monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:11 PM
4

Polygamy doesn't rule. That's unlikely to reflect what our natural, congenital homosapien instincts prompt. What you're referring to is fluidity, and completely unrestricted polyamory. Not polygamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:28 PM
3

Your post is probably one of the most feasible outlooks to have for the vast majority of people on this subreddit. Not everyone is objectively suited for consistent, reliable, unconstrained levels of intimacy. Anyone with too many flaws to count on a single hand is inevitably bound to experience mishaps and discrepancies in they way their romantic affection is reciprocated. It's simply the way of life nowadays, as public social outlets continually rise. The dating market becoming significantly m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:26 PM
0

Why would someone leave someone with reasonable notice for someone better? People have morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:18 PM
0

Biology is fascinating! It's extraordinary how vastly the mating strategies differ between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:16 PM
1

In terms of physiological sex differences in the musculoskeletal system and overall stature disparities, women are seemingly the gender that endorses these preferences. It's likely that it's innate, but we aren't 100% sure as if yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:08 PM
1

Men are also attracted to dimorphism, but to a lesser extent I'd presume. The absence of body hair is often conflated with femininity and purity within the traditional, regressively conservative male demographic. However, oftentimes, people perceive regular body hair maintenance as ordinary personal hygiene, as oftentimes one would exude pungent BO. Not ideal, especially in white and pink collar job sectors. Not quite too sure about makeup, though. I've always held the assumption that men and wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:05 PM
4

Given the choice, women overwhelmingly prefer these highly contrasting dynamics between their men in intimate settings. In a purely platonic, business-rekated setting, I'd imagine that people are generally significantly more malleable and non-conformative with their expression and mannerisms. However, sexual dimorphism is almost always exclusively condoned and influenced by women, AFAIK.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:10 PM
2

Indeed, indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 04:48 PM
1

Generally speaking, these effects are reported and are scientific observations. Outliers will always exist, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 03:14 PM
1

I think you need to review the definitions of those terms, feller.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:33 PM
5

Yeah, redpillers are too generic. They only reguritate talking points, and tropes. They deliberately exaggerate humans imperatives in order to reinforce their overtly biased perspective. They're far too entitled and narcissistic for genuine, reciprocal debates. Amateur, delinquents.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:32 PM
2

Which spectrum? Technically, everyone is on a spectrum of some sort.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:30 PM
1

Usually, more manly men would be preferred during periods of ovulation and increased LH, T, and E levels in women. This is their intrinsic biological makeup urging them to procreate with better men to ensure their offspring is affliction-less and ailment-free. However, during active and regular BC use, the body is artificially tricked into thinking it's in an eternal state of pregnancy by mickiming the notable and well-familiarized characteristic of increased progesterone. Thus, women are more l…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:41 AM
1

Well done OP. Good post, reasonable take.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:34 AM
0

All things are. Everything in existence is. That statement is erroneous, factually and empirically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:34 AM
2

Quantifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:30 AM
2

"Love" as we know it is a metaphysical, subjectively yet objective quantifiable phenomenon. Poetry can also be quantified, everything can. There's always a formula, a method to the madness if you will. Always. Whether someone somehow miraculously recalls your favorite Starbucks drink or is objectively better looking, these attraction triggers can be effectively calculated and analyzed. Would the formula be able to be replicated seamlessly 100% of the time? Probably not, as we aren't living in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:29 AM
3

Ovulation is completely halted and mitigated when ingesting oral contraceptives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 03:31 AM
5

I see what you're doing. Not bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:16 AM
4

So their concious vigilance of sounding politically correct in order to virtue signal is inadvertent? Respectfully, I disagree, but this argument is redundant anyways. I agree with you saying they're playing dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:07 AM
4

And my response directly addresses your queries. Sometimes, it's entirely feasible to pin it down to windows of fertility within their menstrual cycle. With that being said, as the vast majority of women are actively cycling oral contraceptives, and hormonal altering birth control, this may not apply. As a result, women may have their innate, initial preferences artificially tampered with. Furthermore, women have extremely ambiguous and inconsistently selective sex drives overall, so oftentimes …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 02:03 AM
7

Inadvertently? They seems to be well aware of what they're insinuating. But yes, I did notice they were cautious of sounding redpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:52 AM
2

Polygamy? Or polyamory?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:44 AM
8

TLDR; It's biology. It's genetic. It's interactively and passively inherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:28 AM
7

The real answer lies in the disparity in sexual cycles, and the particularly narrow windows of fertility women have compared to men. Men are consistently, continually animalistic and ravenous in their sexual desires, it can simply be pinned down to biological hardwiring. OP seems to be deliberately asking such a rhetorical question in order to gain traction and to recieve responses that solidify their perspective. Anyone with a couple synapsing brain cells could conclusively deduce that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:13 AM
1

People have become significantly more selective when it comes to long term partnership prospects due to the hellacious state of the economy nowadays. Financially, the predicaments of many are far from ideal, and rarely anyone can make an honest, genuine, self-righteous living independently anymore, ESPECIALLY for my fellow Canadians (so my perception of economic inflation is understandably biased and skewed). If men and especially women are finding it increasingly more tedious, tiresome and chal…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:42 AM
1

So it's how modern social feminist/egalitarian-correlated activists are impervious and overtly selective of what constructs they want to have dismantled and preserved for their own personal gain? The phenomenon could simply be boiled down to the subconscious desire to reject universally drastic societal change, whilst actively trying to fight for the 'greater good' (an invisioned highly inclusionary utopia where everyone can coexist along with their inherent differences). But as I stated in my f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 01:51 AM
1

Women have only just begun having full control of their sexual selectiveness and autonomy in the modern era, no? Just because the man/woman ratio is roughly equal doesn't mean the sexes are obligated to date their looksmatch (in terms of sexual market value).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 01:43 AM
1

Did you seriously just try to compare virtual, fleeting dopamine rushes to real-life interaction? Could you justify emphatically convincing someone to watch YouTube vlogs on Osaka instead of actually traveling there to experience it live in the flesh? Obviously, exotic destination seeking isn't even as remotely unethical and abominable as predatory behaviour. However, the concept is awfully similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:15 AM
1

Engaging response and anecdotal experiences. I deliberately wanted to short cast with artificial bait just for some traction, and a detailed, genuine and thorough response. Not going to disagree with you here, as your premise isn't clearly illustrated. However, what are your core principal beliefs in regards to the modern dating market? You say that you're redpill, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:04 AM
-2

Absolutely. The OP created this post in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:38 PM
1

AFAIK, I think this post could be feasibly concluded and paraphrased as; men and women are different and want different things in a relationship. I mean, this isn't rocket science, eh? Traditional values have always held at least some foundational correlation with humans' congenital tendencies. Largely, completely generalizing here. Exceptions will always exist, as homosexuals are a case in point. Again, to reiterate, these are merely empiral generalizations. You may find the odd woman who is na…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:07 PM
1

Precisely. From the moment of birth onwards, various organizations and businesses would only perceive a new mother as a questionable liability.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:01 PM
1

This!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:00 PM
1

It's mainly an inherent issue. Indoctrination and environmental upbringing, although highly prevalent, isn't the predominant element at play here. Because of a man's innate sexual nature, this phenomenon will almost always be bound to occur. Not justifying these behaviours at all, as it's completely amoral and unprincipled. But, akin to women, men have questionable mating strategies that have unfortunately remained as a parting remnant of the Homo-ape family since the dawn of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:51 PM
1

Whether or not male sexuality is externalized and displayed in the field of action is negligible. The predominant point is that male sexuality in a vacuum is inherently, intrinsically, biologically unjust in such a society as our current one. From an ethical standpoint, even moreso than womens', mens' sexuality is based purely off of indulging in hardwired biological impulses recieved via primarily visual input (albeit, other sensory factors may come into play as well). Women have suffered great…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:46 PM
-2

Respectfully speaking, but what a redundant, injudicious post. Men and women shouldn't be treated the same. It makes absolutely zero sense. The comparasion isn't figurative with "apples to apples".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:26 PM
1

These are very case specific anecdotes causing you to boldly make such broad, sweeping generalizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:15 PM
1

Generally speaking, one walk of shame doesn't always bring about multiple consecutive cheats, if one gets away with it without a trace or any reprocussions. However, some do cheat serially. Not that there's anything wrong with it from an evolutionary perspective, as some people simply aren't intrinsically suited for monogamy. But what's considered in one's best interest biologically is largely negligible and redundant in the face of modern constructs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:13 PM
1

This alone redpilled you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:58 PM
1

This. Men and women are congenitally different. Their requirements for intercourse are drastically different as well. Men, biologically, are more appropriately suited for more reliable, consistent orgasms with every sexual session, whereas women (who have infinitely greater orgasm intensity potential with specific men) unfortunately experience an orgasm gap due to men generally not being adequate in various measurable departments. Both tangible and intangible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:16 PM
1

First of all, we must consider the blatantly evident orgasm gap between men and women before jumping to that assertion. Secondly, women are generally receptive to different types of orgasms (clitoral being the most frequent and common). Clitoral orgasms are vaguely similar to orgasms men experience during ejaculation. Ultimately, sex for women has the potential to be a life-changing experience, pending all conditions are IDEAL. It's purely circumstantial. If humans going to be a monogamous speci…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 11:30 AM
3

That's not how it works. Both partners should put forth equitable effort. Sex is an act that reaps disproportionately unequal results for men and women. Biologically, men get a significantly faster orgasm in exchange for more expendable sexual/reproductive value. The only way it should be morally acceptable for men and women to both put forth EQUAL effort alike is if humans miraculously revert back to pre-agricultural revolution mating strategies. I mean, everyone instinctively knows why the gla…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 12:38 AM
1

Why would it seem like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 12:34 AM
2

Foreplay is especially crucial for women compared to men, due to differences in reproductive cycles/windows, in tandem with hormone polarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:39 PM
0

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:38 PM
2

The most predominant factor leading to the substantial orgasm gap between genders is purely physical incompatibility. However, the psychological portion of sex is also TREMENDOUSLY important for women as well. Oftentimes, even that element isn't adequately fulfilled during the pregame warmups. Men, on average, are innately lackluster lovers. This is observational. This is empirical. This simply just is. Biologically speaking, humans weren't originally meant for widespread monogamous indoctrinati…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:28 PM
–

There are core differences between masculinity and femininity, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:56 AM
–

This isn't necessarily true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 03:42 AM
–

Unless a woman's preferences are awfully absurd or unreasonable, there shouldn't be any. Women are the selectors, the receptors. Their judgment is of markedly greater prominence.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 03:32 PM
5

This entire posts stems from the fundamental assertion (insinuated, not explicitly stated) that men and women hold equivalent intrinsic biological value. Phallus size is a reactionary evolutionary byproduct of vaginal size. Evolutionarily speaking, a larger vaginal size is ideal in humans due to offsprings' continually increasing cranium size. This evolutionary phenomenon is considerably likely to continue, as humans have essentially become a brains>brawn species that highly prioritizes mental f…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 01:26 PM
2

Evolution is continual and eternal. Men can change. It's not outside the realm of possibility in due time, especially if we continue to remain as progressive as possible, and not regress back to prior constructs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:32 PM
1

There's an intrinsically biological component to their behavioural differences as well, though. I firmly believe that women possess greater levels of affective empathy, living up to their "role" as nurterers. This doesn't mean that men and women are generally restricted to a box of biological imperatives. I'd argue that women have proven to be much more adaptable and malleable in their behavioural expressions, and general interests. The modern woman's mind is just so much more diversified than m…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:30 PM
4

The sheer abundance of males compared to females in this subreddit explains the downvotes, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:03 PM
-5

Men are generally worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:25 PM
0

This. But, you can't necessarily blame women for being deceptive and disingenuous with their preferences, as they face much higher risks of deviating away from the politically correct social norms as opposed to men. They don't have the luxury of rebelling their way out of the modern monolith. Moreover, women are also inherently at a conundrum. It's counterintuitive to essentially coerce yourself (subsequently after being influenced by others) to be attracted to what you're congenitally unnatract…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:24 PM
20

Objectively speaking, a larger size (within reason of course) has advantages that are far too prominent to be disregarded. It's basic anatomy. Furthermore, largers genital size can also be associated with virility and masculinity (specifically affected by in vitro androgen levels as well as pubertal developmental factors), which is why women generally cackle and swoon over well-endowment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:17 PM
1

110%.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 07:21 PM
3

This is generally a universal preference, eh? Most women are attracted to men who are (superlative shock incoming) manly. More specifically, in comparison with their intersexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:04 PM
29

But the transparency and absolutely zero sugar coating should realistically be appreciated by all, when reflecting back in hindsight.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:02 PM
2

This. Fictional writing in non sci-fi action-packed thrillers has always been at least somewhat based in reality. Observationally, men are the primary perpetrators of crimes universally. Therefore, there's a heightened sense of realism and feasibility when watching and actually analyzing the plot of these fictional narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 06:00 PM
0

You don't hear voices in your head that council you, understand and talk to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:05 PM
–

I don't disagree with your reasoning, it's more feasible than continually desperately persevering. That's not what a real successful male does.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:03 PM
1

This. Men need to learn how to manage their instincts and self regulate. Meditation and ancient 5000 year-old Chinese herbs can aid in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:44 PM
–

This. An accurate description of the PUA grifters in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:42 PM
–

Or the OP is proposing the idea that successful men are much more emotionally and psychologically resilient post-rejection, allowing them to monkey branch from option to option without much afterthought. It doesn't really matter though, it's sort of a trivial discussion at the end of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:39 PM
-1

Indeed. Observationally, males are usually inherently more transgressive, assertive, and audacious with stand up (primarily because of less possibly reprocussions socially). Women may subconsciously be more vigilant and cautious of their mannerisms, and context-control in order to prevent serious offense and backlash in the audience. It's depressing, but respect tends to be more of a given with regards to male comedians.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:29 AM
6

This. The greater male variability hypothesis strikes yet again. More men pooled on either side of the spectrum compared to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 03:50 AM
1

Was I shadow banned or something? My reply isn't appearing!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:20 PM
0

What inexperience? Missionary with her hips being slightly elevated, and legs in the air would artificially shorten ones vaginal length, allowing for deeper penetration. But the length difference between various positions doesn't have as drastic of an effect as other key elements; arousal, basal vagina size, as well as phallus size.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:16 PM
2

When did I insinuate that criticism would generally be perceived as friendly gratification? When did I insinuate that it wouldn't affect the perception of the insulter, and affect the self-esteem of the insulted? More presumptions, because you're evidently struggling with directly refuting my points. Are you referring to my previous statement - that unfiltered phallus criticism would generally be recieved more profoundly than unfiltered labia criticism? Also, complete side note, but do you know …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 09:12 PM
2

For the love of all that is holy (coming from a rigid atheist), I'm specifically referring to the generality of men not having strict labia size, color, and shape preferences. Men DO generally have preferences for a potential female partner's appearance, and even mannerisms. Men are overwhelmingly selective of the idealized female archetype when selecting for long term partnership. A penis that feels good is generally going to appear attractive and desirable to women. Your last paragraph was ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 07:37 PM
1

My words don't reflect what you've clearly misinterpreted, so your response was clearly unwarranted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 07:22 PM
1

This is generally true, I'm not going to disagree with that. Men are inherently more selfish, greedy, and entitled when it comes to intercourse. They don't invest much energy, and intrinsic resources when it comes to procreation either. This is all generally empirical. But that's not what I'M proposing. I'm a strong advocate for womens' pleasure and sexual and romantic satisfaction. If you actually took the time to critically comprehend my comments, you'd realize that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:43 PM
1

With all due respect, you sound ridiculous. Presumptions shouldn't be integrated into a intellectual debate. What's next, ad hominems?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:40 PM
1

To your first paragraph, when did I even insinuate that there shouldn't be any empathy? I was explicitly stating that homogenous, monolithic labia preferences shouldn't (from a biological perspective) be as prevalent as phallus preferences. The shape and size of the phallus has visual, AND practical value. It's directly applicable to the physiological act of intercourse, whereas the outer, visible portion of one's labia isn't (to the same extent). Therefore, everything else you've stated after i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:38 PM
0

You've completely misconstrued my comments, Madame.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:27 PM
1

Remind me to absolutely disintegrate this reply when I'm finished work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:25 PM
0

In a thoroughly aroused woman, the average johnson simply isn't long enough to reach the anterior fornix, let alone the cervix. So to reiterate your point, no. I've never hit the cervix, and the women I've been with haven't had particularly long torsos as well. The average aroused vaginal depth doesn't correlate proportionally with the average NBP (non bone pressed) phallus length. Tenting CAN certainly prevent the penis from hitting the cervix (in women with a retroverted uterus, as tenting and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:39 PM
1

I've never in my life heard this, so it very well could be a case of the loudest and most outlandish opinions being the easiest to recollect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:01 AM
0

Woah, I was expecting a little more abbhorently derogatory urban terminology from a blue piller! Love the response. I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment. Men can be stupid, irrational, illogical, neurotic, and evidently immensely misogynistic. Tomorrow evening at 5, the anchor's got a groundbreaking discovery to share about how the gargantuan star in the middle of the milky way is blindingly bright, and scorching hot! Women put up with A LOT of unnessary judgement throughout their lives, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:00 AM
0

Even when considering a retroverted uterus (which has a 20% prevalence rate), the statistically average phallus physically isn't capable of reaching the cervix, or even the anterior fornix. Furthermore, none of these articles accurately control for those on oral contraceptives, and hormonal altering birth control pills. Intrinsically, during ovulation, the upper third of the vaginal canal would expand and "balloon" (a phenomenon known as tenting) in order to accommodate phallus shaped objects. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:46 AM
-1

How do you know my age?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:28 AM
0

Because I'm a male I can't be educated on basic human anatomy? Is that what you're trying to insinuate?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:14 AM
-1

If you're genuinely proposing that porn-brain induced, highly selective labia preferences is a universal phenomenon more relevant than phallus size idealizations, then this conversation is over. I'm not stating that the labia hasn't ever been the central focal point for a variety of insults, I can confidently assure you that those jokes were likely made out of spite, bitterness, and male neuroticism. No mentally sane man will critique a labia that intently to the point of it being considered unn…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:13 AM
-2

Again, that's false. Usually, when women are in their most fertile phases of their menstural cycles, the cervix is actually positioned much higher. The vast majority of women may not experience this phenomenon the way it's described here due to the simple fact that the vast majority of young women are on birth control/oral contraceptives (which is actually a good thing). On account of this, adequate foreplay is almost always required to get women somewhat close to complete arousal and tenting. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:05 AM
1

That factually isn't true. If you're specifically speaking for yourself, then you could be considered somewhat of an outlier, simply put. However, for the majority of women, a considerably larger than average phallus would almost always be preferred over a statistically average one (albeit, I strongly disagree with the supposed statistical average). Anatomically speaking, the vaginal canal, when full tented and aroused is capable of accommodating objects strikingly larger than a mere 15cm breakf…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:27 PM
-5

The thing is, even IF that were remotely as common and consciously judged (which it observationally isn't), it wouldn't and shouldn't be taken as severely and profoundly. There isn't any functional or practical reason as to why this preference would be considered even mildly prominent. A strict preference for a specific appearance of a woman's labia serves negligible purpose, from a biological standpoint. There's no objectivity here. This phenomenon isn't nearly as common. Not at all. It also, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:22 PM
2

Your last statement ~ "doesn't mean the bigger the better", is a common misconception and misinterpreted evaluation of genuine underlying preferences. Statistically speaking, if the ideal phallus size (strictly for PiV) is within the top 5 - 0.1% of the male population, then the commonly regurgitated, satirical trope of "the bigger the better" could probably be grounded in reality. Of course nobody wants to have sex with a Pringles can, but something even remotely resembling a phallus of that ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:14 PM
5

Anatomically speaking, phallus size naturally being such an critically sensitive and controversial subject of sexual/romantic judgment, size is largely underrated. The vast majority of people aren't even remotely informed and knowledgable on human primary sex characteristics, and how they interrelate with one another. There are a vast multitude of factors to consider, but ultimately, size does in fact matter. Potentially A LOT. And for most experienced, sexually adventurous and unapologetically …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:21 PM
-7

There isn't a specific labia preference amongst male spaces. This isn't prevalent at all. Everything else is feasible and understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:08 PM
6

This is why porn literature is considerable more popular amongst women. Women are interested in the emotional and psychological content, and highly erotic context as opposed to men. Women are interested in fantasy (generally).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:07 PM
3

If an average sized johnson is doing that on a consistent basis, then not all conditions are being met. Rarely should an average sized phallus be in contact with the cervix AT ALL, as arousal and tenting would prevent that from occuring. As the cervix shifts out of harms way towards the posterior, the posterior fornix is now essentially the "end" of the canal, allowing for deep penetration to not only be perfectly tolerable, but highly pleasurable and widely considered an erogenous zone for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 08:05 PM
5

How will the OP respond to this comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:33 PM
2

(I know it's already happening, and largely inevitable. I just wanted my comment to gain more traction, and recieve responses from various intellectual perspectives).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:12 PM
6

I doubt this will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 11:46 AM
2

False. But I guess our interpretations of what a smooth talker is are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 09:34 PM
3

This describes me too!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:03 AM
0

Fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:13 PM
3

A smooth talker is usually quick witted, humourous, and highly creative. They are capable of integrating phrases and discourse about generally anything and everything. They are able to improvise almost instantaneously. That's intelligence. That's something you don't necessarily teach. Moreover, to your point, women ARE in fact attracted to men in STEM-correlated fields. Not because they're inherently directly sexually attracted to Einstein's or Newton's, but simply because of the unmediated bypr…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:15 PM
4

Lackluster bait, my man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:10 PM
2

Likewise!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 07:06 PM
9

I think his comment is a caricature of those who actually do that. He's probably just mocking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:27 PM
2

High intellect is a double edged sword as well, because intelligent people have a strong tendency to overthink things, and perceive things objectively and measurably. Many intelligent people have a defeatist, pessimistic mindset as well. Initiative and motivation aren't necessarily a characteristic exclusively associated to intelligent people either. That's why I'd argue that less intelligent people tend to be more fearless.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:47 PM
2

Well, just know you aren't alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:38 PM
2

So someone who's had plastic surgery for purely cosmetic purposes, and then using such physical, surgically enhanced alterations to their advantage within the dating market with the intention of securing someone above their pay grade wouldn't be widely perceived as at least somewhat deceptive in nature? I'm not advocating for fighting fire with fire, and counteracting with deceitfulness and manipulation at all. That's not what the bigger person does in this hypothetical scenario. But there's abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 03:35 AM
2

I've always thought it was common knowledge (whether subconscious or concious) to be overly selective of favourable physiological attributes over poor attributes. How is this considered even remotely dabbling in eugenicist thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:47 AM
2

Oh, you were genuinely referring to yourself? Apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:37 AM
2

You can only be so successful with a low intelligence quotient, it's usually one of the strongest predictors and predominant variables in overall success. They tend to be more brave, ambitious, and more decisive though! Those are masculine characteristics that women widely find attractive and sexeh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 12:27 AM
1

Intelligence! Very important. Certainly nothing below a triple digit IQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:03 PM
4

This. Generally speaking, I'd say it's a toss up for men who expect their wives to change to a noticable extent after marriage. Men don't tend to consider and base their selection processes on socioeconomic potential nearly as much, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:02 PM
1

You can anecdotally confirm that, generally speaking, women are attracted to men who act like men (ex. masculine)?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 01:28 AM
4

Libido disparity is a huge point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 01:25 AM
5

This is very true, males (from a biological standpoint) have extremely low, ground-level standards. With that being said, males aren't necessarily overtly cautious and selective when it comes to the ole' wham bam thank you ma'am act. This may be perceived as somewhat repulsive and off-putting, but almost any consenting, decent looking woman that's neurotypical is free game for the vast majority of men. The concept isn't thoroughly understood as of yet, but it's hypothesised that males are genera…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 03:10 AM
6

This. However, the ideal female age for procreation has been scientifically observed to be 20-30 (pending on genetics of course, akin to men. However, because men can produce sperm for the vast majority of their lives, naturally sperm become exponentially more expendable and disposable. Andropause is also a very real and prevalent phenomenon that has existed since the dawn of time, so females also become wary of males sexually unfit for reproduction. EDIT: An embarrassingly large amount of gramm…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 02:58 AM
1

When did you initially begin your career in UX design? What are some of the prerequisites and certifications required?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:11 AM
1

What industry do you work in, if I may ask? That income range is statistically within the tip top percentile of earners, I'd like to gain some insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:03 AM
8

I've never insinuated that it did correlate with commitment as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:02 AM
10

I'll admit, I'm not a fan of these purely arbitrary buzz words and terms, I lose a little bit of digital dignity every time I use them. But for the sake of the conversation, readers will find the urban definitions of these words much easier to comprehend in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:30 AM
2

That's very impressive indeed, are you based in America?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:29 AM
1

How much do men in your dating pool make on average?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:24 AM
2

The long term boyfriend/husband dick refers to a penis that regular, consistent, and reliable sex can be achieved with. It almost never causes any significant issues (such as pain or discomfort), and isn't a size where the woman become completely distracted and infatuated with sex to the point where the relationship's fundamental foundation is built upon purely lustful sexual activity (because that would refer to a "vacation" dick). In essence, it would compromise the platonic/comradeship aspect…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:13 AM
3

This! The vast majority of women agree with you on this, ma'am. Women are inherently immensely attracted to true, genuine, unforced, authentic masculinity. As you so eloquently stated, a man who could kill (anyone and anything) with his bare hands, but never would unless the situation become dire and extremely appropriate enough. This description is the epitome of a psychologically/mentally ideal male. Men who embody these characteristics tend to overwhelmingly have the most success. However, me…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 09:35 PM
–

This. Men are usually incredibly selfish, and greedy in bed. Most of them are repugnantly entitled as well, due to them being unjustly privileged in so many other facets of life. Genuinely speaking, I feel bad for women and what they have to endure. It's simply unfair, to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:02 AM
–

As we all know, women's sexual anatomy differs vastly from men's. It's usually noticablely more challenging and tedious to achieve orgasm as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:58 AM
0

Your entire post is accurate, and largely based in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:46 PM
5

It's a red flag that he actually took the initiative to learn how to chop potatoes? Hell, I'm almost a senior and still can't replace a pair of turbo chargers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:46 PM
1

This phenomenon can be easily explained. It's a byproduct of how we have evolved since the dawn of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 09:25 PM
–

This. When the biological imperative that is reproduction is involved, women usually tend to overwhelmingly prefer men with more manly physiological and psychological characteristics. Usually during ovulation, women (that aren't on the hormonal oral contraceptive pill) will defer to men who exhibit more masculine traits (alongside lower levels of inhibition). For these simple reproductive tendencies, humans have evolved drastically and are now FAR beyond the food chain itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:02 PM
–

Some women will, pending some other conditions are met.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 02:01 AM
–

Both certainly play a part.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 01:59 AM
–

Hence why I said "better genes", as women are innately predisposed to being especially sexually selective (during ovulation) for men with objectively better genes best suited for the survival and continuation of our species. Feeling safe is a consciously practical thought for women, but also simultaneously a primitive, sexually arousing thought as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 07:49 PM
1

Exactly, but most men are able to do that anyways. Moreover, tall, broad-shouldered men are markedly more likely to be able to protect them from most regular ordinary threats. Furthermore, they've got better genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 09:05 PM
1

Ah, so no mannerisms would be changed in your idealized world?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 05:11 AM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28545751/ That's one of them, which actually proves the disparity in prevalence to be slightly smaller than once perceived.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 05:09 AM
1

I see, thanks for the clarification.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:17 AM
7

I was about to mention these statistics that directly contradict OP's plausible and intuitive speculations. One major simplified element that quite possibly negates the OP's (already falsified) hypothesis is that usually the wants outlast and are far less expendable than the needs in life. Case in point: Does anyone fundamentally need a pet golden retriever (aside from those who require sercive dogs)? Choosing to be with someone out of "love", and choosing to be with someone out of desperation a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:14 AM
5

This is the most objectively valid and existentially realistic comment thus far.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:04 AM
1

Standards and deal breakers are generally quite divergent between the sexes when critically examined, however. But you're correct, most functional, independent, mentally developed adults would be significantly more keen on those who present themselves maturely and are regulatory of their emotions and personal hygiene habits, as well as all the other examples yourself and the OP have listed. With that being said, these characteristics and tendencies manifest in different ways and with contrasting…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:00 AM
7

This seemingly rings true, in that women's preferences and interest triggers vary somewhat drastically throughout most demographics. Your average man intrinsically won't ever have the same selectively receptive privileges that your average woman has, which is perfectly acceptable and intuitive (based on our biology).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:49 AM
0

Incels are their own responsibility, and must find resolve within themselves under their very own accountability and internal reflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:44 AM
7

These dynamics seem to be purely and solely built upon a foundation of pleasure and enjoyment, with little to no reciprocal domestic responsibilities and emotional support. One would presume that, objectively, a man's prime would be somewhere within the 20-30 year-old range, so some women (irregardless of age demographic) would potentially activate their hindbrains' 'autopilot' mode, if you will. I highly doubt the older woman-younger man relationships dynamics are a mirrored symmetrical version…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:36 AM
6

It seems as though the OP deliberately temporarily endorsed with a highly controversial perspective in order to gain public traction and engagement (for no viable reason at all). I doubt anyone in their right mind with measurable ethical judgement would genuinely agree with the OP's take, but it's largely negligible now, because the post recieved responses. This sub is simply for discussion, after all, so it isn't necessarily a bad thing. I enjoy playing the devil's advocate too occasionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:31 AM
2

In response to your first paragraph -- obviously, I wouldn't disagree here. Pickiness and overtly sexual selectivness amongst females stems predominantly from the vast disparity in fundamental reproductive roles between the genders. Women literally bear children. Intuitively, a woman would be extra cautious, vigilant, and wary of potential male suitors. There's an astronically high risk for women that men simply will never ever have to bear the burden of experiencing in their lifetimes. Yes, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:44 AM
2

Supply and demand is a result of deeply rooted biological factors that don't always need to be disregarded. However, you're correct, technically. Your hypothetical is sound, but largely irrelevant and unrealistic in this day and age. It's not really a feasible possibility, but I do understand where you're coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:33 AM
29

Women are rightfully pickier than men. They generally face a massively unignorable safety risk around men, and also expend significantly more time and energy toward reproduction (considering the majority of heterosexual relationships eventually results in the desire for offspring). No need to whine about it. If you were a woman, I'd guarantee you'd be excersising your biological entitlements in an indistinguishable fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:27 PM
1

Women are attracted to sexual dimorphism relationship dynamics (whether is be romantic or purely sexual/hindbrain-driven instinctual). You'll find that, during ovulation periods in the menstrual cycle (the most important time frame for humanity from a reproductive standpoint), heterosexual women tend to have overtly selective tunnel vision for men with masculine characteristics. These mating strategies have worked for Millenia upon Millenia. We aren't going to change now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:11 PM
3

This isn't one of those things. Perhaps, quite possibly, there are more men at the very extreme percentile, but studies do indeed demonstrate that genetically influenced neurological disorders that primarily affect speech and social mannerisms (such as autism) are markedly more prevalent amongst males compared to females. That is a demonstrable fact. I do speculate that AMAB people are collectively more genetically susceptible to increased characteristic (physiological and psychological) varianc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:06 PM
2

It is indeed practically verifiable and empirically proven that, generally speaking, women are inherently better in social situations and have notably better oral fluency than men. Again, generally. Studies demonstrate this, if I'm not mistaken. I could be slightly overestimating the polarity, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:34 PM
5

Men have always been the performers, so this is true as well. Doesn't negate what I stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 07:52 PM
0

The Witcher or Superman?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 04:00 AM
1

That's a terrible comparison, the sky being blue isn't nearly as nuanced and compex of a topic. No need to be so deliberately obtuse, brethren. I'm just going to assume you're referring to short, stocky tradesmen with ponytails when you reference top percentile males.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 02:58 AM
1

Fits what description, though? Furthermore, would psychological or physical characteristics have a large impact in attracting women? What's the general running theme amongst these men that you've noticed throughout your life? EDIT: Thanks for the edit, looks is awfully vague though. Status is a little more comprehensible.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 01:50 AM
12

Generally speaking, a higher percentage of men tend to be socially awkward and inept compared to women (which I posit is due to generic hardwiring), however I do agree with your post and reasoning somewhat. Moreover, usually the men who imprint the most negative and off-putting encounters are the ones that are most memorable amongst women, so they'll tend to be more vocal about them as they can easily recall those memories. So it might not necessarily be those prominently vocal extremist feminis…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 01:46 AM
2

I would like to know how the general RP community defines a top percentage male, and how they differentiate them from middle tier, and lower tier males. What characteristics do you believe women generally subconsciously and/or consciously acknowledges and are receptive towards?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 01:38 AM
–

This isn't necessarily true. Men who score markedly on Machiavellian and dark triad traits tend to be perceived as more sexually attractive and desirable (in a more acute and temporary context). Some women depend and rely on sexual compatibility for a relationship to work. Caissons for a skyscraper, if you will. Now what I'm saying isn't at all synonymous with the statement: "women actively prefer men who are highly narcissistic and/or psychopathic". But, generally speaking, men who express mini…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:19 PM
–

Hypergamy (defined as dating up in pretty much every tangible and intangible aspect) is considerably more prevalent amongst the female gender as opposed to males, for nothing but good reasons for our species. Realize, that if women weren't as selective throughout homosapien history, we wouldn't be where we are today.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:30 PM
2

Respectfully, there isn't much of a disparity when all conditions are ideal. Unfortunately, all conditions theoretically can't ever be ideal, as not all men are endowed enough. However, most are able to compensate somewhat through oral and/or foreplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 01:55 AM
1

Not all women can, but most certainly can. Akin to how most men can orgasm through PiV as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:40 AM
1

Can have a PiV? I'm not sure if that was a typo, but I'm presuming you meant to say PiV orgasm. This is a common misconception, one crucial aspect that many many people seem to underestimate (or oftentimes unfortunately completely disregard) is foreplay and prior preparation before PiV. This is especially mandatory for well-endowed men. The vast majority of sexually experienced women without any physical sexual ailments or conditions (such as vaginismus) are able to have intercourse on a regular…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 12:13 AM
–

Why don't modern humans engage in more polyamorous or polygamous relationship dynamics? Humans are naturally and inherently poly (from a biological standpoint), so I don't understand why it's become so taboo once agricultural revolution struck. Confirmation of paternity isn't actually required to breed a functioning society that operates in peace and harmony.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:52 PM
2

Genuinely speaking, the only real answer here is penis size (or lack thereof). I know this claim sounds rather outlandish and completely unheard of (sarcasm), but it's definitely a majorly underrepresented and underestimated factor when it comes to sexual pleasure. Anatomically speaking. If anyone is curious as to why that is, just ask. I've studied the subject religiously in the past, so I'm fairly informed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter