TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Captain_Bu11shit Archive

View 2 posts and 64 comments by Captain_Bu11shit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thank you too. This has been one of the most, if not the most, insightful discussions I've had on reddit.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:14 PM
1

First of all: I never said I ignored his arguments. I was just pointing out that the way he acts may deter people from listening to him. Second of all: Fair point. I didn't think that some of his actions could be reactionary, however I don't think that would account for things like his "feminism is cancer" speech. Those seem entirely purposed to piss people off.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 08:06 AM
2

Trust me, I'm a big proponent of "listening to the other side," but often times I find people who like to lie or stretch the truth to support their own narrative or to get a rise out of people, and I typically like to avoid these people, not because I don't want intelligent discussion but because "trolls" and liars actively harm it. Also if he gave of the impression of a troll there would be no reason for me to believe that any of his arguments were serious, and best way to deal with an asshole …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 01:36 AM
9

Eh, personally if I had seen his "feminism is cancer" speech before one of his more "insightful" speeches I probably never would have given him a second thought. Not to say that I currently praise the man but if my impression had started with "troll" milo I never would have taken him seriously.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 06:59 PM
1

What. The. Fuck.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:43 PM
3

Wait, if I remember right, this was posted like a year ago and there was an actual response from the creators of the site saying they were going to fix it. Is this an old picture or did they not fix it?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 12:48 PM
1

It seems more like there should have been a "not" in the question because I'm pretty sure blonde jokes aren't "sexist". It may have simply been a mistake.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:45 AM
1

I thought they said they originally thought 38 then expanded it to ~90
/r/MensRights15/06/16 10:07 PM
1

Where did you get those numbers? I can't find the trial conclusion.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:56 PM
1

I'm pretty sure I just read she is under investigation for nearly a hundred.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:33 PM
1

I think this is what I recalled perhaps what I was reading was simply pointing out that some of the deadliest serial killers are women and I misremembered.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:16 PM
1

I thought the highest was to that nurse that euthanized a crap ton of people.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:20 PM
3

Holy fucking shit. What is wrong with this sub.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 11:55 PM
1

Ditto
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:32 PM
1

Horseshoe theory in action
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:29 PM
1

As a texan i have an intresting perspective on this. At first my knee jerk reaction was anger, for example you saying the confederate flag represented cowardice pissed me off, even though I'm against almost everything that flag stood for. I think there still exists an us vs them mentality with southerners and northerners. I assume from the often generalization of southern culture with hillbilly/redneck shit and religious conservatism. For me it seems to cause a sense of seperation from the North…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 07:43 PM
2

I always just say it would require clear evidence of malicious intent. Short and sweet.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:30 PM
4

Wait, has this guy not even seen the movie?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:16 PM
113

There was one that showed both women's problems and men's problems that I saw a while back. I think that would be something better to hang around the school, because it's more egalitarian and less one-sided. It would also be more accepted by all sides of the debate (theoretically).
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:14 PM
1

Being pressured into it does make a difference, you have a fair point, and im sorry you're being downvoted. However it is not something that should be assumed by the school or by us, nor is it something to be discarded. Until further information is revealed I will stick with equal punishment.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:36 PM
1

Sorry, he looked awfully young in the thumbnail
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:06 PM
4

I thought minors had anonymity in court cases? What happened here?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:50 PM
14

Yes it is. Sexism is " prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination [...] on the basis of sex." You are stereotyping them based on their sex and you are generalizing them. Despite the fact that I already disagree with your blatantly misogynistic assertion that women are inferior, the idea that women can be so neatly organized in a single basket is already flawed logic, and to say women have the exact same opportunities and that women want to be inferior is not only lacking substantial evidence to …
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:13 PM
2

slow jazz hands
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:44 PM
2

I could argue against that and say how he was not in harm's way so he had no reason to act so brutally. But I don't need to because it doesn't matter. If some guy intentionally annoys me by banging on his desk I do not. Have. The. Right. To hit him. If I do hit him, even though he is in the wrong, I am also in the wrong for failing to control myself. It's not a one way street, and both parties involved can be in the wrong, if you ignore what one party did because of the other's actions you're be…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:12 PM
1

We need to assign responsibility to both, she broke the rules and was sexual assaulting him and he over reacted to it. Neither cancels out the other, they were both in the wrong, and IMO debating who was more in the wrong is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:10 PM
9

Came here to say this. In fact myth busters were able to trick even the most advanced (publicly released and at the time) lie detector tests. Including one that I think measured brain activity.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:21 PM
2

I'm under the impression that many that are anti-MRA believe that the MRM wants to halt progress on such issues instead of add to them.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 08:03 PM
5

Am I the only one that would be perfectly fine with raising sexual violence awareness if it targeted men AND woman, instead of just men.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:32 PM
1

I was mostly just wondering why seedless fruit were necessarily horrible just because they're unnatural, but Klarius did present an intresting perspective.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:29 PM
1

Even if I shared your stereotypes, my personal experience of the women around me and the anecdotal examples I've come across do not represent the entire female population. Saying they do is like saying "the guys I know in my town are assholes, therefore all guys are assholes." It doesn't work like that. If you don't have statistical evidence that PROVES the ENTIRETY of females behave a certain way than you can't truthfully say that they do. All you're doing is making shit up and claiming that it…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 05:46 AM
1

This is all very obvious and rudimentary. What you say is "obvious and rudimentary" doesn't matter. You're generalizations are just that and until you can provide actual statistical evidence that all or most woman "act feminist" or even that feminists "act feminist" by your definition, your rebuttal remains entirely anecdotal, subjective, and useless to this discussion. Should you provide actual evidence to support your side I will happily continue this discussion, but if all you can throw at me…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:22 PM
1

I'm confused, what makes nature automatically justified? And vise versa, what makes altering nature necessarily bad? If I take a plant, alter it's genes a bit, and produce it on a massive scale is it bad or good? It has achieved it's perceived goal of survival but it is not done so through natural means. If we say using nature for something other than its original "purpose" is evil we have just committed both a vile and benevolent act simultaneously.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:41 PM
1

I would very much like to see your evidence that most woman act and vote feminist. What does acting feminist mean? Are all decisions that feminists support automatically bad? Are we automatically right? On another note, by putting all women into a single group you are in essence generalizing them; you're judging them preemptively based on their gender; you are being sexist. Do the majority of women hate men? Maybe, maybe not but you are generalizing. Even when it comes to feminism the complexity…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 12:12 AM
8

I understand why you're pissed but I advise you to pay closer attention to your own words. Excluding the 100% female bit you seem to use more personal reasoning than evidence (or at least evidence that I've heard of) and you seem to be demonizing the female gender. You may be mad at feminists, SJWs, or just plain stuck up assholes but it's important (if you must) to focus your anger on the speaker, not those that they claim to represent. I suggest you remember who your enemies are. Your enemies …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 07:26 PM
2

It bothers me that you're being down voted despite the fact that I see no evidence you're wrong here. We need to have contradicting (and in your case questioning) posts a lot more. The devil's advocate is an important part of any argument that's worth a damn. I think we should stop up voting things like the overly used "gender switch" hypothetical that we see in every thread and start up voting posts that contradict our own opinions and represent a different viewpoint so that they may be seen an…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 06:23 PM
1

When reading an analysis on Anita sarkeesian's work the author stated (with sources) that the violent crimes against men and woman are roughly the same in size (with men ever so slightly above) and he also stated men make up the majority of every violent crime except rape so it's not that he's wrong more that the entire truth is not being stated. While men may experience more it is important to discern how much more and of what, because some might assume between 3x more to 1% more. Violent crime…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:48 PM
1

Does it bother anyone else of the possibility that those who make claims like this and then don't provide examples have actual been prevented from posting by the mods and we are just unaware of it. Just thinking because it used to happen to me all the time in feminist subreddits and made me look like an ignorant asshole because my rebuttal was never shown.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:27 AM
4

This "fear" im speaking of is not a rational one but it does (so I'm told) exist. In the same way some guys are wary of the people they sleep with in case of a false accusation some woman would become wary of reporting rape in fear of it backfiring even if only those with clear malicious intent are charged. To clarify I'm trying to explain how to be rid of this fear not how logical it is or wether it's based on actual facts. Apparently telling people they won't get falsely convicted isn't workin…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 10:05 PM
6

I haven't confirmed but a feminist friend told me the worry is if a non-fake rape case doesn't have enough proof then the court would go after the victim and theoretically falsely accuse the victim of lying about the rape getting him/her possibly sent to jail for doing nothing wrong. This fear of false persecution is what would lead them to not report being raped. It should be know that not all rape claims that are dismissed are necessarily false acusations, they could just be a lack of enough e…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:02 PM
1

I wasn't showing a thread that was deleted I was showing one without anything deleted with a good discussion and that was interesting that I found on the frontpage. I was not trying to show the censorship of the feminism subreddit I was trying to show the lack of censorship (as a good thing)
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:37 AM
1

It had actually good conversations in there too. I have now lost any possible faith I had in the moderators of that sub reddit
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:39 AM
1

None... well at least not anymore. The rape statistics and wage gap most of them used but after I showed evidence to the contrary they usually would shut up about it. When it comes to the anti DV campaigns however, I have no idea, it never came up somehow... with any of them.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:48 AM
1

Regardless of wether an apology was needed or not I had completely forgotten to check. And upon a little bit of searching I found for myself that (at least reddit) feminism has dramatically less support for her than the MRM, just as you said. I guess I just assumed she was one of many. Regardless, thank you for allowing me to correct myself before I used her as evidence in further arguments. And I'll have to look into her book too
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:07 PM
1

I'm sorry my anecdotal (offline) experience led me to believe that a large portion of feminists are "good" feminists and I did not feel it was necessary to look into how Ms. Sommers is regarded by the feminist movement because I assumed that she was accepted by both movements. That being said I apologize for not checking my facts.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:16 PM
7

Thank you for pointing this out. I know many feminists who could literally be considered egalitarian but they prefer the title feminist. These are people that actually believe in TRUE equality and not the advancement of solely woman's rights. In fact many feminists like the factual feminist are not the enemy, so let us be sure not to generalize feminists, because their ideals and the way they reach them vary too extremly to generalize with any accuracy.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:44 PM
0

Are... you my brother cpt. bullshitsky
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:13 AM
-1

I'm sorry at first I didn't realize that you were trolling and I think I took it a bit too seriously and I apologize for that.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:12 AM
2

Man you people are spamming the shit out of that post. I debate practically everyone I know about this stuff everyday away from the keyboard. however I do not identify as an MRA more as an egalitarian or equalist so your rant may or may not be directly addressing me
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:56 PM
1

Let's be realistic though, there is a possibility that mensrights, like feminism, censors opposing views or people saying they censor people. My own anecdotal experience would say otherwise as I have seen many long arguments in mensrights where the opposition, with good evidence and reasoning is not deleted. We must entertain the idea that this censorship takes place and find out the truth in order to be sure we are not following blindly in hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:26 PM
1

How do you know if someone removed the comment themselves or if it was removed by a mod?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:03 PM
1

I agree with your point however I personally think these are also just troll threats (when not accounting for the families leaked private information) because I just can't fathom a reason to kill this guy. I think however OP was trying to point out that people don't react to it the same way not the fact that it was being taken seriously.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:22 AM
3

http://youtu.be/75aX9mlipiY Don't have the reddit link but it was in top rated this month
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:43 PM
3

Wasn't a video of a male model walking around New York already posted here?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:07 PM
2

Wasn't there a movie about Madam Curie?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:34 PM
9

To be fair using a wider, bulkier man wouldn't work as well for the l in google.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:19 PM
1

To say only the brave men is a terrible idea. It essentially erases all the female victims and survivors of war and that is not okay. Doing such would be comparable to saying "thanks to all the WHITE scientists and engineers!" It is never okay to delete the minority, no matter how small.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:16 PM
0

There is nothing wrong with focusing on one gender. You're right she is not required to focus on both genders. The idea behind the usual outrage is the general gynocentrism of feminism, where it talks about woman's needs instead of men's. This in its self is fine the problem comes when feminism claims they solve men's problems too and then say men promoting men's rights are mysognistic and men's problems become irrelevant and are ignored. This is the reason mensrights exists not because they onl…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:43 PM
1

What evidence do you have of censorship in the MRM? I personally like to stay up to date on both side of the gender debates so such information would be very useful to me.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:23 PM
3

http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/01/no-women-don-t-make-less-money-than-men.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html http://www.aei-ideas.org/2014/04/once-you-impose-the-ceteris-paribus-condition-the-alleged-23-gender-pay-gap-starts-to-evaporate/
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:49 PM
1

I can't upvote this enough
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:54 PM
6

Additionally I checked /r/feminism and they too thought the argument was bullshit the only person that agreed's flair literally was radical feminist and they called out her bs
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:44 AM
7

http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/heart-disease-death-rate-by-gender/ shows that men die more often than women by a substantial margin due to heart disease ( at least in U.S.) , if the people suffering are not even then neither should the treatment be.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:25 AM
2

I'm confused about the logic behind it being illegal to have a nude selfie of yourself when your underage, even when it's not shared
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter