TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CaseyAnthonyFanClub Archive

View 0 posts and 452 comments by CaseyAnthonyFanClub on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"Cool. So now we will report you to Reddit for an entire ban on your IP." - mod of some subreddit who doesn't understand how IP's work
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 06:25 AM
0

Good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 10:51 PM
0

Why does reddit and certain reddit mods think it/they can legit 'ban' people? It is stupidly easily to circumvent any kind of reddit ban. It's all performative.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 10:29 PM
1

She will not. They will taste overrated like every other tamale on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 08:35 PM
1

I cant even begin telling you how outrageously wrong this is. Mexican food aside, LA has some of the best food on the planet. Albuquerque doesnt even come close to LA level of quality. Like these are not comparable food cities to anyone who likes food.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 07:40 PM
1

I don't know anything about Texas, all of my Mexican food knowledge and experience is from AZ and Los Angeles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 06:57 PM
6

Tamales are the worst Mexican food and I dont care what anyone says. I have lived in the southwest a long time. Every other type of Mexican food is better. Tacos, burritos, chimichangas, etc etc, it all kicks ass except for tamales which is dogfood for dogbrains (also the title of my memoir)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 05:38 PM
3

Lol I kno tis a yoke This happened to me and one of my exes once, we laughed about how I should press charges for her taking advantage of me without my conscious consent. I think its probably something that happens to most couples once theyre together long enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 04:32 PM
1

It is because no matter how wealthy you are that is an insane amount of money for a single event. Forty eight thousand dollars. It took me like almost a decade of dilligent penny pinching to save that much and I am one of the actually lucky ones. Anyone who demands even a fifth of that price for something like a wedding is retarded and belongs to the streets.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 04:28 PM
2

You done got raped. What a goofball.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 04:26 PM
2

redscarepod
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 03:57 AM
1

Of course we should. When did I insinuate or say otherwise? Oh, I know, I didn't, and you just tried to use this as a gotcha argument because you're assuming I'm part of some group I'm not actually a part of. Lookee here, it's almost as if you wouldn't look this retarded if you had just taken my original advice to heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:46 PM
1

In my opinion it is beneficial to be sympathetic to nearly every group unless they are outright causing physical violence. Barring that, all groups ought to be listened to and potentially helped. Outgroup human cooperation is really the only tangible way to solve significant problems. So no, I don't think going "hurr durr teh evil idiots deserve what they get and it is I who is smart and good" is effective. It's pretty much just snobbery and more othering.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 03:21 PM
6

Spoken like a woman who likely thinks she's the main character. Lack of sympathy for the evil others is a primary component of incel and rabid fem logic, it's always nice to see one end of a horseshoe tapping the other without realizing it. Lack of self awareness is another component, funnily enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 01:18 PM
2

There are a couple episodes in the middle there (4, 5, 6) that should be permanently on the sidebar. They basically perfectly encapsulate so many of the arguments here, so much so that I am convinced Mike White at least lurks here, if not posts regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 03:11 PM
8

"24 year olds are LITERAL BABIES and their brains are closer to INFANTS than ADULTS" - rational human complaining about age gap relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 02:25 PM
2

k. Men not only overrate their own attractiveness, they overrate their own skills and intelligence, too. I have never actually read a study that says otherwise. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/201507/when-men-arent-good-looking-they-think ​ https://iradio.ie/men-think-theyre-better-looking-than-they-are/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8858829/ Also, it's not really "just men", ugly people tend to think they're more attractive than they are too: https://bigt…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 02:08 PM
1

I have already read the links. Do you understand statistics? Clearly not by your comment. With the right sample, a survey can make pretty accurate estimates from a surprisingly small sample. For example, iirc, with a random sample of 2,000 people you get a 95% confidence interval of something like 2%. It doesn't matter if your total population is 10,000 or 100,000,000, that margin of error doesn't get any bigger (actually with 10,000 or less it'll be a bit smaller). I think if you turn in a good…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:27 PM
1

Bro, it has an N=almost4k. It's a big enough study. If it was N=300 or something, you might have a point, but when data is collected from 4k people and that data is significantly different than the largest data set, that means two things, a) original data set probably has to be modified because it's not accurate anymore or never was accurate, and b) things have changed like they always do since we live on Earth, with humans. I don't give a fuck about your fake qualms with this. The growing body …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:16 PM
1

It is just the CDC. Anyone else who says the average number of lifetime sexual partners is 4-8 got their info from the CDC. Where else would they have gotten the number? Lmao I never said all data is measured or collected equally. I am saying there is an obvious problem pretty much everyone in the social sciences can see when they look at N count stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:11 PM
1

Actually "the stats", from many different places, say all sorts of different numbers. You are just in love with the infallible brilliant never-wrong CDC, a branch of the infallible surely always-right U.S. government. Your galaxy brain sure is shining rays of golden informative light down on all the morlocks today, Lift.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:08 PM
1

The only org that says the average lifetime N count is 4-8 is the CDC. So I can look at the CDC numbers and take them at face value. Or I can read all the numbers that I can find, including the CDC, most of which say a much higher number, and reach a conclusion based on all the current studies. If some of the current studies contradict one another, then it seems as though there might be a problem in number gathering.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:06 PM
1

We're not talking about casual sex, we're talking about lifetime N count. The CDC does not have infinite resources to constantly be doing social calibration studies lmao. That's exactly why independent organizations do the studies on their own. The CDC hasn't updated this for years, and if you think stats like this remain unchanged for that length of time you desperately need to go back to school.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 01:00 PM
1

Sure, there's tons of studies, and virtually none of the new ones say that the average N count is 4-8 basically anywhere in the western world (cause it's very obviously much higher to anyone with a social life/eyes), because those stats are from like 2007 and don't reflect reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:55 PM
2

I mean, how can you think the average person in the US has an N count of 4? I'm sorry, but that's clearly a bunk number from a very very long time ago. People thinking this number probably got their stats from like 2007. So are you saying nothing has changed within the contemporary dating landscape since then? No newer numbers ought to be tried for? Like... you can either look at the old ass stats, or start drawing (not necessarily causal) conclusions from newer ones. Sex is now greatly expedite…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:53 PM
4

Just fyi, updated stats on this dropped like a year ago, basically: "average" number of partners depends on where you are (aka varies state by state, which really does make a good bit of sense), and it's also higher now, about 14 bodies per person in the U.S. and higher virtually everywhere else in the western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 12:28 PM
6

Yes, almost as if age does legitimately have very little to do with it, and other features matter way way way way way way more or something crazy like that...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/22 03:01 PM
1

unfinished pseudo-profound sentence
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/22 01:19 AM
1

Your little N500 study is so cute and good. I like how it somehow invalidates the 60,000 person study done by Chapman not all that long ago (2015). As usual, it seems as though the answers are somewhere in the middle, not "short men have higher sex frequency" > “These findings confirm that height is relevant on the mating market,” said David Frederick, Ph.D., assistant professor in psychology at Chapman University, and lead author on the study. “However, the relatively limited variation in sex p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:32 PM
2

IDK, seems like you're just reading what he said uncharitably. Most of what he said seems fairly reasonable to me. Honestly your comments read a lot more condescending to me but that's just my opinion. I never said AI is a brain replica, just that if a brain could be replicated in a binary system, it stands to reason some kind of digitized mind could be as well. At that point, it's all just information anyway. I will note, I guess, that I don't think contemporary AI has anything to do with human…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 10:13 PM
1

I was dating 5 women at a time in 2019. It was cool at times. Most of the time it was a nightmare, would never go back or even try to go back . I don't have the planning and logistical skills to keep track of a harem of women. I dwindled it down to four--still too many. 3, closer, but still kind of a lot. Two is the perfect amount of women. Find a woman and find a side chick. Be happy forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 10:08 PM
1

I think this all the time, especially as a guy who only (mostly) does bodyweight stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 10:06 PM
2

Dunno bout him, but I have an MA in philosophy and most of my study was philosophy of mind research. You don't need a PHD in neurobiology to have a conversation about minds and AI. It certainly is complicated, and I agree with your take that no one should talk about it with certainty. That said, it's also true that everything at the moment suggests there is nothing in the brain that couldn't be replicated in silicon or whatever. There's nothing that breaks the laws of physics or the laws of natu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/22 09:59 PM
1

idk, I'm an artfag who has been playing music for a long time, I guess that's vaguely adjacent, but definitely nowhere near gay enough for theater
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 03:05 PM
1

I was an irrigation tech on a farm for 3 years in my early/mid 20's. This was in AZ, so the summers were really inhumanely brutal. Rough job, but pretty rewarding. Glad to be out of it but miss it sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:57 PM
1

That is because it is one of the greatest albums of all time, and you are clearly a person of culture and merit. Fun fact, DMST tunes their guitars randomly "until they sound good" and don't write down their tunings, so a lot of the time they have to re-learn how to play their own songs on the fly during live performances. Makes them even more impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:16 PM
1

The best band no one has heard of is Do Make Say Think. I cannot think of a band with better mixing or production in general, nor can I think of a contemporary band that routinely has arrangements as complex or varied as they do. DMST has jazz songs, fully electronic songs, rock songs, pop songs, pretty much everything. Don't even try to listen to this without good speakers or headphones, you will miss a lot of what's going on. 3:50 - end of this song. The mix is stupidly good. Being able to har…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:04 PM
1

I dunno what Zima Blue is but I wish you good luck and godspeed
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 05:19 PM
2

No issues with "hot babes", bumble is a wonderful app. Weird that you thought I was RP, tho. Might be difficult to get a read on me cause half of the time my posts are deadly serious and the other half I'm just kinda fuckin' around, I can see why there'd be confusion. But thank you. I really need to work on my IRL interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 05:13 PM
1

Every situation is pretty unique, it's not really possible to prepare for all of them. Besides, never has a fucking 8 randomly complimented me and initiated physicality, ever. There is no playbook for that for normie ass me. I could have done a lot of things, you are absolutely right. And I ought to have. Trust me, shit kinda sorta like this has happened to me a lot, the situation will be endlessly repeating in my head and I will make no progress toward fixing the situation, par for the course. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 05:09 PM
1

I am a 31 year old man, brother. I've "owned" this shit a long time ago. Just a funny fail story, which we all have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 05:00 PM
1

It is because I am retarded and wish I was less retarded. I have weird boundaries with physical touch right away, which is why I responded that way. But like... I still wanted her to touch me, and I wanted to touch her, and I wish I didn't have this boundary and just went for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:59 PM
1

Oh, I cringed too. My buddy and I laughed the whole ride home about it and how retarded I am. it was funny. Also... The 'manosphere'? I've never done much hanging around the manosphere, or reading any RP content besides arguing with them. This is about me being awk, not actually believing any RP shit (which I dont, not that I can think of anyway)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:58 PM
1

Honestly I have weird boundaries about any stranger touching me. Also she was super pretty, so it felt like... wrong. If she was slightly less hot I wouldn't have thought anything of it. But Like my "this animal is trying to kill me" sensors were going off, like she was a rattlesnake or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:56 PM
1

TBH I have no issues with women, I just flub like this sometimes and it's very funny/sad. I'm a little like Jewishly neurotic which makes intimacy with strangers very awk no matter what. But I'm not like droolingly autistic lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:54 PM
1

Fucking lmao. Dudes rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:53 PM
1

I am confused as to what doesn't make sense about this ridiculously straight forward event
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:52 PM
3

Last night, half hour before last call, 8 walks into the bar. I stare at her cause she's pretty. She stares back. When she walks in she says, "You're cute." I say, "Thank you, you're very attractive." She then starts walking toward me and putting her hand around my waist and I go, "What are you doing? Don't touch me, I don't know who you are." She then looks at me weirdly, says "uh ok" under her breath and disappears into the bar. I wish this was made up. Someone please end this. Execute me. I a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:20 PM
2

For LA being harder? I mean, it's 'cause the chicks were just ever so slightly more superficial there, that's all. I had to compete with actors and shit. People who are like, pretty for a living. I clean up just fine, but I'm not even remotely close to a good looking actor or model. Standard of living in PHX is all over the place. I make a genuinely middle class salary but can still live cheaply here if I live slightly below my means. I couldn't do that in LA and I'm sure I won't be able to do i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 04:12 PM
1

I've never made a wall post, and the only comment I've ever made about the wall is that these days it's probably closer to 45-50 than it is 35-40.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 08:47 PM
3

Mary Elizabeth will be like a 9 until she is truly haggard and I hope by then plastic surgery can save her. She is still super hot, so I don't buy this, sry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:32 PM
1

Hers is a tiny bit different, imo. Eve got to be with Ewan for his richest, best times and they were together for 22 years. She also got a gigantic financial settlement. I am pretty sure all Riley got is a metaphorical picture of Ewan fucking his ex with the caption "fuck you gay loser".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:21 PM
1

All I've seen is the first episode of the first season and I really didn't like it. I get it's critically acclaimed and shit, but I think that first episode legitimately sucks, near zero entertainment value. There's tons of other good shows, so no reason for me to suffer through however many bad episodes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:17 PM
2

Yes, I can get on board with that interpretation, the point was that your devotion to a cause/being genuinely good yourself (like Riley is) isn't necessarily enough to stop wandering eyes, especially if you're competing with people higher up the status ladder than you. I wasn't making any gendered claims really.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:15 PM
2

Here's a little story about Riley. Riley is a smart kid and turns into a smart young adult, despite dropping out of college. He starts milling around film sets and gets some "ins" into the entertainment industry. Riley starts making some short films and people start taking notice of him, he goes to Sundance and stuff. Big win! His first feature script is selected for the Blacklist, a super prestigious script competition. Soon after, he makes this movie with his mega-hot girlfriend Mary. The movi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 05:11 PM
2

So far in the US I've lived in LA and PHX, so I think that's 2nd and 5th largest respectively. My experience with PHX and LA are pretty much not the same. PHX has been very good to me, LA was a little harder (but still not like terrible).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/22 02:54 PM
2

Eternal Y2K Cultural Time-Trap Forever has always been my vibe, now I just have a phrase for it, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 09:02 PM
–

Honestly it has always made no sense to me as a concept or a singular word. Everyone can be or act "narcissistically", but almost no one is a pure narcissist, you know, someone who would throw their mother in a well for a taste of their own beauty and or power. People generally use the word to mean "soulless psycho who only cares about themselves"... and it's like, why can't I genuinely love other humans (like I do) and also like myself?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 05:43 PM
–

There's a psychologist named Michael Kinsey who has done a lot of research on narcissism. I tend to agree with his takes. Narcissism is kind of a spectrum, and there's a lot of ways to express it healthily and, yes, even altruistically/beneficially. Hopefully the psychological literature will start slanting toward changing the term to something more gradient/delineation-friendly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 05:27 PM
2

"Fun" is a very difficult metric, top five would be Prague, Tokyo, mid2010's San Fran, Belgium, Boston. Leaves out a lot of good places, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 02:03 AM
2

Sure, great, first the paper doesn't say "only upper body strength" it says "makes up most". Second, in the paper, it's defined: "including having wider shoulders [27–30], being physically fit [31], and having greater handgrip strength." So your shoulders can be perceived as "wide" even if you are skinny, as long as you have some upper body strength. Still, "average" bodytypes are chosen...never. Same with fat or super skinny. Soo...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 09:18 PM
2

We're opposites, I'm tall but ugly, I would rather have a better face and be your height tbh. But Yeah, I live in a gigantic metro area, very good for night life, but bumble and tinder work well enough for me that I haven't had to start cold approaching. I'm pretty old now so I hope the day never comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 07:04 PM
1

Not sure if I agree. I think average guy just needs to do everything in his power to get shredded and make some money. If they can't do that, sure, fine, get off the apps. I'm not sure if cold approach in clubs and bars has a better success rate, tho. Last sentence is very true, I've only ever lived in giant metro areas and am fairly introverted. If apps didn't work for me I would have killed myself (in Minecraft) a long time ago. Am so glad I never had to learn how to hit on women in bars and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:49 PM
3

Why? The apps work great for me. I'm talking about average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:43 PM
5

I think the comparative sexual agencies of men and women are extremely different and one sex has a clear advantage in today's dating market. The average man's sexual agency isn't the same thing as the average womans and I think pretty much anyone who has studied gender dynamics for more than five minutes knows this. It is like comparing the agency of a billionaire and a pauper. Sure, they technically are both "free agents" who are allowed to "choose and act freely", but we all know the billionai…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:36 PM
3

Ok I am unsure where I said anything different
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:24 PM
4

Average men are not sexual or relationship selectors, their preferences do not matter. Average women are both of those things, so their preferences do. Pretty easy. I wasn't trying to make a point that "helps", I was making a counter to a claim that was already made. The claim was that some women are ok with dating average men (which is the actually trite point here). The counter to that claim is that women are far more enthusiastic about dating athletic and or tall men, so it doesn't matter if …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:23 PM
5

Sure, I never said they didn't. In fact I explicitly admitted that some women are "ok" with dating average men. I just also think women on the whole, generally but not always, are more enthusiastic about dating a more athletic man, and their preference wouldn't be anywhere near "average". If contemporary women were to pick men of all body types out of a line up their most preferred body type would not be 'average', it would be incredibly fucking fit. They are not the only factors at play, just s…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 05:58 PM
17

'Most'? Are you sure? The OP is overstated, and there is some variance because humans are individuals obviously, but pretending there aren't certain features women are broadly attracted to is a word that rhymes with hope and starts with a C, or maybe it's a word that rhymes with Petarded. Everyone with an argument like yours needs to explain to me why women didn't give AF about my life when I was skinny-fat and basically won't leave me alone now that I can do a bunch of pullups and look "athleti…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 05:36 PM
1

Eck-fuckin-scuse me? Fucking ladyboys is reserved for people who are cool as hell and have good taste, we do not discriminate along political lines
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 04:22 PM
1

Value in economics is constantly fluctuating and is never set. The price of a banana in 1988 is not the price of a banana now. First sentence and you're already objectively wrong. All value is subjective. The things you're asking aren't even what I was talking about. I never made any claims about being able to quantify any kind of values, or what people get in exchange for being high value, or any of that other shit. Also, even though you don't have the self awareness for this, I figured out you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:38 PM
1

I already did answer it, though. The value of anything, humans or objects or anything, is determined by individual observers. There is no set price and there never has been or will be. It is all always subjective. So if you wanna think a human life is worth $5, go ahead, if you think it's priceless, go ahead, there is no wrong or right answer, it is all subjective. But people still making value judgements all the time about other people and they especially do this while dating and mating, and ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:28 PM
1

What I'm talking about is an economic principle called scarcity value, and I already did define it elsewhere in this thread. It's a well known and simple principle. Basically it states that an increase in an item's price is determined by its level of scarcity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:17 PM
1

I mean, but, internal worth isn't the same thing as value. Having "value to yourself" makes about as much sense as getting married to yourself. Your individual value is not determined by your self esteem or how good you feel about yourself, it's determined by how others perceive your value (aka "how much they value you"). Lets say there's a multi-millionaire, but he pisses and shits in his pants all day and sleeps in a cardboard box and hasn't showered in two years. He never tells anyone he has …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 03:11 PM
1

I understand what you're saying, but you're touching on a concept called scarcity value--an item's relative price is determined by low supply. Everyone who has an IQ higher than like 85 is a "sentient, feeling" being. This is a metric everyone shares, thus its value is seriously degraded. When I look for a partner, I don't say, "I hope she's a thinking feeling human", because this is like the bare minimum lowest bar anyone needs to be considered a human. It's like saying "I hope she has a tongue…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 01:54 PM
5

It has always been a contradiction, it is a two headed animal eating itself, redpill has always been two majority factions, one side weird tradchristian/conservative idiots and one side hedonistic selfproclaimed dark triad lone wolf (generally apolitical) antiheroes. very little in between in my experience. Who will win remains to be seen. Forces of idiocy fight very long and well against one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 08:50 PM
3

I get that a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 01:49 AM
3

Nah man, you're thinking about this so black and white it hurts. How much money matters a lot here. A dude making 50-60k a year who is tall and in shape is doing much better with women pretty much his entire life up until maybe his 40's or 50's. This has been true for me cross culturally, as a person who has only ever lived in major metro areas, who has dated probably too many women, and with friends who have also dated probably too many women. The tall in shape man has access to more and higher…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 11:36 PM
2

I've been building a home studio for music production, there's a ton of cheap stuff for that, pretty much every audio interface I've searched for today has genuinely been about 50-150 dollars lower than the original price. Today I just bought a refurb Macbook Pro from 2020 for$600 (and it was the last one!), a pretty beefy one at that. Was like $200 off the price it was two weeks ago. A lot of the black friday deals I saw were dumb bullshit, but the things I've been tracking for the studio have …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 11:09 PM
9

It is a gigantic mistake. The whole comment simply ignores the contemporary dating landscape. That comment is true only idealistically. Modern women have now set the standard that they will fuck dudes they find attractive for free essentially right away. This is a precedent women set. If this is the way they want it, cool, good, I honestly am fine with it, but then it is only ever within a man's interest to fuck her for free, or not fuck her at all. What that comment misses is that most dating n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 11:02 PM
2

I think it really depends on what you want and when you want it and how long you want it for. It also depends on how badly you need the money. Like if you're a 5'3 dude with no muscle mass and a fucked up deranged face... you need the money badly. You don't need it as much if you're 6'4 and ripped. I would be super interested to see any results to the Short Money Chad vs Impoverished Ripped Chad study. My hypothesis is that the Short money Chad would do much better in the long term, and would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 10:38 PM
1

You have your anecdotes, I have mine. In my anecdotal experience, men within the BMI range of 26-29 are fat about 90-95% of the time. If you don't wanna listen to statistics, all we can do is battle anecdotes and our experiences are directly contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:41 PM
1

you're talking about professional fighters. Most normal people with a BMI of 29 are fat as fuck. You're using anomalies as a point, which is pretty retarded. The average nominal person with a BMI of 26-29 is fat, don't know what to tell you, I recommend you open your eyes, this is not only statistically verified but pretty much anyone who has done any traveling at all (I have been to most of the states) can anecdotally verify this as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 08:14 PM
1

You've never heard of westerners being fat? GTFO troll
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 05:24 PM
1

Works perfectly fine for me. https://source.wustl.edu/2015/06/obesity-excess-weight-in-us-continue-upswing/ Shame you haven't heard about the prevalence of western obesity. Everyone else has. Just you hasn't. Must be a lonely existence, not hearing about a very obvious thing everyone else knows about. Living in a dark cave alone with no internet or other human interaction must be very lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 04:44 PM
1

Lmao. "Do my homework on one of the most well known western phenomena that everyone has already read about" There are...so many papers on obesity prevalence in the west. I mean this is so well known and categorized the wiki has like 200 citations.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 04:29 PM
1

Cool non argument, trog. I don't give a fuck if your username is BabyRaper69, if you make a good point you make a good point. Maybe start debating on the debate forum instead of writing useless retard shit. Might help you later.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:53 PM
1

No. Absolutely not. There are VERY few people that have a BMI of 30 that are "in shape". If you have a BMI of 30, you are fat as fuck like 95% of the time. This is where the clinical line for obesity starts according to the CDC. BMI is not even close to a perfect measurement, but there are very few men with BMIs of 30 who are even remotely healthy. They are fat, end of, nearly every time. There are significantly more fat people than there are in shape people and it's not even close. The problem …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 02:52 PM
3

Yes, this is because you have been brainwashed by mouthbreathers and don't even realize it. If I had a group that attracted extremists who told me women like to OBEY and drink out of water bowls on the floor cause they're good doggy brains, I would probably start re-thinking my philosophy and try to understand why it's attracting such shit humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 01:05 PM
2

What you're doing is seeing a tiny sample size of humans and extrapolating that to huge populations, which is, yes, you guessed it, completely retarded. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 01:04 PM
0

So you're saying your anecdotes override evidence? This is called "losing the argument and having no points", but you clearly lack the self awareness to realize this. Find me any evidence that 70% of Americans arent' fat, or that a huge number are now getting not fat. Your own life is not evidence. Things you maybe noticed once one day are not evidence. You thinking something is true doesn't make it true. You noticing a "trend" doesn't make it a "trend". If you don't have even a single point of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 01:02 PM
3

I understand maybe dudes like Tate and Deadin Samuels gave it a little boost in the broader public eye, but it's been around for a while. If you really think American culture, which was literally built on principles of excess and getting yours, can somehow transition into a society full of healthy mentalities and healthy bodies because of a radical online movement of misogynists (in the next decade), I think you are actually either an insane person or remarkably remarkably naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:58 PM
1

Uh not every man is going to the gym. Most aren't. Like I said, like 70% of men in America are fat. They are not going to the gym. The people at the gym who are in shape are literally the minority and we know this because every statistic gathered in the last 30ish years says so. American men are getting fatter and more hopeless. They are not "getting better" on any metric I can see. Also these men have not given up on getting laid, they just fuck fatties/uggos, aka your vibe attracts your tribe
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:51 PM
4

While I agree it's a good thing for the bar to raise, I don't think we have any evidence that it's doing that... Majority of men in the US are still fat and make like 40k a year. They have next to no fashion sense. They have no game because most people are not funny or charming, they are plain and milquetoast. There is no huge push to "be better". OP is pretty much just writing out his Apophenia--he sees a trend being talked about online, so he starts to "notice" the trend, but what he's actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/22 12:41 PM
1

I wasnt talking to you specifically. The royal you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 03:21 AM
1

Yeah, men could, and maybe they ought to, but I've read enough feminist theory to know that any disenfranchised group that lacks power in a certain domain must radically transform the landscape and general mores in order for anything to change. I think the only way to remedy this is for men to stop paying full stop. The dudes who really can get laid already dont pay. The dudes who cant get women dont get women, so they also dont pay. Then there's the men in the middle, who are being shafted, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 03:02 AM
3

Eh they're progressive in a lot of ways, not so much in others. Most cultures still have some backwater cultural stuff, Japan is no different. But they still have a modernized healthcare system, a better housing system than America at least, and just many more social safety nets that make living in Japan pretty god damned pleasant (especially compared to any other Asian country barring maybe SK). The infrastructure, maintenance, buses, food, sights and sounds... all A+.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 09:47 PM
2

Wow who knew your one husband was also three billion other men? That's so cool for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 08:08 PM
1

He's probably thinking of the Ecole Polytechique massacre, which was explicitly targeted against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 01:53 AM
2

A gift and a curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:53 AM
2

Yeah, something like that, although she wasn't unintelligent, it had more to do with us both having some small expertise in different fields, and not really understanding each other on that level. Our individual culminated knowledge just really didn't mesh well together, even if everything else was really good. I know that I need someone I can shoot the shit with about topics that are important than me (even if they are niche and stupid) and she just wasn't that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:51 AM
3

I turn 32 next year in May. A couple weeks back I broke up with a 27 year old working professional, who, all things considered, was pretty good. We dated for 8 months, but I just couldn't talk to her, not really talk, so I decided to cut my losses. She was nigh perfect for me in every other way. I haven't gone without a relationship or some kind of FWB/backup chick for a while now, like five years. Feels weird to be single at this point in my life. I have more money than ever, in better shape th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:16 AM
2

This really depends on where you're going, but try to get to an island. I went to Miyajima Island for a day when I was in Japan (it's off the coast of Hiroshima), it was a magical experience, the islands off Japan's coast are some of the most picturesque in the world. I stayed in Akihabara and Shinjuku for about 15 days, then traveled the southern half of Japan for another 15 days. This was Oct 2019. If you're in Tokyo for the majority of it, stay around here. I'm sure there's other places but w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:03 AM
1

True, altho as a dude who has kept a lot of his frugal college habits in order to save money, the answer is pretty much "traveling now, being able to pay for cancer treatment later"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 10:03 PM
1

Income creep is a real killer. People don't understand how to save or live within (or slightly below) their means.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 09:15 PM
5

Everyone reduces everything and everyone else because it is a linguistic necessity. It would be impossible to talk about things as they actually are because then we'd be talking about the individual micromovements of individual particles. Instead, we talk about macro-events that (technically )describe micro-events. That doesn't mean we can't be somewhat specific or somewhat charitable. That doesn't mean we can't mitigate our own biases, which we all ought to try doing when engaging in discussion…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 08:02 PM
4

Mushy is an ok guy, just young, he'll come around. He at the least (usually) engages in good faith, which is a lot more than most of the people here can say. But I do (95%) agree with your take, and it was very well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:24 PM
1

It's mostly 5 days a week. If it's 6, day 6 is pretty light. Also I only do bodyweight stuff, so I kinda have to do it a lot to maintain/get bigger. A lot more work than weights and stuff, but I hate gyms so... Lol I know the skincare stuff is really popular, it has just never mattered to me nor has it effected anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:13 PM
2

She looks like one of my exes SUE ME
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 07:11 PM
1

"My deeply unfulfilling life makes me lash out at internet strangers," she says to herself, near tears, but her deluge is stopped by an overwhelming need to stuff more sugar and salt into her fat, unloveable mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:59 PM
1

"Childish non-sequitur deflections will make them forget about all the dumb things I said," she thinks, this thought accompanied by a ding, and she begins to finally recognize the aromatic tinge of french fries bathing in golden rich oil wafting from the kitchen. "My fries are ready. My sweetlings. My little sweetlings..."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:49 PM
6

Wow, the smart people I've met and the ones you've met are...entirely different. Very few legit intelligent people are smart in only one direction. Nearly every physicist I know is also a musician, every mathematician I know likes fine art, etc. I haven't met a lot of one track mind individuals. Guess it's safe to say we just have had very different experiences with humans, which colors our opinion on this topic. I will agree that most people around your age simply just haven't had the time to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:40 PM
9

Oh get over yourself. Contemporary women and contemporary men are equivalently vapid. Astrology witches are just as dumb and bad as Marvel gamers, just bad in very particular and distinct ways. And the real point is: you're STILL making individuals into a monolith with your thinking. How many women have you gone on dates with in the last five years? Seriously, how many? How many women have you met? 'Cause I've been on tons of dates and I've met tons of women and almost all of them have had real …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:33 PM
2

I work out 5/6 days a week. My diet is chicken/vegetables/rice/water/blackcoffee. Cheat day maybe once every two weeks. I don't do the skin scare thing, hasn't mattered in my experience. I used to wear my hair long, now it's prim and proper 24/7. The only thing I wear are a variety of multi-color button downs, black jeans, either nice boots or high tops. Fitted peacoat in winters. Everything else looks like shit or lazy on men. I consider myself fairly low maintenance, though. I am not picky or …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:28 PM
1

"Lying about inconsequential nonsense on the internet makes me temporarily forget about my pitiable life," she whispers under her breath to herself, or perhaps to the spirits of loneliness haunting her studio apartment that smells like a graveyard of dead cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:21 PM
2

I've been lucky to be surrounded with people much smarter than me, who in turn know a lot of people smarter than them. This created a positive feedback loop in my life of meeting almost entirely good, interesting people. My high school best friend was the Valedictorian, my high school girlfriend was the salutatorian, and honestly just from these two people and the networks I made from them, my life went from "normal people" to "almost exclusively interesting people" in the span of about four yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:14 PM
–

Should have used Ferroro Rochers sorry bro
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:06 PM
–

"Larping will make me seem more credible," she says to herself, accidentally catching a glimpse of her inflated turkeyish gullet in the reflection of her ice cream spoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:05 PM
1

No, you just have google.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:03 PM
17

I guess I just haven't met very many truly boring, nothing people. Maybe a few here and there, but human have always surprised me for the better, and this became more true the more of them I knew, from all walks of life, in a few different countries and states. Everyone knows something you don't. Near everyone has a path you didn't take, a view you didn't see, a story you don't know. You can say: "This boring idiot only likes soccer! He is a lost cause!" Or you could say: "There is no possible w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 06:02 PM
1

Nothing wrong with my reading comp, you're the one who couldn't read a very easy to read sentence. Vsadím se, že nemůžeš přijít na to, co je tohle za jazyk, ty pitomá píča
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:54 PM
1

You should really work on your English. Also Vietnam is a beautiful country.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:46 PM
–

"Only my inner experience has value," she typed mouth-vacuuming a melted mass of Lindt Lindors, sweat-laden cellulite around her abdomen jumping and gaggling like a nest of hungry baby birds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:44 PM
1

Dom means dominant. And you really did just "I know you are but what I am" me. Incredible. Maybe "Sad Grade School Becky" would be a more appropriate flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:37 PM
1

I'm bi and make no secret of being bi, this isn't the own you think it is, I'm legit not RP and never have been. but nah, cuck shit isn't my thing, I'm a dom :) Have a nice day obviously noncombative perfectly reasonable nonretarded pleasant human.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:29 PM
0

No nerve hit, just clarifying your very obviously silly post. Hopefully it'll help clear up your muddy thinking in the future. Cheers. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:25 PM
0

Cuckold porn is just a version of gay porn. Like how yellow kiwis are just kiwis. Still kiwis, just yellow and sour-ey. A variant. Wanting to watch another man fuck your wife/gf is gay, end of. Every straight normal man will agree with this. No, you're thinking about cuckold porn, which is a type of gay porn. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:20 PM
–

You're literally talking about cuckold porn lmao. Cuckold porn and "liking it" is necessarily gay to anyone who thinks about it for about two seconds, which you have neglected to do clearly. You should change your flair to "Bad Faith Becky"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:10 PM
–

I'm not RP even a little but this is basically the "your ideals are disagreeable to me therefore you are gay" argument, just spun a little. It's shaming with homosexuality. Congratulations you a bigot
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 05:05 PM
96

People on this sub (or maybe just people in general) have a bad habit of near total reductionism. Entire individuals, many (most) of whom have an inner experience just as rich as your own, are reduced to boring Garbage Pail Kids--"Average Adam, Cool Chad, Rich Richard etc etc" This is just boring lazy thinking usually done by boring lazy people. Boil down X people into Y group who always act like Z, extrapolate from there, throw away all multidimensionality and nuance and baby you got a stew goi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 04:58 PM
1

Someone telling me they like my hat isn't a clear indication of anything. When she put her hand on my lap, that was the clear indication. Gigantic difference between those two things imo
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/22 12:23 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 10:25 PM
1

I didn't "try to force it", I told him to shoot his shot cause he was talking about his dry spell. That's hardly "forcing it".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 09:54 PM
0

It wasn't, he was a little mad at me for a few months but it's all chill now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 09:22 PM
1

What does 'true' friendship look like to you? I've known this guy since 8th grade. We're about as close as two dudes can be without being gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 09:22 PM
1

I don't think it was "his girl" just cause I told him to hit on her. I gave him all the time in the world to seal the deal and he didn't. I guess I still just don't see why I shouldn't take the opportunity when it comes to me -- I am not Chad or some casanova, it's not like hot chicks routinely engage me at a bar (has happened like three times in my whole life).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 09:21 PM
1

I agree she decides, that was my whole argument back to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 09:18 PM
3

Based and dairypilled
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 08:38 PM
1

I like that this sub gets weird influxes of new regulars. Means I can repost without really reposting. Here's a situation that happened about a yearish ago. As of now, about 50 people said I was right and about 50 people took the side of my friend. It was pretty polarizing which made the story even more interesting. I posted it on a few subs and every time, it was a pretty clear split. My friend and I have patched this shit up and it is totally water under the bridge, but it's still super intere…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 08:31 PM
1

Are you ... a 5/10 at least? If so, you have a near endless variety of dudes to choose from who will perennially simp for you simply cause you have a vagina. If you are not deformed, you being even mildly attractive and of a certain gender does afford you the time and care of other humans beings essentially for free. Congratulations
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:38 PM
1

Are you a woman? Doesn't matter, put whatever you want, tell them you're a Nazi who drinks cat blood, no one will care and they will still want to fuck you. Are you a man? Are you tall? Are you good looking? If you are tall and good looking, what you write will matter very little. If you are just good looking and not tall, you have an uphill battle, and should probably go steal some obscure jokes from comedians you like. Same goes for if you're tall but not good looking. You better get to being …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:33 PM
2

To gain the favor and future loins of thine sluts, what else?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 04:06 AM
1

100% Lauren. That girl is ridiculously hot to me. The runners up that season I remember were Mariko and Jennifer Mila Hasegawa. They were all pretty pleasant in my opinion, except for Avian, who wasn't my jam.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 04:03 AM
1

Damn some people are really harsh. In some pictures on her page she's pretty stunning. Dolled up and in good light, she's like an 7.5-8. Normal, 6.5-7.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:59 AM
3

Gayer words have rarely been uttered.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:56 AM
2

You know I am going to steal some of this right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:54 AM
1

I heard this one was good, good rec, thanks. Terrace House Hawaii and Love Island Australia probably have the hottest reality show chicks I've seen so far. Those casting directors deserve a raise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:42 AM
6

My most controversial opinion concerning texting etiquette is that texting back as soon as you see the message is a real Chad move and so is typing in a kind of stream of consciousness Notes From the Underground type way, like you don't even really care about what or who you're typing at, or even what you're saying, punctuation is optional
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 03:40 AM
1

Maybe I missed a purge or something, I'm pretty sure you're not the one who made the thread
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 02:26 AM
0

Luckily I am 6'2". The tears of short men are music to my ears.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 01:12 AM
4

"just have insides made of mostly microplastics bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 12:22 AM
1

I mean it is pretty annoying that they're not hot. Can you blame us?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 12:18 AM
1

Well luckily I still had fun in college and I'm still having fun now. 35 - 55 can be plenty fun. That's 20 years and that's a long time. Probably too long for most people anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:47 PM
1

Yeah, I'm in PHX, still kinda pricey out here but I care more about travel than I do a nice house, so it really works for me. Too many people are obsessed with purely money, when, yeah, time and income together are really the ticket. If someone offered me a 40hr a week job for 25k more a year, I wouldn't take it in a million years. My time is far too precious (I say shitposting on PPD...)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:32 PM
1

While I do think some % of posts like this are larping, your argument isn't a good one. Reddit has millions of users. Nothing prevents rich people from being interested in or talking about gender dynamics. There's nothing "unhumble" or "humble" about making threads about X topic on the internet. It just so happens much of gender dynamics is personal and subjective and often necessitates a person talking about themselves and their own experience with certain phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:25 PM
4

Good point, didn't think of this. Still disappointing for the occasional straight dude like me who likes to torture himself and loved ones with bad reality tv. Hot women are one of the major draws!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:23 PM
1

You conjure an ass raping demon who rapes your truest love. Probably against reddit TOS to post totally real arcane incantations but whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:14 PM
1

Were you the guy with the wild Chad jaw that looked almost fake and like a Guy Fawkes mask?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:13 PM
1

I don't really understand what you mean or how it relates to what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:11 PM
1

Sure, maybe, but I ain't, and I still agree with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:06 PM
4

I make 50k a year and agree with most of his points, I don't think income alone alters the viewpoint all that much. I don't make a ton of money but I have insane vacation time, a schedule so flexible I can pretty much call off for like months at a time no issue, I really have so much more flexibility in my life in my 30's than I did in my 20's when I was inundated with school work and real work and made next to no money. Now even with a modest salary, living within my means and saving a lot, I c…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 10:02 PM
3

If the purge picture threads are any indication there is like 1 hot chick here and a bunch of average whatevers, as is expected. Same goes for the men, who were nearly all average, except one or two Chads, and one or two uggos.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 09:46 PM
3

This is mostly true. Chicks don't know 'cause they haven't lived a man's life, and young men don't know 'cause they haven't lived enough life. At 31, I am easily now more confident than I ever have been, and I'd say the last 3 years have been significantly better than the previous decade in terms of quality and quantity of women. Not even really a competition. Get a little good and you will have some amount of good options of 23 - 30 year old chicks, all within a perfectly respectable age range.…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 09:45 PM
4

How the fuck can you be a casting director for a major reality television show and not be able to find a single cute white woman? Valerie and Charita are really the only two very attractive women on the whole show. Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 09:36 PM
1

Aren't you a young woman? I am an old man, I've had lots of time to amass these. You have plenty of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:52 PM
1

Pretty much all of Mo and Aurora's discography. I should not like this music, as a self-serious not gay man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:50 PM
5

Try typing like a nonretarded human and watch the engagement at least double although I guess double nothing is still nothing so maybe you ought to cut your losses
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:48 PM
3

I figured out that if you spell the first two letters of your exes names in rows of three or four it sounds like the dragon language from Skyrim. Sometimes it is physically painful to be burdened with this much genius. Am.He.Er.St. Do.Co.Mo.El. Ja.Ta.Pa.Li. Aa.Ae.As.Al. Ma.Kr.Na. Br.Ga.Th.Zo. Ju.Ly.Ra.Me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 08:41 PM
2

I broke up with my GF very recently and I will tell you that every waking moment I was lusting over other women, despite this particular ex being quite good overall, and probably too good for me in general. Dunno why. Normal test levels, I guess? Neurotypical maleness? Genetic drive? Something like that. I did not seek out or flirt with other women and would consider it cheating or borderline cheating to do so. If I found out a chick did that to me I would dump her instantly with no explanation,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 05:27 PM
–

Because too much fat is viscerally disgusting?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 10:41 PM
1

I'm with ya. Bumble has worked for me so much better than any other dating app. Also the men complaining women only say 'hi' are uninteresting af. I don't think a chick has ever just said 'hi' to me, they almost always remark at one of the dumb things I have written in my profile which are place there specifically to act as response-bait. Look dudes, women aren't ever going to be good at being the initiators. You can help them along by writing interesting/dumb/silly/goofy shit for them to query.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 07:16 PM
1

I debate plenty, this is really the only semantic discussion I can think of that's worth having. There's not any other words or concepts I can think of here that require real technical knowledge, although most of the folks here could probably use a statistics class or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 06:19 PM
1

Great. But I am talking about people using terms wrong, and how using those terms wrong muddies the waters and further diminishes their own thinking. What you're saying is just fine, but it is beside the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 06:13 PM
2

Well bro philosophy isn't exactly an exact science lol. When you're a subscriber to a certain position, you try to educate people on the position. There's also philosophers that believe in Shiva, or bringing back fascism to bring about a utopia, does that mean we should just capitulate and agree, cause they're opinions and not facts? It's not my preferred word lmao. The way I use the word is what the word means. People who understand philosophy aren't arguing over what the word means, they're ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:28 PM
1

I can't tell if you're trolling me or if you really missed the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:13 PM
1

Yeah, we agree, drinks are the way to go for first dates. I bet this would be the majority consensus on this sub for both men and women as well. Sucks for people who don't drink, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:03 PM
1

Lol you know this isn't about my clothing choices, right? I don't even think I have any salmon clothes
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 05:02 PM
1

May I introduce you to halfway introverted hot-but-not-full-Stacy women who will do anything you want, pretty much? I believe in you. They are around everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:53 PM
2

Not even sure a lot of my philosophy compatriots agree with me on how exactly objective ought to be used. It's a pretty contentious topic, I do post to the philosophy subs sometimes. But as all good people who wasted their youth studying useless shit I am stubbornly attached to a few subjects I think people are really not understanding and that makes them well silly and being silly in this way sucks and is no good
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:52 PM
2

I agree with almost everything you said, except I want to make an addendum. The only things that are objective are things which can be quantified. My go to examples are the mass of the sun in comparison to the Earth, or whether or not the Earth rotates around the sun, etc etc. Cosmological realities are the best examples of objectivity because what humans believe about the mass of celestial objects isn't really up to debate, what makes it true is the numbers. Like, I can't go to the sun to prove…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:50 PM
0

Light pink (almost white) is legit my "favorite" color, which is a little socially gay for a mostly straight man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:44 PM
3

Over my years here I've noticed people fundamentally understand certain topics but contradict themselves about them anyway without realizing what they just did. The objectivity/subjectivity divide is the best example for this sub. If I told most people here that pink is objectively the best color, the majority response would be, "But I don't observe it to be the "best" color, and I don't know what "best" means, or how a color could be "best", and this opinion is entirely determined by your own p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:32 PM
2

The real idea is looksmax as much as you are able and you won't have to buy her shit. May not work for everyone, but I think average guy looksmaxing doesn't have to splurge upfront and can at least get a few dates for essentially free. Drinks as first date are 100% the right answer if you do have to spend something, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:23 PM
1

Nothing about what I said changes if it's "dating early on" or just "dating". If the guy checks boxes in other categories, the woman is not going to care about how much he makes. Plenty of men are getting sex for somewhat free. No one gets anything for free. It's about how much cost is going in for how much reward. Tons of men have FWBs and get "free(ish)" sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:43 PM
1

Well because if you had read what I wrote earnestly, I was talking about both FWBs and relationships In FWBs the women will keep fucking the dude who doesn't pay for her while she also fucks the dude that does. Dude who doesn't pay still wins. In a relationship, good women don't leave over this shit at all. At least in my experience. And I have dated lots of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:09 PM
1

Ok, sure, not sure how that alters the fundamental argument. Good women in either FWBs or relationships don't drop dudes over money shit, pretty much full stop. Only shitty women not worth dirt do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:54 PM
1

I actually mentioned both FWBS and relationships as I have been in both relationships and FWB situations with these women. Pretty much everything you've said has been directly contrary to my experience just FYI. You can believe what you want, but it's not even close to reality. Worthwhile Women don't just drop good dudes 'cause some other guy wants to pay for stuff. I know a lot of financially struggling couples where the woman could VERY easily get a more financially successful man. But they do…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:48 PM
1

Some women in STEM make good money. Researchers do not make good money. I've dated a few PHD researchers and a few MA's ... they all barely made 45k a year, some far less. I am dating on the academic side of STEM, not forex traders or engineers. I have an MA in philosophy. I will probably make around 50k for the rest of my life. I am not good looking, I am tall and in shape and read books. This helps. No good woman would drop a good relationship just cause some other guy pays for dinner. How fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:42 PM
1

"Now you see with me it's just a matter of time. I don't know why, but somehow I just don't manage to hold on real long. So, if you wait it out a little it'll be over, you know? I mean, even if I want a fella, somehow or other I manage to get it screwed up. Maybe I'll get a new pair of shoes, a nice dress, a few laughs. Times are hard. Now, if you fool around on the hill up here, then you don't get nothin', I don't get nothin', he don't get nothin'. So, how 'bout it, honey? Just for a little whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:35 PM
0

No. Most of the women I have dated have been either, A) art chicks or B) stem chicks. We are talking researchers and painters. They are not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. They have little interest in being entirely provided for. They enjoy having a life of their own, and having money of their own. This is an increasing cultural trend all over the west. Every woman who has offered to split has slept with me. Almost all of them were FWBS or relationships later. I am talking about dozen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:26 PM
2

Not really. In my experience, if anything, it's the opposite. High quality women don't need you to or care that you pay their expenses. The best women I've ever met were insistent on going dutch and paying their own way. All of these women were conventionally attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:05 PM
1

To me he is hideous. Dunno what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:04 PM
1

Great. Attraction is still subjective which is my entire point. I find neither of these people even remotely attractive as a 6'2 bisexual man. They are both hideous. Their money, height, fame, etc does nothing for me. Trump is a fuckin 2 facially. Literally gagworthy monster to me. Even young Trump. Wanna kno y? Cuz attraction is s u b j e c t i v e
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:55 PM
1

Functional is a matter of degree, so yes, even though most women are not near optimal, most are technically* functional.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:31 PM
1

No one has to be anyone in particular to have an opinion. Welcome to Earth. Thank you for basically proving that attraction is subjective. Which is the opposite claim the commenter youre defending made. Wow you people get dumber by the minute it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:21 PM
1

Lmao yeah cause making lifelong friendships and social connections only happens to frat guys. That's fucking hilarious. What a retard argument. Like are you bein serious rn? Gtfo if youre going to keep sayin this silly shit
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:06 PM
1

No. You dont know how to use words. That's a problem. Objectivity means something. It means the opposite of subjectivity. That dude misused the words. "Objective attraction" is a retard concept only ever enunciated by retards. That's all. Also being a trustfund baby and inheriting millions doesnt make you good, special or otherwise high value. It makes you lucky. Also also I never even said young Trump wasnt high value. He was. He was just never attractive. Which is a subjective notion and canno…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:03 PM
1

It is hugely overstated how often Pareto is applicable. Lots of other kinds of distributions exist. We focus on it here because its simple and the folks here are largely dullards but very little regarding gender dynamics legitimately correlates to a pareto distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:40 PM
2

I guess I was just lucky to have a normal sociality and a few friends with houses in college so I didnt have to join a sad boys club just to feel human and do totally normal things like talk to girls and drink alcohol Smh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:30 PM
3

Yes talking to girls and having parties is impossible unless youre in a frat. Wow what a fuckin galaxy brain you got there dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:19 PM
1

Guess so
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:03 PM
2

No it doesnt. It's from Cours d'économie politique. Pareto showed that approximately 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population. Had zero to do with sales lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 02:02 PM
2

It is fun if you have worms for brains and dont know how to socialize without being forced into it. Being shucked into a world where every other person is a drooling drunk mongrel dumbfuck isnt fun and I have no idea why anyone would or does find it fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 01:57 PM
1

You clearly dont know what objective and subjective mean and its very funny. How can attraction, which depends on observation, be outside of observation? If something is objective it means its true outside of sentient observation. Go look up the word. All attraction is based on individual interpretation full stop. It is subjective necessarily. God damn man. Kids these days are fucking retards. Wow a gold digging wife and mistress makes you a hvm these days. Pathetically sad. Like. Actual tragedy…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 01:48 PM
-1

They also wouldnt call him attractive imo... Omg its almost like attractiveness is...subjective? No freakin way dude They let him do that cause he has money and they cant fight money in court. So "let" is kinda the operative word.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:58 AM
1

Prime Trump next to virtually any other actually attractive man of his era is a night and day difference. He has always been a weird looking ragamuffin ginger. Being tall and lean doesnt change that like how Conan O'Brien isnt a major sex symbol but Ton Cruise is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:38 AM
1

As an agnostic who has always lived in very secular communities, your perspective is just about the least annoying most sane take on monotheistic religion I've ever read.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:27 AM
9

There is no world where current Trump is conventionally attractive. He has been derided for being a weird looking ghoulish genetic freak for the last like eight years. Srsly wtf are you talkin about objectivity when youre throwing around shit ass opinions like that? What you know about objectivity besides absolutely fuck all? You dont even know what the word means dawg. Go look it up before saying words next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:22 AM
1

Sad
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 05:35 PM
3

Tell me you have shit taste without telling me you have shit taste
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 05:26 PM
2

No Nut November is a psyop started by a shadowy world cabal of prostate oncologists. Looks like you fuckin fell for it dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 10:22 PM
1

You have precisely zero evidence for that claim. Pardon me if I don't take a single narrow view of life as gospel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 10:02 PM
3

Constant positive external reinforcement even in the face of obvious reality is a trait I've noticed in almost every woman I've ever been with/known. I am assuming it has something to do with positive social feedback loops, i.e. if I call her pretty she'll call me pretty ad infinitum forever I remember being at a bar once and was chatting with a large group of people and someone asked everyone to rate themselves. 2 gigantic whale women rated themselves as 10's and the 3 or 4 remaining average/cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:50 PM
2

"You're too old to like this incredibly gay thing I like"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:25 PM
1

We're just going to have to disagree here. I have been here a long time. The vast vast vast majority of the people who routinely post on this sub are of average intelligence and there have been maybe two users in seven years I've seen that are genuinely intelligent people like ones I've met IRL (aka physicists, math professors, deep learning researchers, etc). So yeah, just 100% disagree with you there and something tells me my sample size is a lot bigger than yours considering my sad time inves…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:22 PM
2

I never said it was representative of the country as a whole. But it is statistically very unlikely for the vast majority of the users here to make above 6 figures and afaik, when I looked at the old polls of this stuff, and when you look back at old threads of this stuff, like 90% of users here claim to make six figures or up. There is essentially no way that is possible, irrespective of gender. I see no reason why this sub in particular would attract upper income earners in general, or highly …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 08:10 PM
1

Casey looks like an ex of mine, sue me. No, I did KhanAcademy + a techbro buddy of mine teaching me alongside. His help was invaluable but I learned mostly on my own. To this day I still have to have cheatsheets next to me for simple ass shit like table and embed rules. Like, tech stuff really isn't my natural inclination, but it's like the only easy cozy shit that still pays okay
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:37 PM
2

I'm a web dev. I got into it 'cause I have an MA in philosophy and panicked about finding a job that actually paid real people wages. Didn't and still don't want to teach or get a PHD, so I panic-learned HTML in like a year and got really lucky finding a job online. Still at my job fourish years later. I don't understand and probably will never understand much about computers or actual coding but technically I am a tiny part of the "tech" diaspora. Got here cause scared of having no real skills …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:27 PM
2

PPD, where every person somehow earns six figures or more despite that being statistically impossible, where every woman makes more than her husband and is chaste as a nun, where every man has slept with a hundred 10's, where a single lie has never been utterred.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 06:15 PM
2

Best part is: I don't really play games. These dumb cunts can go take a look at my post history. It's literature, philosophy, this place and MMA. I don't talk about, think about or particularly care about games (or like, not the way I genuinely care about literature), but to say people who do are somehow inferior or "wasting time" is pretty damned judgey for no particular reason. People of all types everywhere play games. End of. The last game I played was Red Dead 2 in like 2019. lmao. But that…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:55 PM
6

The West? Latin America and South East Asia are obsessed with video games and comprise a gigantic slice of the world game market. The world likes games. You holier than thou children who waste an enormous amount of time complaining on a gender dynamics forum have essentially zero fuckin room to comment on how other people spend their time lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:50 PM
7

lmfao "I don't play games cause I am just so enlightened and cool, I post on a gender dynamics forum on the internet instead, that's totally not wasting time at all sunglasses emoji"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:48 PM
3

Yeah, they're kinda different, but also kinda not. A video game is a video game. Spending 100 "lobby hours" on candycrush is the same as spending 100hrs on Skyrim imo. And pretty much everyone I have ever known wastes time with some type of game in one way or another. Hell my fairly anti game girlfriend still plays tetris on her phone sometimes. My grandpa plays solitaire on his laptop from 2007. Like... games in general are a human universal, they're just also virtual instead of only physical n…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:33 PM
7

Literally most people in the western world, especially if you include phone games
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 05:28 PM
1

I am a man lol. Also like.. no one I know with tattoos is using google images as their template. But it's good that you can share how ignorant you are about people who enjoy tattoos without outright saying it. And it is just ink, but you can say that about most things, couldn't you? Different strokes. I''m not even particularly into tattoos, but I'm not particularly into a lot of stuff, doesn't mean the people into it are bad or uninteresting or whatever other negative attribute you want to lump…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 01:00 AM
1

"Isn't it retarded how some people like things I don't like?"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 12:27 AM
–

Username is based, hush. I've been here for about seven years. Trust me, what you're seeing is an insulated cadre of weirdos. I guess there's a lot of them now, but certainly not more than the fairly neurotypical demo.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 10:25 PM
–

How long have you been here? Most of the lurkers/semi regular posters are normal no pilled/bluepilled men. The RPers and incels are just the most vocal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 10:13 PM
1

I went to one of the largest universities on Earth and have only ever lived in the second and fifth largest metro areas in the U.S. In environments like these, being Chad means a lot more than being the best dude out of a DnD tournament.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 03:34 PM
1

Where and who?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 03:03 PM
1

That's not a counter, it's just reality. We all lose. Every ounce of effort for anyone ends the same for everyone: infinite nothingness. So yeah. You can either put in no effort or some effort. No one can augur in the results of that effort. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesnt. I have yet to hear how being a browbeaten defeated bitch helps anything or anyone. If your argument is "dont try cause things dont always work out", I think you should have a good hard think about why that's insan…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 03:02 PM
1

Lmao. Almost no one is so unattractive they cant get better "due to their genes". This is what defeated losers tell themselves. But if you're not hugely deformed or an aesthetic anomaly, you can improve a whole hell of a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:36 PM
1

Of course some people have it easier. "Just be a defeated pussy" is not the answer to the conundrum. Billionaires exist but they don't stop me from trying to get as much money as possible do they? Not sure why chads would prevent average men from trying to get women or improving their circumstances as much as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 06:42 PM
11

Those comments are obviously written by a very young person who hasn't figured out much about living or relationships. Comparison is the thief of joy and constantly making value judgements about yourself in relation to other people is a surefire way to make you hate your life and everyone around you (and for shitty invalid made up reasons to boot). He has not yet learned that other people being better than you is a GOOD thing. He has not yet learned that trying and striving to be better than you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 03:03 PM
1

But I'm telling you it's next to zero time and next to zero focus. I live around one of the biggest unis on Earth. The moment I step out the door I am flooded with hot people. As I already said, it takes zero time and next to zero focus to imagine fucking them. Sorry that something so ridiculously simple would take up so much of your limited cognitive capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 12:53 PM
1

Where do I say anything about how much "mental time" I'm devoting to random strangers? Daydreaming about fucking hot people takes no time or energy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:47 AM
0

I get what you're saying but it's such girl logicks. You shouldn't feel jealous for the same reason my gf doesn't. I do want to fuck lots of other women and I decide not to cause my gf is just so fucking cool. Like if you think you found a good dude and you like /love your husband you should be thrilled that your personage and pussy is enough to keep him away from the all encompassing beast that is sexual novelty.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:26 AM
2

I'm a man in a relationship. Yes. Every time I see an even remotely attractive woman I imagine doing pretty much every terrible thing to her imaginable. I would never cheat, and have never cheated, but mentally I am a monster I did this throughout my 20's and I imagine I will do it all throughout my 30's as well. I know nearly all my friends do this too. Men are mostly insatiable, Sisyphean creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:02 AM
5

Talking and it's always been talking
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:53 PM
1

I wonder what this phenomena is called: the less effete and retarded I get/got, the more insecure I get too. I started as an oblivious skinny fat nothing, gradually built myself to a halfway decent human animal, read lots, more than anyone I know, got decent job, saving more than anyone I know, did/do more pullups than God, cool as fuck near perfect girlfriend, overall super pleasant life, some amount of real self-esteem, everything going better than I ever expected... and the insecurity has nev…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:44 PM
7

Internally for most people it's a 1 - 4 scale. 1: ew no 2: eh would if I was drunk/wouldn't date seriously 3: yes 4: yes+ That's it. That's how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 11:22 PM
2

My girlfriend loves me and would never
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:37 AM
1

I am a mostly straight man and dont want anything around my asshole. It is not worth a thousand dollars to be fucked there. I could never ever derive pleasure from this part of my body.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:21 AM
1

I'm sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:15 AM
1

Oh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:15 AM
1

Should have made it a ? for straight men
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:14 AM
1

So you're saying you would let yourself be fucked in the ass for one thousand dollars
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:06 AM
1

A human can be fucked in the ass in many ways. It does not specify how you will be fucked in the ass, or what it will use. It does say it will hurt only as much as a regular human ass fucking and none of the materials and or its own fake and or not fake penis are toxic or otherwise harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 02:05 AM
3

Concept is the same. Women will overlook nearly everything about a personality and or character if the dude is top 1-5%. A rich hot cannibal and a hot rich retard will in perpetuity do better than an average man with integrity and smarts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:43 AM
2

Here is a hypothetical for you. Every day a mysterious gloryhole portal or a ploryhole if you will opens up in your bedroom and on the other side is a human ass and asshole. You do not know if it is male or female as the rest of the genitalia are shrouded in some unknown cosmic darkness. You find this ass and asshole attractive even though it is genderless and exists extradimensionally. It tells you to fuck it and says it will be pleased if you fuck it, but also says it will pay you a thousand U…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:38 AM
6

TIL early 20's chicks are all pedos Pretty cool honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:31 AM
3

Armie Hammer literally wanted to eat bitches and tons of chicks were just like ok armie haha sure thing snookums
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:11 AM
1

Didnt click the link yet. Is it Punch Drunk Love?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 01:07 AM
1

I mean, there's tons, but Gun With Occasional Music, Solaris and Book of the New Sun are probs my top three but there's tons more. Jeff VanderMeer's novels are excellent. Annihilation and Borne are must reads. Canticle for Leibowitz if you're into post apocalyptic stuff. And then of course there's stuff like Vonnegut. My three favorites by him, Galapagos, Cat's Cradle and Bluebeard all contain sci-fi elements. Sirens of Titan and Slaughterhouse 5 are also quite good.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 02:13 PM
11

The new generations don't like old people's idea of "hard work" because it's largely predicated on working hard for someone else. Personal merit and accomplishment means next to nothing in tycoon economies. Your generation seemed largely content getting fucked in the ass by 1%ers, even going so far as to shake their hand afterward and tell them what a great job they did cumming in your gaping asshole, then continuing to vote them into public office so your sons and daughters can get the same kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:26 PM
1

I had to stop saying retard IRL because my GF is a special needs teacher and it's a no no word and it's seriously harming my mental health. I can't express myself without calling someone really bad a gay retard. It just feels right in my soul.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 03:40 AM
1

I don't see how anecdotes are useful. Anecdotally, I've seen the exact opposite of your experience and I have experienced the exact opposite of your experience (and have slept with more people). Pretty much every woman I've made out with I've also slept with, and this is true for essentially every man I know. And this doesn't matter a bit, just like your little story didn't. I don't have hyper conservative beliefs. I am literally a socialist. My thoughts on sex and gender issues are insanely lib…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 03:04 AM
1

Are you denying that making out is an integral part of human mating processes? You kind of said it yourself. You make out with people in order to sleep with them. Very few people just go around willy nilly making out with people -- it almost always leads to sex, or at least increases the probability of sex in the future. It is very much a sexual activity. Maybe pecks and such are not necessarily sexual, but making out certainly is. I've never heard anyone say otherwise until now. Making out with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 09:03 PM
1

Like I said, I have a relatively high N count, especially if compared to the "average". That doesn't really track with a 'low sociosexuality'. I don't think saying a few dozen partners, as in 30 or 40, is fine tracks with that either. Average person fucks like 10 people in their lifetime, I am fine with a much higher number than average before calling it unhealthy behavior. I mean, I just don't think you're thinking about how certain actions contribute to the way people view each other. We're ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 08:27 PM
1

It does mean fewer, though. A hundred is a crazy amount for pretty much everyone, even dudes I would consider killers. I guess I just don't see the appeal of making out and or fucking with hundreds/thousands of women like some of the ultra Chads here. A few dozen, makes sense, that seems like a healthy sexuality to me, not someone hedonistically trying to fill some gap. But if you're making out with everyone available, this is a signal that you're addicted to the thrill of it, or addicted to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 08:05 PM
2

Making out with a hundred people is exactly what that definition entails -- it's indiscriminate action. People like this don't really think about what they're doing or why they're doing it. If it's for hyper temporary thrills, then I don't think that speaks well of their general adjustment. I say this all as a guy with a relatively high N count. But there's an arbitrary line every individual draws where certain behaviors and actions in the opposite start to look like subconscious, unhealthy patt…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 07:27 PM
3

I'm 30 and can kind of see your point but ... romantic kissing is generally sexual, though? I would consider a person who made out with like 100 people promiscuous, even if they didn't fuck any of the people. Besides, the way the word is used in many contexts is the second definition, also listed on google demonstrating or implying an undiscriminating or unselective approach; indiscriminate or casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 05:49 PM
1

Of course they can, but the issue is you spoke in affirmatives. Making a prediction is different than making a positive claim. You made a positive claim, based on incomplete data. Bad thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 07:51 PM
1

You didn't say few, you said 'couple' -- couple means 2 to anyone who speaks English. Still don't see how a dataset of hundreds is enough to speak for hundreds of millions of people. That's not how population statistics work. Hypothetically, if you saw a study with an N=200 and it's about how all women are inherently good, does that study speak for hundreds of millions of people? Or does more research have to be done? Don't you see how the researchers own bias could have influenced the conclusio…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 07:47 PM
1

It's not dismissal, it's literally just having a different experience from yours. I've had mostly good experiences with women. But that actually doesn't matter 'cause I don't say "women are x", I just say, the women I've met and known, have been mostly good. That's much different than saying "all women are good". You're basically saying "womenz bad cause women I have met are bad", and if you can't see how that is retarded (after I already explained it to you), then you are lost. A couple hundred…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 07:38 PM
1

I have also lived only in major metro areas and have traveled a lot and my experience is directly opposite of yours. The difference is I don't make claims about my experience being how millions of other people are. Your sample is still tiny. You're using hundreds of people to say things about billions of people. If we're talking US, that's still 100s of people as a dataset for hundreds of millions aka that's retarded. An individual human can never have a big enough dataset for stuff like this. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 07:04 PM
1

The thing is, though: they're not. The women in your life are like this. A million other people could tell you they know a bunch of cool women who are nothing like you describe and you wouldn't believe them. You're convinced a giant population of people are exactly like the tiny bubble of reality you live in. And that my friend is retarded as fuck. Don't extrapolate your shitty experience onto broad populations.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 06:08 PM
0

If you are continually meeting women like this, seems like you are the common denominator.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 02:17 PM
2

I agree, but keeping Usman there isn't the worst call, he has been fairly dominant and technically has more title defenses. I think both kind of deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 01:35 AM
5

"I don't want to go into hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of medical debt and I don't want the planet to die and I like when student populations don't have to bankrupt themselves in order to get an education" -- communist, basically Stalin
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 07:58 PM
3

Talk about gender dynamics all the time in real life (mostly without using all the lame definitions you see here). I wanna say 90% of the time people enjoy these kinds of conversations. Sex, dating and relationships are interesting on their face and most people like talking and thinking about them. We just autist-ify it to the nth degree here but the topic as a whole is almost always a hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 02:18 AM
2

Purge ain't happenin cause if it did this sub would probably get banned. Already tiptoes the lines pretty dangerously when you consider how gay in the brain reddit mods are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 01:38 AM
2

How to go from ideal physique to obviously drugged freak in several years of not so easy steps
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 01:36 AM
3

It's basically 100% not safe /u/jackedsoon Don't buy drugs from the clearnet. End of advice. No other advice needed. As far as you go PBAJ, I'd recommend not doing it alone at first, but you do you. LSD is almost always better as a communal experience. Good luck either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 12:28 AM
2

You seem excited for it, which is a good sign. You will almost certainly have a fuck ton of fun. Enjoy, brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 11:38 PM
2

LSD made me realize there were layers to human consciousness that can only be "unlocked" by taking a drug. I mean, look, on LSD, things that ought not be a certain color are, things that ought not move do, patterns emerge when they were just boring geometry before. On LSD, your brain unconsciously makes metaphors and symbolizes everything around it (which is where you get a lot of the hokey 'I saw God' or 'I figured out the universe' shit). A paisley rug becomes a trail to the stars, in other wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 11:30 PM
3

I've only had positive experiences on LSD, did it a ton in college, now do it about once a year. It's the best drug on the planet and nothing else even comes close imo. I have seen some folks have bad trips so it makes me weary suggesting it to anyone, but almost everyone will have a great time on a low dose (one tab, or 100ug or under). Low doses are much more euphoric, laughy trips, whereas medium to high doses are much closer to the Fear and Loathing breathing walls psychedelia trips. I think…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 11:06 PM
6

This is 100% the right answer. No one ought to like monogamy, and the problems with it are readily identifiable to anyone willing to think for a second. But it is hugely preferable to any other kind of system when it comes to relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:44 PM
1

Iced coffee is a type of coffee, therefore by your own admission not all coffee is 'fine', and therefore you are a racist
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:40 PM
1

Do I really need to list all the examples of when 'purity' turned out to be absolute shit? All coffee is good. Stop hatin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:00 PM
1

These are good thoughts, and a great steelman, but I guess I just disagree fundamentally. IMO, Mutual friends are just not a good thing when it comes to relationships. Separate friend groups seem to me to be healthier and less prone to fuckery in broad. Relationships are already difficult enough, I don't see how adding more fuckable good people to the table helps a relationship flourish. I know this is a minority opinion. As far as the 'similar values' thing goes, I don't think a woman who just …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:58 PM
1

Traditionalism like this is gross and wrong. Progress is key. Even good formulas can be improved upon. It is okay to be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:50 PM
1

I like all coffee, I am not an "iced person". You are just prejudiced and a bigot. Also I dunno if you know this but black iced coffee with no additives exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:47 PM
1

Why would you want to be the guy in this situation, though? Like... there are no benefits. Other women exist who haven't also fucked your friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:41 PM
1

If coffee tastes "old" to you, that's a you problem, not a coffee problem
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:39 PM
1

Who tf "likes" birds? What a retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:12 PM
3

Wow what does it feel like to be this fucking wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:09 PM
1

Nice, now go look at the wikipedia (or my quote above) and see that plenty of academics have been arguing about appeals to authority for years, and how many believe that appeals to authority are not fallacies. In most cases, I would agree with this, as expert opinion is how laymen ought to be forming their opinions. Don't agree? Guess we're at an impasse. This is one of the few "fallacies" I would argue isn't really one. Moreover, I still did not commit appeal to authority any way you slice it, …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 02:00 AM
1

Your second paragraph is pretty much right on the money. You can grow muscle with low weight, it just takes a significant amount of reps, thus it's a giant time sink by comparison. And I say this as a calisthenics nerd who will never pick up a weight in his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 01:46 AM
1

It is not a separate fallacy, it is literally on the wiki page for argument from authority. It is literally a type of argument from authority. Sorry there is too much nuance in different fallacies for your little brain, but this is just a fact. Wrong once again. When we talk about complex issues like wealth inequality, the sources that explain how and why this is happening are books, not single papers. Do you really want me to link the thousands of studies on wealth inequality in the U.S.? (and …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 01:25 AM
1

I mean, you wouldn't admit that my definition of wealth distribution was correct and literally plucked from a laymen source, so you've been walking back or deflecting or ignoring this entire time. Also that can be what appeal to authority is. That "fallacy" specifically means many different things and is used in many different ways. Many agree it's not even a fallacy. You specifically said you for whatever reason don't like or believe Piketty because "other economists said stuff", which is an ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:06 PM
1

What's funny is I took the definition of wealth distribution off wikipedia and since you clearly don't know what wealth distribution actually means you thought I was "making it up" Here you go, again: "Appeals to authority are not valid arguments, but nor is it reasonable to disregard the claims of experts who have a demonstrated depth of knowledge" Literally straight from the wiki. Appeal to authority is literally one of the most contested logical fallacies around. It is constantly argued about…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:50 PM
1

You know, that's fair. I guess I've seen it be used as a stand in for "paid for dinner once" and somehow that automatically makes you BB. I think 'paying for some stuff' but not expending a large portion of your resources on a relationship would not be BB, but I spose that's just me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 04:04 PM
1

Isn't BB "game" just paying for shit and being a provider? That's the only way I've ever seen the term used. If that's the case, I don't think that's necessary to be in a good healthy relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:55 PM
2

Don't really think that's true, though. A good enough dude can "lock a chick down" in many different ways and being a provider has very little to do with it. Healthy relationships with economic equals exist all over the world and so do relationships where the woman is the primary provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:46 PM
2

49 with 21 is still waaaay more likely than 1 in 200 million.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:44 PM
1

An appeal to authority is when someone appeals to someone who isn't an authority and claims it's true. It's not when someone says "this is what many authorities think, therefore it's likely true", which is exactly what I said. The only way non-economists can start to form economic opinions is to look at the work of experts. This goes for every soft and hard science. Moreover, I did explain exactly why what you said makes no sense. Rich people hoard wealth and spend on luxury, they do not distrib…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:43 PM
1

Not walking back anything. Once again, you said: "it will go a long way towards solving the wealth inequality problem as wealthy people’s assets continually get split amongst more and more descendants." That is unequivocally untrue. Assets continually split up amongst more descendants does not go to "solving" wealth inequality. I already explained why, and gave you an authoritative source that goes into a lot of complex details as to why, and I have paraphrased those details here. You did not sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:23 PM
1

I have a GF and I'm 30, which I'm pretty sure is fairly old for this sub. But you don't need to monetarily simp for women in order to be successful. That's just untrue and silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:22 PM
4

Spoken like a true beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:07 PM
3

Great, luckily your opinion here doesn't matter. The odds of winning the lottery are something like 1 in 200 million. There are significantly more age gap relationships than that, by many orders of magnitude. They are not even remotely comparable. It's a shit analogy. Sucks to suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:06 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:04 PM
5

The chances of winning the lottery are much lower than being an in shape 40 year old fucking 20 somethings. I don't even agree that 40 year old men can easily procure 20 something quality women, but it's astronomically more likely than winning the lottery, they are not analogous whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 03:00 PM
1

Great, I addressed that many times over anyway (and right away, within my first two responses). Splitting up generational wealth does absolutely nothing for "solving wealth inequality". It never has, and I doubt it ever will. My source is a book (a couple books, actually) written by a world renowned economist on this subject exactly. Your evidence is... nothing. Hmmm wonder who is right, random redditor or PHD economics professor... lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 02:54 PM
1

That's not what you said in your original post, though, you said splitting generational wealth would help "solving" wealth inequality. This is called moving the goalposts. You wrote a thing with no evidence backing it, and are now trying to say you "meant something else" even though it's not what you wrote. We can all see what you wrote. It does not say "breaking up generational wealth". Your quote: "Furthermore, it will go a long way towards solving the wealth inequality problem as wealthy peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 02:04 PM
1

First, I am talking about America and not China and comparing disparate economies and "how they work" is disingenuous. They do not work the same, nor is wealth disseminated the same. Second, you said that generational wealth can "solve" income inequality. You said it multiple times in fact. If you want to backtrack now and say you weren't saying what you clearly said, that's called moving the goalposts, and it's no surprise you're doing it because your original statement is so utterly bizarre an…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 12:41 PM
1

What you're talking about is essentially trickle down economics and that has sufficiently been proven to be bullshit by nearly every economist in the world, even super conservative ones. Rich people's wealth does not redistribute to the working class, and it never has -- it does not change the outcomes for 99% of people and effectively does nothing to the economy overall. Generational wealth being squandered (generally on houses, cars, boats, luxuries) is redistributed mostly to other rich peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 12:21 AM
1

My definition is literally from the wikipedia lmao. "There are wide varieties of economic inequality, most notably income inequality measured using the distribution of income and wealth inequality measured using the distribution of wealth." Here's some advice: don't say stuff that you don't understand. You clearly love doing this, but I'd recommend not doing it in the future or else you're going to end up looking as dumb as you do now.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 05:25 PM
1

That's not what wealth inequality means, though. Wealth inequality is how we measure the distribution of wealth. 1% of rich households losing money over 2-3 generations does nothing for wealth inequality, i.e. the distribution of wealth for 99% of people. It literally only effects 1% of people. The economic boons that comes from losing generational wealth are a) virtually nonexistent, or b) shoved into the hands of the already wealthy. You can't make the "difference smaller" for 99% of people wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:45 PM
1

But what you're talking about effects like 1% of people -- it does not solve 'wealth inequality' for already poor people, it simply makes 2nd and 3rd generation rich people less wealthy. That's not "solving" wealth inequality, that's only making the descendants of rich people less rich, but it does nothing for 99% of other people. The gap between the two is absolutely irrelevant as it does not "solve" the circumstances of the 99%. If your idea of "solving wealth inequality" is "evening the playi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:04 PM
1

That still doesn't make your original statement sensible. Descendants getting a smaller portion of a large bundle of generational wealth does nothing for wealth inequality. You would have zero numbers or studies to back this up because it does not exist except as a figment of your imagination. Why not just admit you wrote the wrong words? Once again, you wrote: "Furthermore, it will go a long way towards solving the wealth inequality problem as wealthy people’s assets continually get split among…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 02:34 PM
1

I literally just quoted the part where you explicitly said that... you can't backtrack the internet, brother. It's all there. I think we know for a fact that wealthy people pump their money into excess, yes. This is why I told you to read Piketty. He goes over this in depth in Capital in the Twenty First Century. It's a giant part of the book. Also how are banks mysterious? lmao. I never said mysterious. I do know trustfund babies. They do not spend like normal people do, but go off. Anecdotes a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 02:15 PM
1

I never said it didn't exist. You said: "Furthermore, it will go a long way towards solving the wealth inequality problem as wealthy people’s assets continually get split amongst more and more descendants." This is a fundamental misunderstanding as to how generational wealth actually influences economies. That's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 12:35 PM
1

It's interesting that experts do not agree with this. I have not been able to find a single paper on how dynastic wealth helps wealth equality -- I have only been able to find stories on how it hurts, and even fuckin' billionaires agreeing with that assessment. As I suspected, your thinking on this is essentially just a vapid trickle down dogma which everyone knows is bullshit. Methinks you need to read some Piketty.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 05:23 AM
1

You have yet to explain how dynastic wealth "solves" wealth inequality. This is a claim you made. Burden of proof is on you, dawg. "It goes back into the economy hurr durr" isn't an answer. It does not "go back into the economy", it goes to corporations and other already rich organizations. That's not "back into the economy". It goes back to the already rich. I fail to see how rich people's generational wealth going into the hands of other rich people "solves" wealth inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:45 AM
2

That doesn't answer how that solves wealth inequality. Hell, as far as I know, dynastic wealth creates income inequality The 'pumped back into the economy' line is the same line Reaganites use when desperately clinging to trickle down, which everyone now knows is bullshit. That's not how this works. That wealth is not disseminated into useful economic structures, it doesn't help the poor, it doesn't give impoverished people any more opportunity, it largely goes to other already rich organization…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 04:21 AM
2

How exactly does dynastic/generational wealth "solve" wealth inequality, except for a very tiny specific cadre of already generally wealthy people? That doesn't "solve" wealth inequality, people are just poor two generations later
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 03:32 AM
1

We're missing a whole fuck ton my man. Just how it is. Honestly, good questions, and it's good to be inquisitive, but it's subjective. "Why live" is different based off individual responses, i.e. only biased observers can give you an answer that will likely be different for each observer. It cannot be quantified. It only exists because of human experience. So you may not like it, but the answer will always be different, and the most honest real answer "I don't know, it's probably different for e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 12:06 AM
1

Nope, sorry, you're still wrong, try to say not retarded things next time, will go better for you edit: This is a debate forum. I debate. You say wrong thing, I correct you. That's how this works.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:40 PM
1

Statistical probability isn't an excuse, it's a probability, and saying true things (which I did and you didn't) isn't an excuse either. Fun try, though. I like little guys like you. Very funny and cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:37 PM
1

Been here a long time, it's mostly out of habit. I find gender dynamics interesting. I also don't comment here every day and not even close to it. Maybe one active day a week. I don't delete my history. My other username was mlemisafunnyword. Also ekmetzger, mangosmangos and M0rtAuxRois, but those last three were banned. mlem I stopped using just cause (but it's all still there) I literally just posted (within the last week) in lit, truelit, news and science so maybe if you looked a little more …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:34 PM
1

How do you know I'm dead wrong? Is it because you're extrapolating your personal experience to broader populations and using that as 'proof'? Wow that's not totally dumb as fucking shit at all. I have a tip. Maybe put down the video games and go do some work. Actually use your brain and body instead of living in your daycare pleasure fun box for the rest of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:19 PM
2

There are also millions of short men who get women, so I'm pretty sure you don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 11:11 PM
3

That sure would be interesting anecdote, which could be easily combatted with my own anecdotes about my shorter friends getting shredded and women coming to them a lot more easily. Weird how that works.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 10:55 PM
1

How could they tell you why? All of those italicized words are the key component here. One of the issues is that you are asking for a "logical" answer to a subjective question, and expecting there to be pitchperfect answers to subjective phenomena. That doesn't exist, and it's not how words work. You're both asking an unanswerable question that is ipso facto not objective, and then you're expecting a well formulated objective, or at least empirical, response. Can you see why that's a little wonk…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 10:45 PM
1

I just dont see why you expect an existential question to have a logical answer. Plenty of questions dont have logical answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 10:06 PM
2

If youre trying to imply its only my height that got me women, you're going to have to explain the extreme disparity between not fit me and fit me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 10:01 PM
2

Hard to say. I know plenty of dudes who slay on a level I will never be privy to and I know a bunch of sexless Quasimodo motherfuckers too. I fall somewhere in the middle of that paradigm, but am not quite traditionally attractive enough to fall on the Chad side.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 09:54 PM
1

Not flustered, your paragraph just contains zero actual substance. I dont know what you mean by any of it. All it says is "I dont like absurdism cause reasons" and then you say some other random unrelated shit and say that "why live?" Should* be able to be answered " logically". Why? What does that even mean? Should? What? What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 09:52 PM
1

Right, so that number is probably a lot lower for me, which just kinda makes my middle spectrum of 'not Stacy' and 'not Landwhale Laura' include hundreds of millions more people (and it's already a huge amount of people, as I already said). So I'm confused as to what exactly your point was.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 08:17 PM
1

Why are 10% of women Stacy? What ass did you pull that number out of? And yeah, I know the stats, and they're a big reason why I've been saying "we should not consider fat people average and they can be removed from the equation entirely". Most people's attraction doesn't start at 'fat', it starts at average healthy weight and fit. Also roughly a quarter of 400 million is still 100 million people... kind of a gigantic spectrum of people, if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 08:11 PM
1

I am pointing out what is average within a healthy range before the obesity crisis ruined the western world. There is an average weight a human can be within their height range without being fat or it effecting their life negatively. That is an average healthy weight. Just because it is not the current American average does not mean it is some kind of average, which it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 08:05 PM
1

I DID say average healthy weight. Stop being disingenuous. I said it literally a sentence later. Read. Like, it's all there. Literally said: "And by 'average weight', I mean 'average healthy weight', not 'average'. Those are different things." My point was that attraction does not start at fatness, which I've said over and over, and that it starts for most people at healthy average weight, so we should remove fat people from the equation. The user I was responding to said that men only chase Sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:58 PM
1

They do not. Absurdists say meaning can only be found through reason. In fact they go one step further and say you cannot find meaning without reason, as it is the vehicle for, you know, actually being able to do stuff. Once again, this is just a signal to your ignorance of absurdist works and messaging. Camus is one of the most widely read philosophers of our time and is still taught in universities throughout the country. Clearly he has some things to say about the human condition that people …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:53 PM
1

I have not. I have literally said, every time, that there's a difference between average weight and average healthy weight, and there is. There is a range of weight a person ought to be for their height. That is an average healthy weight. Don't agree? Don't know what to tell you. Every medical professional in my life, included the dudes who literally took the cancer out of my body, are just fine with this terminology. It is essentially what people used to weigh before food abundance, when obesit…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:49 PM
0

You're not a doctor, but okay. It's weird how every doctor's office I've ever been in has a chart for average healthy weights. I guess all the doctor's I've ever seen have been wrong, but anonymous "doctor" on reddit is right. Right, I am talking about average healthy weight. Did you miss the healthy part in like all of my posts? Your reading comp is pretty shit for a 'doctor'. I made a distinction between 'average' and 'average healthy' in every post. It was quite literally the entire crux of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:30 PM
0

I'm not excluding anyone. If we have a statistic that asks people what their preferences are, or what they're attracted to, and they say 'fit people', that's not excluding fat people, that's literally just answering the question lmao You clearly don't understand how survey statistics work
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:27 PM
2

No, this is not what I said. I said that an average healthy weight man should not be expected to enjoy or like fat women (aka average, not healthy weight average). I even said 'this is what I mean by the word average' in the post you're referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:24 PM
1

I don't think you understand what I'm trying to say. If you go into a doctor's office and say, 'What's the average weight of someone who is 5'4?", they're not going to say "175 pounds" lmao. They are going to give you a healthy weight range, an average, of what that person ought to weigh at their height. This is why we should be looking at average healthy weight when we're talking about attraction, and not average weight. These are completely different things, and there are ranges of weight that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:18 PM
1

Dude, do you have reading problems or something? My only claim was that the vast majority of people prefer not fat. That's it. This is a true claim, as far as the statistics go. Not sure what else there is to say. The stats leave out the fat people because most people don't prefer or like fat people. Like, fucking duh. Also it shouldn't be a surprise that even fat people don't prefer fat people. That is also statistically recognized. Virtually everyone (except niche fetishists, as I already said…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:17 PM
2

I don't think these people understand what I'm saying or what they're saying, but I do appreciate the assist. And like my GF is thin, and I am thin. Like usually attracts like in my experience. Guess that's too much for them to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:10 PM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? Are you seriously trying to convince me that the majority of humans find fat people attractive? GTFO, no one who has read any statistics on these topics thinks that's true. The vast majority of humans prefer healthy weight and/or fit people. This isn't 'made up', it is capital T truth. If you don't agree with this fundamental axiom of human existence, then I don't see how we can make any headway with this conversation. This is blaringly obvious to me (and onc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 07:00 PM
1

I didn't "change the rules", I literally stated exactly this in almost every post I made in this thread. Also it's not "what I think what everybody wants". The vast majority of people are not attracted to fatness. This is pretty common sense, and also statistically supported. Not sure what you mean by "never going to win".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:53 PM
0

I'm talking about where attraction begins for the vast majority of people, and it certainly does not start at 'fat', so whether or not the "average" person is fat literally does not matter, since it's never going to be where attraction actually begins.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:49 PM
0

Ok, and? Were you trying to completely miss the point of my posts or did you accidentally do it? "Average" would start at healthy weight, not fatness. This goes for both men and women. So when I said 'average' man, I meant what ought to be average when it comes to attraction and health.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:32 PM
–

Probably, but I just told you the biggest factor. You come from an evolutionary line of people (apes) who all, barring anomalous psychosomatic disorders, longed for and sought out some kind of community or tribe, because if they didn't, they would literally die. Epigenetically, all of these features that made them want community and tribe still exist within you. Being around other people, having a friend group, not being constantly alone, statistically anyway, makes people happy. Why? 'Cause we …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:13 PM
–

Because you are an ape and apes are highly social creatures that long for and specifically seek out tribe. With others, ape strong and happy, probably will not starve, has community, can rely on others and not just himself. Alone, ape gay, frustrated and probably going to starve monke.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:08 PM
–

Pretty much. Very well put. It's funny, you can go into pretty much any social situation and say something like "men are either children, or vicious murderers and rapists, and have committed more atrocities than any other creature on the planet", and no one will bat an eye. They will probably agree. Make a single suggestion that women maybe sorta kinda are flighty sluts and you can practically feel the chicks and their soy brigades burning holes through you. It's like it's okay to make generaliz…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 06:05 PM
6

I would not be surprised, I've been commenting here for like six years lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:55 PM
2

It's not me making the rules either. 'Average healthy weight' is different from 'average weight'. Very few people (except for niche fetishists) start attraction at unhealthy weights, so we really shouldn't expect them to. Humans are apes. We are hardwired to look for signals of health and genetic prosperity in potential mates. It is unreasonable to assume we can override these kinds of cognitive mechanisms.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:38 PM
1

You need to re-read Camus. He says almost exactly the opposite of that. Life is absurd, therefore you ought to create meaning for yourself in any way you can, and you are free to do so in any way you choose, precisely because the world we are shucked into is absurd. Also absurdism, at least Camus-ian absurdism, is born from the fact that humans are reasoning creatures in an unreasonable world. Not sure where you're getting this idea that absurdist 'give up' on reason when having reason is a cent…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:35 PM
0

It's too high of a standard for an average weight man to want an average weight woman, just because most women are fat? And by 'average weight', I mean 'average healthy weight', not 'average'. Those are different things. That's some fucky logicks for ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:32 PM
0

I'm not either, I'm referring to what 'average' means in the minds of most men with a healthy weight. 'Average' starts at 'not fat', which is why people don't want 5'4 170 pound landwhales, and honestly that makes perfect sense. It doesn't mean they're "chasing Stacy" or whatever other cope bullshit. It means they're just not chasing landwhale Laura. There's a whole giant spectrum of women that occupy the space between 'Stacy' and 'Landwhale Laura', and you seem to be missing those in your prior…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:29 PM
2

The word average is a semantic issue here. What an average woman ought to be and what an average woman is are two very different things. I'm 6'2" and 175 pounds. A 5'4" woman should not be anywhere near this weight to be considered 'average'. At that point, on the scale of human attractiveness (and health), a 170 pound 5'4" woman is well below average, even if the "average" person is fat as fuck. The average person ought not to be fat as fuck, and thus the attractiveness scale should start at a …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:26 PM
1

That's not what absurdism means, nor do any of the popular absurdists advocate 'giving up' -- actually, quite the opposite if you've ever read Camus or Kierkegaard. You seem very confused about some of these topics and have made a ton of untrue claims in your posts. I recommend reading the requisite works before typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:06 PM
1

Uhhh, no, that's just an uncharitable interpretation. Absurdists believe that humans have to create their own meaning even if there is no "intrinsic" meaning. That's not "cope", that's actually just a healthy way to adapt to a world without innate meaning. Being a bad parent has nothing to do with absurdism or nihilism, that's just being an asshole, which anyone of any philosophical persuasian can be. The absurdist would understand that being a good parent would almost certainly make their life …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:02 PM
–

The difference between something silly like nihilism and something genuinely profound like absurdism is intonation. A nihilist will gloomily say, "Nothing matters :(" An absurdist will proudly say, "Nothing matters! :)"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 04:24 PM
–

There's a ton of opposing forces to nihilism, though. Ethical egotism, Omnism, structuralism, objectivism, hell, just box standard faith/spirituality is in direct opposition to nihilism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 04:21 PM
38

Some people on this sub are so hopeless that even a totally benign, innocuous story is interpreted as a fanciful LARP.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 04:13 PM
8

Well, self proclaimed victims who want to justify their worldviews are the majority of men on this subreddit, but what you're saying is pretty much right. If I can make it work, so can most other dudes. All it takes it some modicum of consistency and self care.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 03:12 PM
43

I've been pretty much every body type except super muscular and super obese. In high school I was fat, in college I was skinny fat, after college I got skinny ripped and stayed that way. The difference isn't fathomable to people who haven't experienced it. Really the big crux was just having a V shape, not necessarily being super muscular. In high school and college I could maybe manage a relationship or two a year, and that's only 'cause I'm tall and not deformed. When I started working out and…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 02:48 PM
3

This is basically the correct answer. Let the robots do the hard work. They do it better than you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:44 AM
1

This sounds gayer than actual gay sex
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 01:43 AM
2

Is this satire?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 01:23 AM
3

Pretty much anything infidelity related is an instant breakup for me, zero tolerance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 11:17 PM
5

lmao I remember the JGL shit. Perhaps the most solid confirmation that a lot of people here are delusional with a capital D.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:40 PM
1

Concerta is all right, it's basically just baby Adderall. I used an ex's prescription recreationally and it did about the same thing addy did, just to a much smaller and less successful degree, but I still think it worked. For her it was a game changer and let her basically become a normal person instead of an ADHD mess.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:36 PM
3

You can never be a tank. You are like one of those cute little Vespa TAPs the French used in the Algerian War.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 08:42 PM
9

"I don't like something, why do other people like something I don't like?"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 11:22 PM
1

Oh my God. They are so adorable. That goofy jump it does in the last video is the best. I hope they catch lots of chickens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:51 PM
2

Patrice O'Neal. He's dead, but a successful funny fat man will have more (good) options than a successful fat woman. Overall I think you're right. At the upper echelons of fame, money and status, I think rivet has a point, this is slightly nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:35 PM
2

Better to realize this now than live life bitter and bored. The thankfulness mindset keeps away the boogey(wo)men. When I realized that being born a tall white European man in modernity means I am genuinely in the top 1% of luckiest humans ever born, it has been easy to be happy ever since. Hobbies also helped me with this. Feel sad about women? Read. Feel sad about women? Write. Feel sad about women? Play guitar. Feel bad/sad about women? Pullups, and lots of them. Art and working out have both…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:33 PM
2

Show us pictures of cute kits :3
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:17 PM
3

Good opinion. I hate that birds are so important to the general ecosystem, yet another sign that God is retarded. They're disgusting creatures and no one should like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:15 PM
2

IDK, I don't really see most women being that overwhelmingly greedy that they'd put up with someone who disgusts them intellectually and physically. It's a very small minority who would act like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 06:36 PM
2

I mean - why? Saying stupid shit is saying stupid shit and in my experience, saying stupid shit repulses women more than anything, money or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 12:44 PM
1

Pulled up to a Pizza Hut, next to a barking mutt I said, "Shut up, faggot, or your guts will be a bargain brunch" I need a bitch to punch and then a dirty ditch to dump her in These flirty witches ain't my friends and I will not make amends I need a Facebook slut, a Kappa Kappa cunt Tie her up and fuck her butt so long she'll trade her thong in for Depends Forced style, stuff her goddamn esophagus Cut her up like Kanye, put her cunt in a sarcophagus I think there's been an avalanche, so much blo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:48 AM
1

30k is definitely not good for MC and UMC women. They mostly all make more than that. I never said a guy working fast food in his 30's will date high quality women. I said men with comparably paid jobs will, depending on other factors, so to me, that means money is not a giant mitigating factor, or at the very least, it's as powerful but not more powerful than others factors, like overall attractiveness, personality, etc. But since we disagree on how to use 'status' here, it might be difficult t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:33 AM
1

I worked in "research" at a university, it's where they put MAers and PHDers who don't want to teach. Most of it was just compiling new literature, assignments, experiments, etc for assistant profs, aka I was a glorified assistant to professors, without having to fetch coffee and shit. Mostly was just there to go, "Wouldn't it be neat if you did X?" You're in your early 20's, yeah? You have plenty of time. I had my first real headfuck heartbreak at around 21, I know that feel, can be crushing, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:28 AM
1

Yeah, we just don't use 'status' the same way, and that's ok. Height, status, muscles, intellect, etc, are all separate categories to me. Maybe not MacDonald's, but they will go after the hot teacher, the hot cook, the hot musician, the hot painter. I think the specific job has a lot more to do than the income in this case -- you can make 30k as a teacher or a musician and be significantly more attractive to MC and UMC women than a man making a comparable salary in fast food, and I don't think t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:12 AM
1

Lol I'm with you on accommodations. I usually stay in shitter AirBnB's. Very few avenues for a dude entrenched in academia for the last 8+ years. I could teach and stuff, but I really don't wanna do that. I learned HTML and that'll likely be my income for life, and also has nothing to do with my degree, as some degrees usually just don't pay. Most I can do is go back to school for law, and I really don't wanna do that. Keep the Thailand thing in the back of your mind, at least. If you make enoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 03:06 AM
1

I've generally seen status to mean 'overall wealth' and 'overall social movement', while stuff like humor and intellect is placed in separate categories. I don't think humor or intellect have a lot to do with "status" as it's generally used overall. I think an educated, smart 29 year old women will go for a hot loser, it depends on how hot the hot loser is. I've seen this countless times, but that's anecdotal. I'm not sure how else to 'prove' this kind of thing. Your argument now hinges on how s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 02:56 AM
3

I think by your same logic, a wealthy man can kill his chances by saying stupid shit, too. That particular example is more about charm and intellect than it is 'status'. This is a tough one for me, I flip flop on which side is right all the time. Your point makes sense and is salient enough, but there's a trope of shrewish wives fucking poolboys for a reason. Wanting someone good looking is a primal, intrinsic feeling that can override a whole lot of other shit. So is resource gathering, though,…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 02:41 AM
1

Well I'm a Czech guy with family all over Europe and America. You can't go to the places I've been on $1,500. Like, go try to book a week trip to the Czech countryside for $1,500. Or Belgium. Or Nice. You will not be able to do it. Double that, and maybe, and even then, I take at least 2 week trips, usually about a month or two, so it's significantly more than 1.5k every time. Not 10k, though, but I go on multiple trips a year, and I like to splurge man. When I went to Japan, I went to the entir…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 02:35 AM
1

The millennial number I gave you is a total balance, both checkings and savings accounts. 50k total, no debt, would put you at 1% of world wealth and top 1/3rdish of US millennial wealth. The answer to your second question is: America is a money funneling shithole. Rent everywhere is incredibly high. Inflation keeps increasing with no end in sight. Student and medical debt wrecks a huge portion of the younger population. And on top of those things, people suck with money. I mean they just absolu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 02:05 AM
4

Spoken like a true le edgy teen that would existentially crumble the moment his wi-fi connection went out
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 01:30 AM
1

50k in savings at 32 is better than most Americans at any age. The average savings account in the US has $4500 dollars in it. That's not a typo. Not 45k. 45 hundred. If you want to bring this to just millennials to match your age range (and my IRL age range), 58% have a balance under $5,000, and that's overall balance, and that number is only going to get lower as inflation and rents continue to increase. Considering my stats are already much closer to guy 2 and I lead a happy and fulfilling lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 01:16 AM
4

Any sane person chooses 2 and it's not particularly close. I would kill myself if I had a 3 inch dick and money doesn't make it better. Also there's tons of cities in the U.S. and Europe where even a combined income of 100k will afford you a nice life. I make 50k now and feel richer than a lot of my coastal friends 'cause waaay less of my income is spent on rent and overall lifestyle creep (and also 'cause I have no children and a frugal artsy GF)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 12:56 AM
1

IRL my face has two modes for chicks 1 - Hot Jew guy 2 - Ew no Given the polarized nature of women's responses to me, 'janky' seems appropriate. A niche set of women think I'm really hot, but most Anglincanized western women think I'm weird looking/ugly. There is very little in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 09:12 PM
2

Fat isn't an insult if you're literally fat, it's just a description of reality at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 07:55 PM
0

This is why I'm so glad God made me tall, so I don't have to get into gay worthless shit like cars. Thanks God.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 07:51 PM
2

Just FYI, I don't report people, and no one reads that far back in threads anyway, including mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 07:50 PM
1

I never said all professional tennis players were skinny, I just said you weren't anywhere near the weight of the William's sisters. Cool lie, even after you deleted all your posts, and my responses can be read on my profile. lmao. edit: you can't be 5'10 and 194 pounds as a woman and be a "competitive" tennis player. You're fat. You'd gas after a few sets.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 07:42 PM
1

Facially not attractive, sure, that's way different than being dangerously overweight, which she is, and I'm not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 06:25 PM
1

I've posted pics here before, many times in fact. The girls gave me a 6 on average. I'm 6'2" and 170. My face is insanely jank. I'm in shape and tall, but not remotely attractive facially. Here's the kicker, though: I would never pretend to be a "model" or "attractive", and yet I am in significantly better shape than some fatty on a swimsuit magazine cover. Seems weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 05:59 PM
-2

I don't understand how anyone can look at that 'model' and not be immediately repulsed. She is fucking disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 05:44 PM
2

Mr. Noodles is an incredible name for a cat.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 02:32 AM
3

So cute :3 Food names are the best names. The best cats I've known/owned were named Banana, Waffles and Pancakes. I dub this little one ... Gumdrop.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 01:06 AM
1

LOL I genuinely can't even imagine taking a woman I like to Starbucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:46 PM
1

Honestly these stories make it feel so much more normal. Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:30 PM
1

Good point, and I am serious about this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:28 PM
2

The "best" couple I know personally also went exclusive after the second date. Seems to be some magic in that number!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:27 PM
1

That's fair. I don't have big commitment issues, but for most of my 20's I was a bit of a serial philanderer. Not a total fuckboy slut, but have always been a bit cautious of entering LTR's. And all six of our dates (except the first one) were 2+ day long engagements. We go on a date, she comes back to my place and we hang out for the weekend, etc. And we both hate texting, we call each other. It's all very sweet and saccharine and I guess I'm just not used to it as I haven't been in an LTR sinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:25 PM
2

So a laaaady I've been seeing since the beginning of May had the exclusivity talk with me on Saturday. I said "yes, duh, of course" 'cause she's a catch and everything has been going basically perfect, but now I'm wondering if exclusivity after only like six dates is nuts, or if it's more normative than I'm imagining. Generally it takes me months (3-6) of dating to even consider exclusivity so it all feels a little strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:14 PM
3

The filter is called Purple Noon
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 05:09 PM
3

I find Zendaya 0% attractive so hard disagree from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 07:30 PM
3

They literally put her above Margot and Anne Hathaway. Sickening dogbrains at it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 07:26 PM
3

I don't find her physically attractive at all, but she's so legitimately funny and talented that she's automatically like a 9 in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 07:00 PM
1

I thought the preference features on hinge were paid for, and don't most women not pay for apps? Sorry, have only used bumble recently, haven't been on hinge in a couple years.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 04:44 PM
1

Both very true. Location has surely helped me. I am sure dudes in rural Bumfucksville have a harder time at it, even just from a population statistics perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 04:43 PM
3

The struggle is hugely exaggerated on this sub, as this sub is a breeding ground watering hole for desperate eremetic weirdos That being said, I really want to understand why/how some apps work for some people and not for others. As an example, I've always done very well on bumble, okay on hinge, and middling on tinder and can't really explain the disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 04:15 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 01:38 AM
1

All the good breakfast foods I can't eat or else I'll be a fatass. Go to breakfast for the past couple of years has been scoop of peanut butter, no taste no sugar lots of protein Fage (lol) yogurt, banana.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 09:36 PM
1

The best place I've ever been is Tokyo. I'm not even really into Japanese culture or weaboo shit, but Tokyo is fucking magical. So my pick is Tokyo. Or I would just move back to somewhere in the Czech Republic. I was born in Zlin, which is kind of a shitty little city, but the neighboring countryside and forests are very nice. Prague is pretty cool too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 09:32 PM
1

Sentient observation is exactly what it sounds like. A person making a judgement call is sentient observation. Someone observing something is sentient observation. It is the opposite of objectivity. I think once a single person observes Brad Pitt to not be as attractive as some obese dude in glasses, then yes, that is called subjectivity. Considering the wide and wild range of human tastes, this shouldn't be surprising to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:53 PM
1

What? It's entirely subjective. It depends on a sentient observer. If there's a person who finds Rebel hotter than Ana (and there are certainly at least a few people), you have your answer. Yes, beauty is entirely subjective. There cannot be objective beauty, the concept literally makes no sense. Objectivity means true outside of sentient observation. How can you make judgements on a person's appearance without sentient observation?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:48 PM
1

Yes. Beauty is dependent on a sentient observer. That's how subjectivity works.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:43 PM
2

Alison Brie , Liz Debicki , Lauren Tsai These 3 are 10's to me, and probably 8/9's to most other people. Most of the Marvel chicks are like solid 8's.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 06:17 PM
5

It is not "unacceptable" to meet women at bars, clubs and concerts. I don't know where you live, but in major metropolitan cities in the US, this still happens all the time and is not "banned" in the slightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 03:32 PM
2

Ackshually no, not bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:48 AM
1

You have seen me before, this is just a new username. I've been here since like 2015. Mark argues for completely inept and asinine positions constantly. I'll give you that he's willing to learn, but it usually takes paragraphs to make him see completely obvious philosophy 101 points. I wouldn't consider that "good" or useful. I will go away when I choose, thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:44 AM
2

You are pre-judging my "worthiness" based on what? A few posts? Yes, this is called rightoid goop brain in action. Also Mark is one of the dumbest users here. I had to explain to him the difference between objectivity and subjectivity a few months ago. He is a philosophical troglodyte who desperately wants to be smart but clearly isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:35 AM
3

You don't want to talk about it because you don't have anything to say. Literally everything he wrote is true, and no "politics" has to come up, nor did he say anything "leftist", he just said actually true things. People who actually have something to say don't shy away from petty conflicts on debate forums. They just, you know, write.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:27 AM
1

That's a fair enough take, and well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:25 AM
3

Yes, yes, typical rightoid goop-brain deflection "person with political leaning of x said y and I don't like x and y therefore capitalism good" If you want people to treat your silly beliefs seriously, having a rebuttal to the perfectly reasoned arguments in front of you would be a pretty good start. But you don't have anything rational to say back, so you go "ew leftist" and say nothing at all. Good goin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:23 AM
2

Have you tried not being religious
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:20 AM
3

That's not a rebuttal to anything he said. You can go on having shitty beliefs, no skin off my back.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:19 AM
1

Right on, man, keep it goin'. I never struggled much in HS or college, but dating apps have also been a boon to me. I am too naturally introverted to approach random women and my close social circles are mostly men (and men with wives/girlfriends), so dating apps have greatly streamlined the process for me. Never had much of an issue with them. I would add, though, that this isn't an unpopular opinion. Slightly above average dudes can do ok on OLD and everyone knows that, I think. But I also thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:17 AM
4

Gay in brain, retarded in spirit
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:12 AM
3

Everything he said is true. I don't see what his political alignment has to do with his plain-on-their-face unequivocally true statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:10 AM
1

cool > comfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:39 AM
1

Remind me when we can start wearing justacorps again
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:35 AM
1

They look like shit. It's like being a man with strawberry blonde hair. If you’re a man with strawberry blond hair and you’re not in the circus or a Viking, odds are you have not found your place in life and never will. Same with khakis.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:16 AM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 12:08 AM
2

I don't know if women have unrealistic expectations or not but no self respecting man should be wearing khakis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 11:44 PM
1

Deflection as humor. I don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 11:09 PM
1

"Everyone who likes something I dont must be some sort of mentally deficient trog hurr durr" Just say you have a superiority complex and like hating popular things for no good reason. Its ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 10:49 PM
1

Okay so what you said just kinda makes no sense. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 10:03 PM
1

You just said people like it because they have capeshit brain, so which is it? Youre contradicting yourself. And you not liking something doesnt make it overrated. I'd say Fury Road is ' rated' just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:57 PM
1

Just dont see how Fury Road has anything to do with capeshit brain. It is like the antithesis of contemporary superhero movies. They are so unlike each other in virtually all aspects that the comparison seems drawn from absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:51 PM
1

Honestly I think Titanic is extremely well made. Waterworld, not so much. Also degree of difficulty is a thing. What Miller orchesrated with Fury Road was considerably more difficult than Waterworld for god sakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:39 PM
1

If you knew anything about legitimately making movies, I think you'd realize why the newest Mad Max is at the very least insanely impressive. Maybe you didn't like it, but the on the ground filmmaking was considerably impressive pretty much universally. But I guess all the praise it got from other filmmakers means they have 'capeshit' brain, whatever the fuck that means. Comparing a mostly practical effect movie like Fury Road to Marvel movies and their adherents, who definitely do have capeshit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:33 PM
1

George Miller makes good movies, though. Your taste in movies continues to be shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:26 PM
2

Yes and yes, I do. People 'fixate on looks' in different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:35 PM
1

I don't think big channels get six bucks per 1k views, or at least when I was doing the youtube thing that was not the case. Big channels tend to make money other ways, generally through subscriptions and merch and whatnot, the views become not as important once you reach millions of subscriptions and views. And like I said, this is generalized, it's the starting point of monetization, but there's other factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 04:46 PM
2

Fixating on looks is the only thing that improved my dating circumstances and in turn improved my overall life. So, no. Just no.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 04:21 PM
2

I had a monetized youtube channel for a bit. This was in 2015 so it might be different now, but the way it worked back then was 1k views = 1 dollar. I think recently they added some monetization for subscription count as well, and sponsors/ad settings have a lot to do with it as well, but in general, 1k views = 1 dollar.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 04:13 PM
16

I think the best answer you'll get is "it's both biological and cultural", and it's not really possible to specify "how much", kind of just like most things. Attraction is both nature and nurture, and the "how much" part is likely highly individualized and nearly impossible to generalize to broad populations. Some people are probably more prone to "falling for" their "biological type" and others might be more prone to being into their "cultural type" or having inexplicable attractions, and every…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 01:05 PM
1

Yeah, I don't see where I said anything different.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 11:55 PM
2

I didn't tell people to start wearing only white shirts, high waters and used Doc Martens, so no. The outfit I outlined is the only acceptable outfit for a self respecting man and luckily it's variable enough to almost always be interesting and or make you look not stupid. Full suits are relics for traditionalists, polos are for queers and golfers, and t-shirts are low effort, hokey or otherwise unrefined. They all look like shit consistently. Button downs come in a wide variety of styles and if…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:54 PM
5

This is correct. I will make it easy for the fashion illiterate button down that actually fits you + black pants that actually fit you + non gay shoes There you go, suddenly you are "well dressed"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:40 PM
9

"Women should love me even if I'm a loserish impossible cunt" - local ppd man
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter