TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CastAwayVolleyball Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by CastAwayVolleyball on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Okay, let me give it a try. Performing a cosmetic surgery on a person who cannot give consent is wrong.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:16 AM
2

Ah, I understand. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 07:23 AM
1

We should set the thermostat so that it's ideal for women and then men can adapt their behaviour by wearing different clothing... I'm not finding that statement in the article. Is it an actual quote, or a paraphrase?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:49 AM
2

The article says: Buyers can never know if a women or girl has been trafficked. Which isn't the same thing as "of legal age."
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:03 AM
1

That's fine. Your absurd reasoning doesn't interest me, either.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:31 PM
1

They can't get married (the prerequisite to legal underage sex with an adult) without a parent's consent. That's the thing you're missing. For them to be in a relationship in which sex happens with an adult, they have to have the parent's consent, and it has to be a marriage, which the parent consents to.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:20 PM
1

Except that, as you said yourself (but somehow managed to gloss over), minors need parental consent to get married. Minors cannot by themselves consent to adult things. That's what makes them minors.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:57 PM
1

You can't rape a consenting person. Minors can't be consenting persons.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:08 AM
1

I guess not. I'm done. *Ooh, that was a sneaky edit. I was responding to Positive's now-edited question to the effect of, "Are we just going to go around in circles?" They changed that to be: The point of that art piece could not have been made without it.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:52 AM
2

You're shifting goalposts. It is ridiculous to get upset when a part of said performance art required audience to separate based on gender. Okay, shouldn't be upset about paying money and taking time to get a good spot, and then having that taken. If you are not a big enough fan of the performers to know what to expect, maybe you don't deserve to be in the front row anyway. No, I don't think a person needs to expect that they'll lose their spot when they take the time, money, and effort to get t…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:38 AM
2

Maybe a person should get out what they put in. Maybe she could have cordoned off a place for girls before the concert started. Maybe she shouldn't spit on the people who actually made an effort to get there early for her show. Maybe if you don't actually try for the front row, you shouldn't be in the front row. Clearly the people who got there later aren't as big fans as they guys who got there early. Maybe the bigger fans should get the front row? Does anyone know if it happened more than the …
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:28 AM
2

What a ridiculous concept.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:54 AM
3

Yeah, I take it the concert was free admission. The men paid the price of the tickets, and got to the place early so they could get a good spot, and then they're told, seriously, to move to the back, so people who only paid the price of the tickets could get the spots they could have gotten if they'd gotten there sooner. Why anyone would get upset about that, or upset on behalf of the people who experienced that, I have no idea. /s Performance art or not, it's ridiculous for the people actually …
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:45 AM
6

A bunch of angry men A bunch of men were angry that people were being moved from their places because of their gender. I'm not clear on what stopped women from getting those places in the front. Their gender was a barrier to getting to the venue early? Seriously? Sure, it's Hanna's concert, if she wants to ask people to move from their places, she can. That doesn't mean people can't be upset. That doesn't mean it isn't ridiculous for her to do that. And it doesn't mean the people objecting are "…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:22 AM

https://archive.is/2Sd8h
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:40 AM

Research has found that women are superior to men in most ways that will count in the future, and it isn’t just a matter of culture or upbringing—although both play their roles. It is also biology and the aspects of thought and feeling shaped by biology. It is because of chromosomes, genes, hormones and brain circuits. And yet boys can't be naturally better at math or science, because biology is never a factor, you sexist, misogynistic pig.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 04:16 AM
0

But ... what does any of that have to do with men's rights? This is not the forum for discussing sexual preferences, so ... why are you insisting that people do?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 02:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter