TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Castruccio_Castracan Archive

View 18 posts and 126 comments by Castruccio_Castracan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
908

DiscriminationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights02/04/23 07:55 PM
811

Activism/SupportCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights18/05/24 07:37 PM
754

HumourCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:37 PM
411

DiscriminationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights31/03/23 10:26 AM
333

Marriage/ChildrenCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights15/04/23 08:05 PM
297

Marriage/ChildrenCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights03/08/24 12:07 PM
275

Social IssuesCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights11/07/24 11:56 PM
269

False AccusationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights27/05/24 11:13 PM
255

FeminismCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:01 PM
243

Activism/SupportCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:29 PM
175

DiscriminationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights24/11/23 11:40 AM
122

Social IssuesCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights07/04/23 08:53 AM
107

DiscriminationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:20 PM
82

Legal RightsCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:29 PM
58

False AccusationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:16 PM
39

DiscriminationCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:47 PM
31

Marriage/ChildrenCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights15/01/23 04:58 PM
28

GeneralCastruccio_Castracan/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

Any one of those groups could have white males in it (assuming that’s what you’re whining about?) You're projecting, not assuming. I'm talking about men - white, black, any color, every color. It's your own bias to think of "white men" as your default boogieman. You're telling on yourself. but you need to be explicitly mentioned? I know you did no more than take a surface-level look and write the first thing that come to mind, but if you pay a little more attention you'll notice those are links,…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:04 PM
191

And then they wonder why men, especially young men, break more and more towards conservatism. Progressives go out of their way to exclude, dismiss and reject men, then complain men aren't supporting them.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:31 PM
12

ALL of these are statistically proven facts and she chooses to see only what she sees as important. A good chunk of politics is confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 05:56 AM
7

I've had to deal with false accusations from a stalker in the past and these were the lessons I learned: How do I move past something like this, which friends say is trivial It's not trivial and the therapy-speak about "moving on" is what's holding you back. You were the victim of an injustice. You didn't get even, and people are even refusing to recognise that it was an injustice. Which makes it completely normal for you to not have moved on from it. You move on from shit that's settled, not op…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:24 PM
4

What's the current government view on all this? They are the usual "conservative" frauds. Lots of noise and waving about of culture war banners, but absolutely no incisive action to fix this sort of thing. Their current birth rate plan is to give a one-off gift of a few thousand euros to new parents...
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:59 PM
12

WTF is that about? I don't know the specifics about Portugal's situation, but I bet it's like everywhere else: when one party to the marriage has enormous gains to make in case of divorce, with next to no social much less legal consequences, then it's pretty obvious what will happen statistically.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:57 PM
8

You think other European countries are better in this respect?
/r/MensRights03/08/24 09:56 PM
1

Sure buddy. Anything you need to stick to your comfortable, nothing-to-be-done blackpilled hole.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:01 PM
17

Men arn’t less superficial True, but men are blamed for it and required to keep it in check. Women get a "you go girl" attitude and it's treated as quirky and funny when they creep on guys.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:45 AM
8

I'm 5'10, 179 lbs. I started from 258 lbs and it took me 23 months to reach my goal weight with an average calorie deficit slightly south of 400 per day, which is absolutely doable. I don't claim to be any kind of swimwear model or bodybuilding competitor, my physique isn't impressive compared to people who have done years more hard work (obviously); but it really doesn't take much to stand out against a background of 2/3rd of adults being clinically overweight or obese, with many of the rest be…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:44 AM
13

Sounds like an email to HR is needed, just to cover your bases I thought about it, but was advised to avoid even getting near HR with this sort of thing. There is a non-zero chance that they'll turn it around on me regardless.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:42 AM
1

Countries that are able to mobilise their people like this can fill the ranks of their armies and overcome countries who can't. Ukraine has switched to this kind of conscription over much softer methods precisely for this reason. It is absolutely dehumanising, don't get me wrong, but this kind of behavior has evolved among multiple different civilisations precisely because it works. Unless you have a better and more survivable alternative, this will keep happening over and over again and the alt…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:48 AM
39

Male disposability in action. "Abolish gender roles" but when the chips fall you're expected to put your life on the line.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:46 AM
26

And then they plan to give me a gun after this? I wonder how many I can .... before .... There's a whole science to this. You don't get anywhere near a weapon until several days into your kidnapping, when they've gotten you used to the routines of obeying orders quickly and without question amidst a mass of similarly confused, disoriented men. Lack of sleep, shitty food, no comfort, no familiarity will put you in "survival mode", you'll just do what you're told simply to avoid any potential cons…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:45 AM
0

You didn't have a whole lot of female role models for aspiring girl scientists back when women couldn't enroll in universities and do research. Was it because of a problem with women, or because of a problem with women's rights? The answer is the same here. Men suffer legal discrimination, even more so social discrimination, so good male role models struggle to emerge.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:36 PM
2

"Patriarchy" is an application of Marxist dialectical politics to sexes instead of economics. In economics they have capitalists vs proletarians. They took the same model and made it men vs women. It doesn't work and leads to horribel conclusion for the same reason in both cases.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:33 PM
8

But why is this? People will automatically side with a woman against a man in a public altercation. Both sexes know this and behave accordingly.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:32 PM
42

I'm Italian and of child-having age, so I can give you some insight into why I won't have kids: I don't want a 50/50 chance of ruining my life. I ran the statistics a while back, you can find them in my post history. In Italy if you have a child, you have a 50/50 chance of all of these eventually happening: divorce/separation from the mother mother designated as primary caregiver mother staying in the family home while you have to keep paying your share of mortgage or rent you receiving a child …
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:18 PM
104

Societies in crisis quickly rediscover why traditional gender roles developed and stood firm for millennia and across all cultures. It's all fine and dandy to pretend total inherent equality in a developed, safe liberal democracy, but once things get a touch more hairy it's right back to "men pls die fighting so that the tribe can survive". The counterpart of that used to be recognition for this role in social and familial terms, but that's gone out the window over ideological reasons and, surpr…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 10:10 AM
11

Traditional masculinity norms are required to force men into the roles society needs them to fulfill. Without men focusing on career and earning, the economy stops. Without men risking life and limb in dangerous jobs, society stops. Without men putting themselves in danger to be first responders, cops, and soldiers, society is unsafe. And so on. Naturally traditional femininity norms also had a social role, and we see what's happened to society's long-term sustainability (aka birth rate) as a re…
/r/MensRights04/05/24 12:42 AM
14

"Tries"? who's trying to understand men, except a handful of renegade dissenters? largely it's putting on a show of questioning things, while having the conclusions ("men bad") pre-written.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 12:39 AM
18

Feminism has a one-way valve for injustice: it's unjust if and only if women are worse off.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:38 AM
3

It's invisible because the official stats don't register. This guy never went to court or fought any of it legally. In the statistics, he will show as "amicable separation" and "non-judicial agreement for child custody and support payments". Feminists will include this among cases that they argue are automatically fair, since both parties agreed without a court imposing a decision. But this kind of heavily lopsided agreement is only possible because courts are so unfair that people don't even tr…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:03 AM
10

Now, for the record, I don't think the woman in this picture is some special kind of evil. That's the whole point. For all progressives talk about systemitic discrimination, it's the system they've created that produces women like this, without these women having any special kind of inherent moral turpitude. She's been told all her life by politics and media that she deserves more, just for being a woman. That her man having any expectation of her as regards home and children is oppressive and u…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:35 PM
3

Going off what you wrote in the post and comments, it sounds like you're a fairly young guy that spent his best years pouring his everything into his business, relying on his wife for emotional support to the point where she's your only source of outside perspective. Which is why you've been accepting her unforgivable behavior. You need to get some friends. Reconnect with old ones if need be. Go to a support group. Get someone in your life that you trust more than internet strangers, so when the…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 04:20 PM
9

They made up the word 'equity' to justify offending the principle of equality.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 02:22 PM
51

When women are given freedom to express themselves and write fantasy romances, they write stories about rich, powerful and assertive men who sweep them off their feet. And they consume this stuff in huge quantities. Sure fantasies aren't reality and all that, but they're also not divorced from people's actual desires and preferences.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 02:21 PM
2

We don't have left-wing political parties in the West, at all Ah, you're that kind of deluded leftie. I should have known. "Anybody slightly to the right of Pol-Pot is not a leftist". No point continuing this.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:05 PM
2

Nothing they say ever comes to fruition. ShitRedditSays used to be ridiculed as a fringe minority, now its ideas are enforced as sitewide policy. Generally speaking, stuff that leftists used to say 10 years ago that seemed looney insanity is now enforced by law and corporate policies.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:56 PM
2

There is nothing left-wing about these people There is nothing except everything. They self-describe as leftists. They have left-wing economic views, often extreme. They work side-by-side and within leftist organisations: political parties, unions, advocacy groups. They cite Marxist and other leftist authors in their work. You may be part of the tiny minority on the left that rejects woke social politics, but that's you being a minority, not them not being "true leftists". Leftist politics aren'…
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:52 PM
2

left-wing fascism Pretty sure it's just communism.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 12:45 PM
4

Do you know why people say women's standards are too high? We have hard data from dating apps (before they got woke and stopped publishing politically incorrect stats) saying men rate women on a near-perfect bell curve, while women rate 80% of men as "below average".
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:38 AM
3

Crawling back to her Husband and telling him that the relationship deserve another chance. Nah. She'll snag the next idiot and wring him dry too.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:36 AM
23

No, not in present western culture anyways. It's not true in any culture and has never been. The concept of 'patriarchy' is no more than an application of the apex fallacy: since men occupy (or used to occupy) the top spots in society, that must mean that all men are privileged. In reality, men were overpresented at both ends of the spectrum: kings and leaders, but also cannon fodder grunts and backbroken slaves. Women were rarely allowed into positions of independent power, but equally they alw…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:35 AM
5

It's an effective set of heuristics to take timid guys who grew up in our feminised culture and give them the tools to drag themselves out of the pussy-worshipping, scarcity mentality that befalls most of them. As with any cultural phenomenon, some people turn it into their substitute for religion and convince themselves it explains everything and needs to guide every part of their life. These people are more vocal and visible than others and drive a good chunk of the public perception of it.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:27 AM
2

Do they just expect child support to cover all their expenses so they don’t have to lift a finger to support their kid too?? It's not about logic my dude, it's about incentives. Whine on social media that your baby daddy isn't giving you enough and you'll have simps lining up to help you, or church groups sending you care packages. We treat women like they're helpless children, so they act like they are.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 10:20 AM
7

It's a simple truth that any space that is not explicitly anti-feminist becomes dominated by feminist viewpoints. Which includes mainstream dating subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:53 PM
2

Genetic evidence that many more women reproduced than men did. Which means that lots of men died sexeless for most human generations. Very unlikely that this resulted from any kind of egalitarian setup of society.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 05:51 PM
4

pill people advertise preying on broken people No, they don't. TRP somberly takes stock of the modern dating scene, which is broken, and tells men exactly what to do to thrive in it. in order to create a slave You need to put down the bottle or pick it up, whichever makes you stop being this shrill.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 04:20 PM
9

we should not tolerate shitty dating advice If you think advice is "shitty" because it flies in the face of feminist indoctrination, you might be on the wrong sub altogether. The main sin of RP recommendations, the reason why they're so hated, is that they work.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 01:53 PM
212

The more feminised society becomes, the more objectivity, healthy competition and individual freedoms are going to erode. This is inevitable, based on the prevailing psychological imperatives of the sexes.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 09:52 AM
3

Real estate would be for getting her evicted. Criminal defence attorney can advise you on how to conduct yourself in terms of false accusations. Your best bet is a law firm that has both, so they can easily share info and docs.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 07:31 PM
7

Lawyer. Now. This has gone beyond the "handle it yourself" level.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 07:14 PM
7

The fact that people just believe what ChatGPT says without cross checking is both unbelievable and the most believable thing in the world. Lots and lots of people have always preferred abdicating their thinking to authority. Now they have an "Artificial Intelligence" that sounds articulate and confidence and is made by very smart and rich people, so why not believe it?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:17 PM
3

Real life is not like the only world. 99% of the shit that's gospel on reddit would be unknown or barely known to my IRL colleagues. Jokes that would getting you banned sitewide here and crucified for a laundry list of -isms fly around the office on a daily basis. I imagine places like academy and certain white collar profession staffed by fresh college grads are much more touchy about this shit. Heavily suggest moving closer to blue collar professions where people weren't groomed into the woke …
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:16 PM
24

I've seen it all man. Teachers biased against boys. Female teachers who hated other females and picked on the girls while flirting with the boys to feel young again. Teachers choosing pets and targets and making some kids' lives impossible just because they were helpless targets of their frustrations. The entire profession is ridden with people who should never be around kids.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:13 PM
1

Rape and domestic violence are the two crimes where there's gigantic social pressure to believe a female accuser no matter what and start prosecution right away against the accused. It's absolutely inevitable that they would feature extremely inflated rates of false accusations. Simple as.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:12 PM
12

The entire apparatus built up to "fight disinformation", aka control and censor social media and deplatform/ruin unconventional voices, is now ready made for whichever authoritarian is willing to wield it. Label something "hate" and "disinfo" and you can remove it from circulation to 99% of the population with no recourse.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:10 PM
3

Do you feel you are hated by others? In person? pretty much never. The real world is far less insane than the internet, people are far less politics-poisoned and weirdos are rarer and get less cloud. For me I definitely feel the hate, all the time, from strangers on the street, from waitresses, from people at work, my girlfriends friends some of her family, even my Honestly dude it sounds like you have skewed perceptions. There are very very few places where so many random people actually would …
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:09 PM
76

Many American women are now seeking relationships abroad, with some citing the toxic dating scene in the U.S. Holy mother of lmao. By their parameters, the US dating scene is by far the least 'toxic' in existence. By a metric fuck-ton. Gender roles and expectations are much stronger virtually everywhere, even rich Western European countries. Leave the first world, and you're going to get men who fit their machismo patriarchal stereotype damn near to a T. What they're seeking, beside notoriety, i…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 04:07 PM
12

Female rape accusers are believed, automatically and thoughtlessly, to a far higher degree than any other crime excepting domestic abuse, which falls under the same dynamics. Gigantic witch hunts, not rarely ending in legal prosecution, are started by bored, jilted or insane women making false claims. This happens again and again, there are multiple major stories every year and countless minor ones that barely get attention. So the notion that there's somehow a legal/societal chilling effect sto…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:06 AM
9

America's legal paradigm make it hard to defend against these, but I'm curious to see what's going to happen here in Europe. Libel and defamation laws are much stronger in many jurisdictions here, including my own.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:27 PM
19

Anyone caught conspiring to grant undeserved advantages to men as such risks social, professional and legal consequences. Anyone caught conspiring to do the same for women is most likely to receive praise, recognition and state support. That's literally all there is to it.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 10:13 PM
1

Is the believe here at r/mensrighs that women don't suffer any abusive societal standards, differential treatment and infringement on basic rights? The chances that isn't a loaded, rhetorical question are zero, so what is it that you want to say? if it's just empty polemic about how we're some form of cartoon cretin that thinks no woman ever encounters any form of injustice, you can probably imagine how interested we might be in talking to you. If it's something else then go ahead.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:12 PM
1

I find it fucking hilarious. Progressivism eating itself alive. I'm sure they'll eventually find their way to blaming men for this one too, but in the meantime it's hysterical. Avi Silverberg destroying the 'female' bench record is another great example.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:09 PM
13

Oh thank you, I needed something to rage-binge.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:08 PM
1

How about we stop building the military requirements around the average capacity of men then? You... realise not everything in life conforms to our wishes? that the requirements to be effective in combat aren't set arbitrarily, but based on hard-won experience? War is no longer about who can grunt loudest and who's best at hand to hand combat due to muscle density. Technology has levelled the playing field No, it hasn't. It's made it somewhat less uneven, but the vast majority of grunts still ne…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:05 PM
-3

We need gender neutral drafts so that men are not singled out for death on a battlefield simply because of their gender. And the moment such a force actually fights, what so you expect will happen? Do you genuinely think there’s no large gap between the military performance of male and female soldiers?
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:49 PM
-3

Again with the mind-reading - which is actually what an overly-defensive stance looks like. Since you're claiming to know exactly what's going on in my head, why don't you tell me my answer to your question? You've stopped responding to the actual topic of the thread to focus on what personally pisses you off. Sorry, not interested.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:13 AM
-4

Not true. When people talk about gender neutralising the definition of rape, for instance, they're advocating for removing the hate ideology from the law, and in so doing defining a crime from the starting point of recognising equal capacity for men and women to perpetrate and be victim thereof. This isn't a coherent view of how society should be organised, it's a narrow prescription concerning specific laws. You're mind-reading. Subtext is a fundamental part of communication. You misread and ke…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:38 AM
6

I'm a traditionalist. Not as in "let's magically wind the clock back to ye olden days", but as in "tradition is how society used to pass down vital wisdom when formal education wasn't reliable". I think societies used to acknowledge men's role as protectors and women's vital role as mothers because societies that didn't eventually perished, and that we ought to do so again. I think that there is such a thing as social duty, deriving from the mutually necessary relation between the individual and…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:34 AM
2

What about that isn't coherent? You're reacting defensively, misreading a criticism that is not targeted at what you think. "Lacking a coherent alternative vision" doesn't mean that it's incoherent to attack anti-male phenomena; it means that attacking anti-male phenomena does not by itself provide an alternate model of society.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 09:17 AM
1

This article falls into the same trap of many manosphere blogs: it starts from a place of sensible analysis and criticism of the dominant feminist paradigm, but then when it comes to proposing solution it circles back to that same paradigm, effectively disarming itself of any potential to upend it. Premarital counseling can be a perfect solution for those who are serious about and intent on having a wonderful future together. Couples counseling of any kind, most men will find, is unbelievably sk…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 08:50 AM
50

The idea of a pink tax is hilarious. It's literally claiming that women are so stupid they can't price-compare and buy a "male-branded" equivalent razor because it's not packaged in a pink box with flowers. As typical, feminist hysteria reaches all the way back to "women are delicate and senseless creatures who must be protected from the harsh world out there".
/r/MensRights07/04/23 08:41 AM
17

I'd like to be able to create parallel timelines in which we progressively escalate the amount of explosive she had prepared to see when we finally get her put away for life, which is what would have happened to any male would-be terrorist. Do you it'd take more or less than having an actual nuke in her room?
/r/MensRights07/04/23 08:39 AM
28

Of course there is no similar provision for the dirtiest most thankless jobs. Only prestigious, well-paid, comfortable occupations have privilege quotas for women.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:48 AM
0

First of all, nothing is "destroying the planet". Eco-catastrophism is unsupported by science and counterproductive towards anything but doomerism. Second, we can and should reverse global warming by stratospheric aerosol injections, in the short term, electrification of heating and mass transit + afforestation in the medium term, and carbon capture, fusion nuclear, battery grid etc technologies in the long term. Third, trying to blame this or that demographic or group for this is stupid and poi…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 03:46 PM
3

Its big corporations that are causing the harm. This is, has always been, and always will be an asinine point. "Big corporations" are simply the providers of the most in-demand products and services. Oil companies pollute a lot because everyone wants fuel. Ocean freight companies pollute a lot because everyone wants goods shipped fast for cheap. There's no magic law to pass that makes big companies not pollute.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:41 PM
57

Men write plenty about sex and dating. They do so anonymously, because speaking truth on these topics brings social condemnations in our current environment; they are denounced as redpillers, incels, PUAs and all manner of buzzwords designed to stigmatise and discredit them, so that no man shall run the risk of chancing to read them and being corrupted by their foul views. But they do write plenty. And when they do, and other men overcome the social programming and listen to them, they find them…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 09:02 AM
114

Not so much penis envy as in the sexual organ, but definitely male envy as in the physical advantages enjoyed by men. In fact it's my pet theory that anti-male female resentment is rooted in the psychologically devastating realisation, which they all experience at some point during their girlhood, that random men are and will always be so much stronger than them that if those men turned violent, there would be nothing they could do to defend themselves. It's such a harsh, tangible inequality tha…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 08:53 AM
45

In my team we recently hired a woman with over 20 years of experience in our field at a reputable academic institution. She's next to useless. She claims she's 'slow' because the 'systems here are unfamiliar', as if the ability to pick up new processes and tools weren't a basic requirement of the job. She's been with us almost two years and she works on pretty much only one subject area, where half the time she's on a call with the vendor to resolve any but the most minor issues. In the entire d…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 07:11 AM
63

Much of the attacks on the LGBT+ community are, whether consciously or not, deflecting attention away from one of the actual largest sources of SA: abusive heterosexual men. There are several demographics that are significantly over-represented among pedophiles, straight men aren't among them.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 07:03 AM
1

Could they just make another game of thrones series where they don’t completely butcher Dany’s character? Checking out the history of people who come here just to insult us is always good for a laugh. You always find these gems and you don't even have to dig. The character whose "butchery" you lament is a magic princess that gets power literally gifted to her, and proceeds to subsequently use it to bring disaster to everyone in pursuit of her sense of entitlement. Regardless of the endless strin…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:30 AM
1

There is no patriarchy. Along every measure, females in Western countries (and increasingly elsewhere) are privileged by law, culture and society. The system is if anything increasingly matriarchal, affording women exclusive sex-based powers that are explicitly denied to men.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:53 AM
1

A fundamental observation, encapsulated in the male variability hypothesis, is that in mammals males are overrepresented at both tails of any performance distribution: intelligence, size, health and so on. The idea is that for males it pays off, on average, to take greater risks in having extreme traits, while for females it pays off to be in the "safe spot". It's certainly true with humans in modern times. Males are overrepresented both among geniuses and morons, the extremely rich and the extr…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 08:30 AM
1

Women in construction boots will only result in men being forced to pick up the slack and work effectively understaffed, as a nominal "N people" crew will really be "N - number of women" people physically able to do the job. Biology isn't irrelevant. Upper body strength especially is hilariously different, and it counts for a whole lot in construction and many other heavy duty occupations. We shouldn't pretend to believe in woke talking points like absolute equality across every dimension when t…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:54 AM
13

Watch out for false accusations spread through gossip. These things take on a life of their own: someone catches wind that attacking you results in social brownie points, and makes up a lie. Others repeat that lie because they get social brownie points for "spreading awareness" and "keeping people safe", and quicker than you know the entire campus has you pegged as a Nazi creep that women should stay away from. Anyway, take this as a learning opportunity. You went to debate club expecting it to …
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:46 AM
10

Always has been. The entire ideological subversion apparatus is exclusively about power. Power over their own, in the first instance: to be able to scare progressives themselves into going along quietly, or be cast out. And then power over everyone else, by taking over and subverting key decision-making positions. Then they get their own people and subvert everything else.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:41 AM
8

He dodged a bullet, but that school is now going to have an ideologically vetted superintendent who's going to enforce this same madness onto staff and through them onto students.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:40 AM
7

Are manners now a "microaggression"? Expecting these policies to have any consistency or rationality to them is a fool's errand. The only constant is that they are a tool for ideological subversives to increase their power and status at the expense of everyone else.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 08:38 AM
30

People don't understand the true implications of this. An AI that can accurately predict the sentiment of something it's asked to write is also an AI that can accurately interpret the sentiment of something it's asked to read. These tools will enable the true automation of mass-censorship on social media. Rather than rely on volunteer mods or low-paid mass numbers of third world reviewers, social media companies will use their in-house AIs to read every single post and message, read through ever…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 07:43 AM
91

When Shane Seyer was 12, he was sexually exploited by his 16-year-old babysitter Colleen Hermesmann. The word is "raped". He was raped by his babysitter. No one would say that a 12-year-old girl was "sexually exploited" by a 16-year-old boy. Instead of being convicted of rape, Hermesmann was declared a juvenile offender under the non-sexual offense of “contributing to child misconduct.” Seyer was subsequently court-ordered to pay child support. The Kansas Supreme Court ruled against him. The jud…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 10:51 AM
5

Expecting feminism to be rational or equitable is a fool's errand, as you found out. The point she's trying to make is quite funny though. That the difference in physical strength between men and women could be the result of the preferences of the aristocracy. She's combining Lamarckism with the apex fallacy of thinking the aristocracy was ever more than a few % of the population. Unscientific, stupid beliefs suit them perfectly, after all.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 10:47 AM
13

Once again and as many times as are needed: the Marxist paradigm of oppressor class vs oppressed class is applied 1:1 by feminism to men and women. Men are unpersoned and undeserving of any sympathy within such a framework, no matter the individual circumstances. Users here hate it when I point out where this attitude comes from, but it doesn't make it less true.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 10:42 AM
17

Where I live, if you get arrested for DV, you are automatically held overnight and the accuser can get an easy 30 day restraining order. And if you don’t talk to the cops, you are almost guaranteed to get arrested. she was usually the aggressor, I would tell them that and they would leave Lmao. Basically you get arrested, held overnight and have a restraining order placed on you if you're a man, or a shrug and a wave if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:06 AM
9

I'm sure he'll be giving his old career back but plus damages. Oh wait he'll make back legal costs if he's lucky, he'll still largely remain an industry pariah, and the accusers won't spend a day in jail for their crime.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:46 AM
32

wtf have women come to The inevitable end result of being told they're always the victims and nobody has it as bad as them. Men turn out this way too if they're raised like that, but for men it happens in individual circumstances (see the shitbag affluenza guy), whereas for women there's a whole cultural and social environment doing it.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:44 AM
4

Can someone make it make sense? Sure, here's how: discard rationality adopt the paradigm that man bad and privileges, woman good and oppressed now Ukraine conflicts shows climate change primarily affects women See? easy.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:43 AM
210

Take the side of "rape victim": default good, praised by society, nobody will say a word against you Take the side of an accused "rapist": default evil, society scorns you, lots of people will viciously attack you It's pretty obvious what stupid people, which is more than enough people to do damage, will do.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:31 AM
10

You think intelligence is the only factor on how people get selected to become doctors or lawyers? You seem to struggle with following the flow of conversation. You've already made this argument, and I've already answered: given that intelligence can not explain this discrimination, are you arguing that men are so deficient in other traits that an unbiased process can deliver and outcome so skewed as less than 1 in 10 of the admitted being a man?
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:34 PM
7

I can't find the page from that screenshot, so these are their residents: https://med.stanford.edu/xray/CR.html I count 25 men, 16 women.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:26 PM
21

These women who become doctors or lawyers tend to get high scores on SATs which are close enough to IQ tests. Does repeating "but women are smart too" help you assuage the feeling that you don't really know how to respond to my argument? Once again: given what we know about the distribution of intelligence at the top level, the chances of an unbiased process producing this kind of selection are so small at to be safely ignored. Hence this is most likely the result of anti-male bias. To be a doct…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:21 PM
18

you know that’s subjective right? That is literally what I just argued, yes. It's subjective, and this subjectivity just happened to produce a class that has an infinitesimal probability of resulting from any process that is not biased against men. nobody is choosing a candidate getting blown out of the water by a white man just because they’re a minority Don't know about Stanford because no one has filed suit yet, but we have ample documentation of Harvard doing just that. The case is going to …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:17 PM
19

Sure let's go with 68% male prevalence among the very high IQ population. Then the chance of getting 1 men out of 13 among that population is less than 1 in 100,000.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:12 PM
49

Of course. Men are over-represented at both the top and bottom end of the intellectual spectrum, by any measure. Given the underlying demographics, for a random sample of the best candidates for an intellectual job to end up with only 1 man out of 13 is astronomically unlikely. It is however far more likely to end up like that when you take into account misandrist discrimination through affirmative action-style admissions to be responsible for it. Especially given that the admissions process is …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:57 PM
1

Did I overreact? No, you did the right thing. And am I wrong to feel sexually manipulated? Examining your feelings in terms of right and wrong is a largely futile exercise. Your feelings exist for a reason, they're psychological tools provided by evolution to ensure your success. They can be crude tools oftentimes, but they're not malicious. You feel sexually manipulated because you realise your boundaries were not respected AND that society would not side with you in case of controversy. That f…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:25 PM
3

“Ice cold focus” haha don’t make me sound too much like Kobe, but I definitely appreciate that. With all respect for Kobe, being a bazillionaire who's playing to increase his status and legacy at the highest levels certainly takes focus, but it's a different ball game than doing the right thing under the kind of pressure where "spend most of your life in jail" is the underlying threat. NBA players themselves fuck up when dealing with legal matters all the time. I've never been in your shoes, tha…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:22 PM
17

The agent then said to me, “we just want to give you the opportunity to tell your side of the story”. Ah yes, the famous "we just want to give you the opportunity to self-incriminate". Good on you for handling that with ice-cold focus. but I’d be lying if I told you I didn’t have thoughts of taking the law into my own hands at some point Of course you did. Your life's work was threatened unjustifiably. The fact that you conducted yourself as you have, regardless of righteous anger, is a credit t…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:05 PM
2

Unless the hatred is baked into the ethos of the group, as it is with feminism That's inverting the causal relationship. Feminism isn't hateful because too many of its members are, but because its foundation is a Marxist dichotomy that sees men as evil oppressors and women as the worthy oppressed.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 07:00 PM
2

What I came here to say is that how do we stop ourselves from becoming hateful Hating injustice is a good thing. Anger and disgust should be directed at it. The same society that has taught never to be "hateful" is also happy to be hateful against designated targets, men featuring prominently in that list. Obviously there are members of our group that truly do hate women, but how do we distance ourselves from them? There are exactly zero groups with more than 10 members, at a stretch, that don't…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 06:55 PM
5

According to whom? if you want to debate a position you should first define it. Standard feminist discourse will deny many of your items, for example. If instead your objective is practical, then it's far better to decide for yourself how you think gender roles should work in your ideal relationship, what you're willing to compromise on and what you won't tolerate. Then find someone who's compatible, wherever they may be.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 05:59 PM
61

I see that they all made a big deal about how there were multiple allegations of wrongdoing against Chris. They always do, and treat it like evidence. People used to get lynched over this. We haven’t gotten better at due process, we’ve just modernised the aesthetics.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:45 PM
8

Fucking thank you. Even the ground on which this discussion is held is poisoned. "Who does the most chores" runs on the assumption that work commitments have been equalised when they definitely haven't.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:19 PM
11

As if we never have housework to do or kids or social lives or everything else going on that everyone has. Stop. You're buying into the feminist premise that women have equal work commitments, so you argue about home or social commitments. You're reflexively ceding ground as we've all been taught to do on this subject. Women do not have equal work commitments. Men work longer hours from an earlier age for more years in more demanding occupations. Men are the breadwinners in most families, saddle…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:17 PM
8

What about a tremendous lack of self awareness despite being super-duper educated? Education gives you the tools (hopefully, if you studied somewhere decent), the willing to use them is a whole other thing.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:49 PM
4

This is not a win for mens rights. You may not have empathy for falsely accused men or think you could ever find yourself in their shows, that's your problem. This IS a win for men's rights, absolutely. listen to his podcast talking about hot 13 year olds Watch his shows where casual incest between underage characters is a running gag. Fucked up humor and a willing to go where others wouldn't is half his brand. Until I see him convicted in a proper trial, where he's had a chance to defend himsel…
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:48 PM
1

Yes, of course. If you've been sleeping under a rock then yes, "cishet white men" are the permitted target among progressives, they're allowed to pile on any and all kinds of slander on them. As for the thread, lmao what a reddit moment. And of course everyone is telling OP she's right. Not letting your kids get obese is abuse apparently. Kids crying = you're an awful parent. And of course she (in her imagination at least, most of those posts are creative writing exercises) she drops a nice "may…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 01:44 PM
6

Why waste time commenting a hairhead's blogpost-equivalent on the local paper? that mirror article is just a retyping of the original piece here: https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/whats-on/food-drink-news/im-24-year-old-woman-26477729 Yes it's stupid, and no wonder. A quick look at her page shows she mostly does basic write-ups on big news items sourced from wire services and the main papers, and the occasional local interest story. "Rookie journalist with little insight says stupid shit" is what t…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:41 PM
0

It's pretty simple: in modern culture women are taught that as a baseline they are entitled to protecting their interests; more often than not these days, they're actively told to always put their interests first. These goes double with professional women who are bombarded with girlboss culture, basically being taught that being Mad Men stereotypes but in skirts is cool and good. And those are the women who would have any interest in a prenup in the first place. Of-fucking-course they're going t…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:37 PM
19

Yeah I'm sure there's so much 'violence against women' perpetrated by depressed loners who never talk to women in the first place. Tons and tons. For the record, since I hate purely destructive criticism (unless something really needs to be just destroyed): if you want to tackle intimate partner violence, by far and away your biggest area of action if abused men. There's zero attention being paid to it, studies tell us it's at least as frequent as the victimization of women, and even basic inter…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:33 PM
30

Feminists say they’re the only ones impacted by gender roles Your premise is false. Feminists do claim that men are also negatively impacted by 'patriarchal gender roles'. Then they turn around and demand men keep fulfilling those roles anyway, such as taking on all the physically hazardous jobs, being providers to their families, being emotionally tough etc
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:29 PM
3

How bitter, nasty and resentful can somebody be to pull something like that? That's not the draw. The draw is the validation of being part of the pile-on. Women are hardwired towards agreeableness, they're apt at figuring out what the group rewards and conforming themselves to it. The group wants to target this man? you make up some shit and be part of it. They don't see it as wrong in any way.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:24 PM
15

There was a paternity test, it erroneously pegged this man as the father: https://www.riverfronttimes.com/news/missourians-sue-lab-for-apparent-paternity-test-error-that-cost-man-30k-and-jail-time-2900854 They're all suing the lab together. This is a nightmare scenario but hardly a case of paternity fraud. She was promiscuous around the time she conceived, got a paternity test and it matched with one of the men she had been sleeping with at that time, it's not unreasonable for her to assume the …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:15 PM
1

Why do some Marxist feminists like body-shaming unattractive men while accusing others of being "incels" and equating them with "Neo-Nazis" whenever they get called out for body shaming? Because the fundamental paradigm of Marxism is that society can be understood on the basis of dualities of oppression - capitalista vs workers, men vs women, whites vs minorities etc Individual circumstances don't matter as only which group you belong to is held to be meaningful. You will never reconcile a Marxi…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:09 PM
1

55% of White Women voted for Trump Oh good, did equating Trump with evil finally percolate into here too? I was wondering how long that would take. People voting for Trump was no more shameful than voting for Hillary. Both were as likely to serve the corporatocracy that truly rules America. Hillary was liable to start a few more unwinnable wars, as she had gleefully done when she worked for Obama. She was also likely to supercharge the misandrist rhetoric from the US left and pass a few more dis…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:05 PM
17

Society at large treats men as resources first and people a distant second, while it does the exact reverse with women.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:02 PM
12

But how do we draw the line? Would you find this very complicated if the reason for the attack had been "I saw a black man running towards me and I was afraid because I think they're all criminals"? I doubt you would. You simply don't have a right to attack people based on your fear of the groups they belong to. If you do it's a crime and should be prosecuted accordingly. If I were to hear somebody run up on me on a dark night, I would absolutely be on guard to defend myself. Being on guard is c…
/r/MensRights15/01/23 08:34 PM
6

Yes of course.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 08:27 PM
1

That wasn’t edited in lmao.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 12:29 PM
1

You say women would celebrate men being gone, uhhh no they won't, theyr brothers, friends even partners just feckin disappeared and are likely dead. So why are they celebrating??? "The absolute certainty that they're just gone for a while and will be back, safe and sound, is immediately put in the mind of every woman in the world by the entity that oversaw this disappearance, so no one panics for their loved ones."
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:03 AM
1

But apparently the US would fall apart without any men but not without women. Do you disagree with any part of the argument or do you just not like its conclusions?
/r/MensRights31/12/22 01:57 AM
1

Oh my god that's hysterical. It's pretty much all women.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:31 PM
17

Check out the actual threads where those comments are, those people are completely serious.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:18 PM
1

Why write this fanfic when you know full well people who say “we’d be better off without men” aren’t literally saying we should Thanos snap us all out of existence? Because this was literally the premise of a popular Askreddit thread from a few months ago, and it keeps popping up. The idea is that the men are all going away for a short while, without harm coming to them and with them being sure to return. Lots and lots of commenters were saying that they "would go out for walks at night" or they…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:52 PM
1

The insinuation is that women are stupid and unable to learn and be quick on their feet. Which is just flat out wrong. Even using your own statistics. There's enough women in the infrastructure world to do the most important job in this scenario. Teach. You're severely overestimating how long power plants can run without crew, or how easy it is to learn to operate them. There would be no way of training people even remotely fast enough to handle a scenario like this. First this "vacation" part w…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 07:56 PM
1

But try to turn this into a pity contest to justify your own inadequacies There it is. What's the compulsion, I wonder? you lot just can't resist throwing in a jab at how the men you disagree with must obviously be compensating for something they lack. It's more predictable than sunrise at this point.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter