TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CatchPhraze Archive

View 1 posts and 11,779 comments by CatchPhraze on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

CatchPhraze/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 03:41 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 11,779 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They are absolutely a class, a class is simply a classification of people. You can boil those other traits down and you'd find differences as well, for example blue eyed people tend to need less light then darker eyed people, and if we elevated them into a majority power position we might see society shaped in ways where products and norms existed with lower light environments. Men for example run hot, and studies show that offices tend to run cold for women because the men in charge don't reali…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 02:31 AM
1

-> A tiny minority of men, is still many more men then women, so when we break down populations, a correct statement is "men as a class hold more power then women" we're not just talking billionaires though, at every income level besides the ones below poverty lines, men have more disposable income then women, they hold more elected and promoted positions of power. A man is more likely to be someone with power from HOA, McDonald's shift managers all the way up to leaders of countries and billion…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 01:45 AM
1

Could you explain how feminist men uphold systems that allow the predation of women from other men for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 12:37 AM
0

Men own 80% of the wealth in the world and hold 80-85% of elected or promoted positions of power both politically and in corporate settings globally. Even if only 5-10% of men are the issue, 85% of these power postions are men and they have the power as a class to prevent/protect/change systems that let that 5-10% operate. When we blame men, it's not just the bad ones, it's that men as a class hold disproportionately more power and enable those systems
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 10:28 PM
1

Fantastic! I hope men get the same protections from violence women have globally
/r/MensRights21/07/26 10:38 PM
1

None of that is relevant to calling mass shooters saints dude. You're head would explode if the reverse happened.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 06:23 AM
1

What does that have to do with hanging out with people who call mass shooters and bombers saints? Like actually?
/r/MensRights20/07/26 03:00 AM
1

If nobody can buy the house for $1million you didn't pay that much either. What nonsense is all this.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:42 PM
1

Yes, because public transportation is not a social norm in America the way it is in the UK. Just to add more perspective, a house in the UK appreciates at 6.09% a year currently, while the average variable rate for a mortgage is 4.49%. Meaning that almost certainly even if you sold in in a few years, you'd have made money. You certainly would lose less money then the 22,000 a year in rent the UK Averages. The math just doesn't math for you. Even if you broke even in a year, you still saved 22k o…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:26 PM
-2

Brother we're talking the UK, where public transportation is some of the best in the world and where land is the most expensive. All that yapping for nothing.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:12 PM
1

Maybe. Either way it's not fiscal abuse at all. Op clearly didn't read before posting.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:37 PM
-8

If you think a car is a better investment then property you're an idiot 😂
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:36 PM
3

No they wouldn't? Are you some bad faith actor here to torpedo the movement or something? Dude, she's not only doing it as a favor to him she wants him to have a more active role with it. That's the furthest thing from control based abuse. Read the shit you post.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:16 PM
0

What the fuck are you talking about? He asked her to watch the money. Maybe you should read the article before rage posting a headline hu?
/r/MensRights17/07/26 12:06 PM
2

"Sarah wishes Lee would take more ownership as "I feel like it's all down to me", she says. She says Lee is not money-orientated and is happy for her to make the decisions" Now it's only her interviewed here, but if you read the story at face value, her doing the balancing is his idea at his insistance. Did you guys read the article?
/r/MensRights17/07/26 11:58 AM
1

Provide evidence to the contrary then.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 04:20 AM
0

So no, maybe doing more for men and critiquing others doing something would get your movement further eh?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 09:23 PM
0

So the first graph proves my point collectively and neither is a globally scaled model. So no source. Lovely.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 09:17 PM
-1

How many drives for prostate cancer have you organized, or participated in out of curiosity?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 09:12 PM
-6

I meant mine admittedly reading comprehension had failed you. I actually know it's that reason, back in Canada I was the one who organized our run for cancer in the hospital I worked at. It's literally in the sops when talking about these things.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 08:38 PM
-4

Fair, we could move the goalpost to G.I imaging, something that is part of the routine after a certain age due to the pervalance and the point still stands.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:42 PM
-1

It's a lie? Could you show me evidence contrary on a global scale then?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:40 PM
1

Oh really? I thought the case was before the attack, my apologies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:42 PM
-5

Income brackets. As in between x and y amounts. I'm sorry I figured you'd understand the basic concept without needing it made obvious, that was an assumption on my part. My bad. The argument wasn't that all men are handed power, it's that power currently flows from man to man more then it does men to women, women to women or women to man. White people in America are more wealthy then blacks, but nobody expects to be handed a cheque for being white. That's a nonsense argument that doesn't dispro…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:41 PM
1

She cut her husband's dick off after he was acquited for raping her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:32 PM
3

I had such a bizarre example of this, I was in a relationship where I begged for his approval, jumped through hoops and genuinely bent over backwards for this man. He wasn't worth it. Eventually he gave me an ultamatum to stop a hobby I was enjoying because it meant I wasn't at his back and call and I told him no. He instantly floundered and tried to walk it back but it was like a light clicked on and I was like "actually I want to do the hobby and I want to break up anyways even if you are tryi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:29 PM
2

No, it's them having to be the man's mother. If he wants to be treated like a contributing adult, he should be able to handle his own chores without needing to be scolded like a lazy teenager.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 04:23 PM
-2

I'm glad you had positive male role models in regards to health choices! However that ancedote doesn't really counter the numerous studies and data sets that show it trends the other way most of the time. My father was a red meat addict and called a salad rabbit food. Data sets show trends but they aren't rules for each and every person.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 04:18 PM
-9

You've jumped to an apex fallacy, among all social classes and wealth brackets globally, men hold more wealth then women. Among all levels of income, men make more money then women. Among positions of elected or appointed power, men make up the majority. It's not just at the 1%. The numbers shift depending on the country but as a global truth that's what the raw data says. I wonder if you realize you only ever attacked points that harmed women, and not my points that harmed men. I'd sit with my …
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:58 PM
-17

I'll take a crack at it: Toxic masculinity is holding values that are harmful to the self, others or planet due to the notion that the alternative course of action would be gay or feminine. Examples include; not going for prostate exams. Despite the fact prostate cancer effects 2/3 men by age 75, the test due to the invasive nature is seen as gay. Many men refuse to be digitally penitrated by their doctors for this test so many men die of avoidable cancers. Not cutting out red meat, steak, jerky…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 12:09 PM
-4

Incels are not men who can't get romantic interactions. Incels are men angry at women because they can't get romantic interactions and last out by dehumanizing them by calling them foids and praising members of the ideology who've mass murdered people. You don't always get to chose to be the first one, but identifying as an the second is absolutely a choice.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:22 AM
-9

Yes you can veto it. Divorce right away. No long career gap, no need for compensation for the years missed. What you can't do is benefit from it then fiscally abuse the woman into staying.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:38 AM
-1

The same spaces that celebrate fat women would celebrate fat men, it's the other 90% of the world where being fat is a personal flaw where they both get shamed.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 10:44 PM
3

This is just common law like in America and Canada right? It should be contingent on acting married on paper, shared bank accounts, insurances, join filing ect. Otherwise that's crazy over reach.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 06:37 AM
0

I'll need a sorce then on that number then. I'll also point out nobody alive in this thread has seen a western country conscript people into active war either. If we're hand waving things that are too far away, we can hand wave things that haven't happened sense Iran was called Persia.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 11:12 AM
0

And yet, this isn't that, this entire thread is "why won't feminists do this if they care about us?" And not "how do we effectively do this for ourselves?"
/r/MensRights12/07/26 11:09 AM
0

That isn't true on a global scale. 81% of American households with children is a very small sample size. Also you realize that in the majority of the world there is still intense gender based discrimination right?
/r/MensRights12/07/26 01:01 AM
0

Your own examples are just inaction and mean words, that's a tough sell when the other side is countering with mass shootings, you know that right?
/r/MensRights12/07/26 12:04 AM
-1

Yes. It doesn't devolve like that. No bomb making manifestos or mass shootings and feminism has a much longer history then the manosphere and basically no body count. It's very very obvious that feminism has not reacted as negatively as the incel adjacent/manosphere has. Do some people say shitty stuff? Yeah absolutely. Even punching up is still just punching and it's not great. I'll fully admit that. But for the most part, those spaces are more actionable then men's right spaces you'll have to …
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:24 PM
0

There are also people, more then who say those things that think women shouldn't vote or have bodily autonomy. It doesn't stop women from voting or trying to have bodily autonomy. Feminism is a heated word around here and it doesn't stop me. Feminism has helped men, both by dismantling gender roles, and through its intersectionality that helps bipoc and lgbtq+ individuals, many whom are men. It just doesn't focus on mens issues to the point of sidelinging women's. But your capable people. You'll…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:16 PM
1

Sure, the men's right movement is at its core about achieving equality by focusing on the ways men are disadvantaged. You're already on a sub for that purpose, what was the point?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:13 PM
0

What an insane thing to say. Also your elected officials in India on a parliament level have never topped out at over 22% btw.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:11 PM
-1

Men make up 70-77% of the global wealth, and 70-80% of policy making positions (elected and assigned) When you hear it's going to be men who make the changes for men or women, it's because it's a reality that men as a class hold the vast majority of power to do so. Not every man, but men as a class.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:07 PM
1

So why doesn't the men's right movement start a campaign for themselves instead of just complaining feminists aren't doing it for them?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 11:01 PM
-2

Because fixing issues women have is still about equality? Getting the same level of healthcare is just asking for things to be equal. It's also a byproduct that has helped men along the way in regards to less rigid gender norms and later on intersectional efforts that help bipoc and lgbtq+ people many whom are men. I don't think many feminists say we don't need mens rights, I think they say that these spaces just turn into mysognisitic incel breeding grounds that completely stop being "how do we…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 10:59 PM
0

What do you mean people in power have no gender? Only 14% of the world's billionaire class is women. Globally women make up less then 20% of elected officials or government positions. There is clearly a gender that has the power.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:53 PM
-1

"Feminism was specifically responsible for the largest conscription ie world wars" you explicitly said it. I know that some women shamed draft doggers, but that campaign was started by men and besides being women and suffrigete, doesn't have any real strong ties to feminism. Is this satire?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:48 PM
-11

It does, but it's also a myth. It's so much a myth the inverse is true, men actually use their biological advantages during marine and natural disaster/crisis so much they tend to survive far more often then women and children.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:45 PM
-2

Feminism was responsible for both worlds wars? Oh my God please explain, I have to hear this.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:42 PM
0

Oh all of a sudden implict slights are not justifyed on the "just cause I feel that way" doctrine. The "you're too emotional" bit was funny, but doing the very thing I did when you tried that shit with me is actually hilarious. Didn't really take much to get you to fold. So let's stick to the actual words next time eh?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:40 PM
-9

Who said all men? Some men are to blame, but certainly feminism is not. "Sideline your own concerns to address ours" is a pretty big ask for a movement created so that women had recourse for their own issues, isn't it?
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:39 PM
0

Because when polled modern head officials in the military still don't want women in front line/combat roles. Those are not elected positions, at least not externally. 72% of the voting population of Congress is men, there is not an equal representation in policy creation or change. I'm just saying, of all the people to finger point this issue at, feminists are not the culprit.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:36 PM
-12

Why would the feminist movement spend its time and effort fixing an issue cause by men? Men being conscripted for the army predates women being allowed to vote. Why would feminism, take the day off trying to fix the fact that women are more likely to be victims of malpractice or denyed a promotion based on gender to protest something done by men and upheld by other men? I'm not a fan of mandatory service that can include active combat, but this gets far to close to "feminism did this" and "femin…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:59 PM
0

My emotions? A minor swelling of pity and irritation that the birds outside my house are going ham. Very sexist attempt at bait though. Good to know you're big into equality for me but not for thee. Anyways it doesn't assume that at all, what it does point out is that real victims of either gender would be harmed by failure to prove A meaning B is true.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:52 PM
-1

No, you invented an argument that wasn't said then got upset about something you did in your own head. I don't take ownership over what you invent. You can take my words at face value and we can discuss them, or you can keep arguing with yourself.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 01:06 PM
0

I implied it by never saying it and even doubling down on why burden of proof is important. No . You invented an argument and got mad about something that wasn't said. That's on you. And now that you can't hide behind that, you're running away.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 01:04 PM
-7

I never said she was a victim, I said "you can't assume all victims are lying" credibility and proof are required, but lack of proof does not prove an entirely different crime. She is an alleged victim sure, but even that I didn't explicit say. I will now however, as the outcome was only that she couldn't prove that it happened and he can't prove it was a lie either. He may as well be a victim himself. We use the word victim as a respectful term due to the sensitive nature, you'd do well to reme…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 05:56 AM
0

I never said she was a victim, I said "you can't assume all victims are lying" credibility and proof are required, but lack of proof does not prove an entirely different crime. She is an alleged victim sure, but even that I didn't explicit say. I will now however, as the outcome was only that she couldn't prove that it happened and he can't prove it was a lie either. He may as well be a victim himself. We use the word victim as a respectful term due to the sensitive nature, you'd do well to reme…
/r/MensRights11/07/26 05:54 AM
0

Yeah, sure. What proof do you have that this is a case of something nefarious though? It's a bit insane to say "you need hard proof to say x crime happened but failing to prove x crime is enough to prove y crime" you need to keep the same standard of proof for both situations. There is no proof this woman lied, only that she couldn't prove it with external evidence.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 02:11 AM
-1

What do you mean? Do you mean do I think some people go after wealthy people romantically only for the money? Sure I think it's pretty well established to be a thing.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 12:58 AM
-1

Yes. Public figures have things like fans that mobilize and attack alleged victims, and often have the resources for extra security a high profile case can need, while a regular person can not.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 10:36 PM
-7

He's a public person. The laws, and likelyhood of a leek is vastly different due to this factor. If it was two regular 9-5 people I'd agree with you.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 10:18 PM
-9

Sure, but just as we need the burden of proof to prove someone was raped, we need the same exact standard for proof there was a lie. No offense but your personal history is irrelevant to the innocent until proven guilty doctrine that our legal system revolves around. Don't assume guilt either way until you have proof.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 09:17 PM
-11

There wasn't enough evidence to prove he did it, that in itself is not proof that she lied. Only that two conflicting accounts are hard to prove one way or the other. If you automatically assume all victims are lying because they have the uphill battle to prove something happened while often alone with the other party, you silence victims and are going to hurt both men and women.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 08:41 PM
-1

Sure, and people shoot their spouses thinking their robbers at night. My entire point is being a presumed victim of a real crime is a heated situation, and the violence was not a gender based issue.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 12:56 AM
-1

People shoot each other over Robbery and theft constantly.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 12:45 AM
-12

Theft is a crime, cheating isn't. That's insane.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:39 PM
-16

Valorie shot someone over a presumed theft. Her ideas on gender where not the factor of the crime. Do you not understand that?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 10:05 PM
-7

You realize that's a shitty comment that comes from the response of the gang rape of a 12 year old and the stats that India has the highest rated of femicide and rape in all of asia? Those women are angry at their reality, and you're angry at their words from a safe western country.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 08:28 PM
-28

Valorie was sexually abused by her father as a child, who then moved with her grandparents where her grandfather beat her, and she was pregnant and homeless at 15. She was a deeply wounded and traumatized women. The things she wrote where pretty gross, but shooting Andy Warhol was over a presumed theft, not as an act of gender violence. I don't think she's a great role model by any means, but it's constantly misrepresented here.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 05:17 PM
0

Sure, but if I'm talking about what rights women don't have in America and you counter, it has to be an American counter. Otherwise: Taliban. Checkmate I fucking win. See? Not really good conversation is it.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:16 AM
0

That hasn't happened in several decades. This is like claiming that native Americans are oppressed because they are forced to live on a reserve. That's a historical slight, not a modern one.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:12 AM
0

Bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:52 AM
0

Bleeding through your genitals is deeply unpleasant, same with the flood of hormones. Actively bleeding like that would always constitue "going home" if it wasn't normalized.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:37 PM
0

99% of women do, why pretend otherwise?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:34 PM
1

Then we're back to women having to work through the pain to take mental health days men would get. We need a system that acknowledges that women suffer from something men don't and accommodate that. Also vice versa. Treating them both identically isnt equality because their needs aren't identical.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 10:42 AM
0

Yes? And she can't?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 09:45 AM
0

Because men don't have a dibilitating condition once a month.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 12:40 AM
0

I don't really care, let adults police themselves.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:39 PM
-2

No I was trying to highlight different issues should have different solutions
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:33 PM
-8

You realize men in the men's right sphere have said to legalize rape or repeal the 19th? Using either groups bad actors is a race to the bottom.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:15 PM
0

Sure, that sounds fair, and no, why would people without periods need period specific leave?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:14 PM
0

Because we all vote like embarrassed millionaires.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:12 PM
2

The fact that men see a sharper decline in health during the last couple work years.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:11 PM
-7

That leaves no days for women's mental health, so you've just created disparity all over again?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:02 PM
1

Because that just leads to what we currently have, a system where a woman will take a day off due to bleeding and pain, and a man can go fishing. She'd still feel disadvantaged. Meanwhile many men feel disadvantaged their women peers enjoy a decade of retirement in decent health and they only get 8 years. They feel disadvantaged. Treating everyone the same ignores gendered issues.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:00 PM
3

Regardless if it's self inflicted, if it's a genuine truth, why not accommodate for it while it changes? Also men are more likely to have serious issues at end of career age then women, mens risk for cardiovascular issues and cancer spike at 65, but women trail a bit at 72.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:55 PM
-3

Why would that be needed? Just give them the extra days and let them take it on their own. These are adults not children and don't need micromanaging.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:54 PM
-5

Because it's something on top of that?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:53 PM
9

Most people don't work 50 years, considering the average retirement is 62-65. Assuming a 40 year span gives us about a year and a half and I think that's totally a valid amount to shave off for men.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:49 PM
-34

Well, men don't need PTO for menstrual issues, they don't menstruate. They do however tend to have failing heath sooner then women, so giving them a shorter retirement age would let them have the same enjoyment. It's about equality, not identicalicty.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:48 AM
1

Retirement packages are absolutely a thing most people have access to at a job that's also offering sick pay. Anything above fries in the bag often has some form of pension or retirement. Gender is already protected in hiring and discrimination due to it is already illegal, so the frame work already exists. People who are unwell shouldn't have to work. Men feel the effects of aging sooner, and women deal with menstrual issues. We should make both their lives better by accomodations.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:46 AM
4

I already answered this question in my original comment. I'm so confused as to why you're confused.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:27 AM
2

Yes. Equality is not identicalicty. Unless you want men to take medication to make them cramp and bleed for the sake of equality? And I don't! understanding and making accomodations for the biological differences of the sexs will just make the world better for everyone.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:19 AM
338

That's fantastic! I hope it goes through, menstruation is a really unpleasant time for a lot of women. Next maybe we should lower the retirement age for men an equal number of days sense they don't live as long and have more health issues sooner.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:05 AM
0

Great, now add money for medical suffering, abortions are unpleasant and painful, pregnancy and birth is worse. Let's just say we give her like $450 a month for her pain and suffering and cap it at like 18 years
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 01:28 AM
1

21 vs 14 isn't double, but it's close enough you can forgive the hyperbole, meanwhile your idea was way off.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:24 AM
–

They aren't allowing that all, all these countries have sexual abuse protections for men, and none of those groups are asking for them to be lifted, they just don't retaliatory charges in systems that discriminate women. It's not legal to sexually assault boys or men in those countries, it's just not legally considered rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:30 AM
–

So these are fairly valid concerns in those countries, India is considered the rape capital of the world, napal is deeply sexist, and Israel while pretty good for a middle east country is also has a religious law system where only men can be elected into these positions. All you've posted is women's groups in at risk countries being nervous that rape will be even harder to have justice for because of these countries pro male biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:16 AM
1

I'll find my own in a while, but the jump at 50 on yours blows your theory up even harder right?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:12 AM
–

So has partarchal ideologies. Repealing the 19th has twice as many searches as it did a few years ago. I'm asking for a tangeable connection and you have none.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:08 PM
1

This again, is replacing women with feminists, and doesn't state if the group was feminist in nature, while i agree problematic, this could just as likely be argued that stereotypical ideology that's rooted in patriarchy and a traditional view of male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:28 PM
1

So mean words, you said not respecting your consent, what exactly did feminism do in this reguard? Are you using feminism as a placeholder for a women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:23 PM
1

Have they hurt you in any way besides mean words? The floor is yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:07 PM
1

You keep using a lot of buzz words incorrectly, I'm guessing you picked them up to weild as a shield the same way you thought OP's examples would sheild you despite not even knowing anything about them. If femenist mean words have hurt you, then so have these ones on reddit, or the last time someone called you an idiot online elsewhere. In fact these might be worse because they are personal criticism vs broad. If you can live another day being told your ignorance is obvious, you haven't been har…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 06:53 PM
3

Unfortunately for you I know who valorie is, and the other two amount to mean words, like I said. Valorie was a very troubled women who shot Andy over theft, not on the grounds of feminist rehtroic. You can dismiss valid critique as deflection, but I directly addressed your point, there is no to date actionable harm in not chasing out the voices of people who are saying vile/stupid shit, and feminism does as much as any other group about it, so holding them uniquely responsible is a clear bias. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 06:42 PM
3

This falls apart in one serious way, maga and Republican policies have a body count. Directly through ice shootings, Jan 6 rioting and less directly through things like delayed medical abortions causing deaths in texas. Can you name a wildly accepted policy that feminists invite into their space with a body count? I can do it for the manosphere (er, alex.v, ect) but for feminism the biggest gripe anyone has proven is mean words on the Internet. There isn't a single group of people on the Interne…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 06:34 PM
-1

🤦‍♀️ No. I understood the counter argument, it just doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 06:26 PM
0

Women's sex drives peek in their 30s, so the premise is flawed as the data doesn't follow this assumption at all. That's what I'm getting at. Cheating is at its highest for women at early 20s and dives downward as both their sex drive rises and falls. Meanwhile men also lower their sex drives with age and cheating climbs for them. This conclusion doesn't work with the data at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 06:24 PM
3

It trends downward for women after 20 and up for men. It's not a sudden spike at 50, 50 is just the age where it crosses the twice as likely to cheat threshold for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:19 PM
3

But women by 50 are twice as likely to be faithful then men, so clearly these women aren't cheating on these men, the inverse is actually true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:45 PM
4

The shuttering irony of trying to state that feminists are responsible for their absolutely worst examples, while going on to whine about the fact that 90-97% of serious acts of violence like permanent maiming and death are caused by men in d.v situations is lost on you I assume? Even if we accept the worst of the worst, what your asking us to accept is a woman who was sexually abused by several men who shot someone she felt was mocking her in a traumatic state and killed nobody, and people who'…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:38 PM
1

No it doesn't. Again, biological choice is tethered to biological responsibility. When men can carry they can abort. As much say is not equal to as much action.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:41 PM
2

What question? Nobody is taking you seriously talking about kool aid flavors
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 08:30 PM
2

Say the fucking word, rape. If your going to have big boy ideas, you can use big boy words. The tiktok brain rot is so pitiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:02 PM
1

My FIl saw I was a huge fan of the new flowers he got so he delivered more to us today and he's a sweetheart, his mom is even nicer. These people are a blessing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 03:17 PM
4

That's not what a compound injury is. It's like needing a knee replacement because you did the same bad twisting motion 400 times a day for 15 years. Retail workers lift heavy objects frequently, they are tasked with unloading those items from large heavy boxes. Nursing staff lift entire people, ect. Yet construction workers make 2-3x what those "more dangerous" fields make.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 02:00 PM
4

The highest rates of compound injury come from retail, nursing and hospitality. Women dominated fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 01:54 PM
–

Because my sex drive is reactive like many women, and I find passive or timid men less attractive more often then not. I'd rather be alone then feel like I'm chasing my man. So if the guys I like won't approach first, then I end up not attracted and the issue solved itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:26 AM
2

Was checking reviews for the new bakery I want to try and I got rage baited by this fucking cow who left a one star. "Employees looked annoyed with me when I walked in 10 minutes before close and ordered four sandwich combos. They took forever and the music was playing curse words thank goodness my children didn't come in" Like fuck you Janice, don't order custom items 10 to close and be mad the staff had to unpack everything so it took longer, or that the store music isn't kid friendly at 10pm.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 07:53 AM
5

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/women-and-children-first-just-a-myth-researchers-say/ Women and children first is not a norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:10 PM
0

How old were you when you had your first kiss? 12-13 First relationships? Casual sex? 14, and never. How many relationships/partners have you had? 3 What's the longest you've gone single/sexless? I haven't been single for more then 8 months in the last decade, so about 7-8 months. Do you find sex and dating to be unimportant? Were your best experiences in life strictly outside of these things? I find them important, but yes, my best experiences (getting married, vacations with my spouse) didn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:02 PM
7

Just a reminder that the Titanic love story is a fiction, and on average men survive crisis like a sinking ship more then then women because they use their physical prowess to get to the lifeboats first and fight others off for space. Nobody without some form of social autism thinks thoses movies are blueprints for how people are in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:58 PM
–

I'm tempted to speed run getting banned from that sub by throwing in a "pipe down pipsqueak" in the replys to a few of them but it's locked so I'm saved from my own bad choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:55 AM
–

I literally can't watch the boys because starlight looks insane now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:50 AM
13

Not to mention the "I only romance after love not before" bit. What you plant and cultivate grows, if all you do is look at everyone else's feild it's harder to find what you want. Romance and soulmate minded people are going to place a value on romance, if you don't engage with that then you'd the one tripping yourself up, that whole popular of women aren't doing it backwards, you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 08:05 AM
2

No. You rent the cow not buy it. It's prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:09 PM
–

I just stayed up all night with him because he's sick and on the sofa because when he lays down he starts coughing. I dragged him to the doctor against his will almost and kept him company. It's funny how the strong stoic gender grinds to a hault when sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:07 PM
2

I do it every two weeks on cold months and once a week on warm ones, my guy is a night sweater
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 08:58 PM
1

Big difference on what some of those men have done. Andrew literally assaulted and trafficked people, so no. Nick's just a dumbass as far as I know, so maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 06:38 AM
2

It can exist, for example when Activison got sued for paying its female management less and actually being dumb enough to get caught saying "It's incase the go on maternity" But I think it only exists in the middle and upper runs of business and isn't as widespread as it's made out to be. There are genuine reasons for women to be paid less, like working less hours or being out of the workforce while raising kids. It's fine to hire and pay on experence, it's discrimination to assume someone will …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 10:39 AM
0

Back what up that minorities have base level rates of crime once adjusted for income and education
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 01:00 AM
–

You are entitled to your feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:34 PM
–

I do. I think the sub only works if most of us do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:27 PM
–

I don't down vote, so no, it wasn't me. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:26 PM
-1

Those things disappear when you account for poverty and opportunities. The stats on men exist across all socioeconomic levels. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 09:25 PM
–

I'm not the same person as the original response.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:11 PM
–

<image> Hmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:10 PM
–

They aren't downvoted because downvoting is against the rules. Glad you've been here for "years"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:00 PM
5

I think they should do it because it's in the name they picked.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:58 PM
–

If a woman who works and pays her way is a net burden because the only true way to pay your way is to have a child, then most men have been burdens sense the last war in the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:55 PM
0

If facts hurt your feelings, you need to reconcile with reality, not expect everyone else to deny the truths. If me saying that men pose a risk to women is stereotyping all men as monsters, then isn't OP saying their scared/concerned just doing the same in reverse? Yet you didn't hold this energy for him. You surely didn't rush to say "Not all women!" to his complaints. Funny innt? Your thinly veiled bullshit still smells behind the transparent curtain.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:47 PM
–

The point is, it wont fight you. It'll run away.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:44 PM
–

It's a bear in the woods, not an arctic coast. Black fight back, Brown lie down, White goodnight. A black bear chilling in the woods is probably actually less likely to fuck with you then a dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 10:43 AM
2

I laugh. Men are vastly more likely to harm kill or rape a partner then have a woman hurt him in a similar manner, so for men to be scared is a bit of a joke Date or don't date but telling the people sticking their hands in a lion's mouth how scary sticking your hand in the hamster cage is, is soooo so tone deaf.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 10:40 AM
5

"I can find 100s of examples" Comes back with AOC saying that polling shouldn't assume everyone is a man. Kek
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:31 PM
1

Money is a method to get basic needs, but it as an object isn't a requirement. For example people live on off grid compounds that work as collectives or bartter systems where money isn't factored in. Also once a threshold is hit with money, redistribution wouldn't change the lifestyle quality, so they wouldn't be affected in a meaningful way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:29 PM
2

Money is not people
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 05:22 PM
1

You don't think being stranded on an island is a life or death situation without having to be explicitly told so?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:37 AM
2

I'm not sure how a divorced household means a single mom, it should just mean co-parenting but men don't do that for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 07:40 AM
1

I agree we're at an impasse but I don't see that as an issue. Use a dating app, do singles events, ask your friends to set up blind or double dates, ask a woman to dance with you at a club where it's socially normal, or don't. Both sides have options and if neither take them then they value the peace over the stress and that's not an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 11:27 PM
0

None of that is relevant (or true besides some cherry picked examples) to the point that Feminism hadn't gone too far in 1910 is it?
/r/MensRights11/04/26 10:43 PM
0

You didn't ask me about anything political. Then you said I was screeching. At what point was there emotional language used? Besides you describing my post as screeching of course :)
/r/MensRights11/04/26 10:14 PM
0

There is no fallacy. That's a buzz word you've used incorrectly. ad hominem? Nope straw man? Nope False dilemma? nope. slippery slope? Nope circular reasoning? Nope. Appeal to authority? Nope. No true Scotsman? Nope. My entire point is that bugging people on the street is relatively innocent, (as we can see with our rights to protest, and how people will ask for donations or signatures, it's a socially acceptable if minimally annoying thing to do.) What isn't socially acceptable is rape, spousal…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 10:11 PM
-2

Did you just "no, you!" And then try and claim the high ground? Firstly, nothing I said was emotional, it was all factual. The irony in that statement is wild.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:22 PM
1

Is that a life or death situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 07:20 PM
-4

Are you a bot?
/r/MensRights11/04/26 06:50 PM
1

No that's the actual definition of coercive rape. She doesn't want to fuck you, she wants to not die on the island. Very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:46 PM
3

No, I don't think that. I think the right to life is something we as a society provide. There are different expectations depending on circumstances. I only took issue with the statement we'd let a homeless man starve, we wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:44 PM
-5

Statement: Feminism went too far in the 1910s Context: Feminism had not yet established any frame of equality, women were still largely considered property as they had no right to bodily autonomy, nor suffrage. Some women, gave flowers to men as a critique for not participating in a war. Conclusion: Feminism had not gone too far, as nothing near equality had been reached, furthermore, being handed a flower is not as important as being legally raped or being denied the vote. Thus: Feminism had no…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 06:41 PM
2

"he becomes angry" is bolded in the text for a reason. Genocide by starvation is the most common form of genocide btw. We'd certainly be a bit more guilty if they sought help and we rebuffed them unless they did us sexual favors for us. Now I'll admit if the only downside here is just that she's sore and tired but not at risk, then the dynamics are different. However as soon as it's a reasonable position that she might die without his help, the condition of sex becomes coercive rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:49 PM
2

Sure I can. Being stranded alone on an island with a man willing to rape you who is fine to let you die if you don't go along with the rape is an extremely dangerous position to be in, and it's easy to know that if you haven't had a lobotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:39 PM
0

Yeah no, the entire modern world agrees that the right to life isn't entitlement, hence why we shell out social programs you pay taxes for or why all 50 states have good sammertian laws. We do a lot to try and protect the lives of others in a decent society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:37 PM
1

"women on this sub are wrong for saying all men!" But men on this sub: "I'd coercive rape someone in a heartbeat" 🤮 What the actual fuck is wrong with y'all that you'd have sex with someone who doesn't want to have sex with you?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:30 PM
2

No, not at all. That's ad hoc to justify rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:27 PM
3

Wrong reply?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:23 PM
0

Sure, but it's a low cost high reward thing to cut out.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 11:16 AM
6

You don't need sex to survive
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:54 AM
7

You cannot agree to sex under duress, that's not valid consent. Sex without consent is rape. Also.... The man wouldn't die without sex. This is like him murdering someone because he was missing his deer hunting so he shot a guy instead. Yeah that's being okay with murder! Y'all rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:21 AM
9

"you can't say they're okay with coercive rape when they pick the coercive rape option" My brother in Christ there is a no rape option available. This isn't a scenario where it's coercive rape vs violent rape, zero rape was on the board.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 10:07 AM
4

No it proves that a lot of them are okay with coercive rape. 🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:59 AM
4

Their boundary is that they won't employ people who don't work. The boundary isn't that you'll do the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:56 AM
4

I'm talking about the men in prison choosing to do sexual acts for safety. Boundaries are what you do, not what you want others to do. Gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:16 AM
-31

Couldn't vote tho.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:57 AM
10

Then all those men in prison are just choosing to have sex then? Rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 08:57 AM
-33

This was France and England where women couldn't vote until 1928 and 44 respectively
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:51 AM
12

Sure it is Differential Predictors of Intimate Partner Sexual Coercion Versus Physical Assault Perpetration - PMC https://share.google/sB3idMgJRrOsgKVDI This is why when you ask men if they'd rape a woman if they went without consequences only like 1/13 say yes. But 1/3 are okay with "forcing" her. Y'all rapey. Being stranded on an island where you might need the other person's help to survive has a power dynamic makes that forced consent. The same way men in prison choose sexual abuse over impl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 08:48 AM
-4

That's a really poor case to pick, he was found not guilty, but the accuser was not found guilty of false reporting either. The reality is nobody has an answer on the truth of the situation but the lack of evidence to prosecute a crime doesn't prove a different crime. He was also later susspended from a team for violence. Not a great mascot. I think being cooperative, being politely distant and not going into private places with strangers is a good starting point. Keep accurate notations of your…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:37 AM
-39

The second claim is from the 1910s, is historically inaccurate/not what the link suggests. Are we really going to say back when women couldn't get a mortgage, vote, and could be legally beaten and raped was a time Feminism had gone too far because other women where giving flowers to men they thought where avoiding the draft?
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:14 AM
9

It certainly doesn't suggest that 🤣.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:31 AM
7

Sure but your proof doesn't prove your conclusions. It doesn't even suggest them. All it suggests is women are more open minded and less judgemental than men. Women are also more tolerant of immigration but slightly more men migrate than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 06:20 AM
6

We as a society didn't design airbags and seat belts that wouldn't cause decapitated or dead women in front seats until the mid 80's because crash dummies all had male structures and sizing. We didn't know women presented differently with heart disease and heart attacks until the 2010's, where suddenly properly diagnoses made it one of the leading causes of death. The bar used to ban women from bringing menstrual products to the test and wouldn't allow them to go change them in some states until…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 05:00 AM
1

If we complain more about A, even though B is objectively worse, then it's easy to say that we are going too hard on A, or not hard enough on B, or likely both. We don't raise the alarm for verbal, emotional abuse or "minor" forms of physical abuse like shoving because they aren't as dangerous even if they absolutely cause harm. We have finite resources and we allocate them where they will save lives or avoid serious physical injury. Nobody thinks a skinned knee or a broken wrist is good, but we…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:54 PM
-1

Immigrant Muslims have a lower crime rate than American born citizens. It you mean critique for their bigotry in middle eastern countries, then no, that criticism is also valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:55 PM
3

Those groups get a disproportionate amount of criticism. Men actually get too much of a pass. 14% of women in an ER are sent there by domestic violence from a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:42 PM
-1

People underestimate that though, so why would we say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:30 PM
2

If something had more than a 1 in 4 chance of beating you up, it would have to be fantastic for you want to deal with it. You can either be fantastic or figure out a way to make the risk lower, but no, women aren't responsible for making men beat them less. Men aren't owed a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:28 PM
2

The risk is low? 1 in 3 women globally and 22% of women in the USA will be hit by a male spouse. 14% of female patients in an emergency room department will be there for domestic violence. The risk isn't low.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:22 AM
3

Sure, and most dogs don't bite, but I still don't run up and pet every dog I see blindly. There is a risk vs reward that comes with dating men that doesn't happen in the reverse. If you don't want to be a reward worth the risk, then do something to lower the risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 06:34 PM
14

Straight Men, (the majority) don't have to date other men. Y'all make up 90-97% of the serious violent crime and date rape. That's what these women are weary about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 08:27 AM
-3

This isn't accurate according to the sources it pulled from. The actual number is closer to 5-10%, the same as the global data shows.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:07 AM
–

No the data shows men don't pay their child support properly over 60% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:58 PM
–

Correct, they make them with men but pay for the lions shares of their expenses, hence why they get the tax deductions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:52 PM
–

English please
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:46 PM
–

Actually once you factor in children, it's tax equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:36 PM
–

That's exactly what a slacker would say
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:35 PM
–

Yeah they don't sign their organ donation cards.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:35 PM
–

So donate your eyeballs or lungs tf Edit: suck block, hey chuckles, you know you donate them post humorous right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 10:00 AM
–

Men make up 65-80% of all organ donation recipients but women donate 80% of the organs. Men slacking again 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 09:58 AM
1

Other countries are insulated from political swings?
/r/MensRights05/04/26 11:26 PM
0

No. This is wildly unpopular and as we've seen in America way to fickle.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 07:20 PM
0

Yes and no. Left over sperm can hang out in the channel and hitch a ride but no, without a relatively fresh ejaculate there is no sperm. Oh and "are you dumb?" Because I guess that's how we talk to people who don't nitpick.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 07:41 AM
0

Nah, abortions already exist, no need to uninvent the wheel.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:10 AM
2

Could you give me the case please so I can look? The only one I found was Bayatyan v. Armenia, and the resolution was an alternative service, not no service.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:31 PM
2

I did some digging and at best, they can get a civilian alternative over religious/con.ob grounds, but are still required to participate in some form of conscription. The only thing that's been successfully sued over globally is a lack of an alternative. But most conscription doesn't mandate combat rolls so it seems like distinction without difference.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:29 PM
0

That's a very American take. Most of the world views mandatory military service (for one or both genders) a clear expectation of it's people, at least in 85 countries. In fact America complains more despite it not happening in 50 years. Most courts in other countries wouldn't entertain the idea.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:20 PM
1

Had a friend who I worked with, she showed up black and blue once, and she did everything right, restraining order, charges, warrant for his arrest. He beat her to death with the rod from a coat rack. If someone had killed him before he'd broken into her house it would have made for a great song. Gender doesn't matter, if you beat another person to the point you hospitalized them over domestic shit, someone should put you down like the rabid dog you are.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:40 PM
1

Then the rest of us pay the tab? Fuck no.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:31 PM
-1

Sure, so don't ejaculate into a woman, problem solved.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:29 PM
3

I don't agree with the draft either, I'm just pointing out the most common criticism of that plan.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:24 PM
4

Then people would complain putting women in the draft just forces all men into combat rolls and women into the safe ones.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 06:44 PM
1

I don't really mind that, tbh I think standards should be rigid for safety. Paternity fraud is rare, but I don't have an issue with the responsibility of child support being tied to a paternity test. That being said, it should be opt in when a support case happens with both parents splitting the cost. The tests are now under $100 and much cheaper then a lawyer, so it makes sense to do them and sort it out before it gets to a judge, like how most arrangements currently function anyways.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 10:51 PM
1

Are you able to condense your posts? You take too long to get too relevant information. Women's biology gives her a pre and post choice. Men only get a pre choice but don't deal with menstruation and pregnancy and birth. Considering child support payments don't leave dinner plate sizes wounds or are a leading cause of death in men aged 18-35, men are kind of getting the better deal. Women becoming firefighters doesn't starve children or cost the rest of us extra tax money. Once a child is born i…
/r/MensRights03/04/26 04:17 PM
1

"at least men are willing to sexually exploit your poverty and harsh situations" is a shitty take. This is why homeless is so high for men and lower for women. Because it's better to choose your rapist. Sleeping on the streets is an almost surefire way to be sexually assaulted for women, so women just end up sleeping with or staying with abusive men for housing. It's not a privilege to be in this position.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 03:45 PM
1

You had the right to choose before you ejaculated fertile sperm in a woman, hope that helps. It has a lot more to do with how biology works and where the different choices come in then the victim Olympics you're trying to play. Women deal with a heavy toll for reproductive health, the silver lining is that they get a post choice. Men have it easy in that regard, but only get a prechoice. So they need to exorcise that choice when they can and take proper precautions. We aren't going to starve kid…
/r/MensRights02/04/26 03:37 PM
1

And men don't deal with 99% of the biological realities of menstruation and pregnancy. Freeze sperm, and hope you're in the mass majority of people who reverse them without problems. And be grateful you get the better end of biology.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 04:58 AM
1

90% of custody arrangements happen without lawyers, it's a social idea but not fact based.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 05:58 AM
1

Child support is not often calculated by custody time, a higher earning parent even with 50/50 will be expected to help more with the child's expenses. So the idea women keep them away for more $, isn't fact based. Secondly the meta data shows that men receive preferred custody arrangements more often when they seek them.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 05:51 AM
-1

Men get their preferred custody arrangements more often then women, men don't seek 50/50 custody neatly as often. Finding ways men are able and willing to be full time fathers is the bigger barrier. There is a lack of support systems as well as cultural norms that prevent men from wanting to be, or being able to be full time parents.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 04:37 PM
1

Too that end people are sued and fined to recoup costs.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 05:17 AM
1

I am.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 05:16 AM
4

Yes it is. The increased murder and suicide rates bump it up to that regardless of where you live most likely. DYK that every birth leaves a wound the size of a dinner plate inside the organ of a woman? YOUR the one ignorant of how dangerous and harmful pregnancy is.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 10:02 PM
1

Yeah dude I don't care. Taxes don't exist to shield people from poor choices. I'd rather them go to the kids who need the money not to deadbeats to sherk their responsibility.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 08:38 PM
-1

Besides cases of rape, I think the people who create the child should be the ones paying for it, not our taxes. Yeah women have abortion but men can have a vasectomy. Pay for your own kids or don't have them.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 05:49 PM
1

Pregnancy is the sixth leading cause of death in women ages 18-35 and 82% of births leave a form of permanent disfigurement. Pregnancy has a higher injury rate than modern war.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 05:46 PM
0

The draft paid a decent wage for the time, the average child costs almost half a million dollars. Fiscally this seems really unfair.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 09:23 PM
–

Can you give me some examples? I'm willing to be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 03:59 AM
–

Twox does not call for legalizing rape or murder against men. And if there is a post that unhinged it's mod removed. The persecution fetish is going strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 03:54 AM
–

They would be if they could avoid threatening women long enough to stay unbanned for longer than a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 03:52 AM
–

Puusypassdenied Menslib Lockedinmen Mgtow2,3,4 ect The 20th something-cel reddit Menseq Dude there are tons of subs that shit on women constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 03:31 AM
19

No, it's not federally legal, hope this helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:32 AM
2

Abortion doesn't involve a born child, child support does.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:47 PM
1

If I don't want another date, I insist on splitting. If I want to date the person taking turns is more romantic then splitting like I do with "just friends"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:41 PM
–

Got a partner, decided to focus efforts on something that's productivity leading to more, just got bored? Who knows. It's probably not about you tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:32 PM
6

Oh my god my favorite topic! He's very sweet, remembers things I talk about and engages with them later. I was looking for some stationary stuff in our home recently and was disappointed that we didn't have but it also wasn't a real need so I forgot about it. It showed up in a grocery bag a few days later! It was only $2.50 worth of punch protectors but the fact he remembered and acted on it, and does little things like that a lot melts my heart. He's really funny and just hanging out on the sof…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 02:15 PM
3

No more than any other typical double standard. Crying about not getting it and crying about it existing is about equally effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:18 PM
5

And most men want a super hot virgin who fucks like a pro but only for him. It's like people like things that favor them and dislike things that don't favor them. Also water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:51 PM
4

Women are also more likely to cook for a man than the reverse, clean his house ECT. Also you mentioned things like "her birthday" or their "anniversary" like he isn't gifted things on his birthday or the anniversary. Yeah proposing is on a man, and then a woman spends the next 30 years cooking and cleaning for him as a show of her love. It sounds like you only value fiscal contributions to a relationship, and that's not a typical relationship dynamic, but it doesn't mean that women don't bring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 04:21 AM
1

The difference is that taking away economic and social structures eliminates race biases. It doesn't eliminate gender biases towards violence. Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:47 PM
-1

There is less then 2% of the population of black people in Mexico. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:26 PM
7

If you think the orgasm gap is because there isn't enough piv for a second try....dude. no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:41 PM
0

Who's killing all these men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 04:39 PM
–

None of that is evidence or fact based. And you know you'll find data disagreeing with you if you look. Choosing to be ignorant is certainly a choice. https://share.google/9yVri7EZiSogotZYU Breaking-Down-Barriers-Report-5-June-2022.pdf Here they are in front of you. Men as a class fair better economically after a divorce then women do. The idea women are paid out in a divorce is an emotional response that protects the ego that even if it costs them women would prefer no relationship over a bad o…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:06 PM
–

Women as a class end up with less disposable income post divorce than men. Their household income is reduced as a class for a divorce, same as men, but by more and recovers slower. As a class women donate more of their wealth proportionately to their total wealth than men. So the hard data suggests that divorce actually lowers her wealth and that women are less likely to hoard wealth than men. How does that reconcile with your views? You aren't fact based, those are emotional based views.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:50 PM
–

I eat McDonald's/Wendy's ect about 1-2 a year each and that McDonald's ad of the "tested product" that the CEO couldn't even bite had me like "okay, maybe pass on the mickies" But then Burger King and a&w both spoofed it with their ceos, and sure they called it a burger, and took a big bite...we never saw them swallow. If you're paid tens of millions a year and you won't swallow a bite of the food your company makes that shit has to be toxic as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:26 PM
1

I used to think the American hedgemony was cooked with how stupid Trump is but I realized that the big three anti west countries don't operate with synergy. When America starts a war the UK, EU, and all the other allies give clear public announcements on their stance and even those who don't like it begrudgingly comply. China has gotten zero public support in its play for Taiwan, Russia hasn't been supported by Iran/China besides the buying of weapons, and Iran is definitely on its own right now…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 02:55 PM
5

I play wow with my husband, find someone into the same things as you or who at least understands your passion!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 02:48 PM
1

This is the norm imho, man pays for the first (insist on splitting if you dont think you want a second) and then just taking turns after.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:13 AM
1

I'm not sure what your point is here, can you clarify please?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:30 PM
1

Nobody says they can't want those things, but they can't blame others for not wanting to give them those things. Women tell other women to avoid men who won't give you those things, and so the same advice applies. Just avoid women who won't give you that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 10:39 AM
1

Ohh fairs! Mine are more like "I wonder if I can fall asleep with no one noticing" and not slurs but I know a lot of people are wired differently mentally. A few people with OCD mentioned how hard they'd have had it in his place.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 12:16 AM
1

No, it's more like saying the exact worst thing, it's not even inside thoughts, it's like the subconscious knows what you shouldn't say no matter what and the illness makes you say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 10:48 PM
3

People being mad at the guy with Tourette's being at the award show (to promote the movie about his life and how hard it is when you can't stop yourself and how society shuns you ) for saying the N word is insanity to me. And it's all on subs that claim to be progressive! I've seen "Well why did he only say is when he saw a black person?" and "How does he know that word anyways unless he's a racist" and "He should have stayed home!" This is a guy who couldn't stop saying "Fuck the queen! I have …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 09:38 PM
1

No ratio is valid because they aren't similar enough to replicate within each other's data sets.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 02:23 AM
1

Murders per capita in the USA: just under 7 Murders per capita in Canada: under 2 Yeah not culturally similar in that way at all. You are just making too many leaps to be creditable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 01:51 AM
1

If we use stats from one country and apply it to another...brother the hamster is tired.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 12:17 AM
1

Your article is deeply flawed, for one thing it hinges on the idea that because men under report ipv that iph would be equally underreported. This is nonsense. Functionally 0% of people who are murdered are the ones reporting their own deaths, so reluctant reporting guesstimating that you can linearly increase the number over 25-40% is utter trite. This entire article is a chain of if this then maybe this and if this maybe that, it's so far removed from the hard data it's "hamstering" as they ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 11:32 PM
2

Sure, that doesn't change anything i said though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:40 PM
4

Absolutely. And men are vastly more likely to kill their partner or hospitalize them (70-91% depending on the study and country). The problem with that soundbite is it puts grabbing and pushing on the same levels as choking, breaking bones and serious risk of life. The reason IPV is treated as a gender issue is the same reason a person would be more cautious of a pitbull than a chuiwawaw, because being nipped sucks but you aren't going to be mauled to death by a 8lb dog. Doesn't mean we shouldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:02 PM
1

Sure, but aren't you just projecting their bad behavior onto me when you say "you" just like your rightfully pointing out isn't fair when they lump all men together? The worst people are always the loudest for anything unfortunately. All I'm saying is that you can't take the credit of other people for good or bad
/r/MensRights15/02/26 08:11 PM
0

Who is this "you?" I haven't done it at all in this conversation. If that's what you prefer though i feel like pointing out building a house doesn't justify murder lol.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 07:36 PM
0

I didn't say that at all,I said you can either take the good and bad of your gender together or you can be your own person and get neither the credit nor the crimes of the others. It's silly to want the credit of other men's good deeds but then balk at the notion you should be judged for other men's misdeeds.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 06:57 PM
-24

"don't blame all men for the fact that 90-98% of major violence is committed by men, that's wrong" But also "Give other men credit for the work a different man did. " Nah dude. Pick 1.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 09:56 AM
–

A man complaining that women don't understand logic then incorrectly using a premise conclusion chain is got to be peak ppd for me. Even better then the guy who tried to blame the death of an active shooter on the woman who called the cops and not the guy for actively shooting at someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:29 PM
7

Am I the only one bothered by the fact premise 1 and 2 don't relate to your conclusion? If you wanted them to be relevant you'd have to have included "attract more women/be attractive to women" in the conclusion. Instead the only logic chain here is "x y and z are attractive traits" and "if I want to be more attractive I need x y and z" This would fail an introductory course in college. The fucking irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 01:48 AM
-3

Actually it isn't. Retail workers cite long term injury rates at similar rates as blue collar workers. Unless you have any data that says OSHA is wrong?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:29 PM
-5

Yes, standing still is a nightmare for compound injuries and illegal in most of the EU for a reason.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:10 PM
1

From OSHA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That being said, gross injury (Amputation, loss of life) is almost all in agriculture farm/fish and construction. (https://blog.oshaeducationschool.com/industries-highest-osha-injury-rates/) (https://www.westfieldinsurance.com/about-us/articles/workers-suffer-the-most-injuries-in-these-25-jobs)
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:33 PM
-11

This is a misconception, the grunt labor equivalent for women is retail and lower end healthcare, industries that rival/excess oil rigging and sanitation in injury rates but pay 40-60% less. Office work is more desirable for both genders then those fields.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:02 PM
0

-That was post income divorce, meaning men are fiscally better off after a divorce than women, meaning that alimony is happening because those women are making larger fiscal sacrifices in the marriage and coming out worse out than men. -this is anecdotal, for example my father got primary custody, and was in a group of single dads, men do get custody when they ask and no lawyer is going to say not to bother. Hell 75% of agreements don't involve lawyers at all. That said there are way less progra…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 09:13 PM
-1

Oh! sorry about that, idk either, you can always send a message if reddit is being a bum.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 08:06 PM
-2

-Women have been historically heavily favored in divorces, more often being granted alimony and a more sizable chunk of the assets. False, woman's disposable income and household income goes down post divorce, but a man goes up. He's also more likely to remarry. Research Shows Economic Consequences of Divorce in the US Vary by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity | The Institute for Social Research Population Studies Center https://share.google/ZTn8DEhNGST2GaXAb Fascinating Remarriage Statistics 2022 Upd…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 06:03 PM
3

That's fair, both a and b could work in tandem. We need to bring back standardized testing too, just better without so much bias
/r/MensRights01/02/26 05:19 AM
4

Because the same studies that show that little boys are able to focus better when they have addiquite access to outdoor/physical play time shows that they perform disruptive behaviors less, and more in line with their girl peers. That's one of the metrics used. Regardless you're right, it's never the kids fault, but the best way to help them is to give back the tools they used to have to help themselves focus.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:29 AM
15

Absolutely, and the most cited reason is frustration with disruptive behavior, the more energy little boys can run off the less disruptive they are, allowing for the biological differences in boys is important, and hopefully that self corrects. If not we need to move to a blind grading model.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:15 AM
24

The answer is to give them more physical education and play time. Studies show little boys need that time to help burn off extra energy and focus. The iPad kid epidemic is vastly more harmful to our little boys. We need to stop defunding education that involves physical activity and help parents afford things like sports and play.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:03 AM
0

The people who set the budgets as well 2/3 superintendents are men, do you do any fucking research on your views before you spew them out? I couldn't handle being ignorant and loud.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:38 AM
-1

I never said men don't face discrimination, I said the powers that control those systems are held by men. Please engage with what I say and stop arguing with yourself. It's embarrassing. Women voting is irrelevant if all options are of men, consumer spending is irrelevant when it's largely just tied to basic needs for households. Men actually have and spend more on disposable income. Men hold the power, so men must be who fosters the change, it's that simple.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:10 AM
-2

I gave you both the same reason why men are to blame and why women aren't. They don't make up anywhere close to the same numbers in terms of political, social, private sector power or wealth to actually do so. If you're starving, look to the people hoarding the food, not the other people starving with you. I never claimed that those men in power care more for other men (you do a lot of just hallucinating something never said, are you okay?) just that for actionable change to happen, those are th…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:49 AM
21

Yeah the fact she premeditated this enough to pretend to be young absolutely gives her the mental capabilities to be a predator and she needs to go away where she can't hurt anyone else, this isn't a case of a mentally young person being tricked into a situation by a more intelligent minior, she as the adult knew to pretend to be young and manipulated those kids. She's a child rapist and a danger.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:22 AM
0

I think that's my very first sentence. I then later reaffirmed that keeping both male and female victims in the conversation is important. I can't deny men are victims and then go on to say "we need to include them in the conversations"
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:17 AM
-2

I stand by everything I said there. I advocate strongly for men to make the cultural changes they need to make. Men make up 76% of governors, they make up 100% of presidents, they make up 90% of CEOs and 90% of billionaires. If women did it for you, it wyould A. Not informed on what men actually want, B. Unfair to women to sideline their own struggles to gain equal social power and C. Less effective. I am a full supporter of men's rights, but I also realize that the people with the power to chan…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:15 AM
0

Sure, but the crime stats I've seen it's at least 5-10x less likely than any other forms. it makes up 2% of women murderers and 0.5% of male. You're almost more likely to be set on fire by both genders than poisoned. https://share.google/EFd3lUwPtGTyRp7Pj The vrux of my point is that guns aren't really this big equalizer because men are more likely to own and use them then women are anyways, further doubling down on the fact that on average men are more dangerous In terms of drastic life threate…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:49 PM
-1

If you actually read the stat it goes on to say that women in lesbian relationships are most likely, but that's followed by cis men, gay men, then women in hetero relationships. Hence why the other myriad of data backs it up. Secondly I didn't mention poison because it's actually not common in either case.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:36 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/71C5yMYg9r Brother how embarrassing this is for you.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:17 AM
-8

I already have in other comments.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:00 AM
-2

The Devastating Toll of Gun Violence on Americ... | GIFFORDS https://share.google/UJ8DhYSVnZGda17FN "More than two-thirds of all intimate partner homicides of women are committed with guns" Of the 1861 victims in 2023 (CDC) that means over 1250 of them are shooting victims. Meanwhile it's less than 50% of ipv homicides for men. Men are also more likely to stab during ipv (14%) vs women (8%) Intimate partner homicide methods in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian relationships - PubMed https://share.g…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:00 AM
-1

Sure, and I clarified that A. It was likely a comment to the fact it's more a risk for higher physical damage and that B. Regardless we need to keep both kinds of victims in the conversation. Then you accused me of saying I was denying men can be victims and called me names in a hastily deleted comment, so where does that leave us?
/r/MensRights31/01/26 05:27 AM
-3

You're talking to yourself. Where did I suggest that we should exclude male victims, I'm giving advice on how to make sure they aren't ignored, the exact opposite of what you're claiming. Listen to what I'm saying, not your emotional response to the critique.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 04:36 AM
-11

That's just not true. The vast majority of domestic violence doesn't include weapons, and women are 3.5x more likely to have broken bones and fractures than men are in cases of reciprocal man-women violence. Even when weapons come into play, men are more likely to use them than women are, these are well documented facts. That doesn't mean that it's okay that men are abused, but it's anti-science and reality-denying to pretend that women are not more often more seriously injured. When we have the…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 04:09 AM
-4

Yes, that's the most fair and balanced take, and will likely resonate with the most people.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 01:35 AM
-21

DV has poor physical and mental health outcomes for anyone who is subjected to it. However I think the OP meant that men are more able to break bones/harm in way that requires emergency medical intervention. We can acknowledge both as being true, and I think it's always useful to point out the first part without downplaying the second so that it stays in the conversation.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 12:42 AM
10

28 days later is great, the ritual is great, it's a bit older but the nightmare on Elm Street reboot has Quinton who's very likeable. Get out is fantastic as well.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 01:38 AM
15

It is punishable by law, as it falls under general assault and harassment laws. However their domestic violence laws are gendered and outdated and should be fixed.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:38 PM
1

No, you get blocked for doing things like denying that rape and abuse happened. You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't get into with reason. You then spam responded to a bunch of linked sources with zero counter sources all within a few minutes of each other proving you didn't read any of the sources at all. Why would I validate that by responding? Without sourcing it becomes "yes it was" "no it wasn't" over and over again. I'm an adult and that's not worth my time.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:08 PM
-1

How many times do you say "yes, but it was only half terrible and oppressive" before your sense of embarrassment shows up?
/r/MensRights26/01/26 07:05 AM
–

If he won't rescue you from a high tower guarded by a moat filled with vicious alligators or a flying Dragon, does he even like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 12:57 AM
2

This! It's not an entitled need like food, clean water, shelter ect. But it's important in a relationship for most people and it's perfectly fine to have boundaries about it, and you're well within your rights to end a relationship that is unfulfilling for you.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 11:12 AM
-1

Before that, a single woman would be the property, or coverture of her father, and would go back to that as a widow if her father was still living, while property would still stay in her name, he had legal right to her wages as well as medical choices. She couldn't buy more property in her own name without co-signing of the coverture, something that largely remained as a standard practice until the 1970s where women got the same legal rights to solo-sign for a mortgage that men have always had. …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 09:36 AM
–

People are dying from being denied medical care due to pregnancy complications and denial of medications at higher rates now because other people are fighting ice? How does that logic work?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:32 AM
–

Friendly reminder Obama deported more people than Trump currently is per year and did it with 1400% less deaths during arrests and detention. Ice is a Nazi death cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:44 AM
0

Because it's well documented and the cherry picking doesn't prevent that being the case? Here is a source of over 200,000 victims from the 1800s who, while able to obtain a paltry divorce, saw their husbands allowed free, more so it has examples of divorces being denied for only minor acts of abuse: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1076&context=confluence_2009#:~:text=In%20the%20mid%2Dnineteenth%20century,right%20to%20beat%20their%20wives. And a time line of Amer…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 03:05 AM
1

It was legal from the BC's of Greece and egypt up until the 1800s, come on dude, do better
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:56 AM
1

Did 1950s Newspaper Column Ask, 'If a Woman Needs It, Should She Be Spanked?' | Snopes.com https://share.google/L3Wrv0XwcjJQpwjlm
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:07 PM
1

Mob justice is not legal protections, nor is it a widespread president of protection. You got a long ways to go to match my 200k btw.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:14 PM
1

Except in all or even most places it wasn't, how is that a hard concept to grasp. Go ask any edu or validated scholar search engine when was wife beating made illegal and you'll overwhelmingly get results that cite the mid late 1800s. Only excessive force or intoxication in the act was protected earlier than that.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:56 PM
1

There are several examples of hysteria in that article, and back then hysteria included things of that nature. Women's Mental Health - Rockhaven Sanitarium: "In Your Own Backyard" https://share.google/jjZv2A4sx3B3IpZCf Oh look. We've revisited covuture. Yes. Women could be forcefully lobotomizing for being defiant of their husbands, such as fighting back, or not wanting sex, however wanting it too much or being a wild woman was also a reason to lobotomize a woman, such as with rose Kenedy. https…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:53 PM
1

Yes, until he paid a fine.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:42 PM
1

That wasn't even legal justice! 🤣
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:37 PM
1

Dude whips his wife while drunk, gets in trouble for being drunk by a fine and that's....legal protection of hitting your wife? Clown shit at this point.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:37 PM
2

https://share.google/Pn1WTZRxheAJaqQq7 No fact. Most lobotomized victims were of women simply suffering from "hysteria" a word literally just meaning utuers in ancient Greek.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:35 PM
1

No, but she's been lobotomized for complaining about being beaten? Is that better or worse you think? 🤔
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:18 PM
2

Sir that information is on the second page, you clearly did not read the source, or simply just using the search function, please don't pretend to read a source, I'm not an idiot, there is no way you read that entire document and parsed its sources in the minutes between replying.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:01 PM
1

You're free to read the source. Here's a fun more modern take: Did 1950s Newspaper Column Ask, 'If a Woman Needs It, Should She Be Spanked?' | Snopes.com https://share.google/Fm2hxQBkBRzC9Untn Even in the 50's, all the men polled agreed that hitting your wife was good practice. A sample size of six is hardly ground breaking, but it sheds light on how little "unserious" domestic violence like slapping and spanking was taken, and that only true life threatening beatings were considered abuse.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:57 PM
1

To Love and To Cherish Marital Violence and Divorce in Nineteen.pdf https://share.google/cUq1hgyk55LRcO5Sp "rulings like one in Kentucky in 1829 made it clear that the cruelty had to be not only violent but also life threatening; so, for example, a man slapping a woman in the face could be seen as justifiable because it was not a real threat to life. An example of this can be found when the New Hampshire high court ruled against a woman after proving that her husband locked her in a room and whi…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:51 PM
1

"This can particularly be seen at the turn of the century considering that between 1867 and 1906, the United States courts granted 945,625 divorces. Of those, 616,909 were between 1886 and 1906, and 218,520 were granted based on cruelty" none of those men actually suffered legal consequences, we're talking about over 200,000 people here vs your cherry picked examples. To Love and To Cherish Marital Violence and Divorce in Nineteen.pdf https://share.google/cUq1hgyk55LRcO5Sp "rulings like one in K…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:46 PM
1

Yes, some places made it illegal in the late 1800's as places are won't to drag their laws behind or ahead of others by 20+/- years. That doesn't mean it was banned in most places until about the late 1880s. Marital rape and spousal abuse is still legal in some places in the world, but that would be disingenuous of me to cherry pick wouldn't it? For the west it was the late 1880-1890s.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:40 PM
2

"Until the 1900s", it brought all sources from the post 1900s. You don't think more abortions happened after roe vs Wade did you? Do you think attitudes about owning slaves shifted in the 10 years after it was outlawed? How about the idea of women voting? Probably more popular 15 years after it was legalized. This is a joke.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:36 PM
1

Did you just cite that tearing a woman's ear off or breaking her leg would get you a beard shave as a protection for women? Did you even read your sources? British Women's Emancipation since the Renaissance https://share.google/VaAOmZfWg8OtIsf3b Here's a great read in the shift of attitudes in the early to mid 1800's as an "epidemic" of wife beating has occurred. Using mostly news paper articles of the time. And again, the rarity of something doesn't matter, the legality and rights and equality …
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:30 PM
2

No, that's not how consent works, there is no contract that gives a person rights over another person, unless that person is second class aka, an oppressed class. It's wild you-all hand wave historical slavery, abuse and rape, as not oppression but then call the modern state of the world oppressive to men. Nobody is going to support you if you are this unhinged.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:22 PM
1

This is so interesting, so the fact that not all men did terrible things justified the laws treating women as property? Would you say the same thing if the genders are reversed, as long as most women promise not to be terrible, are men willing to lose legal rights and protections? We just bring back reverse coverture? That's the set of rules and laws that made women property btw. Unmarried women belonged to their father or eldest male siblings. fulltext.pdf https://share.google/xsuh6AAXHlnCXHA9W…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:18 PM
4

Agreed, I've had some verbal abuse but very minor all in all. I'm a strong feminist, but also into men's right activism, the tolerance for being both is much higher on this sub then many others.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:10 AM
4

I'm talking about the fact that beating your wife was legal and socially acceptable in most places until the 1900s. The telephone has been around longer than the outlawed practice of wife beating. Your framing is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:53 AM
8

Women did not have legal protections, in fact the law literally allowed it, the fact it didn't happen to everyone isn't how oppression works. Having less rights and freedoms than other people based on an immutable factor is the base line of oppression. Not every Jew ended up in a camp but they faced oppression as a class of people. If your argument is "not all women had it the absolute worst" that's one thing, but that's changing the goal post, your claim is that women weren't oppressed, but wom…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:50 AM
9

Are you saying that the fact that a person was sold into slavery based on a characteristic isn't oppression? Of course it is. What an insane (and Reddit tos breaking) thing to suggest. Do better.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:47 AM
7

No, but it does mean women as a class of people were historically oppressed. Not all men in France are paternity fraud victims, but the government preventing men from checking is a systematic oppression of their rights, well the same logic applies here. You can learn about tabacoo brides (women sold to American settlers without ever meeting them) as well as see real copies of English law texts detailing how women are legal property or the governance on how to beat your wife and children. These a…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:31 AM
7

Correct! I do stand corrected. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/rule-of-thumb.html#:~:text=What%27s%20the%20origin%20of%20the%20phrase%20%27Rule%20of,attacking%20Buller%20and%20caricaturing%20him%20as%20%27Judge%20Thumb%27
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:07 AM
6

It's not a contested subject, we're entering flat-earth levels of reality denial here, and you know that too. I challenge you to find a reputable source that disagrees.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 09:02 AM
-6

Did you read my post? I feel like you didn't, I made clear concessions for male victims. You also make nonsensical points like " tell me 4 rights men have that men don't" Then have the gall to call me a dumb idiot. This conversation is honestly beneath me. Maybe try a proofreader and some deep breathing before you rage post.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:39 AM
5

"Marital rape became a crime in the UK following the landmark House of Lords ruling in R v R in 1991, which abolished the marital rape exemption, making it legally impossible for a husband to claim consent through marriage" Rape Within Marriage - Hansard - UK Parliament https://share.google/9DgnoSFaSAi3Y3572 Edited for fact checking: History of Domestic Violence Laws in the U.S. - FindLaw https://share.google/in4uJCjz2lJu5Dxac None of this is obscured or contested history, you chose to speak on …
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:18 AM
-13

Women spend almost a quarter of their lives menstruating, a process that is as painful and stressful as a heart attack according to bio metric data, on top of that have dinner plate sized wounds on the inside of their genitals and reproductive organs from birth. These are horrific and unfair, but they come with a singular upside: the ability to have a post-conception choice. Men don't. If you wouldn't trade one for the other, you got the better deal. Also, do you want a man to pay for kids he ma…
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:02 AM
10

Women as property was a common thing, children belonged only to the husband, as did her wages. She could be legally raped and beaten, men could not. It was terrible in many ways for many people but this is just historical fiction. Historical injustices do not excuse modern day ones, so we can accept and learn from them.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:47 AM
-9

They didn't respond likely because this was partially or completely written by AI, hence the overly disruptive language and the abuse of -'s. Doesn't make it wrong, but it does make it low effort and skip able to most people.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 01:10 AM
–

Oh ew.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 04:51 AM
–

Yeah but the average conservative is too fucking moronic to realize the reason we do so much foreign trade and aid and defense spending is to keep the rest of the world trading in the USD. Trying to explain how saving $20 million is a bad thing if it means the entire gpd takes a hit because the USD becomes less traded globally is like pulling teeth. Mean words won't hurt you as bad as the peso and dollar closing the gap on each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 04:49 AM
–

In Canada it's 18 if the other party is 18+ iirc. Save for Romeo Juliet laws (less then 3 year gap)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 04:40 AM
–

My man's is 5'11 but says he's 5'10 to fuck with his best friend who is also 5'11 but says 6'0 on his tinder 😈
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 07:14 PM
–

A boar is a male pig.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:02 AM
–

Sorry I wrote hog but I meant boar. Whoops 🐷
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:51 AM
–

While it's small potatoes I do think you're failing to understand the core point here: a witch is a woman, a cackle is the laugh of a witch. Umpa loompas are not just men so it's not a gendered attack. Calling trump an orange is about his tan and body shape, but not his gender. Calling someone a fat pig isn't gendered, but calling them a boar or a sow would be. It's really not important but I thought I'd take a second to help someone understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 01:02 AM
1

I hope you get the chance to realize that dream!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 10:28 AM
3

I met my guy on wow. What charities?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 09:45 AM
–

I see that and raise you this: https://youtu.be/6-bCN2ur3pg?si=2D0_mJqz7dWCXXzM This was peek Tumblr aesthetic
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 02:12 PM
5

Nah, I sometimes read the myboyfriendisai/cogsuckers subs and the most common trait is making the AI responsible for negative emotions/scolding it. Those people want the idea of perfect and the right to rage out for less then. They Will not be missed in the human dating scene
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:11 AM
1

Mostly 2, some 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:06 AM
1

Yes, the type of physical contact has changed. I think the std risk is a huge issue here, STDs are so much worse for women already.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 06:02 AM
–

Or she was moving for any other reason, she might not have noticed you the same way you didn't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:22 AM
0

I don't think so, one carries the risk of STDs the way the other doesn't and involves nonconsensual bodily contact and fluids the way the other doesn't. I do think that using a tossed condom to try and impregnate yourself is violating consent with those fluids and should be treated the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:20 AM
–

You can't get long term benefits if you're able bodied but lazy. Those people just leech off their parents/get temporary aid. Most men work for the same reason most women do, to support themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 01:00 PM
–

Sure, I imagine that putting consent and agency back into encounters is attractive to those women. That's the point, the consent part is so important it becomes the way they frame the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 12:51 PM
–

I don't really care, it's a blank account anyways, but I appreciate the heads up!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:49 PM
–

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMDRo98eC/ The entire vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:47 PM
–

Why? It would be most beneficial to everyone. The only reason to override what's in your best interest is because you enjoy human suffering I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:37 PM
–

That's quite a position to take.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:36 PM
–

Yes, but if there is a more cost effective way then "wait until they're old and finance them until then" then we should take it. Your point is only logically sound in the absence of other methods that are cheaper and better for resources and QOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:25 PM
–

Not in crime rates, gun violence, education, health outcomes, obesity, suicide ect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:23 PM
–

My conclusion is that study reaffirms older people commit less crime and people with longer sentences are older when they get out. I said this already. There is no quantified proof the longer sentence is impacting anything that age itself would not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:17 PM
–

I want to spend money making us safer and then more stable, instead of wasting it. We could mimic Norway if we wanted too, several EU countries have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:16 PM
–

So I cross referenced your data, and what I found was that the medium age of offenders are young adults, and they are also most likely to reoffend. The longer sentences pushed the age of the subjects past reoffending prime ages. That's all. That study just proves the correlation between older people being less likely to commit crime, and that they are older by virtue of spending more time in prison. Now correlation doesn't rule out causation but looking at the Pdf you linked data charts and weig…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:13 PM
–

"Nordic countries, especially Norway, have significantly lower reoffending (recidivism) rates than the U.S., with figures often cited around 20-30% for Nordic nations compared to 60-70% or higher in the U.S., reflecting fundamental differences..." https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=ncpacapstone#:~:text=Key%20Points,United%20States%20desperately%20needs%20change. That's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:03 PM
–

I'm wiser as I age so I more often form an opinion after looking at data, not before. The Nordic models make it obvious that being soft on crime but rehabilitation focused over punishment focused is cheaper and more effective at crime reduction because it lowers reoffending. That's just me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:01 PM
–

Yeah the fact you like getting bumped into, to having your genitals ripped apart from the inside just shows how ignorant and useless the male view of pregnancy can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 10:06 PM
–

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:42 PM
–

Sure, but you'd remove yourself when told to/asap. Bumping into someone is also a far cry from being inside someone. What no longer makes it innocent is the extent of the violation and the non-removal when instructed. Just because you can't remove yourself doesn't mean the other person doesn't have the right to defend themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:15 PM
–

Anyone violating the bodily autonomy of another person isn't innocent. In any and all cases it is moral to defend your bodily autonomy from another person if they do not remove themselves from it. I'm sure you agree!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:02 PM
–

It gives you equal investment in the process and empathy men deeply lack. If you understand the pain you'd be a lot more likely to not pressure others and be more careful to cause it. I bet a lot more men would a. Be very careful about having children on purpose and B. A lot more pro abortion if having a pregnancy meant getting their organs kicked and crushed for months then having their genitals ripped open from the inside out leaving a dinner sized plate, sometimes dying in the processes. Yet …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:41 PM
–

If men wanted equal reproductive responsibility they'd be signing up to let doctors cut them so they could experience menstruation and pregnancy and birth. They are happy to let pregnancy be the sixth leading cause of death in women aged 18-35, but they want extra rights on top of that. Once it leaves your body, your choice isn't there anymore, just like a woman. It just leaves your body sooner than hers, a small price to pay for not having to deal with the extra shit. I'll be pro fiscal abortio…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:56 PM
–

He's already offered to put it in my husband's name, so lt would just be ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:37 PM
–

No, his is on a private road. But the house is the block before his road. My SO already owns the townhouse we live in, so it's not like we're getting a life line exactly, but it is a nicer/bigger/more expensive home.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:36 PM
–

Whore literally just means exchanging sex for money and you can say whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:33 AM
–

Would you guys move out of the big city to a smaller city if your FIL bought you a house at the base of his property/house? The idea is that my SO would work for his dad and I could too if I wanted, the house is almost twice the size of our current one, but further away from other friends and family. We're also worried it might give his dad carte blanche to drop by any time if we're busy leaving us feeling like adult children. I get along with his dad but my SO has a sometimes tense relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:49 AM
–

So I did some digging and the data I've found suggests that men perform worse infractions (makes sense, they cause a disproportionate amount of DUI and aggressive driving accidents according to insurance data) leading to stops where a ticket is more warranted. Sense men are more likely to drive impaired, hit and run and flee police, I find that outcomes only seem on par with behaviours. Can I have a look at your data to cross reference?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:37 AM
–

In most cases that's what happens for both parties. Often unless one party has visible marks (and that does favor women as they bruise easier and men are more likely to unintentionally mark a woman then the reverse due to strength inequality) it's a he said she said situation. The majority of DV (55% iirc) is bidirectional. So yes, men are often the sole person charged because when cops show up, she's got a mark and he doesn't even if she swung first. That being said DV isn't taken seriously at …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:22 AM
–

So just a heads up, I see the "crime punishment" disparity thrown around a lot, but people don't ever add in the context rates, for example men are twice as likely to reoffend meaning that men are more likely to get higher sentences the second or third time they commit a crime while women often are convicted only once. So if it's his third DUI and her first, he's going to be punished harsher. Women are also more likely to be complicit in the detention process leading to lower penalties, if polic…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 05:05 AM
–

Sub $50 budget: -Biodance face masks, a bath bomb, some Korean face serum and a small lotion in a hand made self care basket. -A really soft throw blanket and a book you think she'd like with a tea/coffee mug for a little book time. -cute pajamas and a teady bear. $100-400 -A nice scarf and gloves if she doesn't have one -perfume -sunglasses tickets to Cirque du Soleil or a concert/show she's interested in. a bag she likes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:39 AM
–

Blonde men see less attractive imho, I think tall dark and handsome is popular for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:31 AM
–

Those people reacted differently in your situation, and so it was by that fact a different situation. Yelling is a precursor to violence in a way crying is not. If the man cried society would also push to comfort him. I find the idea that men are forced to take accountability more than women when a convicted rapist is the potus kind of tone deaf. Like the other person said we find what we seek, but if you choose to go looking you can find lots of data that disagrees with you as well. For example…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:30 AM
–

Pew research
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 06:07 PM
–

No. Just go without men that don't measure up
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:45 PM
–

No. I'm saying that men have gone from 15% to 30% in terms of unpaid work while bills are now 50/50
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:44 PM
–

Capitalism is divorced from most of Kirk's recent talking points, identity politics and capitalism don't have to clash.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:31 PM
–

The problem is they never divorced "have a woman in your life take care of you like you're an infant" from "be more open with your emotions" So we get men who are now open with emotions but expecting women to fix it for them like it's dinner. At least from the women's perspective. Women have more agency than ever before but men are actually bringing less to the table then before, most households are duel income while the woman plays mother, maid, and therapist. Sure he's doubled his household la…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 04:28 PM
–

Or do they remember being that age and had bad experiences? Stats show young marriages have higher dv and divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 02:55 PM
–

If the second one applies to both young men and women, as it obviously would, it's still equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 10:04 AM
–

Nah. As much as some Republicans fearmonger it, Muslims typically have mass culture death of coming to the west. Turns out worshiping a pedo who thinks music, bacon, shorts and booze are evil is less appealing than just not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 10:01 AM
1

I have no idea, I don't cross reference my judgement on what I think the group think about a person would be. That's weird behavior .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:32 PM
12

Wants women in the military, but also wants men to be first class because of the military, got it, it's not just ignorance, it's dumbfuckitry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 04:21 PM
8

Then get in line to have your junk stabbed every month. You want rigid equality? Every man must now let a surgeon rip a hole from his balls to his anus from the inside out for every pregnancy he's a part of. Women should murder more men if we're trying to be equal. More women on the front line? Okay but only if we up male suicide and sexual abuse in the military to the numbers for women. Women get those resources because they are more likely to have a child with them, less than 40% of men paid f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 03:02 PM
2

The present of the USA was found guilty of rape by a jury of his peers but it's women who are insulated from failure. Meanwhile the most common type of household below the poverty line is a single mother home. Can't fail my fucking ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:54 PM
0

Sure. But he took a gun he wasn't supposed to have across state lines looking for a fight. The shooting was unfortunately justified considering the mob chasing him, but he's a fucking moron for being an instagtor the way he was .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:28 AM
1

I think voting will just become divorced from the outcomes. The center left is what was a center right position 15 years ago (less focus on social safety, more focus on not changing anything), the far left is insane. The center right is stuck being attached to the far right and is thus also insane. Want affordable healthcare that can't screw you? Want bodily autonomy for women but a reduction in teen pregnancy over all? Too bad. There is nothing left on the center so nobody gets what they want a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 08:18 PM
–

No they don't. Women topped out at 52+ and men at 51. We can both see the chart. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:19 PM
–

Yes they did add it, and look at that, women do more lmao 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 07:07 PM
–

Pew later posted an adium to that because it did not count elder or child care, meaning that this only applied to couples without children or elders, making up less then 14% of the married population. When accredited both correctly, women do more. Interesting you picked the one survey they had to amend to prove your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:56 PM
7

This is the nail on the head, it's not hypocritical to have a standard you don't meet, but it's shitty to shame others for not meeting it. It IS hypocritical to think less of people who don't meet that criteria, but not think less of yourself if you don't meet it. Holding virginity in high esteem is cool, but then you gotta be as hard on yourself then you would be that random women if you're going to add judgement. That's the crux, preferences are a different thing then judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 01:54 PM
16

Nobody is suggesting they do. People get annoyed at socially innocent stuff all the time, it's the reality of sharing space, if you're respectful when told to drop it don't let it live in your head so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 04:20 PM
–

Leading cause of death in pregnant women- the father. A Leading cause of death in women currently going through a divorce? Her ex "Not punished for their bad choices in dating" Uh-huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 01:32 PM
1

You said at the beach.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:59 PM
–

Google a picture of a Swedish grocery store. Dude thinks Ikea looks like North Korea or something, why are the ignorant the most quick to out themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:46 AM
–

Kids. It goes to kids, via women because so many shit father's aren't the primary caregivers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 03:41 AM
–

Today I learned that communist or socialist countries don't have grocery stores.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 03:36 AM
1

A shark. A shark on a beach is not that scary. Do you know how sharks work?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:32 AM
1

Where did I say nobody said stuff like that? Show me where.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:31 PM
3

There are 500,000 bears causing 2-3 deaths a year. Per capita that's a murder rate of .0005% For men it's .0011% The fact the bear is more likely to leave you alone is exactly the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:30 PM
3

In the USA: Bear attacks per year: 30-40. About 3-4 fatalities. How many women are raped per year: 463,000 (excluding young girls) How many women are killed by their male ex/partners every year: 1277+ Men are more dangerous then bears. And the fact you downplay how sad those stats are is a great example of rape culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:36 PM
1

What is this strange what-about-ism? This is about as intellectual fair as me cherry picking the conservative sub for calls to repeal the 19th, suspend women drivers, and put immigrants on a boat and then sink it. Would it then be fair for me to try and attach those views onto the entire group? No? Well apply that to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 05:29 PM
6

Bring up the gender split on reckless driving, stunting, speeding, OSHA non-compliance, extreme sport/leisure activities, high stakes gambling. A small subsect of a traditionally male dominated felid being male dominated isn't nearly as much of a gotcha as you thought it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 01:08 AM
3

That would be a problem for everyone on a societal level, not just women though? Women are already more likely to uphold the social contract of obeying laws, paying taxes, not harming others ect. What you mean is the expectation they let themselves be bough with good boy points like chattel. That's thankfully no longer a social norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 01:03 AM
3

According to meta studies done by looking at arrest, incarceration, and police report data. You'll struggle to find a study done that doesn't suggest as much. And you'd know that if you'd looked.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:28 PM
0

Nobody says that everything to do with the men is bad, what they say is that putting yourself in that position to depend on that man opens you up to severe risk. Traditional gender roles offer less escape if abuse happens. Also, Right now ideologically conservative governments have actual body counts. Women have died begging for help in hospital rooms due to pregnancy complications in abortion banned states, these doctors are unable to help until she's actively dying and then it can be too late.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:15 PM
4

Defunding the police was about defunding a branch that had become dangerous to the community. If you paid more attention to the actual movement and not headlines you'd know it was about reforming and training, basically wanting to form a new version with higher accountability. That's pretty pro-protection. Secondly by population immigrants perform less crime than citizens. It is statistically safer to be around immigrants vs natural born citizens. You feel so strongly about these subjects and ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:01 PM
19

How they vote. Women vote for a better funded government than men do on average, women are more likely to vote for governmental controls vs freedoms. Women are opposed to conservatism because it's largely the thing they need safety from. The good old days was lobotomizing teen age girls for acting out, legally being able to rape your wife, and beating her. Feminism is a response to the awful way women have traditionally been treated. Its entire lifeblood was giving women the agency to free herse…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 03:20 PM
115

Women are more able to conceptualize risk vs reward than men (studies suggest), that's why they are more likely to take precautions than men. As a gender, women are very pro-protection. Just not in the ways you think are valid. Women have a strong bias towards social contracts and funding for protection (women as a gender are more pro-tax and that funds things like the military and police) they also are more likely to be in compliance with authority figures than men. Women try to cultivate a cul…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 02:32 PM
–

Too much credit but if that works you bet we'll see a repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:48 PM
–

I live in America now, I'm married to a USC/have a green card.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:47 PM
–

Curious how much Costco will win if the tariffs are illegal, I don't blame the retailers for suing but if they win then every other store in America will follow suit and then I'll have paid the cost with the sticker price jumping AND my taxes being gobbled by retail giants. Frustration.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:26 PM
5

This. I doubt he'll actually get manslaughter but I imagine lesser charges and a hefty lawsuit.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:40 AM
4

For man slaughter you need only prove gross negligence, knowing it was that dangerous and failing to warn or intervene, it's entirely possible he was too stupid to realize how dangerous it was though.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:14 AM
2

Sounds like you expect women to know the future yet won't hold men responsible for the present.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 03:38 AM
2

Women are tax positive actually. They run tax negative household because men already disproportionately do not support their children leading to those households to dip below taxable income. Less than 40% of men pay their child support properly leading to these outcomes. It's men who get away with out supporting their children who actually benefit from those systems already.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 02:12 AM
1

Menstruation isn't normal? 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 12:42 AM
-3

Equality means cutting your genitals to your anus if you have a kid and making men bleed and cramp for a week a month. Enjoy!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 10:24 PM
6

No. Women often only know themselves months into the pregnancy, 12 weeks after that might be too late to do anything. All a man has to do is change his mind and then we have a long court battle trying to prove he was informed/said whatever whenever. His choices should not affect her. His bodily autonomy ends earlier than hers but men get off easy when it comes to reproductive cycles. No periods, pregnancy or birth. Giving them extra rights that then put undue stress of tax systems isn't somethin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 08:21 PM
–

90% of women don't sign up for casual sex dating apps. This geek doesn't know what sample bias is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 01:37 PM
1

Why do you think we hold any less ire for them? We "attack" the men here because the demographic swings left women and right men here. There are no dumb fuck red women to call dumb fucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 01:14 PM
4

https://share.google/ra5PVRdwODjMzpJU9 Or /videos/s/Qhe4E0wnB5 It's weird you've never heard of three strike cases as an attorney when they are at the forefront of the incarceration nation debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 12:11 PM
2

It makes sense when you understand it's all grift. He also said women should be at home with their children, yet his widow "abandoned" being a sahm to their two children to become ceo of a multimillion dollar company before he was in the ground. The "women should submit to men" guys wife is now a bossbabe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:49 AM
0

God the fucking Brain rot of using numbers to replace letters, what filter are you trying to sneak past lil bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 02:10 PM
1

Aww yeah that is gross. They should use the opportunity to advocate for the fact it's not just a one gender issue, although nicks a POS, he didn't deserve to be assaulted.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:10 PM
1

Ned?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 09:55 AM
1

Source on the two dudes?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 09:52 AM
1

Then you aren't allowed to defend yourself either if someone attacks you. Fair is fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:08 AM
1

Let adults do what they want with their own bodies. Jfc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 06:57 AM
1

You wouldn't say people like drinking bleach, because in a scenario a bunch of people picked drinking it over lava. That's my point. These scenarios are useless because they have non-starters. Also nobody said people are choosing wrong or I find them threatening, do you often have conversations with yourself vs what people are actually saying? Medication could help with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:59 AM
1

Who said threatening? I find them silly because conclusions based on impossible scenarios are clearly going to be wrong conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 08:38 PM
1

That's not possible. I could not love someone I'm not in a monogamous relationship with. Why do y'all think these crazy scenarios up and then go "okay but what if you do" it doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:47 PM
2

The way you respond is strange, so me. I said so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 07:22 AM
1

The way the king behaves makes loving him impossible. Why is this so strange to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 07:13 AM
1

I don't think it's bad advice, it's just only one part of a bigger picture though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 08:21 PM
1

Look where you are, what else is the point if not that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 10:07 AM
1

No,I don't personally use that as advice I was speaking to what people are thinking when they do. It's not a sinister cabal to make themselves feel better-than while inherently sabotaging someone, it's just that in the moment they think it conveys something else than what it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:56 AM
1

I think it's a really poor way of saying "relax, lean into your strengths and don't just be a cookie cutter"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:53 AM
1

I'd never tell him to hit the gym, I'd say go get a haircut and a stylist to show you how to do it, go get better clothes and a skincare routine and a colone from imaginary authors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:52 AM
1

I believe in merit based outcome, but I think we have a long way to go in giving people an equal chance at showing those merits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:36 AM
1

Being nice isn't a dating strategy it's how you choose to treat people as a blanket statement though?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 08:50 AM
1

No they wouldn't be. It's obvious to people who die of lung cancer they should stop smoking and they don't. Or that drinking is bad for you. People are really resistant to change that makes them sacrifice something. In the case of appearance it's time and effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:54 AM
2

True neutrality would be all jobs require a year of maternity leave, two months paternity leave so she has help while recovering and a year of leave after the first year taken on the couples discretion (so whoever they pick, him or her can take it however they see fit.). Women get an extra 12 days of sick leave a year for menstrual issues under 55 and men get the same after 55 to help reduce cardiac risk and promote less stress since they pose higher risks than women at that age. Societal expect…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:49 AM
1

Because we assume that person already knows. For example if the whole world knows the best way to lose weight is to eat less , and your friend comes up to you on their lunch break with their 5 sandwiches, two bags of chips and a large soda and says "I wish I knew how to lose weight more efficiently" saying "eat less" would be pointless advice, you already assume that person knows that's what will work the best, but they aren't willing to do it for reasons their own so instead you say "have you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:33 AM
1

It does though, women are obviously more likely to need more time (pre birth) and have more medical after effects. My logic holds up to what the data suggests which is that women make up a minority of the top paying jobs and a majority of the lower paying jobs. Women are less likely to be promoted within the same structure as their men peers, and we have tons of case law where pregnancy and family related concerns are cited as the reason. What I'm saying isn't speculative. It is well documented.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:22 AM
0

And yet they pair it with a T-shirt a size too big and basketball shorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:52 AM
2

Any parent benefits yes, but only women need it, so when you go to balance a budget you can bank on women needing it but men not, and if your responsibility is to maximize profits, you hire men, you pay women less to offset that cost ECT. That's the reality of the world currently. So when programs combat that, although they look like favoritism, they are just in practice a counter-balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:42 AM
0

Those three things you just listed make men more attractive as well. It's just as straightforward for them too. Look at how much more effort the suited and slicked men in the 60s, the hippie men with their long hair and their bell bottoms of the 70s, and then the glam rock look of the 80s. None of those men had extreme regimes for fitness, they had style. Men used to feel just as much pressure to be attractive and stylish as women did, but somehow that pressure fell off in the 90's-00's but we h…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:36 AM
2

Preferential treatment can be equal treatment if the end goal is equal opportunity. Women are decades behind in nepotistic connections and are still unfairly punished for the biological reality that they need time to recover from pregnancy and the social expectation they'll do the majority of the child and elder care, off setting those things by giving them more support in areas men don't need is both preferred treatment and equally because it creates a leveled playing field in the same way a tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:23 AM
0

I think the disconnect that "just be you" and "be the best version of you" is the problem. Women mostly understand the pressure of being attractive as inherent, you can't really exist and not realize it, from childhood age with Disney princesses being pretty, as a preteen seeing how all the big popstars are conventionally attractive, in social media as older teens ect. When people say "be yourself" they assume you understand how important trying to be attractive already is, and are filling in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:18 AM
1

Do I love the second, because I can't love the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:11 AM
–

Who wouldn't? He went around embarrassing her by basically saying her entire gender was less capable. Her choosing to lead a bunch of men instead of focusing on her kids only is spraying taco bell brewed liquid shit on her husband's world view and it's hilarious. That being said she's a POS for grifting too. I already see the misogynists mad about her being a CEO calling her a man on social media for her jaw line.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:47 PM
–

Charlie Kirk took every opportunity to tell women they should pause their careers and focus on child rearing and his widow is now a CEO of a company despite having two toddlers. The grift is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 12:40 PM
1

My girls nights out include spa trips and ghost tours? Bruh. Just don't date club people if you don't like clubbing as a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:49 PM
1

Why isn't that guy in jail?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 08:57 PM
1

Male, that way he won't bleed out in a hospital waiting room begging for help as he dies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:51 PM
3

Are you serious? The study was first brought to light in a playboy article and cited an AMERICAN study. Where on earth are you getting the idea it's indian? Also here's another one: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16418125/ or this one https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338461556_Orgasm_Equality_Scientific_Findings_and_Societal_Implications or this one https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490609552320 or this one https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39277-6_4 OR …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:44 PM
5

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/sex-and-relationship/080517/just-1-out-of-10-women-able-to-orgasm-during-one-night-stands-study.html Obviously not. Maybe attempt to learn before just being so loudly incorrect. Like why engage at all, just to refuse to answer and double down on easily disproven ignorance? What's the goal with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:06 PM
5

No it doesn't. The only thing a third party is getting here is that you derailed a question about casual sex to grumble about dating. Men obviously orgasm more in casual sex and studies show their refractory period shortens with new partners, on some level men have enjoyment from casual sex that women don't have. Op is asking you to explain what the counter is then, what the draw could be. Then you didn't answer and accused them of some kind of failure. That's entirely on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 12:48 PM
8

As long as we can agree he lost the gun debate by a long shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 10:27 AM
–

White guy in Utah whose family is religious, work in law enforcement and are gun enthusiasts. That's like conservative boiler plate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 02:59 PM
–

Yeah, I hope he was just some unhinged kid, but the right doesn't have the sense to be embarrassed about being wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 02:55 PM
1

->women are barred from service because men don't want them in the army and the men politicians don't make the draft gender neutral -> war breaks out -> blame women for not fighting Like????? Are you stupid or dumb with that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 04:33 PM
14

Feminists say mean things. Women are lit on fire and murdered by men for asking for equality. There is one! One case of a feminist manifesto that led to a non-fatal shooting of a single man. There have been about one or more incel mass killings a year for like half a decade now. Y'all face 0.000001% of the risk and do 99% of the bitching about blow back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:50 AM
16

Rules for thee but not for me! Energy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 05:47 AM
–

She did expose him. You don't date a chef then say cooking is banned. That's retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 11:27 PM
4

That's what it was though. Why would I call it anything else besides that? You are perfectly capable of making an argument without using misogyny or racism too. This just screams "How dare their be consequences for my actions" Like, you used a very very obvious example of a common form of misogyny and are now what? Expecting others to pretend you didn't say what you said?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:48 PM
5

Identicality and equality aren't the same thing my dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:35 PM
5

Saying that you think all woman spend their money on is shoes is a misogynistic statement. Is it based in fact? No. Is it based on stereotypes? Yes. What is it called when you tout negative stereotypes towards women despite them being false? Misogyny. If you don't want to be called a duck, stop waddling around and quacking?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:30 PM
17

"Avoid woman who want equality so you can take advantage of them" Woman avoid any man who's scared to be held to the same standard he expects from you. Thank god we already are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:28 PM
13

My grandfather worked on average 2/3 as much as my grandmother did, despite being the breadwinner because of how much unpaid labor she did. Woman are outpacing men in home ownership and debt free lifestyles, but nice misogyny bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:17 PM
14

I used the exact same anecdote as the person i responded to. So how, how on earth is that a strawman lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:16 PM
1

But they retain them less, they breed more but once people are exposed to the outside world they tend to become vastly more moderate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:07 PM
-1

Nah, there was one case in 8 years of Obama's ice deporting a US citizen, trump had 3 in six months.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:04 PM
31

My grandmother had 16. She ran a border house and raised kids while he worked a 12 hour factory job, He'd then get off work, go home eat dinner then go to a bar with his work friends till 9-10. She worked like a slave for him and the only good thing about him was he didn't hit her. AND that was normal. We had over 115 people at her funeral. Celebrating her sacrifice is not the take away here. She wouldn't want her daughters to do the same and I'm pretty sure your grandmother wanted more for her …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:01 PM
-4

I vote based on what party is going to not strip people of rights and accidently deport its citizens. I can pay for my own video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:55 PM
0

Because there are some women with vastly inflated body counts but on average they have less? Hard fucking math my dude. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm#numberlifetime And men lie more: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982912/ Sorry you don't live in reality or understand how averages work.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 04:10 AM
2

Oh yeah, seems like it. You'd have more success fucking women if you stopped making them a boogeyman. Studies show women are less likely to lie but when they do it's altruism, for the sake of feelings. Manipulation is more of a man's reason to lie. Women are also less likely to sleep with strangers than men. Your entire ethos has a big fat zero of actual data backing it up and you don't live in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:40 AM
1

"It's not true because I don't like it" isn't a valid defense my guy. Every study ever done shows men cheat more and the percentage goes up with age and time of relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 07:50 AM
2

Yeah they file because men cheat? Lmao .Who Cheats More? The Demographics of Infidelity in America | Institute for Family Studies https://share.google/Nq00sp6cRauT8sgOb
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:35 PM
4

What in the what aboutism is this? Men cheat more, twice as much in marriages 10+ years long in fact. Your point is my point lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 03:24 PM
10

Absolutely not. Men date, and even marry women they dislike for a bang maid all the time. It's easy to spot the man who will forget your name the day after you have sex with him. But it's a lot harder to spot the guy who's going to forget your birthday after year two and stops picking up after himself because at this point you are already living together and he thinks you're kind of stuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 11:26 PM
2

Not really anymore. The boomer generation is getting too old to nosologia buy classic cars anymore and the market is tanking. I'd say in 10+ years most people will be under or treading on classic cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 06:07 AM
6

Most women I know who are interested in "a lifestyle" require a lot more than a ride in an okay car for it. They expect a nice night out and a nice place before they do more than kiss you on your cheek. This sounds cap.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 06:02 AM
–

I'm hilarious intentionally and otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:35 AM
7

Because let's be honest, most people consider her a trans woman at best and a man at worst. Almost everyone does disingingish at least in part between cis and trans women. If seeing dick gets you going, then you like dick and if your a man, that's gay. That simple for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:34 AM
1

Can be sure, but how do you know as the buyer your getting A and not B, you don't. Dying in a ditch after being raped and murdered is a stastically more likely outcome then becoming a millionaire for sex workers btw, so maybe sybau when you try and use Alex falacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:45 AM
–

The truth is somewhere in between. Let small shit fly until the same thing becomes a pattern then address it before you explode.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 12:53 AM
2

We call the second Buddah because he's balding and pushing 400. No. He's not attractive (to me)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 05:41 PM
3

Both of my two best male best friends are men I'd never date, one is an attractive man with a commitment problem and kids and the other is a jolly stoner who lives off his disability and parents and has no illusions about being anything other than a burnout playing video games. Good people but awful to date. Women are friends with people they like, in my experience it's actually men who select for female friends they'd date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:33 PM
-1

Behaving better means caring about the exploitation of sex workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:23 PM
1

Not all politically conservative people go as far as to say repeal the 19th, but all repeal the 19thers are politically conservative.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:22 PM
1

Is it conservative women not stepping up or the rampant sexism in conservative spaces that might hold women back? The side that wants you to bleed to death in a hospital waiting room for an unviable pregnancy because it's God's will shockingly doesn't value you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:40 PM
3

It's buying. Selling sex is often born out of necessity or trauma. Buying sex is born out of not caring about how harmful the industry is. That being said, I think legalizing and building safety nets for these women including a big anti trafficking push would go a long way in helping both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:31 PM
7

They didn't say that. They said lots of sex workers are raped, also get off tiktok and learn to use big boy words to discuss big boy topics. Here is how often sex workers are raped: https://share.google/lHjnzJ0u7QhbBpMtJ About 70%. You'd agree that's far higher than average, and more then 2/3 is also just objectively high.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:22 PM
–

You just defended rape. Gtfo. Gross 🤮. You're a product of your ilk for sure. At least India is moving in the right direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:00 AM
3

Not enough little boys to replace the ones that grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 10:59 AM
11

That's false. You persecute rape the least, you have a super high rate because you don't punish people who do it. Hell it's legal to rape your spouse in India. It's an ass backwards country that most women who have to means to escape for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 10:04 AM
4

So just do it correctly this time?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:57 AM
4

Women didn't demand it en masse, they did it to compete with the fact that the amount of kids people have was like 2.6 and now it's down to 1.1.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:54 AM
15

I've said it a couple times but I think if warrants repeating that if you state that having a paternity test is important to you from the get-go like the first time you have the "so do you want kids?" conversation then it's completely fine. That is an absolute trust but verify kind of stance. You have a boundary that has nothing to do with the other person because you set long before. The problem is that many men who get cold feet often do so when the woman is pregnant or while the baby is alrea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 10:13 PM
11

Makes sense, girls are expected to do way more labor in traditional or immigrant households, being at home likely increased the housework they did vs boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 05:38 AM
1

You think I've never asked my fiancee out? Like "hey let's go see this movie!" And paid because I have. Lots. He currently supports me due to immigration stuff but before that we split as we went, however I would not have dated him if I thought he was pressed about the first check. A date should feel like a treat, and you should treat eachother. That's how romance thrives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:55 AM
1

Pick me used to be "pick me because I'm better than her!!" And it was about women putting other women down. That's where the critique comes from. A woman who just let's herself be a doormat to her guy is only her own problem and besides cringe/pity I think women don't really care. I think SIMPs can do the same thing "I'm not a jerk like that other dude I'm a nice guy!" And it's just annoying to get thrown under the bus in lieu of that person having a functioning personality/grounds for attractio…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 05:35 PM
2

Soft flirt, if it's not actively engaged with, stop. Don't take uncomfortable laughing and changing the subject as grounds to continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 05:28 PM
2

They didn't play the victim, decades ago women where beaten and raped legally by their spouses, denied the right to make birth control decisions for themselves, and denied fair pay and work opportunities. They were actual victims of sexism. It's crazy to call that "playing the victim"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 05:24 PM
2

Empathy is understanding why someone might fall behind, but it's not letting yourself drag extra weight. Too many men ask women to shrink themselves so they can tower. If a 18 year old girl is on her shit and has her life more together by 25 then her now 30+ year old boyfriend, why should she make it harder on herself?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:11 PM
0

The problem is that the grace period is gone for one of them. I'm going to be a lot more upset that I'm more "together" then my partner who is 6+ years my sensor. Hey your shit together to an age appropriate place, then date
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 01:26 PM
–

Obama or Kennedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:41 AM
–

Her to bring her self via orgasm via heg clit is doing what to her inner vaginal walls?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:05 AM
18

I fundamentally disagree with the notion that it's worse, it's always been that bad and the pipeline to this most disgusting content is about as vertical as a gutter drain. Roosh before his canceling (yeah, before) actively encouraged rape via intoxication and realised an article on the return of kings that said if we legalized rape then women would just have to learn to stay with a male chaperone. The sidebar itself calls women children or "the most responsible teenagers in the house" already s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 07:58 PM
11

We read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 07:37 AM
–

Generally it's a constant dull pain all day for day 1-3. I'm queesy, I feel like I have to use the bathroom but can't and am fatigued. The pain is 3-4 on your scale. I won't do a thing I don't have to do. I stay in bed with a heating pad. The pain is gone by day 4 but I'm still fatigued.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 07:33 AM
5

Anyone who's worked in oncology already knows this. I know a social service worker who helps Brest cancer patients also warns women that it'll strain the reps and that divorce rates are higher and to have a plan for accommodation and transport to chemo/radiation that isn't just "obviously my husband will take me"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 09:12 PM
–

You linked one case of false rape, in India. https://www.reuters.com/world/india/indias-struggles-with-high-rape-cases-low-conviction-rates-2024-08-15/ Enjoy that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:19 PM
3

You are entirely correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:45 AM
3

"women are as bad as rapists and murderers because they can divorce their husbands" is a wild take.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:35 PM
3

Yes it is true. Give me a source that says women rape men more then the reverse. One reputable source.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 09:14 PM
3

Why is it that these are always hand waved as so rare it's not worth taking about. The leading cause of death in pregnancy is murder from her partner. The most likely person to rape you is a current or ex partner. These are really really bad thinks to happen. Saying it's rare is not really conductive to minimizing the risk. Sure it's rare, should women then just not look for warning signs? The idea we should pretend it doesn't happen just because it hurts men's feelings to address it is a pretty…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 09:11 PM
3

Sure, let's assume most things are equal but stats say men lie more, cheat more, are addicts more, emotional abuse rates are about equal, but men are more prone to violence, sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape, serious violence and murder. Some bad things are gender neutral, but the very bad things men have a lions share on. If we have 10 metrics and 4/10 are even, 1/10 are women are worse, and 5/10 men are worse, stastically we just have more bad men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 05:17 PM
1

It qualifies them for being the baddest.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 05:00 PM
1

It's like 90/10 for murder LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 03:41 PM
3

Did you really just complain I didn't adjust and then fail to adjust? I didn't need to, men comit 90/10 of violent crimes and women are supposedly only given a grace of 15-20%. Not enough to address the gap.= Women only commit more infanticide then men when not adjusted for the fact many men abandon their children pre/post birth. When both adults have access/are responsible for the child? Its men. Again.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:39 PM
–

Do you think women don't see their friends as whole people?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 09:34 AM
0

Stop downplaying rape and murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:27 PM
0

Self defense isn't murder :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:43 PM
1

No, poor people are more likely than wealthy people because poverty is the bigger factor of crime over race and when adjusted racial discrepancy disappears besides South East Asians who just perform less crime in general. What a weird and racist take.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:32 PM
5

Sure: Women commit far less crime than men: "One-quarter of people arrested in the United States each year are female. Women commit 20% of violent crimes and 37% of property crimes." https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sociology/sex-differences-crime#:~:text=The%20study%20of%20sex%20differences,to%20engage%20in%20criminal%20behavior. Even adjusted for presumed "charged with reduced sentences/lesser charges" they still are vastly underrepresented in crime. Women commit less murder then men: h…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:27 PM
1

It's not as serious as murder? Jfc. And even if men and women did this emotional damage equally, men would still be more dangerous because they also murder more!?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:10 PM
0

Men make up about 90%. You think women are underreported/charged by 40% or more?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:09 PM
-2

No, but it is the only way to be a seriously dangerous one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:07 PM
0

Oh my apologies, yeah that absolutely would complicate things, best of luck to you!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:59 AM
0

You can see how desperate the grandma is trying, it's heartbreaking. Then the grandma tries to ask about milestones and the only thing the mom has to say is that the boy learned faster. It was over before it began for that poor girl. Also my aunt is the same way, she has two girls and a middle child boy. He hung the moon and stars but it's the girls who take her to her dr appointments and grocery shopping. He appears for holiday gifts and doesn't even help clean up afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:58 AM
0

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMSJ9MTjr This is the boymom final boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:27 AM
0

Maybe try the sub in your local city. I see gays all the time post "new to the area/new to going out looking for advice on where" and they end up meeting a few people they go out to a bar/club with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:25 AM
2

It's one reason, sure. Testosterone is linked with lower inhibitions, more anger, and yeah, increased willingness to perform sexual assaults. I'm not going to say that anyone with high test WILL do those things, but they absolutely do at least have a correlation relationship, and likely a causal one. I was interested in your point so I went for a bigger deep dive and found this study that actually aligns well with my views that men make up the best examples of humanity as well as the worst. http…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:44 AM
1

Why? As an in-group they are relatively fine. The only thing I can think of is higher crime rates? Buts because they tend to be less wealthy and that's the factor for petty crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:57 AM
-6

Women don't make up the vast majority of rapists and murders.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:36 AM
2

Actually a great little saying I'll have to remember.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:04 PM
2

I'm kinda with you, if your complaint is you just don't like someone because you have no chemistry, that's a pretty small problem. Also if every person you meet doesn't click at all that might be an introspective issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:44 PM
2

Yeah fair enough tbh. I figured sense I added qualifiers that would be enough but it's my mistake to not apply to the LCD.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:18 PM
2

I'll bite, give me an example of this "legal robbery"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:48 PM
0

There are if you want to get into the semantics of what a bad man versus a bad woman is. I would say that my standard might be different for bad than yours. I think that's significant antisocial and violent behavior is where I was coming across as 'bad" There are more bad as in seriously violent and antisocial men then there are bad women. That doesn't mean that women can't be bad in the same standards that I held for men and it doesn't mean that women aren't shitty in other ways. I just think t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:08 PM
3

Absolutely. I started the conversation by saying that I think that the original catchphrase that was being discussed is apt because there are more seriously violent men than there are seriously violent women. It's like a swamp because there is a lot of toxic harmful men. If 3 out of 10 men are dangerous and a woman has a hundred men interested in her, then 30 of those men are dangerous. If 2 in 10 women are dangerous and a man has 20 women interested in him, he has a grand total of four dangerou…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:03 PM
-1

Nobody said that women can't be bad in other ways. I literally used specific language and specific examples for a reason. You invented an argument to be mad at, but it's not an argument I made. Just like men are at the top of the IQ and at the bottom of the IQ distribution. Just like how men are both the most charitable people in the world and the least charitable men are the worst and the best examples of humanity. The problem is that when you start to think about the consequences of meeting th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:49 PM
3

Firstly, I'm not going to engage with this without pointing out that you were using minimizing language by using things like "your perception of i" its not my perception that men pose a greater risk to women women do to men in regards to serious physical violence and sexual assault. That is a factual reality. We are not going to use minimizing language. Well, I fully agree that not every conversation about what women do wrong is an attempt to subjugate or silence. It is when it is using the conv…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:44 PM
4

It's 1/3 willingly that self reported. I'd say the number is probably higher. Also... Did I do that? No. So like go be mad at them lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:29 PM
8

There has been zero studies I've seen that show that the levels equalize. Sexual harassment, yes, assault no. Happy to be wrong though if you have a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:21 PM
2

The truth hurts
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:20 PM
1

That was a weird way to say there are levels to violence?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:15 PM
4

Divorce robbery was so laughable I didn't acknowledge it on purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:13 PM
8

Disproportionately small? https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/men-dont-know-meaning-rape You mean like 1/3?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 06:11 PM
3

We can bump it to 1 and 15% then, as charitable to your point as I can be. Is 15x not still way more likely? Of course it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:54 PM
14

And I was stabbed in an attempted murder suicide by a man, do I win the trauma Olympics now? You can hmmm-and-haw all you want, men are the cause of most serious violence to both genders. Is a murderer a worse criminal than a drug addict? Is a rapist worse than a theif? Of course. It would be so easy for you to acknowledge that there are levels of bad and then men participate disproportionately in the worst levels of bad except you can't do it when it's gendered because that hurts your feelings,…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:51 PM
11

"The average man is less likely" Point where I refused that it happens to men. I'll gladly admit your right and edit every comment to say as much. All I said is that it's more likely to happen to women. The fact that you interpreted that is me saying it doesn't happen at all to men is a you problem. You can't blame me for an argument you invented.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:47 PM
5

Nobody said it's not. I just said one is worse. Are you going to tell me that eating a food that you don't like isn't any worse than drinking bleach because they're both unpleasant and you think that we should be incapable of just pointing out which one is worse. That's kind of stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:40 PM
1

No actually they're stored in the socialization and entitlement of men. They are stored in the fact that men have more testosterone and thus have a harder time controlling emotions like anger. Don't get me wrong. I don't think that we should treat men like their second-class citizens or do anything besides be aware, and raise awareness to the problem and try to counteract some of that socialized entitlement but it still exists. I don't have a problem with the statistical likelihood that women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:37 PM
7

Sure, but nothing you said negates the objective truth, that there are more men who pose a risk to women then the reverse. Completely sidelining the point to engage in lip service towards men's feelings by saying of course not all men. Of course, men face these kinds of things too doesn't change the fact. And really it's just harmful towards pressing the point that these things happen disproportionately to women from men that men are the majority of the risk. If men cannot see or read the statem…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:34 PM
-6

Lesbians pulling each other's arms, and men sending their partners to the hospital are sooo fucking different. A or B: Slapped by a woman 25 times Or Punched square in the jaw by a man twice your size You know your going to pick the first, so stop with this disingenuous slop. Also this quote does such a good job at debunking that stat anyway: "The statistic says not that lesbian relationships have the highest rates of domestic violence. It says that people in lesbian relationships have the highe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:31 PM
5

Paternity fraud is a 0.03% risk. Sexual assault is a 30% one. I think it's a tad, a touch more common wouldn't you say? Yes, men are disproportionately bad people. Not all men are bad, but of the bad people, more are men. Womp womp
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:25 PM
6

Lmao, facts don't give a fuck about your feelings. The CDC backs me up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:23 PM
15

Absolutely, but it's a serious risk. I'm not nearly as harmed if you're a bit of a cheat. But getting your teeth knocked in really sucks. So it's not the only way to be bad, but it's one of the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 05:23 PM
-50

They are though. That's what y'all forgot. The average man is less likely to be seriously harmed or sexually assaulted by a woman than the reverse. There are more bad men then bad women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 04:09 PM
0

"it makes sense when you remember it didn't happen" Is the best internet advice tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 07:28 AM
3

No, we just used to be okay with exploiting people more.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:16 AM
4

There's almost no bigger scam then making women dependant on men, then shaming women who become subservient to bad men. Like what was the other option?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:17 AM
1

Women can't vent because men also have problems is kinda stupid. No, you shouldn't talk over the other, don't come into a post with whataboutism, but both sides have equal rights to vent. Honestly if it makes a guy a spiteful incel that's on him and if he dies mad about it, 100% his choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:10 AM
–

-sigh- no. The fact that medical malpractice is twice as high in women, and it's a trend that starts young with little girls also being less believed, receiving less standard of care, doesn't care if the little boy is a typical boy. The fact that that young girls are 4-5x more likely to be sexually assaulted, does not care if the little boys act like a typical boy. The fact that little girls do more chores around their houses, double for first generation immigrant households, does not care if th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:26 PM
–

This is not true. Transphobia gets you being banned, not being critical of trans people in general. A lot of people tend to do the second pretending to do the first. I'm not, so I'm not worried. I'm not questioning if transwomen are women because they are. I'm just saying they had a different childhood than cis women, because they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:12 PM
–

Boys do less chores, and are literally invested in more as children, nearly double for first gen immigrant households. They are also perceived as more gifted at younger ages even when their female peers show similar aptitude. Young women show similar malpractice rates to their adult peers. Boys concerns about their health are listened to more. Outside of correctional facilities, young girls are preyed upon far more heavily. Girls in foster care are 4x more likely then boys to be sexually abused.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:09 PM
–

Terfy take: The fact transwomen often refuse to acknowledge much less undo the self-centerism of their male privilege by denying it ever existed is peek male privilege. Like no Emily, just because you're a girl's girl now, doesn't mean you know what it's like to go through puberty being preyed upon by adult men and sexualized like that. And you did benefit from a boys will be boys culture as a younger child. I understand they'd have gladly traded it to be a cis woman from the start, but that doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 06:42 PM
3

Females...men. Look, that majority of middle income Americans pair up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 09:47 AM
–

I'm not saying it doesn't ever ever happen, or at least I shouldn't have, but I definitely don't think it happens enough to justify the statement you can't ask women out/for her number in those places anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:36 PM
–

No, the sub doesn't let you link to other Reddit posts, just break up the url and try again or pm it too me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:49 PM
–

Could you find me a single example? I've been on this sub for 5 years, and besides examples where the person didn't take the No at face value, I've never seen it. Not saying it's not true, but I have never seen it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:11 PM
–

Good point, that behavior is a bullet dodged imho.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:29 AM
–

Nobody who takes a no has ever been stigmatized for talking to a girl at a bar, or a party or a trivia night or ect ect. Yes there is always some risk a person will be mean when you talk to them. That's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 02:29 AM
5

Nothing taught me that faster then this trick: Why don't women have more empathy for men? If you state dry dick isn't much of a real problem? Heartless shrew. If you acknowledge that it's hard for them? Viture signaling. They don't want anything but to complain, it's best to let them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:38 PM
2

Men here so quickly balk when you point out the "rules for thee not for me" standard they apply. I myself would not be friends with a homewrecker for the same reasons I would not be friends with a cheater, you can't expect to keep clean hugging someone who plays dirty.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:27 PM
1

How can they observe relationships if nobody wants those women, whom are they having the relationship with? Why wouldn't they assume these men are single because they didn't want the woman? How would they know what the standards are?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:11 AM
–

Nah, I'd want everyone he ever meets to know what a POS he is. Cheating while your partner is pregnant is like, actually your better rotting in the ground imho. That being said I definitely don't have the spite to follow through with blasting him. I'd just move on. But if I could snap my fingers and make that video play above his head for eternity? I would. Fuck him. What a worm.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 12:29 AM
–

Nah good for her, shame all cheaters. Also definitely sue the dude who reached inside her car and grabbed at her.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:52 PM
1

And yet the overlap of supporting both from the same group exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:29 PM
0

...how do you know what the inside of a box looks like without opening it to look?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 11:28 PM
9

All I said is there was overlap, enough to kinda surprise me. Nobody said huge. You invented an argument to disagree with. You're the one who picked at that very nothingburger of a statement that it simply exists and walked yourself into the corner of having to admit it happens. That's on you my guy. Edit: and anyways, my comment was definitely more just pointing out the lack of pushback from either of them means even if people aren't agreeing, they certainly aren't pointing out the fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 09:41 AM
6

... I'll go hunt down an example if you want to flat out say you genuinely believe that the overlap has never existed but I don't think you want to be wrong that badly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 09:24 AM
22

I'm not surprised by the difference in opinions, I was surprised at the general acceptance of both as fact and the cognitive dissonance to not question either. And sure, Not all the men who are the "the woman here will die alone with cats because they suck" guys are the same ones saying "women have impossibly high standards" but the Venn diagram isn't two separate circles by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:32 AM
17

If her standards are too high and she's rejecting men, then clearly some men must want her. If nobody wanted her, her standards would be irrelevant to men wouldn't they?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:32 AM
43

How does this sub both screech that women have too high standards but also it's not actually that, it's that the women here are so insufferable that no man would take them. Like most women on this sub aren't even single to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:49 AM
1

Oh yeah, that's true lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 11:22 PM
1

No, your small mindedness is. Going for train rides, going to hiking groups, rock climbing, a tour of a historical site, a museum, an art class, a cooking class, cooking food for the homeless, walking shelter dogs ect ect. Do you really just do nothing but marinate in how bitter you are? How boring it must be for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 11:21 PM
0

Being attracted to something or someone isn't transactional. Most relationships are built on the enjoyment of the other person in your life, that's it. It's not a you give A to get B thing. There are overt exceptions like sugaring or "fucking your way to the top" like Weinstein or covert "clout, cash, and connections" like with Decaprio but those are outliers. Most people date who they want because of the joy they have around that person, a completely internal feeling they get just from that per…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:50 PM
1

I feel sad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:02 PM
0

Your right, you can: A. Not give a shit B. Be ignorant C. Actually...support that shit? And C is worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 12:09 PM
2

Huge. "I'm not aware of the struggles so they don't exist and thus there is no need to fight them" is self centered and fucking stupid. Neither thing I want in a partner. Example: Him: "We don't need feminism anymore, we have equality" Me: "then why do women army vets kill themselves twice as often? Why are they 5x as likely to be sexually assaulted at work?" Him: "I didn't know that but it's kinda niche right?" Me: "and what about the fact women are routinely denied pain medication and suffer m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 11:22 AM
4

It's morally, ethically, and if it's discriminate along the lines of gender or race, legally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 11:10 AM
2

Nobody here said they are?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 07:25 AM
1

Nobody is entitled to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:56 AM
4

"as they should" To get an unfair advantage is how they should be used to you? Explain that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:44 AM
-2

People are not objects with costs and value. Most relationships are not built on transactional dynamics. This is so gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 06:43 AM
1

It's actually true though. Kids who are born to have late enrollment actually do way better than early. Bigger kids are thought to be better athletes so it becomes true because resources go there. Older kids have a bit more dexterity? Better artists. Or more mature? Gifted programs. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-athletes-birthdays-affect-who-goes-pro-and-who-becomes-a-star/#:~:text=At%20every%20turn%2C%20school%20sports,directly%20out%20of%20high%20school.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:36 AM
0

Nobody is jealous of him because he's dating a younger lady, we're concerned. Lesbian women are concerned, are they jealous? No. Other men are concerned are they jealous? These people don't want to date Joe Shmoe they just don't like it when he's creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:33 AM
11

...good? You're literally asking for the right to use male spaces to discriminate against women. No you can't have it and fuck you for wanting it tbh. This is the quiet part out loud. Men should have spaces, they should not be allowed advantages because of them. The big brothers club, volunteering with older Vets, all male spaces. Go do some good.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:22 AM
5

Girl children are more likely to be sexually abused, adult women are vastly more likely. Women are more likely to be threatened, stalked, harassed by coworkers and potential or ex partners. Women are just as likely sense 2021 to be victims of violent crime as men on top of that. Girl children do more chores and family care then boys, so do adult women. All the data in the world disagrees with you. It's like your entire idea of a woman comes from like a rich YouTube vlogger.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:09 AM
4

If he hates it then he isn't compatible with the woman there anyway. And if he hates every single thing you could do to live a more full life and/or meet people then he has depression or some other mental illness to work on first. No sane and safe person hate doing everything that isn't sulking alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 02:04 AM
–

The majority of my friends are women, it was a women bitching about a woman. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:28 AM
–

Lmao right? Or like, it just comes across as "my parents didn't kiss my ass the way parents do now" Yeah and your parents didn't make you drown barn cat kittens in the river like your grandparents had to. That's how progress works. Get over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:36 AM
–

I'm honestly such a shit friend when it comes to empathy for parental stuff. Like oh fucking boo, your mom is a bit annoying and self centered, she's a fucking person, we all are. That's not a real problem, certainly not enough you need to bitch about it. Of course I don't say that shit but like "I was yelled at/ignored/wasn't encouraged" boohoo is such an exhausting archetype.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:17 AM
–

He's cute! Needs a better haircut and a decent profile shot but at least he's not in gym shorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:27 AM
–

Women are still very feminine, they thrive off emotional outlets, they have strong in group bias, they have high risk aversion. What they aren't, is subservient to men anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:24 AM
1

Conscription predates women voting means it existed before women had the agency to vote for the people who set the system up. Reading comprehension zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:48 PM
8

It's so depressing talking about who's worse for women. Can men just not do this shit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:41 PM
–

Living with the parents is for the successful kids till marriage, the loser kids get shipped off to closet sized apartments and out of sight out of minded.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:07 AM
–

Nono, I mean like people take it that way, that's why you get the pushback, people are afraid that if they outwardly acknowledge that, people will assign moral judgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:29 AM
–

I work out entirely because I have to. I loathe it the entire time. The best part is the shower after which I feel like a human again. I enjoy the outdoors, hiking and camping because of nature, but like, jogging just to jog? Fucking ew. I think me and you are not the same species of human. And that's ok. Too many people imho think that it's some weird moral failure when people don't meet their requirements so you get comments like the one in your op. Like it's totally okay if people select for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:13 AM
–

Vault dwellers eattin good tonight
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:08 AM
–

If I have a destination wedding I feel like I should be responsible for the travel of those I invite. I always found it silly when middle income people try to convince 40+ people to drop everything to fly to like Bali just for a wedding and are shocked that so few people are willing to go
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:05 AM
–

I feel like the scores on this trend lower because the vein diagram of intelligent people and people shelling out $15 usd for a fake online test are two perfect circles far apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:02 AM
–

Sure, but that's a niche market. If you want gymgirls then it makes sense to be a gymbro. If you want to stay home and watch breaking bad' season 4 for the 5th time instead, then find your audience who's into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:57 AM
–

The sex industry is notoriously exploitative, until that's fixed, I think the shame is a way to minimize that impact and it solves a net positive purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:54 AM
–

Low T women poison their men or get the side piece to kill him. Modern women just do what a man does and squares up. I'm kidding of course, mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:03 PM
–

If he did he probably wouldn't have gotten Valerie Solanas'd. Tbf, if anyone deserved to shoot a guy, it was her. Just the wrong guy. Unless he did actually steal her shit. Then fuck em.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:00 PM
10

Some people want more, you aren't compatible and so you should just move on. Of the one friend I have that is high maintenance, her nails, hair, eyelashes, lips, tits, jawline and ass are all fake, and that cost hundreds of thousands. The men she dates can afford that lifestyle and have that expectation of the girls they date. She wakes up two hours before she needs to and does tons to look amazing even to just hang out. She expects a man to buy her what she wants or she'll find someone who will…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 06:57 PM
3

Most manuals with a menstruation cycle?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:27 PM
4

Or, maybe your just ignorant of how prevalent the problem is?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:00 PM
4

https://www.cdc.gov/sexual-violence/about/index.html#:~:text=Sexual%20violence%20is%20common%3A,experienced%20completed%20or%20attempted%20rape. You think the CDC doesn't live in reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 03:06 PM
5

You think 1/4 women being raped is as low as it could be? How the fuck do you think that. Do you know the most common defense in rape cases? That he thought she was consenting. When we teach what active consent is, rape rates go down. You're saying you don't think any more men are able to learn that being drunk, being asleep, freezing in the act, saying no, stop, ow even once and even if you've had sex with that person a thousand times before, even that same day means you should stop. I think me…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 02:32 PM
–

Yeah a lot of younger children resent the disciplinarian parent despite that often being the primary caretaker. They only see the part time parent 2x a month or less so it's typically all just fun and games with "sush don't tell" staying up or eating junk food. It basically bribes the young kids into thinking that the primary parent is just mean for no reason. "Timmy sit still, don't run in a hospital!" "Dad lets me run wherever I want!" "Well then your dad can take you to the doctors!" I can re…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 08:16 AM
3

"I oppose things that would lower the really high amount of rape for my own self interest ' "Men aren't trash because we aren't all rapey" My brother in Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:31 AM
–

Tbf, I think learning not to bite the hand that feeds you is important. Too many dads (but any part time parent) gets the gold star for showing up 3x a year with a gift or vacation, no bed time ect. I don't think that's how you say it to a kid that young and def not in public, but it's really important to know
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:21 AM
–

That's really gross. You aren't entitled to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:06 AM
–

I'm saying if everyone is allowed to exploit labor, they will. How can a business compete if it treats it's workers well but that increases costs if other business are allowed to harm it's workers to cut cost?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 02:03 AM
-5

Tbh, I don't think your comparison is fair. I wouldn't care if someone pre-vetted me on the basis of political ideology, employment, criminal record ect. I'd vet for that stuff too. However, strangers knowing about your sexual history/ex's is just inappropriate for either gender. You kinda compared A to B when you could have just done A to A here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:55 PM
–

My father in law's land in UT. He owns a really nice platou of land above the city and has breathtaking views.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:51 PM
–

Worse, stretch them out so two loops is too loose, but three is too tight and pitchy still.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:50 PM
–

Yeah, it's almost like workers rights are about protecting people and easy access to pussy isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:48 PM
–

I don't, and neither do most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:24 PM
–

More like "I already have a jacket myself to keep warm, so why buy a cheaper coat I don't need? The designer brand fills a niche in my life, but I don't need extra junk coats"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 05:27 PM
–

If they weren't happy and they could just do something as simple as date the apparently long line of "good enough" guys to fix it, they'd use that agency to do so. That's obviously not a fix, but the reality is, it's not a problem. The mass majority of women are not bemoaning having to be single. As a demographic, women enjoy it more than men do. This is a one sided issue that sometimes men use the " where have all the good men gone" bemoaning a woman does after dating a bunch of losers to prete…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 05:24 PM
–

Women do things men don't agree with even though it's literally just their own lives they live so it's a problem. No. "I love burberry coats, but the brand sells for too much money. It's a problem. The brand isn't even giving regular women a chance!" That's a stupid statement, and we're talking about coats. You are far less entitled to date a woman than you are to buy a coat. So adapt, or don't and feel sorry for yourself, fine. But it's not a problem, it's not something to be "solved" that wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 04:56 PM
1

Their on apps, like Raya where the bar to entry is higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 06:26 AM
–

You go lil dude
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:49 PM
–

When I got engaged the last guy I had been seeing hit me with "I wish it was different, being with you was the last time I was happy" And it doesn't feel as good as you'd think it does. I just felt sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:47 PM
1

<image> Yeah you're right, he looks so gay now with his nicer facial hair.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:44 PM
1

No guarantee sure, but even children understand the logic of taking turns. I think there is merit for that argument. As we've seen equality grow between vectors of sex and race, the quality of most of those demographics have gone up. It does stand to reason that letting those demographics hold majority power might further cement those markers. It's certainly a valid argument for it anyways. If we truely wanted equal opportunity, you'd have to oppress white men for a few centuries first before yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:46 PM
5

Not really. Men are free to want what they want, and be disappointed in the reality of what's available. If he's content to be disappointed then all the power to him for that standard. Let people date or don't date who they want. That's just the most fair and only real solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:39 PM
10

Having expectations is about having freedom. A woman can now say you need to be superman to date her or she'll stay single forever, and that is her right. To say she isn't allowed her expectations is again, to infringe on her freedom. You are not owed women changing what they want because it would benefit you. Women being less happy about who they date to make men happy isn't making society healthy just because it's reverting back to an old way of doing things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:03 PM
0

"wouldn’t he reckon that one good way to change structural violence and inequity would be to refuse the power that comes with it?" That's actually a good point about any privilege of all kinds I might sit with for a bit. The rest, idk, I understand her frustration with how masculinity is weiled like a weapon in a lot of the world, but it gives a lot of wanting to burn the good with the bad that I don't agree with. She laments that we disengage toxic forms of masculinity from all men, but I think…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:59 PM
13

I don't know anyone feminist or otherwise who doesn't acknowledge that the shift to women being able to choose men for reasons that they previously didn't have the agency to do, is causing men to struggle. Societal shifts are clearly the reason (that and anxiety+obesity) that young men are struggling. I don't see anyone denying that. The only thing I see, and agree with is, it's the best option. Letting women have equality and freedom, even if it causes issues for some men, is the net positive. …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:49 PM
1

It absolutely is. "The curriculum for our fifth grade class includes two group projects about the solar system" Or "The curriculum for our fifth grade class includes a Field trip to the planetarium and a test after about the solar system" Curriculum is both the subject and subject matter included in a course. How ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 01:31 PM
–

If I'm awake okay, if not, that's fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:56 AM
1

Interesting every source I found said explicitly that teachers/schools are in fact able to grade along their own standard. "In educational settings, the instructor or professor of a course determines how much a test is worth, typically expressed as a percentage of the final grade. They decide the weight of each assessment, including tests, exams, papers, and other assignments, to create a balanced and meaningful grading system" That was sourced from r/teachers when someone asked in 2023. Edit: f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:01 PM
2

It's more common in Asian immigrants/lineage. The hospital I used to work at had a big pinoy population, and a tall men for them is like 5'6.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:56 PM
1

Grading break down and timings of classes are set at an above school level? Do you have a source for that please?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:53 PM
1

Well yes, but my example was of an absentee parent being the one to blame? The mother is the one who owes the support/isn't doing her part.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:51 PM
1

Yes they do. In the sense they are free to plan assignments, outings, tests/quizzes and set the grading percentages within guidelines. At least in Canada, I might be ignorant of your system. Shifting the majority of grading towards homework away from testing punishes boys who underperform on assignments but perform well on testing. Boys also learn better with operational reaching (field trips, experiments ect) whereas girls learn just as well both from text as operation. Those are things schools…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:48 PM
3

...I haven't? That's a really weird twisting of the idea that society has a softer landing pad/contingency for bad dads that it doesn't for moms. So not having a mom is just going to be harder. There are also more programs and help available for moms than dads. Like I'm really curious how you arrived at "bad mothers are to blame for a father's failure" when nothing I said was suggesting of that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:42 PM
0

Superintendents don't largely set the curriculum as a whole besides guidelines being met. The amount/timing of recess, and homework vs testing is largely decided at a school level. So yes, I have an issue with policy, but not the policy superintendents specifically set.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:37 PM
-1

Oh my god, the fucking way they talk to eachother makes me think some of them have uhhh "bigger" problems then being an inch shorter then the average. But that's just Reddit in a nutshell. Tall order to find people who don't just get offended by disagreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:33 PM
0

It clearly does. Studies show that time outdoors, physical activity breaks and test based merits all help boys do well in school, and have no or negative effect on girls. All of the three things I listed above are being shifted out of schools. I don't think it's insidious or purposeful but it is demonstrated as a pattern that is happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:08 PM
5

I think 2 is incredibly potent as someone who had a bad mother. In a society where moms are a status quo and dads are a "maybe, probably" the social and psychological damage of having the assumed defacto parent suck was huge. You know how schools will do special stuff in fathers Day if their demographics show most kids don't have a present one, or how big-brother clubs exist to give boys good male role models? A lot of that isn't available for kids without moms because it's an overlooked problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:00 PM
-2

No they aren't. It's about 50/50, and the rest is heavily female dominated, meaning as a whole the "industry" has a female power bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 05:56 PM
5

Women are more likely to be "victims" of the halo effect where attraction has paved the way for most social interactions in their lives, stunting their empathy and understanding that they shouldn't always just get what they want. On that note, women are more likely to face disordered eating and body image issues than men. While it's more rare for moms to be deadbeats, when they are, they are far worse. Moms who owe more then $1000 child support are far less likely than men to ever pay it. Women'…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 05:49 PM
–

Homie the only thing you fight is the embarrassment of being 35, and less together than most college aged kids. Your parents would have figured it out, their the ones who didn't end up middle aged with nothing. The least you could do is acknowledge that they're ones you owe not the other way around. Also, it's men. "Men have 2 percent more credit card debt than women. Men have 9.7 percent more mortgage debt than women. Men have 20 percent more personal loan debt than women. Women have 2.7 percen…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 09:28 AM
–

Retire by still dealing with a young adult living with them? Creating noise, smells, and just more of a burden? You think they dreamed of that when they brought you home? Lmao. Edit: you're own post history proves you've 35+ and have been unemployed or under employed for the past few years. You aren't helping them at all lmao! Mooch! What a con.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:31 AM
2

No they don't. Joint Chiefs of Staff are selected under the president, but all other positions under them are internally selected. The senate has no part in this process for anyone besides the secretary and chef. The decision to allow women into combat rolls in the army was officiated by the Defense Secretary in 2016, however the Marine Corps in 2015 did so internally first without the subject reaching the secretary at all. Also, the senate at the time (and currently) is still 75% men, so even i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:29 AM
–

So yes. You're an adult man baby living with your parents mad nobody will respect that. You aren't pooling resources, you're denying your parents the rest they should have earned by raising you. If you had actually grown up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:12 AM
–

A lotta yapping, but nothing that actually refutes what I said. Nobody votes for DOD heads btw, so sorry it burns your bottom, but the things you walk around stomping your foot at? The fault of men uniquely. Womp womp.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:02 AM
3

You sound like you're trying to excuse being a loser? Like are you trying to pretend that renting doesn't exist so you can feel better that your mommy still cooks your tenders for you or?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:43 AM
7

This was chock full of such gems as "250 years ago expectations were different" You know who decided who went to Vietnam? men. 40 years before the Seals, army or Marines would even let women apply to combat units. It was a male president and male heads of the DoD. So shove it up your ass. Stop being mad at women for the choices of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:40 AM
1

Ahh it's always disappointing when you suspect someone is unable to answer a question in a way as to maintain their view of the subject so they just disengage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 09:34 PM
13

Probably not, I'm not even sure your own parents are accepting of it. It's...kind of embarrassing that an able bodied man would take advantage of his elderly parents like that, and it's not somebody I'd be proud to show off to MY friends and family. Perhaps you'd be able to find a woman who is equally comfortable with mooching off her own parents, but even she's probably just looking to replace her parents with her partner. I just don't see you having much success, of course never say never, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:34 PM
18

You're presumably 28+. Yet you have few adult skills. This isn't just about finances, it's about you effectively being a teenager a decade past when it was acceptable. No women at 28 wants to plan her weekend of coming over and watching a movie with you around what time your parents go to bed. This is about your failure to launch, not her monetary expectation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:23 PM
0

It's strange you asked me to respond, then didn't bother to engage with it. Can I ask why?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 07:17 PM
–

They made vtmb? Love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:59 PM
–

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 02:57 PM
–

Lush does top, dropped yesterday!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 06:41 PM
3

I'm bisexual. I like masculine men, and feminine women. I definitely have a preference for androgynous features, but not so much mannerisms. I imagine heterosexual women have even less tolerance for it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 06:07 PM
1

I mean, that was a janky way to put it, but yeah, there is some truth to gender stereotypes needing to be true for attraction. If a man is a hand talker, talks in a high pitch, walks like a woman, sits like a women...he probably isn't going to be attractive to most heterosexual women. But a man who carries himself in a traditionally male way is going to be more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 05:55 PM
–

Healthcare costs are the biggest factor in suicides for adults aged 40+ in the USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:06 PM
–

About as science based as those fucking Briggs personally type bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:05 PM
–

Socialism is so bad that only every country in the world with better QoL metrics then the USA practice it. Without unions you'd be allowed to be mulched without any safety precautions and paid company script. Anyone without singular power advocating to remove their collective power is a mouth drooling idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:03 PM
–

No, I just find people who are overly people -pleasing to be tiresome and not fun to engage with. When you amp it up to a sexual level it just feels silly and like it's roleplay. I'm not into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:45 PM
–

Not secretly. I find submissive men not at all attractive. But I'm sure submissive men have the same view for non-dominate women. It's just the luck of the draw.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 09:33 PM
3

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9967946/ It declines until about 24, more so, the global ahe gap in a marriage is 4 years, almost all marriages globally have at least (92%) a gap of one year, and in couples where the woman is under 21 the average was 4.5 older men. It's evidence based. Men who date young women (legal age of consent to 24) tend to be older, and those relationships have the highest rates of abuse and divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 07:53 PM
–

That's an exercise in humiliation imho.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 07:44 PM
0

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3706999/ It's just science based.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 07:39 PM
4

Did you just repost the same drivil without the weird racist tangent? We already went over that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 01:42 AM
–

<image> All we did was get it to redraw photos of us with our cats LMAO. $20 a month well spent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:29 PM
2

No I don't think women always have it worse, but men are always the majority of the people who have the means to change things. So you blame those who could but don't. Not those who can't..
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:27 PM
–

Nah. If he's paying $kk for it, you might as well show it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:19 PM
5

There is no "fixing" who people want to date/fuck. It's rapey and weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:16 PM
6

No your right the vast majority won't. But the vast majority of women will experience sexual harassment and gender based discrimination at the hands of men. Poverty and social power are the reason other demographics have crime issues. Men have wealth and power, it's a behavior problem for them. It's different. There are less homeless women because they enter into sexually exploitative situations because choosing your rapist is better than taking the gamble. So much better. Most of those problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 08:04 PM
–

World hunger maybe. I was thinking about a cure for cancer but that would somehow just get gatekept by the rich west anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 03:30 PM
8

Men literally rape and murder women in vastly disproportionate numbers. Men literally hold most wealth and power. Feminism isn't just crying that men won't date them. Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 03:20 PM
2

Yeah cheating two months into a oopsie marriage is way worse then after 25 years and two kids. This is going to be embarrassing to reread one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 07:09 AM
2

Yeah, those 3-4 years are huge vs the 40 after.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 09:57 PM
7

https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:32 PM
3

It was an example, I am engaged and never married.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:30 PM
8

It's the straw that breaks the camel's back. Example: I divorced my husband because he left the fridge open, for the 300th time. I've begged him to stop and he won't. It's the unwillingness to respect the partner, not the single instance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 07:33 PM
9

The cheating partner often isn't the one who files. Men by 40 are twice as likely to cheat
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 07:30 PM
–

Sure, but that doesn't change it was mostly men does it? Saying that men are a bigger issue isn't saying women isn't one?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:37 AM
–

No, it was an explicit goal of the Republicans.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 02:30 AM
–

I just said that on a earlier post! How is it possible
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:56 PM
–

Abortion actually being stripped vs there was an idea of floating the draft Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:51 PM
8

You: Older women are just jealous they didn't realize they deserved better sooner Also you: The old women are jealous that those same men aren't also treating them like shit. Hu??
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:48 PM
18

Before kids? Cool.i it's a boundary. It's not me it's him. After? It's an accusation. If you respect your wife at all, you talk about it before you have a baby. Hiding your insecurities to then weaponize them against the mother of your brand new child is evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:45 PM
–

The president of the United States is a rapist. Seems like we actually just give out prizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:48 PM
1

What does that have to do with anything? Are you going to pretend you didn't know who the president of the United States is?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:26 PM
5

Sorry you're a rape culture supporter. Maybe women would like you better if you didn't. Your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:05 PM
3

Yes you do. Like on a statistical reality you do. You absolutely motherfuckin do. Do you know who the president is? Boom. That's a rapist. Are you pushing back against the fact he's been found guilty of rape and yet sits at the highest seat of power? Are you sure you're not buried in the sand?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:02 PM
9

Yeah with the prominent figures it's always like "well in retrospect there are a million red flags sure, but he seemed nice" How does a guy who treats women Iike shit ever seen nice? "That's Tom, he's a great guy except he kicks puppies" isn't something anyone says, but with women they do. How they treat dogs is more a litmus for being good then how they treat half the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:53 PM
0

"I know he's throwing tomatoes at you, but saying mean things about us not taking it seriously hurts my feelings" you piss and shake and cry, while wheeling a new cart of tomatoes out. Mhhhm.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:49 PM
3

Every woman has a story, no man know who it is about. Perfect example. 1/3-1/5 women are sexually assaulted. But no man knows our of his 3, 5, 7 friends anyone who would do that. The math doesn't math. Harmless men protect harmful men by intentionally staying ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:30 PM
2

Minimum height, my shortest ex was 5'7. At 5'0 I'm definitely ok with that. I might even go 5'6 but I know shorter then that men tend to have a complex so 5'7 is safe. Minimum fintness level chubby is ok, cute even, but must be able to hike, camp, stand or walk all day. Minimum income if in education, $0. If not about $35-40k a year. Maximum amount of unappealing male hobbies, I love video and table top games, so awesome. I tolerate anime ok, my fiancee is into f1 and I'll get up early to watch …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:46 PM
6

I'm so fucking dumb. Happy first of May everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:06 PM
2

"The hormonal gel, developed by the Population Council and the NIH, is applied to the shoulders and works by suppressing sperm production while maintaining testosterone levels. The gel works with the same principles as female hormonal birth control, which uses two hormones —progestin and estrogen— to prevent pregnancy. “The gel has a progestin called Nesterone, which prevents the testes from making sperm,” explained Mitchell Creinin, professor of obstetrics and gynecology and a family planning s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:09 AM
2

I didn't block you? Lmao. Also no, bodily autonomy is important. Biology isn't fair. Men don't have to deal with menstrual cycles, pregnancy and birth, but they are simply responsible for their own reproductive choices earlier than women. It's still the far better deal. Men aren't dying because of the pregnancy the way women do. Be greatful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:43 AM
2

...yes it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 03:43 AM
4

I agree, all pregnant men should make that choice for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:23 PM
3

The side effects in women's can include death though? The only ones I see listed for Testosterone-progestin injections: Acne Mood changes Weight gain Decreased libido
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:21 PM
3

Women are allowed to have standards you don't think they should have? What business is that of anyone's?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:24 AM
2

Do you think that guy Bs standards for women aren't higher than the women A? Of course they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:59 AM
1

Are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:16 AM
1

There are tons of dangerous jobs that pay well. Underwater welding is vastly dangerous but pays insanely well. Nobody is going to call that a shitty job. Same with being a pilot, but that's the job right under sanitation for danger, it's a dream job. Danger is not a reflection of the desirability of a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:15 AM
2

You are using opinion articles to try and prove a fact, did they not teach you in school what an actual source is? Go find those studies and link them. Smh. Education crisis frfr
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:10 AM
-2

Hmmm.....maybe the same sexism that keeps them from all trades? "McGuire says when she started working in the sewers her male coworkers weren’t comfortable training her to do the job. "They didn’t know what do with me," says McGuire. "I was 120 pounds, 21 years old. I wanted to go down into the sewers, but they wouldn’t let me do anything but sweep. It wasn’t that they were mean to me, but I think they saw me as unusable material. It would be like a man showing up at a quilting bee." She mention…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:04 AM
2

I don't even think you read the study conclusion tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 07:19 PM
2

3 opinion articles and one study that's conclusion is "In urban midlife low-income women, lifetime physical abuse and emotional abuse/neglect are associated with increased feelings of loneliness." Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 07:01 PM
5

Ignoring the fact that gender discrimination is very real and alive, Aren't the men working trash jobs also given equal opportunity to work those better jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:18 PM
1

Wow, almost a quarter. What does women who don't work have to do with women who want to work having equal opportunities?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:50 PM
5

That's all entirely irrelevant to the point that men don't seek the shitty jobs that women disproportionately do, and those ones pay worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:41 PM
–

Book stores in the dark romance section.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:34 PM
1

That's like saying men need to demand equality in shitty gas store cashier jobs. Nobody wants them, but at least the trash collection pays double what that poor cashier makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:32 PM
2

Where is the lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:29 PM
5

Absolutely. I'm not saying women can't be awful of course, but I wish men would lean more into doing things socially instead of suffering. I hope more men who are comfortable doing community/social based self care can normalize it. I rarely agree with the manosphere but I'm so pro-male socialization and community. And sports! I think a big problem is schools have dropped funding for more physical activities, and private ones can be too expensive. Young boys learn how to bond on the playground in…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:28 PM
7

So it's not sexism because it's biology? Then why isn't the draft being men still sexist if they're picked...due to biology? Wouldn't it just be more fair to let women have an equal draft and just lower the standards, and if you or her die because she can't do what a man could, too bad that's equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 11:28 AM
38

The funny thing is women are vastly more likely to build platonic connections and have friends family and community as a social outlet. It's men who don't want to be, or can't make friends and die alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:05 AM
1

Historically pedophilla was more acceptable (along with rape, murder and torture), it was still pedophilla. And you are at least a pedophilla advocate if not one. Above my pay grade.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:31 AM
1

That's a lot of justification for pedophilla.get some help.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 02:42 AM
1

"because of the law" How about because it would make you a pedophile? Sick. I'm reporting this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:11 PM
25

Conscription predates women voting. You know what else is relatively modern : 2015: navey seals pipeline opens to women 2016: the year that the Marine core lifted the ban on women on combat rolls. These are not voted positions. Those departments lead from inside. Men are the biggest gatekeepers to women in war.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:51 AM
–

Then tell him that. Sense you take an unequal burden and risk ( if any of those are incorrect you'd be the only one on the line) that it's unfair you aren't paid for the harder and more risky work. You consistently lighten the load of the business by performing those tasks, and you provide quality work that helps earn the good reputation your business has.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:45 PM
–

We shop at Harmon's, but there is also a chain called Macey's. Back in Canada Macey's is a clothing store lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:36 PM
–

What do you do more then the intern, think about that, then take those extra values to your boss and explain sense you do all that, you think you deserve better compensation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:34 PM
2

No. Not really. Fertility is highest at 17-25, but so are miscarriage rates. In terms of healthy babies being born it's 27-32. Conception issues don't typically arise till 38+
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:58 PM
2

11 years for me and my sister, and 32 years between my dad and his eldest siblings 18-50. He is a great uncle to people older than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 09:54 PM
12

The "why is moms stocking empty" trend just makes me realize how shitty a lot of men are. They don't even love like their wives much less more. Then when women started matching energy on Father's Day/Christmas the men get upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 04:30 PM
–

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Zionism It's not my definition, it's the academically accepted definition from 2024 and backwards for about a few centuries. I didn't bother and won't read the rest because it probably all falls apart after that. Toodles.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:50 PM
–

Men literally kill people at a 9:1 ratio, and burn down cities over sports, but it's women who are too dramatic?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:59 AM
–

Real peanut butter is delicious. That vegetable oil stale ass musty garbage in anything you didn't grind yourself at the grocery store doesn't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:54 AM
–

This is what I mean. A Zionist is anyone who thinks Israel has a right to continue its existence and that it's the Jewish ancestry homeland. Israelis who support the settlement and occupation of Gaza are all Zionists but not all Zionists are Israeli-right. In fact most aren't by the population numbers. Why are stupid people so loud in their stupidity. Thata all I'll say on itm hopefully you have the good sense to be embarrassed but I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:48 AM
–

If everyone is a Nazi does the word have any meaning? Like surely you understand there are atrocities beyond just conquest that make Nazis unique? Wait nevermind I'm done with this. Enjoy the shiny smooth surface
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:16 AM
–

Spain, Portugal, France, The Ottomans, the Muslims, the Romans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Christians ect ect. Every culture that was able to dominate has done so. You get one culture ahead of the rest and borders become optional. See: Gulf of America or 51st state .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:38 AM
4

To many people, yes. Gay men find masculinity attractive, and while women don't as much they often do. It's a bit silly to pretend that in the free world masculine men don't do better because that's what attracts women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:34 AM
11

Feminism is the power to choose those men though, because they don't need one. That's the whole stick, you are free to support yourself and choose who you want. Women just choose attractive men, because duh they want to. If no attractive and fair man excists they'll be ok on their own. The only people who would benefit from...shaming? Women into dating men they don't want is unattractive men, and that's not very feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:13 AM
–

I've decided anyone who thinks Zionism is akin to the Nazis is too retarded to spend time on, and my only hope is they find actual use of their brains without help.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 09:09 AM
2

Always a great idea to wait for like the 2.0 On that note, less important I don't buy single player games anymore until their 6-12 months old. Day one no man's sky vs now? Different game. Day one cyberpunk? Unplayable. Now it's fantastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:26 AM
2

Now that I agree on. Although to her credit she was a very early adopter of both top and bottom surgery, I think in the 70s, so they did a great job considering.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:55 AM
0

She's 57 years old. Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 01:41 AM
0

I used a non-edited live picture for this reason. You don't have to say yes of course but the idea she looks like a man is pretty far out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:58 PM
-2

warning nude image of women https://www.flickr.com/photos/therealherlocher/2949857685 Her standing beside you would look like two men?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:31 PM
13

That just sounds like regret and heartbreak. If I like someone and I know it's a bad idea the best thing is to remove myself from that situation, not make it worse
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 02:31 PM
20

Yeah, it's a need. I have zero interest in sleeping with someone without being monogamous and at least in the starting stages of love. The idea of fucking a guy who I don't care about gives me the heebie jeebies
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 12:15 PM
–

Mix a paint remover and paint together then paint with it, tell me how it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:45 PM
–

https://a.co/d/bccC2OK And no, a shampoo that strips your hair cannot condition it at the same time. They need to be separate applications.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 01:29 PM
14

It's hard because we think your fucking gross and don't want to talk to you. How about taking accountability for being either a weird older loser or someone who goes on the internet to defend weird old losers?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 01:23 PM
–

Cook for me and let me fuck you with no pressure on my side for anything! What a fucking jackpot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:41 AM
–

What's worse is to achieve that outcome, you need to involve rape. They like to avoid it, but what else would women sleeping with men they don't want to, be called? It's morally disgusting to advocate for equal outcomes if those outcomes rely on the stripping of bodily autonomy for half the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:11 AM
–

You sure did. Feminism is about equal rights for women. The male loneliness epidemic is men can't get women . One of those is not really an issue of equality. Both genders have the same right to have a partner that wants them. Women don't prevent men from making strong platonic bonds or familiar ties. Men do hold power in levels of government and religion and suppress equal rights for women. See?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 09:16 AM
–

Having access to use women as fleshlights =\= basic human rights. Holyyyy fuck. Dude come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 09:08 AM
5

And you don't think those people are stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:51 PM
–

I believe we can. It's just not cost effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:48 PM
6

So you think reproductive rights and the super bowl are equally important then?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:45 PM
8

Somone will kill themselves over the Superbowl results. Is your team wining the super bowl life or death?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:42 PM
6

No it can't. Facts don't care about your feelings. You aren't standing up to a bully, your shaking your fist at reality and looking silly at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 02:12 PM
0

I'm not jumping to anything. It's not a good idea to have a child as a teenager with a man you don't know well. Even if he's superman that doesn't change how hard and unprepared or incompatible they might be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:28 AM
2

...you think women don't buy their men dinner or gifts? My guy is currently wrapped up beside me in the blanket I knitted for him, in the slippers I bought him ffs. If you don't give that kind of love you can't expect it back.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:15 AM
6

No, because you said "the best way for men" that's a pretty objective statement. "I've found that splitting checks is the best way to weed out gold diggers" or something more subjective would have come across way different. I think expecting to date someone without romantic gestures, gifts, and wooing is actually the entitled bit. I think both parties should be trying to attract the other and make a good impression, and part of that is buying each other dinner, movies ect. Idk how you expect rom…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:05 AM
2

Do it anyways and start some family therapy. A child doesn't get a say on if it has siblings. That being said it should get the floor to express it's feelings and have time for the family to agree on solutions and compromises.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:52 AM
0

Because they don't like that a teenager is pregnant with a baby from a man she's dated for less than a year?!? And that the dude isn't taking the pressure of it seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:50 AM
3

You did with the title of this thread. For example, I think manners are important, I think treating each other is how you date, not only worrying about yourself. I would hate to date you, and you'd hate to date me. But my fiancee loved dating me, and I'm sure some day a woman might love to date you. But you did absolutely do a lot of "this is how it is for men and women" speaking in the first/Original post.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 10:41 AM
2

I'm unemployed 😞
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 12:38 AM
4

The data from the USDOL 2023 report disagrees, do you have an alternative source?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 12:18 PM
3

The average couple under 50, only has an income gap of 10-15k at max, putting them inside the same income bracket. The net wealth of couples who met under 50, was within 25k of each other. You're using a stat that says only 40% of women make as much or more then their husbands but that includes the 50+ demographic that greatly skews those numbers. For that 25-35 crowd we discussed it's very close.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 12:05 PM
7

Nope. Every bit of data shows that both men and women select for similar income brackets and that people who are far below and above the medium heights tend to trend as more single. Watch what they say not what they do. Men select for normal sized, employed women as much as women do, nice try tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 10:13 AM
12

I had to disagree. I took that "any man would date any average woman who isn't super fat" to heart and decided to gender swap. I asked for a 5'10 man who isn't really fat, aged between 25 and 35 and makes 40k. It gave me a score of 8.9% and semi delusional. I don't see anyone ever pushing back against men being delusional for wanting just average. Because they aren't. These calculators are always just junk.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 07:48 AM
2

Holy shit, this is ableist af. You think being weird and emotional unintelligent is less of a "defect" in a social species as paralysis? Honey no. I wonder how that friend would feel if you said comparing you both was offensive to you. Crazy. Wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 07:32 AM
16

Dude, just talk to a woman your dating about it during the do you want kids phase. "I just want you to know that paternity testing is important to me, I know this kind of thing is a long while off, but it's important to me you understand it's a boundary I have and not an accusation on yours/the mother of my child's part. " You'd spend millions in taxes and cause "DNA database" panic over just telling a girl your dating early on a boundary you have? Isn't that silly?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 02:52 PM
–

I miss working sometimes but then I spend a week or two busy looking at homes or on vacation and realize I. Actually terrified of being that tired all the time again
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 02:44 PM
–

Dudes acing it, good for him!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 02:40 PM
3

Nobody said otherwise? If some men think their feelings should trump the safety of others, then they aren't men I'd find any value in knowing anyways, so if anything distancing themselves is to both our benefits. You said it might chase good men away, but no man who doesn't understand the need to be cautious and careful is to me (and many other women) a good man. Good men understand the unequal risk and accept their privilege in this way and come with understanding and patience. They look to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:38 AM
2

Unfortunately it's really not that simple. For example the rate of women who've asked me to hangout one on one and actually respect friend boundaries is all of them in my case. For men? Less than half of those men didn't cause me some grief even after accepting platonic interest, and half of those made situations scary, dangerous, or uncomfortable. Every stranger who ever copped a feel was a man, and I hung out with a lot of lesbians. So no, I don't think you should treat every man as a creep, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 09:16 AM
3

That's fair, being actively afraid (it consumes thoughts even while not actively in the situation commonly) and just being wary is different, sure. However I disagree with the "without seeing them as dangerous" we should treat all strangers as potentially dangerous. For example it's not wise to pick up a strange hitchhiker regardless of gender, don't let random people inside your home when your alone ect. Men pose more threat then women so be more cautious with them. It's just logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 08:42 AM
–

You even bitch when I compliment a guy. Damn. Get over it. I didn't say he needed to do shit, and I didn't downplay his situation. I just said it was a mature attitude to have, something I can't say for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 06:14 AM
0

No? But the people's who's job it is to stop bad people struggle, regular people are even less empowered lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 04:04 AM
3

I didn't say we should demonize anyone. I'm wary of high traffic intersections, I'm not drawing devil horns on the street lights. You seem to have invented that argument to defeat it because nobody else said as much
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 01:37 AM
1

...yes? A huge portion of both of those departments attempt to stop bad things happening before they do. Hence why you report suspected terrorists and domestic terrorists to their reported groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 01:24 AM
2

First off, I found the problem, not only am I likely near your age 30+, but I understand that most predators look for easier targets, younger women. You didn't just wise up, so much as you also aged out of the group easiest to manipulate because of experience and resources that younger women don't have. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/spycatcher/201203/the-truth-about-lie-detection Every study ever done not only shows we suck at figuring out lies, but we grossly overestimate our ability …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 01:22 AM
-1

Yes because Interpol, the FBI, the CIA can't figure out how to spot bad ones but a regular woman with no training or resources can just do it. That's silly nonsense. People are horrible at catching liars and the people best at telling them are exactly the kind of person who you'd want to avoid. That's just not grounded in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 01:05 AM
1

Learning from them involves being more wary though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 12:45 AM
0

That's a really reasonable take on it. Kudos to you for handling the shittyness of life as well as you do
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 12:43 AM
–

Your butt and thigh muscles grow near the same rate. So you get a bigger ass with tree trunk thighs, that's not a curve, that's the entire thing getting thicker.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:03 PM
–

Op describes the average woman the same way I'd describe Charles Manson. Who would want to be wanted by people they hate? Why want to be wanted by what you clearly don't want? "Love me so I can hate you without you leaving about it"?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:00 PM
–

https://www.mythictrap.com/en/liberation-of-undermine/rik-reverb/mythic
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:01 AM
3

Ah yes, because not bitching about women was too expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:11 PM
1

Do you think you're not already off work to be able to go pick your children up? You do not need court fees to inforce a previous order. Also woman have less wealth then men post divorce/in general so these are actually barriers that would effect women more but don't? How strange right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 09:58 PM
1

No, you can literally get the police to enforce a court order custody swap for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 06:22 AM
8

No. No fucking no. You know damn well the difference between fear of being slapped and screamed at and the fear of being hospitalized or murdered is different. 9.5/10 domestic violence that requires medical attention is done by men. 9/10 homicide by current/former/potential partners is men. In two rooms are two different risks: a stack of papers you need to shuffle, you might get a paper cut, or a mountain lion. Pretending both rooms pose 50/50 risk of injury is absurd. It's absurd when people d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 07:22 PM
6

In theory, in reality it was nothing but Men Getting Triggered Over Women It was pure vitriol. There's a reason all of its subs end up banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:56 PM
0

She legally has to.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:50 PM
5

Nah the one who blew himself up with his own bomb trying to make it. Dude was active on both mgtow and incel stuff. His Reddit posts got leaked a little before the mgtow sub got nuked.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:50 AM
–

80% of women are dating criminals? That's a lot of crime lol!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:11 AM
–

Face lifts. Duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:09 AM
5

No the bomb one specifically mentioned mgtow in the article. It's why I chose that example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:07 AM
–

How do people like you (not you specifically) solve the disconnect of Women who don't fuck lonely men are making men suffer And Women not being loyal in their relationship makes men suffer. Are only single women responsible for your suffering?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:42 AM
23

Nothing? They can go about their day. It's men who don't want to change who insist on being entitled to the benefits of those who are making those changes or already are those things, and blaming others for their lack of said benefits that are the issue. Mgtow is fine, if it's just men going their own way and not you know praising each other for writing mass murder manifestos and making bombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 06:40 AM
1

Studies and data show this is not true. For one thing 90% of custody is decided before a court is involved. For another, men are more likely to get full custody when they petition for it then women. It's just rare they try. Courts also give men more custody when they seek arrangement changes then women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:47 PM
–

You lost me at kitten heel. I think they never work. That needs an oversized sneaker or boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:24 PM
-1

I said they suck the least. Do you not think poverty, starvation, abuse suck? Do you like those things?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 11:21 PM
-1

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-somewhat You are literally a meme. Nothing you said changes what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 06:03 PM
–

My dad used to even get stopped as a single parent while trying to pick me up. It happens to men constantly
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 01:11 AM
10

Iirc the causation is poverty, it's just correlation that single mothers are the poorest family unit type.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:43 PM
0

Most places in the world suck, and the ones that suck the least have embraced letting women also guide how that nation is shaped. Weird hu?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:31 PM
–

Now it's giving, embarrassed and mad so they go through my profile to downvote. Why are some men so emotional like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 03:08 PM
–

Lmao. "I don't want you to have special privileges" ..."exactly you want them instead fufufufu!" Something something equality feels like oppression to the privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:09 PM
–

It's illegal in many EU countries and Canada!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:05 PM
–

https://creativefamilyconnections.com/us-surrogacy-law-map/ No it's not. What's worse is a lot of institutions advocate for it because of ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:00 PM
–

No, I want the resources to enforce those laws and remove yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:26 PM
–

You are really gonna try and gaslight this to save face hu? Peek Redditor.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:25 PM
–

No the feild is literally housekeeping. You call the housekeepers to refresh rooms after patients or guests. You can literally Google "housekeeping jobs". Maybe take a second before gnawing at the bit to invalidate traditionally female forms of labor and you won't feel so silly next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:14 PM
–

What the fuck are the people who clean hotel and hospital rooms called? This is giving "I don't use pronouns". How embarrassing for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:57 PM
–

Well for one thing, we can make legislation that makes it easier to report violations, protects those who do report from retaliation and not repeal 50+ year old acts that help prevent it in the first place. I understand Republicans like to make moral and fair treatment just prohibitively difficult to suppress the rights of people because their base is too retarded to know the difference, but to me this seems absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:38 PM
–

100%. It needs to be codified as organ donation, albeit temporary so it can be banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:16 PM
–

Ah yes, because illegal things just don't happen, right...right. it's like murder and children with guns is illegal and it's...the leading cause of death in children? Oh but don't worry in adults under 45 it's opioid abuse... Wait? That's illegal too? But you just said if something is illegal means people can't do it! What's happening?!?!? Jokes (on you) aside, you misunderstand what I meant. The low skill jobs that women work pay about half of what the lower skill jobs you pointed out are all h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:12 PM
–

Who? ... Asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 12:07 PM
–

Why don't men argue for the shitty jobs that women do like housekeeping or retail or hosting? You know, all those jobs that pay 1/2 of what the men get paid and the women still end up with similar stress and compound injuries anyways? Maybe because those jobs are exploitative to their workers and not to be celebrated?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 11:56 AM
–

I think I'm going to get more involved with trying to get surrogacy for compensation illegalized. Not only is it dangerous in a war on women's healthcare climate but it's a way for the rich to exploit the poor. Most Nordic countries already ban it, and almost all countries ban other forms of organ donation for compensation. It's something I'm passionate about that I never see talked about enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 11:53 AM
15

Why do men work so hard to be rich but don't want to date a gold digger who only values that? It's because it's nice to be valued as more than the stereotype. Also you can complement both attractiveness and wealth without sounding like you just want those things. "You have such an eye for style that dress looks great on you" or "wow the new hair really makes your eyes pop!" For money: " I really admire the dedication you put in, you really deserve all the success you've had" and "you're so smart…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 01:21 AM
24

This is it, the "met my standards" phrasing comes across as snooty. If he said "I haven't found anyone I really mesh/vibe with yet but I'm open for it when it comes along" that's perfectly ok with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 01:17 AM
1

Well this is just because you can sign up when you get a license and men are more likely. They also just die younger more often. I think the metric that matters is living donation. And Women donate blood more, and are living donors of liver, kidney, bone marrow ect.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 02:32 AM
5

Proud. And greatful.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:58 PM
12

It's fine if you talk about it before having kids, and an accusation after. So plan accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:57 PM
–

Or she should divorce him and find a man who cares because the people he's supposed to care about care. May those men end up with the love they deserve (none.)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 10:47 AM
–

And yet those men don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 10:29 AM
–

Fell down a rabbit hole of moms and wives talking about the best place to cry on Christmas when only her stocking is empty. Car is suspicious. Outside can be cold. Bathroom, someone might hear. May love like that never find me. Those women are stronger or weaker then me I can't tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:36 AM
–

Yeah, women are more likely to be victims of malpractice and even die to delayed testing/downplaying.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 09:33 AM
0

...that's not how that works. His own source says verbatim what I said lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 05:59 AM
–

It's giving... autism
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 03:39 AM
5

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 03:35 AM
8

I think my SO hung the moon and the stars. It's not prison food vs roadkill. It's A5 steak vs prison food vs roadkill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 03:35 AM
3

That's why I said look into lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 12:04 AM
3

Oh you know I might be wrong I never considered organ donation, that's actually a great point to look into. Ty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 10:10 PM
0

... It is when you realize that at upper levels the amount of men in those income brackets more than triple the female counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:29 PM
-4

"Canadian men have generally earned more and maintained more wealth than Canadian women, laddering up their giving to higher levels" Literally a quote from your own source.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:10 PM
-1

No, but they are over twice as likely to own the top 5% of the wealth. Basically high donations from billionaires/multimillionaires (and yes there are more then twice as many of them then female) skew that number. Even by that article women give more in every other metric. But by income demographic, women in those demographics give more then men, it's just that there are 9 female billionaires for every 50 male. That's why I explicitly stated by income %. Because billionaires skee those numbers s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 09:01 PM
-1

Women donate more of their income by %, and more time to charity, do more elder and child care than men, and are over twice as likely to help strangers. Tf!??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 08:27 PM
33

I've never used a dating app, but I really like tabletop games so when I moved here I used a friend finder ap explicitly for that. I'm not a super hot woman but after setting up my profile with a picture I let it run over the weekend without interacting. I had 40+ messages None of the first 5 had listed any kind of tabletop game as an interest. It's irritating to waste time looking through profiles of people your just a swipe to. They didn't take the time to think, so why should I? So I just del…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 08:21 PM
7

Women typically don't remarry and more and more are opting out in record high numbers so you're kinda right, they aren't into it That all being said, it's pretty silly to call the gender that works harder for the good of the couple the gender acting in self interest only.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 06:48 AM
7

It means that in couples, both work to fiscally support the pair, but that women also do most child, home and elder care. Totaling up more hours spent on some form of work. Most women work outside the home even when in relationships!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 06:37 AM
6

Yeah the gender that does more hours of paid and unpaid work in relationships is the self serving one lololol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 06:26 AM
2

She's saying they built it, and they did. What she's not saying is that women led it, as they did not. Chinese immigrants built the trans Canada railway, but the Canadian government led the project. The serf class built the pyramids, but the Pharoahs led the project. The design and the work are very different things. And your faults in the design are not the fault of the labourers, hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 01:26 AM
2

Oh I see. Would you say slavery in the history of the United States did not exist because not all white people held slaves? Did colonization not help the West become wealthy even if not all westerns became wealthy or actively colonized? Men are as a class vastly more likely to have/had opportunities that women as a class would not have/had. The fact that some benefit more than others does not mean a beneficiary line along gender did not exist. You want to call it gender roles, but if it was men …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:54 PM
3

3, because the other two links I gave you aren't from there?!? Address that or don't but I, and anyone else who reads this will know why you didn't. (Because you have no refute) Well, they are more or as likely. I feel like 2/3 years of data sets being the majority coupled with the underreporting of serious domestic violence qualified as majority but I'm less interested in semantics then you actually addressing the fact that all three points are valid examples of patriarchy based oppression. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:17 PM
2

"a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it." I'd argue that not only is that historically true, it's still true, if we take largely to mean a number at or above 75%. You might disagree that we presently have one because you feel 75% is not enough to qualify as largely, but it ramps up to 90%+ in the 60-70s, and higher for the thousand years before that. Are you really going to deny men historically have held power and women have been den…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:56 PM
2

Again no, that's not true, in other responses I supply links, but I actually encourage you to google it. See if you can find evidence to support your world view, and if not, maybe reflect why you had it. If sexism was the bar I could have made a 45 point bulletin. I focused on sexism that proves that the unspoken standard is men are leaders/providers and are thus by birthright entitled to more opportunities. Aka the patriarchy. I'm a big fan of occam's razor. The patriarchy was clearly both a th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:46 PM
6

And yet has lost several gender based lawsuits. In fact the articles study you linked suggests leveling as the reason (underqualifed men getting promoted and being paid less due to issues that arise) I'll take case law over a singular internal study that is also older than several of its cases, and actually might suggest it was just over promoting men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 02:19 PM
11

I don't know how many times I have to say this: that's the unadjusted gap. I'm talking about the adjusted gap. Janitor to Janitor. Lawyer to layer, teacher to teacher. 10 years employed to 10 years employed. Two people in identical positions, who work identical hours, who have worked for identical years with identitcal backgrounds. Women get paid less still. With every other factor accounted for. Just by swapping the name Samuel to Samantha, candidates saw offers lower by 5-15%.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 02:13 PM
3

So no. Not willing. Also you cited Finland my guy. Not the person to be coming at me for 1/3 links being foreign when you batted 1/1. No, again the unexplained/unadjusted gap still remains. Again I challenge you to find a reason the multimillion lawsuits the legal team of google and Activision lost but could have won with that information. It's not exactly cherry picked to state that women are now equal or more likely to be victims. It was 50.5 women in 2023, and 49.5 in 2024. So the statement s…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:51 PM
3

I'm using American data because the conversation I butted into was about the west/ America. It's crazy to call a phenomenon misinformation because it's only relevant for one geological location.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:41 PM
3

That was a lot for a post arguing semantics. The core point is that an unexplained gap is persistent on both adjusted pay and upwards mobility. It's certainly not as big as the unadjusted but it's a trend none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:36 PM
7

https://www.payanalytics.com/resources/articles/the-unadjusted-pay-gap-vs-the-adjusted-pay-gap This is a great article, and if you google adjusted or unexplained pay gap you'll find that about 4-20% depending on the sector, is completely unexplained. They'll have tons of resources for you. Also look into the work of Claudia Goldin, she does great work filtering out the differences of the two and iirc she won a Nobel prize for her efforts.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:33 PM
2

It's fixed now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:26 PM
2

Sorry it's an older link, feel free to just throw gender pay gap into the pew search. Edit: nvm was just a misplaced symbol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:24 PM
6

What explanations that law firms handling billion dollar lawsuits managed not to find?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:04 PM
6

Incorrect on all accounts: I already told you what case doctrine to look into, and I'll need a source on your 2-3% Pew has it higher (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/03/01/gender-pay-gap-facts/) Also incorrect. Women overtook men in 2022. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/423245/us-violent-crime-victims-by-gender/) No, in America. (https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/some-fathers-less-willing-spend-daughters-than-sons https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/BFI_WP_202…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:02 PM
9

No it hasn't. Like I said 17-20% has not been debunked, no explanation can be found for it. And that stat is from jobs with the same role/title. Please actually know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 12:31 PM
8

Okay, in the west, even accounting for family time, less negotiations ect ect, women are paid less and often because it's assumed men need to be providers and thus they get more money as well as are more often promoted (see the Activision or Google lawsuits for case doctrine that cites lots of under oath proof as much) Women are more likely to be victims of violence, often from men in their domestic sphere (fathers, brothers, partners). Parents invest more time and money into sons under the expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 12:21 PM
1

Sever ties? Yes. Remove fiscal obligation while still being entitled to parental privileges, no. Also I think the man should only be able to sue/claw back monies after the child turns 21. This prevents the child suffering but gives the man his resources back eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 06:31 AM
–

We have it and all we do with it is teach it about our cats and ask for silly pictures.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 04:13 AM
1

Men are already more likely to be bullies and you think only woman would bully her?!? Ok lmao. One only needs to look in any comment section to find men being asses, for anything, annnnything
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:02 PM
0

Studies done as recent as 2023 show both men and women think it's a man's place to propose my guy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:00 PM
0

No it wasn't? Lots of men chimed in. Talk about blinders.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:47 PM
–

I'll give it a look, Ty for the rec!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:29 PM
–

Haha yeah! I yearn for the harsh Canadian tundra!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:10 PM
–

I'm a frostpunk girlie.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 07:06 PM
1

Sure, but men also date women they hate for sex. You ever met a couple where she's clearly miss right now? He doesn't give a fuck. Women would be single over that. So idk I'd say both men and women who are defective in that way both struggle to get partners who actually like them. And I mean, long term two autistic people wouldn't get along very well. Autism stunts empathy. They like what they like, and don't like/get/respect what others like in the same way. I've seen autistic friendships end o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:12 PM
0

I just saw a post about a woman who proposed to her guy. It was lovely and he said yes, both the men and women in the comments were absolutely brutal. Most men are also protective of their role.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:05 PM
–

It boggles my mind. People become billionaires for being hot but I bet you don't even know the names of the top 1000 nicest people in your country. Nice is a reward for your soul/self and attraction is valuable both internally and externally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:38 PM
–

Suggest counseling? Bestie I'm getting him a U-Haul and myself an STD test. I could not give a fuck less. Every question he asked me not directly about the divorce would be "cheating scum sucking worthless piece of shit said what?" If he offs himself due to the depression he saves me a legal battle but helping that man? Not if he was on fire and I had a glass of water.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:36 PM
1

No, but I do worry about the contract part because it has so many pitfalls. A better app would like the ones that set an alarm off to check in on first dates that will text a contact number if you need help. If you check the all good button, a pop up reminding you to practice safe intimacy and active consent would accomplish the same thing but be actively engaging in safety precautions instead of muddying them the way a contract would.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 04:22 PM
2

I'm suggesting that it has no purpose, you can discuss consent without an app, and signing anything isn't binding. If anything id be more worried that "s/he's saying stop but we both agreed on the app so I don't have to" would be an end result.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:56 PM
5

No, but it's then useless. What's the point of signing a contract that can be revoked at any time. The point of contracts is they bind you to something.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 06:04 AM
5

Consent is on-going. Within reason whatever act it is should be stopped as soon as possible. Pre-consent isn't really a thing except in some extreme bdam stuff and even then that's not a first time situation. I'm not fucking anyone who doesn't know what real consent is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 05:20 AM
–

Uh yeah, I don't work, what do you want me to do with the little money I get through other means? I think he appreciates gifts on holidays far more then he would $20 off the power bill a month.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 09:38 PM
0

The Nazis were in part democratically elected, so do you hate Nazis and democracy or do you like both? because by your logic you have to pick one. Men are happy? Because the average Republican is poorer than the average Democrat and so is having the harder time dealing with funding clawbacks. I see people bitching about the cost of everything all the time. When was the last time a woman went on a killing spree in the name of misandry. When did woman as a class suppress, legalize rape, and treat …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:43 PM
1

Sorry, did you just compare skin being cut off to the inside of your genitals being ripped open to the point it leaves a dinner plate sized hole?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:34 PM
1

No. The state is funded by women too, so again you're just taking resources away at the sole benefit of the already privileged class. An extra reproductive male only tax perhaps to fund this venture and then sole opting out in exchange for those funds might be a work around I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:19 PM
0

Because of the greater burden placed on society and women. Women already have to biologically sacrifice 3 months worth out of each year their entire fertile years for reproduction. How is it fair they do that, and still pay for the children of these other men? They bleed, are torn apart, have their organs battered for births, and men do nothing. Pregnancy is the sixth leading cause of death in women aged 18-35. Asking men who suffer so so much less than women in regard to procreation to be proac…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:48 PM
–

The jars are a great bonus (avoid the glass ones) because the clay ones are oven, microwave and dishwasher safe. I use them for dips and as ramikens all the time. Plus no plastic!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:42 PM
–

I will say if your a yogurt fan try the la freniere brand. Sooooo good. It's traditional dairy and the orange honey one is ammmmazzzingg
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:51 PM
–

Might be a brand thing? I use Too Good, but I've tried the silk stuff and didn't love it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:45 PM
–

The irony of getting on someone's ass about failing a hypothetical and then turning around and being too wrinkle free to imagine any other point of view is just lost in the echo hu? Survivors guilt is felt in 90% of mass casualty survivors and their likelihood of suicide more then doubles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:43 PM
1

Things can never really be equal and I think equitable/justice/fairness are better metrics to make a platform on within reason. A good example I'll use is abortion. abortion is largely considered a way for women to avoid the duties that would follow Parenthood around here. Men in the manosphere often argue that because financial or paper abortions are not available that there is no equality between the sexes. I would then argue that if equality between the sexes is the be all end-all goal that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:36 PM
–

The child. An adult will have survivors guilt/could face social backlash and end up offing themselves anyways. The kid is too dumb/elastic to internalize that delema to the point it could ruin the life anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:20 PM
–

I think the coconut versions are decent!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:19 PM
2

Sure, but a lot of those "choices" aren't really made from a place of equality. Nobody thinks a man in prison getting sexually assaulted was his choice even if he went along with it before violence just to avoid violence, but a woman in a man's home is feeling pressured into sex, and freezes or goes along in fear, the men in the manosphere have a very different view on it. Same with voting, while I absolutely think voting for the current platform of Republicans is unconscionable and devoid of mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 02:16 PM
–

That's largely who's killing the other kids. Y'all already do that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 04:06 PM
–

Why the fuck does America spend more time debating what books to ban in schools, when it's beyond fucked in other ways? like tackle your fucking gun violence problem first. Guns are the leading cause of death in school aged children. Dead kids can't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 04:02 PM
–

I get to put a funny hat on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 03:44 PM
6

I think that it's fair to not have trans women who have undergone male puberty compete in women's sports.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 12:15 AM
3

Lib, rad, most Important though is intersectional. I'm also a smidge too terf'y for the most liberal groups (using menstruation/womb haver instead of just women might be more inclusive but is derogatory, a lot of trans women come into women spaces with male centercism and privilege still) But way too non terf for terfs (trans women are real women, they deserve and need feminism as much or more than CIS for example)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 09:46 PM
1

Nothing you said addresses the fact it's disingenuous to compare non-married couples with married couples. Married couples are more likely to have joint finances, children, and long term career choices with the marriage unit in mind the cohabitating couples. The very nature of being less invested via not being legally wed also has spill over effects. Fiscal literacy is not objective and all knowing. It can make fiscal sense to do A under the idea that the male partner will do B and have that not…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:36 PM
0

The Duke study says that it's temporary in most cases, but not that it doesn't exist. Secondly it used cohabitating couples as well as married. Of course more women who have lived with a guy for a month and break up are less disadvantaged than a mom who's been married for 10 years and swapped to part time. Meanwhile it doesn't change the fact that for men, the income increases. That's still a disadvantaged women even temporary vs an advantaged man. That is self evident. That doesn't change much …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 01:02 PM
1

Has child support and alimony radically changed in a decade besides becoming more gender blind? Critiquing an old article where nothing is changed is like saying because the first study that water is wet is 250 years old now it shouldn't be trusted. Like water is still wet, alimony is rare, child support still doesn't even cover 1/3rd the expenses on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 04:47 PM
–

Fair, I was thinking maze/corn as the grains but that might not count.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 07:05 PM
–

Tbf of that's what we're calling pizza then it's obviously Latin American. They had both tomatoes and dough at the same time way before Italy did.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:59 PM
5

He pays for everything, and I really just use my "fun" money when I need to get him a gift. Not really common but the house/car are already paid for so our month to month is pretty low anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:56 PM
–

Women got the same amount of just be yourself, you'll find the right one ect ect, but then we realized sex sells and it's only ever attractive people anybody wants. I don't think men didn't realize, I just think they thought of themselves as attractive enough despite zero effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 06:51 PM
–

Have women ever gone on mass killing sprees due to misandry the way men have to misogyny? Have men been denied rights and treated as lesser for hundreds of years globally because of misandry? Are men's rights currently up for debate on the highest level of government because of misandry? No? Yet victims of both racism and misogyny can say yes. There are no real world consequences for women choosing to write men off because they do it only on an individualistic level. They are not seeking to excl…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:09 PM
–

This is a phantom distinction fallacy though. When that person in your example said "my husband isn't meeting my emotional needs" they added a bunch of qualifiers to the statement. First: my husband So we understand this is in the context of a relationship Second: emotional needs So the context that these aren't the actual core needs. In your post you're sort of claiming that those qualifiers wouldn't be needed, and yet by your own example you used them. I hope you can kind of see that fallacy n…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 08:48 AM
–

Because without them you die. It's a really easy and simple boundary. It's entirely objective and little argument can be made that people don't die without water or food. It's much easier to agree on people being entitled to life vs the quality they are entitled to, there is value in that distinction. You have yet to provide a reasonable argument for why making needs to live and arbitrary needs the same thing. Friends aren't a need either, I didn't claim that so it's not really a gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 08:04 AM
–

Then you erode the value of the distinction. If I say society should provide the needs of minors, that's a nearly universal truth that everyone would agree with. What your muddling would do is erode the clarity of statements like that. There is no need/use of purposefully making distinctions more difficult. Needs are things you need to survive, food, water, shelter, medical care, socialization and little else. What you require to thrive are things that are "important" but not needs. The distinct…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:56 AM
–

That's being dishonest though. I'm not comfortable saying everyone should have their basic needs met if we throw in wants like sex. You clearly aren't either and make the distinction yourself. So your arguing semantics without actually even believing the point your trying to make. Sex is important? Sure. Sex is a need in most relationships? Cool. Sex is a need? Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:46 AM
-1

"Yes she doesn’t need to have a sexual performance one hour after you talk to her, however you should be feeling how much she has physical lust. You can wait to have sex for sure." It's literally the reply above the one you responded to, how on God's green earth didn't you see it?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:30 AM
-1

What would you call a person you've had 60 minutes of contact with?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:19 AM
2

You can be promoted to management easier, as a CEO, coo or any csuite you'll get paid better then me, if your good at sports, you'll make thousands of dollars to every dollar I would in the sport, you are more likely to have a childhood free of sexual abuse and harassment, you are more likely to be an adult who is free of sexual abuse and harassment, you are less likely to be the victim of a violent crime then I am. You are more likely to get pain medicine when asked at a hospital and less likel…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:04 PM
2

Right, one group has had more rights power and privilege than the other, and still does. If an elevator starts at the ground floor to reach the 20th floor, it's objective on the way up isn't to be higher than the 20th floor, but just to get there. I hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:27 AM
2

Are men and women equal in practice? No. So how can a movement seeking to elevate women to equality be a superiority based movement? Do you call a half full glass overflowing?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:16 AM
1

How about you understand the sub rules and don't down vote. Secondly what was your useless whataboutism supposed to prove? Yeah men and women both get mad, but one of those genders is 40% stronger and several hundred percent more likely to do serious damage if a physical altercation happens. Both house cats and tigers can hiss, but if I'm in the room with the tiger I'm a lot more concerned about the hissing. If I'm with the housecat less so
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:14 AM
2

If there are finite resources, putting aside seeking equality for women to do it for men, is hardly the mission statement of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:11 AM
3

Nah I'm pretty sure it's just ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 02:54 AM
15

He's doing it right now in his tittle. "Women do this" vs "sometimes some women do this"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:05 AM
5

My take away is you think the only kind of flirting is done through physical touch?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:58 AM
42

Dude I don't even want a stranger hugging me..you vastly misunderstand how touch adverse many people are towards strangers. And if I couldn't pick you out of a crowded room with your back turned we ain't there yet. Lusting after a real stranger is weird to me tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:59 PM
0

I never said they didn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 12:08 PM
3

"According to available research, a significant but not majority percentage of men have reported punching a wall, with estimates around 43% of men admitting to this behavior in studies focused on self-harm and anger management, particularly among veteran populations; however, it's important to note that this data can vary depending on the study sample and methodology used" Yeah, it's definitely way more common then that person is pretending. I think of the men I've known in my life all but two h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 06:39 AM
3

I just got engaged to a wonderful man, you frequent penis pump subs. One of us is totally victim to brain rott but it ain't me. Lmaoooooo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:30 PM
9

Average NFL salary: 2.1m Average female pro football: 39k Average men's hockey player: 2.0m Average women's: 56k That already happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:26 PM
3

Great rebuttal. It really must be a psy-op to keep you down with debate chops like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:20 PM
2

"muh opinion is facts" ahh the logical gender in action. Is your gender 51% of the victim of violent crime yet less than 10% of the perpetrators? Does your gender die in hospital waiting rooms because they are denied life saving care? You think men build society alone? Actually laughable. Women have never sat on their asses and had everything handed to them, the raised children, took care of elders, the sick, the food the home. Yet you only consider one genders labor towards society as a contrib…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:09 PM
2

Are you saying it's a responsibility to take certain private sector jobs? No it isn't. And anyways those jobs tend to be more physically demanding than what average women are biologically capable of. So women end up in service jobs that give them compound injuries like cashier, housekeeping, waitress and make pennies on the dollar to what those men make and end up injured anyways. Hardly the flex you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:58 PM
1

Expecting feminism to fight for men is peek missing the message.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:36 PM
1

As someone with an intelligent family member who has brain trauma, and illiteracy due to that, but also was such a talented engineer the military bought a prototype off them and they've been very successful, even after that despite the disability y'all are ableist trash. The ability to read is so rarely correlated with intellect. Fuckers lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 02:17 AM
–

Thank-you!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:08 AM
–

Then just a golddigger. Most sugar babies don't want the SD to be part of their lives outside the arrangement
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:07 AM
–

Thank-you!!! Wishing the best for you too!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:06 AM
–

You visit his parents on opposite ends of the state for a day+ each and hang out with your friends lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:06 AM
–

I got engaged and was busy with that! I hope others are just busy having fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:09 AM
–

You want a golddigger /trophy wife. Sugar babies tend to be short and more casual
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:09 AM
1

Anyone who says divorce rape really needs a reality check. I hope to god these men are shown more humanity then they put out in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:08 AM
–

There is no functional difference between she pools hers and his money for the kids and spends her own on herself vs she pays for the kids and waits for his money to take care of herself. If anything it's more selfless this way. The kids are taken care of 100% but in the likely event there's an issue with child support the kids are still covered. You go mama!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 09:54 PM
2

Red herring, men get more time because they are less compliant then women while being arrested/in custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:01 AM
1

There was so much outrage that the judge was the first judge that was "fired" in 80 years. So I don't think it was a rare opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:26 AM
1

https://www.cbeinternational.org/resource/release-brock-turner-and-boys-will-be-boys/ The judge didn't have to say it verbatim. "A prison sentence would have a severe impact on him" Is an insane thing to say in defense of a rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:48 AM
3

If you want to see it happen both ways just look at Kyle Rittenhouse (actual murderer) or Brock Turner (actual rapist). The flip side of being coddled as women is that "boys will be boys" and it absolutely happens. Society on an institutional level is still very pro-men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:23 PM
6

You to. I hope you are in a happier safer place now. And Fuck anyone who needs to take their pain out on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:49 PM
4

Child endangerment if her country has it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:42 PM
6

Scared for the child. It's true she's likely in a dark place, and it's also true It's a good thing if she gets help, but she's not fit to have anything other than supervised visits for a long long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:25 PM
8

I don't need to imagine it, that's the narrative people always take.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:02 PM
6

As the survivor of a murder suicide attempt by a parent, the parent in question was a man, and yes his/our family/friends also say bullshit about his struggles ect ect, so I can tell you that it's not just women. When men kill their spouses there's always men going off about how awful she likely was too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:40 PM
–

She had the nerve to act disinterested in me is crazy bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 11:55 AM
3

They oppose it because of women who would have protective orders against these men because of physical abuse and threats end up having to come in contact with these men and are several times more likely to end up murdered. Even if the child is passed off through a third party "mum is out with a man daddy, mum got a new job at X" can be catalysts for killing these women. Case in point, just this month: https://people.com/husband-wife-killed-murder-suicide-divorce-8769233 A woman after leaving a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 07:36 PM
-1

adoption and safe haven laws are gender neutral, abortion only affects pregnancy, not children hence the cutoffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:32 PM
1

The fucking unashamed irony of missing my point then soiling the diper in rage at me doing the same to you. Take your own advice. Abortion ends pregnancy. Men have the same rights that women do in regard to both pregnancy and child welfare. The fact men can't get pregnant is a dumb reason to give them rights over child welfare that women don't have either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:04 PM
3

Was having a penis what gave men the right to vote? Did dickless men like the kind that swim in these waters, also lose their voting rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:55 AM
9

Absolutely, and when a bunch of babies and young woman die the blood is on their hands. Child killers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:17 PM
12

You have the same rights, if you ever get pregnant you can abort it too!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:39 PM
0

Well most of us do, so your subjective reality is not that person being objectively harmful
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:56 PM
4

Lots are probably the same woman rebranding themselves too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:54 PM
0

No it would be a fallacy if I was stating that tradition is correct because it's tradition. I'm stating men who are given advice are given it with the knowledge of what's available. Not a fallacy, but nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:07 PM
2

Are they still? If they were we'd probably be giving young women advice in that context dontcha think?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:17 AM
10

Link please, I had no idea the CDC tracked women who cheated being more likely to be in relationships then women who have abortions, seemed odd for them but neat. My first stat is from Harvard.edu and the second is from pew.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 07:16 AM
12

Oh, can you show me that? Cause like I said I just have general abortion numbers and marriage numbers but most women who have an abortion will get married at some point, but I'd love to see the comparisons of stats if you have them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:30 AM
10

You just said women aren't married while they get their abortion, but that doesn't do anything about your claim men won't date/marry women who've had on previously.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:24 AM
11

1/4 women will have an abortion by 45. Less then 1.5/10 women will never be married by 45. The math ain't mathing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:02 AM
2

Abortion has been a societal norm for half a century. Fiscal abortion never has. Why didn't you do A, instead of B isn't a really good argument/advice on it's own Why don't you do A because B does not and has never existed, is a lot more a strong argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:57 AM
1

No. His relationship with his children (aside from any actual interference) is entirely on him. A child growing up without a father is the fault of the father, a woman raising a child alone, sure she has a part in that, but the negative outcome of that single parent household is still his fault. A man can always decide to be a present father, but sometimes women don't realize/he changes before having the child. So really the phrase "it's the fault of deadbeat dad's" is way more apt then "single …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:58 AM
2

Nobody said she was a victim, I said she wasn't responsible for his choices, an objectively true statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:47 AM
1

But there is no blame on both sides. Only a man is responsible for his actions. His choice to engage with his kids is entirely his choice
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:35 AM
3

Why, are the men not responsible for their choices? If that's the case then the woman in their lives should make all the choices for them and we should only allow them the rights of children if they can't be expected to have the responsibility of an adult. Sound good?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:03 AM
0

No my real gripe is that men (mostly only here thankfully) are so against taking responsibility for themselves despite strutting around crying how much more logical and difficult their lives are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:49 PM
1

Are you saying men stop doing romantic gestures in a relationship because women age/gain weight I didn't say unstoppable, I said the same amount of effort would result in different results as you age. That's not you changing the effort, that's just not increasing it to counter aging.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:42 PM
2

So then why didn't the man ask in my example 3? Hmmmm?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:41 PM
3

"it's truely baffling when men get falsely accused of rape, chose the the woman you hang out with better" "It's truly baffling when men get murdered so much more than women, like choose the situations you put yourself in more" "It's truely baffling that men complain women won't let them see their kids, like chose who you have kids with more" Same energy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:30 PM
1

Weight gain as you age is fairly normal regardless of relationship status. If habits don't change with biology. I don't know a single woman who doesn't dress nice to go out. I know lots of couples who don't really date anymore though, so why would she dress up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:28 PM
2

The majority of men who owe child support are employed. Try again. So doubling down on men can't be responsible for themselves? Maybe women should be in charge of them like babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:17 PM
1

You know woman who don't dress up to go on dates still, years into the relationship? I don't know a single one who won't put something nice on.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:16 PM
2

If men can't be responsible for themselves, maybe we should start making them second class citizens like children, no voting, being told what to do by those who can be responsible (women). Sounds logical right? Or...can men be responsible?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:14 PM
7

We should really just make men second class citizens if they can't be responsible for anything
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:11 PM
13

We also see pregnancy and infant care taking those women out of the workforce as knock on effects. Single dad's are just less poor then single mothers, partially because they didn't miss months or even a year+ caring for a newborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 06:52 AM
38

Single mothers? How about we frame it as deadbeat dad's?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 06:47 AM
7

Do you think it's more likely that A. A woman dates a man and dresses very conservative until they get serious then starts dressing very revealing Or B. A guy cleans his house when he knows he's having a girl over and puts lots of effort into wooing her, but then gets comfortable in the relationship and does those things less. Maybe women try and change men more, but men definitely misrepresent themselves more than women do!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 08:54 PM
7

I certainly did, but I'm blessed to know 3, almost four generations of people willing to share their stories, and it's gotten and keeps getting better. My family isn't a mess, my family is just large enough to have a good sample size of behaviors common to those eras.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:59 AM
2

At some point you just have to realize some people are so entitled that they don't think outside themselves. If someone complains about innocent socialization at a place literally dedicated to it, just realize that's the kind of person who wasn't intelligent enough to think "well if not here, then where?" Before they yapped and disregard them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:08 PM
11

Just coming up on 32.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter