TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CautiousPoisson Archive

View 0 posts and 122 comments by CautiousPoisson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I work with one, unfortunately it is not within my authority to have her fired. My strategy is in two parts: 1) I do not argue with her to her face 2) I verify what she has told me and note the truth, date and time in personally secured files She has been busted by my boss lying about minor matters, it is only a matter of time before I am asked for my observations. I have my documentation prepared.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:41 AM
1

Since I am not sending sexist death threats, it isn't my problem either.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:37 AM
1

I have romantic feelings. I am an adult, and I choose not to act on them. That I feel them is sufficient, and a lot less expensive. I count myself as among the MGTOW.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:33 AM
1

You guys banned the red bill documentary from airing? It was available on Australian Netflix (Netflix Oz is an otherwise dumpster fire of rubbish, but this was a surprise). It might still be, I don't have a sub to check.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:21 AM
1

My response is usually along the lines of: A marriage contract is the only legally binding document that men are encouraged to sign with an empty blank page. The blank page is filled in during the divorce and is considered binding. No financial advisor would suggest any other contract with a blank page at the back is safe to sign.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 05:05 AM
1

I look to r/MensRights as a place to educate those men who want to look beneath the veneer of western civilisation and learn how it really works, its pitfalls and traps. We might not be able to change as much as we want but we can minimise feminist harm to ourselves.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:33 AM
1

I consider myself informed about the realities of marriage in my country, not scared. I am not married; I heeded the advice of the men who came before me.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:18 AM
2

Make our own choice. My pov is women are not owed respect simply for existing; respect comes from a response to an individual's behaviour.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:41 AM
1

Toxic Masculinity is a carefully crafted term, to provide an us and them framework that also provides the basis for masculinity to be reviled. Feminists don't want to revise the terminology because it provides a plank in the structure of hating men. Perhaps we need a positive counter, such as nurturing masculinity; a term for all the good things humans do because they are motivated by positive male traits.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 02:54 AM
1

While I have my own brand of GMOW, it isn't just women that are the problem. Men participate in making the laws, sit as judges, participate as journalists, produce media... you get the picture. There is a sufficient population of men who believe women deserve to be treated differently to men that laws are enacted and social imagery is propagated.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:58 AM
1

I thought about how I would speak to my parents about my circumcision. I decided that I would forgive them, they came from a background were it was normalised. However, I also wanted them to know how I felt about it. We are still on excellent speaking terms. I resolved the issue to my own satisfaction, so I do not consider myself a victim. I do not agree with the inhumane practice of male genital cutting, called circumcision. I can only change the future, the past has already happened.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:11 AM
9

I think some men fall hard for the "men are providers" belief and get led astray. I think some women seek to take advantage of this. I was surprised when my gf at the time asked to be a co-user of my credit card, when I asked her why I would do that she answered so she could pay her bills. I declined and we separated soon after.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 12:25 AM
1

I'll have a go at some rhetorical jujitsu, though I am but a padawan. > It is statistically proven there are more male rapists than female Taken on face value, the statistics do indeed present as you say. There are some caveats: Depending upon the jurisdiction in which the offence occurs, women may not be able to legally be charged with rape, they are instead charged with sexual assault. Men can also be charged with sexual assault but it is, in the popular imagination, considered a crime of less…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 05:02 AM
3

Among many things, this sub provides an outlet for some men who had received a raw deal at the hands our our, allegedly, enlightened society. Men complaining, even if it is for valid and accurate reasons, is met with pretty much the reaction you put in your post; contempt and dismissal. Enter r/mensrights, where except for posts such as yours, men can discuss, vent and complain about issues with an audience that includes men who have faced similar problems. I don't always agree with what is said…
/r/MensRights21/06/20 03:43 AM
2

A quick search shows nearly (?) 640 women were part of the Manhattan Project (Los Alamos National Laboratory - Women of the Manhattan Project); not hydrogen bombs, true, but the first atomic weapons. So, what was that about only men make weapons again?
/r/MensRights10/11/19 07:57 AM
2

In recent news, the ABC has received a number of complaints regarding this episode; a review was conducted and the ABC has announced it has removed it from their program list. While that does not address that the episode happened in the first place it does do two things: 1) The ABC has been called to heel for this episode of sexism and promotion of violence against men 2) These prominent feminists are on record for their bigotry
/r/MensRights10/11/19 07:50 AM
1

If your partner cheats on you, walk away. They will do it again although their excuses may change, they clearly do not respect you.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 07:14 AM
2

Once again, a woman thinks she knows what it is to live as a man. 1/10.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 07:13 AM
4

Firing someone based on an unproven accusation is unjust; I hope Depp wins vs Heard.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 07:02 AM
7

No.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 06:57 AM
1

An own-goal if ever their was one.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:43 AM
4

Netflix cheats where this is concerned; thumbnails of movies or series using a female character when the primary protagonist is actually a man. This might be a local phenomena for Australian Netflix.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:35 AM
2

Well, at least she still has a real dummy to spit.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:29 AM
2

How does the source know the men are enraged, maybe the prominence of IWD made them curious about whether men have such a day too? As for 'underdog for a day', my responsibilities at work did not change, my pay per hour did not change and my interaction with the men and women I work with did not change. I think The Sun protests too much.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:28 AM
4

I see it as a trite phrase trotted out by the MSM and feminists to paint a picture of what they portray as bad behaviour in some men as being taught or sanctioned by every man. Universal guilt of men by assigned group identity.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:12 AM
8

It isn't about making one act worse than the other, it is about not mutilating infant boys. It would be helpful to know if the practice causes unnecessary infant mortality, as death of infant boys might sway those who support MGM, but it isn't the whole reason for opposing it. ​ From my perspective, it is wrong to perform unnecessary surgery upon anybody of any age; especially unnecessary surgery they cannot consent to. Once you are an adult you can chop as many pieces off your own body as you l…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:52 AM
3

In my observation, toxic masculinity is a feminist code for 'men who do not do what we tell them'. As such, it is a method of misdirection, rather than a real approach to addressing problems men face.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:23 AM
4

I am afraid she's wrong. Teaching equality is fine; teaching girls they can hit boys and the boys won't hit back is the problem.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:12 AM
2

When you involve yourself in the lives of unstable people, or simply people with unstable lives, you might expect some of it will rub off on you. Your choices are your own; for me I would distance myself from this person and have as little to do with her as possible. Definitely do not pay for any of her bills ever again; you don't want her claiming the two of you are in a relationship, provable by the shared bills and shared accommodation, and now you owe her money since, she may claim, you brok…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:04 AM
23

This is why more contraception options for men are important, so men can control their own reproductive options.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:41 AM
21

I agree, men should indeed join the struggle for equality. r/MensRights is always open.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:37 AM
1

Rape on Campus comes to mind.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:29 PM
1

Some additional numbers. From the 2017 Australian Bureau of Statistics- Causes of Death (3303.0) data, death by any form of assault males=124, females=56 for the year in question. March 7 is the 65th day of the year, we have an expected value of 10 females killed by violence and males an expected value of 22 killed by violence. This is rough as I have only taken into account 2017. ​ By March 7 2019 and using the reported numbers in the graphic, females's death by violence is 10% higher than 2017…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:12 PM
2

Things will get worse before they get better.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:42 PM
2

Perhaps I misunderstand "beer goggles"; in my experience it means the intoxicated desires sex with someone they would not find attractive when sober, alcohol has impaired their discretion.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 03:36 PM
25

Since the gender earnings gap is down to women's choices, make your own choice and don't give the cafe your business.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 01:29 PM
2

Initially from movies but then more from my own research.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:21 AM
1

I have never and will never share my passwords with anyone. Not even a spouse. This. ​
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:19 AM
32

Projection. I remember Big Red and the feminist horde raging against men wanting to hold a conference about men. I have not seen MRAs do the same to women's gatherings.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:34 AM
10

It is an elegant solution for those that want to make a statement with their cinema monies. They can still see a movie with a female lead without rewarding those in Hollywood who seem to want to bash men in return for SJW cred.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:36 AM
2

In the cause of equality, she should be encouraged to (a) make her own decisions as an adult and (b) deal with the consequences, good or bad. She doesn't need a stranger's protection.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:17 AM
1

When I talk about this with people face to face I rename it as gender earnings gap, that usually elicits a request to describe the difference. The normal women I have spoken to accept the results as part of the repercussions for having choice, both for men and women.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:57 AM
1

A female stranger no. A female friend or loved one, yes of course.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:53 AM
2

I am a MGTOW and a political activist; I see equality before the law, and how the law is applied, is needed to ensure men and women have equal rights.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:39 PM
1

I think if people feel wronged, the desire for vengeance is expected and understandable; it also often overreaches which is why the theory of justice is application of vengeance in a balanced and evenhanded manner by third parties. Feminism seems to feed some women with a steady stream of "you have been harmed or you will be harmed or men are planning to harm you"; the unifying feeling of being in a group seeking justice is a powerful motivator. It can be both a good and a bad (socially) force. …
/r/MensRights21/07/18 11:43 PM
3

Archive
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:18 AM
5

Archive 9 Sep 2016 The OP that this responds to is a confused anti-men hit piece with confused ideas of what an MRA and the MRM actually are. Demands facts and not uninformed opinion, then presents an avalanche of her uninformed opinion. Edit for clarity
/r/MensRights07/07/18 02:30 AM
2

Recruit, test and train for the role, not for the gender.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:57 AM
3

One of the things the MRM could do in support of men is make sure boys and men know about these laws. it will vary by country; it gets the movement in front of the target audience and provides useful information. I don't condone the stupidity of the laws btw, but until they are changed there are positive steps we can take.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:42 AM
1

I noticed they start the article with "vulnerable women" but then the tone shifts and the crimes of the women are given little or no sympathy; which is as it should be. It is almost as if the introduction is a salve for the criticism of the women that follows. It is refreshing to see women who falsely accuse are being held to account, perhaps the countries, my own included, that are identified as not prosecuting these criminals will be prompted to reconsider. Women can be anything they want, som…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:31 AM
9

If I go to a restaurant and order and eat a meal, it isn't oppression that makes me pay the bill, it is the rules of commerce (and probably some local laws). The same applies to tertiary education. If anything, journalists should look into the advice these women are getting regarding what makes a worthwhile path of study.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 02:50 AM
1

I am still open to hearing your reasoning, but you seem reluctant to explain even the simplest of your assertions; I think your comments have not been genuine. I'll concede, you trolled me.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:53 AM
1

My answer to are they equal is men and women .... you actually believe men and women are equals? there is no point in continuing. You are either lying, misunderstood the question or are delusional. I probably misunderstood your question, you seem to have quite different views to things than I do. You make statements for which I don't see connections, though you evidently do. If you don't want to continue the exchange, that is fine but I thought you were on the cusp of telling me something new, o…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:27 AM
1

I disagree with this law, I am not currently in a position to propose meaningful change to it.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:54 PM
1

Being an embryo is not the same as being a child, and I have not disputed that human tissue is not alive and not human. Bodily autonomy evidently does outweigh a life created, otherwise we would not have legal abortions in many countries. What I want is the same concern for the bodily autonomy of men. I dispute being equal before the law would require injustice; if a man under circumstances X receives Y sentence, then a woman under circumstances X should receive Y sentence. I do not see how this…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:52 PM
2

Women do not have the right even now to kill children. They remove a collection of cells, a blastocyst, from their uterus, we call it an abortion. Child killing is still considered a crime. Since bodily autonomy is considered part of the justification for abortion, the bodily autonomy of a man should be considered; the right to not be indentured to a woman for 18 years based upon a decision over which he has no control. At the point of pregnancy, the women still has options, the man does not at …
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:35 AM
2

If women want to transfer heavy loads they can always break them down to weights they an manage; even men in work place handling training receive that advice. Whether they are worth the trouble would vary greatly from individual to individual and the circumstances; I mean you cannot reduce the weight of a fridge, but clearing a goods pallet can be broken down.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:11 AM
5

That is interesting, and the link you provided makes it clear the journos were lazy. Locally when two underage children sent each other sexually explicit images, they both could be charged with trafficking in child pornography, even though the image was of themselves. Irritatingly, only the boys were held accountable for it, girls being so helpless and all. Thanks for the additional information.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:07 AM
2

Using your example, in countries/states where abortion is legal and available for women, men should have access to a financial abortion; a full denial of a financial and social relationship with any child purported to be their offspring. In the same manner that women can abandon responsibility for an infant of theirs, men should have the same option. That to me would be equality in this case. I concede it is not absolute equality, but it cannot be since men currently do not get pregnant nor carr…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 05:04 AM
3

Excellent point.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 04:57 AM
10

If I read the article correctly, the man sent the child a recording of the sex act, they didn't both send each other videos. If I understand the use of "minor" in the article correctly, then his sexual partner was not an adult. IANAL, but a quick internet search found this: " In Nebraska, the age of consent is 17 years old. However, in certain circumstances, a person who is 16 or older can consent to sex with a person who is no more than 2years older. Violating age of consent laws is considered …
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:57 AM
42

If she genuinely believes her own argument, then a woman that pushes a man "to his last straw" also deserves to get hit, which doesn't match up with her last statement of "Never hit a woman". I think it is a deliberately provocative post rather than a carefully considered position. It fails as an argument on its own inconsistencies.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:49 AM
4

I suggest putting your skills to work for yourself. If you are interested in some ideas, send me a pm.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:45 AM
2

Can you provide an example of an injustice that would inevitably result from men and women being equal before the law?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:40 AM
14

Viewing the past through the prism of today's morality is foolish. Morality is not absolute; what we hold good and true today will be suspect tomorrow and reviled the day after. Changing our recollection of history simply to make us feel better about ourselves removes even the slimmest chance we'll learn from our past behaviour; perhaps that is what revisionists want. If the warnings of history are forgotten, the way for social manipulation is smoothed.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 01:20 PM
2

It is far easier, and less messy, to encourage normal people to recognise the excesses touted by feminism and to legislate them into oblivion. Once fair-minded people see the difference between equity and equality the pendulum will swing back. The key is continuing the political and social pressure, opposing the same pressure from feminists. Considering a violent solution, such as the OP, only creates noise about "violent MRAs" and dilutes the many messages MRAs are presenting. By all means be a…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 09:06 AM
3

From the ABS 2016 Personal Safety Survey~3) "Results from the survey show a drop in the proportion of Australians responding they had experienced some form of violence in the past year, with rates declining from 8.3 per cent in 2005 to 5.4 per cent in 2016. The decline was driven by a decrease in the proportion of Australians experiencing physical violence, from 7.5 per cent in 2005 to 4.5 per cent in 2016. For men, the proportion that responded they had experienced physical violence in the past…
/r/MensRights25/06/18 08:55 AM
1

I would not be in favour of LPS under these conditions. Financial abortion is my goal for men, a purported father should have the option of not being a father, in the same manner women have the option of not being a mother.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:16 PM
1

My simple answer is "no", I will not be a volunteer monitor of other people's behaviour; neither will I inform on other men. I am not their father, brother, son or partner. I am their perfect stranger and thus I accept no responsibility for them. To borrow a phrase, I am the bicycle and have no want for fish.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 02:55 PM
2

We know that, as safe as society aims to be, there are still criminals, defined as "people who break the law". If telling criminally-minded people not to steal, not to assault, not to embezzle and not to defraud doesn't work, why does anyone think telling criminals not to kill women has any chance of success? The majority of men are not criminals, telling law-abiding men to stop killing women is as effective as telling fish to stop flying.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:37 AM
2

I don't mind women having their own spaces, what I seek out is spaces only for men. Sometimes I just want to identify and discuss solutions without women interjecting with their feelings.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:25 PM
1

That is a disturbing read. That a cabal of feminists could hold such sway even when there is a statement of no evidence from an independent investigator. it also means to me there must be a realisation among those feminists that their position cannot withstand close investigation and so any off-narrative opinion must be ended. I look forward to reading Part III.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:04 PM
1

The movie should get as much exposure as it deserves, then people can make up their own minds. Just in casual skimming of reviews, it is being hailed as successful as the female Ghostbusters reboot. Pretty harsh, but time will tell.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:46 AM
6

Archive
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:30 AM
1

Employer policy can be challenged, I would speak with your lawyer about it. One of HR's tactics is to isolate the employee so they feel they stand alone and thus reduces their access to accurate information and support; they hope the employee will cave in under the pressure. /u/DeepReally mentioned union representation; it may vary by country, in my experience union reps are entitled to be present during discussions with HR, I am sure you can also demand to have your lawyer present. You can also…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 04:58 AM
57

Get a lawyer. Do not trust HR, keep records of everything. Nothing is off the record, even if HR gives you seemingly ironclad assurances. HR are not there for your benefit, they are there to protect the company and will throw you under a bus without a second thought.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:56 PM
1

I don't see MGTOW as sending a message, it is a personal solution which applies to some men in various forms. Because it is only suitable for some men, it won't change man-woman dynamics overall; but then that isn't the point. Despite adopting and encouraging some MGTOW ideas, I still believe men need to work collectively to improve our situation in life.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:48 AM
1

Not all women are easily offended. Being offended in today's social climate, at least in the west, gives one leverage. The narrative is someone who is offended is a form of victim and deserves sympathy or special treatment; notice how quickly people spring to apologise when offence is taken, rather than analysing why the person might be offended, or even if the offence is genuine. The MSM, desperate for relevance of any sort, picks up on this and makes such instances more widely known. From what…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:35 AM
2

The article seems a little desperate, the author protests too much.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:33 PM
2

Some men choose to be married, choose to have children that are purportedly their offspring, some men are willing to face the risk of divorce. Others choose not to. Of those who choose not to, some are still active in the MRM. There is no one size fits all in life.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:27 PM
1

Different treatment doesn't necessarily mean treatment that has to be changed, or that is even important in the greater scheme of things. On occasion I take the time to correct mistakes but often the interaction is so transitory that it doesn't matter. Only if there is a need or a situation of an ongoing relationship, a work place for example, that this matters in my experience.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:17 PM
3

I remain anti-MGM, in this modern day it is a barbarism that has no ethical basis. What you do to your body as an adult it not my concern, but children should not be abused in this way.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 12:08 PM
6

I can see why there is the belief that people who are depressed might want to live if they are treated medically. What about healthy men who still want to die? Why does there have to be an acceptable reason for me seeking my own death? My body, my choice right? As long as I don't harm anyone else, I can even be considerate enough to have a cleaning deposit and a paid up funeral plan.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:33 AM
1

Disagreeing with the accepted public narrative is strongly discouraged, usually by shaming language or outright sanction at places of employment. Some men find it easier to keep their heads down and avoid the issue; for some men it takes divorce, theft of children or abuse by a woman to break those social chains.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:28 AM
1

The underlying assumption seems to be an individual's attributes as you describe them are fully and accurately known by those who interact with them and that knowledge affects how people are treated. I've been mistaken for a priest; I am not even religious. I have been mistaken for a USAian, I am not. Even the apparent pigmentation of my skin has misled people. How I perceive interactions is different to how others may perceive things because I know myself more truly than any random stranger. In…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:25 AM
1

It is a movie, designed to cater to the intended audience.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:48 AM
1

It comes down to money; there is a lot of money in feminist initiatives. Any attention to men as experiencing the same problems, or any problems, risks some money being diverted to looking after them, thus reducing the money intended for women. It isn't that the feminists are stupid, there is cunning in their obfuscations. There are votes in it for the useful idiots, the politicians.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:40 AM
1

Two men I know have been actively helping a man get free of his abusive girlfriend. The worst part is, he still loves her even though he knows what she is. No placards though, no hashtag, just quietly getting on with business. There is support, it just isn't a media-frenzy; women seem to need the attention rather than real solutions.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:37 AM
13

I am conflicted by the suicide debate; why exactly should society demand someone who wants to die, continue to live? if it is acceptable for David Goodall to seek death at 104, why can I not seek death earlier should I wish to do so? Whose life am I living any way? Disclaimer: This is a theoretical point, I am not currently suicidal.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:08 AM
31

it can be difficult to be anti-MGM and also to be circumcised, to know that your body was thought less of because you were born a boy. At your most vulnerable, the adults, men and women, who were supposed to protect you, did not. it is also difficult to know what your penis should have been like because you've only known yourself in your mutilated state. I have accepted my condition and I don't see myself as a victim; times were different when I was born. It might seem sick, but there are times …
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:03 AM
2

Working at a level to provide desired self-sufficiency and comfort is not lazy, I would argue working yourself into an early grave is an outdated idea. Working 18 years to fund your Ex, in the best interests of the children you are no longer permitted to see, is an even more outdated idea.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:53 PM
1

From the article "Earlier this month, the mother was granted bail on strict conditions, despite police opposing her release, fearing she would use her network of contacts to take the children and return to hiding. The mother is due to appear in the Townsville Magistrates Court on July 16." it is not uncommon in Australia for a person facing court to be bailed until the time of their court appearance. Threat to the community or flight risk are taken into account when deciding if someone should be…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:46 AM
1

Lifeline
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:37 AM
1

If you have children, they have a high chance of being legally stolen.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:20 AM
3

There is a difference between a false accusation and a rape that has insufficient evidence.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 12:11 AM
1

Yes, we are ignoring that men and boys have different emotional needs. I would question who the "we" is that needs to understand men, and what their motives are.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 02:20 AM
1

My feelings are only of value to me; what do I gain from sharing them with anyone?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:44 PM
1

I think most men trust women, even with daily evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:18 PM
3

I will explore some options; I agree data like this should be freely available to the public. otherwise the conclusions and motivations of those involved become, naturally, suspect.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 02:13 PM
3

I wonder what is so damaging or unsettling to the narrative that the government has to conceal the data?
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:30 PM
6

Legal advice is essential, depending on where you live there can be very different laws concerning whether you are allowed to obtain a paternity test without the woman's consent. Even the outcome of having proof from a paternity test varies from country to country.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 01:56 AM
2

Found this on the Australian Law Reform Commission page. Seems like Australia has the Duluth pox as well.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 03:28 PM
4

In the current social environment, it really comes down to lack of choice on my part. I was an infant when I was circumcised and my parents, when I spoke with them as an adult, confirmed that I had no medical issue that indicated circumcision was needed. Both my parents agreed to the procedure, for them it was an expected part of having a healthy baby boy. For them it was cultural, though not religious. I don't lament my circumcision, I've never known a different state. I do, however, oppose it …
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:52 PM
2

Then it becomes important to find a counter-narrative that is not divisive; not men vs women as toxic femininity/masculinity suggests, and is more descriptive of normal people vs feminism.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:25 PM
10

While there is a lot to consider here, I applaud the UK cops for not publically identifying the accused.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:57 PM
13

Damien Walter seems confused, like someone who knows the buzzwords and just enough to be inflammatory but not enough to actually understand the nuances of what he writes about. New Journalism seems so lazy.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:28 AM
2

I don't understand why a woman crying is considered evidence of anything other than loss of emotional control. Crying doesn't mean remorse, crying doesn't mean truthfulness, it just means crying.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:03 PM
1

Feminists represent themselves and their own perspective on society; they certainly do not represent the majority of women.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:39 PM
1

False rape claims are usually made for personal advantage, not usually for lolz.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:36 PM
7

The writer has a closed view of the world; just perusing the superficial news in the msm one can see women sexually assaulting boys, women murderers, women thieves, women as violent attackers and women as instigators of domestic violence. Some people will believe all evil flows from men, I beg to differ.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:34 PM
2

I think if the accusations that identify people are not investigated and proven perpetrators punished then it hasn't gone far enough. Accusations against identified people that are malicious and untrue should then be punished. Slacktivism of simply adding #METOO and claiming unspecified offenses against oneself are just noise, the signal is more important.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:22 PM
6

In my experience, men handle their emotions differently to women, it is a strategy in the gender war to typify men's approach as defective; understandably this causes unnecessary friction. Instead of trying to understand why men approach problems differently, some activists demand men change their behaviour to be more like stereotypical women. As I have observed, when you demand people, men and women, to change they often push back against those demands. I believe men and women view violence, an…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:13 PM
3

The advantage I see of countries that have a guarantee of free speech is the hateful take full advantage of it, openly and proudly and thus people know them for who they are and what they believe. It does require extra vigilance in case children are exposed to hateful ideas, and I believe adults are capable of standing guard at the borders of their mind. My country doesn't have a guarantee of free speech, only an implied one, as well has increasingly troublesome hate speech laws.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:42 AM
2

Some women are opportunistic and will use the environment of some genuine complainants to slip in some sly revenge, or malicious accusation, for personal advantage under the cover of what appears to be social upheaval. What #METOO has avoided so far is the next step following a public accusation needs to be proof; failure to present proof means it is defamation pure and simple and should be pursued at the defamed man's convenience (for example lookup Geoffrey Rush and his response to unproven al…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:31 AM
7

Men are affected by these meetings, they face competition from women who have benefited from this service when seeking jobs. I see this organisation in the same light as the men's clubs the feminists close down or force membership of women, because at those clubs men mentor each other, finesse business deals and so-on. In effect, helping other men get higher paid job opportunities. If the men only clubs can be broken, so can the women only clubs.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:38 PM
2

Does the law also say 40% of boards must be men? if not, why not?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:46 PM
4

I think the original comment overly generalises men; agreed, some men will have sex with anything female but that is not the norm. I think what is interesting to me in the comment, without explicitly mentioning it, is the tactics of a pickup are being discussed between women, and some men who rely upon being glib rather than honest are starting to notice less success. I don't think this outcome is necessarily a bad thing. No matter the outcome, I don't encourage bad interactions just for the sak…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:32 PM
1

I think this is worth putting our energy into; building an in-group bias amongst men.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:26 AM
6

I've had boys, girls, men and women open doors for me, as I have opened doors for them. Is there something odd in me that I didn't give it a second thought? My motor skills are such that opening/closing doors is not a physical challenge. Edit:typo
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:23 AM
5

Partners from other cultures that don't value feminism. While individual cultures might suffer, on a species level humans are not homogenous in their social norms.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:11 AM
1

To come back to the point about wearing a seatbelt, you can't demonise all drivers just because you got unlucky and there's a possibility of danger. Seatbelts are a good idea because of the consequences of needing one and not wearing one. The consequences of getting married needs some form of seatbelt imo.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:50 AM
28

When men and maleness are described as problems to be fixed, I see conclusions reached without thought to men being human.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter